中文 · EN

《南華真經循本》Vol. 23

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 23 / 30 7,229 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經循本》 Vol. 23 (Dongshen 洞神部, 30 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 15 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經循本》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經循本卷之二十三因三   廬陵竹峯羅勉道述   門人彭祥點校  雜篇    徐無鬼 徐無鬼因女商見魏武侯  釋文徐無鬼緡山人魏隱士李云無鬼女  商並魏幸臣 武侯勞之曰先生病矣苦於山林之勞故乃 見於寡人徐無鬼曰我則勞於君君有何勞 於我君將盈嗜欲長好惡則性命之情病矣 君將黜嗜欲掔(蓄田反/引去也)好惡則耳目病矣我 將勞君君有何勞於我武侯超然(自高/貌)不對 少焉徐無鬼曰嘗語君吾相狗也下之質執 飽而止是狸德也中之質若視日上之質若 亡其一  狗所以獵也下等之質所捕執者小足飽  其腹而止是狸之材耳德猶言材也中等  之質志高視遠如視天上之日不顧目前  小獸固勝於下等者矣然上等之質并以  捕獵之事爲不足道狗之所專一者獵也  上等者失其所專一則有超乎常狗之外  者矣 吾相狗又不若吾相馬也吾相馬直者中繩 曲者中鉤方者中矩圓者中規  謂御之而中繩鉤矩規也 是國馬也而未若天下馬也天下馬有成材 若卹若失若喪其一  若卹若失如悶而失志也馬之專一者馳  走也忘其專所事則出於自然非常馬矣 若是者超軼絶塵不知其所  超軼過也絶塵足不踏地無塵起也 武侯大悦而笑徐無鬼出女商曰先生獨何
Interpretation

Xu Wugui (a recluse of the Warring States period) was introduced to Marquis Wu of Wei through the courtier Nü Shang. The Marquis greeted him saying: "Master, you must have suffered greatly living in mountain forests—is that why you've come to see me?" Xu Wugui replied: "It is I who should be offering condolences to Your Lordship. If you indulge your desires and amplify preferences, you harm the fundamental nature of life; yet if you suppress desires and reject preferences, you torment your senses. I came to console you, yet you console me first." The Marquis was left speechless.

Later, Xu Wugui spoke of judging dogs: "An inferior dog stops eating when full, shallow as a wildcat. A middling dog lifts its head to gaze afar as if observing the sun. But a superior dog becomes completely self-forgetful." He explained: Dogs are born to hunt—the inferior is content with small prey; the middling aspires higher; but the superior transcends hunting itself, attaining extraordinary states.

Then he discussed judging horses: "Those conforming to measurements are merely state horses. Truly exceptional steeds appear absent-minded, as if forgetting they're horses. Such horses run without touching dust, vanishing in an instant." Here horses symbolize people—true sages resemble these steeds, transcending worldly constraints.

The Marquis laughed heartily. After Xu Wugui departed, Nü Shang asked in puzzlement: "What method did the master actually use...". Through these analogies of dogs and horses, the dialogue subtly satirizes rulers trapped by desires compared to Daoist practitioners' transcendent freedom, embodying the Daoist cultivation states of "sitting in forgetfulness" (zuowang) and "losing the self" (sangwo).

以說(始鋭/反)吾君乎吾所以說吾君者橫說之 則以詩書禮樂從(子容/反)說之則以金弢六弢  金板六弢周書篇名太公六弢文武虎豹  龍犬也 奉事而大有功者不可爲數而吾君未嘗啓 齒今先生何以說吾君使吾君悦若此乎徐 無鬼曰吾直告之吾相狗馬耳女商曰若是 乎曰子不聞夫越之流人乎去國數日見其 所知而喜去國旬月見所嘗見於國中者喜 及期年也見似人者而喜矣不亦去人滋乆 思人滋深乎夫逃虚空者藜藋拄乎鼪鼬之 逕踉(音/郎)位其空聞人足音跫然(讀)而喜矣而 況乎昆弟親戚之謦欬其側者乎乆矣夫莫 以眞人之言謦欬吾君之側乎  柱塞也踉踉蹡也位處也疾趨處乎空谷  也跫然行歩聲也以喻乆無人以至言進  之武侯故聞狗馬之說而亦爲之喜 徐無鬼見武侯武侯曰先生居山林食芧栗 厭葱韭以賔(音/擯)寡人乆矣夫今老邪其欲干 酒肉之味邪其寡人亦有社稷之福邪徐無 鬼曰無鬼生於貧賤未嘗敢飲食君之酒肉 將來勞君也君曰何哉奚勞寡人曰勞君之 神與形武侯曰何謂邪徐無鬼曰天地之養 也一登高不可以爲長居下不可以爲短君 獨爲萬乗之主以苦一國之民以養耳目鼻 口夫神者不自許也夫神者好和而惡姦夫 姦病也故勞之唯君所病之何也
Interpretation

This passage recounts a conversation between Xu Wugui (a Daoist hermit) and Marquis Wu of Wei. When Xu Wugui met the Marquis, the ruler asked him: "Master, having long dwelt in mountain forests eating acorns and wild fruits, have you come in your old age to savor fine wines and meats? Or perhaps to bring blessings for governing my state?" Xu Wugui replied that as a man of humble origins, he dared not covet the ruler's delicacies—he had come instead to "comfort both the spirit (Shen) and form of the Marquis."

Puzzled by this response, Xu Wugui explained: Heaven and earth nurture all things equally—those who stand high are not inherently superior, nor are those in low positions inferior. Yet as ruler of ten thousand chariots, the Marquis made his people suffer to indulge his sensory pleasures. The human spirit's true nature delights in harmony and abhors perversity (meaning actions contrary to the Dao), and such perversity becomes the root of illness. Thus his purpose in "comforting" the Marquis was actually to subtly point out how the ruler's indulgence had strayed from the natural way—a condition requiring adjustment like an ailment needing treatment.

The text employs two vivid analogies: exiled Yue countrymen rejoicing at sights reminiscent of their homeland, and the classic image of a solitary dweller delighting at hearing footsteps in a deserted valley. These illustrate how the Marquis, having gone too long without hearing the admonitions of genuine Daoist sages (truthful words of the Dao), could find pleasure even in trivial discussions about judging dogs and horses. This subtly reveals the ruler's prolonged deprivation of authentic Daoist wisdom.

 問武侯所以思慮而病者何事 武侯曰欲見先生乆矣吾欲愛民而爲義偃 兵其可乎徐無鬼曰不可愛民害民之始也 爲義偃兵造兵之本也君自此爲之則殆不 成凡成美讀惡器也君雖爲仁義幾且僞哉 形固造形  一有形迹則又造添形迹矣 成固有伐(功成則爲/人所毁)變固外戰  此心一動則與外物戰鬪 君亦必無盛鶴列於麗譙之間無徒驥於錙 壇之宫  鶴列陣名猶魚麗之類麗譙樓名徒歩卒  驥騎卒錙壇宗廟祭祀之地言嗜欲戰於  中如室内之戈矛 無藏逆於得  有得則有失逆境已藏於順境之中 無以巧勝人無以謀勝人無以戰勝人夫殺 人之士民廉人之土地以養吾私與吾神者 其戰不知孰善勝之惡乎在君若勿己矣  君如必欲爲之而不已則如下文所云即  孟子無已則有一焉之意 修胷中之誠以應天地之情而勿攖夫民死 己脱矣君將惡乎用夫偃兵哉 黄帝將見大隗乎具茨之山方明爲御昌寓 驂乗張若謵朋前馬昆閽滑稽後車至於襄 城之野七聖皆迷無所問塗適遇牧馬童子 問塗焉曰若知具茨之山乎曰然若知大隗 之所存乎曰然黄帝曰異哉小童非徒知具 茨之山又知大隗之所存請問爲天下小童 曰夫爲天下者亦若此而已矣又奚事焉予 少而自遊於六合之内
Interpretation

Marquis Wu of Wei fell ill due to excessive contemplation. Xu Wugui asked what troubled him. The Marquis replied: "For a long time I've wished to consult you. I desire to cherish the people, practice humaneness and righteousness, and cease warfare. Would this be acceptable?"

Xu Wugui directly refuted: "No. What you call cherishing the people would become the beginning of harming them; proclaiming humaneness and ceasing warfare would become the root cause of war. If you proceed this way, success would be difficult. All deliberate pursuit of reputation becomes an instrument for inviting calamity. Though you wish to practice humaneness, you may end up with hypocrisy. Once action is taken, more actions must follow; when achievements are made, slander inevitably comes; when thoughts arise in the mind, conflict with external things emerges."

He further cautioned the Marquis: "Don't display military formations (the 'Crane Array' refers to battle tactics, while Liqiao is a tower name) on city towers, nor deploy infantry and cavalry (foot soldiers and warhorses) around ancestral temples (Zitan being sacrificial grounds). For the struggle of inner desires is as dangerous as brandishing weapons indoors. Don't crave gains, for within favorable circumstances already lie adversity. Don't use cleverness, schemes, or warfare to surpass others. Killing soldiers and civilians of other states to seize lands for personal desires—such warfare cannot determine who is more righteous."

Xu Wugui advised: "If you truly cannot stop these thoughts, better cultivate inner sincerity, follow the Dao (the Way) of nature, and avoid harassing the people. Then you'll naturally attain liberation—why deliberately pursue cessation of war?"

The subsequent passage recounts the Yellow Emperor's quest for the Dao: Leading six sages (Fangming, Changyu and others), the Yellow Emperor sought the Daoist sage Dawei at Mount Jucí, but got lost near Xiangcheng. There he met a horse-tending youth who knew not only the mountain's location but also Dawei's dwelling. Amazed by the child's wisdom, the Emperor asked about governing All Under Heaven. The youth replied: "Governing is as simple as herding horses—why complicate it? Since childhood I've wandered freely between heaven and earth." This implies that statecraft should follow nature's course without forced action.

 自述其少時則童子非眞童子乃色若孺  子耳 予適有瞀病(瞀音茂/眩也)有長者教予曰若乗日 之車而遊於襄城之野  以其瞀病故教以乗日之車則隨日而能  視 今予病少痊予又且復遊於六合之外夫爲 天下亦若此而已予又奚事焉黄帝曰夫爲 天下者則誠非吾子之事雖然請問爲天下 小童辭黄帝又問小童曰夫爲天下者亦奚 以異乎牧馬者哉亦去其害馬者而已矣黄 帝再拜稽首稱天師而退 知士無思慮之變則不樂辯士無談說之序 則不樂察士無凌誶之事則不樂皆囿於物 者也  凌轢也誶問也每事轢過誶問之 招世之士興朝中民之士榮官筋力之士矜 難勇敢之士奮患兵革之士樂戰枯槁之士 宿名法律之士廣治禮教之士敬容仁義之 士貴際  招世以天下爲己事如招攬之也興朝立  於朝也宿名留名也貴際以交際爲重也 農夫無草萊之事則不比商賈無市井之事 則不比庶人有旦暮之業則勸百工有器械 之巧則壯  比合也不比失業流散也勸者勉於力壯  者勇於爲 錢財不積則貪者憂權勢不比則夸者悲(夸/好) (大/也)勢物之徒樂變遭時有所用不能無爲也 此皆順比於歳不物於易者也馳其形性潛 之萬物終身不反悲夫  物事也徒類也勢事之類喜於變易無常
Interpretation

This passage recounts a dialogue between Zhuangzi and the Yellow Emperor, along with Zhuangzi's observations on various types of people.

Zhuangzi reflects that in his youth, though appearing childlike in demeanor, he was no ordinary child. He once suffered from vertigo (called "mou disease"), until an elder taught him to ride the "solar chariot" (symbolizing wisdom that follows the sun's natural movement) through the outskirts of Xiangcheng. By moving with the sunlight, he could perceive things clearly. Now that his condition has improved, he intends to continue wandering beyond the confines of heaven and earth. He considers governing the world to be just as simple—why should he trouble himself with it?

The Yellow Emperor acknowledges that statecraft shouldn't be Zhuangzi's concern, yet still seeks his counsel. Zhuangzi responds with a herding metaphor: governing is like tending horses—simply remove those that disrupt the herd. Deeply impressed, the Yellow Emperor bows respectfully, addressing him as "Celestial Master" (Tianshi).

Zhuangzi then analyzes various human dispositions:

  • Strategists find no joy without problems to solve
  • Debaters feel unfulfilled without arguments to pursue
  • Overseers remain discontent without cases to investigate

All these remain shackled by mundane affairs.

He further categorizes others:

  • Statesmen take pride in courtly service
  • Warriors glory in overcoming adversity
  • Soldiers delight in battlefield exploits
  • Hermits chase reclusive fame
  • Legalists zealously promote laws
  • Confucianists emphasize ritual propriety
  • Moralists prioritize human relationships

His concluding insight reveals:

Farmers scatter without fields, merchants languish without markets, commoners grow idle without daily work, artisans struggle without tools. The greedy fret over lost wealth, the power-hungry despair when influence wanes. All these types rise and fall with circumstance, anchoring their entire being to external things—pitiful souls who never transcend worldly attachments in their lifetime.

(Note: The "solar chariot" symbolizes Daoist wisdom of following natural patterns; "Celestial Master" honors realized adepts; "beyond the six directions" denotes transcendental realms.)

 人但當處之無心遇其有用之時則不能  無爲不必如貪者夸者之所爲能知此理  者如順合四時不與事物變易者也今人  馳其形與性潛入於萬物而不自知終其  身不能自反可悲已 莊子曰射者非前期而中謂之善射天下皆 羿也可乎惠子曰可莊子曰天下非有公是 也而各是其所是天下皆堯也可乎惠子曰 可莊子曰然則儒墨楊秉四與夫子爲五果 孰是邪或者若魯遽者邪其弟子曰我得夫 子之道矣吾能冬爨鼎而夏造冰矣魯遽曰 是直以陽召陽以陰召陰非吾所謂道也吾 示子乎吾道於是乎爲之調瑟廢一於堂廢 一於室鼓宫宫動鼓角角動音律同矣夫或 改調一弦於五音無當(去/聲)也鼓之二十五弦 皆動未始異於聲而音之君矣且若是者邪  射者必前期志的而中謂之善射今非前  期志的偶爾幸中便謂之善射是天下皆  羿也可乎以喻天下非有公是而各是其  所是以爲天下皆堯也可乎冬爨鼎者冬  寒之時能不以火而爨夏造冰者夏熱之  時能以水而爲冰二事雖若奇異然不過  因冬至陽生以陽召陽而爲火因夏至陰  生以陰召陰而爲冰未足以爲奇異也廢  猶置也置一瑟於堂置一瑟於室鼓此瑟  之宫聲則彼瑟之宫聲自動鼓此瑟之角  聲則彼瑟之角聲自動似爲奇異矣然其
Interpretation

This passage speaks of how one should maintain a state of wuxin (no-mind, free from forced intention), acting naturally when the time comes to fulfill one's function. True wuwei (non-action) is not the deliberate posturing of greedy or ostentatious people. Those who understand this principle flow as naturally as the changing seasons, never altering their true nature because of external things. Yet sadly, modern people indulge their physical forms and innate nature, drowning in material pursuits without self-awareness, remaining unenlightened throughout their entire lives—a truly pitiable state.

Zhuangzi employs archery as a metaphor: If an archer hits the target without consciously aiming, can this be called skillful shooting? Hui Shi replies affirmatively. Zhuangzi counters: Then wouldn't everyone in the world become as skilled as the legendary archer Yi? The discussion then shifts to standards of right and wrong: If the world lacks universally recognized truth, with each person considering themselves correct, wouldn't everyone then become as sage-like as the legendary ruler Yao? Again Hui Shi agrees. Through this, Zhuangzi points out that the doctrines of Confucianism, Mohism, Yang Zhu, and Gongsun Long—along with Hui Shi's own views—are all as one-sided as the disciples of Lu Ju (an ancient music master).

The disciples claimed mastery of their teacher's art, boasting they could cook in winter without fire and make ice in summer. Lu Ju exposed this as merely applying the simple principle of "summoning yang with yang and yin with yin" (the natural heating effect when yang qi arises at winter solstice, or cooling when yin qi emerges at summer solstice), which hardly constitutes the true Dao. He then demonstrated authentic mastery: placing two zithers in the main hall and an inner chamber, plucking the gong note (do) on one caused the other's gong string to resonate; changing to the jue note (mi) produced similar sympathetic vibration. This illustrates how the true Dao operates through holistic harmony—like adjusting one string that affects the entire musical system—rather than pursuing isolated miraculous effects.

 所以然者律相同故聲相應耳亦未爲奇  異如唐曹紹夔知音律洛陽有僧房中磬  日夜自鳴僧以爲怪因成疾紹夔素與僧  善來問疾僧造之故俄擊齋鍾磬復作聲  紹夔笑曰明日可設盛饌當爲除之僧如  其言食訖紹夔出懷中錯鑪擊數下而去  聲遂絶僧苦問其所以云此磬與鍾律合  故擊彼此應僧大喜疾亦愈又如李嗣眞  得車鐸振之地中有應者掘之得鍾蓋有  此事當主也學記鼓無當於五聲之當又  或别改調一弦於五音無所主而鼓之二  十五弦皆動此一弦者初無或異而能然  者乃是爲衆音之主故鼓之而衆弦莫不  聽命耳六十四調皆起於黄鍾之宫宫爲  君故能役他律此亦理之常何足爲奇異  且若是者邪言惠子之所以自是者亦若  魯遽邪 惠子曰今夫儒墨楊秉方且與我以辯句相 拂以辭相鎮以聲而未始吾非也則奚若矣  惠子答云莊子謂我與儒墨楊秉爲五不  知孰爲是而四子之辯終不能折我則我  是而四子非矣此義又如何 莊子曰齊人蹢(呈亦/反)子於宋者其命閽也不 以完其求鈃(音/刑)鍾也以束縛其求唐子也而 未始出域有遺類矣  蹢者蹢䠱行不進貌禮記蹢䠱焉踟蹰焉  鈃鍾鈃鼎與鍾也唐堂塗也乃庭中之路  詩云中唐有甓唐子者堂塗給使令之人
Interpretation

This passage explains the principle of acoustic resonance, which is actually not mysterious at all. It's like the incident involving Cao Shaokui, a Tang Dynasty expert in musical temperament: A Buddhist monk in Luoyang had a qing (a percussion instrument) in his room that would sound without being struck. The monk thought it was haunted and became ill from fright. When Cao went to visit, he happened to hear the temple bell ring, and the qing resonated in response. With a laugh, he asked the monk to prepare a feast. The next day, Cao filed the qing slightly with a rasp, and the strange sounds ceased—it turned out the qing and the bell shared the same pitch, causing resonance. The monk suddenly understood and recovered from his illness. Similarly, Li Sizhen discovered that when a carriage bell rang, there was an echo underground; upon digging, they found a bell—the same principle at work.

The Xueji (Records of Learning) states that drumbeats themselves don't belong to the Five Notes (of the pentatonic scale), yet they can command them. When plucking one string on a qin (zither), the other twenty-five strings resonate because that string is the tonic. All sixty-four musical modes originate from the Huangzhong Gong (the ancient pitch standard), just as the Gong note (the tonic) governs the other notes—this is a natural law, nothing strange about it.

Later, Zhuangzi uses a metaphor to mock Hui Shi: It's like a man from Qi who sent his son to Song to work as a gatekeeper but deliberately crippled him; or someone who wants to find a xingzhong (a type of bell) but keeps it tightly bound; or someone who wants to command people in the courtyard but never steps outside—such self-righteous methods are doomed to fail. Hui Shi was always debating with Confucians, Mohists, and Yang Zhu's school, convinced everyone else was wrong and only he was right. Zhuangzi saw this as just as absurd as that man from Qi.

 猶周禮云門子今俗云廳子耳田子方篇  亦云求馬於唐肆蓋貨馬之肆亦有堂塗  馬所出入也齊人有蹢行其子於宋而使  爲閽人者以其形之不完故弃之外國然  形雖不完畢竟是親子何忍弃之試推其  類其求鈃鍾也束縛維係之惟恐損壞比  之棄其子者爲何如其求唐子也但使之  給堂塗使令未始出疆域之外比之棄其  子於外國爲何如是於惟類之道有遺矣  人於親疏貴賤遠近之類蔽而不自覺以  喻惠子知四子之辯爲非而不知自己之  非也 夫楚人寄而蹢閽者夜半於無人之時而與 舟人鬪未始離於岑而足以造於怨也  離罹同至也岑山岸也楚人寄寓船上而  蹢躅行爲他國之閽者夜半於無人之時  而與舟人爭鬪不思未到岸時何可與人  鬪徒足以造怨而已此又進一歩說與人  爭鬪不惟有自蔽之患亦且有禍 莊子送葬過惠子之墓顧謂從者曰郢人堊 (句)漫其鼻端若繩翼使匠石斲之匠石運斤 成風聽而斲之盡堊而鼻不傷郢人立不失 容宋元君聞之召匠石曰嘗試爲寡人爲之 匠石曰臣則嘗能斲之雖然臣之質  體也立者爲體斲者爲用 死乆矣自夫子之死也吾無以爲質矣吾無 與言之矣 管仲有病桓公問之曰仲父之病病矣可不 謂云(告言/也)至於大病則寡人惡乎屬國而可
Interpretation

This passage contains three parables, each conveying principles for navigating human relationships.

The first story draws from the Rites of Zhou, mentioning how gatekeepers were commonly called "hall attendants." The Tian Zifang chapter records: A man went to a horse market (Tangsi) to find a horse, since markets had passages for horses to enter. In Qi, a man sent his lame son to serve as a gatekeeper in Song, showing disdain for his physical impairment. Yet how could one bear to abandon their own flesh and blood? In contrast, this same person would carefully wrap ritual vessels to prevent damage and only put horses to work in pastures—both better than abandoning his son. This illustrates how people often confuse priorities regarding intimacy and social status, much like how the philosopher Huizi could spot flaws in others' arguments but remained blind to his own.

The second parable tells of a Chu man working as a gatekeeper in another state who fought with a boatman at midnight when no one was around. Starting conflicts before even reaching shore (cen meaning riverbank) only invites resentment. This further demonstrates how quarreling not only clouds one's judgment but invites calamity.

The third famous story occurs when Zhuangzi passes Huizi's tomb: In Ying (Chu's capital), a man with white lime on his nose had the master craftsman Shi chop it off with an axe. Shi swung with such precision that he removed the lime without harming the nose. Later, when Duke Yuan of Song asked Shi to demonstrate, the craftsman replied, "My partner (zhi referring to his collaborator) has long been dead." Zhuangzi used this to lament: "Since Huizi's passing, I've had no one left to truly converse with."

Finally, the passage recounts how when Guan Zhong fell gravely ill, Duke Huan of Qi asked: "Your illness is severe—do you have final instructions? If it worsens, to whom should I entrust state affairs?" This exchange reveals the profound trust between ruler and minister.

管仲曰公誰欲與公曰鮑叔牙曰不可其爲 人絜廉善士也其於不已若者不比之又一 聞人之過終身不忘使之治國上且鉤(亦逆/也) 乎君下且逆乎民其得罪於君也將弗乆矣 公曰然則孰可對曰勿已則隰朋可其爲人 也上忘而下畔愧不若黄帝而衰不已若者 以德分人謂之聖以財分人謂之賢以賢臨 人未有得人者也以賢下人未有不得人者 也其於國有不聞也其於家有不見也勿已 則隰朋可 吴王浮于江登乎狙之山衆狙見之恂然(懼/也) 棄而走逃於深蓁有一狙焉委蛇攫𢮞(音搔/曲折) (而攀/援)見(音/現)巧于王王射之敏給搏捷矢王命 相(去/聲)趨(音/促)射之狙執死(執失/而死)王顧謂其友顔 不疑曰之狙也伐其巧恃其便以敖(音/傲)予以 至此殛也戒之哉嗟乎無以汝色驕人哉顔 不疑歸而師董梧以鋤其色去樂(音/浴)辭顯三 年而國人稱之 南伯子綦隱几而坐仰天而嘘顔成子入見 曰夫子物之尤也形固可使若槁木心固可 使若死灰乎曰吾嘗居山穴之口矣當是時 也田禾一睹我而齊國之衆三賀之(賀其/得賢)我 必先(去/聲)之彼故知之我必賣之彼故鬻之若 我而不有之彼惡得而知之若我而不賣之 彼惡得而鬻之嗟乎我悲人之自喪者吾又
Interpretation

Guan Zhong (a renowned statesman of the Qi state during the Spring and Autumn period) said to Duke Huan of Qi: "Whom do you wish to appoint as your assistant?" The Duke replied: "What about Bao Shuya?" Guan Zhong responded: "No. Bao Shuya is too upright and incorruptible—a man of high moral character—but he refuses to associate with those he deems inferior. Moreover, once he becomes aware of someone's faults, he never forgets them. If he were to govern the state, he would antagonize the ruler above and offend the common people below. He would soon incur the ruler's wrath."

The Duke asked: "Then who would be suitable?" Guan Zhong said: "If we must choose, Xi Peng would do. This man neither boasts of his merits before superiors nor harshly criticizes the common people. Though he feels ashamed of not measuring up to the Yellow Emperor (the legendary sage king), he treats those inferior to himself with kindness. To transform others through virtue is called sagely wisdom; to aid others with material resources is called worthy ability. Those who pride themselves on their worthiness find it hard to gain others' allegiance, while those who humbly serve others with their worthiness will surely win hearts. In governing the state, he knows how to focus on major issues while letting minor ones slide; in managing his household, he understands when to turn a blind eye. If we must choose, Xi Peng is the most suitable."

The King of Wu was crossing the river by boat and climbed Monkey Mountain. All the monkeys fled in panic at the sight of him, hiding deep in the thick grass. Only one monkey remained calm, swinging leisurely from branch to branch, showing off its skills before the king. The king shot an arrow at it, but the monkey deftly caught it midair. The king then ordered his attendants to shoot together, and the monkey was finally struck down. The king said to his friend Yan Buyi: "This monkey flaunted its skill and relied on its cleverness to look down on me—that’s why it met its death. Take this as a warning! Never treat others with arrogance." Yan Buyi returned home and became a disciple of Dong Wu, shedding his proud demeanor, abandoning indulgence, and resigning from office. Three years later, the entire populace praised him.

Nanbo Ziqi (a Daoist figure) sat quietly leaning against a table, sighing as he gazed at the sky. His disciple Yan Chengzi entered and said: "Master, you are truly extraordinary! Can the body be as still as withered wood, and the mind as silent as dead ashes?" Nanbo Ziqi replied: "I once lived in a mountain cave. At that time, whenever Tian He (the ruler of Qi) saw me, the people of Qi would congratulate him three times (for gaining a worthy scholar). It must have been because I first revealed my uniqueness that they came to know me; it must have been because I boasted of myself that they spread word of me. If I hadn’t considered myself special, how would they have known? If I hadn’t promoted myself, how would they have publicized me? Alas! I lament how people lose their true nature."

悲夫悲人者吾又悲夫悲人之悲者其後而 日遠矣  自此而後相悲於無窮也 仲尼之楚楚王觴之孫叔敖執爵而立市南 冝僚受酒而祭曰古之人乎於此言已  贊仲尼非今人之比而爲之乞言 曰丘也聞不言之言矣未之嘗言於此乎言 之市南宜僚弄丸而兩家之難解孫叔敖甘 (音/酣)寢秉羽而郢人投兵丘願有喙三尺  孫叔敖蔿賈之子名艾獵爲楚莊王令尹  在仲尼前市南宜僚善弄丸鈴常八箇在  空中一箇在手楚與宋戰宜僚披胸受刃  於軍前弄丸鈴一軍停戰遂勝之亦在仲  尼卒後寓言而已言二人皆以無爲而解  難息兵則吾亦何以言爲若言可用則吾  願有喙三尺矣言無所用則無用如此喙  也 彼之謂不道之道此之謂不言之辯  彼謂二子此謂仲尼 故德總乎道之所一而言休乎知之所不知 至矣道之所一者德不能同也知之所不能 知者辯不能舉也名若儒墨而凶矣故海不 辭東流大之至也聖人并包天地澤及天下 而不知其誰氏是故生無爵死無謚實不聚 名不立此之謂大人狗不以善吠爲良人不 以善言爲賢而況爲大乎夫爲大不足以爲 大而況爲德乎夫大備矣莫若天地然奚求 焉而大備矣知大備者無求無失無棄不以 物易己也反己而不窮循古而不摩大人之 誠
Interpretation

This passage presents a profound allegory about "Wuwei" (non-action) and "wordless teaching." It begins by lamenting the endless cycle of mutual pity among people, then recounts how Confucius (Zhongni), while visiting the state of Chu, was hosted by the Chu king at a banquet. During the gathering, the virtuous minister Sunshu Ao (son of Wei Jia, who served as prime minister under King Zhuang of Chu) stood holding a wine cup, while another wise scholar, Shi'nan Yiliao, received the wine to offer libation to ancient sages. Praising Confucius as different from contemporary men, he sought his counsel.

Confucius responded: "I have heard of the principle of 'wordless teaching,' yet here I must speak." He then cited two examples: Shi'nan Yiliao, skilled at juggling balls and bells, once used this performance art to avert a war between two states; Sunshu Ao, simply reclining with a feather fan, made the Chu people lay down their weapons. Confucius sighed that if words were truly effective, he would wish for a three-foot-long mouth to debate eloquently—but since words prove futile, such an endowment would be meaningless.

Through these historical figures, the passage illustrates how Shi'nan Yiliao resolved conflict through performance art and Sunshu Ao pacified strife through Wuwei—both achieving solutions via "non-action." Confucius suggests true wisdom lies not in eloquence ("wordless debate"), and the highest truths often transcend verbal expression ("the Way that cannot be spoken").

The text then unfolds deeper philosophy: Genuine De (Virtue) belongs to the wholeness of Dao, while words halt at the frontier where wisdom cannot penetrate. The sea becomes great by never rejecting eastern-flowing waters; the sage embraces heaven-earth and blesses all creatures without claiming fame. Just as good dogs need not bark to prove their worth, worthy men need not display talent through speech—how much more so for those pursuing greatness? True "greatness" requires no forced pursuit, being complete like the self-so perfection of heaven-earth. Those who understand this seek nothing, never alter their nature for external things, return to original authenticity without exhaustion, and follow the ancient Way without affectation—this constitutes the true realm of the "Great Man" (one who has attained Dao).

子綦有八子陳諸前召九方歅(音/因)曰爲我相 吾子孰爲祥九方歅曰梱也爲祥子綦瞿然 喜曰奚若曰梱也將與國君同食以終其身 子綦索然出涕曰吾子何爲以至於是極也 九方歅曰夫與國君同食澤及三族而況父 母乎今夫子聞之而泣是禦福也子則祥矣 父則不祥子綦曰歅汝何足以識之而梱祥 邪盡於酒肉入於鼻口矣而何足以知其所 自來吾未嘗爲牧而牂生於奥未嘗好田而 鶉生於宎(音/要)  奥室西南隅宎室東南隅未嘗牧羊未嘗  田獵而二物乃得於吾室中若生於奥宎  焉即詩所謂不狩不獵胡瞻爾庭有縣鶉  兮但下得生字差異 若勿怪何邪吾所與吾子遊者遊於天地吾 與之邀樂於天吾與之邀食於地吾不與之 爲事不與之爲謀不與之爲怪吾與之乗天 地之誠而不以物與之相攖吾與之一委蛇 而不與之爲事所宜今也然句有世俗之償 焉凡有怪徵者必有怪行殆乎句非我與子 之罪幾天與之也吾是以泣也無幾何而使 梱之於燕盜得之於道全而鬻之則難不若 刖之則易於是乎刖而鬻之於齊適當渠公 之街然身食肉而終 齧缺遇許由曰子將奚之曰將逃堯曰奚謂 邪曰夫堯畜畜然仁吾恐其爲天下笑後世 其人與人相食與(平/聲)夫民不難聚也愛之則
Interpretation

Nanguo Ziqi had eight sons. One day, he summoned them all and invited the physiognomist Jiufang Yin (an ancient expert in face-reading) to examine their fortunes. Ziqi asked, "Which of my sons do you predict will have the most auspicious destiny?" Jiufang Yin pointed to a boy named Kun and declared, "This child will enjoy the greatest blessings—he shall dine at the king's table and live in lifelong prosperity."

Upon hearing this, Ziqi suddenly turned pale and wept, exclaiming, "How could my son come to such a fate!" Puzzled, Jiufang Yin replied, "To share meals with the ruler means blessings extending to three generations of kin—father's clan, mother's lineage, and wife's family—let alone his own parents. Yet you weep at good news? This is rejecting fortune itself. A son's prosperity should bring his father joy."

Ziqi explained: "Ah, Jiufang Yin, you understand nothing of true blessing. What you call Kun's fortune merely means meat and wine upon his table. But do you know whence such feasts come? It's as if ewes appeared in my home though I never kept sheep, or quails materialized though I never hunted—like the verse in the Book of Songs that asks, 'How came the quail to the non-hunter's house?' When unearned gains arrive mysteriously, should we not be wary?"

"The way I raise my children is to let them dwell with Heaven and Earth. Together we partake of celestial joy and terrestrial nourishment, but I teach them no worldly stratagems, no schemes for fame. We follow the Dao's flow, untethered by external things, accepting each circumstance. Now this so-called 'fortune' appears—but extraordinary omens always precede extraordinary calamities. This is no fault of ours, but Heaven's jest! Hence my tears."

Later events proved Ziqi right. Before long, Kun was sent to Yan territory, only to be captured by bandits en route. Finding a whole man troublesome to sell, they amputated his feet (a penal mutilation) and sold him to Qi. There, by ironic fortune, Kun became a market supervisor for Duke Qu of Qi—thus literally fulfilling the prediction of "lifelong meat-eating."

The record continues with another parable: The hermit Nie Que once met Xu You (the renowned recluse from Emperor Yao's era) and asked his destination. Xu You replied, "I flee from Emperor Yao." When Nie Que asked why, Xu You explained: "Yao spreads benevolent governance everywhere. I fear this will make fools of the world, and later ages may witness men devouring each other. The people are easily governed—treat them simply with kindness."

親利之則至譽之則勸致其所惡則散愛利 出乎仁義捐仁義者寡利仁義者衆夫仁義 之行唯且無誠且假夫禽貪者器是以一人 之斷制利天下譬之猶一覕(薄結/反)也  一覕者一頃刻之見不足爲定也 夫堯知賢人之利天下也而不知其賊天下 也夫惟外乎賢者知之矣 有暖姝者有濡需者有卷婁(音權/僂)者所謂暖 姝者學一先生之言則暖暖(暄同自/温也)姝姝(自/美) (也)而私自悅也自以爲足矣而未知未始有 物也是以謂暖姝者也濡需者豕蝨是也擇 䟽鬛自以爲廣宫大囿奎蹄曲隈乳間股脚 自以爲安室利處不知屠者之一旦鼓臂布 草操煙火而己與豕俱焦也此以域進此以 域退此所謂濡需者也  宴安不自拔濡滯需待 卷僂者舜也羊肉不慕蟻蟻慕羊肉羶也舜 有羶行百姓悅之故三徙成都(成都/邑)至鄧之 墟而十有萬家堯聞舜之賢舉之童土之地 (不毛/之地)曰冀得其來之澤舜舉乎童土之地年 齒長矣聰明衰矣而不得歸休所謂卷婁者  卷曲傴僂不得伸舒 是以神人惡衆至衆至則不比不比則不利 也故無所甚親無所甚疏抱德煬和以順天 下此謂眞人於蟻棄知於魚得計於羊棄意 以目視目以耳聽耳以心復心若然者其平 也繩其變也循
Interpretation

This passage employs vivid metaphors to reveal the illusory nature of worldly pursuits such as forced benevolence, fame, and reputation for virtue, pointing out that true wisdom lies in transcending these external constraints.

The text describes three types of people who have lost their original authenticity:

The first are the "self-satisfied" (暖姝者), like those who study a single school of thought and become complacent, akin to a frog at the bottom of a well, believing it has grasped the entirety of truth.

The second are the "complacent parasites" (濡需者), much like lice living on a pig, thinking they have found a safe haven, unaware that they may be burned alive along with the pig at any moment.

The third are the "exhausted seekers" (卷娄者), exemplified by the sage-king Shun. Though revered by the people for his virtue, he spent his life in ceaseless toil, never finding rest—like ants drawn to the smell of mutton, unable to break free from their obsession.

The author particularly criticizes those who exploit the name of benevolence and righteousness for personal gain, emphasizing that true virtue must arise from the heart. To impose one person’s standards on the entire world is as unreliable as judging something from a fleeting glance. Yao, for instance, knew that virtuous men could benefit the world but failed to recognize how they could also bring harm.

Those who have truly attained the Dao (神人, divine person) despise being pursued by crowds, for where there are many people, conflict inevitably arises. They neither deliberately seek closeness nor enforce distance, but simply abide in their natural essence, harmonizing with Heaven and Earth. Such individuals are called "authentic persons" (真人). Like ants relinquishing their obsessions, fish finding ease in water, or sheep shedding their desires, they see only what their eyes naturally perceive, hear only what their ears naturally receive, allowing the mind to return to its original purity.

In life, they move with the straightness of an inked line, yet when facing change, they adapt effortlessly in accordance with nature.

 上言舜得衆而不得歸休故此言是以神  人惡衆至衆至則各有好惡而不比不比  則紛爭起而不利故與人無所親踈抱道  温和以順天下者此之謂眞人前所言蟻  慕羊肉者蟻能有知故不能無慕羊不能  無意故不能不羶眞人則於蟻棄知於羊  棄意却插入於魚得計亦因前面濠上魚  樂之說故來得不覺以目視目以耳聽耳  以心復心此不是等閑語非親造其境者  不能知其平也繩平是寂然不動之時繩  者直而已更無邪曲其變也循變是感物  而動之時循者事物之交唯順以應之不  爲其所亂 古之眞人以天待之不以人入天  天者自然也人則有爲矣 古之眞人得之也生失之也死得之也死失 之也生藥也其實堇也桔梗也雞𢋊也豕零 也是時爲帝者也何可勝言句踐也以甲楯 三千棲於會稽唯種也能知亡之所以存唯 種也不知其身之所以愁  古之眞人付得失於自然以爲有得必有  失有失必有得一件生則一件死一件死  則一件生常相倚伏却以藥譬之堇與桔  梗雞𢋊豕零相爲君臣佐使得失何常之  有又以越事證之大夫種知越亡之後可  以存而不知反以殺其身是皆得失無常  者也 故曰鴟目有所適鶴脛有所節解之也悲  自此連以五箇故字申言其義鴟目夜則  明晝則昏自有所適鶴脛長則宜短則不
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the way of being practiced by ancient Perfected Persons (zhenren) through multiple metaphors that reveal the profound philosophy of "following natural spontaneity."

The text begins by recounting how Emperor Shun, despite being widely revered, found no peace—illustrating how gatherings of people inevitably give rise to preferences and aversions, leading to contention. The truly Dao-attained Perfected Person neither seeks excessive intimacy nor creates distance with others, but instead upholds the Great Dao (Da Dao), gently accommodating all under heaven. Just as ants are drawn to mutton while sheep inevitably carry their own scent, the Perfected Person transcends such states of mutual attraction.

The passage employs the phrase "using eyes to see eyes, ears to hear ears, and heart/mind to return to heart/mind" to describe the Perfected Person's return to primordial simplicity. In stillness, this state is as pure as a straight plumb line; in movement, it flows with the myriad things without becoming disordered. Ancient Perfected Persons treated all matters according to the Dao of natural spontaneity, never imposing human will upon nature.

Medicinal herbs then serve as another metaphor: plants like violetwort, platycodon root, foxnut, and polyporus can each become the sovereign herb (dizhe, "emperor medicine") depending on circumstances, demonstrating that gain and loss follow no fixed pattern. The example of Wen Zhong, a minister of Yue State who understood the principles of national survival yet failed to preserve himself, further illustrates the unpredictability of fortune.

Finally, the text compares the physiological traits of owls and cranes: an owl's eyes are adapted for night vision, while a crane's long legs have their natural limits—attempting to alter these would only cause suffering. These examples collectively demonstrate that all things possess their inherent natural tendencies, and forced changes inevitably bring misfortune. The Perfected Person, profoundly understanding this principle, thus follows the natural course effortlessly.

 宜自有所節若以刀解之傷其生矣言但  當因其自然也 故曰風之過河也有損焉日之過河也有損 焉請只風與日相與守河而河以爲未始其 攖也恃源而往者也  此一節又說向親切處來不是教人事物  之來强排遣將去直是自家有箇主張如  水之有源頭方能如此 故水之守士也審影之守人也審物之守物 也審  言此箇道理元相厠守未嘗相離如水之  守土影之守人物之守物審定而不移 故目之於明也殆耳之於聰也殆心之於殉 也殆凡能其於府也殆殆之成也不給改禍 之長也兹萃其反也循功其果也待乆而人 以爲己寳不亦悲乎故有亡國戮民無已不 知問是也  又以三殆字反前三審字心與耳目若徇  外則不能審定而危殆矣又推廣言之凡  有所能皆爲害舉府則藏在其中矣殆之  成不及可改而禍之長滋積言不好則甚  速也欲其反殆爲安反禍爲福必須循循  漸進之功其剛果自克者亦必待乆而後  能言好則甚難也而世之人玩溺耳目聰  明心思之欲如寳然近而喪身大而亡國  戮民其禍未已蓋不知問此未有曉之者 故足之於地也踐雖踐恃其所不蹍而後善 博也人之知也少雖少恃其所不知而後知 天之所謂也知太一知太陰知太目知太鈞 知太方知太信知太定至矣太一通之太陰
Interpretation

This scripture uses natural phenomena to illustrate the principles of cultivating mind and nature.

First, it employs the examples of wind and sunlight: When wind blows over a river, it carries away moisture; when sunlight shines upon the water, it causes evaporation. Yet the river, replenished by its living source, does not feel disturbed. This mirrors how a practitioner must have an inner foundation to remain steady amid external disruptions.

Next, it draws analogies with water and land, shadow and person, object and self: Water naturally adheres to the earth, shadows naturally follow people, and all things naturally maintain their intrinsic nature. Such natural interdependence is unshakable—cultivation should likewise achieve this state of unity between inner and outer.

Then it points out three dangers: The eyes excessively seeking brightness, the ears excessively seeking sharpness, and the mind excessively chasing external things—all bring harm. Any overuse of sensory faculties damages the inner "treasuries" (referring to the body's Jing (essence), Qi (vital energy), and Shen (spirit)). Calamity forms swiftly, yet reversing it requires gradual effort; only perseverance yields results. Sadly, people often indulge in sensory pleasures, ultimately leading to ruin—even the downfall of nations.

Finally, it uses the metaphor of stepping on the ground: Though the foot touches only a small patch, it relies on the vast untrodden earth to move freely. Similarly, human knowledge is limited, yet it is through the unknown that one comprehends the Dao (the Way). To recognize the highest truth (Taiji, the Supreme Ultimate), understand the deepest mysteries (Taiyin, the Great Yin), grasp the fundamental laws (Taijun, the Great Balance), and attain the most complete state (Taiding, the Great Stillness)—"Taiji" is the root Dao that permeates all things.

解之太目視之太鈞縁之太方體之太信稽 之太定持之盡有天循有照冥有樞始有彼 則其解之也似不解之者知之也似不知之 也不知而後知之  足之所踐者無幾而要所不踐者方可行  立知之所知者無幾而要所不知方爲大  知太一太陰太目太鈞太方太信皆是不  拘於小處吾以爲盡於此矣而又有不盡  之天吾以爲自循其所當行而已而又有  照臨之者吾以爲杳冥矣而又有執其樞  者吾以爲自此始矣而又有彼焉則彼又  自爲始因上文太陰解之言如此究竟則  解之也似不曾解之知之也似不曾知之  然惟不知而後能知之 其問之也不可以有崖而不可以無崖頡滑 有實古今不代而不可以虧則可不謂有大 揚攉(音/霍)乎闔不亦問是已奚惑然爲以不惑 解惑復於不惑是尚大不惑  上文言不知問是也故此提出問字來結  若問此道本無崖際而亦未嘗無崖際說  著來只似前所言頡滑堅白之辯而此却  有其實凡物皆有更代而此無更代不可  虧損揚攉許愼註淮南子云無慮大數名  也亦解得不明白蓋揚者舉揚也攉者反  覆手也當衆舉揚對答以手反覆指陳之  也二字想是當時俗語今襌家升座說法  亦然言此道說來似差異却又眞實豈不  是箇大舉揚話柄人何不問此而自迷惑
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the dialectical thinking in Daoist epistemology. Seeing too clearly with the eyes can paradoxically create limitations, measuring things with rigid standards (taijun) leads to inflexibility, and excessive fixation on form (taixin) causes one to lose the essence. True profound understanding appears as if one doesn't comprehend, and genuine knowing seems like not knowing—only by first relinquishing preconceived knowledge can one attain true wisdom.

The ground beneath our feet is limited, but it's the unexplored territory that demands investigation; what we know is meager, while exploring the unknown constitutes great wisdom. Concepts like "Taiyi" (cosmic origin), "Taiyin" (hidden essence), and "Taimu" (excessive observation) should never be taken at face value. We may believe we've exhausted all truth, yet the Dao (the Way) is boundless; we may think following rules suffices, yet higher laws oversee all; we may assume we've entered the mysterious darkness of profound states, yet pivotal mechanisms still govern; we may imagine we've found the source, yet deeper origins always exist.

The text employs the metaphor of "xiehua" (debating techniques): the true Dao has neither boundaries nor the absence of boundaries, much like how contradictions in debate may conceal profound truths. All things undergo transformation, yet only the great Dao remains unchanging. The term "yangque" (originally meaning gesturing with hands) refers to the vivid demonstrations of Chan masters—when speaking of the Dao, apparent contradictions reveal undeniable truth. Why seek liberation from confusion? True liberation lies in transcending confusion itself.

The passage concludes by noting: inquiries about the Dao inherently lack fixed answers, just as ancient philosophers debated "jianbai" (the School of Names' paradox of hardness and whiteness). The key lies in apprehending the unchanging reality within. This mode of cognition is precisely the path to supreme wisdom.

 爲有能以己之不迷解人之迷使之亦復  於不迷則庶幾都不迷矣雖無問者猶冀  有能開悟之神仙中人用心往往如此 南華眞經循本
Interpretation

This passage speaks of how Dao cultivators should use their own awakening to help others overcome confusion. It conveys that when someone who has attained a state of clarity uses this understanding to assist those still lost in delusion, guiding them back to clarity, then perhaps all may become free from confusion. Even when no one actively seeks guidance, the Dao practitioner still maintains hope, ever ready to enlighten and instruct others. Those who have truly attained the Dao—the realized immortals (referring to accomplished adepts)—often embody this very intention: they constantly carry within them the compassionate heart to deliver all beings.

卷之二十三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0135); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 22 Vol. 24 →