中文 · EN

《南華真經新傳》Vol. 11

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 11 / 20 9,351 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經新傳》 Vol. 11 (Dongshen 洞神部, 20 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 19 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經新傳》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經新傳卷之十一積一    宋 王 元 澤 傳   田子方篇  夫眞人者全至樂達生理以不材爲材無  用爲用而不失眞此魏無擇之師如此矣  莊子因而作田子之篇 田子方侍坐於魏文侯數稱谿工文侯曰谿 工子之師邪子方曰非也無擇之里人也稱 道數當故無擇稱之文侯曰然則子無師邪 子方曰有曰子之師誰邪子方曰東郭順子 文侯曰然則夫子何故未嘗稱之子方曰其 爲人也眞人貌而天虚縁而葆眞清而容物 物無道正容以悟之使人之意也消無擇何 足以稱之子方出文侯儻然終日不言召前 立臣而語之曰遠矣全德之君子始吾以聖 知之言仁義之行爲至矣吾聞子方之師吾 形解而不欲動口鉗而不欲言吾所學者眞 土梗耳夫魏眞爲累耳  夫眞人者内直而不假於物也具體而任  其無爲也故曰人貌而天虚靜而不失其  正也故曰虚縁而葆眞湛然足以有容也  故曰清而容物邪僻來干則示之以未始  出吾宗而俾之自滅也故曰物無道正容  以悟之使人之意也消此皆合於道之無  名也無名安可强名乎此田子方所以言  無擇何足以稱之也夫子方之師如此也  萬物安足爲累乎此文侯自嗟其所學之  非道而魏國之爲累也故曰吾所學者眞  土梗耳魏眞爲我累耳
Interpretation

This passage discusses the concept of the "True Person" (真人) in Zhuangzi's chapter "Tian Zifang." Tian Zifang, a minister of Marquis Wen of Wei, mentions his teacher Dongguo Shunzi during a conversation with the marquis.

Tian Zifang often praised a man named Xi Gong, leading the marquis to assume Xi Gong was his teacher. Tian Zifang clarified that Xi Gong was merely a fellow villager, while his true teacher was Dongguo Shunzi. Surprised, the marquis asked why Tian Zifang had never spoken of this teacher before. Tian Zifang explained: Dongguo Shunzi had attained the state of a "True Person"—outwardly ordinary but inwardly in harmony with Heaven (天), embodying Wuwei (non-action, 无为) while preserving his innate genuineness, remaining pure and encompassing all things. When encountering those who strayed from the Dao, simply maintaining dignified composure was enough to awaken them, causing their delusions to dissolve naturally. Such a person, Tian Zifang felt, was beyond his ability to praise.

Marquis Wen was deeply moved and remained silent the entire day. Later, he confided in his ministers, marveling at how lofty the realm of a truly virtuous gentleman was. He had once believed that the words of sages and the conduct of benevolence and righteousness represented the highest attainment, but now realized that what he had learned was merely superficial—like clay figurines and wooden puppets—and that even his status as ruler of Wei had become a burden.

The text elaborates on the characteristics of a "True Person": inwardly upright and free from dependence on external things, preserving innate genuineness and following nature—hence described as "human in appearance but heavenly in essence" (人貌而天); empty and still in Wuwei yet never deviating from the true path, thus able to "remain empty yet preserve authenticity" (虚缘而葆真); pure and all-embracing, thus capable of "clarity that accommodates all things" (清而容物). When facing those who are misguided, simply revealing the source of the Dao is enough to dispel their delusions. All this aligns with the nameless nature of the Dao, which cannot be forcibly described in words. That is why Tian Zifang felt unworthy to praise his teacher, and why Marquis Wen lamented that what he had learned was not the Dao—even his royal position had become an encumbrance.

温伯雪子適齊舍於魯魯人有請見之者温 伯雪子曰不可吾聞中國之君子明乎禮義 而陋於知人心吾不欲見也至於齊反舍於 魯是人也又請見温伯雪子往也蘄見我今 也又蘄見我是必有以振我也出而見客入 而歎明日見客又入而歎其僕曰每見之客 也必入而歎何也曰吾固告子矣中國之民 明乎禮義而陋乎知人心昔之見我者進退 一成規一成矩從容一若龍一若虎其諫我 也似子其道我也似父是以歎也仲尼見之 而不言子路曰吾子欲見温伯雪子乆矣見 之而不言何邪仲尼曰若夫人者巨擊而道 存矣亦不可以容聲矣  眞人者敦兮若朴也曠兮若谷也淵兮似  萬物之宗也不可以智度不可以言接此  温伯雪子之如此而仲尼見而不能言也  夫仲尼見而不言者心得也心得何假於  言乎故曰亦不可以容聲矣 顔淵問於仲尼  夫田無擇之師與夫温伯雪子其道所以  爲得矣由未及於仲尼故以顔回稱仲尼  之道而繼言之仲尼之道至妙矣其所得  得之於老聃故以孔子與老聃論道而次  之也故無擇之師不及温伯雪子温伯雪  子不及於孔子孔子又師於老聃故第差  一等而言之此莊子託數子之稱師而論  道以至于精也 夫子步亦步夫子趨亦趨夫子馳亦馳夫子 奔逸絶塵而回瞠若乎後矣夫子曰回何謂
Interpretation

Wen Boxue, a Daoist hermit, was traveling to the state of Qi and stopped for a while in Lu. A man from Lu asked to meet him. Wen Boxue declined, saying, “I have heard that the gentlemen of the Central States are well versed in ritual and righteousness, but do not understand the human heart. I do not wish to meet him.” Later, on his return from Qi, Wen Boxue stayed in Lu again, and the man asked to see him once more. After meeting him, Wen Boxue returned and sighed; the following day, after seeing a visitor, he sighed again. His attendant asked why he sighed each time he received a guest. Wen Boxue explained, “I said long ago that people of the Central States understand ritual and righteousness but do not understand the human heart. The person who met me before behaved stiffly, as if measured with compass and square. When he admonished me, he treated me like a son addressing his father; when he instructed me, he was like a father lecturing his child. That is why I sighed.”

Confucius met Wen Boxue but did not say a word. Zilu asked, “Master, you have long wanted to meet Wen Boxue, yet when you met him you said nothing. Why?” Confucius replied, “With a person like him, a glance is enough to reveal where the Dao lies; there is no need to communicate through words.” One who has truly attained the Dao is simple and unadorned, like an uncarved block of wood; open and receptive, as empty as a valley; and profound, like the source of all things. Such a person cannot be measured by cleverness or reached through speech. Confucius saw him and said nothing because they understood one another inwardly. Since their hearts were already in accord, what need was there for words? That is why it is said, “There is no need for sound.”

Yan Yuan asked Confucius about the relative levels of cultivation attained by Tian Wuzi, a hermit, and Wen Boxue. Tian Wuzi’s teacher was inferior to Wen Boxue, Wen Boxue was inferior to Confucius, and Confucius had once studied under Laozi (Lao Dan). Their levels of cultivation thus formed a progression. Zhuangzi uses the line of teachers linking these figures to explain the subtle stages of cultivating the Dao.

Yan Yuan said, “When the Master walks slowly, I walk slowly too; when the Master walks quickly, I walk quickly too; when the Master runs, I run too. But when the Master speeds off and vanishes in a cloud of dust, I can only stare in amazement, left far behind.” Through this metaphor of Yan Yuan learning the Dao, the passage shows that the highest realm of the Dao cannot be mastered through simple imitation.

也曰夫子步亦步也夫子言亦言也夫子趨 亦趨也夫子辯亦辯也夫子馳亦馳也夫子 言道回亦言道也及奔逸絶塵而回瞠若乎 後者  仲尼者入於道也顔回者知於道也入於  道者已至於眞空此所以奔逸絶塵而不  可以及也知於道者未達於眞空此所以  趨步馳騁而瞠若乎後也不可以及則獨  爲於聖人瞠若其後則可以繼聖人此仲  尼所以爲萬世師而顔回所以爲於亞聖  也 夫子不言而信不比而周無器而民滔乎前 而不知所以然而已矣仲尼曰惡可不察與 夫哀莫大於心死而人死亦次之日出東方 而入於西極萬物莫不比方有巨有趾者待 是而後成功是出則存是入則亡萬物亦然 有待也而死有待也而生  孔子待物以其誠故不言而信也接下以  其忠故不比而周也無爵而物最故無器  而民也無位而物歸故滔乎前而不知所  以然而已此夫子之所以聖者歟 吾一受其成形而不化以待盡效物而動日 夜無隙而不知其所終薰然其成形知命不 能規乎其前丘以是日徂吾終身與汝交一 臂而失之可不哀與汝殆著乎吾所以著也 彼已盡矣而汝求之以爲有是求馬於唐肆 也吾服汝也甚忘汝服吾也亦甚忘雖然汝 奚患焉雖忘乎故吾吾有不忘者存  眞宰之造物我所以受其成形而爲我矣
Interpretation

This passage contrasts Confucius and Yan Hui to illustrate different stages of enlightenment in Daoist cultivation. Confucius had completely merged with the Dao (the "True Ruler," or cosmic origin), attaining the state of "absolute emptiness" (zhenkong) — a realm of perfect clarity that grants complete freedom from constraints. While Yan Hui understood the principles of the Dao intellectually, he had not yet realized this state of absolute emptiness, thus could only follow in careful steps. This distinction explains why Confucius became the eternal teacher of humanity, while Yan Hui remained the "secondary sage" who inherited the master's wisdom.

Those who truly embody the Dao need no words to earn trust (achieving credibility without speech), require no forced intimacy to care for others (extending warmth without contrivance), and attract people naturally despite holding no official authority (drawing followers without instruments of power). Their state resembles the sun's natural course — rising in the east and setting in the west — as all things follow this rhythm: emerging into being and withdrawing into non-being, with life and death being part of nature's cyclical flow. Confucius reached sagehood precisely by treating all things with sincerity and receiving others with profound integrity.

The concluding section contemplates life's essence: Once we receive our physical form, it remains unchanged until life's end. Though we move with external things through day and night's alternations, our ultimate destination remains unknowable. Life takes shape as naturally as swirling mist — even those who comprehend Heaven's mandate cannot foresee what comes next. Confucius laments: Though we interact throughout life, we pass each other like strangers, never truly knowing one another. Yet he consoles: "Though my past self has vanished, do not grieve, for the eternal Dao endures — we all received our present forms and existence from the True Ruler (cosmic origin)."

 受其成形而不可以侈易待其終極而後  止此未足以免於憂累也故聖人達觀而  忘其形所以無我而已矣 孔子見老聃老聃新沐方將被髮而乾慹然 似非人孔子便而待之少焉見曰丘也眩與 其信然與向者先生形體掘若槁木似遺物 離人而立於獨也老聃曰吾遊心於物之初 孔子曰何謂邪曰心困焉而不能知口辟焉 而不能言嘗爲汝議乎其將  夫物之初者無有也無有者道之眞體而  與物不耦矣老聃所以逰之宜乎孔子稱  其形體如槁木似遺物離人而立於獨也  夫離人者出於非人之域也立於獨者入  於天而一也此老聃所以神妙歟 至陰肅肅至陽赫赫肅肅出乎天赫赫發乎 地兩者交通成和而物生焉或爲之紀而莫 見其形消息滿虚一晦一明日改月化日有 所爲而莫見其功生有所乎萌死有所乎歸 始終相反乎無端而莫知其所窮非是也且 孰爲之宗  一陰一陽之謂道道生於陰陽陰陽分而  道著然獨陰不可成而獨陽不可生必在  交通而然後萬物生成矣故曰至陰肅肅  至陽赫赫肅肅出乎天赫赫發乎地兩者  交通成和而物生焉夫天陽也地陰也肅  肅出乎天赫赫出乎地見陰陽交通之道  也 孔子曰請問遊是老聃曰夫得是至美至樂 也得至美而遊乎至樂謂之至人
Interpretation

When a person acquires physical form, they cannot alter it at will but must await life's natural conclusion. Yet even this does not free one from worldly afflictions. Therefore, the sage perceives the fundamental essence, forgets the physical form, and attains the state of selflessness (Wuwei).

When Confucius visited Laozi (Lao Dan) who had just washed his hair, he found him drying his disheveled locks, appearing trance-like and unlike ordinary men. Waiting outside before their meeting, Confucius said: "Are my eyes deceived? Or did you truly resemble withered wood in stillness just now, as if transcending all things and leaving the mundane world behind?" Laozi replied: "My spirit (Shen) was wandering in the origin of all things." When Confucius sought deeper meaning, Laozi explained: "This is the ineffable state of 'non-being' (Wu), the true essence of the Dao (the Way), which transcends all particular phenomena."

Laozi's condition exemplified liberation from ordinary human states, embodying unity with celestial Dao. Extreme Yin-Qi manifests as frigid austerity, while extreme Yang-Qi blazes with luminous intensity. Yin-Qi emanates from heaven, Yang-Qi arises from earth—their harmonious intermingling generates the ten thousand things. Though no visible ruler's traces appear, the waxing and waning of Yin-Yang and the alternation of sun and moon follow inherent patterns. Life has its beginning, death its return—an endless cycle without terminus. This constitutes the foundation of the great Dao.

The alternation of Yin-Yang is the Dao itself. The Dao manifests through Yin-Yang: neither Yin nor Yang alone can create; only their mutual interaction generates all beings. Heaven belongs to Yang, earth to Yin—the principle of their interaction manifests in the dynamic where "Yin-Qi descends from heaven while Yang-Qi ascends from earth."

When Confucius inquired how to attain this state, Laozi responded: "Comprehending this realm brings supreme aesthetic perception and joy. Those who achieve perfect beauty and dwell in perfect bliss may be called 'the perfected ones' (Zhiren, highest adepts of the Dao)."

 能全於道者所以能全於命命全則爲樂  莫大焉此老聃所以有至美至樂之言也  夫道者天下之至美也命者萬事之至樂  也至美出於道而視之不見也至樂出於  命而聽之不聞也惟能入道則可全命惟  能有美則可以有樂二者非至人不能備  之矣故曰得至美而逰乎至樂謂之至人 孔子曰願聞其方曰草食之獸不疾易藪水 中之蟲不疾易水行少變而不失其大常也 喜怒哀樂不入於胸次夫天下也者萬物之 所一也得其所一而同焉則四肢百體將爲 塵垢而死生終始將爲晝夜而莫之能滑而 況得喪禍福之所介乎棄隸者若棄泥塗知 身貴於隸也貴在於我而不失於變且萬化 而未始有極也夫孰足以患心已爲道者解 乎此  天地萬物同出於道而得一也人能明得  一之妙則無爲無爲則無我無我則形骸  如遺土死生爲往來皆不能爲累於我矣  豈得失利害可以介萬於心歟故曰夫天  下也者萬物之所一也得其所一而同焉  則四肢百體將爲塵垢而死生終始將爲  晝夜而莫之能滑而況得喪禍福之所介  乎 孔子曰夫子德配天地而猶假至言以修心 古之君子孰能說焉老聃曰不然夫水之於 汋也無爲而才自然矣至人之於德也不修 而物不能離焉若天之自高地之自厚日月
Interpretation

Only those who fully comprehend the Dao (the fundamental principle of the universe) can preserve their heavenly mandate. Preserving this mandate brings the greatest joy. This is what Laozi meant by "supreme beauty and supreme happiness."

The Dao is the most perfect existence in the world, while the heavenly mandate is the ultimate source of happiness for all things. This perfection originates from the Dao yet remains invisible; this joy stems from the mandate yet remains inaudible. Only by deeply understanding the Dao can one preserve the heavenly mandate; only by realizing this perfection can one attain true happiness. These dual states can only be fully embodied by those who have reached the level of "the Perfected" (those at the highest stage of cultivation). Thus it is said: Those who master supreme beauty and wander freely in supreme happiness may be called the Perfected.

When Confucius sought instruction, Laozi replied with a metaphor: Grass-eating beasts do not worry about changing pastures, and aquatic insects do not fear changing waters, because their way of survival remains fundamentally unchanged. Those who truly comprehend the Dao remain undisturbed by emotions like joy or anger. All things in the universe are fundamentally one—understanding this truth allows one to regard the body as dust, and life and death as the alternation of day and night. Even lesser matters like gain and loss or fortune and misfortune cannot trouble their hearts. They dismiss worldly concerns as easily as discarding dirt, knowing their true self is far more precious than external things.

All things between heaven and earth originate from the Dao and return to "the One" (the unified source). Those who grasp the mystery of the One can achieve the state of Wuwei (non-action, or effortless action); achieving Wuwei enables transcendence of the self; transcending the self allows one to regard the body as worthless as dung and view life and death as natural cycles. How could matters of gain and loss then disturb their hearts?

Confucius praised Laozi's virtue as matching heaven and earth, saying he still relied on supreme principles to cultivate his mind. But Laozi replied: Just as water flows naturally without deliberate action, the virtue of the Perfected requires no conscious cultivation—all things follow them spontaneously. Like heaven's natural height, earth's natural thickness, or the sun and moon's natural radiance, true virtue manifests effortlessly.

之自明夫何修焉孔子出以告顔回曰丘之 於道也其猶醯雞與微夫子之發吾覆也吾 不知天地之大全也  缺傳 莊子見魯哀公哀公曰魯多儒士少爲先生 方者莊子曰魯少儒哀公曰舉魯國而儒服 何謂少乎莊子曰周聞之儒者冠圜冠者知 天時履句屨者知地形綬佩玦者事至而斷 君子有其道者未必爲其服也爲其服者未 必知其道也公固以爲不然何不號於國中 曰無此道而爲此服者其罪死於是哀公號 之五日而魯國無敢儒服者獨有一丈夫儒 服而立乎公門公即召而問以國事千轉萬 變而不窮莊子曰以魯國而儒者一人耳可 謂多乎百里奚爵禄不入心故飯牛而牛肥 使秦穆公忘其賤與之政也有虞氏死生不 入於心故足以動人宋元君將畫圖衆史皆 至受揖而立䑛筆和墨在外者半有一史後 至者儃儃然不趨受揖不立因之舍公使人 視之則解衣般礴臝君曰可矣是眞畫者也 文王觀於臧見一丈夫釣而其釣莫釣非持 其釣有釣者常釣也文王欲舉而授之政而 恐大臣父兄之弗安也欲終而釋之而不忍 百姓之無天也於是旦而屬之大夫曰昔者 寡人夢見良人黑色而𩑺乗駁馬而徧宋蹄 號曰寓而政於臧丈人庶幾乎民有瘳乎諸 大夫蹴然曰先君王也文王曰然則卜之諸
Interpretation

This passage presents several allegorical stories illustrating Daoist philosophy, revealing that true wisdom lies not in external forms but in inner cultivation.

Confucius realized that his understanding was as limited as a tiny insect in a vinegar jar. Had it not been for Laozi’s guidance, he would never have grasped the great principles of heaven and earth.

When Zhuangzi met Duke Ai of Lu, he pointed out that though the streets of Lu were filled with people wearing Confucian robes, there were very few true Confucian scholars. A genuine scholar should possess real ability, not just dress the part. After Duke Ai decreed that "those who wear Confucian robes without understanding Confucianism shall be executed," only one true Confucian scholar dared to keep wearing the robes. This shows how few truly learned people there are—most are merely putting on appearances.

Several other examples follow: Baili Xi paid no attention to titles or salaries but focused on tending cattle, which led Duke Mu of Qin to recognize his worth and promote him. The sage-king Youyu remained indifferent to life and death, yet his virtue moved others deeply. When King Yuan of Song sought a painter, only the one who disregarded etiquette and carried himself with natural ease proved to be a true master.

Finally, the story of King Wen of Zhou encountering a recluse (Old Man Zang) who fished without caring for the catch illustrates how true sages often appear ordinary. Wanting to appoint the recluse to govern but fearing opposition from his ministers, King Wen pretended to have a dream in which his ancestors commanded him to pass the throne to the old man. The ministers, believing it was the ancestors’ will, agreed. This tale demonstrates that genuine wisdom requires no deliberate display—it will naturally be recognized by those with discernment, and wise leaders know subtle ways to achieve their aims.

All these stories convey the same truth: The true Dao (the Way) is found not in outward forms but in inner refinement. Real talent needs no forced expression—it will be discovered by those with the vision to see it.

大夫曰先君之命王其無他又何卜焉遂迎 臧丈人而授之政典法無更偏令無出三年 文王觀於國則列士壞植散羣長官者不成 德斔斛不敢入於四境列士壞植散羣則尚 同也長官者不成德則同務也斔斛不敢入 四境則諸侯無二心也文王於是焉以爲大 師北面而問曰政可以及天下乎臧丈人昧 然而不應泛然而辭朝令而夜遁終身無聞 顔淵問於仲尼曰文王其猶未邪又何以夢 爲乎仲尼曰默汝無言夫文王盡之也而又 何論刺焉彼直以循斯須也  夫魯國之多儒周邦之多臣及其所得則  乃一儒一丈夫矣故魯得一儒而哀公問  之國事則千轉萬變而不窮周得一丈夫  而文王授之邦政則四境諸侯無二心是  二人者得於心者充足而爲於外者有餘  所謂才全而德不形故莊子言於此篇矣 伯昏無人射引之盈貫措杯水其肘上發之 適矢復沓方矢復寓當是時猶象人也伯昏 無人曰是射之射非不射之射也嘗與汝登 高山履危石臨百仞之淵若能射乎於是無 人遂登高山履危石臨百仞之淵背逡巡足 二分垂在外揖御寇而進之御寇伏地汗流 至踵伯昏無人曰夫至人者上闚青天下潜 黄泉揮斥八極神氣不變今汝怵然有恂目 之志爾於中也殆矣夫  至人者潜行而不窒所入而皆得放心於
Interpretation

The physician stated that the late ruler had already left his final decree, so the king need not resort to divination. Thus, King Wen invited the elder of Zang (a recluse) to govern the state. During the elder’s administration, he neither altered the legal statutes nor issued biased decrees. After three years, King Wen inspected the kingdom and found: the warriors had disbanded their private militias, the officials no longer boasted of personal achievements, and non-standard measuring vessels from neighboring states no longer entered the borders. The disbanding of private militias showed unity between high and low; officials refraining from self-praise indicated dedication to public service; the disappearance of foreign measures signaled the allegiance of the feudal lords. King Wen then appointed the elder as Grand Tutor and respectfully inquired how to extend benevolent governance to all under heaven. Yet the elder remained silent and withdrew the next day, vanishing without a trace.

Yan Yuan asked Confucius: "Had King Wen not perfected his virtue (De)? Why did he resort to dream divination to seek worthies?" Confucius replied: "Be silent! King Wen had already reached the ultimate state—there is no need for critique. He merely adapted to the times by temporarily using divination."

Though Lu teemed with Confucian scholars and the Zhou court overflowed with officials, those who truly attained the Dao were few: in Lu, only one Confucian (Confucius himself), and in Zhou, only the elder of Zang. Thus, when Duke Ai of Lu consulted Confucius on statecraft, he received boundless wisdom; when King Wen entrusted governance to the elder, the feudal lords submitted. These two men had perfected their inner cultivation, so their outward actions flowed effortlessly. This exemplifies the state of "talent complete yet virtue (De) unmanifested"—a concept Zhuangzi employs to illuminate the Way of the Perfected (Zhiren).

When Bohun Wuren (one who has attained the Dao) demonstrated archery, he drew his bow to full tension, balanced a cup of water on his elbow, and fired arrows in rapid succession, each chasing the last, his posture steady as a wooden figurine. He said: "This is shooting with intention, not the archery of non-action (Wuwei). Dare to join me atop high mountains, treading perilous cliffs, shooting arrows over a hundred-fathom abyss?" With that, he ascended a sheer precipice, his feet dangling over the void, and calmly summoned Lie Yukou (the archery student) forward. Lie Yukou collapsed in terror, drenched in sweat. Bohun Wuren sighed: "The Perfected (Zhiren) gazes upon the blue heavens above and plumbs the yellow springs below, roaming freely in all directions without a change in countenance. Now, with your vision blurred and heart trembling, how could you possibly hit the mark?"

Those who have attained the Dao move through the world unobstructed; wherever they go, they find ease, for their minds remain ever carefree and unfettered.

 天地之外而不入於形器之内忘於危險  而豈有憚慴歟此伯昏無人所以言其闚  青天潜黄泉揮斥八極而神氣不能變也 肩吾問於孫叔敖曰子三爲令尹而不榮華 三去之而無憂色吾始也疑子今視子之鼻 間栩栩然子之用心獨奈何孫叔敖曰吾何 以過人哉吾以其來不可却也其去不可止 也吾以爲得失之非我也而無憂色而已矣 我何以過人哉且不知其在彼乎其在我乎 其在彼邪亡乎我在我邪亡乎彼方將躊躇 方將四顧何暇至乎人貴人賤哉仲尼聞之 曰古之眞人知者不得說美人不得濫盜人 不得劫伏戲黄帝不得友死生亦大矣而無 變乎己況爵禄乎若然者其神經乎大山而 無介入乎淵泉而不濡處卑細而不憊充滿 天地旣以與人己愈有楚王與凡君坐少焉 楚王左右曰凡亡者三凡君曰凡之亡也不 足以喪吾存夫凡之亡不足以喪吾存則楚 之存不足以存存由是觀之則凡未始亡而 楚未始存也  至人者以形骸爲寓寄以生死爲往來而  況爵禄軒冕之外物乎此孫叔敖所以三  仕三去而無榮華憂色也夫爵禄軒冕物  之來寄也其來不可郤其去不可止來去  在彼而不在我故曰吾以得失之非我也  得失之非我則又何憂喜於其間故曰而  無憂色而已矣此叔敖之能忘於外物孔
Interpretation

The dialogue between Sunshu Ao and Jianwu reveals the transcendent spiritual realm of the Daoist "Zhenren" (True Person).

Sunshu Ao served three times as prime minister of Chu without feeling pride, and was dismissed three times without sorrow. He explained: The gain or loss of office is not determined by me—when it comes, I cannot refuse it; when it goes, I cannot retain it. Since neither gain nor loss depends on me, why should I rejoice or grieve over it? The real question is whether the office needs me or I need the office.

When Confucius heard this, he marveled: The ancient Zhenren could not be swayed by the wise, seduced by beauty, or coerced by bandits. Even sage-kings like Fuxi and the Yellow Emperor could not claim his friendship. Such a person remains composed even in the face of life and death—how much more indifferent must he be to rank and salary? His spirit can pass through Mount Tai without obstruction, dive into the deepest abyss without getting wet, and dwell in lowly stations without distress. His essence fills the space between heaven and earth.

The text also cites the examples of the King of Chu and the ruler of Fan: When a Chu attendant declared, "Fan has perished three times," the ruler of Fan replied, "The destruction of Fan cannot deprive me of my true existence." This shows that, to the ultimate person, the survival or fall of a state is merely relative.

The true sage regards the body as a temporary dwelling and life and death as ordinary comings and goings—how much more so for external things like rank, carriages, and horses? This is why Sunshu Ao could serve and be dismissed three times without disturbance. Honors, salaries, and material possessions arrive without being refused and depart without being retained. Their gain or loss is not up to me, so naturally, I neither grieve nor rejoice over them. Such detachment from worldly concerns is precisely how Sunshu Ao embodied the forgetting of external things.

 子所以引古之眞人而稱之也    知北遊篇  夫窈冥寂寞希夷微妙者至道之眞體體  固不可以情求不可以智窺惟以無知而  爲得矣此莊子因而作知北遊之篇 知北遊於玄水之上登隱弅之丘而適遭無 爲謂焉知謂無爲謂曰予欲有問乎若何思 何慮則知道何處何服則安道何從何道則 得道三問而無爲謂不答也非不答不知答 也知不得問反於白水之南登狐闋之上而 睹狂屈焉知以之言也問乎狂屈狂屈曰唉 予知之將語若中欲言而忘其所欲言知不 得問反於帝宫見黄帝而問焉黄帝曰無思 無慮始知道無處無服始安道無從無道始 得道知問黄帝曰我與若知之彼與彼不知 也其敦是耶黄帝曰彼無爲謂眞是也狂屈 似之我與汝終不近也夫知者不言言者不 知故聖人行不言之教道不可致德不可至 仁可爲也義可虧也禮相僞也故曰失道而 後德失德而後仁失仁而後義失義而後禮 禮者道之華而亂之首也故曰爲道者日損 損之又損之以至於無爲無爲而無不爲也 今已爲物也欲復歸根不亦難乎其易也其 唯大人乎生也死之徒死也生之始孰知其 紀人之生氣之聚也聚則爲生散則爲死若 死生爲徒吾又何患故萬物一也是其所美 者爲神奇其所惡者爲臭腐臭腐復化爲神
Interpretation

In the story of "Knowledge Wanders North," Zhuangzi reveals the essence of the Dao. Here, a character named "Knowledge" seeks answers about attaining the Dao but receives three different responses.

First, Knowledge encounters "Non-Doer" (symbolizing pure natural Dao) and asks three questions: How should one think to understand the Dao? How should one act to abide in the Dao? What path leads to attaining the Dao? But Non-Doer remains completely silent, as the true Dao cannot be expressed in words. Next, Knowledge meets "Wildly Bent" (representing the intermediary state between nature and artifice), who wants to speak but forgets what to say. Finally, Knowledge consults the Yellow Emperor (symbolizing artificial wisdom), who provides clear answers: One understands Dao by neither thinking nor scheming, abides in Dao through non-action (Wuwei), and attains Dao by not deliberately pursuing it.

The Yellow Emperor explains that Non-Doer is the one who truly possesses Dao, Wildly Bent is close but not fully there, while both the Emperor and Knowledge remain far from Dao. True wisdom cannot be spoken—what can be articulated is not genuine knowledge. Therefore, sages practice "teaching without words."

The text then elaborates the hierarchy of Dao: Dao is fundamental, De (Virtue) manifests Dao, humaneness practices De, righteousness regulates humaneness, and rites formalize righteousness. Yet these are merely superficial forms of Dao, even the beginning of confusion. Cultivating Dao requires progressively reducing artificial efforts until reaching complete non-action—only then can one accomplish everything effortlessly.

All things follow the cyclical pattern of life and death. Human life is the gathering of Qi (vital energy)—when Qi gathers there is life, when it scatters there is death. Life and death are inseparable companions, so excessive worry is unnecessary. All things are fundamentally unified. What people consider beautiful becomes divine, what they loathe appears rotten, yet the rotten may transform into the divine—demonstrating the relativity of such distinctions.

奇神奇復化爲臭腐故曰通天下一氣耳聖 人故貴一知謂黄帝曰吾問無爲謂無爲謂 不應我非不我應不知應我也吾問狂屈狂 屈中欲告我而不我告非不我告中欲告而 忘之也今予問乎若若知之奚故不近黄帝 曰彼其眞是也以其不知也此其似之也以 其忘之也予與若終不近也以其知之也狂 屈聞之以黄帝爲知言  夫智者言其陽明也北者言其陰晦也能  不用明而自晦則入於至道之妙也故曰  知北逰於玄水之上隱弅之丘適遭無爲  謂焉故無爲者未免於有爲也未免於有  爲則豈足以知道此所以不答知之所問  也智以無爲之不答復之陽明而所以决  其所問焉故曰反於白水之南澄狐闋之  上而睹狂屈焉白水之南者言陽明也狐  闋之上者言中心疑而不果也狂者言其  有所取屈者言其有所伸亦未爲於無爲  也未爲於無爲則亦不足以知於道此所  以答智以予知之將告若之言也智以二  子皆不知道也非聖人不可以明故復之  帝宫而問黄帝焉黄帝者聖人也足以知  其至道矣夫何思何慮者無心也何處何  服者無體也何從何道者無方也無心所  以言至虚無體所以言眞空無方所以言  至妙至虚者道之所集也故曰則知道眞  空者道之所存也故曰則安道至妙者道  之所在也故曰則得道此三者非聖人不
Interpretation

This passage expounds on the Daoist philosophy of Wuwei (non-action) and comprehending the Dao. The Yellow Emperor engages in discussion with several sages about how to grasp the true meaning of the Dao.

The text mentions how miraculous things can transform into decay, illustrating that all things under heaven are essentially transformations of the same Qi (vital energy). The reason sages value "oneness" (the unity of the Dao) is because they understand this principle.

The Yellow Emperor recounts how he sought advice from Wuweiwei (a personification of the state of non-action), who gave no response; then asked Kuangqu (representing partial understanding), who wanted to answer but forgot. This demonstrates that those who truly comprehend the Dao do not deliberately explain it (Wuweiwei), while those with partial understanding attempt to explain but cannot articulate it clearly (Kuangqu).

The sage Zhi represents those who understand truth, while the north symbolizes obscurity. If one can refrain from deliberately displaying wisdom and naturally maintain obscurity, one approaches the profundity of the Dao. Wuweiwei's lack of response indicates he hadn't fully attained the state of non-action; Kuangqu's forgotten answer shows he too hadn't truly realized the Dao.

As a sage, the Yellow Emperor attained the highest state of Dao comprehension: requiring no deliberate thought (no-mind), being unconstrained by form (formless), and unlimited by method (methodless). This ultimate emptiness (supreme void) is where the Dao gathers, true stillness (genuine tranquility) is how the Dao exists, and supreme mystery is how the Dao manifests. Only sages can simultaneously grasp these three aspects and truly attain the Dao.

 能以知之故黄帝曰我與若知之彼與彼  不知也無爲狂屈者皆莊子製名而寓意 天地有大美而不言四時有明法而不議萬 物有成理而不說聖人者原天地之美而達 萬物之理是故至人無爲大聖不作觀於天 地之謂也今彼神明至精與彼百化物已死 生方圓莫知其根也扁然而萬物自古以固 存六合爲巨未離其内秋毫爲小待之成體 天下莫不沉浮終身不故陰陽四時運行各 得其序惛然若亡而存油然不形而神萬物 畜而不知此之謂本根可以觀於天矣  知道者不言言者不知故天地自道而生  而未嘗諭人以覆載之功四時隨道而行  而未嘗告人以寒暑之期萬物由道而出  未嘗語人以生成之理聖人者與天地合  其德與四時合其序曲通萬物之情而與  道冥會未嘗諄諄然以諭人矣故曰聖人  者原天地之美而達萬物之理是故至人  無爲者任其自然而無所爲也大聖不作  者付之自成而無所作也此至人聖人合  天地之不言也故曰觀於天地之謂也 齧缺問道乎被衣被衣曰若正汝形一汝視 天和將至攝汝知一汝度神將來舍德將爲 汝美道將爲汝居汝瞳焉如新生之犢而無 求其故言未卒齧缺睡寐被衣大說行歌而 去之曰形若槁骸心若死灰眞其實知不以 故自持媒媒晦晦無心而不可與謀彼何人 哉
Interpretation

The Yellow Emperor said: "You and I understand this principle, but others do not know it." Those who appear mad or obstinate are actually fictional characters Zhuangzi used to convey profound meanings. Heaven and earth embody supreme beauty yet never speak of it; the four seasons follow clear laws yet never debate them; the ten thousand things operate according to their inherent principles yet never explain them. The true sage (one who has attained the Dao) can perceive the ultimate beauty of heaven and earth and comprehend the patterns of all things.

Thus, those who have attained the Dao do not act with deliberate intention, and the highest sages do not force creation—this is the conclusion drawn from observing the Dao of heaven and earth. The subtle spiritual forces (Shen) and the myriad phenomena of the world, the transformations of life and death, the forms of square and round—none can trace their ultimate origin. The ten thousand things exist spontaneously, as they have since ancient times. The vast cosmos cannot exceed the bounds of the Dao, while the tiniest autumn hair depends on the Dao to take form. All things under heaven are in constant transformation; the movements of Yin-Yang and the four seasons follow their own sequences. Though seemingly indistinct, they are truly present; though formless, they possess miraculous power. All things are nourished by the Dao yet remain unaware of it—this is the root of the Dao, which can be understood by observing heaven and earth.

Those who truly understand the Dao do not speak excessively, while those who chatter eloquently do not truly comprehend it. Heaven and earth arise from the Dao yet never boast of their merit in sustaining all life; the four seasons move with the Dao yet never announce the changes of cold and heat; the ten thousand things are transformed by the Dao yet never explain the principles of their generation. The virtue (De) of sages aligns with heaven and earth; their actions correspond to the four seasons. They subtly perceive the nature of all things, merging with the Dao as one, yet never prattle on to instruct others. Thus it is said that sages can embody the beauty of heaven and earth and penetrate the principles of all things. Those who have attained the Dao follow nature without reckless action; the highest sages let things complete themselves without forced creation—this is emulating the wordless virtue of heaven and earth.

Nie Que (a fictional character in Zhuangzi) asked Bei Yi (another fictional figure) about the Dao. Bei Yi replied: "Straighten your body and focus your gaze, and natural harmony will descend upon you; restrain your cleverness and unify your thoughts, and the spirit (Shen) will take residence within. Virtue (De) will make you beautiful, and the Dao will abide with you. Be as innocent as a newborn calf, asking no questions." Before he could finish speaking, Nie Que fell asleep. Delighted, Bei Yi left singing: "The body like withered wood, the mind like dead ashes—one who truly understands the Dao clings to no fixed views. Dull and muddled, seemingly without mind, beyond the measure of ordinary reasoning. What manner of person is this!"

 正汝形者使之無勞汝形也一汝視者使  之不見可欲也無勞汝形則形全也不見  可欲則精復也形全精復則與天爲一矣  故曰天和將至攝汝知者使之無思無爲  也一汝度者使之不益不損也無思無爲  則反朴也不益不損則全純也反朴全純  則其神不虧矣故曰神將來舍德將爲汝  美者游於自得之場也道將爲汝居者處  於至虚之域汝瞳焉如新生之犢而無求  其故所謂復歸於初也此皆入道之眞理  故齧缺遽悟而心得之此所以聽言未卒  而睡寐也 舜問乎丞曰道可得而有乎曰汝身非汝有 也汝何得有夫道舜曰吾身非吾有也孰有 之哉曰是天地之委形也生非汝有是天地 之委和也性命非汝有是天地之委順也孫 子非汝有是天地之委蛻也故行不知所往 處不知所持食不知所味天地之彊陽氣也 又胡可得而有邪  缺傳 孔子問於老聃曰今日晏間敢問至道老聃 曰汝齋戒疏瀹而心澡雪而精神掊擊而知 夫道窅然難言哉將爲汝言其崖略夫昭昭 生於冥冥有倫生於無形精神生於道形本 生於精而萬物以形相生故九竅者胎生八 竅者卵生其來無迹其往無崖無門無房四 達之皇皇也邀於此者四枝彊思慮恂達耳 目聰明其用心不勞其應物無方天不得不 高地不得不廣日月不得不行萬物不得不
Interpretation

Adjust your physical posture to remain naturally relaxed; focus your gaze without being tempted by external desires. When the body is free from exhaustion, it maintains its wholeness; when not led astray by desires, your vital essence (Jing) and energy (Qi) will return. With a complete form and abundant essence, you merge into oneness with nature. Thus it is said: the harmony of nature will descend upon you.

Gather your mind, neither thinking nor scheming, but following the natural course; maintain your Qi, neither forcibly increasing nor decreasing it. Without thought or calculation, you return to your original truth; without addition or subtraction, you preserve purity. Returning to truth and preserving purity ensures your spirit (Shen) remains undiminished. Thus it is said: the spirit will come to dwell within you, and Virtue (De) will shine upon you.

The Dao allows you to wander freely in self-contentment, settling in the realm of utmost emptiness and stillness. Your gaze should be as pure and desireless as a newborn calf—this is what is called returning to the original source. These are the true principles of cultivating the Dao. Thus, the ancient practitioner Nie Que suddenly attained enlightenment, his mind opening in clarity, so much so that he fell peacefully asleep before even finishing his instruction.

Emperor Shun asked the sage Cheng: "Can the Dao be possessed?" Cheng replied: "Even your body does not belong to you—how could you possess the Dao?" Shun asked: "If my body does not belong to me, then to whom does it belong?" Cheng said: "It is a form temporarily entrusted to you by Heaven and Earth. Your life does not belong to you—it is the harmonious Qi given by Heaven and Earth. Your nature and destiny do not belong to you—they follow the patterns of Heaven and Earth’s movement. Your descendants do not belong to you—they are the continuation of life by Heaven and Earth. Thus, when you walk, you do not know where you go; when you dwell, you do not know where you are; when you eat, you do not know the flavor—all these are the ceaseless transformations of Qi in the universe. How could they be personally possessed?"

Confucius inquired of Laozi: "Today I have leisure and wish to ask about the supreme Dao." Laozi said: "First, you must purify your mind through fasting, cleanse your spirit, and cast aside preconceptions. The Dao is profound and difficult to articulate! I can only give you a rough outline: Light is born from darkness, form arises from formlessness, spirit originates from the Dao, and physical bodies are rooted in vital essence (Jing). All things give rise to one another through their forms. Creatures with nine orifices are born from wombs; those with eight orifices hatch from eggs. The Dao comes without shadow and departs without trace—it has no gate or dwelling, yet penetrates all directions. Those who comprehend this will have strong limbs, clear thinking, sharp hearing, and keen vision. Their minds labor not, yet they respond to all things without constraint. Heaven cannot but be high; Earth cannot but be vast; the sun and moon cannot but move; the myriad things cannot but grow—all these are the natural manifestations of the Dao."

昌此其道與且夫博之不必知辯之不必慧 聖人以斷之矣若夫益之而不加益損之而 不加損者聖人之所保也淵淵乎其若海魏 魏乎其終則復始也運量萬物而不匱則君 子之道彼其外與萬物皆往資焉而不匱此 其道與中國有人焉非陰非陽處於天地之 間直且爲人將反於宗自本觀之生者喑醷 物也雖有壽夭相去幾何須臾之說也奚足 以爲堯桀之是非果蓏有理人倫雖難所以 相齒聖人遭之而不違過之而不守調而應 之德也偶而應之道也帝之所興王之所起 也人生天地之間若白駒之過郤忽然而已 注然勃然莫不出焉油然漻然莫不入焉已 化而生又化而死生物哀之人類悲之解其 天弢墮其天袠紛乎宛乎魂魄將往乃身從 之乃大歸乎不形之形形之不形是人之所 同知也非將至之所務也此衆人之所同論 也彼至則不論論則不至明見無值辯不若 默道不可聞聞不若塞此之謂大得也  夫老聃神人也其妙所以無方而其深所  以不測與孔子之言道則自精而至于粗  自無而至于有故首言昭昭生於冥冥而  終言形之不形夫昭昭生於冥冥者所謂  天地生於混成也有天地然後有人倫有  人倫然後有萬物而君臣帝王之道無有  不備此道之生成如此也然而道不可辯  也辯之不若不辯也故曰辯不若默道不
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist understanding of the Dao (the Way) and its approach to life. Laozi (Lao Dan) is revered as a sage who comprehended the celestial Dao, his wisdom being unfathomably profound.

The text observes that extensive knowledge does not necessarily yield true insight, nor does eloquent speech equate to genuine wisdom. The sage understands this principle: the true Dao (referring to the fundamental law of the universe) remains unchanged whether augmented or diminished. It is as profound as the ocean, as majestic as towering mountains, cycling endlessly without terminus. It nourishes all things yet never exhausts itself—this is the Dao that noble persons follow.

Human existence between heaven and earth is as fleeting as sunlight glimpsed through a door crack. All things undergo constant transformation: birth, growth, and death, following nature's course. While ordinary people grieve over mortality, the sage perceives the cyclical truth: the physical body ultimately returns to formlessness, and the formed inevitably dissolves into the formless. Though this is universally known, it holds no particular concern for those pursuing the supreme Dao.

True wisdom lies not in debate. Those who grasp this principle refrain from contention, while those who argue often lack understanding. The Dao cannot be fully expressed through language—rather than exhausting oneself in futile explanations, maintaining silence proves more fruitful. Herein lies the greatest attainment.

Laozi's exposition of the Dao progresses from the subtle to the manifest, from formlessness to form. He begins by stating that light emerges from darkness (symbolizing heaven and earth arising from primordial chaos), concluding that all forms ultimately return to formlessness. Only with heaven and earth established do human relationships and social order emerge; only with human relationships do the myriad things exist—the principles governing rulers and ministers are all contained within. Yet the Dao itself transcends verbal expression, making silence preferable to contentious debate.

 可聞也聞之不若不聞也故曰聞不若塞  不辯不聞則無爲無而心得矣故曰此之  謂大得此老聃與孔子之言道而始終之  序如此也 東郭子問於莊子曰所謂道惡乎在莊子曰 無所不在東郭子曰期而後可莊子曰在嶁 蟻曰何其下邪曰在稊稗曰何其愈下邪曰 在瓦甓曰何其愈甚邪曰在屎溺東郭子不 應莊子曰夫子之問也固不及質正獲之問 於監市履狶也每下愈況汝唯莫必無乎逃 物至道若是大言亦然周徧咸三者異名同 實其指一也嘗相與遊乎無何有之宫同合 而論無所終窮乎嘗相與無爲乎澹而靜乎 漠而清乎調而間乎寥已吾志無往焉而不 知其所至去而來不知其所止吾已往夾焉 而不知其所終彷徨乎馮閎大知入焉而不 知其所窮物物者與物無際而物有際者所 謂物際者也不際之際際之不際者也謂盈 虚衰殺彼爲盈虚非盈虚彼爲衰殺非衰殺 彼爲本末非本末彼爲積散非積散也妸荷 甘與神農同學於老龍吉神農隱几闔户晝 瞑妸荷甘日中奓户而入曰老龍死矣神農 隱几擁杖而起嚗然放杖而笑曰天知予僻 陋慢訑故棄予而死已矣夫子無所發予之 狂言而死矣夫弇堈弔聞之曰夫體道者天 下之君子所繫焉今於道秋毫之端萬分未 得處一焉而猶知藏其狂言而死又況夫體
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist understanding and realization of the Dao (the Way).

Regarding the hearing of philosophical teachings, both Laozi (Lao Dan) and Confucius believed that not hearing surpasses hearing, for abstaining from debate and auditory input leads to the state of Wuwei (non-action), allowing the mind to attain genuine tranquility—this is what is called the "great attainment."

The subsequent dialogue between Dongguozi and Zhuangzi illustrates the omnipresence of the Dao. When Dongguozi asked where the Dao could be found, Zhuangzi replied that it exists in ants, weeds, tiles, and even in excrement. This demonstrates that the Dao permeates all things, with the most humble and ordinary objects best embodying its universality. Zhuangzi criticized Dongguozi's question for failing to address the essence, likening it to a butcher judging a pig's fatness by pressing its legs—the deeper one presses, the more truth is revealed.

The Dao encompasses all things without boundaries yet exists everywhere. Seemingly opposing concepts like fullness and emptiness, decline and growth, roots and branches, accumulation and dispersion are merely different manifestations of the Dao.

Finally, the story of Lao Longji illustrates the difficulty of realizing the Dao. After Lao Longji's death, the legendary Emperor Shennong recognized that he hadn't grasped even one ten-thousandth of the Dao's profundity, yet maintained humility. Those who truly comprehend the Dao are revered by all noble-minded individuals. This shows that realizing the Dao requires supreme wisdom and cultivation.

道者乎視之無形聽之無聲於人之論者謂 之冥冥所以論道而非道也  道者萬物之所道也在體爲體在用爲用  無名無迹而無乎不在故自有而觀則足  以知其徼自無而觀則足以知其妙虚靜  寥遠而無有終始此道之至妙之理也東  郭子不知其然而問道之烏在所謂蔽於  一曲也蔽於一曲則不能知道之深遠故  莊子答之以無所不在也 泰清問乎無窮曰子知道乎無窮曰吾不知 又問乎無爲無爲曰吾知道曰子之知道亦 有數乎曰有曰其數若何無爲曰吾知道之 可以貴可以賤可以約可以散此吾所以知 道之數也泰清以之言也問乎無始曰若是 則無窮之弗知與無爲之知孰是而孰非乎 無始曰不知深矣知之淺矣弗知内矣知之 外矣於是泰清中而歎曰弗知乃知乎知乃 不知乎孰知不知之知  夫道無所不在天地萬物由之而後成不  可以言不可以拘而已矣故聖人知之而  不言得之而不拘此無窮答泰清以不知  也夫不知者深知也深知者得之於内也  此無始所以有不知深矣弗知内矣之言  也然泰清以無窮眞不知道也故復問於  無爲無爲者未免於有爲是以答泰清以  吾知道可以貴可以賤可以約可以散也  夫知之者知淺也知淺者得之於外也此  無始所以有知之淺矣知之外矣之言也
Interpretation

The Dao is something that cannot be seen with eyes—it has no form; cannot be heard with ears—it makes no sound. When people speak of it, they call it "the obscure and mysterious," yet this is merely a description of the Dao, not the Dao itself. The Dao is the fundamental principle underlying the movement of all things. Manifested in form, it becomes form; manifested in function, it becomes function. It has no name, no trace, yet it permeates everywhere. Observing through tangible things, one may discern the boundaries of the Dao; contemplating the intangible, one may grasp its profound subtleties. Vast, tranquil, and boundless, without beginning or end—this is the most mysterious essence of the Dao.

Dongguozi failed to understand this truth when he asked where the Dao could be found, for he was blinded by partial phenomena. Those confined by partial phenomena cannot fathom the depth of the Dao. Thus, Zhuangzi replied to him: "The Dao is in everything."

Taiqing (a fictional figure) once asked Wuxiong (Boundless, another fictional figure): "Do you understand the Dao?" Wuxiong replied: "I do not know." Taiqing then went to ask Wuwei (Non-Action), who said: "I understand the Dao." Taiqing asked: "Do you have any concrete understanding of it?" Wuwei answered: "Yes. The Dao can be noble or humble, gathered or scattered—this is what I know of it." Taiqing took these answers to Wushi (Beginningless) and asked: "Between Wuxiong's 'not knowing' and Wuwei's 'knowing,' which is right and which is wrong?" Wushi replied: "Not knowing is profound understanding, while knowing is superficial. Not knowing is inner realization; knowing is merely external recognition." Upon hearing this, Taiqing sighed: "So not knowing is true knowledge, while knowing is actually ignorance! Who can comprehend this 'knowledge of not knowing'?"

The Dao is omnipresent—heaven, earth, and the myriad things all take shape because of it. It cannot be fully expressed in words, nor can it be confined. Thus, the sages, though they understand the Dao, do not speak of it; though they master it, they do not cling to it. This is why Wuxiong answered "I do not know"—for true "not knowing" is deep comprehension, arising from inner realization. This is what Wushi meant by saying, "Not knowing is profound; not knowing is internal." Taiqing, thinking Wuxiong truly did not understand, then turned to Wuwei. Yet Wuwei had not fully transcended the realm of deliberate action, hence his reply: "I know the Dao can be noble or humble," and so on. This kind of "knowing" is actually shallow understanding, derived from external observation, which is why Wushi remarked: "Knowing is superficial; knowing is external."

 然無窮者無有其極也無始者無有其初  也此二子所以能知於道矣故泰清所以  遽悟而興於歎也 無始曰道不可聞聞而非也道不可見見而 非也道不可言言而非也知形形之不形平 道不當名  道聽之而不聞也故曰道不可聞視之不  見也故曰不可見摶之而不得也故曰不  可言可聞則非爲其道也故曰聞而非也  可見則亦非爲道也故曰見而非也可言  則又非爲道也故曰言而非也夫不可聞  不可見者無形之形也故曰知形形之不  形乎不可言者無名之名也故曰道不當  名此無始所以能明於道乎 無始曰有問道而應之者不知道也雖問道 者亦未聞道道無問問無應無問問之是問 窮也無應應之是無内也以無内待問窮若 是者外不觀乎宇宙内不知乎太初是以不 過乎崑崙不遊乎太虚   夫道至妙而不可問無形而不可言故曰  道無問問無應旣無問而强問之是所問  有所終極矣故曰無問問之是問窮也旣  無應而强應之是所應得之於外矣故曰  無應應之是無内也無内則所知不深矣  終極則所見不廣矣如此則安能通達於  無盡之外而明了於太初之初逍遥於廣  莫之野放縱於無何有之鄉歟故曰以無  内待問窮若是者外不觀乎宇宙内不知  乎太初是以不過乎崑崙不逰乎太虚此
Interpretation

"Boundless" refers to having no limits, while "beginningless" signifies having no origin. These two concepts form the fundamental understanding of the Dao (the Way), which is why Taiqing (one who has realized the Dao) suddenly attained enlightenment and exclaimed in awe.

Wushi (a fictional Daoist sage) said: The Dao cannot be heard with ears—what is heard is not the Dao. The Dao cannot be seen with eyes—what is seen is not the Dao. The Dao cannot be spoken with words—what is spoken is not the Dao. One must understand that the Dao, which creates all things, has no form, and thus cannot be defined by names.

The Dao is soundless when heard, hence it is said to be "unhearable." It is formless when seen, hence it is said to be "unseeable." It is intangible when touched, hence it is said to be "unspeakable." Whatever can be perceived is not the true Dao. That which cannot be heard or seen is the formless origin beyond all shapes. That which cannot be spoken is the nameless essence beyond all definitions. This is why Wushi was able to comprehend the Dao.

Wushi further said: Those who answer when questioned about the Dao do not truly understand it, and those who ask such questions have never grasped the Dao itself. The Dao neither raises doubts nor requires answers. To forcibly question it only reveals the limitations of one's understanding. To reluctantly answer it demonstrates superficial comprehension. Approaching the fundamental with shallow knowledge means such a person can neither perceive the vastness of the cosmos nor grasp the mystery of Taichu (the primordial origin of the universe). Naturally, they cannot transcend the boundaries of Kunlun (symbolizing the immortal realm) or wander freely in the Great Void (cosmic space).

The Dao is supremely subtle—it cannot be exhausted by questioning. Having no form, it cannot be described with words. Forced questioning only leads to cognitive dead ends, while reluctant answers remain stuck on the surface. Without deep understanding, one's vision remains narrow. How could such a person ever penetrate the infinite? How could they ever comprehend the origin of the universe? How could they roam freely in the vast expanse of heaven and earth? Thus, those who approach the fundamental with shallow knowledge see neither the external cosmos nor the internal Taichu, and naturally cannot ascend to the immortal realm or wander in the Great Void.

 無始所以復諭太清以道不可言也 光曜問乎無有曰夫子有乎其無有乎光曜 不得問而孰視其狀貌窅然空然終日視之 而不見聽之而不聞摶之而不得也光曜曰 至矣其孰能至此乎予能有無矣而未能無 無也及爲無有矣何從至此哉大馬之捶鉤 者年八十矣而不失豪芒大馬曰子巧與有 道與曰臣有守也臣之年二十而好捶鉤於 物無視也非鉤無察也是用之者假不用者 也以長得其用而況乎無不用者乎物孰不 資焉  光曜者言其明智也無有者言其眞空也  以明智而求眞空則所以止知粗徼也故  曰孰視其狀貌然而知粗而必至于精知  徼而必至于妙故光曜終日視之而不見  聽之而不聞摶之而不得所謂至于精妙  也至于精妙則自知其學不及矣故曰予  能有無矣未能無無也夫眞空之妙理蓋  自無而得之矣非由學而後至也故曰及  爲無有矣何從而至哉此莊子寓言至道  之妙於二子矣 冉求問於仲尼曰未有天地可知邪仲尼曰 可古猶今也冉求失問而退明日復見曰昔 者吾問未有天地可知乎夫子曰可古猶今 也昔日吾昭然今日吾昧然敢問何謂也仲 尼曰昔之昭然也神者先受之今之昧然也 且又爲不神者求邪無古無今無始無終未 有子孫而有子孫可乎冉求未對仲尼曰已
Interpretation

This passage presents two allegorical stories about the Dao (the Way).

The first story features Guangyao (symbolizing illuminating wisdom) seeking guidance from Wuyou (symbolizing the realm of absolute emptiness). Observing Wuyou's state, Guangyao finds him seemingly void and insubstantial—unseeable, unhearable, and untouchable. Guangyao laments that while he can attain the states of "being" (you) and "non-being" (wu), he cannot reach the higher realm of "non-non-being" (wu wu), which transcends both. The story then shifts to a master hook-maker from the Grand Marshal’s household, who, even at eighty, could craft hooks with flawless precision. This was because for twenty years he focused solely on hooks, excluding all else from his mind. The lesson is that total concentration—free from distracting thoughts—leads to profound mastery.

The second story involves Ran Qiu asking Confucius about the state of heaven and earth before their formation. Confucius replies, "Past and present are one," leaving Ran Qiu perplexed. Confucius explains that earlier understanding came from intuitive apprehension, while present confusion arises from rational analysis. Time inherently lacks distinctions of past/present or beginning/end—just as one cannot say grandchildren existed before ancestors. These points illustrate how the Dao transcends time, language, and conceptual thought, requiring direct realization rather than logical deduction.

The text emphasizes that intellectual pursuit alone cannot grasp true emptiness. The profound subtlety of the Dao is unattainable through study; one must surpass the duality of "being" and "non-being." These parables reveal the Dao’s ineffable nature, which demands relinquishing attachments and cultivating single-minded practice to awaken to its mystery.

矣未應矣不以生生死不以死死生死生有 待邪皆有所一體有先天地生者物邪物物 者非物物出不得先物也猶其有物也猶其 有物也無已聖人之愛人者終無已者亦乃 取於是者也  昔之昭然者與道冥會也故曰神者先受  之今之昧然者求則愈惑也故曰且又爲  不神者求邪無古無今無始無終者道之  妙體也達於道之妙體則入於不生不死  之域此仲尼所以未待冉求之對而言不  以生生死不以死死生也 顔淵問乎仲尼曰回嘗聞諸夫子曰無有所 將無有所迎回敢問其遊仲尼曰古之人外 化而内不化今之人内化而外不化與物化 者一不化者也安化安不化安與之相靡必 與之莫多狶韋氏之囿黄帝之圃有虞氏之 宫湯武之室君子之人若儒墨者師故以是 非相𩐎也而況今之人乎聖人處物不傷物 不傷物者物亦不能傷也唯無所傷者爲能 與人相將迎山林與臯壤與使我欣欣然而 樂與樂未畢也哀又繼之哀樂之來吾不能 禦其去弗能止悲夫世人直謂物逆旅耳夫 知遇而不知所不遇知能能而不能所不能 無知無能者固人之所不免也夫務免乎人 之所不免者豈不亦悲哉  外化而内不化者心得於道而體自冥合  也内化而外不化者心務求道而體不順  也與物化者一不化者蓋能與物齊同而
Interpretation

This passage explores core Daoist perspectives on life-death and the relationship between self and phenomena.

Regarding the matter of life and death: The true Dao does not generate death simply because life exists, nor does it negate life because of death. These are relative concepts, as all things fundamentally share one source. That primordial origin (Dao) existing before heaven and earth took form is itself not a concrete entity, yet it gives birth to all phenomena. While no thing can precede the Dao, the Dao manifests through all things—this ceaseless generative state knows no end. Similarly, the sage's compassion for all beings flows without cessation.

The dialogue between Confucius and his disciples illustrates how ancient realized beings maintained inner constancy while outwardly adapting to change, whereas modern people exhibit inner restlessness beneath rigid exteriors. Those who truly attain the Dao become one with the transformations of all things while preserving their essential nature unchanged. Consider how the gardens and palaces of ancient sage-kings like Xiwei and the Yellow Emperor were later judged by Confucian and Mohist scholars using rigid standards—how much more so do ordinary people impose limitations. The sage interacts with all things without harming them, and in turn remains unharmed. Only those free from harmful intent can achieve true harmony with nature.

The text observes how people delight in mountain forests' beauty, yet before their joy fades, sorrow arises—revealing the fickle nature of worldly emotions. Most treat phenomena as temporary lodgings, focusing only on what they encounter while neglecting the unseen, pursuing only what they can do or know rather than exploring beyond those limits. Yet human understanding has inherent boundaries—forcing transcendence of these limits only deepens suffering.

The conclusion clarifies: Those outwardly adaptable yet inwardly steadfast achieve this through spiritual unity with the Dao. Those inwardly pursuing the Dao yet outwardly rigid fail because their physical form resists natural flow. True adepts merge with all transformations while preserving their essence—like standing equally with all phenomena yet remaining unshaken by external things.

 抱一不變也安化安不化者任其自化而  無使化也安與之相靡者無心於物而不  與之靡刃也必與之莫多者贍足衣被而  不爲有餘也狶韋氏之囿黄帝之圃有虞  氏之宫湯武之臺者此言道爲聖人之域  而無心足以游處也 至言去言至爲去爲齊知之所知則淺矣  至言者不言也故曰至言去言至爲者無  爲也故曰至爲無爲二者非入於至道則  安能去言去爲矣是以言之於終篇
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist cultivation state of "embracing Oneness and preserving authenticity" (baoyi shouzhen). "Holding fast to Oneness without change" refers to maintaining a mind of undivided purity undisturbed by external circumstances, remaining tranquil amidst worldly transformations ("letting all things transform naturally without being swayed by their changes"). The true sage allows the myriad things to follow their natural course while remaining unaffected by external influences ("wu xin yu wu" - being non-intentional toward things), like a blade passing without leaving traces ("not wearing down its edge through friction").

The text mentions the gardens of Xiwei (an ancient sage-king), the orchards of the Yellow Emperor, the palaces of Emperor Shun, and the towers of Kings Tang and Wu - all metaphors illustrating how the Dao itself is the true abode of sages. Those who attain the Dao dwell in non-intentional spontaneity, naturally roaming in boundless freedom within it.

The highest form of speech transcends words ("ultimate speech abandons speech"), and the highest action transcends deliberate action ("ultimate action abandons action"). When one deliberately pursues knowledge ("leveling all knowledge known"), it only reveals superficial understanding. True "ultimate speech" is wordless, and genuine "ultimate action" is wuwei (non-action). These two states cannot be achieved unless one has profoundly realized the ultimate Dao ("entered into the supreme Dao"). Thus, the author reserves this essential truth for the culmination of the entire text.

南華眞經新傳卷之十一

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0136); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 10 Vol. 12 →