中文 · EN

《南華真經義海纂微》Vol. 5

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 5 / 104 2,837 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經義海纂微》 Vol. 5 (Dongshen 洞神部, 104 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 6 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經義海纂微》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經義海纂微卷之六建六     武林道士褚伯秀學    内篇養生主第二 老聃死秦失弔之三號而出弟子曰非夫子 之友邪曰然然則弔焉若此可乎曰然始也 吾以爲其人也而今非也向吾入而弔焉有 老者哭之如哭其子少者哭之如哭其母彼 其所以會之必有不蘄言而言不蘄哭而哭 者是遁天倍情忘其所受古者謂之遁天之 刑適來夫子時也適去夫子順也安時而處 順哀樂不能入也古者謂是帝之縣解指窮 於爲薪火傳也不知其盡也  郭註秦失見人弔亦弔人號亦號弟子怪  其不倚户觀化乃至三號然至人無情與  衆號耳老者如哭子少者如哭母嫌其先  物施惠不在理上住致此甚愛也夫天性  所受各有本分不可逃亦不可加感物太  深不止於當遯天者也馳騖於憂樂之境  楚戮未加性情已困庸非刑哉適來時自  生適去理當死無時而不安無順而不處  㝠然與造化爲一哀樂無所措其間以有  係者爲縣則無係者縣解也爲薪猶前薪  前薪以指指盡前薪之理故火傳不滅心  得納養之中故命續不絶明夫養生乃生  之所以生也夫時不再來今不一停人之  生也一息一得耳向息非今息故納養而  命續前火非後火故爲薪而火傳火傳命  續由夫養得其極也世豈知其盡而更生  哉
Interpretation

Laozi (Laozi) died in Qin. Qin Shi went to offer condolences, wept three times, and left. A disciple asked, “Was he not the master’s friend?” Qin Shi said, “Yes.” The disciple asked again, “If he was a friend, is it acceptable to mourn him in that way?” Qin Shi replied, “It is. At first I took him for someone who understood the Way; now I see that is not so. When I went in to mourn, I found the old weeping for him as for a son, and the young weeping as for a mother. That they gathered there must mean some spoke though they did not wish to speak, and wept though they did not wish to weep. That is to flee what is natural, go against one’s true nature, and forget the endowment one has received from Heaven. The ancients called such conduct ‘the penalty for fleeing Heaven.’

“To be born when the time is ripe—the master yielded to the times; to die when the time is ripe—the master likewise yielded to the times. To rest at ease in whatever season comes and follow along with change—then joy and grief cannot enter the heart. The ancients called this ‘the Sovereign’s suspended release’ (dijie xuanshi): undoing the bonds by which one is hung on external things. When the fingers are worn out, the firewood can still be handed on and the fire still keeps burning; one need not know when it will burn out.”

Guo Xiang comments: Qin Shi saw others mourning and mourned with them; saw others wailing and wailed with them. The disciple wondered why he did not simply lean on the door and watch the shifts of life and death, yet still wept three times. In truth, the perfected person has no fixed feelings—he merely wept along with the crowd.

The old weeping like a father for a son and the young like children for a mother—the problem is that they pour deep attachment onto the dead without resting in what is fitting. Each nature has its proper allotment: it cannot be fled, nor should one insist on adding to it. To be stirred excessively by things is not only to miss one’s place but also to flee the natural; to let oneself race after sorrow and delight—even before punishment arrives, the disposition is already worn down. Is that not a kind of penalty?

To come when the moment arrives is birth; to go when the moment arrives is, by the pattern of things, death. To be at peace in every season and to follow every change, merging undivided with creation and transformation—then joy and grief have no way in. One who is entangled is as if hung by a rope; without entanglement, there is release.

“Passing fire with firewood” is like this: when one stick is burned through, the flame passes to the next. The transmission of fire does not for that reason stop; if the inner life is nourished to the right degree, life too can continue. The point is that nurturing life (yangsheng) is the root by which life is sustained. The moment does not return, and the present instant does not linger. In human life, each breath is a fresh receiving: the breath before is not this breath—so by nurturing life, life goes on. The earlier stick is not the later stick—so after the wood is gone, fire can still be handed on. Whether fire is passed on or life extended depends on nourishment reaching its proper measure. Ordinary people do not know that after life ends there can still be new vitality.

 吕註弔之爲禮哭死而弔生三號則哭死  爲不哀無言而出則弔生爲不足此弟子  所以疑其爲非友弔焉若此爲不可也始  吾以爲其人意從老聃者皆得聃之道今  見其老者少者愛慕而哭泣之不能安時  處順所以知非其人也盖必有不蘄言而  言不蘄哭而哭者内外相成此所以會之  也人之所受於天其性命之情未始有物  而爲之哀樂是遁天倍情忘其所受無適  非天而欲遁之不免於刑而已矣知其適  來而安之適去而順之古者謂是帝之縣  解以其未嘗有死也火之所託者薪而火  非薪其爲薪也雖窮於指而火傳不知其  盡何則火之在此薪猶彼薪也其傳豈有  盡哉火以喻生薪以喻形達此則知生之  所以爲生者未嘗有死也何哀樂之能入  哉  疑獨註至人本無情老聃死而秦失弔號  者若堯死而百姓如喪考妣自非土木無  情安能使天下兼忘哉然聃之所以爲有  情者特未定也禮曰知生者弔知死者傷  秦失弔之弔其生人三號而出傷其死也  弟子怪其止於三號非與老子爲友也答  以三號爲可矣始也吾以爲其人故人弔  亦弔人號亦號而今見其遁天倍情忘其  所受之爲非也夫形骸如贅疣生死如夜  旦安知生人之非死鬼死鬼之非生人何  乃切切然以生死哀樂於胸中爲哉夫大
Interpretation

Lu’s commentary: The etiquette of a condolence visit is to weep for the dead and to offer sympathy to the living. Qin Shi wept three times and thus wept for the dead; he left without speaking, which was his way of condoling the living—yet it seemed insufficient. So the disciples doubted that he was Laozi’s friend.

If that were really so, it would indeed be contrary to reason. I had first assumed that everyone who followed Laozi had grasped his Dao; now, seeing them all, young and old, cherish Laozi and weep for him, unable to rest in the times and yield to change, I know they had not grasped Laozi’s Dao. There are surely moments when one does not wish to speak yet speaks, does not wish to weep yet weeps; when inner mind and outward bearing answer each other, that is where Qin Shi and the crowd truly meet.

The life-and-feeling that people receive from Heaven originally has nothing that must produce grief or joy. To go against nature and turn one’s back on one’s inborn disposition is to forget what one has received. Nothing can depart from the Way of Heaven, yet one insists on fleeing it—one cannot in the end escape distress. When one understands that life comes exactly when its time arrives, one accepts it in peace; when life goes exactly when its time departs, one goes along with it. The ancients called this the “release of the Heavenly suspension”—meaning the loosening of bonds imposed by Heaven’s decree; for in the root sense, a person has never truly perished.

What fire relies on is fuel, yet fire is not fuel. When one stick is burned through, the fire passes to another; when it will end, no one knows. Why? Fire on this stick is just as fire on that stick; passed along in this way, how could there be an end? Fire stands for life, fuel for the body. Who understands this knows that what makes life life contains no real death—how then could one be swayed by grief and joy?

Yidu’s commentary: The “perfected person” is one who has reached the utmost level and is originally not dragged about by worldly feeling. After Laozi died, Qin Shi came to mourn and wailed; it is like when Yao died and the people grieved as if they had lost their parents. Unless one were emotionless wood or stone, how could one make the whole world forget sorrow? Still, whether Laozi truly had feeling could not be settled from the start.

The Book of Rites says: “Those who know the living go to offer condolence; those who know the dead go to mourn.” Qin Shi came to offer condolence—that was condolence for the living; he wept three times and left—that was mourning for the dead. The disciples wondered at his weeping only three times and doubted he was Laozi’s friend. He replied that three cries were enough. At first I thought he really was Laozi’s old friend, so when others condoled, he condoled; when others wailed, he wailed. Now I see that to go against nature, turn from one’s inborn disposition, and forget the feeling one has received is not fitting.

The human body is like a superfluous growth; birth and death are like night and dawn—how can one fix it that the living are not ghosts or the dead not the living? Why still clutch birth, death, grief, and joy in the heart?

 塊吐精嘘氣鞠而成物固莫知其所自來  雖天地陰陽不得爲之父母而世之昩者  乃執子母之愛而號泣之又況哀他人之  親如己之子母者乎盖所以相會人合而  致此甚哀故不蘄言而言不蘄哭而哭此  方内之事秦失以爲遁逃自然倍益哀情  忘吾所受於造化者之本無也天刑即命  遁於命則累於刑而憂患生矣以適來爲  時適去烏順哀樂不能入也古者謂是帝  之縣解有生爲縣無生爲解也致命之極  則吾之有生長於上古而不老如指窮於  爲薪火傳不知其盡也  劉槩註薪火之論以譬神舍於形而屢移  者也古之至人所以載營魄而視形骸爲  逆旅者以此況肯仞形而喪其尊形者乎  趙註秦失哭老子而不哀弟子疑焉失乃  告以所見說者於此以爲失不滿於老子  謂不合使人哀慕如是之切殊失本意盖  老子平日和光同塵不與物迕人自愛之  故不蘄人言而言不蘄人哭而哭其死也  逃乎造化背乎世情忘其所受於天者至  此則天亦無如之何故曰遁天之刑適來  不以爲樂適去不以爲哀所謂安時處順  也縣者大患有身解者吾今而後知免也  帝之縣解謂造物者勞我以生息我以死  也指窮於爲薪薪盡則火息而所以不息  者常存故曰火傳不知其盡  慮齋云秦失老子之友也三號而出言其
Interpretation

Like a clump of earth, something exhales essential qi and stirs into form; thus the myriad things come to be, yet no one knows where they truly come from. Even Heaven and Earth and Yin-Yang cannot rightly be called the parents of the myriad things. Foolish people in the world cling to the affection between children and parents and wail aloud; how much more so when others mourn the dead as if mourning their own parents and children?

When people meet and bond with one another, this deep grief arises. Therefore, words are spoken when there was no need to speak, and tears are shed when there was no need to weep—all of this belongs to the ways of worldly human sentiment. Qin Shi held that such mourning is a flight from the way of nature; it only deepens sorrow and forgets that one’s life was granted by the transformative process of creation in the first place. What is called “heaven’s punishment” (tianxing) is life itself; to flee the arrangements that life bestows is to be dragged along by them, and worry and calamity arise from this.

To regard the arrival of life as following the timely trend, and the departure of life likewise as following the timely trend—then joy and grief cannot enter the heart. The ancients called this “the Lord’s release from hanging” (di zhi xian jie): to have life is like being suspended and bound; to be without life is to be freed from that bondage. When one comprehends the way of life to its utmost, one knows that even if one were born in high antiquity, one would not grow old. It is like a torch passing along splinters of wood as fuel—the fire keeps being transmitted, and no one knows when it will be exhausted.

Liu Kai’s commentary says: The metaphor of “fuel and fire” illustrates that spirit (shen) lodges in the physical form and continually shifts as the form is replaced. The sages of old could nurture spirit and treat the body as a temporary lodging precisely for this reason. How could such a person cling to the physical form and thereby lose sight of the root of life?

Zhao’s commentary says: Qin Shi wept over Laozi’s corpse, yet did not grieve Laozi’s death, so his disciples were puzzled. Qin Shi then explained his view. Some interpreters think Qin Shi was displeased with Laozi for letting people mourn him so intensely; that reading misses the point. Laozi ordinarily did not contend with the world; he harmonized his light and mingled with the dust (heguang tongchen), not clashing with outer things—so people naturally cherished him. Hence those who need not speak spoke, and those who need not weep wept.

Qin Shi held that excessive mourning means fleeing creation (zaohua), violating ordinary human reason, and forgetting the life one received from Heaven. At that point Heaven too is helpless—hence “fleeing heaven’s punishment.” Not taking the coming of life as joy, nor the going of life as sorrow: this is what is meant by “dwelling in ease according to the times and following what is natural” (anshi chunshun). “Hanging” (xuan) means bearing great affliction and being burdened by the physical form; “release” (jie) means that one now knows one can cast off this bondage. “The Lord’s release from hanging” means the Creator makes one toil because one lives and lets one rest because one dies. The image of “the fingers burned through, the wood becoming fuel for fire” means that when the wood is consumed the fire goes out, yet the source of life that the fire represents continues—hence “the fire is transmitted, and none knows its end.”

Luzhai says: Qin Shi was Laozi’s friend. He wailed three times beside Laozi’s corpse, then spoke.

 不用情故弟子疑而有問失謂始吾以老  子爲非常人今見其弟子之哭若老若少  如此過哀必老子未能去其形迹有以感  會其心不期然而然也夫天之所受本無  物猶以有情相感則是忘其始者之所受  而遁逃天理背棄情實此皆得罪於天者  故曰遁天之刑人之生也適然而來死也  適然而去當隨其時而順之不足以爲哀  樂知此理則天亦不能以死生係着我矣  故曰帝之縣解爲薪火傳生死之喻以薪  熾火指其薪以觀之則薪有盡時而世間  之火古今不絶講理到此却以三句譬喻  結末眞奇筆也   按前諸解指字多以手指釋之盖以爲   訓前則指在其中矣竊詳經意指應同   㫖猶云理也理盡於爲薪故火傳不知   其盡義甚顯明知北遊篇周遍咸三者   異名同實其指一也可證夫一家之薪   有盡而天下之火無盡善爲薪者有以   傳之一人之身有盡而身中之神無盡   善養生者有以存之火之在彼薪猶此   薪也而焰焰不同神之託後身猶今身   也而息息各異焰不同所以有然有滅   息各異所以有死有生然而天下之火   未嘗盡神未嘗滅者有人以主之耳至   若鑑日擊石鑽木戛竹皆可以得火火   性遍天地間非人無以致之神之運化   也亦然去是薪火何麗亡是形神何託   由是知傳火在乎得薪託神在乎得形
Interpretation

The phrase “not being bound by emotion” left the disciples puzzled, so someone asked: “I used to think Laozi was no ordinary man. Now I see his disciples weeping for him—young and old alike grieving so deeply. Surely Laozi had not yet freed himself from the burden of the physical form, so their hearts resonated with his; they did not mean to do this, yet sorrow arose of itself.

“Human nature as received from Heaven was originally without clinging. If people still mourn one another through emotion, they forget the nature first received from Heaven and turn away from the principle of Heaven and betray what is truly so. Such things are like being punished for going against Heaven’s intent. Hence it is said that this is ‘fleeing the penalty imposed by Heaven’s mandate.’ To live is simply to arrive in the world at the right moment; to die is simply to leave the world at the right moment. One should follow the season of fate and need neither grieve nor rejoice over it. Whoever understands this will not be bound by Heaven through birth and death.”

“Di’s xianjie” (di: the Way of Heaven or the governing principle; xianjie: release from the torment of hanging upside down) means liberation from the fetters of life and death. The text uses firewood and fire as a metaphor: fire burns on the wood until the wood is consumed, yet the fire in the world has never been extinguished from ancient times to the present. At this point the author closes with three sentences of analogy—a truly ingenious stroke.

Note: Earlier commentators often took zhi (指) as “finger,” holding that the preceding passage already covered the meaning of fingers. On close reading of the classic, zhi here should be the same as zhi (旨)—the point, the meaning. The whole teaching lies in the “as firewood” analogy, hence “the transmission of fire”: the wood is used up, but the fire is passed on—the sense is perfectly clear. In the “Knowledge Wandered North” chapter, the three words Zhou, Bian, and Xian differ in name but share one substance, pointing to the same principle; that passage can serve as collateral evidence.

One household’s firewood may be exhausted, but the fire in the world is not cut off; one who skillfully gathers fuel and passes on the fire can keep it alive. One person’s body may perish, yet the Shen (spirit) within the body is not thereby extinguished; one who skillfully nurtures life can preserve what endures in spirit. Fire lodges in that bundle of wood as it lodges in this bundle, yet each flame is not the same; Shen lodges in a later body as it lodges in the present body, yet each moment’s breath is not the same. Because flames differ, there is kindling and extinction; because breaths differ, there is birth and death. Yet the fire under Heaven is not fully spent, and Shen is not utterly annihilated, because someone receives and sustains them.

Mirrors reflecting the sun, striking stone, drilling wood, and rubbing bamboo and wood can all produce fire. The nature of fire pervades heaven and earth, but it must rely on such conditions to appear. The transformations of Shen work the same way: without wood, fire has nothing to cling to; without the physical form, where can Shen lodge? From this we know that the transmission of fire requires wood as its support, and the lodging of Shen likewise requires the body as its support.

  所以成至人之妙用相天地之全功南   華舉以結養生主一篇之義深有㫖哉   達養形之理者勿傷得養神之道者無   爲形者生之所託神則爲生之主虚無   之道是所以養其神者也世人徒知養   生而不知養其生之主養愈至而生愈   失故眞人誨以無以有涯隨無涯庶乎   養生之㫖矣夫以道存懷者無心於善   惡以虚待物者何有乎名刑順中而不   失其常保身盡年之理有在於是解牛   喻應物刀以喻生十九年而刃若新發   硎則剸繁治劇不知其幾而吾之精明   者愈乆而不弊是爲生之主人當善養   者唯其善養於平日所以得濟於斯時   以不用而成大用也至於善刀而藏則   應物餘暇斂知韜光物遂其適事盡其   理而吾之利用未嘗或虧古之大隱居   鄽接物而常應常靜得此道故也是以   學道之要虚靜爲先非虚無以全神非   靜無以復命性全命復養生之能事畢   矣如鏡當臺有鑒無迹事物於我何加   焉凡人逐物喪眞攖事拂理得失交患   滿心戚醮生能無損乎所以澤雉不願   畜樊見於後喻老聃大聖南華所師猶   云死者示人安時處順守常得終而遯   形飛化之妙非世所測聖人之死曰神   是也秦失弔之而三號巳爲方外剩法   然弟子猶不能無疑遂告以去來適然   安之勿拒是謂帝之縣解造物不得以
Interpretation

This is precisely the principle by which perfected persons (至人)—those who have attained the Way—deploy their subtle efficacy, align with Heaven and Earth, and bring their work to full completion. The Nanhuá Zhēnjīng (the Daoist honorific title for Zhuāngzǐ) cites these examples to sum up the thrust of the chapter “Nourishing Life” (Yǎngshēng Zhǔ); the meaning runs deep.

Those who know how to tend the physical form do not injure the body; those who know how to tend the spirit and the Way can follow nature without forcing anything. The body is where life lodges; spirit is life’s true master. The path of emptiness and stillness (xūjìng) is precisely the method for nourishing spirit. Ordinary people only know how to “preserve life” and do not know how to nourish life’s master; the more deliberately they try to preserve it, the more easily they lose life’s authenticity. Hence the perfected person (zhēnrén) warns us not to spend a finite life chasing what has no end—only then do we come close to the real aim of nourishing life.

One who holds the Way in the heart does not fixate on good and evil; one who meets the outer world with a vacant, still mind—how could fame or punishment entangle him? To act from the constant Way within without losing one’s original nature—that is where the teaching lies on preserving the body and living out one’s full span of years.

Cook Ding carving the ox stands for how we engage with things; the cleaver stands for life itself. Though the cleaver has seen nineteen years of use, its edge is still like fresh steel from the grindstone. So it is: however many tangled affairs one has handled, my spirit remains clear and unspent for long stretches. That spirit is life’s master and ought to be tended well. Because it is tended in daily life, one can respond freely when the moment comes; by not squandering spirit, one achieves greater effect.

When Cook Ding wipes the cleaver clean and puts it away, that images what happens after dealing with affairs: in idle moments, reining in cleverness and sheathing one’s edge. Let each thing find its place, let affairs accord with reason, and one’s capacity is never worn down. True recluses of old sometimes lived in busy markets and mixed with people, yet could respond to events while the inner mind stayed still—precisely because they understood this.

Thus the key to cultivation puts emptiness and stillness first: without emptiness, one cannot preserve the heavenly spirit (tiānshén); without stillness, one cannot recover the mandate of life (tiānmìng). When nature is kept whole and the mandate of life is restored, the work of nourishing life is complete. Mind is like a bright mirror on a stand: it reflects all things yet leaves no trace—how could outer things truly affect it?

Most people, in chasing externals, lose their authenticity; tangled in affairs, they go against the natural order. Gain and loss, worry and care weave through the heart; sorrow and vexation never cease—how could life not be drained? Hence the marsh pheasant (zé zhì) refuses the cage—a point developed further below.

Lǎo Dān (Lǎozǐ) was a great sage and teacher within the Nanhuá tradition. Even so, the text says that death only teaches us to settle into the times, follow change, and end in constancy. As for the subtleties of shedding the body and transforming in flight, ordinary people cannot fathom them. When a sage dies, it is called “spirit” (shén)—that is the sense intended.

When Qín Shī went to offer condolences, three cries were already more than worldly ritual required. Yet the disciples still did not understand, so he told them: birth and death are both natural transformations; one should accept them calmly and not resist. This is what it means to loosen the bonds the Creator has placed upon us…

  係之矣盡爲薪之理者火傳無窮盡養   形之理者神全不喪有形終於有盡在   我不得不養假幻以修眞亦相資之理   特不必如張毅無足之過養耳是以卒   貴乎全而歸之形得全歸則神無謬適   出有入無何往而非正伏羲得之而襲   氣母黄帝得之而登雲天傅說得之騎   箕尾而比列星太上云死
Interpretation

The bodily form of life must come to an end, yet spirit (Shen) can be kept whole and unlost—like firewood burned to ash while the flame is passed on without end. That is the respective teaching of nourishing the form and nourishing the spirit.

Since we have a body, we cannot avoid using this fleeting, insubstantial form to cultivate true nature; form and true nature rely on each other and support each other. Still, nourishing the form need not mean imitating Zhang Yi, who turned bodily care into an obsession. What matters is to keep both body and spirit intact and, in the end, to return to the Great Dao (the Way) as things naturally are. When the body can return whole, spirit is not lost; whether appearing in the visible or merging into the invisible, wherever one goes accords with the right path.

Fuxi received this Dao and inherited the root of Qi (vital energy). The Yellow Emperor received it and rose into the heavens. Fu Yue received it and rode between the Bow and Tail stars, taking his place among the constellations. The Daodejing says: “One who dies yet does not perish may be called long-lived.”

而不亡者壽 南華眞經義海纂微卷之六

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0127); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 4 Vol. 6 →