中文 · EN

《道德真經集註(二)》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 3 / 18 9,398 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集註(二)》 Vol. 3 (Dongshen 洞神部, 18 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 18 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集註(二)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經集註卷之三      恃六     宋鶴林眞逸彭耜纂集    持而盈之章第九 持而盈之不如其已揣而鋭之不可長保  御註曰盈則溢矣鋭則挫矣萬物之理盈  必有虧不知持後以處先執虚以馭滿而  沉溺滿盈之欲是增傾覆之禍故不如其  已物之變無窮吾之智有盡前識者道之  華愚之始也揣物之情而鋭於進取則智  有時而困可長保乎  碧虚子陳景元曰嚴均平曰富貴之於我  猶登山而長望也名勢之於我猶奔電之  忽過也  潁濱蘇轍曰知盈之必溢而以持固之不  若不盈之安也知鋭之必折而以揣先之  不知揣之不可必恃也若夫聖人有而不  有尚安有盈循理後行尚安有鋭無盈則  無所用持無鋭則無所用揣矣  葉夢得曰道欲或不盈爲其盈而持之則  必覆不若無所執而聽其虧之爲愈也道  欲挫其鋭幸其鋭而揣之則必折不若無  所度而長保之爲愈也盈不持則無喪己  之患鋭不揣則無敵物之憂  黃茂材曰道無執也而欲其虚持而盈之  其可乎道無體也而欲其圓揣而鋭之其  可乎此皆在於非道非道早已又安能長  保  林東曰道之爲道惡盈而好謙惡鋭而以  不露圭角之爲尚假使於盈而能持於鋭  而能揣不若無盈無鋭之安且乆也盈與  鋭非道中物以其易溢易折非安且乆之  理也
Interpretation

This passage discusses the core teaching of Chapter 9 of the Dao De Jing (道德经), using commentaries from several Song Dynasty scholars to expound the principle that "a full vessel will overflow, and sharp edges are easily broken."

Peng Si (鹤林真逸) notes in his compiled commentary: Forcing something to remain full is inferior to knowing when to stop; deliberately displaying sharpness cannot be maintained long. Just as water overflows when full and blades break when too sharp, this reflects the natural order of all things. Clinging to perfection invites misfortune—better to maintain a humble and receptive state.

Chen Jingyuan (碧虚子) cites Yan Junping's observation: Wealth and status are like climbing a mountain to gaze afar—beautiful yet fleeting; fame and power resemble lightning, vanishing in an instant. Su Zhe (颍滨) elaborates: Understanding that fullness leads to overflow, one should embrace moderation; knowing sharpness invites breakage, one should withdraw one's edge. True sages possess without clinging, thus avoiding overflow; by following the Dao (the Way), they need not display sharpness.

Ye Mengde argues: The Dao itself never seeks fullness—human efforts to force it will topple it; the Dao is naturally round without edges—deliberate sharpness inevitably meets resistance. Without clinging to fullness, one avoids self-loss; without forcing sharpness, one prevents external harm.

Huang Maocai points out: The Dao is formless and unconstrained—human attempts to maintain perfection are futile. Such forced actions violate natural principles and should cease. Lin Dong concludes: The Dao abhors complacency while honoring humility, rejects sharpness while valuing harmony. Rather than straining to maintain fullness and edges, return to the natural state of neither fullness nor sharpness, for these are not the Dao's essential qualities and lead only to collapse and breakage.

金玉滿堂莫之能守富貴而驕自遺其咎  御註曰金玉富貴非性命之理也外物之  不可恃而有者也  碧虚子陳景元曰嚴君平曰金玉之於身  而名勢之於神若冰若炭勢不俱存故名  者神之穢也利者身之害也養神之穢積  身之害損我之所成而益我之所敗得之  以爲利失之以爲害則彼思慮迷而趣舍  悖也  黃茂材曰金玉如所謂被褐懷玉非世間  金玉也富貴如所謂知我者希則我貴矣  非世間富貴也古之人有所得於中天下  事物不足以動其心重内而輕外貴己而  賤物故易至於驕晋嵇康之徒相與清談  崇尚玄妙非無得於道而以陵人傲物卒  至於禍宜乎老氏以爲戒也 功成名遂身退天之道  御註曰功成者隳名成者虧日中則昃月  盈則蝕物之理也聖人睹成壞之相因識  盈虚之有數超然自得不累於物無復驕  盈之患非知天者敦能與此故曰功成名  遂身退天之道四時之運功成者去是天  之道知進而不知退知存而不知亡知得  而不知喪能勿悔乎伊尹曰臣罔以寵利  居成功  碧虚子陳景元曰夫大功既成顯名已遂  而不知休退者何人哉且高鳥盡良弓藏  狡兔死獵狗烹勢使然也惟體天道之盈  虚知進退存亡者至人哉  黃茂材曰功者無功之功非世所謂功也  名者無名之名非世所謂名也功成名遂
Interpretation

When gold and silver fill the chambers, none can keep them forever; arrogance born of wealth and honor only invites calamity upon oneself. The Emperor (Huizong of Song) explains in his commentary that external possessions like gold and wealth are not the true principles of life—they cannot be relied upon nor held permanently.

Master Bi Xu (Chen Jingyuan) cites Yan Junping's interpretation: Material treasures like gold and jade affect the physical body, while fame and power influence the spirit (Shen), just as ice and charcoal cannot coexist. Empty reputation pollutes the spirit, while material gain harms the body. Nourishing the spirit with filth and accumulating bodily harm may seem beneficial but actually plants the seeds of disaster, leading to confused thoughts and inverted actions.

Huang Maocai offers another perspective: The "gold and jade" mentioned in the scripture refer to inner virtue (De)—like wearing coarse cloth while harboring jade-like integrity—not worldly riches. "Wealth and honor" denote the spiritual state of those who attain the Dao (as Laozi said, "When few know me, then I am honored"), not mundane glory. Ancient Daoist adepts maintained inner fulfillment, undisturbed by external things, valuing internal cultivation over fame and gain. Yet even enlightened scholars like Ji Kang, though having realized the Dao, ultimately met misfortune due to their arrogance—hence Laozi's warning to the world.

Achieving merit and fame yet knowing when to withdraw—this aligns with the natural order. The Emperor's commentary uses the waxing and waning of sun and moon, the cycling of seasons, to illustrate how extremes reverse. Sages understand that success and failure follow each other, that fullness and emptiness have their measure, thus remaining detached without pride. The ancient minister Yi Yin cautioned: "A subject should not cling to power by flaunting achievements."

Chen Jingyuan adds: Those who don't withdraw after great accomplishments are like fine bows stored after the birds are gone, or hunting dogs cooked when the cunning hares perish—such is heaven's inevitable law. Only those who perceive the Dao's cycles of growth and decline, who understand advancing and retreating, survival and demise, are true masters of the Way.

Huang Maocai concludes: The "merit" mentioned here arises through Wuwei (non-action)—not forced striving; the "fame" comes unsought—not through reputation-seeking. When such merit and fame are achieved, one naturally returns to original authenticity.

 而身退觀諸四時之序亦可以見天道老  莊列子范蠡四皓安期生東方朔古之有  道者也史皆不載其所終豈非道成而退  人莫得而知耶    載營魄章第十 載營魄抱一能無離乎  御註曰魄陰也麗於體而有所止故老氏  於魄言營魂陽也托於氣而無不之故易  於魂言游聖人以神御形以魂制魄故神  常載魄而不載於魄如車之運百物載焉  如時之行寒暑往焉心有天游六徹相因  外天地遺萬物而神未嘗有所困也豈復  滯於魄哉又天一生水於物爲精地二生  火於物爲神精神生於道形本生於精守  而勿失與神爲一則精與神合而不離以  精集神以神使形以形存神精全而不虧  神用而不竭形生而不弊如日月之麗乎  天如草木之麗乎土未嘗離也竊嘗申之  人之生也因精集神體象斯具四達並流  無所不極上際於天下蟠於地化育萬物  不可爲象其名爲同帝而世之愚者役己  於物失性於俗無一息之頃内存乎神馳  無窮之欲外喪其精魂反從魄形反累神  而下與萬物俱化豈不惑焉  碧虚子陳景元曰道家以陽神曰魂魂樂  其生陰鬼曰魄魄好其殺魂則游魄則靜  白虎通曰營者營營不定貌故謂魂爲營  也舊說曰載乘也營魂也又謂營護陽氣  夫魂爲陽精魄爲陰靈陽精喜動逝故仙
Interpretation

Observing the patterns of the four seasons reveals the principles of the Dao's movement. Ancient Daoist masters like Laozi, Zhuangzi, Liezi, Fan Li, the Four Haos of Mount Shang (reclusive sages of Qin-Han period), An Qisheng (Qin-Han alchemist), and Dongfang Shuo—historical records never documented their final outcomes. Does this not precisely indicate their successful cultivation of the Dao followed by reclusive withdrawal, leaving no trace for the world to know?

The chapter "Carrying the Ethereal and Corporeal Souls" states: Maintaining the unity of hun (ethereal soul) and po (corporeal soul)—can one achieve their inseparability?

Emperor Huizong of Song annotated: The po, being yin, attaches to the body with limitations, hence Laozi describes it as "encamped" (ying). The hun, being yang, rides on qi and roams boundlessly, thus the Yijing describes it as "wandering." The sage governs form with spirit (shen), using hun to restrain po, ensuring the spirit perpetually carries the po without being constrained by it. Like a cart transporting goods, or the four seasons cycling through heat and cold. When the mind communicates with nature and the six senses interconnect, transcending all creation while the spirit remains unweary—how could it ever be confined by the po?

The generative principle of heaven and earth: Heaven's One generates water, corresponding to human jing (essence); Earth's Two generates fire, corresponding to shen (spirit). Spirit originates from the Great Dao, while form is rooted in essential qi. Preserve jing without dissipation, unite it with shen, and essence-spirit will blend inseparably. Use jing to coalesce shen, employ shen to command form, and through form nourish shen. When jing remains complete without depletion, shen operates without exhaustion, and form grows without decay—it resembles the sun and moon clinging to heaven, or plants rooted in earth, never parting ways.

Further explanation: When human life takes form, jing coalesces into shen, and physical embodiment follows. The spirit permeates all directions without obstruction—reaching heaven above and penetrating earth below, nurturing all things yet remaining formless. This is the realm of sharing the name with the Heavenly Emperor. Yet worldly fools, driven by external objects, lose their innate nature in mundane affairs, never pausing to nurture spirit within. Instead, they chase endless desires, externally depleting jing. Consequently, hun becomes enslaved by po, and form instead burdens shen—ultimately decaying alongside all creation. Is this not delusion?

Daoist priest Chen Jingyuan said: Daoists name the yang spirit as hun (which delights in life), and the yin ghost as po (which prefers dissolution). Hun governs movement; po governs stillness. The Baihutong interprets ying as "wandering without settling," hence calling hun "encamped." Ancient commentaries explain zai as "to carry," while ying refers to hun—some interpretations suggest it means "guarding yang qi." As yang's essence, hun loves movement and dispersion; as yin's numinous substance, po...

 書有拘留之術陰靈喜浮惑故仙書有制  伏之法使其形體常乘載陽精陰靈抱守  太和純一之氣令無散離永保長年矣夫  道之抱一如鑑之含明眀豈離鑑乎此教  人養神也今解曰能無離乎者老氏審問  之辭也  潁濱蘇轍曰聖人性定而神凝不爲物遷  雖以魄爲舍而神所欲行魄無不從則神  常載魄矣衆人以物役性神昏而不治則  神聽於魄耳目困以聲色鼻口勞以臭味  魄所欲行而神從之則𩲸常載神矣故教  之以抱神載魄使兩者不相離此固聖人  所以修身之要至於古之眞人深根固蒂  長生乆視其道亦由是也  王雱曰魄陰物形之主也神之爲物廣大  通達而不自了者神常載於魄故神反拘  於形體此廣者所以狹通者所以滯也欲  學此道者常先廓其志氣勿累於形體使  神常載魄而不載於魄則可以抱一而體  神矣竊嘗論曰人之既死有升沉之異良  由滅神徇形以神從魄故至於淪乎幽陰  化爲異物也若夫神完之人雖魄之陰滯  精與神爲一而無所不之矣聖人之死曰  神不從魄也其始也亦載魄而已  陸佃曰魂爲陽陽爲動魄爲陰陰爲止魂  者神之佐其動有變而無化魄者精之輔  其止有化而無變故魂言游魄言營游魂  以言其變營魄以言其止載營魄所以外  運抱一所以内守也故曰載營魄抱一能
Interpretation

This scripture discusses the relationship between Shen (spirit) and Po (corporeal soul) in Daoist cultivation, and how to achieve longevity through harmonizing Yin-Yang.

The text records methods for retaining the Hun (ethereal soul) and Po, as the Yin-natured Po tends to drift and delude. Thus, immortal scriptures teach techniques of subduing it—keeping the body constantly carrying Yang-natured Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy), while the Yin-natured Po guards the pure unified Qi of Great Harmony (Taihe), preventing their dispersal to ensure eternal longevity. The Daoist practice of "embracing the One" (Baoyi) is likened to a mirror containing light—how could light ever leave the mirror? This teaches the cultivation of the original Shen.

Su Zhe explains that sages maintain a stable mind and concentrated spirit, unshaken by external things. Though they dwell in the Po (the spirit of the physical form), when the Shen acts, the Po always follows—this is the Shen constantly carrying the Po. Ordinary people, however, are enslaved by external stimuli, their consciousness muddled, and are instead controlled by the Po, indulging in sensory desires—this is the Po carrying the Shen. Therefore, cultivation involves embracing the Shen and carrying the Po, ensuring they do not separate—this is the sage’s key to self-cultivation. The ancient perfected ones (Zhenren) achieved longevity precisely through this principle.

Wang Pang elaborates further: Po belongs to Yin and governs the physical form, while the Shen is vast and penetrating yet difficult to perceive. Often constrained by the Po, the Shen’s expansiveness narrows, and its fluidity stagnates. Practitioners must first expand their will and Qi, not burdened by the body, letting the Shen lead the Po rather than being led by it—thus attaining the "embracing the One" state where the Shen manifests. After death, ascent to heaven or descent into oblivion depends on whether the Shen submits to the Po. If one’s Shen is complete, even the Yin-stagnant Po can unite with Jing and reach everywhere. When sages pass away, their Shen does not scatter with the Po—because from the beginning, they carried the Po.

Lu Dian analyzes from a Yin-Yang perspective: Hun belongs to Yang and governs movement, while Po belongs to Yin and governs stillness. Hun assists the Shen—its changes are only in form; Po assists Jing—its stillness produces transformation in substance. Hence, "wandering Hun" describes transformation, while "nurturing Po" describes stillness. "Carrying the Po" is external operation, "embracing the One" is internal preservation—combining both forms the complete cultivation method.

 無離乎載魄所以致運抱一所以致守而  内外常合而無離矣  劉涇曰人之生諸陽爲魂諸陰爲魄各有  名象而藏於肝肺之間下士知之上士見  之精與神相依以生而並精出入者魄也  與神往來者魂也此篇言載營魄營即魂  是也黃帝曰動以營身謂之魂易曰游魂  爲變莊子曰其魂不疲皆爲魂主經營動  作爲一身之運爲魄則並精出入主化成  變而已今百骸九竅具吾形者魄之屬也  使非魂以營之則與行尸何以異乎魄不  可以無魂猶月不可以無日魄待魂而成  營月待日而生光此言魂之用而曰營言  魄之體而曰魄也載謂以形載也形車也  魄與魂車之積也  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰形體本無知覺  以其載負魂魄故有動作魂爲陽利於清  虚魄爲陰好於營爲雖大概謂之魂魄而  老子獨言魄者以陰魄好營營於欲故也  葉夢得曰人之生也以心藏神以腎藏精  以肝藏魂以肺藏魄而後形體立精神之  運形體不能拘而魂魄者所以守其形體  者也魂出乎陽故升而上者散而無不之  易謂之游魂魄出乎陰故沉而下者滯而  不能去老氏謂之營魄營者有方之言也  善攝生者常使陽勝陰陰不能擾陽故魂  每載魄而與之俱  晦庵朱熹曰以車承人謂之載古今世俗  之通言也以人登車亦謂之載則古文史
Interpretation

Human life is composed of the two Qi (vital energies) of Yin and Yang. The Yang aspect is called the Hun (ethereal soul), while the Yin aspect is called the Po (corporeal soul). These reside in the liver and lungs respectively. Ordinary people may understand this principle intellectually, but only those with genuine cultivation can perceive it directly. The subtle Qi and the Shenming (divine illumination) are interdependent—what moves in and out with the Jing (essence) is the Po, while what interacts with the Shenming is the Hun. Here, the term "bearing the Ying and Po" refers to the Hun as the "Ying."

The Yellow Emperor once said that what governs the body's activities is called the Hun. The Book of Changes mentions "the wandering Hun brings about transformation," and Zhuangzi states "his Hun does not tire," both indicating that the Hun oversees the body's functioning. The Po, on the other hand, follows the movement of Jing and is primarily responsible for physical changes. All the bones and the nine orifices (eyes, ears, nose, mouth, etc.) in our body belong to the domain of the Po. Without the Hun to guide it, the body would be like a lifeless corpse. The Po cannot exist without the Hun, just as the moon cannot exist without the sun. The Po needs the Hun to function, much like the moon relies on the sun for its light. Here, "Ying" describes the function of the Hun, while "Po" refers to its physical manifestation. The term "bearing" (载) signifies the body's role as a vessel—the body is like a cart, and the Hun and Po are what it carries.

Master Cao Daochong observed: The physical form has no awareness on its own; it is only through bearing the Hun and Po that it becomes active. The Hun, being Yang, prefers clarity and emptiness, while the Po, being Yin, is prone to desires. Though collectively referred to as the Hun-Po, Laozi particularly emphasizes the Po because the Yin aspect of the Po easily gives rise to various cravings.

Ye Mengde explained: In human life, the heart stores the Shen (spirit), the kidneys store the Jing (essence), the liver stores the Hun, and the lungs store the Po—only then can a complete physical form be established. The Shen and Jing can transcend the limitations of the body, while the Hun and Po serve as its guardians. The Hun originates from Yang Qi, enabling it to ascend and disperse, while the Po comes from Yin Qi, making it prone to sinking and stagnation. When Laozi speaks of "Ying and Po," "Ying" refers to a tangible existence. Those skilled in nurturing life ensure that Yang overcomes Yin, preventing Yin from disturbing Yang, so that the Hun can continuously bear the Po in harmonious operation.

Zhu Xi added: The character "bearing" (载) is like using a cart to carry a person—a usage common across ancient and modern times. To have someone board a cart is also called "bearing," as seen in classical texts.

 類多有之如漢紀云劉章從謁者與載韓  集云婦人以孺子載蓋皆此意今所謂營  者字與熒同而爲晶明光炯之意其所謂  魄則亦若余之所論於九歌者耳其意蓋  以魂陽動而魄陰靜魂火二而魄水一故  曰載營魂抱一能勿離乎言以魂加魄以  動守靜以火迫水以二守一而不相離如  人登車而常載于其上則魂安靜而魄精  明火不燥而水不溢固長生乆視之要訣  也但爲之說者不能深考如河上公以營  爲魄則固非字義而又並言人載魂魄之  上以得生當愛養之則又失其文意獨其  載字之義粗爲得之然不足以補其所失  之多也若王輔嗣以載爲處以營魄爲人  所常居之處則亦河上之意至于近世而  蘇子由王元澤之說出焉則此二人者平  生之論如水火之不同而於此義皆以魂  爲神以魄爲物而欲使神常載魄以行不  欲使神爲魄之所載洪慶善亦謂陽氣充  魄爲魂魂能運動則其生全矣則其意亦  若蘇王之云而皆以載爲以車承人之義  矣是不唯非其文意且若如此則是將使  神常勞動而魄亦不得以少息雖幸免於  物欲沉溺之累而窈冥之中精一之妙反  爲强陽所挾以馳騖於紛拏膠擾之塗卒  以陷於衆人傷生損壽之域而不自知也 專氣致柔能如嬰兒乎  御註曰易曰乾其靜也專楊雄曰和柔足
Interpretation

This passage explores the profound meaning of the phrase "carrying the luminous po (魄) while embracing unity" from the Daode Jing. Various commentators have offered differing interpretations:

The character "ying" (营) shares meaning with "glimmering light," while "po" (魄), as discussed in my Nine Songs commentary, represents the yin principle of stillness. The scripture holds that the hun (魂) soul belongs to yang and governs movement (associated with the number two and the Fire phase), whereas the po soul belongs to yin and governs stillness (associated with the number one and the Water phase). "Carrying the luminous po while embracing unity" thus describes using the active hun to guide the still po—movement preserving stillness, Fire regulating Water—to achieve harmonious unity. Like a rider remaining steadily upon a chariot, this allows the hun to stabilize and the po to clarify, preventing Fire from becoming agitated or Water from overflowing—the essential key to longevity and clear vision.

However, many commentaries deviate from this meaning. Heshang Gong mistakenly equates "ying" with "po," distorting both the character's meaning and the passage's intent by suggesting humans must "carry" their souls to survive and should cherish them. Only his interpretation of "carry" (载) is marginally correct. Wang Bi (styled Fusi) interprets "carry" as "dwelling," treating "yingpo" as the abode where humans permanently reside—a view similar to Heshang Gong's.

By the Song dynasty, Su Shi (styled Ziyou) and Wang Pang (styled Yuanze) proposed new readings: though typically at odds, both here identify hun as spirit and po as the physical form, advocating spirit's dominance over bodily movement while warning against the body burdening the spirit. Hong Xingzu (styled Qingshan) similarly states that when yang qi fills the form to create hun, and the hun can move, life becomes complete. These interpretations all understand "carry" as a chariot bearing a rider. Yet this not only strays from the original intent—if followed, the spirit would become overworked while the body finds no rest. Though avoiding sensual indulgence, such approaches forcibly drag subtle mysteries into turmoil, ultimately trapping practitioners in the common pitfalls of physical depletion and shortened lifespans without realizing it.

The passage concludes with "concentrating qi (气) to attain softness—can you be like an infant?" The Imperial Commentary cites the Yijing: "The Qian hexagram in stillness becomes focused," while Yang Xiong notes "softness suffices to..." —both emphasizing the vital importance of maintaining infant-like unity and pliancy.

 以安物靜而不雜之謂專和而不暴之謂  柔嬰兒居不知所爲行不知所之不藏是  非美惡故氣專而致柔孟子曰蹶者趨者  是氣也而反動其心心不足以專氣則氣  有蹶趨之不正而心至于僨驕而不可係  聖人虚己以游世心無使氣之强則其靜  而不雜和而不暴與嬰兒也奚擇故曰能  如嬰兒乎孟子曰其爲氣也至大至剛以  直養而無害則塞乎天地之間老氏之專  氣則曰致柔何也至剛以行義致柔以復  性古之道術無乎不在  碧虚子陳景元曰舊說曰專一也任也氣  者冲和妙氣也又自然之氣也夫人卓然  獨化禀自然冲和妙氣氣降形生自無染  雜若乃專任冲妙知見都忘使氣自純和  形自柔弱不爲衆惡所害是得嬰兒之全  和也此教人養氣也  潁濱蘇轍曰神不治則氣亂强者好鬬弱  者喜畏不自知也神治則氣不妄作喜怒  各以其類是之謂專氣神虚之至也氣實  之始也虚之極爲柔實之極爲剛純性而  亡氣是之謂致柔嬰兒不知好惡是以性  全性全而氣微氣微而體柔專氣氣柔能  如嬰兒極矣  王雱曰人生有三曰精曰神曰氣精全則  神王神王則能帥氣矣神衰而不足以帥  氣則神作不常使人陷於非道孟子曰志  者氣之帥也楊雄曰氣者所適善惡之馬  歟帥懦而衆悖則帥必亡馬怒而御疲則
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how to achieve harmony of body and mind through regulating Qi (vital energy), with its core being the cultivation method of "concentrating Qi to attain softness."

The text mentions that maintaining inner tranquility free from distracting thoughts is called "concentration," while being gentle without violence is called "softness." Like an infant whose movements are natural and unaffected, whose mind makes no distinctions between right and wrong or beauty and ugliness, one can thereby concentrate Qi and soften both body and mind. Mencius said that when people hurry about agitatedly, their Qi rebounds to disturb the heart-mind. If the mind cannot govern Qi, it leads to Qi disorder and ultimately loss of mental control.

Sages interact with the world through emptiness and stillness, never allowing Qi to become domineering, thus achieving a state of calm without disorder, harmony without violence—indistinguishable from an infant's condition. While Mencius advocated cultivating the "vast and mighty" upright Qi, Laozi promoted "attaining softness," because strength serves to practice righteousness while softness serves to return to one's original nature. Ancient cultivation methods naturally encompassed various approaches.

Chen Jingyuan explained that "concentration" means focused attention and letting go—here Qi refers to the pure primordial energy humans are born with. If one can concentrate and preserve this innate Qi while forgetting acquired knowledge, allowing Qi to become naturally harmonious and the body naturally soft, one can maintain complete harmonious Qi like an infant.

Su Zhe believed that if the Shen (spirit) cannot govern, Qi becomes disordered—the strong become aggressive while the weak shrink back. When the Shen is stable, Qi doesn't act recklessly, and emotions remain balanced—this is "concentrating Qi." When the Shen reaches utmost emptiness and stillness, softness manifests; when Qi reaches utmost fullness, strength appears. Complete return to original nature while diminishing Qi is "attaining softness." Infants make no distinctions of likes and dislikes, thus their nature remains complete, their Qi subtle, and their bodies soft.

Wang Pang pointed out that human life consists of Jing (essence), Shen, and Qi: abundant Jing makes Shen vigorous, and vigorous Shen can command Qi; if weakened Shen cannot govern Qi, behavior becomes disordered. Mencius said the will is Qi's commander, while Yang Xiong compared Qi to horses carrying people toward good or evil—when the commander is weak, subordinates rebel; when horses are unruly and the driver exhausted, control is lost.

 車必敗神不能專氣則喜怒哀樂唯氣所  爲流陷越佚理固然也古之士無不曉此  苟未及此則當清心以防之孔子所謂三  戒皆防氣也門人獨顔回能專氣故曰不  遷怒氣之暴在陽而陽之發者莫暴於怒  於怒可以無遷則非專氣而何人生本具  聖質氣佚而不能專故自壯以往離道彌  遠能抱一則神王神王則氣柔氣柔則眞  全所以與嬰兒同專者有而擅其權之謂  陸佃曰蓋内守者氣之所以致專外運者  氣之所以致柔其守致專其運致柔而其  德比於赤子則然後其心可以疏瀹其神  可以澡雪而照之於天萬法俱空而無一  法之累也故言專氣致柔能如嬰兒乎  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰心既散亂氣亦  蕩流問爾能專守一氣通於無間與物不  逆柔而至順復命全眞如嬰兒在胎中乎  陳象古曰氣爲動用之先柔爲剛强之本  晦庵朱熹曰專非守之謂也只是專一無  間斷致柔是到那柔之極處纔有一豪發  露便是剛這氣便粗了 滌除玄覽能無疵乎  碧虚子陳景元曰舊說曰滌洗也除遣也  理也玄覽心照也疵病也夫人當洗滌塵  垢除遣五情内外清虚心照萬事瑕疵之  病瑩然不生此教人修心也自此上三事  約人修身自此下三事勸人治國也經曰  修之身其德乃眞修之天下其德乃溥也
Interpretation

This passage explores how to cultivate one's character and attain self-refinement through the regulation of Qi (vital energy). It explains that when people fail to maintain focused control over their Qi, they become enslaved by emotions like joy, anger, sorrow, and pleasure. Ancient practitioners understood this principle well—Confucius' "Three Restraints" (guarding against lust, contention, and greed) were precisely meant to prevent the loss of Qi control. Only Yan Hui achieved such mastery over Qi that he could "not transfer his anger."

Human nature inherently possesses sage-like qualities, but without maintaining single-minded focus (concentration on the Dao) as one ages, one drifts increasingly further from the Way. By embracing the principle of "holding to the One" (abiding in the Great Dao), vitality flourishes, Qi becomes harmonious, and one's true nature remains intact, attaining a state of purity akin to an infant. As Lu Dian elucidates, inner concentration allows Qi to coalesce, while outer refinement renders it gentle—reaching this state makes the mind mirror-like, the spirit clear and bright, transcending all worldly attachments.

Cao Daochong observes that scattered thoughts lead to disordered Qi movements. Only through single-minded focus, allowing Qi to flow unimpeded while harmonizing with all things without resistance, can one return to original authenticity—resembling a fetus in its mother's womb. Chen Xianggu notes that Qi is the foundation of action, and softness the root of strength. Zhu Xi emphasizes that concentration isn't about forced control but sustained, unwavering focus that achieves ultimate pliancy.

The text concludes with "cleansing the mysterious mirror" (removing distractions to contemplate the inner self), advising practitioners to wash away worldly defilements and purge the five emotions (joy, anger, sorrow, pleasure, and desire) until both inner and outer become pure. This allows the mind to reflect all things without blemish—a profound method of mental cultivation. The scripture teaches self-cultivation through these three aspects before transitioning to state governance, illustrating how personal refinement relates to ruling a country: only when individuals are cultivated can their De (Virtue) become genuine; only when extended to the world can this Virtue become vast.

 今解曰能無疵乎者言人欲要洗心除垢  冥察内外之事當能自省己躬無有疵瑕  之病乎  潁濱蘇轍曰聖人外不爲魄所載内不爲  氣所使則其滌除塵垢盡矣於是其神廓  然玄覽萬物知其皆岀於性等觀净穢而  無所瑕疵矣  臨川王安石曰滌除洗心也玄覽觀妙也  如月之明如珠之瑩能無疵乎  劉涇曰此章以全精全氣全神爲學道之  根故無離以言養精如嬰兒以言養氣無  疵以言養神也  陳象古曰滌如水之濯也除如掃糞穢也  玄覽於是可全矣無疵玄覽之要妙故又  教之以不可以有疵瑕也  清源子劉驥曰聖人以此洗心退藏於密  則滌除萬念而玄覽妙理何疵之有 愛民治國能無爲乎  碧虚子陳景元曰舊說曰愛民者當愛民  如赤子臨政不可苛虐賦役不可傷性治  國者當務農簡事使民各遂其業而安其  生斯無爲之化也今解曰能無爲乎者言  人君欲愛養萬民令不傷天性治國務農  使無繁細當能清靜無爲乎  潁濱蘇轍曰既以治身又推其餘以及人  雖至於愛民治國一以無心遇之苟其有  心則愛民者適所以害之治國者適所以  亂之也  臨川王安石曰愛民者以不愛愛之乃長  治國者以不治治之乃長惟其不愛而愛  不治而治故曰無爲夫無爲者用天下之  有爲有爲者用天下之不足然老子方言
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core principles of self-cultivation. The phrase "能无疵乎" (can one be flawless?) suggests that to purify the mind and eliminate distractions, one must examine their words and deeds as carefully as looking into a mirror, scrutinizing whether there remain any faults or blemishes in both inner thoughts and outward conduct.

Su Zhe explains that true sages (those who have attained the Dao) are neither governed by external desires nor swayed by internal emotions, thereby completely clearing the dust from their minds. In this state, their spiritual realm becomes vast and luminous, capable of perceiving the essence of all things. They understand that everything originates from innate nature, maintaining detachment whether observing purity or impurity, and thus naturally remain flawless.

Wang Anshi illustrates with a metaphor: eliminating distractions is like cleansing the heart, while contemplating the profound resembles the clarity of the bright moon and the purity of a pearl—only then can one truly achieve flawlessness. Liu Jing points out that the essence of this chapter lies in the complete cultivation of the Three Treasures: Jing (essence), Qi (vital energy), and Shen (spirit). Purity like an infant is the key to nurturing Jing, and maintaining flawlessness is crucial for cultivating Shen.

Chen Xianggu further elaborates: clearing distractions should be like washing with water, and sweeping away impurities like removing filth—only then can one attain genuine profound insight. Liu Ji adds that sages, through this method of heart-cleansing, eliminate all chaotic thoughts, naturally comprehending the profound principles of the Dao. How could flaws remain?

Regarding "爱民治国能无为乎" (can one govern the people and the state without deliberate action?), Chen Jingyuan cites ancient commentaries: loving the people should be like caring for infants; governance must not be harsh, and taxes or labor must not harm livelihoods. Governing a state requires prioritizing agriculture and simplifying administration, allowing people to live in peace—this is the true meaning of Wuwei (non-action). The idea is that rulers who wish to love the people without harming their innate nature and govern while emphasizing fundamental agriculture must maintain an attitude of serene non-action.

Su Zhe proposes that such cultivation should be applied both to oneself and extended to governance. Even in significant matters like loving the people and governing the state, one must preserve an "uncontrived" attitude—deliberate efforts to love may harm the people, and forced governance may disrupt the state.

Wang Anshi concludes: the highest form of loving the people appears as non-love yet achieves lasting care; the highest form of governing seems like non-governance yet brings true stability. Precisely because it accomplishes without deliberate effort, it is called "Wuwei." Genuine Wuwei skillfully utilizes existing conditions in the world, whereas forced action reveals inadequacy. This is the wisdom Laozi particularly emphasizes.

 其反本而曰愛民治國者何也蓋老子爲  言其反本遠自道而起教所謂吉凶與民  同患是也不惟老子之言若是凡古之聖  人皆如此也  劉涇曰莊子曰道之眞以治身其緒餘以  治國家愛民仁也治國政也王侯之事不  能無爲視以芻狗則得之  清源子劉驥曰老氏方言其反本而繼之  以愛民治國何也蓋一身之設一國之象  也聖人以心爲君以身爲國以氣爲民無  爲而尊君之道也心無爲而尊於上萬氣  自行百骸自治保氣所以愛民全形所以  治國無爲也則用天下而有餘有爲也則  爲天下用而不足故愛民治國能無爲乎  黃茂材曰夫學道而至於無爲豈一日之  積哉抱一矣致柔矣玄覽無疵矣然後可  以至於無爲儻未能是而强欲至於無爲  之地夫是之謂坐馳去道益遠國譬則身  也民譬則神也愛民治國與其身同 天門開闔能爲雌乎  御註曰經曰知其雄守其雌爲天下谿聖  人體天道之變化卷舒啓閉不違乎時柔  剛微彰惟其所用然未嘗先人而常隨人  未嘗勝物而嘗下物故天下樂推而不厭  能爲雌於是乎在  碧虚子陳景元曰天門者自然之門也自  然生太極太極生天地天地生陰陽陰陽  生萬物死萬物生死由之而往來故謂之  天門開謂散施闔謂歙斂開則生成闔則  衰减雖生萬物而未見其生生者雖死萬
Interpretation

This passage discusses the connection between Laozi's concepts of "returning to the fundamental truth" and "loving the people to govern the state." Several Daoist scholars offer their interpretations from different perspectives:

Liu Jing cites Zhuangzi's viewpoint, suggesting that the true essence of the Dao (the Way) is for self-cultivation, while its remaining aspects serve state governance. Loving the people embodies De (Virtue/Power), while governing represents political affairs. Rulers and ministers cannot practice complete Wuwei (non-action), but if they regard common people like straw dogs (sacrificial objects symbolizing equal treatment of all things), they may comprehend the Dao of governance.

Qingyuanzi Liu Ji proposes that an individual's body mirrors a nation in miniature. Sages regard the heart-mind as the ruler, the body as the state, and Qi (vital energy) as the populace. When the ruler (heart) maintains Wuwei, Qi flows naturally and the body remains healthy. Nurturing Qi equates to loving the people, while preserving physical form corresponds to governing the state. Governing through non-action handles the world with ease, whereas forced action becomes entangled by worldly affairs.

Huang Maocai emphasizes that achieving Wuwei requires prolonged cultivation: one must first concentrate on preserving the Dao to attain a state of softness, with a mind clear of distractions, before natural non-action emerges. Forcing Wuwei only distances one from the Dao. The state resembles the body, its people like the spirit—loving the people and governing well parallels self-cultivation.

Regarding the "opening and closing of the celestial gate" (referring to nature's cyclical operations), imperial annotations explain that sages understand strength yet abide in softness, remaining humble like valley streams. They follow heavenly transformations—withdrawing when appropriate, acting when timely—always following rather than forcing, thus naturally attracting the world's allegiance.

Bixuzi Chen Jingyuan further clarifies that the celestial gate represents nature's creative portal where all life comes and goes. Its opening brings growth, its closure brings decay. Though producing countless beings, no trace of deliberate creation appears; though things perish, no active destroyer can be found. This natural rhythm exemplifies "maintaining the feminine" (preserving quiet receptivity).

 物而未見其死死者生生死死而莫見其  形得不謂之自然乎能體自然者其唯大  人乎夫大人量包宇宙氣含陰陽所爲雌  靜則生死王衰不入于胸中雌靜者自然  之妙用也此戒治身治國者當以雌靜是  守  臨川王安石曰夫萬物由是而出由是而  入故謂之天門有開闔則有動靜有動靜  則有雌雄惟其守雌以勝雄守靜以勝動  故曰天門開闔能爲雌乎  劉涇曰成人事者必因天道故此言天門  莊子曰天門無有也萬物出乎無有易曰  一闔一闢謂之變蓋天道主變愛民治國  因諸天而已何事於雄不得已則亦應焉  而已  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰開闔者變化之  道雌靜者畜養之德  黃茂材曰天門顖門也今嬰兒腦顖中開  闔不住修眞至此可以上通天道故謂之  天門雌與牝同 明白四達能無知乎  潁濱蘇轍曰明白四達心也是心無所不  知然而未嘗有能知之心也夫心一而已  苟又有知之心者則是二也自一而二蔽  之所自生而愚之所自始也今夫鏡之於  物來則應之而已矣又安得知應物者乎  本則無有以意加之此妄之源也  黃茂材曰無知者無所不知猶人開眼而  視無所不見何嘗曰吾有見焉有見有不  見謂之眼病有知有不知謂之心病自抱  一凡六進而後進於無知是以齧缺問於
Interpretation

This passage explores the wisdom of the "natural Dao" and "feminine stillness," with various Daoist scholars offering interpretations from different perspectives:

The cycle of life and death of all things leaves no trace—this is the profound mystery of nature. Only those of supreme virtue, the "great persons" (those who have attained the Dao), can truly comprehend the natural Dao. Their minds embrace the cosmos, their Qi harmonizes Yin and Yang, and their actions maintain a state of feminine tranquility, undisturbed even by concepts of life and death, prosperity and decline. Feminine stillness embodies the subtle manifestation of natural law; whether in self-cultivation or governing a nation, one should steadfastly uphold this gentle, quiet way.

Wang Anshi posits that all things emerge from and return to the "Heavenly Gate" (referring to the source of the Dao). Where there is opening and closing, there is movement and stillness; where there is movement and stillness, there is distinction between feminine and masculine. Only by maintaining feminine softness can one overcome rigidity; only by preserving stillness can one master restlessness. Thus, the Daode Jing asks: "When the Heavenly Gate opens and closes, can you remain in the feminine state?"

Liu Jing cites Zhuangzi's view that the "Heavenly Gate" represents the realm of "non-being," from which all things arise. The Dao of Heaven governs transformation; in governing the people, one need only follow Heaven's way without deliberate force, acting only when absolutely necessary.

Cao Daochong explains that "opening and closing" represents the pattern of change, while "feminine stillness" embodies the virtue that nurtures all things. Huang Maocai, from an alchemical cultivation perspective, compares the "Heavenly Gate" to an infant's unclosed fontanelle—when practitioners cultivate to this state, they connect with the Dao of Heaven. The "feminine" shares meaning with "motherly" (the receptive principle), symbolizing the qualities of gestation and inclusiveness.

Regarding the phrase "Can you be all-knowing yet remain unknowing?" Su Zhe uses the metaphor of the mind as a mirror—reflecting things as they come without retaining traces. Deliberately pursuing "knowing" splits the original mind into dualistic thought, which marks the beginning of delusion. Huang Maocai further explains that true "unknowing" is the natural state of omniscience, like seeing all things upon opening one's eyes—if one clings to "I am seeing," it becomes an eye disease. Similarly, deliberately distinguishing between knowing and not knowing is a disease of the mind. Maintain pure unity, gradually reaching a state of non-discriminatory awareness.

 王倪四問而四不知齧缺因躍而大喜良  有以也 生之畜之生而不有爲而不恃長而不宰是 謂玄德  御註曰聖人存神知化與道同體則配神  明育萬物無不可者生之以遂其性畜之  以極其養無愛利之心焉故生而不有無  矜伐之行焉故爲而不恃無刻制之巧焉  故長而不宰若是者其德深矣遠矣與物  反矣故曰是謂玄德  碧虚子陳景元曰言修身治國能行上六  事即如道之生物不塞其原任其自成而  已德之養物不禁其性全其素分而已夫  萬物卓爾獨生聖人豈有乎哉群類各自  營爲聖人何恃乎哉且物自長養聖人安  能主宰乎哉斯乃忘功忘物洞入冥極是  謂淵德也王弼曰淵德者有德而不知其  主乎幽冥也  王雱曰玄爲妙體德之至也昔舜在側微  書稱玄德蓋至德常在於無思無爲  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰雖生成在我任  其賦命不專而有之雖雕刻衆形造化萬  物不恃其能長養於物不主其功潜被嘿  通不自彰顯故曰玄德  陳象古曰生則品物流形各正性命也育  則養之以冲和之氣得遂其自然生死也  育之之功治天下之所有也萬物生之以  奉己而不以爲有故亦爲而不恃長而不  宰矣玄德運之在心不彰於外是也  黃茂材曰經凡兩言此矣前者所言道也
Interpretation

Wang Ni posed four questions, and Nie Que responded to each with "I don't know," yet he leaped for joy at this realization—a profound teaching indeed.

(This parable illustrates the wisdom of "knowing what you know and knowing what you don't know.")

Heaven and Earth give birth to and nurture all things yet claim no possession over them; they act without asserting merit, guide without imposing control—this is the most profound De (Virtue/Power), the Mysterious De (Xuande).

Emperor Huizong of Song (in his imperial commentary) explains: The sages, whose spirit is united with the Dao, participate in the transformation and nourishment of all things by Heaven and Earth. They allow all beings to grow naturally without thoughts of possession, nurture them without pride in achievement, and guide them without forceful domination. Such De is so profound and unfathomable, seemingly contrary to ordinary reasoning, that it is called Mysterious De.

Chen Jingyuan (Master Bixu) observes: Whether in self-cultivation or governing a nation, achieving these six states (giving birth, nurturing, producing without possessing, acting without claiming, guiding without controlling, and Mysterious De) resembles how the Dao generates all things—without obstructing their source, allowing them to achieve their natural course. It is also like how De nourishes all beings—without restricting their innate nature, preserving their inherent endowment. All things grow naturally, and the sage does not claim them; beings act on their own, and the sage does not assert authority; all develop themselves, and the sage does not dominate. This transcendence of fame and merit is the most profound De.

Wang Bi notes: The defining feature of Mysterious De is that while it possesses De, it remains ever obscure and unmanifest, never displaying itself.

Wang Pang states: Mysterious De is the subtlest and highest form of De. Just as Shun, while living among commoners, was praised in the Book of Documents for possessing Mysterious De, the highest De is often revealed in a state of natural, effortless spontaneity.

Cao Daochong (Master Daozhen Renjing) explains: Although all things are generated by the Dao, it allows them to develop naturally without claiming ownership; though it shapes all forms, it does not boast of its ability; though it nurtures all beings, it takes no credit. This silent nourishment without display is Mysterious De.

Chen Xianggu adds: "Giving birth" means allowing all things to attain their proper place; "nurturing" means nourishing them with harmonious Qi (vital energy), enabling their natural growth and decline. The essence of governing the world lies in this—nurturing all things without possessing them, acting without asserting, guiding without dominating. The profundity of Mysterious De lies in its inner workings, never outwardly revealed.

Huang Maocai concludes: This passage discusses Mysterious De twice—first in terms of the Dao (as the source) and here in terms of De (as its function).

 (是第/二章)今之所言德也道降而爲德德之妙  者復與道合故謂之玄德    三十輻章第十一 三十輻共一轂當其無有車之用埏埴以爲 器當其無有器之用鑿户牖以爲室當其無 有室之用  御註曰有無一致利用出入是謂至神有  無異相在有爲體在無爲用陰陽之運萬  物之理也車之用在運器之用在盛室之  用在虚妙用出於至無變化藏於不累如  鑑無象因物顯照  碧虚子陳景元曰此明有無功用相資而  立當其轂中空虚輪得以轉行車中空虚  人所以載其上故其空無之處是有轉行  容載之用也埏和也埴粘土也謂工人範  和粘土陶成形器取其器中空無之處是  有盛受諸物之用也鑿穿也半門曰户門  傍䆫謂之牖古者穴處謂穿鑿穴中之  土以覆其上爲户牖居室也取其室中空  無之處故人有安存出入之用也  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰三者皆於外有  以成形内虚而受物虚因有以能受有假  無以爲用  清源子劉驥曰扁鵲言人身中有五藏眞  氣之所會五藏各有六氣故有五六三十  之會原猶車之三十輻也流轉不息通於  一樞猶三十輻之共一轂也聖人知變化  之樞機假有爲之形體以身爲爐三宫爲  鼎造化於虚無恍惚之中如所乘之車所  用之器所居之室在有爲體在無爲用
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the relationship between De (Virtue/Power) and Dao (the Way). When the Dao manifests concretely, it becomes De, while the subtle essence of De can harmonize with the Dao—hence it's called "mysterious De" (profound and inscrutable virtue).

Take a wheel as an example: Thirty spokes converge at the hub, and precisely because the hub's center is empty that the wheel can rotate and function. When kneading clay to make vessels, it's the hollow interior that allows them to hold contents. When carving doors and windows to build houses, it's the empty space within that makes them habitable.

Emperor Huizong of Song (in his imperial commentary) explains: Being (you) and non-being (wu) are unified—the utility of all things arises from their mutual coordination, which constitutes true wonder. Though they manifest differently, "being" forms physical structures while "non-being" creates function. This represents the fundamental principle of Yin-Yang interaction and all existence. A wheel's function lies in transportation, a vessel's in containment, and a house's in providing space. These marvelous functions all originate from "non-being," with transformations hidden within seemingly useless voids—just as a mirror, though formless itself, can reflect all things.

Chen Jingyuan (Master Bixu) further clarifies: This illustrates the interdependent functions of "being" and "non-being." The wheel hub's emptiness enables rotation; the carriage's hollow space carries people and goods. Potters blend clay to make vessels precisely to utilize their empty interiors. Ancient people dug cave dwellings with doors and windows to inhabit the created void.

Cao Daochong (Master Dao Zhen Ren Jing) summarizes: These three objects (wheel, vessel, house) all possess external form while relying on internal emptiness for utility. Emptiness requires form to contain, while form depends on emptiness to function.

Liu Ji (Master Qingyuan) interprets this through health cultivation: The renowned physician Bian Que described how the human body's five viscera (liver, heart, spleen, lungs, kidneys) gather vital Qi (energy), with each organ circulating six Qi pathways—totaling thirty energy convergence points like a wheel's thirty spokes. These energies circulate through a central pivot, just as spokes converge at the hub. Practitioners understanding this transformative key treat the body as a furnace and the three Dantian (upper, middle, and lower energy centers) as cauldrons, creating vitality within the formless void—just as wheels, vessels, and houses derive function from emptiness while maintaining physical form.

 晦庵朱熹曰無是轂中空處惟其中空故  能受軸而運轉不窮猶傘柄上木管子衆  骨所會者縁管子中空又可受傘柄而開  闔下上車之轂亦猶是也莊子所謂樞始  得其環中以應無窮亦此意  黃茂材曰有有中之有有無中之有無中  之有其用無窮有中之有其利甚博輻轂  以爲車埏埴以爲器户牖以爲室此則有  中之有民之頼其利也博矣雖無車而有  車之用雖無器而有器之用雖無室而有  室之用此則無中之有至人達士資其用  也無窮今參同契黃庭經多載是說蓋有  所由來矣 故有之以爲利無之以爲用  潁濱蘇轍曰非有則無無以致其用非無  則有無以施其利是以聖人常無以觀其  妙常有以觀其徼知兩者之爲一而不可  分則至矣  陸佃曰有無相用不可以一偏故無無則  不足以用有無有則不足以見無以有爲  利則或至於止以無爲用則用常至於無  窮  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰有者適時之利  無者眞常之用在人身則駕御主持神與  炁也無者虚妙之神炁也有者凝滯之形  骸也心運以氣隨假形以爲利氣動以形  隨假神而爲用此二者有無之相須也  清源子劉驥曰有以爲利無以爲用世之  昩者唯聞捨身之道未達即身之妙此老  氏所以引車器室而詳喻之也是猶乾坤
Interpretation

Zhu Xi explains that the emptiness at the hub of a wheel is precisely what allows the axle to be installed, enabling the wheel to turn continuously. Just as the wooden tube connecting all the ribs of an umbrella relies on its hollow center to slide freely along the handle, Zhuangzi’s statement—"the pivot finds its place in the center of the ring to respond endlessly"—conveys the same principle: a door hinge must leave space to rotate smoothly.

Huang Maocai further analyzes: Some forms of "being" (you) are concrete existences (being within being), while others are forms of "being" that rely on emptiness (being within non-being). Objects like wheels, pottery, and doors provide tangible benefits to people, yet it is the hollow spaces—the axle hole, the empty vessel, the room within a house—that truly enable their function. Those who cultivate the Dao (perfected individuals and enlightened scholars) understand how to apply this principle of emptiness, as expounded in classics like the Cantong Qi and Huangting Jing.

Thus, the Daode Jing states: "Being gives advantage, non-being gives function"—the solid provides utility, while the empty enables efficacy. Su Zhe (Yingbin) adds: Without substance, function cannot manifest; without emptiness, efficacy cannot unfold. The sage observes both the boundaries of "being" and the mysteries of "non-being," recognizing their inherent unity.

Lu Dian emphasizes their interdependence: Focusing solely on emptiness makes it hard to actualize function, while fixating on substance obscures ethereal subtlety. Clinging to form leads to stagnation; skillfully employing emptiness ensures perpetual vitality.

Cao Dao Chong (Master Renjing) interprets this from a cultivation perspective: For humans, "being" is the timely use of the physical body, while "non-being" is the eternal operation of spirit and Qi (primordial energy). The mind is as fluid as emptiness, the body as concrete as an object. Thoughts move Qi through the body, and Qi animates the body through the mind—this is the mutual generation of being and non-being.

Liu Ji (Qingyuanzi) observes: People often misunderstand cultivation as rejecting the physical form, yet Laozi’s metaphors of wheels and houses reveal the profound truth of attaining the Dao through the body. Just as Qian and Kun (Heaven and Earth) generate through Yin and Yang, form and spirit must harmonize to realize the Great Dao.

 成列而易立乎其中乾坤毁則無以見易  形體毁則無以保神所以貴乎形神俱妙  也    五色章第十二 五色令人目盲五音令人耳聾五味令人口 爽馳騁田獵令人心發狂難得之貨令人行 妨  碧虚子陳景元曰五色之設黼黻文章别  尊卑之飾斯則五色之用也而後世爲錦  繡之麗青黃悅目逐物外遷傷精喪明不  能徹視無色之色非盲而何五音之設金  石絲竹通天地之氣斯則五音之用也而  後世作鄭衛之聲淫哇悦耳耽營不已蕩  性塞聰不能冥聽無聲之聲非聾而何五  味之設鹽梅調適養人之體斯則五味之  用也而後世有熊掌之嗜芻豢美口饕餮  無厭濁神穢眞不能内嘗無味之味非爽  而何爽亡也差也失也田獵者國之常禮  以講武事示民時也天子諸侯每歲三田  一爲乾豆祭祀宗廟也二爲賔客交二國  之好也三充君之庖食以時也時之不田  則曰不恭不以時則謂之暴天物故春蒐  夏苗秋獮冬狩若不遵法度馳騁逐境禽  荒無節暴物傷農登崖踰險旬月不返心  神發亂非狂而何夫金銀珠玉難得之寳  貨人若貪取無厭采求不已則道行妨傷  而身多勞辱也嚴君平曰五色重而天下  盲五音調而天下聾五味和而天下喑田  獵興而天下狂珠玉貴而天下勞幣帛通  而天下傾是故五色者陷目之錐也五音
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how excessive pursuit of sensory pleasures damages human nature, warning people to practice moderation.

All things in heaven and earth follow their natural patterns (the Dao of change). If heaven and earth were destroyed (with the collapse of Qian and Kun), these patterns could no longer manifest. Similarly, if the human body deteriorates, the spirit (Shen) loses its vessel. Therefore, the most precious state is maintaining both body and spirit in harmonious integrity.

Specifically: Overindulgence in dazzling colors (五色) dulls vision (causing "eye-blindness"); constant exposure to varied music (五音) impairs hearing (causing "ear-deafness"); excessive consumption of delicacies (五味) numbs taste (causing "mouth-failure"); obsessive hunting and chasing disorders the mind; relentless pursuit of rare treasures leads to improper conduct.

Chen Jingyuan (Master Bixu) elaborates: The five colors (blue, yellow, red, white, black) originally distinguished hierarchy through ceremonial robes, but later generations fixated on ornate embroidery, becoming so dazzled by external hues that they lost sight of true essence. The five musical notes (宫商角徵羽) were meant to harmonize celestial and earthly Qi, yet people became addicted to decadent tunes, forfeiting the ability to hear nature's voice. The five flavors (sour, sweet, bitter, spicy, salty) properly nourish the body, but gourmands craving exotic dishes lose sensitivity to food's authentic taste.

Regarding hunting: Originally part of state rituals—spring hunts called "sōu," summer "miáo," autumn "xiǎn," winter "shòu"—serving sacrifices, hospitality, and kitchen provisions. But disregarding regulations through prolonged obsession leads to mental derangement.

As for gold, jewels, and rare treasures, insatiable pursuit not only obstructs spiritual cultivation but invites calamity. Yan Junping wisely observed: Obsession with colors, music, and flavors makes all people dull; hunting mania drives madness; treasure lust exhausts the world. These sensory indulgences become "spikes blinding eyes" and "plugs deafening ears."

(Note: "Shuǎng" denotes loss or impairment; "field-hunting" refers to organized ancient hunts; "dried sacrificial beans" were preserved meats for rituals.)

 者塞耳之推也五味者斬舌之鉞也田獵  者狂惑之帥也遠方之貨天下之所以違  也難成之物天下之所以微也凡此數者  變而相生不可窮極難明而易滅也難得  而易失也殃禍之閭而危亡之室也求之  以自賊而居之以自殺也此上戒君王而  下訓兆民也  潁濱蘇轍曰視色聽音嘗味其本皆出於  性方其有性而未有物也至矣及目縁五  色耳縁五音口縁五味奪於所縁而忘其  本則雖見而實盲雖聞而實聾雖嘗而實  爽也  劉涇曰人之身竅肝爲目竅腎爲耳竅脾  爲口而與五色聲味同爲死生此大患也  而愚者見色不見其害猶弗見也聞聲不  聞其患猶弗聞也嘗味不嘗其患猶弗嘗  也故見作盲聞作聾嘗作爽是作之也非  疾也疾則虧其體而已見聞嘗性固有在  焉莊子曰屬性乎五色雖通如離朱非吾  所謂明屬性乎五聲雖通如師曠非吾所  謂聰屬性乎五味雖通如俞兒非吾所謂  藏亦以係物失己而已受患爲先故耳次  目受患爲深故口次耳又内狂其心外妨  其行則吾身之患備矣馳馬從禽此兩者  能亂人之陽以動其心以至於發狂者而  彼反資以爲樂黃帝則曰狂之病妄行不  休其說是也妨害也行所以行已難得之  貨使人昏於同利則爲害大矣  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰五色炫亂視極
Interpretation

This scripture primarily warns against indulging in sensory pleasures, as such attachments cause one to lose their innate nature. It employs vivid analogies: obsession with beauty renders people blind though their eyes remain open, excessive music indulgence makes one deaf in hearing, and craving fine flavors paradoxically dulls the palate. These conditions arise from chasing external stimuli at the expense of one's fundamental essence.

Several Daoist scholars elucidate this principle from different perspectives:

Su Zhe (Master Yingbin) posits that human vision, hearing, and taste are originally innate capacities bestowed by heaven. However, when eyes become dazzled by colors, ears overwhelmed by sounds, and mouths preoccupied with flavors, people forget their true nature. Though seemingly capable of seeing, hearing, and tasting, they've actually lost genuine perception.

Liu Jing analyzes through bodily structures: the liver manifests through the eyes, kidneys through the ears, and spleen through the mouth. When people indulge in sensory pleasures, the foolish perceive only enjoyment while remaining blind to harm—as if truly deaf or blind. This isn't physical impairment but mental delusion. Quoting Zhuangzi, he observes that even with Li Zhu's legendary vision, Shi Kuang's acute hearing, or Yu'er's refined palate, those led astray by external things will be first to suffer misfortune.

Cao Daochong (Master Daozhen Renjing) further explains that activities like hunting and galloping disturb the body's yang qi (vital energy), inducing madness. The Yellow Emperor's Inner Canon similarly describes madness as loss of behavioral control. The pursuit of rare treasures, he warns, clouds judgment with greed, creating greater harm.

Ultimately, this scripture reminds us that excessive pursuit of sensory stimulation and material enjoyment appears self-gratifying but actually constitutes self-harm. From rulers to commoners, all should heed this caution.

 則損明五音喧雜聽極則損聰爽者失也  人皆縱嗜好之常情失恬淡之眞味故眞  人漱玉池以飲津固靈根以含氣也畋獵  者極其精神以瞻望困其氣血以馳騖是  使心志散亂猖獗發狂害物傷和莫甚於  此亦如世俗奔逐情欲趨走聲利失志沮  氣然後休息貨者非賦分之所有妄求徼  取是謂難得與人善行有所妨礙  黃茂材曰所貴於目者爲其見道若不見  道與盲無異非蔽於五色而然乎所貴於  耳者爲其聞道若不聞道與聾無異非淫  於五音而然乎道之出口淡乎無味若以  肥甘爲美又安知其所謂淡然者今人嚥  納津液乆而自不愛食五味蓋得於此馳  騁畋獵固未至於狂而以清靜無爲者觀  之豈不爲狂昔韓退之論擊毬之害曰凡  五藏之繫絡甚微坐立必垂於胸臆之間  而以之顛頓馳騁其危哉夫稍知道者視  金帛珠玉如糞土然何至於尚貨蓋非此  之謂也當是時神農本草黃帝素問已行  於人間將必有食芝餐玉養丹竈之說老  子以爲是皆身外難得之物無益於生妨  人多矣不若求之吾身之爲易也 是以聖人爲腹不爲目故去彼取此  御註曰八卦坤爲腹以厚載而容也離爲  目以外視而明也厚載而容則無所不受  外視而明則有所不及聖人以天下爲度  故取此能容之腹非事事而治之物物而
Interpretation

Excessive exposure to chaotic sounds damages hearing, while overstimulation from visual distractions harms eyesight—both result from the wasteful depletion of Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy). People indulge their desires and become addicted to various cravings, thereby losing the innate tranquility and simplicity of their original mind.

Authentic practitioners (zhenren) nourish themselves through techniques like "rinsing the mouth and swallowing saliva" (the "Jade Pool" refers to the oral cavity), stabilizing the foundation of life (linggen) to cultivate primordial Qi. Yet those obsessed with hunting exhaust their Shen (spirit) scanning the surroundings, deplete their Qi and blood in pursuit of prey, scattering their consciousness to the point of madness. Such behavior—harming life and disrupting harmony—is profoundly destructive. Similarly, worldly people chase desires, coveting fame, wealth, and sensory pleasures until utterly spent, forcibly seizing what was never rightfully theirs. These futile pursuits not only prove elusive but also obstruct others' virtuous deeds.

Huang Maocai remarked: The value of eyes lies in perceiving the Dao (the Way). If one cannot see the Dao, how is this different from blindness? Is this not the result of being deluded by the Five Colors? The value of ears lies in hearing the Dao. If one cannot hear the Dao, how is this different from deafness? Is this not the consequence of being eroded by decadent music? The Dao, when spoken, seems bland and flavorless. If one only craves rich delicacies, how can they appreciate the true taste of simplicity? Practitioners who consistently swallow their own saliva (a longevity technique) naturally transcend attachment to the Five Flavors, having grasped this truth. Galloping after game may not seem like madness, but from the perspective of Daoist cultivation—which honors stillness and Wuwei (non-action)—is it not a form of derangement? Han Yu once warned of polo's dangers: The meridians connecting our five organs are exquisitely delicate, all suspended within the chest and abdomen—how perilous are violent jolts and reckless riding!

Those with even basic understanding of the Dao regard gold and jewels as dung—why would they covet material wealth? This isn’t meant literally. By that time, texts like the Shennong Bencao Jing (Divine Farmer's Materia Medica) and Huangdi Suwen (Yellow Emperor's Inner Canon) were already circulating, inevitably promoting methods like consuming rare herbs, jade, or alchemical elixirs for longevity. Laozi considered these external pursuits neither beneficial to life nor easily obtained—more obstacles than aids. Turning inward proves far simpler.

Thus, the sage prioritizes inner fulfillment ("filling the belly") over external chasing ("chasing with the eyes"), hence abandoning the latter for the former. The Imperial Commentary explains: In the Bagua (Eight Trigrams), the Kun trigram symbolizes the abdomen—representing the virtue of bearing all things with profound tolerance. The Li trigram symbolizes the eyes—representing outward observation. Tolerance embraces everything, while observation remains limited. Sages take the entire world as their measure, thus choosing the inclusive "belly" over fragmented engagement with external objects.

 察之故去彼外視之目莊子曰賊莫大於  德有心而心有眼故聖人去之  潁濱蘇轍曰聖人視色聽音嘗味皆與人  同至於馳騁畋獵未嘗不爲而難得之貨  未嘗不用也然人皆以爲病而聖人獨以  爲福何也聖人爲腹而衆人爲目目貪而  不能受腹受而未嘗貪故也彼物之自外  至者也此性之凝於内者也  道眞仁靜先生曹道冲曰守綿綿之氣以  實腹去察察之視以養明也  陳象古曰爲腹則實其腹也内藏其明者  也不爲目則防其外境之侵鑠我也彼外  也此内也是聖人之所取舍也  清源子劉驥曰聖人不爲聲色五味畋獵  貨財所惑所以爲腹不爲目也腹者有容  於内目者有見於外聖人收視反聽遺元  復命治其内而不治其外求諸己而不求  諸人所謂明者非見彼也自見而已所謂  𦖟者非聞彼也自聞而已所謂得者非得  彼也自得而已故去彼取此  黃茂材曰腹易厭足而目好尚無窮故學  道者欲收視欲内觀欲默照其不爲目可  知此者此道也亘古及今惟有此道
Interpretation

Zhuangzi said that the greatest misfortune lies in deliberately pursuing external displays of virtue (De). The reason sages can transcend ordinary people is precisely because they abandon this mentality of forced effort.

Su Zhe (Master Yingbin) explained: Sages and commoners alike enjoy beautiful sights, listen to music, savor delicious food, engage in hunting for recreation, and use precious objects. Yet why do ordinary people consider these things burdens while sages regard them as blessings? Because sages "act for the belly, not for the eyes" — ordinary people greedily chase external things with their eyes, while sages peacefully receive them with their belly (symbolizing inner acceptance). External things are imposed from outside, while one's true nature is inherently internal.

Cao Daochong (Master Daozhen Renjing) maintained that one must preserve soft, continuous breath (Qi) to nourish the inner being, and reduce deliberate outward observation to cultivate genuine wisdom. Chen Xianggu further clarified that "acting for the belly" means enriching the inner self and nurturing inner light, while "not acting for the eyes" prevents external temptations from eroding one's original mind. This constitutes the sage's standard for discernment.

Liu Ji (Master Qingyuan) pointed out that sages remain unperturbed by sensual pleasures, fine flavors, hunting, or material goods precisely because they follow the principle of "acting for the belly, not for the eyes." The belly symbolizes containing the inner being, while the eyes represent chasing external things. Sages withdraw their gaze, turn inward to listen, return to the source of life, cultivating the internal rather than the external, making demands on themselves rather than others. True "clarity" (ming) isn't about seeing external objects clearly, but recognizing oneself; true "acuity" (cong) isn't about hearing external sounds, but listening to one's original mind; true "attainment" (de) isn't about acquiring external things, but returning to one's inherent nature.

Huang Maocai concluded: The belly is easily satisfied, while the eyes' desires are endless. Therefore, Dao practitioners must withdraw their gaze, contemplate inwardly, and observe silently through meditation. From ancient times to the present, there has only been this fundamental Great Dao (Da Dao) — all other paths are deviations. Thus one must abandon external pursuits and choose inner cultivation.

捨此  皆非道也故云去彼取此 道德眞經集註卷之三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0095); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →