中文 · EN

《道德真經玄德纂疏》Vol. 13

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 13 / 20 8,108 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經玄德纂疏》 Vol. 13 (Dongshen 洞神部, 20 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 16 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經玄德纂疏》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經玄德纂䟽卷之十三   可四     唐 玄 宗 御 註 并 䟽     河上公 嚴君平 李榮 註      西 華 法 師 成 玄英䟽     濛 陽 强 思 齊 纂    天下有道章第四十六(天下有道章/所以次前者)    (前章舉靜躁兩行勝負不同故次此/章顯有道無道優劣亦異就此章内)    (文有四重第一眀有道之君無爲虚/靜第二明無道之主躁競貪求第三)    (明廣顯躁競之心咎釁深重第/四示知足之美以勸修行人)    第一明有道之君無爲虚靜(夫道體/幽玄神)    (功不宰天地得之而靜默群聖契之/而晏然風不鳴條帝堯稱之於邑穆)    (雨不破塊虞舜致之於太平是以周/之克商致華陽而牧馬湯之勝桀遂)    (桃野以閑牛五帝之與三皇并風淳/而化美則知有凱還條邑之師故有)    (道之代却走馬以糞田無道之年競/戎駒於郊野大聖垂訓豈虚言矣) 天下有道却走馬以糞也  御註天下有道之主無爲化行既不貪求  故無交戰屏却走馬之事人得糞理田園  ○御䟽却屏去也糞謂理田也天下有道  謂以道爲理無爲化行守在四夷疆場無  事不必多貪土地以困黎元所以屏却兵  革走馬之事人得俶載南畝以糞理田園  也○河上公曰天下有道謂人主有道也  却走馬以糞糞者糞田也兵甲不用却走
Interpretation

Collected Commentaries on the Mysterious De of the True Scripture of the Dao and De, Volume Thirteen, Chapter 46, “When the World Has the Dao”: A Modern Chinese Interpretation

This chapter follows the previous one, which asked whether stillness or agitation prevails. It sets the age guided by the Dao against the age that has lost it. The chapter has four parts: first, it describes how a ruler who has the Dao governs through Wuwei and inner stillness; second, how a ruler without the Dao is restless and grasping; third, the depth of the calamities caused by such agitation and rivalry; and fourth, the benefits of knowing contentment, urging people to cultivate themselves.

First part: A ruler who has the Dao practices Wuwei and inner stillness

The Dao’s original nature is profound and mysterious, and the workings of spirit are unseen. Heaven and Earth are silent through the Dao, and sages of every age rest at ease through it. The wind does not stir the branches into song, so Emperor Yao was praised as “serene”; the rain does not break apart the soil, and Yu Shun thereby brought about peace. After the Zhou defeated the Shang, horses were sent back to Mount Hua to graze. After Tang defeated Jie, oxen were left to graze at leisure in the fields of Tao. The customs of the Five Emperors and Three Sovereigns were simple and their influence benevolent. This shows that an age has the Dao when returning troops and their horses come back to the fields—warhorses are put to work spreading manure—and that in an age without the Dao, warhorses race in conflict across the outskirts. The Great Sage passed down this teaching for good reason.

Commentary by Emperor Xuanzong of Tang: A ruler of a world that has the Dao governs the people through Wuwei and seeks no excessive gain. Therefore, there is no fighting and no need for the affairs of “sending the horses away and having people manure the fields.”

Subcommentary by Emperor Xuanzong of Tang: “Send away” means to dismiss; “manure” means to tend the fields. When the world has the Dao, the country is governed according to the Dao, and its influence is carried out through Wuwei. The ruler maintains peace among the surrounding peoples, and there is no trouble on the borders. There is no need to covet more territory and burden the people. Thus, there is no need for weapons or warhorses; the people can farm the southern fields at the proper season and fertilize the soil with manure.

Commentary by Heshang Gong: “When the world has the Dao” means that its ruler has the Dao. “Send the horses away to manure the fields”: “manure” means to fertilize the fields. Weapons and armor are not used; the warhorses are sent back to pull manure carts and help cultivate the land.

 馬以治農田治身者却陽精以糞其身○  榮曰君上有道除奔命之馬臣下無爲糞  乗田之業修眞者去馳騁之浮情糞身神  以道德務學者絶飄蕩之懈惰糞心靈以  藝文○成䟽言有道之君莅於天下干戈  靜息偃武修文宇内清夷無爲而治故能  却馳走之馬以糞農畝治身者却六根兵  馬以道糞心故孟子云人皆以糞糞其田  而莫知以學糞其心也    第二明無道之主躁競貪求 天下無道戎馬生於郊  御註天下無道之君縱欲攻取故兵戎士  馬寄生於郊境之上爾○御䟽郊者交也  謂交境之際拒守之地也言天下無用道  之君則荒塞有不賔之虜故兵戎軍馬生  育於郊境之上謂乆而不還也○河上公  曰天下無道謂人主無道也戎馬生於郊  戰伐不止戎馬生於郊境之上乆不遺也  ○嚴曰人之生也懸命於君君之建也懸  命於人君有道而萬姓昌宗廟顯君無道  而宗廟傾萬民喪自然之應○榮曰生起  也不用道而修文專飾兵而用武四郊多  壘五兵斯起戎馬生於郊也理不内明心  王無道馳六識之馬遍萬境之中得失紛  紜是非交爭○成䟽郭外曰郊無道之人  臨於海内禽荒色荒四方不靜多貪境土  好行征伐遂使軍戎兵馬出生郊外治身  者言躁競之夫心不懷道縱於六根兵馬  馳騁塵境之中内不覽眞恒縁外物故云
Interpretation

A Plain-Language Interpretation

(Continuing from the chapter “Turn back the warhorses to fertilize the fields”)

Rong says: When a ruler follows the right Way, he retires the warhorses sent racing into battle. When ministers uphold Wuwei (non-action), they devote themselves to farming. Those who cultivate the Dao set aside restless desires that gallop outward and use the Dao to nourish body and mind. Those who pursue learning cut off aimless drifting and idleness, and use knowledge to nourish the heart.

Cheng’s subcommentary says: A ruler who has the Dao governs the world by ending warfare and promoting culture. The world becomes tranquil and practices Wuwei, so the racing warhorses can be brought home to plow the fields and spread manure. The same applies to cultivating the body: draw back the “warhorses” of the six faculties—eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mind—and use the Dao to nourish the inner self. As Mencius said, everyone knows that manure can fertilize the fields, but does not know that learning can nourish the heart.


Second section: Explaining the restless competition and grasping of rulers without the Dao

Scripture: When the world lacks the Dao, warhorses are born in the borderlands.

Commentary of the Imperial Editor: A ruler without the Dao gives free rein to desire and attacks other states. As a result, warhorses multiply in the borderlands.

Subcommentary of the Imperial Editor: “Borderlands” refers to frontier and border-defense areas. A ruler without the Dao leaves the border exposed to foreign enemies who refuse to submit. Warhorses breed there, and the armies remain away for years, never returning from battle.

Heshang Gong says: “When the world lacks the Dao” means that the ruler lacks the Dao. “Warhorses are born in the borderlands” means that warfare does not cease: warhorses are born at the frontier and are not brought home for a long time.

Yan says: The people’s lives depend on the ruler, and the ruler’s position depends on the people. When the ruler has the Dao, the people flourish and the ancestral temples shine with honor. When the ruler lacks the Dao, the ancestral temples collapse and the people perish. This is the natural consequence.

Rong says: “Born” means brought into being. When people do not use the Dao, but instead embellish civil institutions while relying solely on military force, fortifications rise across the countryside and weapons are taken up on every side; warhorses are born in the borderlands. In terms of principle, when the mind is not inwardly clear and the ruler lacks the Dao, the horses of the six consciousnesses race through the myriad realms. Gain and loss become entangled, and right and wrong contend with one another.

Cheng’s subcommentary says: The area beyond a city is called its outskirts. When a ruler without the Dao governs the realm, indulges in hunting and sensual pleasures, and leaves the four quarters unsettled, he grasps after territory and delights in waging war. Thus military forces and warhorses arise beyond the city. In cultivating the body, the restless and competitive person does not hold the Dao in the heart. He lets the “warhorses” of the six faculties gallop unchecked through the sensory world. He does not turn inward to observe what is truly constant, but clings to external things. This is why the text says, “Warhorses are born in the borderlands.”


Key comparison

Governing the stateCultivating the body
With the Dao: retire the warhorses and fertilize the fieldsRein in the horses of the six faculties and nourish the heart with the Dao
Without the Dao: warhorses arise in the borderlands and armies do not return from battleRestless competition: the six consciousnesses race through the sensory world, without inwardly observing what is truly constant
 生郊也天下有道却走馬以糞天下無道  戎馬生於郊謂午也正陽之精生於午午  者馬也故心欲東則東欲西則西欲南則  南欲北則北心有四門能知四方晝夜所  見夜寐則夢心中有道則正氣流行支體  滋潤髪膚玄長故却走馬以糞之心無道  則生淫亂戎馬四走於郊邪脉致以害身  故曰戎馬生於郊    第三明廣顯躁競之心咎釁彌重 罪莫大於可欲  御註心見可欲爲罪大○御䟽犯法爲罪  貪求爲欲言戎馬生郊之罪由人君貪求  土地見土地可欲欲心興動將貪求此罪  之大者故云罪莫大於可欲○河上公曰  好色淫也○榮曰罪莫大於可欲禍莫大  於不知足咎莫甚於欲得有道之人遺情  去欲罪禍自除無識之徒縱性任心殃咎  斯至善積成禍幽顯咸亨惡積成殃存亡  俱累罰止一身罪也下及子孫禍也上悞  祖先咎也○成䟽罪摧也言爲苦之所摧  逼也可欲境也言前境美麗稱可欲心故  言可欲也然境能逼心是起罪之縁以戒  修行人不可染境也故云不見可欲使心  不亂 禍莫大於不知足  御註求取不已爲禍大也○御䟽禍害也  神不祐也夫亡敗之禍縁何而來由貪土  地求而無厭不知止足致神道不祐而嬰  禍害人之有過過非一途貪之爲禍禍之  大也○河上公曰富貴不能自禁止也○
Interpretation

I. Warhorses Breed in the Borderlands

“Warhorses breed in the borderlands” speaks of horses. The Horse corresponds to the time of Wu, when the Qi of pure Yang is born. Thus, if the mind wishes to go east, it goes east; if west, it goes west; it may also go south or north. The mind has four gates and can perceive the four directions. This is its state when awake by day; at night, in sleep, it dreams.

When the Dao is in the mind and upright Qi circulates, the limbs and body are nourished, and the hair and skin become dark and glossy. Then the warhorses can be brought back and put to work drawing manure to fertilize the fields. When the Dao is absent from the mind, licentiousness arises, like warhorses running wild across the borderlands. Evil channels surge upward and damage the body. This is why it says, “Warhorses breed in the borderlands.”

II. The Third Section: The More the Mind Seeks and Competes, the Greater Its Transgressions

No Transgression Is Greater Than Seeing Something Desirable

The Imperial Commentary says: When the mind sees something desirable, transgression grows great.

The Imperial Subcommentary says: Breaking the law is transgression; covetous pursuit is desire. Transgressions such as warhorses breeding in the borderlands have their roots in a ruler’s coveting land: he sees the land as desirable, and desire stirs in his heart. Coveting land is the greatest of transgressions; hence the saying, “No transgression is greater than seeing something desirable.”

Heshang Gong says: It means delighting in beauty and sexual indulgence.

Rong says: “No transgression is greater than seeing something desirable; no calamity is greater than not knowing contentment; no fault is worse than the desire to acquire.” Those who follow the Dao leave emotion behind and relinquish desire, and transgressions and calamities disappear of themselves. Those without understanding give free rein to their nature and follow their hearts, and misfortune and blame follow. Good deeds accumulate into good fortune, bringing ease to both the hidden and visible realms; evil deeds accumulate into calamity, burdening both the living and the dead. Punishment confined to oneself is a transgression; when it reaches one’s descendants, it is a calamity; when it misleads one’s ancestors, it is a fault.

The Commentary on the Meaning says: Transgression is being pressed by suffering. “Something desirable” refers to an external object: when what lies before us is beautiful, it is called desirable, and the mind is moved by it. An object can press upon the mind and become the condition from which transgression arises. This serves as a warning to practitioners not to become attached to states of experience. Hence the saying, “Do not look upon what is desirable, and the mind will not be disturbed.”

No Calamity Is Greater Than Not Knowing Contentment

The Imperial Commentary says: When seeking and taking never cease, calamity grows great.

The Imperial Subcommentary says: Calamity means harm, and the spirits offer no protection. Where does the calamity of ruin and collapse come from? It comes from coveting land, seeking without satisfaction, and not knowing when to stop. As a result, the spirits do not protect the person, and harm follows. Human failings are many, but covetousness is the greatest source of calamity.

Heshang Gong says: It means being unable to restrain oneself despite wealth and rank.

General Explanation in Plain Language (for the Scripture passage, “When the world has the Dao, warhorses are sent back to haul manure; when the world lacks the Dao, warhorses breed in the borderlands,” and its commentaries)

When the world has the Dao, warhorses are unarmored and sent back to haul manure to fertilize the fields. When the world lacks the Dao, warhorses breed in the borderlands and charge wildly in every direction.

The commentators associate Wu with the Horse and use the mind as a metaphor for the ruler. When the Dao is in the mind, upright Qi fills it, and the body is healthy and at ease. Naturally, one can then “send warhorses back to haul manure”—that is, there is no need to fight by force. When the Dao is absent from the mind, licentiousness and evil channels proliferate. This is like warhorses running out of control in the borderlands, damaging the body and endangering life. This is the meaning of “Warhorses breed in the borderlands.”

The discussion then turns to transgression and calamity. The greatest transgression lies in seeing something desirable and coveting land; the greatest calamity lies in never being content and seeking without end. Letting external things move the mind is a great danger in cultivation. Hence Laozi says, “Do not look upon what is desirable, and the mind will not be disturbed.” Those who follow the Dao relinquish desire, and transgression and calamity dissolve of themselves. Those who give free rein to desire bring misfortune upon themselves, their descendants, and their ancestors.

 成䟽禍即罪之深重者也言心貪前境不  知厭足害人損物爲罪日深非唯灾及一  身亦乃禍延三族 咎莫甚於欲得  御註殃咎之大莫大於欲必令皆得則禍  深故爾○御䟽咎殃咎也夫貪冒之雄欲  心增侈得之不已而又求之非道得之則  不旋踵自招殃咎不亦宜乎可欲謂欲而  未得初起貪心罪輕於禍不知足者得而  更須禍重於罪莫甚於欲得者謂已得欲  心尚無厭足則咎之爲過斯甚於禍也○  河上公曰欲得人利物且貪也○成䟽咎  考責也欲得之心略無涯際其爲咎責莫  甚於此校量深淺禍重咎輕欲備顯物情  故其彰三釁也    第四示知足之美以勸行人 故知足之足常足矣  御註物足者非知足心足者乃知足也心  若知足此足則常足矣○御䟽以結有道  之君也言有道之君無欲廣大不貪土地  故於本分而知足則爲天下樂推身安國  理此知足之足乃至交讓而常足也注云  物足者非知足心足者乃知足也謂足在  於心不在於物循涯守分雖少而多有欲  無厭雖多亦少爾○河上公曰故知足之  足守眞根也常足矣無欲心也○榮曰除  可欲則外無所求清本性則内無所之故  言知足動皆合道事無不足之足也無不  足之時常足也○成䟽守分不貪於行使  足恒無闕少故言常足欲明貪競之類遭
Interpretation

A Vernacular Interpretation of Collected Commentaries on the Mysterious De of the True Scripture of the Dao and De

The Cheng Commentary (Cheng Xuanying’s explanatory commentary) says: The “calamity” mentioned in the Cheng Commentary refers to grave wrongdoing. The meaning is that someone who covets external things and is never satisfied, harming others and damaging their property, commits increasingly serious offenses day by day. The calamity does not fall only on that person; it also extends to three clans—the paternal clan, the maternal clan, and the wife’s clan.

No Calamity Is Greater Than Desiring to Get What One Wants

(No calamity is greater than coveting something and insisting on having it.)

The Imperial Commentary says: Among calamities, none is greater than desire. When one insists on obtaining everything one wants, calamity runs deep. That is why the text says this.

The Imperial Explanatory Commentary says: “Calamity” means misfortune. The desires of a covetous person grow ever greater: even after getting what they wanted, they are not content and seek more. If they pursue it by improper means, then even if they get it, they will soon bring calamity upon themselves. Is that not only to be expected?

  • Desirable things: Wanting something one has not yet obtained is the first stirrings of greed; the offense is less serious than the resulting calamity.
  • Not knowing contentment: Having already obtained something and still wanting more brings a calamity more serious than the offense.
  • No calamity is greater than desiring to get what one wants: Even after obtaining something, one remains unsatisfied. This “calamity”—punishment or misfortune—is more serious than ordinary disaster.

Heshang Gong says: “Desiring to get what one wants” means coveting other people’s possessions and wealth.

The Cheng Commentary says: “Calamity” carries the sense of being called to account and punished. Desire to get what one wants has almost no bounds, and no punishment brought on by it is more severe. To compare their relative gravity: misfortune is more serious, while culpability is less serious. The text is phrased this way to lay bare human motives, and so it uses the word “greater” three times for emphasis.

Fourth: Showing the benefits of contentment and urging people to practice it

Therefore, contentment in knowing contentment is lasting contentment

The Imperial Commentary says: Whether external things are sufficient does not count as knowing contentment. Only contentment in the heart is true contentment. When the heart is content, that contentment can endure.

The Imperial Explanatory Commentary says: This sums up the meaning of “the ruler who has the Dao”: such a ruler does not seek vast domains or covet land, but is content within their proper bounds. The whole realm gladly supports them; their person is secure and the state is well governed. This contentment can even make people yield to one another, so that all remain content. The commentary’s words, “Having enough things is not knowing contentment; contentment of the heart is true contentment,” mean that sufficiency lies in the heart, not in possessions. Keep to your proper bounds and respect limits, and even a little will seem like much. Be greedy and insatiable, and even much will seem like little.

Heshang Gong says: “Contentment in knowing contentment” means holding fast to one’s true root, or original nature. “Lasting contentment” means a heart free of desire.

Rong, the commentator, says: Remove what is desirable, and one seeks nothing externally; keep one’s original nature clear and still, and one covets nothing internally. This is why it is called contentment. When every action accords with the Dao, there is no sense of lack; when there is no sense of lack, contentment endures.

The Cheng Commentary says: Keep to your proper bounds and travel without greed, and you will never be in want. That is why the text says “lasting contentment.” It also explains that those who compete out of greed will suffer calamity.

Note: This passage discusses lines from the Dao De Jing such as “No calamity is greater than not knowing contentment; no fault is greater than desiring to get what one wants,” and “Knowing contentment avoids disgrace; knowing when to stop avoids danger; thus one can endure.” It brings together interpretations by the Imperial Commentary, the Imperial Explanatory Commentary, Heshang Gong, Cheng Xuanying, and others. Its central point is that covetousness and insisting on getting what one wants bring calamity and punishment, while keeping the heart content allows contentment to endure.

 遇禍殃知足之人恒居安泰先貧後樂故  述此文    不出戶章第四十七(不出户章所以/次前者前章明)    (正辨有道之人知足不知足者無道/故次此章即明有道者照而不由於)    (心無道者由心而不能照就此一章/義開三别第一明聖人虚鑒照不由)    (心第二明凡人由心而不能照/第三重結虚照之人寂而能動)    第一明聖人虚鑒照不由心(夫大聖/不作至)    (人無心産清濁之兩形何曾有物鼓/山河之二炁不見神功歷衆口而無)    (言坐虚心而自得故不出户天下咸/知豈同周穆迎方空射瑶池之宴秦)    (皇觀日虚稱鞭石之威足迹雖歷於/九荒控馭徒疲於八駿廣窺户牖視)    (聽增迷我之大/聖不出而見也) 不出户知天下  御註不出户知天下不窺牖見天道垂拱  無爲不出教令於户外是知理天下之道  人事和則天象順故不煩窺牖而天之道  可知○御䟽有道聖君無爲而理言教不  出於户外淳風自洽於寰區此可謂知理  天下之道爾又解云人君善教天下應之  以善則不煩出户而天下可知故易曰君  子出其言善千里之外應之况其邇者乎  此之謂矣○河上公曰聖人不出户以知  天下者以己身知人身以己家知人家所  以見天下也矣○榮曰觀之以道則理無
Interpretation

A Plain-Language Interpretation of the True Scripture of the Dao and De: Collected Annotations on Profound De

On the preceding passage

A person who knows contentment can remain at peace even when calamity strikes. This is why it says that one may be poor at first and joyful later.

Chapter Forty-Seven: Without Leaving the Door

(This chapter continues the previous one, which discussed those who have the Dao and those who do not. Here the focus is on how a person of the Dao illuminates things without relying on the mind. The chapter has three parts: first, the sage illuminates through empty awareness, without relying on the mind; second, ordinary people rely on the mind and so cannot illuminate; third, it concludes that one who illuminates through emptiness is still and yet able to act.)

First: The sage illuminates through empty awareness, without relying on the mind

The great sage does not set out to become a perfected person. Without a calculating mind, the sage gives rise to the two forms, clear and turbid—yet what thing has ever been there? The sage sets the two Qi (vital energy) of mountains and rivers in motion, but no divine power is seen; passes among many people without speaking, and sits with an empty mind, content within. Thus, without leaving the door, the sage knows all under Heaven. How could this be like King Mu of Zhou, who went to welcome the immortals and staged an empty display of archery at the Jade Pool; or the First Emperor of Qin, who watched the sun and falsely claimed the power to whip stones into motion? Though their footprints crossed the farthest wilderness, their efforts to command the world only wore out the Eight Steeds. They looked far and wide through windows and doors, yet their sight and hearing grew more confused. Our great sage sees without going out.

Without leaving the door, know all under Heaven.

Imperial Commentary: Without leaving the door, one knows all under Heaven; without looking through the window, one sees the Dao of Heaven. The ruler governs through Wuwei (non-action), with no commands issued beyond the palace gate, and thereby understands the principles of governing the realm. When human affairs are harmonious, the signs in Heaven fall into order. Thus there is no need to look through the window to understand Heaven’s Dao.

Imperial Subcommentary: A sage ruler who possesses the Dao governs through Wuwei. The ruler’s teachings do not go beyond the palace gate, yet a simple and honest way of life naturally spreads throughout the realm. This may be called understanding the principles of governing the realm. Another explanation is that when a ruler teaches well, the people throughout the realm respond with goodness. Then there is no need to leave the door to know what is happening under Heaven. Thus the Book of Changes says: “When a noble person speaks well, people a thousand li away respond; how much more so those nearby!” This is what the passage means.

Heshang Gong says: The sage knows all under Heaven without leaving the door: the sage understands other people through understanding the self, and other households through understanding one’s own household. In this way, the sage sees all under Heaven.

Rong says: Viewed through the Dao, principle knows no distance.

 不達照之以智則事無不知所謂不行而  知者也○成䟽户者謂知覺攀縁分别等  門也有道之人虚懷内靜不馳心於世境  而天下之事悉知此以眞照俗也 不窺牖見天道  御䟽天人相應精氣交通人君爲政以德  則象緯以之不迷威侮五行陰陽由其舛  候故書云休徵則肅時雨若咎徵則蒙恒  風若是知行發於己象著于天豈俟窺牖  然後知哉易曰言行君子之所以動天地  也○河上公曰天道與人道同天人相通  精氣相貫人君清靜天氣自正人君多欲  天氣煩濁吉凶利害皆由於己也○榮曰  二景麗天五星耿漢寧須窺牖方始見乎  内明窺牖者穿鑿求解也天道者自然之  理也不假筌蹄得魚兔無勞言教悟至理  此不窺牖見天道也○成䟽窺覘視也牖  根竅也天道自然之理也隳體坐忘不窺  根竅而眞心内朗睹見自然之道此以智  照眞也户通來去譬從眞照俗窗牖内明  喻返照眞源也    第二明凡人由心而不能照 其出彌遠其知彌少  御註若不能無爲假使出令彌遠其知理  天下之道彌少也○御䟽此明失道之君  也不能處無爲而恭己將欲申教令以化  人令出彌遠既失無爲所知政理更爲微  少○河上公曰謂去其家觀人家去其身  觀人身所觀益遠所知益少也○榮曰迹  周於宇宙未識山川覽遍於經籍寧知至
Interpretation

On illuminating wisdom and “knowing without going out”

Without using penetrating wisdom to observe things, one can still understand them clearly. This is what is called knowing without going out: one need not rely on external action or contrivance, because the mind can already see within.

The Cheng commentary explains that “doors” symbolize the various openings through which awareness reaches outward and makes distinctions. A person of the Dao keeps the mind empty and still, without rushing after worldly circumstances, yet knows what is happening throughout the world. This is using true illumination to see the ordinary world.

Seeing the Dao of Heaven without peering through a window

The Yu commentary says that Heaven and humanity respond to one another, and that their vital essences and energies interact. When a ruler governs through De, the stars and celestial bodies remain in proper order. If the ruler shows contempt for the Five Phases and disrupts the balance of Yin-Yang, calamities follow. Thus, the classics say that auspicious signs bring reverence and timely rain, while ominous signs bring obscurity, unrelenting winds, and unusual changes. Our conduct begins within us, while celestial signs appear outside; why, then, would we need to peer through a window to know? The Classic of Changes says: “Through their words and actions, the noble person moves Heaven and Earth.”

Heshang Gong says that the Dao of Heaven and the human way are connected, with vital essence and energy running through both. When a ruler is pure and still, the weather naturally becomes orderly; when the ruler has many desires, the weather becomes troubled and foul. Good and bad fortune, benefit and harm, all arise from one’s own mind.

Rong says: The two luminaries shine in the sky, and the Five Planets gleam across the Milky Way. Why peer through a window to see what is already clear within? “Peering through a window” means probing and forcing one’s way toward an explanation; the “Dao of Heaven” is the natural order. One can catch the fish or hare without relying on the fish trap or snare—that is, reach the underlying truth without depending on tools or methods. One can awaken to the highest principle without laboring over verbal instruction. This is seeing the Dao of Heaven without peering through a window.

The Cheng commentary says that “peering” means looking in, and a “window” is an opening in the wall. The Dao of Heaven is the natural order. Through sitting in forgetfulness—guarding the One, forgetting the body, and becoming mysteriously united with the Dao—one need not look through an aperture: the true mind shines inwardly, and one sees the natural Dao. This is using wisdom to illuminate the Real. “Doors” symbolize movement in and out, obstruction and passage, and so represent seeing the ordinary world through true illumination. The inner light of a window symbolizes turning one’s gaze back to the source of truth.

Section Two: How ordinary people’s minds prevent them from seeing clearly

The farther one goes, the less one knows

The Imperial Commentary says: If one cannot practice Wuwei yet issues commands deliberately, then the farther those commands reach, the less one understands the way to govern the world.

The Imperial Subcommentary explains that this describes a ruler who has lost the Dao. Unable to remain in Wuwei and govern with self-restraint, the ruler tries to reform people by extending teachings and commands. The farther those commands reach, the more the ruler departs from Wuwei, and the less the ruler understands the principles of government.

Heshang Gong says this means leaving one’s own home to observe someone else’s, or leaving oneself to observe another person: the farther away one looks, the less one knows.

Rong says: One may travel throughout the universe without recognizing its mountains and rivers; one may read every classic without understanding the highest principle.

Note

This passage brings together interpretations by commentators across the ages—including the Imperial Commentary and Subcommentary, Heshang Gong, Rong, and the Cheng commentary—of lines from the Dao De Jing: “Know the world without going out,” “see the Dao of Heaven without peering through a window,” and “the farther one goes, the less one knows.” Its central themes are inward illumination, Wuwei, and moving Heaven through De, in contrast with chasing after things externally and forcing one’s way toward explanations.

 理此謂無知也○成䟽顚倒之夫不能照  理其出心逐境彌遠而無厭其知淺近闇  昧而少鑒    第三重結虚寂照之人寂而能動 是以聖人不行而知  御註不出户故云不行無爲淳樸而知爲  理之道○御䟽此覆釋不出户而知天下  也無事無爲教令不出故云不行近取諸  身遠知來物故我無爲而人自化豈待言  教出户然後謂之知乎○河上公曰聖人  不上天不入淵能知天地者以心知之也  ○榮曰獨悟○成䟽不行者心不縁歷前  境而知者能體知者法必竟空寂譬懸鏡  高堂物來斯照照而無心也故莊子云聖  人不由心而照之乎此一句解不出户知  天下 不見而名  御註不窺牖故云不見人和天順而能名  其太平也○御䟽此覆釋不窺牖而見天  道也夫鶴嗚則子和行感而天動原小可  以知大審己可以知物元吉所召存乎其  人則太平之化可得而言爾何必窺見然  後名乎故云不見而名○河上公曰上好  道下好德上好武下好力聖人原小以知  大察内以知外也○榮曰玄覽也○成䟽  不見者了知諸法虚幻無可見之物也而  名者能正名百物垂迹顯教也不見而名  不應而應名而不見應而不應也此一句  解不窺牖見天道也 不爲而成  御註不爲言教而天下化成也○御䟽此
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principle of "knowledge through wuwei (non-action)." Those with deluded minds cannot perceive the true nature of things. Their thoughts constantly chase external phenomena, drifting farther away yet never finding fulfillment. Their understanding remains shallow and narrow, obscured by darkness and lacking true insight.

Those who have truly attained the Dao (the Way) reach threefold spiritual states: emptiness-quietude, profound stillness, and luminous clarity. Though abiding in stillness, they naturally resonate with all things. Thus, sages comprehend all without personal experience. Just as one need not step outside to understand worldly affairs, maintaining a state of wuwei (non-action) and pristine simplicity allows spontaneous apprehension of the Dao's principles. This resembles a mirror suspended high—all things reflect within it naturally, while the mirror itself remains free from any intention to reflect.

Sages perceive the essence of things without visual confirmation. Like how a crane's cry naturally evokes echoes, subtle signs reveal greater transformations; examining oneself leads to understanding all phenomena. The transformative power of an enlightened society lies in the resonance of human hearts—why must one see to comprehend? This embodies the principle of "knowing without seeing."

Sages accomplish all without deliberate striving. Without preaching through words, the world becomes naturally transformed. This represents the state of "achievement through wuwei (non-action)." Such a realm functions like a clear mirror reflecting objects—manifesting all yet clinging to none, offering teachings yet acting without intention.

 總結不出不窺之義也夫以上有所爲下  必有擾今聖人凝神端扆玄默廟堂君無  爲人無事百姓家給萬化自成○河上公  曰上無所爲則下無事家給人足萬物自  化而成就也○榮曰自然就也○成䟽不  爲者凝神寂泊妙絶於有爲也而成者能  施化群品成就學人此明寂而動也    爲學日益章第四十八(爲學章所以/次前者前章)    (正明凡聖二心縁照差異故次此章/即明道俗兩學損益不同就此一章)    (義分三别第一明道俗兩學損益有/殊第二辨次第虚妄以階玄極第三)    (明有事無事/得失不同)    第一明道俗雨學損益有殊(夫希夷/理靜混)    (沌義深開妙鍵而難思扇玄門而聽/入其旨博其趣微堂堂稱象帝之先)    (湛湛爲大羅之士天書照耀見八角/之垂芒玉宇葳蕤總一乗之標榜豈)    (比俗學日益奢浮張芝墨池不出樊/籠之户揚雄書閣終纏生死之津不)    (能日損有爲乃/更墻面之甚也) 爲學曰益爲道日損  御註爲學者日益見聞爲道者日損功行  益見聞爲修學之漸損功行爲悟道之門  是故因益以積功忘功而體道矣○御䟽  爲修爲也損忘損也言初修學者日求聞  見以爲益因益爲道則忘遺功行以爲損  所以者何夫爲學者無不初則因學以知  道修功而補過終則悟理而忘言遺功而
Interpretation

[Carrying over from the previous chapter]

This sums up the meaning of the chapter on “not going out the door or looking through the window”: when those in higher positions take action, those below are inevitably disturbed. Now the sage sits upright, gathering the spirit and remaining silently profound in the ancestral hall. The ruler practices Wuwei (non-action), the people have nothing to trouble them, every household is prosperous, and the myriad transformations come about of themselves.

The Heshang Gong commentary says: When those above take no action, those below have nothing to trouble them. People have enough to live on, and all things are naturally nurtured and brought to completion.

Rong says: This means that things come to completion naturally.

The Cheng commentary explains: “Not acting” means gathering the spirit in stillness and detachment, transcending all deliberate action. “And come to completion” means being able to transform and nurture the many kinds of beings and bring students to fulfillment. This explains how stillness can also be active.

Learning Increases Day by Day (Chapter 48, also called “The Chapter on Learning”)

Continuing from the previous chapter: that chapter clarified the difference between the minds of ordinary people and sages, and between perception shaped by external conditions and perception that illuminates from within. This chapter therefore explains how the learning of Dao practitioners and ordinary people differs in what it gains and loses. Its meaning falls into three parts:

First, it shows how the learning of Dao practitioners and ordinary people differs in gain and loss.

Second, it distinguishes the successive stages of delusion that lead toward the ultimate mystery.

Third, it shows the differing gains and losses of action and inaction.

First part: How the learning of Dao practitioners and ordinary people differs in gain and loss

The principle of the rarefied and subtle is still; the meaning of primordial chaos is profound. It unlocks a wondrous key that is hard to fathom and opens a mysterious gate that is hard to enter. Its meaning is broad, its direction subtle: majestic like what came before the Image Emperor, and serene like a being of the Great Luo realm. Heavenly scriptures shine with the radiance of eight hanging points; the Jade Palace flourishes, gathering the signs of the One Vehicle. How could this be the ordinary person’s learning that “increases day by day,” or the extravagant and frivolous cultivation of Zhang Zhi, whose ink pool never left the confines of the gate? Yang Xiong’s library likewise remained entangled in the ford of life and death. Unable to diminish deliberate action day by day, they only increase it all the more.

Learning increases day by day; practicing the Dao diminishes day by day.

The Imperial Commentary says: Those who pursue learning increase their knowledge and experience day by day; those who pursue the Dao diminish their efforts and practices day by day. Increasing one’s knowledge and experience is a gradual step in cultivation; diminishing one’s efforts is the path to awakening to the Dao. Thus, one accumulates merit through increase, then forgets merit and embodies the Dao.

The Imperial Commentary’s Subcommentary says: “Pursue” means to cultivate; “diminish” means to forget and set aside. At the beginning, those who cultivate learning seek knowledge and experience day by day, taking this as an increase. When they proceed from this increase to the Dao, they forget and leave behind their efforts, taking this as a diminishment. Why is this so? Those who pursue learning invariably begin by relying on study to understand the Dao and by cultivating merit to make up for their faults. In the end, they awaken to the principle, forget words, leave merit behind, and embody the Dao.

 去執故注云益聞見爲修學之漸蓋言其  初損功行爲悟道之門蓋言其終也○河  上公曰爲學日益謂政教禮樂之學也日  益者情欲文飾日以益多也爲道日損道  謂自然之道日損者情欲文飾日以消損  也○嚴曰去知也不知之知知之祖也不  教之教教之宗也神明所因天地之師也  ○榮曰爲學日益增之以卷軸長之以見  聞利之以名聲加之以嗜欲也爲道日損  行不言之教文理雙忘體虚玄之道物我  同遣爲無爲則百爲兼喪事無事則萬事  都損豈唯驕盈奢侈也○成䟽爲學日益  爲修營也學俗學也言修世俗學之人銳  情分别故累欲日增也爲道日損爲道猶  修道也言修道之人虚夷恬淡所以智德  漸明累惑日損也    第二辨次第虚妄以階玄極 損之又損之以至於無爲  御註損之又損之以至於無爲無爲而無  不爲爲學者積功行爲道者忘損之雖損  功行尚有欲損之心兼忘此心則至於泊  然無爲方彼鏡象而無不應故無不爲爾  ○御䟽損之者謂損爲道者之功行也又  損之者謂除忘功行之心也斯則前損忘  迹後損忘心心迹俱忘可爲造極造極則  至於無爲○河上公曰損之又損之損情  欲又損之所以漸去之也以至於無爲當  恬然如嬰兒無所造爲也○榮曰舍有歸  無損者也有去無忘又損之也理冥眞寂
Interpretation

Plain-Language Interpretation

Opening Notes

The commentary on “letting go of attachment” says: reducing what one sees and hears is a gradual process of cultivation; reducing one’s practice and effort is the entry point to realizing the Dao (the Way). This describes the initial stage.

Heshang Gong, the renowned Han dynasty commentator on the Daode Jing, says:

“In pursuing learning, one increases day by day” refers to learning about government, ritual, and music. “Increasing day by day” means that desires and ornamentation grow more abundant each day.

“In pursuing the Dao, one decreases day by day”: The Dao here means the natural Way. “Decreasing day by day” means that desires and ornamentation diminish each day.

Yan Zun, a Daoist of the Jin dynasty, says:

Let go of clever knowledge: knowledge rooted in not-knowing is the foundation of knowing. Teaching without instruction is the aim of teaching. This is what the divine spirit relies upon, and it is the teacher of Heaven and Earth.

Master Rong says:

“In pursuing learning, one increases day by day”: one accumulates books, broadens one’s knowledge, seeks fame, and adds to one’s cravings and desires.

“In pursuing the Dao, one decreases day by day”: one puts into practice teaching without words, forgets both pattern and principle, realizes the empty and mysterious Dao, and lets go of both self and things. When one reaches Wuwei (non-action), all manner of deliberate action falls away; when one is free of affairs, countless matters are reduced. Is it merely a matter of pride, excess, and extravagance?

The commentary in the Chengshu says:

“In pursuing learning, one increases day by day”: “Pursuing” means engaging in cultivation and refinement; what one studies is worldly learning. Those who pursue worldly knowledge are intent on making distinctions through feelings and perceptions, so their desires increase day by day.

“In pursuing the Dao, one decreases day by day”: “Pursuing” means cultivating the Dao. Those who cultivate the Dao are open, tranquil, and detached; their wisdom and De (Virtue/Power) gradually become clear, while the burdens of delusion diminish day by day.

Second: Distinguishing the Sequence of Illusions in Order to Reach the Mysterious Ultimate

“Decrease, and decrease again, until you reach non-action.”

The imperial commentary of Emperor Xuanzong of the Tang says:

“Decrease, and decrease again, until you reach non-action. Through non-action, nothing is left undone.” Those who pursue learning accumulate merit and practice; those who pursue the Dao let go of these. Yet even after letting go of merit and practice, the desire to let go remains. Forget this desire as well, and one reaches tranquil non-action. Like a mirror reflecting images, one responds to everything; thus nothing is left undone.

The imperial subcommentary says:

The first “decrease” means reducing the practices of those who pursue the Dao. “Decrease again” means letting go of the intention to forget those practices. In this way, first one forgets the traces of practice, then one lets go of the mind that forgets. When both mind and traces are forgotten, one can reach the ultimate; reaching the ultimate leads to non-action.

Heshang Gong says:

“Decrease, and decrease again”: reduce desires, then reduce thoughts as well, gradually removing them. “Until you reach non-action” means remaining calm and natural like an infant, without contrivance.

Master Rong says:

Leaving being and returning to nonbeing is one kind of decrease; letting go of being and then forgetting nonbeing is another. Principle merges with true stillness.

Summary of the central meaning:

This passage explains the fundamental difference between pursuing learning and pursuing the Dao:

Pursuing learningPursuing the Dao
Increases day by dayDecreases day by day
Broadens knowledge and desiresReduces desires and attachments
Makes distinctions through feelings and perceptionsIs open, tranquil, and detached

The ultimate aim is to decrease, and decrease again, until even the thought of wanting to let go is forgotten, reaching the state of Wuwei (non-action)—like a mirror that does nothing on its own yet reflects all things, leaving nothing undone.

 至無爲也○成䟽爲學之人執於有欲爲  道之士又滯無爲雖復深淺不同而二俱  有患今欲治此雨執故有再損之文既而  前損損有後損損無二偏雙遣以至於一  中之無爲 無爲而無不爲  御註絶德與道合則無所不施無所不爲  ○御䟽夫有爲則有礙有礙則有所不爲  今既無爲無爲則無礙故能無所不爲也  此謂契道則應用而周普也故上卷云道  常無爲而無不爲也○榮曰夫欲去有累  所以歸無爲而惑者聞無爲兀然常拱手  以死灰爲大道土塊爲至心恐其封執無  爲不能懸解故云無爲而無不爲也無爲  而無不爲非無爲也有爲而歸無爲非有  爲也此則爲學爲道道學皆忘唯動與寂  寂動俱息也○成䟽至寂而動即體而用  故無所不爲也上卷云道常無爲而無不  爲    第三明有事無事得失不同 取天下常以無事  御註無爲無事天下歸懷故可取天下○  御䟽此勸人君行無爲也取猶攝化也攝  化天下必須無爲無事無事則下人不擾  無爲則百姓自安以斯臨莅于何不可所  言常者無事御物不可斯須離也○河上  公曰取治也治天下常當以無事不當勞  煩也○榮曰取天下常以無事及其有事  不足取天下取攝也忘則無舍無不舍用  則有可有不可若以無爲攝天下無有而
Interpretation

A Commentary on the Subtle Virtue of the True Classic of the Dao and Its De

On “Attaining Wuwei”

Cheng’s Commentary: Those who pursue learning cling to “action and desire,” while those who cultivate the Dao become stuck in “non-action.” Though these attachments differ in depth, both are mistaken. The scripture therefore speaks of “further reduction” to remedy these two extremes: first, let go of attachment to “being,” then let go of attachment to “non-being.” Only by releasing both can one return to the One—true Wuwei (non-action).

“Wuwei, Yet Nothing Is Left Undone”

The Emperor’s Commentary: When De (Virtue/Power) is perfected and united with the Dao (the Way), nothing is beyond its reach or action.

The Emperor’s Subcommentary: Action creates obstacles, and obstacles make some things impossible. But now, through Wuwei, there are no obstacles; therefore nothing is left undone. This is to accord with the Dao and to act throughout the whole realm. The previous scroll also says, “The Dao always practices Wuwei, yet nothing is left undone.”

Rong’s Commentary: One turns toward Wuwei in the hope of casting off burdens. But some people hear “Wuwei” and sit inert, taking dead ashes for the Great Dao and clods of earth for the true heart. Fearing that they might cling rigidly to Wuwei and be unable to respond freely, the text adds, “Wuwei, yet nothing is left undone.”

“Wuwei, yet nothing is left undone” does not mean another kind of deliberate action. Nor does “acting in order to return to Wuwei” mean remaining caught up in action. In this way, learning, cultivating the Dao, and studying the Dao can all be released; movement and stillness, stillness and movement, can both come to rest.

Cheng’s Commentary: To reach utter stillness and yet be able to act is to have essence and function as one; therefore nothing is left undone. The previous scroll says, “The Dao always practices Wuwei, yet nothing is left undone.”

Acting and Not Acting: Different Gains and Losses

Scripture: “To take the world, one must always act without interference.”

The Emperor’s Commentary: Through Wuwei and freedom from interference, the people of the world give their hearts to the ruler. Thus the world can be taken and governed.

The Emperor’s Subcommentary: This advises rulers to practice Wuwei. “Take” means to gather in and nurture the world. To nurture the world, one must practice Wuwei and refrain from interference. When there is no interference, the people below are not disturbed; when there is Wuwei, the people are at ease of their own accord. If one governs the world in this way, what cannot be done? The word “always” means that in governing things, one must never depart from freedom from interference and Wuwei.

The Old Master by the River: “Take” means “govern.” In governing the world, one should always make freedom from interference the foundation and avoid troubling or disturbing the people.

Rong’s Commentary: “To take the world, one must always act without interference; when one acts with interference, one is not fit to take the world.” “Take” and “gather in” both mean to draw things together and govern them. One who can forget has nothing that cannot be relinquished; one who can put things to use knows what can and cannot be done. If one gathers in the world through Wuwei, then “non-being” is sufficient; if one clings to interference, one is not fit to take the world.

 不可皆可也若以有事取天下無有而得  可皆不可也○成䟽取攝化也言攝取宇  内蒼生令其歸善者常以無事無爲而化  之也雖復應物施爲而心未嘗有事此即  動而寂也故莊子云敦弊弊焉以物爲事  乎 及其有事不足以取天下  御註有事則煩勞勞煩則凋弊故不足以  取天下也○御䟽夫有事謂政令煩苛禁  網凝密令苛則人擾網密則刑煩百姓不  安四方離散欲求攝化不亦難乎故此有  事則不足以取天下矣○河上公曰及其  好有事則政教煩也民不安故不足以治  天下也取治也○榮䟽取攝也忘則無捨  無不舍用則有可有不可若以無爲攝天  下無有而不可皆可也若以有事取天下  無有而得可皆不可也○成䟽及其心未  虚忘以事爲事而有事者斯則事異無事  無事異事動異於寂寂乖於動如此之人  不足以攝化天下也    聖人無常心章第四十九(聖人無常/心章所以)    (次前者前章明即事無事雖應無心/故次此章即顯聖人無心雨能赴感)    (就此章内文有三重第一明聖人無/常心有感斯應第二明善救蒼生而)    (無棄舍第三顯衆生/眈染故聖起慈悲)    第一明聖人無常心有感斯應(夫太/帝乗)    (時面離方而設教眞君御物握乾軸/而安民鼓腹咸歌不荷皇王之帝力)
Interpretation

“Not everything can be done. If one tries to take the world through deliberate action, one gains nothing: what seems possible is, in fact, all impossible.”

The Commentary of Cheng Xuanying says: “Taking” means gathering people in and transforming them through teaching. To lead all the people of the world toward the good, one should influence them through doing nothing and taking no action. Though one responds to things and acts outwardly, inwardly one remains unattached to affairs. This is the state of “active yet still.” Thus Zhuangzi asks: “Must one earnestly and single-mindedly make things one’s concern?”

“When one is caught up in affairs, one is not fit to take the world.”

Once the mind becomes attached and entangled in “affairs,” one is no longer fit to govern the world.

The Commentary of Emperor Xuanzong says: “Affairs bring toil, and toil brings decline; therefore one is not fit to take the world.”

The Commentary on Emperor Xuanzong’s Note says: “‘Affairs’ refers to burdensome government orders and strict prohibitions. Harsh laws leave the people unsettled, and numerous punishments scatter their hearts. Would it not be difficult to win the world’s willing allegiance? Thus, one caught up in affairs is not fit to take the world.”

Heshanggong says: “If a ruler delights in schemes and stirs up many affairs that disturb the people, government and instruction become chaotic, and the people cannot live in peace. Such a ruler is therefore unfit to govern the world. ‘Taking’ means ‘governing.’”

The Commentary of Rong says: “In forgetting, there is nothing to choose or reject; in acting, there are things one can do and things one cannot. If one transforms the world through non-action, nothing is impossible. If one tries to take the world through deliberate action, nothing can be attained: what seems possible is, in fact, impossible.”

The Commentary of Cheng Xuanying says: “If the mind cannot become empty and let go, but instead treats affairs as things to be pursued, attachment arises. This is the opposite of ‘having no affairs’: the stillness of having no affairs and the movement of being caught up in affairs are at odds. Such a person is unfit to gather in and transform the world.”

Chapter Title: The Sage Has No Constant Mind (Chapter 49)

Continuing the previous chapter’s teaching, “Amid affairs, be free of affairs; though responding, keep the mind unstirred,” this chapter shows how the Sage, with no fixed mind, can respond to whatever calls forth a response.

The chapter unfolds in three parts. First, it explains that the Sage has no constant mind and responds whenever moved. Second, it shows how the Sage skillfully saves all living beings and abandons none. Third, it reveals that living beings are immersed in entanglements, and so the Sage’s compassion arises.

First Part: The Sage Has No Constant Mind and Responds Whenever Moved

The Most High Lord Lao establishes his teachings in keeping with the times; the Perfected Lords govern things and bring peace to the people. The people sing with full bellies, feeling no gratitude for the power of emperors and kings—

   (披衿自咏豈知天地之深功十亂齊/驅見周家之化溢八元斯事酌堯代)    (之風清故曰聖人無心股肱畢力爲/理日亂易節不傾乆自推移任玄功)    (之濟物開赤心於天下爲欲化人/既同百姓之心匪惵惵之云乎) 聖人無常心以百姓心爲心  御註聖人之心物感而應應在於感故無  常心心雖無常唯在化善是常以化百姓  心爲心爾○御䟽聖人虚忘物感斯應應  必縁感感既不一故應無常心心雖無常  義存慈救以百姓有不信不善之心故混  同用心而以化導故云無常心○河上公  曰聖人無常心聖人重改更貴因循若自  無心也以百姓心之所便因而從之○嚴  曰無心之心心之主也夫一人之身去心  則危者復寧用心則安者復亡若上含道  德之化下包萬人之心物無大小視心如  身去我情欲取人所安與人大同也○榮  曰君上無心於有爲任百姓之自化聖人  無情以分别逐萬有而感通○成䟽體道  凝淡虚懷絶慮心與太空均其寂泊故無  心也百姓衆生也然聖人無心有感斯應  應隨物感故以百姓心爲心既無心而應  亦不應應也    第二明善救蒼生而無棄舍 善者吾善之  御註善者吾善之不善者吾亦善之德善  信者吾信之不信者吾亦信之德信欲善  信者吾因而善信之不信者吾亦以善信
Interpretation

A Compilation of Commentaries on the Mysterious Virtue of the True Scripture of the Dao and De

General Meaning of the Scripture

(The ancients sang freely with their robes open, yet how could they know the depth of Heaven and Earth’s creation and transformation? When the Ten Disorderly Ministers worked together, one could see the flourishing of the Zhou dynasty’s instruction; when the Eight Eminent Ones served together, one could appreciate the pure customs of the age of Yao. Thus it is said: the sage has no fixed mind. His ministers devote themselves to governance. Though disorder may arise and the times change, the realm does not fall; over time, things shift of their own accord. He entrusts all things to the aid of mysterious achievement, opening his sincere heart to the world. Seeking to transform the people, he shares their hearts. How could this be called “anxious and apprehensive”? )

The sage has no fixed mind; he takes the people’s minds as his own.

Imperial Commentary

The sage’s mind responds as things move it, and is present in response to each encounter; therefore, it has no constant form. Though his mind has no constant form, it remains constant in guiding things toward goodness: he takes the transformation of the people’s minds as his own mind.

Imperial Subcommentary

The sage is empty and free of attachment. When things move him, he responds; his response necessarily follows what has moved him. Since what moves him is never the same, his responses have no fixed form. Though his mind has no fixed form, its purpose is compassionate aid. Because the people may have minds that are distrustful or unkind, he mingles with them in mind and guides them through transformation. This is why the text says, “has no constant mind.”

Heshanggong’s Commentary

“The sage has no constant mind”: The sage values reform and renewal, and esteems following what is already in place. It is as though he had no mind of his own: he follows what the people find suitable and convenient.

Yan Zun’s Commentary

The mind that has no mind is the mind’s true master. In a person’s body, removing the mind brings danger and restores peace; exercising the mind brings security and causes it to vanish. If those above embody the transformation of the Dao and De, and those below embrace the minds of the people, then they regard all things, great or small, as they regard their own bodies. They set aside their personal desires and take what brings ease to others, joining with them in the greatest unity.

Rong Yi’s Commentary

A ruler has no intention to impose deliberate action, but lets the people transform themselves. The sage has no feelings of preference or distinction; he follows the myriad things and responds to them in communion.

Cheng Xuanying’s Subcommentary

He embodies the Dao, composed and serene, with an open mind free of anxious thoughts. His mind shares the stillness and calm of the vast emptiness; therefore, he has no mind. “The people” means all living beings. The sage has no fixed mind: when moved, he responds, and his response follows the movement of things. Thus he takes the people’s minds as his own. Since he responds without a fixed mind, he does not cling even to the act of responding.

Second: Skillfully Saving the People Without Abandoning Anyone

I treat the good with goodness, and I treat the unkind with goodness too—this is the goodness of De. I treat the trustworthy with trust, and I treat the untrustworthy with trust too—this is the trust of De. The aim is for the good and trustworthy to become good and trustworthy through me, and for the untrustworthy, too, to be transformed through goodness and trust.

Note: This section draws on Chapter 49 of the Dao De Jing, including the lines “The sage has no constant mind; he takes the people’s minds as his own” and “I treat the good with goodness, and I treat the unkind with goodness too.” It brings together commentaries by the emperor, Heshanggong, Yan Zun, Rong Yi, Cheng Xuanying, and others. The commentaries discuss the sage’s lack of a fixed mind, his responses to things as they move him, his taking the people’s minds as his own, and the Virtue of goodness and trust that saves all without abandoning anyone.

 教之令百姓感吾德善信也○御䟽此應  感之義也吾者聖人也善者回向正道之  心聖人奬之以進修以果其行使至夫吾  善之大善也○河上公曰百姓爲善聖人  因而善之○嚴曰善者吾善之不善者吾  亦善之德善信者吾信之不信者吾亦信  之德信信誠實也感德以變其情也○榮  曰善者吾善之不善者吾亦善之得善若  有心分别有善有不善有善有不善不得  以爲善今既無心分别非唯善於善亦善  於不善亦善則與不善皆善是以謂之得  善也○成䟽善者吾善之不善者吾亦善  之得善善者爲無欲修學之士不善者謂  有爲滯境之人普以平等勝善教之令其  得善此則以百姓心爲心義也 不善者吾亦善之德善  御註不善者謂習染增迷信邪背道聖人  亦以善道而汲引之德善者令化聖德而  爲善也○河上公曰百姓雖有不善者聖  人化之使爲善也 信者吾信之  御䟽信謂聞道勤行心無凝執聖人應之  以至誠贊成其善以至於深信也○河上  公曰百姓爲信聖人因而信之○榮曰信  者吾信之不信者吾亦信之得信信順也  物情既有可有不可從事有順有不順不  得以俱順今聖人無可無不可皆可無順  無不順皆順是以名爲大順也○成䟽信  者吾信之不信者吾亦信之德信信謂聞
Interpretation

Modern Interpretation

Overview

The sage teaches in this way so that the people may experience his Virtue of goodness and Virtue of trustworthiness. The Commentary on the Imperial Commentary says this passage describes “response and resonance”: when the people have an inclination toward goodness, the sage encourages them to cultivate themselves, so that their conduct accords with the Dao and reaches the great goodness described in “I am good.”

The Lord of the River says: When the people act well, the sage responds by treating them well.

Yan says: “‘Those who are good, I treat as good; those who are not good, I also treat as good’: this is Virtue in goodness. ‘Those who are trustworthy, I trust; those who are not trustworthy, I also trust’: this is Virtue in trustworthiness.”

“Trust” means honesty. The people are moved by his Virtue and change their ways.

Rong says: “‘Those who are good, I treat as good; those who are not good, I also treat as good’ is called ‘attaining goodness.’ If distinctions remain in the mind, it divides people into good and not good. Once goodness and its opposite are divided in this way, it cannot be called true goodness. The sage makes no distinctions in his mind: he treats good people well, and treats those who are not good well too. He is also good toward those who are not good. This is what ‘attaining goodness’ means.”

The Commentary on the Meaning says: “‘Those who are good, I treat as good; those who are not good, I also treat as good’: the good are people who cultivate themselves without desire; the not good are ordinary people who act with intention and become attached to circumstances. The sage teaches everyone through an impartial, superior goodness, so that all may attain goodness. This is what it means to ‘make the people’s minds one’s own.’”

Those who are not good, I also treat as good: Virtue in goodness

Imperial Commentary: “Those who are not good” refers to people tainted by habitual tendencies, misled by false teachings, and turned away from the right path. The sage still guides them by the right path. “Virtue in goodness” means transforming them, leading them into the sage’s Virtue and turning them toward good conduct.

The Lord of the River says: Even if some among the people are not good, the sage should still teach and transform them, so that they turn toward goodness.

Those who are trustworthy, I trust

Imperial Commentary: “Trustworthy” refers to those who diligently practice after hearing the Dao and whose minds are free of rigid attachments. The sage responds to them with sincerity, helps their goodness come to fruition, and leads them to deep trust.

The Lord of the River says: When the people are trustworthy, the sage responds by treating them as trustworthy.

Rong says: “‘Those who are trustworthy, I trust; those who are not trustworthy, I also trust’ is called ‘attaining trust.’ Things have what can and cannot be followed, what accords and does not accord; one cannot go along with everything indiscriminately. The sage has neither what can nor cannot be accepted, neither what accords nor what does not accord. He can respond to all things, and so is called greatly responsive.

The Commentary on the Meaning says: “‘Those who are trustworthy, I trust; those who are not trustworthy, I also trust’: ‘the trustworthy’ refers to people who have heard the Dao. The sage transforms them through Virtue in trustworthiness, leading both the trusting and the untrusting to the state of trust.

 經愛樂不信謂不樂道聞聖人以空行慈  悲平等救度不問信與不信皆令得益而  普發信心也故紫微夫人曰信者得失之  關鍵又經云信者學道之樞機也問曰聖  人無心有感必應不應不感不感不應者  故信者方教不信者不教而今信與不信  一種教之亦應感與不感一種皆應答曰  應有通有别如治在玄都玉京而恒救三  界此則通應善信是也至如胡人有感紫  炁西浮授尹生道德之徒此則别應若别  應則待别感通應則尋常慈照故上卷云  常善救人而無棄人    第三顯衆生耽染聖起慈悲 不信者吾亦信之德信  御䟽不信謂强梁背教之人聖人亦以平  等正信而化導之令化聖人之德舍疑而  歸信也故云德信○河上公曰百姓爲不  信聖人化之使信也 聖人在天下惵惵爲天下渾其心  御註聖人在理天下化引百姓常惵惵用  心令德善信而聖心凝寂德照圓明渾同  用心皆爲天下故云爲天下渾其心○御  䟽此明聖人混迹用心也惵惵憂勤也聖  人在宥天下統御寰區懽衆生不歸善信  故惵惵憂勤然聖人無心復何憂喜今所  言惵惵者皆爲天下百姓未能信善故聖  人混同於物而用其心也故云爲天下混  其心爾○河上公曰聖人在天下怵怵常  恐怖富貴不敢驕奢也爲天下渾其心言
Interpretation

A Plain-Language Interpretation

On “Those who delight in it but do not believe” in the scripture

“Those who delight in it but do not believe” refers to people who take no joy in believing in the Dao and lack faith in the Way. The sages save and guide all beings with open-mindedness, compassion, and impartiality. Whether people believe or not, the sages find ways to benefit them and to kindle their faith.

Lady Ziwei once said: Faith is the key to gain and loss. The scripture also says: Faith is the pivot of learning the Way. Someone asked: “The sage has no fixed mind, but responds whenever there is a stimulus. If there is no response, there was no stimulus; if there was no stimulus, there can be no response. If faith is a prerequisite for teachings tailored to a person, then those who do not believe should not be taught. But if believers and nonbelievers are taught alike, does that mean the sage responds equally to those who do and do not offer a stimulus?” The answer: Response has both universal and particular forms. For example, governing at the Jade Capital of the Mysterious Metropolis while constantly saving the Three Realms is a universal response; people of good faith belong to this category. Another example is the response to the people of Hu, when the purple qi drifted westward and the Dao De Jing was given to Yin Xi. This is a particular response: it requires a particular stimulus, while universal response is the ordinary, constant illumination of compassion. Hence the previous chapter says: “The one who is always good at saving people abandons no one.”


Third: Showing how beings become entangled in desire and defilement, and how the sage’s compassion arises: “Those who do not believe, I too trust; this is trust in De.”

Commentary by the Imperial Annotator: “Those who do not believe” refers to stubborn people who reject the teachings. The sage still guides them with impartial, true faith, leading them to embody the sage’s De, let go of doubt, and return to faith. Hence the phrase “trust in De.”

Heshang Gong: When the people do not believe, the sage transforms and guides them until they believe.


“The sage, dwelling among the people, is anxious and attentive; in working for the people, he mingles his mind with theirs.”

Commentary by the Imperial Annotator: When the sage holds office and governs the world, he guides the people with constant anxious attentiveness, bringing them to virtue, goodness, and trustworthiness. The sage’s own mind is still and silent, while the illumination of his De is complete and bright; this is one with the mind he applies in governing. Every effort of his mind is for the people. Hence the words: “In working for the people, he mingles his mind with theirs.”

Subcommentary by the Imperial Annotator (explaining how the sage mingles with the world in applying his mind): Anxious attentiveness means diligent concern. As the sage gives the world a place to dwell in peace and governs the whole realm, he is diligently concerned that beings have not yet returned to goodness and faith. The sage is originally without a mind of his own; how could he have worry or joy? The text speaks of his anxious attentiveness because the people still do not trust in goodness. The sage mingles with things and applies his mind for the people. Hence the words: “In working for the people, he mingles his mind with theirs.”

Heshang Gong: When the sage is among the people, he is wary and watchful, fearing that wealth and rank may lead him to arrogance and extravagance. This is the meaning of “In working for the people, he mingles his mind with theirs.”

 聖人爲天下百姓渾濁其心若愚闇不通  ○嚴曰惵惵若恢恢言虚心以包萬方也  ○榮曰惵惵不住也凡情分别見善見不  善有信有不信聖人惵惵不住泛泛隨機  混其分别之心齊其是非之意也○成䟽  惵惵勤懽之貌也言無心赴感之聖人其  在天下也恒布大慈拯救蒼生恐其没溺  故惵惵而勤懼也爲天下混其心混混沌  沌無分别也言凡夫惑情滯境妄生去取  聖人欲混沌其心令無分别勤懼之義則  斯謂乎 百姓皆注其耳目  御註百姓化聖德爲善故傾注耳目以觀  聽聖人○御䟽百姓被聖德而歸善仰淳  化而觀風故皆傾注耳目以觀聽取則於  聖人也○河上公曰注用也百姓皆用其  耳目爲聖人視聽○榮曰百姓不能以性  制情而乃縱心逐欲注耳目於聲色專鼻  口於香味因兹惛惑以此聾盲聖人逐病  行醫隨機闡教因心救物說己化他乃云  我止如嬰孩赤子不知聲色悅於耳目也  ○成䟽淫染滯也顚倒之徒迷没世境縱  恣耳目滯著色聲既而漂浪長流望返無  日聖人愍其迷甚故顯其病狀而六根之  中偏舉兩者欲明此二爲患最深故西昇  經云耳目色聲爲子留𠎝然舉此二根諸  根可悉爲文略故也 聖人皆孩之  御註聖人念彼蒼生猶如慈母故凡視百  姓皆如嬰孩爾○御䟽百姓既傾注耳目
Interpretation

When governing the world, the sage would have the people’s minds remain muddled and simple, as though dull, dim, and unable to understand worldly affairs.

Yan Junping says: “Diligent and cautious, yet broad and open” means embracing all directions under Heaven with an empty mind.

Rongzi says: “Diligent and cautious” means not lingering or clinging. Ordinary people make distinctions through their feelings: they see what is good and what is not, and decide what to trust and what not to trust. The sage does not linger over distinctions, but responds freely as circumstances arise, blending away the mind that divides things and bringing judgments of right and wrong into harmony.

In his commentary, Cheng Xuanying explains: “Diligent and cautious” describes a state of vigilance and care. The sage, who responds to things without a fixed mind and engages with the world, continually extends great compassion throughout the world and saves the people, fearing they may sink into delusion. Thus the sage is vigilant and diligent. To muddle the people’s minds is to make them indistinct and free of divisions. Ordinary people are confused by their feelings and held fast by their surroundings, recklessly choosing and rejecting. The sage seeks to make their minds muddled and free of distinctions. This is the meaning of vigilance and care.

The people all direct their ears and eyes toward the sage.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang comments: The people are transformed by the sage’s Virtue and turn toward goodness. They look up to his unadulterated influence and observe his example, so they direct their ears and eyes toward him to listen, watch, and learn from him.

Heshang Gong says: “Direct” means “use.” The people all use their ears and eyes to see and hear as the sage does.

Rongzi says: The people cannot use their nature to restrain their feelings. Instead, they indulge their minds and pursue desires, directing their ears and eyes toward sounds and sights, and concentrating their noses and mouths on fragrances and flavors. They are thereby clouded and confused, even to the point of deafness and blindness. The sage treats each person’s ailment with the appropriate remedy and teaches in response to each circumstance; he rescues beings according to their minds and transforms people through his own words. Hence he says that he is like an infant, an innocent child who does not know that sounds and sights delight the ears and eyes.

In his commentary, Cheng Xuanying explains: This means being corrupted by sensual stimulation and becoming attached to it. People who are turned upside down are submerged in worldly circumstances. They indulge their ears and eyes and become attached to sights and sounds; they drift on in the long current, with no day in sight when they will return. The sage pities them for being so deeply lost, and therefore reveals the nature of their affliction. Among the six sense faculties, he singles out the ears and eyes to show that these two cause the deepest harm. Thus the Scripture of the Western Ascension says: “Sounds and sights of the ears and eyes keep the child in error.” Yet by naming these two faculties, it also encompasses all the others; they are mentioned because the text is concise.

The sage regards all the people as infants.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang comments: The sage cares for the people as a loving mother does. Therefore, he regards all the people as infants.

 觀聽聖人聖人視之如慈母於赤子故云  皆孩之又解云百姓有分别之心聖人化  使從善令如嬰孩無所分别爾○河上公  曰聖人愛念百姓如蠕蟲赤子養之長之  而不責望其報也○成䟽衆生妄淫耳目  淪没愛河聖人勤懼慈救義同赤子哀其  無識如嬰兒之可愍 道德眞
Interpretation

This scripture discusses the sage's attitude toward the common people. The sage regards the people with the same tender care as a loving mother shows toward her infant. The text states that people originally harbor various forms of discriminative thinking (referring to calculating minds that distinguish between high and low, noble and base), but the sage guides them toward goodness through teaching, returning them to a state of pristine innocence like that of an infant.

Heshang Gong (a renowned Han dynasty commentator on Daoist scriptures) explains: The sage cherishes the people as one would care for tiny insects or newborn infants, nurturing their growth yet never demanding anything in return.

The Tang dynasty Daoist Cheng Xuanying further elaborates in his commentary: Sentient beings drown in sensory desires, sinking helplessly in the sea of emotional attachments. With compassionate hearts, sages diligently work to save them, showing the same tender concern one would have for ignorant infants. The term "river of attachment" mentioned here is a Daoist technical term, metaphorically describing carnal desires as a drowning current.

經玄德纂□卷之十三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0099); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 12 Vol. 14 →