中文 · EN

《南華真經註疏》Vol. 9

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 9 / 35 6,824 characters

About this page. The original text of 《南華真經註疏》 Vol. 9 (Dongshen 洞神部, 35 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 13 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《南華真經註疏》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

南華眞經注䟽卷之九縁三     河南郭象注     唐西華法師成玄英䟽    內篇應帝王第七(夫無心而任乎自/化者應爲帝王也) 齧缺問於王倪四問而四不知  䟽四問而四不知則齊物篇中四問也夫  帝王之道莫若忘知故以此義而爲篇首  老子云不以智治國國之德者也 齧缺因躍而大喜行以告蒲衣子蒲衣子曰 而乃今知之乎  䟽蒲衣子堯時賢人年八歲舜師之讓位  不受即被衣子也齧缺得不知之妙㫖仍  踊躍而喜歡走以告於蒲衣子迷王倪之  深義蒲衣是方外之大賢達忘言之至道  理無知而固乆汝今日乃知也 有虞氏不及泰氏  註夫有虞氏之與泰氏皆世事之迹耳非  所以迹也所以迹者無迹也世孰知之哉  未之嘗名何勝負之有邪然無迹者乗群  變屬萬世世有夷險故迹有不及也  䟽有虞氏舜也泰氏即太昊伏羲也三皇  之世其俗淳和五帝之時其風澆競澆競  則運知而養物淳和則存眞而馭㝢不及  之義驗此可知也 有虞氏其猶臧仁以要人亦得人矣而未始 出於非人  註夫以人所好爲是人所惡爲非人者唯  以是非爲域者也夫能出於非人之域者  必入於無非人之境矣故無得無失無可  無不可豈直臧仁而要人也  䟽夫舜包臧仁義要求士庶以得百姓之
Interpretation

Inner Chapters: Chapter Seven, “Responding as Ruler” (Only those inwardly free of fixed attachments and able to follow the natural transformations of all things are fit to be rulers.)

Nie Que asked Wang Ni four questions, and each time Wang Ni replied, “I don’t know.”

[Commentary] The four questions and four replies of “I don’t know” refer to the four questions in the chapter “On the Equality of Things.” The key to the ruler’s way lies in forgetting cleverness and knowledge, so this idea opens the chapter. The Laozi says, “Not governing a state through cleverness and knowledge is the state’s good fortune.”

Nie Que leapt for joy, then went back and told Puyi about it. Puyi asked, “Have you only understood this now?”

[Commentary] Puyi was a worthy man in the time of Yao. At the age of eight, he had been Shun’s teacher. He declined the throne and refused to accept it; he was also known as Bei Yi. Nie Que grasped the essential point of “not knowing” and, overjoyed, hurried to tell Puyi. But he had not yet truly understood the profound meaning of Wang Ni’s words. Puyi was a great sage who had transcended worldly concerns and deeply understood the ultimate Dao, which cannot be expressed in words. The principle is that cleverness and knowledge are not needed to know the Dao; this has always been so. Have you only understood it now?

The Youyu clan was not as good as the Tai clan.

[Note] The Youyu clan and the Tai clan refer to deeds that have appeared in history; they are not the source from which those deeds arose. The source leaves no trace. Who in the world could know it? It has never been given a name, so how could it be said to surpass or fall short of anything? Yet the Dao, which leaves no trace, moves through all kinds of transformation and runs through every age. The world’s fortunes shift between peace and hardship, so the achievements of historical rulers differ in quality.

[Commentary] The Youyu clan refers to Shun; the Tai clan is Taihao Fuxi. In the age of the Three Sovereigns, customs were simple and generous; in the age of the Five Emperors, people became shallow and competitive. As customs grew shallow, people used cleverness to govern and care for all things. When customs were simple, people could preserve their original nature and govern the world. This shows what “not as good as” means.

Shun may have promoted benevolence and righteousness to win people’s hearts, and so he gained the people’s support. But he never went beyond taking human judgments as the standard for right and wrong.

[Note] To take what people like as right and what they dislike as wrong is to draw boundaries through judgments of right and wrong. Only those who go beyond these boundaries enter a realm in which there is no right or wrong. In that realm, there is nothing to gain or lose and nothing that must or must not be done. How could it be limited to promoting benevolence and righteousness to win people’s hearts?

[Commentary] Shun embodied both benevolence and righteousness, using them to win over scholars and common people in the hope of gaining everyone’s allegiance… (The original text ends here.)

 心未是忘懷自合天下故出於是非之域  亦有作臧字者臧善也善於仁義要求人  心者也 泰氏其卧徐徐其覺于于  䟽徐徐寬緩之容于于自得之貌伏犧之  時淳風尚在故卧則安閑而徐緩覺則歡  娱而自得也 一以己爲馬一以己爲牛  註夫如是又奚是人非人之有哉斯可謂  出於非人之域  䟽忘物我遣是非或馬或牛隨人呼召人  獸尚且無主何是非之有哉 其知情信  註任其自知故情信  䟽率其眞知情無虚矯故實信也 其德甚眞  註任其自得故無偽  䟽以不德爲德德無所德故不偽者也 而未始入於非人  註不入乎是非之域所以絶於有虞之世  䟽既率其情其德不偽故能超出心知之  境不入是非之域者也 肩吾見狂接輿狂接輿曰日中始何以語汝  䟽肩吾接輿已具前解日中始賢人姓名  即肩吾之師也既是汝師有何告示此是  接輿發語以問故也 肩吾曰告我君人者以己出經式義度人孰 敢不聽而化諸  䟽式用也教我爲君之道化物之方必須  己出智以經綸用仁義以導俗則四方氓  庶誰不聽從遐遠黎元敢不歸化耶 狂接輿曰是欺德也  註以已制物則物失其眞  䟽夫以己制物物喪其眞欺誑之德非實  道 其於治天下也猶涉海鑿河而使蚉負山也
Interpretation

With no preconceived attachment in the heart, one can naturally accord with all under Heaven and so rise beyond the realm of distinguishing right from wrong.

Some editions write “zang” as “zang,” meaning goodness. To regard benevolence and righteousness as good and require others to act accordingly is itself a way of making distinctions and constraining others through one’s own intentions.

The people of the time of Tai (the era of Fuxi) slept calmly and at ease, and woke feeling lighthearted and content. The simple customs of Fuxi’s age still prevailed, so they slept peacefully and woke with joy and freedom.

At times they took themselves to be horses; at times, oxen.

[Commentary] In that case, how could there still be a distinction between “this is a human” and “that is not”? This may be said to transcend the boundary between human and nonhuman.

[Explanation] Forget the distinction between self and things, and set aside disputes over right and wrong. If others called someone a horse, he was a horse; if they called him an ox, he was an ox. When neither humans nor animals cling to a fixed identity, how could anyone remain attached to who is right or wrong?

Their understanding and feelings were genuine and trustworthy.

[Commentary] They understood things in accordance with their natural course, so their feelings were genuine and trustworthy.

[Explanation] Acting in keeping with genuine understanding, their feelings held no falseness or contrivance, and so could be trusted.

Their De (Virtue) was utterly pure.

[Commentary] They let things unfold naturally and were content, so they had no pretense.

[Explanation] De is truly De only when it is not treated as something to possess for oneself. Because they did not cling to De, they were free of pretense.

Yet they never entered the realm of disputes over right and wrong.

[Commentary] They did not become entangled in disputes over right and wrong, and so accorded with the simple customs of the age of Youyu (the legendary era when Shun ruled the world).

[Explanation] They acted in keeping with their genuine nature and did not contrive their De. Thus they went beyond scheming and cleverness, and did not become entangled in disputes over right and wrong.

Shoulder-to-shoulder met Madman Jieyu, a recluse in Daoist legend. Madman Jieyu asked, “What did Rizhongshi, your teacher, tell you?”

[Explanation] The story of Shoulder-to-shoulder and Madman Jieyu has already been told earlier. Rizhongshi is the name of a worthy man, and he was Shoulder-to-shoulder’s teacher. Madman Jieyu asks what the teacher had told him.

Shoulder-to-shoulder replied, “My teacher told me that a ruler should use his own wisdom to establish standards and educate the people through benevolence and righteousness. Then who would dare not obey and be transformed?”

[Explanation] “Model” means a standard or rule. Shoulder-to-shoulder believed that those who govern the world should use their own wisdom to plan affairs of state and guide customs through benevolence and righteousness. Then who among the people of the four quarters would not submit, and who in distant lands would not be brought into their teaching?

Madman Jieyu said, “That is merely a way of damaging De.”

[Commentary] When one imposes one’s will on all things, they lose their own nature.

[Explanation] Controlling all things through one’s own will causes them to lose their true nature. This damages De and does not accord with the genuine Dao.

To govern the world in this way is like trying to cross the sea on foot, dig a channel through a river, or make mosquitoes carry a mountain.

 註夫寄當於萬物則無事而自成以一身  制天下則功莫就而任不勝也  䟽夫溟海宏博深廣難窮而穿之爲河必  無成理亦猶大道遐曠玄絶難知而鑿之  爲義其功難克又蚉蟲至小山嶽極高令  其負荷無由勝任以智經綸用仁理物德  小謀大其義亦然 夫聖人之治也治外乎  註全其性分之内而已  䟽隨其分内而治之必不分外治物治乎  外者言不治之者也 正而後行  註各正性命  䟽順其正性而後行化 確乎能其事者而已矣  註不爲其所不能  䟽確實也順其實性於事有能者因而任  之止於分内不論於外者耳 且鳥高飛以避增弋之害鼷鼠深穴乎神丘 之下以避熏鑿之患  註禽獸猶各有以自存故帝王任之而不  爲則自成也  䟽矰網也弋以繩係箭而射之也鼷鼠小  鼠也神丘社壇也鳥則高飛而逃網鼠則  深穴而避薰斯皆率性自然豈待教而遠  害者也鳥鼠既耳在人亦然故知式義出  經誣罔之甚矣 而曾二蟲之無知  註言汝曾不知此二蟲之各存而不待教  乎  䟽而汝也汝不曾知此二蟲不待教令而  解避害全身者乎既深穴高飛豈無知耶  况在人倫而欲出經式義欺矯活物不亦  妄哉 天根遊於殷陽至蓼水之上適遭無名人而 問焉曰請問爲天下
Interpretation

Embedded among the myriad things and following their nature, matters can come to completion naturally through Wuwei (non-action). But if one tries to govern the world by one’s own effort, one’s achievements will be hard to accomplish, and the responsibilities hard to bear.

The sea is vast and deep, beyond measure. If one tried to dig it into a canal, the task would surely fail. It is like the Dao, profound and mysterious, difficult to know: if one insists on carving it into a fixed set of doctrines, its effects will likewise be hard to realize. A mosquito is tiny, while a mountain is immense. If the mosquito were made to carry the mountain, it could never bear the weight. The same principle applies to using clever schemes to plan for the world and benevolence to govern the myriad things: one is trying to accomplish something vast with means too small.

When a sage governs the world, what is there to govern?

Only the bounds within which each thing can preserve its own nature. To govern according to what each nature permits is to refrain from forcing things to do what lies beyond their proper role. This is what “not governing” means: not imposing control beyond what is proper.

First let each thing find its proper place, and only then put teaching into practice.

That is, help each thing bring its own nature and life into proper order, then teach in a way that follows its nature.

It is enough to do well what truly lies within one’s power.

“Truly” means in reality. Follow the real nature of things and let them do what they are able to do, limiting them to their proper roles without demanding what lies beyond them.

Birds fly high to evade nets and arrows; the tiny mouse burrows deep beneath the sacred mound, the altar to the soil deity, to escape the dangers of smoke and digging.

Animals each have their own ways of preserving themselves. So if rulers let things follow their natural course and do not interfere, the myriad things can grow of their own accord.

“Zeng” is a net for catching birds; “yi” is an arrow attached to a cord, used to shoot birds. The xishu is a tiny mouse, and the sacred mound is the altar to the soil deity. Birds fly high to evade nets, and mice burrow deep to escape smoke and digging. Both avoid harm naturally, following their own nature. Who needs to teach them how? The same is true of people. So it is absurd to claim that one can act only by following the scriptures and applying fixed doctrines.

Do you really not understand even these two kinds of small creatures?

“Er” means “you.” Don’t you know that these two creatures need no instructions to understand how to avoid harm and preserve themselves? Birds can fly high and mice can hide deep underground. Surely they have intelligence of their own. How much more absurd, then, to try to control, deceive, and exploit all living beings in human society by means of scriptural rules and doctrines?

Tian Gen was traveling in Yinyang. When he came to the banks of the Liao River, he happened to meet the nameless man and asked him, “May I ask how to govern the world…”

 䟽天根無名並爲姓字寓言問答也殷陽  殷山之陽蓼水在趙國界內遭遇也天根  遨遊於山水之側適遇無名人而問之請  問之意在乎天下 無名人曰去汝鄙人也何問之不豫也  註問爲天下則非起於太初止於玄冥也  䟽汝是鄙陋之人宜其速去所問之㫖甚  不悦豫我心 予方將與造物者爲人  註任人之自爲  䟽夫造物爲人素分各足何勞作法措意  治之既同於大通故任而不助也 厭則又乗夫莽眇之鳥以出六極之外而遊 無何有之鄉以處壙埌之野  註莽眇群碎之謂耳乗群碎馳萬物故能  出處常通而無狹滯之地  䟽莽眇深埦之謂壙埌宏博之名鳥則取  其無迹輕昇六極猶六合也夫聖人馭世  恬淡無爲大順物情有同造化若其息用  歸本厭離世間則乗深遠之大道凌虚空  而滅迹超六合以放任遊無有以逍遥凝  神智於射山處清虚於曠野如是則何天  下之可爲哉蓋無爲者也 汝又何帠以治天下感予之心爲  註言皆放之自得之場則不治而自治也  䟽夫放而任之則物皆自化有何帠術輒  欲治之感動我心何爲如此 又復問  䟽天根未達更請决疑 無名人曰汝遊心於淡  註其任性而無所飾焉則淡矣 合氣於漠  註漠然靜於性而止  䟽可遊汝心神於恬淡之域合汝形氣於
Interpretation

Tiangen and Wuming are both fictional figures in this allegory; here, the two sides of the exchange are referred to by their names. The story takes place south of Yin Mountain, near the Liao River, within the territory of Zhao. Tiangen was traveling among the mountains and rivers when he happened to meet Wuming and asked him for advice on governing the world.

Wuming said, “You are a person of shallow understanding. You’d better be on your way. What you ask about displeases me greatly.”

The commentary explains that Tiangen was asking about governing the world, but his question neither began with the origins of the myriad things nor reached into the depths of the mysterious and far-reaching.

Wuming continued, “I am simply intending to follow the Creator—the natural power that brings the myriad things into being and transforms them—as I go about my life.”

The commentary explains that this means letting people act according to their own nature.

The commentary further explains: Each thing has its own proper place, and each can meet its own needs. Why exhaust the mind by laying down laws, or trouble oneself with governing? It is enough to follow the common Dao of the myriad things and let them be, without trying to make them flourish.

“When I grow weary, I ride the bird of vast obscurity—a reference to what is subtle and leaves no trace—and fly beyond the bounds of Heaven and Earth in every direction. I roam through the Land of Nowhere, the realm of nothingness, and dwell in the open, boundless wilderness.”

The commentary explains: “Vast obscurity” refers to things that gather together yet are subtle and hard to grasp. By riding these subtle things, one can travel among the myriad things; wherever one enters or leaves, one moves freely, without any narrow or obstructed place.

The commentary further explains: “Vast obscurity” describes what is deep, subtle, and far-reaching; “open wilderness” means a broad, empty expanse. The “bird” suggests something that leaves no trace and rises lightly. “The six bounds” means the six directions, or the universe: Heaven, Earth, and the four quarters. When sages govern the world, they are calm and practice Wuwei (non-action), following the nature of the myriad things and moving in harmony with the transformations of nature. If they wish to leave worldly affairs behind and return to the root, they ride the deep and far-reaching Dao, traveling through the air without leaving a trace, beyond Heaven and Earth in every direction, roaming freely through the realm of nothingness. They gather their spirit at She Mountain and dwell in the clear emptiness of the wilderness. What affairs of the world would such people still need to govern? This is what is meant by Wuwei.

Wuming continued, “Why must you try to move my heart by bringing up the matter of governing the world?”

The commentary explains: When the myriad things are all free to be themselves and find their proper place, the world will naturally be at peace without being governed.

The commentary further explains: Let the myriad things be and allow them to transform of themselves. Why use any method to govern them, or even stir my thoughts over it?

Tiangen still did not understand, so he asked again for an explanation.

Wuming said, “Let your spirit roam in a state of calm indifference.”

The commentary explains: When one follows one’s nature without embellishment, the mind becomes calm and indifferent.

“Let your breath harmonize with a state of tranquil stillness.”

The commentary explains: Keep your nature quiet and settled.

The commentary explains further: Let your spirit roam in a state of calm indifference, and let your body and breath merge with ….

 寂寞之鄉唯形與神二皆虚靜如是則天  下不待治而自化者耳 順物自然而無容私焉而天下治矣  註任性自生公也心欲益之私也容私果  不足以生生而順公乃全也  䟽隨造化之物情順自然之本性無容私  作法術措意治之放而任之則物我全之  矣 陽子居見老聃曰有人於此嚮疾彊梁物徹 䟽明學道不倦如是者可比明王乎  䟽姓陽名朱字子居問老子明王之道假  且有人素性聰達神智捷疾猶如嚮應涉  事理務彊幹果决鑒物洞徹䟽通明敏學  道精勤曾無懈倦如是之人可得將明王  聖帝比德不乎 老聃曰是於聖人也胥易技係勞形怵心者 也  註言此功夫容身不得不足以比聖主  䟽若將彼人比聖主無易胥徒勞苦改易  形容技術工巧神慮係累劬勞故形容變  改係累故心靈怵惕也 且也虎豹之文來田猨狙之便執斄之狗來 藉如是者可比明王乎  註此皆以其文章技能係累其身非涉虚  以御乎無方也  䟽藉繩也猨狙獼猴也虎豹之皮有文章  故來田獵獼猴以跳躍便捷恒被繩拘狗  以執捉狐狸每遭係頸若以嚮疾之人類  於聖帝則此之三物可比明王也耳 陽子居蹴然曰敢問明王之治  䟽既其失問故驚𢜺變容重請明王爲政  其義安在 老聃曰明王之功蓋天下而似不自己
Interpretation

In the realm of stillness and Wuwei (non-action), both body and spirit are empty, quiet, and at rest. In this way, the world needs no deliberate rule; it can transform and flourish on its own.

Follow the natural character of all things without introducing personal desires, and the world can be at peace.

Commentary: Letting all things grow naturally according to their own nature is public-mindedness; wanting to intervene further and add to them is self-interest. Self-interest cannot sustain the ceaseless generation of all things. Only by following what is right for all can they be preserved.

Explication: Follow the patterns of all things and comply with their natural character. Do not let private desires intrude when making laws or applying techniques, or when arranging governance by deliberate design. Let all things develop naturally, and both they and I can be preserved.

Yang Ziju—Yang by surname, Zhu by given name, and Ziju by courtesy name—paid a visit to Lao Dan and said, “Suppose there were a person who reacted swiftly, acted with great ability, saw things clearly, and was perceptive and intelligent, and who studied the Dao without ever slacking. Could such a person be compared to a sage ruler?”

Explication: Yang Ziju asked Laozi: Suppose a person were naturally intelligent and perceptive, with quick reactions; capable and decisive in handling affairs, and clear-sighted in understanding things; diligent in studying the Dao and never slack. Could such a person be compared to an enlightened ruler or sage emperor?

Lao Dan said, “In the eyes of a sage, such a person is no more than a weary servant, burdened by his own skills and exhausted in body and mind.”

Commentary: These efforts leave a person unable to find rest. They are not enough to make someone comparable to an enlightened ruler.

Explication: To compare such a person to an enlightened ruler would be like comparing a ruler to a weary servant. Such people constantly alter their outward appearance and are constrained by clever techniques; their bodies and minds grow tired. Their bodies become exhausted, while their minds are troubled and anxious by their concerns.

“What is more, tigers and leopards are hunted because of the markings on their coats; monkeys are bound with ropes because of their agility; hounds are restrained because they are skilled at catching prey. Could such people be compared to an enlightened ruler?”

Commentary: These are all beings burdened by outward adornment or skill, unable to remain inwardly still and respond to unending change.

Explication: “Bind” means to restrain with a rope. “Yuanju” refers to macaques. Tigers and leopards are hunted for their markings; macaques, being agile, are often caught with ropes; hounds skilled at catching foxes are often held by a leash around the neck. If people with quick reactions and exceptional abilities can be compared to sage emperors, then these three kinds of animals could also be compared to enlightened rulers.

Yang Ziju’s expression changed. He said, “May I ask how an enlightened ruler governs the world?”

Explication: Realizing that his earlier understanding was mistaken, Yang Ziju turned pale with alarm and respectfully asked again about the principles by which an enlightened ruler governs the world.

Lao Dan said, “The enlightened ruler’s achievements extend throughout the world, yet seem not to come from him.”

 註天下若無明主則莫能自得今之自得  實明王之功也然功在無爲而還在天下  皆得自任故似非明王之功  䟽夫聖人爲政功侔造化覆等玄天載同  厚地而功成不處故非己爲之也 化貸萬物而民弗恃  註夫明王皆就足物性故人人皆云我自  爾而莫知恃賴於明王  䟽誘化蒼生令其去惡貸借萬物與其福  善而玄功潜被日用不知百姓謂我自然  不賴君之德 有莫舉名使物自喜  註雖有蓋天下之功而不舉以爲己名故  物皆自以爲得而喜  䟽莫無也舉顯也推功於物不顯其名使  物各自得而懽喜適悦者也 立乎不測  註居變化之塗日新而無方 而遊於無有者也  註與萬物爲體則所遊者虚也不能冥物  則迕物不暇何暇遊虚哉  䟽無有妙本也樹德立功神妙不測而即  迹即本故常遊心於至極也 鄭有神巫曰季咸  䟽鄭國有神異之巫甚有靈驗從齊而至  姓季名咸耳 知人之死生存亡禍福壽夭期以歲月旬日 若神鄭人見之皆棄而走  註不喜自聞死日也  䟽占候吉凶必無差失剋定時日驗若鬼  神不喜預而聞凶禍是以棄而走避也 列子見之而心醉歸以告壺子  䟽列子事迹具逍遥篇今不重解壺子鄭  之得道人也號壺子名林即列子之師也  列子見季咸小術驗若鬼神中心羡仰恍
Interpretation

If the world had no enlightened ruler, the people could not truly live freely. The fact that they can now enjoy their lives is, in truth, the work of an enlightened ruler. Yet the ruler’s achievement lies in Wuwei (non-action)—in refraining from coercive interference and allowing everyone in the world to fulfill their abilities. For this reason, it seems as though the achievement is not the ruler’s.

The sage governs the world with effects like those of creation and transformation in nature. He covers all things like the sky and bears them like the earth. His work is accomplished, yet he does not claim it as his own, and so does not regard himself as the one who made it happen.

The sage nurtures and transforms all things, yet the people do not feel that they depend on him. The enlightened ruler follows the nature of all things, enabling everyone to find contentment. So people all say, “I did this myself,” without knowing that they have benefited from the enlightened ruler.

The enlightened ruler has achieved something that encompasses the whole world, yet he does not hold up that achievement as a claim to fame. The people therefore think they have gained something for themselves, and rejoice.

“Mo” means “not,” and “ju” means “to display.” The enlightened ruler credits the people with the achievement and does not reveal his own fame. He makes everyone feel they have gained something for themselves, and so they rejoice.

The enlightened ruler establishes himself in a realm beyond measurement, dwelling amid change. He renews himself day after day without taking any fixed form, and his spirit roams in “nonbeing”—the fundamental realm of the Dao, which cannot be grasped or readily put into words.

When one becomes one with all things, one roams in emptiness. If one cannot merge inwardly with all things, one will be at odds with them everywhere. How could one then have any leisure to roam in the realm of emptiness?

“Nonbeing” is the wondrous root. The sage establishes De (Virtue) and accomplishes great works, yet his miraculous power cannot be measured. He responds to things as they arise without departing from the root, and so his spirit is always roaming in the highest realm.

In the state of Zheng there was a strange diviner named Jixian.

A remarkably accurate diviner came from the state of Qi to Zheng. His family name was Ji, and his given name was Xian.

He could see whether a person would live or die, prosper or perish, meet with good or ill fortune, and how long they would live. He could also accurately predict the year, month, ten-day period, and day when events would come to pass. When the people of Zheng saw him, they dropped what they were carrying and fled.

People did not want to hear their own death dates with their own ears.

Jixian never made a mistake when predicting good or ill fortune, and could even give the exact dates when his predictions would come true. His accuracy was like that of spirits and gods. People did not want to hear of disasters before they happened, so they avoided him whenever they saw him.

Liezi met Jixian and greatly admired him. When he returned, he told Huzi about it.

Liezi’s story has already been introduced in the chapter “Free and Easy Wandering,” so it will not be repeated here. Huzi was an enlightened man of Zheng named Lin, and Liezi’s teacher. When Liezi saw Jixian perform his minor arts with accuracy like that of spirits and gods, he felt deep admiration and envy, and became dazed… (The original text ends here.)

 然如醉既而歸反具告其師 曰始吾以夫子之道爲至矣則又有至焉者 矣  註謂季咸之至又過於夫子  䟽夫子壺子也至極也初始禀學先生之  道爲至今見季咸其道又極於夫子此是  禦寇心醉之言也 壺子曰吾與汝既其文未既其實而固得道 與  䟽與授也既盡也吾比授汝始盡文言於  其妙理余未造實汝固執文字謂言得道  豈知筌蹄異於魚兔耶 衆雌而無雄而又奚卵焉  註言列子之未懷道也  䟽夫衆雌無雄無由得卵既文無實亦何  道之有哉 而以道與世亢必信夫故使人得而相汝  註未懷道則有心有心而亢其一方以必  信於世故可得而相之  䟽汝用文言之道而與世間亢對既無大  智必信彼小巫是故季咸得而相汝者也 嘗試與來以予示之  䟽夫至人凝遠神妙難知本迹寂動非凡  能測故召令至以我示之也 明日列子與之見壺子出而謂列子曰嘻子 之先生死矣弗活矣不以旬數矣吾見怪焉 見濕灰焉  䟽嘻聲也子林示其寂泊之容季咸謂其  將死先怪已彰不過十日弗活之兆類彼  濕灰也 列子入泣涕沾襟以告壺子壺子曰曏吾示 之以地文萌乎不震不正  註萌然不動亦不自正與枯木同其不華  濕灰均於寂魄此乃至人無感之時也夫  至人其動也天其靜也地其行也水流其
Interpretation

Liezi returned as if in a daze and told his teacher, Huzi (Hu Qiuzi Lin), everything he had seen and heard.

“At first I thought your art of the Dao had reached its highest point. I never imagined there was someone whose skill surpassed yours.”

Note: Liezi believed that Jixian’s art of the Dao surpassed Huzi’s.

Commentary: Huzi was Liezi’s teacher. “Highest point” means the utmost limit. When Liezi first studied his teacher’s art of the Dao, he thought it had reached perfection. But now, after meeting Jixian, he felt that Jixian’s skill was greater than Huzi’s. Liezi spoke this way because his mind had been shaken.

Huzi said, “What I passed on to you was only the language and outward forms of the Dao. I have not yet conveyed all its true meaning, and you already think you have attained the Dao?”

Commentary: “Pass on” means to teach, and “all” means completely. Huzi says that what he taught Liezi before was only words about the Dao; Liezi had not truly grasped its mysteries. Yet Liezi clung to the written words, believing that understanding the words meant attaining the Dao. He did not know that words are like a fish trap or a rabbit snare: once the fish or rabbit is caught, the tool cannot be mistaken for the creature itself.

“If there were only a flock of female birds and no male, how could there be any eggs?”

Note: This means that Liezi had not yet truly taken the Dao into himself.

Commentary: Without a male bird, a flock of females cannot produce eggs. If you have only words, without any genuine experience, how can you speak of possessing the Dao?

“You use these words about the Dao to compete with the world, eager to make people believe you. That is why others can see through you.”

Note: Liezi had not truly embodied the Dao and still clung to things in his heart. He was attached to one side of the matter and wanted others to believe him, so people could see through him.

Commentary: You merely use arguments based on written words to debate the world. You have no genuine, superior wisdom, so it is easy for you to trust shallow judgments. That is why Jixian saw through you.

“Why not bring him here and let him look at me?”

Commentary: A true perfected person—a person who has reached an exceptionally high level of cultivation—is deep and remote, with a mysterious nature that cannot be fathomed. Neither ordinary people nor their perceptions can see through the person’s appearances and disappearances, or movements and stillness. So Huzi asked Liezi to bring Jixian and let him look at him.

The next day, Liezi and Jixian came together to see Huzi. After they left, Jixian said to Liezi, “Alas, your teacher is near death. He cannot be saved; he will not live more than ten days. I saw something unusual about him, like damp ashes.”

Commentary: “Alas” is an exclamation of grief. Huzi had appeared quiet and detached, so Jixian thought he was about to die. He declared that this sign would come true within ten days at most, seeing Huzi’s state as lifeless as damp ashes.

Liezi went inside and wept until his tears soaked his robe. He told Huzi what Jixian had said. Huzi said, “Just now I showed him the ‘patterns of the earth,’ a state as still as the earth: nothing stirs, and nothing tries to set itself right.”

Note: This state is motionless and makes no effort to adjust itself, like a dead tree that no longer blossoms or damp ashes sunk in stillness. It is a moment when the perfected person responds to nothing and cannot be moved by external things. In action, the perfected person follows the Way of Heaven; in stillness, the person is settled like the earth; in motion, the person flows like water…

 止也淵默淵默之與水流天行之與地止  其於不爲而自爾一也今季咸見其尸居  而坐忘即謂之將死覩其神動而天隨因  謂之有生誠應不以心而理自玄符與變  化升降而以世爲量然後足爲物主而順  時無極故非相者所測耳此應帝王之大  意也  䟽文象也震動也地以無心而寧靜故以  不動爲地文也萌然寂泊曾不震動無心  自正文類傾頽此是大聖無感之時小巫  謂之弗活也而壺丘示見義有四重第一  示妙本虚凝寂而不動二示垂迹應感動  而不寂第三本迹相即動寂一時第四本  迹兩忘動寂雙遣此則第一妙本虚凝寂  而不動也 是殆見吾杜德機也  註德機不發曰杜  䟽殆近也杜塞也機動也至德之機關而  不發示其凝淡便爲濕灰小巫庸瑣近見  於此矣 嘗又與來  䟽前者伊妄言我死今時重命令遣更來  也 明日又與之見壺子出而謂列子曰幸矣子 之先生遇我也有瘳矣全然有生矣  䟽此即第二垂迹應感動而不寂示以應  容神氣微動既殊槁木全似生平而濫以  聖功用爲己力謬言遇我幸矣有瘳也哉 吾見其杜權矣  註權機也今乃自覺昨日之所見見其杜  權故謂之將死  䟽權機也前時一覩有類濕灰杜塞機權  全無應動今日遇我方待全生小巫寡識  有兹叨濫者也
Interpretation

When he is still, he is as quiet as an abyss; when he moves, he is as natural as flowing water and the revolving heavens. He practices Wuwei (non-action), and the myriad things come into being of themselves. These are all expressions of one and the same thing.

When Jixian saw Master Huzi sitting as still as a corpse, as though entering “sitting in oblivion,” a state of stillness in which body and mind are forgotten, he said that Huzi was close to death. When he saw Huzi’s spirit and vital energy stir and respond to the workings of Heaven, he said that Huzi had come back to life. Huzi could indeed respond to things without directing them through his own subjective intentions. His inner principle was subtle and mysterious, in accord with change. He shifted with the rise and fall of worldly affairs, yet did not judge the myriad things by worldly standards. In this way, he could become master of the myriad things and respond to the times without limit. Huzi, therefore, was not someone an ordinary person could see through. This is the general meaning of the chapter “Responding to Emperors and Kings.”

Commentary: This passage concerns outward appearances. “Zhen” means movement. The earth rests in stillness without intention, so the image of the earth is used to describe what does not move. Huzi appeared quiet and detached, wholly unmoved; his body seemed like a withered, collapsed tree. This was a moment when the Great Sage showed no outward response, but the lesser shaman Jixian thought he was dead. Huzi displayed himself in four ways. First, he revealed the mysterious root: empty, still, settled, and unmoving. Second, he revealed traces of responding and adapting to external circumstances, with sensitivity and movement. Third, root and trace were one, with movement and stillness present together. Fourth, he clung to neither root nor trace, and movement and stillness both dissolved. This passage describes the first way: the mysterious root, empty, still, settled, and unmoving.

Huzi said, “Perhaps he saw the workings of my De (Virtue/Power) sealed away and held in reserve.”

Note: When the workings of De do not stir, this is called “du,” meaning sealed away and held in reserve.

Commentary: “Dai” means “perhaps”; “du” means closed off; and “ji” is the pivot from which movement arises. The pivot of utmost De had not been revealed. Huzi appeared settled, quiet, and detached, like damp ashes, without any sign of life. The lesser shaman had little insight and saw only this aspect.

After a while, Huzi again had Jixian come to see him.

Commentary: The last time, Jixian had rashly declared Huzi dead. This time, Huzi once again gave the order for Jixian to be summoned.

The next day, Jixian came to see Huzi again. After leaving, he said to Liezi, “Fortunately, your teacher met me. His illness has improved; he has completely recovered his vitality!”

Commentary: This is the second way Huzi displayed himself: he responded and adapted to external circumstances, showing movement without being truly still. He let some activity of spirit and vital energy appear; he no longer seemed like a withered tree, but looked entirely as alive as an ordinary person. Jixian, however, mistook the Sage’s workings for his own achievement and rashly claimed, “Fortunately, he met me, and his illness improved.”

Huzi said, “I saw how he recognized the shifting power of my sealed-away pivot.”

Note: “Quan” means the pivot. Only now did Huzi realize that Jixian had understood yesterday’s appearance as a pivot sealed shut and motionless, which was why he had said Huzi was close to death.

Commentary: “Quan” means the pivot. Earlier, Jixian saw Huzi like damp ashes and concluded that he had no vitality at all. Now he imagined that Huzi had regained his vitality because he had met him. The lesser shaman had limited insight, yet claimed credit for Huzi’s transformation.

列子入以告壺子壺子曰曏吾示之以天壤  註天壤之中覆載之功見矣比之地文不  猶外乎此應感之容也  䟽壤地也示之以天壤謂示以應動之容  也譬彼兩儀覆載萬物至人應感其義亦  然 名實不入  註任自然而覆載則天機玄應而名利之  飾皆爲棄物  䟽雖復降迹同塵和光利物而名譽眞實  曾不入於靈腑也 而機發於踵注常在極上起  䟽踵本也雖復物感而動不失時宜而此  之神機發乎妙本動而常寂 是殆見吾善者機也  註機發而善於彼彼乃見之  䟽示其善機應此兩儀季咸見此形容所  以謂之爲善全然有生則是見善之謂也 嘗又與來明日又與之見壺子出而謂列子 曰子之先生不齊吾無得而相焉試齊且復 相之  䟽此是第三示本跡相即動寂一時夫至  人德滿智圓虚心凝照本跡無别動靜不  殊其道深玄豈小巫能測耶謂齊其心迹  試相之焉不敢的定吉凶故言且復相者  耳 列子入以告壺子壺子曰吾曏示之以太沖 莫勝  註居太沖之極浩然治心而玄同萬方故  勝負莫得措其間也  䟽沖虚也莫無也夫聖照玄凝與太虚等  量本跡相即動寂一時初無優劣有何勝  負哉 是殆見吾衡氣機也  註無名不平混然一之以管闚天者莫見  其涯故似不齊
Interpretation

Liezi went in and told Huzi what had happened. Huzi said, “What I revealed to him just now was the way Heaven and Earth move, covering and nurturing all things.”

Commentary: The powers that cover and bear all things are made visible between Heaven and Earth. Compared with the pattern of the earth, is this not an outward expression of responding to things and being moved by them?

Explanation: “Soil” means the earth. To “reveal the pattern of Heaven and Earth” means to reveal the way of moving in response to things. Just as the two powers of Heaven and Earth cover and bear all things, so too does the Perfected One—a person whose virtue and wisdom have reached the highest level—respond to things and be moved by them.

Fame and material gain cannot enter his heart.

Commentary: When one lets the natural Dao cover and bear all things, the workings of Heaven subtly respond to them; the trappings of fame and profit become things that can be cast aside.

Explanation: Even when he appears in the world and lives among ordinary people, restraining his brilliance and benefiting all things, neither fame nor material gain enters his heart in the slightest.

His subtle workings arise from his heels.

Commentary: They always arise from the highest foundation.

Explanation: “Heel” means foundation. Even when stirred into action by external things, he never loses the right moment or measure. His miraculous capacities arise from a mysterious foundation; though he acts, his heart remains still.

Perhaps this is what he saw: my skill in responding to the workings of things.

Commentary: The subtle workings stirred and appeared to surpass the other person, who then saw this.

Explanation: Huzi revealed a state of skillful responsiveness, and Jixian, the diviner skilled at reading people, saw it and called it “skillful.” Once a lively form appears, it is regarded as a visible kind of “skill.”

A day later, Huzi met Jixian again. After leaving, Jixian said to Liezi, “Your teacher’s breath is unsettled, so I cannot read his face. Wait until his breath is even, then bring him back for me to read.”

Explanation: This is the third revelation, showing that substance and manifestation are one, and that movement and stillness coexist. The Perfected One’s virtue is complete and wisdom whole; his mind is empty, still, and brightly aware. Substance and manifestation are not separate, and movement and stillness do not differ. His Dao is profound and mysterious—how could a petty diviner measure it? Jixian said to wait until Huzi had evened his breath and settled his outward signs before reading his face. He did not dare pronounce good or ill fortune, and so only said, “Bring him back for me to read again.”

Liezi went in and told Huzi what had happened. Huzi said, “What I revealed to him just now was the Great Vacuity, a state of utmost stillness and openness, in which there was no victory or defeat.”

Commentary: Abiding in the utmost Great Vacuity, the mind is vast and harmonizes mysteriously with all things. Thus victory and defeat have no place to enter.

Explanation: “Vacuity” means emptiness. The sage illuminates the mysterious and gathers his mind into stillness, equal in vastness to the Great Void. Substance and manifestation are one, and movement and stillness coexist. From the beginning there has been no superiority or inferiority, so how could there be victory or defeat?

Perhaps this is what he saw: my Qi balanced and unified, with nothing divided.

Commentary: This state has no fixed name or form and is neither tilted nor partial; it is unified as a whole. Someone who peers at Heaven and Earth through a tube cannot see its limits, and so takes it to be unsettled.

 䟽衡平也即跡即本無優無劣神氣平等  以此應機小巫近見不能遠測心中迷亂  所以請齊耳 鯢桓之審爲淵止水之審爲淵流水之審爲 淵淵有九名此處三焉  註淵者靜默之謂耳夫水常無心委順外  物故雖流之與止鯢桓之與龍躍常淵然  自若未始失其靜默也夫至人用之則行  捨之則止行止雖異而玄默一焉故略舉  三異以明之雖波流九變治亂紛如居其  極者常淡然自得泊乎忘爲也  䟽此舉譬也鯢大魚也桓盤也審也夫水  體無心動止隨物或鯨鯢盤桓螭龍騰踴  或凝湛止住或波流湍激雖復漣漪清淡  多種不同而玄默無心其致一也故鯢桓  以方衡氣止水以譬地文流水以喻天壤  雖復三異而虚照一焉而言淵有九名者  也鯢桓止水流水汎水濫水沷水雍水文  水肥水故謂之九也並出列子彼文具載  此略叙有此三焉 嘗又與來  䟽欲示極玄應須更召 明日又與之見壺子立未定自失而走  䟽季咸前後虞度來相未呈玄遠猶有近  見今者第四其道極深本跡兩忘動寂雙  遣聖心行處非凡所測遂使立未安定奔  逸而走 壺子曰追之  䟽既見奔逃命令捉取 列子追之不及反以報壺子曰己滅矣已失 矣吾弗及已  䟽驚迫已甚奔馳亦速滅矣失矣莫知所  之者也
Interpretation

“Balance” means equality. In outward expression as well as inner foundation, there is no distinction of higher and lower, better and worse. Spirit and Qi are equal, too.

Judging the Pot Master by this display, Ji Xian showed limited understanding and an inability to see far ahead. His mind was therefore confused and unsettled.

So the Pot Master asked Ji Xian to come again.

The place where a large fish circles can become an abyss; still water can become an abyss; flowing water can become an abyss. There are nine names for abysses, but only three are mentioned here.

Note: “Abyss” refers to stillness and silence. Water has no will of its own; it changes in response to what happens around it. So whether the water flows or stands still, whether a large fish circles or a flood dragon soars, it remains deep and calm, never losing its state of stillness and silence. The Perfected Person—one who has attained the Dao—is like this as well: acting when it is time to act, stopping when it is time to stop. Although action and stillness differ, the inner state of quiet mystery is the same. That is why only three different situations are briefly mentioned here. No matter how varied the changes in the outside world, or how tangled its order and disorder, a person at the highest level remains calm and content, at ease in stillness and unattached to action.

Commentary: Water is used here as a metaphor. “Ni” means a large fish, “huan” means circling, and “shen” describes water that is deep and still. Water itself has no will: whether it moves or rests depends on what happens around it. Sometimes a large fish circles and a flood dragon soars; sometimes the water is still and deep; sometimes its waves surge and race in torrents. Though the water’s conditions change in countless ways, its underlying stillness and lack of intention remain the same. Thus, a large fish circling can symbolize the harmony of Qi; still water can symbolize the patterns of the earth; and flowing water can symbolize the changes between Heaven and Earth. Though these three differ, their essential nature—empty, still, and clearly reflective—is the same.

The scripture says, “There are nine names for abysses.” These are Ni-huan, still water, flowing water, fan water, lan water, fa water, yong water, wen water, and fei water. All these names appear in the Liezi, where they are described in greater detail. Only three are mentioned briefly here.

The Pot Master said again, “Why not come once more?”

Commentary: This means that to respond to matters of the deepest subtlety, Ji Xian must be called back again.

The next day, Ji Xian came to visit once more. The Pot Master had only just stood up and had not yet found his footing when Ji Xian, alarmed and disoriented, ran away.

Commentary: In his earlier visits, Ji Xian had tried to read the Pot Master’s appearance, but his understanding remained shallow. This time, the Pot Master’s state was exceedingly profound: neither his inner foundation nor his outward expression was attached to anything, and neither movement nor stillness constrained him. His state of mind and conduct were beyond the measure of ordinary people. So Ji Xian ran off before he had even found his footing.

The Pot Master said, “Catch up with him!”

Commentary: Ji Xian had already fled in panic, so the Pot Master ordered someone to bring him back.

Liezi could not catch up. He returned and reported to the Pot Master, “He has vanished. He is nowhere to be seen. I can’t catch up with him.”

Commentary: Ji Xian was terrified, and he fled so quickly that in an instant no one knew where he had gone.

壺子曰曏吾示之以未始出吾宗  註雖變化無常而常深根寧極也  䟽夫妙本玄源窈冥恍惚超兹四句離彼  百非不可以心慮知安得以形名取既絶  言象無的宗塗不測所由故失而走 吾與之虚而委蛇  註無心而隨物化 不知其誰何  註汎然無所係也  䟽委蛇隨順之貌也至人應物虚已忘懷  隨順逗機不執宗本既不可名目故不知  的是何誰也 因以爲弟靡因以爲波流故逃也  註變化頽靡世事波流無往而不因也夫  至人一耳然應世變而時動故相者無所  措其目自失而走此明應帝王者無方也  䟽頽者放任靡者順從夫上德無心有感  斯應放任不務順從於物而揚波塵往隨  流世間因任前機曾無執滯千變萬化非  相者所知是故季咸宜其逃逸也 然後列子自以爲未始學而歸  䟽季咸逃逸之後列子方悟己迷始覺壺  丘道深神巫術淺自知未學請乞其退歸  習尚無爲伏膺玄業也 三年不出爲其妻爨食豕如食人  註忘貴賤也  䟽不出三年屏於俗務爲妻爨火忘於榮  辱食豕如人净穢均等 於事無與親  註唯所遇耳  䟽悟於至理故均彼我涉於世事無親䟽  也 彫琢復朴  註去華取實  䟽彫琢華飾之務悉皆棄除直置任眞復  於朴素之道者也 塊然獨以其形立  註外飾去也
Interpretation

The Pot Master said, “Just now I showed him a state in which the Dao had not yet revealed its own guiding principle.” The commentary says: Though the Dao changes without end, it remains deeply rooted in the source of stillness. The subcommentary says: The mysterious source is deep and indistinct, beyond what these four phrases can express, and it does not fall into the errors of making distinctions. It cannot be grasped through thought, so how could outward forms and names capture it? Neither words nor images can point to it; its guiding principle and path are difficult to discern. That is why Ji Xian, the shaman skilled in physiognomy, lost his composure and fled.

“I responded to him with an empty, still mind, not knowing who he really was.” The commentary says: With no fixed mind, one follows the transformations of all things; naturally at ease, one is bound by nothing. The subcommentary says: “Winding and yielding” describes following along. When the Perfected Person encounters things, they remain open and forget themselves, adapting as circumstances require rather than clinging to a single guiding principle. Since no name can identify him, it is natural not to know who he really is.

“I acted in accord with the decline and change of worldly affairs, moving with the current of the world. That is why Ji Xian fled.” The commentary says: Worldly affairs decline and change, flowing like waves; in every situation, one follows the circumstances and responds to them. The Perfected Person’s nature is steadfast, yet he also changes with worldly affairs and acts in step with the times. Thus the physiognomist had nothing he could observe and could only flee in confusion. This shows that there is no fixed method for responding to worldly affairs. The subcommentary says: “Decline” means to let things take their course; “flow” means to follow along. The person of highest De responds without a fixed mind: when touched by something, they respond to it. They do not act deliberately, but follow things as they arise and move with the course of the world, without attachment or obstruction. Faced with endless change, the physiognomist could not see through them, so Ji Xian naturally fled.

Only after this did Liezi realize that he had never truly learned before, and he went home. The subcommentary says: After Ji Xian fled, Liezi recognized how lost he had been. He began to understand that the Pot Master’s Dao was profound, while the shaman’s skill was shallow. Knowing that he had not yet truly learned the Dao, he asked to return home and continue studying the esteem for Wuwei (non-action) and devoting himself to cultivating the mysterious Dao.

Liezi stayed indoors for three years. He cooked for his wife, and when he fed the pigs, he treated them as if they were guests. The commentary says: He had forgotten the distinction between high and low. The subcommentary says: By staying indoors for three years, he withdrew from worldly affairs. He cooked without concern for honor or disgrace, and treated pigs and people alike, no longer distinguishing clean from filthy.

In dealing with worldly affairs, he no longer distinguished between those close to him and those distant from him. The commentary says: He simply responded to whatever he encountered. The subcommentary says: Having understood the ultimate principle, he regarded himself and others as equal; in dealing with the world, he no longer made distinctions between the near and the far.

He cast off ornament and returned to simplicity. The commentary says: He abandoned outward display and kept what was true. The subcommentary says: He cast aside all embellishment and artifice, followed things as they naturally were, and returned to the simple state of the Dao.

He stood alone, quiet and unadorned, preserving his own form. The commentary says: Outward ornament had been removed.

 䟽塊然無情之貌也外除彫飾内違心智  槁木之形塊然無偶也 紛而封哉  註雖動而眞不散也  䟽封守也雖復涉世紛擾和光接物而守  於眞本確爾不移 一以是終  註使物各自終  䟽動不乖寂雖分擾而封哉應不離眞常  抱一以終始 無爲名尸  註因物則物各自當其名也  䟽尸主也身尚忘遺名將安寄故無復爲  名譽之主也 無爲謀府  註使物各自謀也  䟽虚淡無心忘懷任物故無復運爲謀慮  於靈府耳 無爲事任  註付物使各自任  䟽各率素分恣物自爲不復於事任用於  己 無爲知主  註無心則物各自主其知也  䟽忘心絶慮天順群生終不運知以主於  物 體盡無窮  註因天下之自爲故馳萬物而無窮  䟽體悟眞源故能以智境冥會故曰皆無  窮也 而遊無眹  註任物故無迹  䟽眹跡也雖遨遊天下接濟蒼生而晦迹  韜光故無眹也 盡其所受乎天  註足則止也  䟽所禀天性物物不同各盡其能未爲不  足者也 而無見得  註見得則不知止  䟽夫目視之所見雖見不見得於分内之  得雖得不得既不造意於見得故雖見得  而無見得也 亦虚而己  註不虚則不能任群實  䟽所以盡於分内而無見得者自直虚心  忘淡而已 至人之用心若鏡
Interpretation

Outwardly, one is like an uncarved stone, free of artifice; inwardly, one is not led by the mind’s distinctions. The body is like a withered tree, standing alone without attachment.

Though living amid the clamor of worldly affairs, one’s true nature does not scatter or fade. “Seal” means to keep and guard: even when associating with others and responding to external things, one holds firmly to what is genuine. From beginning to end, one meets things in this way, allowing all things to complete their own course. One’s actions do not disturb inner stillness; amid turmoil, one remains with what is constant and true. One holds fast to purity and unity throughout.

One does not deliberately make oneself the master of reputation. One follows the circumstances of things, allowing each to reveal its fitting place and name. If one can even forget oneself, where could one entrust one’s reputation? So one no longer takes pains to cultivate a name.

One does not deliberately become the hub of plans. One lets things arrange themselves as they should. The mind remains empty, still, and untroubled; it does not cling to deliberation, and so no longer schemes within.

One does not deliberately take charge of affairs. One entrusts matters to the things themselves, letting each proceed according to its inborn nature, rather than taking every responsibility upon oneself.

One does not deliberately become the master of wisdom. One forgets private concerns, stills deliberation, and follows the nature of all things, no longer using the mind to control what lies beyond oneself.

When one realizes the source of the Great Dao, one can accord with the boundless. Since all things in the world follow their own course, there is no limit to the ways of responding to them. One moves through the world without leaving a conspicuous trace. “Sign” means a mark: though traveling throughout the world and helping living beings, one gathers in one’s radiance and conceals one’s tracks.

One fully expresses the nature bestowed by Heaven. The natures received by the myriad things differ; each fulfills what it is capable of, and so lacks nothing. When something appears before one, one does not cling to making it one’s own. If one pursues gain without restraint, one loses sight of when to stop. Even when one sees and gains things, one does not regard them inwardly as worth grasping.

One can do all this only because the mind is empty and still. Without such emptiness and stillness, one cannot receive and respond to the myriad things.

The Perfected One uses the mind like a mirror.

 註鑒物而無情  䟽夫懸鏡高堂物來斯照至人虚應其義  亦然 不將不迎應而不藏  註來即應去即止  䟽將送也夫物有去來而鏡無迎送來者  即照必不隱藏亦猶聖智虚凝無幽不燭  物感斯應應不以心既無將迎豈有情於  隱匿哉 故能勝物而不傷  註物來乃鑒鑒不以心故雖天下來照而  無勞神之累  䟽夫物有生滅而鏡無隱顯故常能照物  而物不能傷亦由聖人德合二儀明齊三  景鑒照遐廣覆載無偏用心不勞故無損  害爲其勝物是以不傷 南海之帝爲儵北海之帝爲忽中央之帝爲 渾沌  䟽南海是顯明之方故以儵爲有北是幽  闇之域故以忽爲無中央既非北非南故  以混沌爲非無非有者也 儵與忽時相與遇於渾沌之地渾沌待之甚 善  䟽有無二心會於非無非有之境和二偏  心之執爲一中之志故云待之甚善也 儵與忽謀報渾沌之德曰人皆有七竅以視 聽食息此獨無有嘗試鑿之  䟽儵忽二人由懷偏滯未能和會尚起學  心忘嫌混沌之無心而謂穿鑿之有益也 曰鑿一竅七日而渾沌死  註爲者敗之  䟽夫運四胑以滯境鑿七竅以染塵乖渾  沌之至淳順有無之取捨是以不終天年  中塗夭折勗哉學
Interpretation

A mirror simply reflects what is before it; it has no feelings of its own.

The ancients hung mirrors in their great halls. When an object came before one, the mirror reflected it. The Perfected Person responds to things in just the same way.

A mirror does not greet an object or hold it back. When an object comes, it reflects it; when the object leaves, it ceases to reflect it.

“Sending off” means bidding farewell. Objects come and go, but the mirror has no intention of welcoming or sending them off. Whatever comes before it, the mirror reflects; it does not deliberately hide anything. So it is with the sage’s wisdom: empty, still, and settled, it leaves no darkness beyond its perception. When external things prompt a response, the sage responds naturally, without deliberate thought. Since there is no intention to welcome or send off, how could there be any deliberate concealment or omission?

Thus the mirror can reflect all things without being harmed by them.

When an object comes, the mirror reflects it. Because this reflection does not depend on deliberate thought, even if everything under Heaven appeared before the mirror, it would not exhaust or weary it.

All things come into being and pass away, but the mirror’s brightness does not change on their account. It can therefore keep reflecting things without being harmed by them. So it is with the sage: his De accords with Heaven and Earth. Bright as the sun, moon, and stars, his perception reaches far; he shelters and nourishes all things without favoritism. He responds to things without wearing himself out, and so suffers no harm. Because he can meet all things without being burdened by them, it is said: “He prevails over things without being harmed.”

The ruler of the South Sea was named Shu; the ruler of the North Sea was named Hu; and the ruler of the Center was named Hundun.

The South Sea is a place of brightness, so “Shu” suggests appearing. The North Sea is dark and remote, so “Hu” suggests vanishing. The Center lies neither to the south nor to the north; “Hundun” therefore suggests what belongs neither to being nor to nonbeing.

Shu and Hu often met in Hundun’s realm, and Hundun treated them very kindly.

The two notions of being and nonbeing meet in a state that is neither being nor nonbeing. Each lets go of its own bias and returns to the middle way; hence Hundun treated them so well.

Shu and Hu discussed how to repay Hundun’s kindness. They said, “Everyone has seven openings, through which they see, hear, eat, and breathe. He alone has none. Let’s try to bore seven openings for him.”

Shu and Hu still held to their own biases and had not truly come into harmony. They thought learning and altering things could bring some benefit, but they did not understand Hundun’s original state: without deliberate thought and still undivided. Instead, they believed that forcibly making openings would do him good.

Each day they bored one opening in Hundun. On the seventh day, Hundun died.

Forcing action can ruin things.

A person’s limbs move among external things, while the seven openings take in the dust of the world. If one thereby departs from one’s uncarved, natural nature and insists on choosing between being and nonbeing, one cannot enjoy the full span of life and dies before one’s time. Those who study the Way should take heed and do their best to avoid this. Guo Xiang’s commentary likewise says, “When one acts upon things, one ends up ruining them.”

者幸免之焉故郭注云  爲者敗之也 南華眞經注䟽卷之九

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0139); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 8 Vol. 10 →