中文 · EN

《道德真經注疏》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 2 / 8 10,085 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經注疏》 Vol. 2 (Dongshen 洞神部, 8 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 20 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經注疏》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經注䟽卷之二      信二     吴 郡 徵 士 顧 歡 述 五色令人目盲  注貪淫好色則傷精失明不能視無色之  色○節解曰非謂人之目盲欲自有所見  但見玄黄之色神明出入乘朱玉之輦五  色光耀子則不見是故目盲也○䟽五色  者謂青黄赤白黑也言人不能内照眞源  而外逐塵境雖見異空之色乃曰非盲不  睹即色之空與盲何别 五音令人耳聾  注好聽五音則和氣去心不能聽無聲之  聲也○節解曰非謂人之耳聾欲自有所  聞但聞鐘鼔之音不聞神明之聲故曰耳  襲也○䟽五音者宫商角徵羽也心耽絲  竹耳滯宫商不能反聽希聲故曰聾也莊  子云非唯形體有聾盲夫智亦有之也王  曰若滯者淫聲即傷神敗正既有惡聲啼  吟即是聾也○顧什等曰但聞嘈瓚在耳  廼曰不聾不知聲相即空與聾何異 五味令人口爽  注爽亡也嗜於五味則口妄言失於道也  䟽五味甘苦辛酸鹹也爽差失也耽貪醪  醴咀嚼膻腥不能味道談玄故言口爽也 馳騁田獵令人心發狂  注人精神奸安靜若馳聘呼吸精神散亡  故發狂也○節解曰謂人死歸土家室相  送婚姻馳走恍惚悲泣藏於塜壙之中送  於野田之上親者狂疏者哀故曰若狂○  御曰馳騁世務耽著有爲如彼田獵之夫
Interpretation

This scripture passage discusses the harms of excessive pursuit of sensory pleasures.

Regarding "the five colors blind the eyes": This doesn't mean literal blindness, but rather that obsession with the colors of blue, yellow, red, white, and black makes one unable to see what truly matters. Like the dazzling vermilion and jade chariots used by deities in their processions (ritual vehicles in Daoist tradition), their brilliance can obscure true perception. If practitioners cannot cultivate inner stillness but chase after superficial glamour, how are they different from the blind?

Regarding "the five tones deafen the ears": Overindulgence in the five musical notes (gong, shang, jue, zhi, yu) diminishes one's ability to hear the soundless music of the Dao. As Zhuangzi said, it's not just physical deafness but mental deafness. Those who only hear the clamor of bells and drums but remain deaf to the voice of the divine are no different from the hearing-impaired.

Regarding "the five flavors confuse the palate": "Confuse" here means to lose discernment. Craving sweet, bitter, spicy, sour, and salty tastes makes one lose the ability to perceive true flavor, thereby obstructing comprehension of the Dao's profundity.

Regarding "galloping in the hunt drives the mind wild": The human spirit should remain tranquil. When people rush about excitedly like hunters, their consciousness becomes scattered and frenzied, much like mourners wailing and running wildly during funerals with disturbed minds. Similarly, those constantly occupied with worldly affairs share the same restless mental state as hunters.

All these illustrate how excessive sensory stimulation damages human nature and clouds the clarity needed to comprehend the Dao. Practitioners should maintain inner serenity and avoid being deluded by external sights and sounds.

 唯求殺獲日以心鬬逐境奔馳靜而思之  是發狂病○䟽馳騁猶走驟也言田獵之  夫貪逐禽獸快心放蕩有類狂人倒置之  徒欲心逐境速如騁馳狂如田獵也故莊  子云失性有五一曰五色亂目使目不明  等是也 難得之貨令人行妨  注妨傷也難得之貨謂趙璧隋珠珍貴金  銀珠玉等物心貪意欲不知厭足則行傷  身辱也○䟽佳麗之物貪著愛翫爲生死  之因於修道行中大爲妨礙 是以聖人爲腹  注守五性去六情節志氣養神明 不爲目  注目不妄視妄視則泄精於外也○䟽是  以仍上文也聖人即舉聖戒凡腹内也目  外也懷道抱德充滿於内故爲腹也内視  無色反聽無聲諸根空净不染塵境故不  爲目也 故去彼取此  注去彼目之妄視取此腹之養神○䟽去  彼耳目之盲聾取此爲腹之實智 寵辱若驚  注身寵亦驚身辱亦驚○御曰操之則慄  舍之則悲未忘寵辱故皆驚也○䟽寵是  榮愛之名辱是戮耻之稱若如也驚恐也  言人得寵則逸豫喜歡遭辱則怵惕憂恚  故得寵心驚喜遭辱心驚怖喜怖雖異爲  驚即同故言若驚然喜怖之情皆非眞性  是以達者譬窮通於寒暑比榮辱於儻來  死生不撓於神有何貴賤之能驚也 貴大患若身  注貴畏也若至也畏大患至身故驚○䟽
Interpretation

The text describes how people chase after external things and indulge in desires, behaving like hunters frantically pursuing prey, their hearts restless and agitated—a state that is truly pathological. The thrill of capturing birds and beasts, the indulgence in pleasure-seeking, resembles the derangement of a disturbed mind. Driven by such desires, people chase after external objects like frenzied hunters racing across the land.

Zhuangzi spoke of five ways in which human nature becomes corrupted: first, being deluded by dazzling colors so that the eyes can no longer perceive truth, and so forth. Rare treasures can impair one’s conduct (the character "妨" means "to harm"). Objects like the He Shi Bi jade of Zhao or the Pearl of Sui—gold, silver, and precious gems—if pursued with insatiable greed, will damage one’s virtue and invite disgrace. These dazzling objects ensnare people in obsessive attachment, becoming causes for the cycle of life and death and forming major obstacles on the path of cultivation.

Thus, the sage focuses on inner cultivation ("为腹" refers to safeguarding the innate nature of the five viscera, eliminating the six emotional desires, harmonizing the heart-mind and Qi, and nurturing the spirit), rather than being deluded by external appearances ("不为目" means the eyes do not gaze indiscriminately, lest the vital essence dissipate outward). The sage’s inner being is filled with Dao and De (Virtue), hence the emphasis on inner refinement. When turning their gaze inward, they perceive no forms; when listening within, they hear no sounds. Their senses remain pure, untainted by worldly dust, and thus they are not beguiled by superficial appearances. This is the principle of rejecting external temptations in favor of inner cultivation.

Regarding "宠辱若惊" (treating favor and disgrace as alarming): when favored, one is elated; when disgraced, one is fearful. In truth, both honor and humiliation disturb the heart-mind because one has not yet transcended attachment to them. Favor means glory and affection, while disgrace means shame and ridicule. People rejoice when honored and fret when humiliated—though the emotions differ, both are manifestations of mental agitation. The awakened remain indifferent to such things, regarding poverty and prosperity as the alternation of winter and summer, honor and disgrace as fleeting occurrences. Even life and death cannot disturb their spirit—how much less would they be alarmed by status, gain, or loss?

"贵大患若身" (valuing great calamity as if it were one’s own body): treating major misfortunes with the same gravity as personal concerns ("贵" means to value, "若" means "as if"). It is precisely because one fears impending disaster that alarm arises.

 貴謂爵位也亦是自貴忘身也謂煩惱老  病等也言凡夫但知矜貴此身而惡大患  不知大患即是我身多求資養終歸滅壞  故貴身即是貴患惡患即是惡身爲貴與  大患俱以身爲本也○蔡曰有身者執著  我身不能忘遣爲身愁苦憂其勤勞念其  饑寒即大患故知執有生累存身患起貴  我身者與貴大患不殊故西升經云身爲  惱本痛癢寒温大患之本起乎存身 何謂寵辱  注問何爲寵何爲辱寵者尊榮辱者耻及  身還自間者以曉示於人也 寵爲下  注寵辱爲下賤 得之若驚  注得寵榮驚者處高位如臨危也貴不敢  驕富不敢奢也 失之若驚  注失者失寵處辱驚者恐禍重來○節解  曰謂得道則萬神皆來鳴於腹中與子相  見言語知身五神元氣流馳故曰得之若  驚失之若驚者謂失氣亡精神不行而失  一則頭白齒落而死衆人所哭上屋呼魂  驚於天神故曰失之若驚也○䟽世情顛  倒以寵爲上慧心觀照足爲鄙下何者爲  得寵心驚喜失寵心驚怖此兩驚本由一  寵故足爲下 是謂寵辱若驚  注解上得之若驚失之若驚○御曰寵辱  循環寵爲辱本凡情惑滯驚辱而不驚寵 何謂貴大患若身  注復還自問何故畏大患至身 吾所以有大患爲吾有身  注吾所以有大患者生吾有身有身則憂
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses two core concepts: the relationship between "valuing the body" (guishen) and "great afflictions" (dahuan), and the impact of "favor and disgrace" (chongru) on human beings.

Regarding "valuing the body" and "great afflictions":

People typically prize their social status and rank, yet forget that the physical body itself is the root of suffering. Ordinary individuals only know to cherish this physical form and detest afflictions like illness and aging, failing to recognize these very troubles originate from the body itself. Excessive pursuit of material sustenance ultimately leads to the body's decay and demise. Thus, valuing the body equates to valuing calamity, while loathing misfortune equates to loathing the body. The Xisheng Jing (Scripture of Western Ascension) points out that the body is the source of suffering—all afflictions like cold, heat, pain, and itching stem from attachment to this physical existence.

Concerning the impact of "favor and disgrace":

"Favor" (chong) refers to honor and glory, while "disgrace" (ru) denotes humiliation and adversity. When receiving favor, people feel apprehension, for occupying high status is like standing at a cliff's edge—even in wealth and honor, one dare not become arrogant or extravagant. Losing favor also brings fear, as one worries about calamity striking again. For Daoist practitioners who attain the Dao (de), the myriad spirits (referring to the Jing (essence), Qi (vital energy), and Shen (spirit) throughout the body) operate in harmonious circulation—this is called "attaining it brings alarm." Conversely, losing primordial Qi and vital spirit leads to aging and death—termed "losing it brings alarm." Ordinary people consider receiving favor as beneficial, but from the perspective of wisdom, favor is actually base—because both gaining and losing favor cause mental distress. This dual anxiety stems entirely from attachment to "favor," hence the saying "favor is inferior."

Final summation: The reason we fear impending disaster is precisely because we possess this body. Having a body gives rise to all manner of worries—this is the true meaning of "valuing great affliction as the body."

 其勤勞念其饑寒觸情縱欲則遇禍患也  䟽此答前問也執著我身不能忘遣爲身  愁毒即爲大患故知貴我身者與貴患不  殊也故西升經云身爲惱本痛癢寒温吾  拘於身知爲大患即其事也 及吾無身吾有何患  注使吾無有身體得道自然輕舉升雲出  入無間與道通神當有何患○御曰能知  天地委和皆非我有離形去智了身非身  同於大通夫有何患○節解曰忘身而養  神謂之無身○疏所言無者坐忘喪我隳  體離形即身無身非是滅壞而稱無也 故貴以身爲天下者若可寄於天下矣  注言人君自貴其身而賤人欲爲天下主  者則可寄立不可以長乆○䟽不知身是  大患矜而貴之自貴其身恒欲凌物如此  之人適可蹔寓於世間不得乆視於天下 愛以身爲天下者乃可托於天下矣  注言人君能愛其身非爲己也乃欲爲萬  民之父母以此德爲天下主者乃可以托  其身於萬民之上長無咎也○䟽寄是蹔  時寄寓托謂永相付托言能保愛己身不  輕馳騖謙以自牧雌而順物者則可以托  付化於天下故德經云自愛不自貴也 視之不見名曰夷  注無色曰夷言一無彩色不可得視而見  之也○䟽夷平也言至道微妙非五色不  可以眼識求故視之不見也若其有色色  則參差只爲無色夷然平等也 聽之不聞名曰希
Interpretation

This scripture primarily examines the relationship between the "body" and "afflictions," as well as how to transcend physical limitations to attain the state of "no-body" (wushen).

It first points out that excessive attachment to one's physical form—constantly worrying about hunger, cold, warmth, and satiety, or indulging in desires—inevitably invites misfortune. The Western Ascension Scripture states that the body is the root of suffering because we become bound by its various sensations. Those who truly understand this principle recognize that overvaluing the physical form and inviting calamity are essentially the same thing.

The text then explains the concept of "no-body": this does not mean destroying the physical form but rather achieving transcendence beyond bodily limitations through "sitting in oblivion" (zuowang, a meditative practice of forgetting the self). Cultivators who reach this state can rise lightly upon clouds, commune with the Dao, and naturally remain free from affliction. Such a state requires "leaving form behind and discarding knowledge" (transcending the constraints of both body and intellect), realizing that the physical form is not the true self.

From a governance perspective, the text illustrates: if a ruler only values their own person while neglecting the people, such rule cannot endure. Conversely, by caring for oneself (not for selfish gain but to better govern) and treating all things with humility, one becomes worthy of long-lasting stewardship of the world. As the Daode Jing states, this embodies the principle of "loving oneself without esteeming oneself."

Finally, it explains the terms "invisible" (yi) and "soundless" (xi) as descriptors of the Dao's nature: "invisible" means the Dao has no color and cannot be seen with the eyes; "soundless" means it emits no sound and cannot be heard with the ears. Because the Dao is impartial and undifferentiated, any visible form would imply distinctions—thus it transcends the realm of sensory perception.

 注無聲曰希言一無音聲不可得聽而聞  之也○䟽希簡少也體非宫商不可以耳  根聽故曰希也 摶之不得名曰微  注無形曰微言一無形體不可摶持而得  之也○御曰摶執持也微妙也道無形象  故執持不得以其無形之中而能形焉故  謂之曰微○䟽摶觸也微妙也言體非形  質不可摶觸而得之故曰微也臧曰夫言  希夷微者謂精神氣也精者靈智之名神  者不測之用氣者形相之目總此三法爲  一聖人若不見是精不聞是神不得是氣  既不見不聞不得即應云無色無聲無形  何爲乃言希夷微耶明至道雖言無色不  遂絶無若絶無者豈同太虚即成斷見今  明不色而色不聲而聲不形而形故云夷  希微也所謂三一者也 此三者不可致詰  注三者謂夷希微也不可致詰者謂無色  無聲無形口不能言書不能傳當受之以  靜求之以神不可强詰問而得之 故混而爲一  注混合也故合於三名而爲一也○䟽眞  而應即散一以爲三應而眞即混三以歸  一一三三一不異故不可詰也又解此眞  應兩身作三乘義釋具在開題卷中 其上不皦  注言一在天上不皦皦光明也 其下不昧  注言一在天下不昩昩有所闇冥明道上  下無窮極也○䟽言至道幽微非愚非智  升三清之上不益其明墜九幽之下不加
Interpretation

This passage explains the three concepts of "Xi" (希), "Wei" (微), and "Yi" (夷) from the Daodejing. Laozi describes the nature of the Dao (the Way) with the phrases "listening but not hearing is called Xi" and "grasping but not obtaining is called Wei," which are further elaborated here:

"Xi" refers to a state without sound—not the kind of audible tones like musical notes, hence it is called "Xi." "Wei" denotes a formless state that cannot be touched or grasped, as the Dao has no concrete shape, thus it is termed "Wei."

The text specifically points out that "Xi," "Yi," and "Wei" correspond to three modes of existence: Jing (essence), Shen (spirit), and Qi (vital energy). "Jing" represents numinous wisdom, "Shen" signifies unfathomable function, and "Qi" manifests as form. When sages say they "do not see its essence, do not hear its spirit, and do not grasp its Qi," they are not denying their existence outright but indicating that these do not appear in conventional ways—not as ordinary color, sound, or form, but as higher-order manifestations: "color without color, sound without sound, form without form."

These three characteristics (Yi, Xi, Wei) cannot be fully articulated in words because they transcend sensory perceptions like color, sound, and form. They can only be comprehended through tranquil introspection. Though divided into three aspects, they are fundamentally one. The Dao is neither especially bright above nor dim below, showing its continuity without extremes. Whether ascending to the Sanqing (Three Pure Ones, the highest celestial realm) or descending to the Jiuyou (Nine Darknesses, the deepest underworld), it neither brightens nor darkens, embodying the Dao's eternal equilibrium.

The passage emphasizes that describing the Dao as formless does not equate to absolute nothingness, which would align with nihilistic views. In truth, the Dao exists in a manner that transcends conventional understanding—this simultaneous transcendence and immanence is the profound essence of the "Three-in-One" (San Yi) doctrine.

 其闇所謂不增不减其在兹乎 繩繩不可名  注繩繩者動行無窮極也不可名者非一  色也不可以青黄赤白黑别之非一聲也  不可以宫商角徵羽聽之非一形也不可  以長短大小度之也○節解曰謂道入皮  膚骨節之中故曰繩繩不可名也 復歸於無物  注物質也復當歸之於無質○䟽繩繩正  直也猶繩墨之義言聖人既能自正復能  正他故繩繩不可執名求理故不可名也  又解繩繩運動之貌言至道運轉天地陶  鑄生靈而視聽莫尋故不可名也復歸者  還源也無物者妙本也夫應機降迹即可  見可聞復本歸根即無名無相故言復歸  於無物 是謂無狀之狀  注言一無形狀而能爲萬物作形狀 無物之象  注言一無形質而能爲萬物設形象也○  䟽妙本希夷故稱無狀無物迹能生貸故  云之狀之象 是謂惚恍  注言一惚惚恍恍若存若亡不可狀也○  御曰無形之形無狀之狀不可名有不可  名無無有難名故謂之惚恍○䟽不定貌  也妙本非有應迹非無非有非無而無而  有有無不定故言惚恍 迎之不見其首  注一無端末可預待也除情去欲一自歸  己矣○䟽王曰象者形而非也謂儀貌可  道雖無物而應物有象欲言有也不見其  形欲言無也物由之以生成○顧曰其來
Interpretation

The profundity of the Dao lies in its unchanging constancy—neither increasing nor decreasing, yet perpetually present. It flows continuously without cease, defying definition through concrete names. It cannot be distinguished by colors (blue, yellow, red, white, or black), discerned through musical notes (gong, shang, jue, zhi, or yu), nor measured by form (long, short, large, or small). As the Jiejie commentary states, the Dao permeates human flesh and bones, hence it is described as "inexhaustible yet unnameable."

The Dao ultimately returns to its original state of formless essence. The term "inexhaustible" (绳绳) carries connotations of rectitude, much like a carpenter's plumb line that aligns both itself and others. The Dao's movement and transformation elude conceptual grasp, rendering it indescribable. Another interpretation suggests "inexhaustible" depicts the Dao's dynamic nature—it operates heaven and earth, nurtures all things, yet remains imperceptible to the senses. "Returning" signifies reverting to the source, while "formless" denotes the Dao's fundamental substance. The Dao can manifest responsively (visible and audible) while simultaneously withdrawing into nameless purity, hence the phrase "returns to formlessness."

This is the "form of the formless"—the Dao itself has no fixed shape yet endows all things with form; the "image of the imageless"—though devoid of materiality, it establishes patterns for all existence. The Dao's essence is mysteriously void (xiyi), yet it generates and transforms the myriad things, thus termed "the form of the formless, the image of the imageless."

This state is called "indistinct and vague" (huhuang), hovering between presence and absence, defying description. It is neither purely formed nor wholly formless, shifting dynamically between being and non-being. Meeting it, one cannot perceive its beginning ("confronting it, you see no head"), for the Dao has no starting point. Only by relinquishing selfish desires and distractions can one unite with it. As commentaries note: the Dao's manifestation takes form yet lacks substance; though fundamentally empty, it responds to creation. To declare it existent reveals no shape; to deem it nonexistent ignores its role as life's source. This elusive nature (as Gu Huan remarks)—appearing and vanishing without trace—epitomizes the Dao's profound mystery.

 未兆倏爾不見故言迎之不見其首○䟽  道非古無始也 隨之不見其後  注言一無影迹不可得而見也○御曰道  無始故迎之不見其首道無終故隨之不  見其後○䟽道非今無終也○顧曰其去  無迹混然無際 執古之道以御今之有  注聖人執守古道生一以御萬物知今當  有一也○御曰執古無爲之道以御今有  爲之事則還反淳樸矣○䟽執持也言聖  人持太古無名之道調御今之後生王曰  古今雖異其道恒存執之者方能御物 能知古始是謂道紀也  注人能知上古本始有一是謂知道綱紀  也○䟽古始即無名之道也若知無始無  終而終而始不古不今而古而今用期古  道以御今世者可謂至道之綱紀也王曰  守古無爲之道制御今之有爲之世鎮此  躁動之俗反古淳素之始陶鍊變化是得  道綱紀也 古之善爲士者  注謂得道之君也○䟽古昔也善者智德  也爲修學也前章明執古御今此即御今  引古故援昔善修道之士以軌則聖人 微妙玄通  注玄天也言其志節玄妙精與天通 深不可識  注道德深遠不可識知内視若盲反聽若  聾莫知所長也○御曰士事也言古之善  以道爲事者於彼微言妙道無不玄鑒通  照而德容深邃不可識知也○䟽微妙是  能修之智玄通是所修之境境智相會能
Interpretation

The Dao (the Way, cosmic origin) has no concrete beginning, so when you face it directly, you cannot see its starting point; nor does it have an end, so when you follow behind it, you cannot see its conclusion. The Dao belongs neither to antiquity nor to the present—it is formless, traceless, and an undivided whole without boundaries.

The sage (one who has attained the Dao) upholds the ancient Dao to govern the concrete affairs of the present. Just as "the Dao gives birth to the One" (the initial state from which the Dao transforms and generates all things) can govern the myriad things, one who understands that everything in the present also originates from this "One." By applying the ancient Dao of Wuwei (non-action, following natural spontaneity) to the active affairs of today (human intervention), one can return to a state of pristine simplicity. Though the times of antiquity and the present differ, the essence of the Dao remains eternal—only those who grasp the Dao can govern the myriad things. Those who can comprehend the ancient origin are the ones who have truly mastered the fundamental principles of the Dao.

The true practitioners (士, shi) of ancient times who attained the Dao possessed wisdom and De (Virtue/Power) so subtle and profound that their spiritual state resonated with the heavenly Dao. Their cultivation of virtue was unfathomably deep—inwardly, their contemplation was like that of a blind man, and their inner listening like that of a deaf person, making their realm utterly incomprehensible to ordinary people. Those skilled in cultivating the Dao could thoroughly grasp the most subtle and mysterious principles, yet their manifestation of De was so profound that it remained beyond ordinary recognition. This "wisdom of cultivation" (修行智慧) and the "realm of cultivation" (修行境界) were perfectly aligned.

 使俱深不可以心識知故嘆之也 夫唯不可識故强爲之容  注謂下句也○御曰夫唯德量難識故强  爲容狀以明之○䟽容者形貌也獨此不  可識之聖智甚堪軌物方欲引接群品故  於無形之理而强爲修學之容 豫若冬涉川  注舉事輒加重慎豫兮若冬涉川心難之  也想爾曰豫猶豫行止之貌常當畏敬也  冬涉川者恐懼也畏四鄰不敢爲非恐鄰  里知之此遵道奉戒之人謙謹如此也○  䟽猶豫怖懼也言修道行人懼於世境如  冬涉川冰心地惶怖恐陷溺也此明意業  淨 猶若畏四鄰  注其進退猶猶拘制若人犯法畏四鄰知  之也○䟽又畏塵境如人犯罪慎密恐畏  四鄰閭里知聞也此明口業淨○王曰四  鄰謂生死老病也亦是四魔人不持戒奸  犯非法爲四魔所録是以小心猶當慎密  閑靜似畏人知也 儼若客  注如客對主人儼然無所造作也○䟽儼  矜莊之貌禮記云儼若思言聖人應斂勵  身心勿得放縱由如賔客對主人不可輕  躁此明身業淨○顧曰恭斂之貌也言聖  人恭斂無爲無事若爲客對主人不敢輕  躁常和而不唱 涣若冰將釋  注涣者解散釋者消亡謂除情去欲日以  空虚也○御曰雖則儼然若客無所造爲  而不凝滯於物故涣然若春冰之釋散也  䟽如前修學智慧增明惑染消散如彼冬
Interpretation

This passage discusses the cautious attitude and inner state that Daoist practitioners should maintain.

"The profound cannot be known through ordinary consciousness, hence we can only sigh in awe" means that the true depth of the Dao cannot be comprehended through conventional thinking, leaving one with only reverent wonder. Precisely because it defies verbal description, we reluctantly resort to metaphors.

Practitioners should move through life as cautiously as crossing a winter river (yu ruo dong she chuan) - stepping carefully as ice may crack at any moment, maintaining reverence with each step. This attitude extends to daily conduct, being as circumspect in speech and intention as one who fears neighbors witnessing their mistakes (you ruo wei silin), thereby preserving purity of thought and word.

When interacting with others, one should maintain the dignified composure of a guest (yan ruo ke), avoiding frivolity or presumption to preserve purity of action. As cultivation deepens, inner attachments dissolve naturally like spring ice melting (huan ruo bing jiang shi), with desires gradually fading to reveal luminous emptiness.

Commentaries particularly note that "four neighbors" (silin) symbolizes not only actual neighbors but also life's adversities like birth/death and aging/illness, as well as the four demonic obstructions (si mo). Practitioners must maintain constant vigilance, as cautious about spiritual missteps as one would be about being caught in mundane faults.

 冰之逢春也○松靈曰外雖矜莊若衆内  恒和暢放散無復滯著涣然如凝冰消散  也 敦若樸  注敦者質厚樸者形未分内守精神外無  文彩也○䟽敦者淳厚樸者質素前既三  業清淨惑累消除故能德行淳和去華歸  實也 曠若谷  注曠者寬大也谷者空虚不有德名無所  不包容也○䟽塵累斯盡心靈虚白故道  寬曠包容如谷 渾兮若濁  注渾者守本眞濁者不昭然與衆合同不  自尊也○御曰和光渾迹若濁而清○䟽  渾合也和雜也濁有爲也雖復心靈潔素  障累乆消而渾沌有爲之中與塵濁不異  也 濁以靜之徐清  注靜止也水濁止而靜之徐徐自清也○  䟽徐緩也雖處有欲之中同事利物而在  染不染心恒安靜閑放而清虚也前則雖  清而能渾濁此則處濁不廢清閑明動而  寂也○顧曰濁者昏昩之貌謂其昩智韜  明不任聽察如水之濁無所鑒見也○王  曰藏精匿照外不異物渾同波塵故曰若  濁凡上七事皆人君之德傳曰人君含垢  天之道也得道之君其斯之謂若就行人  論者渾謂和雜也濁謂有爲也雖心潔素  而渾沌有爲之中與塵不異也所言濁以  靜之徐清者喻於水水濁止而靜之徐徐  自清也心亂息縁漸漸而清正也 安以乆動之徐生  注誰能安靜以乆徐徐以長生也○䟽雖
Interpretation

This scripture describes seven virtues a Daoist practitioner should cultivate, using natural imagery to illustrate principles of mental and spiritual refinement.

When inner cultivation reaches a certain level, the practitioner maintains solemn dignity outwardly while preserving perfect serenity within—just as spring melts winter's ice without obstruction. This state is called "dun ruo pu" (simple as unhewn wood), meaning the heart remains as honest and unadorned as raw timber, guarding the shen (spirit) internally without ostentatious display. Upon achieving purity in the three karmic aspects (body, speech, and mind) and eliminating afflictions, one naturally attains harmonious De (Virtue) and returns to original simplicity.

"Kuang ruo gu" (open as a valley) describes a mind vast enough to embrace all things like an empty gorge. Freed from worldly attachments, the practitioner's purified consciousness expands to accommodate the entire Dao. "Hun xi ruo zhuo" (merged as if turbid) means maintaining fundamental authenticity while appearing ordinary—like clear water concealed within murkiness. Though inwardly immaculate, the adept blends seamlessly with mundane society without conspicuous distinction.

"Zhuo yi jing zhi xu qing" (turbid water clarifies through stillness) employs the metaphor of sediment settling to show how practitioners preserve purity amid worldly dust. Just as murky water gradually clarifies when undisturbed, sustained meditative practice leads to luminous clarity. This embodies the ideal of "remaining unstained while dwelling in stain"—engaging the world without contamination.

"An yi jiu dong zhi xu sheng" (tranquility gradually generates vitality through sustained stillness) reveals how prolonged serenity naturally nurtures life energy. Like water clarifying through extended quiescence, a mind anchored in lasting stillness allows vital forces to emerge organically. These seven virtues exemplify the heavenly principle of "rulers containing impurities"—the Daoist ideal of embracing all existence with boundless tolerance.

 復安靜即靜而動雖復應物而動心恒閑  放而化群品也此文明寂而動也○王曰  渾波則濁徐靜則清危躁則死安靜則生  志人知濁之可清故同波而後化體危之  可安故徐動以教生非體道善化誰能如  此故曰孰能生化微妙非速疾可成必須  心專行密積勤累代不日求以得故曰徐  生 保此道者不欲盈  注保此徐生之道不欲奢泰盈溢也○䟽  保持也言持此動寂不殊一中道者不欲  住中而盈滿此遣中也 夫唯不盈故能弊不新成  注夫唯不盈滿之人能守弊不爲新成弊  者匿光榮也新成者功貴名盛也○䟽獨  此遣中聖人於有爲弊濁之内復能慈救  蒼生成大功德此重結成也○盧曰此猶  解前徐清之義和俗而後靜徐以守其清  安身而後動徐以全其生 致虚極  注致至也道人捐情去欲五内清靜至於  虚極也○䟽夫道沖虚德歸清淨心能志  虚則得道之極行能守靜則含德之厚○  盧曰除情慮致虚極也而心恒寂守靜篤  也 守靜篤  注守清淨行篤厚○䟽虚極道果也篤中  也言人欲得虚玄極妙之果者必須靜心  守一中之道則可得之也 萬物并作  注作生也萬物并作生也 吾以觀其復  注吾言以觀見萬物無不皆歸其本言人  當念重其本也○䟽作動用也言一切衆
Interpretation

This scripture primarily explains how Daoist practitioners can attain unity with the Dao through "tranquility" and "gradual movement."

Practitioners should maintain inner stillness, keeping their hearts at ease even when responding to worldly affairs. Just as turbid water gradually clarifies through sedimentation, haste leads to demise while tranquility brings vitality. The truly wise understand how murkiness can transform into clarity, thus flowing with the mundane world without becoming tainted; they know danger can be converted to stability, thus moving gradually to enlighten beings. This subtle transformation cannot be achieved through forced striving—it requires single-minded dedication and long-term accumulation.

Those who maintain this cultivation method never pursue excessive fullness. Only those who avoid seeking absolute perfection can preserve existing accomplishments without obsessively chasing new merits. True sages remain capable of compassionately saving beings and achieving great virtue even amidst worldly turbidity.

The scripture further discusses the cultivation methods of "reaching extreme emptiness" (zhi xu ji) and "maintaining profound stillness" (shou jing du). "Reaching extreme emptiness" means practitioners must relinquish desires to achieve a state of ultimate void-like purity within. "Maintaining profound stillness" requires steadfast adherence to purity with sincere, grounded conduct. Only by calmly abiding in the "Middle Way" can one attain the supremely mysterious fruits of the Dao.

Finally, it speaks of all things growing and transforming, reminding practitioners to observe their patterns of returning to the origin. This serves as a reminder to value the root, for all things ultimately return to their fundamental source.

 生并皆云爲取舍貪逐前境以老君聖智  觀之悉復在妙本雖動而寂也○顧曰夫  靜觀其反眞○王曰生生之體性本湛然  但受納有形六情外動言行云爲妄作招  禍至人觀其本性知可化而復故云觀其  復 夫物芸芸  注芸芸者華葉盛也 各歸其根  注言萬物無不枯落各復反歸其根而更  生也○䟽芸芸衆多貌也言衆生所以不  能同於聖人雖動不動用而無心者只爲  芸芸馳競不息也若能反本歸根即同於  聖照此勸之也 歸根曰靜  注靜謂根也安靜柔弱謙卑處下故不復  死也○䟽但能反本還源馳競之心自息  也○顧曰草木零落歸根則靜人物變化  反眞則安 是謂復命  注言安靜者是爲復還性命使不死乃道  之常也○䟽命者眞性慧命也既屏息囂  塵心神凝寂故復於眞性反於慧命 復命曰常  注復命使不死乃道之所常行也○䟽反  於性命嶷然凝湛不復生死因之曰常○  何晏曰復命當使不死是道之所常○盧  曰能知復命常理者則是見道之明者也 知常曰明  注能知道之所常行者則爲明也○御曰  守靜復命可謂有常知守常者更益明了  也○䟽既知反會眞常之理者則智慧照  明無幽不燭○王曰常道難知故知之曰  明 不知常妄作凶  注不知道之所常行妄作巧詐則失其神
Interpretation

With extraordinary wisdom, Laozi observed how people are constantly driven by desires to pursue external things. Yet the essential nature of all phenomena (the wondrous origin) appears ever-changing while remaining eternally tranquil in its essence. The enlightened sage (zhiren) perceives this truth, realizing that through cultivation one may return to the original state of authenticity.

Consider how the lush foliage of plants and trees (yunyun) must eventually wither and return to their roots. All things undergo cycles of flourishing and decay, ultimately returning to their source to be renewed. The reason ordinary people cannot attain the transcendence of sages is precisely because they ceaselessly chase after external objects. If one can return to the origin, one may reach the sage's realm.

Returning to the root means returning to stillness. When plants wither and return to their roots, they regain peace; when humans return to their authentic nature (fanzhen), they attain stability. This return is called "restoring destiny" (fuming)—allowing life to return to its eternal true nature (zhenxing huiming). When the heart-mind withdraws from worldly disturbances and settles into tranquility, it can manifest the original wisdom-life.

This state of returning to eternal nature is what we call the "constant Dao" (the universe's eternal principle). Those who comprehend this everlasting truth are the ones who truly understand the Great Dao. Their wisdom can illuminate all darkness.

Conversely, those ignorant of this eternal principle invite misfortune through reckless action. Those who indulge in cunning schemes and deceitful arts ultimately lose their inner divine light (shenming).

 明故凶也○䟽不知性修反德而會於眞  常之道者則恒起妄心隨境造業動之死  地所作皆凶○顧曰不知道言知謂之妄  作妄作之人失道故凶○孫曰不能守靜  則天命失常是其凶也 知常容  注能知道之所常行則能去情欲無所不  包容也○御曰知守眞常之道則必竟虚  靜如彼空谷無不含容也○䟽體知凝常  一中之道悟違順之兩空故能容物也 容乃公  注無不包容則公正無私衆邪莫當也○  御曰含容應物應物無私既無私邪故爲  公正○䟽公平正也既能包容庶物所以  公正無私也 公乃王  注公正無私則可爲天下王治身正則形  一神萬共凑己身也○御曰人能公正無  私則爲物所歸往也○䟽王往也只爲包  容萬物公正無私所以作大法王爲蒼生  之所歸往也 王乃天  注王德合神明乃與天通也○䟽既作法  王化主爲物所歸復能蔭覆含靈同於旻  昊也 天乃道  注德與天通則與道合同也○䟽既類上  天覆物平等又同大道生化無窮 道乃乆  注與道合同乃能長乆○䟽量等太虚無  來無去心冥至道不滅不生既與此理相  符故義說爲乆 没身不殆  注能公能王通天合道四者純備道德弘  遠無殃無咎與天地俱没終不危殆也○  䟽没滅也殆危也匿端滅迹謂之殁身應
Interpretation

If one fails to comprehend the principle of cultivating one's true nature and returning to original purity in harmony with the Dao, delusional thoughts will continuously arise, leading one to be pulled by external circumstances and creating all kinds of negative karma. Every action will invite misfortune. Like those who believe they understand the Dao without truly knowing it, their reckless actions only take them further from the Way, ultimately bringing calamity. Inability to maintain inner stillness means violating natural law—this is the root of disaster.

Those who truly understand the eternal principle of the Dao can eliminate selfish desires and embrace all things with vast openness. Like an empty valley that echoes all sounds, the awakened perceive both favorable and adverse circumstances as ultimately empty in nature, thus embracing all phenomena in the world. With this all-encompassing capacity, one naturally attains impartiality, undisturbed by any deluded thoughts. A heart that is fair and upright, capable of embracing all beings, naturally acts without bias.

Achieving this impartiality enables one to become a true ruler whom all under heaven turn toward. When self-cultivation reaches perfect balance and harmony, countless divine spirits (Shen) gather within. When a person is truly impartial, all things naturally align with them. As a Dharma King who guides sentient beings, it is precisely through embracing all existence with fairness and selflessness that one becomes the refuge for all.

When a ruler's virtue (De) connects with the divine, they unite with heavenly principle. As a sovereign who transforms beings, their virtue shelters all things with a compassion as vast as the sky. Virtue that resonates with heaven merges completely with the Dao. Such a one can nurture all beings equally like heaven while generating life endlessly like the Dao itself.

United as one with the Dao, one attains eternal existence. The mind becomes boundless as the great void, without coming or going, birth or cessation—completely aligned with the supreme Dao. Such a person encounters no danger even when their form disappears. Possessing all four perfections—impartiality, virtue matching heaven and earth, unity with the Dao, and boundless moral power—they remain free from calamity or fault. Even when returning to merge with heaven and earth, they never face true peril. The phrase "disappearance of the body" refers to the elimination of all traces of attachment—such a one can never encounter real danger.

 感赴機謂之不殆又解迹有興廢故言没  身本無生滅故言不殆也 太上下知有之  注大上謂太古無名之君也下知有之者  下知上有君不見臣事之迹質樸淳厚○   御曰太上者淳古之君也下知者臣下知  上有君尊之如天而無施教有爲之迹故  人無德而稱焉○䟽太上即是今玄天教主  太上大道君也言道君在玉京之上金闕  之中凝神遐想爲常應之處利根之人機  性明敏悟妙本凝寂體絶形名從本降跡  故有位號不執相生解故下知有之知有  太上名號之所由也 其次親之譽之  注其德可見恩惠可稱故親愛而譽之○   御曰淳德下衰君行善教仁見故親之功  高故譽之○䟽中根之人機神稍闇不能  忘言證理必須執相修學所以耽著經教  親愛筌蹄依文生解共相譽贊○顧曰此  中古也去道漸遠封言著相其德可見親  愛生上則親信於下下則稱譽於上其功  可言則康歌載路 其次畏之  注設形法以治之 其次侮之  注禁多則令煩不可歸誠故欺侮之○御  曰德又下衰君多弊政人不堪命則驅以  刑罰故畏之懷情相欺明不能察故侮之  ○䟽侮欺也下機之人性情愚鈍縱心逐  境耽滯日深唯畏世上威刑不懼冥司考  責所以欺侮聖言毁謗不信故德經云下  士聞道大笑之也 信不足
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist perspective on different levels of governance as presented in the Daode Jing, offering a layered interpretation through Daoist thought.

The most sublime rulers (Taishang) were the nameless and formless sovereigns of antiquity. The people merely knew such rulers existed without perceiving any traces of governance, for this method of rule completely followed the natural Dao (the Way). Commentaries explain that "Taishang" refers both to the sage-kings of high antiquity and to the supreme Daoist deity Lord Taishang Daode Jun (one of the Three Pure Ones/Sanqing). Those of superior spiritual capacity directly comprehend the essence of the Dao, understanding the true meaning behind the title "Taishang."

The next level of rulers are those whom the people cherish and praise. Such sovereigns implement benevolent governance, with their De (Virtue/Power) manifesting outwardly, allowing the people to perceive their beneficence. Those of middling understanding require scriptural texts to grasp the Dao's principles, hence they admire rulers who demonstrate concrete virtuous conduct.

The third-tier rulers are those whom the people fear. These monarchs establish harsh laws and severe punishments to govern the state. Annotations indicate this represents further decline in the embodiment of Dao and De.

The lowest level of rulers are those whom the people despise and deceive. Excessive prohibitions create cumbersome decrees that burden the populace, who respond with deceitful compliance. Those of the poorest spiritual discernment become mired in material desires, fearing only worldly punishments without dread of karmic retribution, thus they mock and slander the words of sages. As the Daode Jing states: "When inferior scholars hear of the Dao, they laugh heartily at it."

The concluding phrase "insufficient trust" reveals the root cause: the ruler's own lack of integrity leads the people to distrust him in turn.

 注君信不足於下下則有巧詐之民也 有不信  注君信不足於下下則應之以不信而欺  其君也○御曰畏之侮之者皆由君信不  足故令下有不信之人也○䟽良由下機  障重信根不足故疑毁聖文有不信之罪 猶其貴言  注說太上之君舉事猶貴重於言恐離道  失自然也○䟽猶其貴重世俗浮僞之言  故不信至道眞實之教是以迷惑日乆罪  障彌深也 功成事遂  注謂天下太平也 百姓謂我自然  注百姓不知君上之德淳厚反以爲己自  當然也○御曰功成而不執事遂而無爲  百姓日用而不知謂我自然而成遂矣○  䟽亭毒之功成育養之事遂而至德潜被  成功弗居百姓日用而不知皆謂我自然  得如此不知荷聖恩也○王曰化不由言  冥功潜被物各逍遥擊壤自得日用不知  欣頼無主莫識所爲故皆謂我自然 大道廢有仁義  注大道之時家有孝子户有忠信仁義不  見大道廢不用惡逆并生乃有仁義可傳  道也○御曰澆淳散樸大道不行曰仁與  義小成遂作而澆淳散樸不足雕弊起於  有爲○䟽即太古之教廢也言大道之世  五德不彰仁義既興淳樸斯廢故莊子云  散道德以爲仁義聖人之過也又云相呴  以濕相濡以沫不如相忘於江湖 智慧出有大僞  注智慧之君賤德而貴言賤質而貴文下
Interpretation

When rulers lack sincerity toward the people, opportunists and deceivers emerge below. The people respond in kind with insincerity, cheating their sovereign. All instances where subjects show contempt or insult toward their rulers stem from the ruler's own deficiency in integrity.

The sage-kings of antiquity governed with particular emphasis on matching words with deeds, ever cautious against straying from the Dao (the Way) or violating natural principles. Yet worldly people value empty, insubstantial rhetoric while distrusting the perfectly authentic teachings of the Dao, thus remaining perpetually confused as their karmic obstructions grow ever deeper.

In times of universal peace, when all affairs reach perfect completion, the people assume this occurs spontaneously, unaware of the ruler's subtle moral influence. Like sunlight and rain nourishing all things without claiming merit, people enjoy peace in daily life without gratitude, believing it all happens naturally.

Only after the primal simplicity of the ancient Dao was abandoned did the need arise to promote benevolence and righteousness. In the Dao's flourishing era, every household had filial children and valued loyalty—no special emphasis on virtue was needed. Only when the Dao declined and wickedness spread did doctrines of benevolence arise. Such attempts to civilize people through virtue already represent a departure from the fundamental principle of wuwei (non-action) in the natural Dao.

When rulers prize clever strategies, severe hypocrisy appears in society. Sovereigns who flaunt wisdom often neglect inner De (Virtue) while emphasizing superficial rhetoric, abandoning质朴 simplicity to pursue ornate formalities.

 則應之以爲大僞奸詐也○御曰用智慧  將立法也法出而奸生則有大僞矣○䟽  智慧聖智也上以聖智治物法令滋彰下  則詐偽百端以避刑網還竊聖智以爲偽  具智之害物備在莊文○王曰大道之時  無知無欲物皆懷德外用不顯道功既息  權詐兹興飭智驚愚耀才動俗樸散淳離  奸情并作故曰大僞 六親不和有孝慈  注六紀絶則親戚不和乃有孝慈相收養  也○御曰皆由失道故有偏名○䟽六親  謂父子兄弟夫妻也淳和之世偏愛不彰  六紀失序孝慈方著是以周德既衰澆競  斯起致彼曾閔之徒顯其高行 國家昏亂有忠臣  注政令不行上下相怨邪僻爭權乃有忠  臣匡救其君此言天下太平不知仁義人  盡無欲不知廉各自潔己不知貞各自守  信不知忠也大道之世仁義没孝慈滅猶  日中盛明衆星失光也○䟽萬乘之主以  四海爲家故言國家但至治之時忠誠不  見昏亂之世貞節斯彰是以龍逄名芳於  夏桀比干譽美於殷紂也 絶聖  注絶聖制作反初守元五帝畫象倉頡作  書不如三皇結繩無文 棄智  注棄智慧反無爲 民利百倍  注農事修公無私○御曰絶聖人言教之  迹則化洽無爲棄凡夫智詐之用人歸淳  樸人歸淳樸巧僞不作矜徇不行人挹天  和物無夭性是有百倍之利○䟽絶有名
Interpretation

The text discusses how when society loses the natural Dao (the Way), falsehood and chaos emerge. Rulers who govern through cunning methods create a paradox—the more laws they establish, the more the people resort to deceit to circumvent them, even distorting the wisdom of sages into tools for wrongdoing. Zhuangzi once warned of the harm such cleverness inflicts upon all things.

In the ideal age of the great Dao, people lived without excessive knowledge or desire, and all things existed in natural harmony. But as the Dao declined, schemes and deception arose. People used cleverness to intimidate the ignorant, flaunted their talents to astonish the world, and as their innate simplicity faded, all manner of deceitful behavior flourished.

The phrase "When the six familial bonds are broken, filial piety and compassion appear" means that only when basic human relationships—between father and son, brothers, husband and wife—become disordered do people begin to emphasize virtues like filial devotion. In simpler times, these virtues existed naturally, without needing to be proclaimed. Just as when the moral integrity of the Zhou dynasty declined, figures like Zengzi and Min Ziqian had to exemplify noble conduct to remind society of its lost values.

Similarly, "When the state falls into chaos, loyal ministers emerge" reflects that only in times of political turmoil do loyal ministers step forward to support the ruler. In an era of peace and prosperity, people naturally embody benevolence and righteousness—loyalty requires no special promotion. It is like how stars become invisible under the bright midday sun. Only in the reigns of tyrants like Jie of Xia or Zhou of Shang did loyal ministers such as Long Feng and Bi Gan leave their names in history.

Finally, the text advocates "rejecting sagely wisdom and abandoning cunning," urging a return to primal simplicity. The pictographs of the Five Emperors' era or the writing system created by Cangjie pale in comparison to the pure simplicity of the Three Sovereigns' knotted-rope records. By discarding cleverness and deception, the people would gain a hundredfold benefit. If farmers devoted themselves to their work without selfish distractions, society could return to its natural state of harmony.

 之聖棄分别之智人皆反本爲利極多言  百倍者舉其大數故莊子云魯酒薄而邯  鄲圍聖人生而大盜起又田成子以聖智  竊國是也 絶仁棄義  注絶仁之見恩惠棄義之尚華言 民復孝慈  注德化淳也○御曰絶兼愛之仁棄財非  之義則人復於大孝慈矣○䟽絶偏尚之  仁棄執迹之義人皆率性無復矜矯孝出  天理慈任自然反於淳古故言民復莊子  云仁義者先王之蘧廬已陳之芻狗又云  削曾史之行天下皆仁也 絶巧棄利  注絶巧詐僞亂眞塞貪路閉權門 盜賊無有  注上化公正下無私邪○御曰人矜偏能  之功必有爭利之心故絶巧則人不爭棄  利則人自足足則不爲盜矣○䟽絶異端  之巧棄貪求之利物各守分故無盜竊莊  子云攦工倕之指天下皆巧矣 此三者  注謂上三事所當棄絶也 以爲文不足  注以爲文不足者文不足以教民也○䟽  三者謂前三絶也此文是頓教大乘上士  所學其理深遠不足以教下機也 故令有所屬  注當如下句○御曰此三者但令絶棄未  示修行故以爲此文不足垂教更令有所  屬著謂下文也○䟽屬謂付屬也言下機  之人未堪大乘之教故有所屬著方進學  心所屬之文即下之四行 見素抱樸  注見素者當見素守眞不尚文飾也抱樸
Interpretation

The true sage discards artificial distinctions and cunning wisdom, allowing people to return to their original nature and attain the greatest benefit. Excessive words only bring a hundredfold calamity (the phrase "hundredfold" is metaphorical, as Zhuangzi said: "The weak wine of Lu led to the siege of Handan; when sages appear, great thieves arise; Tian Chengzi used the wisdom of sages to steal the state").

Eradicate forced displays of benevolence and abandon superficial righteousness. When people cease striving for these external performances, they naturally restore their innate filial piety and compassion. For true virtue (De) is simple and unadorned. By eliminating contrived benevolence and discarding ritualized righteousness, people return to their fundamental nature without affectation. Filial piety springs from innate disposition, compassion arises spontaneously—this is how we recover the pristine simplicity of ancient times. As Zhuangzi observed: "Benevolence and righteousness are like the temporary thatched huts of ancient kings, or straw dogs used in sacrifices" (metaphors for forms that have lost their practical purpose). He also said: "If we abolish the forced righteousness of exemplars like Zeng Shen and Shi Yu, all under heaven will naturally manifest virtue."

Eliminate opportunistic cleverness and abandon the pursuit of profit. Root out deceptive artifices that confuse truth and falsehood, block the pathways of greed, and close the doors to power struggles. Then thieves and robbers will vanish of themselves. When those above govern with impartial selflessness, those below will harbor no wicked thoughts. If people cease flaunting exceptional skills, they will lose the mind to contend for gain. Eliminate cunning artifice, and people won't quarrel; abandon profit-seeking, and they'll naturally become content—contentment leaves no room for theft. As Zhuangzi remarked: "If we break the fingers of master craftsmen" (metaphor for abolishing standards of exceptional skill), "all people under heaven will display their natural abilities."

These three matters (discarding sagely wisdom, abandoning forced benevolence and righteousness, and eliminating cunning profit-seeking) must be thoroughly eradicated. Yet mere doctrinal teaching is insufficient to transform the people, for written precepts cannot truly change hearts. These profound principles belong to sudden enlightenment methods suited to those of superior capacity—they're too abstruse for ordinary individuals.

Therefore, people must be given concrete cultivation methods (referring to what follows). The previous three points only indicate what to discard, without explaining how to proceed. Hence we must further point to practical paths of cultivation—the four methods described below. For those of average capacity, we cannot begin with profound doctrines but must start with fundamentals and progress gradually. Specifically, one must:

1) Maintain pristine simplicity (jian su bao pu)—preserve inner purity without seeking external ornamentation;

2) Hold fast to unadorned nature (bao pu)—guard innate simplicity without artificial refinement.

[Note: The remaining two methods from the original four aren't provided in this excerpt. The translation maintains the classical Daoist terminology while rendering the commentary in clear, flowing English paragraphs as requested. Key terms follow the provided glossary with pinyin parentheticals on first occurrence.]

 者當抱其質樸以示天下令可法則也 少私  注正而無私 寡欲  注當知足也○䟽見素去華也抱樸歸實  也少私公正也寡欲息貪也 絶學  注絶學不眞不合道文 無憂  注除浮華則無憂患○節解曰謂去諸經  書還行一也○御曰絶有爲之學則淳樸  ○䟽憂患也絶有相之學會無爲之理患  累斯盡故無憂也 唯之與阿相去幾何  注同爲應對而相去幾何疾時賤質而貴  文○䟽唯敬諾也阿慢應對也禮記云先  生召無諾幾何者非遠也言世人不達違  順妄生喜怒聞唯則喜聞阿則嗔不知唯  阿兩聲同出一口相去非遠故言幾何 善之與惡相去何若  注善者稱譽惡者諫諍相去何如疾時惡  忠直用邪佞也○䟽順意爲美逆心爲惡  違順既空美惡安奇且唯阿出自一口美  惡源乎一心忘者知其不殊執者肝膽楚  越然有爲之學迷執者多是非美惡之中  喜怒唯阿之内適爲患累之本絶之所以  無憂此兩對略舉執學須絶之狀也 人之所畏  注人謂道人也所畏者畏不絶學之君也 不可不畏  注近令色殺賢人○䟽即行人所畏謂生  死及諸塵也 注必没溺也前令絶惡示  美惡皆空恐滯斯文遂染塵境故發此句  以戒之也 荒兮其未央哉  注言世俗之人荒亂欲進學爲邪文未央
Interpretation

This passage explains how Daoist practitioners should preserve their innate simplicity to serve as models for others. Specifically:

First, one must diminish selfishness and cultivate impartial integrity; second, one must restrain desires and learn contentment. The commentary clarifies that one should reveal the authentic self by discarding superficiality, guard simplicity to return to original nature, reduce selfish cravings to maintain fairness, and curb greed to pacify covetous impulses.

Regarding "abandoning learning" (绝学) and becoming "free from worries," this means relinquishing false knowledge (textual learning that contradicts the Dao) – by eliminating artificial refinement, one naturally becomes carefree. Supplementary annotations explain: one should set aside various scriptures to return to the pure unity of the Dao; only by abandoning contrived scholarship can one recover original genuineness; sever attachment to superficial learning and comprehend the principle of Wuwei (non-action), whereupon afflictions spontaneously vanish.

The text then illustrates with contrasting examples: the difference between "respectful assent" (唯) and "dismissive reply" (阿) is actually minimal, yet people delight in the former and resent the latter, failing to recognize both originate from the same mouth. Similarly with "praise" (善) and "criticism" (恶) – what pleases is deemed beautiful, what displeases seems hateful, though fundamentally no distinction exists. Clinging to such discriminations is the root of suffering, hence one must sever this attachment.

What Dao cultivators truly fear are rulers who refuse to abandon false learning (as they favor flatterers and execute the virtuous). Such fear is necessary, just as ordinary people dread the cycle of life and death. Worldly individuals drowning in artificial knowledge are like those lost in boundless wilderness, never finding their way out.

(Note: "Embracing simplicity" (抱朴) means preserving innate genuineness; "abandoning learning" rejects knowledge incompatible with the Dao; Wuwei is a core Daoist concept denoting natural non-interference; "dusty realms" metaphorically represent worldly afflictions.)

 止也○䟽河上公本作荒諸家云莽莽是  眇莽嘆其乆逺央是盡義嗟其未息言衆  生染滯之心其曰固乆執著情篤未有休  時 衆人熙熙  注熙熙淫放多情欲也 如享太牢  注如飢思太牢之具意無足時 如春登臺  注春陰陽交通萬物感動登臺觀之志意  淫淫也○䟽言耽著者衆故云衆人即衆  生生之别稱也熙熙悦樂也享燕享也太  牢牛羊豕也言衆生欣愛聲色情染極深  如飢人享太牢之饌悦美之甚又如春日  登臺眺望林野暢適其心 我獨怕兮未兆  注我獨怕然安靜未有情欲形兆也○䟽  我老君自稱也怕寂也兆狀也言聖人雖  處塵俗而心智寂怕不爲前境所牽故都  無攀縁之萌狀也 若嬰兒之未孩  注如小兒未能言答偶時人也○御曰言  我獨怕然安靜於情欲略無形兆如彼嬰  兒未能孩孺也 魁無所歸  注魁然如窮鄙無所歸就也○御曰至人  無心運動隨物無所取與若行者之無所  歸○䟽嬰兒赤子也孩笑也魁寬大也歸  往也言聖人動不乖寂處染不染如彼嬰  兒未能孩笑之時心形俱净智慧魁敬器  量宏博譬彼虚舟而無任止也 衆人皆有餘  注衆人餘財以爲奢餘智以爲詐 我獨若遺  注我獨如遺棄似於不足也○䟽衆人滯  有故耽染有餘聖智體空故遺棄不取也
Interpretation

This scripture reveals the fundamental difference between worldly desires and Daoist cultivation by contrasting the states of "ordinary people" with the "sage" (Laozi's self-reference).

Ordinary people indulge in sensual pleasures like music and beauty, much like starving men before a lavish feast (the "Great Sacrifice" refers to the highest-grade offering of oxen, sheep, and pigs) who never feel satisfied. They are also like those who, climbing high in springtime, become entranced by the burgeoning vitality of all things. Their desires are like stubborn stains, persisting endlessly over time.

The sage (Laozi's self-reference), however, maintains a mind as clear and pure as an infant who has yet to laugh ("not yet laughing" describes the pristine state of a newborn). His heart is vast as the void ("expansive" conveys grand capacity), unattached to anything, like a drifting boat that follows the waves yet remains unmoored to any harbor ("without a home").

When ordinary people flaunt their wealth and cleverness, the sage appears as if he has lost something, seeming deficient. Yet this is not true lack—it is the deliberate rejection of worldly greed ("discarding and not taking"). Ordinary people squander their surplus wealth in extravagance and employ their excess cunning in deceitful schemes. The sage, however, abides in a state of "as if lacking," embodying the Daoist principle of "daily diminishing for the Dao"—only by continuously shedding desires can one draw near to the Dao.

我愚人之心  注不與俗人相隨守一不移如愚人之心  也 純純兮  注無所分别也○䟽純純不雜也聖智虚  白純粹精專如彼愚人心無分别也  俗人昭昭  注明且達也 我獨若昏  注如闇昩也○御曰自韜匿也○䟽俗之  人心靈暗昩昭然分别自炫其能聖智虚  通明如日月韜光匿耀故若昏也 俗人察察  注察察急疾也○御曰立法制也 我獨悶悶  注無所割截也○䟽察察機逺是分别之  心悶悶寬緩是無分别之智但俗心滯有  司察是非妄生迫遽聖智體有冥無體知  空幻恒自閑靜也 忽若海  注我獨忽忽如江海之流莫知其所窮極  䟽河上本作海晦者闇也止住也聖智實  明而忽忽如闇欲顯光而不耀故發此言  雖復同塵而恒自凝寂又不住此寂故無  正住止也 飄若無所止  注我獨飄飄若飛颺無所止志意在神域  也○御曰我心寂然絶於俗學似無所止  著也 衆人皆有以  注以有爲也 我獨頑似鄙  注我獨無爲似鄙若不逮也○御曰頑者  無分别鄙者陋不足而心實了悟外若不  足故云似鄙○䟽衆人滯於欲境未嘗休  息雖復取舍不同同有所以聖人妙體虚  假曾無分别既不見是亦不知非譬彼頑  愚若兹邪鄙 我獨異於人  注我獨與人異○御曰人有情欲我無染  心
Interpretation

I maintain the mind of a fool (referring to the Daoist practitioner's state of returning to original simplicity), not drifting with the currents like worldly people, but steadfastly holding the realm of "guarding the One" (Shouyi, a Daoist cultivation method meaning focused concentration) without wavering. This state is pure and free from distracting thoughts, resembling the undiscriminating mind of a simpleton.

Worldly people all appear clever and outwardly bright, while I seem dim and obscure. Master Heshanggong (a Han Dynasty commentator) explains this as the active concealment of wisdom. Ordinary people are always scheming and fond of flaunting their talents, while the wisdom of Daoist practitioners is transparent as the sun and moon, yet they restrain their radiance, thus appearing dull.

People of the world nitpick and act hastily, as if enacting strict laws; while I remain generous and tolerant. Ordinary people cling to distinguishing right from wrong, their hearts anxious and hurried; Daoist practitioners, however, see through the nature of all things, understanding that everything is illusory, and thus always maintain tranquility.

My realm is as vast and deep as the ocean (Heshanggong's version uses the character "晦," meaning dark and still), seemingly obscure yet actually transparent. Though coexisting with the mundane world, I always remain transcendent, yet not stagnating in this detached state, thus having no fixed point of attachment. My spirit drifts freely, like a bird with no resting place, my will always abiding in the wondrous realm.

All people in the world pursue action and achievement, while I alone appear dull as a stone and ignorant as a rustic. In truth, my mind has long been awakened—only my exterior seems clumsy. Ordinary people drown in desires without pause; though their pursuits differ, they are all attached to external things. The sage, however, sees through the emptiness of all phenomena, neither distinguishing right from wrong, appearing like a foolish and uncouth person.

I alone differ from ordinary people. Others are bound by emotions and desires, while my heart remains untainted.

(Note: "Guarding the One" [Shouyi] is an important Daoist cultivation method requiring practitioners to focus their spirit and return to the source; "Heshanggong" was a famous commentator on the Daode Jing during the Han Dynasty; the terms "sage" and "Daoist practitioner" in the text refer to enlightened individuals who have attained the highest spiritual realization.)

而貴食母  注食用也母道也我獨貴用於道也○䟽  人皆照察而分别我獨忽晦而忘懷分别  故愛染於聲色忘懷故貴用於眞道所以  爲異也 道德眞
Interpretation

This passage expounds the principle of "valuing the nourishment from the Mother." Here, "nourishment" signifies practical application, while "Mother" refers to the Dao (the cosmic origin). Laozi states that he particularly emphasizes applying the wisdom of the great Dao. Ordinary people rely on cleverness and intellect to discriminate and calculate, whereas he maintains a state of primal simplicity, free from attachment to distinctions. Precisely because he is not deluded by sensory desires (sounds, sights, etc.), he can focus on the true Dao—this marks the difference between him and worldly people.

This section of the Daode Jing highlights, through contrast, the unique realm of Dao cultivators: while ordinary people chase sensory pleasures (external stimuli like sounds and sights), those who awaken to the Dao preserve inner emptiness and stillness, returning to the source of the Dao. "Suddenly obscure and forgetful" describes a transcendent attitude of not deliberately distinguishing between good and bad, gain and loss. In Daoist cultivation, this state is regarded as approaching the supreme realm of wuwei (non-action).

經注疏卷之二

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0098); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →