中文 · EN

《道德真經取善集》Vol. 7

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 7 / 12 8,292 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經取善集》 Vol. 7 (Dongshen 洞神部, 12 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 16 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經取善集》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

道德眞經取善集卷之七悲二   宋饒陽居士李霖集  反者道之動章第四十 反者道之動  王元澤曰反本則靜靜乃能動譬如秋冬  能起春夏也  蘇子由曰反者復也復性則靜矣然其寂  然不動感而遂通天下之故則動之所自  起也  仰觀乎天四時之行斂藏於冬而蕃鮮於  春俯察乎地五行有水反流全一而動善  時天地之道以反爲動故能長乆人一受  其成形馳其形性潜之萬物終身不反悲  夫 弱者道之用  舒王曰道之用所以在於弱者以虚而已  即在天者而觀之指我亦勝我䠓我亦勝  我則風之行乎太虚可謂弱矣然無一物  不在所鼓舞無一形不在所披拂則風之  用在乎弱也即在地者而觀之决諸東方  則東流决諸西方則西流則水之託於淵  虚可謂弱矣然處衆人之所惡而攻堅强  有莫之能先則水之用在乎弱也又曰反  非所以爲動然有所謂動者動於反也弱  非所以爲强然有所謂强者蓋弱則能强也  雖然言反而不言靜言弱而不言强言動  則知反之爲靜言弱則知用之爲强天下  之物生於有有生於無亦若此而已矣  弱之勝强道之妙用如水至弱能攻堅强 天下之物生於有有生於無  河上公曰萬物皆從天地生天地有形位  故言生於有也天地神明皆從道生道無  形故言生於無
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core philosophy of Chapter 40 in the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue), focusing on the principle that "reversal is the movement of the Dao, and weakness is the function of the Dao."

The Song Dynasty scholar Li Lin compiled commentaries from various interpreters. Wang Yuanze explains that returning to the root (fanben) leads to stillness, and this stillness is precisely the source of movement—just as the contraction of autumn and winter nurtures the vitality of spring and summer. Su Zhe interprets "reversal" as returning to one's inherent nature (fuxing), which appears tranquil and unmoving yet resonates with all transformations, forming the very origin of movement.

Observing natural patterns reveals this truth: in the celestial cycles of four seasons, the gathered energy of winter bursts forth with spring's vitality; among the Five Phases (Wuxing) of earth, seemingly weak water can penetrate solid objects. The Dao of heaven and earth maintains its enduring nature precisely through this cyclical reversal (fan). Yet once humans acquire physical form, they become engrossed in external pursuits and lose their original nature.

Wang Anshi further explains the subtle function of "weakness": observe how the wind in emptiness, though seemingly powerless, can stir all things; witness how water flowing with the terrain, content to occupy low places, can overcome hardness. This doesn't mean weakness itself constitutes strength, but rather that understanding how to employ weakness achieves true strength. Though the scripture mentions only "reversal" and not "stillness," only "weakness" and not "strength," through "movement" we comprehend the stillness within reversal, and through "weakness" we perceive genuine strength.

The passage concludes with Heshang Gong's commentary: all things emerge from the tangible heaven and earth, which themselves originate from the formless Dao. Just as water—though supremely soft—conquers the rigid, this demonstrates the Dao's profound subtlety. All existent things (you) arise from fundamental emptiness (wu), which constitutes the universal pattern of operation.

 吕吉甫曰唯有爲能生天下之物而無又  能生天下之有則道之動在於反而其用  在於弱可知已然則欲反而弱者無他致  一以極乎無而已矣  此章之意反本而靜則動不失已莊子所  謂靜則動動則得矣是也用無不利則不  爭而善勝經所謂弱勝强是也然則欲反  弱者無他致一以極乎無而已    上士聞道章第四十一 上士聞道勤而行之  御註士志於道者也上士聞道眞積力乆  至誠不息  李榮曰信道彌篤强行有志寒暑變而不  革其心金石銷而不移其操始終常堅確  乎不拔上士勤行也  上者至高之稱士者以道爲事上士了悟  聞斯妙道信道彌篤强行有志行與實相  相應若出若處若行若住常依實相不離  眞際念念增修心心不懈故曰勤行也問  曰道不可聞聞而非也上士何以聞之答  曰耳聞其言心行其道眞聞之也孔子曰  朝聞道夕死可矣 中士聞道若存若亡  舒王曰中士者知道之爲美而不知所以  爲道也知道之爲美故若存大音不入俚  耳  李榮曰素絲不恒逐玄黃而改色中士不  定隨奸惡而異心聞眞道存身以安國則  存道而忘俗見財色悦性以娱情則存俗  而忘道也  中士可上可下則有疑心焉疑心生則用  志分故聞道治身以長存治國以太平欣  然而存之退見財色榮譽或於情欲而復
Interpretation

Lü Jifu (a Daoist master of the Northern Song Dynasty) explains: Only "wuwei" (non-action, the Daoist principle of natural spontaneity) can generate and transform all things in the world, while "wu" (the original state of non-being in the Dao) gives birth to "you" (concrete existence). The movement of the Dao follows the principle of cyclic return, and its mode of operation manifests in softness and pliancy. From this we understand that to return to the origin and maintain softness, there is no other path than completely attaining the state of "wu."

The core meaning of this chapter is: Returning to the origin and maintaining emptiness ensures that one's actions never lose their root. As Zhuangzi said, "When stillness reaches its peak, movement arises; with movement comes attainment." Applying the principle of "wu" makes one invincible—prevailing without contention, just as the scripture states "the soft and weak overcome the hard and strong." Therefore, the key to returning to softness lies in complete immersion in the state of "wu."

Chapter 41 describes different levels of understanding the Dao:

When superior individuals hear of the Dao, they diligently practice it. The Imperial Commentary (Emperor Huizong of Song's annotation) states: When scholars aspire to seek the Dao, superior individuals upon hearing the great Dao can sincerely accumulate its virtues and persistently cultivate it, maintaining unwavering sincerity. Li Rong (Tang Dynasty Daoist) adds: Superior individuals possess unshakable faith in the Dao, their resolve as firm as metal and stone that won't melt or change—unmoved by seasonal changes, unwavering in their commitment. They're called "superior individuals" because they uphold the Dao to the highest standard. Having profoundly comprehended the mysterious Dao, whether in reclusion or public service, in every action and thought they remain aligned with the true substance of Dao, advancing diligently without slackening—this is true "diligent practice." Someone asked: The Dao fundamentally cannot be heard—what can be heard isn't the true Dao, so how can superior individuals hear it? The answer: They listen with ears to words but practice the great Dao with their hearts—this is genuine "hearing of the Dao." As Confucius said, "Hearing the Dao in the morning, one could die content in the evening."

Average individuals hearing of the Dao sometimes practice it, sometimes forget it. Chancellor Wang (Wang Anshi) explains: Average individuals recognize the Dao's excellence but don't understand how to practice it. Li Rong illustrates: Like white silk easily dyed different colors, their minds lack steadfastness and are often swayed by external things. When seeing the true Dao can bring peace, they remember it; when encountering wealth and sensual temptations, they indulge in worldly desires. This vacillating mentality creates doubt, scattering their aspirations. Though they may wish to cultivate themselves and govern the state with Dao, they're easily disturbed by worldly desires.

(Note: The original text's section on "inferior individuals" wasn't fully provided; this maintains translation integrity) Inferior individuals hearing of the Dao laugh heartily at it—if they didn't find it laughable, it wouldn't be the Dao. Like the most sublime music failing to please vulgar ears, the most precious jade often being mistaken for stone.

 忘之也則不能勤而行之一出焉一入焉  耳若子夏出見紛華盛麗而悦入聞夫子  之道而樂是也 下士聞道大笑之  王元澤曰道大似不肖淺見者所不識故  笑誠如下文云豈流俗所能睹乎  志琮曰下士聞於妙道無相無名不來不  去非生非滅既不信從翻生違背所以拊  掌大笑謂爲虚誕  下士受性下愚恣情多欲智不足與明識  不足與知目欲視色耳欲聽聲口欲察味  志氣欲盈若不得則大憂以懼夫道無聲  色滋味之可得則其去耳目鼻口之所嗜  也遠矣聞恬惔寂漠虚無無爲之道則大  笑而非之 不笑不足以爲道  羊祜曰下愚昏昩貴華賤實上道深奥虚  無清遠不爲淺識所笑不足爲深遠之至  蘇子由曰道非形不可見非聲不可聞不  先知萬物之妄廓然無蔽卓然有見未免  於不信也故下士聞道以爲荒唐謬悠而  笑之中士聞道與之存亡出没而疑之惟  了然見之者然後勤行服膺而不怠孔子  曰語之而不情者其回也與斯所謂上士  也哉  與俗同時與道乖經曰知我者希則我貴  矣 建言有之  纂微曰建立也將立行道之言謂下文也  舒王曰孔子嘗曰述而不作竊比於我老  彭蓋老子稱古之建言者古之人嘗有此  三者之言故老子述之而已 明道若昧 御註若日明之光照臨下土者明也豐智
Interpretation

This passage explains the principle behind the line in the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue) that states, "When inferior people hear of the Dao, they laugh heartily at it." The essential meaning is:

Ignorant people actually ridicule the profound truths of the Dao. Because the Dao is formless and transcends sensory perception, ordinary people who are immersed in sensual desires—eyes craving beautiful sights, ears longing for music, mouths yearning for delicacies, and hearts filled with greed—cannot comprehend the mysterious state of clarity, stillness, and wuwei (non-action). Thus, they find it absurd and laughable.

Wang Yuanze points out that the Dao appears unlike any concrete thing, so shallow individuals fail to recognize it and therefore laugh. Zhi Cong explains that when people of inferior capacity hear of the wondrous Dao—which is without form or name, neither arising nor perishing—they not only disbelieve but oppose it, clapping their hands in laughter and dismissing it as delusional nonsense.

Yang Hu observes that foolish people value superficial appearances, while the Dao is profound and empty. If such profound truths were not mocked by those with shallow views, it would indicate the Dao wasn't deep enough. Su Zhe notes that the Dao has no form or sound, and unless one first sees through the illusory nature of all things, doubt is inevitable. People of average capacity waver between belief and skepticism, and only those who truly understand will diligently cultivate without slackening.

Finally, the passage cites Confucius praising Yan Hui to illustrate how rare those who comprehend the Dao truly are, making their understanding all the more precious. Just as the bright and vast Dao appears dim in the eyes of fools, genuine wisdom is often misunderstood by the vulgar.

 源而不示襲其光而不耀故若昩  王元澤曰大明若晦  志琮曰内有智慧爲明外無炫耀爲昩 進道若退  李榮曰聞道勤行是進大成若缺是退  吕吉甫曰爲道日損損之又損以至於無  爲是之謂進道若退 夷道若類  李榮曰緬平一等夷道也和光同塵若纇  也  唐明皇曰夷平也類絲之不匀者夫識心  清靜塵欲不生坦然平易與物無際而外  若絲之有纇  杜光庭曰達士治身内則夷坦外示同塵  履苦遇樂隨時應跡若絲之有纇也  道則一致物有萬殊體道之士内則平夷  一定而不易外應萬殊隨物變動故若纇 上德若谷  御註谷虚而受受而不積谷虚而應應而  不竭  陸佃曰至無以供其求至虚而應其感故  曰上德若谷 大白若辱  李榮曰廉而不穢大白也混同於濁若辱  也  陸佃曰知其白守其黑知其榮守其辱故  曰大白若辱  大潔白之人内懷清靜明白入素滌除玄  覧而無疵大白也韜光晦迹混俗同塵處  衆入之所惡若辱也 廣德若不足  孫登曰其德深廣則通疏見遠遺略小節  如智識不足故良賈深藏若虚君子盛德  容貌若愚  志琮曰夫上德功濟十方莊嚴萬物德化  無窮名之爲廣雖云有德恒自若無德即  無德故云不足 建德若偷  唐明皇曰建立也偷盜也言建立陰德潜
Interpretation

This passage from the Daode Zhenjing Qushan Ji compiles interpretations from multiple Daoist masters on several core concepts from the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue), presented here in modern language:

True great wisdom appears as foolishness (Wang Yuanze's explanation of "great brightness seems dim"). Zhizong clarifies: Inner wisdom constitutes "brightness," while outward non-display constitutes "dimness."

The pursuit of the Dao (the Way) appears as regression (Li Rong explains: Diligent cultivation seems like progress, yet reaching the highest state paradoxically appears deficient—this is regression). Lü Jifu adds: Dao cultivation requires continuous reduction of desires; reducing to the ultimate state of "nothingness" (Wu) makes this seeming regression true progress.

The level great Way appears as a rugged path (Li Rong states: Treating all things equally is the "level Way," while blending with the mundane world resembles flawed silk). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang analogizes: Those with purified desire-free minds appear outwardly like uneven silk. Du Guangting further explains: Dao-realized individuals maintain inner constancy while adapting externally, like patterned silk.

The highest virtue (De) resembles a valley's receptive emptiness (imperial commentary explains: Valleys receive all things without accumulation, responding endlessly without exhaustion). Lu Dian says: Ultimate emptiness fulfills all needs; ultimate void answers all sensations.

Purest white appears sullied (Li Rong states: Incorruptible purity is "great white," yet blending with a turbid world makes it seem stained). Lu Dian quotes Laozi: "Knowing brightness yet dwelling in darkness, aware of glory yet content in humility." The purest individuals maintain inner clarity while outwardly concealing their light, mingling with the mundane.

Vast virtue always seems insufficient (Sun Deng remarks: The deeper one's virtue, the more trivial details are overlooked, appearing as wisdom's lack—like skilled merchants concealing treasures or noble persons whose great virtue seems foolish). Zhizong explains: Superior virtue universally benefits beings with endless transformative power, yet Dao-realized individuals always feel their virtue remains inadequate.

Establishing virtue should resemble stealth (Emperor Xuanzong of Tang interprets: "Establish" means to build, while "steal" means conceal—accumulating hidden virtue [Yin De] in secret).

 修密行如彼盜竊常畏人知故曰若偷  車惠弼曰聖人建立衆德濟度羣生妙用  潜流玄功密被不令人覺故云若偷  此二說偷竊之偷  蘇子由曰因物之自然而無所立者外若  偷惰而實建也  王元澤曰偷苟且也區區欲速務有所建  豈足以爲德唯因時任理視若偷惰者其  建大矣莊子曰不得已而後起  此二說偷情之偷 質眞若渝  王元澤曰體性抱神以遊乎世俗之間者  萬變從俗而其道常眞故物莫知其眞彼  漢陰丈人孑孑然以眞爲己任而别乎世  俗乃子貢之徒所驚而聖人以爲假修渾  沌者豈所謂質眞乎  蘇子由曰體性抱神隨物變化而不失其  眞者外若渝也  質性質也眞淳一也渝色變也言道德行  人質眞淳而無假飾若可渝變與物同波  而和光 大方無隅  御註大方者無方之方也方而不割故無  隅  李榮曰震宇有象故有方也至道無形故  無隅也  吕吉甫曰大方體之無南無北爽然四解  淪於不測無東無西始於玄冥反於大通  此大方之無隅也  王元澤曰大方道之體也若有四隅則形  盡於所見其小乆矣 大器晩成  御註大器者不器之器也不益生不助長  故晚成  陶弘景曰積德道成謂之大器非日可就  故曰晩成  陸佃曰其行身也徐而不廢故曰大器晩  成
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates four core concepts—"seeming stealth," "genuine purity appearing mutable," "the great square has no corners," and "the great vessel is late to completion"—through annotations by multiple Daoist scholars.

Regarding "seeming stealth," there are two interpretations: one suggests the sage secretly performs good deeds to aid the world without display, much like a thief acts covertly to avoid detection (represented by Che Huibi's view); the other implies aligning with natural rhythms may appear indolent yet achieves greater results (as Wang Yuanze argued).

"Genuine purity appearing mutable" illustrates the Dao cultivator's way of being. Those who truly attain the Dao (zhi zhen) maintain inner purity while outwardly adapting to worldly changes (ruo yu). Wang Yuanze cites the example of the Han Yin elder to demonstrate how forced displays of purity appear artificial, whereas natural integration with society while preserving one's essence reflects true cultivation.

"The great square has no corners" explains the boundless nature of the Dao. Both imperial commentaries and Li Rong emphasize that true "great square" (the Dao) transcends fixed directions or boundaries (wu yu) as it surpasses concrete forms. Lü Jifu employs phrases like "having neither east nor west" to illustrate the Dao's permeation through all orientations.

"The great vessel is late to completion" underscores the importance of natural accumulation. Imperial annotations and Tao Hongjing clarify that genuine achievement (da qi) arises not through forced pursuit but through patient maturation (wan cheng). Lu Dian further explains this as an unhurried, organic process where things come to fruition in due time.

Collectively, these commentaries embody the Daoist core principle of "natural non-action" (ziran wuwei): true virtue and accomplishment emerge not through deliberate display or rushed striving, but through harmonious alignment with nature's rhythms, achieved almost imperceptibly.

 大器者法身之器也法身大器積功而證  非一朝一夕故曰晚成莊子曰美成在乆 大音希聲  御註動之無方而感之斯應故希聲  王弼曰聽之不聞名曰希不可得聞之音  也有聲則有分有分則不宫而商矣分則  不能統衆故有聲者非大音也  志琮曰希聲者猶無聲也夫聖人一音說  法遍滿十方發蟄開蒙導凡誘俗雖復教  滿十方即言恒寂教即無教言即無言以  此之義名曰希聲  䟽曰道能應衆音大音也聽之無聲希聲  也 大象無形  鍾會曰無象不應謂之大象既無體狀豈  有形容  大象者無象之象也象既無象豈有形狀 道隱無名  纂微曰道本無名而强名曰道今道又隱  焉而名何有此眞所謂滅跡匿端也  吕吉甫曰凡此者皆道也然謂之明而若  昩謂之夷而若類謂之進而若退以至音  而希聲象而無形名與實常相反者以道  隱於無名而以名名之則常若相反故也 夫唯道善貸且成  顧歡曰先與後得謂之貸物得成道謂之  成成之則歸道道得之也  志琮曰今凡夫之生是道以生貸汝汝應  悟生復歸於道何乃執生爲生而不反本  邪  舒王曰善貸者萬物資而不匱是也然復  歸於所自生故曰且成  此章言道深微妙隱奥難見自明道至於  大象皆道也道之妙不可以智索不可以
Interpretation

This passage discusses the highest attainment in Daoist cultivation—the "Dharma Body" (Fashen, the eternal true form realized by practitioners). Such supreme accomplishment requires the long-term accumulation of merit (De) and cannot be achieved in a short time. As the Zhuangzi states, true perfection demands prolonged cultivation.

Regarding "the greatest sound seems silent" (Dayin Xisheng), it means the sound of the highest realm transcends audible form. Emperor's commentary explains this sound has no fixed source yet resonates with all things; Wang Bi interprets it as a mystical sound beyond ordinary hearing. Common sounds have distinct pitches, but the sound of the Dao (the Way) is an undifferentiated whole—hence the greatest sound is ultimately silent. Zhizong further elaborates: when sages expound the Dharma, their voice pervades the ten directions, awakening all beings, yet this teaching is fundamentally wordless and tranquil—thus called "seeming silent."

"The greatest form has no shape" (Daxiang Wuxing) indicates the supreme form transcends physical appearance. Zhong Hui clarifies: only what responds to all forms can be called "the greatest form." Since it has no fixed shape, it cannot be described with specific features.

"The Dao is hidden and nameless" (Dao Yin Wuming) reveals the ineffable nature of the Dao. Though provisionally named "Dao," even this label is temporary. Lü Jifu adds: the Dao often manifests in paradoxical ways—seeming dark yet luminous, ordinary yet extraordinary, retreating yet advancing. These contradictions arise because the Dao itself transcends all names and forms.

Finally, "giving abundantly and perfecting all" (Shan Dai Qie Cheng): Gu Huan explains "giving" (Dai) means the Dao first bestows life upon all things, then draws them back to itself; Zhizong warns mortals to awaken to their origin; Wang Anshi states the Dao nourishes all without exhaustion, ultimately returning them to the source. The entire chapter elucidates the profound, inscrutable nature of the Dao—manifesting as light, smoothness, and progress while simultaneously embodying darkness, ruggedness, and retreat. Such mystery cannot be grasped through ordinary wisdom.

 形求可謂隱矣道之體隱乎無名而用乃  善貸且成上士悟之特然勤行下士聞之  所以大笑誠如篇中所云豈流俗所能識  乎    道生一章第四十二 道生一一生二二生三三生萬物  陸佃曰道生一太極也一生二陰陽也二  生三沖氣也有陰有陽而陰陽之中又有  沖氣則萬物於是乎生矣故曰三生萬物  李榮曰一生二清濁分陰陽著二生三運  二氣構三才三生萬物圓天覆於上方地  載於下人主統於中何物不生也  谷神子曰大道自然變而生神神動而成  和和散而氣結氣結而成形故曰道生一  一生二二生三三生萬物  一者形變之始也清輕爲天濁重爲地沖  和之氣爲人故天地含精萬物化生 萬物負陰而抱陽  河上公曰萬物無不負陰而向陽回心而  就日 沖氣以爲和  陸佃曰道家謂之沖氣醫家謂之胃氣有  陰有陽然後胃氣生於其中  負背也抱向也沖中也凡幽而不測者陰  也明而可見者陽也有生者莫不背於幽  而向於明然萬物獨陽不生獨陰不成必  有陰陽之中以和之然後物生莊子至陽  赫赫至陰肅肅肅肅出乎天赫赫發乎地  兩者交通成和而物生焉 人之所惡唯孤寡不穀而王公以爲稱  纂微曰夫孤寡不穀者柔弱謙卑之稱乃  流俗之所惡嫌也獨大人君子之所以自
Interpretation

This scripture explores the process by which the Dao gives birth to all things and its inherent principles. Laozi uses the phrase "The Dao begets One, One begets Two, Two begets Three, Three begets all things" to explain cosmogony: the primordial Dao (cosmic origin) first generates the undifferentiated "One" (Taiji), which then divides into the two Qi energies of Yin and Yang (Two). The interaction of Yin and Yang produces harmonizing Qi (Three), which ultimately gives rise to the myriad things.

Lu Dian explains that the "One" generated by the Dao is Taiji, "Two" represents Yin-Yang, and "Three" refers to the harmonizing Qi produced by their interaction. Li Rong further elaborates: the differentiation of Yin and Yang forms Heaven (pure and light Qi), Earth (turbid and heavy Qi), and Humanity (balanced harmonizing Qi), constituting the triadic pattern of the cosmos. Master Gu Shenzi describes this evolutionary process: the Great Dao naturally transforms to produce divine function, whose movement creates harmonious states, with this harmonizing Qi eventually condensing into form.

All things contain both Yin and Yang aspects (embracing Yin while carrying Yang), and these two Qi energies achieve harmony through "chong Qi" (harmonizing Qi). Just as medical theory speaks of stomach Qi harmonizing Yin-Yang, Daoists consider chong Qi essential for sustaining life. The Zhuangzi similarly mentions that only through the mutual interaction of extreme Yang and extreme Yin Qi can the myriad things be generated.

The text concludes by noting how people generally dislike humble appellations like "solitary," "desolate," or "unworthy," yet rulers adopt these terms for themselves. This exemplifies the Daoist wisdom that "the soft overcomes the hard" - seemingly lowly titles paradoxically demonstrate a ruler's virtue (De). Such profound philosophy truly transcends shallow worldly understanding.

 謂者乃所以有王公之貴耳是法沖氣之  爲和也損心志之强梁而求益於道德者  也  孤寡不穀者不祥之名也王公居尊極之  位取人之所惡以自名者處謙卑法柔弱  以適陰陽之和也故下文云 故物或損之而益益之而損  李榮曰有道以富貴而稱孤寡損也謙光  日新益也無德處貴爲自益也才下位高  必至傾覆損也  疏曰故者仍上之辭也言王公稱孤寡以  自毁損則爲百姓樂推尊敬而事之而致  益也或益之而損者若王公貴寵其身居  上而驕則爲下人離散而致損也易曰滿  招損謙受益斯之謂也  舒王曰天道虧盈而益謙唯其益謙故能  損者乃所以爲益唯其虧盈故其益者乃  所以爲損然則王公所稱乃所以致益而  處貴高之道 人之所教亦我義教之  河上公曰衆人所教去弱爲强去柔爲剛  言我教衆人去强爲弱去剛爲柔  人之所以教人者當以我柔弱之義教之 强梁者不得其死  河上公曰强梁者謂不信玄妙背叛道德  不從經教尚勢任力也不得其死者爲天  所絶兵刃所伐王法所殺不得以壽命而  死也  嚴仙曰强秦以專制而失大漢以和順而  昌强梁者失道剛武者失神生主已退安  得長存  字說曰屋梁兩端乘實如之物之强者莫  如梁所謂强梁者如梁之强人之强者死
Interpretation

This explains why rulers and nobility historically referred to themselves with inauspicious terms like "the solitary one" (孤家) or "the morally deficient person" (寡人). In reality, this was a cultivation practice—by consciously humbling themselves, they harmonized the Qi (vital energy) of Yin and Yang (Daoism teaches that all phenomena arise from these two fundamental energies).

A ruler truly aligned with the Dao (the Way), though wealthy and powerful, would deliberately use self-deprecating titles like "solitary" or "deficient." What appears as self-diminishment actually wins genuine support from the people. As the Yijing (Book of Changes) states: "Pride invites loss, while humility brings benefit." The Dao of heaven invariably reduces what is excessive and supplements what is modest.

Those who rely on brute force and oppression—the "overbearing strong" (强梁者)—often meet untimely ends. Consider how the tyrannical Qin dynasty collapsed due to its harsh rule, while the harmonious Han flourished. Just as a house's beam, though sturdy, will snap if too rigid.

Heshang Gong (a pivotal Daoist commentator) explains: "The world teaches people to be strong, but I teach them to be soft." Those who disregard heavenly law, defy De (Virtue), and depend on violence inevitably face heaven's retribution—whether through calamity, war, or legal punishment—and rarely die natural deaths.

The core teaching here is: What seems like loss becomes gain; what seems like gain becomes loss. When rulers humble themselves, they gain popular support; when swollen with pride, they invite abandonment. This embodies the Daoist wisdom that "the soft overcomes the hard."

 之徒也子路好勇不得其死羿善射奡盪  舟俱不得其死然是皆失柔弱之義也 吾將以爲教父  李榮曰不從君父之命不順聖人之教貪  榮以守勝尊己以凌人强梁也違科犯法  不盡天年中道而夭不得其死也物皆合  道聖人無不設教凡情失理化主所以興  言由仁義之華彰道德之實因强梁之性  演柔弱之法也  此章言道生一氣一氣生陰陽陰陽生冲  氣物得冲氣以爲和冲和之氣柔弱之義  王公法柔弱以孤寡爲稱是損之而益也  衆人好强梁而不得其死是益之而損也  大聖辯此以爲教父信其然矣    天下之至柔章第四十三 天下之至柔馳騁天下之至堅  李榮曰有象之至柔者水也無形之至柔  者道也水至柔而能銷金穿石破彼堅强  道至柔而能遺彼忘我破兹固執言人若鑒  之於水體之於道足能洞於人我經於丘  山微妙玄通都無滯礙此謂馳騁至堅  至柔者水也至堅者金石也水能貫堅入  剛無所不通水至柔故幾於道而況無形  至柔之道包裏天地貫穿萬物此柔之所  以勝剛也馳騁猶貫穿縱任也經曰天下  莫柔弱於水而攻堅强者莫之能先 無有入於無間  河上公曰無有者道也道無形質故能出  入無間通於神明濟於羣生  嚴遵曰有形銛利不入無理神明在身出  無間入無竅俯仰之頃經數千里
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist principle that softness and weakness overcome hardness and strength. Confucius' disciple Zilu, despite his bravery, met an untimely end; the legendary archer Houyi and the skilled sailor Ao also failed to die naturally—all because they violated the way of softness.

Li Rong (a Tang Dynasty Daoist master) comments that those who disobey their rulers and parents, disregard the sages' teachings, crave vanity, and bully the weak often break laws and meet premature deaths. All things follow natural laws, and the sages through their teachings reveal that benevolence and righteousness are external manifestations while Dao and De (Virtue) form the fundamental root. Addressing humanity's competitive nature, the sages particularly advocate the way of softness.

Here we see the cosmological principle: Dao generates the One Qi, which divides into Yin and Yang, and their harmonious interaction produces the harmonizing Qi. All things achieve balance by receiving this harmonizing energy. Nobles calling themselves "orphaned and alone" appear self-deprecating yet actually benefit, while common people's competitiveness brings misfortune—seeming gains turn to losses. The sages use such phenomena to instruct the world.

The softest things in existence (water and Dao) can penetrate the hardest substances. Li Rong explains: among tangible things, water is the softest; among intangibles, Dao is the softest. Water dissolves metal and erodes stone; Dao helps people relinquish attachments and overcome stubbornness. By observing like water and emulating Dao's qualities, one can transcend self-other distinctions and penetrate all barriers. Though soft, water approximates Dao—how much more so the formless Dao that encompasses heaven-earth and permeates all existence? This demonstrates softness conquering hardness. Here "move freely" means to penetrate and operate without obstruction.

The Daode Jing states "the formless enters the seamless": Heshang Gong (a Han Dynasty Daoist scholar) explains Dao as "formless"—lacking fixed shape, it freely penetrates any space, connecting with divine intelligence to benefit all beings. Yan Zun (a Han Dynasty thinker) adds: tangible tools cannot enter tiny crevices, yet the formless Dao instantly traverses a thousand miles.

 無有者神也神之所爲利用出入莫見其  迹透金貫石入於無間神舍於心心藏乎  神虚心以存神存神以索至直而推之曲  而任之四方上下隨其所寓往來無窮周  流乎太虚上際下蟠六通四闢無入而不  自得也 吾是以知無爲之有益  御註柔之胜剛無之攝有道之妙用實寓  于此棄事則形不勞遺生則精不虧兹所  以爲有益也  王弼曰柔弱虚無無所不通至柔不可折  無有不可窮以此推之故知無爲之道有  益也  李榮曰道無形物得生聖無爲人得化此  乃無爲之益也  柔者道之本無者道之用至柔無有者道  也道無爲而萬物自化是以知無爲之道  有益也 不言之教無爲之益天下希及之  御註不言之教設之以神無爲之益不虧  其眞聖人以此抱樸而天下賔無爲而萬  物化故及之者希  顧歡曰法道不言而風俗自移故言不言  之教法道無爲而人物自化故言無爲之  益  此章言法道之柔弱虚無以不言行教無  爲化民天下及此道者不亦希乎    名與身章第四十四 名與身孰親身與貨孰多  御註夫兩臂重於天下則名與身孰親生  者豈特隋珠之重哉則身與貨孰多至願  在我名非所親也至富在我貨非所多也  惟不知親疏多寡之辨而殘生損性以身  爲殉若伯夷死名于首陽之下盜跖死利
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the wondrous function of the concept of "non-being" (wu you). "Non-being" refers to the mysterious state of the Dao (the Way), which appears nonexistent yet permeates all things. Its operation is subtle and unfathomable—capable of penetrating metal and stone, entering the finest crevices. This divine power resides within the human heart, while the heart in turn serves as its vessel.

Only by maintaining inner emptiness and stillness can one preserve this numinous power, and only by preserving this power can one explore ultimate truth. Whether applied directly or followed indirectly, whether moving up or down, in all directions it flows freely without obstruction, filling the cosmic space—reaching the heavens above and the earth below, connecting the six directions and four dimensions. Wherever it enters, it naturally adapts with perfect ease.

From this we understand the marvelous function of Wuwei (non-action). Just as the soft overcomes the hard and emptiness contains substance, the exquisite operation of the Dao manifests precisely here. Abandon worldly affairs and the body won't grow weary; transcend life and death and the spirit won't suffer depletion—such are the benefits of Wuwei.

Wang Bi explains: The state of softness and emptiness penetrates all things. The softest cannot be broken; what seems nonexistent is in fact inexhaustible. Following this reasoning, one comprehends the advantages of the Dao of Wuwei.

Li Rong further elaborates: Though the Dao has no form or appearance, all things arise because of it. Though sages appear to do nothing, the people are naturally transformed. Such are the benefits of Wuwei. Softness is the essence of the Dao; emptiness is its function. The state of ultimate softness and emptiness is the Dao itself. Without deliberate action, the Dao nurtures all things spontaneously—thus we know the benefits of Wuwei.

The teaching beyond words, the benefits of governing through non-action—few in the world attain this. Sages implement transformation through inner numinous power, maintaining Wuwei without losing authenticity. Holding fast to original simplicity, the world naturally follows; preserving non-action, all things flourish spontaneously. Those who reach this state are exceedingly rare.

Gu Huan states: Emulating the great Dao's wordless teaching, customs transform naturally; following the great Dao's governance through non-action, people and things are influenced spontaneously. Hence the teaching without words and the benefits of non-action. This chapter speaks of modeling the Dao's softness and emptiness—teaching through silence, nurturing people through Wuwei. How few in the world understand this path!

The subsequent Chapter 44 discusses the relationship between fame and life: Which is dearer—reputation or life? Which matters more—life or wealth? A person's two arms are more valuable than the empire—compared to these, which deserves greater care? Is life not more precious than the Pearl of Marquis Sui? Between body and possessions, which holds more worth? True aspiration lies in inner cultivation—fame isn't worth excessive pursuit; true abundance resides in spiritual attainment—wealth isn't worth insatiable craving. Only those who confuse primary and secondary values would harm life and injure innate nature—pitiful like Bo Yi starving for reputation at Shouyang Mountain, or Robber Zhi dying for material gain.

 于東陵之上豈不惑哉  李榮曰身形是成道之本故爲親名聞是  虚假之法故爲疏世人不能爲身以損名  只爲名以損身  王弼曰尚名好高其身必疏貪貨無厭其  身必少  吕吉甫曰烈士之所徇者名也而至於殘  生傷性則不知身之親於名也故曰名與  身孰親貪夫之所徇者貨也而至於殘生  傷性則不知身之多於貸也故曰身與貨  孰多  名虚名也貨財貨也身爲成道之本豈不  親於名而多於貨乎名顯身危蒙莊固辭  楚相寧爲曳尾之龜天師不就大夫願學  軒轅之道是知身親而名疏也 得與亡孰病  纂微曰此釋上兩句也夫虚名浮利得之  乎輕羽性命形神亡之若太山達人校量  孰者爲病  李榮曰名者外之稱譽貨者俗之財帛身  爲忠孝及爲修至道而弱喪者不返逐欲  者失眞爲名以煞身因財而害己迷淪者  衆聖人詳問爲得名貨與亡身者誰爲病  矣  吕吉甫曰所徇者名則世謂之君子所徇  者貨則世謂之小人君子小人之所徇雖  或不同而亡其所存則一也然則得名與  貨而亡其存則不知亡之病於得也故曰  得與亡孰病 是故甚愛必大費多藏必厚亡  唐明皇曰甚愛名者必勞神非大費乎多  藏貨者必累身非厚亡乎  劉進喜曰貪欲無厭謂之甚愛欲甚喪身  故云大費
Interpretation

In the eastern hills (possibly referring to a place of cultivation), is this not perplexing?

Li Rong explains: The human body is the foundation for attaining the Dao (the Way), thus it is most intimate; while reputation is merely illusory and should be kept at a distance. Yet ordinary people often fail to protect their bodies and instead harm their reputations, or pursue fame at the expense of their physical well-being.

Wang Bi adds: Those who excessively chase fame and overreach are bound to neglect their roots; those insatiably greedy for material wealth will inevitably damage themselves.

Lü Jifu elaborates further: Those who sacrifice themselves for reputation pursue empty fame, resulting in harm to their lives and injury to their innate nature—this shows they fail to understand that the body is more important than reputation. Hence the saying: "Reputation and body—which is more intimate?" The greedy pursue wealth, yet similarly harm their lives and damage their innate nature—this shows they fail to realize that the body is more precious than possessions. Hence the saying: "Body and wealth—which is more important?"

Reputation is illusory; wealth is external to the self. The body is the foundation for cultivating the Dao. Is it not clear that the body is more intimate than reputation and more important than wealth? Historically, Zhuangzi (Meng Zhuang) firmly declined the ministerial position in Chu, preferring to be a turtle dragging its tail in the mud; Celestial Master Zhang (Zhang Daoling, founder of Daoism) also refused official posts, devoting himself wholly to following the path of the Yellow Emperor (Xuanyuan) in cultivating the Dao. These examples demonstrate that the body is the root, while reputation is merely the branches.

Gaining and losing—which is more harmful?

The Commentary on Subtleties explains: This discusses the previous two statements. Empty fame and fleeting wealth are as light as a feather, while the loss of life, essence, and spirit (Jing-Qi-Shen) is as heavy as Mount Tai. The wise weigh and compare—which is the true calamity?

Li Rong continues his analysis: Reputation is external praise; wealth is worldly riches. The body carries the foundation of Confucian virtues like loyalty and filial piety, as well as the essence of Daoist cultivation. But those who lose their innate nature do not turn back, and those chasing desires lose their true selves. Sacrificing the body for reputation or harming oneself for wealth—such delusion is widespread. Therefore, the sage asks in detail: "Gaining fame and wealth versus losing the body—which is truly the sickness?"

Lü Jifu concludes: Those who pursue reputation are called "gentlemen" by the world; those who chase wealth are called "petty men." Though their pursuits differ, their loss of the root is the same. Then, gaining fame and wealth while losing the foundation of life—do they not realize that the loss outweighs the gain? Hence the saying: "Gaining and losing—which is more harmful?"

Thus we may conclude: Excessive attachment inevitably leads to great waste; excessive hoarding inevitably invites severe loss.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains: Excessive attachment to reputation must weary the spirit—is this not great waste? Excessive accumulation of wealth must burden the body—is this not severe loss?

Liu Jinxi adds: Insatiable greed is "excessive attachment"; when desires grow too strong, one loses the body—hence "great waste."

 吕吉甫曰愛名欲以富貴其身也以甚愛之  故並其良貴而失之是大費也蓄貨欲以  富其身也以多藏之故並其至富而害之  是厚亡也 知足不辱知止不殆可以長乆  唐明皇曰辱損累也殆危亡也夫不邇聲  名知足也不殖貨財知止也知足故名當  其實而無過分之累知止故貨不多藏而  無貪求之害既不辱不殆乃可長存而乆  壽也  李榮曰不分外以求名遠恥辱也不非理  以䂓財無危殆也外之於名利遠之於危  殆治國可以長存修身可以長乆  吕吉甫曰夫唯有德者知至貴之在己而  無待於名也故知足而不辱知至富之在  己而無待於貨也故知止而不殆不辱不  殆則可以長乆  此章之意欲學長生乆視當先絶利忘名  若名利不除身心俱役不唯有妨於道乆  必於身爲患是以古之得道者不邇聲名  不殖貨利雖三旌之位萬鍾之禄棄之若  弊屣視之如浮雲或樂簞瓢或居圜堵國  卿不能識天子不得臣林宿巖居松飡澗  飲豈以蝸蠅之浮幻害性命之至眞此最  爲學道之至戒修身之要務故引古爲證  欲修眞之士脱此韁鎖而已    大成若缺章第四十五 大成若缺其用不弊  御註域中有四大道居一焉體道之全故  可名於大無成與虧是謂大成不有其成  故若缺知化合變而不以故自持故其用
Interpretation

Lü Jifu (a Daoist priest of the Northern Song Dynasty) explains that people pursue fame to elevate their status, but excessive attachment to reputation leads to losing true nobility—this constitutes a great loss. Accumulating wealth aims to enrich oneself, yet excessive hoarding invites calamity—this represents severe dissipation.

Those who understand contentment will not incur disgrace; those who know when to stop will avoid danger—this is how one achieves longevity. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Li Longji) annotates: Disgrace means harm and encumbrance; danger means disaster and ruin. Not chasing empty fame is knowing contentment; not amassing wealth is knowing limits. The contented person's reputation matches reality without excessive burdens; the restrained person stores no excessive wealth and thus avoids the calamity of greed. Free from both disgrace and danger, one naturally endures.

Li Rong (a Tang Dynasty Daoist) adds: By not pursuing fame beyond one's rightful portion, one stays far from shame; by not seeking wealth through improper means, one remains free from peril. Maintaining distance from fame and fortune while staying vigilant against danger—this enables lasting governance of a state and longevity in self-cultivation.

Lü Jifu further elaborates: Only those with genuine virtue (De) understand that the noblest quality resides within their hearts, requiring no reliance on empty reputation—thus contentment prevents disgrace. The richest state exists within one's innate nature, needing no external wealth—thus restraint avoids danger. Without disgrace or peril, one naturally endures.

The core teaching of this chapter is: Those wishing to learn the Dao of longevity must first sever profit-seeking desires and forget empty fame. If thoughts of fame and fortune remain unremoved, both body and mind become enslaved—not only hindering cultivation but ultimately harming oneself. Ancient Dao-realized individuals neither approached empty fame nor accumulated material wealth, viewing high positions and generous emoluments as worn sandals or floating clouds. Some dwelt contentedly in poverty, living in humble huts—imperial ministers couldn't recognize them, and emperors couldn't recruit them. Dwelling in mountain forests and caves, sustaining themselves with pine nuts and stream water, they would never allow illusory gains as insignificant as snail horns or fly heads to damage the genuine nature within their life essence (Xingming). This constitutes the foremost precept in Dao-learning and the crucial point in self-cultivation. Hence ancient exemplars are cited, hoping truth-seekers may break these shackles.

(The following section discusses "Great perfection seems incomplete") The most complete thing appears defective, yet its function never fails. Emperor Xuanzong annotates: In the cosmos there are Four Greats (Dao, Heaven, Earth, and the King), with Dao as supreme. Comprehending Dao's entirety qualifies as "great"; neither completed nor deficient constitutes "great perfection." Not clinging to one's achievements, it thus appears flawed; understanding adaptation to change without rigid adherence to old rules, its function never exhausts.

 不弊此孔子所以集大成而爲聖之時  河上公曰謂道德大成之君若缺者滅名  藏譽如毁缺不備也其用心如是則無弊  盡之時  纂微曰缺破也弊困敗也大成謂全德之  君子也夫德充於内者故能包荒含穢支  離其形若器之缺玷罕見其用故得保其  完全而無困敗之弊也  功成者虧功成不居是以不去名成者隳  無爲名尸其名不去至人睹成壞之相因  去功與名還與衆人其道大成而常若缺  也唐堯有成功而自視缺然爲五帝之盛  孔子集大成而不居其聖爲萬世之師其  用愈乆愈新豈有弊耶 大盈若沖其用不窮  御註充塞無外瞻足萬有大盈也虚以應  物沖而用之故施之不竭其用不窮良賈  深藏若虚盛德容貌若愚  吕吉甫曰萬物酌焉而不竭是盈也然益  之而不加益故若沖唯若沖故其用日給  而不窮  羅什曰智無不積爲滿空而能正曰沖言  大滿之人能忘其滿雖滿若虚虚則不竭  用能如此則無窮極  月盈則虧志滿則損至人知盈虚之有數  雖盈而常若沖也 大直若屈  王弼曰隨物而直直不在己故若屈  羅什曰理正無邪曰直隨物曲成爲屈  身可屈也道不可屈也大直者屈身以伸  道也柳下惠直道三黜而不去 大巧若拙  蘇子由曰巧而不拙其巧必勞付物之自  然雖拙而巧
Interpretation

The reason Confucius could become a sage of comprehensive attainment was his understanding of proper timing. Master Heshang explains that a ruler with true great De (Virtue/Power) appears flawed, concealing his reputation as if self-deprecating, maintaining an incomplete state. Acting with such mindfulness prevents decline and preserves perpetual vitality.

Li Yue in his "Collected Subtleties" clarifies: "Flawed" implies imperfection, while "worn" suggests exhaustion. "Great completion" refers to a noble person with perfected virtue. Those internally abundant in De can embrace coarseness and accept impurity; externally they resemble damaged vessels that rarely display utility, thereby remaining whole and unhindered by failure.

Those who achieve merit must understand humble withdrawal—only by not claiming credit can merit be preserved. Those who gain fame must guard against corruption—never be trapped by reputation. True wisdom sees through the mutual generation of success and failure, relinquishing achievement to return to simplicity. This great Dao (the Way) appears flawed yet is complete. Emperor Yao established monumental deeds yet felt inadequate, becoming the most outstanding of the Five Emperors; Confucius synthesized all wisdom yet never proclaimed himself a sage, becoming the teacher for all ages. Their influence remains eternally fresh, never decaying.

The most replete things appear empty yet function endlessly. Like the "great fullness" that fills heaven and earth and nourishes all things—it responds to all with empty stillness, thus never being exhausted. Truly great merchants conceal their treasures; those with abundant De appear outwardly dull.

Lü Huiqing states: When all things draw upon it without depletion, that is fullness, yet adding to it brings no increase—thus it appears empty. Precisely because it seems empty, it can be drawn upon daily without ever running dry. Master Kumārajīva says: Wisdom that accumulates everything is fullness; maintaining clarity is emptiness. The truly complete forget their own completeness—though full, they seem empty, and being empty, they never exhaust.

When the moon becomes full, it wanes; when satisfaction peaks, loss follows. Sages understand the patterns of fullness and emptiness, maintaining stillness even in abundance.

The straightest appears bent. Wang Bi explains: Straightness lies in following things' nature—not in oneself—hence the appearance of bending. Kumārajīva clarifies: Principle aligned is straightness; yielding to circumstances is bending. The body may bend, but Dao (the Way) cannot. The truly straight bend physically to uphold righteousness, like Liuxia Hui who thrice suffered demotion without abandoning principle.

The most skillful appears clumsy. Su Zhe observes: Knowing only skill without clumsiness makes skill a burden. Following things' spontaneous course seems clumsy yet is truly skillful.

 劉進喜曰匠成萬物鑪錘羣生有大功巧  而忘功用晦迹同凡故曰拙也  大巧在所不爲因自然以成器不造作無  巧功賦物之形方圓曲直不睹其妙故若  拙刻彫衆形而不爲巧非其驗乎有如梓  慶之削鐻非若宋人之刻楮 大辯若訥  御註不言之辯是謂大辯惠施多方其辯  小矣  羅什曰智無不周爲大辯非法不說故稱  訥  蘇子由曰辯而不訥其辯必窮因理而言  雖訥而辯 躁勝寒靜勝熱清靜爲天下正  吕吉甫曰夫寒熱者天地之所爲有形之  所不能免也而一躁焉可以勝寒一靜焉  可以勝熱一時之躁靜猶可勝天地之所  行況夫體無爲之清靜以爲天下正安往  而不勝哉  此章之義先言諸大終之以清靜爲天下  正老君言得悟道者常清靜矣悟道之人  必靜必清唯見於空乃能如上諸大    天下有道章第四十六 天下有道却走馬以糞  御註以道治天下者民各樂其業而無所  爭糞其田疇而已  有道者謂人主有道也却者去也走馬者  馳走之馬也糞者糞田也言有道之君臨  莅天下少欲知足無求於外兵甲不用偃  武修文無戰逐之事唯本業之修故却去  馳走之馬以治農田治身者意馬不馳丹  田自實 天下無道戎馬生於郊  温公曰貪欲無厭舍内競外  天下無道之君縱欲攻取戰伐不止故兵
Interpretation

Liu Jinxi said that the truly skilled craftsman (referring to the Creator), though having fashioned all things in the world and refined sentient beings with great merit (De), never boasts of his achievements. He conceals his divine traces like an ordinary person, hence the saying "Great skill appears clumsy."

The highest craftsmanship lies in non-deliberate action (Wuwei), following natural laws to accomplish things. Without forced effort, there remains no trace of artificial carving. When giving form to all things—whether square, round, curved, or straight—no human cleverness is visible, thus appearing clumsy. It is like carving various forms without showing intention—this is the true test. Take for example Zi Qing (an ancient master craftsman) naturally crafting a chime instrument, completely unlike the Song people's artificial carving of mulberry leaves (referring to excessive ornamentation).

True eloquence appears as stammering. The Emperor's commentary states that debate without relying on words is great wisdom, while sophistry like Hui Shi's (a representative of the School of Names) is mere cleverness. Master Kumarajiva said comprehensive wisdom constitutes great debate; refraining from speech that contradicts the Dao (the Way) is true stammering. Su Zhe believed that relentless argumentation eventually exhausts reason, whereas speaking in accordance with heavenly principles, even if seemingly inarticulate, constitutes true debate.

Restlessness can ward off cold, silence can resist heat, yet only serene non-action (Wuwei) is the true way to govern the world. Lü Huiqing explained that cold and heat are natural phenomena of heaven and earth, unavoidable for all physical things. Temporary restlessness can fend off cold, temporary silence can withstand heat—how much more so when comprehending the Dao of serene non-action to govern the world? What then cannot be transcended?

The essence of this chapter first discusses various "great" realms, ultimately concluding that serene non-action is the foundation of governing the world. Laozi said those who comprehend the Dao always maintain serenity. Only by attaining the realm of emptiness can one achieve the aforementioned "great" states.

Chapter 46 discusses the way of governing the world: When the world follows the Dao, warhorses retire to plow fields and fertilize. The Emperor's commentary notes that when governing with the Dao, people live in peace without contention, and warhorses are used for farming. A ruler who follows the Dao has few desires, refrains from external expansion, stores weapons to cultivate culture, and avoids warfare—hence warhorses turn to farming. The same applies to self-cultivation: when the mind's "horses" do not wander, the Dantian (energy center) naturally becomes full.

When the world lacks the Dao, even pregnant mares are sent to battle. Sima Guang said this results from insatiable greed and abandoning fundamentals to pursue external things. A ruler without the Dao indulges desires in constant warfare, where frequent battles force pregnant mares to foal in the wild.

 戎之馬寄生於郊境之上乆不得還也邑  外曰郊躁競之夫不能少欲知足遂使坐  騁走馬奔馳聲色之郊 罪莫大於可欲  御註不見可欲使心不亂人之有欲至於  决性命之情以爭之罪之所起也  唐明皇曰心見可欲爲罪大矣  張君相曰前境美麗稱可欲心故言可欲  然境能適心是起罪之縁縁境不止必獲  大罪 禍莫大於不知足  御註平爲福有餘爲禍知足不辱何禍之  有  王元澤曰外求無厭失性生禍  不知性分之至足而貪求外物則使遭濁  辱流浪生死常沉苦海永失眞道禍莫大  於兹矣 咎莫大於欲得  大孟曰得中求取而又得又不厭得中故  更欲得心既無涯必招大咎此言無道之  徒縱性任情殃咎斯至積惡不已存亡俱  累罰止一身罪也下及子孫禍也上誤祖  先咎也  纂微曰咎殃咎也夫物之經目猶有限也  天下之物見與不見咸欲得之使盡在己  而摩有孑遺者此無道之甚也豈唯禍及  一身抑亦殃咎來世夫罪者言人違於禁  令初犯其非名之爲罪道家悔過經曰初  犯爲罪亦名爲過過言誤也犯過一千八  百爲禍禍重於罪矣犯過二千一百六十  爲咎咎又重於禍矣此三者皆無道君子  之所爲也  天下之物見與不見所欲必令皆得欲而  得之人所咎也自取戾曰罪違神而爲禍
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the calamities arising from human desires and insatiability. Through multiple commentators' perspectives, it presents three core teachings:

First, it states "no crime is greater than indulging desires" (罪莫大于可欲). When people encounter objects that arouse desire, their spirit (Shen) becomes disturbed, leading them to violate their true nature in pursuit of gratification. The Tang Emperor Xuanzong's commentary observes that the emergence of covetous thoughts in the heart marks the beginning of grave transgressions. Zhang Junxiang further explains that beautiful external phenomena can awaken greedy desires, and becoming addicted to them without restraint inevitably invites serious offenses.

Secondly, it declares "no misfortune is greater than discontent" (祸莫大于不知足). The Imperial Commentary asserts that only contentment can prevent disgrace and disaster. Wang Yuanze interprets that when people fail to recognize their inherent completeness and instead endlessly seek external possessions, they sink into defilement and humiliation, drifting in the bitter sea of life and death, forever losing the true Dao - this constitutes the greatest calamity.

Finally, it warns "no fault is greater than covetousness" (咎莫大于欲得). The Great Meng commentary emphasizes that insatiably greedy people inevitably invite major misfortunes. The Compilation of Subtleties further elucidates that some individuals not only crave what they see, but desire to possess all things under heaven - such extreme greed harms not only themselves but future generations. Daoist tradition classifies faults into three grades: initial missteps are called "crimes" (罪), accumulating 1,800 instances becomes "misfortune" (祸), and reaching 2,160 constitutes "grave faults" (咎) - all manifestations of those who have strayed from the Dao.

In summary, this scripture cautions that indulging desires, lacking contentment, and insatiable greed form the root of life's three great calamities, bringing disaster both to individuals and their descendants. True Dao cultivators should practice contentment and restrain covetousness.

 違人而爲咎由可欲至於不知足不知足  則欲得也有罪則有禍有禍則有咎咎則  獲戾於衆人也罪莫大於禍禍莫大於咎  此次序之然也 故知足之足常足矣  御註人見可欲則不知足不知足則欲得  欲得則爭端起而禍亂作泰至則戎馬生  於郊然則知足而各安其性命之分無所  施其智巧也日用飲食而已何爭亂之有  舒王曰墨子曰非無安居也我無足心也  非無足財也我無足心也萬物常至於足  而有所謂不足者以其無足心也得道者  知其足心足財故曰知足之足常足矣  王元澤曰各盡其性分則何不足之有  此章言以道莅天下者内自知足外無貪  求故絶爭戰之事無殃咎之禍修身者少  欲知足意馬不馳丹田自守乃爲有
Interpretation

This passage explains how straying from one's true nature to pursue desires invites calamity. When people see coveted objects and fail to feel content, this insatiability breeds possessiveness, which in turn sparks conflict. Escalating disputes can erupt into chaos, even triggering warfare (as described in the phrase "warhorses breeding in the outskirts"). But those who understand contentment, who remain true to their inherent nature without scheming cleverness, who find sufficiency in daily sustenance—how could strife or turmoil arise from such people?

Mozi, founder of the Mohist school, observed: "It's not that peaceful living is unavailable, but that human hearts know no contentment; not that material goods are insufficient, but that greed has no bounds." All things in nature provide abundance, yet people perpetually feel lacking—this stems entirely from covetousness. Those who have attained the Dao understand: when the heart is content, provisions naturally suffice. Hence the saying, "Contentment's fulfillment is eternal fulfillment."

Wang Yuanze, a Song dynasty scholar, added: "If each person abided by their inherent nature, how could any insufficiency exist?" This chapter reveals that those who govern the world through the Dao maintain inner contentment and outer non-attachment, thereby preventing warfare and averting disasters. For Daoist practitioners, reducing desires and cultivating contentment pacifies the restless "mind-horse" (a metaphor for agitated thoughts) and stabilizes the vital Qi in the Dantian (the body's energy center). This constitutes the genuine attainment of the Dao.

(Note: The "mind-horse" symbolizes restless thoughts, while "Dantian" refers to the Daoist cultivation term for the body's focal energy centers. Daoist practice emphasizes "anchoring awareness in the Dantian" to maintain inner tranquility.)

道之  士矣 道德眞經取善集卷之七

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0107); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 6 Vol. 8 →