中文 · EN

《道德真經取善集》Vol. 8

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 8 / 12 7,206 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經取善集》 Vol. 8 (Dongshen 洞神部, 12 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 14 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經取善集》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

道德眞經取善集卷之八悲三   宋饒陽居士李霖集  不出戶章第四十七 不出户知天下不窺牖見天道  車惠弼曰行人虚懷内靜不馳心於世俗  末役思於攀縁以眞炤偽事無不悉也  陸佃曰夫萬物皆備於我矣有天道焉有  地道焉有人道焉反身求之而不誘於外  則人之道可以不出户而知天之道可以  不窺牖而見  天下雖大聖人知之以道天道雖遠聖人  見之以心心與道合以道觀天下無遠之  不察故無待於出户以心見天道無高之  不至故無待於窺牖楊子曰人心其神矣  乎操則存舍則亡能常操而存者其唯聖  人乎聖人存神索至和同天人之際使之  無間者也 其出彌遠其知彌少  蔡子晃曰明無道者不能察己知人馳心  逐境雖復出户遠遊境界窺牖瞻望星辰  其於知見甚爲寡少以其捨己而求於外  也  吕吉甫曰今夫天下之大固無窮也必待  出而後知之則足力之所及者寡矣所知  者幾何哉天道之遠固不測也必待窺而  後見之則目力之所及者寡矣所見者幾  何哉故曰其出彌遠其知彌少  王元澤曰無極之理盡於一塵纖慮不萌  萬縁已現學道之要豈不在兹而彼乃遠  出以求亦已昩矣彌遠彌少不其然歟 是以聖人不行而知不見而名不爲而成  御註以吾之智而知天下是謂不行而知
Interpretation

This passage explores the principle of understanding the world through inner cultivation. Song Dynasty scholar Li Lin compiled annotations from multiple Daoist thinkers to elucidate the core concepts of Chapter 47 in the Dao De Jing.

Che Huibi explains: Practitioners who maintain mental emptiness and stillness, undisturbed by worldly thoughts or external attachments, can perceive all things by observing illusions through their true nature (original innate disposition). Lu Dian further clarifies: The principles governing all things—encompassing the Dao of Heaven, Earth, and Humanity—reside within ourselves. By turning inward without being seduced by external phenomena, one can comprehend human affairs without stepping outdoors and grasp celestial principles without gazing through windows.

Though the world is vast, sages perceive it through the Dao; though the heavenly principles are distant, sages apprehend them through the heart-mind. When mind and Dao unite, one gains penetrating insight without distant travels; by contemplating celestial principles inwardly, one understands supreme truths without looking skyward. Yang Xiong (Yangzi) remarked on the wondrous nature of the human mind—preserved through maintenance, lost through neglect. Only sages can constantly maintain this state, achieving supreme harmony between Heaven and humanity.

Cai Zihuang observes: Those unacquainted with the Dao cannot reflect inwardly or understand others. When the mind chases external phenomena, even extensive travels and stargazing yield limited knowledge, for this approach mistakes branches for roots. Both Lü Jifu and Wang Yuanze emphasize: The boundless world reveals little to those who rely solely on physical travel; the unfathomable heavenly Dao discloses scant truths to mere visual observation. Thus the farther one journeys outwardly, the less one truly knows. Supreme truth manifests in dust motes—when not a single thought arises, all connections appear. Seeking the Dao afar leads instead to confusion.

Therefore, sages know without traveling, understand without seeing, and accomplish without striving. As the Imperial Commentary states: Using our wisdom to comprehend the world embodies the true meaning of "knowing without going."

 以吾之心而以見天道是謂不見而名不  行而知不見而名夫何爲哉巍巍乎其有  成功也是謂不爲而成  其知如神察於人倫堯舜知天下可知矣  則天之大與天之合堯舜見天道可知矣  不行而知不見而名夫何爲哉恭己正南  面而已故曰不爲而成此章主道而言也  有天道焉有人道焉天人雖異其道相通  聖人以心合道天下雖大可不出户而知  天道雖遠可不窺牖而見不行而知不見  而名不爲而成    爲學日益章第四十八 爲學日益爲道日損  御註學以致其道始乎爲士終乎爲聖日  加益而道積於厥躬孔子謂顔淵曰吾見  其進也致道者墮支體黜聰明離形去智  而萬事銷忘故曰損蘧伯玉所以行年六  十而六十化  修眞之人始乎務學以爲士終乎得道以  爲聖方務學以窮理物物而求通故曰益  矣爲道盡性而極乎至虚物物知非不期  乎損而所有漸銷矣先言爲學者若不學  則見善不明信道不篤無以致道既致道  當絶學若不絶學則聞見之多則以博溺  心不能體道故後言爲道日損也故曰始  乎務學以致道終乎得道以絶學乃爲全  眞之士矣 損之又損之以至於無爲  成玄英曰爲學之人執於有欲爲道之士  又滯無爲雖復淺深不同而二俱有患今  欲祛此兩執故有再損之文既而前損損
Interpretation

This passage discusses the distinct realms of cultivating the Dao (修道) versus pursuing conventional learning (为学).

Regarding the relationship between heavenly Dao (天道) and human affairs (人道): Those who truly attain the Dao understand the workings of heaven without direct observation and accomplish great things without deliberate action. Like the sage-kings Yao and Shun, they comprehend worldly matters through inner alignment with the Dao. Though the heavenly Dao is vast and distant, sages know it without leaving their doors; though human affairs are complex, they achieve without forced effort. Heavenly Dao and human affairs appear different yet are fundamentally interconnected.

On learning versus Dao cultivation: The pursuit of knowledge requires daily accumulation, while cultivating the Dao operates inversely—demanding daily reduction of attachments. Beginners should diligently study and exhaust principles, progressing like Confucius praised Yan Hui for doing. But in true Dao practice, one must relinquish bodily and sensory attachments, abandoning cleverness and scheming, evolving constantly like Qu Boyu who kept reforming himself even at sixty. Dao cultivators begin with rigorous study but ultimately must release what they've learned.

Concerning the practice of "reducing and reducing again" (损之又损): Both scholars attached to "having" (有) and Dao practitioners fixated on "non-being" (无) fall into partiality. Genuine cultivation requires progressively abandoning both attachments—first releasing knowledge accumulation, then transcending even the concept of wuwei (无为), ultimately reaching true non-action. As Cheng Xuanying explained, only through this twofold reduction can one surpass the duality of "being" and "non-being."

(Note: Qu Boyu was a virtuous minister of Wei during the Spring and Autumn period, renowned for his commitment to self-correction; Cheng Xuanying was a prominent Tang Dynasty Daoist and key figure in the Chongxuan [Twofold Mystery] school)

 有欲後損損無爲學道二偏雙遣非有非  無一中斯契  舒王曰窮理盡性必至於復命故損之又  損以至於無爲者復命也然命不亟復也  必至於消之復之然後至於命故曰損之  又損以至於無爲  吕吉甫曰損之者未免乎有爲也並其損  之者而損焉而後至於無爲 無爲而無不爲  羅什曰損之者無麤而不遣遣之至乎忘  惡然後無細而不去去之至乎忘善惡者  非也善者是也既損其非又損其是故曰  損之又損是非俱忘情欲既斷德與道合  至於無爲己雖無爲任萬物之自爲故無  不爲也  王弼曰有爲則有所失故無爲乃無所不  爲  吕吉甫曰無者無有而已無不爲者乃所  以無無也此之謂絶學無憂  爲學者日益其所無爲道者日損其所有  損之者損其所有也尚有所損之心至於  又損兼忘此心故無爲也寂然不動無不  爲也感而遂通天下之故經曰道常無爲  而無不爲 取天下常以無事  劉仲平曰孔子稱堯曰蕩蕩乎民無能名  焉稱舜曰無爲而治治至於此百姓皆謂  我自然矣自非無事以取天下曾何足以  及此  無事者道之眞聖人體道之眞天下歸懷  此無事所以取天下 及其有事不足以取天下  御註天下大物也有大物者不可以物物  而不物故能物物故取天下者常以無事
Interpretation

This scripture explores the dialectical relationship between Wuwei (non-action) and youwei (deliberate action), synthesizing insights from multiple Daoist scholars. Wang Anshi (Duke Shu) posits that through progressively diminishing desires and attachments, one ultimately attains the Wuwei state of "returning to destiny" (restoring original nature), though this requires gradual cultivation. Lü Ji-fu supplements this by noting that even the conscious act of "diminishing" must eventually be relinquished to achieve genuine Wuwei.

Kumārajīva (Luo-shu), interpreting from a Buddhist-Daoist integrative perspective, explains: first eliminate coarse negative thoughts, then release subtle attachments to virtuous concepts, ultimately transcending dualistic distinctions between right and wrong. When personal De (Virtue) merges with the Dao, what appears as non-action actually enables harmonious responsiveness to all things—achieving omnipresent efficacy through Wuwei. Wang Bi succinctly observes: forced action often leads to error, while non-action ensures completeness.

Regarding statecraft, Liu Zhongping cites Confucius' praise of Yao and Shun to illustrate that supreme governance makes the people unaware of being governed ("natural"). True sages uphold the Dao's essence without creating artificial disturbances, and the world naturally aligns with them. Conversely, rulers who initiate excessive policies struggle to maintain order. As the Imperial Commentary states: governing the world requires transcending specific affairs—only through "not governing" can one truly govern well.

The core teaching reveals: spiritual cultivation requires progressively dissolving attachments, while governance must follow natural principles. Whether in self-cultivation or social administration, the highest accomplishment lies in realizing omnipresent efficacy (wubuwei) through Wuwei.

 天下神器不可爲也爲者敗之執者失之  故及其有事不足以取天下聖人體道而  以其眞治身帝之所興王之所起偶而應  之天下將自賔太王亶父所以去邠而成  國于岐山之下  唐明皇曰有事則煩勞煩勞則凋弊故不  足以取天下  此章首言爲學者將以致道也致道忘心  故損之又損以至於無爲無事無爲者道  之常無事者道之眞此所以取天下也西  昇經云無爲無事國實民富    聖人無常心章第四十九 聖人無常心以百姓心爲心  御註聖人之心萬物之照也虚而能受靜  而能應如鑑對形以彼妍醜如谷應聲以  彼巨細何常之有疏觀萬物而知情因民  而已此之謂百姓爲心莊子曰卑而不可  不因者民也  劉進喜曰百姓者衆人之總稱也然聖人  無心有感斯應應隨物感故以百姓爲心  既無心應亦無不應 善者吾善之不善者吾亦善之德善信者吾 信之不信者吾亦信之德信  御註善否相非誕信相譏世俗之情自爲  同異豈德也哉德善則見百行無非善者  故不善者亦善之德信則見萬情無非信  者故不信者亦信之眞偽兩忘是非一致  是謂全德之人  王元澤曰善惡生乎妄見妄見生乎自私  公於大道則雖目睹善惡而心無殊想矣  故聖人因世之情强立毁譽而心知善惡
Interpretation

The most sacred thing in the world—the Dao—cannot be forcibly controlled. Those who attempt to dominate it will fail; those who try to grasp it tightly will lose it. Thus, when deliberate action is taken, the qualification to govern the world is already lost. The sage (one who has attained the Dao) follows its principles, cultivating the self through pure and genuine nature. The flourishing of emperors and the rise of feudal lords all arise from aligning with the movement of the Dao. Just as King Tai of Zhou left Bin and naturally established the Zhou dynasty at the foot of Mount Qi.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explained: Deliberate action brings exhaustion and disturbance, which lead to decline. Therefore, one cannot govern the world through forceful striving.

This chapter first clarifies that those who seek the Dao and study its path must relinquish attachments. By continuously reducing artificial effort, one ultimately reaches the state of wuwei (non-action). Wuwei is the eternal principle of the Dao, and wushi (non-interference) is its true nature—this is the fundamental method of governing the world. The Xisheng Jing states: When a ruler governs through wuwei, the state prospers and the people flourish.

Chapter 49 further elaborates: The sage has no fixed personal biases but takes the will of the people as their own. Like a mirror reflecting objects or an echo responding in a valley, how could there be rigid views? Observing all things reveals the truth—simply following the hearts of the people. Zhuangzi said: Though their status may be low, those who cannot but be obeyed are the people.

Liu Jinxi explained: "The people" is a general term for the multitude. The sage maintains a mind free of selfish intent, responding naturally to all things. Thus, they take the people’s hearts as their own—since they have no fixed mind, there is nothing they do not respond to.

To the kind, I respond with kindness; to the unkind, I also respond with kindness—this is how true goodness is attained. To the trustworthy, I extend trust; to the untrustworthy, I also extend trust—this is how true trust is gained. Ordinary people constantly judge truth and falsehood, good and evil—how could this align with De (Virtue)? One who possesses De-shan (virtuous goodness) sees no act as unkind, thus treating even the unkind with kindness. One who possesses De-xin (virtuous trust) sees no sentiment as untrustworthy, thus trusting even the untrustworthy. Transcending distinctions of truth and falsehood, dissolving oppositions of right and wrong—this is the person of complete De.

Wang Yuanze added: Good and evil arise from illusory distinctions, and such distinctions stem from selfishness. If one stands from the perspective of the great Dao, even if the eyes perceive differences, the mind does not create discrimination. Thus, though the sage establishes standards of reward and punishment according to worldly circumstances, the heart understands the nature of good and evil.

 本自非相故不善之善非憐而恕之乃不  覺有異也忘善惡之實眞善也故萬法雖  殊等爲實相信與不信生乎自私知一切  相無非妄者故能視不善猶善知一切相  無非實者視不信猶信當妄知實當實知  妄此聖智所以異於衆人也 聖人在天下惵惵爲天下渾其心  御註方其在天下則吉凶與民同患雖無  常心而不可以不戒也故所以爲己則惵  惵然不自暇逸所以爲天下則齊善否同  誕信兩忘而閉其所譽渾然而已  蔡子晃曰以無分别之教混有分别之心  衆生既有善不善有信不信有分别二見  聖人皆善皆信究竟玄同故云渾  王元澤曰惵惵者恐懼之意 百姓皆注其耳目聖人皆孩之  王元澤曰仰而法之無知之民動皆非理  聖人憐而誘之如父母於赤子恂恂然適  其志氣而無忿疾之心非夫體道忘物而  仁侔天地者其孰能如此  此章言聖人體道無心故忘善惡齊誕信  及其在天下惵惵然不敢易也至於爲天  下則渾然而已百姓仰而法之唯聖人之  視聽聖人遇之以慈待之以厚雖不善信  者亦善信之此孩之也非體道無心者其  孰能如是    出生入死章第五十 出生入死  蔡子晃曰夫衆生失無爲之靜本造有爲  之穢業出没隱顯生死輪迴所以從無適  有名曰出生自有歸無名爲入死也
Interpretation

This classic passage expounds the way of being for sages. Its core teaching reveals that true virtue (De) is not deliberate goodness, but a natural state transcending the duality of good and evil. When observing all phenomena, sages do not cling to superficial oppositions like virtue/vice or trust/distrust.

The text states all phenomena are ultimately illusory ("though the myriad manifestations differ, they equally reveal true reality"). Those who comprehend this can perceive non-virtue as virtue and distrust as trust. This wisdom to penetrate the nature of reality and illusion distinguishes sages from ordinary people.

Sages move through the world with reverent caution ("trembling with care"), treating all things with non-discriminating awareness. They blend distinctions of good/evil and true/false ("unifying their mind") as if merging all dualistic perceptions. While common people focus on sages' words and deeds, the sages guide them with parental kindness—extending benevolence even to those lacking virtue or trust.

The "emerging into life and entering death" section explains: beings fall into the cycle of rebirth because they deviate from their original nature of Wuwei tranquility. Transition from nothingness to form is called "emerging into life," while returning from form to nothingness is "entering death"—this constitutes the cycle of birth and death.

The entire passage emphasizes the sage's wisdom beyond dualistic thinking and their compassionate embrace of all beings. This state requires realizing the essence of Dao without being misled by superficial appearances.

 吕吉甫曰生者死之徒死者生之始則生  死相爲出入而已  陸佃曰性無生死出則爲生入則爲死 生之徒十有三死之徒十有三  韓非曰四支與九竅十有三動靜屬於生  死焉夫善攝生者目不妄視於采色耳不  妄聽於淫聲鼻不妄嗅於穢膻口不妄言  於非道手不妄持於凶器足不妄履於邪  徑動靜翛然諸惡莫犯此乃長生之徒也  趣死者反於此動靜没溺諸吉無有此乃  近死之徒也夫生死之原皆系此十三事  矣與河公說同  唐明皇曰汎論衆生當生安生得生理處  死順死得死理如此者大凡十中有三爾  陸佃曰主出而陽者生之徒也主入而陰  者死之徒也主出而至於求學出死以羡  乆生者出之甚也主入而求學入滅以樂  乆死者入之甚也此兩者十之中有三焉 人之生動之死地十有三  王元澤曰貪生失理故動皆傷性蓋天下  除無知常民之外或殉道而爲道術或殉  欲而爲咎惡皆由有其生而自生故不免  於死生也  人之生動之死地者衆人是也矜生太厚  以養傷生故動之死地如此之輩亦十中  有三爾其能出是三者則不死不生也 夫何故以其生生之厚  御註生之徒悦生而累形死之徒趣寂而  忘身動之死地桁楊者相接也刑獄者相  望也是皆不知身之爲大患生之爲有涯
Interpretation

Lü Jifu (a Daoist figure) states: Life and death accompany each other—the end of life is death, and the beginning of death is life. Birth and demise are like an endless cycle of exiting and entering. Lu Dian (a Song Dynasty scholar) elaborates further: Intrinsic nature knows neither life nor death; when it expands outward, it manifests as life, and when it contracts inward, it appears as death.

The text mentions that "three out of ten belong to the path of life, and three out of ten belong to the path of death." Han Feizi explains: The human body's four limbs and nine orifices make up thirteen parts, and their movement or stillness determines life and death. Those skilled in nurturing life do not let their eyes gaze recklessly at beauty, their ears listen indiscriminately to lewd sounds, their noses inhale foul odors, their mouths speak words contrary to the Dao (the Way), their hands touch weapons of harm, or their feet tread unrighteous paths. Their actions and stillness follow natural principles, keeping them far from evil—this is the true path to longevity. Conversely, those indulging in sensual pleasures and reckless behavior belong to the category approaching death. The key to life and death lies in these thirteen aspects, aligning with the interpretation of Heshang Gong (a Han Dynasty Daoist scholar).

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Emperor Ming of Tang) observes: Among living beings in the world, those who dwell peacefully in life, understanding its principles, or accept death, comprehending its nature, number roughly three in ten. Lu Dian adds: The outward expansion of Yang Qi (vital energy) signifies life, while the inward gathering of Yin Qi marks death. Excessive pursuit of longevity paradoxically hastens demise, while deliberate courting of death may unexpectedly prolong life—these two extremes each account for three-tenths of cases.

Wang Yuanze (a Song Dynasty scholar) points out: People, in their fear of death and clinging to life, often violate natural laws. Beyond the ignorant masses, some harm themselves pursuing esoteric arts (Daoshu), while others commit evil to satisfy desires—all because excessive attachment to "life" traps them in the cycle of birth and death. Ordinary people, overly protective of life, ironically harm it through misguided nourishment—such individuals also comprise three-tenths. Only by transcending these three states can one reach the realm of neither death nor birth.

The Imperial Commentary concludes: Those obsessed with preserving life burden their bodies through attachment, while seekers of death neglect their physical form in pursuit of annihilation. Those on the path to demise resemble shackled prisoners in an endless procession—all because they fail to recognize the body as life's greatest burden and mortality as an inescapable truth.

 而存生過厚爾古之得道者富貴不以養  傷身貧賤不以利累形不樂壽不哀夭朝  徹而見獨故能無古今而入於不死不生  温公曰言十人之中大約柔弱以保其生  者三剛强以速其死者三雖志在愛生而  不免於趨死者亦三其所以愛生而趨死  者由其自奉養太厚故也  經曰人之輕死以其求生之厚是以輕死  夫唯無以生爲者是賢於貴生 蓋聞善攝生者  河上公曰攝養也  纂微曰老氏不自言攝生而曰蓋聞者謙  之辭攝衛也於衛生之中得其精微故曰  善攝生者爾 陸行不遇兕虎入軍不被甲兵  河上公曰陸行不遇兕虎自然遠避害不  干也入軍不被甲兵不奸戰以殺人  成玄英曰此明三毒不能傷害若攝生無  生則害不能害既内無三毒則外三毒不  傷是以陸行不遇兕虎入軍不被甲兵也  何者夫虎主嗔兕主癡兵主貪 兕無所投其角虎無所措其爪兵無所容其 刃  舒王曰惟善攝生者則能無我無我則不  害於物而物亦不能害之矣  莊子曰人能虚己以遊世其孰能害之 夫何故以其無死地  王元澤曰無死地者由其無生彼無生者  湛然常生而不自生故未嘗死未嘗生道  至乎此則雖其形有禪而神未嘗變安得  死乎此中國之神聖而西方之佛也若然  者變化無常水火不能焦濡斫䃮不能創
Interpretation

The ancient sages who attained the Dao, whether wealthy or poor, never harmed their bodies through material indulgence. They neither rejoiced in longevity nor lamented short lifespans. With minds clear and penetrating, they transcended temporal limitations to reach the realm beyond birth and death.

Sima Guang (Duke Wen) explained that among ten people, there are roughly three types: those who preserve life through gentleness, those who hasten death through rigidity, and those who seek to nurture life yet paradoxically move toward death. The latter fail precisely because they excessively pursue material comforts.

The Dao De Jing states: "The reason people die easily is their excessive pursuit of pleasure." Only those who do not deliberately seek longevity prove wiser than those obsessed with life-nourishment.

Those truly skilled in shesheng (life cultivation) encounter no rhinoceroses or tigers when traveling by land, nor suffer weapon wounds when entering battlefields. Heshang Gong's commentary explains this as their natural avoidance of danger without provoking misfortune. Cheng Xuanying further elaborates: "This means the three poisons of greed, hatred, and delusion cannot harm them." When these toxins are absent within, external perils cannot inflict damage.

Wang Anshi (Duke Shu) held that masters of life cultivation reach the state of "non-self" (wuwo) - they harm nothing, and nothing can harm them. Zhuangzi similarly said: "When one dwells in the world with empty humility, who could harm them?"

How is this possible? Because they possess no fatal vulnerabilities. Wang Yuanze explained this invulnerability stems from transcending concepts of life and death. Such people maintain eternal spirit (shen) - though their forms change, their primordial spirit remains indestructible. This represents the realm of Chinese sages and Western Buddhas. Those who attain this state become unfathomably mutable - neither water nor fire can harm them, neither blades nor weapons can injure them.

(Note: The "three poisons" mentioned refer to the Buddhist concept of fundamental afflictions: greed, hatred, and delusion; "shesheng" denotes Daoist life-nourishment practices; "non-self" indicates a state beyond personal attachments)

 病乘虚觸實往無不通則物欲有之而不  得況能傷之哉或曰然則何以謂之攝生  曰降此一等便爲死生所有攝生必至於  此然後生常存也是比於含德之厚者又  其至矣  温公曰兕虎以喻强暴處强暴之間而不  見害者以其柔弱不爭故也  羅什曰地猶生也以其攝生無生故三毒  不能傷害  此章言生死之道以十言之各具三焉惟  善攝生之人道通於一出此三類雖虎兕  刀兵亦不敢傷害故言以其無死地    道生之章第五十一 道生之德畜之物形之勢成之  御註形質既具體勢斯成長短之相形高  下之相傾其勢然也  吕吉甫曰萬物之生常本於無名之物而  其畜常在於一而未形物得以生之際無  名者道也一而未形物得以生者德也及  其爲物則特形而已非其所以生且畜也  已有形矣則躶者不得不躶鱗介羽毛者  不得不鱗介羽毛以至於幼壯老死不得  不幼壯老死皆勢之必然也故曰道生之  德畜之物形之勢成之  道生神德布氣流動而生物物生成理謂  之形 是以萬物莫不尊道而貴德  吕吉甫曰勢出於形形出於德德出於道  道德本也形勢末也本尊而末卑本貴而  末賤是以萬物莫不尊道而貴德  道者萬物之所由也降純精而生物之性  德者物之所得也舍和氣而養物之形道
Interpretation

This passage expounds the core Daoist perspectives on life and virtue (De).

First, it explains the principle that "illness exploits emptiness to attack substance": when a person maintains a state of emptiness and stillness, external desires and harm cannot truly affect them. Someone might ask, what then is the true way of nurturing life? The answer is: simply lower one’s attachments by a single degree (meaning letting go of fixations), and one transcends life and death. Authentic life cultivation must reach this state for life to endure eternally. This represents an even higher attainment than those of profound virtue.

Sima Guang, the Duke of Wen, explains that the rhinoceros and tiger symbolize violent forces, yet remaining unharmed in such an environment stems from maintaining a soft and non-confrontational state. The monk Kumarajiva adds that the earth is like life itself—because true life cultivation transcends the concept of life and death, the "three poisons" of greed, hatred, and delusion cannot harm it.

This chapter discusses the Dao of life and death. Those skilled in nurturing life unite with the Dao (the Way), surpassing the "three dangers" (referring to the three types of harm mentioned in the text). Even when facing wild beasts or weapons, they remain unharmed because they have transcended the limitations of death.

Chapter 51, "The Dao Gives Birth," explains the principle of how all things are generated: the Dao creates them, virtue (De) nourishes them, matter forms their bodies, and circumstances facilitate their development. The Imperial Commentary clarifies that once a form takes shape, it naturally generates corresponding tendencies—just as length and shortness, height and lowness reflect one another—this is the natural order.

Lü Huiqing elaborates: the birth of all things originates from the formless Dao, while their growth relies on virtue (De) in its unformed state. Once they become concrete entities, they are merely forms, no longer the source of creation. Once a body exists, naked creatures remain naked, and armored creatures remain armored—the progression from youth to old age and death is an inevitable trajectory.

The Dao produces spirit (Shen), virtue (De) disperses energy (Qi), and through flow and transformation, all things are generated. Once things take form, they follow their own patterns and structures. Thus, all things honor the Dao and treasure virtue (De). Lü Huiqing further explains: tendencies arise from form, form arises from virtue (De), and virtue (De) arises from the Dao. The Dao and virtue are the root, while form and tendencies are the branches. The root is noble, the branches humble—hence all things revere the Dao and value virtue (De).

The Dao is the origin from which all things arise—it bestows pure essence (Jing) to form their nature. Virtue (De) is the vitality things receive—it contains harmonious energy (Qi) to nourish their forms.

 生物而爲父則道尊而物卑尊故能勝物  而小之莊子所謂眞君是也德畜物而爲  母則德貴而物賤故物莫能賤之莊子所  謂眞宰是也尊者如君父貴者如金玉此  尊貴之異也 道之尊德之貴夫莫之爵而常自然  唐明皇曰言道德之尊貴非假爵命但生  成之功被物而常自然尊貴爾  王元澤曰命於天則爲天子命於天子則  爲諸侯有所受命則出命者能賤之唯道  在萬物之先而制其命孰能爵之故常自  然也 故道生之畜之長之育之成之熟之養之覆 之  御註别而言則有道德勢物之異合而言  則皆出乎道道者萬物之奥也萬物化作  而道與之生萬物斂藏而道與之成出乎  震成乎艮養乎坤覆乎乾剛柔相磨八卦  相盪若有機緘而不能自已道實冒之  纂微曰上言道生之德畜之此不言德者  以道之一氣無不貫穿而略其德之文也  夫受其精之謂生函其氣之謂畜遂其形  之謂長字其材之謂育輔其功之謂成終  時之謂熟保其和之謂養護其傷之謂  覆此八者大道之元功也肖翹蝡動之物  得不尊之貴之乎 生而不有爲而不恃長而不宰是謂玄德  御註生則兆於動出爲則效於變化長則  見於統一道之降而在德者爾然生而不  有其功爲而不恃其能長而不睹其刻制  之巧非德妙而小者孰能與此故曰是謂
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the supreme status of Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue/Power) in the generative process of all things, along with their spontaneous and non-active (Wuwei) nature.

Dao, as the cosmic origin, creates all beings like a father. Its nobility renders all things humble, thus enabling it to govern the myriad creatures. What Zhuangzi calls the "True Sovereign" refers precisely to this supreme governance. De, as the concrete manifestation of Dao, nurtures all things like a mother. Its preciousness makes all beings appear lowly, yet none can disregard it—this is what Zhuangzi terms the "True Arbiter." The nobility resembles a ruler-father, while the preciousness resembles gold and jade—these represent two distinct expressions of supremacy.

The nobility of Dao and De isn't conferred by any authority but arises spontaneously. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains that the supremacy of Dao and De requires no human bestowal, for their function of transforming and nurturing all things naturally establishes their exalted status. Wang Yuanze further clarifies that worldly titles can be revoked by higher authorities, but Dao establishes cosmic principles prior to all existence—no power can ennoble it, thus it remains eternally and spontaneously supreme.

The text then describes the complete process of Dao's creation: generating, storing, growing, nurturing, perfecting, maturing, sustaining, and protecting. Though we may separately discuss the roles of Dao, De, circumstance, and material forms, all fundamentally originate from Dao. As the root of all things, every transformation—whether flourishing or declining—depends upon it. Just as the Eight Trigrams (Bagua: Qian, Kun, Zhen, Gen, etc.) interact through generation and restriction, what appears as mechanical control is ultimately Dao's governance at work.

The compiler notes that while earlier passages mention "Dao generates and De nurtures," here only Dao is emphasized because its primordial Qi (vital energy) permeates everything, with De's function already contained within. Specifically: bestowing vital essence (Jing) is called "generating," containing primordial Qi is called "storing," forming physical shapes is called "growing," cultivating substance is called "nurturing," assisting completion is called "perfecting," fulfilling temporal cycles is called "maturing," maintaining harmony is called "sustaining," and restoring damage is called "protecting." These eight functions all stem from Dao's fundamental operation—even the smallest creatures cannot but revere it.

Finally, the text highlights Dao's profound virtue: it creates without possessing, acts without claiming credit, and governs without dominating—this constitutes the most profound De. Dao manifests through movement and transformation during creation, reveals itself through various changes during action, and appears as unity during governance. Yet it never boasts of achievements, never depends on its abilities, and never displays controlling techniques. Unless De had reached the ultimate state of profundity, how could it accomplish this?

 玄德  纂微曰此都結上生畜等八義也言道之  生乎萬物若顯其有則收其仁矣養乎萬  物若恃其爲則居其功矣長育羣材成熟  庶類載覆動植若矜其宰則處其長矣有  是而退藏於密可謂陰德深矣遠矣  唐明皇曰具如載營魄章所釋彼章言人  修如道此章言道用同人  此章言道德生畜萬物萬物尊貴道德道  至尊德至貴孰能爵之常自然而已然散  而言之則有道德之異合而言之皆出於  道故以玄德終焉是以知道德混沌玄妙  同也    天下有始章第五十二 天下有始以爲天下母  吕吉甫曰天下有始以爲天下母則經所  謂吾不知其名字之曰道者是也無名天  地之始有名萬物之母道常無名而爲天  下母何也蓋有名徒爲萬物母而未足爲  天下母無名天地之始則自天而下皆生  於無名故曰天下有始以爲天下母也  始者道也道爲天下萬物母也始與母皆  道也自其氣之始則謂之始自其生生則  謂之母有始則能生生矣 既得其母以知其子  御註道能母萬物而字之則物者其子也  通於道者兼物物故得其母以知其子  王元澤曰萬物由道以出道爲之母物謂  之子得道則萬物之理不待識而知 既知其子復守其母  河上公曰既知天下萬物之理當復守道  反無爲 没身不殆
Interpretation

This scripture primarily elucidates the concept of "profound virtue" (Xuande, the mysterious and unfathomable quality of De) and the relationship between the Dao and all things.

Regarding "profound virtue": The great Dao gives birth to all things yet does not flaunt benevolence, nurtures all beings yet claims no merit, and fosters their growth without asserting dominion. This silent, hidden virtue—acting without revealing itself—constitutes the most profound form of "hidden virtue" (Yinde). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang noted that this aligns with the chapter "Carrying the Hun and Po" in the Daode Jing, which teaches that human cultivation should emulate the Dao's characteristics.

The text then explains the relationship between Dao-De and all things: The Dao is the origin (mother) of all things, while all things are manifestations (children) of the Dao. Recognizing that all things arise from the Dao allows one to comprehend their principles; yet after understanding these principles, one must still abide by the Dao's fundamental nature. By doing so, one will remain free from peril throughout life.

Lü Dongbin (Lü Ji Fu) adds that the "beginning" mentioned in "the world had a beginning" refers to the Dao, which is both the origin of heaven and earth (the nameless source) and the mother of all things (the named nurturer). From the perspective of Qi, it is the "beginning"; from the generative function, it is the "mother." Wang Chongyang (Wang Yuanze) further clarifies: Those who penetrate the great Dao, having grasped the root (mother), naturally understand the patterns of all things (children). Heshang Gong emphasizes that even after comprehending the principles of all things, one must return to the Dao's essence of Wuwei (non-action).

Through the metaphor of "mother" and "child," this passage reveals the generative relationship between the Dao and all things, as well as the cultivator's essential practice of "knowing the child while guarding the mother."

 王元澤曰夫見理之後逐理不反則妄作爲  凶失道遠矣故知子守母乃常不殆也  既知其子復當守道棄智慧反無知以自  保故終無危殆之患 塞其兊閉其門終身不勤  河上公曰兊目也使目不妄視門口也使  口不妄言  吕吉甫曰此則守母之謂也心動於内而  吾縱焉是之謂有兊有兊則心出而交物  我則塞其兊而不通不通則心不出矣物  引於外而吾納焉是之謂有門有門則物  入而擾心我則閉其門而不納不納則物  不入矣内不岀外不入雖萬物之變芸芸  於前各歸其根而不知矣夫何勤之有哉 開其兊濟其事終身不救  舒王曰没者存之對終者始之對以事對  門者閉其門則事之不入可知矣濟其事  則門之不閉可知矣  裴處恩曰開其五欲之門濟其六塵之事  心神内疲耳目外困終身勞倦也 見小曰明  纂微曰此謂防於未萌治於未亂也若知  塞兊閉門之術是見於微小也見微小則  事不能昏可謂明矣  夫惟守其母者每見其心於動之微小者  道之微見道之微者自知而已故無不明 守柔曰强  張君相曰順道無違曰柔始終不損曰强  吕吉甫曰守無形之至柔而物莫之勝也 用其光復歸其明  御註明者光之體光者明之用聖人之應  世從體起用則輝散爲光攝用歸體則智
Interpretation

Wang Yuanze (a Song Dynasty scholar) explains: If one understands principles yet chases external knowledge without returning to the fundamental truth, they will act recklessly and thus stray further from the Dao. Therefore, one must know how to guard the root (the "mother" refers to the foundation of the Dao) to remain enduring and unfading. After comprehending external manifestations (the "child"), one should still hold fast to the great Dao, relinquish cunning, and return to simplicity to preserve oneself—this way, one will never face peril.

"Block the openings (referring to sensory organs like eyes and ears), shut the gates (referring to entry points of desire)" means: the eyes do not gaze indiscriminately, and the mouth does not speak carelessly. Lü Jifu (a Song Dynasty Daoist) adds that this is the meaning of "guarding the mother." When deluded thoughts arise in the mind, indulging them is like opening the gates of the senses. By sealing these passages, delusions cannot escape; when tempted by external things, accepting them is like opening the gates of desire. By closing these doors, external distractions cannot intrude. Thus, with inner and outer separated, even if myriad things clamor before one, they remain in their place without causing disturbance—how could one ever be exhausted by them?

Conversely, if one opens the gates of desire (the "five desires" being form, sound, scent, taste, and touch) and entangles oneself in worldly affairs (the "six dusts" being the six external realms corresponding to the eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mind), the heart will grow weary, the senses will be strained, and one will never find liberation in this lifetime.

To perceive the subtlest signs is called true wisdom. It is like preventing calamity before it arises or ordering chaos before it unfolds. Understanding the method of blocking the senses and closing the gates of desire is to "discern the subtle and know the profound." One who perceives the minute will not be deluded by external things—this is genuine understanding.

Only those who guard the root can detect the faintest stirrings at the moment they arise in the mind. The subtlety of the Dao can only be grasped through personal realization—thus, nothing remains unclear. What appears as gentle adherence to the Dao is, in truth, the greatest strength. Zhang Junxiang says: To follow the Dao without defiance is called gentleness; to remain undamaged in one's nature from beginning to end is called strength. Lü Jifu adds: By guarding the formless and supremely gentle Dao, external things cannot overcome one.

The Imperial Commentary explains: Clarity (ming) is the essence of light, while light is the function of clarity. When a sage engages with the world, function arises from essence, and wisdom radiates like illumination; when function is withdrawn and returns to essence, wisdom reverts to pristine clarity. It is like using light to illuminate external things and then turning it inward to reflect upon one's own luminous nature.

 徹爲明顯諸仁藏諸用如彼日月萬物皆  照而明未嘗虧所以神明其德者是也  河上公曰用其光於外復當反其光明於  内無使精神泄也 無遺身殃是謂襲常  御註物之化無常也惟復命者遺物離人  復歸於明而不與物俱化故體常而無患  與形諜成光者異矣  顧歡曰若開其兊濟其事殃咎必至至非  外禍是自與身殃  迴光反照内視存神不爲漏失則終身不  至於有殃咎是謂密合常乆之道此章主  守母之義也道者物之母而物者道之子  塞兊閉門見小守柔以至應物用光復當  反照皆守母之義也故其道常存永無殃  咎是密用眞常之道也    使我介然章第五十三 使我介然有知行於大道唯施是畏  陸佃曰夫道以無欲守以無知行故曰使  我介然有知行於大道唯施是畏蓋有知  者於内不能無所矜於外不能無所徇是  以動而有所畏  介者小而辨於物小有知於道而由大道  以行者己憚於施設矣況有大知者乎何  則至人之道不以末傷本也施爲盛於外  則根本虚於内矣故行於大道者纖慮不  萌萬縁俱息不容有介然之知矣齧缺問  王倪所以四問而四不知 大道甚夷民甚好徑  陸佃曰不由道路取疾而行謂之徑  夷平易也徑邪不平正也迷民捨大道而  弗由好邪徑而求捷欲速以邀近功用知
Interpretation

This scripture passage primarily discusses how Dao cultivators should maintain inner radiance while avoiding external disturbances and calamities.

Heshang Gong explains that although practitioners should use the light of wisdom to engage with the external world, it's more crucial to reflect this illumination inward, preventing the dissipation of spiritual energy (Shen). Only then can one avoid self-inflicted misfortunes—this constitutes the practice of following the eternal Dao.

The imperial commentary notes that while all things undergo constant transformation, only those who return to their original nature can transcend material attachments, preserving inner clarity without being altered by external phenomena. Such individuals maintain constancy without worries, standing in complete contrast to those who merely pursue superficial brilliance.

Gu Huan points out that indulging sensory desires ("opening the floodgates") and becoming engrossed in worldly affairs inevitably invites disaster. These calamities aren't external misfortunes but self-created bodily afflictions. Practitioners should "reflect the light inward" (turning attention within), "observe and preserve the spirit" (neiguan cunshen), and prevent the leakage of vital essence (Jing) and energy (Qi), thereby remaining free from lifelong misfortunes. This constitutes alignment with the eternal Dao.

The core teaching here is the principle of "guarding the mother." The Dao serves as the origin (mother) of all things, while phenomena represent its manifestations (offspring). Cultivation requires "stopping sensory outflows" (se dui), "closing the gates of external seeking" (bi men), and maintaining humility and softness (jian xiao shou rou). While engaging with the external world (ying wu yong guang), one must ultimately return inward (fu dang fan zhao)—all these embody the principle of guarding the mother. Following this principle ensures eternal existence without calamity, representing the true eternal Dao.

The subsequent Chapter 53 ("Making Me Resolute") states: "If I have but slight knowledge (jie ran you zhi) of the Dao while walking the great path, my greatest fear is forced action (wei shi shi wei)." Lu Dian explains that cultivation should be guarded through desirelessness and practiced through unknowing. Those with slight knowledge inevitably become self-righteous internally and acquisitive externally, hence their fearful hesitation in action.

"Jie" refers to subtle discriminatory capacity. Even minimal understanding of the Dao creates trepidation when practicing the great path—how much more so for those claiming great wisdom? The way of perfected persons never lets branches harm the root. When external actions become overly conspicuous, the internal foundation empties. Therefore, those walking the great path don't entertain the slightest distracting thought, with all causal conditions ceasing, leaving no room for self-righteous knowledge.

The great path remains perfectly level (shen yi), yet people prefer shortcuts (hao jing). Lu Dian explains "jing" as abandoning the proper road in favor of quick results. The deluded forsake the great path, favoring devious shortcuts in their rush for attainment—all stemming from misapplied wisdom.

 求道而去道也遠又豈知大道以不知而  知則夷之甚者也民乃欲以有知求之是  好徑而不知所内也澹臺滅明者行不由  徑是行於大道也邪徑之弊具如下文 朝甚除  顧歡曰除修也奸徑之人唯以修朝爲善  也  紂惟宫室臺榭楚之章華秦之阿房皆是  也 田甚蕪  河上公曰高臺榭宫室修農事廢不耕治  而失時也  顧歡曰草長曰藥藥荒廢也夫峻宇彫墻窮  侈極麗則人力凋盡田蕪荒廢内明徇名  好利棄少求多道業不修丹田藥廢也  田萊多荒詩所以刺幽王也 倉甚虚  舒王曰朝甚除治也其田反至於藥其倉  反至於虚倉本也今乃蕪虚是由人棄大  道而趨邪徑也  王元澤曰田事治倉積實國之本也今務  除其朝廷以爲一時之榮觀而不恤根本  之已竭豈持乆之道乎明以末傷本者皆  然也 服文彩  河上公曰好飾偽貴外華  青赤爲文色絲爲采 帶利劍  成玄英曰黼黻文繡以麗其身干將鏌鋣  以衛其命 厭飲食財貨有餘  韓非曰夫入其國其政教可知也觀朝闕  甚修除墻宇甚雕峻則知國君好土木之  功多遊嬉之娱矣觀田野甚荒蕪農事失  耕治則知國君好力役奪民時矣觀倉廪  甚空虚農夫多殍餓則知國君好末作廢  本業矣觀衣服多文采質喪而貴華則知
Interpretation

Those who seek the great Dao yet deviate from it only stray further from the Way. They fail to understand that true realization of the Dao comes precisely through "not knowing" (non-attachment to knowledge). Those attempting to grasp the Dao through cleverness are like travelers taking shortcuts yet never finding their spiritual home. The reason disciple Tantai Mieming could embody the great Dao was precisely because he never took crooked paths. Let us now examine the dangers of deviant ways:

When court halls are excessively adorned (as in "the court is overly decorated"), we see examples like King Zhou's Deer Tower, the Zhanghua Terrace of Chu, or the Epang Palace of Qin—all notorious for exhausting the people's resources. Rulers preoccupied with superficial splendor leave fields lying waste ("the fields are overgrown"). Lavish palaces drain the people's strength, farmers miss planting seasons, and weeds overtake the farmland. Such pursuit of empty fame and greedy profit not only shakes a nation's foundations—for spiritual cultivators, their Dantian (the body's energy center where essence and qi converge) becomes like barren fields, losing all vitality. The Book of Odes criticized King You of Zhou for precisely this phenomenon.

Empty granaries ("the storehouses are depleted") result from putting the branch before the root. While the court focuses on external glamor, agriculture—the nation's lifeblood—is neglected. Wearing ornate robes ("dressed in embroidered finery") with intricate blue-and-red patterns; carrying sharp swords ("girded with fine swords") like the legendary Ganjiang and Moye merely for display; growing weary of delicacies yet hoarding wealth ("sated with food and drink, amassing surplus goods")—these all reveal the truth: Observe if a court is excessively decorated, and you'll know if the ruler indulges in pleasure; see if fields lie fallow, and you'll understand if the people's labor is abused; check if granaries stand empty, and you'll recognize if fundamentals are ignored; note if people chase lavish attire, and you'll perceive a society lost in superficiality.

(Note: This passage contrasts the "proper path" with "deviant shortcuts," exposing how rulers pursuing surface prosperity while neglecting fundamental governance mirrors the need for spiritual cultivation to return to simplicity. The metaphor of the barren Dantian extends principles of statecraft to self-cultivation.)

 國君好淫巧蠹女工矣觀佩帶皆利劍剛  强而競闘則知國君好武勇生國患矣觀  飲食常厭飫烹肥而擊鮮則知國君奸醉  飽忘民事矣觀財貨常有餘務多藏珍異  則知國君奸聚斂困民財矣仲尼曰百姓  不足君孰與足此之謂也  唐明皇曰烹肥擊鮮重滋味厭飫足也聚  斂積實饒珍異  王元澤曰侈費於外以取一時之適而忘  本業此明好施以傷本者一本作貨財  紂實鹿臺之財盈鉅橋之栗 是謂盜誇非盜也哉  羅什曰取非其有曰盜貴己之能曰誇  盜者陰取於人而畏人知如上七事皆徇  末忘本取非其有仍不自隱密誇大於人  是謂盜誇既矜豈能持乆故曰非道此章  言行於大道者不可介然有知若小有所  知則施爲盛於外根本虚於内是棄大道  而趨邪徑也大道者本也末盛則本衰下  文皆
Interpretation

When a ruler becomes obsessed with elaborate and luxurious attire, and sees people adorning themselves with ornaments as sharp and aggressive as swords, it becomes clear this monarch glorifies military might—a path that brings calamity to the state. When observing a ruler constantly pursuing rich, delicate delicacies, we recognize his indulgence in gluttony and wine, oblivious to his people's suffering. When witnessing a ruler amassing wealth and hoarding rare treasures, we see him squeezing the lifeblood from his subjects. As Confucius wisely said: "How can the ruler be wealthy when his people are destitute?"

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Li Longji) remarked: Craving rich delicacies reflects excessive obsession with sensory pleasures; hoarding valuables and treasures reveals insatiable greed.

Wang Yuanze (Wang Anshi) observed: Squandering resources for fleeting pleasures while neglecting governance fundamentals exemplifies the folly of chasing grandiose achievements at the expense of foundational stability—much like King Zhou of Shang amassing wealth at Lutai and stockpiling grain at Juqiao.

Such behavior constitutes "robbery with arrogance"—not outright theft, yet worse than theft. Kumarajiva explained: Taking what isn’t rightfully yours is "robbery," while flaunting your prowess is "arrogance." True robbery involves covert seizure, fearing exposure. The seven behaviors mentioned earlier (referring to the enumerated vices of rulers) all abandon the root for the branches, seizing ill-gotten gains while brazenly flaunting them—this is "robbery with arrogance." How can such prideful excess endure? Thus, it is said this is not the true Dao.

This chapter teaches us: Those who follow the great Dao (Dao) must not cling to petty cleverness. Those who rely solely on minor cunning may make a grand outward display while their inner foundation remains hollow—forsaking the Dao and straying onto crooked paths. The Dao is the root; when the branches grow too dense, they harm the root. What follows illustrates the consequences of excessive focus on trivialities at the expense of fundamentals.

以末傷本而施之過也 道德眞經取善集卷之八

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0107); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 7 Vol. 9 →