中文 · EN

《南華真經義海纂微》Vol. 41

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 41 / 104 2,507 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經義海纂微》 Vol. 41 (Dongshen 洞神部, 104 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 5 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經義海纂微》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經義海纂微卷之四十三端一     武林道士褚伯秀學    天道第四 世之所貴道者書也書不過語語有貴也語 之所貴者意也意有所隨意之所隨者不可 以言傳也而世因貴言傳書世雖貴之哉猶 不足貴也爲其貴非其貴也故視而可見者 形與色也聽而可聞者名與聲也悲夫世人 以形色名聲爲足以得彼之情而形色名聲 果不足以得彼之情則知者不言言者不知 而世豈識之哉桓公讀書於堂上輪扁斲輪 於堂下釋椎鑿而上問桓公敢問公之所讀 者何言耶公曰聖人之言也曰聖人在乎公 曰已死矣曰然則君之所讀者古人之糟魄 已矣桓公曰寡人讀書輪人安得議乎有說 則可無說則死輪扁曰臣也以臣之事觀之 斲輪徐則甘而不固疾則苦而不入不徐不 疾得之於手而應於心口不能言有數存焉 於其間臣不能以喻臣之子臣之子亦不能 受之於臣是以行年七十而老斲輪古之人 與其不可傳也死矣然則君之所讀者古人 之糟魄已矣  郭註其貴常在言意之表故得彼之情唯  忘言遺書者耳輪扁之不能喻子言物各  有性教學無益當古之事已滅於今雖或  傳之豈能使古在今哉古不在今今事已  變故絶學任性與時變化而後至焉  吕註莊子言此欲學者遣言忘書而不求
Interpretation

What people value as the Dao is all recorded in books. What books record, however, is only words. Words certainly have value, but their value lies in the meaning they express. What that meaning points to cannot be conveyed through words alone. Yet people value words and record them in books to pass down from generation to generation. Even if people cherish these books, they may not truly understand what makes them valuable, because what they cherish may not be what is truly valuable in them.

The eyes can see shapes and colors; the ears can hear names and sounds. How sad that people think shapes, colors, names, and sounds are enough to understand the true nature of things. In fact, these outward appearances cannot bring true understanding. Those who understand the principle may not speak of it, and those who speak of it may not truly understand. How, then, can people see it clearly?

Duke Huan of Qi was reading a book in his hall while Wheelwright Bian was making a wheel below. Bian set down his hammer and chisel, went over to Duke Huan, and asked, “May I ask what book you are reading?” Duke Huan replied, “The words of the sages.” Bian asked, “Are the sages still alive?” Duke Huan answered, “They are dead.” Bian said, “Then what you are reading is nothing but the dregs left behind by the ancients.”

Duke Huan said, “I am reading a book. What right does a wheelwright have to make such a judgment? If you can explain your reasoning, you may live; if you cannot, you will die.” Wheelwright Bian replied, “From my own work, I know that if I carve a wheel too slowly, it turns out loose and weak; if I carve it too quickly, the wood feels rough and the pieces will not fit. Only when I work neither too slowly nor too quickly does the result come out just as I intend. This knack cannot be put into words; it has its own measure. I cannot explain it to my son, and my son cannot learn it from me. That is why, at seventy, I am still making wheels with my own hands. Whatever the ancients could not pass down vanished when they died. By that reasoning, what you are reading is nothing but the dregs left behind by the ancients.”

Guo Xiang’s commentary says that what is truly valuable in books and words often lies beyond words and writing. To understand the true nature of things, one must therefore forget words and avoid clinging to books. Wheelwright Bian’s inability to explain his craft to his son shows that each thing has its own nature, and that teaching and learning alone are of no use. Things of the past have vanished; even if someone passes down an account of them, that cannot bring the past back to the present as it was. The circumstances of the past are not those of today, and things today have also changed. One should therefore set aside rigid learning, follow one’s nature, and adapt to changing times in order to reach what is fitting.

At the start of his commentary, Lü Huiqing says that Zhuangzi tells this story to encourage learners to let go of their attachment to words and books, and not to… (The original text ends here.)

 於形色名聲之間也夫斲輪事之粗者然  疾徐甘苦得於手而應於心者雖父子猶  不能喻而受之則夫道之爲物其傳之難  於斲輪甚矣誠不能求之於心而唯書之  讀則糟魄之喻非虚言也  疑獨註易曰書不盡言言不盡意則所謂  書者不過陳迹而已世以爲書足以盡道  不知道者也言者莫不貴意意者隨道而  無窮言不足傳則所謂書者何足貴哉世  之所貴非所貴也不可言者道之全可以  言者道之散道本出於性命之自然必也  會之以無形因之以至理聞於寂寂見於  㝠㝠可也而世之人舍自然之常性求先  王之陳迹愈求而愈失矣夫耳目所聞見  不過乎形色名聲其於書也亦若是而世  人迷眞失性謂形色名聲爲能得彼之情  此可悲也若能忘其形色名聲而棄言遺  書因之以心會之以意則天地之至理性  命之大情可不言而知矣篇扁以桓公惑  於先王之陳迹而不知大道之本故以斲  輪之事喻之在乎循之以理而不失其性  不疾不徐得手應心數者自然之性存焉  者所謂理也口不能言所以不能喻之於  子而老斲輪斲輪技之末猶不可以言喻  況欲求道於書乎唯善學者讀其書求其  意舍其迹會其心斯免輪扁之譏也  詳道註書言之於意猶形色名聲之於情  情不可得之於形色名聲意不可傳之於
Interpretation

Does the Dao exist in physical forms, colors, names, and sounds? Wheelwright Bian, an ancient craftsman skilled in making wheels, considered wheel carving a rudimentary craft. Yet the right measure of speed and force, of sweetness and bitterness, must be grasped by the hands and matched by the heart. Even a father and son cannot explain this experience clearly or pass it on to each other. If so, transmitting the Dao as a way of being must be far more difficult than teaching someone to carve a wheel. Unless one understands it through the heart, simply reading books makes the metaphor of “dregs” no idle figure of speech.

The Commentary on Doubting What Stands Alone says: “The Book of Changes says that writing cannot fully express speech, and speech cannot fully express what is in the mind. What we call books are merely traces left behind by those who came before. People think books are enough to exhaust the principles of the Dao because they do not understand the Dao. Speech values what is in the mind, and the mind moves with the Dao, which has no limit. If speech cannot convey it, what is there to value in books? What people value is not truly worthy of their regard.

“The Dao in its entirety cannot be expressed in words; words can express only a part of it. The Dao arises naturally from one’s nature and life. To understand it, one must go beyond physical things and follow the most fundamental principles. One must listen in stillness and perceive in the depths. People abandon their constant, natural nature and instead pursue the old traces left by the former kings. The more they pursue them, the farther they move from the Dao.

“What the ears and eyes can hear and see amounts only to physical forms, colors, names, and sounds. Books are no different. People lose their true nature and believe that forms, colors, names, and sounds can reveal the true inner reality of things. This is truly lamentable. If one can forget forms, colors, and sounds, and avoid clinging to words and books, then understand through the heart and grasp through intention, the most fundamental principles of Heaven and Earth and the deepest realities of nature and life can be understood without being spoken.

“In the Zhuangzi, Wheelwright Bian uses the carving of a wheel as a metaphor to show that Duke Huan, ruler of Qi during the Spring and Autumn period, was absorbed in the old traces left by the former kings but did not understand the root of the Great Dao. The key is to follow the principles of things without losing one’s nature: neither too fast nor too slow, with the hands working just right and the heart responding naturally. The ‘measure’ spoken of here is natural nature; what it contains is principle. Words cannot express it clearly, so Wheelwright Bian could not explain his craft to his son. If even the minor skill of carving wheels cannot be taught through words, how much less can one seek the Dao in books? Only those who study well, seeking the intent behind what they read rather than getting stuck on the literal traces, and using their own hearts to understand it, will avoid Wheelwright Bian’s scorn.”

The Commentary on the Detailed Dao says: “Writing conveys what is in the mind, just as forms, colors, names, and sounds convey the true condition of things. The true condition cannot be directly obtained from forms, colors, names, and sounds, and what is in the mind cannot be fully conveyed in…” The original text breaks off here.

 書言必矣故善易者得意而忘象得象而  忘言善詩者得志而忘辭得辭而忘文豈  非所謂祠祀畢芻狗捐醇精流糟粕棄者  哉桓公所以因輪扁而悟讀書之非王壽  所以因徐馮而起焚書之舞也  碧虚註古人已往所傳者書語而已胡足  貴哉譬如問答五味只可說其形色名聲  甘苦之味終莫能告也舍形色名聲則知  者不言斯得之矣輪扁之得心應手妙莫  能喻者有術數存焉此所以終身行之也  年隨時化道逐日新古人語此未嘗不慨  然也  鬳齋云書能載道所以貴之貴在道不在  書也以道爲言故其言可貴然所貴在意  而不在言意之所向言不得而傳則言與  書皆不足貴矣形色則可見名聲則可聞  道不可見聞而世人欲以形色名聲得其  實可悲也夫此段發明前意謂道不可以  言傳而設喻精妙若此書載古人之言其  人不存則其不可傳者何從得之糟粕之  餔豈知酒味哉   跡者履之所出而跡非履也書者道之   所寓而書非道也悟者因書以明道迷   者舍道而求書故桓公溺於陳言輪扁   得以進說以粗喻精即事明理無適而   非道也夫斲輪者選材施工所以任重   致遠而推行於天下即懷道抱德而欲   有以濟世之譬也其運斤之妙得心應   手雖父子不能相傳則方圓長短之數   疾徐甘苦之節一得之於自然有不容
Interpretation

However fully a book may express itself, it is still only words. Thus, one who is skilled at reading the Book of Changes grasps the meaning and forgets the hexagrams; once the hexagrams are understood, they no longer cling to the words. One who is skilled at reading poetry grasps its intent and forgets the phrases; once the phrases are understood, they no longer cling to their literary polish. Is this not like discarding the straw dogs after the sacrifice is over, or casting aside the dregs after drinking fine wine? This is how Duke Huan of Qi, ruler of the state of Qi during the Spring and Autumn period, learned from Lun Pian, the wheelwright, that reading books does not necessarily yield the true principle. And Wang Shou, too, danced as he burned his books because of what happened with Xu Feng.

Bixu’s commentary: The ancients have passed away, and all they left behind is words in books. What is there to value in that? Take the discussion of the five flavors: one can describe their forms, colors, and names, but words can never convey the actual taste of sweetness or bitterness. Only by setting aside forms, colors, and names can one understand the principle that cannot be expressed in words. The subtle skill with which Lun Pian’s hands and mind worked together could not be fully explained in language. It had its own methods and measures, and he practiced this craft throughout his life. As the years change with time, the Dao renews itself day by day. The ancients could not speak of this without a sigh.

Yanzhai’s commentary: Books can carry the Dao; that is why people prize them. What is truly precious is the Dao, not the books. The words in a book are precious because they speak of the Dao, but what is precious is the meaning within those words, not the words themselves. If meaning cannot be conveyed through language, then neither words nor books are worth esteeming. Forms and colors can be seen; names and sounds can be heard. But the Dao cannot be seen with the eyes or heard with the ears. It is lamentable that people insist on seeking the substance of the Dao through forms, colors, and sounds. This passage further clarifies the point made earlier: the Dao cannot be transmitted through words, and the author expresses this with a remarkably apt metaphor. Books record the words of the ancients, but the ancients are gone. How, then, can we obtain what they could not pass on? How could eating wine dregs tell us the taste of wine?

The tracks left behind by a wheel appear after the wheel has passed, but the tracks are not the wheel. A book is a place where the Dao resides, but a book is not the Dao. Those who awaken to the Dao use books to understand it; those who are deluded abandon the Dao and concern themselves only with pursuing books. Thus Duke Huan of Qi was so absorbed in the old sayings of ancient books that Lun Pian had the chance to speak. Profound principles can be illustrated through humble things and explained by concrete examples; the Dao can be found everywhere. Making a wheel requires selecting materials and shaping them so that the wheel can bear heavy loads, travel long distances, and serve all under Heaven. This is like someone who holds De in their heart and hopes to accomplish something that will benefit the world. As Lun Pian wielded his axe to make wheels, the subtle coordination of hand and mind could not be passed on even from father to son. The measures of roundness and squareness, length and shortness, the pace of each movement, and the degree of tightness and looseness felt by the hands all had to be understood for oneself. Some of the craft’s mysteries cannot be fully explained by any fixed method…

  以言書者矣況神鬼神帝生天生地之   道其可以書盡乎扁之老於斲輪豈搰   搰於椎鑿之間而勞筋苦骨爲哉盖因   道進技以天合天得其所以爲輪用力   少而見功多故終身由之而弗舍也推   是理以達於書宜無難矣桓公滯跡遺   心遂謂聖人已死扁也得以盡其辭而   救其失夫聖賢所學者道所傳者心苟   得其心則知有不死者存此道可以坐   進又豈在譊譊乎紙上之糟粕耶此有   以見聖賢不得已而立言傳書南車借   此以祛世人泥象執文之弊學者信能   見月忘指而復吾混成之天則迴視挾   册諸生不直一笑此條大意與庖丁解   牛章相類但末後欠桓公領話耳留此   一語以惠後人必有承當者  是篇以天道命名特標其首次以帝王聖  道玄聖素王之事業以道德爲主無爲之  常此乗天地馳萬物而用人羣之道也中  叙德教禮樂仁義分守形名賞罰治世之  具無不畢備然皆不離乎人道之常何也  盖善論天道者必本乎人能盡人道者可  配乎天天人交通本末一致廣無不容淵  不可測又安知天之非人人之非天乎至  論五變而形名可舉九變而賞罰可言此  萬世不易之理所以立人極贊天道也若  夫天德而出寧日月照而四時行若晝夜  之有經雲行而雨施矣則天自己出炳靈  獨化地道人道其有不從者乎夫修治具
Interpretation

Even someone who writes an essay may be able to put their thoughts into words. How much less, then, can words convey everything about the Great Dao that speaks of spirits and ghosts, the divine emperor, and the creation of Heaven and Earth?

When Wheelwright Bian grew old, he was still making wheels. Was he merely hammering away with hammer and chisel until his sinews and bones grew tired? He worked by following the Dao, letting natural skill respond to the nature of the wood. That is why he made wheels with little effort and great effect. He used this method throughout his life and never abandoned it. By extension, reading books and understanding their words by the same principle should not be difficult.

Duke Huan of Qi stayed on the surface of the words in a book and forgot the thoughts behind them. He therefore assumed that the sages had died and that their teachings remained only as written words in books. Wheelwright Bian used the occasion to explain that words cannot contain everything the sages meant. The worthy sages learned the Dao and conveyed their thoughts. Once we grasp those thoughts, we know that something exists which does not die with the body. The Dao can be experienced and cultivated in stillness; how could it be found only in the ceaseless words on a page? This shows that sages established teachings and wrote books only because they had no other choice. Nan Che uses this idea to dispel the world’s failing of clinging to appearances and fixating on words. If scholars can see the moon and forget the finger pointing to it, returning to their own undivided nature, then when they look back at those who cling to their books, they may find it hard to keep from smiling. The main idea of this passage is close to that of “Cooking an Ox,” though it ends without Duke Huan’s reply. The author leaves these words for later generations to understand, trusting that someone will truly be able to take them to heart.

This chapter is titled “The Way of Heaven.” It begins by discussing the work of emperors, sages, mysterious sages, and uncrowned kings, taking Dao and De as its foundation to explain the constant Way of Wuwei (non-action). This Way governs Heaven and Earth, sets the myriad things in motion, and also serves in governing human society. The chapter then discusses methods for ordering the world, including instruction in De, ritual and music, benevolence and righteousness, duties and ranks, rewards and punishments. Its account is comprehensive, yet none of it departs from the constant principles of human life. Why? Those skilled at discussing the Way of Heaven must take the human way as their foundation; those who fulfill the human way can also accord with Heaven. Heaven and humanity run through one another, and root and branch are one. The Way is vast, containing all things, and so profound that it is hard to fathom. How, then, can we be certain that Heaven is not humanity, or humanity not Heaven?

With five transformations, ranks and institutions can be established; with nine transformations, rewards and punishments can be discussed. These are principles unchanged through the ages, by which standards for human relationships are established and the Way of Heaven is supported in its workings. As for the De of Heaven, it manifests naturally, without human effort: the sun and moon shine, the seasons turn, and day and night follow their regular order; clouds move and rain falls. All these are the Way of Heaven revealing itself and shining forth in its course. If so, how could the Way of Earth and the human way fail to move in accord with it?

 以明治道古今之道通論然有用之而治  用之而亂者以其不知本末先後之序君  臣詳要之宜故也世謂南華立言多尚無  爲而略治具觀是篇所陳禮樂政教究極  精微有非諸子所可及者要皆出於天理  之自然假人以行之耳信明乎自然之理  則可以由治具而通治道使君臣父子鳥  獸草木皆得其宜天下擊壤謳歌不知帝  力謂之無爲可也至若孔予欲藏書而繙  經以說成綺問修身而其容崖然是皆狗  人而忘天所以老聃弗許也唯至人知仁  義爲道之末禮樂爲道之賔能天能人極  貞守本而神未嘗有所困故雖有世而不  足爲之累也終以遣書得意糟粕陳言而  寓之於輪扁盖恐學者狗跡遣心舍本趨  末則去道愈遠但當究夫聖人有不亡者  存則學者當自絶學而入傳者當得無傳  之傳而天地聖人之心見矣何以古人之
Interpretation

This passage explains that methods of governing a state are not useless in themselves. The key is to understand the foundations of the Dao of governance, as well as the proper relationship between root and branch, priority and sequence, ruler and minister. Those who know only how to apply specific methods, without understanding these principles, may bring disorder to the state.

People often say that the Nanhua Jing (Classic of the Southern Florescence, or Zhuangzi) focuses on Wuwei (non-action) and gives little attention to practical methods of governance. Yet its discussion here of ritual and music, government orders, and moral instruction reveals subtle insights beyond those of the other thinkers. In the end, these methods all arise from the natural order of Heaven; they are simply expressed through human action. Understand the principles of nature, and specific methods of governance can open the way to the Dao of governance, allowing rulers and ministers, fathers and sons, and even birds, beasts, plants, and trees to each find their proper place. When the people throughout the realm live and work in peace, singing as they pound the earth, and are even unaware of the ruler’s achievements, that is what may be called “Wuwei.”

As for Confucius, he wanted to collect books and study the classics to enlighten Cheng Qi. Yet when speaking with him about self-cultivation, he seemed self-important and proud. These are all examples of imitating human words and conduct while forgetting the Dao of Heaven. Lao Dan therefore disagreed with him. Only the True Person understands that benevolence and righteousness are minor branches of the Dao, while ritual and music are its guests. Such a person understands both the Dao of Heaven and human affairs, and by holding fast to the root, keeps the spirit from becoming trapped. Even while living in the world, such a person is not burdened by worldly affairs.

The passage concludes with the story of Wheelwright Pian to show that the written words of sages are merely tools for expressing the meaning of the Dao, like dregs of wine and stale words; they are not the Dao itself. If learners follow only the traces left by words and forget the Dao those words seek to convey, they will abandon the root for the branches and drift ever farther from the Dao. They should investigate the root that the sages never lost. Learners must go beyond fixed methods to experience the Dao, while teachers must grasp the true transmission that cannot be conveyed through words alone. In this way, the heart of Heaven and Earth and the sages can be revealed. Why, then, cling to the words of the ancients?

 糟粕爲哉 南華眞經義海纂微卷之四十三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0127); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 40 Vol. 42 →