中文 · EN

《南華真經義海纂微》Vol. 100

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 100 / 104 3,445 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經義海纂微》 Vol. 100 (Dongshen 洞神部, 104 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 7 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經義海纂微》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經義海纂微卷之一百二傳五     武林道士褚伯秀學    列御寇第四 人有見宋王者錫車十乗以其十乗驕穉莊 子莊子曰河上有家貧恃緯蕭而食者其子 没於淵得千金之珠其父謂子曰取石來鍛 之夫千金之珠必在九重之淵驪龍頷下子 能得珠者必遭其睡也使驪龍而寤子尚奚 微之有哉今宋國之深非直九重之淵也宋 王之猛非直驪龍也子能得車者必遭其睡 也使宋王而寤子爲韰粉夫或聘於莊子莊 子應其使曰子不見失犧牛乎衣以文繡食 以芻菽及其牽而入於太廟雖欲爲孤犢其 可得乎  郭註取富貴者必順乎民望若挾奇說乗  天衢以攖人主之心者明君之所不受也  故如有所譽必有所試於斯民不違僉曰  舉之以合萬夫之望者此三代所以直道  而行也樂生者畏犧而辭聘髑髏聞生而  矉蹙死生情異各自當也  吕註世之冒險探嘗以徼寵名幸而不寤  者皆探珠之類也此乃至人之所危而哀  之彼用以驕穉人不亦謬乎莊子入於不  死不生嘗以死爲南面王樂則太廟犧牲  非所畏也而俗方危身傷生以蹈利故其  制行如此  疑獨註緯蕭易食業之至賤一旦子没淵  得千金之珠必遭驪龍之睡也使驪龍而  寤子之身安有哉今子得宋王之車何以  異此又引太廟犧牲答聘使不以利禄累  其生也
Interpretation

Someone distinguished himself before the King of Song, and the king rewarded him with ten chariots. Relying on these ten chariots, he went to show off to Zhuangzi.

Zhuangzi said, “A poor family lived by the river and made their living weaving mats from mugwort. One day, their son dove into deep water and brought up a pearl worth a thousand pieces of gold. His father said to him, ‘Bring me a stone and smash the pearl. A pearl worth a thousand pieces of gold must be hidden in a ninefold abyss, beneath the jaw of a black dragon. You could only have found it while the dragon was asleep. If it had been awake, could you have kept your life? The dangers of the state of Song today are no less deep than a ninefold abyss, and the King of Song is no less fierce than a black dragon. You could only have obtained these chariots while the king was still unaware. If he wakes to what has happened, you will be chopped to pieces like meat.’”

Someone came on behalf of the King of Song to invite Zhuangzi to serve him. Zhuangzi replied to the messenger, “Have you ever seen an ox used in a sacrifice? It is dressed in embroidered robes and fed grain and beans. When it is led into the Grand Ancestral Temple for the sacrifice, even if it wants to become a free and unrestrained calf again, it can no longer do so.”

Guo Xiang’s commentary says: “To gain wealth and status, one must follow the wishes of the people. If someone relies on strange words and methods to seize an opportunity and sway a ruler, a wise ruler will not accept him. Therefore, when recommending someone, one must examine whether the people approve of him. Only by meeting the people’s expectations does one follow the proper way practiced by the sage kings of antiquity. Zhuangzi delighted in living freely, and so feared being bound, like an ox used in a sacrifice; he declined the invitation. When the skull heard that someone wanted to bring it back to life, it frowned in displeasure. Life and death each have their own conditions, and people each find contentment in the state they inhabit.”

Lü Huiqing’s commentary says: “Those in the world who take risks, seeking to win favor and fame, are like people who dive into an abyss to retrieve a pearl, even if they happen to escape disaster. This is something the Perfected Person worries over and pities. To show it off to others—is that not absurd? Zhuangzi transcended life and death, and even regarded death as a joy like ascending to a ruler’s throne. He therefore did not fear becoming an ox for the Grand Ancestral Temple. Yet ordinary people risk harming themselves for profit. This is how Zhuangzi dealt with the world.”

Yiduzizi’s commentary says: “Weaving mats from mugwort is an extremely lowly way to make a living. The poor man’s son dove into an abyss and obtained a pearl worth a thousand pieces of gold; he could only have done so while the black dragon was asleep. If the dragon had awoken, how could he have survived? How is your obtaining chariots bestowed by the King of Song any different? Zhuangzi also answered the messenger who invited him with the example of the sacrificial ox, showing that he did not wish to let wealth and rank burden his life.”

 碧虚註業緯簫而獲珠何異不田而鶉生  幸遭其睡亦險矣夫誇十乗而忘韰粉之  禍却聘使而慕孤犢之生其賢愚之操可  見矣  鬳齋云驕穉者驕矜而孩視人緯簫織蘆  爲箔得珠遇龍睡喻人之取富貴皆危道  也使其君覺悟禍必不輕奚微之有殘食  無餘也太廟犧牲一段與龜曳尾於塗中  意同   緯簫一本作葦簫言採薪以給食碧虚   本從之其子没淵泅戲得珠非所望也   故亦不識爲奇而驪龍之睡寤曾弗介   意父欲取石鍛試則有心矣且謂驪龍   若寤將有粉身之禍幸一生於萬死淵   其可復入哉此喻奪人所欲者禍必重   縱瞰彼無心而得之僥倖不可再也奚   微之有或疑微下逸軀字理盖不然此   四字正是奇筆鬳齋說爲當犧牛之喻   明不待釋 莊子將死弟子欲厚葬之莊子曰吾以天地 爲棺槨日月爲連璧星辰爲珠璣萬物爲齎 送吾葬具豈不備邪何以加此弟子曰吾恐 爲鳶之食夫子也莊子曰在上爲烏鳶食在 下爲螻蟻食奪彼與此何其偏也以不平平 其平也不平以不徴徴其徴也不徴明者唯 爲之使神者徴之夫明之不勝神也乆矣而 愚者恃其所見入於人其功外也不亦悲乎  郭註以一家之平平萬物不若任萬物之  自平不因萬物之自應而欲以其所見應  之必不合矣夫役其所見受役多矣安能
Interpretation

Bixu's commentary says: A man who makes his living weaving reed curtains comes upon a precious pearl. How is this different from gaining quail without ever plowing a field? He has merely been lucky that the Black Dragon was asleep, and even so, it was an extremely dangerous matter. Compare those who boast of owning ten chariots and forget the disaster that grinds the body to pieces with those who refuse the summons of the King of Chu and would rather seek their living freely, like a solitary calf. From this comparison, one can see who is worthy and who is foolish in their conduct.

Yuzhai (Lin Xiyi, a Song dynasty commentator on the Zhuangzi) says: "Jiaozhi" refers to those who are proud and self-satisfied and who treat others like children. A family weaves reeds into curtains, and one of them dives into the deep abyss and obtains a pearl, having come upon the Black Dragon (Lilong; a black dragon said to keep a pearl beneath its chin) while it was sleeping. This is a metaphor for people who pursue wealth and rank: all of them walk a perilous road. Had the dragon awakened, the calamity would surely have been grave. How could it be called a matter of "no consequence"? Not even the dregs would have been left. The later passage on the "sacrificial ox in the ancestral temple" carries the same meaning as Zhuangzi's wish "to be like a tortoise dragging its tail in the mud."

Another edition writes "weaving reeds" (葦簫) in place of "weaving silk" (緯簫), meaning gathering firewood in exchange for food, and Bixu's edition follows this reading. In this version, the man's son dives into the abyss to play in the water and obtains a pearl. It was never something he had hoped for, so he did not know it was a rare treasure, and the Black Dragon, when it awoke, paid it no mind. The father then wanted to try smashing the pearl open with a stone. This was deliberate intent, and he said that if the Black Dragon awoke, there would be the disaster of having one's body ground to pieces. Having luckily gained one life out of ten thousand deaths, could one enter the abyss again? This is a metaphor for those who seize what others cherish: their calamity will surely be severe. Even if they succeed while the other party is unaware, such luck will not come a second time. Regarding "what is there that is trifling?" (xi wei zhi you), some suspect that the character for "body" (軀) has dropped out after "trifling" (微), but this is not so in principle. These four characters are in fact a marvelous stroke of the brush, and Yuzhai's explanation is the apt one. As for the metaphor of the sacrificial ox, its meaning is clear and needs no further explanation.

When Zhuangzi was about to die, his disciples wished to give him a lavish burial. Zhuangzi said, "I take Heaven and Earth as my inner and outer coffins, the sun and moon as my pair of jade discs, the stars as my pearls and gems, and the ten thousand things as my funeral gifts. Are my burial furnishings not already complete? What could be added?" The disciples said, "We fear that the crows and kites will eat you, Master." Zhuangzi said, "Above ground, I would be eaten by crows and kites; below ground, I would be eaten by mole crickets and ants. To snatch from one side and give to the other—how partial! To use unfairness to seek fairness, that fairness will never be true fairness; to use what is unverified to seek verification, that verification will never be true verification. The clever are merely driven by external things, while only those who attain the realm of spirit illumination (shen) can truly verify the principles of things. That the clever fall short of the spirit-like has long been the case, yet the foolish rely on what they have seen and throw themselves into human affairs, so that their efforts remain only on the surface. Is that not truly sad?"

Guo Xiang's commentary says: To measure the ten thousand things by the "fairness" of one's own school or one's own self is not as good as letting the ten thousand things each reach their own balance. Those who do not follow the natural responses of things, but try to meet them with their own views, will surely fail to match them. One who is driven by one's own knowledge is driven in many ways, so how could one attain ease and freedom?

 使物哉惟任神然後能至順故無往不應  也明之所及不過於形骸至順則無遠近  幽深皆各自得用發於彼而功藏於物若  恃其所見執其自是雖欲入人其功外也  吕註得天地萬物之所一而同焉以爲體  則其生也備物以將形其死也以之爲齎  送非虚言也彼怠烏鳶螻蟻之食則不免  子奪之偏唯無心則無所予奪干以平之  則平之至于以徵之則徵之至苟有心則  不無取舍失其常心是爲至不徵至不平  也欲以平之則其平也不平欲以徵之則  其徵也不徵猶之水也莫動則平大匠取  法唯其平也故以平之則平唯其徴也故  以徵之則徵凡今知所以予奪者明而已  其不知者乃所以爲神也明者唯爲之使  而神則徵之此明之所以不勝神也而愚  者莫知所謂神獨恃其所見以入於人則  用功於外安能反其性命之情哉  疑獨註先王制爲葬禮棺槨衣衾以掩其  形以盡人子之心而已非不知其神魂歸  天精魄反土形如蟬蜕遄化異物也爲人  子者有所不忍先王因人心所有而節文  之莊子非不知古人制禮之意而自處如  此者盖當時禮文過侈務厚葬以相勝不  獨盡其心而己故高言以矯之欲其反本  復朴也以天地爲棺槨亦有以見其已至  於命則凡在命之下有形有象者皆爲己  所役故萬物備於我而無求也至人之處
Interpretation

Letting all things follow their own nature and act spontaneously depends entirely on allowing their wondrous workings to unfold; only then can responsive attunement reach its utmost. In this way, whatever one encounters can be met appropriately.

What human intelligence and insight can reach extends only to forms and outward appearances. Attunement at its utmost, however, reaches far and near, into the hidden depths, allowing each thing to fulfill its own function and find its proper place. Though its workings arise from within, their effects spread among all things. If one relies on what one sees and clings to one’s own opinions, then even when trying to influence others, the effects remain only on the surface.

Lü’s commentary says: When one understands that Heaven, Earth, and the myriad things all come from the One and take the One as their source, then, while a person is alive, the myriad things serve as the means by which the body is formed; when the person dies, they become the means by which the body is sent off. This is no empty talk. A corpse being eaten by crows, eagles, mole crickets, and ants differs from being buried in the earth only in what happens to it. If someone insists on snatching the corpse from the animals, that is to cling to a one-sided view. Only by having no preference for one outcome over another can one avoid partiality and contention.

Treat things with an ordinary, unforced mind, and one can attain true evenness. Let things appear according to their circumstances, and one can respond to them appropriately. If one holds preconceived opinions, one makes distinctions and loses one’s ordinary mind; then one can neither truly respond nor treat things with true equality. Trying to force equality only makes equality impossible; trying to force a particular response does not guarantee an appropriate one.

It is like water: left undisturbed, its surface naturally becomes still. A skilled artisan takes the levelness of water as a model. Follow its levelness, and things become level; respond in keeping with the circumstances in which things appear, and the response will be fitting. People today know why they give or take away; that is merely clear-sightedness. Not knowing the reasons behind it is what is wondrous. The clear-sighted person can only act by exertion, while wondrous workings allow things to appear naturally. This is where clear-sightedness falls short of the wondrous. The ignorant do not understand what the wondrous is; they rely only on their own judgment to influence others, so their efforts remain on the surface. How could they return to the true nature of life?

Yi Du’s commentary says: When the ancient kings established funeral rites and prepared coffins, outer coffins, burial clothes, and coverings to conceal the body, they were simply giving full expression to the feelings of children toward their parents. They did not fail to know that a person’s Shen (spirit) returns to Heaven, the Jing (essence) and Po return to Earth, and the body, like a cicada’s cast-off shell, soon transforms into something else. But children feel compassion and cannot bear to part with their parents, so the ancient kings followed human feeling and established rites to give it limits and form.

Zhuangzi was not unaware of why the ancients established these rites. He put it this way because the rites of his time had become excessively elaborate, and people competed to provide lavish burials; such burials were no longer simply a way of fulfilling filial devotion. He therefore used forceful language to correct the practice, hoping to lead people back to the source and a return to simplicity. To take Heaven and Earth as one’s coffin and outer coffin also means that when a person is at peace with Heaven’s mandate, anything with form and appearance within the course of fate can be put to use. When the myriad things are all within oneself, there is nothing one needs to seek outside. The state in which the Perfected One dwells…

 已者如此若夫處人則有先王之禮在且  形骸之委於地上與地下皆不免爲物所  食奪彼予此不免於偏聖人存神不存形  者以此夫平平者不平徵徴者不徵以不  平平天下則天下自平非有心於平之也  以不徵徵天下則天下自徵非有心於徵  之也天下有平則有不平平出於不平則  無不平矣萬物有徵則有不徴徵出於不  徴則無不徵矣唯平與徴神者主之則明  者爲之役神者天道明者人道故明不勝  神也世之愚者恃其所見由明以入於人  而滅其天用功於外而不知有内可不悲  哉  碧虚註璧玉珠璣富者用以飾棺今以日  月星辰爲之豈不備耶任烏鳶螻蟻爲兩  平奪彼予此爲不平以偏見平萬物萬物  何由而平以偏見應群動群動何由而應  分别爲明明者受役神則㝠漠虚通物無  不應分别有盡㝠漠無窮是爲明不勝神  也而世之愚者恃已所見探彼隱情奪爲  我有用功於外而不知反至人所以興歎  也  鬳齋註此章譏當時厚葬之弊奪烏鳶而  予螻蟻見之偏也萬物之理本平我以不  平之心而欲平之則其平者亦不平矣物  理一一可驗我以不驗之心驗之則其可  驗者亦不驗矣本莫之爲而以爲或之使  是以無心爲有心也明者之自累每如此  至於神則聽其自應而已明不勝神言有
Interpretation

From the human point of view, the rites and laws established by the ancient kings still exist. Yet after a person dies, whether the body is left on the ground or buried beneath it, it will inevitably be eaten by crows and eagles, or by ants and maggots. This merely gives the body to one kind of creature instead of another, and in the end cannot help favoring one side. The sages cared about preserving the spirit and did not cling to preserving the body; this is why.

If the world is brought to order with an impartial attitude, it will settle of its own accord; there is no need deliberately to make it settle. If one responds to the world by following the signs inherent in things, the world will likewise receive a response of its own accord; there is no need deliberately to make things conform. In the world there is both what is level and what is uneven. When what is level emerges from what is uneven, nothing is beyond being brought into balance. Among things, some can be verified and some cannot. When what can be verified emerges from what cannot, nothing is beyond receiving a response.

Only when both balance and response are governed by the spirit can there be clear insight. Relying on discriminating judgment alone instead leaves one led around by things. The spirit belongs to the Way of Heaven; discriminating judgment belongs to the human way. Thus human discernment cannot surpass the spirit. Foolish people in the world rely on their own understanding and use discriminating judgment to investigate worldly affairs, but in doing so they lose their innate, natural capacity. They expend their efforts on external things and do not realize that the root lies within. Is this not lamentable?

Bixu’s Commentary: Wealthy people often use precious objects such as jade and pearls to adorn coffins. Now they also regard the sun, moon, and stars as such ornaments. Is this not an excessively elaborate way of arranging a funeral? Leaving the body to the crows and eagles, or to the ants and maggots, is to treat them equally. Taking the body from one group and handing it to another is favoritism. If one seeks to make all things equal through a one-sided view, how could they truly be equal? If one responds to the many changes through a one-sided view, how could one truly respond to all things? Discriminating judgment is what is called “clarity”; people who rely on such clarity are driven by external things. The spirit, by contrast, is deep, open, and unobstructed; nothing is beyond its response. Discriminating judgment has limits, while the deep and open spirit has none. This is what “clarity cannot surpass the spirit” means. Foolish people in the world rely on their own views, probe into the hidden thoughts of others, and seize external things for themselves. They work only on the outside and do not understand that they must return to the inner. This is precisely what gives the Perfected One cause for lament.

Yanzhai’s Commentary: This chapter criticizes the excesses of elaborate burials in its time. Taking the body away from the crows and eagles and handing it to the ants and maggots is favoring one side. The principles of all things are inherently equal. If I seek equality with a biased mind, the equality I claim will itself become unequal. The principles of things can all be verified one by one. If I try to verify them with a mind that cannot verify, then what could originally be verified will become impossible to verify. Things arise naturally, yet to insist that some force is directing them is to call what is mindless something that has a mind. This is how discriminating judgment often traps people. The spirit, by contrast, simply follows along with all things, allowing them to appear naturally and receive their responses naturally. “Clarity cannot surpass the spirit” means that human discernment cannot surpass the spirit.

 心不能勝無爲而愚者恃其私見入於人  爲求功於外可悲也夫   古者因山爲墳不封不樹上無通臭下   不及泉務藏形而已則棺衾之朴素葬   具之簡約可知後世習尚浮侈璧玉珠   璣生前受用已爲過矣用之以飾棺則   明器之繁夥塋隧之雄廣固不待言盖   由據尊恃貴厚享於前則送終之禮勢   不容薄歷觀古之侈葬如虎丘驪山者   自以爲固可千萬年終不免爲大盜積   耳今南華弟子欲厚葬其師是亦人心   所當盡然猶蹈俗習故慨謂吾以天地   爲棺槨達哉斯言古所未道楊王孫祼   葬之說劉伯倫荷鍤之意皆自此發夫   既委形于地則烏鳶螻蟻何以自免曰   吾之生也盖本於無而外蒸蚤蝨内變   蟯蚘皆因我而有及其死也猶蜩甲蛇   蜕委之而往神則無不之也又何烏鳶   螻蟻之足慮哉明謂形之可見者必籍   形中不可見者主之欲動而動欲止而   止其中有信即此所謂徵也不平者形   形有貧富壽夭之殊神之在人則一以   神觀物無有不平以形觀物則不平矣   徵者扣之而應感之則通若以不信視   物物亦不信之矣形本無徵取徵於神   以外求徴於内内重而外輕也若以内   求徽於外則其徵也不徵其徵也不徵   則其平也不平矣明者爲使動用有限   神者徵之靜體無極故曰明不勝神也
Interpretation

The mind cannot surpass “Wuwei (non-action).” Yet foolish people rely on their own prejudices and impose them on others in pursuit of worldly reputation and status. It is truly lamentable.

In ancient times, people built tombs against hillsides without raising earthen mounds or planting trees. They made no air passage into the burial chamber and did not dig down to the underground springs; they simply sought to conceal the body. This shows that coffins and shrouds were plain, and burial goods were few. Later generations prized ostentation and extravagance. They had already made excessive use of treasures such as jade discs and pearls in life, and after death used them to adorn their coffins. They also buried numerous funerary objects and built grand passageways and tomb chambers. This hardly needs further elaboration. Perhaps those who had enjoyed high status and abundant comforts in life were bound, when it came to their funerals, to receive no less lavish treatment.

Consider the extravagant burials of antiquity, such as those at Tiger Hill and Mount Li. The tomb owners imagined their graves would endure for tens of millions of years, yet in the end they merely amassed wealth for great robbers. Today, the disciples of Nanhua—another name for the Zhuangzi—want to give their teacher a lavish burial. This is difficult to avoid as a matter of human feeling, but it still follows worldly custom. Thus Zhuangzi said with feeling, “I take Heaven and Earth as my coffin and outer coffin.” These words are truly far-reaching; no one in antiquity had put it this way. Yang Wangsun’s advocacy of burial without a coffin or clothes, and Liu Bolun’s habit of carrying a spade when he went out, ready to dig a grave and bury himself at any moment, both stem from this same idea.

Once people entrust their bodies to the earth, what is there to fear from crows, eagles, and ants? Human life originally comes from “nonbeing.” Lice and fleas arise on the body’s surface, while pinworms grow inside it; all of them exist because this body of mine exists. When a person dies, it is like a cicada shedding its old shell or a snake casting off its skin: the body is left behind, while the spirit goes wherever it will. Why, then, worry about crows, eagles, and ants?

The point of this passage is that visible form must be governed by something within it that cannot be seen. It moves when it wishes to move and stops when it wishes to stop. There is a reliable basis for this: what is called “verification,” an inward sign or confirmation. Things in the world may appear unequal on the surface: bodies differ in wealth and poverty, and in longevity and early death. But people’s Shen (spirit), their inner spirit, is the same. When Shen is used to regard the myriad things, nothing is unequal; when they are viewed through bodily form, they seem unequal.

“Verification” means that a question receives a response, and that what is affected can connect with what affects it. If you do not trust things, they will not respond to you. The body itself cannot provide this verification; it must be sought through Shen. To seek confirmation inwardly is to value the inner and look lightly upon the outer. If instead one seeks an inward sign from external things, true verification will not appear. Without such verification, things cannot be understood as equal.

Brightness—external cleverness and insight—can only limit a person’s actions and capacities. The verification of Shen, the inner spirit, has stillness as its substance and is inexhaustible. Thus brightness cannot surpass Shen.

  眞人立是論非唯矯時俗厚葬之弊抑   使後世學者所重在内而不在外所養   在神而不在形平徵之由已出神明之   暫相須也信能造此則與天地爲一日   星參光棺槨而珠璧之非過論也  南華沖虚二眞人應期弘教躋世清寧遺  訓流芳千古蒙惠二經㫖趣互相發揮盖  不可以優劣論然本經首載列子御風猶  有所待而後篇引用不一或議以漆園之  才縱横馳騁自出瓌奇何不可者而乃必  蹈沖虚之轍耶愚嘗考其所以云凡有德  者必有言言所以述行也行同而言異者  無之造極玄談古今一致直言曲喻正說  反說皆所以明道也南華樂道前賢之善  舉其全章以寓己意者十有六其㝠海章  列文甚略莊子特詳焉故每章歸結則時  見出藍之青精彩倍越莊子得列文而愈  富列文賴莊子而愈彰前謂御風有待猶  以跡觀後取立言微妙則以心契編末又  以御寇名篇明所舉之不隱歸趣之合轍  也然而當篇所載列文無幾疑爲郭氏删  易之始乎饋漿之事戒其出異感人未幾  而户外屨滿不能使人無保也次以緩翟  交爭憤死化烏楸栢遁自然而之刑戮造  物者報其人之天也知道不言如天之運  知而言之其機淺矣是以屠龍技成無所  用巧用巧不足以效於屠龍甘䑛痔者得  車愈多不多不足以旌其䑛痔皆所以警
Interpretation

When the True Person (one who has attained the Dao) discusses right and wrong, the aim is not only to correct the excesses of lavish burial in his own time. It is also to teach later scholars to value what is within rather than outward appearances, and to cultivate the spirit rather than the body. The signs ordinarily seen already reveal their underlying causes; spirit and body are only temporarily interdependent. One who truly reaches this state can become one with Heaven and Earth, while the sun, moon, and stars shine alongside them. Coffins, outer coffins, pearls, and jade are not matters worth excessive concern.

The Perfected Nanhua (Zhuangzi) and the Perfected Chongxu (Liezi) spread their teachings in response to their times, bringing the world toward peace and clarity. Their teachings have endured through the ages and benefited later generations. The purport of the Nanhua True Classic (the book of Zhuangzi) and the Chongxu True Classic (the book of Liezi) illuminates each other; they cannot simply be ranked as superior or inferior.

The opening of this classic records Liezi riding the wind, yet still depending on something. Later chapters also cite him repeatedly. Some have therefore asked: Zhuangzi’s talent ranged freely and his imagination was extraordinary, so why did he need to follow Liezi’s account? I have examined the reason. A person of virtue must have teachings, and those teachings express that person’s conduct. It is impossible for conduct to be the same while the teachings are entirely different. In probing the mysteries of principle, ancient and modern times are one. Whether one speaks plainly or through indirect metaphor, in the affirmative or the negative, the purpose is always to clarify the Dao.

Zhuangzi delighted in praising the merits of earlier sages. He quoted entire passages from Liezi to convey his own meaning in sixteen places. In the chapter on the “Dark Sea,” Liezi’s original text is quite brief, but Zhuangzi gives a particularly detailed account. Thus, at the ends of the chapters, one often sees Zhuangzi’s interpretation surpassing its source, with greater literary grace and imaginative force. Zhuangzi’s writing is enriched by Liezi, while Liezi is brought further into prominence through Zhuangzi’s interpretation. The earlier account of Liezi riding the wind yet still depending on something looks at outward events; the later selection of Liezi’s finest sayings shows an affinity of mind. The final chapter is named “Yukou,” showing that the quoted material has not been concealed and that the aims of the two books accord with one another.

This chapter, however, records few of Liezi’s words. Perhaps it marks the beginning of Guo Xiang’s textual deletions and revisions. It opens with Liezi accepting a gift of gruel and water, and warns him against moving others with extraordinary displays. Before long, though, his doorway is crowded with guests. This shows that he, too, failed to free people from dependence. Next comes the account of Huan and Di, who fight and die in anger, then transform into crows, Chinese toon, cypress, and other things, yielding to natural change and ultimately meeting a violent end. This is the Creator returning that person’s nature to him.

One who knows the Dao does not speak, just as the Way of Heaven proceeds in silence. One who knows yet insists on speaking has shallow understanding. Thus, the skill of killing dragons, once mastered, has no place to be applied; showing off one’s technique cannot prove that dragon-slaying is useful. And the more willingly a man licks another’s hemorrhoids, the more carts he receives. These stories are all meant as warnings…

 學徒而鍼時病也至於賴貞幹以扶國不  若休之悟動過之刑心當加謹只九徵用  而不肖得三命至而恭慢分八極三必之  不常一珠九殞而僅得又以喻處世應物  之多端貪名逐利之召怠也儻能因其有  形反究夫未始有物則人間世之累可免  矣舍犧牛而爲孤犢亦在人篤信而力行  之篇末結以莊子死示幻形不足戀凡物  必有終也門人慮烏鳶之食猶以世眼觀  唯至人忘形任化無予奪之或偏體神用  明顯平徵之不謬此其所以離人入天而  登假乎道也歟
Interpretation

Those who study to become officials originally do so to remedy the ills of the state. Relying on loyal and upright people to support the state, however, cannot remain empty talk. If one fails to awaken in time and instead incurs punishment through misguided actions, one should become all the more cautious. Examining the nine signs—the methods for observing and distinguishing people’s abilities—does not by itself establish whether someone is worthy or unworthy. When one’s allotted fate arrives, respect and arrogance also become clear. The world is in constant change, so claims that something must happen three times are unreliable. Even a person who possesses pearls may lose them nine times and in the end save only one. These examples show how many different situations arise in dealing with the world and responding to things: craving reputation and pursuing profit invite laziness and anxiety.

If one can use visible, tangible things to trace back to the realm where nothing had yet come into being, one can escape the burdens of worldly life. Whether one gives up the sacrificial ox and instead raises a calf orphaned and weak also depends on one’s sincerity and diligence in putting this teaching into practice.

The text closes with Zhuangzi’s death to show that an illusory body is not worth clinging to, for everything must eventually come to an end. His disciples feared that crows and kites would peck at his corpse, still viewing life and death through worldly eyes. Only the perfected person, one who has attained the Dao, forgets the body and lets change take its course, without clinging to either giving or taking away. When the workings of body, mind, and spirit become manifest, they confirm that the principle is sound. Perhaps this is how one transcends the worldly, returns to nature, and ascends into the realm of the Dao.

南華眞經義海纂微卷之一百二

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0127); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 99 Vol. 101 →