中文 · EN

《南華真經義海纂微》Vol. 14

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 14 / 104 4,816 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經義海纂微》 Vol. 14 (Dongshen 洞神部, 104 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 10 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經義海纂微》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經義海纂微卷之十五名五     武林道士褚伯秀學    內篇大宗師第二 古之眞人其狀義而不朋若不足而不承與 乎其觚而不堅也張乎其虚而不華也邴邴 乎其似喜乎崔乎其不得已乎滀乎進我色 也與乎止我德也厲乎其似世乎謷乎其未 可制也連乎其似好閉也悗乎忘其言也以 刑爲體以禮爲翼以知爲時以德爲循以刑 爲體者綽乎其殺也以禮爲翼者所以行於 世也以知爲時者不得已於事也以德爲循 者言其與有足者至於丘也而人眞以爲勤 行者也  郭註眞人與物同宜非朋黨也下之而無  不上若不足而不承也常遊於獨而非固  守曠然無懷乃至於實暢然和適故似喜  也動靜行止常居必然之極不以物傷已  而無所趨也至人無厲與世同行故若厲  也謷乎未可制高放而自得連乎其好閉  綿邈深遠也刑者治之體而非我爲禮者  世自行而非我制知者時之動而非我當  德者彼所循而非我作以刑爲體者任治  之自殺雖殺而寬以禮爲翼者順世之所  行故無不行夫高下相受不可逆之流小  大相君不得已之勢承百流之會居師人  之極者任時世之知委必然之事付之天  下而已矣丘者性之本物各足於本付羣  德之自循斯與有足者至於本也本至而  理盡矣  吕註眞人與物有義而非朋盛德若不足
Interpretation

Chapter 15 of Essentials of the Profound Ocean of Meaning on the True Scripture of Southern Florescence, Fifth Named Section

Composed by Daoist priest Chu Boxiu of Wulin

Inner Chapter: “The Great Ancestral Teacher,” Section 2

The ancient True Person—one who embodied the Great Dao—acted in fitting ways yet did not form factions; he always seemed insufficient yet did not refuse what came to him. Living among the world he had edges and angles, yet was not stubborn; his mind was vast, empty, and still, yet not showy. His spirit was bright, as if pleased; yet he also seemed calm, as though compelled by necessity. His expression was gentle, as if welcoming me; his manner settled, as if settling my De. He looked stern, as if ill at ease with the world, yet was not bound by convention; lofty and remote, as if hard to approach; deep and prolonged, as if fond of silence; wordless, as if he had forgotten speech.

He took penal law as the root of governance, ritual as the aid for moving in society, wisdom for adapting to the times, and De as the standard to follow. Taking penal law as root means that when he applied punishment it was lenient and measured; taking ritual as aid means using it to accord with the world and walk among people; taking wisdom to suit the times means that handling affairs often arose from having no other choice; taking De as standard means going along with each thing’s own nature. It is like those who were already complete: following their natures they reached the hillocks, yet people took that for the fruit of diligent cultivation.

Guo Xiang’s commentary:

The True Person accords with all things yet does not form cliques. He lowers himself toward others yet nothing is beyond what he can bear; he always seems somewhat lacking. He often dwells at ease alone, yet does not rigidly cling to empty stillness; his mind is open and untroubled, and so he reaches fullness, flow, harmony, and ease—hence he seems joyful.

In movement, rest, walking, and stopping he always stays in what is necessarily right; he neither lets outer things harm him nor deliberately chases after anything. The utmost person originally has no harshness; he simply walks the same road as the world, so he looks stern as if at odds with society. Lofty and detached, he delights in himself, and therefore seems unfettered; deep and long, so he seems to love keeping silent.

Penal law is the root of order—not something I deliberately invented; ritual is the order the world follows on its own—not something I laid down; wisdom stirs with the times—not something I decide; De is the standard each thing follows on its own—not something I fabricate. Taking penal law as root is letting the way of governance work naturally: though there is killing, it remains mild; taking ritual as aid is going along with what the world already practices, so nothing fails to get through.

High and low take up from one another; their flow cannot be reversed. Large and small constrain one another—that is the shape necessity takes. Where all streams gather, in the place of the teacher of the multitude, one need only adapt wisdom to the moment and hand over what must happen to Heaven to handle.

Here “the hill” (qiu) points to the root-source of nature-and-life (xingming). Each thing rests content in its nature and leaves its De for itself to follow naturally—like those already complete who follow nature to the source. When the source is reached, the pattern of things is exhausted.

Lu’s commentary:

The True Person accords with all things yet does not form parties; great De looks like insufficiency…

 而不承也先聖嘗嘆觚不觚眞人之觚觚  矣與世推移非堅而不能自舉者也其道  彌滿六合而未始有物然而居其實者也  邴之言炳受而喜之崔亦猶催迫而後動  滀乎進我色而容物也與乎止我德不失  己也人之所畏不可不畏則厲乎似世猶  可制也謷乎大哉則不可制也連乎好閉  不與物通故悗乎忘其言也此皆言其似  而不可以狀求也仁者於殺則矜之以其  愛之也不仁者於殺則快之以其惡之也  眞人無所愛惡則其殺也豈不綽乎哉此  則見其所體矣克己復禮則視聽言動莫  非禮也用之爲翼以行於世而已入於不  古不今則豈有時哉物採而後有知是其  不得已於事也以德如軌轍之可循則有  足者皆可與之至於丘也丘者中高之地  中而不可不高者德也凡此皆用吾眞而  已何動行之有哉  林註眞人與物宜而不爲黨心若不足而  其道首出萬物之上老子云後其身而身  先若不足而不承也與者自適觚者獨立  而人皆可入故曰不堅其道舒張雖虚而  不華也喜則其色炳焕崔則迫而後動進  其色而不藏止於德而常靜夫惟進我德  故厲乎其似世夫惟止我德故謷乎未可  制終則退藏於密連乎好閉悗乎忘言而  至矣以刑爲體者其殺如秋冬理之當然  雖殺而綽然有餘也禮者德之華所以行
Interpretation

Unbound by old forms, and not merely following predecessors’ ways. The ancient sages lamented: “The gourd-cup no longer resembles a gourd-cup.” (觚: an ancient wine vessel; here it means things have lost their proper standard.) The norm that the True Person upholds can stand on its own yet also shift with the changing world; it is not so rigid that it cannot flex and extend. His Dao fills heaven and earth in all directions, yet he does not cling to any particular thing; he dwells in the truth of the Dao.

Bing’s words were clear and striking; those who heard them were glad to accept them. Cui’s actions seemed to happen only when pressed. His expression showed outwardly and could embrace external things; his De rested calmly and did not lose itself. What people fear cannot be faced without awe, so at times he seemed stern, almost like the world, as if he could still be constrained by others; at other times he seemed vast and lofty, beyond constraint. He shut his mind and did not mingle with things outside, until he forgot what he had said. All of this describes only approximations of him; one cannot capture the True Person by sketching outward shapes.

A benevolent person, faced with killing, feels compassion from love; an unbenevolent person, faced with killing, feels satisfaction from aversion. The True Person has neither partial love nor hatred—when he carries out killing, can he not still be at ease and generous? Here his Dao shows through. “Restrain the self and return to ritual” (克己复礼)—then seeing, hearing, speaking, and acting all accord with ritual. Taking ritual as a support for action is like walking in the world with wings. Entering a realm beyond past and present, how could one still be bound by the age? Only when things appear do people respond with corresponding understanding; that is the unavoidable way of dealing with concrete affairs. De is like the track of a wheel, which one may follow forward; anyone with feet can walk it to the hills. A hill is where the ground rises in the middle; De occupies the center yet cannot but be lofty. All of the above is simply the use of one’s authentic nature—where is there deliberate effort or contrived action?

Lin’s commentary: The True Person accords with all things yet takes no side; his mind seems insufficient while his Dao towers above the myriad things. Laozi said, “Put yourself behind and you end up in front”—that is exactly the appearance of not taking the lead and not contending. “Yu” (与) means going along with nature and finding one’s own ease; “gu” (觚) means standing independently while still allowing others to enter within. Hence it is said that he is not rigidly obstinate. His Dao spreads out: though empty and still, it is not showy. When pleased, his expression is bright; the Cui lineage acts only when urged. He shows expression without hiding it, and inwardly keeps De in constant quiet. Because he shows outward expression, he seems stern and close to the world; because he inwardly keeps De, he is lofty and beyond being constrained. In the end he retreats and hides in depth, shuts his mind, forgets words, and reaches the utmost. One who takes the way of punishment as root carries out killing like the austerity of autumn and winter—the necessity of following affairs; even in killing, he can remain generous and at ease. Ritual is the outward form of De, used to…

 於外有翼之象以知爲時者因時之自然  不得已於事也丘者地之高有足者皆可  至以德爲循亦猶是也此皆眞人出而與  人同者亦何嘗經心哉  詳道註其狀義而不朋不可得而親疏若  不足而不承不可得而貴賤觚而不堅行  雖弗圓而非固守虚而不華文雖弗實而  非滅質邴乎其似喜暢然自適也崔乎不  得已迫而後應也滀乎進我色嗇精於内  發神於外也與乎止我德利用於外不蕩  於内也厲乎謷乎連乎三者至爲去爲也  悗乎其言至言去言也眞人之道至於去  爲去言者以刑禮知德爲本而巳矣經中  多以山喻道丘喻德藐姑射之山隱弅(音/粉)  之丘具茨之山崑崙之丘是也眞人之道  用之不勤而人眞以爲勤行者是睹萬物  之衆而疑天地雕斲之勞也  碧虚註眞人之容狀非有朋黨也復能謙  沖若愚卑而不受觚而不堅虚而不華邴  乎似喜崔乎不得已言其虚曠悦懌應物  有節也滀乎與乎言其温顔教育厲乎謷  乎則聽厲而仰高也連乎好閉悗乎忘言  此眞人之道不可測識者也而刑禮知德  治世之具必有以體翼時循之刑不寬則  失治體禮不興則化不行知不明則事留  滯以德循禮然後能行於道也土高曰丘  人物之所歸聚有足言能行者皆可至也  眞人無爲自合天理世人見其成功則以  爲勤行者也
Interpretation

Outwardly he may seem winged; inwardly he accords with the right moment, knows how to read the times, and acts along with nature. When something arises, he only comes forward to deal with it when he truly has no other choice. A qiu is raised ground; whoever can walk can reach the heights. Letting De follow the pattern of things works the same way. All of this describes how the True Person (zhenren)—one who embodies the Dao—shows up in the world and lives among people. He never really took such things to heart.

The Xiangdao commentary explains the True Person’s appearance and way of acting: he forms no factions and does not lean to any side; others cannot draw near or push him away on that account. He seems insufficient yet does not accept flattery; others cannot fix his rank high or low because of it. He is sharp-edged like a vessel yet not stubborn; his conduct is not slick, but he is not merely rigid either. His mind is empty without being showy; his words may lack ornament yet the substance is not erased. He seems cheerful and at ease, yet also as if compelled—responding only when pressed. He nourishes spirit and mind, treats others with mildness, stores essence within and lets spirit show outward; he moves with events, lets the power of De appear outside, without disturbing the inner calm. He is stern and lofty, unbroken in continuity; these three aspects all look like doing something, yet he does not cling to doing. He is quiet and sparing of words; what he says seems to stop when the utmost truth is touched. The way of the True Person finally comes down to not clinging to action or to speech—only taking penal law, ritual, wisdom, and De as the root.

The classic often uses mountains to stand for the Dao and mounds (qiu) for De—for example Mount Miaogushe, the mound of Yinbian, Mount Juci, and the Kunlun mound. The True Person practices the Dao without strain; people often think he must be painstaking and diligent. That is because they see the myriad things and suspect that heaven and earth must have toiled to carve and fashion them when creating them.

The Bixu commentary says: the True Person’s form and bearing do not form cliques; he can also be humble and mild, seeming plain and lowly without accepting praise; he has edges without obstinacy and an empty heart without flash. He is content and at ease, yet when affairs come he seems to respond only when he must—showing a broad, joyful mind and measured response to things. “Nourishing” and “accord” refer to his gentle countenance and way of teaching others; “stern” and “lofty” mean that to hear him is to feel awe and to look up to what is far; “unbroken continuity” is skill in gathering in, “quiet” is forgetting to speak. This is exactly where the way of the True Person is unfathomable and hard to recognize.

Penal law, ritual, wisdom, and De are tools needed to order the world, and each must be applied according to the times. If penal law is not tempered, governance goes wrong; if ritual is not upheld, teaching cannot spread; if judgment is unclear, affairs stall. Letting De follow ritual is how the Dao can be put into practice. “Raised ground is called a qiu”: people and things gather there; “having feet” means being able to walk. Whoever can walk can arrive. The True Person acts by wuwei and naturally fits heaven’s principle; the world sees him accomplish things and assumes he did them by deliberate effort.

 趙註與物宜而非黨周而不比也中不足  則外物易入此無所入實若虚也觚有稜  角易與物忤堅而不觚則觚不觚矣虚而  不華大而非夸也邴乎崔乎外洋洋見於  顔色中實迫而後動也滀乎進我色安安  而能遷與乎止我德和而不流也厲乎其  似世有人之形無人之情也謷乎未可制  廣矣大矣物莫禦也連乎好閉無關鍵而  不可開悗乎忘言默而成之也刑禮知德  不得巳而應世之道也以刑爲體象刑惟  明藏於不用也以禮爲翼知和而和必以  禮節之也以知爲時動靜不失其時也以  德爲循言與有足者至於丘丘山也有足  人也與之者無足也特寓形骸象耳目人  見其不行而自至眞以爲有足也  鬳齋云義而不朋中立不倚也慊然若不  足而不自卑承觚德之隅也觚而不堅有  德之隅而無圭角也張乎舒暢貌虚者有  若無不華實也邴邴似喜不喜崔下也處  世應物有不得已之意滀乎充悦貌其生  色也睟然見於面故曰進我色與乎自得  之貌進我德吉祥止止也望之厲然與世  人同而其中實有崔乎不得已之意謷乎  未可制不屈於世也連乎密也好閉不欲  開口方其未言似不欲言及其既言亦若  不言故悗乎其忘言也兩句一意以刑爲  體雖殺而綽綽乎無忤我心也以禮爲翼  行於世而徇俗也時乎用知是不得已而
Interpretation

Zhao’s commentary states: He can treat all things appropriately yet never forms cliques or factions; he is thorough in worldly conduct yet does not cling to others for support. When the inner life is full, one is not easily tempted by external things—this is what is meant by “seeming empty, yet in truth replete.” A gu (angular wine vessel) has corners and easily clashes with others; if it were so hard that it offered no give at all, it would cease to be a gu. The mind stays empty and still, without showy display; the bearing is broad yet not exaggerated. “Bingbing” (a relaxed, open countenance) and yet “cuiran” (a countenance that draws inward): outwardly easy and bright, the expression appears spacious; inwardly grave and weighty, he acts only when there is no alternative. Inner fullness brings joy that shows on the face; when receiving things from outside, the expression is calm and can shift with circumstances. In dealing with people, his virtue is even-tempered, yet he does not drift with the crowd. Outwardly stern, like an ordinary person of the world; inwardly he is not bound by vulgar sentiment. His mind is lofty and cannot be mastered by things; his intent is close-woven, as though he loved to keep silent, yet nothing can truly seal it shut. Silent, he forgets words, and affairs complete themselves naturally.

What is meant by “taking punishment as the substance, ritual as the wings, knowledge as timeliness, and virtue as the path to follow” is the manner of responding to the world when one has no choice: punishment as the foundation—when applying penalties, one must be clear-sighted, and strive to keep punishment in reserve so it need not be used; ritual as support—knowing how to harmonize in the world, yet harmony too must be bounded by ritual; employing wisdom in accord with the right moment, so movement and stillness never miss their time; virtue as the standard one follows.

Regarding “accompanying those with feet to the hill”—the hill is a mound, “those with feet” are people who walk; the one who goes with them in fact has no feet, but is lodged in a human form, appearing as eyes and ears. People see that he does not walk yet reaches the hill on his own, and truly believe he has feet.

Yi Zhai says: “He conforms to righteousness yet does not factionalize; he stands centered, neither leaning this way nor that.” The inner mind seems to lack something, yet he does not belittle himself on that account—this exactly continues the sense of “the corner of gu-like virtue.” A gu has corners yet is not stubbornly hard: there is the edge of virtue without the sharpness that wounds. “Zhang” is an expansive, unobstructed manner; what is called “empty” is appearing as though there were nothing at all, while inside there is substance—it is not mere ornament.

“Bingbing” looks like joy yet does not look pleased; “cui” carries the sense of gathering inward. In engaging the world, there is always the flavor of acting because one must. “Chu” is the look of full, joyful repletion; the light of life shows on the face, hence “advancing my color.” “Yu” is self-possession; “advancing my virtue” means resting in auspicious peace within oneself.

Seen from afar, he is stern like a worldly person; yet inwardly he truly has depth, restraint, and the aspect of acting only when compelled. “Aoran and not to be controlled” means he does not submit to the vulgar world and cannot be ruled by it. “Lian” means close-woven. “Loving to close” means he seems unwilling to speak: before speaking, as if he did not wish to; after speaking, as if he had said nothing—hence “manran, forgetting words.” These two lines mean the same.

“Taking punishment as the substance” means that though penalties are applied, the heart remains lenient and does not turn against one’s true nature; “taking ritual as the wings” means that in worldly action one follows conventional propriety. “Taking knowledge as timeliness” means that wisdom is used according to occasion—this is the sense of having no choice but to….

 應事也循天德之自然而無所容力譬人  登丘山有足行者皆自至不必謂勤勞而  後至也   此言眞人之狀者其心善淵而不可測   姑即其形似者論之義而不朋與物宜   而非黨也若不足而不承自卑者人尊   之也在衆人則宜物必黨不足必承矣   觚而不堅廉而不劌也虚而不華實若   虚也邴乎崔乎則言其情似喜於濟人   利物又似乎不得已盖無心之應斯眞   應也滀乎進我色睟然見於面人喜即   之也與乎止我德愛人也以德人亦樂   得之此皆言其德容之盛有以化物厲   乎難釋崔本作廣乎言德量廣無不包   足以容斯世所以謷乎大哉獨成其天   也連乎其好閉莫見其根門若是則眞   人之道不容聲矣禮刑知德皆先王治   世之具行乎自然與民宜之德則循之   而皆可至於高循謂安而行之非必勤   勞而可得也陳碧虚照文如海張君房   校本喜已世下三乎字並作也與上下   句恊似亦有理 故其好之也一其弗好之也一其一也一其 不一也一其一與天爲徒其不一與人爲徒 天與人不相勝也是之謂眞人死生命也其 有夜旦之常天也人之有所不得與皆物之 情也彼特以天爲父而身猶愛之而況其卓乎 人特以有君爲愈乎己而身猶死之而況其眞 乎泉涸魚相與處於陸相呴以濕相濡以沫
Interpretation

When handling affairs in the world, one follows the operation of Tian De (Heaven’s virtue—the way of nature) and does not force things deliberately. It is like climbing a hill: anyone who can walk with their feet can reach the top in the end; there is no need to insist that one must toil strenuously before one can stand on the summit.

What was said earlier describes the zhenren (true person): inwardly he is deep and remote, hard to measure. Here the text speaks only from outward signs. In action he accords with yi (rightness) yet does not form factions; he goes along with how things are yet does not play favorites. He seems to lack something yet does not hurry to grasp; he keeps himself low, and people honor him all the more. Ordinary people in the world usually band together in cliques and, when they feel something is missing, rush to seize it.

He has sharp edges yet does not cut others; he is clear and upright yet does not wound. Inwardly he is empty and bright, not showy; he is full yet seems like nothing. His bearing is open and at ease, as if he delights in helping others and letting things benefit—yet also as if he acts only when he must. This is because he has no private aim: he answers to events as they come. That is the genuine way of responding to affairs.

His inner store is ample; his face is mild and his joy shows naturally, so people are glad to draw near. His De (virtue/power) is steady and has a quiet pull; he treats others with care, and they are glad to be close. All of this depicts the fullness of his virtue and bearing, and his power to transform things. The word li (“severe” or “imposing”) in one manuscript appears as guang (“vast”) in Cui’s version: his measure of De is broad enough to hold the myriad things. Thus his vast height and breadth complete xing (natural endowment) by itself.

What he loves and what his heart intends stay hidden; the root is not displayed. At that level, the way of the zhenren can no longer be exhausted in words. Ritual, punishment, knowledge, and De were all tools the ancient kings used to order the world. As long as one follows nature, suits the people’s real needs, and acts in line with De, each can reach what is fitting. “To follow” (xun) here means to abide in it peacefully—not that one must sweat and strain to achieve it.

Chen Bixu’s commentary reads zhao wen ru hai as one phrase; Zhang Junfang’s edition takes the three hu after “joy in the world” as equivalent to ye (“indeed”), which also fits the context.

So when he likes something, his mind is single; when he dislikes something, his mind is single too. Whether single or not, both return to the same ground. Merge with that ground and you keep company with Heaven; fail to merge and you keep company with people. When Heaven and the human do not overcome each other, that is called the zhenren.

Death and life are only shifts of fate, like the alternation of day and night—matters of natural order. That there are things in which people cannot take part or cannot change is the constant lot of the ten thousand things. People treat Heaven as a father and still cherish their bodies; how much more should they cherish the lofty Dao (the Way)? They often think the ruler is above themselves and still are willing to give their lives for him; how much more for the true Dao?

When the spring dries up, fish are stranded together on the dry land; they puff breath on each other to stay damp and moisten one another with spit……

不如相忘於江湖與其譽堯而非桀也不如 兩忘而化其道  郭註常無心而順彼故好惡善惡與彼無  二無有不一者天也彼彼而我我人也眞  人同天人齊彼我曠然無不一㝠然無不  任知死生者命之極非妄然也眞人在晝  得晝在夜得夜以死生爲晝夜豈有所不  得今人有所不得而憂虞在懐皆物情耳  非理也卓者獨化之謂人之所因者天天  之所生者獨化人以天爲父晝夜寒暑皆  安之而不敢惡況卓爾獨化於玄㝠之境  又安得不任之哉眞者不假於物自然不  可違豈眞君命而已故證以涸魚之喻與  其不足而相愛豈若有餘而相忘夫非譽  皆生於不足至足者忘善惡遣死生與變  化爲一又安知堯桀之所在邪  吕註夫物視其所一而不見其所異故其  好之者美與善也而美善出於此不好之  者惡與不善而惡與不善亦出於此則好  與不好一也一猶水之湛然者其不一猶  水之波流亦水而已知此則非獨止而後  止也然有一有不一者其一與天爲徒退  藏於密也不一與人爲徒吉凶與民同患  也莫之致而致者命莫之爲而爲者天死  生之相爲夜旦出於命與天則人之有所  不得與此物之情也吾何爲哀樂於其間  哉以天爲吾之所自生身猶愛之況生之  所自生其爲父也卓矣獨不愛之乎苟惟
Interpretation

Rather than being like fish in a dried rut, moistening one another with foam to stay alive, it is better to forget one another in the great rivers and lakes and live at ease. Rather than praising Yao and condemning Jie, it is better to forget such distinctions altogether and move with the transformations of the Dao.

Guo Xiang’s commentary: By not holding fixed preconceptions and following things as they are, one does not cling to likes and dislikes, good and evil, and thus does not split reality into two sides. That things differ and each affirms itself is a human-made division; the True Person (zhenren), united with Heaven, can equalize self and other, you and I, so the mind opens and things no longer seem separate, and one can quietly comply with all things.

To understand life and death is the utmost in following Heaven’s mandate—not something forced or artificial. The True Person is at ease in daylight by day and at ease in darkness by night; treating life and death like the alternation of day and night, what could there be that cannot be accepted calmly? When people today meet what displeases them and brood in worry, that is merely worldly habit; it does not accord with reason.

“Outstanding” (zhuo) means coming into being alone, each thing generating itself. What humans rely on is Heaven; what Heaven nourishes each generates on its own. Humans take Heaven as father—even changes of day and night, cold and heat, they accept calmly and dare not resent; how much more should one comply with that outstanding, solitary transformation and that deep, subtle realm? The True Person is not someone who merely obeys orders from some “True Lord”; the True Person does not depend on externals but follows nature, and cannot go against the way of nature. Thus Guo Xiang uses the parable of fish in a dried rut: rather than pitying one another in scarcity, it is better to forget one another in abundance.

Praise and blame both arise from insufficiency. One who is truly full forgets the division between good and evil, transcends the distinction between life and death, and merges with transformation—how could such a person still care where Yao and Jie respectively stand?

Lyu Huiqing’s commentary: Viewed from what is the same, one does not see difference between this and that. Those who like something call it beautiful and good, and beauty and goodness arise from that; those who dislike it call it ugly and not good, and ugliness and not-good arise from that. Seen this way, liking and disliking are originally one matter.

What is called “sameness” is like water still and clear; what is called “difference” is like water rippling and flowing—yet it is still only water. Understanding this, one is not only at peace after things have settled. Things have sameness and difference: holding to sameness, one companions Heaven and retreats into depth; showing difference, one companions people and shares fortune and misfortune with the multitude.

What arrives without anyone deliberately making it happen is fate (ming); what occurs without anyone deliberately acting is Heaven (tian). Life and death alternate like night and dawn—this is from ming and tian. When people cannot have what they want, it is like each thing having its own nature; why should I grieve or rejoice over it?

If Heaven is taken as the source of one’s own life, and one still cherishes the body, how much more should one cherish Heaven as the truly outstanding father of life? If one only…

 知其卓者而愛之則生無足忻明矣人特  以有君爲愈乎己身猶死之而況其眞乎  苟知其眞者而聽之則死無足距明矣性  命之源涸處乎人偽之陸而呴濡以仁義  之濕沬不若相忘於道術之江湖而不知  死生聚散也盖悦生惡死者情無死無生  者道譽堯非桀亦情而已知兩忘非譽而  化其道則所以忘死生者未始不同也  林註此言刑禮知德皆眞也故復明好與  不好㝠烏一致其一也一其不一也一則  一與不一復爲一矣天人齊等無有高下  豈復有一與不一之相勝哉死生之理命  也陰陽之常天也眞人任其自然在晝得  晝在夜得夜以死生爲晝夜豈有所不得  與然猶有患慮在懐皆物情耳非理也卓  者天地之祖眞者萬物之母物自天生以  天爲父樂從而不敢違況天之祖乎以君  爲勝乎己猶以身死難況萬物之母乎涸  魚濡沬不若相忘於江湖以喻大道之世  物各逍遥雞犬相聞民不往來及至後世  道散朴離跂踶爲仁蹩躠爲義父子兄弟  懷情相欺始思所以治之譽堯非桀紛爭  無已不若相忘於自然也  陳詳道註一者無迹於天下卓然獨立塊  然獨處天得之以清地得之以寧侯王得  之以爲天下正是以古之得道者始於致  一中於抱一終於反一此眞人所以無適  而非一也萬物本一而不一者物之私意
Interpretation

To understand “Zhuo” (that which transcends all things and stands as the fundamental root independent of heaven and earth) and to cherish it is to see that life holds nothing especially worth rejoicing over. People always suppose there is a ruler superior to themselves, yet they themselves cannot escape death—how much less can the authentic reality of all things? If one understands “Zhen” (the source of all things) and follows it, one sees that death is nothing that must be resisted.

When the spring of nature and life runs dry, people are stranded on the fabricated dry land of hypocrisy, moistening one another only with scattered drops of benevolence and righteousness. That is inferior to forgetting one another in the great river and lake of Dao practice (the way of aligning with the natural Dao), no longer even noticing birth, death, gathering, and scattering. Delighting in life and loathing death are merely human feelings; neither clinging to death nor clinging to life is the Dao. Praising Yao and condemning Jie are likewise only emotional distinctions. To know how to forget both praise and blame, yield to transformation along the Dao, and forget the logic of life and death is to see that they were never really different.

Lin Xiyi comments: The punishment, ritual, knowledge, and virtue spoken of here are all expressions of the true nature, which is why the text goes on to say that “liking” and “not liking” should be fused into one. Take unity as unity, and also take non-unity as unity; then unity and non-unity return to unity again. Heaven and humanity stand on the same level, with no high or low—how could unity and non-unity still compete with each other? The principle of life and death belongs to fate; the alternation of yin and yang is the constant pattern of nature. The true person follows what is natural: at day he rests in day, at night he rests in night; treating life and death as the shift between day and night, what could he not accept? Worry and attachment still lodged in the heart are only human emotion and do not accord with natural principle.

“Zhuo” is the ancestral root of heaven and earth; “Zhen” is the mother of the ten thousand things. The ten thousand things are born from heaven; since humans take heaven as father, they ought all the more to follow heaven and not dare to go against it—how much more the ancestral root of heaven and earth? If people think a ruler is superior to themselves yet still find their own death hard to bear, how much more the mother of the ten thousand things?

Fish in a dried-up pool keep one another alive by spitting foam—far inferior to forgetting one another in the rivers and lakes. This image stands for an age when the great Dao prevailed: each thing wandered freely in its own ease; chickens and dogs could be heard by one another, yet the people did not visit back and forth. In later ages the Dao scattered and simplicity split apart; people strained to practice benevolence and labored to practice righteousness, while fathers, sons, and brothers harbored private motives and deceived one another—only then did people begin to devise ways of governing. Praising Yao and condemning Jie, arguing without end—it is better to forget one another and comply with nature.

Chen Xiangdao comments: What is called “the One” is the root of the world—without form, standing alone, existing by itself. Heaven receiving it becomes clear, earth receiving it becomes tranquil, lords and kings receiving it can set the world straight. Therefore the ancients who obtained the Dao at first devoted themselves to returning to oneness, in the middle guarded oneness, and in the end returned to oneness. The true person, wherever he dwells, never leaves the One. The ten thousand things are originally one; they appear not-one only because of each thing’s private intent.

 㝠夫一者則知物之私意亦一而已故入  而一則與天爲徒出而不一則與人爲徒  與天爲徒而不失人與人烏徒而不廢天  則一與不一復爲一矣夜者旦之藏死者  生之始觀夜旦之不足係則死生豈足卹  哉故眞人無情於生死而生死與之皆則  夫人之有所不得與皆者物之情也人知  以天爲父以君爲尊而不知所謂卓者尤  當愛眞者尤當守也至仁無親則有恩以  相生養者不足於仁也至知無知則有情  以相非譽者不足於知也江湖譬道之廣  大故言道者多以水喻之  碧虚註得與猶相與人之不能一好惡同  天人齊彼我者皆物情之所係也彼唯知  尊愛天命而未識保其妙道唯知死節事  君而不知外身修眞魚失水則相濡沬適  江湖則忘矣人昧理則相非譽得此道則  化矣  趙註好之也一弗好之也一好惡在人我  則無好惡也天則無好惡人自有好惡耳  何勝負之有知夜旦相代天之所爲死生  相代命之所爲通乎晝夜之道則知死生  之說人而不知此理則悦生惡死情皆然  也子之所以孝其父者以父爲天也而在  己之天不知愛可乎臣之所以忠其君者  雖死不顧而眞君之所存不知尊可乎魚  處陸而思水人處亂而思治皆不免悦生  惡死之情相忘江湖相忘道術則生死一  理何喜何懼哉
Interpretation

To grasp the principle that “all things return to the One,” one understands that the partial, self-serving intentions each thing harbors are nothing more than movements of mind. When mind returns to oneness, one walks with the Way of Heaven (Tiandao); when action turns away from this, one aligns only with ordinary people. Walking with the Way of Heaven without abandoning human affairs, and dwelling among ordinary people without forsaking the Way—then “returning to the One” and “not returning to the One” merge again into a single whole.

Night is the concealment of day; death is the opening of life. If one need not be fixated on the alternation of day and night, what is there to worry about in death and life? Therefore the perfected person (zhenren)—one who has embodied the great Dao—does not cling to life or death, and both life and death can follow their natural course. The reason people cannot return to oneness with all things is that they are bound by the particular dispositions of each thing.

People know to regard Heaven as father and the ruler as their superior, yet they do not know there is a Dao that transcends even this, and that they ought to cherish their true nature and guard it. The highest benevolence does not favor one person over another, yet enables all things to receive its grace; if one still relies on closeness and affection to sustain nurturing, that is not yet fully benevolent. The highest wisdom does not deliberately display cleverness; if one still praises or blames one another through personal feeling, that is not yet fully wise. Rivers and seas are vast and boundless and are often used as images of the great Dao; hence those who discourse on the Dao often take water as their analogy.

Bixu’s commentary: “De yu” means being companions to one another. People cannot bring likes and dislikes into one accord, nor can they equalize Heaven and humanity, self and other—these are all expressions of being constrained by the dispositions of things. They only know to honor and cherish the mandate of Heaven, but do not understand how to preserve the subtle Dao; they only know to be loyal to the ruler even unto death, but do not understand how to preserve the self and cultivate true nature. When fish leave the water, they can only moisten one another with foam and spittle; when they return to rivers and seas, they forget such distress. When people do not understand the principle, they mutually blame or praise; when they awaken to this Dao, they can dissolve themselves out of these distinctions.

Zhao’s commentary: Likes and dislikes are human discriminations: what one side likes, the other may dislike. Viewed from the divide between self and other, there are likes and dislikes, whereas the Way of Heaven itself has no likes or dislikes—only people generate them. Where is there any high or low, victory or defeat? The alternation of day and night is the operation of the Way of Heaven; the alternation of death and life is the transformation of fate. To penetrate the principle of day and night’s cycle is to understand death and life. Those who do not understand this will naturally cling to life and fear death. Children honor their father because they see the father as their support; but if they do not know to cherish the nature they have received, how can that be right? Ministers are loyal to the ruler even at the cost of life; but if they do not know to revere the inner true lord (their authentic nature), how can that be right? Fish on dry land long for water; people in chaotic times long for peace—these cannot escape the emotion of clinging to life and fearing death. Yet if fish return to rivers and seas and forget the distress of moistening one another with foam, and people return to the Way and forget mutual discrimination, then life and death are originally one principle—what is there to rejoice or fear?

 鬳齋云一自然也造化也好惡之異同皆  不出乎造化之外故一與不一皆一也人  能同好惡則知天故與天爲徒以好惡爲  異則知人而已故與人爲徒眞人無好惡  異同無分乎天人但循自然而已涸魚之  相濡沬喻人處世有爲相忘於江湖喻體  道無爲也譽堯非桀一句是其獨見自得  處無桀亦無堯無譽亦無毁兩忘而付之  自然是化之以道也   此論眞人好惡出於至公亦猶無好惡   也故好亦一弗好亦一其一也一不一   亦一其一與天爲徒本乎自然無所不   一也其不一與人爲徒或出使然不純   乎一也以道觀之一與不一亦一而已   天不人不因人不天不成亦何相勝之   有盖恐世人泥夫迹之不一而失其理   之大同故又喻以人之生死猶天之有   夜旦凡戴天履地者俱不免而有所不   得與知者皆物情蔽之耳若攝情歸性   混合天人則可以與知死生之理猶夜   旦之常而不足芥蒂也人以天爲父而   猶尊愛之況己之卓然者乎君愈乎己   而身猶死之況己之至眞者乎此又直   指道體以示人人能反求其卓然至眞   者則知吾之生死乃一念之起滅一氣   之往來耳儻不明此則失其所以生何   異魚之處陸而呴濡以濕沬視相忘於   江湖爲何如哉   南華自謂吾爲是論亦無異譽堯非桀   未能相忘而化其道盖欲人忘言而以
Interpretation

Yan Zhai said: “The Dao is one—namely, the spontaneous working of nature. People’s likes and dislikes toward things differ, yet those differences never fall outside the scope of creation; so whether preferences align or clash, in the end they all return to the one Dao. When a person shares nature’s likes and dislikes, that is knowing Heaven (Tian) and keeping company with Heaven; when one treats likes and dislikes as mutually opposed, one only knows people and keeps company with humanity. The realized person (one who has embodied the Dao) does not cling to sameness or difference in liking and disliking, nor does he separate Heaven from humanity; he simply follows what is natural.

When fish are stranded on dry land, they moisten each other with foam—a image of people in the world acting and helping one another; when fish live in rivers and lakes, they forget each other—a image of embodying the Dao through Wuwei (non-action). The line that praises Yao and condemns Jie is precisely Zhuangzi’s distinctive insight. If one can forget both Jie and Yao, and let praise and blame drop from the mind, leaving everything to nature, that is truly dissolving distinctions through the Dao.

This discussion means that the realized person’s likes and dislikes arise from utmost fairness, so one may also say he has no likes and dislikes: to prefer is natural, and not to prefer is also natural; whether aligned or not, both resolve into the same. Keeping company with Heaven takes nature as root, and nothing fails to return to oneness; keeping company with people is distinction born from events, and cannot be purely one. Seen from the Dao, “one” and “not one” both unite in the Dao. Heaven is not the human, and the human is not Heaven; yet if there were no human, Heaven could not be fulfilled either—so what quarrel over rank between them?

Zhuangzi feared that people would fixate on surface differences and forget the deeper shared principle, so he again compared human life and death: birth and death are like night and day in Heaven. All who live between Heaven and Earth cannot escape birth and death; the reason people fail to understand this is only that worldly feeling blinds them. If feeling is gathered in and true nature is restored, so that Heaven and humanity merge as one, one can grasp the principle of birth and death: it is like the alternation of day and night—a constant state, not worth anxiety.

People regard Heaven as father and still revere it; how much more the self that stands alone in its authenticity? If a lord is above oneself, people will even die for him; how much more one’s own most real nature? This again points straight at the substance of the Dao (daoti), so that one understands: if one turns back and seeks the self that stands alone, utterly true and unfeigned, one will know that so-called birth and death are nothing but the arising and passing of a single thought, the coming and going of one breath of Qi (vital energy).

If this principle is not understood, the root of life is lost. It is like fish leaving the water and stranded on land, able only to moisten each other with foam—how can that compare with forgetting one another in the rivers and lakes?

Zhuangzi said of himself: “When I speak this way, I am still no different from praising Yao and condemning Jie; in that I have not yet forgotten each other, nor dissolved distinctions through the Dao.” He spoke thus, presumably to make people forget words and rely on…

  心契之又所以掃其迹也 南華眞經義海纂微
Interpretation

Once the mind has become aligned with the Dao, one must also sweep away the traces left by this alignment and no longer cling to it.

卷之十五

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0127); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 13 Vol. 15 →