中文 · EN

《墨子》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taiqing 太清部 Vol. 3 / 15 5,741 characters

About this page. The original text of 《墨子》 Vol. 3 (Taiqing 太清部, 15 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 12 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《墨子》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

墨子卷之三沛三    尚同上第十一 子墨子言曰古者民始生未有形政之時蓋 其語人異義是以一人則一義二人則二義 十人則十義其人兹衆其所謂義者亦兹衆 是以人是其義以非人之義故交相非是也 以内者父子兄弟作怨惡離散不能相和合 天下之百姓皆以水火毒藥相虧害至有餘 力不能以相勞腐列餘財不以相分隱匿良 道不以相教天下之亂若禽獸然夫明虖天 下之所以亂者生於無政長是故選天下之 賢可者立以爲天子天子立以其力爲未足 又選擇天下之賢可者置立之以爲三公天 子三公既以立以天下爲博大遠國異土之 民是非利害之辯不可一二而明知故畫分 萬國立諸侯國君諸侯國君既已立以其力 爲未足又選擇其國之賢可者置立之以爲 正長正長既已具天子發政於天下之百姓 言曰聞善而不善皆以告其上上之所是必 皆是之所非必皆非之上有過則䂓諫之下 有善則傍薦之上同而不下比者此上之所 賞而下之所譽也意若聞善而不善不以告 其上上之所是弗能是上之所非弗能非上 有過弗䂓諫下有善弗傍薦下比不能上同 者此上之所罰而百姓所毁也上以此爲賞 罰其明察以審信是故里長者里之仁人也 里長發政里之百姓言曰聞善而不善必以
Interpretation

In the chapter "Shangtong" (Elevating Uniformity), Mozi expounds a crucial thesis: In the earliest days of humanity when there was no governmental order, every individual held their own standards of right and wrong. One person maintained one standard, two people held two standards, and as the population grew, these standards became increasingly chaotic. Consequently, everyone insisted on their own criteria to negate others, leading to mutual hostility and conflict.

Within families, resentment arose between fathers and sons, brothers and siblings, causing relatives to drift apart and live in disharmony. The common people harmed one another, even resorting to fire, water, and poison to inflict suffering. The strong refused to aid the weak, the wealthy hoarded their surplus rather than sharing, and those with valuable knowledge withheld instruction from others. Society descended into chaos, resembling a world of wild beasts.

Mozi identifies the root of this disorder as the absence of unified leadership and political institutions. Therefore, he proposes selecting the most virtuous and capable individuals in the world to establish a Son of Heaven (the ruler). Recognizing the limitations of one ruler’s power, the Son of Heaven then appoints the most worthy to serve as the Three Dukes (the highest ministers of antiquity). Given the vastness of the world and the difficulty in discerning right and wrong in distant states, the realm is divided into myriad feudal domains, each governed by lords. These lords, in turn, appoint capable officials to oversee local administration.

Once governance is established, the Son of Heaven issues decrees to the people: Whether they hear of good or bad deeds, they must report them to their superiors. What the superior deems right, all must affirm; what the superior deems wrong, all must oppose. If a superior errs, subordinates must remonstrate; if a subordinate excels, they must be recommended. Those who practice "shangtong" (alignment with superiors) rather than "xiabi" (collusion with inferiors) will be rewarded. Conversely, those who conceal information, feign compliance while disobeying, fail to admonish their superiors, neglect to recommend the worthy, or engage in factionalism will be punished.

Mozi argues that such a clear system of rewards and punishments fosters good order. For example, the village chief (a local official) should be the most benevolent person in the community, and when issuing commands to the people, he too must uphold this principle.

告其鄉長鄉長之所是必皆是之鄕長之所 非必皆非之去若不善言學鄕長之善言去 若不善行學鄉長之善行則鄕何説以亂哉 察鄉之所治者何也鄕長唯能壹同鄉之義 是以鄉治也鄕長者鄕之仁人也鄉長發政 鄉之百姓言曰聞善而不善者必以告國君 國君之所是必皆是之國君之所非必皆非 之去若不善言學國君之善言去若不善行 學國君之善行則國何説以亂哉察國之所 以治者何也國君唯能壹同國之義是以國 治也國君者國之仁人也國君發政國之百 姓言曰聞善而不善必以告天子天子之所 是皆是之天子之所非皆非之去若不善言 學天子之善言去若不善行學天子之善行 則天下何說以亂哉察天下之所以治者何 也天子唯能壹同天下之義是以天下以治 也天下之百姓皆上同於天一而不上同於 天則菑猶未去也今若天飄風苦雨凑凑而 至者此天之所以罰百姓之不上同於天者 也是故子墨子言曰古者聖王爲五刑請以 治其民譬若絲縷之有紀罔罟之有綱所連 收天下之百姓不尚同其上者也    尚同中第十二 子墨子曰方今之時復古之民始生未有正 長之時蓋其語曰天下之人異義是以一人 一義十人十義百人百義其人數兹衆其所 謂義者亦兹衆是以人是其義而非人之義
Interpretation

This passage explains Mozi's (founder of Mohism) political doctrine of "Shangtong" (Upward Conformity), which advocates that the people should maintain ideological unity with their superiors. Using a step-by-step progression from village chiefs to feudal lords and finally to the Son of Heaven, the text illustrates how subordinates should emulate the words and actions of their superiors.

At the village level, whatever the village chief (local administrator) deems right, all the people should support; whatever the chief deems wrong, all should oppose. The people must learn from the chief's virtuous words and deeds while correcting their own shortcomings, thus ensuring the village remains orderly. The chief's ability to unify the village's thinking is what makes good governance possible. As the most benevolent person in the village, the chief issues decrees requiring the people to report both good and bad deeds to the feudal lord.

The same principle applies at the state level: whatever the feudal lord approves, the entire state must support; whatever he condemns, all must oppose. By emulating the lord's virtuous conduct, the people prevent chaos in the state. The feudal lord's capacity to unify the state's ideology is key to effective governance, and he stands as the most benevolent figure in the realm.

Finally, at the imperial level, whatever the Son of Heaven (supreme ruler) endorses, all under heaven must uphold; whatever he rejects, all must oppose. When the people follow the Son of Heaven's virtuous example, the world remains free from disorder. The Son of Heaven's ability to unify the world's thinking ensures peace under heaven. However, if the people conform upward only to the ruler rather than aligning with Heaven (natural law), calamities will persist. The frequent storms and disasters of the present age are precisely Heaven's punishment for the people's failure to conform with the Son of Heaven.

Mozi concludes: The ancient sage-kings established the Five Punishments as guiding principles, much like the main thread in silk or the central rope in a fishing net, to restrain those who disobey their superiors. In the chapter "Shangtong Zhong," he further states: If we were to revert to humanity's earliest days when people first emerged without rulers, everyone would follow their own reasoning—one person one doctrine, ten people ten doctrines, a hundred people a hundred doctrines. The more numerous the people, the more numerous their interpretations of "righteousness" (moral principles) became, until each person considered themselves correct and others wrong.

故交相非也内之父子兄弟作怨讎皆有離 散之心不能相和合至乎舍餘力不以相勞 隱匿良道不以相教腐㱙餘財不以相分天 下之亂也至如禽獸然無君臣上下長幼之 節父子兄弟之禮是以天下亂焉明乎民之 無正長以一同天下之義而天下亂也是故 選擇天下賢良聖知辯慧之人立以爲天子 使從事乎一同天下之義天子既已立矣以 爲唯其耳目之請不能獨一同天下之義是 故選擇天下贊閲賢良聖知辯慧之人置以 爲三公與從事乎一同天下之義天子三公 既已立矣以爲天下博大山林遠土之民不 可得而一也是故靡分天下設以爲萬諸侯 國君使從事乎一同其國之義國君既已立 矣又以爲唯其耳目之請不能一同其國之 義是故擇其國之賢者置以爲左右將軍大 夫以遠至乎鄉里之長與從事乎一同其國 之義天子諸侯之君民之正長既已定矣天 子爲發政施教曰凡聞見善者必以告其上 聞見不善者亦必以告其上上之所是必亦 是之上之所非必亦非之已有善傍薦之上 有過䂓諫之尚同義其上而母有下比之心 上得則賞之萬民聞則譽之意若聞見善不 以告其上聞見不善亦不以告其上上之所 是不能是上之所非不能非已有善不能傍 薦之上有過不能䂓諫之下比而非其上者
Interpretation

This passage discusses the root causes of social disorder and methods for establishing an orderly society. When people constantly blame one another, even fathers and sons or brothers may become enemies, creating psychological alienation and division that makes harmonious coexistence impossible. People would rather hoard surplus strength than help each other, conceal valuable principles rather than teach them, and let material goods rot rather than share them. Such a society descends into chaos resembling the animal kingdom, lacking the proper hierarchies between ruler and subject, superior and inferior, elder and younger, as well as the fundamental rituals governing familial relationships between fathers and sons or brothers.

To resolve such disorder, impartial leaders must be established to unify the moral standards of the world. First, one must select individuals of both virtue (De) and talent—those with wisdom and discernment—to be installed as the Son of Heaven (emperor), entrusting him with unifying the world's moral principles. However, the Son of Heaven cannot accomplish this task alone, so outstanding individuals must also be chosen as the Three Dukes (highest ancient officials) to assist him.

Considering the vastness of the world, where remote regions are difficult to govern directly, the realm is divided into numerous feudal states, with each ruler responsible for unifying moral principles within their domain. Each state then appoints generals, ministers, and other officials down to village leaders, creating a multi-tiered system to implement unified moral standards.

Once the Son of Heaven, feudal lords, and all levels of officials are established, the Son of Heaven issues decrees to instruct the people: all good deeds witnessed must be reported upward, and all wrongdoing must likewise be reported. What superiors deem right should be followed; what they deem wrong should be opposed. One should actively recommend good ideas and dare to remonstrate when superiors err. Alignment with superiors must be maintained at all times, avoiding secret factions that oppose them. Those who perform well will receive rewards and public praise.

Conversely, failing to report good deeds or wrongdoing, refusing to support what superiors approve or oppose what they disapprove, withholding good suggestions, neglecting to admonish superiors' errors, or forming factions against them—these are the behaviors that lead to social chaos.

上得則誅罰之萬民聞則非毁之故古者聖 王之爲刑政賞譽也甚眀察以審信是以舉 天下之人皆欲得上之賞譽而畏上之毁罰 是故里長順天子政而一同其里之義里長 既同其里之義率其里之萬民以尚同乎鄉 長曰凡里之萬民皆尚同乎鄕長而不敢下 比鄉長之所是必亦是之鄉長之所非必亦 非之去而不善言學鄕長之善言去而不善 行學鄕長之善行鄕長固鄕之賢者也舉鄕 人以法鄕長夫鄕何説而不治哉察鄕長之 所以治鄕者何故之以也曰唯以其能一同 其鄕之義是以鄕治其鄉而鄉既以治矣有 率其鄉萬民以尚同乎國君曰凡鄕之萬民 皆上同乎國君而不敢下比國君之所是必 亦是之國君之所非必亦非之去而不善言 學國君之善言去而不善行學國君之善行 國君固國之賢者也舉國人以法國君夫國 何說而不治哉察國君之所以治國而國治 者何故之以也曰唯以其能一同其國之義 是以國治國君治其國而既已治矣有率其 國之萬民以尚同乎天子曰凡國之萬民上 同乎天子而不敢下比天子之所是必亦是 之天子之所非必亦非之去而不善言學天 子之善言去而不善行學天子之善行天子 者固天下之仁人也舉天下之萬民以法天 子夫天子何說而不治哉察天子之所以治
Interpretation

The enlightened rulers of antiquity established systems of rewards and punishments only after thorough investigation, ensuring fairness and credibility. Thus all people under heaven eagerly sought the ruler's commendation while fearing his disciplinary measures.

The village chiefs (local officials) followed the sovereign's decrees to standardize behavioral norms throughout their communities. Having established these unified standards, they would lead their people in emulating the township chiefs (higher-ranking officials). Every villager aligned their conduct with the township chief's example, never forming private factions. What the township chief approved, they approved; what he condemned, they condemned. They discarded improper speech to adopt his virtuous words, and corrected misguided actions to follow his exemplary conduct. Since the township chief represented the finest virtue in his jurisdiction, when all villagers emulated him, how could the community fail to be well-governed?

Examining the township chief's governance method reveals its essence lies in unifying behavioral standards across his jurisdiction. Once the township was properly ordered, he would then lead his people in emulating the feudal lord. All subjects took their ruler's judgments as standards, adopting his virtuous speech and conduct. As the feudal lord embodied the state's highest wisdom, when the entire kingdom followed his example, the nation naturally achieved good governance.

Ultimately, the feudal lords led their people in emulating the Son of Heaven (the emperor). Being the most benevolent person under heaven, when all people followed the emperor's example—approving what he approved and condemning what he condemned, discarding improper speech for his virtuous words, and correcting misguided actions to match his exemplary conduct—this hierarchical emulation from village to township to kingdom to empire naturally brought universal peace.

天下者何故之以也曰唯以其能一同天下 之義是以天下治夫既尚同乎天子而未尚 同乎天者則天菑將猶未止也故當若天降 寒熱不節雪霜雨露不時五穀不熟六畜不 遂疾菑戾疫飄風苦雨荐臻而至者此天之 降罰也將以罰下人之不尚同乎天者也故 古者聖王明天鬼之所欲而避天鬼之所憎 以求興天下之利除天下之害是以率天下 之萬民齋戒沐浴潔爲酒醴粢盛以祭祀天 鬼其事鬼神也酒醴粢盛不敢不蠲潔犧牲 不敢不腯肥珪璧幣帛不敢不中度量春秋 祭祀不敢失時幾聽獄不敢不中分財不敢 不均居處不敢怠慢曰其爲正長若此是故 出誅勝者何故之以也曰唯以尚同爲政者 也故古者聖王之爲政若此今天下之人曰 方今之時天鬼之福可得也萬民之所便利 而能彊從事焉則萬民之親可得也其爲政 若此是以謀事舉事成入守固上者天鬼有 厚乎其爲政長也下者萬民有便利乎其爲 政長也天鬼之所深厚而彊從事焉則天下 之正長猶未廢乎天下也而天下之所以亂 者何故之以也子墨子曰方今之時之以正 長則本與古者異矣譬之若有量之以五刑 然昔者聖王制爲五刑以治天下逮至有苗 之制五刑以亂天下則此豈刑不善哉用刑 則不善也是以先王之書以刑之道曰苗民
Interpretation

This passage from Mozi discusses the fundamental principles for governing the world. The core idea is that the key to achieving order in the world lies in unifying moral standards across the land ("Shangtong," or "Elevating Unity"). If people merely submit to the Son of Heaven (the ruler) but fail to follow the Dao of Heaven, natural disasters will not cease. When anomalies such as abnormal weather, crop failures, or epidemics occur, these are all punishments from Heaven for humanity's failure to abide by its Dao.

The ancient sage-kings understood the preferences of the celestial spirits (tian gui, or "heavenly ghosts") and conducted sacrificial rites to seek blessings and avert calamities. They led the people in fasting and purification, preparing clean wine, food, livestock, and jade and silk offerings to honor the spirits. They adjudicated legal cases with impartiality, distributed resources equitably, and never slackened in their daily governance. Their success in subduing injustice was precisely because they adhered to the governing principle of "Shangtong."

Nowadays, people believe that merely working hard will earn them blessings from the spirits and the support of the populace. Governing in this way makes planning affairs easier to succeed and defenses more secure. Above, they receive the favor of the spirits; below, they benefit the common people. Yet why does disorder still prevail in the world? Mozi points out that the standards for appointing officials today differ from those of antiquity. It is like the establishment of penal laws: the ancient sage-kings used the Five Punishments to govern the world, yet the Sanmiao (an ancient tribe) also employed the Five Punishments and brought chaos to the land. The problem does not lie in the laws themselves but in how they are applied. This principle is recorded in the Lü Xing, the legal classic of the ancient kings.

否用練折則刑唯作五殺之刑曰法則此言 善用刑者以治民不善用刑者以爲五殺則 此豈刑不善哉用刑則不善故遂以爲五殺 是以先王之書術令之道曰惟口出好興戎 則此言善用口者出好不善用口者以爲讒 賊㓂戎則此豈口不善哉用口則不善也故 遂以爲讒賊㓂戎故古者之置正長也將以 治民也譬之若絲縷之有紀而罔罟之有綱 也將以運役天下淫暴而一同其義也是以 先王之書相年之道曰夫建國設都乃作后 王君公否用泰也輕大夫師長否用佚也維 辯使治天均則此語古者上帝鬼神之建設 國都立正長也非高其爵厚其禄富貴佚而 錯之也將以爲萬民興利除害富貴貧寡安 危治亂也故古者聖王之爲若此今王公大 人之爲刑政則文此政以爲便譬宗於父兄 故舊以爲左右置以爲正長民知上置正長 之非正以治民也是以皆比周隱匿而莫肯 尚同其上是故上下不同義若苟上下不同 義賞譽不足以勸善而刑罰不足以沮暴何 以知其然也曰上唯毋立而爲政乎國家爲 民正長曰人可賞吾將賞之若苟上下不同 義上之所賞則衆之所非曰人衆與處於衆 得非則是雖使得上之賞未足以勸乎上唯 毋立而爲政乎國家爲民正長曰人可罰吾 將罰之若苟上下不同義上之所罰則衆之
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the proper use of punishments and speech, as well as the discrepancy between the original intent behind establishing official positions and their actual implementation in practice.

Regarding the application of punishments: Those skilled in employing penalties can effectively govern the people, while those unskilled will abuse the five capital punishments (wusha). The fault lies not with the punishments themselves, but with their improper application. Just as the mouth can speak words of wisdom or sow discord, the issue isn't with the mouth itself but with how it's used.

The original purpose of establishing officials in ancient times: Like how weaving requires warp threads and fishing nets need headropes, officials were instituted to govern the people, eliminate violence and disorder, and unify moral standards. The classics of former kings record that establishing states, designating capitals, and enfeoffing lords weren't meant to provide them with high positions, generous salaries, wealth, or leisure, but to benefit the people by removing harms, balancing wealth disparity, and stabilizing chaotic situations.

Current problems in practice: When contemporary rulers and high ministers administer governance, they appoint relatives and treat official positions as private tools for gain. When the people realize these officials aren't genuinely committed to governance, they begin covering for each other and refuse to unite in purpose with their superiors. When superiors and subordinates lack shared purpose, rewards fail to encourage good conduct, and punishments cannot curb violence.

Illustrative example: If standards differ between upper and lower levels—when those the superiors wish to reward are viewed by the masses as deserving criticism, or those marked for punishment are considered blameless by the people—then even when superiors bestow rewards, they cannot genuinely motivate good behavior, and imposed punishments won't effectively stop wrongdoing.

所譽曰人衆與處於衆得譽則是雖使得上 之罰未足以沮乎若立而爲政乎國家爲民 正長賞譽不足以勸善而刑罰不可以沮暴 則是不與鄕吾本言民始生未有正長之時 同乎若有正長與無正長之時同則此非所 以治民一衆之道故古者聖王唯而以尚同 以爲正長是上下情請爲通上有隱事遺利 下得而利之下有蓄怨積害上得而除之是 以數千萬里之外有爲善者其室人未徧知 鄕里未徧聞天子得而賞之數千萬里之外 有爲不善者其室人未徧知鄉里未徧聞天 子得而罰之是以舉天下之人皆恐懼振動 惕慄不敢爲淫暴曰天下之視聽也神先王 之言曰非神也夫唯能使人之耳曰助已視 聽使人之吻助已言談使人之心助己思慮 使人之股肱助已動作助之視聽者衆則其 所聞見者遠矣助之言談者衆則其德音之 所撫循者博矣助之思慮者衆則其談謀度 速得矣助之動作者衆即舉其事速成矣故 古者聖人之所以濟事成功垂名於後世者 無他故異物焉曰唯能以尚同爲政者也是 以先王之書周頌之道之曰載來見彼王 求厥章則此語古者國君諸侯之以春秋來 朝聘天子之廷受天子之嚴教退而治國政 之所加莫敢不賓當此之時本無有敢紛天 子之教者詩曰我馬維駱六轡沃若載馳載
Interpretation

This passage comes from the "Shangtong" (Elevating Unity) chapter of Mozi, discussing the importance of establishing a unified social order. Mozi argues that if a ruler's system of rewards and punishments fails to encourage virtue and deter violence, it would be no different from the chaotic state of ancient times when there were no leaders.

The wise kings of antiquity employed the method of "Shangtong" (unifying thought and standards) to establish a system of officials, ensuring smooth communication between superiors and subordinates. When good policies were overlooked above, those below could help refine them; when grievances accumulated below, those above could promptly address them. Thus, even if someone thousands of miles away performed a good deed before their family and neighbors knew of it, the Son of Heaven could already reward them. Similarly, if someone thousands of miles away committed a crime, the Son of Heaven could immediately punish them. As a result, all under heaven were filled with reverence and caution, daring not to act recklessly.

The ancient kings said: "This is no mystical power, but rather the skill of borrowing the eyes and ears of the people to observe, their mouths to communicate, their wisdom to deliberate, and their strength to act." By borrowing many eyes and ears, one's understanding becomes broad; by borrowing many voices, virtuous governance spreads far; by borrowing many minds, decisions are made swiftly and accurately; by borrowing many hands, undertakings are swiftly accomplished.

Thus, the sages of antiquity were able to achieve great deeds and leave their names for posterity—not through any secret, but by understanding how to govern according to the principle of "Shangtong." The Book of Songs: Hymns of Zhou records how the feudal lords came seasonally to pay homage to the Son of Heaven, received stern instruction, and returned to govern their lands, none daring to defy the imperial decrees. In those times, no one dared to disrupt the Son of Heaven's teachings—just as the poem describes fine horses with gleaming reins swiftly carrying envoys to deliver the ruler's commands.

驅周爰咨度又曰我馬維騏六轡若絲載馳 載驅周爰咨謀即此語也古者國君諸侯之 聞見善與不善也皆馳驅以告天子是以賞 當賢罰當暴不殺不辜不失有罪則此尚同 之功也是故子墨子曰今天下之王公大人 士君子請將欲富其國家衆其人民治其刑 政定其社稷當若尚同之不可不察此之本 也    尚同下第十三 子墨子言曰知者之事必計國家百姓所以 治者而爲之必計國家百姓之所以亂者而 辟之然計國家百姓之所以治者何也上之 爲政得下之情則治不得下之情則亂何以 知其然也上之爲政得下之情則是明民於 善非也苟若明於民之善非也則得善人而 賞之得暴人而罰之也善人賞而暴人罰則 國必治上之爲政也不得下之情則是不明 於民之善非也若苟不明於民之善非則是 不得善人而賞之不得暴人而罰之善人不 賞而暴人不罰爲政若此國衆必亂故賞不 得下之情而不可不察者也然計得下之情 將奈何可故子墨子曰唯能以尚同一義爲 政然後可矣何以知尚同一義之可而爲政 於天下也然胡不審稽古之治爲政之說乎 古者天之始生民未有正長也百姓爲人若 苟百姓爲人是一人一義十人十義百人百 義千人千義逮至人之衆不可勝計也則其
Interpretation

This passage comes from the "Shangtong" (Elevating Unity) chapter of Mozi, primarily expounding on the importance of communication between rulers and the populace. Mozi believed that the key to a state's order or chaos lies in whether the ruler can understand the true conditions among the people.

The original text mentions that in ancient times, feudal lords would swiftly report both virtuous and wicked deeds to the Son of Heaven via fast horses. Only in this way could rewards reach the worthy and punishments fall upon the violent. Mozi states that if modern rulers and high officials wish for their states to prosper, their populations to flourish, and governance to be clear, they must uphold this principle of "Shangtong" (elevating unity through communication between superiors and subordinates).

Mozi further analyzes: A wise ruler must consider the reasons for good governance and chaos among the people. If the ruler understands the conditions below, they can distinguish good from evil, reward virtue and punish vice, ensuring great order in the state. Conversely, if they remain ignorant of the people's circumstances, unable to differentiate good from evil or administer fair rewards and punishments, the state will inevitably descend into chaos.

Tracing history, he explains that in ancient times, when there were no rulers, each person held their own standards of right and wrong, leading to endless disputes. Mozi proposes that the only solution is to implement the governing principle of "Shangtong yiyi" (elevating unity through a single standard of righteousness). By examining the governance of ancient sage-kings, he concludes that only by applying a unified standard can the world be properly governed.

所謂義者亦不可勝計此皆是其義而非人 之義是以厚者有闘而蕩者有争是故天下 之欲同一天下之義也是故選擇賢者立爲 天子天子以其知力爲未足獨治天下是以 選擇其次立爲三公三公又以其知力爲未 足獨左右天子也是以分國建諸侯諸侯又 以其知力爲未足獨治其四境之内也是以 選擇其次立爲卿之宰卿之宰又以其知力 爲未足獨左右其君也是以選擇其次立而 爲鄕長家君是故古者天子之立三公諸侯 卿之宰鄕長家君非特富貴游佚而擇之也 將使助治亂刑政也故古者建國設都乃立 后王君公奉以卿士師長此非欲用說也唯 辯而使助治天助明也今此何爲人上而不 能治其下爲人下而不能事其上則是上下 相賤也何故以然則義不同也若苟義不同 者有黨上以若人爲善將毁之若人唯使得 上之賞而辟百姓之毁是以爲善者必未可 使勸見有賞也上以若人爲暴將罰之若人 唯使得上之罰而懷百姓之譽是以爲暴者 必未可使沮見有罰也故計上之賞譽不足 以勸善計其毁罰不足以沮暴此何故以然 則欲同一天下之義將奈何可故子墨子言 曰然胡不賞使家君試用家君發憲布令其 家曰若見愛利家者必以告若見惡賊家者 亦必以告若見愛利家以告亦猶愛利家者
Interpretation

This passage discusses the concept of "righteousness" (yi). Mozi observes that everyone holds different understandings of righteousness, with each person believing their own view is correct while others' are wrong. This leads to the strong contending against each other and the weak scrambling for advantage. Thus, all people under heaven desire a unified standard of righteousness.

In ancient times, positions such as the Son of Heaven, the Three Dukes (highest officials), feudal lords, ministers, village elders, and family heads were established not for these individuals to enjoy wealth and comfort, but to assist in governing the state. From the Son of Heaven down to family heads, each level requires the assistance of the level below due to their limited capacity to govern alone.

The current problem lies in superiors being unable to govern their subordinates and subordinates refusing to obey their superiors, with mutual disrespect between them. Why does this occur? It stems precisely from differing understandings of righteousness. When principles are not unified, situations arise where superiors may reward someone they consider virtuous while the common people slander that same person, or punish someone they deem wicked while the people praise them. In such cases, rewards fail to encourage good conduct, nor can punishments deter wrongdoing.

Mozi finally proposes a solution: Why not begin experimentation at the family level? Let family heads issue commands within their households: whoever sees someone benefiting the family should report it, and whoever observes someone harming the family should likewise report it. In this way, people who truly care for their families can be cultivated.

也上得且賞之衆聞則譽之若見惡賊家不 以告亦猶惡賊家者也上得且罰之衆聞則 非之是以禍若家之人皆欲得其長上之賞 譽辟其毁罰是以善言之家君得善人而賞 之得暴人而罰之善人之賞而暴人之罰則 家必治矣然計若家之所以治者何也唯以 尚同一義爲政故也家既已治國之道盡此 已邪則未也天下爲家數也甚多此皆是其 家而非人之家是以厚者有亂而薄者有争 故又使家君總其家之以尚同於國君國君 亦爲發憲布令於國之衆曰若見愛利國者 必以告若見惡賊國者亦必以告若見愛利 國以告者亦猶愛利國者也上得且賞之衆 聞則譽之若見惡賊國不以告者亦猶惡賊 國者也上得且罰之衆聞則非之是以禍若 國之人皆欲得其長上之賞譽避其毁罰是 以民見善者言之見不善者言之國君得善 人而賞之得暴人而罰之善人賞而暴人罰 則國必治矣然計若國之所以治者何也唯 能以尚同一義爲政故也國既已治矣天下 之道盡此已邪則未也天下之爲國數也甚 多此皆是國而非人之國是以厚者有戰而 薄者有争故又使國君選其國之義以義尚 同於天子天子亦爲發憲布令於天下之衆 曰若見愛利天下者必以告若見惡賊天下 者亦以告若見愛利天下以告者亦猶愛利
Interpretation

This passage expounds on Mozi's political doctrine of "Shangtong" (advocating unity). The main ideas are as follows:

Within a family, reporting good deeds and virtuous individuals leads to rewards and praise, while concealing bad deeds and wrongdoings results in punishment. Thus, all family members naturally strive for rewards and avoid penalties by actively reporting both good and bad conduct. The head of household can then reward virtue and punish vice, ensuring proper family governance. The effectiveness of this system lies in implementing the "Shangtong" principle.

However, well-governed families alone are insufficient, as the world consists of numerous households. If each family prioritizes its own interests while rejecting others, chaos and conflict arise. Therefore, family heads must lead their households in submitting to the ruler of the state. The ruler should likewise issue decrees requiring citizens to report both patriots and traitors, applying the same principle of rewarding good and punishing evil to achieve national governance. A well-ordered state also results from practicing "Shangtong."

Yet even well-governed states are inadequate, as the world contains many nations. If each country prioritizes itself while negating others, wars and conflicts emerge. Thus, rulers must lead their nations in submitting to the Son of Heaven (the universal monarch). The Son of Heaven should then command all people to report those who benefit or harm the world, thereby establishing universal peace.

The passage progresses systematically from family to state to the entire world, demonstrating that only through the "Shangtong" principle—establishing unified values and a reward-punishment system from top to bottom—can proper social governance be achieved.

天下者也上得則賞之衆聞則譽之若見惡 賊天下不以告者亦猶惡賊天下者也上得 且罰之衆聞則非之是以禍天下之人皆欲 得其長上之賞譽避其毁罰是以見善不善 者告之天子得善人而賞之得暴人而罰之 善人賞而暴人罰之天下必治矣然計天下 之所以治者何也唯而以尚同一義爲政故 也天下既已治天子又總天下之義以尚同 於天故當尚同之爲說也尚同之天子可以 治天下矣中用之諸侯可而治其國矣小用 之家君可用而治其家矣是故大用之治天 下不窕小用之治一國一家而不橫者若道 之謂也故曰治天下之國若治一家使天下 之民若使一夫意獨子墨子有此而先王無 此其有邪則亦然也聖王皆以尚同爲政故 天下治何以知其然也於先王之書也大誓 之言然曰小人見姦巧乃聞不言也發罪鈞 此言見淫辟不以告者其罪亦猶淫辟者也 故古之聖王治天下也其所差論以自左右 羽翼者皆良外爲之人助之視聽者衆故與 人謀事先人得之與人舉事先人成之先之 譽令問先人發之唯信身而從事故利若此 古者有語焉曰一目視也不若二目之視也 一耳之聽也不若二耳之聽也一手之操也 不若二手彊也夫唯能信身而從事故利若 此是故古之聖王之治天下也千里之外有
Interpretation

This passage discusses Mozi's political philosophy of "Shangtong" (unifying thought). The general meaning is as follows:

To govern the world, a clear system of rewards and punishments must be established. When good deeds are observed, they should be reported for commendation; when evil acts are witnessed, they should be reported for punishment. Thus, all people under heaven will naturally seek rewards and avoid penalties, actively reporting both good and evil. Through this mechanism, the Son of Heaven can distinguish virtue from vice, rewarding the good and punishing the wicked, thereby naturally bringing peace to the world.

The key to effective governance lies in implementing the "Shangtong yiyi" (unified principles) approach to statecraft. The Son of Heaven applies this principle to govern the realm, feudal lords use it to administer their states, and family heads employ it to manage households—it applies equally to all scales of governance. Therefore, governing the world is like managing a single household, and leading the multitudes is like directing one individual.

The ancient sage-kings all relied on "Shangtong" to govern. They selected worthy and capable individuals as advisors, enlisting the masses to assist in observation and information gathering. Thus they could plan affairs ahead of others and accomplish tasks before others succeeded. Just as one eye sees less clearly than two, one ear hears less distinctly than two, and one hand has less strength than two, the sage-kings excelled at harnessing collective strength, thereby effectively governing territories thousands of miles away.

The text quotes the "Great Declaration": "When petty men witness wickedness yet fail to report it, their crime equals that of the evildoers." This shows that when ancient sage-kings governed the world, they surrounded themselves with virtuous individuals whose collective observation and reporting enabled foresight and great achievements.

賢人焉其鄕里之人皆未之均聞見也聖王 得而賞之千里之内有暴人焉其鄉里未之 均見也聖王得而罰之故唯毋以聖王爲聰 耳明目與豈能一視而通見千里之外哉一 聽而通聞千里之外哉聖王不徃而視也不 就而聽也然而使天下之爲㓂亂盗賊者周 流天下無所重足者何也其以尚同爲政善 也是故子墨子曰凡使民尚同者愛民不疾 民無可使曰必疾愛而使之致信而持之富 貴以道其前明罰以率其後爲政若此唯欲 毋與我同將不可得也是以子墨子曰今天 下王公大人士君子中情將欲爲仁義求爲 士上欲中聖之道下欲中國家百姓之利故 當上同之說而不察尚同爲政之本而治要 也 墨子卷
Interpretation

A virtuous man in his hometown may not be equally recognized by all his fellow villagers for his moral character, yet a sage ruler can discern and reward him. A tyrant a thousand miles away may not be equally perceived by local people for his wickedness, yet a sage ruler can detect and punish him. Does this mean the sage king truly possesses clairvoyance and clairaudience, able to see through affairs a thousand miles away or hear distant movements at once? In truth, the sage king need not personally inspect or closely listen, yet can make rebellious bandits across the realm flee with no place to hide. Why is this? It is because he implements the governing principle of "Shangtong" (upward conformity/unified standards of thought).

Thus Mozi said: When rulers demand unified thought among the people, if they do not genuinely care for them, the people will not obey. Only through profound love for the people can one effectively lead them—maintaining the bond with sincerity, guiding with the path of prosperity ahead, and urging with clear punishments behind. Governed this way, even if you tried not to make the people share the ruler's heart and virtue, it would be difficult. Therefore Mozi concluded: If the nobles and gentlemen of today truly wish to practice benevolence and righteousness, becoming worthy scholars—aligning above with the Dao of sage kings and below with the interests of state and people—they must adopt the principle of "upward conformity," understanding that "Shangtong" is the fundamental essence of governance.

(Background note: Mozi advocated the "Shangtong" doctrine, believing society requires unified value standards and a hierarchy of obedience ultimately converging with the "Will of Heaven." This reflects the Mohist emphasis on social organization and collectivism.)

之三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5f0010); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →