中文 · EN

《南華真經新傳》Vol. 4

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 4 / 20 6,539 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經新傳》 Vol. 4 (Dongshen 洞神部, 20 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 13 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經新傳》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

南華眞經新傳卷之四惡四     宋 王 元 澤 傳    德充符篇  夫處人間經世變免於憂患之累者是能  全其性命也性命全則自得自得則德之  所以充也德充於内而無待於外則不求  合於物而物自來合此莊子所以作德充  符之篇而次於人間世也 魯有兀者王駘從之遊者與仲尼相若常季 問於仲尼曰王駘兀者也從之遊者與夫子 中分魯立不教坐不議虚而往實而歸固有 不言之教無形而心成者邪是何人也仲尼 曰夫子聖人也丘直後而未往耳丘將以爲 師而況不若丘者乎奚假魯國丘將引天下 而與從之  聖人之所以爲聖人者能内全其神而外  忘其形泯然喪智而與化爲一此王駘雖  兀而猶全人也夫能忘形喪智與化爲一  則其所感者廣而所化者多宜乎從之者  與仲尼之弟子相敵也 常季曰彼兀者也而王先生其與庸亦遠矣 若然者其用心也獨若之何  常者習其庸常季者物之少稚以其庸常  少稚而不足以知聖人故曰常季此莊子  制名而寓意也然德之所以充實則美大  具矣美大具而從之者衆所謂大而化之  矣此仲尼所以稱之爲聖人也夫聖人非  聖人不能以明之此莊子所以託問於仲  尼 仲尼曰死生亦大矣而不得與之變雖天地 覆墜亦將不與之遺審乎無假而不與物遷
Interpretation

This passage comes from the "Virtue Complete Talisman" chapter of the New Commentary on the Zhuangzi (also known as the Southern Florescence Scripture), discussing how to transcend physical imperfections through inner cultivation of De (Virtue/Power) and attain spiritual wholeness.

The text recounts the story of Wang Tai from the state of Lu, a man who had lost one foot yet attracted as many followers as Confucius himself. Chang Ji (representing ordinary people) expresses bewilderment at this phenomenon and questions Confucius, who responds: "Wang Tai is a sage—even I should take him as my teacher. Though physically impaired, he has attained the highest realm of inner cultivation."

This reveals a profound Daoist principle: those with genuine De need not deliberately instruct others, for their inner Virtue naturally transforms people through silent influence. Though Wang Tai neither speaks nor consciously teaches, his followers gain substantial benefits—demonstrating the power of "teaching without words" (buyan zhi jiao).

Confucius elaborates: Wang Tai has transcended the disturbances of life and death transformations. Even if heaven collapsed and earth split apart, his mental state would remain unaffected. Having grasped the unchanging "true constancy" (zhen chang, fundamental truth), he remains unshaken by external changes. This represents the state of "inner Virtue made complete" (de chong yu nei)—when one's De is fully realized within, it naturally inspires all beings without needing external validation.

Through this parable, Zhuangzi conveys that true cultivation lies in preserving the root of one's nature and life (xingming, the inner spirit) rather than clinging to physical form. When one truly attains the state of "forgetting form and abandoning knowledge" (wangxing sangzhi)—transcending physical limitations and relinquishing discriminative thinking—one merges with the creative process of nature, generating profound influence. This explains why the "Virtue Complete Talisman" chapter follows "Human World" in the text's structure—first learn worldly engagement, then pursue higher spiritual cultivation.

命物之化而守其宗也  天下之事莫過於生死而生死者物之所  變也惟聖人了於不生不死而未嘗與變  俱變也故曰生死亦大矣而不得與之變  夫了於不生不死則寂然忘形而與化爲  一雖穹壤傾側而豈有遺喪故曰雖天地  覆墜亦將不與之遺此言窮理之妙也至  于審乎無假而不與物遷所謂盡性之奥  也命物之化而守其宗所謂至於命也王  駘之形雖不全而能窮理盡性至於命此  德之所以充也 常季曰何謂也仲尼曰自其異者視之肝膽 楚越也自其同者視之萬物皆一也  物我殊形此所以異也物我同根此所以  同也蔽於異而視之則形質所以不同知  其同而視之則根本所以不異王駘能忘  支體之不完而達性命之本内全其眞而  外合萬物以爲一非德之所充則孰能至  於此故曰自其異者而視之肝膽楚越也  自其同者視之萬物皆一也 夫若然者且不知耳目之所宜而遊心乎德 之和物視其所一而不見其所喪視喪其足 猶遺土也  以耳而聽則聞其所聞而不及其所不聞  以目而視則見其所見而不及其所不見  此蔽於任智之累也惟聖人内充懿德而  外出聰明所聽不以耳而所視不以目雖  事物之紛擾而不比吾之所聞見惡有拘  累於視聽歟故汎然逰心於自得之場而
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist profound understanding of life's essence and the origin of all things.

Those who comprehend the transformations of all phenomena yet hold fast to the fundamental root can perceive that life and death are merely changes in material form. The truly enlightened ones (sages) realize an eternal realm that transcends life and death, remaining unshaken by external changes. Even if heaven were to collapse and earth to crack, their inner being would remain unharmed—such is the profound mystery of penetrating ultimate truth.

The text mentions Wang Tai (an enlightened Daoist), who, despite physical disability, could perceive the essential nature of all existence. Superficially, all things appear vastly different (just as the liver and gallbladder seem distinct, or the states of Chu and Yue lie far apart); yet fundamentally, all things share the same origin. Clinging to apparent differences leads to seeing only separation, while understanding their common source reveals underlying unity.

The truly enlightened are not confined by sensory perception. They apprehend the harmony of the Dao (the Way) through inner realization, perceiving the unified nature of all things while overlooking superficial imperfections. Like viewing their own lost limbs as no more significant than discarded clods of earth. Ordinary people rely on ears to hear and eyes to see, their cognition limited by sensory faculties; whereas sages, with hearts filled with De (Virtue/Power), transcend sensory limitations. Even amidst chaos, they remain unbound by what they perceive, their spirits roaming freely in the realm of Dao-realization.

 和之所以不出也故曰夫若然者且不知  耳目之所宜而逰心乎德之和夫德之充  者與化一體天下見其化而忘其形知其  得而遺其喪王駘雖兀而天下忘其所以  兀也然非不見其兀也以其德之所充者  大而形之不全者小是以悦其大如睹金  玉而忘其小如遺土壤也故曰物視其所  一而不見其所喪視喪其足猶遺土也 常季曰彼爲己以其知得其心以其心得其 常心物何爲最之哉  夫聖人之所以悦萬物者以大化也萬物  之就聖人者以其德也常季不知其然而  以王駘任智得心而物就之是億度於聖  人也 仲尼曰人莫鑑於流水而鑑於止水  水流則莫辨於鬚髮水止則可鑒於天地  德忘則物所以不從德充則物所以來合  此理勢之必然也故人之所鑒者必鑒於  止水而物之所合者必合於盛德故物之  所最於王駘者由止水之所以蒙鑒也故  曰人莫鑒於流水而鑒於止水 唯止能止衆止  天下之性生而未嘗不靜靜則正正則定  正定之性天下所同惟妄情所役外物所  擾正之所以不正而定之所以不定也然   不正不定者以其内無所主也故内無   則不止不止則不能止其所止也惟聖   内以德爲主而外忘物所役故惟根所   正定而止也以其所止而止天下衆人   動則動之所以自止也故曰唯止能止
Interpretation

This passage uses the story of Wang Tai (a Daoist adept who had lost his feet) to illustrate the core Daoist concept of "inner virtue filling one's being" (德充于内). A true Dao-realized person possesses such abundant inner De (Virtue/Power) that it merges with the natural creative processes of the cosmos. Even with physical imperfections (like Wang Tai's missing feet), people overlook such external flaws due to the radiance of their inner virtue—just as we ignore the mud surrounding gold and jade when recognizing their intrinsic value.

Chang Ji (the interlocutor) fails to understand why crowds follow Wang Tai, mistakenly assuming he employs clever tactics to win hearts. In truth, sages attract all beings through the fusion of their inner De with the great transformations of nature, not through deliberate action. Like still water that perfectly reflects the world while turbulent currents can't even mirror a beard—only when the human mind achieves tranquility can its true nature manifest, and abundant virtue naturally inspires all things.

The text emphasizes the importance of "stillness" (止): human nature is originally pure and calm, but desires disturb this fundamental state. Only sages can maintain minds as clear as still water by grounding themselves in inner virtue—thereby not only achieving personal serenity but also calming the restlessness of others. This reveals the deeper meaning behind "only still water can reflect all things, only a tranquil mind can pacify the agitation of the multitude."

 衆止此莊子傷時性之流放而所以寓  意仲尼之言也 受命於地唯松栢獨也在冬夏青青受 命於天唯舜獨也正幸能正生以正衆生夫 保始之徵不懼之實勇士一人雄入於九軍將 求名而能自要者而猶若是  木受命於地人受命於天地非私於松栢  而使之獨青天非私舜而使之獨正蓋松  栢不變其至堅而大舜能守其正性故曰  受命於地唯松栢獨也在冬夏青青受命  於天唯舜獨也正夫天下之人不知舜能  守其正而皆稱爲聖人豈自悟其幸生而  正而自喪其正唯能知其本正而守之亦  可正於衆人矣奚獨聖人歟故曰幸能正  生以正衆生 而況官天地府萬物直寓六骸象耳目一知 之所知而心未嘗死者乎彼且擇日 登假 人則從是也彼且何肯以物爲事乎  夫聖人體道而無對於天下故天地雖大  而歸於統任萬物雖衆而由之芘藏生死  不慮而形骸如寄視聽不用而耳目存象  務知德之所充而能以不生爲生以不生  爲生則適去在我此人之所以最之也豈  以物而爲累乎故曰而况官天地府萬物  直寓六骸象耳目一知之所知而心未嘗  死者乎彼且擇日而登假人則從是也彼  且何肯以物爲事乎此王駘所爲如此而  莊子言之於篇首也 申徒嘉兀者也而與鄭子産同師於伯昏無 人
Interpretation

The text illustrates Zhuangzi's teaching on maintaining one's authentic nature through the examples of pine trees and Emperor Shun.

Pine trees draw life from the earth yet remain evergreen through bitter winters and scorching summers; Shun received his life from heaven and guided others by steadfastly upholding his upright nature. The earth does not favor the pines, nor does heaven favor Shun—rather, the pines never waver from their resilient essence, and Shun preserves his pure character. People in the world do not realize that Shun became a sage precisely because he guarded his innate nature; instead, they blindly revere him. In truth, as long as one understands and preserves their authentic self, anyone can attain sagehood—why chase after the mere name of a sage?

A true sage who embodies the Dao (the Way) governs heaven and earth, embraces all things, treats the body as a temporary dwelling, and regards the senses as mere symbols. They focus on enriching their inner De (Virtue/Power) and perceive life from the perspective of the unborn and undying. How could such a person be burdened by external things? Like Wang Tai (a Daoist figure) in his transcendence, people naturally follow him—why would he trouble himself with worldly trivialities?

The later story of Shentu Jia (a man with amputated feet) and Zichan (a statesman of the Spring and Autumn period) studying under Bohun Wuren (a Daoist recluse) further implies that cultivation knows no social rank—physical imperfections do not hinder enlightenment.

 申徒者教民之官也嘉者善之至也此莊  子製名而寓意然申徒嘉者賢人也故次  於王駘而言之嘉雖外兀而德内充德雖  充而人未最此所以未免於師也故曰與  鄭子産同師於伯昏無人夫伯者長也昏  者晦也無人者無我也爲物之長能晦而  無我所以得賢人師之也 子産謂申徒嘉曰我先出則子止子先出則 我止其明日又與合堂同席而坐子産謂申 徒嘉曰我先出則子止子先出則我止今我 將出子可以止乎其未邪  夫至人忘己而外與物同物雖不完而不  能浼己是以下惠同物而袒裼裸裎者皆  不能浼之蓋知内同其命而外可忘形矣  子産鄭國之賢也不知申徒之德充而止  惡形骸之不全欲其行止與之不同也此  所以異於下惠矣 且子見執政而不違子齊執政乎  聖人之與賢人庶僚之與庶民其所異者  分而其所同者命達者觀之則均爲人爾  均爲人則安可獨異乎此子産自矜執政  而適取申徒之所鄙也 申徒嘉曰先生之門固有執政焉如此哉子 而說子之執政而後人者也聞之曰鑑明則 塵垢不止止則不明也乆與賢人處則無過 今子之所取大者先生也而猶出言若是不 亦過乎子産曰子旣若是矣猶與堯爭善計 子之德不足以自反邪申徒嘉曰自狀其過 以不當亡者衆不狀其過以不當存者寡知
Interpretation

This passage recounts the story of Shentu Jia and Zichan, a virtuous minister of Zheng, from Zhuangzi's writings. Their dialogue reveals Daoist wisdom on navigating human relationships.

Shentu Jia was an official who taught the common people. The name "Jia" (meaning supreme goodness) was deliberately chosen by Zhuangzi. Though physically disabled, he possessed abundant inner virtue (De) and thus became a disciple of Bohun Wuren ("Bo" signifies elder status, "hun" means concealing one's light, "wuren" suggests self-forgetfulness). This teacher could lead all things yet remained hidden and selfless, making him the ideal mentor for sages.

Zichan told Shentu Jia: "If I go out first, you stay behind; if you go out first, I'll stay." The next day, seated together, he repeated this exclusionary remark. A true Dao-realized person forgets the self and merges with all existence—physical imperfections cannot tarnish their inner purity. Like Liuxia Hui who felt no shame sitting beside half-naked men, recognizing the identical life essence within different forms. Zichan, despite being Zheng's wise minister, discriminated against Shentu Jia's disability, revealing his inferiority to Liuxia Hui.

Shentu Jia retorted: "Does our master's gate honor officials above others? A bright mirror gathers no dust; constant company with sages prevents faults. You revere Bohun Wuren yet speak thus—isn't this wrong?" When Zichan asked if he equated himself with sage-kings Yao and Shun, Shentu Jia responded: "Men often justify their faults, thinking punishments unjust; few acknowledge errors and feel unworthy to live. Only the virtuous (De) can accept inevitable fate and abide peacefully in their circumstances."

不可奈何而安之若命唯有德者能之  夫顔回之從孔子也始焉克己而終焉未  始有回故黜聰明墮支體而未嘗貳過而  已矣子産之從伯昏無人也不能克己而  欲爲於物先又惡德充之人而致其過亦  所以異於顔回也 遊於羿之彀中中央者中地也然而不中者 命也人以其全足笑吾不全足者衆矣我怫 然而怒而適先生之所則廢然而反不知先 生之洗我以善邪吾與夫子遊十九年矣而 未嘗知吾兀者也  孟子曰羿教人射必志于彀學者亦必志  於彀彀者弓矢所及之地也天之生人也  皆不出榮辱利害貴賤生死之塗其所以  或榮或利或貴或生者由其發而中也其  所以或辱或害或賤或死者由其發而不  中也中與不中皆命也豈能越其自然之  理歟惟聖人無我而無心於萬物故榮辱  不能累利害不能加貴賤不能役了於不  生不死而獨處於自得之場所謂至於命  而已中與不中吾何預焉 今子與我遊於形骸之内而子索我於形骸 之外不亦過乎子産蹴然改容更貌曰子無 乃稱  恥形體之不全者常人也愧盛德之不充  者聖賢也申徒嘉内務其全而外忘形子  産不取其德之充而惡其形不完此所以  太過而已矣故曰今子與我逰於形骸之  内而子索我於形骸之外不亦過乎
Interpretation

When facing unchangeable circumstances, only those with profound De (Virtue) can accept them as destiny's arrangement. Yan Hui (Confucius' most virtuous disciple) followed Confucius in study—first restraining himself, ultimately reaching selfless enlightenment. He discarded cleverness and forgot his physical form, yet never repeated mistakes. Zichan (statesman of Zheng during Spring-Autumn period) studied under Bohun Wuren (Daoist hermit) yet failed in self-restraint, always rushing to interfere with external matters while resenting those rich in De, thus frequently erring—a stark contrast to Yan Hui.

Like within the legendary archer Yi's shooting range where the bullseye is easiest to hit, whether the arrow strikes remains heaven's will. People often mock my disability because of their intact limbs—I would rage initially, but upon meeting my master (Daoist teacher), anger dissolves. Has his virtuous Dao cleansed me? For nineteen years studying under him, he never treated my amputated foot as noteworthy.

Mencius said: When Yi taught archery, he first emphasized aiming at the target's heart. So too must Dao practitioners fix their aim. The reach of bow and arrow mirrors life's inevitable path—honor/disgrace, gain/loss, nobility/humility, life/death. Some attain glory, others suffer humiliation—all decreed by fate. Who can transcend natural law? Only sages achieve selfless states, transcending worldly bonds, untouched by honor or disgrace, unswayed by gain or loss, unmoved by status, abiding in the deathless realm of spontaneous freedom—this is aligning with heaven's mandate. What have successes or failures to do with me?

Now you commune with me in spiritual exchange, yet judge by outward form—is this not absurd? Hearing this, Zichan flushed with shame: "Speak no more."

Ordinary men feel shame for physical flaws; sages examine their De's insufficiency. Shentu Jia (the virtuous amputee) cultivated inner refinement while forgetting his deformity, whereas Zichan fixated on physical incompleteness while ignoring abundant De—such is the peril of clinging to appearances. Thus it's said: Measuring inner cultivation by external standards—what grave error this is.

魯有兀者叔山無趾踵見仲尼仲尼曰子不 謹前旣犯患若是矣雖今來何及矣無趾曰 吾唯不知務而輕用吾身吾是以亡足今吾 來也猶有尊足者存吾是以務全之也  叔者歟於伯仲也山者有形之最大也此  亦莊子製名而寓意也以其次於申徒爲  第三故曰叔而已以其亦有德之大故曰  山而已然而必曰見於仲尼者以非聖人  不足知賢人也 夫天無不覆地無不載吾以夫子爲天地安 知夫子之猶若是也孔子曰丘則陋矣  天地無心於萬物其覆載所以不私也聖  人無心於萬物其來者所以不耟也夫天  地豈以物形之不具而不覆載聖人豈責  人體之不宗而不與合故曰夫天無不覆  地無不載吾以夫子爲天地安知夫子之  猶若是也孔子曰丘則陋矣然仲尼非果  責其不謹也此莊子高言盡道之妙而學  者宜取其意也 夫子胡不入乎請講以所聞無趾出孔子曰 弟子勉之夫無趾兀者也猶務學以復補前 行之惡而況全德之人乎無趾語老聃曰孔 丘之於至人其未邪彼何賔賔以學子爲彼 且蘄以諔詭幻怪之名聞不知至人之以是 爲己桎梏邪老聃曰胡不直使彼以死生爲 一條以可不可爲一貫者解其桎梏其可乎 無趾曰天刑之安可解  夫聖人内守其正性而外循其常德汎然  無心而物不能累故生死可不可皆不介
Interpretation

In the state of Lu, there was a man named Shushan Wuzhi ("Shushan" meaning "lesser than a great mountain," and "Wuzhi" meaning "without toes"—Zhuangzi uses this name to symbolize someone whose virtue is incomplete but still strives for self-improvement). He walked on his heels to visit Confucius. Confucius said, "You were careless in the past and thus met with misfortune. What use is there in coming to me now?" Wuzhi replied, "I once knew nothing of the Dao (the Way) of living and treated my body lightly, which is why I lost my toes. Today, I come to you because there are things more precious than toes (referring to moral cultivation) that I must preserve."

(Author's explanation of the name's symbolism) "Shu" indicates that he is second in rank, while "shan" (mountain) symbolizes the greatest physical form—this is Zhuangzi's way of embedding deeper meaning in names. Because Wuzhi's virtue is lesser than that of Shentu Jia (another disabled figure in the Zhuangzi), he is called "Shu"; yet because he still possesses great virtue, he is called "shan." The detail of him visiting Confucius is intentional, as only a sage can truly understand a worthy person.

Wuzhi continued, "Heaven covers all things without exception, and Earth bears all things without discrimination. I thought you, sir, were as all-encompassing as Heaven and Earth—I did not expect you to judge by appearances." Hearing this, Confucius, ashamed, said, "I have been narrow-minded." (Philosophical explanation) Heaven and Earth show no partiality toward the myriad things, and thus they universally shelter and sustain them. The sage holds no prejudice toward people and thus embraces them broadly. Would Heaven refuse to cover something just because its form is incomplete? Would the sage refuse to engage with someone just because their body is maimed?

Confucius invited Wuzhi inside for further discussion. After Wuzhi left, Confucius said to his disciples, "You must strive diligently! Even a disabled man like Wuzhi seeks learning to amend his faults—how much more should those with whole bodies do so?" Later, Wuzhi said to Laozi, "I fear Confucius has not yet reached the state of the Perfected Man. Why is he so eager to learn from you? He pursues strange and empty reputations, not realizing these are the very shackles of the Perfected Man." Laozi replied, "Why not make him understand that life and death are one and that right and wrong are interconnected, thus freeing him from these shackles?" Wuzhi sighed, "This is a bondage imposed by Heaven—how can it be undone?"

(Summary of the main theme) The sage inwardly preserves their innate nature and outwardly follows the constant Dao, transcending worldly attachments and remaining unburdened. Thus, they regard life and death, right and wrong, as one. This dialogue, through the story of a disabled man, illustrates that true cultivation lies in spiritual attainment rather than physical form. It critiques Confucius's fixation on ritual and reputation, showcasing the Daoist philosophy of equanimity and carefree wandering (qi wu xiao yao).

 蠆於胸中豈有意而一之歟使聖人有意  而一生死與可不可則是不忘其所當忘  而忘其所不忘也如此則去常德遁天刑  惡爲聖人而已矣夫常德不可去天刑不  可遁惟聖天人能全而不能忘故曰天刑  安可解 魯哀公問於仲尼曰衛有惡人焉曰哀駘它 丈夫與之處者思而不能去也婦人見之請 於父母曰與爲人妻寧爲夫子妾者數十而 未止也未嘗有聞其唱者也常和人而己矣 無君人之位以濟乎人之死無聚禄以望人 之腹又以惡駭天下和而不唱知不出乎四 域且而雌雄合乎前是必有異乎人者也寡 人召而觀之果以惡駭天下與寡人處不至 以月數而寡人有意乎其爲人也不至乎期 年而寡人信之國無宰而寡人傳國焉悶然 而後應汜而若辭寡人醜乎卒授之國無幾 何也去寡人而行寡人卹焉若有亡也若無 與樂是國也  哀駘它者醜惡之名也以其德充而形惡  故製其醜惡之名矣夫形骸者委氣之所  聚至人視之如旅寄而未嘗以好惡爲辨  也惟務全其所當全充其所當充則形雖  惡而物自以爲最此哀駘它能使人心之  願從而魯哀亦授之以國也 是何人者也仲尼曰丘也嘗使於楚矣適見 豚子食於其死母者少焉眴若皆棄之而走 不見己焉爾不得類焉爾  天之生人也均委之氣而同受之命非有
Interpretation

This passage recounts a story about Aitai Tuo from the Zhuangzi. Duke Ai of Lu once asked Confucius about a man from Wei named Aitai Tuo - though physically repulsive, men who associated with him became unwilling to leave his company, while women who met him preferred being his concubine over becoming another man's principal wife. Despite having no power, status, wealth, and possessing frightening features, he consistently drew both men and women to him. When Duke Ai summoned him, within a year he gained such trust that the duke considered entrusting the entire state to him. Aitai Tuo initially declined, eventually accepted briefly, then departed, leaving the duke disconsolate.

Zhuangzi explains that while Aitai Tuo's external form was ugly, his internal De (Virtue) was complete. Those who truly attain the Dao regard their physical bodies as temporary lodging houses, unattached to beauty or ugliness. When one cultivates inner De, even with an unattractive exterior, people will naturally be drawn to them. Just as piglets flee when they realize a dead sow no longer resembles their kind, what people truly connect with is the essential life force within, not external appearances.

Confucius elaborates further: Heaven endows all people with the same essential life nature, all composed of primordial Qi. What we love is the vital breath of life itself (referring to the inner Shen/spirit), not the external form. Just as people don't judge sacrificial offerings by their appearance when revering spirits, what truly matters is the internal De.

 私於聖賢而惡於凡常蓋聖賢能全其當  全正其所正故命之所以至而德之所以  充凡常不知其然而疑聖賢有異於人也  雖魯哀之國君不知哀駘之所充而以爲  有異人也是以問於仲尼焉 所愛其母者非愛其形也愛使其形者也  夫德之充者非求合於物而物自來合物  之所以來合者非愛其形而愛其德也故  曰愛使其形也 戰而死者其人之葬也不以翣資刖者之屨 無爲愛之皆無其本矣爲天子之諸御不爪 翦不穿耳取妻者止於外不得復使形全猶 足以爲爾而況全德之人乎今哀駘它未言 而信無功而親使人授己國惟恐其不受也 是必才全而德不形者也哀公曰何謂才全 仲尼曰死生存亡窮達貧富賢與不肖毁譽 饑渴寒暑是事之變命之行也日夜相代乎 前而知不能規乎其始者也故不足以滑和 不可入於靈府使之和豫通而不失於兊使 日夜無卻而與物爲春是接而生時於心者 也是之謂才全何謂德不形曰平者水停之 盛也其可以爲法也内保之而外不蕩也德 者成和之脩也德不形者物不能離也哀公 異日以告閔子曰始也吾以南面而君天下 執民之紀而憂其死吾自以爲至通矣今吾 聞至人之言恐吾無其實輕用吾身而亡吾 國吾與孔丘非君臣也德友而已矣  至人之所以爲至人者以其才全也才者
Interpretation

People often favor sages while disliking ordinary folk, because sages fully follow the Dao of Heaven. They maintain their own purity, so celestial mandate naturally descends upon them, and their De (Virtue/Power) naturally overflows. Ordinary people don't understand this principle, always suspecting sages must possess some extraordinary quality. Like Duke Ai of Lu—though a ruler himself—couldn't comprehend the inner cultivation of Aitai Tuo (a man of great virtue), thinking him peculiar, which is why he consulted Confucius.

One who truly loves their mother loves not her outward appearance, but the inner spirit that gives her form. Those whose De is complete need not deliberately conform to external things—external things are naturally drawn to them. When things come close, it's not their physical form that's loved, but their De. Hence it's said, "What is loved is the spirit that gives form."

Those who die in battle aren't buried with feathers adorning their coffins; those who've had their feet cut off don't cherish their former shoes—because these have already lost their root. The maidservants of the Son of Heaven don't trim their nails or pierce their ears; married men halt their steps outside the palace—all to preserve the wholeness of the body. If physical wholeness is so important, how much more so for one whose De is complete? Now, Aitai Tuo gains trust without speaking, is loved without merit, even to the point where people would entrust their state to him. This must be what it means to have "perfect talent and De that does not show."

Duke Ai of Lu asked what "perfect talent" meant. Confucius replied: Life and death, success and failure, wealth and poverty, worthiness and unworthiness, slander and praise, hunger and thirst, the changes of cold and heat—these are all transformations of things, the workings of celestial mandate. They alternate day and night, yet wisdom cannot glimpse their source. Therefore, they should not disturb the harmony within, nor be allowed to invade the heart. One must maintain tranquil joy, remain unimpeded without losing delight, day and night unceasingly dwelling with all things in the harmony of spring. This state—where the heart senses the changes of the seasons yet preserves harmony—is called "perfect talent."

As for "De that does not show," it is like still water at its most placid, which can serve as a mirror's standard. When inner stillness is maintained, the exterior does not stir. De is the cultivation that achieves harmony; "De that does not show" means De does not manifest outwardly, yet nothing can escape its influence. Later, Duke Ai said to Minzi: "Originally, I thought ruling as king, governing the people, and worrying over life and death were the highest wisdom. But now, having heard the words of the ultimate person (one of supreme virtue), I fear my name exceeds reality, and reckless action would lead to the state's ruin. My relationship with Confucius is not that of ruler and minister—we are friends bound by De."

The reason ultimate persons become ultimate is that they possess perfect talent and De. "Talent" refers to...

 性命之妙理惟至人能以不全而全之全  之然後盡之也全盡於性命之理則死生  存亡窮達貧富之變了然不以汩于中陰  陽之更運宵晝之迭遷冥然不務度其始  事變不足滑其和憂喜不足動其神豫然  悦懌而日夜忘變之至故與物應對而復  感而遂通所謂才全而已矣故曰是之謂  才全才全者性命之理不虧也性命之理  旣不虧則德之所以充也德之充者非有  意於充如停水非有意於平也故曰平者  水停之盛也夫德之充者物自以爲最而  水之平者人取以爲法故曰其可以爲法  也然德之充者内有其所守而外無其所  放寂然無迹而物所以歸嚮故曰内保之  而外不蕩又曰德不形者物不離也此至  妙之理而非聖人不能以知之雖知不能  以言之故魯哀得聞而不敢臣於聖人也  故曰吾與孔丘非君臣也德友而已矣 闉跂支離無脤說衛靈公靈公說之而視全 人其脰肩肩甕㼜大癭說齊桓公桓公說之 而視全人其脰肩肩故德有所長而形有所 忘  闉跂者言其忘行支離者言其忘形無脤  者言其忘智故忘行則所以無迹忘形則  所以忘我忘智則所以無知無迹則泯然  絶世無我則渾然同物無知則泊然無爲  故德之所以充也此莊子製名而寓意夫  斯人也其形如此而其德有所長故說衛
Interpretation

This scripture explores the relationship between "the principles of nature and life" (the profound mysteries of life's essence) and "De" (inner cultivation). Those who truly attain the Dao can achieve inner completeness amidst imperfect appearances. When one fully comprehends the principles of nature and life, they transcend the influences of worldly fluctuations like life and death, wealth and poverty.

The alternation of Yin-Yang, the cycle of day and night—these natural transformations are not deliberately pondered by the Dao-realized regarding their origins. External disturbances cannot disrupt their inner peace, nor can joy or anger shake their spirit. They dwell in ease and contentment, maintaining a transcendent state day and night. Though interacting with all things, they preserve their original nature—this is what is called "perfect talent" (comprehensive ability). Those with perfect talent do not violate the principles of nature and life, and their De naturally overflows. Like still water that levels itself, De is not something forcefully pursued.

Those whose De overflows naturally become exemplars for all things. Just as calm water is taken as a standard by people, such individuals hold firm within while showing no outward traces. Silent and formless, yet all things gravitate toward them. This embodies the principle of "preserving within while not displaying outwardly" and "De that shows no form yet keeps all things from departing." Such profound truths can only be truly understood by sages—even when grasped, they are difficult to articulate.

The text cites two examples: Yuǎnqí Zhīlí (a hunchbacked cripple) without lips persuaded Duke Ling of Wei, while Dàyǐng (a man with a neck tumor) convinced Duke Huan of Qi. This illustrates that when one's De is extraordinary, people forget their physical flaws. "Forgetting conduct" means leaving no traces, "forgetting form" is transcending one's physical self, and "forgetting wisdom" is reaching a state beyond thought. Thus, one becomes unified with all things, naturally practicing Wuwei (non-action)—this is the manifestation of overflowing De. Through these physically imperfect yet morally lofty figures, Zhuangzi demonstrates that true value lies in inner cultivation rather than external appearance.

 靈公則靈公悦之而忘其形說齊桓公則  桓公亦悦而忘其形斯人也非有異於人  也蓋能全其所當全忘其所當忘全忘之  外雖有役性之物則不足爲其累也故曰  甕㼜大癭又曰德有所長而形有所忘也 人不忘其所忘而忘其所不忘此謂誠忘  夫形者天之所委也德者我之自得也蓋  天之所委者一氣之暫聚我之自得者萬  物不能役豈可愛一氣之暫聚而忘萬物  不能役之之妙乎惟至人内不忘其不當  忘而外忘其所當忘故才全而所以德不  形所謂誠忘而已矣故曰人不忘其所忘  而忘其所不忘此之謂誠忘 故聖人有所遊而知爲孽約爲膠德爲接工 爲商聖人不謀惡用知不斷惡用膠無喪惡 用德不貨惡用商四者天鬻也天鬻也者天 食也旣受命於天又惡用人  故聖人有所遊者所謂乗物以遊心也乗  物以遊心則處於無爲之境而任其自然  之理雖知約德工皆非我有而我惡用哉  然我之惡用於四者皆天之所付於人而  養於人我惡可廢廢則滅天而已矣旣不  可廢又不可益益則助天而已矣滅天則  致累助天則反害如此則天人安得和同  歟惟聖人不廢不益矣故曰旣受食於天  又惡用人 有人之形無人之情有人之形故羣於人無 人之情故是非不得於身眇乎小哉所以屬 於人也謷乎大哉獨成其天
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist dialectical relationship between "form" (形) and "De" (德, Virtue/Power). The reason why Duke Ling and Duke Huan could forget their physical forms was because they preserved what should be preserved (their De) and forgot what should be forgotten (their forms). Beyond preservation and forgetting, even things that might tempt ordinary minds could not burden them. Just as a large jar can accommodate a massive growth, when a person's De is extraordinary, others forget their physical imperfections.

The human form is but a temporary gathering of Qi (气, vital energy) bestowed by heaven, while De is cultivated through one's own efforts. The physical form granted by heaven will eventually disperse, but the self-cultivated De cannot be enslaved by external things. The true sage (至人) never forgets internally what should not be forgotten—their De—yet externally forgets what should be forgotten—their form. Thus they preserve their heavenly nature while keeping their De from being outwardly displayed.

Sages transcend worldly conventions, regarding cleverness as calamity, restraints as shackles, virtuous acts as transactions, and skillfulness as commerce. Sages don't strategize, so they need no cleverness; they don't divide, so they need no restraints; they lose nothing, so they need no virtuous transactions; they don't trade, so they need no commercial skills. These four things are all bestowed by nature (天鬻). Since they receive their mandate from heaven, why should human intervention be necessary?

Sages can "ride things to let their hearts wander freely"—following external phenomena while allowing their spirits to roam unimpeded. They dwell in the state of Wuwei (无为, non-action), conforming to natural principles. Though they understand that restraints, virtuous acts, and skills don't truly belong to them, they cannot completely discard these, for they represent heaven's way of sustaining human existence. Neither abolishing nor excessively pursuing them, sages find the balance—abolition would defy nature, while excess would disturb it. Only sages achieve this perfect equilibrium.

Ultimately, they possess human form without human selfishness. Having human form allows them to live among people; lacking human selfishness keeps them untroubled by judgments of right and wrong. From the worldly perspective they appear insignificant, yet from the heavenly Dao's view they are great—for they commune solely with the spirit of heaven and earth.

 有人之形者所謂塊然同類也無人之情  者所謂寂然無爲也同類所以能羣而不  能異無爲所以無是而無非故曰有人之  形無人之情有人之形故羣於人無人之  情故是非不得於身故形雖眇而皆視以  爲人德已充而不虧其全矣故曰眇乎小  哉所以屬於人也謷乎大哉獨成其天此  闉跂支離無脤之所長也 惠子謂莊子曰人故無情乎莊子曰然惠子 曰人而無情何以謂之人莊子曰道與之貌 天與之形惡得不謂之人惠子曰旣謂之人 惡得無情莊子曰是非吾所謂情也吾所謂 無情者言人之不以好惡内傷其身常因自 然而不益生也惠子曰不益生何以有其身 莊子曰道與之貌天與之形無以好惡内傷 其身今子外乎子之神勞乎子之精倚樹而 吟據槁梧而瞑天選子之形子以堅白鳴  夫情者性之害也人之生則貌出於道而  形受於天皆正正而已矣惟情戕害其正  正而正正所以不正矣惠子不知其然而  以爲人而無情何以謂之人故莊子答之  以不以好惡傷其身又曰常因自然而不  益生夫好惡生於情而害於身有好惡則  以生爲不足而欲其過度而益也過度而  益則外役於物役於物則用神神大用則  疲疲則有所感感而不已則昏瞑而已矣  如此則見役於造化而不能與萬物爲一
Interpretation

This dialogue explores the distinction between "human form" and "human disposition." Zhuangzi posits that merely possessing human physicality (being lumpishly similar in appearance) is superficial, while what truly matters is maintaining a state of "non-attachment" (serenely practicing wuwei). By "non-attachment," he doesn't mean the absence of emotion, but rather not allowing personal preferences to harm one's innate nature, following spontaneity without forced striving.

Zhuangzi explains that human appearance is bestowed by the Dao, while physical form is generated by Heaven—this alone suffices to be called human. True non-attachment means not letting personal likes and dislikes disturb inner tranquility, nor exhausting one's shen (spirit) through excessive desires. His interlocutor Huishi fails to grasp this, insisting that without emotions one cannot be considered human.

Zhuangzi observes that relentless pursuit of external things exhausts the spirit, ultimately enslaving people to the creations of nature and preventing unity with all things. He criticizes Huishi for wasting his days debating propositions like "hardness and whiteness," draining his vital energy as pointlessly as someone singing while leaning against a dead tree or napping against a withered parasol tree. True cultivation means preserving the integrity of heavenly nature unharmed by passions—only then can one attain the grand state of harmony with the Dao.

The mention of "Yinqi Zhili Wushen" (the lame, hunchbacked, lipless man) exemplifies Zhuangzi's recurring motif: those with physical imperfections who maintain inner wholeness can still fulfill their heavenly nature. This illustrates Zhuangzi's principle of "the tally of inner virtue's fullness"—the plenitude of inner De (virtue/power) matters more than external form.

 所以惑於堅白同異也故曰今子外乎子  之神勞乎子之精倚樹而吟據梧而瞑天  選子之形以堅白鳴夫聖人之所爲守其  正正而全其當全不任智不用神廓然與  造化同體而以萬物爲一安所措其情哉  此惠子不知聖人之如此也夫莊子作  德充之篇始之以王駘次之以申徒嘉  又次之以叔山此三人者皆德充而形不完也  故申徒不及王駘叔山不及申徒故第降  一等而言之矣至于哀駘闉跂支離無脤  者亦皆德充而形至惡也又第降一等而  言之與人間世之篇次序相同矣夫不完  至惡者皆外也外雖如此而内充其德  則物爲之最而自求合也物自來合則  是是萬物與我爲一也又何必措情於  其間哉所以終於惠子之問情此莊  
Interpretation

This passage elucidates Zhuangzi's profound insights on the relationship between inner virtue (De) and external form. The text critiques Hui Shi (Master Hui) for exhausting his spirit in logical debates like "hardness and whiteness, similarity and difference," while true sages who embody the Dao maintain inner purity, refrain from contrived cleverness, and merge with the creative forces of nature, perceiving all things as an indivisible whole—thus having no need to deliberately cultivate emotional bonds.

In the chapter "The Sign of Virtue Complete" (De Chong Fu), Zhuangzi employs three characters—Wang Tai, Shentu Jia, and Shushan Wuzhi—each physically impaired yet brimming with inner virtue, to illustrate that despite their imperfect forms, their consummate De naturally draws others to them. Later, figures like Aitai Tuo and Yinqi Zhili Wushen (a hunchbacked, lipless cripple), even more grotesque in appearance, similarly command respect due to their inner moral plenitude.

The author notes these examples are arranged hierarchically: Wang Tai represents the highest attainment, followed by Shentu Jia, then Shushan Wuzhi, and finally those with the most severe deformities. Yet regardless of physical flaws, when inner virtue is complete, all things spontaneously harmonize with such individuals—embodying the realm where "the ten thousand things and I are one." Through this layered progression, Zhuangzi ultimately responds to Hui Shi's question about "emotional bonds," clarifying that true Dao-realized individuals need not artificially manage relationships, for the power of consummate virtue naturally transforms all existence.

子立言盡道如是也 南華眞經新傳卷之四

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0136); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 3 Vol. 5 →