中文 · EN

《通玄真經(一)》Vol. 5

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 5 / 12 7,495 characters

About this page. The original text of 《通玄真經(一)》 Vol. 5 (Dongshen 洞神部, 12 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 16 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《通玄真經(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

其氣安撫萬物則風雨不愆災 害不作也) 老子曰得萬人之兵不如聞一言之當得隋 侯之珠不如得事 之所由得和氏之璧不如 得事之所適(一言有益萬兵非貴一事可當和璧非寶)天 下雖大 好用兵者亡國雖安好戰者危故小國寡民 雖有什伯 之器而勿用(大國莫若修德小國莫若事人則征伐不 興上下安泰也) 老子曰能成霸王者必勝者也(非首不御)能勝敵 者必强者也(非德不勝) 能强者必用人力者也能 用人力者必得人心者也(用賢者之力得眾人 之心也)能 得人心者必自得者也自得者必柔弱者能 勝不如己 者至於若己者而格柔勝出於若 己者其事不可度故能眾不 勝成大勝者也 (惟保謙柔眾不能屈故能成其勝也) 重刊道藏輯要  通玄眞經 周辛鈃 著      默希子註   道德(此篇上問道德下反禮智雖前篇具明今更起問以其玄與故 宜精審將成後學悟道之由) 文子問道老子曰學問不精聽道不深(非學不知 非精不達)凡聽者將以 達智也將以成行也將以 致功名也(疑則有問聽則須審亦猶撞鐘聲不虛應必將有益 以致功名也) 不精不明不深不達故上學以神聽(玄覽无遺)中 學以心聽 (或存或亡)下學以耳聽(瞥若風過)以耳聽者 學在皮膚以心聽者學在肌 肉以神聽者學
Interpretation

In the Tongxuan Zhenjing (Scripture of Pervading Mystery), Laozi expounds: When the Qi (vital energy) between heaven and earth is harmonious and stable, it nourishes all things, ensuring timely and moderate wind and rain, and natural disasters do not occur.

Regarding the Dao of governance, Laozi points out: Gaining an army of ten thousand is not as valuable as hearing a single correct word on statecraft; obtaining treasures like the Pearl of Marquis Sui (a legendary gem) is not as precious as understanding the patterns of how things develop; possessing rare jade like the He Shi Bi (a famous jade disc) is not as useful as mastering the proper methods of handling affairs. No matter how powerful a state may be, if it exhausts itself in warfare, it will eventually perish; no matter how stable a nation may be, if it is bellicose, it will court danger. Thus, even if a small state with a sparse population possesses advanced weaponry, it should not use it lightly. (Great states should cultivate De (Virtue/Power), while small states should remain content—this way, war can be avoided, and all may live in peace and prosperity.)

On the subject of achieving hegemony, Laozi holds: Those who can establish hegemony must be skilled in victory; those who can defeat their enemies must possess great strength; those who can maintain their strength must excel in employing people; those who excel in employing people must have won the hearts of the people; and those who have won the hearts of the people must understand self-cultivation. Those who understand self-cultivation often maintain a posture of softness—using softness to overcome weaker opponents is easy, but when facing equally matched adversaries, the effectiveness of this strategy becomes unpredictable. Thus, true victory does not lie in conquering numerous weaker foes but in achieving decisive, monumental triumphs. (Only by maintaining a humble and gentle demeanor, unoppressed by the masses, can one attain genuine victory.)

Regarding the pursuit of the Dao and learning, Wenzi inquired of Laozi. Laozi replied: If one’s learning is not profound, their understanding of the Dao will not be thorough. The purpose of listening to and studying the Dao is to increase wisdom, perfect conduct, and achieve merit and renown. (Just as striking a bell inevitably produces a sound, earnest inquiry will surely yield results.) Without deep comprehension, one cannot attain clarity; without profound reflection, one cannot attain mastery. Therefore, the highest method of learning is to grasp with the Shen (spirit)—comprehensively apprehending without omission. The middling method is to ponder with the heart—sometimes grasping, sometimes not. The lowest method is to listen with the ears—like wind passing by. Those who listen with the ears can only reach the surface of learning; those who ponder with the heart can penetrate to the middle layer; only those who grasp with the Shen can reach the essence of learning.

在骨髓故聽之不深卽知之不明知之不明 卽 不能盡其精不能盡其精卽行之不成(道德 高妙如見明了則功業可就也)凡聽 之理虛心清靜損氣無 盛無思無慮目無忘視耳無苟聽專精 積稸 內意盈并既以得之必固守之必長久之(此爲 神聽之法悟道之由既以 得之必能守之善聽不忘善抱不脫也)夫道者原 產有始(欲聽其理必先明本)始於柔弱成 於剛强始於 短寡成於眾長十圍之木始於把百仞之臺 始於 下此天之道也(自旡生有從微至著天道常然况於人乎)聖 人法之卑者所以自下 也退者所以自後也 儉者所以自小也損者所以自少也卑則 尊 退則先儉則廣損則大此天道所成也(凡人多自 尊而卑人故失人之所尊聖人 後己而先人故得人之所先是知忤物則羣情莫應順天 則樂推而不猒也)夫道者德之元天之根 福之門萬 物待之而生待之而成待之而寧(道爲生化之主德爲 畜養之資羣物 之根莫不待而生百福之門莫不由而出也)夫道無爲無 形(旡爲而萬物生旡形而萬物化)內以修 身外以治人功成 事立與天爲鄰無爲而無不爲(修身治人旡爲旡形與天 爲鄰與道俱冥合乎旡爲而旡不寧也)莫知其情莫知其眞其 中有信(雖非情可察非眞可 識然窈㝠之中信而有焉)天子有道則
Interpretation

This passage expounds the fundamental principles of cultivating the Dao and conducting oneself in the world. It begins by stating that if one's understanding of the Dao remains superficial ("not hearing it deeply"), perception becomes unclear; unclear perception prevents complete mastery of its essence, and without mastering the essence, practice cannot succeed. Only when one's moral cultivation reaches profound levels can achievements be accomplished.

Regarding the secret to comprehending the Dao: maintain inner emptiness and stillness, reduce distracting thoughts, and avoid excessive mental agitation. The eyes should not gaze indiscriminately, nor the ears listen carelessly—focus the spirit (Shen) and accumulate internal energy (Qi). Once the Dao is apprehended, hold it firmly and persist steadfastly. This is the path to understanding the Great Dao through spiritual realization.

The Great Dao (referring to the fundamental laws of the universe) invariably begins from minute origins: what is soft and weak transforms into strength, what is few becomes many. Just as a giant tree requiring ten men's embrace grows from a tiny sprout, or a hundred-foot tower rises from its foundation—such is the Dao's natural principle. Sages emulate this pattern: through humility comes nobility; by yielding, one advances; through frugality comes abundance; by decreasing, one increases.

The Great Dao is the source of Virtue (De), the foundation of heaven and earth, the gateway to blessings. All things depend on it for growth, fulfillment, and tranquility. The Dao itself acts without deliberate action (Wuwei) and has no fixed form—it serves equally for self-cultivation and governing states. When accomplishments are achieved, one unites with the celestial Dao. Though the Dao's true nature remains ultimately unfathomable, it undeniably contains trustworthy patterns.

The text concludes by mentioning that if the Son of Heaven (the ruler) could follow the Great Dao...

天下服長有社稷公侯有道則人民 和睦不 失其國士庶有道則全其身保其親(上至天子下及 庶人皆宜守道安國 睦民全身保親)强大有道不戰而克小弱 有道不爭而得舉事有道功 成得福君臣有 道則忠惠父子有道則慈孝士庶有道則相 愛 故有道則和無道則苛由是觀之道之於 人無所不宜也夫道 者小行之小得福大行 之大得福盡行之天下服服則懷之(有其 所行皆原 其福)故帝者天下之適也王者天下之往也天 下不適不往 不可謂帝王(言其旡道民不歸往雖處其位何能 久乎)故帝王不得人不能成(國以人爲 本本固邦寧也)得人 失道亦不能守(有人旡道是謂空國)夫失道者奢泰驕 佚慢 倨矜傲見餘自顯自明執雄堅强作難 結怨爲兵主爲亂首小 人行之身受大殃大 人行之國家滅亡淺及其身深及子孫夫 罪 莫大於無道怨莫深於無德天道然也(罪大怨深 有國者不得不亡有身者不得 不死以其道喪德滅天亡之故也) 老子曰夫行道者使人雖勇剌之不入雖巧 擊之不中夫剌之 不入擊之不中而猶辱也 未若使人雖勇不敢剌雖巧不敢擊 夫不敢
Interpretation

The Tongxuan Zhenjing (Scripture of Pervading Mystery) explains the universal importance of the Dao across all social strata. Regardless of status, those who follow the Dao's principles receive corresponding blessings: When emperors and feudal lords abide by the Dao, their nations enjoy peace and harmony; when commoners follow the Dao, they protect themselves and their families. Powerful states adhering to the Dao achieve victory without warfare, while weaker ones following the Dao gain without contention.

Specifically: When rulers and ministers embody the Dao, they manifest loyalty and benevolence; when fathers and sons practice the Dao, they demonstrate kindness and filial piety; when ordinary people live by the Dao, they cultivate mutual affection. Thus we see that with the Dao comes harmony, while without it arises harshness. The Dao applies to all human affairs, great and small—partial practice brings limited blessings, extensive practice yields greater rewards, and complete embodiment leads to universal allegiance.

A true sovereign (referring to an enlightened ruler embodying the Dao) becomes the heart's desire of all under heaven. Without the people's allegiance, even one seated on the throne cannot endure. No ruler can accomplish great deeds without worthy advisors, yet even with talented ministers, the loss of the Dao means the loss of the realm. Those who deviate from the Dao often indulge in extravagance, arrogance, self-display, and aggressive competition—when petty men behave thus, they invite personal calamity; when great men do so, they bring about national ruin. No transgression exceeds abandoning the Dao; no resentment runs deeper than lacking De (Virtue)—this is the natural law of heaven.

Laozi states: Those who truly embody the Dao cannot be harmed by the most courageous assassin nor struck by the most skillful attacker. Yet this describes only passive defense—superior is making the courageous dare not strike and the skillful dare not attack. This illustrates the intangible protective power and deterrent effect of the Dao's principles.

者非無其意也未若使人無其意夫無其意 者未有愛 利害之心也(夫行道者勇剌不傷巧擊不中雖曰旡害 而已受辱於聾俗則爲神奇在至道謂之兒戲不若使彼 不起剌擊意我旡愛利害之心 忘詭世之迹道亦全矣)不若使天下丈夫女子莫不懽 然 皆欲愛利之若然者無地而爲君無官而 爲長天下莫不願安 利之(庚桑尸羽俗孔丘稱素王卽其人也) 故勇於敢則殺勇於不敢則活(勇於敢則死勇 於不敢則 存也) 文子問德(向已知道今更問德兼之仁義次及禮智自非廣問何能大通也) 老子曰畜之養之 遂之長之兼利無擇與天 地合此之謂德(畜之成之旡爲旡私澤滋萬物合乎天地 謂之至德)何 謂仁曰爲上不矜其功爲下不羞其病於大 不矜於小 不偷兼愛無私久而不衰此之謂 仁也(貴爲天子而不驕賤爲匹夫而不憂慈惠不偏 博施濟眾所謂仁也)何謂 義曰爲上則輔弱爲下則守節達不肆意窮 不 易操一度順理不私枉撓此之謂義也(扶傾 極溺固窮守節隨宜順理所謂義也)何 謂禮曰爲上則恭嚴爲 下則卑敬退讓守柔爲天下雌立於不 敢設 於不能此之謂禮也(敬尊撫下卑己先物秉謙柔之德旡怠傲之容 此之謂禮者也)故修 其德則下從令修其仁則下不
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the Daoist understanding of core concepts such as De (Virtue/Power), humaneness, righteousness, and ritual propriety.

It first discusses the state of "having no intention" — meaning those who have truly attained the Dao harbor no selfish thoughts of love, hatred, gain or loss. Even when facing attacks, they remain unharmed. While this seems miraculous to ordinary people, to those embodying supreme Dao it appears as child's play. The ideal state is when no one in the world harbors aggressive intentions, and one remains free from calculations of personal gain, thus achieving perfect harmony with the great Dao. Like the sages Gengsang Chu and Confucius who, though lacking royal status, naturally attracted followers. The scripture illustrates this with the saying: "Those courageously daring meet death; those courageously yielding preserve life" — showing how forceful action invites disaster while gentle restraint safeguards existence.

Next, Wenzi inquires about the meaning of "De" from Laozi. The sage explains that De resembles heaven and earth nurturing all things without discrimination, impartially benefiting all beings in harmony with natural principles. This constitutes supreme De.

Regarding "humaneness," Laozi clarifies: Those in high positions don't boast of achievements, while those in low positions aren't ashamed of poverty; neither arrogant about great matters nor negligent of small ones; showing universal love without partiality, sustained without decline. Like the Son of Heaven remaining humble and commoners staying unworried, distributing kindness equitably — this constitutes humaneness.

"Righteousness" means: When in authority, supporting the weak; when subordinate, maintaining integrity; when successful, avoiding indulgence; when impoverished, preserving moral character; always following principle without bending the law. This righteousness rescues the endangered and comforts the poor while delighting in the Dao.

"Ritual propriety" manifests as: Those above maintaining dignity, those below showing respect; yielding and gentle in all situations, willingly occupying the humblest position; acting prudently without self-importance. This constitutes ritual propriety that maintains humility completely free from arrogance.

Finally, it notes that when rulers cultivate De, the people obey; when they cultivate humaneness, the people...

爭修其義則下平正修其禮則 下尊敬四者 既修國家安寧(四者有虧以治人卽敗國以修身則喪生)故物生 者道 也長者德也愛者仁也正者義也敬者 禮也(五者兼修天下无敵)不畜不 養不能遂長不慈不 愛不能成遂不正不匡不能久長不敬不 寵 不能貴重故德者民之所貴也仁者民之所 懷也義者民之 所畏也禮者民之所敬也此 四者文之順也聖人之所以御萬 物也(備此四德 謂之聖人故能承順天心攝御羣類)君子無德則下怨無仁則 下爭無 義則下暴無禮則下亂四經不立謂 之無道無道不忘者未之 有也(夫道既隱四經乘之文子 問其本末老子陳其得失若四者俱廢怨暴所作爭亂必興所謂無道立見亡敗也) 老子曰至德之世賈便其市農樂其野大夫 安其職處士修其 道人民樂其業(非夫至德之化豈能 各安其分以樂其業)是以風雨不毁折草木不 夭死河 出圖洛出書(圖謂龜負八卦書卽洪範九疇惟德動天澤沾庶物此聖人至 治所致也)及世 之衰也賦歛無度殺戮無止刑諫 者殺賢士是以山崩川涸蠕 動不息壄無百 蔬(季世之君隳綱敗紀誅賢任佞聚歛不時荒怠无厭逆氣陵沴上達于天星辰乖殊 下應 於地故山崩川竭人無聊生昆蟲草木咸失其所唯爲人主者不可不儆也)故
Interpretation

This scripture expounds the fundamental principles of governing a state and cultivating one's character. Laozi asserts that when rulers cultivate the four essential virtues of "righteousness, propriety, Dao (the Way), and De (Virtue/Power)," the nation will achieve stability. Should these four foundations be neglected, governance will fail and self-cultivation will lead to ruin.

The root of all living things lies in the Dao (the Way), their growth is nurtured by De (Virtue/Power), their care is sustained by benevolence, their conduct is rectified by righteousness, and their respect is expressed through propriety. When these five are fully cultivated, one becomes invincible under heaven. Just as things cannot grow without nourishment, they cannot flourish without kindness, endure without rectitude, or be valued without reverence.

De (Virtue/Power) is what the people cherish, benevolence is what they long for, righteousness is what they revere, and propriety is what they honor. These four are the fundamental laws for governing the world, and it is through them that sages rule over all things. If a ruler lacks De (Virtue/Power), the people will resent them; without benevolence, they will contend; without righteousness, they will become violent; without propriety, they will descend into chaos. When these four foundations are not established, it is called "being without the Dao," and nothing that is without the Dao has ever avoided destruction.

Laozi describes an ideal society thus: In an era where Dao and De (Virtue/Power) flourish, merchants conduct business peacefully, farmers till the land joyfully, officials fulfill their duties faithfully, recluses cultivate virtue, and the common people live in contentment. During such times, even wind and rain are harmonious, plants thrive, auspicious patterns appear in the Yellow River, and mysterious writings emerge in the Luo River. But in times of decline, rulers impose heavy taxes, slaughter the innocent, and execute those who remonstrate, leading to mountains collapsing, rivers drying up, pestilence spreading, and fields lying barren. This serves as a warning to rulers: governing without the Dao inevitably provokes the wrath of heaven and the resentment of the people, plunging all things into disorder.

世治則愚者不得獨 亂(正不容邪)世亂則賢者不 能獨治(寡不勝眾)聖人和愉寧靜生也至德 道行 命也故生遭命而後能行命得時而後能明 必有其世而 後有其人(遭時遇命得主有人高梧自然接靈鳳尺 瀆不能容巨鱗) 文子問聖智(問聖與智)老子曰聞而知之聖也見 而知之智也故聖 人常聞禍福所生而擇其 道智者常見禍福成形而擇其行(見可 而爲知難而止) 聖人知天道吉凶故知禍福所生智者先見 成形故知 禍福之門(聖人知吉凶倚伏察其未形故治於未亂智者 知禍福相傾監於已兆故不游其門也)聞未生 聖也先見成形 智也無聞見者愚迷(聞未生之事非聖如何覩已形之禍非智如何 无聞 无見眞謂愚迷也已矣) 老子曰君好義則信時而任己棄數而用惠 (人生信一時之義不慮將來之患畧 大道之數矜巧惠之能非賢君也)物博智 淺以淺贍博未之有也(指杯爲海短綆汲深何以 能濟也)獨 任其智失必多矣(獨任多敗詢眾可允)好智窮術也好 勇危亡之 道也(獨眩所知必致窮屈專勇无料坐見危亡)好與則 無定分上之分不定則下之 望無止若多歛 則與民爲讎少取而多與其數無有故好與 來
Interpretation

In times of great peace, ignorant people cannot single-handedly disrupt social order (because upright Qi naturally rejects corrupt influences); yet in chaotic eras, even the virtuous cannot govern alone (the few cannot prevail against the many). The reason sages can live with serene joy and tranquil clarity is that they embody the highest De (Virtue), acting in harmony with the Dao (the Way).

Human destiny is predetermined—only by aligning with fate can one achieve meaningful action; only when the proper moment arrives can one’s abilities manifest. Specific eras give rise to specific talents (just as towering phoenix trees naturally attract phoenixes, while small ditches cannot harbor great fish).

Wenzi inquired about the difference between sages and the merely wise. Laozi replied: Those who comprehend through hearing alone are sages; those who require visual proof to understand are the wise. Thus, sages often perceive the roots of fortune and misfortune through listening, thereby choosing the correct path. The wise, however, act only after observing established outcomes (they proceed when they see feasibility and halt when recognizing difficulty).

Sages understand the auspicious and inauspicious patterns of heaven’s Dao, thus foreseeing the origins of fortune and calamity. The wise first notice manifested signs, thereby discerning their causes (sages recognize the interdependence of fortune and misfortune, detecting shifts before events take form—thus governing chaos before it arises. The wise observe the transformation between fortune and misfortune through visible omens, thereby avoiding the gates of disaster). Those who can hear of things yet unborn are sages; those who foresee fully formed trends are the wise. Those who can neither hear nor foresee remain foolish and confused.

Laozi further said: If a ruler excessively exalts personal righteousness, they will trust momentary judgments and act autocratically, abandoning the laws of the great Dao to rely on petty favors (prioritizing transient righteousness without considering future calamity, neglecting cosmic principles while flaunting trivial cleverness—this is no enlightened ruler). Facing vast complexities with shallow wisdom, attempting to address the profound with the superficial, is doomed to fail (like using a finger as a cup to hold the ocean or drawing from a deep well with a short rope—how could it succeed?). Relying solely on personal intellect invites frequent errors (arbitrary decisions lead easily to failure; consulting the collective ensures stability).

Excessive pursuit of cunning exhausts one’s methods; overvaluing bravery is a path to peril (flaunting one’s insight inevitably brings stagnation, while reckless courage without strategy courts ruin). Extreme generosity lacks fixed standards: when those above distribute without clarity, those below crave without limit. Over-taxation breeds public enmity, while giving much while taking little is unsustainable—thus, excessive generosity creates problems.

怨之道也(凡有所與必先所取取則有窮與則有竭以有竭之物給无窮 之費亦難爲恒也而易彼與此一得一失 况取非其道與非其當得者未喜失者爲仇是 以志人絶取捨之心守平和之分怨何從而生也)由是觀之財 不足 任道術可因明矣(觀取與之分乃仇怨之府是以財不足以救時唯道 可以輔眾) 文子問曰古之王者以道莅天下爲之奈何 (問先王之道諷當時之主言今時之 弊不及昔者之政將如之何也)老子曰執 一無爲因天地與之變化天下大器 也(夫上古帝 王爲治非謂神奇唯法天地執一无爲與時消息大器者謂有天下也)不可執 也不可爲 也爲者敗之執者失之(神而无形不可執也 執者非也微而无狀不可爲也爲者敗之)執一者 見小也見小故 能成其大也(唯一故能總眾以御物唯大故能見小而不遺)無爲者 守 靜也守靜能爲天下正(動不逾分靜不滯方此靜之至也故 能爲天下正也)處大滿而不 溢居高貴而無驕處大 不溢盈而不虧居上不驕高而不危盈 而不 虧所以長守富也高而不危所以長守貴也 富貴不離其 身祿及子孫古之王道具於此 矣(夫理契无爲心符至道處大滿而不溢履高位而不危澤 濡品物德貽子孫昔者明 王皆守此道以化天下也) 老子曰民有道所同行有法所同守義不能
Interpretation

The root of resentment lies in this: one must always take before giving, yet taking has its limits and giving will eventually exhaust itself. Using finite resources to satisfy infinite desires naturally cannot last. Giving and taking are like transactions—what one gains, another must lose. Moreover, when acquisition is unjust or giving ill-timed, the recipient may feel no gratitude while the deprived nurse grievances. Thus, the truly wise sever all calculations of taking and giving, abiding in peaceful authenticity—how could resentment arise from this?

From this we see material wealth alone cannot truly resolve problems; only by following the principles of the Dao (the Way) can conflicts be fundamentally resolved. (Here "Dao" refers to natural law and cosmic order.) Observe the dynamic of taking and giving, and you'll find precisely the source of enmity. When material means cannot save the age, only the Dao can aid all beings.

Wenzi (a Daoist figure) asked: "When ancient sage-kings governed the world through the Dao, how exactly did they proceed?" (This rhetorically contrasts ancient wisdom with contemporary misrule.) Laozi replied: "By holding to the One (the origin of Dao) and following spontaneity, conforming to celestial patterns while transforming alongside all creatures. The world is like a precious vessel (symbolizing state power)—it cannot be forcibly controlled nor deliberately manipulated. Forced control leads to loss; deliberate action brings ruin."

"To hold the One" means perceiving the subtle to comprehend the profound. Only by seeing the minute can great affairs be accomplished. "Wuwei (non-action)" means maintaining serene emptiness—this emptiness becomes the world's compass. (Here "non-action" means unforced action, not inactivity.) Full yet not overflowing, exalted yet not arrogant; in extreme abundance without excess, one preserves lasting wealth; in high position without pride, one preserves lasting nobility. When wealth and honor never leave one's person, blessings extend to descendants. This was the essence of ancient sage-kings' governance.

(This passage explains how enlightened rulers of antiquity followed this principle: their inner being aligned with wuwei, their actions conformed to supreme law. At the zenith without complacency, in exalted position without peril, their grace nourished all things, their virtue benefited posterity—thus they taught the world through this Dao.)

相固威不能相必 故立君以一之(譌僻之俗澆薄之民 有道不守有法不一外飾於義以求譽內作其威以伏眾不立君長何以 齊之也)君 執一卽治無常卽亂(一法不明萬民失據也)君道者非 所以有爲 也所以無爲也智者不以德爲事 勇者不以力爲暴仁者不以 位爲惠可謂一 矣(不擇逍而妄爲不馮位而濟惠能全五者可謂一矣)一也者無適之 道 也萬物之本也(一者法也適者往也言君致法而治則萬物皆歸往 於君故無不適也)君數易法 國數易君(法數變君數易是君无一 則民物勞弊天下不安君无恒法隨時遷變固無恒主亦廢與也)人以 其位 達其好憎下之任懼不可勝理(凡爲君者宜鎮以道德不 妄好憎恣其胷臆逾於賞 罰不當則下吏斯懼懼則刑濫何可勝理也)故君失 一其亂甚於無君也君必執一 而後能羣矣 (天下所以戴君上者以君有道故也今國有君而無道是民無主雖有其主使奸臣竊柄 賢者受害 微歛無厭民物勞苦故云甚於無君也) 文子問曰王道有幾老子曰一而已矣(皇王之號 雖殊古今之道唯一也)
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the art of governance, emphasizing that rulers should adhere to the principle of "One" (the unified, constant law of the Dao) in administering the state.

The text observes that when social customs deteriorate and people become shallow—outwardly feigning benevolence and righteousness for reputation while actually abusing power—a ruler must be established to unify governance. A ruler who maintains the principle of "One" can govern effectively, whereas frequent changes to laws will lead to chaos. True governance does not rely on deliberate action but follows the natural principle of Wuwei (non-action). The wise do not flaunt virtue, the courageous do not misuse force, and the benevolent do not exploit their position to dispense favors—only then can the state of "One" be achieved.

"One" is the fundamental Dao that permeates all things, the origin of all existence. If a ruler frequently alters decrees, the state will frequently change rulers. Without constant laws, the people will suffer hardship, and the world will lack peace. If a ruler rewards and punishes based on personal whims, subordinates will live in fear, leading to the abuse of punishments.

The scripture particularly stresses: when a ruler loses the principle of "One," the resulting chaos is worse than having no ruler at all. Only by steadfastly upholding "One" can a ruler truly lead the masses. When Wenzi (a Daoist figure) asked Laozi how many ways of kingly governance existed, Laozi replied there was only "One," illustrating that while ancient and modern rulers bore different titles, the fundamental principle of governance remained the same.

The core teaching of this passage is: governance must follow the unchanging natural law ("One"). Rulers should govern through Wuwei (non-action), avoid arbitrary changes to laws, and refrain from acting on personal biases—only then can the world achieve stability.

文子曰古有以道王者有以兵王者何其一 也(唐虞揖讓湯武征伐其不一也) 曰以道王者德也以兵王 者亦德也(道旡升降時有澆淳理在變通義非膠柱故適時而 舉因資濟物大 矣哉其誰知之且結繩而理用道以化者德也夷暴殄逆用兵而治亦德也動不逾正靜 不乖道雖曰凶器實 爲至德也)用兵有五有義兵有應兵有 忿兵有貪兵有驕兵(夫兵者動有危 亡用有可否也)誅暴救 弱謂之義敵來加己不得已而用之謂之應 爭 小故不勝其心謂之忿利人土地欲人財 貨謂之貪恃其國家 之大矜其人民之眾欲 見賢於敵國者謂之驕義兵王應兵勝 忿兵 敗貪兵死驕兵滅此天道也(國有五兵輕用則死敗身有五 賊輕用之則危亡天道賞 善懲奸其理不差仁者愼之也) 老子曰釋道而任智者危棄數而用才者困 (捨平夷之道專巧詐之智遺禍福之 數騁譎詭之才抑本趨末得不危亡也)故守 分循理失之不憂得之不喜成者非 所爲得 者非所求(不驚得失自旡憂喜)入者有受而無取出者 有授而無 與(受旡貪取之心與旡矜出之態)因春而生因秋 而殺所生不德所殺不怨則 幾於道矣(春秋旡心 生殺有時人主旡爲賞罰必當遠違其理近失其道) 文子問曰王者得其歡心爲之奈何(帝王之理何以 得百姓歡心)老子曰若
Interpretation

Master Wenzi (a prominent Daoist figure) once posed a question: Ancient rulers governed the world either through moral transformation or military conquest—are these two approaches essentially the same? (For example, Yao and Shun practiced abdication, while Tang of Shang and Wu of Zhou achieved power through conquest—their methods clearly differed.)

Laozi replied: Governing through moral instruction is virtuous governance (De), and ruling through military force likewise manifests virtue. (Because the Dao itself makes no distinction between high and low—only eras have cycles of prosperity and decline. The key lies in flexible adaptation, not rigid dogma. Acting in accordance with circumstances and solving problems based on actual conditions—this is the highest wisdom. In ancient times when knots recorded events, moral influence was virtuous governance; during rebellions, using force to restore order was equally virtuous governance. Action that doesn't deviate from the right path, stillness that doesn't violate heavenly principles—though weapons are instruments of violence, when used appropriately they become the highest virtue.)

Military action divides into five types: armies of righteousness, self-defense, vengeance, plunder, and display. (Warfare concerns life and death—it must be carefully considered.) Punishing tyrants to save the weak is righteous warfare (yi bing); responding to invasion is defensive warfare (ying bing); fighting over petty disputes is wrathful warfare (fen bing); coveting others' lands and wealth is greedy warfare (tan bing); flaunting power to intimidate is arrogant warfare (jiao bing). Righteous armies can win the world, defensive armies can achieve victory, wrathful armies will face defeat, greedy armies invite destruction, and arrogant armies ultimately perish—this is the Dao's immutable law. (States possess these five types of military force—misuse brings ruin; individuals harbor five destructive impulses—indulgence invites calamity. Heaven's Dao rewards good and punishes evil without error—the virtuous must be cautious.)

Laozi said: Abandoning the Dao to rely solely on cleverness is perilous; discarding natural laws to depend only on talent brings trouble. (Forsaking the broad path for petty schemes; ignoring fortune's cycles to show off sophistry—this is prioritizing branches over roots—how could it not be dangerous?) Therefore, those who abide by their true nature and follow heavenly principles neither grieve at loss nor rejoice at gain. (Because they understand) success isn't attained through forced pursuit, nor gains through desperate striving. (With inner stillness, joy and sorrow naturally fade.) Receiving gifts without greed, giving aid without pride—like spring nurturing all things without claiming merit, or autumn withering life without incurring resentment—this approaches the Dao. (The seasons operate by fixed principles; rulers too must govern in harmony with heaven's Dao, dispensing impartial rewards and punishments while avoiding actions that violate natural order.)

Master Wenzi further asked: How can rulers truly win their people's heartfelt support? Laozi answered: (The subsequent text is missing, but following the pattern, this would expound on governing through wuwei (non-action) and policies that let the people rest.)

江海卽是也淡兮無味用 之不既先小而後大(夫明王之德湛若江海來者不 逆酌者不竭淡 然无味五味成焉施之旡窮萬物賴焉故得萬姓歡心子孫不絶也)夫欲上人 者必以其 言下之欲先人者必以其身後之 天下必效其歡愛進其仁義 而無苛氣居上 而民不重居前而眾不害天下樂推而不厭 雖 絶國殊俗蜎飛蠕動莫不親愛無之而不 通无往而不遂故爲 天下貴(欲上人者非有欲上之心有欲 人之不上矣先人者非有先人之心則推先而不害若然者德惠動天地况於 人乎) 老子曰執一世之法籍以非傳代之俗譬猶 膠柱調瑟(執一隅之說非 通代之典其猶膠柱調瑟何典節之能全也)聖 人者應時權變見形施宜世異則事 變時移 則俗易論世立法隨時舉事(夫聖王救時濟物眾人仰止猶 飢而待食渴而思飲 人誰不願也)上古之王法度不同非古
Interpretation

Rivers and seas appear insipid and tasteless, yet their resources are inexhaustible. They always begin from small origins, yet ultimately achieve vastness. (The virtue [De] of enlightened rulers resembles rivers and seas—they reject nothing and exhaust nothing. Though appearing plain, they harmonize all flavors; though giving endlessly, all things depend on them. Thus they win the people's affection and their descendants flourish.)

To stand above others, one's words must remain humble; to lead others, one's actions must willingly follow. In this way, people will naturally delight in emulating their humaneness and practicing their righteousness, without harboring resentment. When such rulers occupy high positions, the people feel no burden; when they walk ahead, none are harmed. All under heaven gladly support them without weariness. Even distant lands with alien customs, down to the smallest creatures, all draw near with affection. Wherever they go, passage is unobstructed; whatever they undertake proceeds smoothly—thus they become the most revered under heaven.

(To stand above others isn't about true dominance, but wishing others needn't remain below; to lead isn't about seizing precedence, but being placed ahead without harming others. Such virtue [De] can move heaven and earth—how much more so humans?)

Laozi says: Clinging rigidly to one era's laws to negate inherited customs is like tuning a zither by gluing its tuning pegs (metaphor for obstinate inflexibility). The sage adapts flexibly to circumstances, observing reality to take appropriate measures. When times differ, actions must change; when situations shift, customs must transform—establish laws according to the age's needs, act in harmony with prevailing trends.

(Sage-kings rectify contemporary ills and aid all creatures; people gaze up at them as the starving await food, the thirsty yearn for drink—who wouldn't aspire to this?) The laws of ancient kings differed not because they sought novelty, but because circumstances changed.

相返也時務異也是故不法 其已成之法而 法其所以爲法者與化推移(道无隆替而俗有變革是以五 帝不 同治三王不共法非欲相返因時宜者也)聖人法之可觀也其 所以作法不可原也 (法未然人不可知政已洽眾有可觀)其言 可聽也其所以言不可形也(言可聽者當時用也 不可形者 不可以當時之言爲後時之用)三皇五帝輕天下細萬物齊 死生同變化 (輕天下者非鄙薄也細萬物者非簡賤也言非有欲取天下而 天下歸无心利萬物萬物自附者也齊死生則憂懼不能入同 變化則詭異不能移也) 抱道推誠以鏡萬物之情(神而爲鏡照无不得)上與道 爲友 下與化爲人(上與道交下與化游)今欲學其道不 得其清明玄聖守其法 籍行其憲令必不能 以爲治矣(夫存其典籍行其法制實賴玄聖發揚導達使後之學者知貴 其導 內以治身外以治國也) 文子問政(政者政教也)老子曰御之以道養之以 德無示以賢無加 以力(教之以道无見其智能臨之以德无矜其 威勢)損而執一無處可利無見可欲(清虛 爲體欲利自亡 也)方而不割廉而不劌(正不割物廉不傷義)無矜無伐 御之以道 則民附養之以德則民服無示以 賢則民足無加以力則民朴 無示以賢者儉 也無加以力不敢也下以聚之賂以取之儉
Interpretation

This passage expounds on principles of governance and self-cultivation, with the core philosophy of following nature's course and governing through Wuwei (non-action).

In governing a state, one should not rigidly adhere to established laws but emulate the fundamental principles behind their creation, adjusting according to changing circumstances. Just as the Five Emperors (legendary sage rulers of antiquity) and Three Sovereigns (virtuous kings of Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties) employed different governance methods—not for novelty's sake but to meet their era's needs—sages observe effective governance models while the profound rationale behind these methods remains elusive. Their words may be heeded as guidance, yet their true intent can never be fully grasped.

The Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors regarded imperial power lightly, maintained detachment toward all things, viewed life and death as equal, and merged with nature's transformations. This wasn't because they disdained the world, but because they were free from desire—what they didn't forcibly pursue came to them naturally. Holding fast to the great Dao, they perceived all things' true nature with sincere hearts. Above, they befriended the Dao; below, they moved with change.

Those today who wish to learn this art of governance yet fail to maintain inner clarity—who rigidly cling to texts and mechanically enforce laws—will never govern effectively.

Wenzi (a Daoist figure) inquired about governance from Laozi, who replied: "Govern through the Dao, nurture people with De (Virtue). Flaunt no talents nor abuse authority. Reduce desires and preserve singular focus—thus avoiding temptation and preventing greed. Be upright without harming others, incorruptible without being harsh. Neither arrogant nor boastful. Govern through Dao and people will follow; nurture through De and people will submit; refrain from flaunting talents and people will be content; abstain from power abuse and people will remain pure. Not flaunting talents is frugality; not abusing authority is prudence. Only thus can you unite hearts and win people's support."

以 自全不敢自安不下則離散弗養則背叛 示以賢則民爭加以 力則民怨離散則國勢 衰民背叛則上無威人爭則輕爲非下 怨其 上則位危四者誠修正道幾矣(儉而自全養以親眾賢而 不恃威而不暴四者兼修 正道存矣) 老子曰上言者下用也下言者上用也上言 者常用也下言者 權用也唯聖人爲能知權 言而必信期而必當(上言謂道下言爲權唯聖人能 知用之不失其 道善用權也小人用之則喪其軀不知權也唯權不言而信不期而當也)天下之 高行直而 證父信而死女孰能貴之(世之所謂證父 爲賢死女爲信而天下莫不高之斯不然其矯性而求直 節行以存誠乃末世之詭法非 至德之眞意則故不足信貴也)故聖人論事之曲直與之屈 伸 無常儀表(理在稱機事无定體)祝則名君溺則捽父 勢使然也(捽祚骨切名君非禮 在祝卽當捽父非法於溺卽可事在適時誰云 適禮也)夫權者聖人所以獨見夫先迕而 後合 者之謂權先合而後迕者不知權不知權者 善反醜矣(善用 權者先譎而後通不善用者始吉而終凶也) 文子問曰夫子之言非道德无以治天下上 世之王繼嗣因業 亦有無道各没其世而无 禍敗者何道以然(設問之意)老子曰自天 子以下
Interpretation

This scripture primarily expounds on the wisdom of governance and personal conduct, with its core principle being mastery of the "art of situational adaptation" (quanbian).

It first addresses four critical aspects of statecraft: Excessive frugality leads to alienation of the people, neglecting their welfare invites rebellion, flaunting one's worthiness provokes contention, and reckless use of military force breeds resentment. When these four conditions arise, the state will decline. Conversely, one should practice frugality without being harsh, nurture the people to unite their hearts, possess worthiness without ostentation, and maintain dignity without cruelty—only then can the proper Dao (the Way) be preserved.

The text then distinguishes between "higher discourse" (shangyan) and "lower discourse" (xiayan). The former refers to the eternal and unchanging Dao, the foundation of governance; the latter denotes expedient and adaptable methods. Only sages can properly employ situational adaptation, remaining true to the Dao while flexibly responding to circumstances. Ordinary people who misuse such adaptation ultimately harm themselves.

Two examples illustrate this: a son testifying against his father, and a woman dying to keep a promise. While these may appear righteous and trustworthy on the surface, they violate the innate genuineness of human nature and are not true virtues (De). Sages handle matters with flexible adaptation according to specific situations, without fixed patterns. For instance, it may be permissible to address a ruler by name during rituals, or to grab one's father's hair when rescuing him from drowning—these are exceptions allowed under extraordinary circumstances.

Wenzi asks why some rulers lacking the Dao can still maintain peaceful rule. Laozi replies that from the Son of Heaven to commoners, all exist in a relationship of mutual dependence. This implies that even rulers without the Dao may temporarily sustain their rule by understanding certain principles of adaptation, but in the long run, adherence to the great Dao remains essential.

至于庶人各自生活然其活有厚薄天下時 有亡國破 家无道德之故也(非有他殃在於失道)有道 德則夙夜不懈戰戰兢兢常 恐危亡無道德 則縱欲怠惰其亡无時(居存若亡國无餘殃安時忘危身死无時) 使 桀紂循道行德湯武雖賢無所建其功也 (有道卽王无道卽亡固知善惡无王興亡 在人皇天輔德自然之理豈云昧也哉)夫 道德者所以相生養也所以相畜長也 所以 相親愛也所以相敬貴也夫聾蟲(鼈聾旡耳)雖愚 不害其所愛 誠使天下之民皆懷仁愛之心 禍災何由生乎(夫道者廣覆厚載生之畜之親 之愛之一不異物盡申諸 己使萬物皆然則雖聾蟲之愚尚感仁澤何憂禍災之生也)夫無道而無 禍害 者仁未絶義未滅也仁雖未絶義雖未 滅諸侯以輕其上矣諸 侯輕上則朝廷不恭 縱令不順(夫王者无道有位繼業未滅者以仁義猶存故也而禍福之釁 已萌 於兹陵熳之情以輕其上矣則夷王下堂而見諸侯文公要盟而會踐土此衰世之謂也) 仁絶義滅諸侯 背叛眾人力政(以威力爲政也)强者 陵弱大者侵小民人以攻擊爲業 災害生禍 亂作其亡无日何期无禍也(道喪德亡仁絶義滅有君非君 爲臣非臣尊卑 失位强弱相陵故卽秦之二世漢之季主此國毁亡之時也) 老子曰法煩刑峻卽民生詐(法煩難奉奉之不逮則峻之以
Interpretation

Ordinary people go about their lives, yet their circumstances vary between fortune and misfortune. When states collapse and families are torn apart in this world, it is always due to a lack of De (Virtue) (not because of other calamities—the root lies in straying from the Dao). Those who embody De remain diligent day and night, ever vigilant, fearing they might fall into peril; those without De indulge their desires, grow lax and idle, and destruction may come at any moment (living in peace yet behaving like those in a doomed kingdom, complacent and oblivious to danger—death arrives unannounced).

Had the tyrants Jie of Xia or Zhou of Shang acted in accordance with De, even the virtuous Tang of Shang and Wu of Zhou could not have accomplished their feats of overthrowing tyranny (following the Dao leads to kingship; abandoning it brings ruin. Thus, good and evil alone do not determine dynastic rise and fall—what matters is human action. Heaven naturally protects those with De—is this principle not clear?). The function of De is this: it fosters the growth and nourishment of all things, helps them accumulate and flourish, and brings people closer in affection, mutual respect, and reverence. Even creatures as dull as the "deaf turtle" (referring to slow-witted reptiles) do not harm what they cherish. If all under heaven embraced benevolence, how could calamities arise? (The Dao is vast and inclusive, nurturing all things equally with care. If one extends this principle universally, even the deaf turtle would respond to kindness—why fear disaster?)

Those who stray from the Dao yet avoid immediate misfortune do so only because remnants of benevolence linger and righteousness has not fully perished. But already, feudal lords grow insolent toward their sovereign, the court loses its reverence, and governance falters (a ruler without Dao temporarily retains his throne due to the lingering De of past generations. Yet signs of doom appear—disrespect takes root, as when King Yi of Zhou was forced to descend his throne to greet his vassals, or Duke Wen of Jin coerced the Zhou king into an alliance—these are omens of decline). When benevolence is exhausted and righteousness extinguished, lords rebel, the people glorify violence (resolving matters by force), the strong oppress the weak, great states swallow small ones, and the masses take warfare as their trade. Calamity and chaos erupt, ruin looms near—how can one expect to escape disaster? (With the Dao forsaken and De vanished, hierarchy crumbles: ruler and subject lose their roles, the noble and lowly are overturned, the powerful prey on the helpless. Like the eras of Qin Er Shi or the last Han emperors, these are the harbingers of a state's demise.)

Laozi said: When laws are excessive and punishments severe, the people learn deceit (overly complex laws are hard to obey; when they cannot be followed, harsh penalties enforce them).

刑刑之不正則罪及无辜遂使百姓 輕生冒禁以死抵法天下之危莫不由此也)上 多事則下多態求多卽得寡禁多卽 勝少以 事生事又以事止事譬猶揚火而使无焚也 以智生患 又以智備之譬猶撓水而欲求其 清也(人多事卽心亂國多禁則民勞猶火不可頻揚 水不可數撓也) 老子曰人主好仁卽无功者賞有罪者釋好 刑卽有功者廢无 罪者及无好憎者誅而無 怨施而不德(人主无好憎之心則臣无頗僻之刑則賞者不 避誅者不怨) 放準循繩身無與事若天若地何不覆載合 而和之君 也别而誅之法也民以受誅无所 怨憾謂之道德(動循法度德合天地君明 卽理无不鑒法平則民不遭其 辜) 老子曰天下是非无所定世各是其所善而 非其所惡夫求是 者非求道理也求合於己 者也非去邪也去迕於心者今吾欲 擇是而 居之擇非而去之不知世所謂是非也(世人善己 所是惡人所非彼亦 惡吾所善非吾所是是既非是善亦非善卽善惡無定是非安在然 愜其情者雖惡以爲善善其所善非去衰也迕其意者雖 是以爲非其所非違其心也則 无是以不非其所非者則无非矣則无是无非无善无惡故明不出善惡而无是非者也) 故 治大國若烹小鮮勿撓而已(大國不勝亂政小鮮何堪 數撓)夫趣合者卽言中
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the principles of state governance and the discernment of right and wrong.

It first points out that unjust punishments will harm the innocent, leading the people to disregard life, violate prohibitions, and defy the law even at the cost of death—this is the root of chaos in the world. If a ruler issues excessive decrees, the people will devise countless ways to circumvent them; the more prohibitions there are, the fewer can truly be enforced. It is as futile as constantly stirring a fire to prevent it from burning or agitating water to make it clear.

Laozi says that if a ruler is overly fond of benevolence, they will reward the undeserving and pardon the guilty; if they favor harsh punishments, they will dismiss the meritorious and punish the innocent. The ideal ruler should be free of personal biases, ensuring that rewards and punishments are just—those rewarded will not evade, and those punished will not resent. The ruler should be as impartial as heaven and earth, embracing all things without partiality.

Regarding the discernment of right and wrong, the scripture observes that there is no absolute standard in the world. People affirm what they favor and reject what they dislike. What is called "seeking truth" often merely means finding arguments that align with one's own views, and "eliminating falsehood" simply means dismissing what contradicts one's preferences. Thus, the truly wise do not cling to worldly distinctions of right and wrong, good and evil.

Finally, the analogy "governing a large state is like cooking a small fish" illustrates that ruling a great nation requires minimal interference—just as frying small fish demands little turning. Forcing uniformity of opinion (quhe) will only backfire; maintaining natural harmony is the true Dao (the Way).

而益親身疏而謀當卽 見疑(趣合謂偶合於君所言且當而身疏則君未深信必見疑也)今 吾欲 正身而待物何知世之所從規我者乎吾若 與俗遽走猶 逃雨无之而不濡(今我欲爲人規矩人亦爲 我師匠猶速走避雨身已勞倦不免沾濡)欲在於虛 則不能虛若 夫不爲虛而自虛者此所欲而旡不致也(夫虛 者无欲有 欲非虛旡心无所不至也)故通於道者如車軸不運 於己而與轂致于千里 轉於無窮之原也(達道 之士身由轂也神由軸也身混世而嘗適心居中而常寂不馳言外不勞諸己故能 轉於 无窮之路游於絶㝠之境)故聖人體道反至不化以待化 動而無爲(聖人內以 反眞外能應化觸情不染動用无爲也) 老子曰夫亟戰而數勝者則國必亡亟戰則 民罷數勝則主驕 以驕主使罷民而國不亡 者則寡矣主驕則恣恣則極物民罷 則怨怨 則極慮上下俱極而不亡者未之有也故功 遂身退天 之道也(戰不欲頻主不欲驕民不欲罷物不欲極極則返極 而不亡未之有也) 平王問文子曰吾聞子得道於老聃今賢人 雖有道而遭淫亂 之世以一人之權而欲化 久亂之民其庸能乎(平王周平王也言一人者王自 况也賢人指文
Interpretation

This scripture conveys three main teachings:

The first section discusses the Dao (the Way) of human conduct. While one may wish to rectify oneself to interact with others, it's impossible to know what standards the world will use to judge us. If we simply follow the crowd, it's like running through the rain trying to avoid getting wet—we'll end up soaked regardless. True emptiness and stillness (referring to a state of mental clarity without desire) cannot be achieved through forced pursuit. Only those who attain stillness naturally without striving for it can fulfill all aspirations. Those who attain the Dao are like an axle—remaining motionless themselves yet enabling the wheel to travel thousands of miles, operating within boundless realms. The sages (enlightened beings who have realized the Dao) embody the great Dao, returning to their original nature. They respond to infinite changes with constancy, their actions appearing as wuwei (non-action).

The second section addresses governance. A state that wages frequent wars, even with consistent victories, will inevitably perish. Constant warfare exhausts the people, while repeated victories inflate the ruler's arrogance. An arrogant ruler driving exhausted subjects—few states survive such conditions. An arrogant ruler becomes indulgent, and indulgence drains the people's vitality; exhausted people grow resentful, and resentment breeds extreme thoughts. When both ruler and subjects reach their limits, destruction is inevitable. Therefore, withdrawing after accomplishing one's task aligns with the heavenly Dao.

The third section presents a dialogue between King Ping of Zhou and Master Wenzi. The king asks: "I've heard you learned the great Dao from Lao Dan (Laozi). But even if a worthy person possesses Daoist arts, when facing chaotic times, can one person's authority truly transform long-corrupted people?" Here, King Ping refers to himself as "one person," expressing his confusion about the difficulties of governance.

子也言今雖權在一人不能化之子有何道而能治之也)文子曰夫道德 者匡邪以 爲正振亂以爲治化淫敗以爲樸 淳德復生天下安寧要在一 人(夫衺正存心治亂由君心 衺則衺君治則治故興亡匪天成敗在我不係於物貴在諸道道彼一人則淫俗可變醇 德復 興何憂不治者也)人主者民之師也上者下之儀 也上美之則下食之 上有道德則下有仁義 下有仁義則无淫亂之世矣(故知天下顒顒莫不 上師於君 望爲儀表其由决水於千仞之谿旡不歸往也)積德成王積怨成亡 積石成山積 水成海不積而能成者未之有 也(德不積不足以成名惡不積不足以毁身故王者愼所積 也)積道德者 天與之地助之鬼神輔之鳳凰翔其庭麒麟 遊其 郊蛟龍宿其沼(故積道德以感天地四靈呈其祥萬物樂其業 者也)故以道蒞天下天下 之德也無道莅天下 天下之賊也以一人與天下爲讎雖欲長 久 不可得也(蒞臨也人君以道蒞天下天下共戴之而不重无道處天下天下怨 之而不久也)堯舜以 是昌桀紂以是亡(觀乎善否以察存亡) 平王曰寡人敬聞命矣(平王周之賢王傷時 道衰故問文子求於 治道文子云要在一人匪由於他故平王修政周道復興而春秋美之後謚爲平
Interpretation

Wenzi (a Daoist master) replied to King Ping (the virtuous ruler of Zhou dynasty): Though all power now resides in the sovereign alone, if you cannot transform the people through moral influence, what means can you employ to govern the state properly?

The power of Dao and De (Virtue) manifests thus: it rectifies deviant thoughts and returns them to the right path, pacifies chaos to restore order, transforms corruption into pristine simplicity. When the ruler cultivates genuine De within himself, the world naturally attains peace. The crux lies with the sovereign alone - for both depravity and rectitude originate from the heart, order and disorder depend entirely on the ruler. Prosperity and decline are not heaven's decree; success or failure depends on one's own actions, unrelated to external factors.

The ruler serves as the people's teacher, those above become models for those below. When superiors honor virtuous conduct, inferiors will emulate; when the sovereign upholds Dao and De, the people will practice benevolence and righteousness; when all people embrace these virtues, social disorder cannot arise. The multitudes look up to their ruler as mountain streams inevitably flow down thousand-foot cliffs.

Accumulating good deeds builds the foundation for kingship, while amassing resentment leads to ruin. Just as piled stones form mountains and gathered droplets create oceans, nothing is achieved without gradual accumulation. Those who accumulate De receive heaven and earth's protection, with spirits and deities lending aid - auspicious signs appear: phoenixes soar in courtyards, qilin roam the suburbs, dragons dwell in marshes.

To govern the world through Dao and De is to bestow blessings upon it; to rule without them brings calamity. One who makes enemies of the world cannot maintain lasting rule. Yao and Shun prospered through De, while Jie and Zhou fell through its loss.

King Ping responded: I reverently receive your instruction. (King Ping, the virtuous Zhou ruler who lamented the world's decline, sought Wenzi's counsel on governance. Wenzi revealed that the key lay in the ruler's self-cultivation. Subsequently implementing benevolent policies, King Ping restored Zhou's prosperity and was later honored by posterity as "Ping the Peacemaker.")

王)

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0140); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 4 Vol. 6 →