中文 · EN

《南華真經義海纂微》Vol. 79

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 79 / 104 5,818 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經義海纂微》 Vol. 79 (Dongshen 洞神部, 104 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 11 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經義海纂微》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經義海纂微卷之八十一空六     武林道士褚伯秀學    徐無鬼第七 古之眞人以天待之不以人入天古之眞人 得之也生失之也死得之也死失之也生藥 也其實堇也桔梗也雞壅也豕零也是時爲 帝者也何可勝言句踐也以甲楯三千棲於 會稽唯種也能知亡之所以存唯種也不知 其身之所以愁故曰䲭目有所適鶴脛有所 節解之也悲故曰風之過河也有損焉日之 過河也有損焉請只風與日相與守河而河 以爲未始其攖也恃源而往者也故水之守 土也審影之守人也審物之守物也審故目 之於明也殆耳之於聰也殆心之於殉也殆 凡能其於府也殆殆之成也不給改禍之長 也兹萃其反也縁功其果也待乆而人以爲 己寳不亦悲乎故有亡國戮民無已不知問 是也  郭註居事而待事事斯得以有事求無事  事愈荒死生得失各隨其所居耳於生爲  得於死或以爲失故當所需則無賤非其  時則無貴各適一時之用不能摩所不可  則有時而失有時而悲矣夫有形者自然  相與爲累唯外乎形者磨之而不磷猶風  日過河實已損而不自覺恃源以往也無  意則止乎分所以爲審有意則無涯故殆  所以貴其無能任其天然苟不能忘知禍  長多端反守其性則其功不爲而成矣欲  速則不果己寳謂知能故亡戮之禍皆有
Interpretation

The perfected people of antiquity—those who followed nature and reached a state of true reality—conducted themselves according to the Dao of nature, without imposing human preconceptions on it.

To obtain it is life; to lose it is death. Sometimes obtaining it means death, while losing it means life. Medicinal plants are the same: some roots and stems taste bitter; herbs such as balloonflower root, gorgon fruit sprouts, and polyporus each serve different purposes. A herb’s value depends on whether it suits the needs of the moment. Those who govern a state are no different. How could their methods be the same in every case?

King Goujian of Yue once led three thousand armored soldiers into retreat at Kuaiji. Only Wen Zhong knew how the state could rise from ruin and survive, yet he did not know why he himself was troubled, and in the end he could not save himself. Thus an owl’s eyes are suited to life at night, and a crane’s legs have their proper length. To forcibly take them apart and alter them only brings sorrow.

When wind passes over a river, it does indeed carry some things away; when the sun shines on it, something is also lost. Yet if wind and sun remained over the river, the river would feel that it had never been disturbed, because wind and sun come by virtue of their source and give the matter no thought. Water and land coexist, each with its distinct place; a shadow follows a person, each keeping its own bounds. Things should relate to one another in the same way.

Eyes that ceaselessly strive to see clearly grow tired; ears that ceaselessly strive to hear keenly grow tired; a heart that ceaselessly chases external things grows tired too. Any capacity, when exercised to its limit, can bring danger. As danger accumulates, it becomes impossible to cope; as troubles keep growing, they gather into disaster. If instead one holds to one’s nature, results will arise of themselves. After waiting a long time, people come to treat knowledge and ability as their own treasures. Is this not sad? That is why states fall and people are slaughtered, yet the killing does not stop: people do not understand that they must ask after the reasons behind it.

Guo Xiang’s commentary: Be content with the circumstances in which you find yourself and follow the course of events; things will then come to a proper conclusion of their own accord. If you try to attain Wuwei through deliberate intention, you will only make things more disordered. Life and death, gain and loss, differ according to circumstances: what counts as gain for the living may count as loss for the dead. When something is needed, nothing is lowly; when the time is wrong, nothing is noble. Each thing has its use at a particular time. If you forcibly alter what cannot be altered, disappointment and sorrow will follow.

Things with form cannot avoid burdening one another. Only those who have transcended the constraints of form can be like wind and sun: though they pass over the river and something is lost, they do not cling to this or even notice it. To act in reliance on the source, without deliberate intent, is to stop at what is fitting. Once you pursue something deliberately, there is no end to it, and so exhaustion follows. What matters is not showing off one’s abilities, but letting one’s nature operate freely. If you cannot forget cleverness and knowledge, troubles will follow one after another. Hold to your nature instead, and results will take shape without being forced; in your haste to succeed, you will only make success harder to attain. In Guo Xiang’s commentary, “making oneself a treasure” means treating knowledge and ability as prized possessions. The calamities of losing a state and slaughtering its people are both connected to this.

 其身之過不知問禍之由乎有心而脩心  以救禍也  吕註以天待之則無爲而應感不以人入  天雖爲而未嘗爲眞人不知有死生有時  曰得之也生失之也死萬物不得無以生  是也此爲輕生者而言有時曰得之也死  失之也生以生爲喪以死爲反是也此爲  惡死者而言猶藥之或甘或毒時烏帝而  不常其餘臣佐而已以生烏得死爲失則  輕生者之藥也以生爲喪死爲反則惡死  者之藥也視彼病而投之其變何可勝言  大夫種知亡越之可以存而不知身之所  以愁猶鴟目能夜不能晝所適不可移鶴  脛能長不能短有節不可解解之也係於  有形而不知其源也風日之過河非不損  而河以爲未始攖恃源而不竭也通道者  與物無不適亦有源而已水之於土蟲穴  蟻隙無不至影之於人坐起行止無不從  則無情而守之審者耳之於聽目之於視  心之於思未嘗須臾不在則物守物而審  者其聰明心志非若水與影之無情故不  能不殆凡能其於府也殆府五藏殆謂安  其所不安不給改則禍滋萃夫惟迷非一  日故其反也縁功其果也待乆上士所以  損之又損者以殆之不可成也而世人以  爲己寳不亦悲乎  疑獨註以天待人誠而明也以人入天明  而誠也無得失無生死此所以謂之玄堇  烏喙雞壅芡也皆藥之至賤者時能療病
Interpretation

If you do not understand your own faults, how can you ask where calamities come from? A person who deliberately sets out to cultivate the mind does so only in the hope of dispelling calamities.

Lü’s commentary (by Lü Huiqing) says: Treat human affairs with the attitude of the Dao, and you can respond naturally to what comes from outside. Bring human contrivance to bear on the Dao, and you become constrained. Even when Heaven acts, it does not do so deliberately; this is the state of the “True Person.” The True Person does not regard life and death as fixed and unchanging. Sometimes one says, “To gain life is gain; to lose life is death,” to console those who make light of life. At other times one says, “To gain life is loss; to lose life is gain,” treating life as a departure and death as a return, to console those who dread death. This is like using medicine to treat an illness: some medicines are sweet, others poisonous, and which one takes the leading role is not fixed; the rest serve as supporting remedies. Treating life as gain and death as loss is a remedy for those who take life lightly. Treating life as a departure and death as a return is a remedy for those who fear death. If you judge the patient’s condition accurately before treating it, how could there be only one way to change things?

Wen Zhong, a minister of Yue during the Spring and Autumn period, knew how to preserve the kingdom of Yue from ruin, yet did not know how to free himself from trouble. He was like an owl that sees clearly at night but not by day: the conditions to which it can adapt cannot be changed. A crane’s legs can be long but not short, and its natural joints cannot be taken apart. These are all limits imposed by physical form, yet people do not understand their source.

Wind and sunlight pass over a river’s surface, and though they draw something away, the river seems undiminished because it has a source and cannot run dry. Those who understand the Great Dao can adapt to whatever they encounter for the same reason: they have a source. Water flows into the earth and reaches everywhere, whether into a wormhole or an ant’s nest. A person’s shadow follows wherever the person sits, lies down, or walks. The shadow has no feelings or awareness; it simply stays where it belongs, and so can follow without fail. Hearing, sight, and thought, by contrast, are ceaselessly active. The human mind is aware and attached to external things, distinguishing among them. It cannot be free of intention like water and shadow, and so inevitably grows weary.

Whenever one’s capacities are brought to bear on the internal organs, the organs grow weary. “The organs grow weary” means becoming accustomed to a state in which one cannot be at ease, while failing to change it in time; calamities then gradually gather. A person’s loss of the Way does not happen in a single day, so returning to one’s original nature also requires steady, accumulated effort, and the result takes a long time to arrive. The highest kind of person keeps reducing because weariness and peril cannot be dispelled by a moment’s effort. Yet people of the world regard these things as treasures. How sad!

The Yidu commentary (by Yiduzi) says: To treat human affairs with the Dao is to be sincere and then illumined; to bring a contriving mind to bear on the Dao is to be illumined and then sincere. Having no distinctions between gain and loss, life and death, is what is called the Mysterious. Monkshood, crow’s beak, cockscomb, and fox nuts are all inexpensive medicinal ingredients, yet at times they can cure illness.

 遞爲君臣得失窮通無異於此世人妄計  賤彼貴我豈知用舍在時而已昔越王句  踐棲兵會稽大夫種能知亡之可再存而  不知身之將死猶鴟目晝暗而夜明鶴脛  能長不能短各適一時之利解去其適則  悲有所徇者不免乎一偏也夫陰陽有氣  萬物有形氣妙而形粗氣摩其形形必有  損風日陰陽之氣河水有形者也風日過  河河水必損而不自覺雖相與守之而河  無所攖拂者有源可恃也喻人處陰陽之  中日有所損恃有命存焉水之於土影之  於形物之於物皆無心而守之故其守也  審雖審而不逃造化之密移昨日之物今  已化矣而昩者不知故耳目心之於徇皆  不免於危殆也凡能出於府藏則爲所役  必至危殆既成而欲速改不暇給矣是以  禍生滋甚若反本復性則順而有功欲其  事果其待必乆而世人乃以多能爲己寳  此至人之所悲以至爭城爭地而殺無辜  之民不知問禍起之由故也  碧虚註以天待人任其自然不以人入天  偽難契眞也得之生失之死與物同也得  之死失之生與物異也萬物得時而榮失  時則悴眞人得時不榮失時不悴猶藥之  堇梗壅苓雖賤物而良醫主療時用之以  爲君喻眞人御世無時而不治也種能存  國不能活身喻醫療他疾不能治己病鴟  目鶴脛之有適不適喻種之才知而終不
Interpretation

The shifts in power between ruler and minister, and the changes between gaining and losing influence, hardship and success, are no different from the conditions of the world at large. Yet people recklessly make distinctions, belittling others and esteeming themselves. How could they know that whether someone can be put to use depends only on whether the time is right?

In the past, when King Goujian of Yue withdrew to Kuaiji, the minister Zhong (Wen Zhong) knew that Yue’s destruction might still be reversed and the state restored, but did not know that he himself was going to die. This is like the owl, whose sight is dim by day but clear at night, and like the crane’s legs, which can only grow longer, never shorter: each has strengths suited to a particular time. Once removed from the time and setting that suit them, they suffer. Those who fixate on one thing and insist on pursuing it are bound to see only one side.

The Qi of Yin-Yang is formless, while the myriad things have form. Qi is subtle; physical forms are coarse and visible. Qi acts upon physical forms without cease, and they must inevitably wear away. Wind and sunlight belong to the Qi of Yin-Yang, while a river is something with form. As wind and sunlight pass over the river, its water must inevitably diminish, though the river itself cannot perceive it. Wind and sunlight remain in the company of the river, yet do not visibly disturb it because it has a source to sustain it. This is like a person living amid the changes of Yin-Yang: each day brings loss, yet the person is sustained by the life force. Water depends on earth, a shadow depends on a body, and things depend on other things. They remain together without being aware of one another; it is precisely for this reason that their interdependence is so thorough.

Even such close interdependence cannot escape the quiet shifting of the transformations of nature. What existed yesterday has changed today, but the unenlightened do not notice. Thus, whenever the ears, eyes, and mind insist on pursuing something, they are bound to fall into danger. Anyone who applies their abilities to what the mind stores up and schemes over will be driven by those concerns and eventually brought to peril. Once danger has taken shape, it is too late to change course quickly, and calamities will only accumulate. If one can return to the root and recover one’s nature, one can accord with nature and achieve results; yet to bring matters to their full effect requires a long wait. People of the world, however, regard many talents and abilities as their own treasures. This is what saddens the realized person. That is why people fight over cities and lands and kill innocent people, without asking where their calamities truly began.

The Bixu commentary says: To treat human affairs according to the Dao of Heaven, letting things follow their own course and imposing no artificial contrivance upon the Dao of Heaven, is the way to accord readily with what is real. To gain it is to live; to lose it is to die—this is the same for all things. To gain it and thereby die, or to lose it and thereby live, is what sets one apart from all things. All things flourish when the time is right and wither when it is not. The True Person does not boast when the time is favorable, nor decline when it is not.

This is like the medicinal herbs jin, geng, yong, and ling. Though they are all humble plants, a skilled physician uses them according to the illness and the right moment, making them the principal medicines. The True Person who governs worldly affairs can likewise respond to each moment; nothing is out of season. Wen Zhong could preserve the state of Yue but not himself, just as a physician can cure others’ illnesses but not his own. The owl’s eyes and the crane’s legs each have times when they are useful and times when they are not. This is used to illustrate that, though Wen Zhong was wise and capable, in the end he could not… (The original text ends here, unfinished.)

 免禍風吹日曝河水耗减讒深佞入忠臣  失權所恃重者其攖拂亦不輕矣水離土  則散影離人則滅物去物則空人失道則  亡唯善審者幾乎全目徇離朱耳徇師曠  心徇曾史未有不危殆者反覆縁於功過  善惡之果目前未見耳世有恃功爲己寳  而禍不旋踵者大夫種是也  鬳齋口義不以有心預自然之理曰不以  人入天生死得失一聽自然生而曰得亦  可死而曰得亦可生而曰失亦可死而曰  失亦可如醫用藥主者爲帝其餘爲臣藥  雖同而用有輕重猶人在世得時則貴失  時則賤在我者初無二也大夫種爲越報  吴能於亡中求存可謂知矣而不知反以  殺身鴟目鶴脛又重引喻風日皆能損水  而河未始攖者其源長也故物雖損己而  我無所攖拂此五句自是一意水土相入  形影相依物之守物自然之理耳目心之  徇物皆非自然凡知出於胸府自以爲能  皆危殆也給猶及反訓覆因謀功之心必  致敗覆有待乆之謀其心固必而不化此  皆爲身之害而人人以此爲寳古今亡國  戮民無已者不知於此致問故也   以天待人其義灼然謂以天理爲主而   人事應之人入天者以人事爲主而天   理悖矣次古之眞人四字只應是故字   上文有此誤筆重出言或得此道而生   失此道而死理之常也或得此道而死
Interpretation

If a person can remain free from disaster, wind, sun, and even a gradual decline in the river’s waters will not harm them. The rise of slanderers and petty men, or the rejection of loyal ministers, will not damage them either. When a person loses power and position, the more heavily they relied on what they had, the harder the blow is likely to be. Water scatters when separated from earth; a shadow vanishes when separated from its form; people lose their support when parted from things. When people lose the Dao, they move toward ruin. Only those skilled at careful discernment may be able to preserve themselves.

Eyes that single-mindedly pursue Li Zhu, famed in legend for his exceptional sight; ears that single-mindedly pursue Shi Kuang, the ancient musician celebrated for his keen hearing; and minds that single-mindedly pursue Zeng Shen and Shi Qiu, known for their virtue—all may lead a person into peril. Affairs shift repeatedly, often in connection with the pursuit of fame and success or the weighing of faults. The consequences of good and evil simply have not yet appeared before us. Some people in the world rely on their achievements and treat their accomplishments as their own treasures, only to have disasters follow close behind. The minister Wen Zhong of Yue was one such person.

The commentary Kouyi from Yanzhai explains: Do not use deliberate intention to interfere with the natural order; that is, do not use human plans to control the Way of Heaven. Let life and death, gain and loss, follow their natural course. One may say that to live is to gain, and to die is also to gain; one may say that to live is to lose, and to die is also to lose. It is like a physician prescribing medicine: the principal remedy is like a ruler, and the other ingredients are like officials. Even when the ingredients are the same, their combination and dosage differ in importance. People, too, are like this in their dealings with the world: when their time is favorable, they become honored; when it is not, they become lowly. Yet their own nature has not changed.

Wen Zhong helped Yue avenge itself on Wu and found a way to preserve the state when it was on the brink of collapse; this may be called wisdom. But he did not understand when to withdraw, and so lost his life. The text also compares the owl’s eyes with the crane’s slender legs to show that every kind of thing has its own form and limits. Wind and sun both diminish water, yet they do not disturb a river whose source is abundant. Things may be depleted, but if their foundations are firm, outside forces cannot shake them. These statements all express the same principle.

Water depends on earth, and a form is accompanied by its shadow: this is the natural way things remain together. But for the eyes, ears, and mind to pursue external things single-mindedly is not the natural way. Any approach that prides itself on cleverness and keeps all its schemes hidden in the mind may bring danger. Here, the character “給” should be read as “及,” while “反” carries the sense of ruin or defeat: single-mindedly seeking achievement may instead bring failure; when planning for the long term, a will that refuses to bend can itself become a source of harm. Yet people often treat these things as treasures. From ancient times to the present, states have fallen and people have been slaughtered again and again. One reason is that people have failed to ask what lies behind it all.

“To treat people by means of Heaven” means taking the principles of Heaven as one’s foundation and then aligning human actions with them. If human action is made primary, it goes against those principles. The four characters “次古之真人” in the text, according to the commentators, should follow the character “故”; they may have been copied twice by mistake. The intended meaning is that some people live by following this principle, while others die by going against it—this is the natural order. There are also people who die by following this principle…

  失此道而生又出於人事之變如顔夭   跖壽之類譬藥中之烏喙豕零隨證施   用主治則爲君佐使則爲臣適當其時   非有常也種之工於謀國拙於全身猶   鴟目鶴脛各有所適强其所不能則悲   矣又喻風日過河不能無損損而不覺   恃其有源然則得失利害之攖心人能   無損乎欲補之者道爲之源凡事物之   來能不納於靈府則吾源壯矣事物之   起伏不啻蚊蝱之過前又何所攖拂哉   水之守土理相資而實無心影之守形   則所自出而不能相無者物之守物各   生其心雖相守之審而互生互尅或然   或流有若外物篇所云者則不能無殆   矣況以耳目心之徇爲能殆成而不   給改其禍長也固宜夫欲反歸本源當   致功於改過待乆而决成世人乃以聰   明心知爲己寳此眞人之所憫也亡國   戮民禍之大者其端實起於耳目心之   所殉貴在謹遏其源耳 故足之於地也踐雖踐恃其所不蹍而後善 博也人之知也少雖少恃其所不知而後知 天之所謂也知大一知大陰知大目知大均 知大方知大信知大定至矣大一通之大陰 解之大目視之大均縁之大方體之大信稽 之大定持之盡有天循有照㝠有樞始有彼 則其解之也似不解之者其知之也似不知 之者不知而後知之其問之也不可以有崖 而不可以無崖頡滑有實古今不代而不可
Interpretation

A person cannot walk steadily by setting their feet only on the ground; they also depend on the places they do not step. Likewise, though people know little, they can gain deeper understanding only by relying on what they do not know.

What is called “Heaven”—the natural Way—speaks of such levels as the Great One, the Great Yin, the Great Eye, the Great Equality, the Great Square, the Great Trust, and the Great Stability. The Great One brings all things into connection; the Great Yin dissolves all things; the Great Eye enables people to observe all things; the Great Equality lets each thing follow its own nature; the Great Square enables people to accord with the nature of things; the Great Trust enables people to examine things; and the Great Stability enables people to hold fast to the Way. If one puts all these principles fully into practice, one can follow the Way of Heaven, discern the subtle changes among all things, and grasp the pivot of change.

All things have this and that. So when we explain them, it can seem that we have explained them, yet also that we have not; when we understand them, it can seem that we understand them, yet also that we have not truly understood. Only by acknowledging what we do not know can we truly come to know. In investigating things, we should neither set fixed boundaries in advance nor refuse to distinguish boundaries altogether. The affairs of the world are intricate and ever changing, yet they have their own underlying truth. Though past and present do not replace one another, these truths endure and should not be lightly disregarded.

以虧則可不謂有大揚搉乎闔不亦問是已 奚惑然爲以不惑解惑復於不惑是尚大不 惑  郭註忘天地遺萬物然後蜩翼可得而知  況欲知天地之所謂可不無其心哉大一  即道也用其分内則萬事無滯用萬物之  自見大目也因其本性令各自得大均也  體之使各得本分則萬方俱得所以爲大  方命之所期無令越逸斯大信也眞不撓  則自定持以大定斯不持也物未有無自  然者循之則明無所作也至理有極但當  㝠之則得其樞要始有之者彼也故我迷  而不作解任彼則彼自解解之無功故似  不解用彼之知故似不知我不知則彼知  自用彼知自用則天下莫不皆知應物㝠  而無方各以其分萬物雖頡滑不同而物  物各自有實不可相代搉而揚之有大限  也若問其大榷則物有至分故忘己任物  之理可得而知奚爲而惑若此也夫惑不  可解故尚大不惑愚之至也聖人從而任  之所以皇王殊迹隨世爲名也  吕註足所踐者少恃其所不踐而後善博  所謂知無用而後可以言用人之知也少  恃其所不知而後知天之所謂則大一太  陰以至大定從可知矣爲道者主之以大  一則無所不通入窈㝠之門至至陰之原  則亦至於至陽之原矣物負陰而抱陽所  以係而不能解不知有至陰之原故也目
Interpretation

To look only at the ground one has already walked over is to see very little. Only by learning to rely on what one has not yet walked over can one speak of breadth of understanding. As the saying goes, only by understanding what is “useless” can one speak of what is useful. Human intelligence can grasp only a limited part of things. One must rely less on what one does not know in order to understand the principles of the Dao of Heaven. In this way, one can gradually understand the stages from the “Great One” (the unified state at the source of all things), through the “Great Yin,” and onward to the “Great Stability.” Those who cultivate the Dao take the “Great One” as their foundation and so move freely without obstruction. They enter the deep and mysterious realm and reach the source of the Utmost Yin; from there, they can also reach the source of the Utmost Yang. All things turn their backs on Yin and face Yang, and are therefore bound together in ways that make them difficult to separate. This is because people do not understand that there is also a source of the Utmost Yin.

Guo Xiang’s commentary says: Only after forgetting Heaven and Earth and putting all things out of mind can one recognize something as minute as a cicada’s wing. How much more, then, must the mind become empty and still to understand what Heaven and Earth truly are? The “Great One” is the Dao. When each thing is allowed to act according to its own proper nature, nothing is obstructed. Letting all things reveal their own nature is the “Great Vision,” a broad way of seeing. Following the nature things already possess and letting each rest at ease is the “Great Equitability,” an arrangement that is broad and impartial. Observing all things and letting each take its proper place allows every quarter to find what suits it; this is the “Great Square.” Letting life follow the limits of what it can attain, without allowing it to overstep and run wild, is the “Great Trust.” When one’s true nature is undisturbed, it settles of its own accord. To hold fast to the “Great Stability” is to do so without deliberately holding fast. Nothing among the myriad things fails to arise from nature. Follow nature in observing them, and understanding will come; there is no need to impose another arrangement.

The highest principle has its own ultimate point. Grasp its pivot by quietly attuning oneself to it. What first brings all things into being is “the other”—the natural transformations of things themselves. So if “I” am confused and do not force an explanation, but simply let things be as they are, they will reveal themselves naturally. Explanation accomplishes nothing, and so it can seem as though nothing has been explained. Using the wisdom inherent in all things can seem like not knowing. If I do not presume to be clever, the wisdom of all things can unfold on its own. As each thing exercises its own wisdom, everything under Heaven can fully realize what it knows. In responding to all things, keep the mind and spirit quiet and free of fixed methods, allowing each thing to remain within its proper bounds. Though the myriad things differ in countless ways, each has its own true nature, and none can take the place of another. Weighing and distinguishing them reveals that each has its limits. If we investigate their overall boundaries, we will understand that each thing has its own fitting place. From this we can also understand how to forget ourselves and follow the principle of things. Why be so confused?

Confusion cannot be dispelled by forcing an explanation. To honor “Great Freedom from Confusion” as the highest state is, in fact, the height of folly. The sage follows things as they are. Thus the deeds of emperors through the ages have differed, and their titles have changed with the times.

 視有限不視以目則無不見縁其一未有  能均和以是非任其兩行縁以大均也無  南無北無東無西體以大方也其精甚眞  其中有信稽以大信也澤焚不熱河沍不  寒雷破山風震海而不驚持以大定也盡  有天則止乎知之所不知循有照則雖不  知而無所不知㝠有樞則彼是莫得其偶  始有彼則所以應彼是者固無窮也其解  似不解言本無係故不解而後解其知似  不知以其本無知故不知而後知此至人  所以遊乎世俗之間若愚若拙也問以有  崖無崖皆爲有係崖謂自邊徼而求之然  亦不可求之於有無之間也頡不可係滑  不可持若無物而有實也往古來今若不  相代而不可虧也能以是問之可不謂有  大揚榷乎揚謂發其幽榷謂劾其實彼不  問是則我不能以是告之唯能見其未始  有物則不惑以是解其有物之惑而猶存  未始有物者亦惑而已唯解之而復於不  惑庶幾大不惑也  疑獨註此言無用之爲有用不知之爲能  知也明矣大一謂天大陰謂地大目者天  無不見大均者地無不載大方生萬物而  悉備大信應萬物而不期大定鎮萬物而  不動夫知始於知終於養之以不知而所  知至於如此之妙故曰至矣一係乎數貴  乎通之陰主乎凝貴乎解之大目無意於  見物物來而視之大均無意於順物物至
Interpretation

Human vision has its limits, yet one who does not rely on the eyes to see has nothing that remains unseen, because he follows the common source of all things. He can reconcile right and wrong and regard them equally, allowing both to proceed side by side, because he follows the greatest balance. He makes no distinction between north and south, east and west, because his heart is as vast as Heaven and Earth and can contain all things.

His vital essence is pure, and within him lies a trustworthy foundation; this is because he possesses the greatest sincerity. Great fires can spread across lakes and marshes without making him feel hot; great rivers can freeze over without making him feel cold. Thunder and lightning may split mountains, and violent winds may churn the sea, yet he remains undisturbed. This is because he possesses the greatest steadfastness.

So long as there is a Way of Heaven to follow, one should stop at the bounds of what one can know and not insist on knowing what is unknowable by nature. By observing in accordance with what is already understood, one can respond without hindrance even when some things remain unclear. When the mind is deep and has its own pivot, it does not treat “that” and “this” as opposing poles. Once there is “that,” the principles for responding to the relation between that and this are boundless.

His resolution of things appears to be no resolution at all because nothing binds his mind. Precisely because he does not cling to answers, he can pass through freely. His wisdom appears to be ignorance because he does not take his own preconceptions as authoritative. Precisely because he does not presume to know, he can truly understand. This is why the Perfected Person—the Daoist term for one who has attained the Dao—seems dull and awkward while moving among ordinary people.

Someone asked: Whether there are boundaries or none, does either still involve attachment? “Boundaries” here means seeking an answer at the limits; yet one cannot simply turn around and look for it between “being” and “nonbeing.” What is lofty cannot be tethered; what slips away cannot be grasped. It seems to be nothing, yet has real existence. From antiquity to the present, things have seemingly never replaced one another, yet they have never been depleted.

To ask in this way—is that not to pose a great question? “Yang” means bringing what is hidden to light; “que” means examining the facts of a matter. If the other person had not asked, I would have had nothing on which to base my reply. Only by seeing that the myriad things have never begun to exist can one avoid confusion. But if one uses this to explain the confusion caused by the existence of the myriad things while clinging to the idea that they never existed, one remains confused. Only after dispelling confusion and returning to a state free of confusion can one hope to reach the greatest understanding.

Yidu’s commentary holds that this passage explains how what seems useless may prove useful, and what seems like not knowing may be true knowledge. Here, “Great Unity” refers to Heaven, “Great Yin” to Earth, “Great Vision” to seeing all things, and “Great Balance” to carrying all things. “Great Form” gives rise to the myriad things and enables each to be fully formed; “Great Trust” responds to the myriad things without making prior agreements; “Great Stability” steadies the myriad things without wavering. Human understanding begins with what is known, but must ultimately be nourished by “not knowing”; only then can what is known reach subtle perfection. When the mind is attached to something, what matters is to become unobstructed; when Yin energy stagnates, what matters is to transform it. “Great Vision” does not deliberately search for things; it sees them when they come before it. “Great Balance” does not deliberately accommodate the myriad things; it can carry them when they arrive.

 而縁之大方嫌於無體故以易爲體大信  嫌於不考故稽之以道終之以造物持之  而巳天下萬物之理各有一天循理以觀  之則有光自㝠以觀之則有樞有始則有  彼無始未有物無彼亦無我也解似不解  知似不知凡論至其極者皆疑之以不知  而後知斯至矣問而有崖切問也問而無  崖泛問也切問可窮理未可以盡性泛問  可博知未可以反約故皆不可也滑稽多  不實而或有實焉古今相代而理實無代  能盡其理故曰不虧如上所陳可不謂大  顯揚榷論乎事不可則已何惑而爲之夫  人之惑己以不惑解之彼雖復於不惑而  解惑者尚大惑也此莊子遣言之意  碧虚註地至廣大人之所踐容足而已恃  其不踐之處而後行之無窮道至微妙人  之所知可道而已賴其忘言之趣而後悟  之無盡故至人以無用無言爲天之所謂  也大一妙有知之者廓然通達大陰玄寂  知之者悗然蜕解大目天光昭然徹視大  均平一靡然縁順大方渾然無不體用大  信誠然無不稽考大定至靜默而持之所  以成上諸妙用也凡此七日皆有天然之  理順理則明寂然自運始即道對道者皆  彼也蜕然自解故似不解自然而知故似  不知知不知而後知之愈澄而愈照也道  不可以有崖求又不可以無崖求萬形參  差實理則一頡滑參差也古今不二生死
Interpretation

All things move according to the “Great Square”—the overall principle of the Great Dao. If we regard it as having no substance, it may seem to have nothing to rely on, so change is taken as its manifestation. If it seems not to have been examined, then it must be examined in accordance with the Dao and sustained through the workings of the Creator. All things under Heaven each have their own natural principles. Observe them by following those principles, and their manifest aspects will become visible; observe them from the depths of obscurity, and you will see their pivots and origins.

Once there is a beginning, there is also an opposing “other.” But if we inquire back to a time before any beginning, when the myriad things had not yet taken form, neither “this” nor “other” could be established, and there would be no “I.” To understand things this far is to seem to understand and yet not understand; to know this far is to seem to know and yet not know. When people encounter principles pursued to their furthest point, they often find them difficult to grasp. Only by recognizing what one does not know can one approach true knowledge.

Questions have bounds when they pursue a specific issue; without bounds, they are asked in general terms. A specific inquiry can investigate how things work, but may not exhaust human nature. A general inquiry can broaden one’s knowledge, but may not bring one back to the root. Each kind of questioning therefore has its limits. Witty, humorous words are often not very substantial, yet sometimes they hit upon the truth. Ancient and modern times continually alternate, while the principles themselves remain unchanged. One who understands how things work will suffer no loss. Can the ideas discussed above not be considered a thorough explanation and a balanced account? If something cannot be done, let it be; why should anyone be troubled and insist on doing it? If someone tries to dispel another person’s confusion by means of “freedom from confusion,” then even if the other person is no longer confused, the one who dispels the confusion may remain caught in an even deeper perplexity. This is what Zhuangzi intended to express through his words.

Bixuzi’s commentary says: The earth is vast beyond measure, yet a person can stand only on a patch large enough for one foot. It is precisely because we know there are countless places beyond the ground beneath us where we have never set foot that our journey has no end. The Dao is subtle beyond measure, while what people can say is only the portion that words can express. By relying on the meaning that remains after words are forgotten, one can continue to understand. Thus the Perfected Person takes uselessness and wordlessness as the state affirmed by the Way of Heaven.

The “Great One” is at once subtle and vast, containing all things. Those who understand it are open-hearted and unobstructed. The “Great Darkness” is deep and still; those who understand it find their minds at peace and are released as though shedding an outer shell. The “Great Eye” is like the radiance of Heaven, allowing people to see through things clearly. The “Great Equality” brings all things into equality and enables people to follow the course of events. The “Great Square” is a seamless whole that can contain everything. The “Great Trust” is true and reliable, so that nothing cannot be examined by it. The “Great Stillness” is utterly quiet and steadfast; it makes the various wondrous functions described above possible.

These seven states all embody natural principles. When one follows those principles, clarity and stillness operate on their own. In the beginning, the Dao appears; whatever stands in relation to the Dao as an object belongs to the “other.” All things naturally dissolve and transform, and so it seems as though they are not understood; they are naturally understood, and so it seems as though they are not known. First recognize that there is something you do not know, and only then can you truly know. The clearer the mind, the more clearly it sees.

In seeking the Dao, one must not cling either to boundedness or to boundlessness. The forms of the myriad things differ, yet their fundamental principle is one. Though they may seem tangled and confused, they still share an underlying order. Ancient and modern times do not follow two different principles, and life and death, too, belong to the same process of change.

 自殊理不可虧生死自具是有大發揚商  榷存乎其中何不問諸此道知道則此理  不惑矣大惑終身不解下愚上知莫移猶  鶴脛不可斷鳧脛不可續也禀生受氣盖  有由然唯識侔造化者默而知之若假世  學而欲復於不惑是大惑之人徒欽尚於  大不惑也  鬳齋口義人之踐地少所不踐者多喻人  所知無幾其所不知者皆天也不恃所知  而恃所不知可以知天矣大一造化之運  者大陰至靜也大目所見大均謂分劑大  方與大虚同體大信眞實之理大定總持  萬物者也無物之始必有物以始之齊物  論云非彼無我即此彼字謂造化也曰天  曰照曰樞曰彼雖可解之知之亦似不解  不知者不敢以爲可知可解是謂不知爲  知乃眞知也問者問造物之理以爲有崖  無崖皆不可頡滑旋轉言造物不可捉摸  若無物而實有古今只此造化用之不窮  此事可不爲大發揚而榷論之世人乃不  知問此理又何疑乎以此不疑之理解天  下之疑復歸不疑之地庶幾大不疑矣只  是不疑二字鼓舞出此數句結一篇之文  可謂奇特   足踐之地不若所不踐之廣心知之事   不若所不知之多不恃其所踐所知而   以無用爲用然後可以知天矣天道難   諶不容擬議故無所措知於其間止乎   其所不知斯眞知也要在日損之功人
Interpretation

Each thing has its own principle, which must not be diminished; life and death each inherently contain their own principles. There is much here that deserves to be explained at length and discussed carefully. Why not investigate by following this principle? Once it is understood, the mind will no longer be troubled by doubt. The greatest confusion can keep a person bound for life. Neither the ignorant nor the supremely wise can change this, just as a crane’s legs cannot be shortened and a wild duck’s legs cannot be lengthened. Each person receives life and takes in Qi (vital energy) for its own natural reasons. Only those whose understanding accords with the workings of creation can know without speaking. To try to dispel confusion through worldly learning is to be deeply confused, merely admiring and aspiring to that state of being “greatly free of confusion.”

Yanzhai’s Commentary: The ground people actually tread covers little; the ground they have not trodden covers much. This is a metaphor: what people know is scant, while what they do not know belongs to the Way of Heaven. Do not rely on what you already know; value instead what you do not yet know. Only then can you understand the Way of Heaven.

“Great One” refers to the workings of creation as a whole; “Great Stillness” refers to a state of utter quiet; “Great Vision” refers to everything that can be seen; “Great Equality” refers to the distinct allotments of all things. “Great Square” and “Great Emptiness” share the same substance. “Great Truth” refers to the principle that is real and unfailing; “Great Stability” refers to the state that gathers and sustains all things. The beginning of all things must depend on something. The Discussion on Making All Things Equal says, “Without that, there would be no this, no self.” “That” refers to creation. To call it “Heaven,” “Illumination,” “Pivot,” or “that”—these names may be explained and understood, yet they seem not to explain or reveal it fully. Not daring to claim that one knows or has explained what one does not know is called knowing what one does not know; that is true knowledge.

The questioner wants to investigate the principle behind the creation of things, but whether it has bounds or has none cannot be determined or recast through arbitrary conjecture. In other words, the principle of creation is elusive: it seems formless and insubstantial, yet it truly exists; from antiquity to the present, the workings of creation have continued without end. Does this not deserve to be explained at length and discussed carefully? Yet people do not know to ask about this principle—so what is there to be puzzled about? Use this principle of being free from doubt to understand the things under Heaven that cause bewilderment, then return to a state of no doubt. Perhaps then one can reach a truly great freedom from doubt. The whole passage turns on the words “free from doubt”; these few lines bring it to a close in a distinctive way.

The ground actually covered by one’s feet is not as vast as the ground left untrodden; what the mind knows is not as abundant as what it does not know. Do not rely on what you have walked through and learned; instead, make non-action your means. Only then can you understand the Way of Heaven. The Way of Heaven is hard to fathom and cannot be discussed through human conjecture, so one should not impose one’s understanding upon it. To stop where one’s knowledge ends is true knowledge. What matters is the practice of steadily letting go of personal opinions and attachments.

  欲既盡天理見矣自大一大陰至大信   皆因知天而後知首以大一通之道貫   萬理通生庶物禀陽而結形遇陰則解   化生於無而歸於無也大目視物所不   視大均順物使自平大方以無方爲體   大信稽之以不期終以大定持之所以   應天下之動而已常無爲也盡有天則   極物之自然循有照則順理而自明㝠   中有樞寂而常運始由乎彼和而不唱   也以不解解天下之紛以不知知天道   之祕又何所施其頡問而考其有崖無   崖哉由是言之雖若頡頏滑稽而有實   理存焉古今不易各盡其分可不謂有   大揚榷乎漢書揚榷古今揚舉也榷引   也舉而引之陳其趣也世人胡不問是   而恃其妄知之博昩夫自己之天又安   足以知乾元之所謂此盖心天無照有   惑以障之故以不惑解惑復於不惑是   尚大不惑惑者妄情之偽不惑者本來   之眞本來之眞我之自然者猶知尊尚   之則非大不惑也若眞造不惑之地有   何不惑之可尚亦何惑之可解哉  有道之主不以國位而驕人有道之士必  以節義而匡君武侯雖强悍難入而無鬼  說之有道首言良駿以啓其心兼明君之  於臣下可不具眼乎遂能始忤終合徐救  其虐民奉已之過盖人之良心善性無蔑  盡之理猶去國者見似人而喜也及其再  見然後納忠逆耳以警其失好和而惡姦
Interpretation

When desire is exhausted, the principles of Heaven become clear. From the Great Oneness and the Great Yin to the Great Trust, all these principles arise from understanding Heaven. Only by understanding Heaven can one know the root of the myriad things and unite them through the Great Oneness.

The Dao runs through all principles, and the myriad things grow from it. They receive Yang Qi and condense into form; when they encounter Yin Qi, they disperse and change. They emerge from nothing and in the end return to nothing. The Great Vision sees the myriad things, as well as what is ordinarily unseen. The Great Balance accords with the myriad things, allowing each to find its own equilibrium. The Great Vastness takes the boundless as its substance. The Great Trust measures things by principles that are not agreed upon in advance, and holds to them through the Great Stability. It simply follows the transformations of the world and does not act by deliberate design.

Exhaust the principles of Heaven, and you can grasp the natural state of the myriad things. Follow the principles of clear discernment, and things will become clear naturally, in accord with their own patterns. In the depths there is a pivot, still and silent yet always in motion. The myriad things begin by responding to one another and harmonizing without forcefully taking the lead. Unravel the world’s disorder without pulling it apart; perceive Heaven’s mysteries without clinging to knowledge. Why, then, ask and investigate as Jie did, seeking to determine whether things have boundaries or are boundless?

Seen in this light, though Jie’s playful, clever words seem humorous on the surface, they contain truths. From ancient times to the present, each thing has fulfilled its proper role. Could this not be called a “great survey”? The Book of Han speaks of “surveying ancient and modern times”: to raise up and draw out means to cite and recount events past and present, explaining their significance. Why do people fail to investigate these principles and instead rely on their own false and expansive knowledge? They are unclear even about the Heaven within themselves; how could they know what is called the Origin of Qian, the root of the Way of Heaven? This is because there is no clear discernment between the heart and Heaven: delusion has obscured it. So delusion must be dispelled through freedom from delusion, returning to that state of clarity. This is what it means to esteem the Great Freedom from Delusion.

Delusion is caused by false thoughts and feelings; freedom from delusion is the original, true state. If one still treats this original and natural state as something to be revered, one has not yet reached the Great Freedom from Delusion. When one truly arrives at that state, what freedom from delusion is there to esteem, and what delusion is there to dispel?

A ruler who possesses the Dao does not use the authority of his position to treat others arrogantly. A minister of the Dao corrects the ruler through integrity and moral principle. Though Marquis Wu was forceful, stubborn, and reluctant to heed advice, Wugui spoke to him in a way that followed the Dao. He first praised fine horses to open the ruler’s mind, then used the opportunity to explain that a ruler must be able to recognize people in order to see through his ministers. Though Marquis Wu was displeased at first, in the end he accepted the advice. Wugui gradually rescued him from his wrongs: mistreating the people while indulging himself.

A person’s innate moral awareness and goodness cannot be completely extinguished. Like someone who has left home and feels glad to meet a person with a familiar face, people too can recognize what is good. When they meet again, they can accept loyal advice and let words that are hard to hear awaken them to their failings. People always like agreeable words and dislike words that expose wrongdoing.

 盡脩身之要脩誠應天地盡爲國之道得  聞斯語社稷之福也何在乎爲義以宜民  偃兵而求治哉黄帝見大隗而七聖皆迷  喻人之六識既昏則心君不能獨朗猶知  問塗於牧馬童子則不遠復故至人取之  寓言明君欲見大道當絶聖棄知求諸守  心之神而去其爲吾害者則大隗不求而  自至矣豈若武侯者苦國民以養耳目至  於神者不自許然後求夫爲義偃兵哉唯  其後世君德不淳所尚非一遂有諸士趨  向之不同潛形性而之萬物無復望其歸  根則與道日遠矣若儒墨楊秉惠者各執  一偏自以爲道盡於是然其言論機鋒所  觸亦有賴以發明道妙者猶郢人聽斲足  以成匠石之巧也又喻有隰朋之才然後  足以致管仲之舉終不以鮑叔私愛而易  之也狙以傲人而速斃人以狙色而致稱  此所以警世俗之驕慢也又豈若灰心槁  形者之累日遠弄丸秉羽者難可解乎九  方歅知梱祥而不言其刖許由畏堯仁欲  逃而去之此皆睹微而知彰外賢而獲利  者也堇梗壅零時爲帝以喻人之移是風  日河水之相攖以喻化之移人物之守物  固審矣終不免於移移則殆矣唯知足恃  不踐心恃不知者則盡己天以燭物之天
Interpretation

When the principles of self-cultivation are perfected, one can respond sincerely in harmony with Heaven and Earth. When the principles of governing a state are fully understood, one can achieve results. To hear such teachings is a blessing for the state and its people. Where, then, does this way of governing lie? It lies in acting in accordance with what is right, governing the people in a way suited to them, and also in ending warfare and seeking peace.

When the Yellow Emperor went to visit Da Kui, a legendary sage who had attained the Dao, the seven sages accompanying him all lost their way. This is a metaphor: once the six faculties—sight, hearing, smell, taste, touch, and thought—become confused, the mind’s master cannot remain clear on its own. Later, they asked a young herdsman for directions and soon found their way again. Those who have attained the Dao take instruction from this story. Through the parable, it explains that a wise ruler who wishes to encounter the Great Dao should set aside cleverness and self-assurance, devote himself to guarding the clarity within, and remove whatever obstructs his original nature. Then Da Kui will appear of his own accord, without being deliberately sought.

How does this resemble Lord Wu, who made the people toil to gratify his senses? Only after one stops assuming one has already grasped the wondrous Dao can one speak of pursuing what is right and ending warfare. Later rulers lacked deep and steadfast Virtue, and the things they esteemed were many. As a result, scholars of different schools took different paths. They concealed their nature and pursued things outside themselves, no longer expecting to return to the root, and so drifted ever farther from the Dao.

The Confucians, Mohists, followers of Yang Zhu, and thinkers such as Hui Shi each clung to one position, believing their own doctrine had exhausted the Great Dao. Yet their writings and debates sometimes helped illuminate the Dao’s mysteries. This is like the man from Ying who let the craftsman Shi swing his axe to scrape white plaster from the tip of his nose, thereby bringing the craftsman’s skill to full expression. It is also like having someone as capable as Xi Peng, whose recommendation enabled Guan Zhong to be appointed. Bao Shuya’s personal affection should not have changed the decision to employ Guan Zhong.

A monkey’s arrogance toward people brings it to ruin, while a person who imitates a monkey’s manner is praised. This is meant to warn the worldly against arrogance. As for those who simply lose heart and wither their bodies, wearing away their strength of mind over a long time, or those who toy with pellets or carry feather fans, how could they easily understand the principle at stake?

Jiu Fang Yin could discern subtle signs of good and ill fortune but did not speak of them. Xu You revered Yao’s benevolence and wanted to avoid him and depart. These are examples of people who could see great changes in minute details and appeared wise on the surface, yet gained advantage from it. The examples of the plants jin, geng, yong, and ling show that people’s conduct changes with the prevailing environment. The interplay of wind and sun, and rivers surging against one another, serve as metaphors for how teaching and transformation affect all things. People should indeed carefully guard themselves, yet they cannot ultimately avoid being influenced by external things. Once changed by them, they fall into danger.

Only those who understand contentment know what they can rely on; only those whose minds do not act recklessly know not to depend on clever devices. In this way, they can fully express their inborn nature and perceive the nature of all things. Once they are no longer confused themselves, they can also dispel the confusion of the people under Heaven.

Collected Subtle Commentaries on the Meaning of the True Classic of Southern Florescence, juan 81

 己不惑而解天下之惑矣 南華眞經義海纂微卷之八十一

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0127); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 78 Vol. 80 →