中文 · EN

《南華真經義海纂微》Vol. 49

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 49 / 104 4,353 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經義海纂微》 Vol. 49 (Dongshen 洞神部, 104 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 9 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經義海纂微》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經義海纂微卷之五十一端八     武林道士褚伯秀學    秋水第一 秋水時至百川灌河涇流之大兩涘渚涯之 間不辯牛馬於是焉河伯欣然自喜以天下 之美爲盡在己順流而東行至於北海東面 而視不見水端於是焉河伯始旋其面目望 洋向若而歎曰野語有之曰聞道百以爲莫 己若者我之謂也且夫我嘗聞少仲尼之聞 而輕伯夷之義者始吾弗信今我睹子之難 窮也吾非至於子之門則殆矣吾長見笑於 大方之家北海若曰井蛙不可以語於海者 拘於虚也夏蟲不可以語於冰者篤於時也 曲士不可以語於道者束於教也今爾出於 涯涘觀於大海乃知爾醜爾將可與語大理 矣天下之水莫大於海萬川歸之不知何時 止而不盈尾閭泄之不知何時已而不虚春 秋不變水旱不知此其過江河之流不可爲 量數而吾未嘗以此自多者自以比形於天 地而受氣於陰陽吾在天地之間猶小石小 木之在大山也方存乎見少又奚以自多計 四海在天地之間不似礨空之在大澤乎計中 國之在海内不似稊米之在太倉乎號物之 數謂之萬人處一焉人卒九州穀食之所生 舟車之所通人處一焉此其比萬物也不似 豪末之在於馬體乎五帝之所連三王之所爭 仁人之所憂任士之所勞盡此矣伯夷辭之
Interpretation

When the autumn floods arrived on schedule, many rivers flowed into the Yellow River. Its waters spread so wide that cattle and horses on opposite banks, or on either side of the sandbars, could no longer be distinguished. The Earl of the River, the god of the Yellow River, was delighted, believing that all the finest sights in the world had gathered before him. He followed the current eastward until he reached the North Sea. Facing east, he looked out, but could not see where the water ended.

Only then did the Earl of the River turn around and gaze up at the boundless sea. He sighed and said, “There is a saying that if someone hears a hundred teachings, they think no one can equal them. That describes me. I once heard people say that some considered Confucius poorly informed and looked down on Boyi’s sense of duty. At first I did not believe them. Now that I have seen your vastness with my own eyes, I realize I nearly made a grave mistake. If I had not come to your threshold, I would probably have gone on being laughed at by those with broader understanding.”

The Lord of the North Sea said, “You cannot speak to a frog in a well about the sea, because its dwelling is too confined. You cannot speak to a summer insect about ice, because it is limited by its season. You cannot discuss the Great Dao with someone of narrow understanding, because that person is bound by existing doctrines. Now you have left the riverbanks and seen the sea; you know how shallow your understanding was. That means I can speak with you about the Great Dao.

“Of all the waters in the world, none is greater than the sea. Thousands upon thousands of rivers flow into it, and no one knows when they will stop, yet the sea does not overflow. Its waters flow out through the Tailgate, the legendary place where seawater drains away, and no one knows when they will stop, yet the sea does not run dry. Whether the seasons change or droughts and floods come, the sea is unaffected. Its volume far exceeds that of the rivers, beyond calculation. But I never boast of this, because I know that I am only one form among Heaven and Earth, formed by the Qi of Yin and Yang. Between Heaven and Earth, I am like a pebble or a small tree among great mountains. Once I have seen how small I am, what is there to boast about?

“Seen from the space between Heaven and Earth, are not the Four Seas like a small hollow in a great lake? Seen from within the Four Seas, is not China like a single grain of rice in a great storehouse? The many kinds of things in the world are why we call them ‘the myriad things.’ Humans are only one kind among them. Within the Nine Provinces, people live together, grow grain for food, and use boats and carts to travel; yet humans, too, are only one kind among them. Compared with the myriad things, are people not like a single hair on a horse?

“The Five Emperors who successively governed the world, the Three Kings who contended for it, the humane people who worried over it, and the capable people who labored for it—all were concerned with these same things. Boyi, however, declined to take the world…”

以爲名仲尼語之以爲博此其自多也不似 爾向之自多於水乎  郭象註不辯牛馬言其廣也吾長見笑於  大方之家知其小而不能自大則理分有  素跂尚之情無爲乎其間也物之所生而  安者趣各有極以其知分故可與言理也  窮百川之量懸於河河懸於海海懸於天  地則各有量也此發辭氣者有似乎觀大  可以明小尋其意則不然夫世之所患者  不夷也故體大者怏然謂小者爲無餘質  小者塊然謂大者爲至足是以上下誇跂  俯仰自失此生民所惑也欲正之者莫若  先極其差而因其所謂所謂大者至足故  秋毫無以累乎天地所謂小者無餘故天  地無以過乎秋毫然後各知其極物安其  分逍遥者用其本歩而遊乎自得之場矣  若觀大而不安其小視小而自以爲多將  奔馳於勝負之境而助天民之矜誇豈達  乎南華之㫖哉小大之辨不可相跂故五  帝三王仁人任士之所爲不出乎一域物  有定域雖至知不能出焉故起小大之差  將以申明至理之無辯也  吕惠卿註秋水時至百川灌河則學自外  至而未達乎大道之譬涇流兩涘不辨牛  馬則爲道而不出乎兩旁中央而未至乎  無所不見也順流至於北海言循理而求  則必得其所歸旋面望洋向若回趨大道  從無窮之遊也拘於墟則小大之所限篤
Interpretation

When the river swelled in flood, countless streams flowed into the Yellow River, whose waters became vast and powerful. The River Earl grew proud, believing that all the beauty in the world belonged to him. Then he followed the current eastward to the North Sea. Only when he saw the sea stretching without end did he turn his face toward it and sigh. He said to the sea god Ruo, “As the saying goes, ‘Once you know a little of the Way, you think no one can compare with you.’ That must describe me. I once heard people praise Zhongni (Confucius) for his extensive learning, and I also heard that Boyi thought little of his own conduct. At first, I did not believe them. Now that I have seen the vastness of the sea with my own eyes, I know how limited my understanding was. If I had not come here, I might have gone on being laughed at by those who understand the Great Way.”

Guo Xiang’s commentary says that when the river grows so wide that one can no longer tell a cow from a horse on the opposite bank, this describes its vastness. Yet I was still laughed at by those whose understanding is truly broad. To recognize the limits of one’s understanding without becoming complacent is to accord with reason. Each thing has a place where it is at home, and each has its own limits. Only when we understand our own place can we speak of things as they are. The waters of the countless streams flow into the Yellow River; the Yellow River’s waters flow into the sea; and the sea, in turn, lies between Heaven and Earth. Each thing has its own capacity.

On the surface, this seems to use the observation of great and small to explain their differences. But on closer examination, that is not its point. People commonly make the mistake of failing to regard all things on equal terms. Those with large bodies think they are full and abundant; those with small bodies think they already have enough. So they boast and compare themselves with one another, losing their sense of how to advance or withdraw. This is where people go astray. To correct this bias, it is better to take the differences to their furthest extent, then follow each thing’s own account of itself. What is “great” is already complete; Heaven and Earth cannot add anything to it. What is “small” has nothing to spare; Heaven and Earth cannot take anything away from it. In this way, each understands its own limits, and all things rest content within their proper bounds. The free and easy person keeps to the natural rhythm of things and lives at ease.

If we see only what is great and cannot be content with what is small, or see what is small and think ourselves remarkable, we will rush about trying to outdo one another and feed people’s vanity. How could we then grasp the purpose of the Nanhua Jing, the Daoist name for the Zhuangzi? Great and small each have their own distinctions, and there is no need to compare them. The deeds of the Five Emperors, the Three Kings, the benevolent, and those who devoted themselves to service all remained within the bounds of their respective circumstances. Every thing has its fixed limits, which even the wisest person cannot overstep. The distinction between great and small is raised to show that the highest principle needs no argument.

Lü Huiqing’s commentary says that the autumn floods, when the countless streams flow into the Yellow River, symbolize learning accumulated from outside, which has not yet reached the Great Way. When one can no longer tell a cow from a horse on opposite banks, this shows that although one has sought the Way, one’s view remains confined by the riverbanks and has not yet reached a vision that sees all things. Following the current to the North Sea symbolizes seeking along the course of things and eventually finding one’s destination. Turning to face the boundless sea and looking up at the sea god Ruo symbolizes turning the mind and body toward the Great Way and roaming through the realm without end. Those who remain confined within their own small world are bound by the distinctions between great and small.

 於時則乆近之所專束於教則方術之所  制天下所以不得逍遥者以此出涯涘而  觀大海則脫其拘限而與於無方之觀故  可以語大理也萬川歸之不盈則益之不  加益尾閭泄之不虚則損之不加損非乆  近所專非小大所限此水之幾於道也計  四海在天地間中國在海内人卒在萬物  若亡若存如此其微而五帝三王仁人任  士之所憂勞不過於此而或辭之以爲名  語之以爲博自大道無方觀之輕其義而  少其聞豈虚言哉  林疑獨註拘虚者不能背境篤時者不能  趨變束教者不能循道道歲也聖人時也  執一時而疑歲者終不聞道矣聖人之言  應時而變所變者言所同者道道散而爲  教教者各售其師之說乆而成弊則泥束  不通今爲儒者則非釋爲釋者則非道不  知三聖立教其心則一儻不明此皆束於  教者也今河伯出涯涘而觀海則不蔽於  一曲可以語大理矣夫北海萬川歸之而  不盈尾閭泄之而不虚遠過江河之流豈  可量數而未嘗以此自多者比形於天地  受氣於陰陽則爲其所制役吾形在天地  間若小木小石之在泰山也礨空蟻穴𥺀  米粺子皆至小者而置於山澤之間亦如  北海之在天地也夫物數以萬爲號取其  盈數言之人是萬物中一物中國九州人  衆所聚何異一毫之在馬體耶五帝之連
Interpretation

In matters of time, people are often constrained by distinctions of long and short, far and near. In matters of teachings, they are also limited by various techniques. This is why people under Heaven cannot roam freely and at ease. When the Earl of the River stepped beyond the riverbank and looked out at the sea, he cast off his former limitations and gained a vision without fixed boundaries. Only then could he speak of the great principles.

The sea gathers all the streams, yet does not overflow. The Tail-Gate—the legendary seabed passage through which seawater drains away—lets the water out, yet the sea does not run dry. Neither distinctions of long and short, far and near, nor distinctions of great and small can dictate or constrain this. The sea’s condition is already close to the Dao (the Way).

Viewed from between Heaven and Earth, the Four Seas are only a part of it; China is only a part of the lands within the seas; and a human being is only one among the myriad things, so tiny as to seem almost absent, almost there and almost gone. The concerns and labors of the Five Emperors, the Three Kings, the benevolent, and those who took responsibility for public affairs amounted to no more than this. Yet some people make a show of yielding to gain a reputation, or display their learning by speaking at length. From the boundless perspective of the Great Dao, the moral principles they prize are slight, and what they have heard is limited. Can this really be empty talk?

Lin Yidu’s commentary: Those trapped in narrow understanding cannot go beyond their immediate circumstances; those who cling to a particular age cannot adapt to change; those bound by teachings cannot follow the Dao. The Dao runs through the ages, while sages adapt to the times. If one clings to the practices of a single age and uses them to doubt the Dao that runs through past and present, one will never hear the Dao.

A sage’s words change with the times; what changes is the language, while the Dao does not. The Dao branches out into various teachings, and each school in turn promotes the views of its own teacher. Over time, teachings accumulate faults, and people become rigid and constrained, unable to grasp what runs through them all. Today, Confucians reject the Buddhists, and Buddhists reject the Daoists. They do not understand that the three sages originally shared the same purpose in establishing their teachings. Those who fail to understand this are all constrained by teachings.

When the Earl of the River stepped beyond the riverbank and looked out at the sea, he was no longer obscured by the view from a single corner and could speak of the great principles. The North Sea gathers all the streams and is never full; the Tail-Gate drains its waters, yet it is never empty. The sea is vastly greater than the rivers—how could its scale be calculated? Yet the sea never boasts of this. If we compare a person’s physical form with Heaven and Earth, and the Qi (vital energy) received at birth with Yin-Yang, we are constrained and driven by them. Our bodies stand between Heaven and Earth as a small tree or stone stands on Mount Tai. Caves in the mountains, anthills, grains of broken rice, and millet seeds are all tiny things. Viewed among the mountains and marshes, they are as small as the North Sea is between Heaven and Earth.

People often use “ten thousand” to count the myriad things, meaning simply that they are numerous. A human being is one among the myriad things. China is a place within the Nine Provinces where people live; compared with a single hair on a horse, how is it any different? The Five Emperors succeeded one another… (The original text ends here.)

 續揖讓三王之征伐爭國仁人之憂民任  士之勤職雖事業不同俱盡於毫末而巳  伯夷辭國以爲名仲尼修經以爲博而誇  大於當世亦猶河伯之自多於水也  陳詳道註老子多以水喻道道在乎有本  水貴乎有源莊子所以以北海喻聖人之  道秋河喻百家之術當是時也大道裂於  百家天眞沉於俗習而一曲之士方且欣  然以天下之美爲盡在己猶拘墟之蛙不  可以語海篤時之蟲不可以語冰及其悟  也然後仰天庭而卑天下之居登泰嶽而  知衆山之小此秋水之篇所以作也盖百  家之學以長衆爲能故託之河伯聖人之  道以順物爲功故託之海若百川歸之不  盈尾閭泄之不虚歸墟無底故也以小大  相視則有餘不足之累生以小大相忘則  俯誇仰歎之情泯莊子不期於相忘而期  於相視將以驅小道歸宿於大方而已矣  陳碧虚註望洋見水之盛大貌未至海門  則成鄙陋所以爲無隅者所嗤是故通變  適時廣大之道也君子小人各有涯量越  分妄語自遺其醜知其醜者乃可語理知  愚惑者非愚惑也夫水莫大於海未嘗以  自多者盖取善下後身之義齊魏之爭蝸  角兆民之處毫末皆爲貪者舉喻五帝之  所連謂連續仁義也  林氏鬳齋口義云涇濁也河水驟至而濁  拍滿兩岸故曰涇流之大兩涘非涇渭之
Interpretation

Following the earlier discussion of rulers who dealt with one another through ritual deference, the Three Kings who fought to seize territory, benevolent people who worried for the common folk, and committed officials who worked diligently at their duties, we may say that although these people pursued different endeavors, in the end they were all confined to what was small and limited.

Bo Yi yielded the throne in order to win a reputation. Confucius arranged the classics to display his extensive learning and vaunt himself in his own age. This was like the Earl of the River, who took pride in himself because his waters were abundant.

Chen Xiangdao’s commentary says: Laozi often used water as a metaphor for the Dao (the Way). The Dao depends on having a foundation; water is prized for having a source. The Zhuangzi therefore uses the North Sea to represent the Sage’s great Dao, and the rivers swollen by autumn rains to represent the teachings of the various schools. In that age, the great Dao had split into a hundred schools, and worldly habits had submerged people’s natural, unspoiled nature. Yet scholars who clung to one-sided views were pleased with themselves, believing that all the finest principles in the world belonged to them. This is like a frog at the bottom of a well, with whom one cannot speak of the sea, or an insect that lives from summer to autumn, with whom one cannot speak of ice.

Only after they awaken do they look up at the heavens and see how low the roofs of the world are; only after climbing Mount Tai do they realize how small the other mountains seem. The “Autumn Floods” chapter was written for this very reason. The learning of the hundred schools takes the expansion of knowledge as its strength, so the Earl of the River serves as its image. The Sage’s Dao takes responding to all things as its function, so Hai Ruo, the sea spirit, serves as its image. The sea does not fill up when a hundred rivers flow into it, nor does it dry up when its waters drain away through the Tail Gate, the legendary channel through which the sea discharges its waters, because the Great Void, the legendary unfathomable abyss beneath the sea, has no end.

If we compare things as greater or lesser, we become burdened by thoughts of having more or less. If we can forget the distinction between great and small, the feelings of looking down in self-congratulation or looking up in astonishment will also disappear. Zhuangzi does not ask people to forget all distinctions between great and small at once. Instead, he first has them compare things, thereby guiding narrow teachings toward the broad and proper Dao.

Chen Bixu’s commentary says: “Looking out over the vast waters” describes the sight of immense waters. Before the Earl of the River had even reached the sea, his limited understanding was already apparent, and he was mocked by the boundless Dao. Thus, understanding change and responding to the times is the broad view. Gentlemen and petty people each have their own limits of understanding; to go beyond one’s proper bounds and presume to pass judgment only makes one ridiculous. Only by recognizing one’s own limitations can one discuss the Dao. Those called ignorant and confused are not necessarily ignorant and confused forever.

No body of water is greater than the sea, yet the sea never boasts, because it takes humility as its model and places itself last. The states of Qi and Wei fought over a space as small as the tips of a snail’s horns, while their people lived within this tiny world: both are metaphors for greedy contention. “The succession of the Five Emperors” means the handing down and continuation of benevolence and righteousness.

Lin Yanzhai’s Oral Commentary says: “‘Jing’ means turbid. When the Yellow River swells violently, its waters become muddy and batter the banks, almost filling the riverbed. Hence the phrase ‘the great flow of the Jing.’” (The source text breaks off at “Jing and Wei,” so its meaning is not presented in full.)

 涇也洋海中若海神名拘墟篤時蟪蛄不  知春秋之類尾閭沃焦也見山海經礨空  小穴也人處萬物中之一此合太虚之間  可名者論之其在九州之内又只是一件  此合草木鳥獸論之二句發得極妙言世  界之小如此五帝三王所知所能皆不出  其内也   褚氏管見云觀於海者難爲水遊於聖   人之門者難爲言故秋水至而河伯欣   然東至海則望洋而歎無怪乎海若引   井蛙夏蟲之喻繼又形容北海之大不   可量數然計四海之在天地中國之在   四海奚啻馬體一毫未則安知天地之   外不有大於天地者乎故是篇借河海   問答以明小大少多之分與鯤鵬蜩鳩   之論相類文體機軸變换愈奇海若首   答大意在曲士束於教欲有以袪其自   多之謬使爲大方之歸而已矣辯論極   致詳見下文 河伯曰然則吾大天地而小毫末可乎北海 若曰否夫物量無窮時無止分無常終始無 故是故大知觀於遠近故小而不寡大而不 多知量無窮證曏今故故遥而不悶掇而不 跂知時無止察乎盈虚故得而不喜失而不 憂知分之無常也明乎坦塗故生而不悦死 而不禍知終始之不可故也計人之所知不 若其所不知其生之時不若未生之時以其 至小求窮至大之域是故迷亂而不能自得 也由此觀之又何以知毫末之足以定至細
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the relativity of size and quantity, along with the limitations of human cognition.

The dialogue between the Sea Spirit (Ruo) and the River Earl (Hebo) illustrates how those who have seen the ocean are no longer amazed by small streams, just as those who have studied with sages remain unmoved by ordinary words. The River Earl initially considered himself vast, but upon encountering the Northern Sea, realized his insignificance. The Sea Spirit uses the metaphors of a frog in a well and summer insects (with their brief lifespans) to represent those with limited perspective, explaining that while the Northern Sea's immensity defies measurement, the Four Seas are but a single hair on a horse's body within the cosmos—let alone the potentially greater realities beyond Heaven and Earth.

Through their exchange, the text reveals how all measurements are relative. The Sea Spirit explains: material quantities are boundless, time flows ceaselessly, boundaries between things constantly shift, and life-death cycles endlessly revolve. The truly wise perceive these truths—they neither belittle small things nor overvalue large ones; understanding time's eternity, they avoid excessive joy or sorrow over gains and losses; comprehending life-death as natural law, they neither cling to life nor fear death.

The passage concludes by observing how human knowledge pales against the unknown, and our living years dwindle compared to pre-existence. Attempting to explore the infinite cosmos with our finite understanding only leads to confusion. How then could we possibly use the fineness of a hair to determine what constitutes ultimate smallness?

Through vivid analogies and progressive reasoning, this text unveils the constraints of human perception, teaching us to embrace the world with open-mindedness rather than self-limiting assumptions.

之倪又何以知天地之足以窮至大之域  郭註物各有量死生時行得失皆分終始  日新各足而無餘則知遠近小大之物各  有量曏明也今故猶古今遥長也掇短也  證盟古今知變化之不止於生死故不以  長而悒悶短故爲跂察其一盈一虚則知  分之不常於得也能忘其憂喜死生者日  新之正道明始終之日新則知故之不可  執而留矣是以涉新而不愕舍故而不驚  雖死生之化若一而所知各有限生時各  有率莫若安於所受之分則大小俱足若  秋毫不求天地之功則周身之餘皆爲棄  物天地不見大於秋毫則顧其形象纔自  足耳將何以知細之定細大之定大耶  吕註道非小大豈有定體今夫天地吾以  爲至大極吾知之所知而莫得其盡則吾  所謂大者豈眞大所謂小者豈眞小耶小  不烏寡大不爲多以知量之無窮也我以  曏爲曏今爲今未及言而今已爲曏則所  謂曏與今者豈有止哉證夫曏今之皆故  則遥而不悶掇而不跂以知時之無止也  吾安能鬰鬰侍百年之王則遥而悶者也  彭祖以乆特聞衆人匹之則掇而跂者也  日中則昃月滿則虧察乎盈虚則得而不  喜失而不憂知分之無常也有始必有終  有終必有始原始要終而明乎坦途故生  而不悦死而不禍以知終始之不可故也  則物之所謂時分終始豈眞知也哉知而
Interpretation

And what gives us grounds to know that Heaven and Earth are so vast as to encompass everything that is great?

Guo Xiang’s commentary says: Each thing has its own limits. Life and death, fortune and misfortune, gain and loss all have their bounds, beginnings, and endings. The principle of daily renewal—the ceaseless transformation of all things—allows each thing to be complete in itself, with nothing lacking. From this we can see that things near and far, small and great, each have their own limits. This is what the earlier passage means.

What is present will eventually become past, and the distance between past and present is great. Regard what is distant as close at hand, and you will not be troubled by the long span between them. Fix your thoughts on what is fleeting and pursue it deliberately, and you will become impatient. Taking past and present as evidence, we can see that change never ceases; it does not occur only between life and death. So we need not be troubled by a long life or impatient over a short one. By observing things wax and wane, we see that the bounds between gain and loss are never fixed.

To forget sorrow and joy, life and death: this is the true principle of daily renewal. Understand that things are always renewing and changing, and you will know that what has passed cannot be held back. Then new things will not startle you, and letting go of old things will not alarm you. Even if the changes of life and death seem alike, what people can know remains limited in different ways; each person, too, receives a different measure in life. It is better to be content with the bounds of what one has received. Then the great and the small can each be complete in themselves.

If even a fine autumn down does not depend on Heaven and Earth for its achievements, then for that down Heaven and Earth are, in effect, something extraneous. Heaven and Earth do not appear vast to it; it need only attend to its own form and it feels complete. And what gives us grounds to say that the small must be small and the great must be great?

Lü Huiqing’s commentary says: The Dao has no distinction between great and small; how could it have any fixed form? We regard Heaven and Earth as immensely great, yet the reach of our understanding cannot encompass them. So is what we call “great” truly great? Is what we call “small” truly small? The small does not thereby become smaller, nor the great greater. This shows that the scale by which we measure all things has no limit.

I call the past “past” and the present “present”; before I have finished speaking, the present has already become the past. Where, then, is there any fixed boundary between past and present? Understand that both past and present will eventually become past, and you will not be troubled by the distance of time or impatiently seize a fleeting moment, for you know that time does not stand still.

How can I wait gloomily for a ruler who will come a hundred years from now? That would be to suffer over a wait that is too long. Pengzu was famed for his longevity. When people compare themselves with him, they are placing too much weight on their brief lives and impatiently seeking long life. The sun leans west once it reaches midday, and the moon wanes after it is full. See clearly how things wax and wane, and you can gain without delight and lose without sorrow, knowing that your own bounds are never fixed.

Where there is a beginning, there must be an end; where there is an end, there must also be a new beginning. Investigate the beginnings and endings of things, and you will understand the way of equanimity within them. So there is no need to rejoice wildly at being alive or regard death as a calamity, for beginnings and endings cannot be fixed or grasped. Seen in this light, can the fortunes, bounds, beginnings, and endings attributed to the myriad things truly be known and grasped? (The original text continues beyond this point.)

 非眞知則所知固不若其所不知也生而  有知未生則無知則其生之時固不若其  未生之時也知至小也無窮至大也以至  小而求窮至大之域是以迷亂而不自得  也  疑獨註以形觀物有小大以道觀物無小  大量者物之取平時者物之變化分者物  之辨制始終者物之死生以大知觀之是  皆不足以爲物之遠近小大也明證今古  所行之道雖甚遠而心無不通之悶所取  之物拾之甚易而無强行之跂此知時無  止者能之察乎盈虚故得失無心知分之  無常也世人之憂皆係乎得失唯大知者  知得失非己任其自然而無憂喜於其間  明乎坦途故死生不足以動其心則日新  而無故也夫人有知則爲知所役勞形怵  心逐物忘已不若無知㝠然自得矣人生  之後爲生所役膠擾不息不若未生之時  寂然至虚而已人之知至小萬物之境至  大以至小求至大非迷亂而何  詳道註知物量無窮則小大不足爲多寡  知時無止則今故不足爲厭跂知分無常  則得失不足以憂喜知終始無故則死生  不足爲禍悦人之所以觀是者以其所知  也所以有知者以其有生也能㝠其所以  知而復乎未生之時則孰知大者不爲至  細細者不爲至大耶  碧虚註物量無窮則不可以言小大時無  止則不可以言代謝分無常則不可以言
Interpretation

Without true and penetrating understanding, what one already knows is indeed inferior to what one has yet to know. After birth, people have awareness; before birth, they do not. Thus the state after birth is indeed less still and free of awareness than the state before birth. Human understanding is extremely limited, while the realms of the myriad things are vast and boundless. To use limited understanding to exhaust an infinitely vast realm can only lead to confusion and bewilderment, leaving one unable to find ease.

Commentary by Yidu: When we observe the myriad things through physical forms and external measures, we distinguish large from small. When we observe them through the Dao (the Way), there is no such thing as large or small. That things each take what they need and balance one another is their ordinary state; that the seasons and cycles continually change is their transformation; that they each have their distinctions is their differentiation; and that they have beginnings and ends is their life and death. From the perspective of “great understanding”—a penetrating and expansive grasp—none of these provides grounds for judging the distance or size of the myriad things. One who understands how past and present continue into one another will not feel, even on a long journey, that the way ahead is beyond reach. When taking what is needed, even if one merely picks up what is close at hand, there is no need to strive for more. This is what it means to understand that the cycles of time have no end.

By observing changes in fullness and decline, one can avoid becoming fixated on gain and loss. By understanding that each thing has its own bounds, though these are never permanent, one sees that the gains and losses people worry over are not burdens one must take upon oneself. Let everything follow its own nature, and gain and loss will bring neither sorrow nor joy. Understand the open road of life, and life and death will no longer unsettle the heart. Then life can renew itself day by day, unbound by old assumptions.

Once people have awareness, they are easily ruled by it: they exhaust the body, disturb the heart, chase after external things, and forget themselves. Better to be still and natural, at ease in one’s proper place, as when there was no awareness. After birth, people are constrained by life and beset by ceaseless turmoil; better the stillness and emptiness of the state before birth. Human understanding is extremely limited, while the realms of the myriad things are boundless. How could seeking the infinite with what is limited fail to bring confusion?

Commentary on the Detailed Way: Understand that the scope of the myriad things is without limit, and you will no longer treat large and small as absolute measures of quantity. Understand that the cycles of time have no end, and you will no longer tire of the succession of past and present. Understand that each thing’s bounds are not fixed forever, and you will no longer grieve or rejoice over gain and loss. Understand that things have no fixed form of beginning or end, and you will no longer regard life and death as calamities. People see the myriad things this way because they have understanding; they have understanding because they are alive. If one could forget the basis on which one knows things and return to the state before birth, who could say that the large cannot become extremely small, or the small extremely large?

Commentary by Bixu: The scope of the myriad things is without limit, so they cannot simply be divided into large and small. The cycles of time have no end, so they cannot simply be measured by succession. Each thing’s bounds are not fixed forever, so one cannot simply say… [The original text ends here unfinished.]

 得喪終始無故則不可以言變化大人滌  除玄覽知物遠事小其用乃衆已近理大  所費甚微故其量莫極也曏昔遥而不可  明即今掇而不可證物遷不可悶日新不  可跂故時難留也察富盈之何貴故得之  不喜知貧虚之何賤故失之不憂知生死  爲去來故不知悦惡也迎不見首隨不見  後理豈有故哉是知分别之知有盡悗然  虚曠無窮生則利害紛錯死則寂寥一空  以蟻蛭之趣究崑崙之墟則困矣毫末具  體細倪有餘也天地傾缺大域不足也  鬳齋云前言其大於此又言無小無大即  所謂莫大於秋毫之末而泰山爲小也物  量無窮言不可量數時無止言寒暑晝夜  分無常言有無得失終始新故大知之人  然後有下面四知明今古爲一故迎而未  至者遠而不憂掇而可取者易而不跂由  乎正道而生死聽之明乎此則知終猶始  不可以終爲故也人之所知者人所不知  者天既生之後我則知之未生之前我何  由知以我之至小欲窮至大之天宜乎迷  亂而不自得也   人能知夫物量時分之無常又何終始   小大多寡之有考明今故之不停則此   理可見遥謂歷時之乆掇謂推移之速   不悶無厭其所生也不跂無求益其生   也脩短定分安之而已人固不能無生   不能無知而經云不若無知不若未生   者盖爲世人不務眞知而求妄知不務
Interpretation

The gains and losses of things, and the ending and beginning of life, have no fixed causes. We should therefore not regard them simply as changes wholly separate from one another. The great person—the one who follows the Dao—washes the mind clean, making it clear as a mirror, and can see the long-term course of things. They do not cling to minor gains and losses before them; though they expend little, their influence is vast and without limit. Looking back, the past lies too far away to be seen clearly. If we say it is part of the present, we cannot prove that from the present alone. All things are constantly changing, but there is no need to be troubled by this. Each day brings new changes, but there is no need to pursue them deliberately; time, after all, cannot be held in place.

One who sees that abundant wealth is nothing to prize does not rejoice upon gaining it; one who sees that poverty and want are nothing to despise does not grieve upon losing them. One who understands that life and death are simply coming and going will not be led about by likes and dislikes. In meeting things, one sees no beginning; in following them, no end. Could principle have a fixed and unchanging origin? From this we can see that knowledge that distinguishes among things has its limits; only a mind that is empty, still, and open has no end.

In life, benefits and harms are tangled together; after death, all returns to silence and emptiness. To investigate a vast place like the Kunlun Mountains with the narrow vision of ants and leeches is naturally to fall into confusion. Conversely, even the smallest things have complete forms of their own, and even the tiniest places have room to spare. Even if Heaven and Earth were tilted and broken, they would still be incomplete when measured against the vastness of Heaven and Earth.

The commentator Yanzhai says: “The earlier passage speaks of the vastness of things; here it says there is no such thing as large or small. This is precisely what is meant by ‘nothing is greater than the tip of an autumn hair, while Mount Tai seems small.’ The scale of things has no limit, so it cannot be measured by fixed numbers. Time has no end, so the divisions of cold and heat, day and night, are not constant. Being and nonbeing, gain and loss, end and beginning, new and old—all are changing. Only great knowledge, the wisdom that comprehends the Dao, can understand that present and past are one. Things not yet arrived may seem far off, but there is no need to worry about them. Things that can be obtained by following their course come easily, so there is no need to pursue them deliberately. If one lives in accordance with the right way, life and death can unfold naturally. Understanding this, one sees that an ending is like a beginning and should not treat ‘the end’ as an absolutely fixed boundary.”

What people can know is what they are capable of knowing; what they cannot know belongs to the realm of Heaven. After being born, people can know what they have experienced. But how could they know what happened before their birth? Trying, from the narrow confines of one’s own self, to exhaust the vast and boundless principles of Heaven inevitably leads to confusion and a loss of ease.

If people can understand that the scale of things and the stages of time have no fixed measure, that beginnings and endings, large and small, many and few cannot be assessed by any fixed standard, and that past and present are continually changing, they can grasp the principle involved. “Distant” refers to the long passage of time one has experienced; “swift” refers to the rapid succession of change. “Not troubled” means not growing weary of the life one has experienced; “not striving” means not seeking extra years to prolong life. Each life has its own allotted span; to accept it calmly is enough.

People, of course, cannot be without life, nor can they be without knowledge. Yet the scripture says it is better to have no knowledge, better never to have been born. This is because people in the world do not seek true understanding; instead, they chase after delusive knowledge. They do not devote themselves solely to…

  全生而求益生以有限而追無窮忘素   分而希劵外在己之利害不能自明何   以定物理細大之倪域哉不若無知王   倪對齧缺之間是也不若未生髑髏不   願人間之勞是也然既生既知矣將何   以自免曰能以無生爲生不知爲知則   於生何累於知何有
Interpretation

To preserve life while also seeking to make it more abundant is like using a finite life to pursue endless desires, forgetting its original simplicity.

When people make distinctions and calculations, hoping to gain benefits beyond what is reasonable, they are led by their own interests and harms. They can no longer see things as they are. How, then, can they judge the measure of the size and differences among the myriad things? Better to be like Wang Ni, who made no distinctions among things through knowledge. This refers to the exchange between Wang Ni and Nie Que, legendary figures of antiquity. Better to be as free of knowledge and desire as before birth. The skull, too, was unwilling to endure the toil of human life—that is the point being made.

Yet once people are born and have awareness, how can they free themselves from these burdens? The answer is this: if they can take “non-birth” as the root of life and “not-knowing” as the realm of knowing, what burdens can life still have, and what attachments can knowledge still hold?

哉 南華眞經義海纂微卷之五十一

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0127); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 48 Vol. 50 →