中文 · EN

《南華真經義海纂微》Vol. 54

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 54 / 104 4,426 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經義海纂微》 Vol. 54 (Dongshen 洞神部, 104 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 9 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經義海纂微》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經義海纂微卷之五十六表二     武林道士褚伯秀學    至樂第一 天下有至樂無有哉有可以活身者無有哉 今奚爲奚據奚避奚處奚就奚去奚樂奚惡 夫天下之所尊者富貴壽善也所樂者身安 厚味美服好色音聲也所下者貧賤夭惡也 所苦者身不得安逸口不得厚味形不得美 服目不得好色耳不得音聲若不得者則大 憂以懼其爲形也亦愚哉富者苦身疾作多 積財而不得盡用其爲形也亦外矣貴者夜 以繼日思慮善否其爲形也亦疏矣人之生 也與憂俱生壽者惛惛乆憂不死何之苦也 其爲形也亦遠矣烈士爲天下見善矣未足 以活身吾未知善之誠善邪誠不善邪若以 爲善矣不足活身以爲不善矣足以活人故 曰忠諫不聽蹲循勿爭故夫子胥爭之以殘 其形不爭名亦不成誠有善無有哉今俗之 所爲與其所樂吾又未知樂之果樂邪果不 樂邪吾觀夫俗之所樂舉羣趣者誙誙然如 將不得已而皆曰樂者吾未之樂也亦未之 不樂也果有樂無有哉吾以無爲誠樂矣又 俗之所大苦也故曰至樂無樂至譽無譽天 下是非果未可定也雖然無爲可以定是非 至樂活身唯無爲幾存請嘗試言之天無爲 以之清地無爲以之寧故兩無爲相合萬物 皆化芒乎芴乎而無從出乎芴乎芒乎而無
Interpretation

Is there a supreme happiness in the world? Is there a way for life to find true rest and stability?

What should people do, what should they rely on, what should they avoid, where should they settle, what should they pursue and give up, what should they love and what should they dislike?

What the world honors is wealth and rank, long life, and a good name. What people enjoy is bodily comfort, fine food, splendid clothes, a beautiful appearance, and pleasing music. What they scorn is poverty and low status, a short life, and a bad name. People feel distressed when their bodies cannot be comfortable, when they cannot taste fine food, wear good clothes, see beautiful things, or hear pleasing music. When they cannot obtain these things, they grow anxious and afraid. To toil so hard for the body is truly foolish.

The rich rush about in labor and accumulate great wealth, yet may never fully enjoy it. To treat the body this way is to let external things weigh on it too heavily. The high-ranking spend day and night worrying, calculating whether they have acted rightly or wrongly. To treat the body this way is to keep it too far from oneself. At birth, it seems, worry arrives alongside us. Those who live long grow dull and confused, burdened by sorrow for a long time yet slow to die. How profound their suffering is! To treat the body this way is to stray too far from life’s purpose.

Upright people act for the sake of the world and do what others consider right, yet may not be able to preserve themselves. I do not know whether what is called “good” is truly good, or is in fact not good. If it is good, it may still fail to preserve oneself; if it is not good, it may benefit others. Hence the saying: “If loyal counsel is not heeded, withdraw and hold back; there is no need to contend.” Wu Zixu, a minister of the state of Wu during the Spring and Autumn period, insisted on arguing and as a result brought ruin upon himself. Had he not argued, he might still have failed to make a name for himself, but at least he could have preserved himself. In light of this, is there really such a thing as true goodness?

As for the things people do and enjoy nowadays, I do not know whether they truly make people happy, or whether they do not. I see people rushing after them in a crowd, hurried and tense, as though they have no choice. Everyone says this is happiness, yet I have felt no happiness in it, and cannot say for certain that it is not happiness. Is there really such a thing as true happiness?

I believe that Wuwei (non-action)—acting without contrivance and following things as they are—is true happiness. Yet this is precisely what the world regards as the greatest hardship. Hence the saying: “The greatest happiness is happiness without contrivance; the highest reputation is a reputation never deliberately pursued.” Right and wrong in the world are ultimately hard to determine. Wuwei, however, can free people from clinging to disputes over right and wrong. Of all ways to bring life to rest, only Wuwei comes close to offering a path. Let me try to explain: Heaven does not act through contrivance, and so is clear; Earth does not act through contrivance, and so is still. When the Wuwei of Heaven and Earth join, the myriad things are brought forth. They are vast and mysterious, and it seems impossible to trace the myriad things back to their source; they are mysterious and vast, and it seems as though…

有象乎萬物職職皆從無爲殖故曰天地無 爲也而無不爲也人也孰能得無爲哉  郭象註忘歡而後樂足樂足而後身存以  爲有樂邪而至樂無歡以爲無樂邪身已  存而無憂擇此爲據避處等八者莫足以  活身唯無擇而任其所遇乃全耳凡厚味  聲色失之無傷於形得之有損於性今反  以不得爲憂故愚也内其形者知足而已  親其形者自得於身中而已夫遺生然後  能忘憂忘憂而後生可樂生可樂而後形  是我有富是我物貴是我榮也列士見善  矣未足以活身善則過當故不周濟蹲循  勿爭唯中庸之德爲然有善無善當縁督  以爲經舉羣趣其所樂乃不避死吾未知  樂不樂無懷而恣物耳夫無爲之樂無憂  而已俗以鏗鎗爲樂美善爲譽天下是非  果未定也無爲而任之是非自定矣百姓  定則吾身近乎存譬夫天地自清寧非爲  之所得故物皆化有意乎爲之則有時乎  滯也無從出之者皆自出耳無有爲之象  皆自殖耳人得無爲則無樂而樂至矣  吕惠卿註略而不論  林疑獨註無樂則不憂無身則不死求其  至樂而不憂活身而不死者無有也然則  何爲何據何避何處何就何去何樂何惡  雖然亦奚爲奚不爲奚據奚不據但因時  順理無心於其間者至矣夫天下所尊者  富貴壽善所下者貧賤夭惡又以身安厚
Interpretation

All things take different forms and flourish in growth; they all arise from Wuwei (non-action). Thus it is said: Heaven and Earth act without action, yet nothing fails to come into being through them. Who among people can achieve Wuwei?

Guo Xiang’s commentary: Only after delight is forgotten can happiness be fulfilled; only when happiness is fulfilled can the body be kept whole. If one takes happiness to mean delight, then the highest happiness has no delight. If one takes the absence of delight to mean the absence of happiness, then when the body is kept whole, there is no anxiety. Which should one take as one’s guide? Whether one withdraws or settles in place, and the other six courses of action, none is enough to preserve the body. Only by making no choice and following whatever one encounters can one preserve oneself.

Rich flavors, beautiful music, and lovely colors do no harm to the body when they are absent; when acquired, they may instead damage one’s nature. Yet people now grieve over failing to obtain them. This is foolish. Those who cherish the body know that being content is enough; those who are close to themselves need only find contentment within themselves. Only by not taking life too seriously can one forget anxiety. Once anxiety is forgotten, one can enjoy life; and once one can enjoy life, one sees the body as one’s wealth, treasure, and glory.

People with resolve may recognize goodness, yet that alone is not enough to preserve themselves. If doing good goes beyond its proper measure, one loses completeness. One should withdraw with ease and yield, without contending with others. This is the virtue of the Mean: whether there is goodness or no goodness, follow the middle course in accordance with things’ inherent principles, and take it as the constant rule. Everyone pursues what they desire, even risking death to obtain it. I do not know whether this pursuit is truly happiness or unhappiness. Better to hold no fixed views in the heart and let the myriad things change of themselves.

The happiness of Wuwei is simply freedom from anxiety. The worldly take resonant, pleasing sounds as happiness, and beauty and goodness as praise; yet right and wrong throughout the world have never reached a settled conclusion. When one acts without action and lets the myriad things follow their own course, right and wrong settle of themselves. When the people are at peace, my body too comes close to being preserved. This is like the natural clarity and tranquility of Heaven and Earth: it is not deliberately brought about, and so the myriad things can all transform. Deliberate action meets obstruction. The myriad things have no external source; all arise spontaneously. They have no forms imposed by human making; all grow spontaneously. If people can achieve Wuwei, happiness will come even without their deliberately seeking it.

Lü Huiqing’s commentary: Omitted.

Lin Yidu’s commentary: Without happiness, there is no sorrow; without a body, there is no death. It is impossible to seek the highest happiness without sorrow and to preserve the body without dying. Since this is so, why insist on doing anything, on what basis make judgments, what should one avoid, where should one settle, what should one pursue or abandon, what should one like or dislike? As for what to do or not do, and what to hold to or not hold to, it is enough simply to follow the circumstances and abide by the principles of things, without bringing subjective intentions into it.

People throughout the world honor wealth, rank, longevity, and a good reputation, and look down on poverty, low status, a short life, and a bad reputation. They also regard bodily comfort and abundance… (The original text ends here.)

 味美服聲色爲樂求而不得則爲苦而憂  懼以此養形亦愚矣富者累於財貴者累  於位身愈壽而憂愈長益遠於性命之理  矣列士忘身而徇名若以爲不善又足以  活人必活人而不失身斯爲盡善故古之  人忠諫而不聽蹲循而勿爭若子胥好爭  反害其身然不爭名亦不成是誠有善邪  無有邪今世俗之所爲非正爲所樂非眞  樂正爲無爲所以能有爲眞樂無樂所以  能盡樂吾未知世俗之所樂果樂邪果不  樂邪世俗樂於有爲聖人樂於無爲無爲  誠樂矣而世俗以爲大苦而不能行也故  至樂者無樂至譽者無譽夫是非起於有  爲唯無爲則是非自定無是無非心何適  而非樂身何往而不存哉清寧者天地之  德而天地非恃於清寧故兩無爲相合萬  物皆化道出而爲物物入而爲象無從出  不知從何出無有象不可得而見也職職  言各有所主皆出入於無爲無爲而無不  爲者天地之道人位天地之中豈得無爲  哉  陳碧虚註若係爲據等八目則其樂未必  至其身未必生天下之所尊所樂者皆外  物來寄不可必也今以不得而憂懼非愚  而何金玉軒冕比形疏矣薾然疲役乆生  奚榮列士敢爲而身不免者以爲天下見  善故也是皆知善之爲善斯不善已善名  不可必必在全王而已俗之所爲所樂奔
Interpretation

To treat delicious food, fine clothes, pleasing sounds, and beautiful sights as sources of happiness, and pursue them single-mindedly without obtaining them, is to feel pain and sorrow. It is also foolish to use these things to maintain the body out of fear of losing them. The rich are burdened by their possessions; the powerful are burdened by their rank. The longer the body lives, the longer one’s worries endure. This takes one even further from the way of following one’s nature and life.

Some people of noble purpose disregard themselves for the sake of fame. If we consider this wrong, then acting to save others may still be acceptable; but the ideal is to save others without harming oneself. In ancient times, people advised rulers, and if their advice was not accepted, they yielded and did not argue. Wu Zixu, a minister of the state of Wu during the Spring and Autumn period, preferred to argue; he was ultimately killed, to his own ruin. Yet without striving for fame, one cannot achieve fame. Is this good, or bad?

What worldly people do does not truly accord with the right way, and what they consider happiness is not truly happiness. Following Wuwei (non-action) is the true form of action; only by not making happiness an object of pursuit can one fully enjoy true happiness. I do not know whether the happiness spoken of by worldly people is really happiness or not. Worldly people delight in action; sages delight in non-action. Non-action is indeed joyful, yet worldly people regard it as intensely painful and impossible to practice. Thus, the greatest happiness is to take no pleasure in happiness, and the highest renown is to seek no renown.

Right and wrong arise through action; only through non-action can right and wrong settle themselves. There is no fixed right and no fixed wrong. Wherever the mind turns, what place cannot be joyful? Wherever the body goes, what place cannot keep it safe? Stillness and peace are the De (Virtue/Power) of Heaven and Earth, yet Heaven and Earth do not depend on stillness and peace in order to exist. Thus, Heaven and Earth both act through non-action and are in harmony, and all things come into being through transformation. The Dao (the Way) manifests as the myriad things, and the myriad things transform into their various forms. Where they first emerge, people do not know. What has no form cannot be seen. Each kind of thing has its own governing principle, and all enter and depart, changing within non-action. To act through non-action and yet leave nothing undone is the Dao by which Heaven and Earth operate. Can humans, living between Heaven and Earth, truly be entirely without action?

Chen Bixu’s commentary: If one acts according to the eight standards of names, regulations, and the like, the happiness one gains may not be true happiness, nor will the body necessarily be kept safe. What people everywhere revere and love is entrusted to external things, and there is no guarantee it can be obtained. To grieve and fear because one cannot obtain it—is that not foolish? Gold, jade, high rank, and eminent position are all external to the body. If one wears oneself out striving for them, what is there to celebrate in a long life? People of noble purpose dare to act, yet cannot keep themselves safe, because they want the people of the world to see their good deeds. But this is precisely how knowing that goodness is called good gives rise to what is not good. A good name cannot be forced; what matters is simply keeping oneself safe. What worldly people do and what they delight in are all pursuits of … The original text ends here.

 競誙誙然如將不得已是以塵妄爲樂而  以無樂無譽爲苦是非果未定也若乃自  守分内性眞不移可以定是非矣兩無爲  相合澹然而衆美從之上下有爲而不交  則和氣否塞矣眹兆之初本無出入形象  之迹然萬物皆自一氣芒芴而來所謂造  物者無物而有物之自造也人多前識不  能無心安得無爲哉  林氏虞齋口義云奚爲奚據以下四句與  屈原卜居文勢一同次叙富貴壽善四段  本同意皆以物害己者說前三段了後以  列士一段如此發明變换語勢此文法也  蹲循即逡巡爭則殘其形不爭名不成此  兩句說破世故爲名而至於殘形不得謂  之善矣舉世羣趣誙誙然必取之意我以  無爲爲樂而俗反以爲大苦則樂譽是非  果未定也唯無爲可以定之耳   褚氏管見云人處幻境之中難遂者樂   難保者生故是篇首歎至樂活身之不   可必得而兼有使人安其素分無所爲   據去就於其間則亦奚樂奚惡哉天下   所樂者富貴壽善厚味聲色也而倚伏   之機莫測美善不可常有所下所苦者   貧賤夭惡所求不得也而能遊乎物初   則己猶可忘何外累之能及今觀夫富   者之苦身疾作貴者之思慮善否壽者   之乆憂不死皆疏外其形去道遠矣列   士之不足活身亦猶是也故忠諫勿爭   徐有以啓悟之則君無過舉臣得盡職
Interpretation

People rush ahead in competition, as if they must obtain something. They take the illusory things of the world as sources of joy, while seeing freedom from desire and from fame as suffering. So the standards by which we judge true joy and true suffering, right and wrong, remain unsettled. If one can hold to one’s proper place and keep one’s nature from being altered, then right and wrong can be judged. When people act without interference and accord with one another, their minds are calm and untroubled, and many good things arise of themselves. But if those above and below each act on their own without blending together, harmony becomes blocked and cannot flow. When things first show signs of emerging, they have no comings or goings, no visible traces. Yet all things arise from the dim, undifferentiated state of a single Qi (vital energy). The so-called “Creator” is not some entity that makes things; all things generate themselves. People are always calculating and making plans in advance, unable to empty and quiet their minds. How, then, could they practice Wuwei (non-action)?

Lin’s Yuzhai Kouyi says: “‘What should I do?’ and ‘What should I rely on?’ and the next two lines follow the same pattern of expression as Qu Yuan’s Divination. The passage then sets out, in turn, four things: wealth and rank, long life, and a good name. The meaning is the same throughout: external things harm the self. The first three sections have already been completed; the section on the worthy men that follows extends the discussion through a change in its development, a matter of literary composition. ‘Duncun’ means ‘to hesitate and retreat.’ Struggle harms the body; if one does not contend for a reputation, that reputation will not be established. These two lines reveal the state of the world: harming the body in pursuit of a name cannot be called good. Everyone in the world rushes ahead, as if they must obtain something; I, however, take Wuwei as joy, while the conventional world sees it as great suffering. This shows that the standards for joy, honor, and right and wrong are indeed unsettled. Only through Wuwei can those standards be made certain.”

Chu’s Guanzian says: “People live amid illusory circumstances. What they cannot obtain as they wish is joy; what they cannot keep safe is life. Thus the chapter opens with the lament that supreme joy and the preservation of life cannot necessarily be attained together. If people can be content with their proper place, neither acting on things nor pursuing them single-mindedly, what is there to rejoice in or despise? What people under Heaven cherish are wealth and rank, long life, a good name, fine food, and beautiful sights and sounds. Yet fortune and misfortune turn upon one another unpredictably, and beauty and goodness cannot last. What people suffer from are poverty and low status, short lives, bad reputations, and desires left unfulfilled. But if one can wander in the realm from which all things first emerged and even forget oneself, how could external things become a burden? Consider the wealthy, who labor bitterly and wear out their bodies; the eminent, who fret over whether they have acted well; and the long-lived, who remain anxious for years that they will not die. All have become estranged from the nature of external things and are far from the Dao (the Way). The worthy men who cannot preserve their lives are in the same situation. Therefore, when offering loyal remonstrance, one should not argue, but calmly guide the ruler so that he understands the principle. In this way, the ruler will not act wrongly, and the minister can fulfill his duty.”

  君臣之盛也若夫子胥因爭以殘形亦   因以成名誠有善邪無有邪觀俗之所   樂果樂邪不樂邪吾以無爲誠樂矣而   世俗以爲大苦則其向背可知故必知   至樂之無樂至譽之無譽者然後安於   無爲始可以定天下之是非矣夫欲求   至樂活身者唯無爲近之天地無爲而   清寧故萬物皆化人而能無爲物惡得   不化哉 莊子妻死惠子吊之莊子方箕踞鼓盆而歌 惠子曰與人居長子老身死不哭亦足矣又 鼓盆而歌不亦甚乎莊子曰不然是其始死 也我獨何能無槩然察其始而本無生非徒 無生也而本無形非徒無形也而本無氣雜 乎芒芴之間變而有氣氣變而有形形變而 有生今又變而之死是相與爲春秋冬夏四 時行也人且偃然寢於巨室而我噭噭然隨 而哭之自以爲不通乎命故止也  郭註未明而槩既達而止斯所以誨有情  者推至理以遣累也  吕註莊子之所貴則孔子孟孫才顔氏而  其制行則若子桑子反子琴張之徒何也  盖人道之弊天下沉於哀樂之邪而滅其  天理故救之之道爲若此  疑獨註莊子襲諸人間不能忘人道故妻  死則鼓盆而歌見其情發乎聲也惠子謂  子巳長身已老不爲不乆死而不哭亦見  其無情矣又鼓盆而歌不亦甚乎莊子答  以其妻始死也豈得不槩然及察其本無
Interpretation

At the height of their relationship as ruler and minister, Wu Zixu suffered bodily harm through political strife and, in doing so, won himself a reputation. Was this truly a good thing, or not? Consider what people in the world commonly value: is it really worth valuing, or is it not? I believe that Wuwei (non-action) is the true joy, while the world regards Wuwei as a great hardship. This shows that people differ in what they pursue and what they turn away from. We must therefore understand that the highest joy is not what the world calls joy, and the highest reputation is not what the world calls reputation. Only by understanding this can we be at ease with Wuwei and judge what is right and wrong under Heaven. Of all ways to seek true joy and preserve life, Wuwei comes closest to the goal. Heaven and Earth act through Wuwei, and so are clear and peaceful; all things are born and transformed in their wake. If people too could practice Wuwei, how could all things fail to be transformed by them?

Zhuangzi’s wife died, and Huizi came to mourn her. Zhuangzi was sitting with his legs stretched out, tapping a clay basin and singing.

Huizi said, “You lived with her, she raised your children, and she grew old and died. It would be one thing if you did not weep, but to go so far as to tap a basin and sing—isn’t that excessive?”

Zhuangzi said, “It is not so. When she had just died, how could I have felt nothing? But when I looked into the beginning of her life, I saw that she originally had no life. Not only was there no life; at first she had no form. Not only was there no form; at first there was not even Qi (vital energy). Qi was mingled in a vague, indistinct state; through change it became Qi, Qi changed and took form, and form changed and became life. Now she has changed once more and gone toward death. This is like the alternation of the four seasons—spring, autumn, winter, and summer. She now lies at peace in the great chamber of Heaven and Earth, while I stand beside her weeping aloud. I thought that would show I did not understand Heaven’s decree, so I stopped.”

Guo Xiang’s commentary says: When people do not yet understand what has happened, they feel grief; once they grasp its underlying principle, their sorrow ceases. This is meant to teach people with feelings to pursue the ultimate principle and thereby release themselves from their attachments.

Lü Huiqing’s commentary says: Among the figures Zhuangzi admired were Confucius, Mengsun Cai, and Yan Hui. In his conduct, however, he emulated people such as Zisang, Zifan, and Qin Zhang. Why? The trouble with human society is that people everywhere become consumed by grief and joy, thereby damaging their inborn nature. Zhuangzi’s words and actions were intended to remedy this affliction.

Yidu’s commentary says: Living in human society, Zhuangzi could not entirely forget human relationships and their proper feelings. After his wife died, he tapped a basin and sang; this shows that his feelings still found expression in his voice. Huizi said that Zhuangzi and his wife had lived together for many years and that he himself was now old. His wife had died, yet he did not weep—already this seemed heartless; and now he even tapped a basin and sang. Was that not excessive? Zhuangzi replied that when his wife had just died, how could he have felt nothing? The original text is incomplete after this point.

 生無形無氣則果何自而有哉㝠於眞空  而莫得其眹也精鞠而爲物斯有氣有氣  斯有形有形斯有生芒未有象陽之始也  芴未有數陰之始也陰陽之中各有沖氣  氣變而有形有以設飾之形變而有生有  生則有死死生相隨如環無端盖自無氣  無形無生以觀之則萬物者眞空而已自  有形有氣有生以觀之則無變而有有變  而無猶四時之運相爲無窮人且偃然寢  於巨室巨室指天地萬物譬室中之人人  何嘗不出入於室萬物何嘗不出入於天  地哉  碧虚註聞死感槩人之常情鼓盆而歌假  物遣累也人本無生孰爲形氣混乎㝠漠  之際相因而有此生今又化而歸無何異  四時代謝而往來無迹推求原本故止世  慮也  鬳齋云形變而有生言先有形而後有此  動轉者釋氏云動轉歸風便是此生字四  時行者有生必有死之喻鼓盆之事亦寓  言如原壤登木而歌豈親死之際全無人  心乎聖門之學所以盡其孝慕者豈不知  生死之理原壤莊子之徒欲指破人心之  迷故爲此過當之舉便是道心惟微不可  以獨行於世所以有執中之訓李漢老因  哭子而問大惠以爲不能忘情恐不近道  大惠答云子死不哭是豺狼也此語極有  見識若其它學佛者答此問必墮偏見   莊子妻死章以世情觀之人所難忘者
Interpretation

How could all things appear from nowhere when, at the beginning, they had neither form nor Qi? They returned obscurely to the true void, with not even the faintest sign of a beginning to be found. Subtle Qi gathered and formed all things. With Qi came form; with form came life. At first, before the chaos had divided, no images could yet be discerned: this was the state in which Yang Qi was just beginning to arise. In a hazy, unsettled state, its changes could not yet be counted: this was the state in which Yin Qi was just beginning to arise. Between Yin and Yang, each had its own harmonizing Qi. As Qi changed, form took shape; as form changed, life appeared.

Where there is life, there is death. Life and death follow one another like a ring, revolving without end. Seen from the perspective of having no Qi, no form, and no life, all things return to the true void. Seen from the perspective of having form, Qi, and life, some things persist in another form after changing, while others change and pass away. It is like the seasons succeeding one another in an endless cycle.

People sleep peacefully in the great house that is Heaven and Earth. “Great house” here means that Heaven and Earth are likened to a house: people are like lodgers who come and go, and all things likewise arise, perish, and change between Heaven and Earth.

Commentary by Bixuzi: To hear of death and grieve is only human. Zhuangzi beat a clay basin and sang in order to release his sorrow and free himself from attachment through an external object. People were not originally born with a fixed form of life; only when various conditions interacted within the dark, undifferentiated chaos did this life come to be. Now it changes once more and returns to nothingness, no differently from the changing seasons and their ceaseless cycle. Tracing all things back to their origin is a way to quiet worldly anxieties.

Yanzhai says: “Form changes, and then there is life” means that form comes first, and activity and movement follow. What Buddhism calls “movement returning to wind”: that “movement” is equivalent here to “life.” The turning of the seasons is an analogy for the fact that whatever is born must die. Zhuangzi beating a basin and singing after his wife’s death is also a parable, like Yuang Rang striking and singing on his mother’s coffin. Does the death of a loved one truly leave the heart without grief? The teachings of the sages instruct people to be filial and remember their loved ones. Did they not understand the principle of life and death? People like Yuang Rang and Zhuangzi wanted to expose the world’s deluded attachment to life and death, and so they acted in ways that seemed almost excessive.

The Daoist heart is subtle and obscure; one cannot simply act on one’s own opinions. That is why there is the teaching to “hold to the Mean.” When Li Hanlao wept after his son died, he once asked Chan Master Dahui, “If I cannot let go of this grief, I fear it is not in accord with the Dao. Is that so?” Dahui replied, “If your son dies and you do not weep, you are a jackal.” This answer shows great insight. Other Buddhists, when answering this question, often risk falling into partiality. In the chapter about Zhuangzi’s wife dying, viewed through ordinary human feeling, this is indeed the hardest thing to forget.

  而處之泰然何也盖究其形氣之始悉   本於無雜乎芒芴有氣有形形生而情   識愛樂無所不有至若親姻情好假合   須臾耳惑者認以爲實縁情生愛因愛   生貪滋長業縁生死纏縛害形損性一   何愚哉眞人痛憫凡迷方便開喻謂天   下之物生於有有歸於無此自然之理   金石有壞況於人乎須以毒眼覷破世   間使無一毫障礙青天白日萬古靈靈   固已無容憂喜於其間而又鼓盆而歌   者寄聲於無情之物所以矯流俗哀號   痛泣過用其情之弊若云易悲爲喜則   亦不免於偏見耳列子載魏有東門吴   者其子死而不哭人問其故曰吾嘗無   子無子之時不憂今子死與向無子同   吾何憂焉此達人大觀所以異於俗也   然則外物之儻來不足介懷也宜矣   槩字說之不通當是嘅然歎也芒芴宜   讀同恍惚 支離叔與滑介叔觀於㝠伯之丘崑崙之虚 黄帝之所休俄而柳生其左肘其意蹶蹶然 惡之支離叔曰子惡之乎滑介叔曰亡予何 惡生者假借也假之而生生者塵垢也死生 爲晝夜且吾與子觀化而化及我我又何惡 焉  郭註斯皆先示有情然後尋至理以遣之  若云我無情故能無憂則夫有情者遂自  絶於遠曠之域而迷困於憂樂之境矣  吕註黄帝之所休則心死形廢如土壤而  不覺柳之生其肘也柳者易生之物以滑
Interpretation

Zhili Shu and Huajie Shu were wandering together at the Hill of Dark Elder and the Ruins of Kunlun, where legend says the Yellow Emperor once rested. Before long, a lump grew on Huajie Shu’s left elbow. He looked alarmed and deeply disliked it. Zhili Shu asked, “Does it bother you?” Huajie Shu replied, “No. What is there to dislike? Life is only something temporarily borrowed. Once borrowed, it takes the form of life, but life itself is no more than dust. Life and death are like day and night. Now, as I watch change with you, change has come upon me. What could I possibly dislike about it?”

Guo Xiang’s commentary says: These stories first portray people as having feelings of joy, anger, liking, and dislike, then guide them to understand the principle and let go of those feelings. To say, “I have no feelings, so I have no worries,” would make people with feelings think they could never attain transcendence, leaving them trapped in sorrow and joy.

Lü Huiqing’s commentary says: The claim that the Yellow Emperor once rested there means that his mind had become still, and his body seemed no different from clay. So even when something grew on his left elbow, he was not disturbed. A lump grows easily because it…

 介爲事則其初不免驚而惡之終知其生  之爲假借塵垢又何惡焉古之所謂觀化  者其道盖如此  疑獨註黄帝之所休大道也柳陰木左陽  肘柳生左肘陰陽之變也夫生者造物之  假借皆塵垢粃糠何足愛惡易曰通乎晝  夜之道而知明此理也今觀於陰陽之變  化而化及我又何惡邪  碧虚註二人或以支榦離散爲善或以滑  稽介獨爲善觀化空於㝠寞之丘峻極之  墟而柳發其肘左取生義夫生者化空之  假借於空論之生爲塵垢長景況之死爲  昏夜也是故生生者不生化化者不化今  有生乃常生忽化乃常化以常生觀常化  則知常生不眞常化不空空化相通於理  何患哉  鬳齋云黄帝之所休謂嘗休息於此柳瘍  也今人謂生癤也想古時有此名字假借  喻外物塵垢言至微釋氏所謂四縁假合  是也觀物之變化而化及我言我隨造物  而變也前言蹶蹶然惡之亦人情也思死  生之理而知其本原便是道心爲主又何  惡焉   按柳生左肘其語頗怪諸解略而不論   獨吕註及之偶得管見廣而爲說云柳   者易生之木左肘罕用之臂臂罕用而   木易生喻無心無爲者也遠化也夫肘   動物也柳植物也動植異性形質亦殊   動者俄化爲植在常情不能無怪然物   受化而不自知故處乎大冶之中者例
Interpretation

If being distinct—standing apart and unlike others—becomes a way of dealing with the world, at first it is bound to provoke surprise and aversion. Later, once we understand that our lives are merely temporary lodgings amid the world’s dust and grime, what is there to find repellent? This, perhaps, is what the ancients meant by “contemplating transformation”—observing how all things change.

Yidu’s Commentary: The place where the Yellow Emperor rested was where the Great Dao was present. A willow tree’s shade fell beside the tree, and the willow itself grew from a person’s left elbow: this is a manifestation of Yin-Yang transformation. Life is something temporarily lent to us by the Creator. It is all like dust and chaff; what is there to cherish or despise? The Book of Changes says that those who understand the alternation of day and night can grasp this. Now I watch Yin-Yang transformation, and transformation takes place in me as well. What is there to find repellent?

Bixu’s Commentary: Some consider being fragmented and unrestrained good; others consider being playful and solitary good. A person observes transformation from a high place on a dark, empty hill, while a willow grows from his left elbow. Here, the emphasis is on “life.” Life is a form temporarily borrowed by the emptiness that undergoes transformation. From the standpoint of emptiness, life is dust; compared with the long span of daytime, death is like night. Thus, that which enables all things to be born and reborn without end is itself unborn, and that which enables all things to change without end is itself unchanging. The life before us is one manifestation of the constant Way of birth and rebirth; sudden transformation is likewise one manifestation of constant change. If we use constant birth and rebirth to observe constant change, we will understand that the life before us is not truly constant, and that the change before us is not truly nothingness. Emptiness and transformation are connected in principle, so what is there to worry about?

Yanzhai says: “The place where the Yellow Emperor rested” means that the Yellow Emperor once rested there. “Willow sore” means a willow-tree growth, like what we now call a boil; it seems the term was also used in ancient times. “Borrowing” means using something external as a metaphor. “Dust and grime” means that things are exceedingly minute. This is also what Buddhism means by “the temporary convergence of the four conditions”—the temporary coming together of multiple conditions. To observe the transformations of things and see transformation taking place in oneself means that I change along with the Creator. The earlier phrase “shrink back in fear and find it repellent” describes a common human response. Once we understand the principles and source of life and death, we can let the Dao-centered mind take the lead. What is there to find repellent?

Editorial Note: The statement that a willow grew from the left elbow is quite strange. Most commentators pass over it, and only Lü’s commentary mentions it, offering this further explanation: willows grow readily, while the left arm is the less-used arm. The less-active arm and the readily growing tree are used as a comparison to illustrate acting without intention or effort—that is, being free from transformation. The elbow is part of an animal, while the willow is a plant; they differ in nature and form. By ordinary standards, it is naturally strange for an active elbow suddenly to become a plant. Yet the myriad things undergo transformation without knowing it, so the things within the great furnace of transformation—the Creator’s melting pot—usually…

  莫遁焉儻悟吾生之爲假借塵垢則肘   也柳也均爲物耳何所容其親疏愛惡   哉由是知萬物與我同一化機然非靜   極無以見所以滑介叔觀於黄帝之所   休而化及之黄帝土德主靜休亦息靜   之義靜者化之體動者化之用觀化而   化及與化俱者也身與化俱何往而非   我此言有情化爲無情則無情者亦或   化爲有情至樂篇種有幾已下可見皆   造物所化耳行小變而不失大常當無
Interpretation

Do not evade this principle: if we realize that our lives are only a temporary sojourn in the world, like dust and grime, then whether it is the elbow (Zhuangzi was punished by having his elbow severed) or the willow (a figure like Liuxia Hui), the mediocre or the worthy, each is simply one thing among the myriad things. What reason, then, is there to distinguish closeness from distance, or affection from aversion?

From this we can see that the myriad things and “I” are together within the process of change. But unless we reach a state of utmost stillness, we cannot see this clearly. Thus Huajie Shu, a figure in the Zhuangzi, visited the place where the Yellow Emperor rested and was later transformed by the encounter. The Yellow Emperor embodied the virtue of Earth and presided over stillness; “rest” also means coming to a stop and becoming quiet. Stillness is the substance of change, while movement is its function. To be transformed by observing change and to move along with it is what is meant by “transformation reaching one.” When the body moves in step with change, wherever one goes, how could that place not be “I”?

Here it is said that beings with feelings may turn into beings without feelings, and beings without feelings may in turn become beings with feelings. The passage in the “Great Joy” chapter beginning with “things have their seeds” shows that all this is simply change brought about by the Creator. Even through subtle changes, as long as one does not lose the constant Way at the root of things, one can remain at ease in any circumstance.

  適而非樂也 南華眞經義海纂微卷之五十六

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0127); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 53 Vol. 55 →