中文 · EN

《南華真經循本》Vol. 22

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 22 / 30 5,330 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經循本》 Vol. 22 (Dongshen 洞神部, 30 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 11 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經循本》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經循本卷之二十二因二   廬陵竹峯羅勉道述   門人彭祥點校  雜篇    庚桑 老聃之役(供役/者)有庚桑楚者偏得老聃之道 以北居畏壘(音根/磊)之山其臣之畫然知者去 之其妾之挈然仁者遠(去/聲)之擁腫之與居鞅 掌之爲使居三年畏壘大壤(音/穰)畏壘之民相 與言曰庚桑子之始來吾灑然異之(史記/音跣)今 吾曰計之而不足歲計之而有餘庶幾其聖 人乎子胡不相與尸而祝之杜而稷之乎庚 桑子聞之南面而不釋然弟子異之庚桑子 曰弟子何異於予夫春氣發而百草生正得 秋而萬寳成夫春與秋豈無得而然哉大道 己行矣吾聞至人尸居環堵之室而百姓猖 狂不知所往今以畏壘之細民而竊竊焉欲 俎豆予千賢人之間我其杓(音/標)之人邪吾是 以不釋於老聃之言  至人尸居環堵之室而百姓猖狂不知所  如往言至人隱處而人不知其姓名故猖  狂莫知所歸杓與標同揭木爲標則人皆  見之不釋於老聃之言謂老聃之道以無  爲爲主而人猶不能相忘吾是以不釋於  其所言 弟子曰不然夫尋常之溝巨魚無所還其體 而鯢鰌爲之制步仞之丘陵巨獸無所隱其 軀而㜸狐爲之样且夫尊賢授能先善與利 自古堯舜以然而況畏壘之民乎夫子亦聽
Interpretation

Among Laozi's disciples was one named Gengsang Chu, who had profoundly grasped the Master's teachings of the Dao. He moved to dwell in the Weilei Mountains in the north, where all his clever, self-important attendants departed, and those who conspicuously displayed humaneness and righteousness left as well—only simple folk and rough servants remained with him. After three years, the Weilei region experienced abundant harvests.

The local people began saying: "When Master Gengsang first arrived, we thought him peculiar. But now, calculating the results—though no immediate effects were visible, in the long run he's brought us such benefits—could he be a sage? Why don't we make offerings and sacrifices to him?" When Gengsang Chu heard this, he sat facing south with visible displeasure, puzzling his disciples.

Gengsang Chu explained: "Why your surprise? When spring's Yang Qi arises and grasses grow, when autumn comes and all things ripen—is this human doing? It's simply the Dao's natural movement. I've heard that those who truly attain the Dao dwell like corpses in humble huts of tamped earth, while the people remain free and unrestrained. Yet now these Weilei villagers privately wish to enshrine me among sages—have I not become a conspicuous target? This is why I feel uneasy about departing from Laozi's teachings."

[Note: Here "those who attain the Dao" (至人) refers to highly cultivated adepts; "dwell like corpses" (尸居) describes quiescent stillness; "huts of tamped earth" (环堵之室) means simple four-walled dwellings; and "free and unrestrained" (猖狂) indicates the people's natural spontaneity.]

His disciples objected: "In small ditches, great fish cannot turn about, yet loaches find perfect freedom; low hills cannot conceal fierce beasts, yet foxes reign supreme. Since ancient times, Yao and Shun honored the worthy and benefited the people—how much more should Weilei's people do so? Master, why not follow their natural inclination?"

[This dialogue illustrates the Daoist principle of "governing through non-action" (无为而治), showing how true sages avoid fame and act through natural accord rather than deliberate intervention.]

矣庚桑子曰小子來夫函車之獸介而離山則 不免於網罟之患吞舟之魚碭而失水則蟻 能苦之故鳥獸不厭高魚鼈不厭深夫全其 形生之人藏其身也不厭深渺而己矣且夫 二子者堯舜又何足以稱揚哉是其於辯也 將妄鑿垣墻而殖蓬蒿也簡髮而櫛數米而 炊竊竊乎又何足以濟世哉舉賢則民相軋 任知則民相盜之數物者不足以厚民民之 於利甚勤子有殺父臣有殺君正晝爲盜日 中宂阫(音/坏)吾語汝大亂之本必生乎堯舜之 間其末存乎千世之後其必有人與人相食 者也 南榮趎蹙然正坐曰若趎之年者已長矣將 惡乎託業以及此言邪庚桑子曰全汝形抱 汝生無使汝思慮營營若此三年則可以及 此言也南榮趎曰目之與形吾不知其異也 而盲者不能自見耳之與形吾不知其異也 而聾者不能自聞心之與形吾不知其異也 而狂者不能自得形之與形亦辟(音闢/開也)矣而 物或間之邪欲相求而不能相得今謂趎曰 全汝形抱汝生勿使汝思慮營營趎勉聞道 達耳矣庚桑子曰辭盡矣曰奔蜂不能化藿 蠋越雞不能化鵠卵魯雞固能矣雞之與雞 其德非不同也有能與不能者其才固有巨 小也今吾才小不足以化子子胡不南見老 子  庚桑子教南榮趎以全形趎不以爲然曰
Interpretation

Gengsangzi (a Daoist figure) said to Nanrong Chu: Observe those giant beasts capable of swallowing chariots—once they leave the deep mountains, they inevitably fall into hunters' traps. Those massive fish that can devour boats—when stranded ashore, even ants can harm them. Therefore, birds and beasts always fly to high places, while fish and turtles dive into the depths. Those who wish to preserve their lives should likewise conceal themselves, the more deeply hidden, the better. As for sage-kings like Yao and Shun, what is truly praiseworthy about them? Their governance doctrines are as futile as randomly chiseling walls to plant weeds or counting grains of rice to cook a meal—how could such trivial methods truly save the world and benefit the people?

He then criticized the flaws of promoting the worthy and employing the wise: Honoring the virtuous leads people to scheme against one another, while appointing the clever incites deception among the populace. These superficial solutions cannot genuinely bring welfare to the people. Nowadays, people pursue profit by any means—sons kill fathers, ministers murder rulers, daylight robberies occur, and walls are breached at high noon. I tell you, the root of the world's chaos was planted during Yao and Shun's era, and its consequences will persist for millennia, ultimately leading to the horror of cannibalism.

Nanrong Chu straightened respectfully and asked: For someone my age, how should I cultivate to understand these truths? Gengsangzi replied: Preserve your body, safeguard your innate nature (xing), and refrain from idle thoughts all day. Persist in this for three years, and you will attain realization. Puzzled, Nanrong Chu said: Eyes share the same structure, yet the blind cannot see; ears are no different, yet the deaf cannot hear; hearts are alike, yet the mad lose their reason. Though bodies are fundamentally interconnected, why do these barriers exist? I seek the Great Dao (Da Dao) but cannot grasp its essence. When you tell me to "preserve the form and embrace life, neither thinking nor deliberating," these words barely enter my ears but fail to take root in understanding.

Gengsangzi said: The principle has been fully explained. It's like how small wasps cannot hatch bean insects, or how Yue hens cannot incubate swan eggs—only the great fowls of Lu can accomplish this. Though all are fowl, their innate capacities differ. My ability is limited; I cannot enlighten you. Why not journey south to meet Laozi?

This dialogue employs vivid metaphors to expound the Daoist wisdom of "remaining deeply concealed," critiques the shortcomings of Confucian governance ideals, and reveals that true cultivation lies in returning to simplicity. Nanrong Chu's confusion reflects common obstacles faced by ordinary seekers of the Dao, ultimately guiding him to seek instruction from a wiser teacher—Laozi himself.

 試以形言之耳目心同是形體初無或異  而盲聾者不能自見聞狂者不能自得當  其賦形未嘗不開闢而物或間之則雖欲  相求而不能相得是形不可全也趎雖勉  强聞庚桑子之道不過達於耳而巳目猶  無所見心猶無所得也庚桑子却引喻曰  人有常言其㫖盡矣曰奔蜂不能化藿蠋  越雞不能化鵠卵以喻吾之才小不能化  南榮趎故又使之見老聃也 南榮趎贏糧七日七夜至老子之所老子曰 子自楚之所來乎南榮趎曰唯老子曰子何 與人偕來之衆也南榮趎懼然顧其後老子 曰子不知吾所謂乎南榮趎俯而慙仰而歡 曰今者吾忘吾答因失吾問老子曰何謂也 南榮趎曰不知乎人謂我朱愚  丹朱不肖故後世謂不識理者爲朱愚 知乎反愁我軀不仁則害人仁則反愁我身 不義則傷彼義則反愁我己我安逃此而可 此三言者趎之所患也願因楚而問之老子 曰向吾見若眉睫之間吾因以得汝矣今汝 又言而信之若䂓䂓然若喪父母揭竿而求 諸海也汝亡人哉(如有所失/之人也)惘惘乎汝欲反 汝情性而無由入可憐哉南榮趎請入就舍 召其所好去其所惡十日自愁復見老子老 子曰汝自灑濯孰哉鬱鬱乎然而其中津津 乎猶有惡也夫外韄者不可繁而捉將内犍 内韄者不可謬而捉將外犍外内韄者道德
Interpretation

From the perspective of physical constitution, human ears, eyes, and mind are originally the same organs without fundamental differences. Yet the blind cannot see, the deaf cannot hear, and the insane cannot control themselves—though born with these organic functions, their connections are severed by external influences, rendering mutual communication impossible even when desired. This demonstrates the inherent imperfection of physical form.

Though Nánróng Chú diligently listened to the teachings of Gēngsāngzǐ (a Daoist recluse), the principles merely reached his ears—his eyes still could not see, and his mind still could not comprehend. Gēngsāngzǐ explained with a metaphor: just as small wasps cannot hatch the large green caterpillars on bean leaves, and the short-legged chickens of Yue cannot incubate swan eggs—this was to say his own abilities were limited, unable to enlighten Nánróng Chú, so he directed him to seek Laozi’s guidance.

Carrying dry provisions, Nánróng Chú journeyed for seven days and nights to Laozi’s dwelling. At first sight, Laozi asked, "Have you come from Gēngsāng Chǔ?" As soon as Nánróng Chú answered "Yes," Laozi immediately followed with, "Why have you brought so many people with you?" Startled, Nánróng Chú turned to look behind him. Laozi explained, "Do you not understand my meaning?" Only then did Nánróng Chú awaken, lowering his head in shame before raising it again in delight: "Just now, I forgot how to respond—I even lost the question itself."

Nánróng Chú confided his confusion to Laozi: People call him "Zhū Yú" (as foolish as Dān Zhū, the unworthy son of Emperor Yao). He desires wisdom but fears harming himself. Lack of humaneness (rén) harms others, yet practicing it troubles himself; lack of righteousness (yì) injures others, yet upholding it torments himself—these threefold contradictions leave him at a loss.

Observing his expression, Laozi said, "Earlier, seeing your furrowed brow, I understood your state. Now, hearing these words, I am further convinced you are like one lost, holding a bamboo pole to search for a needle in the ocean. Pitiable! You wish to return to your original nature but cannot find the gate." Nánróng Chú stayed in seclusion for ten days before visiting Laozi again. This time, Laozi pointed out that while he had cleansed the surface impurities, knots remained in his heart—just as external bonds cannot be resolved by external force, internal shackles cannot be forcibly undone from without. Only by releasing both inner and outer constraints can one harmonize with the natural Dao (Dào).

(Note: The term "韄" (huò) refers to leather rope binding, and "犍" (jiān) signifies a door bolt—metaphors for artificial constraints. Laozi emphasizes that cultivation must avoid forced striving, upholding the Daoist principle of natural non-action (wúwéi).)

不能持而況放道而行者乎  孰與熟同鬱鬱猶陸離汝自修治灑濯得  熟鬱鬱然可觀然此特其外耳其中津津  然流動者猶有可惡也韄者以皮束物制  縛之意犍者門牡關閉之意制其外者繁  多而不可把捉則將拒閉之於内制其内  者謬亂而不可把捉則將拒閉之於外内  外韄者其病若此雖有道德者將不能自  持而況學者方依倣而行者乎 南榮趎曰里人有病里人門之病者能言其 病然(病之所/以然)其病病者猶未病也  下二病字訓甚能言其病之所以然則病  雖甚猶未得爲甚也 若趎之聞大道譬猶飲藥以加病也趎願聞 衛生之經而已矣老子曰衛生之經能抱一 乎能勿失乎能無卜筮而知吉凶乎能止乎 能已乎能舍諸人而求諸己乎能翛然乎能 侗然乎能兒子乎兒子終日嘷而嗌不嗄(所/嫁) (反)和之至也終日握而手不掜(吾禮/反)  嗄失聲也掜以手拊打也 共其德也終日視而目不瞚(音/舜)偏不在外也 行不知所之居不知所爲與物委蛇而同其 波是衛生之經己南榮趎曰然則是至人之 德已乎是乃所謂冰解凍釋者夫至人者相 與交食乎地而交樂乎天不以人物利害相 攖不相與爲怪不相與爲謀不相與爲事翛 然而往侗然而來是謂衛生之經己曰然則
Interpretation

This passage discusses the internal and external constraints encountered in the cultivation of Dao. If one cannot even exercise self-control, how much harder is it to relinquish attachments and pursue the great Dao (the Way)?

The characters "熟" and "孰" share the same meaning, while "鬱鬱" describes a superficially splendid appearance. Though your external cultivation may appear refined and impressive, this is merely surface-level practice. Internally, your thoughts remain restless, still requiring correction. "韄" refers to binding something with leather, and "犍" signifies the act of bolting a door shut. If you only restrain external behavior—complex and difficult to grasp—you suppress problems within; if you only control the mind—chaotic and elusive—you push problems outward. Those bound both internally and externally suffer from such afflictions that even realized adepts struggle to maintain composure, let alone beginners in cultivation.

Nanrong Chu (a Daoist figure) said: When someone in the village falls ill, fellow villagers inquire about their condition. The sick person can describe their symptoms but not their root cause. Those who can articulate their symptoms are not severely afflicted; those who understand the cause, though seriously ill, are not yet at the worst stage.

Someone like me, who has heard of the great Dao, is like a patient whose condition worsens after taking medicine. I only wish to learn the essentials of nurturing life (yangsheng). Laozi replied: The key to nurturing life lies in these questions: Can you hold fast to the pure and undivided Dao? Can you avoid losing your innate nature? Can you discern fortune and misfortune without divination? Can you know when to stop? Can you relinquish attachments? Can you seek within rather than depend on others? Can you wander freely and without restraint? Can you preserve your natural simplicity? Can you be like an infant? An infant cries all day without growing hoarse—this is the pinnacle of harmony; it clenches its fists all day without cramping—this is the preservation of innate nature; it gazes all day without blinking, for its attention is not fixed on external things. When it moves, it does not know where it is going; when at rest, it does not know what it is doing. It flows along with the transformations of all things. These are the essentials of nurturing life.

Nanrong Chu asked: Is this the virtue (De) of the perfected person (zhiren)? Is this what is meant by the state where ice melts and frost thaws? Laozi said: The perfected person shares sustenance with the earth and joy with heaven. They do not let human affairs or personal gain disturb their mind, nor do they seek novelty, scheme, or force action. They come and go in carefree wandering—this is the essence of nurturing life. Nanrong Chu said: Now I understand.

是至乎兒子動不知所爲行不知所之身若 槁木之枝而心若死灰若是者禍亦不至福 亦不來禍福無有惡有人災也  南榮趎疑老子所言衛生之經莫是至人  之德否老子曰非也此乃所謂冰解凍釋  冰凍初解釋未盡消溶猶未得爲至也夫  至人者相與交食乎地至侗然而來皆是  說至人處却申言前所言者是衛生之經  已曰然則是至乎者南榮趎曰然則此所  言衛生之道極至乎老子曰未爲至也吾  所以告汝曰能兒子者可以無禍無福而  已矣 宇泰定者發乎天光發乎天光者人見其人 人有脩者乃今有恒有恒者人舍之天助之 人之所舍謂之天民天之所助謂之天子學 者學其所不能學也行者行其所不能行也 辯者辯其所不能辯也知止乎其所不能知 至矣若有不即是者天鈞敗之  心宇泰定者自然發乎天光即所謂定生  慧人見其發乎天光以爲人能如是不知  由於心宇泰定者天也有一等人不能心  宇泰定必假脩爲則亦不能發乎天光可  以有常而已有常者人雖舍之天必助之  人之所舍則無位而爲天民天之所助則  有位而爲天子此皆非其至者必盡黜聰  明知慮若無所能而後爲至其有不能成  此者天鈞自敗之不必不爲天所助也天  鈞吾之大鈞也 備物以將形藏不虞以生心敬中以達彼若
Interpretation

This passage discusses the distinction between the "Perfected Being" (zhiren) and ordinary practitioners in Daoist cultivation. Laozi explains to Nanrong Chu that while the state of an ignorant, desireless infant—with body and mind like withered wood or dead ashes—may avoid misfortune, it does not represent the highest realm.

The true Perfected Being shares sustenance with the earth and breathes with the cosmos, arriving in complete accordance with nature. They require no deliberate cultivation; when their inner cosmos (yu) achieves supreme stability ("yu tai ding"), the celestial radiance (tian guang) naturally shines forth. This state cannot be attained through force—one must relinquish cleverness and knowledge to reach what appears as utter incapacity.

The text describes three types of practitioners:

1. Ordinary individuals require constant practice to maintain stability ("you heng"). Those who achieve this gain human acceptance and celestial assistance, becoming either "People of Heaven" (tian min) or "Sons of Heaven" (tian zi).

2. Yet the supreme state is that of "Heavenly Equilibrium" (tian jun), where even these titles become unnecessary.

3. Those who forcibly pursue unattainable realms will instead be eliminated by the natural order ("tian jun").

The concluding section outlines cultivation methods: preserve physical form, eliminate distracting thoughts, and maintain reverent mindfulness to penetrate external phenomena. All practice must follow nature's flow without coercion—only then can the spontaneous manifestation of "celestial radiance" be achieved.

是而萬惡至者皆天也而非人也不足以滑 成不可内(音/納)於靈臺靈臺者有持而不知其 所持而不可持者也  將養也藏存也生猶立也外則備物以養  形内則常存不虞之防以立心主敬於中  以達於外如此而禍至者皆天命而非人  事所召不足以滑亂我之成德不可以橫  逆之事入於吾心心者雖有所持而人不  知其所持有不可持者言不可執者也洪  容齋隨筆載洪慶善解乃吾儒家說耳 不見其誠己而發每發而不當業入而不舍 (上/聲)每更爲失爲不善乎顯明之中者人得而 誅之爲不善乎幽間之中者鬼得而誅之明 乎人明乎鬼者然後能獨行  此反上文言之人惟未能誠己而發故每  發而不中雖明知其不誠然業已入其間  而不能舍去之既不能改過反更益其過  故有人鬼之禍不可以橫逆言矣 券内者行乎無名券外者行乎期費行乎無 名者唯庸有光志乎期費者唯賈人也人見 其跂猶之魁然與物窮者物入焉與物且者 其身之不能容焉能容人不能容人者無親 無親者盡人  劵内分内也求諸分内者所行不務名聲  求諸分外者所志期於廣大費廣也中庸  君子之道費而隱之費行乎無名者雖晦  而明用有光顯志乎期費者欲以眩鬻當  世如商賈之人又如跂立者人見其魁然
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how practitioners of the Dao should maintain inner purity while dealing with external disturbances.

It begins by stating that when various calamities arise, they are ordained by heaven’s decree (天命) and not caused by human actions. Therefore, one should not allow these external disturbances to disrupt inner cultivation. Though our spiritual core (灵台, Lingtai) naturally maintains its integrity, this holding is effortless and should not be forced. Just as in nurturing the body and mind, externally we prepare resources to sustain the physical form, while internally we remain vigilant, guarding against unforeseen circumstances—using inner reverence to shape outward conduct.

Hong Rongzhai, in his essays, notes that this aligns with Confucian interpretation. If a person fails to be sincere with themselves, their actions will often go awry. For overt wrongdoing, humans will impose punishment; for hidden misdeeds, spirits (鬼神) will bring retribution. Only those who grasp this principle can truly cultivate themselves in solitude.

The text then criticizes those who lack self-honesty—knowing their faults yet unable to correct them, sinking deeper until they invite calamity, drawing condemnation from both humans and spirits.

Finally, it uses the metaphors of "券内" (focusing within one's bounds) and "券外" (reaching beyond them): Those who attend to their proper duties (券内) act humbly without seeking fame, while those who chase external pursuits (券外) become ambitious and restless. The former, though seemingly obscure, embody true clarity; the latter resemble merchants flaunting their wares or people standing on tiptoe—appearing tall but fundamentally unsteady. Those who cannot embrace others will ultimately face abandonment.

The passage emphasizes that Daoist cultivation requires focusing on inner refinement, maintaining sincerity, and avoiding forced external displays—only then can one truly unite with the Dao (道).

 長大而實不然劵外者與物馳逐窮極而  物反入據其位劵内者與物苟且相應而  不爲所累且不知有其身豈知有人無人  者雖至親亦無無親者人盡無矣此離世  獨立之意 兵莫憯于志鏌鎁爲下寇莫大於陰陽無所 逃於天地之間非陰陽賊之心則使之也 道通其分也其成也毁也所惡乎分者其分 也以備所以惡乎備者其有以備故出而不 反見其鬼出而得是謂得死滅而有實鬼之 一也以有形者象無形者而定矣  本無成與毁人自分而爲二故道者所以  通其分也所惡乎分者何以其分之遠則  必至於極成者百般計巧做到成就毁者  一切放弛任其毁壞備猶極也所以惡乎  極者何既極則如人之出外而不反矣但  見其逐於外物日漸銷鑠如鬼之屈而不  伸而世人却自以爲出而有得不過得死  之道而已得死之道則此生已滅矣而自  以爲有其實與鬼何異哉以有形者象無  形者以人而象鬼也而定矣者不能反之  爲人也 出無本入無竅有實而無乎處有長而無本 剽(標/同)有所出而無竅者有實有實而無乎處 者宇也有長而無本剽者宙也有乎生有乎 死有乎出有乎入入出而無見其形是謂天 門天門者無有也萬物出乎無有有不能以 有爲有必出乎無有而無有一無有聖人藏 乎是
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how practitioners can transcend worldly constraints to attain unity with the Dao.

Cultivation practice manifests in two realms: those who chase external phenomena (the externally striving), though exerting tremendous effort, ultimately find their consciousness occupied by material things; while those who focus on inner refinement (the internally cultivating) can harmonize with all things without becoming entangled, even forgetting their own existence, let alone concerning themselves with others. This represents true transcendental independence.

The world's most formidable weapon isn't the legendary sword Moye, but rather the human will; the greatest adversary isn't other people, but the natural laws of Yin-Yang transformation. Daoist cultivation aims to transcend these dualistic distinctions. People cling to distinctions between "success" and "failure," yet fundamentally there is no difference. Excessive pursuit of perfection (bei) resembles someone who leaves home never to return - seemingly gaining something, yet actually moving toward death, like a ghost possessing only empty form.

Cosmic spacetime (yu denoting space, zhou denoting time) appears substantial yet has no fixed location, appears continuous yet has no beginning or end. The transformations of life and death, emergence and withdrawal exist, yet their concrete forms remain invisible - this is the "Heavenly Gate," the portal through which all things arise from emptiness. True sages understand this principle, abiding serenely in the realm of emptiness without attachment to the manifest world.

The core teaching instructs practitioners to transcend dualistic oppositions, relinquish fixation on success and failure, and return to the original emptiness of the Dao. Cultivators should emulate the sages by abiding in the formless, imageless state, unbound by worldly concepts.

 所謂道者出而不見其有本入而不見其  有竅有其實而不見其處所剽與標同末  也有其長而不見其本末然雖出無本入  無竅而又有其實不是空言有實而無乎  處者如四方上下之宇何有定所有長而  無本剽者如古往今來之宙何有起止生  死出入皆不見其形是謂天門天門者空  虚無有而萬物出乎無有之中凡有不能  以有爲有必出乎無有之中而併與無有  亦無有聖人懐藏此道而已 古之人其知有所至惡乎至有以爲未始有 物者至矣盡矣弗可以加矣其次以爲有物 矣將以生爲喪也以死爲反也是以分己  已是分生死爲兩途 其次曰始無有既而有生生俄而死以無有 爲首以生爲體以死爲尻孰知有無死生之 一守者吾與之爲友是三者雖異公族也昭 景也著戴也甲氏也著封也非一也  戴職任也封封邑也三者雖異譬如昭景  甲皆楚之公族持或以職著或以封著而  有不同耳 有生黬(五咸於/咸二反)也披然曰移是嘗言移是非 所言也雖然不可知者也臘者之有膍(音/毗)胲 (吉才/反)可散而不可散也觀室者周於寢廟又 適其偃焉爲是舉移是  黬釜底黑披然散也移是所謂是者轉移  不定也臘冬至後三戌祭名膍牛百葉肱  足指毛肉偃偃息之室也人之所以自是
Interpretation

This passage describes the characteristics of the Dao (the Way): When manifest, its origin cannot be seen; when concealed, no entrance can be found. Though truly existent, its precise location remains indeterminate. Like space (Yu) having no fixed boundaries or time (Zhou) having no definite beginning and end, the coming and going of life and death leave no discernible traces. This is the "Gate of Heaven" (Tianmen) — a state of empty non-being from which all things arise. True "being" cannot generate or sustain itself; it must originate from "non-being," yet even this "non-being" itself does not exist. The sage grasps this principle.

Ancient Dao-realized individuals understood reality through three levels of perception: The highest realization recognizes that originally nothing whatsoever existed in the world. The intermediate level acknowledges the existence of things but considers birth as losing one's true nature and death as returning to the source, thus creating opposition between life and death. The basic level believes that "being" arises from "non-being," with life briefly flourishing before perishing, taking "non-being" as the beginning, life as the main subject, and death as the conclusion. Whoever understands that being/non-being and life/death are fundamentally one — such a person I would take as my companion. These three perspectives resemble the three great aristocratic families of Chu — Zhao, Jing, and Jia — superficially different yet all belonging to the same ruling clan.

Life resembles soot at the bottom of a cauldron — seemingly erasable yet undeniably present. Standards of right and wrong flow and shift like water. Just as winter sacrifices require preparations of tripe and trotters (ritual offerings that seem dispensable yet remain essential), or when touring palaces one must examine both the main hall and resting chambers (adjusting standards for thoroughness), people persistently cling to their views like insisting on preparing all offerings or inspecting every room.

(Notes: "Yan" refers to cauldron soot; "piran" describes a scattered state; "yi shi" indicates shifting standards of judgment; "laji" denotes post-winter solstice sacrifices; "pihai" respectively mean tripe and trotters; "yan" refers to side chambers for rest.)

 者譬如釡底之星披然而開轉移不定故  曰移是試言移是之說本不足道然事正  有不可知者如臘祭者分膍與肱於俎上  是可散也而總一牲之體則不可散又如  觀室者必周匝寢廟方謂之全室然必須  適其息偃之所觀之一則須分之而合一  則須合之而分是不可知者也如此看來  安有眞的是處故爲此而舉移是之說 請嘗言移是是以生爲本以知爲師因以乗 是非果(信/也)有名實因以已爲質使人以爲己 節(名節/也)因以死償節若然者以用爲知以不 用爲愚以徹爲名以窮爲辱移是今之人也 是蜩與鷽鳩同於同也  上言有生黬也披然曰移是此言移是者  正縁人以有生爲根本看得大重師知則  因而生是非信名實則因而惟知有巳立  節操則因而死且不顧如此者必以用舍  窮通怵其心故移是者乃當今世俗之人  也其視蜩與鷽鳩之小見何異二蟲同矣  而人又與之同故云同於同 蹍(女展/反)市人之足則辭以放驁兄則以嫗大 親則己矣故曰至禮有不人至義不物至知 不謀至仁無親至信辟兵入金  蹍踐也偶然踐市人之足則辭謝以放驁  不檢束之過若踐兄之足則但呴嫗之而  已大親父母也父母則并呴嫗不必矣辟  屏去也至信則不必以金寳爲質 徹志之勃解心之謬去德之累達道之塞貴
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the concept of "shifting standards" (the relativity of right and wrong) and the natural way (Dao) in human relationships.

Regarding "shifting standards": Just as sparks from a cooking fire scatter unpredictably, standards of right and wrong are constantly changing. For instance, during sacrificial meat distribution, the parts of the animal can be divided while the whole cannot be separated. Or how viewing a house requires walking around it completely, yet resting requires just one spot. This demonstrates there are no absolute standards of right and wrong in the world, hence the concept of "shifting standards."

People often take life as fundamental and cognition as their standard, thus forming judgments. Some value reputation so highly they'd sacrifice their lives to defend it. Such people consider employment as wisdom and unemployment as foolishness, viewing prominence as honor and hardship as shame. This "shifting standards" mentality is precisely the common failing of worldly people today - their understanding is as shallow as a cicada's or sparrow's.

On human relationships: If you step on a stranger's foot, you apologize for carelessness; stepping on a sibling's foot only requires comforting words; with parents, no words are needed at all. This illustrates: The highest ritual makes no distinction between self and other, the highest righteousness doesn't differentiate objects, the highest wisdom requires no calculation, the highest benevolence recognizes no degrees of intimacy, and the highest trust needs no collateral.

Finally, the essential method of cultivating the Dao is revealed: One must dissolve conflicts of will, release mental constraints, shed the burdens of virtue (De), and remove obstructions to the great Dao. External pursuits like wealth, fame and reputation are shackles to one's true nature - only by abandoning these can one return to original authenticity.

富顯嚴名利六者勃志也容動色理氣意六 者謬心也惡欲喜怒哀樂六者累德也去就 取與知能六者塞道也此四六者不盪胸中 則正正則靜靜則明明則虚虚則無爲而無 不爲也  篇中凡如此者煩絮不切自可無 道者德之欽也生者德之光也性者生之質 也  欽者敬也有收歛之義道而後德故云道  者德之欽有德則潤身故云生者德之光  性與生俱生故云性者生之質 性之動謂之爲爲之僞謂之失知者接也知 者謨也知之所不知猶睨也動以不得己之 謂德動無非我之謂治名相反而實相順 羿工乎中微而拙乎使人無己譽聖人工乎 天而拙乎人夫工乎天而俍(音良猶/能也)乎人唯 全人能之唯蟲能蟲唯蟲能天全人惡天惡 人之天而況吾天乎人乎  聖人工乎與天合而拙乎使人無己譽唯  全人能工乎天而又能乎人然豈以此自  多蟲能蟲而亦能天則能人能天未足自  多是以全人惡有能天之名且惡人之天  而況我之天與之人乎 一雀適羿羿必得之威也以天下爲之籠則 雀無所逃是故湯以庖人籠伊尹秦穆公以 五羊之皮籠百里奚是故非以其所好籠之 而可得者無有也介者拸(音/侈)畫(音/化)外毁譽也 胥靡登高不懼遺死生也  兀者栘去畫像以形既不全無事乎人之
Interpretation

This passage expounds Daoist teachings on mental cultivation and the natural Way (Dao).

It first identifies six categories that disturb the mind: wealth, status, authority, fame, profit, and honor disrupt one's aspirations; appearance, demeanor, expression, logic, breath (Qi), and thoughts confuse the heart; hatred, desire, joy, anger, sorrow, and pleasure burden one's virtue (De); choices, gains/losses, knowledge, and talents obstruct the Great Dao. Only by preventing these from agitating within can one attain uprightness, tranquility, clarity, and emptiness—ultimately achieving Wuwei (non-action) that accomplishes all.

Key concepts are then explained: Dao is the root of virtue ("qin" implies reverence and restraint), life manifests virtue, and innate nature is life's essence. Natural activity of one's nature is called "authentic action," while artificial striving constitutes "failure." Wisdom divides into two types: knowledge from external contact and knowledge from internal deliberation.

The text contrasts different levels of attainment: the legendary archer Yi excelled at hitting minute targets but couldn't prevent others from praising him, while sages excel at following nature but struggle with human relations. Only the "complete person" (quanren) masters both. Just as insects perfectly follow instinct, true completeness dislikes conscious displays of "following nature."

Metaphors illustrate these principles: when the whole world becomes a cage, no bird can escape. King Tang won Yi Yin through culinary arts, and Duke Mu of Qin obtained Baili Xi with five sheepskins—demonstrating the importance of aligning with others' nature. The amputee cares not for adornments, and the prisoner fears no heights when climbing, having transcended worldly judgments of praise/blame and life/death.

Emphasizing the rejection of external distractions to return to natural simplicity, this passage presents the "complete person" as embodying the Daoist ideal of unity between heaven and humanity.

 毁譽也胥靡登高而不懼以罪囚中視死  生爲輕也喻人之外榮辱好惡者豈可得  而籠之哉 夫復謵(陟涉/反)不餽而忘人忘人因以爲天人 矣故敬之而不喜侮之而不怒者唯同乎天 和者爲然出怒不怒則怒出於不怒矣出爲 無爲則爲出於無爲矣欲靜則平氣欲神則 順心有爲也欲當則縁於不得己不得己之 類聖人之道  復應答也謵與讋同小語也應答之際低  聲細語如出於不得已未嘗自以言送人  極其至也至於忘人此一句作三節看 南華眞
Interpretation

This passage expounds the essential method of transcending worldly judgments to attain the state of union between Heaven and humanity. Prisoners in confinement do not fear when climbing heights because they have already made light of life and death. Similarly, those who are truly liberated are not bound by external concerns of honor and disgrace, gain and loss.

The term "repeated whispers" (fuxi) refers to interacting with others without deliberate flattery, thereby achieving the state of "forgetting people." Only by forgetting mundane human relationships can one approach the condition of being a "Heavenly person" (in harmony with the Dao). Those who have truly attained the Dao feel neither elated when respected nor angered when insulted, for they have already achieved unity with the natural order of Heaven and Earth.

When anger arises yet one maintains inner peace, such anger actually stems from a place of serenity. When acting while preserving a Wuwei (non-action) mindset, such action originates from the realm of non-action. To attain mental tranquility, one must regulate the Qi (vital energy); to achieve spiritual clarity, one must follow the original heart-mind. All actions should appear as if undertaken out of necessity—this state of "acting by necessity" constitutes the sage's way of being in the world.

A final explanatory note: "repeated whispers" simply means speaking softly. When interacting with others, one speaks in hushed tones as if compelled by necessity, never actively using words to curry favor. The highest attainment is complete "forgetting of people" (transcending mundane relationships)—this teaching should be understood through three progressive levels of realization.

經循本卷之二十二

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0135); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 21 Vol. 23 →