中文 · EN

《莊子注》Vol. 6

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 6 / 10 13,130 characters

About this page. The original text of 《莊子注》 Vol. 6 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 27 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《莊子注》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

欽定四庫全書  莊子注卷六       晉 郭象 注   刻意第十五(音義曰以/義名篇) 刻意尚行離世異俗髙論怨誹為亢而已矣此山谷之 士非世之人枯槁赴淵者之所好也語仁義忠信恭儉 推讓為修而已矣此平世之士教誨之人逰居學者之 所好也語大功立大名禮君臣正上下為治而已矣此 朝廷之士尊主彊國之人致功并兼者之所好也就藪 澤處閒曠釣魚閒處無為而已矣此江海之士避世之 人閒暇者之所好也吹呴呼吸吐故納新熊經鳥申為 夀而已矣此道引之士養形之人彭祖夀考者之所好 也(此數子者所好不同恣具所好各之其方亦所以為/逍遙也然此僅各自得焉能靡所不樹哉若夫使萬) (物各得其分而不自失者故當付之無所執為也○枯/槁若鮑焦介推赴淵若申徒狄熊經若熊之攀𣗳而引) (氣也鳥申若鳥之/嚬呻也道音導)若夫不刻意而高無仁義而脩無功 名而治無江海而閒不道引而夀(所謂/自然)無不㤀也無不 有也(㤀故能有若有之則不能救其㤀矣/故有者非有之而有也忘而有之也)澹然無極而 衆美從之(若厲已以為之則不/能無極而衆惡生)此天地之道聖人之德 也(不為萬物而萬物自生者天地也/不為百行而百行自成者聖人也)故曰夫恬淡寂漠
Interpretation

This passage presents Guo Xiang's commentary on the Zhuangzi chapter "Deliberate Action," examining the hierarchical differences between various life attitudes.

The opening enumerates five approaches to life: The first are recluses who withdraw to mountain forests, cynical about the world, deliberately pursuing purity while criticizing secular society. The second are scholars who promote humaneness (Ren) and virtue (De), devoted to self-cultivation and moral instruction. The third are court officials who seek fame and uphold ritual laws. The fourth are those who retreat to lakes and rivers, fishing and wandering in idleness. The fifth are longevity practitioners who train in breathing techniques and mimic animal movements, like Peng Zu pursuing extended lifespan.

Guo Xiang observes that all these individuals cling to specific pursuits. While each attains a certain level of accomplishment, none reaches the highest state. The supreme state is one of "non-deliberation" (Wuwei) — achieving natural nobility without striving for purity, embodying self-cultivation without preaching humaneness, governing effectively without chasing fame, enjoying leisure without physical seclusion, and attaining longevity without practicing Daoyin exercises.

The true way of sages is "serenely boundless" — maintaining a mind of tranquil detachment, deliberately pursuing nothing yet naturally embodying all virtues. Just as heaven and earth don't deliberately create yet all things grow spontaneously, sages don't consciously cultivate virtue (De) yet their moral perfection arises naturally. This realm of "quietude and profound stillness" represents the highest state in harmony with the natural Dao of heaven and earth.

虚無無為此天地之平而道德之質也(非夫寂漠無為/也則危其平而) (喪其/質也)故曰聖人休休焉則平易矣(休乎恬淡寂漠息乎/虚無無為則雖歴乎) (險阻之變常/平易而無難)平易則恬惔矣(患難生於有為有為亦生/於患難故平易恬淡交相) (成/也)平易恬淡則憂患不能入邪氣不能襲(泯然與正/理俱徃)故其 德全而神不虧(夫不平不淡者豈唯傷其/形哉神德並喪於内也)故曰聖人之生 也天行(任自然/而運動)其死也物化(蛻然無/所係)靜而與隂同德動 而與陽同波(動靜無心而/付之隂陽也)不為福先不為禍始感而後 應(無所/唱也)迫而後動(㑹至/乃動)不得已而後起(任理而起吾/不得已也)去 知與故循天之理(天理自然知故/無為乎其間)故無天災(災生於/違天)無 物累(累生/逆物)無人非(與人同者/衆必是焉)無鬼責(同於自得/故無責)其生若 浮其死若休(汎然無/所惜也)不思慮(付之/天理)不豫謀(理至/而應)光矣而 不耀(用天下之自/光非吾耀也)信矣而不期(用天下之自/信非吾期也)其寢不夢 其覺無憂其神純粹(一無/所欲)其魂不罷(有欲乃疲/○罷音皮)虚無恬
Interpretation

Emptiness and non-action (Wuwei) constitute the fundamental principle of heaven and earth's operation, and represent the essential nature of the Dao. (If one fails to maintain this state of empty tranquility and non-action, the natural balance will be disrupted, and the essence of Dao will be lost.) Therefore, when sages abide in emptiness and stillness, they attain a state of serene simplicity. (Dwelling in quietude and emptiness, resting in the realm of non-action, even when facing adversity and change, they maintain equanimity without perceiving difficulty.)

Serene simplicity naturally leads to detached contentment. (All worldly troubles stem from artificial striving, which in turn begets more troubles—thus simplicity and detachment are mutually reinforcing.) Maintaining this serene and detached state of mind prevents worries from penetrating and harmful energies (Qi) from invading. (One becomes completely unified with the true Dao.) In this way, one preserves their Virtue (De) and keeps their spirit (Shen) undiminished. (Those who fail to maintain this serenity and detachment not only harm their physical bodies but also lose their inner spirit and Virtue.)

Thus, sages in life follow nature's course (acting in complete accordance with natural laws), and in death merge with all things (like a cicada shedding its shell, utterly unburdened). In stillness, they harmonize with the virtue of Yin (existing in quiet resonance with yin energy), and in movement, they resonate with the waves of Yang (moving in synchrony with yang energy). They neither deliberately seek blessings nor invite misfortune, responding only when stimulated by external things (never initiating action arbitrarily), acting only when compelled (moving when the time is ripe), and rising only when absolutely necessary (acting in accordance with heavenly principles, not personal desires).

Abandoning cleverness and artificiality, they follow natural laws (the Dao operates spontaneously, requiring no human interference), and thus avoid natural disasters (calamities arise from defying cosmic order), remain unburdened by material things (suffering comes from resisting external reality), face no criticism from others (being of one mind with the multitude, they naturally gain acceptance), and incur no blame from spirits (aligned with their innate nature, they are beyond reproach). In life, they drift like duckweed on water (free from attachment), and in death, they rest like one retiring to sleep (serene and unburdened). They neither exhaust themselves with thought (entrusting all to cosmic principles) nor plan in advance (responding naturally when events arise). Radiant yet not dazzling (illuminating through the inherent light of all things, not self-display), trustworthy yet not contrived (earning trust through natural accord, not coercion). Dreamless in sleep, untroubled upon waking, their spirit (Shen) remains pure and untainted (utterly free from selfish desires), their soul never wearied (fatigue arises only from desire). This state of empty tranquility and detachment is the truest embodiment of the Dao's nature.

淡乃合天德(乃與天地合/恬淡之德也)故曰悲樂者德之邪喜怒者 道之過好惡者德之失故心不憂樂德之至也(至德常/適故情) (無所/槩)一而不變靜之至也(静而一者/不可變也)無所於忤虛之至 也(其心豁然⬤盡/乃無纎介之違)不與物交淡之至也(物自來耳至淡/者無交物之情) 無所於逆粹之至也(若雜乎濁欲/則有所不順)故曰形勞而不休則 弊精用而不已則勞勞則竭(物皆有當/不可失也)水之性不雜則 清莫動則平欝閉而不流亦不能清天德之象也(象天/德者) (無心而/皆㑹也)故曰純粹而不雜(無非至當/之事也)靜一而不變(常在/當上) 淡而無為(與㑹俱/而已矣)動而以天行(若夫逐欲而/動人行也)此養神之 道也夫有干越之劒者柙而藏之不敢用也寳之至也 (况敢輕用其神乎○吳有谿名干谿越/有山名若耶並出善銅鑄為名劒也)精神四達並流 無所不極上際於天下蟠於地(夫體天地之極應萬物/之數以為精神者故若) (是矣若是而有落天地之/功者任天行耳非輕用也)化育萬物不可為象(所育/無方)其 名為同帝(同天帝/之不為)純素之道唯神是守守而勿失與神
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core principles of Daoist mental cultivation. Only by maintaining a detached and tranquil state of mind can one harmonize with the Dao (the Way) of heaven and earth. Excessive sorrow or joy both violate natural authenticity—emotional fluctuations disrupt the movement of the great Dao, while personal preferences erode the purity of De (Virtue/Power).

The truly virtuous person never sinks into worry or delight within, abiding constantly in serene concentration—the highest realm of self-cultivation. The mind remains empty and unobstructed, free from forced entanglement with external matters, preserving absolute purity without distraction. Like water that stays clear when unmixed and calm when undisturbed, yet loses vitality if completely sealed from flow, this mirrors the operating principles of celestial Dao.

The purest state is a mind utterly unclouded by thoughts, abiding in stillness without change, detached and practicing Wuwei (non-action). In action, one follows natural rhythms rather than chasing desires. This constitutes the true art of nurturing Shen (spirit). Just as precious swords like Ganjiang and Moye must be carefully stored rather than recklessly used, so too must human spirit be treasured and cultivated.

When spirit permeates all directions without obstruction, it ascends to heaven and descends to earth, nurturing all things without leaving traces. This state is called "being one with the Sovereign"—identical to the Wuwei of the Celestial Emperor. The essence of pristine simplicity lies in safeguarding the primordial Shen (the innate authentic spirituality), preserving it without loss until achieving complete unity with it.

為一(常以純素守乎至寂/而不蕩於外則㝠也)一之精通合于天倫(精者物/之真也) 野語有之曰衆人重利廉士重名賢士尚志聖人貴精 (與神為一非守神也不逺其精/非貴精也然其迹則貴守之)故素也者謂其無所與 雜也純也者謂其不虧其神也(苟以不虧為純則雖百/行同舉萬變參備乃至) (純也茍以不雜為素則雖龍章鳯姿粹乎有非常之觀/乃至素也若不能保其自然之質而親乎外飾則雖犬) (羊之鞟庸得/謂之純素哉)能體純素謂之真人   繕性第十六 繕性於俗學以求復其初(已治性於俗矣而欲以俗學/復性命之本所以求者愈非) (其道/也)滑欲於俗思以求致其明(已亂其心於俗而方復/役思以求明思之愈精) (失之/愈逺)謂之蔽蒙之民(若夫發蒙者必離/俗去欲而後幾焉)古之治道者以 恬養知(恬靜而後知不蕩知/不蕩而性不失也)生而無以知為也謂之以 知養恬(夫無以知為而任其自知則/雖知周萬物而恬然自得也)知與恬交相養而 和理出其性(知而非為則無害於恬恬而自為則無傷/於知斯可謂交相飬矣二者交相飬則和) (理之分豈/出他哉)夫德和也道理也(和故無不得/道故無不理)德無不容仁
Interpretation

This passage from the Zhuangzi discusses how practitioners of the Dao maintain their authentic nature and return to a state of natural harmony. The concept of "being one" refers to sustaining a pure and simple state of mind, free from external disturbances, thereby achieving profound spiritual concentration. This purified mental state aligns with the patterns of nature (heavenly principles), because "Jing" (essence) represents the most authentic substance of all things.

There is a popular saying: Ordinary people value material gain, the refined esteem reputation, the virtuous admire aspirations, but sages treasure spiritual purity above all. The term "valuing Jing" here does not mean consciously maintaining a mental state, but rather not straying from one's innate nature. "Plainness" (su) means remaining untainted by external influences, while "purity" (chun) denotes preserving one's spiritual integrity without depletion. A person may appear as splendidly adorned as dragon scales or phoenix feathers, yet if their inner core remains uncontaminated, they can still be called "plain." Conversely, if one loses their natural disposition while chasing superficial embellishments—like dressing dogs or sheep in ornate furs—they cannot be considered truly pure. Those who attain this state of plain purity are called "authentic persons" (zhenren), or realized beings who have attained the Dao.

In Chapter 16, "Mending the Nature," Zhuangzi critiques conventional approaches to self-cultivation: attempting to repair one's innate nature (xing) through worldly learning in hopes of returning to one's original state is like trying to cleanse something by soiling it; seeking enlightenment through mundane reasoning to pacify desires only leads one further from the Dao the more one deliberates. Such people are called "the obscured and deluded masses." True wisdom arises only by distancing oneself from worldly concerns and desires.

Ancient Daoist practitioners nurtured wisdom through serenity (yi tian yang zhi), for only with inner stillness could genuine knowledge be attained without losing one's fundamental nature. Simultaneously, they used wisdom to nourish serenity (yi zhi yang tian), avoiding forced pursuit of knowledge and instead following natural spontaneity. Thus, even while comprehending all things, they maintained profound detachment. When wisdom and serenity mutually sustain each other, harmony and natural order spontaneously emerge from one's innate nature. What we call "De" (Virtue/Power) is this harmony, and the "Dao" (Way) is this inherent order. Those who reach this state embody virtue that embraces all things and benevolence that extends universally.

也(無不容者非為仁/也而仁迹行焉)道無不理義也(無不理者非為義/也而義功著焉) 義明而物親忠也(若夫義明而不/由忠則物愈疎)中純實而反乎情樂 也(仁義發中而還任本懐則志得矣/志得矣其迹則樂矣○樂音洛)信行容體而順乎 文禮也(信行容體而順乎自然/之節文者其迹則禮也)禮樂徧行則天下亂矣 (以一體之所復一志之所樂行/之天下則一方得而萬方失也)彼正而蒙已德德則不 冐冐則物必失其性也(各正性命而自蒙已德則不以/此冐彼也若以此冐彼安得不) (失其/性哉)古之人在混芒之中與一世而得澹漠焉當是時 也隂陽和靜鬼神不擾四時得節萬物不傷羣生不夭 人雖有知無所用之(任其自/然而已)此之謂至一當是時也莫 之為而常自然(物皆自然/故至一也)逮德下衰(夫德之所以下衰/者由聖人不維世) (則在上者不能無為而羨/無為之迹故致斯弊也)及燧人伏戯始為天下是故 順而不一(世已失一或不可解故/釋而不推順之而已)德又下衰及神農黄 帝始為天下是故安而不順(安之於其/所安而已)德又下衰及唐 虞始為天下興治化之流□淳散朴(聖人無心任世之/自成成之淳朴皆)
Interpretation

Here Zhuangzi expounds on the relationship between the Dao (the Way) and human-created moral codes. The true Dao embraces all things without deliberately pursuing benevolence, yet expressions of benevolence naturally manifest; the Dao itself governs without conscious effort, yet the effects of governance spontaneously appear. When people comprehend moral principles intellectually but not from their essential nature, they instead become estranged from all existence. Only when one's inner being is pure and authentic, returning to original nature, can true joy be attained.

External demonstrations of sincerity and ritual propriety should align with natural disposition. Forcing uniform standards of rites and music upon the world will paradoxically create disorder, as such measures may satisfy a few while violating the innate nature of the majority. The correct approach is to let all things maintain their inherent qualities rather than imposing one's own standards upon others.

In ancient times, people lived in primordial simplicity, free from worldly contention. Then, Yin and Yang were harmoniously balanced, spirits caused no disturbances, the seasons followed their natural order, and all beings coexisted peacefully. Though humans possessed wisdom, they had no need to use it—everything operated spontaneously in what is called the state of "perfect unity." Later, Dao and De (Virtue/Power) gradually declined. Beginning with Suiren and Fuxi's attempts to govern the world, they could only accommodate but not unify; by the time of Shennong and the Yellow Emperor, they could pacify but not accommodate; until the Yao and Shun era, when the widespread promotion of moral instruction caused the dissipation of primal simplicity.

Zhuangzi maintains that ideal governance should emulate the ancient state of "perfect unity," allowing all things to develop naturally rather than constraining innate nature with artificial moral codes. This philosophy embodies the Daoist core principle of "governing through Wuwei (non-action)."

(非聖也聖能任世之自得耳豈能使世得聖哉故皇王/之迹與世俱遷而聖人之道未始不全也○□古堯反) (本亦/作澆)離道以善(善者過於適之稱/故有善而道不全)險德以行(行者違性/而行之故) (行立而/德不夷)然後去性而從於心(以心自役/則性去也)心與心識(彼我/之心) (競為先識無/復任性也)知而不足以定天下(忘知任性/斯乃定也)然後附之 以文益之以博文滅質博溺心(文博者心/質之飾也)然後民始惑 亂無以反其性情而復其初(初謂性/命之本)由是觀之世喪道 矣道喪世矣世與道交相喪也(夫道以不貴故能存世/然世存則貴之貴之道) (斯喪矣道不能使世不貴而世/亦不能不貴於道故交相喪也)道之人何由興乎世世 亦何由興乎道哉(若不貴乃/交相興也)道無以興乎世世無以興 乎道雖聖人不在山林之中其德隱矣(今所以不隱由/其有情以興也) (何由而興/由無貴也)隱故不自隱(若夫自隱而用物則道世/交相興矣何隱之有哉)古之 所謂隱士者非伏其身而弗見也非閉其言而不出也 非藏其知而不發也時命大謬也(莫知反一以息迹而/逐迹以求一愈得迹)
Interpretation

This passage examines the relationship between sages and worldly society. The true sage (one who has attained the Dao) does not deliberately strive to become a sage, but rather follows the natural patterns of all things in the world. The achievements of ancient sage-kings like Yao and Shun may change with the times, yet the Dao of sages remains complete and unchanging.

When people deviate from the great Dao to pursue so-called "goodness" (referring to excessive perfectionism), making virtue (De) artificially difficult and unnatural, they lose their innate nature and become enslaved by intellectual constructs. As people compete and vie for superiority through mental calculations, such activities ultimately fail to bring stability to the world.

Furthermore, when elaborate rituals, ornate decorations, and extensive knowledge are employed as embellishments, they obscure the original simplicity of nature and drown out the true heart-mind. Consequently, people become confused and disordered, unable to return to their primal state of purity. Thus we see how worldly society loses the Dao, and how the Dao withdraws from worldly society—the two become mutually estranged.

Those who truly attain the Dao never deliberately display themselves. Even while dwelling in the mundane world, they do not conspicuously manifest virtue (refraining from artificial demonstrations). The ancient so-called recluses (spiritual practitioners) did not necessarily retreat to mountain forests, remain silent, or conceal their wisdom. Rather, they returned to the source because the fortunes of their era had become disordered. They understood: the more one chases after external forms, the farther one strays from the true Dao.

(Note: In this text, "Dao" refers to natural law and ultimate truth; "De" denotes qualities aligned with the Dao; "mind" indicates the discriminating consciousness formed through conditioning; while "nature" refers to humanity's innate purity.)

(愈失一斯大謬矣雖復起身以明之開言以出/之顯知以發之何由而交興哉祗所以交喪也)當時命 而大行乎天下(此澹漠/之時也)則反一無迹(反任物性而物/性自一故無迹)不 當時命而大窮乎天下(此不能澹/漠之時也)則深根寧極而待(雖/有) (事之世而聖人未始不澹漠也故深根寧/極而待其自為耳斯道之所以不喪也)此存身之道 也(未有身存而/世不興者也)古之存身者不以辯飾知(任其真/知而已)不以 知窮天下(此澹泊/之情也)不以知窮德(守其自/得而已)危然處其所而 反其性已又何為哉(危然獨/正之貌)道固不小行(遊於/坦途)德固不 小識(塊然/大通)小識傷德小行傷道故曰正己而已矣樂全 之謂得志(自得其志獨使其心而無哀樂之情/斯樂之全者也○樂音洛下皆同)古之所 謂得志者非軒冕之謂也謂其無以益其樂而已矣(全/其) (内而/足)今之所謂得志者軒冕之謂也軒冕在身非性命 也物之儻來寄也寄之其來不可圉其去不可止(在外/物耳) (得失之/非我也)故不為軒冕肆志(淡然自若不/覺寄之在身)不為窮約趨俗 (曠然而得不/覺及之在身)其樂彼與此同(彼此謂軒/冕與窮約)故無憂而已矣
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist wisdom of self-cultivation. When one aligns with heavenly mandate and comprehends the world (a state of serene detachment), one should return to original simplicity without leaving traces, allowing all things to develop naturally without interference. When facing adversity and hardship (a state where serenity cannot be maintained), one should remain inwardly tranquil like a great tree deepening its roots, awaiting the natural arrival of opportunity (even amidst turmoil, sages maintain their serenity, thus preserving their foundation while awaiting change—this illustrates the indestructible principle of the Dao).

The essential method of self-preservation lies in this: the ancients who excelled at preserving themselves never used clever arguments to flaunt wisdom (maintaining innate wisdom suffices), never employed cunning to force worldly affairs (this is the realm of detachment), nor used intellectual knowledge to forcibly perfect virtue (simply safeguarding one's natural disposition). They dwell peacefully in themselves, returning to their original nature—why engage in deliberate action?

The Dao fundamentally isn't constrained by trivial behaviors (walking the broad path), and true De (Virtue) doesn't reside in petty cleverness (being wholly united with the Dao). Petty cleverness damages De, while rigid adherence to minor details injures the Dao. Thus, rectifying oneself is sufficient—complete preservation of one's joyful nature constitutes true fulfillment.

What the ancients called "fulfillment" didn't refer to high rank and wealth (xuānmiǎn denoting officials' carriages and regalia), but rather that state of perfect contentment where inner joy cannot be increased. Modern people's "fulfillment" exclusively means obtaining official positions. These external things aren't life's essence—they're merely temporary possessions that come by chance. Their arrival cannot be prevented, nor their departure detained (gain and loss belong to external things, unrelated to the true self).

Therefore, don't let official positions inflate your aspirations (maintain detachment, not feeling burdened by externals), nor conform to vulgar customs due to poverty (remain transcendentally content, not feeling oppressed by hardship). Maintaining equal joy whether in wealth or poverty brings freedom from care.

(亦無大歡/之喜也)今寄去則不樂由是觀之雖樂未嘗不荒也 (夫寄去則不樂者寄來/則荒矣斯以外易内也)故曰喪已於物失性於俗者謂 之倒置之民(營外虧内/其置倒也)   秋水第十七 秋水時至百川灌河涇流之大兩涘渚崖之間不辨牛 馬(言其廣也○秋水水生於春壯於秋白虎通云/水涯也⬤古亂反涇音經涇徑也直度曰徑)於是 焉河伯欣然自喜以天下之美為盡在已順流而東行 至於北海東面而視不見水端於是焉河伯始旋其面 目望洋向若而歎曰野語有之曰聞道百以為莫已若 者我之謂也且夫我嘗聞少仲尼之聞而輕伯夷之義 者始吾弗信今我睹子之難窮也吾非至於子之門則 殆矣吾長見笑於大方之家(知其小而不能自大則理/分有素⬤尚之情無為乎) (其間○河伯姓馮名夷一名水夷一名己見太宗師運/命篇一云姓吕名公子馮夷是公子之妻盡注忍反北) (海故云東海之北是也目盳莫剛反又音旁又音望本/亦作望洋音羊盳洋猶望洋仰視貌向若向音嚮許亮) (反若/海神)北海若曰井鼃不可以語於海者拘於虛也夏蟲 不可以語於氷者篤於時也曲士不可以語於道者束 於教也(夫物之所生而/安者趣各有極)今爾出於崖涘觀於大海乃知
Interpretation

This passage recounts a parable from the "Autumn Floods" chapter of the Zhuangzi, where a dialogue between the River God and the Ocean God illustrates the Daoist philosophy regarding the limitations of human perception.

When autumn floods swelled the rivers, countless tributaries poured into the Yellow River, broadening its waters so immensely that one could no longer distinguish oxen from horses on opposite banks. The River God, Hebo (also known as Fengyi), swelled with pride, believing all the world's grandeur was concentrated within his domain. Yet when he followed the current eastward to the Northern Sea (north of the Eastern Sea) and gazed toward the horizon, he found no end to the waters. Only then did he realize his own insignificance. Looking up at the Ocean God Ruo, he sighed: "There’s a saying—'Those who hear a few truths think no one surpasses them'—and it describes me perfectly! I once heard of people who belittled Confucius’ learning and scorned Boyi’s integrity, and at first, I didn’t believe it. But now that I see your boundless vastness, I understand how close I came to being mocked by those who truly embody the Dao (the Way)."

The Ocean God Ruo replied: "You can’t discuss the sea with a frog trapped in a well—it’s confined by its narrow space. You can’t talk of ice and snow with a summer insect—it’s bound by its fleeting season. You can’t speak of the Dao (the Way) with a provincial scholar—he’s shackled by rigid teachings. Now that you’ve left the banks of the Yellow River and witnessed the ocean, you’ve begun to grasp your own limitations."

This dialogue reveals how perception is constrained by environment, time, and education—much like Hebo’s initial complacency. Only by transcending these confines can one recognize a vaster truth.

爾醜爾將可與語大理矣(以其知分故/可與言理也)天下之水莫大 於海萬川歸之不知何時止而不盈尾閭泄之不知何 時已而不虚春秋不變水旱不知此其過江河之流不 可為量數而吾未嘗以此自多者自以比形於天地而 受氣於隂陽吾在於天地之間猶小石小木之在大山 也方存乎見少又奚以自多(窮百川之量而縣於海海/縣於天地則各有量也此) (發辭氣者有似乎觀大可以明小尋其意則不然夫世/之所患者不夷也故謂大者快然謂小者為無餘質小) (者塊然謂大者為至足是以上下夸跂俯仰自失此乃/生民之所惑也惑者求正正之者莫若先極其差而因) (其所謂大者至足也故秋毫無以累乎天地矣所謂小/者無餘也故天地無以過乎秋毫矣然後惑者有由而) (反各知其極物安其分逍遙者用其本步而逰乎自得/之場矣此莊子之所以發德音也若如惑者之説轉以) (小大相負則相傾者無窮矣若夫視大而不安其小視/少而自以為多将奔馳於勝負之境而助天民之矜夸) (豈達乎荘生之旨哉○/尾閭泄海水出外者也)計四海之在天地之間也不似 礨空之在大澤乎計中國之在海内不似稊米之在太 倉乎號物之數謂之萬人處一焉人卒九州榖食之所 生舟車之所通人處一焉此其比萬物也不似毫末之
Interpretation

When you recognize your own limitations, you can comprehend the great truth of the Dao (the Way). For understanding proper measure allows one to speak of principles. Among all waters under heaven, none surpass the sea in magnitude. Countless rivers flow into it, yet though they pour endlessly, it never overflows. The mythical Weilu (a legendary underwater drain) at the ocean's bottom continuously discharges water, yet though it drains ceaselessly, the sea never runs dry. Unaffected by the turning of spring, summer, autumn and winter, undisturbed by droughts or floods, its volume far exceeds that of the Yangtze and Yellow Rivers combined—so vast it defies calculation. Yet I never grow arrogant because of this, for I understand I am but a form bestowed by heaven and earth, a being coalesced from the Qi (vital energy) of Yin-Yang. Between heaven and earth, I'm like a tiny pebble or sapling upon a great mountain—so insignificant that I feel my understanding is minuscule. How then could I possibly become conceited?

(All rivers combined cannot match the sea's volume, yet even this sea is but a finite existence within heaven and earth. Superficially, this passage seems to suggest observing the great to understand the small, but its true meaning runs deeper. Ordinary people torment themselves over inequality, believing the great represents perfection while the small signifies deficiency. Consequently, the great grow smug while the small feel ashamed, caught in endless comparison that makes them lose themselves—this is the common person's confusion. To resolve this confusion, the best method is first perceiving the essence of size differences: what we call "great" is already complete, so adding a single hair wouldn't make heaven-earth heavier; what we call "small" isn't deficient either, so heaven-earth holds no superiority over a hair. Only then can confused individuals return to authenticity, each understanding their proper measure as all things abide in their natural roles. Those who wander freely live according to their nature, roaming joyfully in their self-contented worlds. This is Zhuangzi's true message. If one persists like the confused—believing sizes must be comparatively measured—they'll sink into endless competition. Seeing greatness and feeling small breeds anxiety; seeing smallness and feeling superior breeds arrogance. Thus exhausted by gains and losses, they fuel worldly vanity—how could this possibly align with Zhuangzi's intent?)

Consider the four seas within heaven and earth—aren't they like an ant's nest beside a vast lake? The Central States within the four seas—aren't they like a grain of rice in a giant granary? We speak of ten thousand categories of things, and humanity is but one among them. Where grain grows and boats travel across the nine continents, human settlements exist—yet compared to all things, doesn't humanity resemble a single hair on a horse's tail?

在於馬體乎(小大之辨各有等級不可相跂○礨力罪/反空音孔小穴也一云小封也稊徙兮反) (小米也爾/雅稊以稗)五帝之所連三王之所爭仁人之所憂任士 之所勞盡此矣(不出乎/一域)伯夷辭之以為名仲尼語之以 為博此其自多也不似爾向之自多於水乎(物有定域/雖至知不) (能出焉故起大小之差將/以申明至理之無辨也)河伯曰然則吾大天地而小 毫末可乎北海若曰否夫物量無窮(物物各/有量)時無止(死/與) (生皆/時行)分無常(得與生/皆分)終始無故(日新/也)是故大知觀於逺 近故小而不寡(各自/足也)大而不多(亦無/餘也)知量無窮(攬而觀/之知逺) (近大小之/物各有量)證曏今故(曏明也今/故猶古今)故遙而不悶(遙長/也)掇而 不跂(掇猶/短也)知時無止(證明古今知變化之不止於死生/也故不以長而挹悶短故為跂也) 察乎盈虗故得而不喜失而不憂知分之無常也(察其/一盈) (一虗則知分之不常於/得也故能忘其憂喜)明乎坦途(死生者日/新之正道)故生而不 説死而不禍知終始之不可故也(明終始之日新也則/知故之不可執而留) (矣是以渉日新而不愕舍故而/不驚死生之化若一○説音悅)計人之所知不若其所
Interpretation

This passage records a dialogue between Zhuangzi and the River Earl, where the North Sea Deity (Beihai Ruo) expounds the Daoist perspective on the relativity of all things.

The North Sea Deity begins by pointing out that all things have their inherent boundaries—just as the structure of a horse’s body has its natural hierarchy, they cannot be forcibly compared. The regimes passed down by the Five Emperors, the world contended for by the Three Kings, and the worldly affairs that benevolent scholars toil over—all are confined to the same limited domain. Bo Yi sought fame by renouncing the throne, Confucius pursued erudition through teaching, yet such self-aggrandizement is as laughable as your (River Earl’s) earlier boasting about the abundance of your waters.

He then presents four core insights:

1. The quantity of things is inexhaustible (物量无穷, wuliang wuqiong).

2. Time never ceases (时无止, shi wuzhi).

3. Gain and loss have no fixed pattern (分无常, fen wuchang).

4. The beginning and end of things renew themselves daily (终始无故, zhongshi wugu).

Those with true wisdom perceive these truths:

When observing the world, they neither consider things small as insufficient (小而不寡, xiao er bu gua) nor regard the vast as excessive (大而不多, da er bu duo), understanding that all things have their inherent measure. Comprehending the transformations of past and present (证曏今故, zhengxiang jingu), they remain untroubled by the passage of long ages (遥而不闷, yao er bu men) and do not grasp at fleeting moments (掇而不跂, duo er bu qi). Seeing the patterns of waxing and waning, they neither exult in gain nor grieve over loss. Recognizing that life and death are like the daily renewal of a smooth, open road (坦途, tantu), they neither rejoice excessively in life nor regard death as calamity.

Finally, he reveals: What humans know is far less than what they do not know. Through this layered discourse, the dialogue dismantles rigid attachments to concepts like size, gain and loss, life and death, embodying the Daoist philosophy of "equalizing all things" (齐物, qi wu). Concepts such as "daily renewal" (日新, rixin) and the "smooth path" (坦途, tantu) reflect essential Daoist mental frameworks for perceiving the natural flux of existence.

不知(所知各/有限也)其生之時不若未生之時(生時各/有年也)以其至 小求窮其至大之域是故迷亂而不能自得也(莫若安/於所受) (之分/而已)由此觀之又何以知毫末之足以定至細之倪又 何以知天地之足以窮至大之域(以小求大理終不得/各安其分則大小俱) (足矣若毫末不求天地之功則周身之餘皆為棄物天/地不見大於秋毫則顧其形象裁自足耳將何以知細) (之定細大/之定大也)河伯曰世之議者皆曰至精無形至大不可 圍是信情乎北海若曰夫自細視大者不盡自大視細 者不明(目之所見有常極不能無窮也故於大則有所/不盡於細則有所不明直是目之所不逮耳精) (與大皆非無也庸詎知/無形而不可圍者哉)夫精小之微也埒大之殷也故 異便(大小異故所便不得同○/埒普囘反盛也殷衆也)此勢之有也(若無形而/不可圍則) (無此異便/之勢也)夫精粗者期於有形者也(有精粗矣故/不得無形)無形 者數之所不能分也不可圍者數之所不能窮也可以 言論者物之粗也可以意致者物之精也言之所不能 論意之所不能察致者不期精粗焉(唯無而已何精粗/之有哉夫言意者) (有也而所言所意者無也故求之於言意/之表而入乎無言無意之域而後至焉)是故大人之
Interpretation

Our capacity to comprehend the true nature of things is inherently limited, for human cognition has its boundaries. The duration of any life's existence pales in comparison to the vast stretches of time before its birth and after its end (each being has its predetermined lifespan). To forcibly apply finite understanding in probing the infinite realm only leads to confusion and chaos, never attaining true knowledge (better to abide by one's natural station).

From this perspective, how can we be certain that the tip of a hair represents the smallest possible limit? Or that heaven and earth constitute the absolute boundary of largeness? (The pursuit of the infinite with finite means is ultimately futile—all things find fulfillment when each remains in its proper place. If a hair doesn't presumptuously seek the functions of heaven and earth, its own existence holds value; if heaven and earth don't disregard the autumn hair's tip but reflect on their own forms, they too find contentment—why must we rigidly determine absolute standards of large and small?)

The River Earl (deity of the Yellow River) asked: "People say the most subtle things have no form, and the grandest things cannot be measured—is this true?" The North Sea Ruo (deity of the Northern Sea) replied: "Observing the grand from the perspective of the minute always leaves aspects unseen; examining the minute from the perspective of the grand always leaves details unclear. (The eye's capacity is limited—when facing immense things there will always be unseen portions, when facing tiny things there will always be indiscernible features. This merely reflects visual limitations. Both the subtle and the grand truly exist—how can we declare formless things nonexistent?)"

The subtle represents the smallest within smallness, the grand the largest within largeness—thus each possesses distinct characteristics. (Differences in scale produce unique attributes. "Lie" signifies magnificence, "yin" abundance.) This is determined by the Dao's natural patterns. (If there truly existed formless, immeasurable things, such characteristic differences wouldn't exist.) What we call refined or coarse applies only to formed objects (only what has form can be judged refined or coarse). Truly formless things cannot be divided by quantity; immeasurable things cannot be exhausted by numbers.

What language can describe constitutes a thing's rough appearance; what the mind can grasp represents its subtle essence. But what neither words nor thought can reach has already transcended the categories of refined and coarse. (This is pure "nothingness"—how could distinctions of refinement or coarseness remain? Words and thoughts belong to the realm of "being," yet what they point toward is the state of "non-being." Only by surpassing language and thought, entering wordless awareness, can one truly comprehend the Dao.) Therefore, those who have attained the Dao (meaning enlightened beings)...

行不出乎害人(大人者無意而任天行也舉足/而投諸吉地豈出害人之塗哉)不多仁 恩(無害而不/自多其恩)動不為利(應理而動而理自/無害○為于偽反)不賤門𨽻(任/其) (所能而位當於斯耳非/由賤之故措之斯職)貨財弗爭(各使/分定)不多辭譲(適中/而已) 事焉不借人(各使/自任)不多食乎力(足而/已)不賤貪汙(理自/無欲)行 殊乎俗(已獨無可無不可所以/與俗殊○行下孟反)不多辟異(任理而自殊/○辟四亦反) 為在從衆(從衆之/所為)不賤佞謟(自然/正直)世之爵禄不足以為 勸戮耻不足以為辱(外事不/擾於心)知是非之不可為分細大 之不可為倪(故𤣥/同也)聞曰道人不聞(任物而物性自通則/功名歸物矣故不聞) 至德不得(得者生於失也物各/無失則得名去也)大人無已(任物而已/○已音紀)約 分之至也(約之以至其分故㝠也夫唯/極乎無形而不可圍者為然)河伯曰若物之 外若物之内惡至而倪貴賤惡至而倪小大北海若曰 以道觀之物無貴賤(各自足也○/惡音烏下同)以物觀之自貴而相 賤(此區區者乃道之/所錯綜而齊之也)以俗觀之貴賤不在已(斯所謂/倒置也)以 差觀之因其所大而大之則萬物莫不大因其所小而
Interpretation

This passage describes the attitude and conduct of the "Great Person" (one of profound cultivation) in Daoist philosophy:

A truly cultivated person acts without harming others, moving in accordance with nature, with every gesture aligned with the Dao (the Way). Such a person would never take the path of causing harm. They don't deliberately flaunt their benevolence, for causing no harm to creatures is simply the natural order of things.

Their actions aren't driven by personal gain, but by following the principles of situations. They don't look down on gatekeepers or servants, understanding that each person fulfills their proper role and abilities - these jobs aren't performed because the workers are inherently lowly. They don't compete for material goods, recognizing all things have their proper share; they yield appropriately without ostentation, handling matters personally rather than delegating.

In eating and drinking, they seek only satisfaction, not excess; they don't despise greedy people, understanding that desire itself is part of nature. Their behavior differs from worldly customs, but not from deliberate eccentricity - their naturalness simply makes them stand apart. While outwardly following conventions, they maintain inner natural integrity, without contempt for flatterers.

Worldly ranks and salaries cannot move them; punishments and humiliations cannot shame them. For they understand that right and wrong have no absolute standards, and size is always relative. Thus those who attain the Dao don't pursue fame, the highest De (Virtue) doesn't strive for "gain," and the deeply cultivated forget themselves, achieving unity with the Dao.

The River God (He Bo) asked: How do we determine what's noble or base, large or small? The Sea God (Ruò of the Northern Sea) replied: From the Dao's perspective, all things are inherently equal in value, each complete in itself; from individual perspectives, everything considers itself noble and others base; from worldly views, standards of value come from external judgments; from the perspective of differences, if you focus on largeness then all things are large, if on smallness then all things are small.

小之則萬物莫不小知天地之為稊米也知毫末之為 丘山也則差數覩矣(所大者足也所小者無餘也故因/其性足以名大則毫末丘山不得) (異其名因其無餘以稱小則天地稊米無所殊其稱若/夫觀差而不由斯道則差數相加幾微相傾不可勝察) (也/)以功觀之因其所有而有之則萬物莫不有因其所 無而無之則萬物莫不無知東西之相反而不可以相 無則功分定矣(天下莫不相與為彼我而彼我皆欲自/為斯東西之相反也然彼我相與為脣) (齒脣齒者未嘗相為而脣亡則齒寒故彼之自為濟我/之功𢎞矣斯相反而不可以相無者也故因其自為而) (無其功則天下之功莫不皆無矣因其不可相無而有/其功則天下之功莫不皆有矣若乃忘其自為之功而) (思夫相為之惠惠之愈勤而偽薄滋甚天下/失業而情性瀾漫矣故其功分無時可定也)以趣觀之 因其所然而然之則萬物莫不然因其所非而非之則 萬物莫不非知堯桀之自然而相非則趣操覩矣(物皆/自然) (故無不然物皆相非故無不非無不非則無然矣無不/然則無非矣無然無非者堯也有然有非者桀也然此) (二君各受天素不能相為故因堯桀以/觀天下之趣操其不能相為也可見矣)昔者堯舜譲而
Interpretation

From the perspective of size, nothing in the universe is absolutely large or small. Understanding that heaven and earth can be as small as a grain of rice, while the tip of a hair can be as vast as a mountain, reveals the relativity of size distinctions. What we call "large" refers to something being sufficiently big in itself, while "small" means having no superfluous parts. Thus, when we designate size according to an object's inherent nature, there is no essential difference between a hair and a mountain; when we designate smallness based on the absence of excess, heaven and earth are no different from a grain of rice. If one observes differences without following this principle, they will become lost in endless comparisons.

From the perspective of function, when viewed according to their inherent qualities, all things possess value; when viewed according to what they lack, all things appear insufficient. Just as east and west are opposite directions yet cannot negate each other's existence, this demonstrates the inherent boundaries of function. All things in the world exist as opposites, each striving to assert itself—much like the opposition between east and west. Yet opposing pairs are like lips and teeth: though separate, if the lips are gone, the teeth grow cold. Thus, the existence of one actually completes the other, showing that opposites cannot negate each other. If we deny the value of the other, all functionality in the world would cease to exist; if we acknowledge this interdependence, everything has its purpose. If we forget our own worth and blindly seek mutual benefit, we only grow more artificial, leading to chaos in the world and the loss of human nature.

From the perspective of value, accepting things as they are means all things have their own validity; rejecting their inherent nature makes everything seem invalid. Recognizing that Yao (the sage king) and Jie (the tyrant) are naturally formed opposing archetypes reveals the essence of value orientation. All things arise spontaneously, so none are invalid; yet all things also negate each other, so all can seem invalid. The true state—neither affirming nor denying—is the realm of Yao; clinging to affirmation or denial is the way of Jie. These two rulers each embodied their own nature and could not replace one another, allowing us to discern the value orientations of all people.

In ancient times, Yao and Shun became emperors through abdication, but this system of succession was only suited to their era.

帝之噲譲而絶湯武争而王白公爭而滅(夫順天應人/而受天下者) (其迹則争譲之迹也尋其迹/者失其所以迹矣故絶滅也)由此觀之争譲之禮堯桀 之行貴賤有時未可以為常也梁麗可以衝城而不可 以窒穴言殊器也騏驥驊騮一日而馳千里捕鼠不如 狸狌言殊技也鴟鵂夜撮蚤察毫末晝出瞋目而不見 丘山言殊性也(就其殊而任之則萬物莫不當也○梁/麗小舩也一云屋棟也淮南子鴟夜聚) (蚤察分毫末許慎云鵂夜聚食/蚤蝨不失也一本作蚉音文)故曰蓋師是而無非師 治而無亂乎是未明天地之理萬物之情者也(夫天地/之理萬) (物之情以得我為是失我為非適性為治失性為亂然/物無定極我無常適殊性異便是非無主若以我之所) (是則彼不得非此知我而不見彼者耳故以道觀者於/是非無當也付之天均恣之兩行則殊方異𩔖同焉皆) (得也○師是/或云師順也)是猶師天而無地師陰而無陽其不可行 明矣然且語而不舍非愚則誣也(天地陰陽對生也是/非治亂互有也將奚) (去哉○舍/音捨下同)帝王殊禪三代殊繼差其時逆其俗者謂之 簒夫當其時順其俗者謂之義之徒黙黙乎河伯女惡 知貴賤之門小大之家(俗之所貴有時而賤物之所大/世或小之故順物之迹不得不)
Interpretation

This passage illustrates through multiple comparative examples that all things in the world possess their own inherent characteristics and cannot be forced into uniformity. Just as a massive ship or roof beam (Liangli) may be suitable for battering city walls but ineffective for plugging small holes, or how famed steeds like Qiji and Hualiu can travel a thousand miles in a day yet prove inferior to wildcats in catching mice, or how owls can catch fleas at night but cannot see mountains in daylight—all beings come with innate attributes and limitations.

The author criticizes those who stubbornly cling to singular perspectives: those who exclusively venerate "Heaven" while rejecting "Earth," or recognize only "Yin" while dismissing "Yang"—such extreme approaches are clearly unworkable. Historical examples like the peaceful abdication of Yao and Shun versus the revolutionary takeovers by Tang and Wu were all responses suited to their times, yet when Bai Gong (a noble of the Spring and Autumn period) blindly imitated such models, it led to his downfall. The worldly standards of nobility and baseness, or greatness and smallness, are all relative—even a deity like the River Earl (Hebe, god of the Yellow River) remains silent on such matters, so how can ordinary humans presume to judge right and wrong?

The crucial insight lies in recognizing that diversity among things reflects natural law. Just as craftsmen select tools according to different materials, governance too must adapt to circumstances and popular sentiment. Forcing everything under a single standard—like demanding all creatures possess identical abilities—ultimately violates the Dao (the natural order). True wisdom acknowledges differences and allows all things to fulfill their unique purposes.

(殊斯五帝三王/之所以不同也)河伯曰然則我何為乎何不為乎吾辭 受趣舍吾終奈何北海若曰以道觀之何貴何賤是謂 反衍(貴賤之道/反覆相尋)無拘而志與道大蹇(自拘執則/不夷於道)何少何 多是謂謝施(隨其分故所施無常○謝代也/施用也不伐其德是謂謝施)無一而行 與道參差(不能隨變則/不齊於道)嚴乎若國之有君其無私德(公/當) (而/已)繇繇乎若祭之有社其無私福(天下之所同/求○繇音由)泛泛乎 其若四方之無窮其無所畛域(泛泛然/無所在)兼懐萬物其孰 承翼(掩御羣生反之公内而乎/徃者也豈扶疎而承翼哉)是謂無方(無方故能以/萬物為方) 萬物一齊孰短孰長(莫不/皆足)道無終始物有死生(死生者/無窮之) (變耳非/終始也)不恃其成(成無/常處)一虛一滿不位乎其形(不以形/為位而) (守之/不變)年不可舉(欲舉之令/去而不能)時不可止(欲止之使/停又不可)消息盈 虚終則有始(變化日新/未嘗守故)是所以語大義之方論萬物之 理也物之生也若驟若馳無動而不變無時而不移(欲/不) (可執/而守)何為乎何不為乎夫固將自化(若有為不為於/其間則敗其自)
Interpretation

The River God (deity of the Yellow River) asked the Sea God (deity of the Northern Sea): "Then what should I do and what should I avoid? How should I make choices?" The Sea God replied: From the perspective of the Dao (the Way), nobility and baseness inherently transform into each other (fanyan: the principle of status is cyclical) — do not stubbornly cling to personal views and thereby oppose the great Dao. Abundance and scarcity are likewise relative (xieshi: gain and loss change spontaneously); fixating on either extreme will lead one astray from the Dao.

Be like a ruler governing the state with impartial fairness, or like commoners making offerings to the Earth God without seeking personal benefit. The Dao resembles the boundless four directions, having no demarcated borders. It embraces all things yet shows no partiality (wufang: without fixed patterns), for all beings are fundamentally equal — how could there be distinctions of long or short? The Dao itself has neither beginning nor end, while all things undergo the transformations of life and death (which are but phenomena within infinite change). Do not cling to established conditions, as emptiness and fullness continuously alternate, and forms never remain fixed.

Time cannot be detained (years cannot be held back), transformation cannot be halted (the moment cannot be stopped). Ending and beginning, fullness and emptiness revolve in endless cycles (zhong ze you shi: change never ceases). This is the principle of the Dao, the truth of all things. The growth of all beings resembles galloping steeds — every movement brings change, every instant brings transition (bu ke zhi er shou: impossible to grasp and fix). Why labor over what to do or avoid? All things naturally transform of themselves (zihua: spontaneous evolution), and human interference only disrupts this natural process.

(化/矣)河伯曰然則何貴於道耶(以其/自化)北海若曰知道者必 達於理達於理者必明於權明於權者不以物害已(知/道) (者知其無能也無能也則何能生我我自然而生耳而/四肢百體五臟精神已不為而自成矣又何有意乎生) (成之後哉達乎斯理者必能遣過分之知遺益生之情/而乘變應權故不以外傷内不以物害己而常全也) 至德者火弗能熱水弗能溺寒暑弗能害禽獸弗能賊 (夫心之所安則危不能危/意無不適故苦不能苦也)非謂其薄之也(雖心所安亦/不使犯之) 言察乎安危(知其不/可逃也)寧於禍福(安乎命/之所遇)謹於去就(審去/就之) (是/非)莫之能害也(不以害為害/故莫之能害)故曰天在内人在外(天然/在内) (而天然之所順者在外故大宗師曰知天/人之所為者至矣明内外之分皆非為也)德在乎天(恣/人) (任知則流/蕩失素也)知天人之行本乎天位乎德(此天然之知自/行而不出乎分) (者也故雖行於外而常/本乎天而位乎德矣)蹢䠱而屈伸(與機會應者有斯/變也○蹢丈益反) (䠱音/濁)反要而語極(知雖落天地事雖接萬物而常不失/其要極故天人之道全也○要於妙) (反/)曰何謂天何謂人北海若曰牛馬四足是謂天絡馬
Interpretation

The River God (deity of the Yellow River) asked: "If this is so, then why should we revere the Dao?" The North Sea God (deity of the Northern Ocean) replied: Those who truly understand the Dao inevitably comprehend the principles underlying all things. Those who comprehend these principles naturally grasp the art of adaptive response, and those who master adaptation prevent external matters from harming themselves.

Those who know the Dao understand that all things arise without artificial contrivance (referring to the Dao's natural spontaneity). Since nothing is deliberately created, all phenomena emerge spontaneously. Just as our limbs, internal organs, and consciousness aren't deliberately manufactured, why cling to their manifested forms? Those who penetrate this truth necessarily relinquish excessive cleverness, abandon artificial enhancements, and flow with transformation as circumstances require. Thus they prevent external matters from injuring their innate nature, maintaining perfect integrity.

Those possessing supreme De (Virtue) cannot be burned by fire, drowned by water, harmed by extreme temperatures, or injured by wild beasts. This doesn't mean they deliberately confront dangers, but rather that when the mind is settled, external threats cannot truly endanger them; when awareness remains unperturbed, suffering cannot truly cause pain. They clearly perceive the essence of safety and danger (understanding that fortune and misfortune are unavoidable), serenely accepting what destiny brings while carefully navigating choices of advancement or withdrawal (discerning right from wrong). Therefore nothing can harm them.

Hence the saying: "Heaven's nature resides within, human artifice manifests without" (internally aligning with spontaneity, while external actions accord with natural patterns. Thus the Great Ancestral Teacher states: Those who understand the distinction between heaven and human reach the ultimate state). True De lies in following nature (indulging in artificial cleverness leads to losing one's original purity). Understanding heaven's operational patterns, they take spontaneity as foundation and De as root (this awareness itself being natural, their actions never exceed proper boundaries). Advancing or withdrawing as appropriate, bending or extending as needed (responding fluidly to circumstances), they ultimately return to fundamental truth (though their understanding encompasses heaven and earth, and their actions engage with all things, they never deviate from the essential Dao—thus completing the way of heaven and humanity).

The River God further asked: "What constitutes heaven? What constitutes human?" The North Sea God answered: "Oxen and horses being born with four legs—this is heaven. Putting bridles on horses and nose rings on oxen—this is human."

首穿牛鼻是謂人(人之生也可不服牛乘馬乎服牛乘/馬不可穿絡之乎牛馬不辭穿絡者) (天命之固當也茍當乎天命則/雖寄之人事而本在乎天也)故曰無以人滅天(穿絡/之可) (也若乃走作過分驅/步失節則天理滅矣)無以故滅命(不因其自為而故為/之者命其安在乎) 無以得殉名(所得有常分/殉名則過也)謹守而勿失是謂反其真(真/在) (性分/之内)⬤憐蚿蚿憐蛇蛇憐風風憐目目憐心⬤謂蚿曰 吾以一足趻踔而行予無如矣今子之使萬足獨奈何 蚿曰不然子不見夫唾者乎噴則大者如珠小者如霧 雜而下者不可勝數也今予動吾天機而不知其所以 然蚿謂蛇曰吾以衆足行而不及子之無足何也蛇曰 夫天機之所動何可易邪吾安用足哉(物之生也非知/生而生也則生) (之行也豈知行而行哉故足不知所以行目不知所以/見心不知所以知俛然而自得矣遲速之節聦明之鍳) (或能或否皆非我也而或者因欲有其身而矜其能所/以逆其機而傷其神器也至人知天機之不可易也故) (捐聦明棄智慮塊然忘其為而任其自動故萬物無動/而不逍遙也○⬤求龜反一足獸也黄帝在位諸侯於) (東海流山得竒獸其狀如牛蒼色無角一足龍走出入/水即風雨目光如日月其音如雷名曰⬤黄帝殺之取)
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here employs a series of vivid metaphors to reveal the principle of all things following their natural dispositions. He begins with the example of oxen and horses: people put nose rings on oxen and bits in horses' mouths—seemingly artificial interventions—yet the animals don't resist. This demonstrates that when things accord with their innate nature, even human involvement remains fundamentally aligned with the natural order. Thus Zhuangzi proposes three key principles: never use artificial means to disrupt nature (like overdriving oxen would violate their disposition), never forcibly alter destiny (by grasping for what isn't yours), and never sacrifice authenticity for empty reputation (all pursuits beyond one's proper role are excessive). Only by upholding these principles can one return to life's genuine state.

The chain reaction of "admiration" then illustrates how all creatures possess unique dispositions: the millipede envies the snake's footless movement, the snake envies the wind's formless motion, the wind envies the eye's ability to see distant places with a glance, while the eye admires the mind's capacity to perceive all things with a single thought. The millipede explains how its thousand legs coordinate like saliva naturally dividing into droplets during a sneeze—pure instinctual operation. Similarly, the snake clarifies its legless crawling as equally innate. Through this, Zhuangzi observes: all existence and movement require no deliberate effort, while human cleverness disrupts natural mechanisms. Those truly awakened to the Dao (zhiren) understand celestial workings cannot be altered; thus they discard artificial wisdom to follow nature's flow, enabling all beings to wander in carefree harmony.

The concluding reference to "Kui"—a mythical one-legged beast discovered in the East Sea during the Yellow Emperor's era—carries profound symbolism. Resembling a hornless blue ox, its movements stirred wind and rain, its gaze shone like sun and moon, its roar echoed thunder. The legend of the Yellow Emperor slaying Kui to make drums from its skin serves as a cautionary metaphor about the consequences of forcibly interfering with nature's design.

(皮以冐皷聲聞五百里蚿音𤣥馬蚿蟲也廣雅云蛆渠/馬蚿蚿憐蛇蛇憐風風憐目目憐心⬤一足蚿多足蛇) (無足風無形目形綴於此明/流於彼心則質幽為神逰外)蛇謂風曰予動吾脊脅而 行則有似也今子蓬蓬然起於北海⬤蓬然入於南海 而似無有何也風曰然予蓬蓬然起於北海而入於南 海也然而指我則勝我鰌(鰌一/作䠓)我亦勝我雖然夫折大 木蜚大屋者唯我能也故以衆小不勝為大勝也為大 勝者唯聖人能之(恣其天機無所與爭斯小不勝也然/乘萬物御羣才之所為使羣才各自) (得萬物各自為則天下莫不/逍遙矣此乃聖人為大勝也)孔子逰於匡宋人圍之數 匝而弦歌不輟子路入見曰何夫子之娛也孔子曰來 吾語女我諱窮乆矣而不免命也求通乆矣而不得時 也(將明時命之固當故寄之求諱○孔子逰於匡衛人/誤圍孔子以為陽虎虎常暴於匡人又孔子弟子顔) (尅時與虎俱後尅為孔子御至匡匡人共識/尅又孔子容貌與虎相似故匡人共圍之)當堯舜而 天下無窮人非知得也當桀紂而天下無通人非知失 也時勢適然(無為勞心於/窮通之間)夫水行不避蛟龍者漁父之 勇也陸行不避兕虎者獵夫之勇也白刃交於前視死 若生者烈士之勇也(情各有/所安)知窮之有命知通之有時
Interpretation

This passage contains two allegorical stories from the Zhuangzi, which elucidate the Daoist understanding of fate, circumstance, and courage through dialogic narratives.

The first story features a conversation between a centipede and the wind. The centipede says: "I move by twisting my spine and ribs, leaving at least visible traces. But you roar from the North Sea to sweep across the South Sea without showing any trace—why is this?" The wind replies: "Indeed. Though people can block me with a finger or stomp on me with a foot, I can snap great trees and topple houses. This is how seemingly weak forces accomplish great deeds. Only the sage understands this principle—not contending for petty victories but achieving ultimate triumph." Here, the wind's nature illustrates the Daoist concept of wuwei er wubuwei (non-action yet nothing left undone), demonstrating that true power lies not in superficial dominance.

The second story recounts how Confucius was besieged in Kuang after being mistaken for Yang Hu (a tyrant who oppressed locals). His disciple Zilu was puzzled to find Confucius calmly playing the zither and singing amid the siege. Confucius explains: "I've long understood that life alternates between adversity (qiong) and success—both shaped by circumstance. In the eras of Yao and Shun, no one suffered obscurity not because they were wise; under Jie and Zhou, none found prominence not because they were foolish—all was determined by circumstance." He then analogizes how fishermen don't fear flood dragons, hunters don't avoid fierce tigers, and martyrs disregard swords: each situation cultivates its own form of courage.

Together, these stories convey the Daoist perspective on fate: one must align with natural patterns, recognizing that adversity and success stem from circumstance rather than force. True wisdom resembles the wind—eschewing petty contention to accomplish greatness.

臨大難而不懼者聖人之勇也(聖人則無/所不安)由處矣吾命 有所制矣(命非已制故無所用其心也夫知於命者無/徃而非逍遙矣故雖匡陳羑里無異於紫極) (間堂/也)無幾何將甲者進辭曰以為陽虎也故圍之今非 也請辭而退公孫龍問於魏牟曰龍少學先生之道長 而明仁義之行合同異離堅白然不然可不可困百家 之知窮衆口之辯吾自以為至達已今吾聞莊子之言 汒焉異之不知論之不及與知之弗若與今吾無所開 吾喙敢問其方公子牟隱機大息仰天而笑曰子獨不 聞夫塪井之鼃乎謂東海之鱉曰吾樂與吾跳梁乎井 榦之上入休乎缺甃之崖赴水則接掖持頥蹶泥則沒 足滅跗還虷蠏與科斗莫吾能若也且夫擅一壑之水 而跨跱塪井之樂此亦至矣夫子奚不時來入觀乎(此/猶) (小鳥之自足於蓬蒿○塪井壊井也井榦井欄也諸詮/之音西京賦作韓音甃側救反如䦨以塼為之著井底) (闌也虷音寒井中赤/蟲也科斗蝦蟇子也)東海之鱉左足未入而右膝已縶 矣(明大之不逰/於小非樂然)於是逡巡而却告之海曰夫千里之逺 不足以舉其大千仞之高不足以極其深禹之時十年 九潦而水弗為加益湯之時八年七旱而崖不為加損 夫不為頃乆推移不以多少進退者此亦東海之大樂
Interpretation

To face great peril without fear—this is the courage of a sage (the sage's heart is at peace, free from all fear). My life follows its own natural course (destiny is not within our control, so there is no need for excessive worry). Those who understand the true meaning of fate remain carefree wherever they may be. Thus, whether besieged in Kuang or imprisoned in Youli, it is no different from dwelling in the Purple Palace of the immortals.

Before long, the commanding officer came to apologize: "We mistook you for Yang Hu and surrounded this place in error. Now that we realize our mistake, we beg permission to withdraw our troops." At this moment, Gongsun Long sought advice from Wei Mou: "In my youth, I studied the ways of the ancient kings; in maturity, I mastered benevolence and righteousness. I could debate the similarities and differences of things, distinguish between hardness and whiteness, prove wrong as right and the impossible as possible, leaving scholars of the hundred schools speechless. I once believed I had reached the highest attainment. Yet now, hearing Zhuangzi's words, I find myself utterly bewildered. Is my reasoning inferior to his, or is my wisdom lacking? I can hardly open my mouth—what is the reason for this?"

Wei Mou leaned on his armrest, sighed deeply, then looked up to the sky and laughed: "Have you not heard the story of the frog in the shallow well? It boasted to the giant turtle of the Eastern Sea: 'How happy I am! I leap upon the well's railing and rest in the cracks of its broken bricks. When I enter the water, it buoys my arms and cheeks; when I tread the mud, it barely covers my feet. Looking back at the tadpoles and crabs, none can match my freedom! To possess this pit of water and reign over this single well—this is the greatest joy. Why don't you come visit more often?'" (Note: The "shallow well" refers to a dilapidated well; the "well railing" is its edge; the "bricks" form its walls; "red worms" are tiny creatures in the well; "tadpoles" are young frogs.)

"The giant turtle of the Eastern Sea could not even get its left foot through the well's opening before its right knee became stuck (showing how a massive being cannot move freely in a tiny space—not that it lacks happiness). Slowly withdrawing, it described the sea to the frog: 'A thousand miles cannot encompass its vastness; a thousand fathoms cannot measure its depth. In the time of Yu the Great, nine floods came in ten years, yet the sea did not rise. Under Tang of Shang, seven droughts struck in eight years, yet the shoreline did not recede. Unchanging through time, unaffected by rain or drought—this is the true joy of the Eastern Sea!'"

也於是塪井之鼃聞之適適然驚規規然自失也(以小/羨大) (故自/失)且夫知不知是非之竟而猶欲觀於莊子之言是 猶使蚉負山商蚷馳河也必不勝任矣(物各有分不可/強相希效○蚷) (音巨商蚷蟲名/北燕謂之馬蚿)且夫知不知論極妙之言而自適一時 之利者是非塪井之鼃與且彼方跐黄泉而登大皇無 南無北奭然四解淪於不測無東無西始於𤣥㝠反於 大通(言無不至/也跐音此)子乃規規然而求之以察索之以辯(夫/逰) (無窮者非察辨所/得○索所白反)是直用管闚天用錐指地也不亦小 乎子徃矣(非其任者/去之可也)且子獨不聞夫夀陵餘子之學行 於邯鄲與未得國能又失其故行矣直匍匐而歸耳(以/此) (效彼兩失之○夀陵邑名未應丁夫/為餘子邯音寒鄲音單趙國都也)今子不去將忘子 之故失子之業公孫龍口呿而不合舌舉而不下乃逸 而走莊子釣於濮水楚王使大夫二人徃先焉曰願以 竟内累矣莊子持竿不顧曰吾聞楚有神龜死已三千 歲矣王巾笥而藏之廟堂之上此龜者寧其死為留骨 而貴乎寧其生而曵尾於塗中乎二大夫曰寧生而曵 尾塗中莊子曰徃矣吾將曵尾於塗中(性各有所安也/○呿起據反司)
Interpretation

The frog living in a shallow well, upon hearing of the vastness of the ocean, was struck dumb with astonishment, flustered and at a loss (this illustrates how limited perspectives admire boundless realms). Those who cannot even distinguish basic boundaries of right and wrong yet attempt to comprehend Zhuangzi's teachings are like asking a mosquito to carry a mountain or a millipede to cross a river—utterly impossible (all beings have their inherent capacities that cannot be forcibly imitated. "Millipede" is what northern Yan people call a certain insect).

Aren't those who remain content with petty gains while ignorant of the supreme Dao just like frogs in shallow wells? Yet Zhuangzi could plunge to the Yellow Springs (the underworld) and soar to the Great Void (heavenly realms), unbound by north or south, transcending worldly distinctions to reach unfathomable depths; unconfined by east or west, he began from the Mysterious Darkness (profound obscurity) only to return to the Great Dao (signifying the all-encompassing realm). When you try to explore this with narrow vision and demand explanations through debate (those who roam infinite realms cannot be reached through analytical disputation), it's precisely like viewing the sky through a bamboo tube or measuring the earth with an awl—how pitifully limited! You should leave now (what's unsuitable should be abandoned).

Have you not heard the story of the young man from Shouling who went to Handan to learn walking? He failed to master the elegant gait of Zhao people while forgetting how to walk his own way, ultimately having to crawl home (blind imitation leads to double failure. Shouling is a place name; "young man" refers to an underage youth, while Handan was the capital of Zhao). If you don't depart now, you too will forget your roots and lose your original abilities. When Gongsun Long (representative of the School of Names) heard this, his jaw dropped in shock before he slunk away in defeat.

While fishing in the Pu River, Zhuangzi was approached by two Chu ministers sent by their king: "Our lord wishes to entrust you with state affairs." Without turning his head, Zhuangzi kept fishing and replied: "I hear Chu possesses a sacred turtle that died three thousand years ago, whose shell the king preserves in his ancestral temple wrapped in brocade. Tell me—would this turtle prefer being dead with venerated bones, or alive and wagging its tail in the mud?" The ministers answered: "Surely it would choose life and tail-wagging." Zhuangzi said: "Then begone—I too shall keep wagging my tail in the mud (all things belong to their intrinsic nature)."

(馬云開也濮/水陳地水也)惠子相梁莊子徃見之或謂惠子曰莊子 來欲代子相於是惠子恐捜於國中三日三夜(揚兵/整旅)莊 子徃見之曰南方有鳥其名鵷鶵子知之乎夫鵷鶵發 於南海而飛於北海非梧桐不止非練實不食非醴泉 不飲於是鴟得腐鼠鵷鶵過之仰而視之曰嚇今子欲 以子之梁國而嚇我耶(謂所好不同願各有極○鵷鶵/鸞鳯之属嚇怒拒聲恐其奪已) (也詩箋云以/口拒人曰嚇)莊子與惠子逰於濠梁之上荘子曰鯈魚 出游從容是魚樂也惠子曰子非魚安知魚之樂莊子 曰子非我安知我不知魚之樂(欲以起明相非而不可/以相知之義耳子非我) (尚可以知我之非魚則我非魚亦可/以知魚之樂也○鯈音由白魚也)惠子曰我非子固 不知子矣子固非魚也子之不知魚之樂全矣(舍其本/言而給) (辯以/難也)莊子曰請循其本子曰女安知魚樂云者既已知 吾知之而問我我知之濠上也(尋惠子之本言云非魚/則無縁相知耳今子非) (我也而云女安知魚樂者是知我之非魚也苟知我之/非魚則凡相知者果可以此知彼不待是魚然後知魚) (也故循子安知之云已知吾之所知矣而方復問我我/正知之於濠上耳豈待入水哉夫物之所生而安者天)
Interpretation

When Hui Shi served as prime minister of Liang, Zhuangzi went to visit him. Someone warned Hui Shi: "Zhuangzi has come to usurp your position." Terrified, Hui Shi ordered a nationwide manhunt for Zhuangzi that lasted three days and nights.

Zhuangzi voluntarily appeared before Hui Shi and told him a parable: "In the south lives the Yuanchu (a mythical phoenix-like bird). When it flies from the Southern Sea to the Northern Sea, it perches only on parasol trees, eats only bamboo fruit, and drinks only from sweet springs. An owl that had caught a dead rat looked up as the Yuanchu passed overhead and screeched threateningly. Are you now screeching at me with your premiership of Liang?" (Implying their aspirations differed completely - what Hui Shi prized held no attraction for Zhuangzi.)

Later, the two were strolling across Hao Bridge. Watching the fish below, Zhuangzi remarked: "How leisurely these white fish swim - this is the happiness of fish." Hui Shi retorted: "You're not a fish - how could you know their happiness?" Zhuangzi countered: "You're not me - how could you know I don't know the fish's happiness?" (Turning Hui Shi's logic against him.)

Hui Shi said: "Since I'm not you, I truly don't know your thoughts; but you certainly aren't fish, so you can't possibly know whether fish are happy." (A sophistical evasion of the core issue.)

Zhuangzi replied: "Let's return to the original question. When you asked 'how do you know the fish are happy,' you already presupposed I knew their happiness. I perceived it here on Hao Bridge." (Demonstrating that understanding needn't be constrained by form - all beings share fundamental nature, and humans can intuitively perceive others' states.)

(地不能易其處隂陽不能囘其業故以陸/生之所安知水生之所樂未足稱妙耳)   至樂第十八 天下有至樂無有哉有可以活身者無有哉(忘歡而後/樂足樂足) (而後身存将以為有樂耶而至樂無歡将以為無樂/耶而身以存而無憂○樂音洛篇内下出者皆同)今 奚為奚據奚避奚處奚就奚去奚樂奚惡(擇此八者莫/足以活身唯) (無擇而任其所遇者/乃全耳○惡烏路反)夫天下之所尊者富貴夀善也所 樂者身安厚味美服好色音聲也所下者貧賤天惡也 所苦者身不得安逸口不得厚味形不得美服目不得 好色耳不得音聲若不得者則大憂以懼其為形也亦 愚哉(凡此失之無傷於形而得之有/損於性今反以不得為憂故愚)夫富者苦身疾作 多積財而不得盡用其為形也亦外矣(内其形者/知足而已)夫貴 者夜以繼日思慮善否其為形也亦疏矣(故親其形者/自得於身中) (而/已)人之生也與憂俱生夀者惽惽乆憂不死何之苦也 其為形也亦逺矣(夫遺生然後能忘憂忘憂而後生可/樂生可樂而後形是我有富是我物) (貴是我榮也/○惽音昬)列士為天下見善矣未足以活身吾未知 善之誠善耶誠不善耶若以為善矣不足活身以為不
Interpretation

The earth cannot alter its position, and the forces of Yin-Yang cannot reverse their natural course. What land-dwelling creatures find comfortable may be wholly unsuitable for aquatic life—this hardly counts as profound mystery.

Does supreme joy truly exist in human life? Is there truly a way to preserve one's vital essence? In truth, only by forgetting the conscious pursuit of happiness can one attain genuine contentment; only through true inner fulfillment can life be preserved. Do you imagine that chasing pleasure leads to ultimate joy? The highest joy requires no deliberate pursuit. Do you suppose there's no joy to be found? Yet life can thereby be preserved without distress.

People perpetually agonize over: What to do? What to rely on? What to avoid? Where to settle? What to pursue? What to discard? What to love? What to hate? Ironically, fixating on these eight choices hinders the preservation of life. Only by relinquishing forced decisions and accepting circumstances with natural ease can wholeness be maintained.

What the world esteems amounts to wealth, rank, longevity, and fame; what it pursues as pleasure consists of bodily comfort, fine food, elegant attire, beautiful sights, and pleasing music. What it despises is poverty, low status, and early death; what it considers suffering includes physical discomfort, coarse fare, plain clothing, ugly sights, and discordant sounds. When deprived of these, people become deeply troubled—such excessive concern for the body is utter folly. In truth, lacking these things harms not the body, while obtaining them may damage one's essential nature.

The wealthy toil endlessly, amassing fortunes they cannot exhaust—this treatment of the body creates distance. The powerful calculate gains and losses day and night—this treatment of the body shows little regard. From birth, humans coexist with sorrow; those called long-lived muddle through years of anxious dread about death—this treatment of life contradicts its fundamental principle. Only by transcending life and death can sorrow be forgotten; only by forgetting sorrow can life be truly enjoyed; only by enjoying life can one achieve harmony with the body.

Those martyrs who sacrifice themselves for the world appear noble, yet fail to preserve their own lives. I cannot determine whether such "goodness" is genuine or false. If deemed good, it doesn't preserve life; if deemed evil, it benefits others.

善矣足以活人(善則過當/故不周濟)故曰忠諌不聽蹲循勿爭(唯/中) (庸之德為然/○蹲七旬反)故夫子胥争之以殘其形不争名亦不成 誠有善無有哉(故當縁督/以為經也)今俗之所為與其所樂吾又 未知樂之果樂耶果不樂耶吾觀夫俗之所樂舉羣趣 者誙誙然如將不得已(舉羣趣其所樂乃不/避死也○誙亡耕反)而皆曰樂 者吾未之樂也亦未之不樂也(無懐而/恣物耳)果有樂無有哉 吾以無為誠樂矣(夫無為之樂/無憂而已)又俗之所大苦也故曰 至樂無樂至譽無譽(俗以鏗鏘為/樂美善為譽)天下是非果未可定 也雖然無為可以定是非(我無為而任天下之是非/是非者各自任則定矣)至 樂活身唯無為幾存(百姓足則吾/身近乎存也)請嘗試言之天無為 以之清地無為以之寧(皆自清寧耳/非為之所得)故兩無為相合萬 物皆化(不為而自合故皆化若有/意乎為之則有時而滯也)芒乎芴乎而無從出 乎(皆自出耳未有為而出之也○芒李/音荒又乎晃反下同芴音忽下同)芴乎芒乎而無 有象乎(無有為/之象)萬物職職皆從無為殖(皆自/殖耳)故曰天地 無為也而無不為也(若有為則/有不齊也)人也孰能得無為哉(得/無)
Interpretation

This passage explores the relationship between "ultimate joy" (zhile) and "non-action" (wuwei). It points out that the pleasures pursued by worldly people—such as fame and profit—may not constitute true happiness, but can instead bring suffering. The example of Wu Zixu, who suffered for his forceful remonstrations, illustrates the consequences of excessive attachment.

True joy lies in wuwei—a state of non-forced action and natural spontaneity. This joy may appear plain, yet it represents the highest realm ("ultimate joy is joyless"). Just as heaven and earth operate through non-action yet accomplish everything ("heaven and earth act through non-action, yet nothing is left undone"). The sky remains clear through non-action, the earth maintains peace through non-action, and all things flourish naturally in this state of unforced harmony.

The author questions whether what the world calls happiness is truly joyful, suggesting people blindly chase after things that may bring danger. The highest honor is actually the absence of honor-seeking ("ultimate praise is praiseless"). Distinctions between right and wrong are difficult to determine absolutely, but adopting wuwei allows all things to reveal their natural state spontaneously. To reach this realm, one must learn the way of heaven and earth—refraining from forceful interference and allowing all beings to develop according to their nature.

The text repeatedly emphasizes that wuwei doesn't mean doing nothing, but rather avoiding artificial striving and conforming to natural patterns. In this state, all things can develop according to their inherent nature—this constitutes true joy and the authentic way of existence.

(為則無樂/而樂至矣)莊子妻死惠子弔之莊子則方箕踞鼓盆而 歌惠子曰與人居長子老身死不哭亦足矣又鼔盆而 歌不亦甚乎莊子曰不然是其始死也我獨何能無槩 然察其始而本無生非徒無生也而本無形非徒無形 也而本無氣雜乎芒芴之間變而有氣氣變而有形形 變而有生今又變而之死是相與為春秋冬夏四時行 也人且偃然寢於巨室而我噭噭然隨而哭之自以為 不通乎命故止也(未明而槩已達而止斯所以誨/有情者將令推至理以遣累也)支離 叔與滑介叔觀於㝠伯之丘崐崘之虚黄帝之所休俄 而柳生其左肘其意蹷蹷然惡之支離叔曰子惡之乎 滑介叔曰亡予何惡生者假借也假之而生生者塵垢 也死生為晝夜且吾與子觀化而化及我我又何惡焉 (斯皆先示有情然後尋至理以遣之若云我本無情故/能無憂則夫有情者遂自絶於逺曠之域而迷困於憂) (樂之/塲矣)莊子之楚見空髑髏髐然有形撽以馬捶因而問 之曰夫子貪生失理而為此乎將子有亡國之事斧鉞 之誅而為此乎將子有不善之行愧遺父母妻子之醜 而為此乎將子有凍餒之患而為此乎将子之春秋故 及此乎於是語卒援髑髏枕而卧夜半髑髏見夢曰子 之談者似辯士諸子所言皆生人之累也死則無此矣
Interpretation

When Zhuangzi's wife passed away, Huizi (Hui Shi) came to offer condolences and found Zhuangzi sitting with his legs apart, beating on an earthen basin and singing. Huizi said, "You lived with your wife for many years, she bore your children and grew old with you. Not weeping is one thing, but drumming and singing—isn't this going too far?"

Zhuangzi replied: "Not so. When she first died, how could I not grieve? But upon reflection, I realized she originally had no life; not only no life, but no physical form; not even the primordial Qi (the fundamental energy that constitutes all things in Daoist thought) that forms the body. Life emerges from chaotic nothingness—first comes Qi, which condenses into form, and form then generates life. Now she has returned to death, as naturally as the cycling of the four seasons. At this moment she rests peacefully in the great chamber of Heaven and Earth, yet here I am weeping—wouldn't that show ignorance of life's true essence? So I ceased my mourning."

The recluses Zhili Shu and Hu Jie Shu were wandering on Mingbo Hill (a legendary place where the Yellow Emperor once rested) when a tumor suddenly grew on Hu Jie Shu's left elbow. Appearing disgusted by it, Zhili Shu asked, "Do you loathe it?" Hu Jie Shu answered: "No, why should I? Life is but a borrowed vessel—our existence is like dust temporarily settled. Birth and death alternate like day and night. We came to observe the transformations of all things—now that transformation manifests in me, why should I resent it?"

In the state of Chu, Zhuangzi saw a skull and, tapping it with his horsewhip, asked: "Did you die clinging to life against the Heavenly principle? Or was it from war and execution during your kingdom's fall? Did misdeeds shame you before your family? Did cold and hunger take you? Or was it natural longevity's end?" Then he used the skull as a pillow. At midnight, the skull appeared in his dream saying: "You speak like a sophist, but your words reflect living men's troubles. In death, none remain."

(These stories first present ordinary human emotions, then resolve them through philosophical insight. Had they directly stated "I am without emotion therefore without sorrow," ordinary people would have found it unattainable, remaining trapped in their afflictions.)

子欲聞死之説乎莊子曰然髑髏曰死無君於上無臣 於下亦無四時之事從然以天地為春秋雖南面王樂 不能過也莊子不信曰吾使司命復生子形為子骨肉 肌膚反子父母妻子閭里知識子欲之乎髑髏深矉蹙 額曰吾安能棄南面王樂而復為人間之勞乎(舊説云/莊子樂) (死惡生斯説謬矣若然何謂齊乎所謂齊者生時安生/死時安死生死之情既齊則無為當生而憂死耳此荘) (子之旨也○髑音獨髏音樓/髐苦堯反從子用反縱⬤也)顔淵東之齊孔子有憂色 子貢下席而問曰小子敢問囘東之齊夫子有憂色何 耶孔子曰善哉女問昔者管子有言丘甚善之曰禇小 者不可以懐大綆短者不可以汲深夫若是者以為命 有所成而形有所適也夫不可損益(故當任/之而已)吾恐囘與 齊侯言堯舜黄帝之道而重以燧人神農之言彼将内 求於已而不得不得則惑人惑則死(内求不得将求於/外舍内求外非惑) (如/何)且女獨不聞邪昔者海鳥止於魯郊魯侯御而觴之 於廟奏九韶以為樂具太牢以為膳鳥乃眩視憂悲不 敢食一臠不敢飲一杯三日而死此以己養飬鳥也非 以鳥飬飬鳥也夫以鳥養養鳥者宜栖之深林遊之壇 陸浮之江湖食之鰌䱔隨行列而止委蛇而處彼唯人 言之惡聞奚以夫譊譊為乎咸池九韶之樂張之洞庭
Interpretation

Would you like to hear a perspective on death? Zhuangzi said, "Certainly." The skull told him: After death, there are no rulers above to oppress you, no subjects below to trouble you, nor the toil of laboring through the four seasons. You roam freely, taking heaven and earth as your measure of time. Even the joy of being a king facing south cannot compare to such liberation. Skeptical, Zhuangzi replied, "What if I asked the Director of Fate (the god who governs life and death) to restore your body, revive your bones, flesh, and skin, and return you to your parents, wife, children, neighbors, and old friends—would you agree?" The skull frowned deeply and said, "How could I abandon kingly joy for the hardships of human life again?" (Old commentaries misunderstand Zhuangzi as glorifying death and despising life. His true teaching is to abide peacefully in the moment—living with ease, accepting death with equanimity. Life and death are ultimately no different; there’s no need to dread death while alive.)

When Yan Yuan prepared to journey east to Qi, Confucius wore a troubled expression. Zigong stepped forward and asked, "May I ask why you’re concerned about Yan Yuan’s trip to Qi?" Confucius replied, "A good question. Long ago, Guan Zhong once said something I deeply agree with—‘A small bag can’t hold large things; a short rope can’t reach deep well water.’ All things have their destined endowments and fitting forms; they cannot be forcibly altered. I fear Yan Yuan will speak to the Duke of Qi about the great Dao of Yao, Shun, and the Yellow Emperor, adding the teachings of Suiren and Shennong. If the Duke fails to grasp it, he’ll grow perplexed, and perplexity may bring disaster. (Consider this:) Once, a seabird alighted in the outskirts of Lu. The Marquis of Lu welcomed it into the ancestral temple, performed the Nine Shao music, and offered the grand sacrifice of the Tai Lao. Yet the bird, dizzy and terrified, dared not eat a morsel or drink a drop. It died in three days. This was nurturing a bird as one nurtures a man, not as one nurtures a bird. To truly nurture a bird, let it perch in deep forests, wander sandy isles, float on rivers and lakes, feed on minnows and loaches, rest among its flock, and live with unhindered ease. Birds detest human clamor—why subject them to the raucous strains of the Xianchi or Nine Shao? Even if such music were played in the wilds of Dongting (the vast expanse of nature), what good would it do the bird?"

之野鳥聞之而飛獸聞之而走魚聞之而下入人卒聞 之相與還而觀之魚處水而生人處水而死彼必相與 異其好惡故異也故先聖不一其能不同其事(各隨其/情○爰) (居一名雜縣舉頭高八尺/樊光註爾雅云形似鳯皇)名止於實義設於適是之謂 條達而福持(實而適故條達/性常得故福持)列子行食於道從見百嵗 髑髏攓蓬而指之曰唯予與女知而未嘗死未嘗生也 (各以所/遇為樂)若果養乎予果歡乎(歡飬之實/未有定在)種有幾(變化種/數不可) (勝計○種/章勇反)得水則為㡭得水土之際則為鼃蠙之衣生 於陵屯則為陵舄陵舄得欝棲則為烏足烏足之根為 蠐螬其葉為蝴蝶蝴蝶胥也化而為蟲生於竈下其狀 若脫其名為鴝掇鴝掇千日為鳥其名為乾餘骨乾餘 骨之沫為斯彌斯彌為食醯頥輅生乎食醯黄⬤生乎 九猷瞀芮生乎腐蠸羊奚比乎不箰乆竹生青寧青寧 生程程生馬馬生人人又反入於機萬物皆出於機皆 入於機(此言一氣而萬形有變化而無死生也○得水/則為㡭此古絶字音絶今讀音繼萬物雖有兆) (朕得水土氣乃相繼而生也本或作㫁又作續㫁得水/土之際則為鼃户蝸反蠙步田反又音賔之衣言物根)
Interpretation

Wild birds take flight at the sound of voices, beasts flee when they hear noise, and fish dive deep upon hearing disturbances—only humans gather to observe. Fish survive in water, yet humans die in it, illustrating how all creatures have their distinct preferences and aversions. Therefore, the ancient sages never forced uniformity in talents or demanded identical pursuits (allowing all things to follow their inherent nature).

(Here, a bird called "Zaxian" is mentioned, which holds its head eight feet high. Fan Guang's commentary on Erya describes it as resembling a phoenix.) Names should correspond to reality, and meanings should be precisely fitting—this is called "orderly coherence with enduring blessings" (content that is substantial and appropriate ensures smooth reasoning; preserving one's inherent nature ensures lasting fortune).

Liezi, while eating by the roadside, saw a century-old skull. Brushing aside the weeds, he pointed at it and said: "Only you and I understand—there is truly no such thing as death, nor such a thing as life." (All things find joy in their own circumstances.) Are you truly sorrowful? Am I truly joyful? (The nature of joy and sorrow has no fixed standard.) How countless are the varieties of life (the transformations are beyond numbering).

When encountering water, it becomes fragmented silk-like strands ("Ji" is the ancient character for "severed"). At the boundary of water and earth, it transforms into moss. Growing on mounds, it becomes plantain; in decaying environments, plantain turns into crowfoot grass. The roots of crowfoot grass become scarab larvae, while its leaves become butterflies. Soon, the butterfly transforms again into a tiny insect that dwells beneath the stove, resembling a freshly molted larva, called the Quduo insect. After a thousand days, the Quduo becomes a bird named the Ganyugu. The saliva of the Ganyugu forms the Simi insect, which then becomes the vinegar insect. The Yilu insect emerges from vinegar, the Huangkuang insect arises from the Jiuyou insect, and the Maorui insect is born from the decayed Quan insect. The Yangxi grass, when combined with old bamboo that no longer sprouts, produces the Qingning insect. The Qingning gives birth to the Cheng insect, the Cheng to the horse, and the horse to humans—who ultimately return to the mechanism of creation. All things arise from this mechanism and, in the end, return to it (demonstrating that all things are transformations of a single Qi; though forms change, there is no true birth or death).

(Note: "Ji" is the ancient equivalent of the character for "severed," here pronounced "jue"—though many today read it as "ji." Though things display signs of transformation, they sustain life by receiving the Qi of water and earth. Some versions write it as "broken" or "continuous." Intermittently nourished by water and earth, they become moss, illustrating how all things are rooted in the natural process of creation.)

(在水土際布在水中就水上視不見抄之可得如張緜/在水中楚人謂之鼃蠙之衣生於陵屯阜也言物因水) (成而陸産生於陵屯化作車前改名陵舄也一名澤舄/隨燥□變也然不知其祖言物化無常形也人之死也) (亦或化為草木之精或化為人也陵舄得欝栖則為烏/足欝栖蟲名烏足草名生水邊也言欝栖在陵舄之中) (則化為烏足也一云欝栖糞壌也言陵舄在糞化為烏/足也烏足之根為蠐音齊螬音曹一本作螬䗲云蝎也) (其葉為蝴蝶音蝶蛺蝶即蝴蝶也草化為蟲蟲化為草/未始有極蝴蝶胥也一名胥也化而為蟲生於竈下得) (熱氣而生也其狀若脫它括反新出皮恱好也鴝其俱/反掇丁活反乾音干沫音末口中汁也斯彌蟲也食如) (字一本作蝕醯許⬤反蝕醯若酒上蠛蠓也頥以之反/輅音路一音洛黄⬤音况頥⬤蟲名九猷音由九宜為) (乆乆老也猷蟲名也瞀莫豆反芮如銳反腐音輔蠸音/權亦蟲名也爾雅云一名守𤓰一名忿鼠也羊奚比毗) (志反箰息尹反羊奚草名根似蕪菁與乆竹比合而為/物皆生於非𩔖也青寧蟲名青寧生程未聞程生馬馬) (生人俗本多/誤故具録之)  
Interpretation

This passage vividly depicts the wondrous phenomena of mutual transformations among various life forms in nature, conveying in modern terms the Daoist principle of perpetual flux in all things. The plant lingxi (a type of plantain) growing by water transforms into wuzu grass when encountering yuqi (possibly certain insects or decaying matter). The roots of wuzu grass then metamorphose into qicao (grub larvae), while its leaves become butterflies. Conversely, butterflies can also revert to insects.

The text enumerates a series of remarkable biological transformations: The heat beneath a kitchen stove gives rise to insects that shed their skins like snakes; the simi insect transforms into vinegar flies found on fermented liquids; the yellow huangrang insect becomes the nine-tailed jiuyou insect; the maorui beetle turns into the melon-devouring fuquan pest; when the yangxi plant (with turnip-like roots) combines with aged bamboo, it produces the enigmatic qingning insect, which ultimately transforms into a horse—and the horse, in turn, may transform into a human.

These seemingly fantastical tales of metamorphosis illustrate the Daoist philosophical view of "the impermanence of material transformations" (wuhua wuchang): all things exist in eternal flux without fixed forms, as natural as the cycle of life and death. The commentary specifically notes that "popular versions often contain errors," indicating that divergent accounts of these biological transformations already existed at the time, further emphasizing the theme of ceaseless change.

                   莊子注卷六

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0138); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 5 Vol. 7 →