中文 · EN

《南華真經循本》Vol. 14

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 14 / 30 3,301 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經循本》 Vol. 14 (Dongshen 洞神部, 30 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 7 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經循本》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經循本卷之十四禍六   廬陵竹峯羅勉道述   門人彭祥點校  外篇    天道 天道運而無所積故萬物成帝道運而無所 積故天下歸聖道運而無所積故海内服  無所積無留滯 明於天通於聖六通四辟於帝王之德者其 自爲也昧然無不靜者矣  昩然者聰明盡泯六通四辟者如六合四  方皆洞達 聖人之靜也非曰靜也善故靜也  非以靜爲善故制之使靜 萬物無足以鐃(乃孝/切)心者故靜也水靜則明 燭鬚眉平中准大匠取法焉  周禮匠人水地以縣 水靜猶明而況精神聖人之心靜乎天地之 鑒也萬物之鏡也 夫虚靜恬澹寂寞無爲者天地之平而道德 之至故帝王聖人休焉(休止/也)休則虚虚則實 實者倫矣  虚中有實自有倫序 虚則靜靜則動動則得矣  靜中有動動則無適而不得 靜則無爲無爲也則任事者責矣  無爲則任事者自任其責 無爲則俞俞俞俞者憂患不能處年壽長矣 夫虚靜恬澹寂寞無爲者萬物之本也明此 以南鄉(去/聲)堯之爲君也明此以北面舜之爲 臣也以此處上帝王天子之德也以此處下 玄聖素王之道也以此退居而間遊江海山 林之士服以此進爲而撫世則功大名顯而 天下一也靜而聖動而王無爲也而尊樸素 而天下莫能與之爭美
Interpretation

The movement of the Heavenly Dao never stagnates, thus all things can grow; the operation of the imperial Dao flows unimpeded, thus the world submits; the way of sages encounters no obstructions, thus all under heaven pay allegiance. What is called "accumulating nothing" here means the absence of any blockage or stagnation.

Those who truly comprehend the Heavenly Dao and penetrate the sagely way, who can extend the imperial virtue through all six directions (up, down, and the four cardinal points), act spontaneously—appearing muddled yet able to bring all things to stillness. This "muddled state" refers to complete relinquishment of cleverness, while "mastering all directions" signifies perfect understanding of heaven, earth and the four quarters.

The sage's stillness is not achieved through forced restraint in pursuit of quietude. Rather, it arises because nothing in creation can disturb his heart-mind, thus stillness comes naturally. Just as calm water perfectly reflects facial hair and the water level becomes the carpenter's standard (as recorded in the Rites of Zhou where craftsmen use water levels to measure surfaces), if water's stillness can produce such clarity, how much more so the spiritual state of sages? The sage's tranquil mind resembles a mirror reflecting heaven and earth, a polished surface showing all things.

Emptiness, stillness, blandness, and wuwei (non-action)—these represent the balancing point of cosmic operation and the highest realm of Dao and De (virtue). Therefore emperors and sages abide here. "Abiding" means dwelling, and dwelling leads to emptiness; within emptiness emerges substance, and within substance appears order. Emptiness brings stillness; within stillness stirs movement; movement yields attainment. In stillness there is wuwei, and wuwei allows each performer to fulfill their responsibilities. Wuwei brings ease, and those at ease remain untroubled by worries, thus attaining longevity.

Emptiness, stillness, blandness, and wuwei—these form the root of all things. Understanding this principle, Yao facing south became an enlightened ruler, while Shun facing north became a worthy minister. Applied to high position, it manifests as the virtue of the Son of Heaven; in low position, it becomes the way of hidden sages and uncrowned kings. Retiring to rivers and lakes, it wins the admiration of mountain recluses; entering court service, it achieves greatness and fame throughout the land. In stillness one becomes a sage; in motion, an enlightened ruler. Through wuwei one attains greater nobility; preserving original simplicity, no virtue in the world can compare.

夫明白於天地之德者此之謂大本大宗與 天和者也所以均調天下與人和者也與人 和者謂之人樂(音/洛)與天和者謂之天樂莊子 曰吾師乎吾師乎(即大/宗師)䪡萬物而不爲戾(䪡/粉) (之/義)澤及萬世而不爲仁長於上古而不爲壽 覆載天地刻雕衆形而不爲巧此之謂天樂 故曰知天樂者其生也天行其死也物化靜 而與陰同德動而與陽同波故知天樂者無 天怨無人非無物累無鬼責故曰其動也天 其靜也地一心定而王天下其鬼不崇其䰟 不疲一心定而萬物服言以虚靜推於天地 通於萬物此之謂天樂天樂者聖人之心以 畜天下也 夫帝王之德以天地爲宗以道德爲主以無 爲爲常無爲也則用天下而有餘有爲也則 爲天下用而不足故古之人貴夫無爲也上 無爲也下亦無爲也是下與上同德下與上 同德則不臣下有爲也上亦有爲也是上與 下同道上與下同道則不主上必無爲而用 天下下必有爲爲天下用此不易之道也故 古之王天下者知雖落天地不自慮也(落猶/隳也) 辯雖雕萬物不自悦也能雖窮海内不自爲 也天不産而萬物化地不長而萬物育帝王 無爲而天下功故曰莫神於天莫富於地莫 大於帝王故曰帝王之德配天地此乗天地 馳萬物而用人羣之道也
Interpretation

Those who truly comprehend the laws of heaven and earth can grasp the fundamental Dao (the Way) and live in harmony with nature. Such individuals can both manage worldly affairs and maintain harmonious relationships with others. Harmony with people is called "human joy," while harmony with nature is called "celestial joy."

Zhuangzi said: "My teacher! My teacher!" (referring to the Dao) It shatters all things yet appears unviolent, bestows blessings for generations without claiming benevolence, predates antiquity yet does not boast of longevity, upholds heaven and earth and shapes all things without flaunting skill—this is the realm of celestial joy. Those who understand celestial joy live in accordance with nature's movements and, in death, transform along with all things. In stillness, they share the virtue (De) of yin; in action, they resonate with yang. Thus, those who grasp celestial joy do not resent heaven, are not blamed by others, are not burdened by external things, and are not reproached by spirits. Their movements mirror heaven's course; their stillness resembles earth's bearing. With a tranquil mind, they govern the world, and even spirits do not trouble them—their spirit (Shen) remains unwearied. Inner tranquility brings all things into submission. Extending this emptiness and stillness to heaven and earth, they penetrate all things—this is celestial joy. Celestial joy is the mind of sages, used to nurture the world.

The virtue of emperors and kings must take heaven and earth as its foundation, Dao and De as its guide, and wuwei (non-action) as its principle. Practicing wuwei, governing the world becomes effortless; deliberate action, however, exhausts one in worldly affairs. Thus, the ancients revered the Dao of wuwei. If rulers practice wuwei and subjects also practice wuwei, the distinction between high and low is lost. If subjects act and rulers also act, the hierarchy of master and servant becomes confused. Rulers must maintain wuwei to govern the world, while subjects must act to serve it—this is the eternal, unchanging law.

The ancient rulers of the world possessed wisdom encompassing heaven and earth yet did not rely on schemes, eloquence capable of adorning all things yet did not seek personal delight, and abilities reaching to the four seas yet did not labor personally. Just as heaven produces nothing yet all things transform of themselves, earth cultivates nothing yet all things grow of themselves, the emperor's wuwei allows the world to complete itself. Thus it is said: Nothing is more divine than heaven, nothing more abundant than earth, nothing greater than the emperor. The virtue of emperors matches heaven and earth—this is the great Dao that harnesses heaven and earth, commands all things, and leads the masses.

本在於上末在於下要在於主詳在於臣三 軍五兵之運德之末也賞罰利害五刑之辟 (萍/入)教之末也禮法度數形名比詳(比校/詳悉)治之 末也鍾鼓之音羽旄之容樂之末也哭泣衰 絰隆殺之服哀之末也此五末者須精神之 運心術之動然後從之者也末學者古人有 之而非所以先也 君先而臣從父先而子從兄先而弟從長先 而少從男先而女從夫先而婦從夫尊卑先 後天地之行也故聖人取象焉天尊地卑神 明之位也春夏先秋冬後四時之序也萬物 化作萌區(音/勾)有狀盛衰之殺變化之流也夫 天地至神而有尊卑先後之序而況人道乎 宗廟尚親朝廷尚尊鄉黨尚齒行事尚賢大 道之序也語道而非其序者非道也語道而 非其道者安取道 是故古之明大道者先明天而道德次之道 德已明而仁義次之仁義己明而分守次之 分守已明而形名次之形名已明而因任次 之因任已明而原省次之  省音生上原赦而省形 原省已明而是非次之是非己明而賞罰次 之賞罰己明而愚知處宜貴賤履位仁賢不 肖襲情必分其能必由其名以此事上以此 畜下以此治物以此脩身知謀不用必歸其 天此之謂太平治之至也故書曰有形有名 形名者古人有之而非所以先也古之語大
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist philosophy regarding the fundamental order of things and natural laws.

The root stands above, while the branches lie below; the sovereign represents the essence, and the ministers attend to details. Deploying armies and weapons already belongs to the lowest manifestation of Dao and De (Virtue/Power). Establishing reward-punishment systems and formulating penal codes represent the baser aspects of education. Emphasizing ritual protocols and comparing status distinctions constitute the lesser aspects of governance. Bell-and-drum music and feathered adornments are but superficial elements of ceremonial rites. Wearing mourning garments with lamentations forms the outermost layer of funeral customs. These five lesser practices all require expenditure of Shen (spirit) and mental exertion to implement. Though such lesser teachings existed in antiquity, they were never paramount.

The sovereign precedes while ministers follow, fathers lead while sons comply, elder brothers go first while younger brothers yield, seniors take precedence over juniors, men walk ahead of women, husbands guide while wives accompany. This hierarchy of precedence mirrors the operating principles of heaven and earth. Thus the sages emulate this pattern: heaven's nobility and earth's humility reflect the positions of divine luminaries; spring and summer precede autumn and winter in the sequence of seasons. All things in their growth and transformation undergo stages of sprouting, forming, flourishing and declining—this constitutes the pattern of change. If even the sacred cosmos maintains such order of precedence, how much more should human affairs?

In ancestral temples, kinship proximity matters; at court, noble and humble distinctions prevail; in villages, seniority governs; in undertakings, competence determines—all these follow the great Dao's sequence. To discuss Dao while neglecting this sequence is not authentic Dao; how can one attain Dao while speaking of inauthentic Dao?

Therefore, the ancient knowers of great Dao first comprehended heavenly principles, then Dao and De (Virtue/Power); after understanding Dao and De, they apprehended humaneness and righteousness; following this came awareness of duties; after duties came recognition of status; after status came appointment; after appointment came evaluation; after evaluation came discernment of right and wrong; after this came reward and punishment. With clear rewards and punishments, the dull and clever each find their place, noble and humble rest content, the worthy and unworthy are distinguished by their nature, all exercising their capacities according to their names. Applying this principle to serve rulers, govern people, order all things, and cultivate oneself—without resorting to cunning schemes, everything returns to spontaneity—this represents the pinnacle of peaceful governance.

Thus ancient texts state: "Where there is form, there is name." Though the ancients acknowledged form and name, these were never primary. Those who discussed great Dao in antiquity passed through five stages before addressing form and name, nine levels before mentioning rewards and punishments. To speak immediately of rewards and punishments reveals ignorance of Dao's root.

道者五變而形名可舉九變而賞罰可言也  自明天至形名而五至賞罰而九 驟而語形名不知其本也驟而語賞罰不知 其始也倒道而言迕道而說者人之所治也 安能治人驟而語形名賞罰此有知治之具 非知治之道可用於天下不足以用天下此 之謂辯士一曲之人也禮法數度形名比詳 古人有之此下之所以事上非上之所以畜 下也 昔者舜問於堯曰天王之用心何如堯曰吾 不敖無告不廢窮民苦死者嘉孺子而哀婦 人此吾所以用心已舜曰美則美矣而未大 也堯曰然則何如舜曰天德而出寧日月照 而四時行若書夜之有經雲行而雨施矣堯 曰然則膠膠擾擾乎(堯自/謂)子(指/舜)天之合也我 人之合也夫天地者古之所大也而黄帝堯 舜之所共美也故古之王天下者奚爲哉天 地而已矣  夫天地者古之所大也以下莊子引堯舜  問答而結之之語 孔子西藏書於周室子路謀曰由聞周之徵 藏史(徵猶/典也)有老聃者免而歸居夫子欲藏書 則試往因焉孔子曰善往見老聃而老聃不 許於是繙(數袁/切)十二經以說  一說詩書禮樂易春秋六經又加六緯合  爲十二一說易上下經並十翼爲十二一  說春秋十二公經其說不同亦不必泥 老聃中(去/聲)其說曰大謾願聞其要孔子曰要
Interpretation

The Dao (cosmic principle) undergoes five transformations before establishing the forms and names of things, and nine transformations before instituting systems of reward and punishment. From initial "clarity" to "form-naming" constitutes five stages, and progressing to "reward-punishment" completes nine stages.

Those who abruptly discuss systems of form-naming show ignorance of their foundation; those who suddenly debate reward-punishment measures fail to understand their origin. Those who invert Daoist principles in speech and contradict natural laws in argument can only be governed by others—how could they possibly govern others themselves? Those who hastily discuss form-naming and reward-punishment merely understand the tools of governance without comprehending its fundamental principles. Such individuals may be employed by the world, but cannot truly govern it—these are so-called "sophists," people with partial understanding. Ritual systems, form-name examinations—these things existed since ancient times, but they are instruments for subordinates serving superiors, not the fundamental methods by which superiors nurture subordinates.

Long ago, Shun asked Yao: "As Son of Heaven, how do you apply your mind to governance?" Yao replied: "I don't slight the orphaned and helpless, nor abandon the impoverished. I mourn the dead, cherish children, and sympathize with women. This is how I apply my mind." Shun said: "This is good, but not yet magnificent." Yao asked: "Then what should be done?" Shun responded: "Emulate Heaven's virtue (natural law) and all things will find peace—like the sun and moon shining, the seasons progressing, as regular as day and night alternating, as natural as clouds moving and rain falling." Yao sighed: "Then I've been troubling myself needlessly! You harmonize with the Dao of Heaven, while I've only matched the Dao of humanity." The Way of Heaven and Earth has been the most magnificent since antiquity, praised alike by the Yellow Emperor, Yao, and Shun. Thus ancient rulers of the world simply emulated Heaven and Earth.

When Confucius wished to deposit his books in the Zhou royal library, Zilu advised: "I've heard that Lao Dan (Laozi), the Zhou archivist, has retired to his home. If you wish to deposit these texts, you might seek his assistance." Confucius agreed and visited Laozi, who initially refused. Confucius then enumerated twelve classics (Note: Three interpretations exist regarding "twelve classics": 1) the Six Classics plus Six Weft texts; 2) the Book of Changes' upper and lower texts plus the Ten Wings; 3) the twelve ducal chronicles of the Spring and Autumn Annals) to persuade him. Laozi interrupted: "Too verbose—give me the essence." Confucius then presented the essential points.

在仁義老聃曰請問仁義人之性邪孔子曰 然君子不仁則不成不義則不生仁義眞人 之性也又將奚爲矣老聃曰請問何謂仁義 孔子曰中心物愷兼愛無私此仁義之情也 老聃曰意平聲幾乎後言  近乎落後底說話 夫兼愛不亦迂乎無私焉乃私也夫子若欲 使天下無失其牧乎則天地固有常矣日月 固有明矣星辰固有列矣禽獸固有羣矣樹 木固有立矣夫子亦放德而行循導而趨已 至矣又何偈偈(用力/貌)乎揭仁義若擊鼓而求 亡子焉意夫子亂人之性也 士成綺見老子而問曰吾聞夫子聖人也吾 固不辭遠道而來願見百舍重趼(足下/皮起)而不 敢息今吾觀子非聖人也鼠壤有餘蔬而棄 妹不仁也生熟不盡於前而積歛無崖  鼠壤中有食餘之蔬而乃不能養其妹生  熟之物不盡於前而積斂猶無崖此皆不  仁之事上句不仁也包下句棄妹積斂以  世俗所見爲譏非有此事 老子漠然不應士成綺明日復見曰昔者吾 有刺於子今吾心正卻矣  郤退却也不復譏刺矣 何故也老子曰夫巧知神聖之人吾自以爲 脱焉(脱離/也)昔者子呼我牛也而謂之牛呼我 馬也而謂之馬苟有其實人與之名而弗受 再受其殃吾服也恒服吾非以服有服  服服從也吾之服從人乃是平日常存服
Interpretation

This dialogue records the debate between Laozi (Lao Dan) and Confucius on humaneness and righteousness, as well as Shicheng Qi's misunderstanding and subsequent realization about Laozi.

When Confucius asked Laozi whether humaneness and righteousness were inherent to human nature, Laozi countered by questioning their essence. Confucius explained that embracing all things with impartial, universal love constituted their core. Laozi, however, considered this "universal love" concept overly pedantic—seemingly selfless yet secretly self-serving. Using natural laws as metaphor, he observed that celestial movements, the sun and moon, stars, birds, beasts, and plants all follow natural principles. Humans need only follow their innate nature—why deliberately promote humaneness and righteousness? It's like beating gongs and drums to search for a lost child, which only disrupts people's natural dispositions.

Later, Shicheng Qi visited Laozi with great admiration, only to find this so-called "sage" living in modest conditions—with leftover vegetables nibbled by mice, seemingly not supporting his own sister, yet continuously accumulating goods. He accused Laozi of lacking humaneness. Laozi remained silent. The next day, Shicheng Qi realized his error and apologized. Laozi responded: "The truly wise transcend names and labels. Call me ox and I'll be ox; call me horse and I'll be horse. If one merits a title yet refuses it, calamity follows. I've always followed nature spontaneously, without deliberate effort."

This exchange embodies the Daoist core principle of Wuwei (non-action) and naturalness: opposing forced moral posturing while advocating the elimination of artificiality to return to authentic being. Laozi's "ox-horse metaphor" illustrates how Dao cultivators should transcend external judgments while maintaining inner constancy. Shicheng Qi's story warns against misjudging realized beings through conventional moral standards.

 從之心不是止服其有可服者雖其言不  足服亦服之也 士成綺鴈行避影履行遂進而問脩身若何 老子曰而容崖然而目衝然而顙頯然(廣闊/貌) 而曰闞然(虓/豁)而狀義然似繫馬而止也  馬雖繫之而意常奔馳 動而持發也機察而審知巧而睹於泰凡以 爲不信邊境有人焉其名爲竊  舉動而必持守不放則一旦縱發必如弩  機之不可止察視而必細微詳審則知巧  所極必見其過於泰甚凡如此者以爲不  信實之人若是邊境上有此等人即爲盜  賊矣 夫子(老子/也)曰夫道於大不終於小不遺故萬 物備廣句廣乎其無不容也淵乎其不可測 也形德仁義神之未也非至人孰能定之夫 至人句有世不亦大乎而不足以爲之累天 下奮㨀(音/丙)而不與之偕審乎無假而不與利 遷極物之眞能守其本故外天地遺萬物而 神未嘗有所困也通乎道合乎德退仁義賔 禮樂(不以之/爲主)至人之心有所定矣  此一段以老子言類於士成綺問答之後 世之所貴道者書也書不過語語有貴也語 之所貴者意也意有所隨意之所隨者不可 以言傳也而世固貴言傳書世雖貴之哉猶 不足貴也爲其貴非其貴也故視而可見者 形與色也聽而可聞者名與聲也悲夫世人 以形色名聲爲足以得彼之情夫形色名聲
Interpretation

This passage recounts the dialogue between Laozi and Shicheng Qi regarding self-cultivation, along with Laozi's exposition on the Dao (the Way).

Shicheng Qi approached respectfully to inquire about the path of self-cultivation. Laozi described his demeanor thus: his expression was haughty, his gaze piercing, his forehead broad, and his voice resonant—outwardly imposing, yet inwardly restless like a tethered horse. Laozi pointed out that while such a person may appear restrained on the surface, their outbursts are like arrows loosed from a bow; though observant in detail, they often fixate excessively on trivialities. Such individuals cannot be trusted, akin to bandits lurking at the borders.

Laozi said that the Great Dao (the supreme truth of the Way) neither neglects the grand nor overlooks the minute, thus embracing all things. It is vast and boundless, unfathomably deep. Superficial virtues like benevolence and righteousness are but the outermost branches of the spirit—only those who have truly attained the Dao (Zhiren, the perfected person) can grasp its essence. The perfected possess all things in the world yet remain unburdened; they do not engage in the world's conflicts, preserving their innate purity untempted by profit. They perceive the true nature of things and hold fast to the root, thereby transcending the myriad phenomena of heaven and earth, their spirits eternally free. They comprehend the Great Dao, aligning with their natural disposition, relegating benevolence, righteousness, rites, and music to secondary status while maintaining unshaken inner tranquility.

The final passage observes that people often value recorded words in books, yet what is truly precious in speech lies in its profound meaning. The ultimate truth behind these meanings cannot be conveyed through words. People cling to visible forms and colors, audible names and titles, unaware that such superficial phenomena can never capture the true essence of things.

果不足以得彼之情則知者不言言者不知 而世豈識之哉桓公讀書於堂上輪扁斲輪 於堂下釋椎鑿而上問桓公曰敢問公之所 讀者何言邪公曰聖人之言也曰聖人在乎 公曰己死矣曰然則君之所讀者古人之糟 魄(音/粕)己夫桓公曰寡人讀書輪人安得議乎 有說則可無說則死輪扃曰臣也以臣之事 觀之斲輪徐則甘而不固疾則苦而不入不 徐不疾得之於手而應於心口不能言有數 存焉於其間臣不能以喻臣之子臣之子亦 不能受之於臣是以行年七十而老斲輪古 之人與其不可傳也死矣然則君之所讀者 古人之糟魄己夫 南華眞經循本卷之
Interpretation

This passage recounts a dialogue between Duke Huan of Qi and the wheelwright Bian, revealing the truth that "true wisdom cannot be fully conveyed through words."

While Duke Huan was reading in his hall, the wheelwright Bian set down his tools and inquired, "What book is Your Highness reading?" The Duke replied it contained the sayings of sages. When Bian asked whether these sages were still alive and learned they had passed away, he bluntly remarked, "Then what you're reading is merely the dregs left by ancient people."

Enraged, the Duke threatened to execute Bian unless he could justify his statement. The wheelwright then explained through his craft: When making wheels, working too slowly produces loose and unstable wheels, while working too fast makes them too tight to assemble properly. Only through the perfect rhythm—neither too fast nor too slow—can one achieve mastery. Yet this intuitive skill cannot be transmitted through words; even his own son cannot learn it this way. That's why at seventy, he still must make wheels himself.

Bian used this analogy to illustrate how the true wisdom of the ancients resembles his wheelmaking craft—its essence cannot be fully captured in writing. The written records left by deceased sages are but remnants of their thought. Authentic wisdom requires personal practice to comprehend; it cannot be attained through book learning alone.

十四

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0135); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 13 Vol. 15 →