中文 · EN

《莊子注》Vol. 7

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 7 / 10 19,580 characters

About this page. The original text of 《莊子注》 Vol. 7 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 40 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《莊子注》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

欽定四庫全書  莊子注巻七       晉 郭象 注   達生第十九 達生之情者不務生之所無以為(生之所無以為/者分外物也)達命 之情者不務知之所無奈何(知之所無奈何/者命表事也)養形必先 之物物有餘而形不養者有之矣(知止其分物稱其生/生斯足矣有餘則傷) (也/)有生必先無離形形不離而生亡者有之矣(守形太/甚故生) (亡也○離力/智反下同)生之來不能却其去不能止(非我所制則/無為有懐於) (其/間)悲夫世之人以為養形足以存生(故彌養之/而彌失之)而養形 果不足以存生(養之彌厚則/死地彌至)則世奚足為哉(莫若放/而任之)雖 不足為而不可不為者其為不免矣(性分各自為者皆/在至理中來故不) (可免也是以善養/生者從而任之)夫欲免為形者莫如棄世棄世則無 累無累則正平正平則與彼更生更生則幾矣(更生者/日新之) (謂也付之日新則性/命盡矣○幾其依反)事奚足棄而生奚足遺棄事則形 不勞遺生則精不虧(所以遺/棄之)夫形全精復與天為一(俱/不) (為/也)天地者萬物之父母也(無所偏為故/能子萬物)合則成體散則 成始(所在皆成/無常處)形精不虧是謂能移(與化/俱也)精而又精反
Interpretation

This passage presents Guo Xiang's Jin Dynasty commentary on the Zhuangzi's "Mastering Life" chapter, exploring the wisdom of properly understanding life and nurturing vitality.

One who truly comprehends the essence of life does not pursue things extraneous to existence itself ("what life has no use for" refers to external matters beyond one's fundamental nature). One who understands the truth of destiny does not force what intellect cannot change ("what knowledge finds无可奈何" refers to predetermined matters). Though people generally recognize that nurturing the body requires material means, we often see cases where material abundance fails to properly sustain vitality (knowing when to stop is enough - when materials match life's needs, excess becomes harmful).

Preserving life first requires keeping body and spirit united, yet some cling to physical form so desperately they lose vitality (because excessive attachment to form destroys life's energy). When life comes, none can refuse it; when it departs, none can stop it (neither is within human control, so excessive concern is unnecessary). Sadly, worldly people believe maintaining the body preserves life (yet the more deliberately they nurture it, the more they lose it). In truth, mere physical care cannot retain life (the more excessive the nurturing, the closer one approaches death) - so why do people exhaust themselves? (Better to follow nature's course). Though such efforts prove ultimately useless, humans cannot refrain from them (because these actions stem from inherent nature, all conforming to Dao's patterns and being unavoidable. Thus those truly skilled at nurturing life follow natural rhythms).

To transcend physical constraints, the best method is rising above worldly concerns. Beyond worldly ties there are no burdens; without burdens one achieves mental equilibrium; with equilibrium one renews life alongside nature ("renewal" means daily rebirth - following natural transformations fully realizes one's nature and vitality). What worldly matters deserve abandoning? Why deliberately forget life itself? Releasing mundane affairs relieves the body's toil; forgetting forced longevity practices prevents spiritual depletion (this explains why forgetting and relinquishing matter). When form remains whole and spirit restored, one merges with nature (both occurring without forced action).

Heaven and earth act as parents to all things (their impartiality enables nourishing all existence). When yin and yang qi combine, they form physical entities; when dispersed, they return to primordial state (omnipresent yet formless). When neither physical form nor spiritual essence suffers depletion, this constitutes moving in harmony with creation's transformations (following nature's changes). When spiritual cultivation reaches its zenith, one returns to assisting nature's operations.

以相天(還輔其自然也/○相息亮反)子列子問關尹曰至人潜行不 窒(其心虚故能御羣實/○關尹關令尹喜也)蹈火不熱行乎萬物之上而不 慄(至適故無不可/耳非物往可之)請問何以至於此闗尹曰是純氣之 守也非知巧果敢之列居予語女凡有貌象聲色者皆 物也物何以相逺(唯無心者/獨逺耳)夫奚足以至乎先是色而 已(同是一物耳未/足以相先也)則物之造乎不形而止乎無所化(常/逰) (於/極)夫得是而窮之者物焉得而止焉(夫至極者/非物所制)彼将處 乎不淫之度(止於所/受之分)而藏乎無端之紀(㝠然與變/化日新)遊乎 萬物之所終始(終始者/物之極)壹其性(飾則/二矣)養其氣(不以心/使之)合 其德(不以物/離性)以通乎物之所造(萬物皆造/於自爾)夫若是者其 天守全其神無郤物奚自入焉夫醉者之墜車雖疾不 死骨節與人同而犯害與人異其神全也乘亦不知也 墜亦不知也死生驚懼不入乎其胸中是故⬤物而不 慴彼得全於酒而猶若是(醉故失其所知耳非自然/無心者也○郤去逆反)而 况得全於天乎聖人藏於天故莫之能傷也(不闗性分/之外故曰) (藏/)復讐者不折鏌干(夫干將鏌鎁雖與讎為用然報讐/者不事折之以其無心○鏌音莫)
Interpretation

Liezi asked Guan Yin (disciple of Laozi and guardian of Hangu Pass) why those who attain the Dao can submerge in water without drowning, tread on fire without burning, and walk upon all things without fear. Guan Yin replied that this is because they preserve the pure primordial Qi (vital energy), which cannot be achieved through mere cleverness or brute force.

Guan Yin elaborated further: All things with form, sound, or color are concrete phenomena. There is no fundamental difference between objects—what truly matters is whether one can transcend the constraints of form and appearance. Those who truly attain the Dao reach a state beyond form and image, wandering in harmony with creation. Such individuals abide in their true nature, flowing with the transformations of nature, their spirit connected to the root of all things.

Just as a drunkard who falls from a carriage may be injured but not fatally harmed—because his spirit is in a state of selfless oblivion—those who embody the Dao go even deeper. They are wholly united with the heavenly Dao, so that neither life nor death nor fear can disturb their minds. The sage fully merges with nature, and thus external things cannot harm them. It is like how an avenger would not break the sword (Ganjiang or Moye) once wielded by their enemy, for the sword itself has no will of its own.

(吴王闔閭使干將造劒劒有二狀一/曰干將二曰鏌鎁鏌鎁干將妻名也)雖有忮心者不怨 飄瓦(飄落之瓦雖復中人人莫之怨/者由其無情○忮音支害也)是以天下平均(凡/不) (平者由/有情)故無攻戰之亂無殺戮之形者由此道也(無情/之道) (大/矣)不開人之天而開天之天(不慮而知開天也知而後/感開人也然則開天者性) (之動也開人/者知之用也)開天者德生(性動者遇物而當足/則忘餘斯德生也)開人者 賊生(知用者從感而求勸/而不已斯賊生也)不厭其天不忽於人(任其天/性而動) (則人理亦/自全矣)民幾乎以其真(民之所患偽之所生常在/於知用不在於性動也)仲 尼適楚出於林中見痀僂者承蜩猶掇之也仲尼曰子 巧乎有道邪曰我有道也五六月累丸二而不墜則失 者錙銖(累二丸於竿頭是用手之停審也其承蜩所失/者不過錙銖之間也○痀於禹反僂音縷承一) (本作美蜩音條蟬也掇丁活反拾也五六月/黏蟬時也累劣彼反下同謂累之於竿頭也)累三而不 墜則失者十一(所失/愈少)累五而不墜猶掇之也(停審之至/故乃無所) (復/失)吾處身也若厥株拘吾執臂也若槁木之枝(不動之/至○厥)
Interpretation

King Wu of Wu commissioned Gan Jiang to forge swords, ultimately creating two blades—one named Gan Jiang and the other Mo Ye (after the swordsmith's wife). This narrative illustrates a profound truth: even those harboring resentment do not rage against randomly falling roof tiles (the "drifting tile" symbolizes accidental occurrences that incur no blame, as they lack intentionality).

Herein lies a fundamental principle: the world achieves peace by adhering to the "emotionless" natural order (where "emotionless" denotes freedom from human selfish desires). Rather than clinging to artificial striving, one should accord with innate nature ("human-made heaven" represents artificial cleverness, while "heaven's heaven" signifies spontaneous authenticity). Aligning with nature nurtures De (Virtue/Power) (when one's essence flows naturally, situations are met with perfect responsiveness), whereas forced cleverness breeds calamity (conscious pursuit traps one in endless craving).

When Confucius traveled through Chu, he observed a hunchbacked old man catching cicadas with a bamboo pole, his skill so effortless as if simply picking them up. The elder revealed his secret: "Through five or six months of practice, I balanced two clay balls atop my pole without dropping them—then missed few cicadas. With three balls steady, I failed only once in ten attempts. When five balls stayed balanced, it became as easy as gathering fallen fruit." He described his state: "My body stands like a rooted stump, my arms extend like withered branches" (depicting ultimate focused absorption).

These paired parables—sword-forging and cicada-catching—demonstrate the state of natural accord and selfless concentration. The hunchback's gradual mastery reveals a Daoist cultivation path where skill transcends into Dao (the Way). When focus reaches its zenith, external movements appear effortlessly spontaneous.

(本或作橛同其月反株音誅拘音/俱厥䜿也䜿若株拘也槁苦老反)雖天地之大萬物之 多而唯蜩翼之知吾不反不側不以萬物易蜩之翼何 為而不得(遺彼故/得此)孔子顧謂弟子曰用志不分乃凝於 神其痀僂丈人之謂乎顔淵問仲尼曰吾嘗濟乎觴深 之淵津人操舟若神吾問焉曰操舟可學邪曰可善游 者數能(言物雖有性亦須/數習而後能耳)若乃夫沒人則未嘗見舟而 便操之也(沒人謂能鶩/沒於水底)吾問焉而不吾告敢問何謂也 仲尼曰善游者數能忘水也(習以成性/遂若自然)若乃夫沒人之 未嘗見舟而便操之也彼視淵若陵視舟之覆猶其車 却也(視淵若陵故視舟之覆於/淵猶車之却退於坂也)覆却萬方陳乎前而不 得入其舍(覆却雖多而猶不以/經懐以其性便故也)惡徃而不暇(所遇皆/閒暇也)以 瓦注者巧以鉤注者憚以黄金注者㱪(所要愈重則其/心愈矜也○注) (之𣗳反撃也憚音丹忌惡也一曰難也㱪音/昬説文云㱪矜也補注射也射而賭物曰注)其巧一也 而有所矜則重外也凡外重者内拙(夫欲養生全内者/其唯無所矜重也) 田開之見周威公威公曰吾聞祝腎學生(學生者/務中適)吾子 與祝腎逰亦何聞焉田開之曰開之操拔篲以侍門庭
Interpretation

This passage reveals the essential Daoist practice of "single-minded concentration and spiritual focus" through several vivid stories.

An old hunchback catching cicadas with a bamboo pole demonstrated such precise skill it seemed effortless. When Confucius asked his secret, the old man explained that after five or six months of practice, he could balance two pellets on the pole without dropping them, making mistakes rare. When he progressed to balancing five pellets, his movements became as natural as picking things up by hand. Confucius marveled: "When the mind is unified without distraction, one attains divine mastery—this hunchbacked elder exemplifies this truth."

Yan Yuan once asked Confucius about ferrymen at the Shang Deep crossing whose boat-handling skills seemed miraculous. Confucius explained: "Good swimmers quickly forget about the water, while expert divers see deep abysses as flat ground and capsized boats merely as carts rolling backward. No accident can disturb their composure, hence they handle any situation with ease."

The text then uses gambling as metaphor: When wagering with pottery shards, one's movements remain deft; with belt hooks, hesitation appears; with gold, the hands grow clumsy. The skill remains constant, but excessive attachment to external objects makes the mind dull. Those who overvalue material things invariably lack inner cultivation.

Finally, when Tian Kaizhi visited Duke Wei of Zhou, he mentioned studying under Zhu Shen (a longevity master) by simply sweeping the front steps—implying true practice requires the inner stillness Zhu Shen taught. These stories collectively illustrate that only by eliminating distractions and maintaining single-minded focus can one attain transcendent mastery.

亦何聞於夫子威公曰田子無譲寡人願聞之開之曰 聞之夫子曰善養生者若牧羊然視其後者而鞭之威 公曰何謂也田開之曰魯有單豹者岩居而水飲不與 民共利行年七十而猶有嬰兒之色不幸遇餓虎餓虎 殺而食之有張毅者髙門縣薄無不走也行年四十而 有内熱之病以死豹養其内而虎食其外毅飬其外而 病攻其内此二子者皆不鞭其後者也(夫守一方之事/至於過理者不) (及於㑹通之適也鞭其後者去不及也○縣音𤣥薄簾/也走至也言無不至門奉貴富也補走趍走也帷薄之) (外不趍而猶必走恭之至也/吕氏春秋曰張毅好恭是也)仲尼曰無入而藏(藏既内/矣而又) (入之此過/於入也)無出而陽(陽既外矣而又出/之此過於出也)柴立其中央(若/槁) (木之無心而/中適是立也)三者若得其名必極(名極而/實當也)夫畏塗者十 殺一人則父子兄弟相戒也必盛卒徒而後敢出焉不 亦知乎人之所取畏者袵席之上飲食之間而不知為 之戒者過也(十殺一耳便大畏之至於色欲之害動/皆之死地而莫不冐之斯過之甚也)祝 宗人𤣥端以臨牢筴説彘曰汝奚惡死吾将三月㹖汝 十日戒三日齊藉白茅加汝肩尻乎彫爼之上則汝為 之乎為彘謀曰不如食以糠糟而錯之牢筴之中自為
Interpretation

This passage vividly illustrates Zhuangzi's core philosophy of nurturing life through several allegorical stories.

Duke Luwei sought Tian Kaizhi's advice on cultivating life. Tian recounted Confucius' analogy: nurturing life well is like herding sheep - one must notice stragglers and urge them forward. He then presented two cautionary tales: Shan Bao, who secluded himself in mountains retaining youthful looks at seventy only to be devoured by a tiger; and Zhang Yi, who immersed himself in social affairs and died of internal fever at forty. These show the pitfalls of focusing solely on inner cultivation or external engagements.

Confucius proposed three principles: don't over-isolate yourself (like Shan Bao's complete seclusion), nor excessively publicize yourself (like Zhang Yi's constant socializing), but maintain the middle way like withered wood. The text employs a traveler's encounter with bandits to highlight how people guard against minor dangers while ignoring greater harms in daily indulgences of food and desire.

The passage concludes with a sacrificial pig allegory satirizing worldly delusions: A priest in ceremonial robes tells the pig, "Why fear death? We'll honor you with exquisite vessels," when for the pig, living in its pen eating husks would be preferable. This metaphor reveals how people become enchanted by superficial glory while forgetting life's essence.

謀則茍生有軒冕之尊死得於腞楯之上聚僂之中則 為之為彘謀則去之自為謀則取之所異彘者何也(欲/贍) (則身亡理常俱耳不間人獸也○筴初革反牢豕室也/木欄也㹖音患養也尻苦羔反楯食凖反腞猶篆也楯) (猶案也僂力主反聚僂器名也今塜壙中注為之一云/聚僂棺槨也一云聚當作菆才官反僂當作蔞力乆反) (謂殯於菆塗/蔞翣之中)桓公田於澤管仲御見鬼焉公撫管仲之 手曰仲父何見對曰臣無所見公反誒詒為疾數日不 出齊士有皇子告敖者曰公則自傷鬼惡能傷公夫忿 滀之氣散而不反則為不足上而不下則使人善怒下 而不上則使人善忘不上不下中身當心則為病桓公 曰然則有鬼乎曰有沈有履竈有髻户内之煩壌雷霆 處之東北方之下者倍阿鮭蠪躍之西北方之下者則 泆陽處之水有罔象丘有崒山有⬤野有⬤⬤澤有委 蛇公曰請問委蛇之状何如皇子曰委蛇其大如轂其 長如轅紫衣而朱冠其為物也惡聞雷車之聲則捧其 首而立見之者殆乎霸桓公囅然而笑曰此寡人之所 見者也於是正衣冠與之坐不終日而不知病之去也 (此章言憂來而累生者不明也患去而生得者達理也/○誒音哀詒音䑓誒詒失魂魄也皇子告敖皇姓告敖)
Interpretation

This passage presents two stories illustrating how psychological factors affect health.

The first story describes how people crave high positions and luxurious carriages (xuān miǎn) during their lives, and ornate coffins (shàn dùn, jù lǚ) after death, yet advocate simplicity when planning for pigs. Zhuangzi points out the absurdity of this double standard, showing that humans and animals share the same fundamental nature in life and death.

The second story recounts Duke Huan of Qi's ghost encounter. While hunting, the duke claimed to see a ghost and fell ill from fright. The wise scholar Huangzi Gao'ao explained: "No ghost can actually harm people—what harms you is pent-up Qi (fèn chù zhī qì)." He elaborated how stagnant Qi causes different ailments: rising Qi induces irritability, sinking Qi leads to forgetfulness, and blocked chest Qi creates real illness. He then catalogued various legendary spirits: the kitchen god (lǚ zào) of the hearth, the door god (jì), the thunder deity (léi tíng), and finally mentioned a marsh creature called Wēi yí—a purple-bodied, red-crowned monster as large as a chariot axle that fears thunder. Those who see it would rule the world. Upon hearing this, the duke laughed, exclaiming this was exactly the "ghost" he'd seen, and immediately recovered.

The moral shines through: most worries are self-created, and clarity of mind dissolves ailments. As the commentary notes: "Anxiety arises from obscured understanding, while relief comes through penetrating truth"—distress stems from confused perception, and healing follows awakened wisdom.

(字齊之賢士也滀敕六反沈水汙也漏神名竈有髻音/結竈神著赤衣狀如美女鮭戸蝸反蠪音聾倍阿神名) (也鮭蠪状如小兒長一尺四寸黒衣赤幘大冠帶劒持/戟泆音逸泆陽豹頭馬尾作狗頭一云神名也罔象本) (作無傷云狀如小兒赤黒色赤爪大耳長臂一云水神/名崒本又作莘所巾反又音臻状如狗有角文身五采) (⬤求龜反状如鼔而一足方音傍本亦作⬤同皇/本亦作⬤同⬤⬤状如蛇兩頭五采文委於危反)紀渻 子為王養鬭雞十日而問雞已乎曰未也方虚憍而恃 氣十日又問曰未也猶應嚮景十日又問曰未也猶疾 視而盛氣十日又問曰幾矣雞雖有鳴者已無變矣望 之似木雞矣其德全矣異雞無敢應者反走矣(此章言/養之以) (至於全者猶無敵於外况自全乎○王齊王也虚憍居/喬反高仰頭也應應對之應下同嚮許丈反本亦作響) (景於領反應/響鳴顧景行)孔子觀於吕梁縣水三十仞流沫四十里 黿鼉魚鱉之所不能游也見一丈夫游之以為有苦而 欲死也使弟子並流而拯之數百步而出被髮行歌而 游於塘下孔子從而問焉曰吾以子為鬼察子則人也 請問蹈水有道乎曰亡吾無道吾始乎故長乎性成乎 命與齊俱入與汨偕出(磨翁而旋入者齊也囘伏而湧/出者汨也○吕梁今西河離石)
Interpretation

This passage records several intriguing stories and legends. First are descriptions of various divine manifestations: the Kitchen God (Zao Shen) wears red robes and resembles a beautiful woman; the Household Guardian Deity (Bei'a Shen) appears as a child, standing one chi four cun tall (about 47cm), clad in black with a red headscarf, wielding a sword and halberd; the Water Spirit Wangxiang (also called Wushang) looks like a child with reddish-black skin, large ears and long arms; there's also a spirit called "Shen" resembling a horned dog adorned with five-colored patterns.

Next comes the story of Ji Shengzi training fighting cocks for the King of Qi. After forty days of training, the rooster transformed from initial bluster to complete indifference toward other birds' challenges, standing motionless like a wooden fowl. Ji Shengzi declared this the highest achievement, explaining the bird had attained "perfect De" (complete inner cultivation) - making other cocks flee without daring to fight. This allegorically illustrates human self-cultivation through poultry training.

Lastly is Confucius' encounter at Lüliang (modern Lishi, Shanxi). There, a thirty-ren-high waterfall (about 54m) created torrents too fierce even for giant turtles or crocodiles. Spotting a man swimming effortlessly, Confucius assumed he was suicidal and sent disciples to rescue him. The swimmer covered hundreds of paces before emerging, shaking his hair and singing. When asked his technique, the man replied there was none - he simply followed the water's nature, diving with whirlpools and surfacing with currents. This parable demonstrates the vital principle of conforming to natural laws.

(西有此縣絶世謂之黄梁淮南子曰古者龍門未/鑿河出孟門之上也齊囘水如磨齊也汨胡忽反)從水 之道而不為私焉(任水而/不任己)此吾所以蹈之也孔子曰何 謂始乎故長乎性成乎命曰吾生於陵而安於陵故也 長於水而安於水性也不知吾所以然而然命也(此章/言人) (有偏能得而任之則天下無難矣用夫/無難以涉乎生生之道何徃而不通也)梓慶削木為鐻 鐻成見者驚猶鬼神(不似人所作也○梓慶魯大匠也/梓官名慶其名也鐻音據樂器也) (似夾/鍾)魯侯見而問焉曰子何術以為焉對曰臣工人何 術之有雖然有一焉臣將為鐻未嘗敢以耗氣也必齊 以靜心齊三日而不敢懐慶賞爵禄齊五日不敢懐非 譽巧拙齊七日輒然忘吾有四枝形體也當是時也無 公朝(視公朝若無則/跂慕之心絶矣)其巧專而外滑消(性外之/事去也)然後入 山林觀天性形軀至矣然後成見鐻然後加手焉不然 則己(必取材中者也○見/賢遍反中丁仲反)則以天合天(不離其/自然也)器之所 以疑神者其是與(盡因物之妙故乃/疑是鬼神所作耳)東野稷以御見荘 公進退中繩左右旋中規莊公以為文弗過也使之鉤 百而反顔闔遇之入見曰稷之馬将敗公密而不應少 焉果敗而反公曰子何以知之曰其馬力竭矣而猶求
Interpretation

This passage presents two stories illustrating the Daoist principle of "following natural spontaneity."

The first recounts the story of Zi Qing crafting a musical instrument called ju (similar to a bell). As a master artisan of the Lu State, Zi Qing would first observe purification rituals to quiet his mind: for three days he abstained from thoughts of rewards and titles, for five days disregarded others' opinions, and after seven days even forgot his own physical existence. Only then would he enter the mountains to select the most suitable wood, crafting the instrument entirely according to the material's inherent qualities. When Duke Lu inquired about his secret, Zi Qing explained the key lay in not expending Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy), achieving complete inner stillness to reach the state of "matching Heaven with Heaven"—where the natural properties of the material perfectly harmonized with the artisan's innate nature.

The second story tells of Dongye Ji, a master charioteer who demonstrated his skills for Duke Zhuang of Lu. His horses moved with such precision in advancing, retreating and turning that their movements seemed measured with compasses. The Duke marveled that not even the most exquisite patterns could compare. However, Yan He, a Daoist sage, discerned the horses were exhausted yet being pushed beyond their limits, predicting inevitable failure. Soon after, the horses indeed collapsed. This illustrates how forcibly pursuing perfection against natural laws ultimately leads to failure.

Both stories demonstrate that true mastery comes not through forceful striving, but by aligning with the inherent nature of things ("flowing like water," "matching Heaven with Heaven"). By eliminating selfish desires and distractions ("free from personal bias"), one attains sublime skill. Just as water flows naturally without conscious effort, humans who act in this manner achieve unimpeded success. The stories exemplify Wuwei (non-action)—the Daoist ideal of effortless action through profound attunement to natural patterns.

焉故曰敗(斯明至當之不可過也○東野稷孫卿作東/野畢荘公衛莊公文弗過也謂過織組之文) (也使之鉤百而反稷白矜其能圓/而驅之如鉤復迹百反而不知止)工倕旋而蓋規矩指 與物化而不以心稽故其靈䑓一而不桎(雖工倕之巧/猶任規矩此) (言因物之易也○倕音垂云工倕堯時巧人也旋圎也/瞿句也倕工巧任規以見為圎覆蓋其句指不以施度) (也是與物化之不以心稽/留也補蓋車蓋指手指)忘足屨之適也忘要帶之適 也(百體皆適則/都忘其身也)知忘是非心之適也(是非生於/不適耳)不内變 不外從事㑹之適也(所遇而安故/無所變從也)始乎適而未嘗不適 者忘適之適也(識適者猶/未適也)有孫休者踵門而詫子扁慶 子曰休居鄉不見謂不脩臨難不見謂不勇然而田原 不遇歲事君不遇世賔於鄉里逐於州部則胡罪乎天 哉休惡遇此命也扁子曰子獨不聞夫至人之自行耶 忘其肝膽遺其耳目(闇付自然也○/詫救駕反告也)芒然彷徨乎塵垢 之外(凡非真性/皆塵垢也)逍遙乎無事之業(凡自為者皆/無事之業也)是謂為 而不恃(率性自為耳/非恃而為之)長而不宰(任其自長耳/非宰而長之)今汝飾知 以驚愚脩身以明汙昭昭乎若掲日月而行也汝得全
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist wisdom of "following nature's course." Dongye Ji, though a master charioteer of antiquity, failed precisely because he over-displayed his skills—demonstrating that excellence requires measured expression. Gong Chui, the legendary artisan of Emperor Yao's time, could draw perfect circles freehand because he worked in complete harmony with his materials, never forcing results.

True comfort manifests when: one forgets their feet because the shoes fit perfectly, or forgets their waist because the belt sits just right. Only by releasing distinctions of right/wrong can the mind find ease; only undisturbed by externalities can one achieve genuine contentment. The highest state is the comfort of "forgetting comfort itself"—conscious pursuit inevitably eludes this grace.

The subsequent story of Sun Xiu illustrates this: perpetually lamenting unrecognized talent, the Daoist sage Bian Qingzi diagnoses his flaw as striving for display—like "carrying lanterns at high noon" to flaunt intellect, which only highlights imperfections. The truly realized person "forgets their liver and gall, discards ears and eyes" (becoming unaware even of their own organs), naturally merging with the cosmic flow. They remain transcendent amid worldly affairs, accomplishing without claiming, guiding without controlling. Herein lies the essence of preserving innate nature and harmonizing with Dao.

(Note: "Gong Chui's circles surpassed compass-drawn ones" refers to the artisan's freehand perfection; "parading with sun and moon" metaphorically depicts ostentatious self-display)

而形軀具而九竅無中道夭於聾盲跛蹇而比於人數 亦幸矣又何暇乎天之怨哉子徃矣孫子出扁子入坐 有間仰天而歎弟子問曰先生何為歎乎扁子曰向者 休來吾告之以至人之德吾恐其驚而遂至於惑也弟 子曰不然孫子之所言是耶先生之所言非耶非固不 能惑是孫子所言非耶先生所言是耶彼固惑而來矣 又奚罪焉扁子曰不然昔者有鳥止於魯郊魯君説之 為具太牢以饗之奏九韶以樂之鳥乃始憂悲眩視不 敢飲食此之謂以己飬飬鳥也若夫以鳥養飬鳥者宜 棲之深林浮之江湖食之以委蛇則平陸而已矣(各有/所便) (也○委/蛇泥鰌)今休欵啓寡聞之民也吾告以至人之德譬之 若載鼷以車馬樂鴳以鐘皷也彼又惡能無驚乎哉(此章/言善) (養生者各任性分之適而至矣○欵空/也啓開也如空之開所見小也鴳音晏)   山木第二十 莊子行於山中見大木枝葉盛茂伐木者止其旁而不 取也問其故曰無所可用荘子曰此木以不材得終其 天年夫子出於山舍於故人之家故人喜命豎子殺鴈 而烹之豎子請曰其一能鳴其一不能鳴請奚殺主人 曰殺不能鳴者明日弟子問於莊子曰昨日山中之木 以不材得終其天年今主人之鴈以不材死先生将何 處莊子笑曰周將處夫材與不材之間材與不材之間
Interpretation

Though the human body is complete, if the nine orifices (eyes, ears, nose, mouth, etc.) become damaged midway—turning one deaf, blind, or lame—can such a person still be considered normal? That they remain alive is already fortunate—how could they have time to complain against Heaven? Go now!" After the grandson left, Master Bian entered the house and sat down.

After a while, Master Bian sighed, looking up at the sky. His disciple asked, "Why does the Master sigh?" Master Bian replied, "Just now, Xiu came to see me, and I spoke to him about the virtue (De) of the Perfected One (one who has attained the highest moral cultivation). I fear that hearing such things may have startled him, only deepening his confusion." The disciple said, "That cannot be. If what the grandson said was right and you were wrong, error cannot confuse truth. If the grandson was wrong and you were right, he came here already confused—what fault is there in that?"

Master Bian said, "It is not so. Once, a bird alighted in the outskirts of Lu. The ruler of Lu delighted in it, feasting it with the grand sacrifice (the highest ceremonial offering) and playing the Nine Shao music to please it. Yet the bird was terrified, dizzy with fright, and dared not eat or drink. This is called nourishing a bird as one would nourish a human. Had it been raised according to its nature, it should have been allowed to perch in deep forests, float on rivers and lakes, feed on minnows, and be left undisturbed on open ground. Xiu is a man of narrow understanding. When I spoke to him of the virtue of the Perfected One, it was like carrying a small mouse in a carriage or amusing a bird with bells and drums—how could he not be startled?"

The "Mountain Tree" chapter records: Zhuangzi saw a great tree in the mountains, lush and flourishing, yet the woodcutters rested beside it without felling it. When asked why, they replied, "It is useless." Zhuangzi said, "This tree survives to fulfill its natural lifespan precisely because it is useless." Later, Zhuangzi visited a friend's home. The friend, pleased, ordered a servant to kill a goose for the feast. The servant asked, "One goose can honk, the other cannot—which shall I kill?" The host said, "Kill the one that cannot honk." The next day, Zhuangzi's disciple asked, "Yesterday, the mountain tree survived by being useless, yet the master's goose was killed for being useless. How, then, should one conduct oneself?" Zhuangzi laughed and said, "I would position myself between usefulness and uselessness. Between usefulness and uselessness..."

似之而非也故未免乎累(設將處此耳以此/未免於累竟不處)若夫乘道 德而浮逰則不然無譽無訾一龍一蛇與時俱化而無 肯專為一上一下以和為量浮逰乎萬物之祖物物而 不物於物則胡可得而累耶此神農黄帝之法則也(故/莊) (子亦/處焉)若夫萬物之情人倫之𫝊則不然合則離成則毁 廉則挫尊則議有為則虧賢則謀不肖則欺胡可得而 必乎哉悲夫弟子志之其唯道德之鄉乎(不可必故待/之不可以一) (方也唯與時俱化者為能涉變而常/通耳○𫝊直専反事願可傳行也)市南宜僚見魯侯魯 侯有憂色市南子曰君有憂色何也魯侯曰吾學先王之 道脩先君之業吾敬鬼尊賢親而行之無須㬰離居然 不免於患吾是以憂市南子曰君之除患之術淺矣(育/其) (身矜其國故雖憂懐萬端尊賢尚行而患慮愈深/者矣○市南宜僚熊宜僚也居市南因為號也)夫豐 狐文豹棲於山林伏於巖穴靜也夜行晝居戒也雖飢 渴隱約猶且胥疏於江湖之上而求食焉定也然且不 免於罔羅機辟之患是何罪之有哉其皮為之灾也今 魯國獨非君之皮耶吾願君刳形去皮洒心去欲而逰 於無人之野(欲令無其身忘其國而任其自化也○豐大/也胥相疏草謂相望疏草也補相視疏逺無)
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here employs the fable of foxes and leopards as a metaphor for worldly troubles. Those foxes with splendid fur and leopards with beautiful markings, though dwelling reclusively in mountain forests, moving cautiously by night and hiding by day while foraging along rivers and lakes, still cannot escape hunters' nets and traps. Their misfortune stems not from any wrongdoing, but from the preciousness of their pelts that invites calamity.

The state of Lu is like the "pelt" upon your person, Lord of Lu. Though you diligently study the ancient kings' methods of governance, reverently serve the spirits, and honor worthy men, you cannot avoid anxiety and peril—just as those magnificent beasts suffer because of their beautiful coats. Shinan Yiliao (a Chu state recluse) advised the Lord of Lu: Better to cast off external form, wash clean the desires in your heart, and wander freely in the uninhabited wilderness.

True liberation lies in following nature's course. Those who attain the Dao (the Way) transform like dragons and serpents according to circumstance, never clinging to fixed forms. They maintain harmony with both above and below, roaming freely within the source of all things. They govern external matters without becoming enslaved by them—how could worldly entanglements possibly constrain such beings? This is the principle of existence handed down by Shennong and the Yellow Emperor.

Those obsessed with worldly sentiments and human conventions meet the opposite fate: what gathers must scatter, what succeeds must decay, the rigid easily breaks, the eminent invites slander, action brings loss, worthiness provokes schemes, while incompetence invites bullying. Remember this, disciples—only by returning to the realm of the great Dao can one attain true peace.

(人之/處)南越有邑焉名為建德之國(寄之南越取其/去魯之逺也)其民 愚而朴少私而寡欲知作而不知藏與而不求其報不 知義之所適不知禮之所将猖狂妄行乃蹈乎大方(各/恣) (其本步而人人自蹈其方/則萬方得矣不亦大乎)其生可樂其死可𦵏(言可終/始處之) 吾願君去國捐俗與道相輔而行(所謂去國捐俗謂/蕩除其胷中也)君 曰彼其道逺而險又有江山我無舟車奈何(真謂欲使/之南越) 市南子曰君無形倨(形倨躓/礙之謂)無留居(留居滯守之謂○/無留居無留安居) 以為君車(形與物夷心與物化/斯寄物以自載也)君曰彼其道幽逺而無 人吾誰與為鄰吾無糧我無食安得而至焉市南子曰 少君之費寡君之欲雖無糧而乃足(所謂知足則/無所不足也)君其 涉於江而浮於海望之而不見其崖愈徃而不知其所 窮(絶情欲/之逺也)送君者皆自崖而反(君欲絶則民/各反守其分)君自此逺 矣(超然獨立於/萬物之上也)故有人者累(有人者有之/以為己私也)見有於人者 憂(見有於人者為/人所役用也)故堯非有人非見有於人也(雖有天/下皆寄) (之百官委之萬物而不與焉斯非有人也/因民任物而不役已斯非見有于人也)吾願去君之
Interpretation

In the southern lands of Nanyue, there exists a city-state called the "Land of Established Virtue (Jiande zhi guo)" (Zhuangzi deliberately chose this place far from the Central Plains to symbolize a realm transcending worldly concerns). The people there are simple and innocent, with few selfish desires and minimal cravings. They work diligently without hoarding, give generously without seeking reward, neither understanding where to apply worldly notions of "righteousness" nor adhering to conventional "ritual propriety." Though they may appear unrestrained, they actually follow the most fundamental Dao (each person acts naturally according to their innate nature, thereby achieving the broadest possible state of being). They live in carefree joy and are laid to rest peacefully when they die (showing this state persists through life and death alike).

I hope you can cast aside the affairs of state, relinquish worldly attachments, and walk in harmony with the Dao (relinquishing worldly attachments means clearing the mind of fixations). Yet you say: "That path is too distant and perilous, requiring me to cross rivers and seas—how can I go without a boat or carriage?" (Here, the physical distance serves as a metaphor for the difficulty of cultivating the Dao.)

Shinanzi (a fictional enlightened figure) replies: "Do not be constrained by your physical form (xingju refers to obstacles arising from the body), nor cling to any fixed state (liuju means attachment to a particular condition). Take this liberated mindset as your carriage (when form and all things are equal, and the mind communicates with all existence, you can rely on the myriad things to carry you forward)." You then worry: "That path is dark and remote, with no human presence. I have no companion and no provisions—how can I possibly reach it?"

Shinanzi says: "Reduce your expenditures and diminish your desires, and even without provisions, you will feel abundant (understanding contentment means never experiencing true lack). When you cross rivers and drift upon the sea, gazing into the distance where no shore is visible, the farther you go, the more boundless it becomes (a metaphor for completely freeing oneself from emotional attachments). Those who see you off will remain on the shore and turn back (when a ruler relinquishes fixations, the people naturally settle into their proper roles), while you will leave the mundane world behind (transcending and standing above all things)."

Thus, those who possess subjects are burdened (treating the people as private property), and those who are controlled by others are troubled (being manipulated or used). A sage ruler like Yao neither possesses his subjects nor is controlled by them (though he holds the empire, he delegates governance to officials and entrusts all things to nature, never interfering—this is non-possession; by following the people and aligning with the natural flow of things without being controlled, this is non-subjugation). I hope to help you shed these burdens.

累除君之憂而獨與道遊於大莫之國(欲令蕩然無有/國之懐○莫無) (也/)方舟而濟於河有虚舩來觸舟雖有惼心之人不怒 有一人在其上則呼張歙之一呼而不聞再呼而不聞 於是三呼邪則必以惡聲隨之向也不怒而今也怒向 也虚而今也實人能虚己以逰世其孰能害之(世雖變/其於虚) (己以免害一/也○方並也)北宫奢為衛⬤公賦斂以為鐘為壇乎郭 門之外三月而成上下之縣王子慶忌見而問焉曰子 何術之設奢曰一之間無敢設也(澹然抱一耳非敢假/設以益事也○壇祭) (地縣音𤣥怪/簡⬤故問之)其奢聞之既雕既琢復歸於朴(還用其/本性也)侗 乎其無識(任其純/朴而已)儻乎其怠疑(無所/趣也)萃乎芒乎其送徃 而迎來(無所/欣説)來者勿禁徃者勿止(任彼/也)從其彊梁(順乎/衆也) (○彊梁/多力也)隨其曲傅(無所係也○謂曲/附己者隨之也)因其自窮(用其不/得不爾) 故朝夕賦斂而毫末不挫(當故/無損)而况有大塗者乎(泰然無/執用天) (下之自為斯大通之塗也/故曰經之營之不日成之)孔子圍於陳蔡之間七日不 火食太公任徃弔之曰子幾死乎曰然子惡死乎曰然(自/同) (於好惡耳聖/人無好惡也)任曰予嘗言不死之道東海有鳥焉名曰
Interpretation

After the ruler's worries are removed, one roams alone with the Dao (the Way) in a vast and boundless realm. The "Land of Nowhere" mentioned here refers to a realm of stillness and emptiness, where nothing exists.

Two boats are crossing a river side by side, and an empty boat bumps into one's own. Even a narrow-minded person would not become angry. But if someone were aboard, one would first shout for them to steer the boat away. If the shout goes unheard, one shouts again; if that too goes unheard, one shouts a third time, and then is sure to curse at them in anger. One was not angry a moment ago but is angry now, because the boat that struck was empty then, and now someone is on it. If a person can approach the world with an empty heart, like an empty boat, who can harm them? Though worldly affairs keep changing, one who lives with an emptied self can avoid misfortune. Here, "fangzhou" (方舟) means boats joined side by side, and "emptying the self" (虚己) means letting go of the ego and not clinging to one's own opinions.

Bei Gong She collected goods and funds on behalf of Duke Ling of Wei in order to cast bells. He built an altar outside the gate of the outer city wall, and within three months the bells of both the upper and lower tiers had been hung. Prince Qingji saw this and asked him, "What method did you use?" Bei Gong She replied, "I simply held to the One, and did not dare to devise anything else." The commentary explains that he merely held to the One in a state of calm detachment, without deliberately adding any arrangement of his own; the "altar" here refers to a platform for sacrifices to the earth, and "hanging" refers to suspending the bells.

Bei Gong She had heard this principle: after carving and polishing, one should return to simplicity. Remain in undivided, unadorned simplicity, without striving for knowledge; remain at ease and unhurried, without rushing toward anything. Gathering and dispersing without fixed pattern, vacant and without fixed intent, take no delight in, and cling to nothing in, the comings and goings of people and events. Do not block those who come, and do not detain those who leave; act in accordance with the strength of the many, respond to the twists and turns of events as they unfold, and do not bind oneself within them. Follow circumstances, and let things run their own course to their natural end. Thus, though he collected goods from morning till night, he did not harm even the slightest detail. How much more so for one who has mastered the great Dao! Such a person is at ease and attached to nothing, letting the myriad things under heaven follow their own nature. This is the Dao of free passage, and therefore matters are accomplished swiftly.

When Confucius was besieged between the states of Chen and Cai, he went seven days without a cooked meal. Taigong Ren went to console him, asking, "Are you about to die?" Confucius answered, "Yes." Taigong Ren asked further, "Do you dislike death?" Confucius answered, "Yes." The commentary notes that Confucius was merely answering in accordance with the likes and dislikes of ordinary people; the sage inherently has no fixed likes or dislikes.

Taigong Ren said, "Let me tell you about the Dao of deathlessness. In the Eastern Sea there is a kind of bird, and Taigong Ren used it to illustrate the Dao of deathlessness."

意怠其為鳥也翂翂翐翐而似無能引援而飛迫脅而 棲(既𢎞大舒緩又心無常/係○翂音分翐音秩)進不敢為前退不敢為後(常/從) (容處/中)食不敢先嘗必取其緒(其於隨物而已/○緒次緒也)是故其行 列不斥(與羣俱也○行/戸剛反下亂行)而外人卒不得害是以免於患 (患害生於役知以奔/兢○卒子恤反終也)直木先伐甘井先竭(才之/害也)子其意 者飾知以驚愚脩身以明汙昭昭乎如揭日月而行故 不免也(夫察焉小異則與衆為忤矣混然大同則無獨/異於世矣故夫昭昭者乃㝠㝠之迹也将寄言) (以遺迹故因/陳蔡以託患)昔吾聞之大成之人曰自伐者無功功成 者墮名成者虧(恃功名以為已成者未/之嘗全○墮許規反)孰能去功與名 而還與衆人(功自衆成/故還之)道流而不明(昧然而/自行耳)居得行而 不名處(彼皆居然自得此行/耳非由名而後處之)純純常常乃比於狂(無心/而動) (故/也)削迹捐勢不為功名(功自彼成故勢不/在我而名迹皆去)是故無責於 人人亦無責焉(恣情任彼故彼/各自當其責也)至人不聞子何喜哉(寂/澹) (無懐乃/至人也)孔子曰善哉辭其交逰去其弟子逃於大澤衣
Interpretation

This passage presents Zhuangzi's philosophical insights through the parable of the "sluggish bird" to illustrate the art of living. This bird flies slowly and weakly, appearing clumsy and incapable, always moving with the flock—never venturing ahead nor lagging behind, never scrambling to eat first. Precisely because it doesn't draw attention to itself, it avoids rejection and remains unharmed by external threats.

Zhuangzi employs the metaphors of "straight trees being felled first" and "sweet wells running dry first" to demonstrate how conspicuous excellence invites trouble. Trees that grow straight are cut down first, and wells with sweet water are drained first. Those who deliberately display their intelligence or flaunt their virtue are like people walking while holding up the sun and moon—impossible to overlook, and thus prone to misfortune.

The text quotes the "Great Perfected Person" (referring to one who has attained the Dao), who states: "Those who boast of themselves achieve no real merit, for fame and accomplishment ultimately bring loss." The truly enlightened seek neither fame nor achievement, but blend with ordinary people and follow nature's flow. They erase their traces, relinquish power, neither harshly judge others nor become targets of judgment themselves.

Finally, Confucius exclaims in admiration: "How profoundly true! To sever worldly ties, withdraw from disciples and followers, escape to wild marshes, wear coarse clothing, and subsist on simple fare—this is true freedom and ease. What you describe is precisely what my heart yearns for, though I've yet to attain it."

裘褐食杼栗(取於棄人/間之好也)入獸不亂羣入鳥不亂行(若草/木之) (無心故為禽/獸所不畏)鳥獸不惡而况人乎(蓋寄言以極推至誠/之信任乎物而無受) (害之/地也)孔子問子桑虖曰吾再逐於魯伐樹於宋削迹於 衛窮於商周圍於陳蔡之間吾犯此數患親交益疏徒 友益散何與子桑虖曰子獨不聞假人之亡與林囘棄 千金之璧負赤子而趨或曰為其布與赤子之布寡矣 (布謂匹帛也○虖/音户布謂貨財也)為其累與赤子之累多矣棄千金之 璧負赤子而趨何也林囘曰彼以利合此以天屬也夫 以利合者迫窮禍患害相棄也以天屬者迫窮禍患害 相收也夫相收之與相棄亦逺矣且君子之交淡若水 小人之交甘若醴君子淡以親(道合/故親)小人甘以絶(飾利/故甘) (利不可常/有時而絶)彼無故以合者則無故以離(夫無故而自合/者天屬也合不) (由故則故不足以離之也然/則有故而合必有故而離矣)孔子曰敬聞命矣徐行翔 佯而歸絶學捐書弟子無挹於前其愛益加進(去飾任/素故也) 異日桑虖又曰舜之將死真泠禹曰汝戒之哉形莫若 縁情莫若率(因形率情不矯之以利也○泠音零冷曉/也謂以真道曉語禹也冷或為命又作令)
Interpretation

Wearing coarse hemp garments and eating simple fare (demonstrating the renunciation of worldly pleasures), he could walk through herds of animals without startling them and enter flocks of birds without disturbing their formations (like plants and trees in their natural innocence, so neither beasts nor fowl feared him). When even birds and beasts do not dislike him, how much less would people? This parable illustrates how perfect sincerity can resonate with all things without causing harm.

Confucius asked Sanghu (a Daoist recluse): "Twice I was driven from Lu, suffered the humiliation of the felling of my tree in Song, was barred from entering Wei, found myself destitute in the lands of Shang and Zhou, and was besieged between Chen and Cai. After enduring so many trials, my relatives and friends grew increasingly distant, and my disciples scattered. Why is this?" Sanghu replied with a question: "Have you not heard the story of the flight from the doomed state? Lin Hui abandoned a jade disk worth a thousand pieces of gold yet carried an infant on his back as he fled. Someone asked: 'Was it for material gain? An infant isn't worth much. Was it to avoid burden? An infant is far more cumbersome than a jade disk.' Lin Hui answered: 'The jade disk was joined by profit, but the infant is connected by innate nature.' What is joined by profit will be abandoned when hardship comes; what is connected by innate nature will support each other even in calamity. The difference between these two kinds of relationships is immense. The friendship of noblemen is as insipid as water (drawn together by shared ideals), while the friendship of petty men is as sweet as honey (sweetened by the ornament of profit, but severed when interests change). Those who come together without cause will separate just as inexplicably."

Hearing this, Confucius said: "I have received instruction." Then he slowly paced back, abandoning his scholarly texts and ceasing to demand formal bows from his disciples—yet the bond between teacher and students grew deeper (having shed artifice to return to genuineness).

Later, Sanghu further remarked: "On his deathbed, Emperor Shun earnestly admonished Yu: 'Take heed! Let your physical form follow its natural course, and let your emotions flow with unfeigned sincerity (conforming to the body's nature and expressing feelings authentically, without distorting them for gain).'"

(命猶/教也)縁則不離率則不勞(形不假故常全/情不矯故常逸)不離不勞則 不求文以待形(任朴而/直前也)不求文以待形固不待物(朴素/而足) 莊子衣大布而補之正緳係屨而過魏王魏王曰何先 生之憊耶莊子曰貧也非憊也士有道德不能行憊也 衣敝屨穿貧也非憊也此所謂非遭時也王獨不見夫 騰猿乎其得柟梓豫章也攬蔓其枝而王長其間雖羿 逢蒙不能眄睨也(遭時得地則升其長枝故雖古之善/射莫之能害大布粗布也緳賢節反) (帶也係屨屨穿故係眄一作睥睨音詣邪視也憊薄計/反柟音南木名攬舊歴敢反蔓音萬郭武半反王徃况) (反兩枝相/去長逺)及其得柘棘枳枸之間也危行側視振動悼 慓此筋骨非有加急而不柔也處勢不便未足以逞其 能也今處昏上亂相之間而欲無憊奚可得耶此比干 之見剖心徵也夫(勢不便而强為之則又戮/矣○柘章夜反枸音矩)孔子窮於 陳蔡之間七日不火食左據槁木右撃槁枝而歌焱氏 之風有其具而無其數有其聲而無宫角木聲與人聲 犁然有當於人之心顔囘端拱還目而窺之仲尼恐其 廣己而造大也愛己而造哀也曰囘無受天損易(唯安/之故) (易○焱必遙反造/適也易以豉反)無受人益難(物之倘來/不可禁禦)無始而非卒
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here employs vivid metaphors to illuminate the crucial importance of timing and circumstance for spiritual cultivation.

He describes destiny as a form of instruction – those who follow natural laws never stray from the Dao (the Way), while those who act according to their true nature never grow weary. When the physical form isn't artificially adorned, it remains whole; when emotions aren't artificially constrained, one finds constant ease. Such people, who neither stray nor tire, have no need for ornate appearances to embellish themselves – just as Zhuangzi appeared before the King of Wei wearing patched hemp garments.

Seeing his ragged clothes, the king asked why he was in such dire straits. Zhuangzi replied: This is poverty, not distress. When scholars possess De (Virtue) yet cannot practice it – that is true distress. Like how gibbons moving through tall nanmu or catalpa trees swing freely through the branches, evading even divine archers like Houyi. But when forced into thorny bushes, they must move with trembling caution – not because their bones have stiffened, but because circumstances constrain them.

Zhuangzi then cites the historical example of Bi Gan being disemboweled to illustrate how true cultivation becomes impossible during eras of tyrannical rulers and corrupt ministers. Similarly, when Confucius was stranded without food for seven days between Chen and Cai, he could only beat time on withered wood while singing. Though his instrument was crude and the melody incomplete, Yan Hui listened with rapt attention. Confucius reminded him: Accepting heaven's mandate comes easily (like being content with simple fare), but resisting the temptations of fame and wealth proves difficult, as external distractions always arrive uninvited.

The core teaching emphasizes how cultivators must understand the importance of "timely circumstances": In adverse conditions, one shouldn't force progress – like gibbons moving cautiously through thorns. Yet one must maintain transcendent awareness, like Confucius finding joy amid hardship. True practitioners content themselves with poverty while delighting in the Dao, neither resisting heaven's decree nor coveting vain glory.

也(於今為始者於昨為卒則所謂/始者即是卒矣言變化之無窮)人與天一也(皆自/然)夫 今之歌者其誰乎(任其自爾則/歌者非我也)囘曰敢問無受天損易 仲尼曰飢渇寒暑窮桎不行天地之行也運物之泄也 (不可/逃也)言與之偕逝之謂也(所謂不識不知而順/帝之則也○言我也)為人臣 者不敢去之執臣之道猶若是而况乎所以待天乎(所/在) (皆安不以損為損斯/待天而不受其損也)何謂無受人益難仲尼曰始用四 達(感應旁通/為四達)爵祿並至而不窮(旁通故可以/御高大也)物之所利 乃非己也(非己求/而取之)吾命有在外者也(人之生必外有接/物之命非如瓦石) (止於形/質而已)君子不為盗賢人不為⬤吾若取之何哉(盗竊/者私) (取之謂也今賢人君子之致/爵禄非私取之受之而已)故曰鳥莫知於鷾鴯目之 所不宜處不給視雖落其實棄之而走(避禍之⬤○知/音智鷾音意鴯) (音而或云鷾鴯燕也目之所不宜處昌吕/反言不可止處目已羅絡知之故棄之也)其畏人也而 襲諸人間(未有自疏外於人而人存之者也畏人/而入於人間此鳥之所以稱知也矣)社稷 存焉爾(况之至人則𤣥同天下故天下樂推而不厭/相與社而稷之斯無受人益之所以為難也)何
Interpretation

This passage explores the relationship between humanity and nature, along with principles for navigating life. It begins by observing that what we call "beginnings" are in fact endings, illustrating the infinite transformations of all things. Humans and Heaven (nature) originally form an inseparable unity—both exist in spontaneous naturalness.

The discussion unfolds through a dialogue between Confucius and Yan Hui: When Yan Hui asks how to avoid being harmed by nature, Confucius replies that hunger, thirst, cold, heat, and life's obstacles are all part of Heaven and Earth's natural rhythms. Just as moving objects inevitably experience wear, these phenomena are inescapable. The key lies in aligning with natural laws. If even ministers must abide by their roles, how much more should we respect the Dao of Heaven? By accepting one's circumstances with equanimity, one ceases to perceive harm.

Regarding the more challenging question of resisting temptations of human-derived benefits, Confucius explains: When first undertaking tasks, one may find all paths open, with titles and emoluments flowing effortlessly—yet these external gains are not obtained through deliberate pursuit. Human life is fated to interact with external things, unlike tiles or stones that possess mere form without engagement. The noble person avoids thievery; the wise refrains from seizing what isn't theirs. Like swallows (鷾鴯) that know to avoid unsuitable perches—even abandoning food to fly away—they dwell under human eaves despite wariness of people. The sage, however, merges completely with the world, making all under Heaven delight in supporting them. This represents the truly difficult achievement: transcending the lure of human-derived advantages.

謂無始而非卒仲尼曰化其萬物而不知其禪之者(莫/覺) (其變○禪市/戰反授予也)焉知其所終焉知其所始正而待之而已耳 (日夜相代未始有極故正而待之/無所為懐也○焉於䖍反下同)何謂人與天一耶仲 尼曰有人天也有天亦天也(凡所謂天皆明/不為而自然)人之不能 有天性也(言自然則自然矣人安能故/有此自然哉自然耳故曰性)聖人晏然體逝 而終矣(晏然無矜而/體與變俱也)荘周逰乎雕陵之樊覩一異鵲自 南方來者翼廣七尺目大運寸感周之顙而集於栗林 莊周曰此何鳥哉翼殷不逝目大不覩蹇裳躩步執弹 而留之覩一蝉方得美䕃而忘其身螳螂執翳而摶之 見得而忘其形(執木葉以自翳於蝉而忘其形之見乎/異鵲也○運寸可囘一寸也感觸也翼) (殷不逝目大不覩殷大也/留力救反宿留伺其便也)異鵲從而利之見利而忘其 真(目能視翼能逝此鳥之真性/也今見利故忘之○真身也)荘周⬤然曰噫物固相 累(相為利者/恒相為累)二𩔖相召也(夫有欲於物者/物亦有欲之)捐弹而反走 虞人逐而誶之(誶問之也以/周為盗栗也)荘周反入三月不庭藺且 從而問之夫子何為頃間甚不庭乎荘周曰吾守形而
Interpretation

This passage primarily contains a dialogue between Zhuangzi and his disciple Zhongni, along with Zhuangzi's observations in the Diaoling region, illustrating the Daoist concept of "the unity of Heaven and humanity."

Zhongni remarked: All things are in constant transformation, yet we know not what force drives this change ("chan" refers to succession and alternation). How can we discern their end points, or ascertain their beginnings? One need only maintain an upright mind to face these changes. Day and night alternate endlessly, thus we should meet them with equanimity, free from excessive attachment.

Regarding the question of "human-Heaven unity," Zhongni explained: Humans are subject to Heaven's workings, yet Heaven itself follows natural operation. Humans cannot possess Heaven's inherent nature ("tianxing" denotes natural disposition), for what is natural occurs spontaneously—how can one deliberately pursue spontaneity? The sage dwells in tranquil contentment, harmonizing with transformation until life's completion.

The subsequent narrative recounts Zhuangzi's parable in Diaoling: Zhuangzi saw a peculiar magpie with seven-foot wingspan and inch-wide eyes flying from the south. The bird alighted in a chestnut grove. When Zhuangzi prepared to shoot it with his slingshot, he observed: a cicada reveling in shade had forgotten its vulnerability; a mantis lurked behind leaves awaiting the cicada; while the magpie poised to seize the mantis. All had neglected their fundamental nature through greed for immediate gain.

Zhuangzi sighed: "Thus do all creatures entangle one another ("xianglei" signifies mutual involvement), as two kinds of phenomena inevitably attract (denoting how desire-bound entities gravitate toward each other)." Discarding his slingshot, he departed—only to be chased by the grove keeper who mistook him for a chestnut thief. For three months afterward, Zhuangzi remained indoors. When disciples inquired, he replied: "I became fixated on external forms (ensnared by the phenomena of magpie, cicada and mantis), forgetting my own fundamental safety."

忘身(夫身在人間世有夷險若推夷易之形於此世而/不度此世之所宜斯守形而忘身者也三月不庭) (不出坐庭中三月藺力信反/且子餘反藺且莊子弟子)觀於濁水而迷於清淵(見/彼) (而不明即因彼以自/見幾忘反鍳之道也)且吾聞諸夫子曰入其俗從其俗 (不違其/禁令也)今吾逰於雕陵而忘吾身異鵲感吾顙遊於栗 林而忘真栗林虞人以吾為戮吾所以不庭也(以見問/為戮夫) (荘子推平於天下故每寄言以出竒乃毁仲/尼賤老⬤上掊撃乎三皇下痛病其一身也)陽子之宋 宿於逆旅逆旅人有妾二人其一人美其一人惡惡者 貴而美者賤陽子問其故逆旅小子對曰其美者自美 吾不知其美也其惡者自惡吾不知其惡也陽子曰弟 子記之行賢而去自賢之行安徃而不愛哉(言自賢之/道無時而) (可○陽子/陽朱也)   田子方第二十一 田子方侍坐於魏文侯數稱谿工文侯曰谿工子之師 耶子方曰非也無擇之里人也稱道數當故無擇稱之 文侯曰然則子無師耶子方曰有曰子之師誰耶子方 曰東郭順子文侯曰然則夫子何故未嘗稱之子方曰 其為人也真(無假也○田子方魏文侯/師也名無擇谿工賢人也)人貌而天(雖貌/與人)
Interpretation

This commentary on the Zhuangzi illustrates the principles of "forgetting the self" and "true nature" through several parables. The first story tells of a man who remained secluded in his courtyard for three months after being scolded by a chestnut grove keeper during an outing to Diaoling. So immersed was he in admiring the scenery that he was mistaken for a thief, leading him to realize how attachment to external things causes one to lose oneself. Like gazing at turbid water yet failing to see the clear depths beneath, excessive focus on the outer world obscures the inner heart.

The text then quotes Confucius: "When entering a place, follow local customs." But Zhuangzi adds that true wisdom lies in not deliberately displaying oneself. This is exemplified through Yang Zhu's (also called Yangzi) experience at an inn, where two concubines resided—one beautiful yet slighted, the other plain but respected. The innkeeper explained: the beautiful one flaunted her looks, making others overlook her beauty, while the plain one acknowledged her plainness, making others disregard it. Yang Zhu thus realized that truly virtuous people never consciously flaunt their virtues, and such individuals are welcomed everywhere.

The dialogue between Tian Zifang and Marquis Wen of Wei ultimately reveals the core message. When Tian repeatedly praised his townsman Xi Gong, the marquis assumed this was his teacher. Tian clarified his true teacher was Dongguo Shunzi, whom he seldom mentioned precisely because he was a "zhenren" (true person)—one who preserves innate nature. Though outwardly indistinguishable from ordinary people, such a person's inner being resonates with the Dao. This demonstrates that genuine attainment of the Dao requires no external reputation or display.

(同而獨/任自然)虚縁而葆真(虚而順物/故真不失)清而容物(夫清者患於/太㓗今清而) (容物與/天同也)物無道正容以悟之使人之意也消(曠然清虚/正己而已) (而物邪/自消)無擇何足以稱之子方出文侯儻然終日不言 召前立臣而語之曰逺矣全德之君子始吾以聖知之 言仁義之行為至矣吾聞子方之師吾形解而不欲動 口鉗而不欲言(自覺/其近)吾所學者真土梗耳(非真物也○/土梗土人也) (遭雨/則壊)夫魏真為我累耳(知至貴者以/人爵為累也)温伯雪子適齊舍 於魯魯人有請見之者温伯雪子曰不可吾聞中國之 君子明乎禮義而陋於知人心吾不欲見也至於齊反 舍於魯是人也又請見温伯雪子曰徃也蘄見我今也 又蘄見我是必有以振我也出而見客入而歎明日見 客又入而歎其僕曰每見之客也必入而歎何耶曰吾 固告子矣中國之民明乎禮義而陋于知人心昔之見 我者進退一成規一成矩從容一若龍一若虎(槃辟其/步逶蛇) (其/迹)其諌我也似子其道我也似父(禮義之弊有斯/飾也○道音導)是以 歎也仲尼見之而不言(己知其/心矣)子路曰吾子欲見温伯 雪子乆矣見之而不言何耶仲尼曰若夫人者目擊而
Interpretation

This passage illustrates the Daoist concept of "following natural spontaneity" through several stories. In Zhuangzi's account of Marquis Wen of Wei and Tian Zifang, we see how true wisdom manifests not through deliberate display, but by maintaining one's natural state. The Marquis initially believed his mastery of sage teachings and benevolent conduct represented the highest attainment. Yet after meeting Tian Zifang's teacher, he realized his learning was as artificial as clay figurines, recognizing how these external rituals had become constraints instead.

The story of Wenbo Xuezhi critiques the excesses of ritual propriety. He twice refused to meet visitors from Lu because, while these central plains gentlemen understood ceremonial norms, they lacked comprehension of the human heart's essence. When he finally received them, their every movement rigidly conformed to ritual prescriptions—offering admonitions with filial deference and guidance with paternal sternness—their artificial posturing made him sigh repeatedly. When Confucius met Wenbo Xuezhi and remained silent, Zilu was puzzled. Confucius explained: "With such a man, wherever his gaze falls, the Dao is present. Words become unnecessary."

These narratives collectively emphasize that genuine cultivation lies not in external ritual forms, but in internal authenticity. Excessive pursuit of formalized "propriety" risks losing touch with fundamental human nature. The highest gentlemen need no forced demonstrations—their mere presence allows others to perceive the Dao's existence.

道存矣亦不可以容聲矣(目裁徃意已達無所/容其德音也擊動也)顔淵問 於仲尼曰夫子步亦步夫子趨亦趨夫子馳亦馳夫子 奔逸絶塵而囘瞠若乎後矣夫子曰囘何謂耶曰夫子 步亦步也夫子言亦言也夫子趨亦趨也夫子辯亦辯 也夫子馳亦馳也夫子言道囘亦言道也及奔逸絶塵 而囘瞠若乎後者夫子不言而信不比而周無器而民 蹈乎前而不知所以然而已矣仲尼曰惡可不察與夫 哀莫大於心死而人死亦次之(夫心以死為死乃更速/其死其死之速由哀以) (自喪也無哀則已有哀/則心死者乃哀之大也)日出東方而入於西極萬物莫 不比方(皆可/見也)有目有趾者待是而後成功(目成見功足/成行功也) 是出則存是入則亡(直以不見為/亡耳竞不亡)萬物亦然有待也而 死有待也而生(待隱謂之死待顯謂/之生竟無死生也)吾一受其成形而 不化以待盡(夫有不得變而為無故一/受成形則化盡無期也)效物而動(自無/心也) 日夜無隙(恒化/新也)而不知其所終(不以死/為死也)薫然其成形(薫/然) (自成又/奚為哉)知命不能規乎其前丘以是日徂(不係於前與/變俱徃故曰) (徂○徂/病也)吾終身與女交一臂而失之可不哀與(夫變化/不可執)
Interpretation

Here Zhuangzi, through a dialogue between Yan Hui and Confucius (Zhongni), conveys a profound lesson about "following the Dao." Yan Hui says: "When you walk slowly, master, I walk slowly too; when you quicken your pace, I quicken mine; when you run, I run as well. But when you suddenly dart away leaving only dust behind, I can only stare blankly while lagging far behind." When Confucius asks what this means, Yan Hui explains: "I've been superficially imitating your every move, even echoing your teachings about the Dao, yet I've never truly grasped its essence."

Confucius reveals the key insight: "The true Dao cannot be fully expressed in words (Dao exists yet cannot be contained in speech). When I can convince others without speaking, attract followers without deliberate effort, and have people follow me naturally without authority—this is the state of 'darting away leaving dust behind.' It's like the sun rising in the east and setting in the west—all things follow this pattern, yet the Dao is far more profound."

Zhuangzi further elaborates on the view of life and death: "The greatest sorrow isn't physical death, but the death of the heart (no sorrow is greater than a dead heart). All things appear to have life and death (they are born dependent on something, and die dependent on something), but this is merely transformation of form. Just as we assume human form that seems fixed (once receiving this form), we're actually undergoing subtle changes every moment (day and night without pause), though we remain unaware. Those who truly understand destiny (those who know fate) don't obsess over predicting the future, but adapt to changes like Confucius (thus I daily move forward with it). If we spend a lifetime interacting with others yet never truly understand them (losing them while passing arm in arm), this is the greatest tragedy."

Note: The character "徂" carries dual meanings of "going forward" and "fading away"—Zhuangzi uses this pun to emphasize the truth of constant flux.

(而留也故雖執臂相守而不能令停若哀死者則/此亦可哀也今人未嘗以此為哀奚獨哀死耶)女殆 著乎吾所以著也彼已盡矣而女求之以為有是求馬 於唐肆也(唐肆非停馬處也言求向者之有不可復得/也人之生若馬之過肆耳恒無駐須臾新故) (之相續不舍晝夜也著見也言女殆見吾所以見者耳/吾所以見者日新也故已盡矣安得有之○著音張慮) (反又一音張畧反吾所以著者外化也女殆庻於此耳/吾一不化者則非女所及也是求馬於唐肆也唐肆非) (停馬處也又/云唐停也)吾服女也甚㤀(服者思存之謂也甚忘謂/過去之速也言女去忽然) (思之恒/欲不及)女服吾也亦甚忘(俱爾耳不問賢之/與聖未有得停者)雖然女奚 患焉雖忘乎故吾吾有不忘者存(不忘者存謂繼之以/日新也雖忘故吾而) (新吾已至未始非吾吾何患焉故/能離俗絶塵而與物無不𡨕也)孔子見老⬤老⬤新 沐方将⬤髪而乾慹然似非人(寂澹之至○慹乃牒反/不動貌説文云怖也) 孔子便而待之少焉見曰丘也眩與其信然與向者先 生形體掘若槁木似遺物離人而立於獨也(無其心身/而後外物) (去也○與音餘下同/掘音屈槁苦老反)老⬤曰吾遊於物之初(初未有而/歘有故逰)
Interpretation

Here Zhuangzi employs metaphor to explore the issues of life, death, and transformation. He observes that just as one cannot forcibly restrain their own arm from moving, death is an unstoppable natural process. People often grieve for the deceased without realizing that life itself resembles horses galloping through a marketplace (the "Tangsi" referring to ancient horse trading grounds) - in perpetual flux, with the cycle of renewal continuing ceaselessly day and night.

What you perceive as my enduring self is in fact already vanishing, as futile as searching yesterday's horse in today's empty marketplace. Our mutual memories fade swiftly ("shen wang" denoting rapid forgetting), yet there's no need for distress, because while former selves continuously dissolve, new selves persistently emerge ("bu wang zhe cun" signifying life's essential capacity for renewal).

The passage then illustrates this through Confucius' encounter with Laozi (Lao Dan): Finding Laozi standing motionless as a wooden figure ("zhi ran" describing meditative stillness) with hair still wet after washing, Confucius initially thought he'd achieved out-of-body transcendence. Laozi explained he was journeying through the primordial state of all existence ("wu zhi chu" - the original condition of the Dao), a realm transcending physical form to achieve selfless unity with the Way. This demonstrates how those who attain the Dao liberate themselves from corporeal constraints, merging with the transformative flow of existence's fundamental source.

(於物初然後明有物/之不為而自有也)孔子曰何謂邪曰心困焉而不能 知口辟焉而不能言(欲令仲尼必求之於言意之表/也○辟必亦反辟卷不開也)嘗 為女議乎其將(試議隂陽以擬向之無形/耳未之敢必○為于偽反)至隂肅肅至 陽赫赫肅肅出乎天赫赫發乎地(言其/交也)兩者交通成和 而物生焉或為之紀而莫見其形(莫見為紀之/形明其自爾)消息滿 虚一晦一明日改月化日有所為(未嘗/守故)而莫見其功(自/爾) (故無/功)生有所乎萌(萌於未/聚也)死有所乎歸(歸於/散也)始終相反 乎無端而莫知乎其所窮(所謂迎之不見其/首隨之不見其後)非是也且 孰為之宗孔子曰請問逰是老⬤曰夫得是至美至樂 也得至美而逰乎至樂謂之至人(至美無美至樂無樂/故也○且如字舊于) (餘反樂音/洛下同)孔子曰願聞其方曰草食之獸不疾易藪水 生之蟲不疾易淵行小變而不失其大常也(死生亦/小變也)喜 怒哀樂不入於胷次(知其小變而不失大/常故也○次中也)夫天下也者 萬物之所一也得其所一而同焉則四肢百體将為塵 垢而死生終始将為晝夜而莫之能滑而况得喪禍福 之所介乎(愈不/足患)棄𨽻者若棄泥塗知身貴於𨽻也(知身/之貴)
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here explores the fundamental origin of all things and the highest state of human existence through a dialogue between Confucius and his disciples. First, he points to the essential nature of all things' spontaneous existence: before forms take shape, there already exists an invisible primal force. This power cannot be fully captured in words, much like understanding something in one's heart yet being unable to articulate it.

He then explains the generation of all things through the interaction of Yin and Yang Qi (vital energies): the ultimate Yin Qi carries coldness and austerity, originating from the heavens, while the ultimate Yang Qi embodies heat and radiance, emerging from the earth. When these two energies harmoniously intermingle, all things come into being. Though there exists an arranger (the Dao) orchestrating this process, its concrete form remains unseen. All things exist in perpetual transformation—birth and dissolution, an endless cycle without cessation.

When Confucius inquires how to attain the highest state, the response is: Just as grazing animals don't mind changing pastures, and aquatic creatures don't fear shifting waters, those who understand that life and death are merely surface transformations without losing their root remain unaffected by joy or sorrow. One who truly comprehends the Dao knows all things under heaven are fundamentally one. Viewing the body as dust and life-death as the alternation of day and night, such a person naturally remains undisturbed by gain, loss, fortune, or misfortune.

The passage concludes by emphasizing: Those who can lightly regard external attachments discard them as easily as casting away dirt, for they understand their spiritual essence is far more precious than these worldly things. Here, "attachments" refers to external pursuits like fame, wealth, and social status—all transient possessions of the mundane world.

(于𨽻故棄之若遺土耳茍知死生/之變所在皆我則貴者常在也)貴在於我而不失於 變(所貴者我也而我/與變俱故無失也)且萬化而未始有極也夫孰足以 患心已為道者解乎此(所謂/縣解)孔子曰夫子德配天地而 猶假至言以修心古之君子孰能脱焉老⬤曰不然夫 水之於汋也無為而才自然矣至人之於德也不修而 物不能離焉若天之自高地之自厚日月之自明夫何 修焉(不修不為而自得/也○汋音灼取也)孔子出以告顔囘曰丘之於道 也其猶醯雞與(醯雞者甕中之蠛蠓○醯/許西反若酒上蠛蠓也)微夫子之發 吾覆也吾不知天地之大全也(比吾全於老⬤猶/甕中之與天地矣)莊子 見魯哀公哀公曰魯多儒士少為先生方者荘子曰魯 少儒哀公曰舉魯國而儒服何謂少乎荘子曰周聞之 儒者冠圜冠者知天時履方履者知地形緩佩玦者事 至而斷君子有其道者未必為其服也為其服者未必 知其道也公固以為不然何不號於國中曰無此道而 為此服者其罪死於是哀公號之五日而魯國無敢儒 服者獨有一丈夫儒服而立乎公門公即召而問以國 事千轉萬變而不窮荘子曰以魯國而儒者一人耳可 謂多乎(德充於内者/不修飾於外)百里奚爵祿不入於心故飯牛而
Interpretation

The text presents several allegorical stories illustrating core Daoist principles, emphasizing that inner cultivation surpasses outward forms in importance.

First, Zhuangzi asserts true nobility lies in maintaining one's original heart-mind, undisturbed by the transformations of life and death. Understanding that birth and death are natural patterns of the Dao allows one to preserve inner constancy. Though the myriad things undergo endless transformations, the Daoist practitioner transcends such disturbances.

Confucius once sighed in admiration, saying Laozi's De (Virtue) was as vast as heaven and earth, while he himself resembled nothing more than a tiny vinegar gnat (xi ji) trapped in a jar. Were it not for Laozi's illumination, he could never have comprehended the mysteries of the cosmos. This demonstrates how a true sage can suddenly awaken profound understanding in others.

Another story recounts Zhuangzi's meeting with Duke Ai of Lu. Though all Lu citizens wore Confucian robes, Zhuangzi remarked that genuine Confucian scholars were actually rare. He explained: "Those wearing round hats don't necessarily understand astronomy; those in square shoes don't necessarily know geography; those wearing jade pendants aren't necessarily skilled at decision-making." True gentlemen value inner cultivation over external adornments. When Duke Ai later decreed death for anyone wearing Confucian attire without genuine learning, only one man dared continue wearing the robes—and he truly mastered statecraft. This proves authentic knowledge resides in substance, not form.

The text concludes with the example of Baili Xi, the renowned Spring and Autumn period statesman. He transcended fame and profit while contentedly tending oxen, yet ultimately became a brilliant minister. This again demonstrates the primacy of inner cultivation.

These stories collectively expound the Daoist principle of Wuwei (non-action) and naturalness: True De flows like water naturally springing forth, as heaven naturally reaches heights, earth naturally bears weight, sun and moon naturally shine—requiring no artificial embellishment. Those with inner fullness need no outward ornamentation.

牛肥使秦穆公忘其賤與之政也有虞氏死生不入於 心故足以動人(内自得者外事全也○飯煩晚/反忘其賤謂忘其飯牛之賤也)宋元君 将畫圗衆史皆至受揖而立䑛筆和墨在外者半有一 史後至者儃儃然不趨受揖不立因之舍公使人視之 則解衣般礴臝君曰可矣是真畫者也(内足者神閒而/意定○受揖而) (立受命揖而立也儃吐但反般字又作槃礴旁各反般/礴謂箕坐也臝本又作羸同力果反将畫故解衣見形) 文王觀於臧見一丈人釣而其釣莫釣(聊以卒歲○/臧地名也)非 持其釣有釣者也(竟無/所求)常釣也(不以得失經意/其於假釣而已)文王欲 舉而授之政而恐大臣父兄之弗安也欲終而釋之而 不忍百姓之無天也於是旦而屬之夫夫曰昔者寡人 夣見良人黒色而⬤乘駁馬而偏朱蹄號曰寓而政於 臧丈人庶幾乎民有瘳乎諸大夫蹵然曰先君王也文 王曰然則卜之諸大夫曰先君之命王其無它又何卜 焉遂迎臧丈人而授之政典法無更偏令無出三年文 王觀於國則列士壊植散羣長官者不成德螤斛不敢 入於四境列士壊植散羣則尚同也(所謂和其光同其/塵○夫夫大夫也) (一云夫夫古讀為大夫無它無違命壊音懐下同植行/列也散羣言不養徒衆也一云植者疆界頭造屋以待)
Interpretation

Duke Mu of Qin, upon seeing Baili Xi's well-fed cattle, overlooked his lowly status as a herdsman and entrusted him with state affairs. Emperor Shun of the Youyu clan regarded life and death with such detachment that he could truly move people's hearts. (Those who are genuinely liberated within will handle external affairs with ease. The phrase "forgetting his lowliness" refers to disregarding one's humble status as a cattle herder.)

When Lord Yuan of Song sought painters, numerous artists arrived. After paying respects, they stood deferentially—some licking brushes to prepare ink, half of them visibly nervous. The last painter arrived unhurriedly, offered casual greetings without standing formally, and immediately returned to his quarters. When Lord Yuan sent someone to observe, the man was found sitting cross-legged with his upper body bare. The ruler remarked, "This is the true master painter." (Those with inner fulfillment maintain serene composure and focused intent. "Receiving orders with a bow" refers to standing respectfully after accepting instructions.)

While inspecting the Zang region, King Wen observed an old man fishing in an unusual manner—as if completely indifferent to catching fish. (The activity merely served to pass time. Zang was a place name.) He wasn't truly fishing, but using it as means for self-cultivation. (Utterly free from desire) This exemplifies what's called "constant angling." (Without concern for gain or loss, simply using fishing as spiritual practice.)

King Wen wished to appoint this elder to govern, yet feared opposition from ministers and relatives. Considering abandonment of the idea pained him, knowing the people would lose a wise leader. At dawn court, he announced: "Last night I dreamt of a sage—dark-complexioned, astride a dappled horse with half-red hooves—who declared: 'Entrust governance to Zang's angler, and the people shall prosper.'" The ministers gasped: "Our ancestral ruler's vision!" When King Wen proposed divination, they replied: "An ancestral command requires no doubt—why consult oracle bones?" Thus they welcomed the Zang fisherman to administer state affairs.

For three years, the elder governed without altering statutes or issuing arbitrary decrees. When King Wen later toured his realm, he found scholars no longer forming cliques, officials not pursuing personal merit, and foreign grain measures (zhong hu) dared not cross the borders. (Scholars ceased factionalism—this embodies "harmonizing light with dust." Note: "Great officers" refers to ministers. "Without deviation" means violating no ancestral decree. "Uprooting factions and dispersing coteries" denotes ending patronage networks—alternatively interpreted as removing boundary markers and dissolving spheres of influence.)

(諌者也長丁丈反下同不成德不利功名也螤音庾補/屬之大夫古本作夫夫夫一大也泰山石始皇文曰御) (史夫夫盖篆字夫與大同/見文選六解四斗曰螤)長官者不成德則同務也(潔/然) (自成則與/衆務異也)斔斛不敢入於四境則諸侯無二心也(天下/相信) (故能同律/度量衡也)文王於是焉以為太師北面而問曰政可以 及天下乎臧丈人昧然而不應泛然而辭朝令而夜遁 終身無聞(為功者非已故功成而身不得不退事遂而/名不得不去名去身退乃可以及天下也) (大音/泰)顔淵問於仲尼曰文王其猶未耶又何以夢為乎 仲尼曰黙女無言夫文王盡之也(任諸大夫而不/自任斯盡之也)而又 何論刺焉彼直以循斯須也(斯須者百姓之情當悟未悟/之頃故文王循而發之以合) (其大/情也)列御冦為伯昬無人射引之盈貫(盈貫謂溢鏑也/○為于為反貫) (古亂反/鏑也)措杯水其肘上(左手如柜右手如附枝右手放/發而左手不知故可措之杯水) (也○措七故/反肘竹九反)發之適矢復沓(矢去也箭適去復軟沓也/○適丁歴反復扶又反) 方矢復寓(箭方去未至的已復寄杯/於肘上言其捷敏之妙也)當是時猶象人也 (不動/之至)伯昬無人曰是射之射非不射之射也嘗與女登
Interpretation

This passage presents two stories that use dialogue and metaphors to illustrate the Daoist political wisdom of "governing through non-action" (Wuwei).

The first story recounts how King Wen sought governance advice from the hermit Zang the Elder. The old man remained silent and quietly departed the next day. This demonstrates how true sages don't pursue personal fame - only by achieving merit and then withdrawing can virtuous governance benefit the world. As Confucius explained when Yan Hui asked about this incident, King Wen had already reached perfection - he excelled at appointing capable ministers without claiming credit for himself, completely aligning with the people's needs.

The second story uses Liezi's archery as a metaphor for the state of Wuwei. When Liezi shot arrows, he could balance a cup of water on his elbow without spilling, moving so swiftly that he could nock the next arrow as soon as the first left the bow. But Bohun Wuren pointed out this was still "deliberate shooting," not yet reaching the highest state of "shooting without shooting" - the completely natural, effortless state of a wooden dummy.

Both stories emphasize that true governance and self-cultivation don't lie in forced striving, but in the Wuwei state of following nature's flow, claiming no merit and making no display. Whether in politics or personal cultivation, the most sublime state appears as doing nothing while actually being in perfect harmony with the Dao.

髙山履危石臨百仞之淵若能射乎於是無人遂登高 山履危石臨百仞之淵背逡巡足二分垂在外揖御冦 而進之御冦伏地汗流至踵伯昬無人曰夫至人者上 闚青天下潜黄泉揮斥八極神氣不變(揮斥猶縱放德/充於内則神滿) (於外無逺近幽深所在皆明/故審安危之幾澹然自得也)今汝⬤然有恂目之志爾 於中也殆矣夫(不能明至分故有懼有懼而所喪多矣/豈唯射乎○恂救律反恂又作眴音荀) (爾雅云恂慄也目之志恂謂眩也欲以眩悦人之目故/恂也中丁仲反又如字中精神也䘮息浪反後章同) 肩吾問於孫叔敖曰子三為令尹而不榮華三去之而 無憂色吾始也疑子今視子之鼻間栩栩然子之用心 獨奈何孫叔敖曰吾何以過人哉吾以其来不可却也 其去不可止也吾以為得失之非我也而無憂色而已 矣我何以過人哉且不知其在彼乎其在我乎其在彼 ⬤亡乎我在我耶亡乎彼(曠然無係𤣥同彼我則在彼/非獨亡在我非獨存也○栩) (况甫/反)方将躊躇方将四顧何暇知乎人貴人賤哉(躊躇/四顧) (謂無可無不可躊/直留反躇直於反)仲尼聞之曰古之真人知者不得説 美人不得濫盗人不得刦伏戲黄帝不得友(伏戲黄帝/者功號耳)
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here illustrates the state of those who have attained the Dao through two parables. In the first story, Bohun Wuren (a fictional Daoist sage created by Zhuangzi) asks an expert archer to demonstrate his skills while standing at the edge of a cliff. The archer stands on a precarious rock beside a thousand-foot abyss, his heels hanging over empty space, until fear drenches him in sweat. Bohun Wuren observes that a true "perfect person" (the highest level of practitioner) can gaze up to the azure heavens above and plunge into the yellow springs below, with their spirit (Shen) reaching all directions while remaining utterly composed. When the mind is gripped by fear, even one's most mastered skill like archery falters.

The second story recounts how Sunshu Ao (a famous minister of Chu during the Spring and Autumn period) neither took pride in being appointed chancellor (the highest office in Chu) three times, nor grieved when dismissed three times. He explains that he understood official positions come and go beyond personal will, thus transcending gain and loss. Through Confucius's voice, Zhuangzi comments: the ancient "authentic persons" (those who attained the Dao) couldn't be swayed by eloquent arguments, seduced by beauty, or intimidated by force—not even sage-kings like Fuxi and the Yellow Emperor could claim their friendship.

Both parables demonstrate how Daoist adepts achieve the state of "forgetting both self and external things," where the mind remains unshaken by circumstances, whether facing danger or worldly gains and losses. As Sunshu Ao declares, "I don't know whether the gain and loss belong to the office or to myself"—the truly liberated have dissolved the boundary between self and the external world.

(非所以功者也故况功號於所以功相去逺矣故其名/不足以友於人也○刦居業反元嘉本作却戯音羲) 死生亦大矣而無變乎已况爵祿乎若然者其神經乎 大山而無介入乎淵泉而不濡處卑細而不憊充滿天 地既以與人已愈有(割肌膚以為天下者彼我俱失也/使人人自得於己者與人而不損) (於己也其神明充滿天地故所在皆可所在皆可故不/損己為物而放於自得之地也○介音界憊皮拜反) 楚王與凡君坐少焉楚王左右曰凡亡者三(言有三亡/徴也○凡) (國名在汲郡共縣案左傳凡周公之後也隐七年天王/使凡伯來聘俗本此後有孔子窮於陳蔡及孔子謂顔) (囘二章與譲王篇同衆家並於譲王篇音之檢此/二章無郭訌似如重出古本皆無謂無者是也)凡君 曰凡之亡也不足以喪吾存(遺凡/故也)夫凡之亡不足以喪 吾存則楚之存不足以存存(夫遺之者不以亡為亡則/存亦不足以為存矣曠然) (無矜乃/常存也)由是觀之則凡未始亡而楚未始存也(存亡更/在於心) (之所措耳天/下竟無存亡)   知北遊第二十二 知北遊於𤣥水之上登隱弅之丘而適遭無為謂焉知 謂無為謂曰予欲有問乎若何思何慮則知道何處何 服則安道何從何道則得道三問而無為謂不答也非
Interpretation

This passage consists of two sections from different chapters of the Zhuangzi Commentary.

The first section discusses how neither life nor death can alter one's fundamental nature, let alone external matters like rank and salary. A person who has truly attained the Dao (the Way) can traverse mountains without obstruction, plunge into deep waters without getting wet, dwell in humble circumstances without feeling distressed—their Shen (spirit) permeates heaven and earth. The more they give to others, the more abundant they become. If one sacrifices personal benefit to govern the world, both sides suffer loss; whereas allowing each person to find their own joy means giving without depletion. When the King of Chu sat with the ruler of the small state of Fan, Chu's attendants repeatedly declared Fan would perish. The Lord of Fan responded: "Fan's destruction cannot truly make me lose anything." Conversely, Chu's existence couldn't truly preserve anything either. This reveals Fan might not truly perish, nor Chu truly exist—for existence and extinction depend on perspective, as the world fundamentally lacks absolute states of being or non-being.

The second section recounts the "Knowledge Wanders North" parable: A figure named "Zhi" (Knowledge) journeyed to the Dark River and climbed Hidden Bluff Mountain, where he encountered "Wuweiwei" (Non-Action Speaker). Zhi posed three questions: How should one reflect to understand the Dao? What must one practice to abide in the Dao? By what path can the Dao be attained? Yet Wuweiwei never replied—not out of refusal, but because he genuinely didn't know how to answer (implying the Dao transcends verbal explanation).

Note: "Wuweiwei" is Zhuangzi's fictional character meaning "one who speaks not of non-action"; "Dark River" and "Hidden Bluff Mountain" are allegorical locations. "Zhi" represents the seeker of knowledge—the name itself carries connotations of intellectual inquiry. This dialogue embodies Zhuangzi's teaching that the Dao cannot be conveyed through words but must be realized through inner contemplation.

不答不知答也知不得問反於白水之南登狐闋之上 而睹狂屈焉知以之言也問乎狂屈曰唉予知之將語 若中欲言而忘其所欲言知不得問反於帝宫見黄帝 而問焉黄帝曰無思無慮始知道無處無服始安道無 從無道始得道知問黄帝曰我與若知之彼與彼不知 也其孰是耶黄帝曰彼無為謂真是也狂屈似之我與 汝終不近也夫知者不言言者不知故聖人行不言之 教(任其自行斯不言之教/也○弅音紛唉哀在反)道不可致(道在自然非/可言致者也)德不 可至(不失徳故稱德/稱德而不至也)仁可為也義可虧也禮相偽也故 曰失道而後德失德而後仁失仁而後義失義而後禮 禮者道之華而亂之首也(禮有常則故矯/效之所由生也)故曰為道者 日損(損華/偽也)損之又損之以至於無為無為而無不為也 (華去而朴全則/雖為而非為也)今已為物也(物失其所/故有為物)欲復歸根不亦 難乎其易也其唯大人乎(其歸根之易者唯大人耳大/人體合變化故化物不難○) (易以/䜴反)生也死之徒(知變化之道/者不以為易)死也生之始孰知其紀 (更相為始則未/知孰死孰生也)人之生氣之聚也聚則為生散則為死 (俱是聚也/俱是散也)若死生為徒吾又何患(患生/於異)故萬物一也是
Interpretation

This passage explores profound insights about the Dao (the Way). There was a seeker named Knowledge who traveled extensively inquiring about the true meaning of the Dao. He first encountered Kuangqu (a hermit), who was about to answer but suddenly forgot what to say. Later, Knowledge consulted the Yellow Emperor, who told him: the true Dao cannot be attained through thinking, speech, or deliberate action.

The Yellow Emperor explained: The one called Non-Action (referring to those who don't forcibly pursue the Dao) truly understands it. Kuangqu was close to this state, while both the Yellow Emperor and Knowledge remained far from it. Those who truly comprehend don't speak, and those who speak don't truly comprehend. Therefore, sages teach through "non-speaking" (Wuwei).

The Dao cannot be forcibly sought (as it exists naturally), nor can De (Virtue/Power) be attained through deliberate pursuit. Humaneness can be consciously practiced, righteousness will always have shortcomings, and ritual easily becomes superficial. Thus it is said: Only after losing the Dao does De appear; only after losing De does humaneness emerge; only after losing humaneness comes righteousness; and only after losing righteousness remains ritual. Ritual is actually the superficial form of the Dao, and may become the beginning of chaos.

The path of cultivating the Dao is a process of continuous reduction (removing artificiality), diminishing until reaching the state of "non-action" (Wuwei). Achieving Wuwei paradoxically enables one to accomplish all things without striving. Nowadays people are trapped by material desires, making it difficult to return to their original simplicity. Only genuine "Great Persons" (those who have attained the Dao) can do this effortlessly.

Life and death transform into each other—human life is the gathering of Qi (vital energy). When Qi gathers, there is life; when Qi disperses, there is death. Since life and death are fundamentally one, why worry about them? All things are essentially the same in their fundamental nature.

其所美者為神奇其所惡者為⬤腐⬤腐復化為神奇 神奇復化為⬤腐故曰通天下一氣耳(各以所美為神/奇所惡為臭腐) (耳然彼之所美我之所惡也我之所美彼或惡/之故通共神竒通共臭腐耳死生彼我豈殊哉)聖人故 貴一知謂黄帝曰吾問無為謂無為謂不應我非不我 應不知應我也吾問狂屈狂屈中欲告我而不我告非 不我告中欲告而忘之也今予問乎若若知之奚故不 近黄帝曰彼其真是也以其不知也此其似之也以其 忘之也予與若終不近也以其知之也狂屈聞之以黄 帝為知言(明夫自然者非言知之所得故當昧乎無言/之地是以先舉不言之標而后寄明於黄帝) (則夫自然之㝠物/槩乎可得而見也)天地有大美而不言四時有明法而 不議萬物有成理而不説(此孔子之所以云予欲無/言○大美謂覆載之美也)聖 人者原天地之美而達萬物之理是故至人無為(任其/自為) (而/已)大聖不作(唯因/任也)觀於天地之謂也(觀其形容象其物/宜與天地不異) 今彼神明至精與彼百化(百物自化而/神明不奪)物已死生方圎 莫知其根也(夫死者已自死生者已自生圓者已自/圎方者已自方未有為其根者故莫知)扁 然而萬物自古以固存(豈待為之而后存焉/○扁音偏又音幡)六合為巨
Interpretation

People regard what they like as miraculous and wonderful, while viewing what they dislike as rotten and foul. Yet the rotten can transform back into the miraculous, and the miraculous may decay into the rotten. Thus, all under heaven is but the same Qi (vital energy) in constant transformation (each person considers what they favor as divine and what they despise as decay).

In truth, what others find beautiful might be what I detest, and what I cherish could be what others reject. Therefore, the miraculous and the rotten are fundamentally interconnected—what difference is there between life and death, self and other? The Yellow Emperor once said: "I asked Wuwei (the one who embodies non-action), but Wuwei did not answer me—not because he refused, but because he truly had nothing to say. I asked Kuangqu (another enlightened being), who wanted to reply but found himself unable—not because he was unwilling, but because the words slipped away as he tried to speak. Now I ask you (the interlocutor), who clearly knows the answer—why do your words always fall just short?" The Yellow Emperor concluded: "Wuwei is a true master of the Dao, for he dwells in the realm of unknowing. Kuangqu is close to the Dao, for he has reached the state of forgetting words. But you and I remain one step behind—because we cling too tightly to 'knowing.'"

Heaven and Earth contain the highest beauty yet never speak of it; the four seasons follow clear patterns yet never discuss them; the ten thousand things grow according to their own principles yet never explain them (this is why Confucius said, "I wish to speak no more"). The sage emulates the virtue of Heaven and Earth, comprehending the natural order of all things. Thus, the perfected person (the highest practitioner of the Dao) does not act deliberately (letting all things unfold naturally), and the great sage does not interfere arbitrarily (only following the laws of nature). This is the lesson learned from observing Heaven and Earth.

The most subtle divine transformations and the countless forms of existence (all things change on their own, with no interference from the divine)—whether things live or die, whether they are square or round—no one knows their root cause (death occurs naturally, life continues naturally, circles are inherently round, squares are inherently square—there is no hidden hand controlling them). Yet all things have existed since ancient times (do they need human intervention to exist?). Though the cosmos is vast and boundless...

未離其内(計六合在無極之中則陋矣○離/力智反其内謂不能出百化也)秋毫為小 待之成體(秋豪雖小非無/亦無以容其質)天下莫不沈浮終身不故(日/新) (也/)隂陽四時運行各得其序(不待/為之)惽然若亡而存(昭然/若存) (則亡矣/惽音昬)油然不形而神(挈然有形則不神○油/音由謂無所給措也)萬物 畜而不知此之謂本根(畜之而不得其本性之根故不/知其所以畜也○畜同勅六反) 可以觀於天矣(與天/同觀)齧缺問道乎⬤衣被衣曰若正汝 形一汝視天和将至攝汝知一汝度神將來舍德将為 汝美道将為汝居汝瞳焉如新生之犢而無求其故言 未卒齧缺睡寐被衣大説行歌而去之曰形若槁骸心 若死灰真其實知不以故自持(與變/俱也)媒媒晦晦無心而 不可與謀彼何人哉(獨化/者也)舜問乎丞曰道可得而有乎 曰汝身非汝有也汝何得有夫道(夫身者非汝所能有/也塊然而自有耳身) (非汝所有而况道哉○舜師也一/云古有四輔前疑后丞葢官名)舜曰吾身非吾有也 孰有之哉曰是天地之委形也生非汝有是天地之委 和也性命非汝有是天地之委順也(若身是汝有者則/美惡死生當制之)
Interpretation

Zhuangzi here reveals the essence of the Dao (the Way) and the essentials of spiritual cultivation through several allegorical stories. He first points out that although the myriad phenomena of the universe appear chaotic, they all follow natural patterns. Just as the finest autumn hair (an extremely tiny thing), though minute, still manifests the Dao; the movements of yin-yang and the four seasons may seem disordered yet possess their own inherent order. The true Great Dao is formless, yet governs the fundamental nature of all things.

The story of Nie Que (an ancient hermit) seeking instruction from Bei Yi (an enlightened master) illustrates the key to cultivation: aligning one's physical form, focusing one's gaze, and gathering one's mental faculties. When a person becomes as guileless and desireless as a newborn calf, they naturally harmonize with the Heavenly Dao. Bei Yi rejoices upon seeing Nie Que asleep in a state where "his body resembled dead wood and his mind like cold ashes," singing as he departs—for this state of relinquishing preconceptions and complete self-forgetfulness precisely embodies union with the Dao.

The dialogue between Emperor Shun (an ancient sage-king) and his minister Cheng delves deeper: neither one's physical body, life, nor innate nature truly belongs to the individual—they are but temporary forms bestowed by Heaven and Earth. Since even our bodies are not truly ours, how could we possibly "possess" the Dao? This reminds practitioners to dissolve ego-attachment and accord with natural spontaneity.

These parables all emphasize the same truth: genuine cultivation does not involve outward striving but rather releasing attachments to return to one's original, authentic state. When one ceases forcing outcomes and relinquishes possessiveness, they paradoxically become attuned to the Great Dao of Heaven and Earth.

(由汝今氣聚而生汝不能禁也氣散而死汝不能/止也明其委結而自成耳非汝有也○委積也)孫子 非汝有是天地之委蛻也(氣自委結而蟬蛻/也○蛻敕外反)故行不知 所徃處不知所持食不知所味(皆在自爾中/來故不知也)天地之彊 陽氣也又胡可得而有耶(彊陽猶運動耳明斯道也/庶可以遺身而忘生也)孔 子問於老⬤曰今日晏間敢問至道老⬤曰汝齋戒疏 瀹而心澡雪而精神掊擊而知夫道窅然難言哉将為 汝言其崖略夫昭昭生於㝠㝠有倫生於無形精神生 於道(皆所以明其獨/生而無所資借)形本生於精(皆由精/以至粗)而萬物以形 相生故九竅者胎生八竅者卵生(言萬物雖以形相生/亦皆自然耳故胎卵) (不能易種而生明/神氣之不可為也)其來無迹其徃無崖無門無房四達 之皇皇也(夫率自然之性逰無迹之塗者放形骸於天/地之間寄精神於八方之表是以無門無房) (四達皇皇逍遙六/合與時偕行也)邀於此者四肢彊思慮恂達耳目聦 明其用心不勞其應物無方(人生而遇此道則/天性全而精神定)天不得 不髙地不得不廣日月不得不行萬物不得不昌此其 道與(言此皆不得不然而自/然耳非道能使然也)且夫博之不必知辯之不
Interpretation

Now you possess life because Qi has gathered, yet this Qi is not something you can control; when Qi disperses and brings death, you cannot prevent it either. This is like water naturally pooling into a pond—not by your deliberate effort, but as a manifestation of Heaven and Earth's natural operation. Your life is like the empty shell shed by a cicada, a temporary form entrusted to you by Heaven and Earth.

Thus, when walking, one need not consciously think of a destination; when dwelling, one need not cling to a fixed abode; when eating, one need not overly pursue flavors (for these all occur naturally). The eternal Yang Qi (the universe’s primordial energy) circulating between Heaven and Earth—how could it ever be possessed by humans?

Confucius once asked Laozi (Lao Dan) about the highest truth. Laozi replied: "First, you must purify your heart through fasting (a practice of cleansing body and mind), eliminate distracting thoughts, and break through the confines of fixed understanding. The Dao is profound and difficult to articulate—I can only give you a general idea: light is born from darkness, form arises from formlessness, and spirit originates from the Dao (showing that all things emerge independently without reliance on external conditions). The physical body is rooted in Jing and Qi (both gradually condensing from the subtle to the coarse), and all things reproduce through form. Thus, creatures with nine orifices are born from wombs, while those with eight orifices hatch from eggs (demonstrating that though all things propagate through form, it is a natural process—each method of birth follows its inherent principle, proving the unfathomable workings of Qi cannot be altered by human will).

The Dao comes and goes without trace, has no fixed gate, yet penetrates all directions (it wanders the pathless path in accordance with its nature, releasing form into the expanse of Heaven and Earth and entrusting the spirit beyond the eight wildernesses). Those who align with this state will have robust limbs, unhindered thinking, keen senses, a mind engaged yet unburdened, and respond to all things without rigidity (for those who follow the Dao, their innate nature is preserved, and their spirit remains serene). Heaven is naturally high, Earth naturally vast, the sun and moon move of their own accord, and all things flourish naturally—these are all manifestations of the Dao (showing they are inevitable spontaneity, not the Dao’s deliberate acts).

As for broad knowledge—it does not equate to true wisdom, nor does eloquence signify insight (implying real wisdom transcends words and cognition). The sage discards such superficialities."

必慧聖人以斷之矣(㫁棄知慧而/付之自然也)若夫益之而不加益 損之而不加損者聖人之所保也(使各保其正分而已/故無用知慧為也) 淵淵乎其若海(容恣/無量)魏魏乎其終則復始也(與化俱者/乃積無窮) (之紀可/謂魏魏)運量萬物而不匱(用物而不役/已故不匱也)則君子之道彼 其外與(名取於/身而足)萬物皆徃資焉而不匱此其道與(還用/物故) (我不匱此明道之贍物在於不贍不贍而物自得/故曰此其道與言至道之無功無功乃足稱道也)中國 有人焉非陰非陽(無所/偏名)處於天地之間直且為人(敖然/自放) (所遇而安/了無功名)將反於宗(不逐/末也)自本觀之生者喑醷物也(直/聚) (氣也○喑音蔭醷於/界反喑醷聚氣貌)雖有夀夭相去幾何須㬰之説也 奚足以為堯桀之是非(死生猶未足殊况夀夭/之間哉○幾居豈反)果蓏有 理(物無不理但當順/之○蓏力果反)人倫雖難所以相齒(人倫有知慧/之變故難也) (然其知慧自相齒/耳但當從而任之)聖人遭之而不違(順所/遇也)過之而不守 (宜過/而過)調而應之德也偶而應之道也(調偶和合/之謂也)帝之所 興王之所起也(如斯/而已)人生天地之間若白駒之過郤忽
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the wisdom of sages (those who have attained the Dao) in navigating worldly existence. True sages relinquish artificial cleverness, completely aligning themselves with natural laws. Like the vast ocean that neither appears fuller when water is added nor diminished when water is withdrawn, the sage maintains this state (preserving the original nature of things without deliberate action).

The sage’s realm is as deep and boundless as the sea (embracing infinity) and as lofty as the mountains (merging with the cyclical transformations of nature, endlessly revolving). They utilize all things yet never exhaust them (skillfully employing creation without becoming enslaved by external objects)—this is the way of the noble person. Though all things draw from them, they never face depletion, for this is the true Dao (inexhaustible because it follows nature).

In the heart of the Central Plains, there exists a kind of person who belongs neither to Yin nor Yang (transcending dualities). Dwelling between heaven and earth, they merely adopt human form temporarily (detached and at ease, adapting effortlessly). Such individuals ultimately return to the source. At its root, life is but an aggregation of Qi (like a coalescing breath of energy). Though lifespans may differ in length, what significance does this hold before eternity? Even the distinctions between the virtuous rulers Yao and Shun and the tyrants Jie and Zhou are not worth disputing.

Fruits and melons follow their natural growth patterns (all things abide by inherent principles—one need only comply). Human relationships may be intricate, yet harmony arises naturally (human wisdom spontaneously generates order). The sage neither resists circumstances (yielding to what comes) nor clings to experiences (letting go when they pass). Harmonious response is De (Virtue); fluid adaptation is the Dao. Thus did the ancient sage-kings rise to prominence.

Human life between heaven and earth is as fleeting as sunlight glimpsed through a door crack. This speaks to life’s brevity, urging us to see beyond worldly judgments of right and wrong, gain and loss, and instead align with the natural Dao.

然而已(乃不足惜○白駒或云日也/郤去逆反本亦作隙隙孔也)注然勃然莫不出 焉油然漻然莫不入焉(出入者變化之謂耳言天/下未有不變也○漻音流)已化 而生又化而死(俱是/化也)生物哀之(死物/不哀)人𩔖悲之(死𩔖/不悲)解 其天弢墮其天袠(解脫也○弢勅刀反弓衣/也墮許規反袠陳筆反)紛乎宛乎 (變化⬤煴/宛於阮反)魂魄将徃乃身從之乃大歸乎(無為用心/於其間也)不 形之形形之不形(不形形乃成若形/之則敗其形矣)是人之所同知 也(雖知之然不能任其自/形而反形之所以多敗)非将至之所務也(務則/不至)此衆 人之所同論也(雖論之然故不能/不務所以不至也)彼至則不論(悗然不/覺乃至) 論則不至明見無值(闇至/乃值)辯不若黙道不可聞聞不若 塞此之謂大得(黙而塞之則無/所奔逐故大得)東郭子問於荘子曰所 謂道惡乎在荘子曰無所不在東郭子曰期而後可(欲/令) (荘子指/名所在)莊子曰在螻蟻曰何其下耶曰在稊稗曰何其 愈下耶曰在瓦甓曰何其愈甚耶曰在屎溺東郭子不 應莊子曰夫子之問也固不及質(舉其標質言無所不/任而方復怪此斯不) (及質也○稗蒲賣/反稊稗二草名)正獲之問於監市履豨也每下愈况
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist perspective on the omnipresence of Dao (the Way) and the perpetual transformation of all things. It begins by observing that all phenomena are in constant flux, where life and death represent merely different phases of transformation. Living beings grieve for the dead, yet the departed feel no sorrow—this reflects the natural order. Like unwrapping a bow case (tao) or shedding an arrow quiver (zhi), life disperses and returns to nature.

Zhuangzi employs the phrase "formless taking form, formed returning to formlessness" to illustrate this principle: the shapeless assumes shape, while the shaped ultimately dissolves. Though universally acknowledged, people stubbornly cling to forms, inviting repeated failures. Those truly awakened to Dao (the Way) never strive artificially, for forced efforts prove counterproductive. Ordinary folk delight in debating principles, yet genuine Dao practitioners abstain from discussion—just as eyes fail to see themselves, silence surpasses argument, since Dao transcends verbal description.

The subsequent dialogue between Zhuangzi and Dongguozi vividly demonstrates this: When Dongguozi demands to know Dao's location, Zhuangzi replies "omnipresent." Pressed for specifics, Zhuangzi cites ants, weeds, tiles, even excrement—using extreme examples to show Dao permeates the humblest things, much like market inspectors determining a pig's fatness by pressing its leaner parts (the origin of the idiom "mei xia yu kuang"—truth emerges through examining the lowliest). Zhuangzi reveals Dongguozi's error lies in fixating on concrete appearances, thereby missing Dao's essence.

(豨大豕也夫監市之履豕以知其肥瘦者愈履其難肥/之處愈知豕肥之要今問道之所在而每况之於下賤) (則明道之不逃於物也必矣○正亭卒也獲其名也監/市又魁也豨大豕也履踐也夫市魁履豕履其股脚豨) (難肥處故知豕肥耳問/道亦况下賤則知道也)汝唯莫必無乎逃物(若必謂無/之逃物則) (道不周矣道而不/周則未足以為道)至道若是大言亦然(明道不/逃物)周徧咸 三者異名同實其指一也嘗相與遊乎無何有之宫同 合而論無所終窮乎(若逰有則不能周徧咸也故同合/而論之然后知道無不在知道之) (無不在然后能曠然/無懐而逰彼無窮也)嘗相與無為乎澹而靜乎漠而清 乎調而間乎(此皆無為故/也○間音閑)寥己吾志(寥然/空虚)無徃焉而不 知其所至(志茍寥然則無所徃矣無徃焉故徃而不/知其所至有徃焉則理未動而志已驚矣)去 而來不知其所止(斯順/之也)吾已徃來焉而不知其所終(但/徃) (來不由於知耳不為不徃來也徃/來者自然之常理也其有終乎)彷徨乎馮閎大知入 焉而不知其所窮(馮閎者虚廓之謂也大知逰乎廖廓/恣變化之所如故不知也○馮皮氷) (反閎音宏虛/廓之謂也)物物者與物無際(明物物者無物而物自/物耳物自物耳故㝠也)
Interpretation

This passage employs the metaphor of judging a pig's fatness at the marketplace to illustrate the omnipresent nature of the Dao. Just as an experienced butcher (market inspector) determines plumpness by pressing the least fleshy parts (like legs and feet), comprehending the true essence of the Dao requires observing it in the most humble, ordinary things.

The text points out that insisting the Dao must exist apart from concrete phenomena is itself an incomplete understanding. The true "Great Dao" resembles grand discourse—it never separates itself from tangible existence. The terms "universal" (zhou), "all-pervading" (bian), and "complete" (xian), though named differently, all refer to the Dao's omnipresent essence.

A series of images then depict the mental state of one who comprehends the Dao: wandering through palaces of emptiness, merging with all things without boundaries; maintaining a mind of serene detachment, clear and harmoniously balanced. When the inner self reaches this expansive emptiness (liao), actions flow without forced purpose, coming and going freely without fixation on destinations. This realm resembles the "great wisdom" that roams freely through infinite void (fenghong), adapting to all transformations without constraint.

The crux is revealed: the Dao that makes things what they are shares no boundaries (wuji) with concrete phenomena. Because the Dao isn't a specific object but the fundamental principle allowing all things to manifest their true nature, it achieves profound unity (ming).

而物有際者所謂物際者也(物有際故每相與不能/㝠然真所謂際者也)不 際之際際之不際者也(不際者雖有物物之名直明物/之自物耳物物者竟無物也際) (其安/在乎)謂盈虚衰殺彼為盈虚非盈虚彼為衰殺非衰殺 彼為本末非本末彼為積散非積散也(既明物物者無/物又明物之不) (能自物則為之者誰乎哉皆/忽然而自爾也○殺色界反)妸荷甘與神農同學於老 龍吉神農隱几闔戸晝瞑妸荷甘日中奓戸而入曰老 龍死矣神農隱几擁杖而起嚗然放杖而笑(起而悟夫/死之不足) (驚故還放杖而笑也○妸於何反荷/音河奓音奢開也嚗音剥放杖聲也)曰天知予僻陋慢 訑故棄予而死已矣夫子無所發予之狂言而死矣夫 (自肩吾以下皆以至言為狂而不信也故/非老龍連叔之徒莫足與言也○訑音但)弇堈弔聞之 曰夫體道者天下之君子所繫焉(言體道者人之宗主/○弇音奄堈音剛) 今於道秋毫之端萬分未得處一焉(秋毫之端細矣又/未得其萬分之一) 而猶知藏其狂言而死又况夫體道者乎(明夫至道非/言之所得也) (唯在乎/自得耳)視之無形聽之無聲於人之論者謂之㝠㝠所 以論道而非道也(㝠㝠而猶復非/道明道之無名)於是泰清問乎無窮
Interpretation

This passage explores the relationship between "things" (物) and the Dao (道). It first points out that all things have boundaries (物际), yet the true Dao transcends these limits. The concepts of boundaries and boundlessness are ultimately relative. Phenomena like fullness and emptiness, flourishing and decline, roots and branches, gathering and dispersion—these transformations are not governed by the phenomena themselves, but by deeper underlying principles.

The text then illustrates this through the story of Lao Longji: Shennong (the Divine Farmer) and E Hegan studied under him. One day, E Hegan discovered Lao Longji had passed away. At first, Shennong leaned on his desk with his staff, then suddenly dropped it and laughed aloud. He realized death was nothing to fear, for though Lao Longji had died, he had attained the state of "embodying the Dao" (体道)—those who truly comprehend the great Dao become the guiding figures all noble-minded people follow (体道者,天下之君子所系焉).

Finally, the passage observes that the great Dao is formless and soundless. People describe it as "dark and obscure" (冥冥), yet even this description falls short. Just as Taiqing consulted Wujiong (the Boundless), this shows the true Dao cannot be fully expressed in words—it can only be realized through personal awakening (唯在乎自得耳). The text emphasizes the Dao's transcendence beyond form and name, its ineffable nature, and the vital importance of internal realization to truly embody it.

曰子知道乎無窮曰吾不知又問乎無為無為曰吾知 道曰子之知道亦有數乎曰有曰其數若何無為曰吾 知道之可以貴可以賤可以約可以散此吾所以知道 之數也泰清以之言也問乎無始曰若是則無窮之弗 知與無為之知孰是而孰非乎無始曰不知深矣知之 淺矣弗知内矣知之外矣於是泰清中而歎曰弗知乃 知乎知乃不知乎孰知不知之知(凡得之不由/於知乃㝠也)無始曰 道不可聞聞而非也道不可見見而非也道不可言言 而非也(故黙成乎不聞不/見之域而後至焉)知形形之不形乎(形白形耳/形形者竟) (無物/也)道不當名(有道名而竟無物/故名之不能當也)無始曰有問道而應 之者不知道也雖問道者亦未聞道(不知故問問之而/應則非道也不應) (則非問者所得故雖/問之亦終不聞也)道無問問無應(絶學去教而歸/於自然之意也)無 問問之是問窮也(所謂/貴空)無應應之是無内也(實無而假/有以應者) (外/矣)以無内待問窮若是者外不觀乎宇宙内不知乎大 初是以不過乎崐崘不遊乎大虚(若夫婪落天地逰虚/涉逺以入乎㝠㝠者) (不應而已矣/○大音泰)光曜問乎無有曰夫子有乎其無有乎光 曜不得問而熟視其状貌窅然空然終日視之而不見
Interpretation

Someone asked Boundless (symbolizing infinite existence): "Do you understand the Dao?" Boundless replied: "I do not know." The questioner then asked Non-Action (Wuwei, symbolizing the state of natural spontaneity): "Do you understand the Dao?" Non-Action said: "I do." The questioner pressed further: "Can the Dao you understand be described in concrete terms?" Non-Action answered: "Yes. The Dao can manifest as noble or humble, as gathering or dispersing—these are the forms of the Dao as I know it."

Hearing this, Great Clarity (a seeker of the Dao) went to consult Beginningless (symbolizing the origin of all things): "If so, between Boundless’s ‘not knowing’ and Non-Action’s ‘knowing,’ who is right and who is wrong?" Beginningless replied: "The one who says ‘I do not know’ has actually grasped it more deeply, while the one who says ‘I know’ understands it only superficially. ‘Not knowing’ is an inner realization, whereas ‘knowing’ is merely external cognition." Great Clarity sighed in response: "So ‘not knowing’ is true knowledge, while ‘knowing’ is actually ignorance! Who can comprehend the true meaning of this ‘knowledge through not knowing’?"

Beginningless continued: "The Dao cannot be heard with the ears—what is heard is not the true Dao. The Dao cannot be seen with the eyes—what is seen is not the true Dao. The Dao cannot be spoken with words—what is spoken is not the true Dao. (True realization must be silently achieved in a realm beyond sound and form.) Understand that the source which gives form to all things itself has no form. The name ‘Dao’ cannot truly represent it. (For though the Dao has a name, it has no form—no name can accurately describe it.)"

Beginningless went on: "Those who answer when asked about the Dao do not truly understand it. Even those who ask about the Dao have never truly heard it. (In the true state of the Dao,) there is neither questioning nor answering. To insist on asking is futile; to force an answer is mere pretense. To respond with such pretense to empty questioning—such people cannot observe the truth of the cosmos outwardly nor realize the origin of all things inwardly. Thus, they will never reach the Kunlun paradise (symbolizing the highest realm) or wander in the realm of the Great Void. (Only by letting go of attachments and merging the spirit into the vast emptiness can one attain true unity.)"

Finally, Radiant Light (symbolizing illumination) asked Nonexistence (symbolizing emptiness): "Do you, sir, exist or not?" Receiving no answer, Radiant Light carefully observed the other’s appearance: profound and boundless, yet gazing all day without seeing anything. (This shows that the highest state transcends the duality of existence and nonexistence.)

聽之而不聞搏之而不得也光曜曰至矣其孰能至此 乎予能有無矣而未能無無也及為無有矣何從至此 哉(此皆絶學之意也於道絶之則夫學者乃在根本中/來矣故學之善者其唯不學乎○窅烏了反搏音博) 大馬之捶鉤者年八十矣而不失豪芒(玷捶鉤之輕重/而無毫芒之差) (也○捶之睡反大馬司馬也江/東三魏之間人皆謂鍜為捶)大馬曰子巧與有道與 曰臣有守也臣之年二十而好捶鉤於物無視也非鉤 無察也是用之者假不用者也以長得其用而况乎無 不用者乎物孰不資焉(都無懐則/物來皆應)冉求問於仲尼曰未 有天地可知耶仲尼曰可古猶今也(言天地常存乃/無未有之時)冉 求失問而退明日復見曰昔者吾問未有天地可知乎 夫子曰可古猶今也昔日吾昭然今日吾昧然敢問何 謂也仲尼曰昔之昭然也神者先受之(虚心以待命/斯神受也)今 之昧然也且又為不神者求耶(思求更致不了/○為于偽反)無古無 今無始無終(非唯無不得化而為有也有亦不得化而/為無矣是以夫有之為物雖千變萬化而) (不得一為無也不得一為無故/自古無未有之時而常存也)未有子孫而有子孫可 乎(言世世無極○言其要有由不得無故而有傳世故/有子孫不得無子而有孫也如是天地不得先無而)
Interpretation

This passage explores the profound realm of "nothingness" (Wu) in Daoist philosophy and the essentials of cultivation through several stories and dialogues.

First, there is the story of Guangyao, who laments: Who can reach the highest state? He understands the distinction between "being" (You) and "nothingness" (Wu), but cannot yet attain the state of "no-nothingness" (Wu Wu)—transcending the duality of existence and non-existence. He wonders how to achieve the state of "neither being nor nothingness" (Wu You). This illustrates that the key to Daoist cultivation lies in surpassing all conceptual knowledge—true wisdom comes not from deliberate study but from letting go.

Next, the story of an eighty-year-old blacksmith who worked under Grand Marshal Da Ma is told. The old man crafted hooks with flawless precision. When asked whether he relied on skill or method, the blacksmith replied: Since the age of twenty, his focus had been solely on hooks—nothing else existed in his vision. This demonstrates the power of single-minded concentration—through long-term, undistracted practice, one can attain a state of mastery. Just as skill is perfected by entering a state of "effortless mind" (Wuwei), how much more profound is the state of complete non-attachment? Do not all things rely on this natural principle?

The dialogue between Ran Qiu and Confucius (Zhongni) delves even deeper. Ran Qiu asks whether it is possible to know what existed before the formation of heaven and earth. Confucius replies, "The past and present are one." The next day, Ran Qiu confesses his confusion: he thought he understood yesterday but is lost today. Confucius explains: Yesterday, he grasped it intuitively through direct spiritual insight (Shen), but today he became confused because he tried to analyze it with thought. This reveals a crucial truth—time has no inherent division between past and present, beginning and end; all things eternally exist. Just as it is impossible to have descendants without first having ancestors, heaven and earth could not have emerged from absolute "nothingness."

These stories collectively convey that Daoist cultivation requires transcending dualistic distinctions to reach a state where self and object are forgotten. True wisdom is not attained through intellectual reasoning but through direct spiritual realization. Concepts like time, existence, and non-existence are artificial distinctions—the Dao itself is eternal and ever-present.

(今有/也)冉求未對仲尼曰已矣未應矣不以生生死(夫死/者獨) (化而死耳非夫/生者生此死也)不以死死生(生者亦獨/化而生耳)死生有待耶(獨/化) (死/生)皆有所一體(死與生各/自成體)有先天地生者物耶物物者 非物物出不得先物也猶其有物也猶其有物也無已 (誰得先物者乎哉吾以隂陽為先物而隂陽者即所謂/物耳誰又先隂陽者乎吾以自然為先之而自然即物) (之自爾耳吾以至道為先之矣而至道者乃至無也既/以無矣又奚為先然則先物者誰乎哉而猶有物無已) (明物之自然非有使/然也○有先悉薦反)聖人之愛人也終無已者亦乃取 於是者也(取於自爾故恩流/百代而不廢也)顔淵問乎仲尼曰囘嘗聞 諸夫子曰無有所将無有所迎囘敢問其遊仲尼曰古 之人外化而内不化(以心順形/而形自化)今之人内化而外不化 (以心/使形)與物化者一不化者也(常無心故一不化一/不化乃能與物化耳)安化 安不化(化與不化皆任/彼耳斯無心也)安與之相靡(直無心而恣其自/化耳非將迎而靡) (順/之)必與之莫多(不將不迎/則足而止)豨韋氏之囿黄帝之圃有虞 氏之宫湯武之室(夫無心而自化/乃羣聖所逰處)君子之人若儒墨者
Interpretation

This passage explores the relationship between life and death, and between natural spontaneity and human artifice. Through a dialogue between Confucius and his disciples, Zhuangzi presents the Daoist perspective on the transformations of life and death.

Life and death do not causally determine each other. Living things do not die because they are alive, nor do dead things generate life because they are dead. Life and death exist independently as part of nature's spontaneous transformations. Just as there was no sovereign creator before heaven and earth came into being, all things emerge spontaneously. While Yin-Yang may appear as the source of all things, they themselves are natural existences. We speak of the Dao as fundamental, yet the Dao itself is "nothingness" (wu) — how could it require any earlier origin?

The sages' (those who have attained the Dao) benevolence endures eternally precisely because they accord with this natural principle. When Yan Hui asked Confucius about the state of "neither welcoming nor sending off," Confucius explained: The ancient adepts outwardly followed transformations while maintaining inner constancy (external transformation with internal non-transformation), whereas modern people experience inner fluctuations while remaining outwardly rigid (internal transformation with external non-transformation). Those who truly unite with all things maintain unwavering constancy within. To abide peacefully in both transformation and non-transformation, neither deliberately accommodating nor resisting — this was the attainment of ancient sage-kings like Xiwei, the Yellow Emperor, Yu Shun, and the founders of Shang and Zhou dynasties. In contrast, Confucian and Mohist scholars who rigidly adhere to doctrines deviate from this natural way.

The key lies in "no-mind" (wuxin) — non-deliberate action (wuwei) that allows all things to transform spontaneously. Like the parks and palaces of ancient sage-kings, they were not deliberately constructed but naturally formed dwellings. This thought embodies the core Daoist principle of "governing through non-action."

師故以是非相□也而况今之人乎(□和也夫儒之師/天下之難和者而) (無心者猶故和之而况其/凡乎○□子兮反和也)聖人處物不傷物(至順/也)不傷 物者物亦不能傷也(在我/而已)唯無所傷者為能與人相将 迎(無心故至順至順故能無/所将迎而義冠於将迎也)山林與⬤壌與使我欣欣 然而樂與(山林皋壌未善於我而我/便樂之此為無故而樂也)樂未畢也哀又繼 之(夫無故而樂亦無故而哀也則凡/所樂不足樂凡所哀不足哀也)哀樂之來吾不能 禦其去弗能止悲夫世人直謂物逆旅耳(不能坐忘自/得而為哀樂) (所寄/也)夫知遇而不知所不遇(知之所遇者即知之知/之所不遇者即不知也)知 能能而不能所不能(所不能者不能强能也由此觀之/知與不知能與不能制不由我也) (當付之/自然耳)無知無能者固人之所不免也(受生各/有分也)夫務免 乎人之所不免者豈不亦悲哉至言去言至為去為(皆/自) (得/也)齊知之所知則淺矣(夫由知而後得者假學者耳/故淺也○齊才細反又如字)  
Interpretation

This passage expounds Zhuangzi's transcendent attitude toward worldly knowledge and emotions. The sage interacts with all things yet harms none (by complete conformity with nature), and thus nothing can harm him. Only one who remains unharmed can truly engage with others without entanglement (for an empty mind allows complete accommodation, and complete accommodation enables transcendence over human interactions).

Mountains and wilderness bring me joy (though these external things don't truly belong to me, such joy is causeless), yet before the joy subsides, sorrow follows (groundless joy inevitably begets groundless sorrow—proof that worldly pleasures and pains aren't worth clinging to). When sorrow or joy arrives, I cannot stop it; when it departs, I cannot retain it. Pitiable are those who, like transient guests dwelling among the myriad things (failing to attain the state of "sitting in oblivion" for true freedom), remain shackled by these emotions.

People only know what they've encountered, ignorant of what they haven't (their understanding confined to their limited sphere); they can do what's within their capacity, yet strain for the impossible (what cannot be done shouldn't be forced—proof that neither knowledge nor ability is truly self-determined). To lack certain knowledge and abilities is humanity's inescapable nature (each life has its inherent boundaries). Isn't it tragic to stubbornly resist these inevitable limitations? The highest speech transcends speech itself; the highest action transcends action (this is true freedom).

To forcibly standardize all knowledge (through acquired learning) would render one's understanding shallow (deliberately acquired knowledge remains superficial, mere surface appearance).

                       莊子注巻七

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0138); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 6 Vol. 8 →