中文 · EN

《南華真經新傳》Vol. 10

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 10 / 20 10,200 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經新傳》 Vol. 10 (Dongshen 洞神部, 20 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 21 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經新傳》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經新傳卷之十惡九    宋 王 元 澤 傳   至樂篇  夫能去異學守正性忘己而與物齊諧者  則生死富貴窮達壽夭不能介蠆於胸中  怡然逍遥於天地之間矣此莊子因而作  至樂篇 天下有至樂無有哉有可以活身者無有哉 今奚爲奚據奚避奚處奚就奚去奚樂奚惡 夫天下之所尊者富貴壽善也所樂者身安 厚味美服好色音聲也所下者貧賤夭惡也 所苦者身不得安逸口不得厚味形不得美 服目不得好色耳不得音聲若不得者則大 憂以懼其爲形也亦愚哉夫富者苦身疾作 多積財而不得盡用其爲形也亦外矣夫貴 者夜以繼日思慮善否其爲形也亦疏矣人 之生也與憂俱生壽者惛惛乆憂不死何之 苦也其爲形也亦遠矣列士爲天下見善矣 未足以活身吾未知善之誠善邪誠不善邪 若以爲善矣不足活身以爲不善矣足以活 人故曰忠諫不聽蹲循勿爭故夫子胥爭之 以殘其形不爭名亦不成誠有善無有哉今 俗之所爲與其所樂吾又未知樂之果樂邪 果不樂邪吾觀夫俗之所樂舉羣趣者誙誙 然如將不得已而皆曰樂者吾未之樂也亦 未知不樂也果有樂無有哉吾以無爲誠樂 矣又俗之所大苦也  夫萬物不足以憂者至樂也至樂者非由  自外而入也非由感音而生也出於忘己
Interpretation

In his Commentary on the Zhuangzi, Wang Yuanze interprets the chapter "Perfect Happiness" by noting: Those who attain true happiness are those who can discard heterodox doctrines, maintain pure innate nature, forget themselves and harmonize with all things. Such individuals remain unperturbed by worldly concerns like life and death, wealth and poverty, success and failure, or longevity and premature death—dwelling freely between heaven and earth. It was from this elevated perspective that Zhuangzi composed "Perfect Happiness."

Does ultimate happiness truly exist in this world? Is there genuinely a way to nurture life? What do people pursue nowadays, and upon what do they base their actions? What do they avoid, what do they settle for, what do they flock toward, what do they abandon, what brings them joy, and what do they detest? The world esteems wealth, status, longevity, and fame; people delight in comfort, fine food, elegant clothing, beautiful sights, and music; they despise poverty, lowliness, and short lifespans; they suffer when their bodies lack ease, their tongues miss delicacies, their backs go without fine robes, their eyes see no beauty, and their ears hear no music—when deprived of these, they fret endlessly. Such an approach to life is profoundly misguided.

The wealthy exhaust their bodies in relentless labor, amassing fortunes they cannot possibly use up—this inverts life's proper order. The powerful scheme day and night over political gains and losses—this betrays life's true essence. Humans enter this world accompanied by sorrow; the long-lived wander in confusion, perpetually fearing death—this strays farthest from life's truth. Martyrs praised by all still cannot preserve their own lives—is such "goodness" genuine or false? If it counts as goodness yet fails to protect oneself, while counting as badness yet saves others, then when loyal counsel goes unheeded, one should withdraw rather than contend. Wu Zixu died for his forceful remonstrations—had he not persisted, he would have left no name behind. Does the so-called goodness of this world truly exist?

As for the happiness pursued by worldly people, I cannot say whether it constitutes real joy. Observing how crowds rush headlong after what they deem happiness, I feel neither joy nor sorrow about it. Does perfect happiness actually exist? I consider wuwei (non-action) to be true happiness, yet this is precisely what the world most despises.

Perfect happiness transcends the vexations brought by all things. This joy is not obtained from external sources, nor is it produced by sensory stimulation—it arises from the state of self-forgetting.

(Note: Wuwei is a core Daoist concept referring to a life attitude of following nature's flow without forced action; Wu Zixu was a loyal minister of the Spring and Autumn period who was executed for his blunt admonishments to the King of Wu.)

 無爲而天下不能知之也故曰天下有至  樂無有哉惟能忘己無爲則至樂自有有  至樂則可以全身身全而豈爲無樂歟故  曰有可以活身者無有哉然而天下之世  俗不知至樂之所出徒以富貴壽善衣食  聲色之備爲其樂故得之則勞形喪生耽  之而不誤失之則刻意傷生求之而不止  是爲大惑而已矣安知至樂之其樂也内  爲樂之其樂也外乎此莊子所以有爲形  亦愚亦外亦疏亦遠之言矣 故曰至樂無樂至譽無譽天下是非果未可 定也雖然無爲可以定是非至樂活身唯無 爲幾存請嘗試言之天無爲以之清地無爲 以之寧故兩無爲相合萬物皆化芒乎芴乎 而無從出乎芴乎芒乎而無有象乎萬物職 職皆從無爲殖故曰天地無爲也而無不爲 也人也孰能得無爲哉  至樂生於無爲無爲則非有樂也故曰至  樂無樂至譽出於難名難名則非爲有譽  也故曰至譽無譽然而無爲者合於天地  之道也天地無爲而任物之生成安有勞  苦之困歟此其所以爲樂之至也人能無  爲則亦爲樂之至人安得於無爲乎故曰  天無爲以之清地無爲以之寧故兩無爲  相合萬物皆化又曰人也敦得無爲哉此  莊子譏於世俗也 莊子妻死惠子弔之莊子則方箕踞鼓盆而 歌惠子曰與人居長子老身死不哭亦足矣
Interpretation

True happiness requires no deliberate pursuit, yet few in the world understand this. Thus we ask: does ultimate joy truly exist? In truth, when one can relinquish the self and accord with spontaneity, supreme happiness naturally manifests. Reaching this state preserves one's vital life force, and when life is preserved, how can we say there is no joy?

Worldly people misunderstand the source of genuine happiness, mistakenly equating it with wealth, longevity, fine clothes, sumptuous food, and sensual pleasures. In obtaining these, they exhaust their bodies and lose their true nature, becoming so immersed they cannot awaken; in losing them, they exhaust their minds and harm their lives in endless pursuit. This is indeed the greatest delusion! How could they know that ultimate joy arises from inner fulfillment, not external gratification? This illustrates Zhuangzi's teaching: "To be trapped by physical form is foolishness; to cling to external things is estrangement."

Therefore we say: the highest joy appears joyless, the greatest honor seems honorless. The world's distinctions between right and wrong have no fixed standard - only by following nature can one discern clearly. The essence of supreme happiness and nurturing life lies in accordance with spontaneity. Observe how heaven acts without acting yet remains clear, how earth acts without acting yet remains tranquil. Heaven and earth operate naturally, and the ten thousand things transform spontaneously. Vaguely, indistinctly, their origins remain unknown; dimly, obscurely, they show no concrete form. All flourishing growth emerges from following nature's course. Thus while heaven and earth seem to do nothing, there's nothing they don't accomplish. Yet who among worldly people can truly practice this natural accord?

Supreme joy arises from Wuwei (non-action), yet Wuwei isn't the deliberate pursuit of happiness - hence "ultimate joy is joyless." Highest honor comes from ineffable realms, and the ineffable isn't the deliberate pursuit of fame - hence "ultimate honor is honorless." Following nature aligns with the Dao of heaven and earth. Though heaven and earth act without acting, they perfect all things' growth - where then is hardship or exhaustion? This is happiness at its pinnacle. When humans accord with spontaneity, they too can attain this supreme joy.

When Zhuangzi's wife died, his friend Huizi came to offer condolences and found Zhuangzi squatting while drumming on a bowl and singing. Huizi said: "You lived with your wife for years, raised children together until her old age - now she's gone and you don't weep? Isn't this excessive?" (This story illustrates Zhuangzi's realization of life and death as natural processes, unattached to conventional mourning rituals.)

又鼓盆而歌不亦甚乎莊子曰不然是其始 死也我獨何能無槩然察其始而本無生非 徒無生也而本無形非徒無形也而本無氣 雜乎芒芴之間變而有氣氣變而有形形變 而有生今又變而之死是相與爲春秋冬夏 四時行也人且偃然寢於巨室而我噭噭然 隨而哭之自以爲不通乎命故止也  夫至人以生死爲往來故生不喜其成而  死不哀其毁莊子妻死而箕踞鼓盆而不  哭者蓋了於生死之常而至樂也與孟子  反子琴張編曲鼓琴之意同 支離叔與滑介叔觀於冥伯之丘崑崙之虚 黄帝之所休俄而柳生其左肘其意蹶蹶然 惡之支離叔曰子惡之乎滑介叔曰亡予何 惡生者假借也假之而生生者塵垢也死生 爲晝夜且吾與子觀化而化及我我人何惡 焉  支離叔者言其形不正也滑介叔者言其  心無智也此莊子製二子之名而寓其意  夫形不正者能忘於形心無智者能忘於  智忘形忘智則其於死生了然矣是以二  子同逰觀於冥伯之丘崑崙之虚黄帝之 所休而以觀變化之妙也夫觀變化者達  觀其生死之變也能達生死之變則外物  安足累我乎雖柳生於滑介叔之左肘而  亦不爲之惡也故曰我又何惡若二子者  可謂萬物不足以憂之而内能全於至樂  也 莊子之楚見空髑髏髐然有形撽以馬捶因
Interpretation

When Zhuangzi's wife passed away, instead of wailing in grief, he beat on an earthen pot and sang. Those around him thought this behavior outrageous, but Zhuangzi explained: For her, death was merely a return to the original state. All things were originally without life—not only without life, but without form, and even without the Qi (the fundamental Daoist element) that constitutes form. Life emerges from primordial chaos—first comes Qi, which condenses into form, and form then gives birth to life. Now she has returned to death, as natural as the turning of the four seasons. While others sleep peacefully in the great chamber of heaven and earth, my weeping would show ignorance of nature's ways.

Those who truly comprehend the Dao regard life and death as ordinary comings and goings—they neither rejoice at birth nor grieve at death. Zhuangzi's pot-beating without mourning demonstrates his penetrating insight into the naturalness of mortality, mirroring Mencius' description of "playing the zither calmly during mourning"—maintaining equanimity even in bereavement.

The Crippled Scholar (whose body was incomplete) and Simpleton (whose mind was uncomplicated) wandered together through the Hills of Obscurity (symbolizing emptiness) and the Wastes of Kunlun (a sacred site where the Yellow Emperor once rested). Suddenly, a tumor grew on Simpleton's left elbow, which initially disgusted him. The Crippled Scholar asked, "Do you loathe it?" Simpleton awakened to realization: "Why should I? Life is but a temporary lodging for this body—birth and death are like day and night's alternation. We came to observe the transformations of all things, and now transformation occurs within me—what's there to loathe?"

"Crippled" signifies physical incompleteness, while "Simpleton" represents mental non-attachment. Through these fictional characters, Zhuangzi illustrates how physically impaired individuals transcend bodily constraints, and those with uncomplicated minds surpass intellectual distinctions. Only such people truly penetrate life and death's essence. Their pilgrimage to sacred sites symbolizing emptiness aims precisely to contemplate creation's mysteries. When one sees through life's transformations, how can external things disturb the mind? Thus Simpleton felt no disgust at his tumor. To such people, nothing in the world can bring sorrow—their hearts preserve genuine joy.

In Chu, Zhuangzi saw a dried skull and tapped it with his horsewhip, asking: "How did you come to die?" (The subsequent dialogue reveals Zhuangzi's transcendent attitude toward death—that dying might be happier than living.)

而問之曰夫子貪生失理而爲此乎將子有 亡國之事斧鉞之誅而爲此乎將子有不善 之行愧遺父母妻子之醜而爲此乎將子有 凍餒之患而爲此乎將子之春秋故及此乎 於是語卒援髑髏枕而卧夜半髑髏見夢曰 子之談者似辯士諸子所言皆生人之累也 死則無此矣子欲聞死之說乎莊子曰然髑 髏曰死無君於上無臣於下亦無四時之事 從然以天地爲春秋雖南面王樂不能過也 莊子不信曰吾使司命復生子形爲子骨肉 肌膚反子父母妻子閭里知識子欲之乎髑 髏深矉盛頞曰吾安能棄南面王樂而復爲 人間之勞乎  夫生者一氣之暫聚死者一氣之暫散生  未必無爲而死未必有爲未必無爲者至  樂所以缺未必有爲者至樂所以全此莊  子所以有觸髏不棄南面之樂之言也夫  六骸者寓之於身也生則隨氣而暫聚死  則隨氣而暫散聚散皆非我之所有我又  何自有而有我乎自有而有我則未能忘  形也不能忘形則有爲也有爲而與物相  摩刃則至樂安能内全歟此髑髏之不欲  復爲於人也 顔淵東之齊孔子有憂色子貢下席而問曰 小子敢問回東之齊夫子有憂色何邪孔子 曰善哉汝問昔者管子有言丘甚善之曰褚 小者不可以懷大綆短者不可以汲深夫若 是者以爲命有所成而形有所適也夫不可
Interpretation

This passage recounts Zhuangzi's allegorical dialogue with a skull, followed by Confucius' concerns about Yan Hui's journey to Qi.

Zhuangzi encounters a skull by the roadside and questions it: "Did you die because you feared death and defied the natural order? Were you executed after your state's collapse? Did you perish from shame over misdeeds against family? Or from cold and hunger? Perhaps you completed your natural lifespan?" Using the skull as a pillow, he dreams it appears at midnight saying: "These worries belong to the living. In death, such burdens vanish. Shall I describe death's joys?" The skull explains how death abolishes social hierarchies and seasonal toil, granting freedom where heaven and earth mark the passage of time—even surpassing a king's pleasures. When Zhuangzi offers to petition the Director of Destinies (Si Ming) to restore its body and reunite it with family and community, the skull frowns: "Why abandon this regal bliss for mortal hardships?"

The commentary reveals life's essence: existence is but Qi's temporary coalescence, death its dispersion. Life doesn't guarantee freedom, nor death suffering. The skull's refusal to revive suggests death may offer greater liberation. Our forms are fleeting Qi condensations—their gathering and scattering beyond our control. Why cling to "self"? Attachment to form breeds friction with external phenomena, obstructing inner serenity.

The narrative shifts to Confucius appearing troubled as Yan Hui departs for Qi. When Zigong inquires, Confucius quotes Guanzi: "Small bags won't hold large objects; short ropes can't reach deep wells"—illustrating how all beings have destined capacities and forms find fitting environments. This implies Yan Hui may be ill-suited for Qi's circumstances.

損益吾恐回與齊侯言堯舜黄帝之道而重 以燧人神農之言彼將内求於己而不得不 得則惑人惑則死且汝獨不聞邪昔者海鳥 止於魯郊魯侯御而觴之于廟奏九韶以爲 樂具太牢以爲膳鳥乃眩視憂悲不敢食一 臠不敢飲一杯三日而死此以己養養鳥也 非以鳥養飬鳥也夫以鳥飬飬鳥者宜棲之 深林遊之壇陸浮之江湖食之鰌䱔隨行列 而止委蛇而處彼唯人言之惡聞奚以夫譊 譊爲乎咸池九韶之樂張之洞庭之野鳥聞 之而飛獸聞之而走魚聞之而下入人卒聞 之相與還而觀之魚處水而生人處水而死 彼必相與異其好惡故異也故先聖不一其 能不同其事名止於實義設於適是之謂條 達而福持  燧人神農黄帝堯舜之道非聖人不足與  言之齊侯中材之君也安足與言此道乎  此顔回之齊而孔子所以有憂色也夫非  聖人而與言聖人之道適使心之致惑也  心惑則求之不止而傷生傷生則至于死  而已至樂安得而全歟故曰惑則死安若  順其材而語之以中庸之道乎如此則不  惑而生全生全則樂亦從而全此孔子所  以有以鳥養鳥之喻也 列子行食於道從見百歲髑髏攓蓬而指之 曰唯予與汝知而未嘗死未嘗生也若果養 乎予果歡乎種有幾得水則爲繼得水土之 際則爲蛙蠙之衣生於陵屯則爲陵舄陵舄
Interpretation

The passage recounts Confucius' concern that when Yan Hui discusses the Way of Yao, Shun, and the Yellow Emperor with the Duke of Qi, it might backfire just as the Duke of Lu's attempt to nurture a seabird did.

The Duke of Lu once welcomed a seabird into his ancestral temple, entertaining it with the most solemn music of the Nine Shao and offering a grand feast of oxen, sheep, and pigs. Yet the bird, terrified, refused to eat or drink and died within three days. This was an example of raising a bird according to human customs rather than its innate nature. To truly nurture a bird, one should let it perch in the forests, roam the sandbanks, drift along rivers and lakes, feed on small fish and loaches, and move freely among its flock.

The same principle applies elsewhere. When the exquisite music of "Xianchi" or "Nine Shao" is played in the wilderness, birds, beasts, fish, and insects flee in fright—only humans gather to admire it. Fish thrive in water, yet humans drown, for all beings have different natures. Thus, the ancient sages never imposed uniformity but allowed all things to follow their own ways.

The teachings of sage-kings like Suiren, Shennong, the Yellow Emperor, Yao, and Shun can only be grasped by sages. The Duke of Qi, however, is a ruler of middling capacity. If Yan Hui forcibly expounds these profound principles to him, he will only grow confused and unsettled. Once confused, a man will obsessively overthink, ultimately harming his body and life. It would be better to tailor one's teachings to the listener's capacity, imparting the moderate Way suited to them—only then can life be preserved and true joy attained.

The subsequent parable of Liezi encountering a century-old skull further illustrates this point: life and death are part of nature's cycle, like seeds turning into water plants when submerged, transforming into moss between water and earth, or becoming plantains on hills. All things undergo natural transformations—there is no need to force anything.

得鬱棲則爲爲足烏足之根爲蠐螬其葉爲 胡蝶胡蝶胥也化而爲蟲生於竈下其狀若 脱其名爲鴝掇鴝掇千日爲鳥其名爲乾餘 骨乾餘骨之沫爲斯彌斯彌爲食醯頤輅生 乎食醯黄軦生乎九猷瞀芮生乎腐蠸羊奚 比乎不箰乆竹生青寧青寧生程程生馬馬 生人人又反入於機萬物皆出於機皆入於 機  至人者冥於生死之極而以生爲不生以  死爲不死不生所以生不死所以存此列  子所以見髑髏而有予與汝未嘗死未嘗  生之言也夫未嘗生者能生生未嘗死者  能化化故繼言萬物生成變化之無終也  然萬物生成變化之無終其出入皆由於  機也機者道之妙本而萬物安有名由乎  故由萬物皆出於機皆入於機夫萬物出  入皆由於機也其生成豈不爲樂乎此莊  子言之於終也    達生篇  夫外形骸忘彼我全於無樂之至樂則其  於性命之情盡之矣此莊子因而作達生  篇 達生之情者不務生之所無以爲達命之情 者不務知之所無奈何飬形必先之物物有 餘而形不養者有之矣有生必先無離形形 不離而生亡者有之矣生之來不能却其去 不能止悲夫世之人以爲飬形足以存生而 養形果不足以存生則世奚足爲哉雖不足 爲而不可不爲者其爲不免矣夫欲免爲形 者莫如棄世棄世則無累無累則正平正平
Interpretation

This passage comes from the "Mastering Life" chapter of the Zhuangzi (also known as Nanhua Zhenjing), which explores the philosophy of life and death cycles and the realm of spiritual cultivation.

All beings follow nature's rhythms in their transformations: The roots of crowfoot grass become scarab larvae, while its leaves transform into butterflies. These butterflies hatch into insects that live beneath stoves, later molting into quduo insects. After a thousand days, the quduo transforms into a qianyu bone bird, whose saliva gives birth to simi insects. From these emerge shixi yilu insects, which then evolve into various creatures like huangkuang and maorui, ultimately returning to the primordial source (ji). All things emerge from this "ji" (the mysterious origin of natural creation) and eventually return to it.

Those who attain the highest state of cultivation (zhiren, perfected persons) perceive the essence of life and death. They understand that what we call life isn't true birth, nor is death true extinction. Precisely because they don't cling to life, they truly live; because they don't fear death, they achieve eternal existence. Like when Liezi beheld a skull and declared: "You and I have never truly lived or died." Such individuals flow with nature, participating in the endless transformations of existence.

The core teaching of "Mastering Life" is this: Those who truly comprehend life's essence don't forcibly pursue what life cannot obtain; those who understand destiny's truth don't seek what intellect cannot grasp. While nurturing the body requires material means, many with abundant resources fail to properly care for their form. Though life depends on physical form, countless people maintain sound bodies yet lose their vitality. Life comes unbidden and departs unhindered. The tragedy lies in humanity's delusion that preserving the body preserves life—this cannot be done. Though impossible, we must still attempt it—such is life's unavoidable paradox. To transcend physical limitations, the best method is "abandoning the world"—freeing oneself from worldly entanglements, thereby attaining mental tranquility and unity with nature.

The key to cultivation lies in maintaining inner purity and harmony while following natural laws. Though the body may age and perish, the spirit can eternally abide with the Dao. This is what Zhuangzi calls "supreme joy"—the highest state that transcends worldly pleasures.

則與彼更生更生則幾矣  夫生者時之暫來受之有涯也命者天之  所付也且然無間也知其暫來則所謂達  生之情也知其所付則所謂達命之情也  知其有涯而不以外物而傷之所謂不務  生之所無以爲也知其無間而不用智巧  而蹈悔所謂不務知之所無奈何何也然  而生必有形形必得養裁其非類而養之  所謂養形必先之物也養形役物而無厭  則物翕贍而形必喪故曰物有餘而形不  養者有矣夫形者生之所寓也非我所有  也我謂有而不能自忘之所謂有生必先  無離形也形旣不忘而自有則形愈虧而  生必喪故曰形不離而生亡者有之矣惟  能忘生而又能忘形則適來之謂時而適  去必能順也故曰生之來不能却其去不  可止夫莊子之書其篇有名養生者有名  達生者養之者自内而達之者及外以其  自内而故以養生爲内篇以其及外而故  以達生爲外篇此周爲書之意也 事奚足棄而生奚足遺棄事則形不勞遺生 則精不虧夫形全精復與天爲一天地者萬 物之父母也合則成體散則成始形精不虧 是謂能移精而又精反以相天  事無窮生有涯以有涯而應無窮則力不  贍而命殆矣惟能棄事而任自然忘生而  處無爲則逍遥自得而神王矣故曰棄事  則形不勞遺生則精不虧形不勞者形所
Interpretation

Life is but a fleeting pause in the passage of time, and what we can possess has its limits. Fate is bestowed by heaven, continuous and unbroken. To understand that life is merely temporary existence is to comprehend the true essence of life; to recognize that fate is heaven's gift is to grasp the fundamental nature of destiny. When one realizes the finitude of life, one becomes invulnerable to external harms—this means not pursuing what life cannot obtain. When one knows fate's unbroken continuity, one refrains from forcing things through cleverness—this means not striving for what wisdom cannot alter.

Life necessarily manifests through physical form, and this form requires nourishment. Yet if one chooses inappropriate methods to nourish the body (such as excessive pursuit of material comforts), one may instead damage it. Thus there exist cases where material abundance fails to properly nurture the form. The physical body is merely the vessel of life, not truly belonging to oneself. If one clings to the notion of "possessing a body," the form will gradually deteriorate, ultimately leading to the loss of life. Therefore, situations occur where the body remains while life departs.

Only by both seeing through life's illusions and transcending attachment to form can one calmly accept life when it comes and let it go when it departs. In Zhuangzi's works, "Essentials for Nurturing Life" discusses inner cultivation, while "The Full Understanding of Life" addresses external manifestations. Inner cultivation is fundamental, hence classified as "Inner Chapters"; external manifestations are extensions, thus categorized as "Outer Chapters." This reflects Zhuangzi's compositional intent.

Worldly affairs are boundless, yet life has its limits. Using finite life to address infinite matters leads to exhaustion that endangers one's vital existence. Only by relinquishing mundane concerns to follow nature's flow, forgetting life and death while abiding in wuwei (non-action), can one roam freely with vibrant spirit. Therefore it is said: relinquishing worldly burdens keeps the body unweary; transcending life and death prevents spiritual depletion. Those whose forms remain unweary and spirits undepleted may unite with the Dao of nature. Heaven and earth are the parents of all things—when yin and yang qi combine, life forms; when they disperse, all returns to the source. Maintaining the integrity of both form and spirit allows one to transform along with nature's changes. When spiritual cultivation reaches its ultimate state, one may even assist nature's creative transformations.

 以全也精不虧者精所以復也全則反於  眞復則歸於靜如此則與天無異也故曰  形全精復與天爲一與天爲一則物最之  也故曰天地者萬物之父母也爲物之父  母而能生成於物故曰合則成體散則成  始始者言其生而體者言其成生成萬物  而不勞形損精而與化之密移是謂至精  之精而歸於自然而然矣故曰形精不虧  是謂能移精而又精反以相天 子列子問關尹曰至人潜行不窒蹈火不熱 行乎萬物之上而不慄請問何以至於此關 尹曰是純氣之守也非知巧果敢之列居予 語女凡有貌象聲色者皆物也物與物何以 相遠夫奚足以至乎先是色而已則物之造 乎不形而止乎無所化夫得是而窮之者物 焉得而止焉彼將處乎不淫之度而藏乎無 端之紀遊乎萬物之所終始  夫至人者虚心應物而無不通也故曰潜  行不窒待物以誠而物莫傷也故曰蹈火  不熱反以相天而心無累也故曰行乎萬  物之上而不慄然而至人如此者由精神  之不虧也非智勇之用也故曰是純氣之  所守也非智巧果敢之 壹其性飬其氣合其德以通乎物之所造夫 若是者其天守全其神無却物奚自入焉  壹其性者不跂其本也養其氣者不出其  和也合其德者守於自德也不跂其本則  正正所以存不出其和則眞純所以全守
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how practitioners of the Dao can achieve unity with nature through nurturing Jing (essence), Qi (vital energy), and Shen (spirit).

The text first explains the concept of "complete form and restored essence": when the physical body remains intact and the essence is not depleted, the essence will naturally regenerate. Maintaining wholeness allows one to return to the original state, and returning to this state leads to tranquility, ultimately aligning with the Dao. Thus, those with complete form and restored essence can merge with heaven and earth, which serve as the parents of all things—capable of both gathering to form all beings and dispersing to return to the source. This process of creation requires no effort, does not deplete the body's essence, and follows the subtle transformations of natural creation. This represents the highest state of essence, fully in accordance with the laws of nature.

Next, through a dialogue between Liezi and Guan Yin, the text illustrates the realm of the "perfected person" (one who has attained the Dao): such individuals can dive underwater without drowning, tread on fire without burning, and walk among all things without fear. Guan Yin explains that this is because perfected persons preserve the purity of their Qi (vital energy), relying not on cleverness or courage. All things with form and sound belong to the category of "objects," while perfected persons reach a state beyond form and appearance. They respond to all things with a mind of emptiness and stillness, treating external phenomena with sincerity, and thus nothing can harm them.

Finally, the text outlines the method of cultivation: one must unify their innate nature, nurture the primordial Qi, and preserve De (virtue/power) to connect with the source of all things. Unifying the innate nature means not straying from the root; nurturing Qi means maintaining harmony; preserving De means upholding one's natural disposition. By not straying from the root, one becomes upright; by maintaining harmony, one preserves purity; by upholding natural disposition, one connects with all things. Such individuals possess a complete nature, with no gaps in their spirit, and external influences cannot penetrate them.

(Note: The term "perfected person" refers to those who have reached the highest level of moral cultivation; "pure Qi" refers to the pristine primordial energy; "unifying one's nature" means maintaining a mind free from distractions.)

 於自得則過失所以忘如此則眞君虚靜  而明於萬物之始故曰以通乎物之所造  至人若是而其道所以曲全而其妙所以  不測萬物焉能撓役乎故曰夫若是者其  神無却物奚自入焉 夫醉者之墜車雖疾不死骨節與人同而犯 害與人異其神全也乗亦不知也墜亦不知 也死生驚懼不入乎其胸中是故遻物而不 慴彼得全於酒而猶若是而況得全於天乎 聖人藏於天故莫之能傷也復讎者不折鏌 干雖有忮心者不怨飄瓦是以天下平均故 無攻戰之亂無殺戮之刑者由此道也不開 人之天而開天之天開天者德生開人者賊 生不厭其天不忽於人民幾乎以其眞仲尼 適楚出於林中見痀僂者承蜩猶掇之也仲 尼曰子巧乎有道邪曰我有道也五六月累 丸二而不墜則失錙銖累三而不墜則失者 十一累五而不墜猶掇之也吾處身也若厥 株拘吾執臂也若槁木之枝雖天地之大萬 物之多而唯蜩翼之知吾不反不側不以萬 物易蜩之翼何爲而不得孔子顧謂弟子曰 用志不分乃凝於神其痀僂丈人之謂乎顔 淵問仲尼曰吾嘗濟乎觴深之淵津人操舟 若神吾問焉曰操舟可學邪曰可善游者數 能若乃夫没人則未嘗見舟而便操之也吾 問焉而不吾告敢問何謂也仲尼曰善游者 數能忘水也若乃夫没人之未嘗見舟而便
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist cultivation of mental states and the power of focused awareness.

First, it describes how those who have truly attained the Dao (the Way) possess a mind that is empty, tranquil, and clear, capable of perceiving the essence of all things. Their actions are harmonious and unobstructed, profound and unfathomable—external distractions cannot unsettle them. The text uses the metaphor of a drunkard falling from a cart yet remaining unharmed because, in his intoxicated state, his spirit (Shen) is concentrated, and fears of life and death cannot penetrate his awareness. If even drunkenness can provide such protection, how much more so for one who is truly united with the Dao? The sage follows the natural order of heaven, and thus nothing can harm him.

Further analogies illustrate this principle: a vengeful person will not break his enemy’s sword, nor will an aggrieved man blame the tile that happens to strike him. The key to harmony in the world lies in aligning with nature rather than creating artificial conflicts. Opening one’s innate nature nurtures Virtue (De), while indulging artificial desires breeds calamity.

The passage then recounts two stories: The first tells of Confucius encountering an elderly hunchback in Chu who caught cicadas with a bamboo pole as effortlessly as picking them up by hand. The old man explained that he practiced with total concentration, forgetting all else—even heaven and earth—focusing only on the cicada’s wings. Confucius marveled at this as the state of "single-minded focus and gathered spirit." The second story involves Confucius’ disciple Yan Hui asking why skilled swimmers quickly learn to row boats, while expert divers—who have never seen a boat—can row naturally. Confucius explained that swimmers understand water’s nature, and divers are so immersed in it that they instinctively master rowing.

These examples demonstrate that when one fully merges with their environment, reaching a state where self and object are forgotten, extraordinary abilities emerge. The key lies in letting go of distractions, maintaining unwavering focus, and harmonizing with the natural Dao.

操之也彼視淵若陵視舟之覆猶其車却也 覆却萬方陳乎前而不得入其舍惡往而不 暇以瓦注者巧以鉤注者憚以黄金注者殙 其巧一也而有所矜則重外也凡外重者内 拙  夫承蜩操舟技之至末也由能用志而精  之精之則乃幾於神也而況全生之道乎  夫生者事之至大也人能用志而全之全  之乃入於神也世俗不能用志而全之此  莊子所以寓言仲尼之歎承蜩顔淵之美  操舟也 田開之見周威公威公曰吾聞祝腎學生吾 子與祝腎遊亦何聞焉田開之曰開之操拔 篲以侍門庭亦何聞於夫子威公曰田子無 讓寡人願聞之開之曰聞之夫子曰善飬生 者若牧羊然視其後者而鞭之威公曰何謂 也田開之曰魯有單豹者巖居而水飲不與 民共利行年七十而猶有嬰兒之色不幸遇 餓虎餓虎殺而食之有張毅者高門縣薄無 不走也行年四十而有内熱之病以死豹飬 其内而虎食其外毅飬其外而病攻其内此 二子者皆不鞭其後者也  夫生必有形形必有體體所以分於内外  也全生者均養其内外則内外兩全而生  所以存也若專養其内而忘其外則外與  物迕而不免於累此單豹所以亡軀於虎  若專養於外而忘其内則内必焚和而不  免於累此張毅所以没身於病也二子者  皆不中於道而罹其害此田開之所以有
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principles of nurturing life (yangsheng). Through two parables, Zhuangzi demonstrates the importance of balancing internal and external cultivation in life-nourishing practices.

The first parable illustrates that although cicada-catching and boat-steering are minor skills, complete devotion and refined mastery can lead to miraculous attainment. How much more so for the great matter of life cultivation—it requires wholehearted dedication to achieve perfection.

The second parable presents two failed cases of extreme approaches: Shan Bao secluded himself in mountain forests, focusing solely on inner cultivation while avoiding external contact. Though maintaining a youthful complexion at seventy, he was devoured by a tiger. Zhang Yi constantly socialized with nobility, concentrating only on external connections, yet died at forty from internal heat disease. Both exemplify the error of clinging to one extreme.

True life cultivation must harmonize both physical form and spiritual essence. The body serves as the vessel distinguishing inner and outer dimensions—authentic nourishment requires balanced development. Those who neglect external circumstances while overemphasizing inner refinement, like Shan Bao, invite external calamities; those who chase social connections while disregarding internal regulation, like Zhang Yi, succumb to internal disorders.

Zhuangzi employs these examples to reveal that the Dao of life cultivation lies in maintaining equilibrium. Just as shepherds tend their straggling sheep, nourishing life requires addressing one's deficiencies without fixating on extremes. This embodies Tian Kaizhi's teaching: "Those skilled in nurturing life are like shepherds—they observe the lagging ones and urge them forward."

 牧羊之喻也 仲尼曰無入而藏無出而陽柴立其中央三 者若得其名必極夫畏塗者十殺一人則父 子兄弟相戒也必盛卒徒而後敢出焉不亦 知乎人之所取畏者衽席之上飲食之間而 不知爲之戒者過也祝宗人玄端以臨牢筴 說彘曰汝奚惡死吾將三月㹖汝十日戒三 日齊藉汝白茅加汝肩尻乎彫俎之上則汝 爲之乎爲彘謀曰不如食以糠糟而錯之牢 筴之中自爲謀則苟生有軒冕之尊死得於 腞楯之上聚僂之中則爲之爲彘謀則去之 自爲謀則取之所異彘者何也桓公田於澤 管仲御見鬼焉公撫管仲之手曰仲父何見 對曰臣無所見公反誒詒爲病數日不出齊 士有皇子告敖者曰公則自傷鬼惡能傷公 夫忿滀之氣散而不反則爲不足上而不下 則使人善怒下而不上則使人善忘不上不 下中身當心則爲病桓公曰然則有鬼乎曰 有沈有履竈有髻户内之煩壤雷霆處之東 北方之下者倍阿鮭蠪躍之西北方之下者 則泆陽處之水有罔象丘有崒山有夔野有 彷徨澤有委蛇公曰請問委蛇之狀何如皇 子曰委蛇其大如轂其長如轅紫衣而宋冠 其爲物也惡聞雷車之聲則捧其首而立見 之者殆乎霸桓公辴然而笑曰此寡人之所 見者也於是正衣冠與之坐不終日而不知 病之去也紀消子爲王養鬥雞十日而問雞
Interpretation

Confucius used the analogy of herding sheep to illustrate the art of worldly conduct: one should neither completely conceal oneself nor excessively reveal oneself, but maintain a middle position like firewood standing upright. When these three states are properly balanced, one can avoid the most perilous paths. For instance, on a dangerous road where one in ten travelers perishes, fathers and sons, brothers would warn each other and only dare pass through when traveling together—isn't this truly wise?

What people should most guard against are actually the dangers in daily life—the indulgence in sensual pleasures upon the couch and excesses at the dining table. Yet these hidden perils are often overlooked. It's like when a sacrificial priest in ceremonial robes addresses a pig: "Why fear death? I'll feed you refined fodder for three months, observe purification rituals for ten days, then place you upon carved vessels cushioned with white reeds." From the pig's perspective, it would surely prefer eating husks while alive in its pen. Yet humans themselves pursue riding in fine carriages and wearing official caps in life, then thick coffins and lavish burials in death. Why apply completely different standards to pigs and ourselves?

When Duke Huan of Qi was hunting in the marshes, Guan Zhong drove his chariot. The duke claimed to have seen a ghost and returned home frightened into illness. The Qi sage Huangzi Gao'ao said: "This fear came from within yourself. When stagnant Qi (vital energy) congeals in the body's center, illness arises." The duke asked whether ghosts truly existed. Gao'ao enumerated various spirits: the kitchen god resembling a maiden, the thunder god dwelling in dusty doorways, the marsh-dwelling Wei Snake (a type of specter), etc. When describing the Wei Snake—shaped like a chariot pole, clad in purple with a Song-style crown, fearful of thunder—the duke laughed heartily, recognizing it as what he'd seen, and his illness vanished immediately.

Ji Xuzi trained fighting cocks for the king. After ten days the king inquired about progress—this illustrates how cultivation requires gradual progression (the original text breaks off here, but the continuation likely describes how training fighting cocks involves eliminating their combative Qi until reaching the highest state of appearing "dumb as a wooden chicken").

已乎曰未也方虚憍而恃氣十日又問曰未 也猶應嚮景十日又問曰未也猶疾視而盛 氣十日又問曰幾矣雞雖有鳴者已無變矣 望之似木雞矣其德全矣異雞無敢應者反 走矣  紀渻子之養雞梓慶之爲鐻皆能全其天  眞而順其自然也夫天眞全則所以德全  而合於天故雞遂至於無敢應而鐻成而  凝於神也 孔子觀於吕梁縣水三十仞流沫四十里黿 鼉魚鼈之所不能游也見一丈夫游之以爲 有苦而欲死也使弟子並流而拯之數百步 而出被髮行歌而游於塘下孔子從而問焉 曰吾以子爲鬼察子則人也請問蹈水有道 乎曰亡吾無道吾始乎故長乎性成乎命與 齊俱入與汩偕出從水之道而不爲私焉此 吾所以蹈之也孔子曰何爲始乎故長乎性 成乎命曰吾生於陵而安於陵故也長於水 而安於水性也不知吾所以然而然命也梓 慶削木爲鐻鐻成見者驚猶鬼神魯侯見而 問焉曰子何術以爲焉對曰臣工人何術之 有雖然有一焉臣將爲鐻未嘗敢以耗氣也 必齊以靜心齊三日而不敢懷慶賞爵禄齊 五日不敢懷非譽巧拙齊七日輒然忘吾有 四枝形體也當是時也無公朝其巧專而外 骨消然後入山林觀天性形軀至矣然後成 見鐻然後加手焉不然則已則以天合天器 之所以疑神者其是與東野稷以御見莊公
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the Daoist philosophy of "following nature's course" through several allegorical stories.

The first story describes Ji Shengzi training fighting cocks. Initially the rooster still bluffs aggressively; after ten days it still reacts to external movements; after another ten days it retains an intimidating demeanor. Only when the bird becomes completely still like wood is its De (Virtue) considered perfected. At this stage, other roosters dare not challenge it and flee instead. This demonstrates that true cultivation means returning to original simplicity, achieving complete naturalness.

The second story tells of craftsman Zi Qing making wooden musical instruments. By preserving his pure innate nature and following natural principles, his instruments became so exquisite people thought them made by spirits. When the Duke of Lu asked his secret, Zi Qing explained his preparatory purification: after three days he forgot fame and profit; after five days he stopped caring about others' opinions; after seven days he even forgot his physical form. Only then could he enter the mountains to select wood, allowing the material's natural qualities to harmonize with his skill.

The third story recounts Confucius observing a master swimmer at Lüliang Falls. The man swam effortlessly through torrents where even fish couldn't navigate. He claimed no special method—since childhood he'd lived by water, following its nature, letting currents carry him without forcing anything. This embodies the principle: "Begin with habit, grow through nature, perfect through destiny"—starting from familiarity, developing through innate qualities, and achieving mastery through natural accord.

These stories collectively show that whether raising fowl, crafting objects, or swimming, the highest attainment lies in eliminating artificial effort to completely follow things' natural tendencies. When human cultivation achieves perfect harmony with nature, miraculous effects emerge. This is what Daoism calls "using heaven to match heaven"—employing natural qualities to align with natural laws.

進退中繩左右旋中規莊公以爲文弗過也 使之鉤百而反顔闔遇之入見曰稷之馬將 敗公密而不應少焉果敗而反公曰子何以 知之曰其馬力竭矣而猶求焉故曰敗工倕 旋而蓋規矩指與物化而不以心稽故其靈 臺一而不桎忘足屨之適也忘要帶之適也 知忘是非心之適也不内變不外從事會之 適也始乎適而未嘗不適者忘適之適也有 孫休者踵門而詫子扁慶子曰休居鄉不見 謂不脩臨難不見謂不勇然而田原不遇歲 事君不遇世賔於鄉里逐於州部則胡罪乎 天哉休惡遇此命也扁子曰子獨不聞夫至 人之自行邪忘其肝膽遺其耳目茫然彷徨 乎塵垢之外道遥乎無事之業是謂爲而不 恃長而不宰今汝飾知以驚愚脩身以明汙 昭昭乎若揭日月而行也汝得全而形軀具 而九竅無中道夭於聾盲跛蹇而比於人數 亦幸矣又何暇乎天之怨哉子往矣孫子出 扁子入坐有間仰天而歎弟子問曰先生何 爲歎乎扁子曰向者休來吾告之以至人之 德吾恐其驚而遂至於惑也弟子曰不然孫 子之所言是邪先生之所言非邪非固不能 惑是孫子所言非邪先生所言是邪彼固惑 而來矣又奚罪焉扁子曰不然昔者有鳥止 於魯郊魯君說之爲具太牢以饗之奏九韶 以樂之鳥乃始憂悲眩視不敢飲食此之謂
Interpretation

This passage presents two contrasting stories that illustrate the Daoist principle of "Wuwei (non-action) and naturalness."

The first story tells of Duke Zhuang of Lu training horses: The duke forced his horses to run in endless circles until Yan He predicted their collapse from exhaustion. When the horses soon fell, Yan He explained that demanding more from already spent creatures inevitably leads to ruin. He compared this to the ancient craftsman Chui, whose fingers moved in perfect harmony with his materials without conscious thought, leaving his mind unburdened and pure. True mastery means forgetting even the comfort of shoes around one's feet or a belt around one's waist, ultimately transcending distinctions between right and wrong to achieve natural inner peace.

The second story features Sun Xiu lamenting his fate: Visiting Bian Qingzi to complain about his unrecognized virtue, Sun received a lesson about the perfected person's (zhiren) state. Such beings forget their physical form, rise above worldly affairs, and follow Wuwei without forcing outcomes. Bian pointed out how Sun's deliberate displays of wisdom and virtue were like parading through markets holding up the sun and moon—merely surviving such behavior was fortunate enough, let alone complaining about destiny.

Bian Qingzi concluded with Duke Lu's bird-keeping parable: When the duke entertained a seabird with lavish royal ceremonies, the terrified creature refused to eat or drink. Forcing worldly customs upon natural beings only brings harm. This subtly revealed how Sun Xiu's suffering stemmed from his artificial pursuit of social recognition—a fundamental violation of the Dao's natural order.

以己飬養鳥也若夫以鳥養養鳥者宜棲之 深林浮之江湖食之以委蛇則平陸而已矣 今休款啓寡聞之民也吾告以至人之德譬 之若載鼷以車馬樂鴳以鐘鼓也彼又惡能 無驚乎哉  全生之道非至人不能知之矣非至人而  與語全生之道是養鳥以太牢九韶之具  也安能使無驚懼之心歟此扁子所以慮  孫休之惑也夫莊子之作此篇以覺世俗  未悟全生之理也而世俗者未可卒告之  以全生之道故終於扁子之所歎而寓其  所作之意也若莊子者可謂能盡其意者  乎     山木篇  夫能達生之情而無爲無爲則歸於虚靜  寂寞而材全材全則不蘄乎用矣此莊子  因而作山木篇 莊子行於山中見大木枝葉盛茂伐木者止 其旁而不取也問其故曰無所可用莊子曰 此木以不材得終其天年夫子出於山舍於 故人之家故人喜命竪子殺鴈而烹之竪子 請曰其一能鳴其一不能鳴請奚殺主人曰 殺不能鳴者明日弟子問於莊子曰昨日山 中之木以不材得終其天年今主人之鴈以 不材死先生將何處莊子笑曰周將處夫材 與不材之間材與不材之間似之而非也故 未免乎累若夫乗道德而浮遊則不然無譽 無訾一龍一蛇與時俱化而無肯專爲一上 一下以和爲量浮遊乎萬物之祖物物而不
Interpretation

This passage explores Zhuangzi's philosophy of "the way of preserving life in its authentic state" (quan sheng zhi dao).

The text begins with an analogy about raising birds: using human methods—such as offering lavish sacrifices like the Grand Sacrifice (Tailao) and the Nine Shao music—only frightens the bird. True care for a bird means letting it dwell in deep forests or vast rivers, feeding it what it naturally eats. Similarly, explaining the realm of the "perfect person" (zhiren, one who has attained the Dao) to those with shallow understanding is like using carriages to transport mice or entertaining small birds with bells and drums—it only bewilders them.

Bianzi (a wise figure in Zhuangzi’s writings) laments that discussing the way of preserving life with those who are not yet perfected is as futile as raising a bird the wrong way. Zhuangzi wrote this text to awaken people to this truth, but worldly individuals cannot grasp it immediately—hence, he conveys deeper meaning through Bianzi’s sigh.

The "Mountain Tree" chapter (Shan Mu Pian) illustrates the art of navigating life through two stories:

The first tells of a great tree in the mountains that escapes being cut down precisely because it is "useless" (bu cai), thus living out its natural lifespan. Yet, a goose in a household is slaughtered for "not cackling" (also bu cai). When a disciple expresses confusion, Zhuangzi suggests the middle path of being "between usefulness and uselessness"—though this is not the highest state.

The true way of living is to "float and wander by riding the Dao and De (Virtue/Power)"—neither chasing fame nor fearing slander, soaring like a dragon one moment and coiling like a snake the next, adapting to circumstances without fixating on any single approach. In this way, one harmonizes with all things and returns to the authentic state of life.

物於物則胡可得而累邪此神農黄帝之法 則也若夫萬物之情人倫之傳則不然合則 離成則毁廉則挫尊則議有爲則虧賢則謀 不肖則欺胡可得而必乎哉悲夫弟子志之 其唯道德之鄉乎  夫命者材之體材者命之用材所以殊小  大而用所以分有無聖人之材大材也材  大則材全而已矣材全而以無用爲用則  能全生此山木以不材而得終其天年也  世俗之材小材也材小則材缺而已矣材  缺而亦以無用爲用則反喪生此山舍之  鴈以不能嗚而見烹也夫鴈之不能鳴亦  似山木之不材也似之而未爲其全材是  以不免於患也故曰材與不材之間似之  而非之也故未免乎累 市南宜僚見魯侯魯侯有憂色市南子曰君 有憂色何也魯侯曰吾學先王之道脩先君 之業吾敬鬼尊賢親而行之無須臾離居然 不免於患吾是以憂市南子曰君之除患之 術淺矣夫豐狐文豹棲於山林伏於巖穴靜 也夜行晝居戒也雖饑渴隱約猶且胥疏於 江湖之上而求食焉定也然且不免於網羅 機辟之患是何罪之有哉其皮爲之災也今 魯國獨非君之皮邪吾願君刳形去皮灑心 去欲而遊於無人之野南越有邑焉名爲建 德之國其民愚而朴少私而寡欲知作而不 知藏與而不求其報不知義之所適不知禮
Interpretation

This scripture expounds the Daoist wisdom of "the usefulness of the useless" and how to attain spiritual freedom by eliminating desires.

The teachings of Shennong and the Yellow Emperor reveal that clinging to external things will inevitably lead to being burdened by them. Yet the laws of the world and human relationships operate differently—what gathers will scatter, what succeeds will decay, what is pure will be undermined, what is noble will invite slander, what is active will suffer loss, what is virtuous will be plotted against, and what is unworthy will be deceived. How can any of these be forced? Therefore, disciples must remember that only by returning to the realm of Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue) can one follow the true path.

A person’s innate nature is the root, while talent is its outward expression. Talent determines one’s capacity, but its application determines whether it bears fruit. The sage possesses great talent, yet precisely because it is all-encompassing, they take "uselessness" as their use—only then can life be preserved. It is like the trees in the mountains that, precisely because they are not useful timber, live out their full natural lifespan. Ordinary people, however, have limited and flawed talents—if they also imitate the "useless" path, they will instead perish, like the goose that was slaughtered because it could not honk. The goose’s inability to honk may seem similar to the tree’s uselessness, but their natures are fundamentally different, so disaster still befalls them. Thus, dwelling in the space between "being useful and useless" may appear similar, but the difference remains, and one will still be burdened.

When Shi Nan Yiliao met the Duke of Lu, who wore a troubled expression, he asked why he was distressed. The Duke replied, "I study the ways of the ancient kings, inherit the legacy of my ancestors, revere the spirits, honor the virtuous, and practice these principles constantly—yet I still cannot escape misfortune." Shi Nanzi said, "Your method for dispelling misfortune is too superficial. The fox and the leopard, with their splendid fur, dwell in the mountains, hiding by day and moving cautiously by night. Though hungry and thirsty, they must venture far from danger to seek food, yet still they cannot escape traps and snares—it is their fur that brings them calamity. Is not the state of Lu now your 'fur'? I urge you to cast aside your form, eliminate desires, and wander freely in the boundless wilderness. In the south, there is a land called the Country of Jian De. Its people are simple and free of selfish desires. They know only labor, not hoarding; they delight in giving without seeking reward, understanding nothing of ritual propriety or formal rules."

Through these metaphors, the text illustrates that excessive pursuit of usefulness invites disaster—true wisdom lies in grasping the subtle function of "uselessness." External achievements, fame, and wealth are like the splendid fur of animals, becoming burdens. Only by shedding desires and returning to simplicity can one attain true freedom.

之所將猖狂妄行乃蹈乎大方其生可樂其 死可葬吾願君去國捐俗與道相輔而行君 曰彼其道遠而險又有江山我無舟車奈何 市南子曰君無形倨無留居以爲君車君曰 彼其道幽遠而無人吾誰與爲鄰吾無糧我 無食安得而至焉市南子曰少君之費寡君 之欲雖無糧而乃足君其涉於江而游於海 望之而不見其崖愈往而不知其所窮送君 者皆自崖而反君自此遠矣故有人者累見 有於人者憂故堯非有人非見於有人也吾 願去君之累除君之憂而獨與道遊於大莫 之國方舟而濟於河有虚船來觸舟雖有惼 心之人不怒有一人在其上則呼張歙之一 呼而不聞再呼而不聞於是三呼邪則必以 惡聲隨之向也不怒而今也怒向也虚而今 也實人能虚己以遊世其孰能害之  夫材全則所以知命知命則所以不憂魯  侯之材不全而不能知於命所以有憂色  而已夫憂者生於物之所累也魯侯物於  國而其國所以爲之累此市南子引豐狐  文豹皮爲之災而諭之也人欲使其國不  能爲累者莫若無心於物而任其自然無  意於民而任其自化汎然逰於自得之場  而處於至虚之域則其材所以自全而其  用歸於無用乃入於寥天而孰能爲  乎故曰君自此遠矣又曰虚己以逰  敦能害之此市南子語魯侯以深根固蒂  無爲清淨之道也
Interpretation

This dialogue recounts how Shinanzi (a Daoist recluse) advised the Duke of Lu to relinquish worldly burdens and wander with the Dao. Shinanzi said: "Those who indulge in reckless actions may appear free, yet they have already strayed from the great Dao. To live joyfully and be buried peacefully in death—I urge you to abandon your state, cast aside mundane affairs, and journey with the Dao."

The Duke of Lu worried: "The path is long and treacherous—without carriage or boat, how shall I proceed?" Shinanzi replied: "Do not cling to form or dwell on residence—this shall be your carriage." The Duke pressed further: "The road is desolate and uninhabited—without provisions, how can I travel?" Shinanzi explained: "Reduce expenditure and diminish desires—even without provisions, you will have enough. When crossing rivers or sailing seas, as the shore vanishes from sight and you venture into boundlessness, those who bid you farewell will return to land, while you depart forever from the dusty world."

He then elucidated the principle: "To govern others is a burden; to be relied upon brings sorrow. Emperor Yao neither controlled others nor was entangled by them." Shinanzi sought to relieve the Duke of these burdens, urging him to wander alone with the Dao through vast, empty realms. He illustrated this with an example: "An empty boat drifting toward you provokes no anger, but if a person stands aboard, curses will follow—if one can empty oneself (relinquish ego) in navigating the world, who could harm them?"

Further, he clarified: "Those with wholehearted nature understand heavenly decree (Tianming) and remain free of sorrow. The Duke, burdened by an incomplete nature, is weighed down by the material desires of rulership—like the elegant fox and leopard hunted for their fur." To prevent the state from becoming a burden, one must maintain no-mind toward all things, allowing them to unfold naturally, letting the people transform themselves, and abiding serenely in the realm of emptiness. Only then can original nature be preserved—seemingly useless yet aligned with heavenly Dao, attaining the state of "Liaotianyi" (merging with the celestial Dao).

In conclusion, the passage highlights Shinanzi’s teaching of the Daoist essentials: "deep roots and firm foundation" (stabilizing the core) and the practice of Wuwei (non-action), emphasizing the wisdom of "emptying oneself to wander the world."

北宫奢爲衛靈公賦斂以爲鍾爲壇乎郭門 之外三月而成上下之縣王子慶忌見而問 焉曰予何術之設奢曰一之間無敢設也奢 聞之旣雕旣琢復歸於朴侗乎其無識儻乎 其怠疑萃乎茫乎其送往而迎來來者勿禁往 者勿止從其彊梁隨其曲傳因其自窮故朝 夕賦斂而豪毛不挫而況有大塗者乎  夫道一而不可不變也變而復歸於眞也  生物而任其自生也成物而任其自成也  不加不損而與物無迕也無爲無用而莫  知其終也此皆至道之妙體而得之足以  全生矣此北宫奢所以寓之於爲鍾爲壇  之間也故曰而況有大塗者乎 孔子圍於陳蔡之間七日不火食太公任往 弔之曰子幾死乎曰然子惡死乎曰然任曰 予嘗言不死之道東海有鳥焉其名曰意怠 其爲鳥也翂翂翐翐而似無能引援而飛迫 脅而棲進不敢爲前退不敢爲後食不敢先 嘗必取其緒是故其行列不斥而外人卒不 得害是以免於患直木先伐甘井先竭子其 意者飾知以驚愚修身以明汙昭昭乎如揭 日月而行故不免也昔吾聞之大成之人曰 自伐者無功功成者墮名成者虧孰能去功 與名而還與衆人道流而不明居得行而不 名處純純常常乃比於狂削迹損勢不爲功 名是故無責於人人亦無責焉至人不聞子 何喜哉孔子曰善哉辭其交遊去其弟子逃
Interpretation

Beigong She was raising funds for Duke Ling of Wei to cast a great bell. He built an altar outside the city gates and completed the bell's hanging frame in just three months. Prince Qingji saw this and asked, "What special method did you employ?" Beigong She replied, "I employed no method at all. I've heard that what is carved and polished must ultimately return to simplicity. I simply maintained a state of unknowing and unthinking, drifting in a daze, neither obstructing nor forcing anything. Those who came I did not refuse; those who left I did not detain. I followed each person's capacity and adapted to different circumstances, letting them contribute according to their means. Thus, though I collected donations morning and night, I didn't harm even a single hair—how much less would this trouble one who comprehends the Dao!"

The great Dao is singular, yet it must follow transformation. After transforming, it returns again to its original truth. It gives birth to the myriad things yet lets them grow naturally; it completes the myriad things yet lets them fulfill themselves. It neither increases nor decreases, and does not contend with the myriad things. Seemingly without action and without use, none can fathom its ultimate extent. These are the most profound mysteries of the supreme Dao—those who grasp them can preserve their lives. Beigong She applied these principles in the process of casting the bell and building the altar, hence his remark, "how much less would this trouble one who comprehends the Dao!"

When Confucius was besieged between the states of Chen and Cai, he went seven days without lighting a cooking fire. Taigong Ren came to console him, saying, "You nearly died, didn't you?" Confucius replied, "Indeed." Taigong Ren asked, "Do you detest death?" Confucius said, "Of course." Taigong Ren said, "Let me speak to you about the way of long life. In the Eastern Sea there is a bird called the 'sluggard.' It flies slowly and clumsily, as if inept, and must flock together to fly, huddling close to roost. When advancing, it dares not take the lead; when retreating, it dares not lag behind. It dares not eat first but always takes the leftovers. Thus, it is not ostracized by the flock, and outsiders ultimately cannot harm it—this is how it avoids calamity. Straight trees are felled first; sweet wells are drained first. Do you always strive to display your wisdom to awaken the foolish, cultivating yourself to highlight others' impurity? Such dazzling brilliance is like carrying the sun and moon as you walk—of course it invites disaster."

"I once heard a man who had attained the Dao say: 'Those who boast of themselves achieve no merit; when merit is achieved, it brings ruin; when fame is displayed, it invites loss.' Who can abandon fame and return to the common multitude? The Dao flows everywhere yet does not shine; virtue spreads widely yet leaves no trace. Remain simple and ordinary, appearing foolish and mad. Eliminate your tracks, diminish your authority, and do not pursue merit or fame—then none will blame you, and others will have nothing to blame. Those who attain the Dao do not seek renown—why must you cling to it?" When Confucius heard this, he exclaimed, "Excellent!" Thereupon, he took leave of his friends, dismissed his disciples, and retired to live in the wilds.

於大澤衣裘褐食杼栗入獸不亂羣入鳥不 亂行鳥獸不惡而況人乎孔子問子桑虖曰 吾再逐於魯伐樹於宋削迹於衛窮於商周 圍於陳蔡之間吾犯此數患親交益疏徒友 益散何與子桑雽曰子獨不聞假人之亡與 林回棄千金之璧負赤子而趍或曰爲其布 與赤子之布寡矣爲其累與赤子之累多矣 棄千金之璧負赤子而趍何也林回曰彼以 利合此以天屬也夫以利合者迫窮禍患害 相棄也以天屬者迫窮禍患害相收也夫相 收之與相棄亦遠矣且君子之交淡若水小 人之交甘如醴君子淡以親小人甘以絶彼 無故以合者則無故以離孔子曰敬聞命矣 徐行翔佯而歸絶學捐書弟子無挹於前其 愛益加進異日桑雽又曰舜之將死眞泠禹 曰汝戒之哉形莫若縁情莫若率縁則不離 率則不勞不離不勞則不求文以待形不求 文以待形固不待物莊子衣大布而補之正 緳係履而過魏王魏王曰何先生之憊邪莊 子曰貧也非憊也士有道德不能行憊也衣 弊履穿貧也非憊也此所謂非遭時也王獨 不見夫騰猿乎其得柟梓豫章也攬蔓其枝 而王長其間雖羿逄蒙不能眄睨也及其得 枯棘枳枸之間也危行側視振動悼慄此筋 骨非有加急而不柔也處世不便未足以逞 其能也今處昏上亂相之間而欲無憊奚可
Interpretation

This passage presents several allegorical stories about the art of living. It first depicts the life of a recluse: wearing coarse hemp garments, eating wild fruits, and living in harmony with birds and beasts—even animals do not dislike him, let alone humans.

Confucius complained to Zisang Hu (a Daoist hermit) about his repeated misfortunes: being expelled from Lu, humiliated by having trees cut down in Song, barred from entering Wei, impoverished in the lands of Shang and Zhou, and besieged between Chen and Cai. These ordeals caused relatives and friends to distance themselves and disciples to scatter. Zisang Hu then enlightened him with the story of "Lin Hui Abandoning the Jade": A man named Lin Hui, while fleeing, discarded a priceless jade disk but carried an infant on his back. When asked why, Lin Hui explained that the jade represented a bond of profit, while the child embodied a natural kinship. Relationships based on profit dissolve when calamity strikes, whereas those rooted in innate nature grow stronger in adversity. The friendship of noblemen is as mild as water yet enduring, while that of petty men is as sweet as wine yet easily broken. Connections formed without reason will dissolve just as arbitrarily. Confucius was deeply inspired upon hearing this.

Later, the narrative recounts how Emperor Shun, on his deathbed, advised Yu the Great: "Let your physical form follow nature, and let your emotions remain genuine and unadorned. Thus you will neither stray from your true nature nor grow weary. Without contrived external adornments, you won't depend on material things."

Finally, Zhuangzi visited the King of Wei wearing patched, coarse clothing. When the king remarked that he appeared destitute, Zhuangzi clarified: "This is poverty, not destitution. A scholar who possesses virtue but cannot practice it—that is true destitution. Like a gibbon leaping effortlessly among nanmu trees where even divine archers cannot touch it, yet trembling when trapped in thorny bushes—this isn't due to stiffened sinews, but unfavorable circumstances. In this age of foolish rulers and chaotic ministers, how could one avoid being trapped?"

These stories collectively illustrate that true wisdom lies in following nature and preserving authenticity. Maintaining spiritual independence in turbulent times surpasses the pursuit of external wealth and status. Human relationships should be founded on sincere natural bonds rather than calculated interests.

得邪此比干之見剖心徵也夫孔子窮於陳 蔡之間七日不火食左據槁木右擊槁枝而 歌焱氏之風有其具而無其數有其聲而無 宫角木聲與人聲犂然有當於人之心顔回 端拱還目而窺之仲尼恐其廣己而造大也 愛己而造哀也曰回無受天損易無受人益 難無始而非卒也人與天一也夫今之歌者 其誰乎回曰敢問無受天損易仲尼曰饑渴 寒暑窮桎不行天地之行也運物之泄也言 與之偕逝之謂也爲人臣者不敢去之執臣 之道猶若是而況乎所以待天乎何謂無受 人益難仲尼曰始用四達爵禄並至而不窮 物之所利乃非己也吾命有在外者也君子 不爲盜賢人不爲竊吾若取之何哉故曰鳥 莫知於鷾鴯目之所不宜處不給視雖落其 實棄之而走其畏人也而襲諸人間社稷存 焉爾何謂無始而非卒仲尼曰化其萬物而 不知其禪之者焉知其所終焉知其所始正 而待之而已耳何謂人與天一邪仲尼曰有 人天也有天亦天也人之不能有天性也聖 人晏然體逝而終矣莊周遊乎雕陵之樊睹 一異鵲自南方來者翼廣七尺目大運寸感 周之顙而集於栗林莊周曰此何鳥哉翼殷 不逝目大不睹褰裳躩步執彈而留之覩一 蟬方得美蔭而忘其身螳蜋執翳而搏之見 得而忘其形異鵲從而利之見利而忘其眞
Interpretation

This passage recounts a dialogue between Confucius and his disciple Yan Hui, using vivid parables to explore the relationship between humans and nature. At the time, Confucius found himself stranded between the states of Chen and Cai, going seven days without hot meals, yet still singing while tapping rhythms on a withered tree. As Yan Hui stood respectfully observing, Confucius, concerned his disciple might overly revere him, offered profound remarks.

Confucius first presented three insights: it is easier to avoid harm from nature than to resist the temptations of human profit; all things lack true beginnings or endings; and humans and heaven (tian) are fundamentally one. Using birds as metaphor, he noted how intelligent sparrows avoid dangerous places, even abandoning food when sensing human presence—just as virtuous men should not covet unearned gains, lest they become like thieves.

He then illustrated the principle of "greed blinds awareness" through the tale of a cicada, mantis, and strange magpie: while the cicada enjoys cool shade, it forgets its vulnerability; the mantis raising its leaf-like arms to seize the cicada overlooks its own peril; and the southern magpie fixates on catching the mantis. Observing this, Confucius suddenly realized his own intent to shoot the magpie with a slingshot mirrored this very cycle of "seeing profit but forgetting truth."

Finally, Confucius explained the unity of heaven and humanity: humans belong to nature, which in turn belongs to the greater Dao (the Way). One cannot possess nature’s essence—the sage simply follows its transformations peacefully until life’s end. These parables collectively teach that humans should align with natural laws, never allowing immediate gains to obscure fundamental truths.

莊周怵然曰噫物固相累二類相召也捐彈 而反走虞人逐而誶之莊周反入三月不庭 藺且從而問之夫子何爲頃間甚不庭乎莊 周曰吾守形而忘身觀於濁水而迷於清淵 且吾聞諸夫子曰入其俗從其俗今吾遊於 雕陵而忘吾身異鵲感吾顙遊於栗林而忘 眞栗林虞人以吾爲戮吾所以不庭也  形者天之委質也命之所累也惟其能忘  形則足以忘物忘物則足以全命命全則  足以全生惟其不能忘形則不能忘物不  能忘物則不能全命不能全命則不能全  生此莊周所有執彈鵲蟬螳蜋之言也夫  執彈彈鵲而忘栗林之禁此役於物而不  能忘形也螳蜋摶蟬而忘異鵲之所利此  利於得而不能全命也不能忘形而全命  皆不免於憂患也安得生所以全歟此周  之所以遽悟而不出門庭也 陽子之宋宿於逆旅逆旅人有妾二人其一 人美其一人惡惡者貴而美者賤陽子問其 故逆旅小子對曰其美者自美吾不知其美 也其惡者自惡吾不知其惡也陽子曰弟子 記之行賢而去自賢之行安往而不愛哉  夫欲全其性命終其天年者莫若外忘其  形也形忘則所以自得而所適安有不得  歟此陽子所以取逆旅小子之言也夫美  者自美吾不知其美惡者自惡吾不知其  惡者此皆外忘其形而美惡從而兩忘也
Interpretation

Zhuangzi was suddenly struck with profound realization and sighed: "All things in the world are indeed interconnected, and like attracts like!" He threw down his slingshot and fled, while the forest keeper (yuren) chased after him with angry shouts. Returning home, Zhuangzi remained indoors for three months without stepping outside. His disciple Lin Ju came to inquire: "Master, why have you secluded yourself these days?"

Zhuangzi explained: "I became obsessed with external forms while forgetting my own safety—like staring at turbid waters and thereby failing to see the clear depths beneath. I once heard my teacher say: 'When entering any place, observe its customs.' Yet while wandering in Diaoling, I forgot my true identity. When that extraordinary bird brushed past my forehead, I became so fixated on the birds among the chestnut trees that I completely forgot this grove was forbidden ground. The keeper's punishment was justified—this is why I remain in contemplation."

The human body is nature's vessel, yet also life's burden. Only by forgetting physical form can one transcend external things; only by transcending externals can life be preserved whole; only with whole life can one live completely. Conversely, obsession with form enslaves one to externals, making life's preservation impossible and natural longevity unattainable. This is the lesson behind Zhuangzi's parables—the man aiming his slingshot at birds while forgetting the grove's prohibition becomes enslaved by externals; the mantis fixated on cicadas ignores the bird behind it, endangering life for immediate gain. Those who cannot forget form to preserve life remain trapped in sorrow—how then can true peace be found? Thus Zhuangzi's awakening and self-seclusion.

Another tale: Yang Zhu traveled to Song and lodged at an inn. The innkeeper had two concubines—one beautiful, one plain—yet the plain one was honored while the beautiful one despised. When Yang Zhu asked why, a young servant replied: "The beautiful one flaunts her beauty, so I see no beauty; the plain one owns her plainness, so I see no plainness." Yang Zhu told his disciples: "Remember this truth: The virtuous who claim no virtue will be cherished wherever they go."

For those seeking to preserve life and attain natural longevity, the supreme method is forgetting external appearance. Forget form, and contentment follows—one dwells at ease in any place. This is the deeper meaning Yang Zhu recognized in the innkeeper's words. "The beautiful flaunting beauty appears unbeautiful; the plain owning plainness appears unplain"—this transcends physical form, dissolving distinctions between beauty and ugliness.

 豈爲不全性命之情歟此莊子所以言之  於篇終也 南華眞經新
Interpretation

In this passage, Zhuangzi raises a fundamental question: Is it not all about preserving the authentic state of life? This precisely captures the key idea he conveys at the conclusion of his entire work.

The term "the true nature of life and destiny" (xingming zhi qing) refers to humanity's innate natural disposition and essential life force. Zhuangzi observes that people often become deluded by worldly notions and external desires, thereby losing touch with the most precious, genuine state of existence. This point is particularly emphasized in the closing section of the Nanhua Zhenjing (i.e., the Zhuangzi), where he reminds readers to return to the natural Dao of life.

This passage appears at the end of the tenth volume of A New Commentary on the Nanhua Zhenjing and can be regarded as the summarizing viewpoint of the entire text. Through this rhetorical question, Zhuangzi guides readers to reflect on what truly matters in the pursuit of life.

傳卷之十

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0136); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 9 Vol. 11 →