中文 · EN

《沖虛至德真經四解》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 2 / 20 9,224 characters

About this page. The original text of 《沖虛至德真經四解》 Vol. 2 (Dongshen 洞神部, 20 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 18 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《沖虛至德真經四解》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

沖虚至德眞經四解卷之二聖二    天瑞 子列子適衛食於道從者見百歲髑髏攓蓬 而指(攓扳/也)顧謂弟子百豐曰唯予與彼知而 未嘗生未嘗死也  俱涉變化之塗則予生而彼死推之至極  之域則理既無生亦又無死也  盧曰形則有生有死神也無死無生我如  神在彼如神去髑髏與我生死不同若悟  其神未嘗生死 此過養乎此過歡乎  遭形則不能不養遇生則不能不歡此過  誤之徒非理之實當也  盧曰既受其形則歡養失理以至於死耳 種有幾  先問變化種數凡有幾條然後明之於下 若鼃爲鶉(事見/墨子)得水爲㡭得水土之際則爲 鼃蠙之衣(衣猶/覆蓋)生於陵屯  陵屯高潔處也 則爲陵舄  此隨所生之處而變者也 陵舄得鬱栖則爲烏足  此合而相生者也 烏足之根爲蠐螬其葉爲胡蝶  根本也葉散也言烏足爲蠐螬之本其末  散化爲胡蝶也 胡蝶胥也  胥皆也言物皆化也 化而爲蟲生竈下其狀若脱其名曰𪀊掇  此一形之内變異者也 𪀊掇千日(千日/而死)化而爲鳥其名曰乾餘骨乾 餘骨之沫爲斯彌(沫猶精/華生起)斯彌爲食醯頤輅 食醯頤輅生乎食醯黄軦食醯黄軦生乎九 猷九猷生乎瞀芮瞀芮生乎腐蠸  此皆死而更生之一形者也
Interpretation

Liezi was traveling with his disciples to the state of Wei when they stopped for a meal by the roadside. A follower discovered a century-old human skeleton among the weeds. Brushing aside the grass, Liezi pointed at the skull and said to his disciple Baifeng: "Only this skeleton and I truly understand—we were never really born, nor shall we ever truly die."

He explained: What we perceive is merely a process of transformation. Superficially, I appear alive while this skeleton seems dead, but if we trace existence to its fundamental nature, we find no real distinction between life and death. Lu Chongxuan (a Tang dynasty Daoist master) later commented: While the physical body undergoes birth and death, the original spirit (Shen) is neither born nor destroyed. My Shen remains present while its Shen has departed—though the skeleton and I appear in different states of existence, one who comprehends the true nature of Shen realizes there is ultimately no such thing as life or death.

Liezi continued his teaching: People mistakenly cling to preserving their bodies and coveting life's pleasures. Once physical form is acquired, one inevitably becomes preoccupied with its maintenance; upon receiving life, one cannot resist delighting in it—such behaviors stem from losing touch with one's fundamental nature. Lu Chongxuan observed: After acquiring form, humans violate the Dao through excessive attachment to nurturing their bodies, ultimately hastening their demise.

The discourse then turned to categories of transformation in nature: Beginning with the legendary transformation of frogs into quails (recorded in the Mozi) and aquatic plants changing forms in different environments. For instance, when water weeds grow on dry highland, they transform into lingxi (a xerophytic plant), demonstrating how organisms adapt their morphology to surroundings. When lingxi combines with decaying soil, it gives rise to wuzu grass—a new lifeform emerging from the fusion of two substances.

The roots of wuzu grass metamorphose into scarab larvae while its leaves become butterflies, showing how a single organism can differentiate into multiple forms. All living beings undergo continuous transformation—a butterfly may become a kitchen moth, which upon death transforms into a bird called ganyugu. The avian essence then evolves into a simi insect, subsequently manifesting as vinegar mites, yellow kuang insects, and eight other forms—all exemplifying how a single life essence undergoes successive rebirths.

羊肝化爲地臯馬血之爲轉鄰也人血之爲 野火也  此皆一形之内自變化也 鷂之爲鸇鸇之爲布穀布穀乆復爲鷂也鷰 之爲蛤也田鼠之爲鶉也朽瓜之爲魚也老 韭之爲莧也老羭之爲猨也(羭牡/羊也)魚卵之爲 蟲  此皆無所因感自然而變者也 亶爰之獸自孕而生曰類  亶音釋山海經云亶爰之山有獸其狀如  狸而有髮其名曰類自爲牝牡相生也 河澤之鳥視而生曰鶂  此相視而生者也莊子曰白鶂相視眸子  不運而風化之也 純雌其名大腰純雄其名穉蜂  大腰龜鼈之類也穉小也此無雌雄而自  化上言蟲獸之理既然下明人道亦有如  此者也 思士不妻而感思女不夫而孕  大荒經曰有思幽之國思士不妻思女不  夫精氣潜感不假交接而生子也此亦白  鶂之類也 后稷生乎巨跡  傳記云高辛氏之妃名姜原見大人跡好  而履之如有人理感己者遂孕因生后稷  長而賢乃爲堯佐即周祖也 伊尹生乎空桑  傳記曰伊尹母居伊水之上既孕夢有神  告之曰臼水出而東走無顧明日視臼水  出告其鄰東走十里而顧其邑盡爲水身  因化爲空桑有莘氏女子採桑得嬰兒于  空桑之中故命之曰伊尹而獻其君令庖  人養之長而賢爲殷湯相
Interpretation

This passage documents various extraordinary phenomena of reproduction and transformation in nature and human society, primarily categorized into two types: spontaneous metamorphosis and asexual reproduction.

First, regarding spontaneous metamorphosis: A sheep's liver can transform into earthworms (a type of small insect), horse blood may become zhuanlin (a mythical creature), and human blood can turn into will-o'-the-wisps. These are all natural transformations occurring within the same physical form. There are also instances where a sparrowhawk changes into a harrier, the harrier into a cuckoo, and the cuckoo back into a sparrowhawk; swallows transforming into clams, field mice into quails, rotten melons into fish, old leeks into amaranth, aged rams into apes, and fish eggs into insects. These transformations occur spontaneously without external catalysts.

Concerning asexual reproduction: On Danyuan Mountain (from the Classic of Mountains and Seas), there exists a beast called "lei" resembling a wildcat but covered in hair, capable of self-impregnation. In rivers and marshes lives a bird called "yi" that can reproduce simply through mutual gazing between male and female (Zhuangzi mentions that white "yi" birds conceive when their eyes remain motionless during gazing). There are also all-female "dayao" (turtles) and all-male "zhifeng" (small wasps), both capable of self-reproduction.

Similar phenomena appear in human society: In the land of Siyou (from the Classic of the Great Wilderness), Sishi men never marry and Sinü women never wed, yet they conceive children through spiritual resonance, much like the white "yi" birds' mutual conception. The birth of Houji (ancestor of the Zhou dynasty) occurred when his mother Jiang Yuan stepped on a giant's footprint and became pregnant through spiritual resonance. The birth of the Shang dynasty's famous minister Yi Yin is even more marvelous: his mother dreamed of a deity warning about a flood, transformed into a hollow mulberry tree while fleeing, and later a woman of the Youshen clan found the infant within the tree—this was Yi Yin.

These records reflect ancient people's observations and imaginings about the origins of life, connecting nature's wonders with human reproductive legends, embodying the primitive animistic worldview that "all things possess spirit."

厥昭生乎濕(此因蒸/潤而生)醯雞生乎酒(此因酸/氣而生)羊 奚比乎不荀(此異類而/相親比也)乆竹生青寧(因於林/藪而生) 青寧生程  自從㡭至於程皆生生之物蛇鳥蟲獸之  屬言其變化無常或以形而變或死而更  生終始相因無窮已也 程生馬馬生人人乆入於機萬物皆出於機 皆入於機  夫生死變化胡可測哉生於此者或死於  彼死於彼者或生於此而形生之主未嘗  暫無是以聖人知生不常存死不永滅而  一氣之變所適萬形萬形萬化而不化者  存歸於不化故謂之機機者群有之始動  之所宗故出無入有散有反無靡不由之  盧曰種之類也言種有類乎亦互相生乎  設此問者欲明神之所適則爲生神之所  去則爲死形無常主神無常形耳神本無  期形則有凝一受有形之質猶機關繫束  焉生則爲出死則爲入  政和易曰原始反終故知死生之說蓋有  生者必有死而死於是者未必不生於彼  通乎此則唯子與彼知而未嘗生未嘗死  也方生方死方死方生則養形而悅生今  之所存乃昔之所過者爾故曰此過養乎  此過歡乎萬物以不同形相代則死生之  變不可勝計也故曰種有幾如下文所云  乃耳目之所及者耳若鼃爲鶉者蓋言萬  物之化無川陸之間也㡭也蛙蠙之衣陵
Interpretation

This scripture describes the wondrous transformations and cyclical nature of life forms. Fireflies (zhao) emerge from damp vapors, vinegar mites (xiji) arise from fermented vinegar, while different species develop peculiar affinities—like the sheep's-foot fern (yangxi) growing alongside the dogbane vine (bugou). In bamboo groves, green larvae (qingning) appear, which then transform into leopards (cheng), revealing a chain of metamorphosis from tiny creatures to large animals.

These serpentine, avian, and insectoid life forms undergo ceaseless transformations—some through physical changes, others through death and rebirth in perpetual cycles. The leopard (cheng) may transform into a horse, and the horse in turn may give rise to humans. Ultimately, all things originate from the "pivotal mechanism" (ji, the axis of creation) and return to it. The mysteries of birth and death remain unfathomable—what perishes here may be reborn elsewhere, with only the sovereign spirit (shen), master of physical forms, remaining indestructible.

The sage understands that life is not eternally preserved, nor is death permanent annihilation—both are fundamentally transformations of primordial qi (vital energy). That unchanging "pivotal mechanism" is the source of all things, the governor of all movement, capable of shaping the formless into form and returning form to formlessness. As Lu Chongxuan's commentary explains: life forms may appear distinct yet are fundamentally interconnected. When the spirit takes residence, there is life; when it departs, death follows. Physical forms have no permanent master, nor does the spirit possess fixed form—once embodied, it becomes bound by material laws, with birth as manifestation and death as return to the source.

As the Zhouyi (Book of Changes) states: comprehending the cycle of beginnings and endings unveils the truth of life and death. What dies here may live elsewhere—those who grasp this principle understand birth and death as mere transformations of form. All things substitute for one another through different manifestations, with infinite permutations of life and death transitions. Consider how frogs transform into quail birds, demonstrating that metamorphosis transcends geographical boundaries—aquatic and terrestrial creatures may mutually evolve. When frog spawn (wa yi) attaches to elevated land (lingtun), it becomes plantain herbs (lingxi), which further evolve into other plants, revealing the marvelous fluidity of life forms.

 舄也一種也或得水土而生於下或得陵  屯而生於上蓋言萬物之化隨形氣之所  遇也陵舄得鬱栖則爲烏足則假異物以  爲體烏足之根爲蠐螬其葉爲胡蝶則散  同體以爲物胡蝶胥也化而爲蟲生於竈  下其狀若脱其名爲𪀊掇則睘飛者有化  而爲蝡動者矣𪀊掇千日化而爲鳥其名  曰乾餘骨則穴處者則有化而爲林棲者  矣或因形而移易則斯彌而爲頤輅原黄  軦之生乎腐蠸與天地臯轉鄰野火之類  是也或因性而反復則鷂之爲鸇鸇之爲  布穀布穀之復爲鷂是也鷰之爲蛤田鼠  之爲鶉朽爪之爲魚老韭之爲莧老羭之  爲猿魚卵之爲蟲則或以類而相因或以  不類而相與爲類亶爰之獸自孕而生日  類則無所感而化者河澤之鳥視而生曰  鶂則無所交而化者也純雌其名大腰純  雄其名穉蜂則其在物也有一陰陽而自  生化者矣思士不妻而感思女不夫而孕  則其在人也有非陰陽而能潜通者矣以  至后稷生乎巨跡伊尹生乎空桑雖不可  致詰而不足怪也厥昭生乎濕則化於氣  醯雞生乎酒則化於味羊奚比乎不筍則  化於習乆竹生青寧則以無情而生有情  也青寧生程則以無知而生有知也尸子  以程爲豹之類程生馬則以同類而相生  也馬生人則以非類而相生也然則昆蟲  之出入草木之生死變化無常未始有極
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principle of constant transformation in all things, using numerous natural phenomena to demonstrate how life forms change according to environmental conditions. The marsh-dwelling Xicao grass transforms into Wuzu grass under different circumstances; the roots of Wuzu grass can become scarab larvae while its leaves turn into butterflies—revealing how living beings can assume different forms through material transformations. Butterflies may then metamorphose into small stove-dwelling insects called "Jianduo," changing from flying to crawling creatures; after a thousand days, these insects can transform into birds called "Ganyugu," shifting from subterranean dwellers to forest inhabitants.

Some transformations involve gradual physical changes, like the Yilu insects emerging from decaying yellow cucumber beetles as naturally as wildfire spreads. Others represent cyclical nature transformations, such as sparrowhawks turning into kites, kites into cuckoos, then reverting back to sparrowhawks. Swallows transforming into clams, field mice becoming quails, decaying fingernails turning into fish, aged leeks morphing into amaranth, old ewes changing into apes, or fish eggs becoming insects—these changes demonstrate both same-species and cross-species metamorphoses.

Particularly noteworthy are the Danhuan mountain beasts capable of self-impregnation, the river marsh birds that reproduce through visual contact, the exclusively female Dayao creatures, and the all-male Zhi wasps—showing existence of unisexual reproduction. Even among humans there are cases of pregnancy without intercourse, like Houji conceived through sensing a giant's footprint or Yi Yin born from a hollow mulberry tree—phenomena that, while inexplicable, should not be considered extraordinary.

The conclusion observes: marsh insects emerge from dampness due to Qi transformation; wine midges appear from fermented flavors; the Yangxi grass transforms after prolonged association with bamboo shoots; withered bamboo gives birth to Qingning insects (inanimate matter generating sentient life); Qingning insects produce Cheng beasts (unconscious lifeforms creating conscious ones). The philosopher Shizi classified Cheng beasts as leopard-kind; their production of horses represents same-species generation, while horses producing humans shows cross-species transformation. Thus we see the endless metamorphosis of insects and the cyclical withering-flourishing of plants—these changes proceed without end, following no fixed patterns.

 又烏知死生先後之所在哉惟萬物生有  所乎萌死有所乎歸聖人於此知其有機  緘而不能自已耳  范曰道無終始物有死生陶於大化之冶  適然而變則氣聚形成强名曰生轉於造  化之機適然有遺則氣散形壊强名曰死  氣有聚散特浮雲之去來耳形有存亡特  一漚之起滅耳死生之名有對而立方死  方生夢已俄覺方生方死覺已俄夢敦知  其所以然耶惟原始反終者知其未嘗死  未嘗生敵來而無從去而無往殆將入於  不死不生矣百歲髑髏特已腐之餘骨果  何知也然莊子載其言有曰吾安能棄南  面王樂復爲人間之勞乎則不悅生而惡  死可知世之昧者攬一身而願膠萬化而  執生化而死戚然而惡故此過養乎以其  畏於死也死變而生欣然而喜故此過懽  乎以其悅於生也死固奚足畏生固奚足  悅乎是特萬化而未始有極者耳又況萬  物相禪種名不同故鶉也㡭也蛙蠙之衣  也陵舄也此一種也或得水或得水土之  際或得陵屯而其生各不同也烏足也蠐  螬也胡蝶也其與陵舄亦一種也或以鬱  栖或以葉或以根而其變各不同也𪀊掇  也乾餘骨也斯彌也食醯頤輅也其與胥  亦一種也或以竈下或以千日或以其沫  而其生各不同也食醯頤輅生乎食醯黃  軦食醯黃軦生乎九猷九猷生乎瞀芮瞀
Interpretation

This passage explores the fundamental nature of life and death, asserting that all things follow natural cycles of growth and decline. The sage who has attained the Dao understands that life and death are merely the gathering and dispersing of Qi (vital energy), as natural as drifting clouds coming and going or bubbles forming and vanishing.

What appears as the opposition between life and death is actually like the relationship between dreaming and waking—just as one thinks they're dreaming, they may already be awake, and when feeling fully conscious, they might slip back into dreams. Those who truly comprehend the origin of life know there is essentially neither true birth nor true death. As the centenarian skeleton once remarked: "How could I abandon the joy of being a monarch to return to human suffering?" This illustrates how those who see through life and death neither cling to life nor fear death.

Ordinary people typically make two mistakes: some excessively preserve their bodies in fear of death, while others obsessively cling to life in delight of survival. In truth, life and death are like the endless transformations of all things—different life forms mutually transforming into one another. Creatures like quails, frogs, and plantains may appear different, yet they are all manifestations of the same vital energy. Consider how a butterfly emerges from a caterpillar, or how insects beneath a stove transform into dried husks before becoming other organisms—these metamorphoses appear distinct but share the same origin.

The transformation of life forms resembles how vinegar worms give birth to yellow insects, which then produce nine-headed creatures, which in turn generate tiny flying insects that eventually become fireflies—revealing the perpetual mystery of life's cyclical transformations.

 芮生乎腐蠸則不知其種自然而生者羊  肝化爲地臯馬血之爲轉鄰人血之爲野  火鷂之爲鸇鸇之爲布穀鷰之爲蛤田鼠  之爲鶉朽爪之爲魚老韭之爲莧老羭之  爲猨魚卵之爲蟲則不知其種自然而變  者自孕而生者有若亶爰之獸相視而生  者有若河澤之鳥大腰之類純雌而無雄  穉蜂之類純雄而無雌以思士則不妻而  感以思女則不夫而孕以至厥昭醯雞則  有所因而生羊奚不筍則無所因而比乆  竹也青寧也程也是又馬與人有自之而  生也用是以觀則物或以有情而相生或  無情而相生或以有情而生無情或以無  情而生有情或生於無所因或生於無所  感萬形萬化無有紀極意者其有機緘而  不得已邪利用以出注然勃然莫不出焉  者皆出於機也利用以入油然漻然莫不  入焉者皆入於機也有萬不同出生入死  不知其所由然彼其神機之張氣機之運  固有爲之斡旋宰制者列子方論無爲之  職繼之以此良有以也 黄帝書曰形動不生形而生影聲動不生聲 而生響  夫有形必有影有聲必有響此自然而並  生俱出而俱没豈有相資前後之差哉郭  象注莊子論之詳矣而世之談者以形動  而影隨聲出而響應聖人則之以爲喻明  物動則失本靖則歸根不復曲通影響之  義也 無動不生無而生有
Interpretation

This passage explores the marvelous phenomena of generation and transformation in all things, revealing the profound principles behind the mutual metamorphosis of various life forms in nature.

Some creatures seem to appear out of thin air: insects emerge from rotting melons and fruits with unknown origins; a sheep's liver decomposing transforms into a ground beetle, horse blood becomes will-o'-the-wisps, and human blood turns into wildfire. Even birds undergo mutual transformations: sparrowhawks become cuckoos, swallows turn into clams, and field mice transform into quails. Fingernails decaying can become fish, old leeks mutate into amaranth, aging ewes evolve into apes, and fish eggs develop into insects.

Nature exhibits various extraordinary reproductive methods: the beasts of Mount Danyuan conceive merely through eye contact; the large-waisted creatures in rivers and marshes are all female without needing males, while slender-waisted wasps are entirely male without requiring females. Humans also display peculiar phenomena: lovesick men can conceive without marriage through sympathetic resonance, and lovesick women can become pregnant without wedlock. As for the tiny insects in vinegar, their generation follows specific causes; yet the sheep's-bane grass coexists long-term with bamboo shoots without union. Creatures like the Qingning insect and Cheng insect, horses and humans—all arise spontaneously from nature.

From these phenomena we observe: some beings emerge through emotional exchange, others appear without any emotional cause; some sentient creatures produce insentient matter, while some insentient substances generate sentient life; some manifestations occur without reason, others arise without resonance. The endless transformations of forms in this world likely stem from some intrinsic mechanism driving them forward? All flourishing life originates from this mechanism, and all decay and dissolution return to it. Though life manifests in countless variations, the cycle of life and death remains beyond comprehension—precisely because this marvelous life mechanism operates through the fluctuations of Qi (vital energy), governed by its inherent regulator.

The Yellow Emperor's classic states: "Moving forms don't generate forms, but produce shadows; vibrating sounds don't create sounds, but yield echoes." Where there's form there must be shadow, where there's sound there must be echo—these are natural phenomena arising and vanishing simultaneously, requiring no sequence of before and after. Guo Xiang's commentary on the Zhuangzi has already explored this thoroughly. When people say "shadows follow moving forms, echoes respond to sounds," sages use this metaphor to illustrate that once things move they lose their authentic nature, while stillness returns them to their source—there's no need to obsess over superficial relationships like shadows and echoes.

Without movement there would be no transformation, yet transformation indeed gives birth to new things.

 有之爲有恃無以生言生必由無而無不  生有此運通之功必賴於無故生動之稱  因事而立耳  盧曰形有所生不能生無影響是也神而  無形動則生有萬類是也  范曰影之爲影若有待於形也而實無所  待形動而影自從耳影非有求於形也響  之爲響若有待於聲也而實無所待聲動  而響自應耳響非有求於聲也有生於無  其理若此 形必終者也天地終乎與我偕終  料巨細計修短則與我殊矣會歸於終理  固無差也  盧曰大小雖殊同歸於盡耳  范曰系物數之終冬時數之終無物也無  時也孰知其所終天地者形之大也既已  囿於形矣雖欲不終得乎 終進乎不知也  進當爲盡此書盡字例多作進也聚則成  形散則爲終此世之所謂終始也然則聚  者以形實爲始以離散爲終散者以虚漠  爲始以形實爲終故迭相與爲終始而理  實無終無始者也  盧曰進當爲盡假設問者言天地有終盡  乎爲復不知乎其下自答也 道終乎本無始進乎不乆  乆當爲有無始故不終無有故不盡  范曰無物無時孰爲終始除日無歲孰爲  乆暫謂道爲可終邪特未可知也彼其本  無始莊子所謂未始有始是已謂道爲可  進邪特未可知也彼其本不乆莊子所謂  先天地生而不爲乆是已 有生則復於不生有形則復於無形
Interpretation

This passage explores the dialectical relationship between "being" (you) and "non-being" (wu). All existing things owe their existence to the fundamental source of "non-being," just as life must emerge from emptiness. The dynamic patterns of movement and transformation (the "operating function") are likewise necessarily grounded in this root of "non-being."

The text employs metaphors of shadows and forms, echoes and sounds: while shadows appear to depend on physical forms, they actually rely on nothing; echoes seem to require original sounds, yet they arise through natural resonance. This illustrates the principle that "being" is born from "non-being"—all things appear to have dependencies, yet in truth they manifest spontaneously.

Regarding the discussion of "endings and beginnings," the text observes that all formed things must eventually perish, even the grandest forms like heaven and earth. However, the author distinguishes between worldly understandings of beginnings and ends (the gathering and dispersal of matter) and ultimate truth (which is without beginning or end). The coalescence of matter into form constitutes a "beginning," while its dispersion marks an "end"; yet the state of emptiness as fundamental source has neither commencement nor conclusion.

The passage ultimately emphasizes that the Great Dao (cosmic origin) has neither beginning nor end, and transcends both "being" and "non-being." As the Zhuangzi states, "there has never been a beginning"—it existed before the formation of heaven and earth, yet one cannot say it has existed for long. All living things return to lifeless states; all formed things ultimately revert to emptiness.

 生者反終形者反虚自然之數也  盧曰凡有始有終皆本乎無始歸於不有  今從太初渾淪而言之是有始也安得不  終乎安得不盡乎 不生者  此不生者先有其生然後之於死滅 非本不生者也  本不生者初自無生無滅 無形者  此無形者亦先有其形然後之於離散 非本無形者也  本無形者初自無聚無散者也夫生生物  者不生形形物者無形故能生形萬物於  我體無變今謂既生既形而復反於無生  無形者此故存亡之往復爾非始終之不  變者也  盧曰所言神之不生者非本不曾生也萬  物所以生群品所以形皆神之所運也以  其能生生而即體無生滅耳是非都無形  生同夫太虚之氣  范曰生之所生者死矣則復於不生形之  所形者實矣則復於無形不生者非本不  生自有生而復於此耳是豈生生而不生  者耶無形者非本無形自有形而復於此  耳是豈形形而無形者耶 生者理之必終者也終者不得不終亦如生 者之不得不生  生者不生而自生故雖生而不知所以生  不知所以生則生不可絶不知所以死則  死不可禦也 而欲恒其生盡其終惑於數也盡亡也  盧曰有生之物必有終極亦如和氣萌達  草木不得不生而欲令長生者迷於至數  者也  范曰生有所乎萌死有所乎歸始終相反
Interpretation

This scripture explores the fundamental relationship between life/death and physical form. It first observes that all living things ultimately return to death, and all physical forms eventually dissipate - this is the natural order of things.

Lu Chongxuan (Tang Dynasty Daoist master) explains: All things with beginnings and endings originate from "beginninglessness" (wushi) and ultimately return to "non-being" (bu you). Viewed from the primordial chaos of the universe, since there is emergence, how could there not be cessation? How could there not be dissolution?

The so-called "non-living" state actually follows existing life entering death and stillness - it's not that life never existed originally. True "fundamental non-arising" (ben busheng) means neither birth nor death from the very origin. Similarly, "formlessness" comes after physical forms disperse - not that forms never existed. True "fundamental formlessness" (ben wuxing) means neither aggregation nor dispersion from the source.

The life-creating origin itself has no birth/death; the form-shaping origin itself has no form. Thus it can generate all things while remaining unchanged. When we say life and form return to non-living/formless states, this is merely the cyclical alternation of existence and non-existence, not the eternal ultimate reality.

Lu further clarifies: The "Shen" (referring to the Daoist primordial spirit, the mechanism of creation) being deathless doesn't mean it lacks generative power. All things' capacity for life and all forms' capacity to manifest operate through Shen. Precisely because it can generate while remaining unaffected by birth/death cycles, it shares the nature of the Supreme Void's primordial Qi (cosmic source energy).

Fan Yingyuan (Southern Song Dynasty master) adds: Generated life must return to the non-living source; formed bodies must return to the formless origin. "Non-living" doesn't mean never having lived, but returning from living to this state; "formless" doesn't mean never having form, but returning from formed to this state.

Life inevitably moves toward termination just as it inevitably emerges. Life doesn't deliberately choose to exist - it arises spontaneously, hence living beings don't know why they live. Precisely because they don't know life's origin, they cannot prevent its continuation; not knowing death's cause, they cannot resist it. Seeking eternal life to avoid termination constitutes delusion that violates natural law.

Lu offers an analogy: Just as spring's warm Qi inevitably makes plants grow, living things must have endings. Desiring endless life misunderstands ultimate principles.

Fan concludes: Birth has its initiating sprout, death its returning destination - beginning and ending mutually transform.

 乎無端而莫知其所窮殆有數存焉於其  間而欲怕其盡者直將執而勿失流轉於  生死之域而莫覺莫悟豈不惑哉 精神者天之分骨骸者地之分屬天清而散 屬地濁而聚精神離形各歸其眞  天分歸天地分歸地各反其本 故謂之鬼鬼歸也歸其眞宅眞宅太虚之域  盧曰神明離於形謂之死也歸眞宅反乎  太清也以太清爲眞宅者明此形骸而爲  虚假耳  范曰精者水也神者火也水與火合而生  土故人之生也因精集神而百骸九竅六  藏該而存焉精神者天之分以其運而無  窮故清而散骨骸者地之分以其常而不  變故濁而聚精神離散各歸其眞此其所  以謂之鬼也切常申之人之初生精神䰟  魄具而後形成焉魂云也從於神而無不  之魄白也營於物而有所止聖人則以魂  制魄故神不至於殉形衆人則以䰟從魄  則不足於使形神不至於殉形則雖死也  無以異於生神不足以使形則雖生也無  以異於死賢人之死爲鬼盡人道而死雖  曰其鬼不神與夫淪於幽陰化爲異物者  固有間矣列子之言若非其至姑自其歸  眞宅者言之故曰鬼而已爾雅曰鬼之爲  言歸也 黄帝曰精神入其門骨骸反其根我尚何存  何生之無形何形之無炁何炁之無靈然  則心智形骸陰陽之一體偏積之一炁及
Interpretation

This scripture explores the fundamental nature and ultimate destination of human spirit and physical form. The spirit belongs to the celestial aspect (heavenly portion), being light and expansive; while bones and physical form belong to the earthly aspect (earthly portion), being heavy and consolidating. At death, the spirit departs from the body, each returning to its origin—the spirit ascends to heaven while the physical form returns to earth. This is called "gui" (ghost), meaning returning to the "true abode" (zhenzhai), the realm of the Great Void (Taixu, the cosmic origin).

Human life emerges from the union of water and fire (Jing-essence and Shen-spirit), giving birth to earth (physical form). At birth, only when both spirit and hun-po soul are complete can a whole life be formed. The hun (ethereal like cloud qi) follows the Shen-spirit and can reach everywhere, while the po (white substance) governs the physical form with inherent limitations. Sages can use hun to control po, preventing the spirit from being burdened by the body; ordinary people, however, let hun submit to po, causing their spirit to become insufficient to govern the physical form. Thus, when sages die, though their physical forms perish, their spirit remains as vibrant as in life; whereas ordinary people live with spirits as if already dead.

Virtuous individuals become ordinary gui after death—though they lose supernatural powers, they remain distinct from those who sink into darkness and transform into aberrant beings. The original meaning of "gui" is "to return," signifying the return to origin. The Yellow Emperor said: "When the spirit enters the heavenly gate and bones return to the earth, what remains of 'me'?" Life originates from formless Dao, the physical body emerges from shapeless Qi (vital energy), and within this Qi lies spiritual consciousness. Both mind and body are unified manifestations of Yin-Yang energies, concrete expressions of the primordial Qi (先天一气).

(Note: Here "Qi" refers to innate life energy, distinct from postnatal breath; "Great Void" denotes the most primordial state of the cosmos; "true abode" metaphorically represents the fundamental realm to which life ultimately returns.)

 其離形歸根則反其眞宅我無物焉  盧曰凡人以形爲我縁我則有情情多者  愛溺深而情少者嗜欲薄唯至人無我了  識其神凡人不知封執彌厚令神歸乎眞  形歸乎地向時之我竟何在耶  政和靜則復性動則去本理之然也形動  而不生形而生影聲動不生聲而生響無  動不生無而生有則去本遠矣無則生有  有必歸無故曰形必終者也天地與我並  生及其終也與我皆終孰知其極則謂終  者進乎不知矣有終有始有乆有暫者唯  其時物也故有始以無始爲至道終乎本  無始則又至矣有乆者以不乆爲至道進  乎本不乆則又至矣夫何故以有生則復  於不生有形則復於無形也不生者非卒  不生無形者非本無形蓋自有生有形者  見之也生者理之必終終者不得不終生  者不得不生而欲其生之長存以終爲界  辯又烏知環中之無窮者哉此惑於數者  也生者天地之委和精神者天之分故清  而散骨骸者地之分故濁而聚精神離散  各歸其眞尚何有於我哉然此自衆人言  之也故曰精神入其門骨骸反其根我尚  何存若夫聖人上與造物者遊下與無終  始者反則形未嘗衰而我獨存矣  范曰萬物有乎出而莫見其門有乎生而  莫見其根精神入其門者還其所自出也  骨骸反其根者復其所自生也若然則歸
Interpretation

This scripture explores the Daoist perspective on the relationship between form and spirit, and the nature of life and death.

Ordinary people mistakenly regard the physical body as the entirety of "self," thus generating various emotional desires. The more emotions one has, the deeper one sinks into attachment; the fewer desires one harbors, the lighter one's burdens become. Only those who have attained the Dao (the Way) can transcend this "attachment to self" and recognize the true nature of spirit. Common people cling to their physical forms, causing their spirit (Shen) to drift away from its original purity. When the body eventually returns to dust, where then is that clinging "self"?

Heaven and Earth operate according to their inherent patterns: in stillness, they return to their fundamental nature; in movement, they distance themselves from their source. Just as physical movement creates shadows and sound vibrations produce echoes, "being" emerges from "non-being," moving ever further from the root. Since all "being" must ultimately return to "non-being," the physical form is destined to perish. Heaven and Earth exist simultaneously with me, and will conclude with me—who can truly comprehend this ultimate mystery?

Concepts of beginning and end, duration and brevity, are all relative. The supreme Dao (the Way) itself has neither beginning nor end. Life emerges from formlessness and returns to formlessness—this is not sudden transformation but natural law. To cling to the idea of perpetual existence is like using the finite to measure the infinite, a delusion caused by superficial appearances.

A person's spirit (Shen) originates from the clear, light Qi (vital energy) of Heaven, while bones derive from the turbid, heavy Qi of Earth. After death, the spirit returns to the great void (Taixu), and flesh and bones revert to dust—where then does "self" remain? Yet this applies only to ordinary people. Sages roam with the Creator beyond life and death, beyond beginnings and endings—though their forms may decay, their true selves endure eternally.

All things have their origin and destination. When spirit returns to its source and bones to their root, this constitutes the state of returning to one's original truth.

 其眞宅我尚何存之有聖人以精集神以  神御形以形存神精全而不虧神用而不  竭形生而不敝閉其門物無目而入深其  根物無得而摇不壞之相自古固存是謂  長生乆視之道古之人修身千二百歲而  形未嘗衰蓋進乎此 人自生至終大化有四  其間遷易無時暫停四者蓋舉大較而言  者也  盧曰夫嬰兒者是非未生乎心也故德厚  而志專矣及欲慮充起攻之者必多衰老  炁柔更近於道命之終極乃休息焉 嬰孩也少壯也老耄也死亡也  范曰自物之無而觀之則眞常湛寂亘古  不去故江河競注實未嘗流自物之有而  觀之則大化密移交臂已失故舟山雖藏  不能無遯一將入陰陽之機遊造化之塗  則形之所形者實矣無動不變無時不移  借明於鑑今吾非故吾停燈於缸前焰非  後焰操有時之具託無窮之間貌色智態  止日不異自謂變化可逃得乎哉故自嬰  孩而少壯自老耄而死亡大化日徂間不  可省夫惟日夜無隙爲能通晝夜而知古  今不代爲能參萬歲而一反復終始揭天  地以趨靜是謂化化而不化於化者矣 其在嬰孩氣專志一和之至也物不傷焉德 莫加焉  老子曰含德之厚比於赤子  范曰兒子居不知所爲行不知所之故其  氣專則不雜其志一則不二沖和内固莫
Interpretation

This scripture primarily explores the Daoist principles of cultivating longevity and observing the transformations of life.

Practitioners of the Dao nurture their primordial spirit (Shen, the innate spiritual nature) by consolidating vital essence (Jing) and Qi (vital energy). They use the Shen to govern the physical form, and through the form, they preserve the Shen. In this way, Jing remains intact and undepleted, the Shen’s function never exhausts, and the body flourishes without decay. By closing the sensory gates, external phenomena cannot disturb them; by stabilizing the foundation of life, external influences cannot shake them. This indestructible state has existed since ancient times—this is the cultivation method of "long life and enduring vision." Ancient Daoist practitioners cultivated their bodies for twelve hundred years while their forms remained unweakened, having attained this very state.

A human life has four major stages: infancy, youth, old age, and death. Throughout these stages, transformation never ceases. In infancy, the mind holds no notions of right and wrong, so virtue (De) is pure and the will is unified. But once desires and thoughts arise, troubles multiply. In old age, the Qi becomes gentle and harmonious, bringing one closer to the Dao (the Way), and at life’s end, one enters a state of rest.

From the perspective of "non-being" (wu), the true eternal nature—one’s innate essence—remains forever still and unchanging. From the perspective of "being" (you), the myriad things are in constant flux. Just as rivers appear to flow while their essence remains unchanged, and boats seem still while actually moving, a person’s appearance and mind transform daily without their awareness. Only by understanding the alternation of day and night, and the continuity of past and present, can one grasp the cyclical patterns of all things.

Particular emphasis is placed on infancy, when Qi is concentrated and the will is pure and harmonious—the state of greatest De. As Laozi said, "One who embodies thick virtue is like an infant." Infants act with natural non-action (Wuwei), so their Jing is not scattered, their will is not divided, and their inner harmony remains firm.

 能傷憂患不能入邪氣不能襲故其德全  而形不虧老子所謂含德之厚是也 其在少壯則血氣飄溢欲慮充起物所攻焉 德故衰焉  處力競之地物所不與也  范曰孔子所謂血氣方剛是也 其在老耄則欲慮柔焉體將休焉物莫先焉  休息也已無競心則物不與爭 雖未及嬰孩之全方於少壯間矣  范曰莊子所謂佚我以老是也 其在死亡也則之於息焉反其極矣  盧曰近於性則體道惑於情則喪眞故含  德之厚比於赤子倦而不作猶爲次焉方  之馳競大可知也  政和其在嬰孩氣專志一和之至也老子  所謂含德之厚也其在少壯血氣飄溢欲  慮充起莊子所謂與接爲構及其老也血  氣既衰故欲慮柔而體將休焉至於歸其  眞宅則之於息焉而反其極矣莊子大塊  載我以形勞我以生佚我以老息我以死  此之謂也自嬰孩至於死亡皆以是日徂  故謂之化  范曰子貢所謂君子息焉是也四者之化  形生之所同也衆人則形化而心亦然聖  人則外化而内不化 孔子遊於太山見榮啓期行乎郕之野鹿裘 帶索鼓琴而歌孔子問曰先生所以樂何也 對曰吾樂甚多天生萬物唯人爲貴而吾得 爲人是一樂也  推此而言明人之神氣與衆生不殊所適  者異故其形貌不一是以榮啓期深測倚
Interpretation

In infancy, the human heart remains pure and undisturbed by external influences, making it impervious to harmful energies (Xieqi), thus preserving the integrity of one's innate nature (Xing). This is what Laozi referred to as "the state of profound Virtue (De)."

In youth, when vitality (Qi) is abundant, desires and thoughts flood the mind, making one easily swayed by external temptations, leading to the gradual decline of one's innate nature. At this stage, individuals engage in competition with the world, yet fail to gain harmony with all things. It resembles what Confucius described as the "stage of vigorous vitality."

In old age, desires and thoughts grow faint, the body requires rest, and one no longer actively pursues external things. Without the heart of contention, external matters no longer disturb. Though not as pure as infancy, it surpasses the turbulence of youth. This is the state Zhuangzi spoke of as "old age bringing me ease."

At death, one attains complete rest, returning to the ultimate origin. Lu Chongxuan's commentary explains: Approaching one's innate nature allows realization of the Dao (the Way), while indulgence in desires leads to the loss of true nature. Thus, the state of "profound Virtue" in infancy clearly surpasses the restless striving of others.

Zhenghe Zhenren further elaborates: In infancy, essence (Jing) and energy (Qi) are concentrated, the heart-mind is unified—this is the pinnacle of harmony, what Laozi called "profound Virtue." In youth, vitality is unsettled, desires flourish—as Zhuangzi said, "contact with external things breeds entanglement." In old age, vitality wanes, so desires fade and the body seeks rest. As for death, the true return—it is complete rest and the return to one's origin. Zhuangzi's words, "Heaven and Earth gave me form, life makes me toil, old age brings me ease, death grants me rest," express this truth. From infancy to death, transformation occurs daily—hence it is called "transformation" (Hua).

Fan Yingyuan remarked: Like Zigong's saying, "The noble man rests content here," these four states are universal patterns of life. Ordinary people change inwardly as their forms change, while sages adapt outwardly yet remain inwardly unchanged.

When Confucius traveled to Mount Tai, he saw Rong Qiji in the wilderness of Cheng, dressed in crude deerskin tied with a straw rope, playing the zither and singing. Confucius asked, "Why are you so joyful, sir?" Rong Qiji replied, "My joys are many: Heaven creates all things, yet humans are most precious. That I can be human is my first joy."

From this we infer that the spiritual essence (Shenqi) of humans is no different from other creatures—only their pursuits differ, hence their forms vary. Rong Qiji understood this deeply.

 伏之縁洞識幽顯之驗故忻遇人形兼得  男貴豈孟浪而言 男女之别男尊女卑故以男爲貴吾既得爲 男矣是二樂也  人之將生男女亦無定分故復喜得男身 人生有不見日月不免襁褓者吾既已行年 九十矣是三樂也貧者士之常也死者人之 終也處常得終當何憂哉孔子曰善乎能自 寬者也  不能都忘憂樂善其能推理自寬慰者耳  盧曰夫大冶鑄金依範成質故神爲其範  群形以成男女修短陰陽已定矣何者神  運其功形爲功報耳形既不能自了神者  未形已知啓期暮年方始爲樂是知道之  晩情滯於形夫子但善其自寬未許期深  達至道 林類年且百歲  書傳無聞蓋古之隱者也 底春被裘底當也拾遺穗於故畦  收刈後田中棄穀捃之也 並歌並進孔子適衛望之於野顧謂弟子曰 彼叟可與言者試往訊之子貢請行逆之壠 端面之而歎曰先生曾不悔乎而行歌拾穗 林類行不留歌不輟子貢叩之不已乃仰而 應曰吾何悔邪子貢曰先生少不勤行長不 競時老無妻子死期將至亦有何樂而拾穗 行歌乎林類笑曰吾之所以爲樂人皆有之 而反以爲憂  我所以爲樂者人人皆同但未能觸事而  夷故無暫歡  盧曰仁者不憂智者不懼不受形也生分  已隨之是以君子不戚戚於貧賤不遑遑
Interpretation

This passage recounts a dialogue between the ancient hermit Lin Lei (a practitioner nearing a hundred years of age) and Confucius's disciple Zigong, revealing the Daoist perspective on life, death, poverty, and wealth.

In early spring, Lin Lei wore a fur coat while gathering fallen grain stalks in harvested fields, singing as he walked. Confucius, observing this, deemed the elder worthy of conversation and sent Zigong to inquire. Zigong couldn't comprehend why this old man appeared so joyful: in youth he hadn't been diligent, in prime years he hadn't sought advancement, in old age he had neither wife nor children, with death approaching—yet he could still happily gather grain while singing.

Lin Lei laughed and replied that his joy was actually attainable by all, only people mistakenly considered these very things causes for sorrow. He proposed three great joys of human existence: first, being born human rather than beast; second, being born male (reflecting the era's social hierarchy); third, living to ninety when many died in childhood. He viewed poverty as the scholar's natural state and death as life's inevitable conclusion—what then remained to grieve when one accepts nature's course and completes life's journey well? Confucius praised his skill in self-consolation.

The commentator surnamed Lu notes that just as casting metal requires a mold, human form and spirit (Shen) are shaped by the "divine" (referring to Dao or natural law). That Lin Lei only realized this in old age shows his excessive attachment to physical form (xing). While Confucius approved his ability to console himself, he considered Lin Lei not yet truly penetrating the ultimate Dao.

This exchange demonstrates the Daoist attitude of following nature's flow and finding contentment in poverty while embracing the Dao. It suggests transcending conventional views of wealth and mortality to recognize life's essential nature—the true path to joy.

 於富貴人不達此反以爲憂汝亦何怪於  我也 少不勤行長不競時故能壽若此  不勤行則遺名譽不競時則無利欲二者  不存於胸中則百年之壽不祈而自獲也  盧曰非於非分之行競於命外之時求之  不跋傷生夭壽矣吾所以樂天知命而得  此壽 老無妻子死期將至故能樂若此  所謂樂天知命故無憂也  盧曰妻子適足以勞生苦心豈能延人壽  命居常待終心無憂戚是以能樂若此也 子貢曰壽者人之情死者人之惡子以死爲 樂何也林類曰死之與生一往一反故死於 是者安知不生於彼故吾知其不相若矣吾 又安知營營而求生非惑乎亦又安知吾今 之死不愈昔之生乎  尋此㫖則存亡往復無窮已也  盧曰知形有代謝神無死生一往一來猶  朝與暮耳何故營營貪此而懼彼哉 子貢聞之不喻其意還以告夫子夫子曰吾 知其可與言果然然彼得之而不盡者也  卒然聞林類之言盛以爲已造極矣而夫  子方謂未盡夫盡者無所不盡亦無所盡  然後盡理都全耳今方對無於有去彼取  此則不得不覺内外之異然所不盡者亦  少許處耳若夫萬變玄一彼我兩忘即理  自夷而實無所遣夫冥内遊外同於人群  者豈有盡與不盡者乎  盧曰死此生彼必然之理也林類所言安  知者是疑似之言耳故云未盡
Interpretation

The wealthy and powerful fail to comprehend this principle, yet they worry over it—why then should you find my views strange?

In my youth I never strove desperately for fame, nor in old age do I contend for fleeting opportunities. Thus I've attained such longevity. Without desperate striving, one won't covet empty reputation; without contending for chances, one remains free from profit-driven obsessions. With neither of these burdens weighing on the heart, one naturally lives to a hundred years without deliberate supplication. Lu Chongxuan explains: by not pursuing what exceeds one's lot nor contending for opportunities beyond fate's design, one avoids exhausting the spirit and suffering premature death. It is precisely because I "rejoice in Heaven and know my fate" that I've achieved such long life.

This old man has neither wife nor children, with death approaching—yet he finds such joy. This exemplifies the Book of Changes' teaching: "Rejoicing in Heaven and knowing fate, thus having no sorrow." Lu Chongxuan adds: spouses and children only tax one's spirit—how could they truly prolong life? Serenely awaiting life's conclusion without inner distress—this is why such joy is possible.

Zigong (Confucius' disciple) asked: "Long life is humanity's common desire; death is what all men dread. Yet you find joy in death—why?" Lin Lei replied: "Death and life are like coming and going. Those who die here—how do we know they're not reborn elsewhere? Thus I perceive no difference between them. How can you be certain that frenetically pursuing longevity isn't delusion? Or that my present death isn't superior to past life?" Lu Chongxuan explains: understanding that the physical body undergoes renewal while the spirit neither dies nor perishes, that life and death alternate like day and night—why then cling to life and fear death?

Zigong failed to comprehend and reported this to Confucius, who said: "I knew one could discuss profound matters with him, though his realization remains incomplete." Hearing Lin Lei's words initially, one might consider them ultimate truth, yet Confucius recognized their imperfection. The truly complete state embraces all without attachment, thereby fully comprehending heavenly principle. Presently Lin Lei still distinguishes having from lacking, acceptance from rejection—inevitably perceiving internal and external as separate. Yet he approaches truth, lacking only final penetration. Were he to perceive the mystery of myriad transformations returning to Oneness, forgetting all distinctions, truth would become self-evident—indeed requiring no deliberate rejection. That state of harmonizing inner and outer, blending with the multitude—where lies any division between completeness and incompleteness?

Lu Chongxuan concludes: dying here while being born elsewhere follows inevitable law. Lin Lei's "how do we know" expresses approximate truth—hence Confucius' judgment of incompleteness.

 政和易曰樂天知命故不憂處常得終死  生無變於己所以自樂也蓋修一身任窮  達知去來之非我亡變亂於心慮則何憂  之有雖然知樂知憂非眞樂也孔子以無  樂爲眞樂榮啓期者眞能自寬而林類蓋  得之而不盡者爾  范曰生者死之徒死者生之始萬化而未  始有極惟原始反終者故知死生之說自  不悅生不惡死言之則營營求生者可謂  惑矣然亦安知其爲惑乎自生之勞死之  息言之則今之死者固愈於昔之生矣然  亦安知其愈於昔之生乎觀林類之言若  是眞可與言者然以彼之所以爲樂者觀  之尚不免對無於有取此去彼故夫子以  爲得之而未盡者也 子貢倦於學告仲尼曰願有所息  學者所以求復其初乃至於厭倦則自然  之理虧矣 仲尼曰生無所息  勞知慮役支體此生者之事莊子曰生爲  徭役 子貢曰然則賜息無所乎仲尼曰有焉耳望 其壙睪如也宰如也墳如也鬲如也則知所 息矣  見其墳壤鬲異則知息之有所莊子曰死  爲休息也 子貢曰大哉死乎君子息焉小人伏焉  樂天知命泰然以待終君子之所以息去  離憂苦昧然而死小人之所以伏也 仲尼曰賜汝知之矣人胥知生之樂未知生 之苦知老之憊未知老之佚知死之惡未知 死之息也  莊子曰大塊載我以形勞我以生佚我以
Interpretation

This passage primarily explores perspectives on life and death and the realms of human existence, with its core ideas summarized as follows:

Those who comprehend the laws of nature and understand the Mandate of Heaven (Tianming) remain free from sorrow, for by accepting ordinary circumstances they achieve a good end. The transformations of life and death cannot affect their fundamental nature, thus they maintain joy. The truly self-cultivated person accepts both adversity and prosperity with equanimity, understanding that the coming and going of life lies beyond personal control. With an undisturbed heart, they naturally remain without sorrow. However, Confucius observed that deliberate pursuit of either joy or sorrow constitutes false happiness—true joy transcends such dualities in its natural state.

The text mentions Rong Qiqi (a Spring and Autumn period hermit) as one who truly attained self-contentment, while Lin Lei (an ancient worthy), though enlightened, hadn't reached complete realization. Life and death form a cyclical process—death marks life's beginning, with the transformations of all things being endless. Those who penetrate this truth neither cling to life nor dread death, unlike those anxiously toiling for survival who remain fundamentally confused.

When Zigong (Confucius' disciple) wearied of study, the Master told him: "While alive, there is no cessation—life itself is labor. Only when seeing graves (kuang meaning tomb chambers, fen meaning burial mounds, and li referring to funerary objects) does one understand true rest." Zigong sighed that death is magnificent—the noble find repose in it while the petty succumb. Confucius further explained: "People know life's pleasures but not its sufferings; recognize old age's weariness but not its comfort; fear death's terror but not its rest." Finally quoting Zhuangzi: "The Great Clod (nature) burdens us with form, labors us with life, eases us with age, and rests us with death."

Through this teacher-disciple dialogue, the text elucidates the Daoist philosophical view equating life and death while advocating harmony with nature. It presents death as life's natural destination—neither to be feared nor escaped.

 老息我以死耳  盧曰夫生者動用之質也唯死乃能休息  耳亦猶太陽流光群物皆動君子徇名小  人徇利未嘗休止也  政和學道而不至於死之說則何以學爲  哉子貢倦學而願息是未知死之說也故  夫子告之以生無所息望其壙睪如其明  宰如其高墳如其大鬲如而與世殊絶此  息之所也然衆人之死曰物而君子則雖  死而不亡故曰君子息焉小人伏焉生之  苦所謂勞我以生也老之佚所謂佚我以  老也死之息所謂息我以死也  范曰老子曰爲學日益又曰絶學無憂子  貢倦於學而願息焉由未進乎日益又烏  能損之又損無爲而無不爲而得夫謂所  絶學者哉孔子告之以生無所息欲其日  有孳孳死而後已故也莊子曰大塊載我  以形勞我以生佚我以老息我死體道者  無佚老息死之事特爲載形勞生者言之  乎故孔子以是對子貢 晏子曰善哉古之有死也  生死古今所同而獨善古之死者明古人  不樂生而惡死也 仁者息焉不仁者伏焉  修身愼行恒懷兢懼此仁者之所憂貪欲  縱肆常無厭足此不仁者之所苦唯死而  後休息寢伏之 死也者德之徼也  德者得也徼者歸也言各得其所歸 古者謂死人爲歸人言死人爲歸人則生人 爲行人矣行而不知歸失家者也一人失家 一世非之天下失家莫知非焉
Interpretation

This scripture explores perspectives on life, death, and the meaning of existence. Laozi states that death is the means by which I find rest. Lu Chongxuan explains that living represents a state of constant activity, and only through death can one truly rest. Just as the sun's radiance keeps all things in motion—with noble men pursuing reputation and petty men chasing profit—there is never cessation.

Zhenghe Zhenren observes that if Daoist study doesn't reach the stage of comprehending life and death, what's the purpose of studying? When Zigong (Confucius' disciple) grew weary of learning and desired rest, it was because he hadn't yet understood death's true meaning. Confucius told him there's no rest in life—one must behold the towering tomb mound and prominent epitaph to recognize death as the secluded resting place that separates us from the world. While ordinary people perish in death, noble men's spirits endure beyond physical demise, hence the saying "noble men find rest, petty men perish." Life is toil, aging brings ease, but death is true repose.

Fan Yingyuan quotes Laozi: "In learning, advance daily; yet transcend the burdens learning brings." Zigong's desire for rest stemmed from not having reached the stage of "daily advancement," let alone the supreme state of "continually reducing desires to achieve non-action (Wuwei) that accomplishes all." Confucius told him one must remain diligent until death. Zhuangzi says the earth gives us form—life brings toil, aging brings comfort, death brings rest. These truths are meant for those attached to physical form and wearied by life's struggles.

Yanzi marvels: "How splendid was the ancients' attitude toward death!" While life and death remain constant across time, the special praise for ancient perspectives shows they neither clung to life nor feared death.

The benevolent find peaceful rest; the unvirtuous simply perish. Those who cultivate virtue and act prudently maintain reverential caution—this is the benevolent person's concern. The greedy and unrestrained, forever unsatisfied, suffer continuously until death ends their torment.

Death is virtue's homecoming. "De (Virtue)" means attainment, while "jiao" (boundary) signifies return—each going to their proper place. The ancients called the dead "returnees," making the living "travelers." To journey without knowing one's destination is to be homeless. When one person loses their way, the world condemns them, yet when all under heaven are lost, none recognize the disorder.

(Note: The term "jiao" referenced here is a Daoist technical term denoting the ultimate destination or boundary of things; "great clod" refers to the earth; "lofty mound" describes the tomb's imposing appearance)

 此衆寡相傾者也晏子儒墨爲家重形生  者不辯有此言假託所稱耳  盧曰老子曰歸根曰靜靜曰復命復命曰  常知常曰明不知常妄作凶神之有形一  期之報迷本執有勞神苦心疲亦極矣唯  死也乃歸乎眞猶脱桎梏而捨負擔也貪  生惡死者苟戀乎有曾不知歸於本焉而  天下不以爲非迷者多矣 有人去鄉土離六親廢家業遊於四方而不 歸者何人哉世必謂之爲狂蕩之人矣又有 人鍾賢世(鍾賢世宜/言重形生)矜巧能修名譽誇張於 世而不知己者亦何人哉世必以爲智謀之 士此二者胥失者也  此二者雖行事小異而並不免於溺喪也 而世與一不與一唯聖人知所與知所去  以生死爲寤寐者與之溺喪忘歸者去之  盧曰夫棄本逐末勞神苦心順情之與求  名逐欲之與徇利二者俱失也何厚何薄  哉而群所謂則舉世爲是也凡執所滯則  舉世爲非矣唯有道者知去與焉故莊子  云臧與穀二人俱牧羊俱亡羊一則博塞  問一則讀書善惡雖殊亡羊一也苟失道  則游方之與修學夫何遠哉  政和死生亦大矣善吾生者乃所以善吾  死故曰善哉古之有死也死而不亡曰壽  仁者壽不仁之人則與物偕盡而已故曰  仁者息焉不仁者伏焉徼者有所歸宿之  地生陽也生者德之光而光則本乎陽死
Interpretation

This scripture reveals the common delusions of worldly people by contrasting two states of existence. First, it describes two types of individuals: one is the reckless wanderer who abandons his homeland, forsakes his kin, and neglects his household to roam aimlessly; the other is the scheming intellectual obsessed with worldly achievements, flaunting his talents and chasing fame, only to lose himself in the process. Though their manifestations differ, both are fundamentally trapped in a state of "drowning and dissipation" (沉溺迷失, chenni mishi)—a profound state of delusion and loss.

Laozi (the founder of Daoism) teaches that "returning to the root is called stillness" (归根曰静, guigen yue jing), emphasizing that true tranquility lies in returning to one’s original nature. Those who cling to physical life exhaust their spirit and torment their hearts, as if shackled and burdened—only in death do they find release and return to authenticity. Ordinary people fear death and crave life, yet fail to understand the return to life’s source. This confusion is widespread.

The text cites Yanzi (a famed minister of the Qi state during the Spring and Autumn period) and the Confucian and Mohist schools as examples, demonstrating that the emphasis on physical existence is not ultimate truth. The Zhenghe era (宋徽宗年号, here representing Confucian thought) regards life and death as great matters, asserting that only those who properly nurture life can properly face death. True longevity lies in the indestructibility of spirit (神, shen)—the virtuous (仁者, renzhe) endure in spirit, while the unvirtuous (不仁者, burenzhe) perish along with all things upon death.

Finally, the text employs a parable from Zhuangzi: two shepherds both lost their sheep—one due to gambling, the other due to study. Though their methods differed, the outcome was the same: both strayed from the proper path. Whether wandering the world or pursuing knowledge, any deviation from the Dao (道) is fundamentally no different. Only the sage who awakens to the Dao truly understands what to pursue and what to relinquish.

 陰也死者德之徼而徼則本乎陰故以生  爲行而死爲歸亦陰陽動靜之義狂蕩之  人其失之也外智謀之士其失之也内去  彼取此世俗之蔽耳唯聖人知所與知所  去  范曰人死曰鬼鬼者歸也歸其眞宅之謂  一旦攬有涯之生託無遯之地與物相刃  相靡其行盡如馳而莫之能止不亦悲乎  終身役役而不見其成功薾然疲役而不  知所歸可不哀耶是乃迷而不知復者人  謂之不死奚益今有人焉去鄉國離六親  廢家業遊於四方而不知歸者果何人哉  是特造化之流人陰陽之逆旅薾然疲役  而不知歸者爾又有人焉鍾賢世矜行能  修名譽自務誇張於世而不知已者亦何  人哉是直飾智以驚愚修身以明污獨賣  名聲於天下者爾二者不同其於溺喪而  不知歸一也而世與一不與一或自以爲  狂蕩之人或自以爲智謀之士要之知所  
Interpretation

This passage expounds profound truths about life, death, and ultimate destiny. Death represents the ultimate manifestation of De (Virtue/Power) (where "ultimate" refers to the final realization), while the fundamental origin of life actually stems from Yin (which symbolizes stillness and homecoming). Life is the journey, death the homecoming—this reveals the deeper meaning behind the dynamic interplay of Yin-Yang.

Those who indulge in wild excess err by overly pursuing external gratification; cunning strategists falter through excessive attachment to internal scheming. Ordinary people often cannot discern what to relinquish and what to pursue, while only sages truly understand the Dao of discernment.

Fan Yingyuan (a Song Dynasty Daoist) explains: When people die they are called "ghosts," and "ghost" means to return—returning to life's true abode. Yet people cling to their limited existence, anchoring themselves in fleshly forms from which there is no escape, mutually harming and exhausting themselves through external attachments, their lives like galloping carriages that cannot stop—is this not profoundly pitiable?

Some toil throughout life yet see no accomplishment, exhaust themselves yet know no homecoming—is this not tragic? Those who lose themselves in this way, unaware of returning to their original nature, what meaning does their living hold? It's like someone abandoning their homeland, forsaking kin, neglecting family duties to wander aimlessly without return—what manner of person is this? Merely a drifting passerby in Heaven and Earth's creation, a temporary lodger in the cycles of Yin-Yang.

Others become obsessed with worldly reputation, flaunting talents and chasing empty fame, proclaiming themselves in society without self-awareness. What manner of person is this? Merely one who embellishes wisdom to startle fools, adorns conduct to highlight others' flaws—a peddler of fame in this world. Though these two types manifest differently, both are like drowning souls unaware of homecoming. Some may praise the former as free-spirited or commend the latter as resourceful, but ultimately, only sages truly grasp the Dao of discernment.

與知所去唯聖人能之 沖虚至德眞經四解卷之二

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0123); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →