中文 · EN

《南華真經義海纂微》Vol. 69

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 69 / 104 4,857 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經義海纂微》 Vol. 69 (Dongshen 洞神部, 104 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 10 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經義海纂微》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經義海纂微卷之七十一正六     武林道士褚伯秀學    雜篇庚桑楚第二 南榮趎贏糧七日七夜至老子之所老子曰 子自楚之所來乎南榮趎曰唯老子曰子何 與人偕來之衆也南榮趎懼然顧其後老子 曰子不知吾所謂乎南榮趎俯而慙仰而歎 曰今者吾忘吾答因失吾問老子曰何謂也 南榮趎曰不知乎人謂我朱愚知乎反愁我 軀不仁則害人仁則反愁我身不義則傷彼 義則反愁我己我安逃此而可此三言者趎 之所患也願因楚而問之老子曰向吾見若 眉睫之間吾因以得汝矣今汝又言而信之 若規規然若喪父母揭竿而求諸海也汝亡 人哉惘惘乎汝欲反汝情性而无由入可憐 哉  郭註老子問趎何與人偕來之衆挾三言  而來故  吕註趎欲烏道其心不能致一而挾三言  則謂與人偕來之衆亦宜矣以道與世亢  其心莫得而藏此老子所以得之於眉睫  之間也道者物之所生唯致一能得之今  趎規規然以趣舍不一之心索之於无窮  之間若喪父母而揭竿求之於海罔罔然  哉欲反其性情而无由入此至人之所憐  也  疑獨註贏同籯裹糧器七日七夜言慕道  之切晝夜不息也老子知其自楚之所來  挾三言而至故問與人偕來之衆趎遂懼  然莫辨主賔繼陳三條以求决盖爲夫明
Interpretation

Nanrong Chu carried provisions with him and traveled for seven days and seven nights until he reached Laozi’s dwelling. Laozi asked, “Did you come from the state of Chu?” Nanrong Chu replied, “I did.” Laozi then asked, “Why have you come with so many people?” Startled, Nanrong Chu looked back over his shoulder. Laozi said, “You don’t understand what I mean?”

Nanrong Chu lowered his head in shame, then looked up and sighed. “Just now I forgot how I ought to answer, and then I forgot what I wanted to ask.” Laozi asked, “What do you mean?” Nanrong Chu replied, “If I don’t understand the Way, people call me foolish. If I understand a little of it, I worry about my own well-being. If I show no benevolence, I harm others; if I show benevolence, I end up worrying about myself. If I ignore what is right, I harm others; if I follow what is right, I end up worrying about myself. How can I escape these troubles? These three things have been weighing on me constantly. I wanted to ask your advice by way of the affairs of Chu.”

Laozi said, “A moment ago, I understood you already from the look in your eyes and the expression on your face. Now that I have heard you speak, I’m even more certain. You are cramped and unsettled, at a loss, like someone who has lost their parents and is searching for something in the sea with a bamboo pole. You are truly lost! You are bewildered and want to return to your original nature, yet cannot find the way in. How pitiful.”

Guo Xiang’s commentary: Laozi asked Nanrong Chu why he seemed to have come with so many people because he had brought those three perplexities with him to seek instruction.

Lü Huiqing’s commentary: Nanrong Chu wanted his mind to settle into emptiness and stillness, but could not keep it focused. Instead, he brought three perplexities with him, so Laozi said he seemed to have come with many people. He set the Way against the ways of the world, and his mind could not find peace. That is why Laozi understood his situation just by looking at his eyes and expression. The Way is the source from which all things arise; only by focusing the mind can one grasp it. Yet Nanrong Chu sought answers amid the endless variety of things with a wavering mind that kept making distinctions and choices. He was like someone who, after losing their parents, searched the sea with a bamboo pole: bewildered and at a loss. Wanting to return to his original nature but unable to find the way in is precisely what the Perfect Person pities.

Yidu’s commentary: Nanrong Chu set out carrying a vessel filled with provisions. “Seven days and seven nights” means that he admired the Way and traveled without stopping, day or night. Laozi knew he had come from Chu and had brought three perplexities to seek instruction, so he asked why he seemed to have come with so many people. Nanrong Chu was then so startled that he could no longer distinguish host from guest. He went on to raise his three perplexities, hoping to find answers. This is because… (The original text ends here unfinished.)

 仁義知之本故有此疑老子告以向吾見  眉睫而得汝今又言而信之世之術士以  言貌觀人亦此理但學不至者不免於妄  耳趎失道之眞猶童穉失所親而欲揭竿  測海以求斷不可得汝亡人哉言失爲人  之道也  碧虚註問何與人偕來之衆謂采色不定  意不一也懼然顧後懐疑失容吾所謂者  非言非貌驚故忘答慚故失問朱愚丹心  愚蠢也夫仁知義三者彼我皆爲患既目  擊道存矣又況有言乎海非藏親之地竿  非探淵之策喪本无歸罔然失措欲反性  情而无由入此所以可憐也  鬳齋口義趎方獨見而老子以爲與衆偕  來釋氏所謂汝心中正鬧也朱愚猶顓蒙  仁知義三語謂无心又不可有心又不可  疑而未决也規規蹇淺貌揭竿求海言求  无於有亡人亡失其本心之人欲見自然  之道不可得也   何與人偕來之衆一語勘辨甚力此楚   老爲人眞切處若内无眞見聞此鮮不   懷疑宗門諸老慣用此機趎於言下忘   答失問遂以第二機接之及其懼消慚   釋陳述三條覬免世累老子告以汝如   孩童失親而揭竿求海言眞性汝之至   親不能保全而致喪失乃欲爲仁義以   索之於无涯世事之中愈求愈遠身雖   存與亡无異矣惘惘无歸貌欲反性情   而无由入則是迷能思復聖人不棄所   以憐而進之信能超三言而无累斯爲
Interpretation

Benevolence, righteousness, and wisdom are the source of people’s doubts; that is why the exchange of questions and answers took place earlier. Laozi said to Erchui, “A moment ago, I saw your eyes and expression at a glance. Now that you have spoken, I can confirm my judgment even more. Practitioners in the world—those who judge people by their speech and appearance—use this same method. But unless their learning and cultivation are sound, they are bound to make rash judgments.”

Erchui has lost the true nature of the Dao. He is like a child who has lost a parent and tries to measure the sea with a bamboo pole. That is simply impossible. You truly are someone who has lost your roots! By saying that you are ‘lost,’ you mean that you have lost the fundamental principles of being human.

Bixuzi’s commentary says: Laozi asked, “Why have you come with so many people?” on the basis of Erchui’s unsettled expression and divided attention. He looked back in alarm, his mind grew confused, and his expression changed. Laozi was not speaking of what Erchui had said or what he looked like. He meant that, startled, Erchui forgot to answer, and, ashamed, forgot to ask his question. “Zhuyu” means dull and ignorant. Benevolence, wisdom, and righteousness can all become burdens, whether for oneself or for others. Once you have seen with your own eyes that the Dao has manifested, why would you still need to explain it in words?

The sea is no place to put a lost parent, and a bamboo pole is no instrument for probing the depths. When you lose your roots and have nowhere to return, you are left bewildered and helpless. To want to return to your original nature and disposition, yet find no way in—that is what makes this pitiable.

The Yanzhai Commentary says: Erchui thought he had come alone, but Laozi said he had come with a crowd. The Buddhist saying, “Your mind is in turmoil right now,” describes the same situation. “Zhuyu” means benighted and ignorant. The three phrases about benevolence, wisdom, and righteousness mean this: to be without intention will not do; to act with intention will not do either; and to be doubtful and unable to decide is worse still. “Guigui” describes a stiff, narrow-minded manner. “Raising a pole to seek the sea” means trying to seek the formless Dao through things that have form. “A person who has lost” means someone who has lost their original mind. They want to see the natural Dao, but cannot.

The question, “Why have you come with so many people?” is a forceful act of discernment. This is how Laozi of Chu met people with such directness. Few people can avoid becoming doubtful when they lack genuine insight within. Old Chan monks often used such verbal surprises to awaken others. When Erchui heard Laozi’s words, he forgot to answer and forgot to ask his question, so Laozi guided him further with a second layer of words. Once Erchui’s alarm had subsided and his shame had eased, he offered three reasons, hoping to escape entanglement in worldly affairs. Laozi told him: You are like a child who has lost a parent and raises a bamboo pole to measure the sea. Your true nature is what is closest to you, yet you failed to preserve it and instead lost it. Now you want to recover it by practicing benevolence and righteousness amid the boundless affairs of the world; the more you search, the farther away it gets. Though your body is still alive, you are no different from the dead. This bewilderment, this having nowhere to turn, is what it means to want to return to your original nature and disposition but find no way in.

Though he has lost his way, he still hopes to restore his original nature. The sage does not abandon him for this reason, but takes pity on him and guides him further. If he can truly go beyond these three teachings of benevolence, wisdom, and righteousness and cease to be burdened by them, that is what it means to…

  反性情之道也歟○朱愚難通碧虚云   江南古藏本作株愚取形若橛株之義 南榮趎請入就舍召其所好去其所惡十日 自愁復見老子老子曰汝自灑濯孰哉鬱鬱 乎然而其中津津乎猶有惡也夫外韄者不 可繁而捉將内揵内護者不可繆而捉將外 揵内外護者道德不能持而況放道而行者 乎南榮趎曰里人有病里人問之病者能言 其病然其病病者猶未病也若趎之聞大道 譬猶飲藥以加病也趎願聞衛生之經而已 矣老子曰衛生之經能抱一乎能勿失乎能 无卜筮而知吉凶乎能止乎能已乎能全諸 人而求諸己乎能翛然乎能侗然乎能兒子 乎兒子終日嘷而嗌不嗄和之至也終日握 而手不掜共其德也終日視而目不瞚偏不 在外也行不知所之居不知所爲與物委蛇 而同其波是衛生之經己  郭註全形抱生莫若忘其心術遺其耳目  若乃聲色韄於外則心術塞於内欲惡韄  於内則耳目塞於外故必无得无失而後  爲通偏韄尚不可況内外韄乎耳目眩惑  於外心術流蕩於内雖繁乎以執之綢繆  以持之弗能止也抱一不離性遺自得當  則吉過則凶无所卜也止謂止於分已謂  无追故迹舍人求已全我而不效彼也无  停迹无節硋任聲之自出而不由喜怒任  手之自握而非獨得任目之自見非係於
Interpretation

“Could this be a principle that goes against one’s nature?” Zhu Yu found the sentence difficult to understand. Bi Xu said, “An old Jiangnan manuscript reads ‘Stump Fool,’ referring to the shape of a tree stump or wooden peg.”

Nanrong Chu (a personal name) asked to go inside and rest. He gathered those he liked and sent away those he disliked. Ten days later, he grew troubled again and went to see Laozi once more.

Laozi said, “You think you have already cleansed yourself, yet your heart is still knotted and unsettled, and you still feel aversion. When external things bind the ears and eyes, no amount of elaborate effort can force them under control. When the heart is constrained, no method of tying and binding can subdue it. When both inner and outer are constrained, even De cannot be maintained—how much less can those who act against the Dao?”

Nanrong Chu said, “There is someone in my village who falls ill. When others ask him about it, he can describe his symptoms. But the illness he describes still isn’t the patient’s true illness. Like me, someone who has heard of the Great Dao only seems to grow sicker after taking medicine. I only wish to hear the essentials of nourishing life.”

Laozi said, “The essentials of nourishing life are these: Can you hold fast to unity and not lose your original nature? Can you know good and ill fortune without resorting to divination? Can you remain within your proper bounds and stop pursuing things? Can you stop demanding completeness from others and seek it within yourself? Can you be at ease and free from restraint? Can you be simple and unformed? Can you be like an infant?

“An infant cries all day without making its throat hoarse because its harmonious Qi is abundant. It keeps its fists clenched all day without its hands cramping because its De is harmonious. It gazes all day without blinking because its spirit does not turn toward external things. When walking, it is not fixated on where it is going; when sitting quietly, it is not fixated on what it must do. It changes naturally along with external things and rises and falls together with the myriad things. This is the essence of nourishing life.”

Guo Xiang’s commentary explains: To preserve the body and nourish life, it is best to forget one’s preconceptions and clever schemes, and to let go of the ears and eyes’ fixation on external things. When external things such as sounds and colors bind the ears and eyes, the heart becomes obstructed; when desires and aversions bind the heart, the ears and eyes become obstructed. So one must be free of both gain and loss in order to be unimpeded. Being constrained in just one way is already a problem; how much more so when both inner and outer are constrained? The ears and eyes are confused by external things, while the spirit churns and wanders within. No matter how hard one tries to control and hold on tightly, one cannot bring it to rest.

To hold fast to unity is to remain true to one’s original nature; only by abandoning deliberate pursuit can one be at ease in oneself. Staying within one’s proper bounds brings good fortune; going beyond them brings ill fortune, so there is no need for divination. “Stop” means to remain within one’s own proper bounds; “cease” means to stop pursuing the tracks of the past. Give up seeking from others and turn instead to what is within oneself; preserve yourself rather than imitating others. Leave no trace of fixation and set up no obstacles. Let sounds arise naturally, without being governed by joy or anger; let the hands close naturally, without deliberate force; let the eyes see naturally, without being…

(The Guo Xiang commentary provided here breaks off at this point.)

 色也信足自行縱體自任至於物波亦波  斯順之也  吕註知趣舍滑心而惡之欲洗濯而復於  虚靜是爲召好去惡然猶未之能行所以  自愁鬱鬱之氣充津津有所漏韄則物之  粘著而難去者今惡耳目之韄於聲色而  欲物物以持之是繁而捉也則莫若内揵  内揵則心不出而外不韄矣老子云塞其  兊閉其門是也心術韄於事爲而欲事事  以止之是繆而捉也則莫若外揵外揵則  物不入而内不韄矣老子云開其門解其  紛是也故寂然不動萬物不足以撓其心  不然則雖有道德者猶不能持況倣效而  行者乎所謂聞道者知其未始有物而无  所事爲也趎自知其病未足以勝大道之  藥但願聞衛生之經而已衛生以无爲爲  經一者道之所自生吉祥所止何事卜筮  哉此皆能止其思爲而求諸己故也翛然  无係侗然无硋則如兒子矣使其嘷出於  哀怒而不和其能不嗄乎以至握而不知  其爲握視而不知其爲視其行止一出於  无心與物宛轉同其波流此銜生之經也  疑獨註心存好惡所以自愁洗去其惡亦  孰矣然而鬱鬰津津猶有發見於外者韄  猶羈縛楗謂關閉耳目之於聲色外韄也  不可使至於繁捉而納諸内以楗閉之身  意之於觸法内韄也不可使至於繆捉而  置諸外以楗閉之與由外入者中有主則
Interpretation

A person’s physical form and outward expressions do indeed follow their own natural temperament and conduct, unfolding of themselves. When they encounter external things, they are like water flowing with the waves.

This is following nature.

Lü’s commentary says: People know that making distinctions and choosing between things can disturb the mind. They dislike this state and want to wash away distracting thoughts and return to emptiness and stillness. This is called drawing near what one likes and pushing away what one dislikes. But they cannot yet do so, and thus become worried and stifled, with the Qi of the heart continually showing itself outward. “Binding” means being stuck to and restrained by external things, unable to break free.

If one dislikes the ears and eyes being bound by sounds and sights, and tries to solve this by controlling external things one by one, one will only scramble to seize them. It is better to close the gates within: when the heart does not rush outward, external things cannot hold it in check. This is like what the Laozi says: “Block the openings of desire and shut the gates of the heart.”

If one’s thoughts are held fast by all kinds of affairs, yet one tries to stop this by dealing with each affair in turn, one will only become more entangled. It is better to close the gates without: when external things are not allowed to enter, the heart within will not be bound by them. This is like what the Laozi says: “Open the gates and untangle the knots.”

Thus, when the heart is still and unmoving, the myriad things cannot disturb it. If one cannot achieve this, even a person of moral cultivation may not be able to maintain control—how much less someone who merely imitates such conduct? Those who hear the Great Dao know that the myriad things have no fixed, unchanging substance, and so there is no need to insist on acting.

Zhili Shu (called “Chu” in the text) knew that the Great Dao’s remedies were not enough to cure his illness. He only hoped to hear the essentials of nurturing life. Nurturing life takes Wuwei (non-action) as its foundation. “The One” is the source from which the Dao gives rise to things, and the place where good fortune resides. Why would there be any need for divination? This is because people can quiet their thoughts and cease acting, then seek within themselves.

The mind is at ease, with neither cares nor obstructions, like that of an infant. If an infant cries from sorrow or anger, unable to remain calm, will its voice not grow hoarse? Moreover, it grasps things without knowing that it is grasping them, and looks at things without knowing that it is looking. Every movement arises without conscious intent, changing naturally with external things, like water flowing with the waves. This is the key to preserving life.

Yi Du’s commentary says: When likes and dislikes reside in the heart, worry follows; wanting to wash away what one dislikes is itself a form of action. Yet the Qi of distress still shows itself outwardly. “Binding” means fettering and restraint; “bar” means shutting a door. When the ears and eyes are drawn by sounds and sights, this is external restraint. One should not respond by scrambling to seize external things and then shutting them inside the heart. When the body and intentions are drawn by what the senses encounter, this is internal restraint. One should not respond by scrambling to seize things and then placing them outside and shutting them away. As for things that enter the heart from the outside, if the heart has something that governs it…

 不入自内出者有正於外則不距意同譬  人家有不肖子爲姦於外者捉而閉諸内  爲宄於内者捉而閑諸外嗜慾之害身猶  不肖子之害家防閑不可不謹也趎引里  人之病以自喻病病者猶未病猶列子云  生生者不生趎欲聞大道而未得其方猶  飲藥以加病也願聞衛生之常道而已答  以抱一勿失則不待卜筮而知吉凶見險  而能止已則終止矣足於己而无待於外  故翛然侗然不失其赤子之心專氣致柔  而常德不離是以入鳥獸而不亂逢虎兕  而不傷其嘷握視也一出於无心以至任  足之自行任體之自爲與物同波而不離  乎道也  碧虚註能病己病者猶未病聞道愈惑者  爲難悟故知大方之難窺願聞小乗而已  抱一勿失專而藏照也知吉凶者誠明能  止已則不役求諸己則自信翛然侗然无  所係累能兒子乎全其朴也兒子淳德未  虧故聲完而握專无著而神定縱任而无  忤同流而莫汨此皆衛生之經也  鬳齋口義召好求其是去惡離其非未忘  好惡所以自愁孰同孰謂用功之乆鬱鬱  意未寧一故津津可見韄以皮束物楗閉  門之牡皆檢束之喻應物於外欲自檢枙  則繁多而不可執捉將反而求之於内曰  内楗中心擾擾欲自檢枙則綢繆而不可  執捉又將求之於外曰外楗言學道不得
Interpretation

People are always trying to decide from the outside what they should pursue and what they should abandon. In the end, their likes and dislikes lead them around, and the harder they strive, the more unsettled they become. It is like a family with an unruly son who does wrong outside the home: they seize him and lock him inside. But if he causes trouble at home, they seize him and lock him outside. A person’s cravings and desires harm the self just as an unruly son harms his family, so one must be careful in guarding and restraining them.

Nanbo Zikui—called “Chu” here for short—uses the example of “a person in the village falling ill” to explain that someone who worries about being ill, while regarding himself as a sick person, is not yet truly ill. This is like what the Liezi says: “Wanting life to continue without end, one fails to understand the Way of life.” Chu wants to hear of the Great Dao, but has not yet grasped how to approach it. To seek the Dao in this way is like taking medicine when ill and making the illness worse. He says that all he wants is to hear the ordinary principles of nourishing life.

The reply is: Hold fast to the One—the undivided original mind—and do not lose it; then there is no need to consult divination to know what is auspicious or inauspicious. When you see danger, you can stop in time, and once you have stopped, you do not press on. Be content with what is within yourself and do not rely on external things; then you can be free and unadorned, preserving the heart of an infant. Concentrate your vital energy and soften your nature, and your abiding De will not disperse. Such a person could enter among birds and beasts without disturbing them, or encounter a tiger or rhinoceros without being harmed. Their breathing, gaze, and movements all arise without conscious intent. They let their steps fall naturally and their bodies act of themselves. They flow along with all things without departing from the Dao.

Bixu’s commentary says: Someone who knows he is ill and can turn inward to examine himself is not yet truly gravely ill. Hearing of the Great Dao and becoming more confused means that it is difficult to grasp the Dao’s source. Thus, those who know how vast and unfathomable the Dao is step back and seek only to hear about more immediate methods of cultivation. “Hold fast to the One and do not lose it” means to focus inward and keep the mind and spirit clear. The ability to know what is auspicious or inauspicious comes from an inner sincerity and clarity; being able to stop in time means one will not be controlled by external things; seeking within makes it possible to trust oneself. Only by being free and unadorned, without entanglement, can one be like an infant and preserve one’s uninjured original nature. An infant’s simple, generous De has not yet been diminished, so its voice is whole and its grip firm. Its mind clings to nothing, its spirit is at ease; it follows nature and does not resist external things. Though it flows along with all things, it is not disturbed by them. These are the ordinary methods of nourishing life.

Yanzhai’s Oral Commentary says that when people insist on pursuing what they believe to be right and rush to distance themselves from what they believe to be wrong, they have not escaped their likes and dislikes, and so bring themselves sorrow. In the text, “huo” refers to binding something with leather, while “jian” is the bar that secures a door; both serve as metaphors for restraint. When dealing with external things, trying to restrain oneself at every turn from the outside means there are too many things to manage and they are hard to control. Turning inward to seek restraint, one finds the mind’s thoughts tangled and confused, just as difficult to control; so one then tries to look outside for a way in. The point is that if learning the Dao means repeatedly trying to impose restraints from within and without, one still has not grasped the essentials.

 其要内外皆无下手處若此者其在身之  道德且不能持況欲循自然之理而行者  乎趎陳愚惑之甚欲聞大道而自不知其  受病之處雖承教而愈惑猶飲藥以加病  今不敢求聞大道願聞衛生之經而已抱  一謂全眞勿失得於天者无所喪无卜筮  知吉凶至誠可以前知也止即定已即大  休歇舍人求諸己不務外也兒子啼而聲  不乾无容心而不傷其和也掜者屈而不  可伸小兒乆握而无窒硋共其德猶云同  其性言人皆如此目不瞬者視而无心不  知所居所爲而與物同波此可爲衛生之  常道也   請入就舍願留而受業於門召好去惡   則不能忘情於善惡之間又不知所好   之果善所惡之果不善耶自愁一本作   息愁又作愁息說俱未通審詳經意猶   書云自怨自艾之義退處旬日怨艾日   前爲學不力見道不明今雖遇聖師卒   難陶鑄至於洗心復見可謂有志而能   自新矣老子謂汝洗濯孰哉古同孰鬰   鬰乎勇進於子充乎顔貌然其中津津   形見於外猶有未除之惡此又勉進向   上一歩而成其自新之志也内韄即六   根之盤固外韄即六塵之染著楗則關   閉防閑以嚴其界限之意諸解多從捉   爲讀疑獨從繁從繆絶句亦有理内外   二韄人之通患在中有主者善持之則   情不流而性可復心不撓而道可進矣
Interpretation

People of this kind can find no starting point for self-cultivation, either within themselves or in the world around them. They cannot even hold fast to the principles of settling themselves and establishing De, so how could they act in accord with the patterns of nature? Chen Chu is deeply confused: he wants to hear the Great Dao but does not know what ails him. Even when he accepts instruction, he only grows more bewildered, like someone whose illness worsens after taking medicine.

Now I dare no longer seek to hear the Great Dao. I only hope to hear about the art of nourishing life. “Embracing the One” means preserving one’s true nature and not letting it be lost. What is received from nature is inherently free from loss. There is no need to consult divination to judge good or ill fortune: with a mind wholly sincere, one can foresee how things will change. To become still is to settle oneself; once settled, one can rest fully. Give up seeking outwardly and turn to work on yourself, without relentlessly pursuing external things.

When an infant cries, its voice does not grow hoarse. Its mind is free of clever schemes, so it does not damage its inner harmony. When an infant makes a fist, its fingers curl and are not easily straightened; yet holding the fist for a long time does not harm the body. This is because the infant moves in accord with its nature. To be “the same as its De” means to be in harmony with one’s original nature. If people could all be like this, they would look at things without fixing their gaze or making distinctions and calculations. Unaware of where they are or what they are doing, they would respond naturally to the changes in things around them. This is the constant way of nourishing life.

Chen Chu asked to enter the room and stay to study as a disciple. Zhuangzi pointed out that although he wanted to abandon evil and follow good, he was still unable to free himself from his attachment to the distinction between good and evil. Nor was he necessarily clear about whether the good he recognized was truly good, or the evil he despised truly evil. Commentators interpret the phrase “zi chou” in different ways; some also read it as “zi xi” or “chou xi,” though none makes the passage’s meaning entirely clear. In context, it seems to mean blaming and correcting oneself, as in the phrase “reproach and reform oneself” from the Book of Documents.

Chen Chu withdrew for ten days to reflect. He reproached himself for having studied without sufficient effort and for having understood the Dao too poorly. Now, though he had met a sage teacher, he found it hard to be transformed by the teaching at once. He resolved to cleanse his heart and reveal his original nature anew, which may be called a resolve to renew himself. Laozi said, “How thoroughly you have washed yourself!” In the ancient sense, “shu” meant “mature” or “deep.” Chen Chu was eager to advance, and his bearing seemed full and vigorous; yet deep within, traces of habits he had not fully cast off could still be seen. He therefore needed to make one further effort to fulfill his resolve to renew himself.

“Inner fettering” refers to the six faculties—the eyes, ears, nose, tongue, body, and mind—being bound by attachments within. “Outer fettering” refers to the contamination that comes from the six objects of perception: forms, sounds, odors, tastes, touch, and mental objects. “Jian” means to close off or guard against something: to keep firm boundaries and prevent inner and outer forces from pulling at the spirit. Interpretations differ: some read the relevant characters as “grasp,” and the punctuation also varies. Here, the passage is understood in terms of two kinds of fettering, inner and outer. Such constraints are afflictions everyone encounters. If one can establish an inner sovereign and guard it well, desires will not run rampant, one’s nature may return, and the spirit will remain undisturbed. In this way, one can gradually advance in the Dao.

  趎猶未悟引里人有病猶能言己有病   而不能毉恐不可以進大道願聞衛生   之經而已能抱一則心不二不務得則   必无失无卜筮知吉凶垢去而心鑑明   也知至則能止造忘則能已舍人求己   内足而不假乎物也能兒子乎此誠切   喻使人皆可以求諸己而復乎本來之   天其嘷握視之所以異於成人者内韞   沖和而无心於外故也衛生之經何以   加此 南榮趎曰然則是至人之德已乎曰非也是 乃所謂冰解凍釋者夫至人者相與交食乎 地交樂乎天不以人物利害相攖不相與爲 怪不相與爲謀不相與爲事翛然而往侗然 而來是謂衛生之經已曰然則是至乎曰未 也吾固告汝曰能兒子乎兒子動不知所爲 行不知所之身若槁木之枝而心若死灰若 是者禍亦不至福亦不來禍福无有惡有人 灾也  郭註若能自改而用此言便欲自謂至人  之德冰解凍釋明非自爾至人无心皆與  物共不以利害相攖也趎謂己便可得此  言而至耶答云非謂此言爲不至但能聞  而學者非自至耳苟不自至則雖聞至言  適可以爲經胡可以爲至哉故學者不至  至者不學也禍福生於得失人灾由於愛  惡今槁木死灰无情之至憂患得失何自  而來  吕註人心湛然如水知識結硋而不能虚  猶水凍而爲冰知衛生之經冰解而凍釋
Interpretation

Nanrong Chu still did not understand. “It is like someone in the village who falls ill. Though he knows he is sick, he cannot cure himself. I worry that this is still not enough to cultivate the Great Dao. Please tell me the essentials of nourishing life.”

The reply came: “If you can hold fast to the One—concentrating your attention without letting your mind and spirit scatter—your mind will have no second thought. If you do not crave gain, you will have nothing to lose. Then there will be no need to divine good or ill fortune in advance. Once the mind’s dust is cleared away, its mirror will naturally become bright. When you recognize the Great Dao, you will also know when to stop. Forget contrivance and artifice, and you will cease acting recklessly. Give up seeking outside yourself and turn inward to seek within; when you are inwardly full, you will not depend on external things. To be like an infant is the closest comparison. It tells us that everyone can seek within and return to their original nature. An infant cries, clenches its fists, and looks at things differently from an adult because it contains an inner breath of harmony, yet has no deliberate intent toward external things. What could surpass this as the essential way to nourish life?”

Nanrong Chu said, “Then is this the Virtue of the Perfected Person, one who has reached the highest state?”

The reply came: “Not yet. This is merely what is called ice melting and frost thawing. The Perfected Person takes sustenance from the earth together with all things and shares in the joy of Heaven and Earth. He does not let relations of benefit and harm between people and things disturb one another, nor do they proclaim their strangeness, scheme, calculate, or act with deliberate intent. He goes freely and returns in utter simplicity. This is what is called the essential way to nourish life.”

Nanrong Chu said, “Then has one reached the highest state?”

The reply came: “Not yet. I told you before that you must be like an infant. When an infant moves, it does not know what it is doing; when it walks, it does not know where it is going. Its body is like a withered branch, its mind like ashes that have burned out completely. In such a state, calamity does not descend, and blessings do not arrive by design. When neither misfortune nor good fortune can arise, where could disaster come from?”

Guo Xiang’s commentary: If someone hears these words and then tries to remake himself into this state, believing that he already possesses the Virtue of the Perfected Person, that is like ice melting and frost thawing: it shows that this state has not been reached naturally. The Perfected Person has no deliberate mind and lives together with all things, without letting relations of benefit and harm disturb one another. Does Nanrong Chu think that, merely by believing he has understood these words, he can reach this state? The answer is no. It is not that these words are not lofty enough; rather, merely hearing and learning them cannot bring one to the state naturally. Without truly reaching it oneself, even if one hears the highest truth, one can only treat it as a rule for cultivation. How can one claim to have reached the highest state? Thus, the learner has not yet arrived; one who has truly arrived no longer relies on learning to attain it. Good and ill fortune arise from gain and loss, and people’s troubles arise from love and hatred. When the body is like withered wood and the mind like dead ashes, there are no feelings; where, then, could worry, loss, or gain arise?

Lü’s commentary: The human mind should be clear and still. When blocked by knowledge and fixed views, it cannot remain empty and tranquil, just as water cannot when it freezes. To understand the essential way to nourish life is to be like ice melting and frost thawing…

 矣至人心常如水故德不脩而物不能離  交食交樂而不以利害相攖也不與爲怪  故世俗所不能異不與爲謀故世俗所不  能同无係无硋又何能抱一能勿失翛然  侗然之足問乎此至人所以爲衛生之常  而非其至所謂至者亦止於所不知耳兒  子之不知所之所爲而若槁木死灰者是  也禍福生於有身有心天地鬼神之所司  也人能身槁心灰安得而累之哉  疑獨註趎聞衛生之經便以爲至人之德  止於此矣冰解凍釋喻人爲物欲所蔽聞  道則釋然也至人者仁足以安土故受於  地者不擇而食之知足以事天故受於天  者不辭而樂之不以我敵人不以己徇物  則利害不足以攖其心矣不爲怪以尚奇  則能常其德不爲謀以任知則能守以仁  不爲事以好動則能鎮以靜翛然侗然去  來无累此至人之德也趎又問然則是至  乎老子復舉前話人能如兒子之槁形灰  心何禍福之能及哉  碧虚註趎以此爲至人之德是見彈而求  炙也故鍼藥去病言教解惑皆非至至者  至人脩德以調陰陽庶人竭力以事稼穡  交食所以養形交樂所以和性人和物阜  誠心无攖利害兩忘任常不怪空有无係  恣其遊適是衛生之經已理至則忘言也  夫欲至極者必先反淳朴淳朴如嬰兒爲  道之捷徑若以言爲至猶咀糟粕而求醇  液之美也
Interpretation

The Perfected Person, one who has reached the highest state of the Dao, keeps a heart as calm as water. They do not deliberately embellish their De, and external things do not leave them.

They eat and rejoice alongside other people, yet do not let gains and losses disturb their heart. They do not regard things as strange or scheme with others to compete. Thus they neither vie with ordinary people to be extraordinary nor form factions with them to pursue their plans. Their heart has no attachments or obstructions. They hold to the Dao without losing it, while remaining free, unobstructed, and simple in their wholeness. The Perfected Person is at ease and self-sufficient in this way. What more is there to ask? This is the ordinary way in which the Perfected Person nourishes life. Yet it is not the highest state. The highest state means no longer clinging to what one does not know. Like an infant, one does not know where one is going and makes no deliberate effort to accomplish anything. The body is like a withered tree, and the heart like dead ashes: this is the state in question. Calamity and good fortune arise from the human body and its desires, and are also governed by Heaven and Earth, and by spirits and gods. If a person’s body is like a withered tree and the heart within is like dead ashes, how could calamity or good fortune entangle them?

Commentary by Yidu: Chu heard the teaching on nourishing life and assumed that the Perfected Person’s De amounted to no more than this. The melting of snow and ice, and the thawing of frozen earth, are metaphors for a person blinded by material desires who suddenly becomes clear upon hearing the Dao. The Perfected Person is benevolent enough to dwell peacefully in the world, so they are not choosy about the food Earth provides. Their wisdom is sufficient to follow the course of Heaven, so they refuse nothing Heaven gives and accept it calmly. They do not set themselves against others or let external things subdue them, so gains and losses cannot disturb their heart. They do not prize the unusual, and so keep their De within the ordinary. They do not rely on schemes to display their cleverness, and so preserve their benevolence. They are not eager to act, and so steady themselves through stillness. Free and simple, they come and go without entanglement. This is the De of the Perfected Person.

Chu asked again, “Then is this the highest state?” Laozi once more brought up what he had said earlier: if a person’s body can be like a withered tree and the heart within still, how could calamity or good fortune affect them?

Commentary by Bixu: Chu took these qualities to be the Perfected Person’s highest De, like seeing a slingshot and rushing to look for roast meat. Treating illness with needles and medicines, or dispelling confusion through verbal instruction, still falls short of the highest state. The Perfected Person cultivates De to harmonize Yin-Yang; ordinary people, meanwhile, devote themselves to farming. Eating together nourishes the body, and rejoicing together harmonizes the heart and nature. Each person and thing finds its proper place, the heart is free of contention and disturbance, gains and losses are both forgotten, and one follows the ordinary course without treating the unusual as strange. With no attachment to either being or nonbeing, one can roam freely and at ease. These are only the ordinary ways of nourishing life. At a higher state, even words can be forgotten.

To reach the highest state, one must first return to simplicity. Simplicity like that of an infant is a shortcut to the Dao. To treat verbal explanations as the highest state is like chewing wine dregs in search of the flavor of fine wine.

 鬳齋口義趎問衛生之經求其次者聞老  子所言高妙又有至人之德之問老子曰  非也恐其住著於此故示以冰解凍釋脫  灑自悟之意交食乎地與人同也交樂乎  天與天同也不與物相攖爲怪而无謀度  事事之迹是衛生之經已上言夫至人者  此曰衛生之經衛生之經即至人事以此  見得非也二字不是實語趎又問然則是  至乎老子曰未也則當别有話頭却又再  舉前文盖不欲與之盡言使之自悟耳   列子載陳大夫聘魯稱吾國有亢倉子   者得老聃之道魯侯使上卿厚禮而致   之則知庚桑之道與老子无異故其推   仁愛物善誘樂育之心唯恐其不至也   是篇首庚桑子曰凡四南榮趎問者三   洎趎往見老子老子曰者八其諄諄誨   導不忍棄人於失道之域盖可見矣夫   眞性如水虚明澄湛非有非无及爲物   欲蔽結如水凍而成冰水至清而結冰   不清神至靈而結形不靈聞道悟理則   冰解冰釋清靈何損焉人患弗反求耳   交食乎地耕鑿共給也交食乎天均陶   太和也若然則人物利害何由及怪行   謀爲何所用往來安得而不適生經安   得而不銜學道造此因已至矣而猶曰   未也違詰其至又復引兒子之辭以告   此師家作略轉换人耳目處分明兩手   分付要人力量承當盖人之性質本柔   日與物接客氣乗之相刃相靡皆吾敵
Interpretation

In the Kouyi commentary by Yanzhai, Nanrong Chu (a personal name) asks about the art of nourishing life and seeks an account of a lesser degree. He has heard that the teachings Laozi expounds are profound and mysterious, and that Laozi has also spoken of the “Perfected Person”—someone who has cultivated to an exceptionally high level—so he asks Laozi for guidance. Laozi replies, “No.” Fearing that Nanrong Chu will become attached to such lofty teachings, he uses the image of “ice melting and frost thawing” to explain: when attachment dissolves, the mind becomes free and open, and one can come to understanding for oneself.

“By joining with the earth and taking its food, one becomes like the people of the earth; by joining with Heaven and taking delight, one becomes like Heaven. One does not come into conflict with external things, treat the strange as extraordinary, scheme and calculate, or leave traces of human contrivance behind—this is the art of nourishing life.” The earlier passage speaks of the Perfected Person; this one speaks of nourishing life. The art of nourishing life is simply the way the Perfected Person acts. From this, we can see that when Laozi says “No,” he is not truly denying the teaching Nanrong Chu has asked about.

Nanrong Chu asks again, “Then is this the highest state?” Laozi replies, “Not yet.” One might expect Laozi to offer a different teaching at this point. Instead, he repeats what he has already said, perhaps because he does not want to explain everything outright and hopes Nanrong Chu will understand for himself.

The Liezi records that when Minister Chen went as an envoy to Lu, he said, “In our state there is a man named Kangcangzi who has attained the Dao of Lao Dan.” The ruler of Lu then sent a high minister, bearing generous gifts, to invite him. From this we can see that Gengsangzi’s Dao is no different from Laozi’s. Thus Gengsangzi puts benevolence into practice, cares for all things, and is skilled at guiding and nurturing others, always fearing that his efforts may fall short.

At the beginning of this chapter, Gengsangzi speaks four times; Nanrong Chu asks three questions; later, when Nanrong Chu goes to see Laozi, Laozi speaks eight times to instruct him. His repeated, earnest guidance shows how unwilling he is to let anyone remain trapped in a state of having lost the Dao.

A person’s true nature is like water: empty and still, clear and pure. It cannot be said to exist, nor can it be said not to exist. Later, obscured and congealed by material desires, it becomes like water turning to ice. Water is clear by nature, but once frozen it is no longer clear. The spirit is originally numinous and bright, but after congealing into bodily form it is no longer so. To hear the teachings and understand the Dao within them is like ice melting and snow thawing; one’s clear, luminous nature has not been harmed. What should concern people is their unwillingness to turn back and seek their original nature.

To join with the earth and take its food means to cultivate and reclaim the land and provide for oneself. To join with Heaven and take one’s food means to share in the harmonious Qi of Heaven and Earth. If one can live this way, how could there be conflicts of interest between people and other things? Why make a fuss over strange behavior or spend one’s energy scheming? How could one’s actions and dealings fail to be free and at ease? How could the art of nourishing life be obstructed? To study the Dao and reach this state is already a great achievement, yet Laozi still says, “Not yet.” When Nanrong Chu presses him about the highest state, Laozi answers by quoting a child’s words. This is how a teacher guides a student: he shifts the direction of the conversation to offer a fresh perspective, then places the key in the student’s hands, to see whether the student can take it up and understand.

Human nature is originally gentle, but through daily contact with external things, outside habits enter wherever they find an opening. People and things clash and wear one another down, until everything becomes our adversary.

  矣信能專氣致柔而至於還淳復朴粹   如嬰兒又何禍福之能及飜覆答問至   此辭窮理盡亦无所施力矣奈何趎之   載道力微卒无領會一語惜哉 南華眞
Interpretation

If one can truly focus on cultivating Qi (vital energy), become gentle, and go further by returning to simplicity and purity, recovering a state like that of an infant, then what misfortune or good fortune could affect them? The repeated debate has now exhausted its words and fully explained its reasoning; there is nothing more to be done. Sadly, the Dao that Ruan Chu conveyed was not profound enough, and in the end he failed to grasp even a single phrase of it.

經義海纂微卷之七十一

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0127); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 68 Vol. 70 →