中文 · EN

《南華真經新傳》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 3 / 20 9,783 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經新傳》 Vol. 3 (Dongshen 洞神部, 20 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 19 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經新傳》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經新傳卷之三惡三     宋 王 元 澤 傳    養生主篇  夫齊物者必無我無我者必無生無生所  以爲養生之主而生之所以存此莊子作  養生主之篇而次之於齊物也 吾生也有涯而知也無涯以有涯隨無涯殆 已已而爲知者殆而已矣  生者天之委和也天地之委和於人素定  其分而不過其極故曰吾生也有涯役於  富貴悦於榮寵思慮交萌而妄情無限故  曰智也無涯以有涯之生而隨無涯之智  則生之所以不存矣生之所以不存則安  足以免困苦之累歟故曰殆已 爲善無近名爲惡無近刑縁督以爲經可以 保身可以全生可以養親可以盡年  善養生者内冥其極而任其自然忘善與  惡則所以遠於刑名矣不善養生者思慮  内萌而以善爲善以惡爲惡所以近於刑  名矣遠刑名則生所以全近刑名則生所  以喪縁督以爲經所謂道中庸也夫至人  之養生不役物不喪眞不擇地不害性而  已故不役物則可以保身不喪眞則可以  全生不擇地則可以事親不害性則可以  盡年此皆存諸己而已 庖丁爲文惠君解牛手之所觸肩之所倚足 之所履膝之所踦砉然嚮然奏刀騞然莫不 中音合於桑木之舞乃中經首之會文惠君 曰譆善哉技蓋至此乎庖丁釋刀對曰臣之 所好者道也進乎技矣始臣之解牛之時所
Interpretation

This passage explores the core philosophy of the Zhuangzi chapter "Essentials for Nurturing Life" through Wang Yuanze's commentary, elucidating the proper way to cultivate vitality. The central tenet is that those who truly understand life-nurturing do not obsess over external matters, but instead harmonize with nature while maintaining inner tranquility.

The text begins by noting that to achieve the state of "equalizing all things" (eliminating discriminatory perceptions), one must relinquish ego-attachment. By releasing the self, one ceases to cling to life itself. Paradoxically, it is precisely this non-attachment to life that enables genuine life cultivation. Zhuangzi placed "Essentials for Nurturing Life" after the chapter "On the Equality of Things" precisely to illustrate this principle.

The commentary then explains the famous line "Our life has limits, but knowledge is limitless": Human existence is finite, yet desires and intellectual pursuits are boundless. When limited lifespan chases infinite knowledge and cravings, suffering inevitably follows. Life itself is bestowed by heaven and earth as harmonious Qi (vital energy), possessing natural boundaries—transgressing these through excessive striving harms vitality.

Regarding the life-nurturing principle of "doing good without approaching fame, doing bad without approaching punishment": Those truly skilled in cultivation attain ultimate inner equilibrium, following nature's flow without artificially distinguishing good from evil, thus remaining free from the burdens of reputation or penalty. The unskillful, by contrast, become entangled in overthinking and rigid moral dichotomies, trapped by concerns of praise and blame. "Following the central axis as one's constant" means maintaining the Middle Way. The perfected person's life-nurturing involves four negations: not being driven by external things, not losing innate nature, not being fastidious about circumstances, and not harming heavenly endowment—only thus can one preserve life, serve parents, and fulfill one's natural lifespan.

Finally, the butcher Ding parable illustrates: His blade moves with cloudlike fluidity, matching musical rhythms and dance steps, because he pursues the Dao rather than mere technique. Initially he saw whole oxen; after three years he perceived skeletal structures; now his spirit comprehends beyond visual perception. This metaphor shows that life-nurturing too must follow natural patterns, grasping the inner workings of phenomena to achieve effortless mastery.

見無非牛者三年之後未嘗見全牛也方今 之時臣以神遇而不以目視官知止而神欲 行依乎天理批大卻導大窾因其固然技經 肯綮之未嘗而況大軱乎良庖歲更刀割也 族庖月更刀折也今臣之刀十九年矣所解 數千牛矣而刀刃若新發於硎彼節者有間 而刀刃者無厚以無厚入有間恢恢乎其於 遊刃必有餘地矣是以十九年而刀刃若新 發於硎雖然每至於族吾見其難爲休然爲 戒視爲止行爲遲動刀甚微謋然已解如土 委地提刀而立爲之四顧爲之躊躇滿志善 刀而藏之文惠君曰善哉吾聞庖丁之言得 養生焉  夫生必有理而理出於性命之際能順其  理則舉知其全生之妙此庖丁之解牛能  依牛之天理而所以舉不見其全牛也然  庖丁寓言養生於解牛必言其三年而又  言其十九年者蓋言陰陽之數雖更而生  之所以愈全也故曰未嘗見全牛又曰刀  刃若新發於硎夫庖丁之能解牛者以其  善刀故也善刀者全其刀之利韜藏而不  衒也故曰善刀而藏之所以况養生者必  全其生之之理而歸之老子所謂全而歸  之是也文惠君遂悟庖丁之言而知養生  所謂庶幾於道也 公文軒見右師而驚曰是何人也惡乎介也 天與其人與曰天也非人也天之生是使獨 也人之貌有與也以是知其天也非人也
Interpretation

This passage uses the story of Cook Ding carving an ox to illustrate the core principles of Daoist health cultivation. When Cook Ding first began butchering oxen, he saw the whole animal before him. After three years, he no longer saw the complete ox but instead perceived its anatomical structure through his spirit (Shen). Now when he carves, his blade follows the ox's natural grain, gliding through the spaces between bones and tendons without touching tangled sinews, let alone major bones.

A good cook changes his knife yearly, an average cook monthly—yet Cook Ding's blade has served nineteen years, carving thousands of oxen while remaining as sharp as newly honed. This is because the blade's edge is exquisitely thin, and there's always space between joints, allowing it to move with effortless ease. Still, whenever encountering complex bone structures, he proceeds with special caution, slowing his movements and applying gentle pressure until the ox naturally separates. When finished, he stands with knife in hand, surveys his work with deep satisfaction, then cleans and stores the blade properly.

Lord Wenhui, upon hearing this, realized: The Dao of health cultivation resembles Cook Ding's knife-work—one must follow natural patterns. Life possesses inherent principles rooted in the foundation of our innate nature (Xing) and vital force (Ming). By aligning with these principles, one comprehends the mystery of preserving life. Cook Ding spent three years reaching the state of "not seeing the whole ox," then nineteen more maintaining his blade's sharpness—demonstrating that though Yin-Yang transformations never cease, harmonizing with their rhythms makes life more complete. The phrase "skillfully maintaining and storing the knife" suggests we should nurture life as carefully as maintaining tools, avoiding unnecessary depletion.

The subsequent dialogue between Gongwen Xuan and the one-legged Right Master (who suffered penal amputation) further illustrates how physical form is Heaven-given—we must accept our natural, authentic state. Though the Right Master lost a limb, this was Heaven's decree rather than human fault. This example reinforces that health cultivation means following one's inherent nature and preserving life's wholeness, as Laozi's saying "return whole to the source" suggests. Through Cook Ding's ox-carving, Lord Wenhui grasped this profound health wisdom that approaches the Great Dao itself.

 生者本也形者枝也本固而枝缺則亦可  以爲全此右師雖介而生所以全公文軒  徒驚其形也 澤雉十步一啄百步一飲不蘄畜乎樊中神 雖王不善也  雉飲啄於野澤則忘形而樂生畜乎樊中  則養形而傷生樂生則神所以全養形則  生所以喪生之喪則未免乎憂累故曰不  善也 老聃死秦失弔之三號而出弟子曰非夫子 之友邪曰然然則弔焉若此可乎曰然始也 吾以爲其人也而今非也向吾入而弔焉有 老者哭之如哭其子少者哭之如哭其母彼 其所會之必有不蘄言而言不蘄哭而哭者 是遁天倍情忘其所受古者謂之遁天之刑  至人以生之爲暫來以死之爲暫往生不  喜其成而死不悲其毁然老聃死而秦失  弔之而三號者非所以哀其毁而蓋不能  獨異於衆也 適來夫子時也適去夫子順也  夫至人忘情全眞汎然自得生死利害未  嘗介蠆於胸中故適來則爲時適去而能  順時不爲之樂而順不爲之哀此生之所  以生生而無喪也 安時而處順哀樂不能入也古者謂是帝之 縣解  天者命也命之所受於人不可逃遁而已  逃其命則累其生適自致於憂患矣故曰  遁天之刑也帝亦命也命無係著則憂患  不能累其生故曰帝之縣解也養生者必  達乎二者之妙矣 指窮於爲薪火傳也不知其盡也
Interpretation

Life is the root, while the physical form is merely branches and leaves. When the root is firm yet the branches are damaged, it can still be considered whole. Just as the Right Minister (a title) lived on despite having only one foot, this demonstrates the preservation of innate nature. When Gongwen Xuan (a person) first saw him and was shocked by his physical deformity, it showed his lack of understanding of life's essence.

The pheasant in the wild marsh takes ten steps to peck once for food and a hundred steps to drink once—it does not seek to be caged. Though captivity may appear comfortable, it harms one's innate nature. The pheasant foraging freely in nature forgets its physical form and enjoys life; when confined in a cage, though its body may thrive, it loses the authenticity of life. Losing this authenticity inevitably leads to distress—thus, captivity is not beneficial.

When Laozi (Lao Dan) passed away, Qin Shi (a person) went to mourn him but only wept three times before leaving. A disciple asked, "Was he not your friend?" Qin Shi replied, "He was." "Then is this manner of mourning appropriate?" Qin Shi answered, "I originally thought he was a man who had attained the Dao (the Way), but now I see he was not. Earlier, I saw elders weeping as if they had lost a son and youths crying as if they had lost a mother. These people must have gone against nature, forcing their grief and forgetting life's inherent principles. The ancients called such behavior 'punishment for defying heavenly order.'"

Those who attain the Dao regard life as a temporary stay and death as a temporary departure. They neither rejoice at birth nor grieve at death. Qin Shi wept only three times for Laozi's passing—not to mourn his departure but because he could not entirely stand apart from convention.

Life's arrival follows the timing of heaven, and its departure follows natural law. Those who truly attain the Dao forget worldly emotions, preserve their true nature, and remain transcendent, untouched by life and death, gain and loss. Thus, when life comes, they accept it in accordance with heaven's timing; when it departs, they let it go with ease. Neither delighting in life nor sorrowing over death, they ensure life continues unbroken without losing its essence.

Those at peace with heaven's timing and in harmony with nature remain undisturbed by joy or sorrow. The ancients called this state "release from heaven's bonds." Heavenly decree cannot be escaped by human effort—defying it brings suffering to life, which is "punishment for defying heavenly order." But those freed from fate's constraints remain unburdened by sorrow—this is "release from heaven's bonds." Those who understand the art of nurturing life must grasp the profundity of these two truths.

Just as firewood burns away while the flame passes on eternally, so too does life: the physical form perishes, but the true nature of life endures forever.

 以薪繼薪則火不能滅知生養生則生不  能絶不滅則火所以傳不絶則生所以乆  所以無時而盡也故曰不知其盡也夫莊  子之言養生始乎有涯而終乎不盡者以  性命受之有分而能不累於榮辱利害則  生之所以不喪而無極矣所以終於不盡  也非明達者孰與於此乎    人間世篇  善養生者必自得於性命之際而無思無  爲也無思無爲則足以處人間應世變而  憂患不足以累之此莊子作人間世之篇  而次之於養生也 顔回見仲尼請行曰奚之曰將之衛曰奚爲 焉曰回聞衛君其年壯其行獨輕用其國而 不見其過輕用民死死者以國量乎澤若蕉 民其無如矣回嘗聞之夫子曰治國去之亂 國就之醫門多疾願以所聞思其則庶幾其 國有瘳乎仲尼曰譆若殆往而刑耳  天下之事變不一非經世者不足與之應  對酬酢矣夫經世者本無我無我則無思  無爲而患禍不能及之矣故仲尼者無我  也無我則已見無對故當天下之至變處  天下之至難則寂然不動而無纎毫之累  顔回者克己也克己則未至於無我當衛  君之輕用其國民則介然自動而欲以所  聞說之而幾不免於累夫仲尼之無我則  無思無爲也顔回之克已則有思有爲也  有思卒至於無思有爲卒至於無爲此顔  回終至於未始有回也未始有回者亦無
Interpretation

This passage explores Zhuangzi's wisdom on nurturing life (yangsheng), illustrated through the dialogue between Yan Hui and Confucius regarding worldly engagement.

Just as a fire persists when continuously fed with firewood, life endures when one understands the Dao of nurturing it. The flame doesn't extinguish because of sustained transmission; longevity arises from proper cultivation. Hence, life knows no true ending. Zhuangzi's discourse on life-nurturing begins with finite existence yet ultimately attains infinity—this occurs when one comprehends the predetermined nature of xing (inner nature) and ming (life destiny), remaining unswayed by honor, disgrace, profit, or harm. Thus life isn't lost but achieves permanence—a realm beyond ordinary understanding.

Those truly skilled in nurturing life find spontaneous joy in matters of xingming, practicing wuwei (non-action) and thought-free awareness. Such practitioners respond serenely to worldly changes, undisturbed by worries. This explains why Zhuangzi transitions to discussing life-nurturing in his chapter "The Human World."

When Yan Hui bid farewell to Confucius to visit the state of Wei, Confucius inquired about his motive. Yan Hui described the young Wei ruler as arrogant and autocratic, recklessly exhausting state resources while remaining oblivious—his people perished like withered grass across the land. Hoping to heal Wei with his teacher's teachings, Yan Hui received Confucius' warning that such direct approach might lead to punishment.

Worldly affairs transform unpredictably; only those thoroughly understanding human affairs can navigate them. Such enlightened individuals inherently embody "no-self"—without ego, they become thought-free and actionless, remaining untouched by misfortune. Confucius exemplified this no-self state, facing the world's gravest upheavals with unshaken composure. Yan Hui, still at the stage of restraining self (keji, Confucian self-discipline), couldn't resist admonishing the tyrant—nearly falling into peril. Confucius' no-self enabled wuwei; Yan Hui's self-restraint prompted conscious action. The progression from deliberate thought to thoughtlessness, from purposeful action to non-action, represents Yan Hui's ultimate attainment of "never having existed as Hui"—the state of self-forgetting. To forget self is to realize no-self.

(Note: "No-self" (wuwo) is a key Daoist concept denoting transcendence of personal attachments and discriminative mind; "self-restraint" (keji) refers to Confucian self-cultivation; "never having existed as Hui" describes the state of self-oblivion.)

 我也此二人足以爲萬世法莊子所以首  於此篇而稱之也 夫道不欲雜雜則多多則擾擾則憂憂而不 救  道集於虚而生於一一者道之妙本矣夫  能抱一則足以爲天下式故曰道不欲雜  不能抱一則支離而百端故曰雜則多惑  於百端則心不自止故曰多則擾心不自  止則未免於憂累故曰擾則憂未能自免  於憂累則豈能去他人之憂累乎故曰憂  而不救此皆有思有爲之致也 古之至人先存諸己而後存諸人所存於己 者未定何暇至於暴人之所行且若亦知夫 德之所蕩而知之所爲出乎哉德蕩乎名知 出乎爭名也者相軋也知也者爭之器也二 者凶器非所以盡行也  聖人無名所以無爲無智所以無得無爲  則物莫不歸無得則物莫與競常人好名  用智而所以有爲有得也有爲則物不相  服有得則物必與競故曰名也者相軋也  智也者爭之器也 且得厚信矼未達人氣名聞不爭未達人心 而彊以仁義繩墨之言術暴人之前者是以 人惡有美也命之曰菑人菑人者人必反菑 之若殆爲人菑夫且苟爲悦賢而惡不肖惡 用而求有以異若唯無詔王公必將乗人而 鬭其捷而目將熒之而色將平之口將營之 容將形之心且成之是以火救火以水救水 名之曰益多順始無窮若殆以不信厚言必 死於暴人之前矣
Interpretation

This passage expounds the core Daoist concept of "embracing unity and maintaining centeredness" (抱一守中). Zhuangzi teaches that the Dao (the fundamental principle of the universe) abhors fragmentation - when things become scattered, they create disturbances that ultimately lead to inescapable anxieties. Those who truly comprehend the Dao should maintain inner emptiness and stillness, focusing single-mindedly on the fundamental "One," thereby becoming exemplars for all under heaven.

Failure to maintain this focused unity results in fragmented thoughts and various delusions. A disordered mind cannot achieve tranquility, inevitably sinking into worry. If one cannot free themselves from afflictions, how could they possibly help others? These troubles all stem from excessive deliberation and forced action.

The perfected beings (至人) of ancient times who attained the Dao always cultivated themselves first before influencing others. If one hasn't perfected their own cultivation, how could they have the capacity to correct the behavior of tyrants? It's crucial to understand that moral corruption often originates from the pursuit of fame, while the misuse of wisdom frequently provokes contention. Reputation makes people undermine each other, and cleverness becomes a tool for conflict - both are dangerous instruments.

The reason sages transcend worldly concerns is precisely because they don't chase fame, thus governing through wuwei (non-action); they don't flaunt cleverness, thus avoiding contention. Through non-action, all things naturally align; through non-contention, no one can contend with them. Ordinary people, obsessed with fame and profit while playing with schemes, only invite more opposition.

The text further warns that attempting to admonish a tyrant with rigid standards of benevolence and righteousness before truly understanding human affairs is like flaunting one's virtues before others - it invites disaster. Such behavior resembles pouring oil on flames, only intensifying conflict. Ultimately, one might meet a tragic end before the tyrant due to lack of trust.

 目將熒之者所謂眸子眊焉是也色將平  之者所謂色𧹞𧹞焉是也口將營之者所  謂騰口之說是也容將形之者所謂以爲  容悦是也心且成之者所謂役心從物是  也此皆不存諸己之累矣 且昔者桀殺關龍逄紂殺王子比干是皆脩 其身以下傴拊人之民以下拂其上者也故 其君因其脩以擠之是好名者也昔者堯攻 叢枝胥敖禹攻有扈國爲虚厲身爲刑戮其 用兵不止其求實無已是皆求名實者也而 獨不聞之乎名實者聖人之所不能勝也而 况若乎  名實者虚器也聖人豈有心而求之歟故  寂默無爲而聲迹俱泯凶患不可及之矣  此堯禹之所以能處天下也昧者不知其  然而深求於名實名實雖立而凶患繼至  此叢敖有扈之所以自喪其國也故曰是  皆求名實者也夫聖人之忘名實名實忘  而所以無我於天下萬物豈能累我乎使  聖人不忘於名實則名實立而有我於天  下萬物交至而爲累聖人豈能勝之歟故  曰名實者聖人之所不能勝也而况若乎 雖然若必有以也嘗以語我來顔回曰端而 虚勉而一則可乎曰惡惡可夫以陽爲充孔 揚采色不定常人之所不違因案人之所感 以求容與其心名之曰日漸之德不成而况 大德乎將執而不化外合而内不訾其庸詎 可乎  端而虚勉而一此内外雖正而由有内外
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the perils of pursuing fame and material gain, as well as how sages transcend these worldly attachments.

Those whose vision is obscured are people with clouded sight; those whose countenance is disturbed wear expressions of agitation; those whose mouths are busy justifying themselves are skilled in sophistry; those who deliberately adorn their appearance seek to please others through looks; those whose hearts are driven by external things are enslaved by material desires. All these stem from failing to maintain one's original mind.

In ancient times, the tyrant Jie executed Guan Longfeng, and King Zhou killed Bi Gan—both instances where virtuous ministers who cultivated themselves offended despotic rulers. The rulers then persecuted them under the pretext of their self-cultivation, all calamities arising from the pursuit of fame. Emperor Yao attacked the states of Congzhi and Xuao, while Yu waged war against Youhu, leading to their destruction and the slaughter of their people. Their incessant military campaigns and insatiable greed were all driven by the pursuit of fame and profit.

Fame and material gain are illusory—why would sages deliberately seek them? Therefore, sages maintain stillness and wuwei (non-action), leaving no trace of their deeds or reputation, so misfortune cannot find them. This is how Yao and Yu were able to govern the world. Ignorant people fail to understand this principle, obsessively chasing fame and profit. Though they may attain them, calamity follows closely. This is why states like Congzhi, Xuao, and Youhu brought about their own destruction.

The reason sages can forget fame and profit is that they have reached the state of "no-self," where nothing in the world can burden them. If sages became attached to fame and profit, they would fall into the realm of "selfhood" and be weighed down by worldly things. Thus, even sages find it difficult to completely transcend fame and profit—how much more so ordinary people?

Yan Hui asked: "What if one maintains uprightness and emptiness, striving with single-minded focus—would this suffice?" The answer was: "No!" Because this forced attempt at rectitude, though outwardly solemn and dignified, still involves the mind calculating gains and losses. It creates a division between inner and outer, failing to achieve true unity. Such superficial cultivation doesn't even qualify as minor De (Virtue), let alone great De. Clinging stubbornly to one's views without understanding flexibility, outwardly complying while inwardly resisting—how could this possibly work?

 之别夫有内外者必有諸身有諸身則未  免於患老子曰吾有大患爲吾有身此顔  回未能忘我也故仲尼告之以其庸詎可  乎 然則我内直而外曲成而上比内直者與天 爲徒與天爲徒者知天子之與己皆天之所 子而獨以己言蘄乎而人善之蘄乎而人不 善之邪若然者人謂之童子是之謂與天爲 徒外曲者與人之爲徒也擎跽曲拳人臣之 禮也人皆爲之吾敢不爲邪爲人之所爲者 人亦無疵焉是之謂與人爲徒成而上比者 與古爲徒其言雖教讁之實也古之有也非 吾有也若然者雖有不爲病是之謂與古爲 徒若是則可乎仲尼曰惡惡可大多政法而 不諜雖固亦無罪雖然止是耳矣夫胡可以 及化猶師心者也  内直外曲成而上比者雖與天人上古爲  徒而未得爲無身也未得爲無身者未得  爲無我也此仲尼由答之以烏可夫至人  外無我而内無心體合太虚而不可得有  故能使萬物俱化矣若與天人上古爲徒  則未合於太虚爲能使萬物自化乎故曰  胡可以及化故無心於物則物莫不從有  心於化則化未必及顔回欲化衛君也尚  爲有心而已矣故仲尼告之以猶師心者  也 顔回曰吾無以進矣敢問其方仲尼曰齋吾 將語若有而爲之其易邪易之者皥天不宜 顔回曰回之家貧唯不飲酒不茹葷者數月
Interpretation

This passage explores the philosophical tension between "having a body" and "selflessness." Laozi once said, "My greatest suffering comes from having a body," while Yan Hui (Confucius' disciple) had not yet reached the state of forgetting the self. Confucius advised him: "Being inwardly upright and walking with Heaven's Dao (neizhi), outwardly compliant while interacting with people (waiqu), and emulating the ancients to elevate oneself (cheng er shangbi)"—yet these three approaches still fell short.

An inwardly upright person regards both themselves and the Son of Heaven as children of Heaven, indifferent to others' praise, maintaining childlike purity. An outwardly compliant person follows worldly rituals, mirroring others' actions to avoid criticism. One who emulates the ancients cites classical teachings to admonish, recognizing these truths as timeless rather than self-invented, so even mistaken words bear no blame.

Yet Confucius pointed out these methods remain deliberate efforts ("shixin")—like teaching others with preconceptions. A perfected person (zhiren) has attained the state of "no self outwardly and no mind inwardly," merging body and spirit with the Great Void (cosmic origin), free from attachment, thus naturally transforming all things. Yan Hui sought to use these methods to influence the ruler of Wei, revealing his lingering attachments, prompting Confucius to call him "one who still clings to preconceptions."

Finally, Yan Hui confessed he could conceive no better approach. Confucius instructed him to first undertake fasting (a Daoist purification ritual preceding cultivation, abstaining from alcohol and meat), for acting with preconceptions guarantees failure. Yan Hui replied that his family's poverty had already kept him from wine and meat for months, implying he was already in a fasting-like state.

矣若此則可以爲齋乎曰是祭祀之齋非心 齋也回曰敢問心齋仲尼曰若一志無聽之 以耳而聽之以心無聽之以心而聽之以氣 聽止於耳心止於符  志一則心鑑定而思慮澄廓然空虚而至  道自集也故曰一志夫中旣空虚而道集  非由外知而由於内得也故曰無聽之耳  而聽之心心旣得之則然後以氣而得之  也故曰無聽之以心而聽之以氣如此則  至道集于己而推其緒餘而可化於人矣  然至道不可以情求必先精其聰聽矣故  曰聽止於耳耳者體也體旣得之則合於  心心旣得之則合於氣故曰氣止於符 氣也者虚而待物者也唯道集虚虚者心齋 也顔回曰回之未始得使實自回也得使之 也未始有回也可謂虚乎夫子曰盡矣  齋者易所謂齋戒以神明其德是也夫齋  則將以有思而戒則將以有爲孔子將使  顔回受其說故使之心齋而已矣故曰虚  者心齋也然虚者一也齋者靜也一則足  以應萬變靜則足以制羣動如此則可以  化人矣夫心齋本於無我無心也此顔回  悟心齋之言而遂忘於己也故曰未始有  回也未始有回則亦可以經世矣 吾語若若能入遊其樊而無感其名入則鳴 不入則止  得至虚之妙者雖處於天地之間而泯然  絶於聲聞也故曰若能入遊其樊而無感  其名夫無感其名則冲寂也物來則然後
Interpretation

This dialogue recounts how Yan Hui sought Confucius' guidance on the practice of "heart-mind fasting" (xinzai, spiritual purification). Confucius explained that ordinary fasting is merely a ritual form for sacrifices, while true heart-mind fasting requires achieving a state of spiritual purity.

First, one must concentrate their awareness—not listening with the ears, but perceiving with the heart-mind. Going further, one must transcend even the heart-mind and perceive through Qi (vital energy). The hearing of the ears is limited, and the perception of the heart-mind is only superficial. When awareness becomes unified, the heart-mind becomes as clear as a mirror, thoughts settle into stillness, and one naturally comprehends the Dao. This understanding is not knowledge acquired from the external world but an inner awakening.

When this state of emptiness is attained, the Dao naturally gathers within the heart-mind. At this stage, one not only grasps the truth themselves but can also transmit this realization to others. However, to reach this state, one must not pursue it through emotional striving; first, hearing and perception must be purified.

After hearing this, Yan Hui admitted he had not yet truly attained such a state. Confucius told him that the essence of heart-mind fasting lies in "emptiness" (xu). By maintaining a state of unified stillness, one can respond to all changes; by preserving tranquility, one can master all transformations. The foundation of heart-mind fasting is "no-self" (transcending self-awareness), and after Yan Hui grasped this, he even forgot his own existence. This selfless state is precisely the condition necessary for governing worldly affairs.

Finally, Confucius said that those who reach this supreme state of emptiness can transcend fame and profit even while living in the world. Like a bell, they resonate when struck but remain silent when untouched. This serene and detached state is true transcendence.

 應不來則不自動譬由人籟受氣則鳴氣  止則息也故曰入則嗚不入則止 無門無毒  無門者善閉也無毒者不治也善閉所以  藏用不治所以顯仁此任其自然而然也 一宅而寓於不得已則幾矣  體全至虚抱一自處無心於物而物來則  應不得已而然後起至道所謂盡之矣故  曰一宅而寓於不得已則幾矣 絶迹易無行地難  泯然無爲高世而絶迹則聖人所以爲易  也超然有爲經世而無患則聖人所以爲  難也故曰絶迹易無行地難 爲人使易以僞爲天使難以僞  人者使然也天者自然也使然可以欺而  自然不可詐故曰爲人使易以偽爲天使  難以爲 聞以有翼飛者矣未聞以無翼飛者也聞以 有知知者矣未聞以無知知者也瞻彼闋者 虚室生白吉祥止止  室虚則所以自白心虚則所以自靜靜則  定而性命之情不動矣然後吉祥所以來  舍也故曰瞻彼闋者虚室生白吉祥止止 夫且不止是之謂坐馳  心不虚則不止不止則不定不定則所以  徧法界役萬物而不能息形雖坐而心實  馳也故曰夫且不止是謂坐馳 夫徇耳目内通而外於心知鬼神將來舍而 况人乎  耳目外也心智内也惟能忘我則超然自  得耳目非必在外而心智非必在内體與  化合而理與神契况人間焉有不化乎故
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core principles of Daoist mental cultivation and self-nurturing.

Just as a flute (human pipes) requires breath to produce sound—ceasing when the breath stops—so too does the human mind: it responds to external stimuli but remains tranquil in their absence. True cultivation requires achieving "no gateway, no poison": the "no gateway" refers to skillfully closing the senses (excellent closure), while "no poison" means not deliberately controlling (non-governance). Skillful closure allows concealment of function, and non-governance reveals benevolent De (Virtue)—both manifestations of following nature's course.

When one achieves complete emptiness and stillness, maintaining a state of pure unity without actively pursuing external things—responding only when necessary—one approaches the Dao. This is the realm of "dwelling in unity while abiding in inevitability."

The text contrasts several concepts: complete withdrawal from society (vanishing all traces) is easy, but moving through the world without leaving traces (walking without treading ground) is difficult; being driven by others allows for pretense, but being driven by innate nature makes pretense impossible. It's like having seen birds that fly with wings but never those that fly wingless; having encountered knowledgeable people but never those who know without knowledge.

When the mind becomes as empty and still as an unoccupied room (empty chamber generates brightness), illumination naturally arises, and auspiciousness comes to rest (auspiciousness settles upon settling). If the mind cannot achieve this emptiness, even while sitting motionless, thoughts race about (sitting while racing). Only by transcending sensory perceptions and mental discriminations, reaching the state where self and objects are both forgotten, can one merge with the Dao—then even ghosts and spirits will come to dwell, let alone humans.

All this illustrates that the key to cultivating the Dao lies in maintaining emptiness and naturalness, avoiding deliberate action, and allowing everything to unfold according to innate nature.

 曰夫徇耳目内通而外於心知鬼神將來  舍而况人乎 是萬物之化也禹舜之所紐也伏羲几蘧之 所行終而況散焉者乎  體合至虚則可以使萬物之化故曰是萬  物之化也禹舜有爲之名羲蘧無爲之至  有爲無爲均是至妙道至此而渾合而不  解散聖人終始於其間也夫道合則渾而  至妙離則散而猶精得其渾則足以任之  自化得其散則亦可使之入化矣故曰禹  舜之所紐也伏羲几蘧之所行終而况散  焉者乎 葉公子高將使於齊問於仲尼曰王使諸梁 也甚重齊之待使者蓋將甚敬而不急匹夫 猶未可動也而况諸侯乎吾甚慄之子嘗語 諸梁也曰凡事若小若大寡不道以歡成事 若不成則必有人道之患事若成則必有陰 陽之患若成若不成而後無患者唯有德者 能之吾食也執粗而不藏爨無欲清之人今 吾朝受命而夕飲冰我其内熱與吾未至乎 事之情而旣有陰陽之患矣事若不成必有 人道之患是兩也爲人臣者不足以任之子 其有以語我來  經世之道必先於忘身而其次在信命故  忘身則至於無我而信命則任其自然如  此則憂患不足以累之此莊子於人間世  之篇首言顔回之化衛而次言葉公子高  之使齊也夫子高之使齊而仲尼告之以  義命此賢人之事而已所以降於顔回而
Interpretation

This scripture conveys two main teachings: the realm of Dao cultivation and the wisdom for worldly engagement.

First, it discusses the realm of Dao cultivation: When one withdraws the outward pursuit of sensory perceptions through eyes and ears, turning inward for contemplation while relinquishing intellectual discrimination and attachment, even spirits and deities will come to abide with them—how much more so ordinary people? This reveals the fundamental principle of all things' transformation and growth, the governing secret employed by Emperor Yu and Emperor Shun, and the lifelong practice followed by ancient sage-kings like Fuxi. When human body and mind unite with the supremely empty and quiescent Dao, one naturally aligns with the spontaneous changes of all things. Yu and Shun represent the governance through purposeful action (youwei), while Fuxi and Ji Qu (an ancient worthy) embody the supreme state of non-action (wuwei)—both being wondrous manifestations of the Dao's function.

Next, it illustrates worldly wisdom through the story of Duke Ye Zigao's diplomatic mission to Qi: Troubled by the mission's heavy responsibility, Duke Ye consulted Confucius, who advised that all matters—great or small—require following their natural course for fulfillment. Forcing outcomes leads either to physical and mental depletion (the hazard of Yin-Yang imbalance upon success) or social condemnation (the hazard of human censure upon failure). Only those with profound virtue (De) can transcend success and failure. Confucius confessed that while he normally maintained simple meals and a cool mind, accepting this mission made him feel as agitated as someone needing ice water to cool down—demonstrating how striving for achievement disrupts mind-body harmony.

The conclusion presents the way of worldly engagement: First relinquish personal gain and loss (forgetting the self), then trust heaven's arrangement (believing in destiny). Upon reaching selflessness, one naturally flows with spontaneity, unperturbed by worries. In the "Human World" chapter, Zhuangzi first recounts Yan Hui's story about transforming the ruler of Wei, then presents Duke Ye's mission—using the worthy's example (Duke Ye) to illustrate worldly wisdom one level below the sage's (Yan Hui) attainment.

 言之至于顔闔之傳衛太子匠石之見齊  櫟社子綦觀商丘之大木此皆有思有爲  之事也故第降一等而言之人間世之說  無以復加矣此莊子爲言盡道如此矣 仲尼曰天下有大戒二其一命也其一義也 子之愛親命也不可解於心臣之事君義也 無適而非君也無所逃於天地之間是之謂 大戒  有天地然後有父子有父子然後有君臣  父子君臣之道立則萬事起萬事起而不  可以不愼故曰大戒夫父子内也君臣外  也内焉者主於命而外焉者主於義命所  以無間而義所以立我無間則不間於親  立我則能立於君親不可違而故曰不可  解於心君不可避而故曰無適而非君也  夫内事父而外事君是有諸身而已有諸  身必有諸事不可遁去而已矣故曰不可  逃於天地之間此事之自然而惟能順其  自然則免於憂累矣 是以夫事其親者不擇地而安之孝之至也 事其君者不擇事而安之忠之盛也  不擇地而安之者所謂安土也不擇事而  安之者所謂不辭難也安土故能愛不辭  難故能誠愛必孝而誠必忠臣子之道盡  於此故曰孝之至忠之盛也至者次於盛  而盛者廣於至 自事其心者哀樂不易施乎前知其不可奈 何而安之若命德之至也  夫子之事父知其有命臣之事君知其有  義守之於心而順其自然則悲喜不足以
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the fundamental principles governing human society. Confucius stated there are two supreme guidelines in the world: one is heavenly mandate (predestined relationships), the other is moral duty (social norms). A child's love for parents belongs to heavenly mandate—this innate affection rooted in one's heart cannot be severed; a subject's responsibility toward the ruler constitutes moral duty, an obligation from which nowhere under heaven offers escape. These are what we call the "Great Precepts."

After heaven and earth took form, the parent-child relationship emerged, and from this relationship derived the ruler-subject dynamic. The way of parents and children pertains to intrinsic blood ties, sustained by heavenly mandate; the way of rulers and ministers belongs to external ethical bonds, upheld by moral duty. Heavenly mandate eternally connects us with our parents, while moral duty establishes our position in society. Parental affection cannot be defied—hence it's said "cannot be unraveled from the heart"; sovereign authority cannot be evaded—thus we say "nowhere exists without one's lord."

The truly filial can put their parents at ease in any circumstance—this represents the highest realm of filial piety. The genuinely loyal can face all governmental affairs with equanimity—this embodies the ultimate expression of loyalty. Not being particular about circumstances while maintaining one's duty is called "being at peace with the land"; not shirking difficult tasks is termed "not refusing hardship." Achieving these naturally manifests sincere filial devotion and loyal righteousness.

Those who cultivate inner refinement never let emotions like joy or anger cloud their judgment. When recognizing certain matters cannot be changed, they accept them serenely as they would heavenly mandate—this constitutes the highest virtue. Whether serving parents as children or rulers as subjects, one must comprehend the heavenly mandate and moral duty therein, preserving inner steadfastness while acting in accordance with natural flow. Thus one remains unperturbed by fluctuating emotions.

(Note: Figures mentioned like Yan He, Carpenter Shi, and Ziqi are allegorical characters from the Zhuangzi illustrating worldly principles. The "Great Precepts" refer to life's fundamental rules as binding as religious commandments.)

 動也故曰自事其心者哀樂不易施於前  夫哀樂者心本無有而惟外物之所致能  守其心而忘於哀樂則達於義命之極而  死生所以安之也故曰德之至也 爲人臣子者固有所不得已行事之情而忘 何暇至於悦生而惡死夫子其行可矣  臣子之事君親能安於命則忘身忘身則  生死不介於胸中故曰何暇至於悦生而  惡死也 丘請復以所聞凡交近則必相靡以信遠則 必忠之以言言必或傳之夫傳兩喜兩怒之 言天下之難者也  喜出於不喜怒出於不怒則其言所以盡  誠也喜出於喜而怒出於怒則其言所以  非誠也盡誠之言有法度而非誠之言多  過溢過溢之言傳之者非易也故曰傳兩  喜兩怒之言天下之至難也 夫兩喜必多溢美之言兩怒必多溢惡之言 凡溢之類也妄妄則其信之也莫莫則傳言 者殃故法言曰傳其常情無傳其溢言其幾 乎全且以巧鬭力者始乎陽常卒乎陰泰至 則多奇巧以禮飲酒者始乎治常卒乎亂泰 至多奇樂  以巧鬬力卒乎陰以禮飲酒卒乎亂是皆  已甚之事也故曰泰至則多奇巧多奇樂  此聖賢不爲而已矣 凡事亦然始乎諒常卒乎鄙其作始也簡其 將畢也必巨言者風波也行者實喪也夫風 波易以動實喪易以危  孔子曰予欲無言聖人豈欲强言乎蓋無
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the cultivation of inner virtue, perspectives on life and death, and principles of human interaction.

Regarding inner cultivation: Those who truly understand self-cultivation are not easily swayed by external joys and angers. Human emotions are not inherently part of one's inner being—they arise only through external influences. By maintaining one's fundamental heart-mind and remaining undisturbed by these emotions, one can reach the highest state of "righteous destiny" (the harmony of virtue and fate), facing life and death with equanimity. This represents the pinnacle of De (Virtue/Power).

On the way of ruler and subject: As ministers or children, there are matters one cannot avoid undertaking. By accepting Heaven's decree with composure, one forgets personal safety, and matters of life and death cease to burden the heart. How then could there be leisure for clinging to life and fearing death?

Concerning human relationships: In interactions, deal with those nearby through sincerity, and communicate with those afar through words. Yet conveying messages about joy and anger proves most difficult because:

  • Spontaneous expressions of joy and anger often remain sincere and measured
  • Deliberate displays of emotion frequently become exaggerated and false
  • Transmitting exaggerated words easily invites misfortune

Thus the ancient teaching says: convey only the truth of matters, never their exaggerations.

The text provides two examples illustrating how excess distorts all things:

1. Contests of cleverness and strength begin honorably but often degenerate into covert schemes

2. Ritual drinking starts orderly but commonly descends into chaos

These represent the consequences of overdevelopment, which sages consciously avoid.

The conclusion observes: All matters follow this pattern—beginning in simplicity and honesty, ending in coarseness. Words resemble wind and waves that easily unsettle hearts, while actions readily create actual harm. Hence Confucius said, "I wish to remain silent"—could the sage have desired forced speech? Truly, he sought to preserve stillness.

 言者物不能擾而有言者物所以應應則  所以不靜矣故曰言者風波也無所行則  迹所以藏有所行則迹所以顯迹顯於外 而眞亡於内矣故曰行者實喪也夫不靜 則至于動眞亡則難以安故曰風波易以 動實喪易以危 故忿設無由巧言偏辭獸死不擇音氣息茀 然於是並生心厲  夫處心於寂然無事之際則和聲内藴而  夜氣自存達於性命之理而動靜正順矣  若蹴之於紛然憂患之際則天眞茀亂而  夜氣不存違於性命之理而舉措乖迕矣  故曰獸死不擇音氣息茀然於是並生心  厲 尅核太至則必有不肖之心應之而不知其 然也苟爲不知其然也孰知其所終  夫至人藏天眞晦心術不期爲而自爲不  必應而自應靜與物同而動與吉會儻衒  聰明務精察用心太過則舉措有不肖之  累而禍患之來不知其所招而又不知其  終極也故曰尅核太至則必有不肖之心  應之而不知其然也茍爲不知其然也孰  知其所終 故法言曰無遷令無勸成過度益也  人臣之道顧於義而已奉君之令則無改  格君之非而無成故曰無遷令無勸成然  旣不遷令勸成而不能任其自然而違理  以益上則所謂揠苗而助長也故曰過度  益也 遷令勸成殆事美成在乆惡成不及改可不 憤歟  美者充實惡者自戕充實自戕皆所以無
Interpretation

When speaking, if the mind remains undisturbed by external things, words will naturally respond to circumstances. But once there is response, the mind loses its tranquility. Thus speech is like wind and waves - when still, no traces appear; when moving, traces become visible. The more pronounced these external traces grow, the more the inner true nature diminishes. Therefore action leads to the loss of authenticity.

When the mind lacks tranquility, agitation arises; when true nature is lost, stability becomes difficult. Thus wind and waves easily stir restlessness, and the loss of authenticity brings danger.

When people become angry, it often happens without clear reason. Flowery words and biased arguments resemble the chaotic cries of a dying beast - when Qi becomes disordered, malicious thoughts arise in the heart. Maintaining inner stillness and non-interference allows harmonious Qi to accumulate within, naturally preserving clear Shen (spirit) at night, comprehending the principles of nature and life, with every movement and stillness following the proper path. But when entangled in troubles and worries, one's innate nature becomes disordered, unable to preserve clear Shen at night, violating the principles of life, leading to erratic behavior. Thus when a beast nears death, its cries become chaotic, Qi becomes disordered, and malicious thoughts emerge.

Excessive demands create harmful mental states, yet people often don't understand why. If the cause remains unknown, how can one foresee the consequences? Those who attain the Dao conceal their nature, restrain their cleverness, practicing Wuwei (non-action) yet accomplishing naturally, not forcing responses yet responding appropriately. In stillness, they unite with all things; in motion, they meet with good fortune. Those who flaunt intelligence, scrutinize excessively, and overexert their minds will find their actions adversely affected - misfortune arrives without warning, its final outcome unknowable. Thus excessive demands create harmful mental states without apparent cause, and without knowing the cause, how can one predict the result?

Therefore the ancients said: Do not alter commands, do not force success - excess brings harm. The way of ministers lies in contemplating righteousness. When fulfilling a ruler's command, do not change it arbitrarily; when correcting a ruler's faults, do not insist on success. Neither altering commands nor forcing success, yet violating natural principles to please superiors is like pulling up seedlings to help them grow - harmful indeed. Thus excess brings harm.

Altering commands and forcing success ruin affairs. Beautiful achievements require long accumulation, but once harm manifests, it's too late to change - how can one not be cautious? Beauty springs from inner fulfillment; harm arises from self-injury. Whether fulfillment or injury, both follow their own natural course.

 虧也故曰美成在乆惡成不及改充實非  一朝之所致故言在乆自戕不可革而已  故言不及改有美有惡則不若無美無惡  也故曰可不愼歟 且夫乗物以遊心託不得已以飬中至矣何 作爲報也莫若爲致命此其難者  至人無心乗萬物以爲心來去無礙而不  居其一所謂遊心者也旣乗物以爲心則  無爲而已矣若其有爲則非得已而有爲  是不得已而後應也然不得已而後應又  能去其已甚而存于中所以全於道也故  曰乗萬物以爲心託不得已以養中至矣  爲臣如此則盡道矣此子高賢而仲尼終  告之以至人之道也 顔闔將傅衛靈公太子而問於蘧伯玉曰有 人於此其德天殺與之爲無方則危吾國與 之爲有方則危吾身其知適足以知人之過 而不知其所以過若然者吾奈之何  天生賢智所以輔于不賢不智矣賢智者  衒其賢智則不賢不智者起而爲累矣惟  能内冥賢智而外與物同則亦足免當世  之患此顔闔之傅衛太子而蘧伯玉告之  以信理晦默之義故次於子高之事而言  之也 蘧伯玉曰善哉問乎戒之愼之正汝身哉  孟子曰枉己者未有能正人者也夫欲正  於人者必先正於己己正而人亦自正此  蘧伯玉答顔闔之問而先之以正汝身也 形莫若就心莫若和雖然之二者有患就不 欲入和不欲出
Interpretation

This passage from the New Commentary on the Nanhua True Scripture conveys two main teachings:

The first section discusses the state of Dao cultivation. Those who have truly attained the Dao (zhiren, perfected persons) possess no clinging mind, instead harmonizing with the natural flow of all things. They roam freely as if riding upon the transformations of phenomena, their inner selves unshackled by external attachments. When encountering situations requiring response, they maintain the balanced Dao of centrality—neither forcing outcomes nor deliberately avoiding engagement. This state of "riding phenomena while wandering with the heart-mind" (chengwu youxin) represents the highest spiritual attainment. As Confucius instructed Zigao, when ministers achieve this state, they fully embody the Heavenly Dao.

The second section recounts the story of Yan He consulting Qu Boyu about educating the crown prince of Duke Ling of Wei. The prince possessed a violent nature—allowing his misconduct would endanger the state, yet restraining him too severely would risk the advisor's safety. Qu Boyu's advice emphasized first rectifying oneself (zheng rushen), for only through upright conduct can one influence others. Practically, he recommended outwardly drawing close to the prince (xing mo ruo jiu) while inwardly maintaining equanimity (xin mo ruo he). However, both approaches carried risks: proximity must avoid complicity in wrongdoing, and harmony must conceal no ulterior motives.

The concept of "nourishing centrality" (yang zhong) mentioned here represents essential Daoist cultivation—maintaining inner equilibrium. "Riding phenomena while wandering with the heart-mind" describes the transcendent freedom of Dao-realized beings. Qu Boyu's wisdom exemplifies the Daoist principle of "square within, round without"—holding firm to the Dao internally while adapting flexibly in external expression.

 形者天之委質也心者人之眞君也委質  不可不全故曰形莫就若眞君不可不和  故曰心莫若和形全者不可曲從於一物  心和者不可攄發而示外故曰就不欲入  和不欲出 形就而入且爲顚爲滅爲崩爲蹶心和而出 且爲聲爲名爲妖爲孽彼且爲嬰兒亦與之 爲嬰兒彼且爲無町畦亦與之爲無町畦彼 且爲無崖亦與之爲無崖達之入於無疵  夫君子外順而内正不務獨異於人矣故  趍時應變而與物無迕蓋能通達其道而  不立小廉以自高要之以無玷爲美也故  曰達之人於無疵 汝不知夫螳蜋乎怒其臂以當車轍不知其 不勝任也是其才之美者也戒之憤之積伐 而美者以犯之幾矣汝不知夫養虎者乎不 敢以生物與之爲其殺之之怒也不敢以全 物與之爲其决之之怒也時其饑飽達其怒 心虎之與人異類而媚養己者順也故其殺 者逆也  螳蜋以臂當車轍才雖美而不勝其敵也  猛虎不敢害於養己者性雖惡而不敢犯  其順也顔闔之傅衛太子太子之從於顔  闔何異螳蜋猛虎歟此伯玉所以引之而  告也 夫愛馬者以筐盛矢以蜃盛溺適有蚤虻僕 縁而拊之不時則缺銜毁首碎胸意有所至 而愛有所亡可不憤邪  仁人之愛物不失於愛而曲全其愛物有  迕理則率而使順而終不忘其所愛矣豈
Interpretation

Our physical form is the material vessel bestowed by heaven, while the mind is the true sovereign of a person. Since the body is a gift from heaven, it must be kept whole and unharmed; as the ruler of our being, the mind must be maintained in harmonious tranquility. Those with intact bodies will not be distorted by external things, and those with harmonious minds will not casually express their emotions. Therefore, in dealing with others, maintain an appropriate distance—keep the heart peaceful yet not easily revealed.

If the body excessively conforms to external things, it will lead to collapse and ruin; if inner emotions are recklessly vented, it will invite disgrace and calamity. When encountering someone as pure as an infant, interact with them as you would with a child; when facing those without restraint, adapt to their free-spiritedness; when meeting the unrestrained, respond in kind. Only then can one reach a state of perfect harmony. True gentlemen appear easygoing on the outside but uphold inner integrity, never deliberately seeking novelty. They adapt to the changes of circumstance, harmonizing with all things, embodying the Dao without being bogged down by trivialities, and regard flawlessness as the highest pursuit.

Have you not seen the praying mantis? It angrily raises its forearms to block a chariot wheel, unaware of its own limitations. This is because it overestimates its own ability. Beware! When a person grows overly self-confident, they risk danger just like the mantis. Do you know how tiger keepers operate? They dare not feed live prey to tigers, fearing it would awaken their killing instinct; nor do they offer whole animals, lest it provoke their savage urge to tear and bite. They carefully time the tiger’s hunger and fullness, guiding its ferocity. Though tigers are of a different kind from humans, they will still fawn on their keepers—because the keepers understand how to follow their nature. Those harmed by tigers are always those who defy their innate tendencies.

The mantis blocking the chariot, though talented, cannot overcome a stronger opponent; the tiger refrains from harming its keeper—though fierce by nature, it does not defy those who treat it well. When Yan He was instructing the crown prince of Wei, was not the prince’s behavior just like the mantis and the tiger? This is the lesson Qu Boyu sought to impart.

Horse lovers use bamboo baskets to collect manure and seashells to hold urine. But if a gadfly happens to bite and the groom suddenly slaps it, the startled horse may snap its bit or break its head against the yoke. Such well-intentioned actions can backfire—how can one not be cautious? The benevolent cherish all things but never lose measure in their affection. When things deviate from their natural course, guide them back to the right path—yet never forget the original heart of care.

 務過愛而反傷其愛乎傷愛則以人而滅  天也故曰意有所至愛有所忘可不愼邪 匠石之齊至乎曲轅見櫟社樹其大蔽牛絜 之百圍其高臨山十仞而後有枝其可以爲 舟者旁十數觀者如市匠伯不顧遂行不輟 弟子厭觀之走及匠石曰自吾執斧斤以隨 夫子未嘗見材如此其美也先生不肯視行 不輟何邪曰已矣勿言之矣散木也以爲舟 則沉以爲棺槨則速腐以爲器則速毁以爲 門户則液樠以爲柱則蠹是不材之木也無 所可用故能若是之壽匠石歸櫟社見夢曰 汝將惡乎比予哉若將比予於文木邪夫𣙁 梨橘柚果蓏之屬實熟則剥則辱大枝折小 枝泄此以其能苦其生者也故不終其天年 而中道夭自掊擊於世俗者也物莫不若是 且予求無所可用乆矣幾死乃今得之爲予 大用使予也而有用且得有此大也邪且也 若與予也皆物也柰何哉其相物也而幾死 之散人又惡知散木匠石覺而診其夢弟子 曰趣取無用則爲社何邪曰密若無言彼亦 直寄焉以爲不知己者詬厲也不爲社者且 幾有剪乎且也彼其所保與衆異而以義譽 之不亦遠乎  物之生長則所以爲得性翦伐則所以爲  失性得性則爲榮失性則爲辱榮必有所  譽而辱必有所毁齊之大櫟豈欲於失性  之中而復求榮譽乎此所以不欲爲社明
Interpretation

This passage recounts a parable from Zhuangzi illustrating the concept of "the usefulness of the useless."

The story tells of a master carpenter named Shi who traveled to the state of Qi. In the region of Quyuan, he came across a massive oak tree worshipped as the shrine of the earth god. The tree was enormous—its shade could shelter a thousand oxen, its trunk required a hundred men to encircle, its crown towered above the mountain peaks, and its branches were thick enough to build over a dozen boats. Crowds gathered around it as if at a marketplace. Yet, the carpenter walked past without a glance. His apprentices, however, marveled at the tree before catching up to ask, "We’ve followed you with our axes for years, yet we’ve never seen timber this magnificent. Why did you ignore it?"

The carpenter replied, "Don’t mention it—this is a worthless tree. A boat made from it would sink, a coffin would rot quickly, tools would break, doorframes would ooze sap, and pillars would be riddled with insects. Precisely because it’s useless, it has lived so long."

That night, the oak appeared to the carpenter in a dream and said, "What are you comparing me to? If you pit me against 'useful' trees—hawthorns, pears, oranges, pomelos—their fruits are plucked and beaten, their large branches snapped, their small ones twisted. Their usefulness brings them suffering, cutting their lives short before their time. This is the cruelty of the world. Everything follows this pattern. I’ve long sought uselessness, narrowly escaping death several times, and now I’ve preserved myself—this is my greatest use. Had I been useful, could I have grown so vast?"

Upon waking, the carpenter shared the dream with his apprentices. One asked, "If it pursued uselessness, why serve as a shrine tree?" The carpenter said, "Hush! It merely borrows the shrine’s status to protect itself, enduring the scorn of those who don’t understand. Without this role, it would’ve been felled long ago. Its way of preserving life is unconventional—judging it by ordinary standards misses the mark entirely."

Zhuangzi concludes: All things flourish by following their nature and perish by opposing it. To follow nature is honor; to defy it is disgrace. Would that great oak of Qi seek honor by betraying its nature? This is why it disdained being a shrine tree.

 矣而匠石之弟子尚疑焉此明至人之於  世以道任性忘己齊物而毁譽所以不及  矣 南伯子綦遊乎商之丘見大木焉有異結駟 千乗隱將芘其所籟子綦曰此何木也哉此 必有異材夫仰而視其細枝則拳曲而不可 以爲棟梁俯而視其大根則軸解而不可以 爲棺槨咶其葉則口爛而爲傷嗅之則使人 狂酲三日而不已子綦曰此果不材之木也 以至於此其大也嗟乎神人以此不材宋有 荆氏者宜楸栢桑其拱把而上者求狙猴之 杙者斬之三圍四圍求高名之麗者斬之七 圍八圍貴人富商之家求禪傍者斬之故未 終其天年而中道之夭於斧斤此材之患也  夫至人能存諸己而不蘄乎用存諸己者  足而其用所以有餘蓋至於命者是也命  者萬事之根本而莫大焉故莊子每以大  樹而爲况樹之爲用用則傷其根本而不  用則枝葉以生故以不材爲材而無用爲  用事能全而不傷也老子曰深根固蒂之  道蓋亦言其命也而南伯子綦見商丘之  大木而嗟嘆其神人之不材此亦知其全  命之道歟使神人以材而見用則不能全  其命也何異宋氏之楸栢桑乎夫宋氏之  楸栢桑之先夭以其小有材而已故小有  材而不能明道以至於命則適自爲累而  已矣故曰此材之患也 故解之以牛之白顙者與豚之亢鼻者與人
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the Daoist wisdom of "the usefulness of the useless" through two allegorical stories.

Nanbo Ziqi observed a peculiar great tree in Shangqiu whose twisted branches couldn't serve as beams and whose split trunk was unfit for coffins, while its poisonous leaves could drive people mad. Ziqi marveled that precisely because it was "useless timber," the tree could grow so magnificently. This resembles the Daoist "divine person" (shenren) who preserves life precisely by appearing useless.

The text then contrasts this with trees from the Jing family's land in Song state: catalpas, cypresses and mulberries—valued for making monkey stakes, roof beams and coffins—were felled before reaching maturity. This demonstrates the calamity of being "useful timber."

True Daoist adepts (zhiren, perfected persons) preserve themselves without pursuing utility. Precisely by not seeking functionality, they safeguard their lives and manifest greater efficacy. Like the great tree that would suffer root damage if utilized, its very lack of usefulness allows luxuriant growth. This echoes Laozi's principle of "deep roots and firm foundation" concerning life preservation.

The passage concludes with three striking metaphors: the white-foreheaded ox, the high-nosed pig, and the hemorrhoid-afflicted man—all seemingly defective traits that ironically spared them from sacrificial slaughter. These demonstrate how apparently useless characteristics sometimes become the key to preserving life.

有痔病者不可以適河此皆巫祝以知之矣 所以爲不祥也此乃神人之所以爲大祥也  牛之白顙豚之亢鼻此物之所以不材也  人之痔病此人之所以不材也巫祝皆爲  不祥而不用不用所以生全也生全所以  得終其天年得終其天年則祥莫大焉故  曰此神人之所以爲大祥也然莊子之言  及此者蓋以處人間者不能晦道以忘己  而多務衒材以誇衆衆雖企慕而反傷其  命矣豈若晦道以忘己藏材以全命而免  經世之患乎此所以反復言之而寓意也 支離疏者頤隱於齊肩高於頂會撮指天五 管在上兩髀爲脅挫鍼治繲足以餬口鼓筴 播精足以食十人上徵武士則支離攘臂於 其間上有大役則支離以有常疾不受功上 與病者粟則受三鍾與十束薪夫支離其形 者猶足以飬其身終其天年又况支離其德 者乎  支離疏者形不正之人也形不正於外而  實自正於内足可以全其命也故曰由足  以終其天年然支離其形則尚能全其命  況支離其德而歸功於羣材外不衒其美  而内不虧其實又豈不能全命而免人間  之累乎故曰又況其支離其德者乎 孔子適楚楚狂接輿遊其門曰鳳兮鳳兮何 如德之衰也來世不可待往世不可追也天 下有道聖人成焉天下無道聖人生焉方今 之時僅免刑焉
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the Daoist wisdom of "the usefulness of the useless" through vivid analogies and stories.

A man with hemorrhoids was forbidden from participating in riverside sacrifices, as priests deemed it inauspicious. Yet Zhuangzi observed that such seemingly unlucky traits might be the greatest blessing from the spirits. Just as white-foreheaded oxen and high-snouted pigs - seemingly defective animals - were spared from slaughter, so too might hemorrhoids, though appearing as flaws, actually preserve one's life and allow peaceful longevity, becoming the greatest fortune.

The story of Zhili Shu (a severely deformed man) demonstrates this principle even more vividly. With his chin buried in his navel and shoulders towering above his head, he nevertheless made a living mending clothes and supporting ten family members through divination. When conscription came, his deformity exempted him from military service, yet he received three measures of grain and ten bundles of firewood during relief distributions. Physical imperfection became his means of preserving life.

Zhuangzi further suggests that if bodily defects can bring such fortune, then "defective De (Virtue)" - meaning concealed talents - offers even greater security. Truly wise individuals hide their abilities, neither boasting nor competing for merit, thereby safeguarding their lives while avoiding worldly entanglements.

The song of Chu Kuang Jieyu (a Chu State hermit) to Confucius encapsulates the core message: "Phoenix, oh phoenix, why appear in this age of moral decline? The future offers no hope, the past cannot be reclaimed. When the Dao prevails in the world, sages accomplish great deeds; when the Dao is lost, sages can only preserve their lives. In times like these, avoiding punishment is fortune enough." This serves as a profound admonition to conceal one's talents and flow with the circumstances of the age.

 大聖人與世推移而不凝滯於物物亦莫  能傷之矣孔子之心未嘗以經世爲事其  所以推而行之者直隨時而已故時之可  行則成其功時之可止則全其生汎然無  礙而盛衰不自以知覺此聖人之心如此  也故接輿之歌所以寓聖人之心而莊子  引之以終經世之道而亦自嘆其不得於  時故曰方今之時僅免刑焉 福輕乎羽莫之知載禍重乎地莫之知避   莊子之所謂禍福非世之所謂禍福也以  能全性命者謂之福忘性命者謂之禍全  性命者其道微故曰福輕乎羽然以至微  之道而不能自舉而行之故曰莫之知載  也忘性命者其理著故曰禍重乎地然以  至著之理而不能自知而避之故曰莫之  避也此莊子所以嘆人間之人不能盡知  全之之道也 已乎已乎臨人以德殆乎殆乎畫地而趨迷 陽迷陽無傷吾行吾行卻曲無傷吾足山木 自寇也膏火自煎也桂可食故伐之漆可用 故割之人皆知有用之用而莫知無用之用 也  桂可食故伐之漆可用故割之此所謂小  有材而不能自全而已矣工文所謂此材  之患是也豈知聖人以不材爲神而無用  爲妙乎知其不材明其無用則經世之道  極
Interpretation

The true sage advances with the times yet remains unbound by external things, thus nothing can harm him. Confucius never deliberately sought to govern worldly affairs—his propagation of doctrines was simply in accordance with the currents of his era. When circumstances were favorable, he achieved merit; when times were adverse, he preserved his life essence, living with unhindered freedom, neither consciously perceiving nor affected by the rise and fall of worldly fortunes—this is the mind of a sage.

The madman of Chu, Jieyu, sang verses embodying the sage's philosophy. Zhuangzi quoted them to summarize the art of navigating life while lamenting his own untimely birth. He observed that in this present age, merely escaping punishment could be considered fortunate. Happiness is light as a feather, yet none know how to bear it; calamity weighs heavy as the earth, yet none know how to avoid it. Zhuangzi's conception of fortune and misfortune differs from worldly understanding: preserving one's life essence constitutes fortune, while losing it means calamity. The method of preserving life is exceedingly subtle—hence "happiness light as a feather"—yet people fail to consciously practice even this most refined principle, hence "none know how to bear it." The principle of losing life is glaringly obvious—hence "calamity heavy as the earth"—yet people facing such evident danger remain oblivious, hence "none know how to avoid it." This is Zhuangzi mourning humanity's failure to comprehend the Dao of preserving life.

Alas! How perilous are those who impose moral standards upon others! It's like drawing lines on the ground demanding people tread precisely. Brambles and thorns, block not my path; I walk the winding deer trail, harm not my feet. Mountain trees invite the axe through their usefulness as timber; grease invites the flame through its combustibility; cassia trees are felled for their edible bark, lacquer trees tapped for their utility. All men know the usefulness of the useful, but none understand the marvel of the useless.

The cassia is edible and thus felled, the lacquer useful and thus tapped—this illustrates how minor talents cannot ensure self-preservation. As craftsmen say: "The calamity of material value." Who could know that sages regard "lack of talent" as divine and "uselessness" as profound mystery? To understand the principle of untapped potential and comprehend the wonder of uselessness—this represents the highest realization of life's art. Herein lies the meaning of Zhuangzi's concluding words.

盡矣此莊子所以終之於此言也 南華眞經新傳卷之三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0136); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →