中文 · EN

《弘道錄》Vol. 20

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Xu Daozang 續道藏 Vol. 20 / 41 6,665 characters

About this page. The original text of 《弘道錄》 Vol. 20 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 41 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 14 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《弘道錄》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

弘道録卷之二十七将四  義   朋友之義 東萊先生吕祖謙夷簡六世孫也本之家庭 有中原文獻之傳長益從林之奇汪應辰胡 憲游既又友張栻朱熹講索益精嘗讀陸九 淵文喜之而未識其人適主禮部試偶得一 卷曰此必江西小陸之文也揭示果然人皆 服其精鑑先是書肆有書曰聖宋文海學士 周必大言其去取差謬恐難傳後盍委館職 銓檡以成一代之書孝宗以命祖謙遂斷自 中興以前崇雅黜浮類爲百五十卷上之賜 名皇朝文鑑蓋其學以關洛爲宗而旁稽載 籍不見涯涘心平氣和不立厓異一時英偉 草犖之士皆歸心焉自少卞急一日誦論語 躬自厚而薄責於人忽覺乎時忿懥之心涣 然氷釋故晦翁嘗言學如伯恭方是能變化 氣質其所講畫將以開物成務既卧病而任 重道遠之意不衰居家之政皆可爲後世法 晚年會友之地曰麗澤書院在金華城中既 殁郡人即而祠之  録曰愚觀濂洛關閩之學各有攸起吾浙  自宋南渡後吕成公得中原文獻之傳倡  於其始而後何玉金許諸儒輩出奮於其  間以至 本朝青田劉基浦江宋濂麗水  葉琛龍泉章溢 太祖嘗稱四先生而不名彬彬乎郁郁乎而  婺實吕公倡道之邦不可以不著也録之 西山先生蔡元定生而頴悟父發授以程氏
Interpretation

Lü Zuqian (zi Bogong, hao Donglai Xiansheng) was a sixth-generation descendant of Lü Yijian. He inherited his family's scholarly tradition and was well versed in the classics and culture of the Central Plains. As he grew up, he studied under Lin Zhiqi, Wang Yingchen, and Hu Xian in turn, and he exchanged ideas with Zhang Shi and Zhu Xi, so that his learning grew steadily deeper.

Lü Zuqian once read an essay by Lu Jiuyuan and admired it, though he did not yet know its author. Later, while presiding over the examinations of the Ministry of Rites, he happened upon one examination paper and said, "This must have been written by the Little Lu of Jiangxi." When the papers were publicly released, it turned out to be exactly so. People admired his discernment in judging writing.

Earlier, a bookshop had published a work called Shengsong Wenhai (Sea of Literature of the Sacred Song). Scholar Zhou Bida judged that its selection of texts was improper and feared it would not be passed down, so he proposed that officials of the imperial libraries compile a new anthology that would represent the present age. Emperor Xiaozong then ordered Lü Zuqian to take charge of the task. Lü selected from writings produced before the restoration of the Southern Song, favoring works of elegance and rejecting ornate and superficial ones, and compiled a collection of one hundred and fifty juan, which he presented to the emperor. The emperor bestowed on it the title Huangchao Wenjian (Mirror of Literature of the Imperial Dynasty).

Lü Zuqian's scholarship was rooted in the Guan school and the Luo school, and he also searched widely through many books, so his learning was broad and profound. He was gentle in temperament and did not deliberately seek to be original, so many outstanding and talented scholars of his time respected him and gathered around him. In his youth, however, he was quick-tempered. One day, while reading the Lunyu (Analects), he came to the line "gong zi hou er bo ze yu ren" (one should reproach oneself heavily and reproach others lightly), and he suddenly understood it, and his anger dissolved at once. For this reason, Zhu Xi once remarked that only a scholar like Bogong, who studied in this way, could truly transform a person's temperament.

The teachings Lü Zuqian expounded and planned aimed to enlighten understanding and accomplish affairs. Even after he later fell ill and was bedridden, he did not forget his heavy responsibilities or his duty to advance the Great Dao (dao). The way he managed his household was also enough to serve as a model for later generations. In his later years, the place where he gathered with friends to lecture was called Liize Shuyuan (Academy of Liize), located within the city of Jinhua. After his death, the people of the prefecture set up a shrine near the academy in his memory and offered sacrifices there.

The compiler of the Honghao Lu (Record of Broadening the Dao) comments: In my view, the Lian school, the Luo school, the Guan school, and the Min school each had their own origins. After the Song court moved south, Lü Chenggong (Lü Zuqian) in the Zhejiang region carried on the scholarly tradition of the Central Plains and was the first to advocate lecturing and teaching. After him, scholars such as He Ji, Wang Bai, Jin Lüxiang, and Xu Qian emerged one after another and worked in this region to promote learning. In our dynasty, there followed Liu Ji of Qingtian, Song Lian of Pujiang, Ye Chen of Lishui, and Zhang Yi of Longquan. The Taizu emperor called them the "Four Masters," referring to them only as "Master" and never by their personal names. Here Confucian learning flourished and talented men arose in great numbers, and Wuzhou (the area of present-day Jinhua, Zhejiang) was indeed the place where Master Lü promoted the Way, so it could not go unrecorded.

Master Xishan, Cai Yuanding, was intelligent and quick of understanding from birth. His father, Cai Fa, transmitted to him the teachings of the Cheng family.

語録並經世正蒙諸書曰此孔孟正脉也遂 深涵其義既長辯折益精登西山絶頂啖虀 讀書聞朱熹名徃師之熹扣其學大驚曰此 吾老友不當在弟子列遂與對榻講論諸經 奥義俾四方來學者先從質正焉時韓□胃 設僞學之禁以空善類臺諫承風排擊沈繼 祖劉三傑連䟽詆熹併及元定謫道州聞命 不辭求即徃就道熹與從游者餞别蕭寺中 坐客興嘆有泣下者熹㣲視元定不異平時 因喟然曰友朋相愛之情季通不挫之志可 謂兩得矣衆謂宜緩行元定曰獲罪於天天 可迯乎杖屨同其子沈行三千里脚爲流血 無幾㣲見言面至春陵遠近來學日衆士子 莫不樞趨聼講有名士雖挾才簡傲亦瑞服 謁拜執禮甚恭於書無所不讀於事無所不 究義理洞見本原下至圖書禮樂制度無不 精妙古書奇辭奥義人所不能曉者一過目 輙觧喜釋四書及爲易經傳通鑑綱目皆與 徃復參訂啓蒙一書則屬之起藁曰造化㣲 妙惟深於理者能識之及喪以文誄之曰精 詣之識卓絶之才不可屈之志不可窮之辯 不可復得而見矣  録曰孟子曰以德服人者中心悅而誠服  也如七十子之服孔子也是故陳蔡不能  移匡人不能奪叔孫武叔不能毁司馬桓  魋不能害而况一時之浮議諸人之私論  哉雖然竊以比之今時大不同也何也宋
Interpretation

He read widely, including the Recorded Sayings (Yulu), the Jingshi (Ordering the World), and the Zhengmeng (Correcting Youthful Ignorance), and he regarded these works as the orthodox transmission of the teachings of Confucius and Mencius. He therefore studied their principles in depth. As he grew older, his skill in analysis became increasingly refined, and he climbed to the summit of Western Mountain, where he read while eating pickled vegetables.

After hearing of Zhu Xi's reputation, he went to study under him. Zhu Xi examined his learning and was greatly astonished, saying, "This is an old friend of mine, and he should not be counted among my disciples." The two then sat together on the same couch, discussing the profound principles of the various classics, and scholars who came from every direction were first questioned and corrected by him.

At that time, Han [missing character] Zhou (the character is missing in the original text; it is usually understood to be Han Tuozhou) issued a ban on "false learning" (weixue), using it as a pretext to exclude virtuous scholars. The Censorate and the remonstrating officials seized the opportunity to attack Zhu Xi. Shen Jizu and Liu Sanjie submitted memorials one after another to slander Zhu Xi, and the charges also implicated Yuanding, who was consequently banished to Daozhou. When he received the order, he did not refuse but asked to set out at once. Zhu Xi and fellow students who had traveled with him held a farewell banquet for him at a monastery. Some of those present sighed, and some even wept. Zhu Xi looked at Yuanding, whose expression was no different from usual, and then remarked, "The affection between friends who love one another, and the unyielding resolve of Jitong (Yuanding's courtesy name), may both be called complete."

Everyone said he should travel slowly, but Yuanding replied, "Having offended Heaven, how could I escape it?" He set out with a staff and straw sandals, taking his son Shen with him on a journey of three thousand li. Along the way his feet bled. Before long he arrived at Chunling. Students from near and far came to study with him in ever greater numbers, and scholars competed to attend his lectures. Even famous scholars, who ordinarily held themselves proud and disdainful of their talent, came to pay their respects to him with deep reverence and conducted themselves with great courtesy.

He studied everything he read and examined every matter thoroughly, and he could see clearly to the root of principles. From the River Chart and the Luo Writing, down to ritual and music institutions, he investigated all of them with depth and clarity. Peculiar and obscure phrases and profound principles in ancient texts that others could not understand, he grasped after a single reading.

He enjoyed annotating the Four Books, and he also took part in compiling the Commentary on the Book of Changes and the Outline and Digest of the Comprehensive Mirror, repeatedly discussing and revising them with Zhu Xi. The Qimeng (Elementary Learning of the Book of Changes) was entrusted to him for drafting. Zhu Xi said, "The subtle workings of Heaven and Earth's transformations can be recognized only by one who thoroughly understands principle."

After his death, Zhu Xi wrote a eulogy for him, praising him: "His profound and penetrating insight, his outstanding talent, his unyielding resolve, and his inexhaustible eloquence—these can never be seen again."

The Hongdao lu (Record of Broadening the Way) comments:

Mencius said, "When one wins people over through virtue, they will be pleased in their hearts and submit sincerely. The seventy disciples of Confucius submitted to him in exactly this way." Therefore, the hardship of Chen and Cai could not make Confucius change his aims, the people of Kuang could not take away his resolve, Shu-sun Wu-shu could not slander him, and Sima Huan could not harm him. How much more so, then, for a temporary rumor or the private gossip of certain people?

Yet if we privately compare this matter with the present day, the circumstances are already very different. Why? Because the Song...

 季人心尚在士風尤存其排抵承望者有  限也是以士子尚知摳衣趨席心服謁拜  今之人心澆極士氣薄甚其揶榆非笑者  無窮也尚安徃而非困境涸轍可憎可畏  之途哉觀者又當辯矣 陳同父亮才氣超邁議論風尤存丈皆一時 豪俊志存經濟隆興初上中下五論不報退 居永康力學著書淳熙中詣開極言時事孝 宗赫然震動欲牓朝堂以勵群臣用神放故 事召令上殿將擢用之曾覿聞而欲見焉亮 咀之踰垣而避覿不悅大臣亦惡其直交沮 之亮笑曰吾欲爲社稷開數百年之基寧用 以愽一官乎復渡江而歸所學益愽自孟子 後惟推王通氏嘗自謂曰研窮義理之精㣲 辯析古今之同異原心於抄忽較體於分寸 以積累爲工以涵養爲正睟面盎背則於諸 儒誠有愧焉至於堂堂之陣正正之旗風雨 雲雷交發而並至龍蛇虎豹變現而出没推 倒一世之智勇開拓萬古之胸襟自謂差有 一日之長盖指朱熹吕祖謙也  録曰愚觀天下之理勢枉不極則伸不大  宋自光寧以來議切道學幾於無所容矣  以爲正心誠意之學上所厭聞而戒謹恐  懼之說祗爲欺世若陳賈林栗京鏜胡統  沈繼祖劉三傑何澹劉德秀之徒駕言醜  抵攘臂肆志至投竄迫逐殆無虗日吾道  至此可謂枉之極矣然豈知堂堂之陣正
Interpretation

In the declining age, people's hearts had not yet been fully lost, and the customs of the scholar class still survived. Those who excluded and slandered others or flattered the powerful were few. Scholars therefore still knew to straighten their robes and step forward, to sit with respect, and to call on others with sincerity. Now human hearts have grown shallow to the utmost, the spirit of the scholars is very low, and those who mock and ridicule others are countless. Under such conditions, how could one avoid falling into distress, like a fish in a cart rut with no way out, a situation that is hateful and frightening? Those who see this should also distinguish it clearly.

Chen Tongfu (Chen Liang, zi Tongfu, a thinker of the Southern Song) had outstanding talent, sweeping debate, and the bearing of a hero of his age. He cherished the aspiration to order the world and relieve the people. In the early Longxing (Longxing) years, he submitted three memorials to the court, superior, middle, and lower. Receiving no reply, he retired to Yongkang, where he studied diligently and wrote books. In the Chunxi (Chunxi) period, he went to court to present his views and vigorously described current affairs. Emperor Xiaozong was deeply stirred on hearing them and wished to post his memorials in the court hall to encourage the officials. Following precedent, the emperor also summoned him to audience, intending to promote and employ him.

Zeng Di (a powerful minister of the Southern Song) heard of this and wished to meet Chen Liang, but Chen Liang climbed over a wall to avoid him. Zeng Di was displeased, and the ministers, disliking Chen's uprightness, joined forces to obstruct him. Chen Liang laughed and said, "I wish to lay a foundation for the state that will last several hundred years. Should I trade that for an official post?" He then crossed the river again and returned home, and his learning grew broader still.

After Mencius, Chen most esteemed Wang Tong. He said, "In probing the subtleties of principle, I distinguish the similarities and differences of past and present. In searching the human heart, I attend to its finest points, and in weighing things, I am exact to the smallest measure. I take accumulation as my method of work and the nourishing of body and mind as my root. As for mild, gentle, and virtuous fullness showing in the face and on the back, I truly cannot match the Confucian masters. But as for commanding the majestic formation, arranging the upright banners, letting the attacks of wind, rain, cloud, and thunder arise together, and letting the changes of dragon, snake, tiger, and leopard appear and vanish unpredictably, overwhelming the wisdom and courage of the age and opening the breadth of mind for ten thousand ages, I consider myself slightly superior." The masters he had in mind were Zhu Xi and Lü Zuqian.

The author of the Hongdao Lu (Record of Broadening the Way) comments: I observe that the affairs of the world and the trends of the times extend only after they have been bent to the utmost. From the reigns of Guangzong and Ningzong onward in the Southern Song, discussion of Daoxue (learning of the Way) came close to leaving it no place to exist. Some held that the learning of zhengxin chengyi (rectifying the heart and making the will sincere) was what the emperor tired of hearing, and that the admonitions to caution and reverent fear were merely deceiving the world. Men such as Chen Jia, Lin Li, Jing Tang, Hu Tong, Shen Jizu, Liu Sanjie, He Dan, and Liu Dexiu, under the name of debate, vilified Daoxue, rolled up their sleeves, and attacked without restraint. They even repeatedly exiled and banished Daoxue scholars, and hardly a day passed without such action. Our Daotong (transmission of the Way) has suffered persecution of this kind to an extreme. Yet how could they know that the tangtang zhi zhen (majestic formation) and the zhengzheng zhi qi (upright banners)...

 正之旗掲然特立不旋踵間理宗者出崇  尚道學旌奬儒風不獨周程張朱之表揚  而且蔡吕諸賢之作氣然後知雲雷交發  而日月倍明蛇虎爲妖而鳳麟益顯眞有  以推倒二世之狂軌開拓萬古之人心如  同父者豈但一日之長而已哉 元史草廬先生吴澄自幼頴悟及長知用力 聖賢之學著孝經章句校定易書詩春秋儀 禮及大小戴記時詔求賢御史程鉅夫舉至 京師請置所著書於國子監以資學者行省 □元明善文學自負嘗問澄易詩書春秋奧 義嘆曰與先生言如探淵海遂執子弟禮終 眞身左丞董士選延之於家親執饋食亦曰 先生天下士也至大元年召爲監丞先是許 文正爲祭酒始以朱子小學等書授弟子久 之漸失其舊澄至命諸生以次受業晨起燃 燭堂王日昃退燕居之至執經問難者接踵 而至各因其材質反覆訓誘之直至夜分雖 寒暑不易爲教法四條一經學二行實三文 藝四治事爲人身若不勝衣正坐拱手氣融 神邁答問亹亹使人涣然氷釋嘗著說曰道 之大原出於天神聖繼之堯舜而上道之元 也以下其亨也朱泗鄒魯其利也濓洛關閩 其貞也分而言之上古則羲黃其元堯舜其 亨禹湯其利文武周公其貞乎中古之統仲 尼其元顔曾其亨子思其利孟子其貞乎近 古之統周子其元程張其亨朱子其利孰爲
Interpretation

Lizong, having firmly raised the banner for rectifying the Way of the age, soon began to honor the Learning of the Way (Daoxue) and to commend the Confucian spirit. The men he praised were not limited to Zhou Dunyi, Cheng Hao, Cheng Yi, Zhang Zai, and Zhu Xi, but also included worthy scholars such as the Masters Cai and Lü. From then on the atmosphere revived, like clouds and thunder rising together or the sun and moon growing brighter. The more wicked men were exposed, the more precious became talents like the phoenix and the qilin. Lizong indeed powerfully reversed the reckless course of the "Second Generation" and opened the hearts of men for ten thousand generations. Could his brother of the same father have been only a day older than he?

The Yuan History records that Master Caolu Wu Cheng, a scholar of the Yuan dynasty, was intelligent from childhood and, as an adult, knew to devote himself to the learning of the sages and worthies. He wrote the Commentary on the Classic of Filial Piety and collated the Yi (Classic of Changes), Shu (Classic of Documents), Shi (Classic of Poetry), Chunqiu (Spring and Autumn Annals), Yili (Ceremonies and Rites), as well as the Da Dai Liji and the Xiao Dai Liji. At that time the court issued an edict seeking worthy men, and the Censor Cheng Jvfu recommended him to enter the capital. He also requested that Wu's writings be placed in the Imperial Academy (Guozijian) so that scholars could study them.

The provincial official Yuan Mingshan, proud of his literary talent, once asked Wu Cheng to explain the profound principles of the Yi, Shi, Shu, and Chunqiu, and sighed, "Conversing with the Master is like searching an unfathomable sea." He thereafter treated Wu as a disciple for the rest of his life. The Left Assistant Administrator Dong Shixuan invited Wu Cheng to his home and personally arranged his meals, saying, "The Master is the worthiest scholar under Heaven."

In the first year of the Zhida era (1308), Wu Cheng was summoned to serve as Assistant Director of the Imperial Academy. Before this, when Xu Heng had served as Chancellor of the Imperial Academy, he had begun teaching his students with Zhu Xi's Xiaoxue and other texts, but over time these older practices had gradually been abandoned. After Wu Cheng took office, he ordered the students to enter the school in turn to receive instruction. Each dawn he lit candles and began his lectures, which lasted until the sun was low in the west. After he returned to his lodgings, people carrying classics in hand came one after another to consult and debate with him. Adapting to each person's aptitude, he instructed and enlightened them repeatedly, sometimes until late at night. Regardless of cold or heat, he did not change his method of teaching.

His teaching had four components: classical learning, the practice of conduct, the skill of writing, and the handling of affairs. Wu Cheng was thin of frame, as if his clothes could barely hang on him. He sat upright with his hands clasped, his expression calm yet vigorous. When answering questions, he spoke with clarity and order and never tired of discussion, so that those who heard him were suddenly enlightened and their doubts dispelled at once.

He once wrote: "The root of the Dao comes from Heaven and is carried forward by spirits and sages. Before Yao and Shun was the beginning of the Dao; from Yao and Shun onward it was made to flow through; the worthies of the Zhu and Si region caused it to develop; and the scholars of Lianxi, Luoyang, Guanzhong, and Min made it pure." Separately considered, the transmission from high antiquity had Fuxi and the Yellow Emperor as its beginning, Yao and Shun made it flow through, Yu and Tang made it develop, and King Wen, King Wu, and the Duke of Zhou made it pure. The transmission of the Way (Daotong) in middle antiquity began with Confucius; Yan Hui and Zengzi made it flow through, Zisi made it develop, and Mengzi made it pure. The transmission of recent times began with Zhou Dunyi; Cheng Hao, Cheng Yi, and Zhang Zai made it flow through, and Zhu Xi made it develop. Then, who made it pure……

今日之貞乎其以斯文自任如此  録曰愚觀元之立國未聞投戈講藝息馬  論道徒以魯齋草廬二公上以帝王之道  聞于其君下以儒先之說淑諸其人僅能  延百年之命脉而已非有繼徃聖開來學  之大制作大氣運也其著悅以元亨利貞  喻今古道統愚意邵子皇極經世之論更  爲切近以草廬言之其時其事殆天之冬  乎未可以爲天地交也 皇明名臣録潜溪先生宋濓幼從游鄉先生 翰林待制柳公貫侍講學士黄公溍洪武初 由布衣召入授 太子經奉書勉以孝友恭 敬勤敏讀書進德脩業以副天下之望 太祖覽書喜悅賜書寵答曰曩者先生教吾 子以嚴相訓是爲不佞也以聖人文法變俗 未之是爲䟽通也所守者忠貞所用者節儉 是爲得體也時在朝若凡郊社宗廟山川百 神之典朝饗宴慶禮樂律曆衣冠之制四夷 朝貢賞賚之儀及勳臣名卿焯德耀功之文 悉皆論次紀述至 上欲俾叅大政固辭曰 臣少無他長惟文墨是攻不願居職任也與 人交和易任眞接引後學惟恐弗及遠方來 者授館而飮食之雖久不衰内誠外恕一出 於正常曰古者重德教非惟子弟之求師而 爲師者得一英才而訓𩛙之未嘗不喜動顔 色此無他天埋民彜之不能自己也予晩得 天台方生其爲人凝重而不遷於物頴銳有
Interpretation

Today's commitment to upholding the correct Way may be seen in people who take it as their own mission to promote the Confucian classics.

The compiler of the Hongdao Lu (Record of Expanding the Way) says: Looking at the Yuan dynasty since its founding, I have not heard that the court ever laid down its weapons to study the classics, or let its warhorses rest while discussing principles. The Yuan achieved its civilizing influence only through two masters, Master Lu Zhai (Xu Heng) and Master Cao Lu (Wu Cheng). Above, they explained the art of governing to the ruler; below, they taught scholars through the teachings of the Confucian sages. Yet they merely sustained the dynasty for about a century. They did not truly undertake the great work of carrying on the former sages and enlightening later learners, and they did not produce a grand spirit capable of transforming the age.

Some use the four virtues of the Yijing (Book of Changes), yuan, heng, li, and zhen (origin, success, benefit, and correctness), to describe the lineage of the Dao (the Confucian transmission of the Way) from antiquity to the present. I think Shao Yong's Huangji Jingshi (Supreme Polarity Principles for Governing the World, a work that deduces the cycles of historical change) offers a more fitting account. Judging by Wu Cheng's circumstances and era, it was likely the winter of the cosmic cycle, not yet a time when heaven and earth were in harmony and all things flourished.

The Huangming Mingchen Lu (Record of Eminent Ministers of the Great Ming) records that Master Qianxi, Song Lian, studied in his youth under the local scholars Liu Guan, a Hanlin Daizhao (Academician-in-Waiting), and Huang Jin, a Lecturing Academician. In the early Hongwu reign of Emperor Taizu of the Ming, the court summoned him from the commoner ranks, appointed him as tutor to the crown prince, and had him write a letter urging the prince to be filial and fraternal, respectful and reverent, diligent and quick, to study earnestly, improve his virtue, and cultivate his learning, so as not to disappoint the expectations of the world.

The emperor was pleased upon reading the letter and bestowed a letter of praise on Song Lian: "Previously, you strictly instructed my son, which fulfills the duty of a teacher. Using the literary works and institutions of the sages to transform customs shows a thorough understanding of worldly affairs. Holding to loyalty and esteeming frugality is how one grasps the root."

At that time, Song Lian took part in compiling and editing the court's ritual system for the suburban sacrifices to Heaven and Earth, the altar sacrifices, the ancestral temple, the mountains and rivers and the various spirits; the protocols for audiences, sacrifices, banquets, and celebrations; the systems of ritual music, the calendar, and official dress and headwear; the ceremonies for the tribute missions of the peoples of the four directions and the court's rewards in return; and the essays recording the virtues and achievements of meritorious officials and eminent ministers.

Later, the emperor wished to have him take part in the great affairs of state, but Song Lian firmly declined, saying, "In my youth I had no other strength, only a single-minded devotion to writing, and I am unwilling to hold concrete office."

Song Lian was gentle and sincere in his dealings with others and delighted in guiding younger scholars, always worried that he would not have time to teach them all. For students who came from afar to learn, he arranged lodging and provided food, and he did not grow weary of this even over long periods. His heart was sincere, his conduct toward others generous, and all of it proceeded from the correct Way. He often said, "The ancients valued the cultivation of virtue through teaching. Students and disciples certainly must seek out a teacher, and a teacher who meets a gifted student and guides him well will often be so delighted that it shows on his face. This is for no other reason than that the ethical nature bestowed on human beings naturally expresses itself."

"In my later years I met Fang Sheng of Tiantai. He was steady and dignified, unswayed by external things, and keen and perceptive..."

以燭諸理間發爲文如水湧而山出喧啾百 鳥中見此孤鳳凰也  録曰宋潜溪之堅辭大政也有以哉夫明  與行未能兼得也以教 太子淑人心立  國制闡遺文沛然而有餘以叅大政歉然  而不足時不同也而遜志之相處若陰爲  他日綱常倫理計者想其平居之議論門  墻之講習决非抽黃對白縭詞繪句而凡  朝政之得失 國運之否泰 儲貳之負  荷憂患之隱伏所不能見之行者必昭晰  不遺以是而後能卓然無負於 聖祖之義則當時執政者所未能及也 正學先生方孝孺受學於潜溪之門凡理學 淵源之統人物絶續之紀盛衰幾㣲之載名 物度數之詳靡不研究離祈於一絲而會歸 於大通及長徧交名士如蘇伯衡胡翰輩劘 切研究鈎深致遠淹貫經史自脩身刑家以 至於國動可師表謂道之於事無乎不在故 列所當勉之目爲二十箴又作雜誡三十八 章以爲警戒謂化民必自正家如故又作宗 範九篇以告宗人謂今之學者習前聞之弊 竊成說爲文辭雜者佛爲該愽志氣污下議 論卑淺齪齪然無復有大人君子之態故嘗 奮然而超曰不以伊周之心事君賊其君者 也不以孔孟之學爲學賊其身者也天下有 志之士莫不高其言論將盡棄其所學而從 之其所自視直欲上接夷齊下揖于逢殺身 取義至死而不顧焉
Interpretation

When it comes to illuminating whatever in the various principles is worth elucidating, and writing it into prose, the writing flows like a spring welling up or peaks rising into view, full of momentum. Amid the clamor of countless birdsongs, people catch sight of this solitary phoenix.

The Hongdao Lu says: Song Lian (courtesy name Qianxi) resolutely declined to take on weighty governmental duties, and there was reason for this. Intellectual talent and practical execution are not always found together. He excelled at instructing the crown prince, cultivating people's minds and natures, establishing state institutions, and clarifying the ancient classics; these tasks he could handle with ease. But when it came to participating in the great affairs of the court, he felt his ability was insufficient. This was bound up with the differences of the times and of one's responsibilities.

When Song Lian was together with Fang Xiaoru, he may have quietly considered the future of the cardinal bonds and ethical principles (the ethical standards that sustain social order). Surely, when they discussed matters in private or lectured to their disciples, they never confined themselves to ornate phrasing and parallel prose. They would have discussed the gains and losses of court politics, the security or peril of the state's fate, and the responsibilities and latent anxieties borne by the heir apparent (the successor to the throne). Matters that were hard to perceive would also certainly have been seen clearly by them, with no detail overlooked. It was for this reason that Fang Xiaoru was later able to stand firmly on his own and not betray the righteousness of the Sage Ancestor, whereas the officials in power at the time failed to do so.

Master Zhengxue, Fang Xiaoru, studied under Song Lian. He investigated deeply the transmission of Neo-Confucian learning, the rise and fall of persons and the subtle shifts in the fortunes of the age, as well as knowledge of named objects and institutions, measures, and the calendar. He pursued principles down to the most minute details and ultimately achieved a thorough synthesis. As he grew older, he widely befriended renowned scholars such as Su Boheng and Hu Han, engaging with them in mutual debate and deep research, and became thoroughly versed in the classics and histories. From self-cultivation to regulating the family and governing the state, his words and deeds were sufficient to serve as models.

He held that principle is present everywhere and can be manifested in everyday affairs. Accordingly, he set forth twenty precepts that one should strive to follow and wrote them as Zhen (admonitory essays of exhortation and reproof). He also composed Miscellaneous Admonitions in thirty-eight sections to awaken both himself and others. He further wrote nine chapters of Zongfan, instructing the members of his clan that in transforming the common people, one must first rectify one's own household.

Fang Xiaoru believed that some scholars of his time, influenced by the custom of adhering to old explanations, merely borrowed ready-made opinions to compose their writings. Their learning was miscellaneous and shallow, their aspirations were low, their arguments were superficial, and their outlook was narrow and fragmented; they no longer possessed the bearing of true gentlemen and noble persons. He therefore once declared with fervor: "To serve the ruler without the aspirations of Yi Yin or the Duke of Zhou is to harm the ruler; to take the learning of Confucius and Mencius as one's own learning is to harm oneself." Aspiring men across the realm respected his words, and some were even willing to set aside what they had previously studied in order to follow his views. He held himself in high regard, aiming to inherit the integrity of Boyi and Shuqi above, and to stand as equals with Yu Feng and those who sacrificed their lives for humaneness below. For the sake of righteousness, he was prepared to give up his life without regret.

 録曰伊周之所以事君何也曰予不狎於  不順放太甲於桐太甲賢又反之管蔡流  言曰周公將不利於孺子故周公誅之非  周公誅之天下之所當誅也孔孟之所以  爲學何也曰志士仁人無求生以害仁有  殺身以成仁曰生我所欲也義亦我所欲  也所欲有甚於生故不爲茍避也先輩之  講如與今時何以異哉而能身體力行之  者鮮矣是可遺而弗録乎 王忠文公禕與宋潜溪同游柳文肅黄文獻 之門一時交友賛之者若胡教授翰曰勃平 山出水湧與黄如出一律清江胡御史行簡 曰源委雖出黄公其深造自得過之潜溪則 曰幼時所爲幅程廣而運化宏光焰燁燁起 諸公間譬之搆厦屋者掄材甚多而基緒亦 以廣矣及踰弱齡則波浪湧而魚龍張風霆 流而雨雹集五采競明而十日並照譬之臺 閣已建程礎駢列觚稜高騫而氣象益以沈 雄及乎年踰四十其文渾然天成而條理弗 爽使人挹而愈深味之而弗竭譬之堂戺嚴 邃左爼豆而右琴瑟鴻儒鉅公冠冕佩玉雍 容揖遜於其間而間巷韋布之士欲望其餘 光而不可得也故公之謀畧運于帷幄功業 顯于治民文章用于垂憲道學見於格君忠 義著于死事噫是可以論公矣比以厄於胡 孽一事論之公之全不專是云  録曰愚觀 明朝亦起淮右所用多彬彬
Interpretation

When Yi Yin and the Duke of Zhou assisted their rulers, why did they act as they did? Because Taijia would not abide by the proper Way, Yi Yin banished him to Tong; later, when Taijia had become worthy, Yi Yin welcomed him back. Guanshu and Caishu spread rumors that the Duke of Zhou meant harm to the young King Cheng, so the Duke of Zhou put them to death. These men truly deserved to be punished by all under Heaven.

Why did Confucius and Mencius stress learning? Confucius said: "A determined scholar or a person of humaneness will never harm their humaneness to preserve their life; at times they will give up their life to complete their humaneness." Mencius said: "Life is what I cherish, and righteousness is also what I cherish. If there were something I cherished more than life, I would not cling to life and evade righteousness." How do the teachings of the ancients, who expounded these principles, differ from ours today? Yet few are able to practice them personally. Should such deeds not be recorded?

Duke Zhongwen Wang Wei (Wang Wei) studied together with Song Lian under Liu Guan and Huang Jin. His friends of the time all admired him. Hu Han said: "The momentum of his prose surges like water welling up from level ground; compared with Huang Jin's writing, the style is of one lineage." The censor Hu Xingjian said: "Although his scholarly origins derive from Huang Jin, he penetrated deeply and gained his own insights, and his attainment surpassed that of Huang Jin." Song Lian said:

"When he was young and wrote essays, their scope was broad, his brushwork vast in its transformations, and his brilliance dazzling, so that he stood out among the senior masters. It was like building a tall hall: he used a great quantity of timber, and the foundation he laid was wide. After he passed twenty, the momentum of his writing surged like billows, with leaping fish and dragons, wind and thunder stirring, and hail falling all at once; five-colored lights vied to shine, as if ten suns were shining together. It was like a terrace already completed, its platforms set side by side and its eaves rising high, so that its bearing grew ever more profound and vigorous. In his forties, his writing became seamlessly natural and its order clear; the more one read it, the deeper it seemed, and each savoring revealed new content. It was like a hall, deep, solemn, and still: ritual vessels are displayed on the left, zithers and se are set on the right, and the erudite great scholars and eminent famous men, wearing caps and jade pendants, calmly perform rites and converse within it; while a scholar who lives in a remote lane, dressed in plain cloth, may long to look up to its bearing, yet cannot reach it."

Therefore, Wang Wei's strategy was manifest within the tent, and his achievements showed in governing the people; his writings could serve as models for later generations, his learning of the Way showed in remonstrating with the ruler, and his loyalty appeared in facing death in a time of peril. Alas, only in this way can one fittingly assess Duke Wang. Later, some judged him by a single matter, his persecution at the hands of the Hu (foreign) forces, but Duke Wang's complete character does not lie in that one matter alone.

I believe the Ming dynasty, too, rose from Huaixi, and the men it employed were mostly refined and courteous...

 文學之士與販繒屠狗者異然皆吾浙之  英而不狥鄉土與南陽近親亦不相眸其  間乃有如華川之死節正學之狥義視彼  隨何周昌之徒何萬萬也推原其故盖以  當道學大明之後所興起於婺儒文獻之  徵與漢初𦷥於秦習者大相懸絶然則雖  國勢搶攘之初而師友講習之𦔳學問淵  源之益端不可無也録之  齋先生吴與弼弱冠見侯洛淵源録心慕 道之及覩明道亦嘗有獵心乃知聖賢之必 可學遂棄舉業謝絶人事日玩經書收歛身 心沉潜義理視世之所尚舉不足爲其志直 欲造乎聖賢之域居郷動必以禮四方朱學 者却其束脩不受善于啓迪聼其言者莫不 踴躍思奮恒勵學者四人須以聖爲志學湏 以道爲至進脩不可躐等必先從事於小學 然後進乎大學讀論語竟造愽文約禮孟子 則求放心充四端中庸謹乎存養省察之功 以馴至致中和之極明太極以知性之原究 西銘以識仁之體易宗先程而鄙後學新奇 之說書則古文義埋精深固不得而去取之 也嘗嘆諸書箋註之繁無能直截上逹故不 輕於著述天順初忠國公石亨薦于朝命行 人齎 勑書束帛造其廬既至授春坊諭德 固辭不拜引見 文華殿懇辭以老 英宗皇帝顧謂大學士李賢曰此老非迂闊 者務令就職與弼終不就
Interpretation

Scholars and those who made their living selling silk or butchering dogs were all different from one another, yet they were all outstanding talents of my native Zhejiang. They did not show favoritism out of ties to their home region, nor did they shield anyone because of kinship with Nanyang. Among them were also men like Huachuan, who died for the sake of righteousness, and Zhengxue, who gave his life for the sake of moral duty. Compared with figures such as Sui He and Zhou Chang, how many thousandfold were they superior!

Tracing the reasons for this, it is probably because after Daoxue (Learning of the Way) flourished greatly, the Confucian scholarship of Wuzhou (today's Jinhua area in Zhejiang) that arose was quite different from that of men influenced by the customs of the Qin dynasty in the early Han. Therefore, even at the very beginning of turbulent times in the state, the benefits of instruction and discussion among teachers and friends, and the influence arising from the sources of learning, were truly not to be ignored. Thus these deeds have been specially recorded.

Master Zhai Wu Yubi (a Neo-Confucian scholar of the Ming dynasty) at the age of twenty read the Record of the Origins of the Yi and Luo Schools (a work recounting the transmission of Neo-Confucianism through Cheng Hao, Cheng Yi, and others), and in his heart he admired Daoxue. Later, on reading Cheng Hao (styled Mingdao), he too once became interested in hunting. From this he recognized that the Way of the sages could indeed be attained through study. He therefore gave up pursuing official rank through the civil examinations, declined social obligations and courtesies, and each day studied the classics, gathered in his body and mind, and penetrated deeply into the meaning of principle. He held that the things the world prized were not worthy of being his aspiration, and he wholeheartedly wished to reach the state of the sages.

In his village, his every action conformed to ritual propriety. Those who came from various places to study with him paid no tuition fees (shushu). He was skilled at enlightening and guiding, and everyone who heard his lectures was invigorated and strove to advance. He often encouraged his students to aim at becoming sages in their studies and to take the Dao as their ultimate goal. In cultivating virtue and undertaking learning, one must not skip steps: one must first study the Xiaoxue (Elementary Learning) and then advance to the Great Learning. In reading the Analects, one should aim to attain the ideal of "extensively studying culture and restraining oneself through ritual" (broadly learning the textual tradition and binding oneself with ritual). In reading Mencius, one should recover the lost original mind and extend the Four Sprouts of goodness. In reading the Doctrine of the Mean, one should apply careful effort to cultivating and examining the self, gradually reaching the state of centrality and harmony.

He clarified the root of human nature by elucidating the Taiji (Supreme Ultimate), and he studied the Western Inscription (Ximing) to realize the substance of benevolence (ren). In lecturing on the Yi (Book of Changes), he honored the tradition before Cheng Yi and scorned the novel interpretations of later scholars. In lecturing on the Shu (Book of Documents), he held that the meaning of the ancient-text classics was profound and could not be lightly discarded. He once sighed that the various commentaries on the classics were so numerous that it was difficult to reach the meaning of principle directly, and for this reason he did not casually write books.

In the early Tianshun reign period (around 1457), Duke Zhongguo Shi Heng recommended Wu Yubi to the court. The court sent an envoy bearing an imperial edict and gifts to his home to invite him to take office. After arriving in the capital, Wu was granted the post of Vice Director of the Hall of the Heir Apparent (Chunfang Yudé), but he firmly declined and would not accept it. When the emperor summoned him to the Wenhua Hall, he still earnestly begged to be excused on account of his age. Emperor Yingzong said to Grand Secretary Li Xian, "This old man is not one who is pedantic and out of touch with worldly affairs; we must have him take office." In the end, Wu Yubi did not assume the post.

 録曰愚觀康齋之出處盖有不得已者焉  夫孔子歷聘孟子傳食至聞大道之行與  三代之英喟然嘆息夫豈不欲如伊如吕  俾大君有忘勢之美在我遂三聘之樂乎  不得已也享何人也以職則掌兵非求賢  之任以勢則柄權非安意之誠以時則亢  龍非沉晦之日以德則耄老非和衷之任  茍斯須不斷禍不旋踵今觀 勑諭之言  始之誠意終之恩禮輝耀浹洽光明俊偉  弼愈有榮其視官職眞猶弊蹤君臣朋友  之間可謂兩全矣 白沙先生陳獻章從吴康齋學康齋教人多 舉伊洛成語白沙未有得也歸築一臺名曰 陽春日端默其中以涵養本原人罕見其面 初志勇銳用功或過幾致心病後悟其非所 謂戒謹與恐懼斯言未云偏後儒不省事差 失毫釐間蓋驗其弊而發也又累年始有所 得曰吾自此以後此心乃如馬之有衘勤隨 動靜應事接物叅前倚衡照檢而無不在矣 其論治道必曰天下非誠不動非才不治必 才與誠合而後冶化可興其教人必先靜坐 以養其善端曰人所以學者欲聞道也求之 書籍而不得則求之吾心可也惡累於外哉 此事定要覷破若覷不破雖日從事於學亦 爲人耳斯埋識時爲已者信之詩文輩末習 著達等路頭一齊塞斷一齊掃去毋令半㸃 芥蒂於胷中然後善端可養□可能也始終
Interpretation

I believe Wu Kangzhai (Wu Yubi, a Ming scholar) had unavoidable reasons both for taking office and for withdrawing from it. Confucius traveled from state to state, and Mencius lived on the support of the feudal lords while moving about to teach. Whenever they heard of the Great Dao (the Way) being put into practice, or of the flourishing ages of the virtuous rulers of the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties, both sighed with feeling. Did they not wish to assist their rulers as Yi Yin and Lü Shang had, to see the ruler humble himself to seek out worthy men, and to share in the honor of being summoned to office? It was only that circumstances did not allow it.

Let us ask, then, what the appointment Wu Kangzhai received was really like. In terms of office, he was in charge of military affairs, not of recruiting men of talent. In terms of power, he held a position of authority, yet lacked the sincere conditions needed to carry out his duties steadily. In terms of timing, he was like a dragon that has flown to a high place, and it was no longer a time for retreat and seclusion. In terms of prestige, he was advanced in years and not suited to the heavy task of reconciling the various parties. If such a situation were not handled properly, even for a moment, calamity would soon arrive. Now, looking at the emperor's edict, it opens by expressing sincerity and closes by treating him with favor and courtesy. It is radiant, and its grace reaches everywhere. Wu Kangzhai's service to the emperor brought him ever greater glory, yet in regarding his office he treated it as nothing more than a worn-out shoe. In this way, both the bond between ruler and minister and the bond between friends could be said to have been fully satisfied.

Master Baisha, Chen Xianzhang, once studied under Wu Kangzhai. When Wu taught, he often quoted the sayings of the Yiluo school (the teachings of Cheng Hao, Cheng Yi, and their followers), and Chen did not at first grasp them. After returning home, he built a terrace named "Yangchun" (Spring Sunshine), where he sat in quiet stillness every day to nourish the root of his mind and nature. Few people ever saw him there.

At first, Chen Xianzhang resolved to pursue learning with great vigor, and at times his efforts were so excessive that they nearly injured his mind and spirit. Later he recognized that this was wrong, and he came to understand that sayings such as "be cautious and apprehensive" (remaining constantly vigilant and alert) were not themselves mistaken. Later scholars, lacking an understanding of actual conditions, would err slightly and thereby bend the principle out of shape. His warning was thus a response to a particular ailment. Many years later he finally attained some understanding and said: "From now on, my mind is like a horse with its reins in hand. Whether in motion or at rest, in affairs or in dealing with others, I can attend to and examine myself at every moment, and there is not a single instant when I am not within this."

When he discussed the way of governance, he always said: "If there is no sincerity in the world, people cannot be moved. If there is no ability, government cannot be done well. Only when ability and sincerity are united can moral transformation arise." In teaching, he always first had students sit quietly, so as to nurture the initial sprouts of goodness in their hearts. He said: "People learn in order to hear of and comprehend the Dao. If it cannot be found in books, one may turn inward and seek it within one's own heart. Why be burdened by external things? This matter must be thoroughly seen through. If one fails to see through it, then even studying every day amounts to nothing more than scholarship for others."

He also taught that in learning one should believe in and practice the principle of "learning for oneself." Trivial habits such as composing poetry and prose, along with the paths of pursuing fame and advancement, should all be blocked and swept away, so that not a trace of attachment remains in the heart. Only then can the sprouts of goodness within be nourished.

一意氣象將日佳造詣將日深所謂自近而 神百姓日用而不知者自此迸出面目來也 又語門人林光曰終日乾乾只是收拾此而 己此理于涉至大無有内外無有先後無一 處不到無一息不運得此𢺞柄入手更有何 事徃古來今四方上下都一齊穿紐一齊收 合隨時隨處無不是這充塞舞雩三三兩兩 正在勿忘勿助之間曾㸃些見活計被孟子 一口打併出來便都是鳶飛魚躍若無孟予 工夫驟而語之以曾㸃見趣一似說夢 敬齋先生胡居仁從康齋得心學之正退而 益加充廣慨然以古人自期斯道自任記誦 詞章爲不足事專心於内以主忠信爲本求 放心爲要以聖學成始成終在於敬因以敬 名齋端莊凝重履繩蹈矩與人交隱㣲幽獨 之際愈嚴愈密其詩曰謹獨切深切防㣲意 最玄爭交眞在此要不愧皇天四方及門者 衆築書屋曰禮吾曰南國監後講學嘗曰第 一怕見不得眞第二伯工夫間斷多有質羙 者好高入於禪騁詞失於於不知操存省察 爲何事安能造道德之域乎與上饒婁一齋 永豐羅一峯南昌張東白麗澤相會于弋陽 之龜峯餘干之應天寺所著有居業録敬齋 集取易脩詞立其誠所以居業之義也  録曰陳胡亦公之從康齋也一則以舉伊  洛成語爲未以得一則從事於敬以得心
Interpretation

Devoting oneself wholeheartedly to cultivation, one's bearing improves day by day and one's attainment deepens day by day. This is what is meant by starting from what is near at hand, so that in the end the face of "spirit" (shen) is revealed. It is a principle that ordinary people use every day without knowing it.

He also said to his disciple Lin Guang: "Working diligently without pause all day long ultimately amounts only to gathering in and holding fast this heart-mind. This principle is exceedingly vast. It has no distinction of inner and outer, no sequence of before and after. There is no place where it does not reach, and no moment where it stops operating. Once one grasps this key, what is there that cannot be accomplished? Everything from past to present and from all four directions can be connected and brought together. Whenever and wherever, there is nothing that is not filled with this principle.

"At the Wuyu (the altar of ancient sacrifices and rain-prayers), Zeng Dian was at ease gathering with several companions, standing precisely between 'not forgetting and not helping': neither forgetting to preserve and nurture, nor deliberately forcing growth. He slightly revealed this lively effort, and Mencius clarified it in a single phrase, so that all things presented the vitality of 'kites flying and fish leaping.' Without the effort Mencius described, to suddenly speak of the delight Zeng Dian had seen would sound like talking in one's sleep."

Master Jingzhai, Hu Juren, received the orthodox transmission of the learning of the heart-mind (xinxue) from Kangzhai. After retiring, he continually expanded and deepened it, resolving to take the ancient sages as models and to shoulder the responsibility of transmitting the Way of the sages. He held that rote memorization and composing literary pieces were not matters of importance. He devoted himself to cultivating the inner heart, took loyalty and sincerity as the root, and made the recovery of the scattered, dissipated heart his essential task. He believed that the learning of the sages, from beginning to completion, depends entirely on "reverence" (jing), and so he named his studio after it.

Hu Juren was dignified and composed, his words and conduct conforming to propriety. In dealing with others, and even when alone in hidden places, he was all the more strict and cautious. He wrote a poem saying: "Being cautious when alone carries profound meaning; what matters most is to guard against the first stirrings, for this principle is the most subtle. The root of contention and rivalry lies here; the key is to be without shame before Heaven."

Many people came from various places to study with him. He built a study hall and named it "Liwu" (Ritual and Self). Later, when he served as a supervisor in the Southern Capital, he also lectured. He said: "There are two things a learner should fear most. First, failing to see the true principle. Second, having effort that is interrupted and discontinuous. Many people are naturally gifted, yet aim too high and wander into the path of Chan Buddhism. Others indulge only in the display of literary style, and so do not understand what it means to hold fast to the original heart and to examine and verify through reflection. How can such people attain the realm of virtue?"

He once gathered for lectures and discussion with Lou Yizhai of Shangrao, Luo Yifeng of Yongfeng, and Zhang Dongbai of Nanchang, at Guifeng in Yiyang and the Yingtian Temple in Yugan. His works include the Juye Lu (Record of Dwelling and Enterprise) and the Jingzhai Ji (Collected Writings of Jingzhai). The meaning of "juye" can be understood from the phrase in the Yijing "cultivating words to establish sincerity." By rectifying speech and establishing sincerity of intent, one settles and completes one's enterprise.

The Hongdao Lu comments: "Chen Xianzhang and Hu Juren both also studied under Kangzhai. Chen Xianzhang considered citing the established doctrines of the Yi-Luo school insufficient, while Hu Juren devoted himself singly to 'reverence,' and thereby obtained the foundation of the learning of the heart-mind."

 學之正然愚觀楊月湖答林緝熙書中云  白沙好作隱語所云康齋多舉成語教人  白沙惟求自得夫伊洛成語亦伊洛所自  得者後之人必欲以自得教人恐又生出  一弊又曰白沙晚聞道聊以拙自脩者然  則今之學者欲求自得以何爲主曰以敬  爲主以何爲事曰居業爲事見之眞求之  篤不患不居之安資之深既能免憚學之  累亦不致末流之失茍取之左右逢其源  而又何待曰一入商量便作疑耶學者不  可不知 一峯先生羅倫目不視惡色耳不聼惡聲不 耻惡衣惡食與人子言依於孝與人臣言依 于忠與居官者言言民所疾苦見一善人愛 之如麟鳳惡人見之如蛇蝎見一饑寒凍餒 則傾所有以賑之大率義之所在毅然必爲 人之毁譽欣戚事之成敗利鈍己之死生禍 福皆所不顧也初爲翰林脩撰會大學士李 賢之喪 朝廷援例起復臺諫皆不敢言倫 私告以不可復上䟽歷陳古今起復之非必 欲 聖朝準富弼珙故李終喪反覆數千 言一本於天理人心之不可已者䟽奏遂落 職由是天下之士爭自刮磨向之不言以養 忠厚者爲之一變而終倫之世臺省未嘗有 起復者矣退居金牛山開門授徒日以註經 爲業名重天下所至人必相率而觀之雖武 臣俗吏亦知敬仰所交皆當世豪傑之士其
Interpretation

What, then, is the proper path to learning? I was reading Yang Yuehu's (Ming Dynasty Neo-Confucian) letter to Lin Jixi, in which he writes:

Baisha (Chen Xianzhang, styled Baisha) liked to speak in veiled terms, while Kangzhai (Wu Yubi, styled Kangzhai) often quoted ready-made maxims to teach people. Baisha sought only to awaken to things himself. As for the maxims of the Yiluo school (referring to Cheng Hao, Cheng Yi, and their followers), these too were insights they had reached on their own. If later scholars insist on relying on such ready-made words to teach people how to attain understanding for themselves, another kind of harm is likely to arise.

The letter also says that Baisha did not come to know the Dao until late in life, and that he cultivated himself only in a plain and unadorned manner. Given this, how should scholars today seek their own realization, and what should be their foundation? The answer: take "reverence" (jing) as the foundation. What should they do? Concentrate on the studies that they ought to pursue. As long as they see clearly and seek sincerely, they need not worry about being unable to persevere steadily or failing to accumulate deep understanding. This both frees them from being discouraged by difficulty or weary of learning, and keeps them from falling into the errors of superficial practice. If they can grasp principles from the things around them and encounter their source everywhere, why would they need to wait for others to tell them? Someone asked: "Does beginning with discussion and debate amount to becoming confused?" Scholars must not fail to understand this point.

Master Yifeng, Luo Lun, kept his eyes from improper sights and his ears from improper speech, and he did not regard wearing shabby clothes or eating coarse food as shameful. When he spoke with people about the duties of a child, he spoke of filial piety; when he spoke of the duties of a minister, he spoke of loyalty. When he conversed with officials, he spoke of the sufferings of the common people. When he saw a good person, he delighted in them as one would in the qilin or the phoenix; when he saw a wicked person, he loathed them as one would a snake or a scorpion. When he saw someone starving or freezing, he gave away everything he had to relieve them.

In general, whenever something was right according to righteousness, he resolutely carried it out. The praise and blame of others, his own joy and anger, the success or failure and smoothness or adversity of affairs, and even his own life, death, misfortune, or blessing, he did not hold in his heart.

Luo Lun first served as a Compiler in the Hanlin Academy. At that time, the Grand Secretary Li Xian died, and the court, citing an old precedent, summoned Li Xian to resume office while still in mourning. The censors and remonstrating officials all dared not speak. Luo Lun privately pointed out that this was improper, and then submitted a memorial that laid out, article by article, the arguments from ancient and modern times against resuming office during mourning. He insisted that the sagely court follow the earlier precedent and let Li Xian complete his mourning period. The memorial ran to several thousand characters, and its essential grounds were the principles of Heaven's Pattern and of the human heart that could not be ignored. After the memorial was presented, Luo Lun was dismissed from his post as a result.

From this time on, the scholars of the realm vied to examine and refine themselves. Those who had previously been too concerned with appearing dutiful to speak out now changed their conduct. Until Luo Lun's death, no official in the court's censorial or executive offices was again called back to office during mourning.

Luo Lun retired to Mount Jinniu, where he opened his door to students and devoted himself every day to annotating the classics, and his reputation spread throughout the realm. Wherever he went, people often went along with him to see him. Even military officers and secular officials knew to respect and admire him. The people he associated with were all the outstanding heroes of his age……

語及先生之爲人也必曰青天白日云  録曰倫之必爲君子而不爲小人有由然  哉 國家元氣自 列聖培養以至於成  化盛矣是故乾德開寳在前而有不在温  飽之王曾慶曆元祐在後而有獨不戴花  之君實惟不在温飽也而後正色立朝隨  之惟獨不戴花也而後孤忠自許隨之倫  豈易得者哉狀元魁選何代無之屈指之  間曾不多見而文逹一䟽尤見愛人以德  今世以姑息豈非今古之一暢耶此其高  官顯爵固不若青天白日之尤所難及也 □山先生章懋自少識趣高遠讀書學問與 人交恂恂如也時在朝羅一峯莊孔暘黃仲 昭賀克恭陸克深謝元吉鄭克脩咸好古慕 義自羅倡章和咸相激勵直欲致 君於唐 虞之盛一時氣衆頓覺一新未幾因元夕張 燈公與莊黄同上章大要以培養聖德爲本 忤 㫖斥外聲望赫然京師稱三君子與羅 通號翰林四諫公蓄德深厚喜怒不形於色 恩怨不槩於心務伐不出諸口驕泰不措諸 身於書無所不讀於天下事無不理會究極 義理精㣲身體力行惓惓斯世不爲矯𩛙嘗 曰人形天地之氣性天地之埋須與天地之 體同其廣大天地之用同其周流方可謂之 人論學者須大其心胷蓋心大則百物皆通 必有窮理功夫心纔會夫又須心小必有涵 有工夫心纔會小不至狂妄矣
Interpretation

This passage recounts the deeds and character of several upright officials from the Ming dynasty. Figures like Wang Zeng (a renowned Northern Song statesman) and Junshi (the courtesy name of Sima Guang) were historically celebrated for their integrity and moral rectitude. The author admires how these individuals neither pursued material comforts nor indulged in pleasures, maintaining their moral fortitude even in court politics. They refused to follow the crowd, steadfastly upholding their solitary loyalty. The text particularly notes that while imperial examination champions appeared in every dynasty, few possessed such rare combination of virtue and talent.

The account focuses on Zhang Mao (known as Master □shan). From youth, he nurtured lofty aspirations while remaining humble in conduct. At court, he found kindred spirits in Luo Yifeng, Zhuang Kongyang, Huang Zhongzhao, and others—all sharing the ambition to assist their sovereign in achieving governance akin to the golden age of Yao and Shun. Later, when he submitted a memorial opposing the wasteful lantern displays during the Yuanxiao Festival, his defiance of imperial wishes led to demotion. Yet this act earned him widespread acclaim, joining Luo Yifeng and others as one of the "Three Noble Men" and later celebrated among the "Four Hanlin Remonstrators."

Zhang Mao possessed profound virtue—his emotions never showed on his face, he bore no grudges, never boasted of his achievements, and remained free from arrogance. A man of encyclopedic learning who understood worldly affairs, he embodied Confucian principles through personal practice. He believed humans, endowed with the Qi (vital energy) of heaven and earth, should emulate their vastness and ceaseless dynamism. In scholarship, he emphasized both broad-minded synthesis (to grasp interconnected truths) and meticulous investigation (to penetrate depths)—only this dual approach could prevent intellectual hubris.

 録曰自康齋力辭儲弼之任於是白沙不  以檢職爲榮一峯不以元魁爲愛而翰林  四諌三君子之名昭著於天下矣至於賀  吉士亦聞風而起抗䟽觧官此何等時也  上有仁明之 君下多眞諒之臣然果何  爲而得之哉正由平日窮理涵養之功故  立心廣大不以外物爲意操存精密亦不  以自足爲心然則所謂狂妄者不能黽勉  以副之耳豈人能待之以薄乎録者詳之 張元禎撰陳選先生墓表曰 國家承平日 久士大夫多奄奄無氣節間有之而檢身之 功或歉焉故其發之也不耀而其持之也不 恒如公則何可議哉其立志以古聖賢自期 潜脩默識不求人知其學以克己求仁爲要 因自號克齋讀書不資于文詞遇格言即手 録于册以爲力行之助平生言若不出口視 所當爲者勇於爲之操履恪然一出于誠居 此官即欲盡此職行此事即欲盡此心視去 就升沉甚輕一在於生靈國家餘不恤也故 謂公有天下不可奪之大節有足以濟天下 之大才有不可遏於天下之大勇宦轍所至 無不感動廵江西至今稱頌南畿河南提學 切切感慕廣東尤切怙恃去之日庶道擁留 相率立生祠及去思碑故公名滿天下無問 識不識論一時正人必曰陳某云  録曰夫所謂人不能以薄待之者陳公士  賢之謂也公致位未極入朝無妬忌之行
Interpretation

The records state that Kangzhai (Wu Yubi) firmly declined the appointment as tutor to the Crown Prince; Baisha (Chen Xianzhang) did not regard his post as Compiler-Reviser (jiantao) as a distinction; and Yifeng (Luo Lun) did not esteem winning first place in the palace examinations as especially valuable. As a result, the reputations of these three gentlemen, the "Four Remonstrating Academicians of the Hanlin Academy," spread throughout the realm. Later, He Ji was also stirred by their example and rose to submit a memorial requesting to resign from office. What an age this was! Above, there was a benevolent and wise ruler; below, there were many sincere and upright ministers.

Yet why were they able to act in this way? It was precisely because they had, in their daily lives, worked diligently to investigate principle and to nourish their virtue. They set their aspirations broadly and did not keep external fame and profit in mind; they held fast to their minds and bodies with rigor, yet did not consider themselves already perfect. As for those called wild and arrogant, they simply failed to exert themselves diligently enough to meet the expectations placed upon them. How could one say that others had wronged them? The compiler has explained this in detail.

Zhang Yuanzhen's "Epitaph for Master Chen Xuan" states: Because the realm had enjoyed peace for a long time, most scholar-officials had grown listless and lacked integrity, and those few who possessed integrity often fell short in self-cultivation. Their conduct therefore was not conspicuous, and their principles were difficult to sustain. What could be criticized in someone like Master Chen?

Master Chen took the sages of antiquity as models, cultivating himself in secret and quietly embodying their teachings, without seeking to be known by others. In scholarship, he regarded the overcoming of selfish desire and the pursuit of humaneness as essential, and so he called his studio "Studio of Overcoming" (Kezhai). He did not rely on ornate prose when reading; whenever he came upon a maxim, he copied it by hand into a notebook to spur himself toward practice. In daily speech he was cautious, yet when something needed to be done, he acted with courage. His conduct was strict, and everything proceeded from sincerity. Whatever office Master Chen held, Master Chen wished to discharge its duties to the utmost; whatever task was undertaken, it was to be completed wholeheartedly. Toward resignation or retention, promotion or setback, Master Chen regarded all with light indifference, keeping the common people and the state alone in mind and letting all other concerns go.

Thus people said that Master Chen possessed a great integrity that no one in the realm could take away, a great talent sufficient to save the realm, and a great courage that nothing under heaven could obstruct. Wherever Master Chen went, people were moved. When Master Chen inspected Jiangxi, the local people still praise that work today; when serving as Educational Intendant (tixue, the official responsible for regional education and for examining the provincial academic administration) in the Southern Metropolitan Area and in Henan, people deeply missed Master Chen; and when serving in Guangdong, the people were especially attached to Master Chen. On the day of departure from office, crowds lined the roads to see Master Chen off, and they successively built a living shrine (shengci, a shrine erected for someone still alive) and a "Memorial Stele of Remembrance" (qusi bei, a stele commemorating an official who has left office and expressing longing for him). Therefore Master Chen's name filled the realm, and whether or not people had met Master Chen, when the people of the time spoke of upright men, they were sure to mention Chen Mou.

The compiler says: "Those whom people cannot wrong" refers precisely to Chen Shixian. Master Chen's official rank had not reached its highest level, and when entering court to serve, Master Chen had no conduct of envying others……

 而四方有公是之心若張東白正直忠厚  恬然退䖏垂三十年出而際遇 孝皇所勸者正學所講者正傳祗因優寵眷  注簡在帝帝心而人遂忌之然則康齋諸  公誠不可無也以朋友切切愢愢義莫有  難於此故終焉 弘
Interpretation

People everywhere have a standard in their hearts for judging right and wrong fairly. A man as upright and kindhearted as Zhang Dongbai lived quietly and contentedly in retirement for nearly thirty years. When he later entered public service, the Filial Emperor came to value him. He urged people to study orthodox learning and taught its orthodox traditions. Yet because he received generous favor and was esteemed by the emperor, people grew jealous of him.

In light of this, the worthy men of the Kangzhai school were indeed indispensable. Among friends, there is nothing harder than earnestly urging one another on, sharpening one another through mutual criticism, and acting in accordance with principle. That was how the matter ultimately ended.

Hongdao lu, juan 27

道録卷之二十七

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0033); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 19 Vol. 21 →