中文 · EN

《南華真經循本》Vol. 13

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 13 / 30 6,700 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經循本》 Vol. 13 (Dongshen 洞神部, 30 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 14 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經循本》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經循本卷之十三禍五    廬陵竹峯羅勉道述    門人彭祥點校  外篇    天地 天地雖大其化均也萬物雖多其治一也人 卒雖衆其主君也君原於德而成於天故曰 玄古之君天下無爲也天德而己矣以道觀 言而天下之君正以道觀分而君臣之義明 以道觀能而天下之官治以道汎觀而萬物 之應備故通於天地者德也行於萬物者道 也上治人者事也能有所藝者技也技兼於 事事兼於義義兼於德德兼於道道兼於天 故曰古之畜天下者無欲而天下足無爲而 萬物化淵靜而百姓定記曰通於一而萬事 畢無心得而鬼神服 夫子曰  此兩夫子曰无嘉本皆爲别章崔本亦然  然連上文則爲引證之語離而析之則無  頓著處疑所謂夫子即老子上文所引記  曰者老子也故就述其言耳不然莊子之  所尊事者也下文夫子問於老聃曰者則  明指孔子矣 夫道覆載萬物者也洋洋乎大哉君子不可 以不刳心焉  刳去其情慾之心下文乃莊子演其說 無爲爲之之謂天無爲言之之謂德愛人利 物之謂仁不同同之之謂大行不崖異之謂 寬有萬不同之謂富故執德之謂紀德成之 謂立循於道之謂備不以物剉志之謂完君 子明於此十者則韜乎其事心之大也沛乎 其爲萬物逝也  事藏而心不窄物往而心不留
Interpretation

Though heaven and earth are vast, their operations follow the same principles; though the myriad things are diverse, their governance adheres to consistent laws. Though the common people are numerous, all must follow the guidance of their ruler. The ruler models himself on the natural virtue (referring to the inherent qualities of the Dao) and attains accomplishment through heavenly principle. Thus it is said that the ancient rulers governed the world by simply following natural virtue and practicing non-action (Wuwei).

When viewing titles and status through the lens of the Dao, the rulers of the world become upright. When distinguishing responsibilities by the standard of the Dao, the proper relationship between ruler and minister becomes clear. When examining abilities according to the principles of the Dao, all officials find their proper roles. When observing through the universality of the Dao, the correspondences among all things become complete. Therefore, what connects heaven and earth is virtue (De), and what operates through all things is the great Dao. For those in high positions, governing the people is their duty; possessing specialized skills constitutes one's craft. Crafts are subordinate to duties, duties to righteousness, righteousness to virtue, virtue to the Dao, and the Dao ultimately returns to the natural way of heaven.

Thus it is said that those who nurtured the world in ancient times, being free from selfish desires, saw the world naturally become prosperous; practicing non-action, they witnessed the myriad things transform of themselves; maintaining deep tranquility, they observed the people naturally settling into peace. The Records (possibly referring to ancient texts) state: "When one comprehends the root of the great Dao, all affairs reach fulfillment; when the heart seeks nothing, even spirits and deities submit."

Regarding the mention of "the Master said," there are two versions: both the Wu-Jia and Cui editions present it as an independent section. However, considering the context, it appears more like a citation. The "Master" mentioned here likely refers to Laozi (founder of Daoism), and the quoted Records may well be Laozi's words. Later when the text explicitly mentions "the Master asking Lao Dan," it refers to Confucius (founder of Confucianism) seeking instruction from Laozi.

The great Dao embraces and carries all things—how vast and boundless it is! The noble person must purify his heart (kuxin means removing selfish thoughts and distractions). Having removed the heart of desires, Zhuangzi further elaborates:

What accomplishes all things through natural non-action is called "heaven"; what speaks truth through natural non-action is called "virtue" (De); loving people and benefiting all things is called "humaneness"; harmonizing different things into unity is called "greatness"; conduct that avoids novelty and eccentricity is called "breadth"; encompassing all diversity is called "abundance." Therefore, maintaining virtue is called "discipline," its perfection called "establishing oneself," following the Dao called "completeness," and not letting external things frustrate one's will called "perfection." When the noble person understands these ten principles, he can handle affairs with magnanimous breadth and immense capacity of heart—flowing like rivers in accordance with the transformations of all things, with heart unhindered.

若然者藏金於山藏珠於淵不利貨財不近 貴富不樂壽不哀夭不榮通不醜窮不拘一 世之利以爲己私分不以王天下爲己處顯 顯則明  縱處顯耀其本心明自若 萬物一府死生同狀 夫子曰夫道淵乎其居也漻(音/溜)乎其清也金 石不得無以鳴金石有聲不考不鳴萬物孰 能定之  居止也漻水清貌言道之本體如水淵乎  其止故漻乎其清又如金石元有其質故  擊之則鳴即水與金石推之則萬物之理  莫不然但人不能審定之耳 夫王德之人素逝而恥通於事立之本原而 知通於神故其德廣  王德其德足以王天下也素逝猶易言素  履往王德之人此心恬素而往以通曉事  務爲恥但立之本原得其要道而其知自  與神明通故其德廣大而足以王天下 其心之出有物採之故形非道不生生非德 不明存形窮生立德明道非王德者邪蕩蕩 乎忽然出勃然動而萬物從之乎此謂王德 之人  此又從人心上說來其心之出有物採之  即所謂人生而靜天之性也感於物而動  性之欲也吾儒說得平坦莊子說得痛口  耳形非道不生生非德不明老莊之所謂  道德不可以吾儒之見解之蕩蕩廣大難  名之狀至於忽然出勃然動而萬物從之  方見其爲王德之人也 視乎冥冥聽乎無聲冥冥之中獨見曉焉無
Interpretation

This passage describes the state and attitude of those who have attained the Dao.

Those truly aligned with the Dao hide gold in mountains and sink pearls in deep abysses, showing no greed for wealth or pursuit of riches. They neither rejoice in longevity nor grieve over premature death, neither take pride in prominence nor feel shame in poverty. They don't claim worldly benefits as their own, nor do they seek to rule the world. Even when occupying eminent positions, their inner clarity remains undisturbed.

To them, all things are united as one, and life and death hold no distinction. The Dao is as serene as a deep pool, as clear as limpid water. Just as metal and stone possess inherent sound-producing qualities that remain silent until struck, all things follow their intrinsic principles - though ordinary people struggle to grasp this.

Those possessing "kingly virtue" (wangde, the supreme De) maintain their original simplicity, considering worldly sophistication shameful. Rooted in fundamentals with wisdom reaching spiritual clarity, their virtue becomes vast and expansive. When their intention manifests, all things respond. Forms cannot exist without the Dao, nor can life be revealed without De. Only those with kingly virtue can preserve form, fulfill life's potential, establish virtue, and illuminate the Dao.

Such individuals possess expansive minds and act with natural ease, drawing all things to follow them. They perceive light where others see only darkness, hear celestial harmonies in silence. Amidst chaos, they alone maintain lucid awareness.

(Note: "Wáng dé" refers to supreme virtue capable of governing all under heaven; "sù shì" means moving through the world while preserving original simplicity; "liáo" describes water's crystal clarity)

聲之中獨聞和焉故深之又深而能物焉神 之又神而能精焉故其與萬物接也至無而 供其求時騁而要其宿大小長短脩遠  視乎冥冥以下皆言其道之妙處其與萬  物應接亦變化無窮至虚無一物而能供  人之所求時復馳騁而終有歸宿之地或  大而忽然小或長而忽然短或短而又忽  然脩且遠所謂王德之人蓋如此竊謂前  一段是插入僞撰是以有兩夫子曰文意  深淺自粲然可見當删之 黄帝遊乎赤水之北登乎崑崙之丘而南望 還歸遺其玄珠使知(去/聲)索之而不得使離失 索之而不得使喫詬(讀作/本字)索之而不得也乃 使象罔象罔得之黄帝曰異哉象罔乃可以 得之乎  此皆託言玄珠道也知巧者也離朱即離  婁明者也喫詬喫人詬駡無能者也是巧  者之反象罔無有形象是明者之反言智  巧目明皆不足以得道頑鈍無恥近之矣  而猶未得必有超乎形象之外而後得之 堯之師曰許由許由之師曰齧缺齧缺之師 曰王倪王倪之師曰被(音/披)衣堯問於許由曰 齧缺可以配天乎(爲天/子也)吾籍王倪以要之許 由曰殆哉圾乎天下齧缺之爲人也聰明叡 知給數(音/朔)以敏其性過人而又乃以人受天  其資性既過人而又乃使之受天命爲天  子則所爲愈過矣
Interpretation

This passage presents two illustrative stories of Daoist philosophy.

The first section elucidates the mysterious nature of the Dao (the Way). Though formless and intangible, the Dao fulfills all things' needs; appearing without fixed shape, it becomes the ultimate destination for all existence. The Dao can expand or contract, lengthen or shorten, manifesting infinite transformations. The term "wangde zhiren" (王德之人) refers to those who have truly comprehended the Dao.

The second part recounts the allegory of the Yellow Emperor seeking the "Mysterious Pearl" (symbolizing the Dao). While traveling north of the Chishui River and ascending Mount Kunlun to gaze southward, the Yellow Emperor lost this pearl upon returning. He dispatched successively: "Zhi" (representing intellectual knowledge), "Lizhu" (representing acute vision), and "Chigou" (representing incompetence) to retrieve it—all failed. Finally, "Xiangwang" (meaning formless and imageless) succeeded in recovering it. This demonstrates that conventional methods like intellectual cleverness or keen observation cannot attain the Dao; only by transcending formal limitations can one grasp its true essence.

The third section records a dialogue between Emperor Yao and Xu You. Yao inquired whether his teacher Nieque could "match heaven" (become emperor), expressing his intention to invite Nieque through Wang Ni. Xu You warned this would be perilous, as Nieque possessed extraordinary intelligence—if entrusted with the heavenly mandate, his actions might become increasingly unconventional. This reflects Daoism's cautionary stance toward excessive intellectual brilliance.

彼審乎禁過而不知過之所由生與之配天 乎彼且乗人而無天  與之配天彼且淩駕人而並不知天矣 方且本身而異形  本只一身而爲千萬人之身是一身而異  形也 方且尊知而火馳  尊尚知巧其心如火之馳 方且爲緒使  爲事之緒餘所役使 方且爲物絯  絯公才切束也爲物所束縛 方且四顧而物應方且應衆宜  二句義同上句應物下句應衆人之所宜 方且與物化而未始有恒  逐物變化未能布其恒性 夫何足以配天乎雖然有族有祖可以爲衆 父而不可以爲衆父父  雖上文所言齧缺如此然人不可以一槩  論譬如人有族有祖族各有所尊而祖又  衆族之所尊齧缺亦可以爲衆族之父但  不可以爲衆族之祖衆父父者祖也 治亂之率(色類/切)也北面之禍也南面之賊也  齧缺之才撥亂世之將率也而不免下爲  人臣之禍上爲人君之賊猶言治世之能  臣亂世之姦雄也 堯觀乎華(去/聲)華封人曰嘻聖人請祝聖人使 聖人壽堯曰辭使聖人富堯曰辭使聖人多 男子堯曰辭封人曰壽富多男子人之所欲 汝獨不欲何邪堯曰多男子則多懽富則 多事壽則多辱是三者非所以養德也故辭 封人曰始也我以汝爲聖人邪今然君子也 天生萬民必授之職多男子而授之職則何
Interpretation

This passage discusses the concept of "aligning with Heaven's Dao" (配天), criticizing those who claim to conform to the Dao while actually violating it.

Those who presume to prohibit faults remain ignorant of how faults truly arise. Believing they harmonize with Heaven's Dao, they instead exploit human desires while disregarding heavenly principles. Though aspiring to match the Dao, they elevate themselves above the masses, fundamentally misunderstanding true heavenly alignment.

They fragment their original singular nature into countless forms, exalting cunning artifice while their minds race like wildfire. Driven by trivial affairs and bound by external things, they constantly look outward to accommodate phenomena, satisfying worldly demands while shifting with circumstances—lacking any constant inner nature. How could such people ever align with Heaven's Dao?

Yet like clans having ancestors, such individuals may serve as "fathers" (leaders) to the masses, but never as their "ancestors" (supreme exemplars). They become capable ministers for governing chaos, yet simultaneously prove to be disasters among subordinates and threats to rulers—like competent officials who become treacherous heroes in turbulent times.

The narrative then recounts Emperor Yao's story: When Yao inspected Hua territory, the border guardian said, "O Sage, let me wish you longevity." Yao declined. Next came wishes for wealth and honor, which Yao also refused. Finally, the guardian wished him numerous descendants, yet Yao still demurred. The guardian protested: "Longevity, wealth, and progeny—all things people desire—why reject them?" Yao replied: "More sons mean more worries; wealth brings more troubles; longevity increases occasions for disgrace. These three don't cultivate Virtue (De), hence my refusal." The guardian then realized: "At first I took you for a Sage—now I see you're merely a noble man. When Heaven creates the myriad beings, it assigns each their proper station. More sons mean more assigned duties—why worry about them?"

Through this contrast, the text critiques superficial practitioners while using Yao's story to demonstrate how true Sages transcend worldly desires and accord with natural arrangements.

懼之有富而使人分之則何事之有夫聖人 鶉居而鷇食鳥行而無彰  鶉無常居鷇仰母哺鳥行乎人不見之境 天下有道則與物皆昌天下無道則脩德就 間千歲厭世去而上仙乗彼白雲至于帝鄉 三患莫至身常無殃則何辱之有封人去之 堯隨之曰請問封人曰退已 堯治天下伯成子高立爲諸侯堯授舜舜授 禹伯成子高辭爲諸侯而耕禹往見之則耕 在野禹趨就下風立而問焉曰昔堯治天下 吾子立爲諸侯堯授舜舜授予而吾子辭爲 諸侯而耕敢問其故何也子高曰昔堯治天 下不賞而民勸不罰而民畏今子賞罰而民 且不仁德自此衰刑自此立後世之亂自此 始矣夫子闔(與盍/通)行邪無落吾事俋俋乎耕 而不顧(落猶/廢也) 泰初有無無有無名一之所起有一而未形 物得以生之謂德未形者有分且然無間謂 之命留動而生物物成生理謂之形形體保 神各有儀則謂之性性脩反德德至同於初 同乃虚虚乃大合喙鳴喙鳴合與天地爲合 其合緡緡若愚若昏是謂玄德同乎大順  設問泰初有乎無乎曰無有也亦無此名  也而無之中一由此起有一矣特未形著  耳此所謂無極而大極也萬物得此以生  者謂之德其未形之時萬理皆具已各有  條理可以分别但且以其混然無間而謂
Interpretation

This scripture expounds the Daoist philosophy of natural non-action (Wuwei) and returning to primordial simplicity, illustrating its principles through parables and metaphysical discussions.

First, it describes how sages (those who have attained the Dao) are like quails, content wherever they dwell, or like fledgling birds feeding naturally, or like flying birds leaving no trace. They follow the natural course without deliberate self-display. In times of peace, they flourish alongside all beings; in chaotic eras, they cultivate virtue (De) and retreat into seclusion. Those who refine themselves to the utmost transcend worldly ties, riding white clouds to the celestial abodes of the heavenly emperors, far removed from calamity.

Next, it recounts an anecdote from the era of Yao and Shun: Bo Chengzi Gao served as a feudal lord under Yao but resigned to farm when Yu succeeded the throne. He told Yu, "Under Yao’s rule, rewards were unnecessary—the people naturally inclined toward goodness; punishments were unneeded—the people instinctively revered order. But now, governance relies on rewards and punishments, marking the decline of virtue (De) and the rise of legal coercion. From this, the turmoil of later ages begins." Having spoken, he turned back to plowing, ignoring Yu.

Finally, it elucidates the metaphysics of the "Great Beginning" (Taichu), the origin of the cosmos: The primal state was "nothingness," devoid even of the concept of "nothing." From this void emerged the "One" (the Dao), formless yet containing the principles of all creation—this is virtue (De). When the "One" stirred, the myriad beings arose; as they took form, each acquired its unique nature—this is "xing" (innate nature). By refining one’s heart-mind, one can return to the original virtue (De), merging completely with the natural harmony of heaven and earth. This state of undifferentiated unity is the profoundest "Mystic Virtue" (Xuande).

The text emphasizes that the ideal governance, exemplified by Yao, follows Wuwei—ruling without coercion, where people naturally incline toward goodness without rewards or punishments. Excessive human intervention disrupts natural harmony, leading to moral decay. Practitioners should emulate nature, return to their authentic selves, and ultimately unite with the Dao.

 之命及其留者不能不動而生物物各成  生理謂之形形體中保合元神各有儀則  謂之性所謂物各具一大極也性脩則復  於德矣德之至極則同於未形之初矣同  乃虚虚則無是非彼我凡天下之以喙爭  鳴者皆合爲一矣喙鳴合則同乎天地矣  緡緡如綸之合也其合緡緡若愚若昏形  容合之意玄德者深妙之德大順者無一  民一物不順也相傳太極圖出於方外之  士由此觀之末必不然 夫子(孔/子)問於老聃曰有人治道若相放(上/聲)可 不可然不然辯者有言曰離堅白若縣(音/玄)㝢 若是則可謂聖人乎老聃曰是胥易技係勞 形怵心者也執狸之狗成思猨狙之便自山 林來丘予告若而所不能聞與而所不能言 凡有首有趾無心無耳者句衆有形者與無 形無狀而皆存者盡無其動止也其死生也 其廢起也此又非其所以也有治在人忘乎 物忘乎天其名爲忘己忘己之人是之謂入 於天  治道所治之道若放猶言相似離析縣揭  也㝢宇也縣揭天宇昭然可見也胥易技  係以下四句解見前有首有趾猶言有首  有尾無心者無心於聽無耳不聞也  孔子問於老聃曰有人於此其所居之道  若與聖人相似可人之不可然人之不然  善辯者嘗有言曰離析堅白如揭天宇昭  然可見此人正如此問可以謂之聖人乎
Interpretation

This passage expounds the profound Daoist teachings on the fundamental nature of all things and the cultivation of virtue (De):

All beings are governed by celestial mandate and cannot remain in absolute stillness; they inevitably undergo movement and transformation, giving rise to myriad phenomena. Each entity, once formed, possesses its particular morphological structure - this physical constitution is called "form" (xing). Within these forms resides the harmoniously unified primordial spirit (Shen, innate spiritual nature), each following its natural patterns - this is what we term "inherent nature" (xing). It can be said that every being contains the complete Taiji (Supreme Ultimate, cosmic origin).

Through cultivating one's inherent nature, one can return to the realm of "virtue" (De). When virtue reaches its ultimate expression, it becomes identical to the undifferentiated chaos before the separation of heaven and earth. This "identity" represents a state of emptiness and stillness, where all distinctions between right and wrong dissolve. All worldly debates and disputes become unified in this state. Such unification resembles tangled fishing lines - seemingly dull and chaotic, yet manifesting the most profound Mysterious Virtue (Xuan De, the virtue of the Dao). What is called "Great Accord" (Da Shun) means nothing and no one fails to comply with natural laws.

The text suggests the Taiji diagram might have originated from reclusive sages, and judging from these principles, this seems plausible.

The following presents a dialogue between Confucius and Laozi:

Confucius asked Laozi: "There are those who study the Dao arts and appear like sages. They can declare possible what others deem impossible, and justify what others consider wrong. Sophists claim they can analyze concepts like 'hardness and whiteness' (a famous logical debate topic) as clearly as revealing the sky. Can such people be called sages?"

Laozi replied: "This is merely like petty clerks playing with skills, exhausting their heart-mind (Xin). It resembles hunting dogs tied up all day thinking of chasing prey, or monkeys captured from mountains constantly plotting escape. Let me tell you: there are truths you cannot hear nor express. All concrete existences (those with beginning and end), compared to the formless yet eternally existing Great Dao, have their movements and stillness, life and death, rise and fall determined not by themselves."

"True governance lies with humans, but requires forgetting external things and even heaven-earth - this is called 'forgetting oneself' (wang ji). Those who attain self-forgetting may be said to have merged with the natural Heavenly Dao."

Annotations:

  • "Separation of hardness and whiteness" refers to the famous logical proposition by Gongsun Long regarding the relationship between a stone's "hardness" and "whiteness" attributes
  • "Mysterious Virtue" (Xuan De) denotes the profound and subtle virtue of the Dao
  • "Great Accord" (Da Shun) signifies complete alignment with natural order
  • Laozi maintains that clever argumentation cannot attain the Dao; true sages transcend dualities to reach the state of forgetting both self and objects
 老聃曰云云豈得爲聖人又呼而告之曰  予告汝以汝所不能聞與汝所不能言凡  人所聞有記得有首有尾者有聽得無心  如無耳者所言有說得許多有形象者有  說從無形無影而如在面前者凡此盡非  眞有皆是虚無其所論動止死生廢起不  過幻詭之言又非其眞實所以然之理辯  者之無益如此别有所治之道在彼人者  却不然既忘乎物又忘乎天天者物之所  從出併忘則忘之至也世以多忘者名忘  己故名此人爲忘己忘己之人是之謂入  於天言忘已則純乎天矣後面有治在人  一句應前有人治道若相放一句文義甚  明 蔣閭葂(音/勉)見季徹曰魯君謂葂也曰請受教 辭不獲命既已告矣未知中否請嘗薦之吾 謂魯君曰必服恭儉拔出公忠之屬而無阿 私民孰敢不輯季徹局局然笑曰若夫子之 言於帝王之德猶螳蜋之怒臂以當車軼(音/轍) 則必不勝任矣且若是則其自爲處危其觀 臺多物將往投迹者衆蔣閭勉覤覤然驚曰 葂也汒若於夫子之所言矣雖然願先生之 言其風也季徹曰大聖之治天下也揺蕩民 心使之成教易俗舉滅其賊心而皆進其獨 志若性之自爲而民不知其所由然若然者 豈兄堯舜之教民溟涬然弟之哉欲同乎德 而心居矣  危其觀臺多物將往投迹者衆言自處於
Interpretation

Laozi said: How can this be considered sagehood? He further admonished:

I shall tell you of truths you cannot hear with ears nor express with words. What people hear - some remember the beginning and end, while others listen without comprehension as if deaf; what people say - some describe concrete forms, while others discuss formless things as if they were present before their eyes. None of these are real existences, all are illusory and untrue. Those discussions about movement and stillness, life and death, prosperity and decline are merely deceptive sophistry, not the true principles of existence. Such debates bring no benefit, for the true Dao to be cultivated exists on an entirely different plane.

Those who attain the Dao are different - they forget external things, and even forget the Heavenly Dao (referring to the source of all things). Forgetting even the Heavenly Dao constitutes complete oblivion. Ordinary people often call those good at forgetting "self-forgetters," hence such persons are called "self-forgetting people." Those who reach this state of self-oblivion become completely united with the Heavenly Dao. The later mention of "governance lies with people" corresponds to the earlier "some govern the Dao," making the meaning quite clear.

Jiang Lü Mian (whose given name was Mian) paid respects to Ji Che and said: "The ruler of Lu told me 'please instruct me.' Unable to decline, I've already offered advice, but don't know if it was appropriate. Let me recount it to you. I told the ruler: 'You must be reverent and frugal, selecting just and loyal people without favoritism - then how could the people not live in harmony?'" Hearing this, Ji Che laughed heartily: "Your words regarding the way of imperial governance are like a mantis angrily raising its arms to stop a chariot wheel - certainly incapable of the task! Moreover, acting this way would place oneself in danger, like piling treasures on a high platform which would attract many climbers." Jiang Lü Mian said in astonishment: "I'm bewildered by your words. Yet I still wish to hear your explanation." Ji Che replied: "The truly sage-like ruler governs the world by letting people's minds develop freely, allowing teachings and customs to form naturally, eliminating harmful intentions while letting each fulfill their aspirations. It's like following one's inherent nature - the people wouldn't even know why things are so. In such case, why would one need to emulate Yao and Shun's methods of instructing the people? Simply having one's inner being accord with virtue is sufficient."

The phrase "piling treasures on a high platform which would attract many climbers" means that if a ruler deliberately promotes himself, he will attract many sycophants.

 高趨者衆多有不勝任之患矣揺蕩民心  不使之拘束也賊心相戕之心獨志自得  之志豈兄堯舜之教民溟涬然弟之哉謂  大聖治天下任其自然堯舜治天下不能  無迹大聖之如此者豈肯與堯舜爲兄弟  哉心居心寧止也與天下同德無所作爲  則心寧止矣 子貢南遊於楚反於晋過漢陰見一丈人方 將爲圃畦鑿隧而入井抱甕而出灌搰搰(音/忽) (用力/貌)然用力甚多而見功寡子貢曰有械於 此一日浸百畦用力甚寡而見功多夫子不 欲乎爲圃者仰而視之曰奈何曰鑿木爲機 後重前輕挈水若抽數(朔/音)如泆湯(疾速如/湯沸溢)其 名爲橰爲圃者忿然作色而笑曰吾聞之吾 師有機械者必有機事有機事者必有機心 機心存於胸中則純白不備(純白者本/然之質)純白 不備則神生不定神生不定者道之所不載 也吾非不知羞而不爲也子貢瞞然(目無/晶以)慙 俯而不對有間爲圃者曰子奚爲者邪曰孔 丘之徒也爲圃者曰子非夫博學以擬聖於 于以蓋衆  於于語助猶俗嘲儒之說之乎也者云 獨弦哀歌以賣名聲於天下者乎汝方將忘 汝神氣墮(音/隳)汝形骸而庶幾乎而身之不能 治而何暇治天下乎子往矣無乏吾事子貢 卑陬失色(卑遜自處/於陬隅)頊頊然(敬謹/貌)不自得行
Interpretation

The passage conveys two main layers of meaning:

The first section discusses the highest realm of governing the world. When the most enlightened sages rule, they completely follow natural laws, making the people feel no trace of governance. Though virtuous rulers like Yao and Shun governed well, their methods still bore marks of artificial intervention. True sages refuse to be compared with Yao and Shun - their minds remain tranquil, merging with heaven and earth in natural harmony, practicing wuwei (non-action).

The second section illustrates Daoist philosophy through the story of Confucius' disciple Zigong encountering an old vegetable farmer. In the state of Chu, Zigong saw the old man laboriously drawing water with clay pots to irrigate his field and suggested using labor-saving mechanical devices. The old man replied: "Using machinery breeds opportunistic thoughts (jixin, 'machine heart'), which corrupts humanity's original pure and unblemished nature (chunbai, 'pure whiteness'), disturbing the shen (spirit) and preventing harmony with the Dao." He criticized Confucian scholars like Zigong for being widely learned yet chasing empty fame, failing even in self-cultivation - how could they presume to discuss governing the world? Zigong was left deeply ashamed.

The concept of "jixin" represents calculating cleverness, while "chunbai" symbolizes humanity's originally pure and unadulterated nature. Daoism holds that excessive reliance on tools and technology damages our natural essence, forming a stark contrast with Confucianism's advocacy of technological progress. The old farmer embodies the Daoist ideal of returning to natural simplicity and preserving authentic living.

三十里而後愈其弟子曰向之人何爲者邪 夫子何故見之變容失色終日不自反邪曰 始吾以爲天下一人耳(謂孔/子)不知復有夫人 也吾聞之夫子事求可功求成用力少見功 多者聖人之道今徒不然執道者德全德全 者形全形全者神全神全者聖人之道也託 生與民並行而不知其所之汒乎淳備哉  託吾之生與民並行而不知其所如往只  是言與民相安相忘却語下别汒乎即茫  然淳備即淳全 功利機巧必忘夫人之心若夫人者非其志 不之非其心不爲雖以天下譽之得其所謂 謷然不顧以天下非之失其所謂儻然不受 天下之非譽無益損焉是謂全德之人哉我 之謂風波之民  風起波動不能定也 反於魯以告孔子孔子曰彼假脩渾沌氏之 術者也  渾沌即謂太極 識其一不知其二(專一而/無二)治其内不治其外 (事内而/不務外)夫明白入素  凡質之明白者入得素淨 無爲復朴體牲(猶言順/其性)抱神以遊世俗之間 者汝固驚邪且渾沌氏之術予與汝何足以 識之哉 諄芒將東之大壑(東/海)適遇苑風於東海之濱 苑風曰子將奚之曰將之大壑曰奚爲焉曰 夫大壑之爲物也注焉而不滿酌焉而不竭 吾將遊焉苑風曰夫子無意于橫目之民乎 願聞聖治諄芒曰聖治乎
Interpretation

This passage recounts a dialogue between Zhuangzi (the Nanhua Zhenren) and his disciple, using contrasting approaches to life to elucidate Daoist philosophy.

The disciple asks his teacher why he seemed so deeply affected after meeting a certain man. The teacher explains that he had once believed Confucius was the only sage in the world, but now he realizes there are others like this man. This person embodies the Dao of the sage: he seeks perfect Virtue (De), a sound body, and a complete spirit (Shen). He lives among ordinary people without striving for artificial goals, existing in a state of natural harmony. Such a man remains unaffected by worldly gains or clever schemes, indifferent to praise or blame, and preserves his innate authenticity. In contrast, people like us are like waves stirred by the wind—our minds restless and unsettled.

Later, Confucius hears of this and remarks that the man practices the Dao of "Hundun Shi" (the Primordial Chaos), symbolizing the undifferentiated origin of the cosmos. This cultivation focuses on inner refinement rather than outward display, preserving one’s pure nature, following the natural course, and wandering freely within the mundane world. Confucius sighs, admitting that even he cannot fully comprehend such profound attainment.

The final section presents a conversation between Chun Mang and Yuan Feng, using the metaphor of the "Great Chasm" (the Eastern Sea) to illustrate the boundless nature of the Dao: no matter how much water flows into it, it never overflows; no matter how much is drawn from it, it never runs dry. When Yuan Feng asks how to govern the people, Chun Mang implies that true sage-rule resembles the sea accepting all rivers—effortless and non-active (Wuwei).

(Note: "Hundun Shi" represents the primordial, undifferentiated state of the universe; "Great Chasm" symbolizes the infinite capacity of the Dao; "people with horizontal eyes" refers to ordinary folk.)

 試言所謂聖治者乎 官施而不失其宜拔舉而不失其能畢見其 情事而行其所爲行句言自爲而天下化手 撓顧指四方之民莫不俱至此之謂聖治  所謂聖治者官施政事而不失其宜拔舉  人才而不失其能盡見人情事理而行其  所爲當行者惟恐其有差錯嘗言人當自  脩爲而天下化既能自脩爲則手所撓目  所指而人莫不俱至 願聞德人  苑風聞諄芒之言聖治未爲至又問願聞  德人 曰德人者居無思行無慮不藏是非美惡四 海之内共利之之爲悦共給之之爲安怊乎 若嬰兒之夫其母也儻乎若行而失其道也 財用有餘而不知其所來飲食取足不知其 所從此謂德人之容願聞神人曰上神乗光 與形滅亡此謂照曠  得道之後神升而上只在光景中遨遊下  視其軀殻如枯木糞土此之謂照曠言照  徹空曠無復形拘也 致命盡情天地樂而萬事銷亡萬物復情此 之謂混冥  致推極也上既言神人之狀矣又言人能  究極命根盡其情實與天地同樂而萬事  盡泯萬物復其本然則混然冥漠之間矣 門無鬼與赤張滿稽觀於武王之師赤張滿 稽曰不及有虞氏乎故離此患也門無鬼曰 天下均治而有虞氏治之邪其亂而後治之 與赤滿稽曰天下均治之爲願而何計以有 虞氏爲  天下均治則願足矣又何用有虞氏
Interpretation

This passage explains the concept of "sagely governance" (圣治). When rulers implement policies with perfect appropriateness, appoint talents where they are best suited, and act only after fully understanding the actual circumstances, their words and deeds naturally stem from self-cultivation, thereby transforming the world effortlessly. Wherever they point or direct their gaze, the people follow without exception—this is what is called sagely governance.

After hearing Chunmang's explanation of sagely governance, Yuanfeng felt it still lacked ultimate profundity and proceeded to inquire about the "virtuous person" (德人). The characteristics of a virtuous person are: dwelling in stillness without idle thoughts, acting without anxiety over gain or loss, and harboring no distinctions between right and wrong or beauty and ugliness in their heart. They rejoice when all within the four seas benefit together and are content when everyone is well-fed and clothed. Innocent as an infant clinging to its mother, carefree as a traveler who forgets the way, their wealth never exhausts though they know not its source; their provisions are ample yet they remain unaware of who provides them. Such is the appearance of a virtuous person.

Yuanfeng then asked about the "divine person" (神人). The divine person can harness light, their physical form dissolving into illumination—this is the state of "radiant expansiveness" (照旷). Upon attaining the Dao, their spirit ascends to roam freely within the light, regarding their own body as withered wood or dung. At the ultimate stage, they fully align with heavenly decree, express their innate nature without restraint, share joy with heaven and earth, forget all worldly affairs, and witness the myriad things return to their original truth. This is entry into the realm of "primordial mystery" (混冥).

The latter part recounts a dialogue between Men Wugui and Chi Zhang Manji as they observed King Wu of Zhou's army. Chi Zhang Manji remarked, "This cannot compare to the era of Emperor Shun—hence these present troubles of war." Men Wugui retorted, "Did Emperor Shun govern because the world was already at peace, or because it was in chaos that he had to govern?" Chi Zhang Manji replied, "Universal peace is the greatest aspiration—why must there be an Emperor Shun to govern?" The implication is that if the world were naturally at peace, what need would there be for a sage-king to govern it?

有虞氏之藥瘍也秃而施髢病而求醫孝子 操藥以脩慈父其色焦然聖人羞之  武王之師固不及有虞氏而有虞氏之治  亦不過如醫之用藥療病非出於自然也 至德之世不尚賢不使能上如標枝  上君上也樹標高出於上而無心古之君  上如之 民如野鹿端正而未知以爲義相愛而不知 以爲仁實而不知以爲忠當而不知以爲信 蠢動而相使不以爲賜是故行而無迹事而 無傳孝子不諛其親忠臣不諂其君臣子之 盛也親之所言而然所行而善則世俗謂之 不肖子君之所言而然所行而善則世俗謂 之不肖臣而未知此其必然邪世俗之所謂 然而然之所謂善而善之則不謂之導諛之 人也然則俗故嚴於親而尊於君邪  世所謂忠臣孝子以其能有過則諫不事  諂諛也隨和君親者世俗必爲諂諛而隨  和世俗者却不以爲諂諛如此則是敢諫  君親而不敢諫世俗世俗及嚴於親而尊  於君邪 謂己導人則勃然作色謂己諛人則怫然作 色而終身導人也終身諛人也合譬飾辭聚 衆也是終始本末不相坐  人不肯受導諛之名而所爲乃終身導諛  混合譬喻矯飾言辭求以聚衆人之歸己  非導諛而何然不自覺也是一人之身而  終始本末自不相坐罪 垂衣裳設采色動容貌以媚一世而不自謂
Interpretation

This passage contrasts ancient social customs with contemporary moral standards.

During the reign of Emperor Shun of the Yu dynasty in high antiquity, when people fell ill they sought medical treatment. Though filial sons wore worried expressions while preparing medicine for their sick fathers, the sages considered such behavior shameful. While King Wu of Zhou's military might couldn't compare to Shun's era, even Shun's governance was merely like a physician treating illness with medicine—not the natural way of the Dao.

In the most virtuous age (the era of supreme De), worthiness wasn't exalted. The ruler remained aloof like the highest branches of a tree, undisturbed and non-interfering. The people were as guileless as wild deer—upright without knowing "righteousness," loving without recognizing "humaneness," honest without understanding "loyalty," proper without comprehending "trustworthiness." They naturally helped one another without perceiving it as benevolence, thus leaving no traces of their actions and creating no stories worth recounting.

A truly filial child doesn't flatter parents, nor does a loyal minister fawn upon rulers. If children obey their parents' every word or ministers their sovereign's every command, they're actually considered unfilial and disloyal by worldly standards. What society deems "correct" and "virtuous," when followed blindly, amounts to sycophancy. People praise those who admonish rulers and parents as loyal and filial, yet condemn those who comply as flatterers—revealing how worldly standards have become harsher than those of rulers and parents themselves.

People grow furious when accused of leading others or engaging in flattery, yet spend their whole lives doing precisely that. They employ elaborate metaphors and ornate speech to win hearts, never admitting their sycophancy. Like those who dress finely and adorn themselves to please the world while denying their pandering, this stems from the fundamental disconnect between people's words and deeds—their chronic inability to recognize their own true behavior.

導諛與夫人之爲徒通是非而不自謂衆人 愚之至也  此方說歸舜身上舜垂裳而天下治以五  采彰施于五色恭己正南面故云垂衣裳  設采色動容貌舜以此媚悦一世而不自  謂導諛與斯人之徒通論是非而不自謂  同於衆人乃愚之至也此是說舜下文却  說從武王去只似藏頭說話讀者不覺 知其愚者非大愚也知其惑者非大惑也大 惑者終身不解大愚者終身不靈  綴上愚字添一惑字立論莊子文法每見  之 三人行而一人惑所適者猶可致也惑者少 也二人惑則勞而不至惑者勝也而今也以 天下惑予雖有祈嚮不可得也不亦悲乎  此以行爲喻如三人同行欲適東有一人  欲適西不過一人惑耳猶有可致東之理  若二人欲西則惑者勝矣徒勞而不能至  也以喻武王伐紂而歸之者八百國是天  下皆惑矣予赤張滿稽自予也祈嚮欲向  也予雖自有所欲趨向不可得已不亦悲  乎重傷武王之事也 大聲不入於里耳折楊皇華(俗/曲)則嗑然而笑 (嗑音/呷)是故高言不止於衆人之心至言不出 俗言勝也以二缶鍾(並如字/瓦爲鍾)惑而所適不得 矣而今也以天下惑予雖有祈嚮其庸可待 邪  此又以樂爲喻古樂不入衆耳聞俗樂則  喜設有二人擊瓦鍾以爲音則人必喜其
Interpretation

This passage employs vivid metaphors to critique how worldly people easily become deluded by superficial things.

The first example uses Emperor Shun to illustrate this: Shun governed the world wearing magnificent robes, adorning himself with colorful decorations, and sitting upright in his court. While these actions were meant to please the masses, he didn't consider them as flattery. When debating right and wrong with ordinary people, he refused to acknowledge his similarity to the crowd—an extremely foolish attitude.

Next comes the metaphor of three travelers: If three people journey together and one wishes to go west, they might still barely reach the east. But if two insist on going west, the destination becomes utterly unreachable. This alludes to King Wu of Zhou's campaign against King Zhou, where although eight hundred feudal lords responded ("the whole world was deluded"), the author (Chi Zhang Manji referring to himself as "I") found his own principles impossible to implement, lamenting this predicament.

The musical metaphor follows: Sublime music ("grand melodies") falls on deaf ears in marketplaces, while people laugh joyfully at vulgar folk tunes ("Zhe Yang Huang Hua"). Thus profound discourse cannot take root in ordinary minds—ultimate truths are no match for common sayings. It's like trying to play music with two earthen jars ("two fou vessels"), producing nothing resembling proper melody. When the entire world is steeped in delusion, how can someone like me realize my aspirations?

The recurrent character "惑" (delusion) signifies how people lose their judgment by being beguiled by shallow things. Through three layered metaphors—Emperor Shun, fellow travelers, and music—the author progressively reveals worldly foolishness, expressing profound sorrow over this universal state of confusion.

 新聲而爲其所惑古樂之音不能行矣況  今天下皆惑予雖欲有所趨向豈可得邪  重譬喻重言之文意覺痛切舊解因所適  二字遂連前一節讀之而欲改缶鍾爲垂  踵謬矣此所適不得亦是就上文所適二  字粘綴來上文所適者人之行也此所適  者樂之行也 知其不可得也而强之又一惑也故莫若釋 之而不推不推誰其比去聲憂  此又暗說伯夷之類比同也捨之而不尋  究其事則不必與人同憂矣 厲之人夜半生其子遽取火而視之汲汲然 唯恐其似已也  却舉一箇不必同之譬喻厲醜惡之人也  厲人生子唯恐其似己是不欲其同者則  又何必與人同憂 百年之木破爲犧樽青黄而文之其斷在溝 中比犧樽於溝中之斷則美惡有間矣其於 失性一也跖與曾史行義有間矣然其失性 均也且夫失性有五一曰五色亂目使目不 明二曰五聲亂耳使耳不聰三曰五臭薰鼻 因嵕好公中顙四曰五味濁口使口厲爽五 曰趣含滑心使性飛楊此五者皆生之害也 而楊墨乃始離跂自以爲得非吾所謂得也 夫得者困可以爲得乎則鳩鴞之在於籠也 亦可以爲得矣且夫趣舍聲色以柴其内  下文有柴栅字則是閉固之義 皮弁鷸冠搢笏紳脩以約其外内支盈於柴 栅外重(平/聲)纆繳(音/灼)睆睆然在纆繳之中而自
Interpretation

This passage explores how people become deluded by worldly desires and lose their original nature. The text begins with a musical analogy: contemporary people are captivated by novel tunes while neglecting classical elegance—just as I (Zhuangzi), though aspiring to follow the true Dao (the Way), find it difficult amid such circumstances.

The author criticizes those who force what cannot be achieved, viewing this as another form of delusion. Rather than stubbornly striving, it is better to relinquish attachment and avoid compulsion—this way, one won’t share others’ vexations. Here, the text subtly alludes to figures like Bo Yi, whose rigid pursuit of purity becomes its own kind of fixation.

Two vivid metaphors follow: An ugly person, upon having a child, anxiously lights a lamp at midnight to inspect it, fearing the child will resemble them—showing that people inherently resist complete similarity, so why insist on sharing others’ worries? A hundred-year-old tree is felled: some parts become exquisite ritual vessels, while others are discarded in ditches. Though their beauty differs, both lose the tree’s original, natural essence. Similarly, the bandit Zhi and virtuous sages like Zeng Shen and Shi Yu may differ in conduct, but all have strayed from humanity’s innate nature.

The text identifies five things that obscure one’s true nature: dazzling colors blind the eyes, cacophonous music deafens the ears, pungent scents overwhelm the nose, rich flavors corrupt the palate, and indulgence in pleasure unsettles the heart. These are life’s calamities. Yet schools like Yang Zhu and Mo Di proclaim their eccentric doctrines as enlightenment—though this is far from true attainment (De, Virtue/Power). If confinement counted as attainment, then caged turtledoves and owls would qualify too.

Finally, it depicts people ensnared by desire: their hearts clogged with sensory cravings like firewood, their bodies constrained by ceremonial robes and caps—bound inside and out as if by ropes, yet still smugly self-satisfied.

以爲得則是罪人交臂歷指而虎豹在於囊 檻亦可以爲得乎 南華眞經循本卷之
Interpretation

This passage comes from Nanhua Zhenjing Xunben (a commentary on the Zhuangzi), using metaphor to criticize those who mistakenly believe they have attained the truth.

The meaning is: If one considers being bound hand and foot ("arms crossed and fingers clamped" — referring to a form of torture) as having attained the truth, then tigers and leopards caged in pens might as well be called free. This satirizes the absurd notion of mistaking bondage for liberation or hardship for accomplishment.

Through this vivid comparison, the author conveys that truly "attaining the Dao" is not about external constraints or limitations—one must not confuse a state of forced acceptance with genuine cultivation achievements. Just as wild beasts confined in cages cannot be considered free, neither can a person who merely passively submits to precepts and restrictions without understanding their true meaning be said to have genuinely realized the Dao.

十三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0135); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 12 Vol. 14 →