中文 · EN

《弘道錄》Vol. 35

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Xu Daozang 續道藏 Vol. 35 / 41 6,092 characters

About this page. The original text of 《弘道錄》 Vol. 35 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 41 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 12 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《弘道錄》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

弘道録卷之四十二路三  智   父子之智 唐書貞觀二十三年夏四月太宗有疾謂太 子曰李世勣才智有餘然汝與之無恩但不 能懷服我今黜之若其即行俟我死汝於後 用爲僕射親任之若徘徊顧望當殺之耳遂 以同中書門下三品爲疊州都督世勣受詔 不至家而去  録曰唐太宗之不能庇其子若孫也宜哉  托孤之命未行托勣之言先入是所以教  其謟一蓋帝本挾數任術長於任人而不  閑於觀物故夫今日之心膂即他日之仇  讐今日之智計即他日之禍本自以爲得  而不知勣也者旣不難於事帝安在其不  背密乎其始也徒以一鬚之剪爲社稷之  計不知鷹犬之量更思其餘物乎其終也  乃以去鞅之故智欲遺安劉之逺圖悖亦  甚矣斯大有関於唐之宗廟社稷不可以  不録也 睿宗元年上將立太子以宋王成噐嫡長而 平王隆基有大功疑不能决成器辭曰國家 安則先嫡長國家危則先有功茍違其宜四 海失望臣死不敢居平王之上涕泣固辭者 累日大臣亦多言平王功太宜立劉幽求曰 臣聞除天下之禍者當饗天下之福乎王拯 社稷之危救君親之難論功莫大語德最賢 無可疑者上從之立平王隆基爲太子  録曰人皆曰廬陵王之復辟唐之天下一  再造也而不知造於平王隆基之爲太子
Interpretation

A Father and Son’s Wisdom

The Book of Tang records that in the fourth month of the summer of the twenty-third year of Zhenguan (649), Emperor Taizong of Tang fell ill. He said to the Crown Prince, “Li Shiji, a Tang court official whose original name was Xu Shiji, has ample talent and intelligence, but you have shown him no kindness, so he will not truly submit to you. I am demoting him now. If he sets out for his post at once, then after I die you should reinstate him, appoint him as puyi—the head of the Department of State Affairs—and trust him. If he hesitates and waits to see what happens, you should have him killed.” Taizong then appointed Li Shiji governor of Diezhou. On receiving the edict, Li Shiji did not return home; he set out for his post immediately.

The Record comments: Emperor Taizong of Tang failed to protect his descendants, and he brought this upon himself. Before he had put into effect his instructions to the Crown Prince, he had already disclosed his plan concerning Li Shiji. In effect, he was teaching the Crown Prince to use political tricks to win people over. Taizong was skilled at strategy and at employing talent, but poor at discerning people’s true nature. Those who were trusted allies today could become enemies tomorrow, and schemes that seemed clever today could become the source of disaster tomorrow. Taizong thought he had arranged everything properly, but failed to consider this: if Li Shiji could readily defy Taizong, how could anyone be sure he would not later betray the Crown Prince?

At first, Taizong merely cut off a lock of his beard, believing he was acting for the good of the state. He did not realize that someone who let himself be used like a hawk or hound might still have plans of his own. In the end, he again tried to use his old method of dealing with Li Shiji to secure lasting stability for the Liu imperial house. This was truly absurd. Since the matter concerned the ancestral temples and state altars of the Tang dynasty, it must be recorded.

In the first year of Ruizong’s reign (710), the emperor was preparing to appoint a Crown Prince. The Prince of Song, Li Chengqi, was the eldest son born to the empress, while Prince Ping, Li Longji, had rendered great service. The emperor could not decide. Li Chengqi declined the position, saying, “When the state is at peace, the eldest son born to the empress should be appointed first. When the state is in peril, the person who has rendered great service should come first. If the proper course is ignored, people throughout the realm will be disappointed. Even if I were to die, I would not dare to place myself above Prince Ping.” For several days he repeatedly wept and refused. Most of the ministers also believed that Prince Ping’s achievements were great and that he was the most suitable choice for Crown Prince.

Liu Youqiu said, “I have heard that those who put an end to turmoil and pacify the realm should enjoy its blessings. Prince Ping rescued the ancestral altars and state from danger, and saved the ruler and his family from peril. No one surpasses him in merit, and in virtue he is the most worthy. There is no reason to doubt what should be done.” The emperor accepted his advice and appointed Prince Ping, Li Longji, as Crown Prince.

The Record comments: Everyone says that the restoration of the Prince of Luling rebuilt the Tang realm, but they do not realize that the foundation of this restoration was Prince Ping, Li Longji, being appointed Crown Prince.

 也夫震長子也若乃建成與承乾及陳王  忠皆庸劣無似所謂震索索視矍矍者也  終亦必亡而已矣至於中宗昏愚尤甚始  則其心受辱而不顧俛首廢棄而不耻終  則生於憂怠而不知制於妻孥而不恤所  謂震逐泥未光者也以及於玄宗赫然奮  怒震驚羣枉之心發攄襀陰之氣神堯故  物不失其舊所謂震驚百里不喪喪鬯出  可以守宗廟社稷以爲祭主者也觀於出  乃見 權臯者唐相德輿父也以才名表署安禄山 從事陰察安有異志然畏其清虐欲潜去又 慮禍及老母適禄山使獻俘京師回過福昌 尉仲謨臯從妹壻也密以計約之比至河陽 詐稱疾亟召謩謩至假爲哀哭手自殯襲既 逸而葬其棺人無知者從吏以詔書還其母 初不知聞之慟哭禄山遂不疑許其母𡚖乃 㣲服匿跡候其母於淇門奉之晝夜南去及 渡江禄山已反由是名聞天下採訪使高適 表爲判官屬永王璘亂多刼士大夫臯又變 名以免玄宗在蜀聞而嘉之士君子如李華 柳識皆仰臯之德以爲分天下善惡一人而 已德輿四歲能詩七歲以孝聞十五爲文數 百篇名聲日大韓洄辟從事試秘書省後爲 禮部尚書平章事自貞元至元和三十年羽 儀朝行性直亮寛恕動作語言一無外餙醖 籍風流爲時稱嚮於述作特盛六經百氏游
Interpretation

Zhen, the Thunder hexagram, symbolizes the eldest son. Li Jiancheng, Li Chengqian, and Prince Li Zhong were all mediocre and inferior, with nothing outstanding about them. They were just as the hexagram statement says: “Thunder brings trembling and alarmed, darting eyes.” They were bound to meet their end.

Emperor Zhongzong was especially dull and foolish. At first, he endured humiliation without feeling shame, bowed his head in submission, and let himself be deposed. Later, he lived amid anxiety and neglect, yet did not know how to restrain himself; he was controlled by his wife and children and failed to take care. This is just as the hexagram statement says: “Thunder drives one into the mud; the way ahead is still not bright.”

When Xuanzong came to power, he rose up in anger, startling many wicked men and releasing the upright energy he had long kept in reserve. The old foundation laid by Emperor Shenyao—Li Yuan, Emperor Gaozu of Tang—was thereby preserved. This is just as the hexagram statement says: “Thunder startles for a hundred li, yet the sacrificial spoon and libation remain undropped.” Such a person can protect the ancestral temple and the state, and serve as the presiding celebrant in its rites. From this, we can see that this line of the Zhen hexagram speaks of someone capable of bearing great responsibility.

Consider also the story of Quan Gao. Quan Gao was the father of the Tang chancellor Quan Deyu. Recommended for office on account of his talent and reputation, he later became a subordinate of An Lushan. He secretly realized that An Lushan harbored rebellious intentions, but feared his cruelty and wanted to slip away. He also worried that disaster might befall his elderly mother. By chance, An Lushan sent him to the capital to present prisoners. On the way, he passed through Fuchang County, where the county lieutenant Zhong Mo was married to his maternal cousin. Quan Gao quietly consulted Zhong Mo about a plan. When he reached Heyang, he pretended to be gravely ill and summoned Zhong Mo. After Zhong Mo arrived, Quan Gao feigned grief and personally arranged his own funeral. In this way, Quan Gao escaped. The coffin was in fact empty, but no one else knew the truth. When officials, acting on an imperial order, escorted Quan Gao’s mother back, she initially knew nothing of what had happened. When she heard the news, she wept in anguish. An Lushan therefore grew suspicious of nothing and allowed her to leave. Quan Gao then changed into ordinary clothes, concealed his whereabouts, and waited for his mother at Qimen. They fled south by night and day. By the time they crossed the Yangtze, An Lushan had already launched his rebellion.

Quan Gao’s name thus became known throughout the land. Gao Shi, an investigating commissioner, submitted a memorial recommending him for the post of judicial adviser. Later, when Prince Li Lin rebelled and frequently seized scholar-officials, Quan Gao changed his name again and escaped. After hearing of his deeds in Shu, Xuanzong praised him. Scholar-officials such as Li Hua and Liu Shi all admired Quan Gao’s character, believing that he alone was enough to distinguish good from evil throughout the realm.

Quan Deyu could compose poetry at the age of four and was known for his filial piety at seven. By the age of fifteen, he had written hundreds of pieces, and his reputation continued to grow. Han Hui recruited him as an aide in his headquarters. Later, he passed the examinations and entered the Secretariat Library, eventually rising to Minister of Rites and Tong Zhongshu Menxia Pingzhangshi, a chancellor. From the Zhenyuan era through the Yuanhe era, he served at court for thirty years with dignified bearing. He was upright and generous, making no attempt to conceal his words or actions. His composed manner and exceptional presence won him the praise of his contemporaries. He was especially skilled in writing and had read widely in the Six Classics and the works of the various schools…

詠漸漬其文雅正而弘博時人以爲宗匠焉  録曰愚觀權臯之䧟虜窟可謂無策矣而  能卒保其身以奉其親蓋不寧完節全名  抑且慶鍾後裔韓洄王定常評臯可爲宰  輔師保卒非空言父子貞文孝德羽儀朝  行豈非明哲之君子乎 符令奇子璘初爲盧龍神將會幽州亂奔昭 義田悅拒命奇密語璘曰吾閱世事多矣自 安史干紀無噍類吾觀田氏覆亡無日汝能 委質朝廷爲唐忠臣吾亦名揚後世璘泣曰 悅忍人也近禍可畏奇曰今王師四合吾屬 俎中醢兒不行吾死壘尸逆地云何璘與父 嚙臂别時朝廷遣馬璲討悅璘降璲悅怒切 責罵以忘義背主旦夕且死令奇曰吾教子 以順殺身庸何悔遂遇害燧署璘爲軍副詔 拜特進封義陽郡王復表父冤加左散騎常 侍户部尚書  録曰此事與權臯等矧令奇眞死臯尚假  耳而史不列卓行豈以其子不在相位耶  録之 宋史曹璨曹瑋皆彬之子也璨沉毅多智彬 以爲類己特鍾愛焉授河陽節度使同平章 事瑋沉勇有謀喜讀書通春秋三傳於左傳 尤深李繼遷叛諸將數出無功太宗問誰可 將者彬曰臣少子瑋可任即召見以本官同 知渭州時年十九及彬疾眞宗臨視明以後 事對曰臣無事可言臣二子材器可取臣若 内舉皆堪爲將上問其优劣對曰璨不如瑋
Interpretation

Yong Jian’s writings were elegant and dignified, and wide-ranging in their content. People of his time all regarded him as a master.

The Hongdao Lu says: “In my view, when Quan Gao fell into enemy captivity, he seemed to have no good options. Yet in the end he preserved himself and was able to serve his parents. He not only safeguarded his integrity and reputation; his good fortune also extended to later generations. Han Hui and Wang Dingchang both once assessed Quan Gao, saying he was fit to serve as a chancellor or tutor to the heir apparent. Their words were no idle talk. Quan Gao and his son were renowned for their loyalty and filial virtue, and became models for the court. Was he not a wise and far-seeing gentleman?”

Fu Lingqi’s son, Fu Lin, initially served as a divine general in Lulong. After unrest broke out in Youzhou, Fu Lingqi went over to Tian Yue, military governor of Zhaoyi. Tian Yue refused orders to submit to the court. Fu Lingqi privately told Fu Lin, “I have seen much of the world. Ever since An Lushan and Shi Siming rebelled against the law, the people have suffered enormous casualties. I think the Tian family will soon meet its end. If you can enter the service of the court and become a loyal servant of the Tang, I too can win a name that will be remembered by later generations.”

Fu Lin wept and said, “Tian Yue is cruel, and disaster is clearly about to befall him. It is terrifying.” Fu Lingqi said, “The court’s armies are now closing in on us from every side. We are already like meat on a chopping board. If you do not leave, after I die my bones will be piled up on rebel territory. What more is there to say?” Fu Lin then bit his arm and took leave of his father.

At that time, the court sent Ma Sui to campaign against Tian Yue, and Fu Lin surrendered to him. Tian Yue was furious. He harshly rebuked Fu Lin for forgetting his benefactor and betraying his lord, and said he would soon meet his death. Fu Lingqi said, “I taught my son to follow the right path. Even if that costs him his life, what is there to regret?” He was killed soon afterward. Ma Sui appointed Fu Lin deputy commander, and the court issued an edict conferring on him the title of Grandee of the Palace and the rank of Prince of Yiyang Commandery. Fu Lin also submitted a memorial pleading his father’s case, and the court posthumously bestowed on Fu Lingqi the titles of Left Attendant Gentleman of the Scattered Cavalry and Minister of Revenue.

The Hongdao Lu says: “Compared with the cases of Quan Gao and the others, Fu Lingqi truly died, while Quan Gao was merely taken captive. The histories did not include Fu Lingqi among those with outstanding achievements. Was it perhaps because his son did not become a chancellor? I record this account here for that reason.”

The History of the Song records that Cao Can and Cao Wei were both sons of Cao Bin. Cao Can was steady, resolute, and resourceful. Cao Bin thought he greatly resembled himself and especially favored him. Cao Can later served as military governor of Heyang and as a Tongping Zhangshi. Cao Wei was brave, composed, and strategic. He loved reading, knew the Three Commentaries on the Spring and Autumn Annals, and was especially well versed in the Zuo Commentary.

When Li Jiqian rebelled, several generals led campaigns but failed to win. Emperor Taizong of Song asked who could command the troops. Cao Bin replied, “My younger son, Cao Wei, is up to the task.” Taizong summoned Cao Wei and appointed him prefect of Weizhou while retaining his existing post. Cao Wei was then nineteen.

When Cao Bin fell gravely ill, Emperor Zhenzong of Song visited him. They spoke of what should happen after his death, and Cao Bin replied, “I have nothing else to say. Both my sons are capable and can be appointed to office. If I were to recommend them, either would be fit to serve as a general.” The emperor asked which of the two was more outstanding. Cao Bin replied, “Cao Can is not as good as Cao Wei.”

後瑋有功與彬同配饗廟廷彬太祖瑋仁宗 知子莫如父云  録曰彬之右瑋也豈預期其不附丁謂歟  是故寧爲寇黨無爲謂黨㓂黨雖罪猶榮  以其無忝所生也謂黨雖貴猶戮以其有  靦面目也蓋不惟國之禎𠏉其邦之司直  已乎 瑋常覘趙元昊知其必叛謂樞密王鬷曰在 陜西日聞趙德明常使人以馬博易怒其息 㣲欲殺之莫可諫止時元昊方十餘歲諫曰 我戎人從事鞍馬而以資鄰國易不急之物 已非得策又從而殺之邊人誰肯爲我用者 德明從之瑋因私念曰此子欲用其人矣是 必有異志聞其嘗往來牙市中瑋欲識之屢 使人誘致之不可得乃使善晝者圖其貌而 觀之眞英物也他日必爲邉患計其時正在 公秉政之日公甚勉之鬷時未以爲然後始 嘆其明識  録曰此不但璨之不如瑋鬷亦未爲得也  彬可謂始終不負所舉矣 向敏中父瑀躬親教督不假顏色曰大吾門 者此兒也及長姿表瓌碩豈弟多智曉民政 善理繁劇居大任三十年人以重德目之爲 人主所優禮故雖罹變故終不得謝嘗進右 僕射兼門下侍郞眞宗謂學士李宗諤曰朕 自即位未嘗除僕射今命敏中此殊命也敏 中應大喜賀客必多卿試往觀之勿言朕意 也宗諤既至門闌寂然竟入賀曰今日聞降 麻士大夫莫不懽慰敏中但唯唯又曰自上
Interpretation

Later, Shi Wei distinguished himself through his service, and he and Shi Bin were both enshrined together in the Imperial Ancestral Temple. Shi Bin lived during the reign of Emperor Taizu, while Shi Wei lived during the reign of Emperor Renzong.

As the saying goes, "No one knows a son better than his father." The compiler comments that Shi Bin was Shi Wei's colleague and also his senior. Could it be that when he recommended Shi Wei, he had already foreseen that Shi Wei would not attach himself to Ding Wei? For this reason, Shi Bin would rather belong to Kou Zhun's faction than to Ding Wei's clique. Even when Kou Zhun's followers were guilty, they still felt honored; even when Ding Wei's followers were exalted, they were still held in contempt, because they were ashamed of their own conduct. This was not only an auspicious sign for the state, but also a model for the upright ministers of the court.

Shi Wei once secretly observed Zhao Yuanhao of the Western Xia, who was later known as Li Yuanhao and originally bore the surname Zhao, and concluded that he would certainly rebel. He said to the Privy Councilor Wang Zong: "In my early years in Shaanxi, I heard that Zhao Deming, Yuanhao's father, often sent people to trade horses with the border people for goods. Yuanhao, then only in his teens, advised his father, saying, 'We Rong people make our living by fighting on horseback, yet we exchange our war horses for the useless goods of neighboring states. This is already not a sound strategy. Moreover, if these horses are slaughtered, who among the border people will still be willing to serve us?' Deming followed his advice. From this, Shi Wei privately speculated, 'This boy wishes to attract talented men, so he must have ambitions beyond the ordinary.' Hearing that Yuanhao often went back and forth at the border markets, Shi Wei repeatedly sent people to invite him, but never managed to meet him. So he had a skilled portrait painter draw Yuanhao's likeness so that he could study it. When the portrait was finished, Shi Wei sighed, 'This man is truly outstanding, and in the future he will surely become a threat on our borders.' This took place while Shi Wei was serving as chief minister. Wang Zong did not agree at the time, but later he sighed in admiration at Shi Wei's far-sighted insight.

The compiler comments that this shows not only that Shi Wei fell short of Shi Bin, but also that Wang Zong's judgment was lacking. Shi Bin may be said to have never failed the people he recommended.

Xiang Minzhong's father, Xiang Yu, personally taught and urged him, never showing him a warm expression, and often said, "The one who will bring glory to our family name is this child." As an adult, Xiang Minzhong was imposing in appearance and gentle in temperament. He was clever and resourceful, well versed in civil administration, and skilled at handling complex affairs. He held important posts for thirty years, and people respected his character, while the emperor also treated him with special favor. Therefore, even when he encountered misfortune, he was never dismissed. He once rose to the post of Right Pushe concurrently Vice Director of the Chancellery. Emperor Zhenzong said to the scholar Li Zongo, "Since I ascended the throne, I have never appointed a pushe. Now that I am appointing Minzhong, this is an extraordinary favor. Minzhong will surely be overjoyed upon receiving the appointment, and many guests will come to congratulate him. You may go and see, but do not say that this was my intention." When Li Zongo arrived at Xiang's residence, he found the gate quiet and cold, so he went in to offer congratulations, saying, "Today I heard that the court has issued the decree of appointment, and all the gentlemen are delighted." Xiang Minzhong only responded repeatedly and mentioned that "His Majesty paid special attention to this matter," which shows that Zhenzong's regard for him was out of the ordinary.

即位未嘗除端揆非勳望隆重眷倚殊越何 以至此敏中復唯唯又歷陳前世爲僕射勳 德禮命敏中亦唯唯卒無一言其智略愼重 類如此子五人傳正傳式傳亮傳師傳範傳 亮子經女即欽聖憲肅皇后也後累贈敏中 燕王傳亮周王經吴王餘孫並顯   録曰宋之后族或以仁或以智或以勇仁   而不濫智而不徼勇而不亂是故彬之清   介無伐是不濫也敏中豈弟多智是不徼   也瓊有子十四人皆教以讀書是不亂也   不知尚此而惟色之求幾何望其伉儷之  益嗣續之賢哉 吕夷簡與子公著俱拜司空平章事宋興以 三公平章事者四人而吕氏居其二士艶其 榮夷簡父蒙亨即蒙正弟也祥符間眞宗封 太山幸其第謂蒙正曰卿諸子孰可用對曰 諸子皆不足用有姪夷簡宰相才也由是知 名公著自少即以治心養性爲本於聲利紛 華泊然無所好暑不揮扇寒不親火簡重淸 靜蓋天禀然其智識深敏遇事善决苟利於 國不以利害動其心見士大夫以人物爲意 者必問其所知與其所聞參互考實以逹於 上毎議政事博取衆善以爲善神宗嘗言其 於人材不欺如權衡之稱物尤能避逺聲跡 不以知人自處司馬光亦曰毎聞晦叔言便 覺己語爲煩其爲人所重如此  録曰愚觀吕許公不惟文穆知之王文正
Interpretation

After Emperor Zhenzong came to the throne, Xiang Minzhong, a distinguished official of the Northern Song, was never appointed chancellor. Someone asked him, “Your achievements are outstanding, your reputation is high, and the emperor’s trust in you is especially deep. Why is this?” Minzhong only replied briefly, then repeatedly listed the achievements, virtues, and honors of earlier officials who had served as puye, a title comparable to chancellor. He still said nothing on his own behalf. Such were, in essence, his political judgment and caution.

He had five sons: Chuanzheng, Chuanshi, Chuanliang, Chuanshi, and Chuanfan. Chuanliang’s daughter later became Empress Qingsheng Xiansu. Xiang Minzhong was later posthumously awarded titles and ranks on several occasions. Chuanliang was made Prince of Yan; the Prince of Zhou was Chuanliang’s son, and the Prince of Wu was his grandson. All three enjoyed great distinction in their time.

The Record says: Among the relatives by marriage of the Song emperors, some were known for benevolence, some for wisdom, and some for courage. To be benevolent without being indulgent, wise without relying on lucky chances, and courageous without acting rashly—these are the qualities to prize. Bin was honest and upright without boasting: benevolent, yet not indulgent. Minzhong was even-tempered, generous, and resourceful: wise, yet not given to grasping at lucky chances. Qiong had fourteen sons and taught them all to read: courageous, yet not reckless. If these qualities are not valued, and one seeks only beauty, how can one expect harmony between husband and wife or worthy descendants?

Lü Yijian and his son Lü Gongzhu both served as Sikong and Pingzhangshi, senior official posts. Since the founding of the Song, four men had been granted one of the Three Ducal titles and also served as Pingzhangshi; two of them were from the Lü family. Scholars all envied the family’s glory. Lü Yijian’s father, Lü Mengheng, was the younger brother of Lü Mengzheng. During the Xiangfu era, Emperor Zhenzong performed the fengshan rites on Mount Tai and visited Lü Mengzheng’s residence. He asked, “Which of your sons is fit for office?” Lü Mengzheng replied, “None of my sons is fit for appointment. I have a nephew, Lü Yijian, whose abilities are sufficient for the office of chancellor.” Lü Yijian thus became known.

From his youth, Lü Gongzhu, courtesy name Huishu, took the cultivation of the mind as his foundation. He was indifferent to fame, profit, and a life of luxury. In summer he did not fan himself; in winter he did not sit close to a brazier. He was simple and steady in manner, quiet and even-tempered—qualities that were perhaps natural to him. His insight was penetrating and keen, and he was skilled at making decisions when matters arose. When something benefited the state, he would not be swayed by personal gain or loss. When he met scholar-officials who considered identifying worthy people their duty, he would ask whom they knew or had heard about, then compare and investigate their accounts before reporting the findings. In discussing affairs of state, he drew widely on others’ strengths and brought them together into sound policies.

Emperor Shenzong once said that Lü judged people without bias, as evenly as a balance weighs objects. He was especially skilled at avoiding entanglement in people’s reputations and records of their deeds, and did not make a reputation for himself as a discerning judge of character. Sima Guang also said, “Whenever I hear Huishu speak, I feel that my own words are too verbose.” Such was the respect he commanded.

The Record says: In my view, Duke Xu, Lü Yijian, was understood not only by Duke Wenmu, but also by Duke Wang Wenzheng…

 亦知之觀其一言之决雖筮龜不如正所  謂拔茅連茹以其彙征吉者也至止獻公  雖曰人才不欺如權衡稱物然未能燭計  見效猶所謂包承包羞者此人事關於天  道而興衰得失判然見矣 蘇洵名二子說曰輪輻蓋軫皆有職子車而 軾獨若無所爲者雖然去軾吾未見其爲完 車也軾乎吾懼汝之不外餙也天下之車莫 不由轍而言車之功轍不與焉雖然車仆馬 斃而患不及轍是轍者禍福之間也轍乎吾 知免矣又木假山記曰予家有三峯予每思 之則疑其有數存乎其間且其孽而不傷拱 而不夭任爲棟梁而不伐風㧞水漂而不破 拆不傷不腐不破拆而不爲人所材以及於 斧斤出於湍沙之間而不爲樵夫野人之所 薪而後得至乎此則其理似不偶然也然予 之愛之而又有感焉予見中峯魁岸踞肆意 氣端重若有以服其旁之二峯二峯者莊栗 刻峭凛乎不可犯雖其勢服於中峯而岌然 若無阿附意吁其可敬也夫其可以有所感 也夫  録曰史謂軾稍自韜戢雖不獲柄用亦當  免禍斯言豈其然哉觀老泉之所以逆料  其子終身不差毫末而三峰之說比喻親  切千古之下可想見一門之内父子之間  智識非尋常可比豈草草知其子者同日  語哉 歐陽脩幼喪父母韓國夫人鄭氏親誨讀書
Interpretation

Su Xun, a writer of the Northern Song, says in “On the Names of My Two Sons”: The wheels, spokes, canopy, and carriage body each have their own function. Only the crossbar at the front of the carriage, which a passenger can lean on, seems to do nothing. Yet if it were removed, I have never seen a carriage that remained whole. Su Shi, I fear you do not know how to conceal your brilliance. Every carriage in the world leaves tracks, but when people speak of a carriage’s achievements, they do not count its tracks among them. Even so, when a carriage overturns and its horses die, the calamity does not befall the tracks. The tracks stand between calamity and good fortune. Su Zhe, I know you will escape calamity.

In “Record of a Wooden Mountain,” he also says: My family has a wooden model of a mountain with three peaks. I often ponder it and feel that some kind of destiny must be at work in it. It grew branches without being damaged and became a tree so large it would take two people to embrace, yet was not cut down in its prime. It could have served as a roof beam, but was never felled. Torn up by violent winds and swept along by floods, it was not broken, damaged, or left to rot. No one cut it down for timber; later, it escaped the rapids and sandbanks without being taken for firewood by woodcutters or villagers. That it has survived to this day seems no accident.

I cherish this wooden mountain and have been moved by what I see in it. The central peak is tall and upright, with a dignified bearing, as though it could command the assent of the two peaks beside it. The side peaks are grave and stern, steep and forbidding, inspiring no one to treat them lightly. Though their forms defer to the central peak, they still rise high, without any air of clinging to it or currying favor. Ah, they are truly worthy of respect, and truly moving.

The Hongdao lu comments: The histories say that if Su Shi had restrained his brilliance a little, he ought to have escaped calamity, even if he was never given an important position. Can this really be so? Consider how precisely Su Xun foresaw the course of his sons’ lives, and how apt and profound his comparison to the three peaks was. A thousand years later, one can still glimpse the affection and insight shared by the father and sons of the Su family. Their wisdom was extraordinary. How could it be compared with that of those who only casually get to know their sons?

Ouyang Xiu lost his parents in childhood, and Lady Zheng of the Han family personally taught him to read…

家貧無資以荻畫地教其書字謂之曰汝父 爲吏嘗夜燭治官書屢廢而嘆吾問之則曰 死獄也吾求其生不得尔吾曰生可求乎曰 求其生而不得則死者與我皆無恨也矧求 而有得耶以其有得則知不求而死者有限 也夫常求其生猶失之死而世常求其死也 此語脩服之終身凡斷死罪非殺人者多所 平反平居教他子弟亦以此語之  録曰歐陽氏之父非有所求也盡己之心  焉耳其母亦非有所爲也明父之志焉耳  此其人所不知而己獨知之冥冥之中所  謂陰德莫過於此故不必明其報應而但  服之終身尤可爲知者道也 劉安世母有賢名及安世除諫官尚未拜命 入白其母曰朝廷不以安世不肖使在言路 倘居其官須明目張膽以身任責脫有觸忤 禍譴立至主上方以孝治若以老母辭當可 免母曰不然吾聞諫官爲天子諍臣汝父平 生欲爲之而不可得汝幸居此地當捐身以 報國恩正得罪流放無問逺近吾當從汝所 之於是受命在職正色立朝面折廷爭人目 之以爲殿上虎  録曰愚觀安世之事而嘆死生有命君子  不可以不安也以敦卞之威權而濟之以  凶虐人爲之甘心者衆矣不惟嶺表不能  死人而指教數四或將到而先斃或數驛  而赦原後世聞之祇增一咲若有使之然  者向使母預憂禍患則直道不顯直道不
Interpretation

His family was poor and could not afford paper or brushes, so he taught his son to write on the ground with a reed. He told him, “When your father was an official, he often stayed up at night by lamplight handling official papers. As he wrote, he would stop and sigh. I asked him why, and he said, ‘This is a case in which the accused is to be sentenced to death. I tried to find a way to spare his life, but could not.’ I asked, ‘Could you not try to save him?’ He replied, ‘If I do everything I can to save him and still fail, then neither the dead man nor I will have anything to regret. Besides, sometimes, after doing everything one can, it is still possible to save someone. It is precisely because lives can sometimes be saved that we know how wrong it is to let someone die without trying to save them.’ He always did his utmost to find a way for the accused to live. Even if some were still sentenced to death, that was better than people simply seeking to condemn them.”

Ouyang Xiu, the Northern Song writer and statesman, kept these words in mind throughout his life. Whenever he tried cases carrying the death penalty, he often cleared the names of many accused people, except those who had truly committed murder. In his daily instruction of the younger members of his family, he always used these words to encourage them.

The compiler of the Hongdao lu comments: Ouyang Xiu’s father was not trying to gain anything for himself; he was simply following the dictates of his own heart. Nor was his mother acting with any particular aim; she only wanted her son to understand his father’s aspirations. Others might not have known of this intention; Ouyang Xiu alone understood it. Doing good where no one can see it is what is called “hidden virtue”—good deeds done quietly, without seeking recognition—and nothing is more profound. So there is no need to spell out what reward good deeds may bring. Simply keep this teaching in mind for a lifetime, and share it especially with those who truly understand.

Liu Anshi, a Northern Song official renowned for his fearless remonstrance, had a mother famed for her wisdom. He was appointed remonstrance official, a position whose duties included advising the emperor and correcting his faults. Before formally accepting the appointment, he first went home and told his mother, “The court has not considered me unworthy despite my lack of talent, and has placed me among the remonstrance officials. In this post I must distinguish right from wrong, speak frankly, and take responsibility myself. If I offend powerful people, disaster may soon follow. The emperor is now governing the realm through filial piety. If I decline on the grounds that I must care for my elderly mother, I may be spared the position.”

His mother replied, “That is wrong. I have heard that a remonstrance official speaks to the Son of Heaven on behalf of all under Heaven. Your father wanted to hold such an office all his life, but never got the chance. You are fortunate to have this position, so you should give your life in gratitude for the state’s favor. Even if you are convicted and exiled, I will follow you, however far away you are sent.” Liu Anshi therefore accepted the appointment. As an official at court, he was stern in demeanor, pointed out the emperor’s faults to his face, and argued frankly and resolutely. People called him “the tiger in the palace hall.”

The compiler of the Hongdao lu comments: Reading about Liu Anshi, I cannot help reflecting that life and death have their own allotted course, and a noble person should not be swayed by fortune or misfortune. Cai Que, a powerful Northern Song minister, used cruel methods as well, and many people wanted Liu Anshi dead. Yet exile to Lingnan did not kill him. On several occasions, people were sent to harm him: some died before reaching their destination, while in another case, after they had traveled only a few stages, the court granted Liu Anshi a pardon. To later generations, this sounds almost comical, as though some unseen force had arranged everything.

If his mother had worried only about the dangers from the start, Liu Anshi’s path of integrity could never have come to light; the path of integrity would not…

 顯母子之賢無由而彰此其蓄縮退汗固  不若明目張膽之得以無怍也 尹焞母陳氏焞常應舉發策有誅元祐諸臣 乞一郡自效而上惟恐其去弗許也仁宗嘗 對左右曰儒者皆用矣惟虞伯生未顯擢爾 英宗即位拜住爲相乃言於上遣使求之集 以憂還中丞趙世安乘間爲請曰伯生久居 京師甚貧又病目幸假外任以便醫帝怒曰 一虞伯生汝輩不容耶帝方嚮用文學集弘 才博識無施不宜故重聼其去有如此  録曰愚觀女士讀書通大義則有之矣至  左傳歐蘇文今向學之徒尚猶難之矧女  子乎史傳文仲守衡汲夫婦從以未有子  爲禱於南嶽故集生而文仲異之嗚呼生  子者本其氣也以汲之知人素本儒流而  楊之睿德無忝士行有匹配之賢而後有  嗣續之賢不待智者可以占知其成就矣  又奚待夢卜之或然歟 御製文集西平侯沐英誥曰功懋懋官帝王 之定制思親戀舊人事之常情曩者朕於擾 攘之時年已二十有五尚未生兒女爾沐英 因兵受厄八歳逢難罔知存活朕憐其孤幼 撫育如兒夜卧同相數番鼾睡於朕懷後因 有子爾亦長成以人情天理度之不晦爾名 使從爾姓祀爾祖宗今也不忘爾孩童之狀 以吾無異於爾父特封爲西平侯爾當思幸 逢之初會休忘釋難之洪恩知報不窮究心 利濟永爲多福吉哉
Interpretation

If they were not publicly honored out of concern for the virtue of the mother and son, such hesitation and restraint would ultimately be less fitting than praising them openly and frankly, leaving nothing on one’s conscience.

Yin Tun’s mother was Lady Chen. Yin Tun once sat for the imperial examinations. In his policy essay, he advocated executing the ministers of the Yuanyou era and requested an appointment outside the capital, where he could serve the court. The emperor feared he would leave and repeatedly refused his request. Emperor Renzong once said to those around him, “All the scholars have been appointed; only Yu Boseng has yet to receive a prominent promotion.” After Emperor Yingzong ascended the throne, Bayan, who had become chancellor, advised the emperor to send an envoy to seek out Yu Boseng. After Yu Boseng returned home in sorrow, Zhao Shian, the Censor-in-Chief, took the opportunity to petition on his behalf, saying, “Boseng has lived in the capital for a long time. His family is very poor, and he suffers from an eye disease. I hope Your Majesty will allow him to serve elsewhere so that he can seek treatment.” The emperor angrily replied, “Is it too much for you to tolerate even one Yu Boseng?” The emperor was then preparing to appoint civil officials to important posts. Yu Boseng was exceptionally talented and widely learned, and could serve capably in any position, so the emperor was especially reluctant to let him leave. Matters had come to this pass.

The Hongdao lu comments: I have seen that women who read and understand principles do indeed exist. But even diligent scholars today find it difficult to understand the Zuo Commentary and the writings of Ouyang Xiu, Su Xun, and others; how much more difficult must this be for women? Historical accounts relate that when Wen Zhong served in Heng, his wife, Lady Ji, accompanied him. Since the couple had no children, they went to Mount Heng to pray. Later, when a child was born, Wen Zhong thought the child was extraordinary. Alas, a child’s endowment has its roots in the Qi of its parents. Lady Ji was discerning and came from a family long devoted to Confucian learning; Yang—described here in the original as “Yang’s wise virtue,” though the reference is unclear—also possessed moral integrity and did not bring dishonor upon the principles of a scholar. When virtuous and wise spouses are matched, virtuous offspring follow. The signs of what a child will achieve need not await a sage’s divination to be seen in advance. Why wait for a dream omen or a divination to come true?

In the Imperial Collection of Writings, the emperor’s patent of appointment to Mu Ying, Marquis of Xiping, says:

“Outstanding merit deserves an appropriate rank and title; this is the institution established by emperors. Longing for one’s family and cherishing old ties, meanwhile, are common human feelings. In the midst of the turmoil of war, I was already twenty-five years old and had no children. You, Mu Ying, suffered hardship because of the fighting and, at the age of eight, met with disaster, with your life and death uncertain. I pitied you for being so young and alone, and raised you as though you were my own child. At night we slept together, and more than once you snored in my arms. Later I had children of my own, and you grew to adulthood. In keeping with human feeling and the natural order, I did not conceal your name from you: I let you keep your own surname and maintain the ancestral rites.

“Even now I remember you as a child. I have treated you no less well than my own sons, and therefore confer on you the title of Marquis of Xiping. Remember the good fortune of our first meeting, and do not forget the great kindness with which I rescued you from hardship. Understand what it means to repay kindness: help others wholeheartedly and practice good deeds over many years, and you will receive blessings in abundance. May good fortune be with you.”

 録曰愚觀西平侯與漢之劉肥等耳肥不  旋踵而亡沐至今猶存何也蓋不鑒於齊  無以知漢法之弊不觀於宗又何以見 明祖之善哉始焉提携撫育無以異於繼體  之愛終焉大公至正卒不隱其疇昔之情  且使得以自復其姓自禰其祖不惟逺於  稱王稱伯之僣而曉然功懋懋官之典眞  帝王之大智天理之大公存之萬世而無  弊又安得下與天同其久與國同其休哉  則雖有謀臣辯士無須措一詞而 天章綸渙不可以不録也 陳沂畜德録解學士縉應制題虎顧衆彪圖 曰虎爲百獸尊誰敢觸其怒惟有父子清一 步一回顧 文皇素不喜 仁宗感此詩甚思時 仁宗留守南京頗懷憂虞因命所親夏原吉 即日往迎之  録曰愚觀此詩賢於張良之計逺矣夫父  子天性之親與敵國謀臣之見不同敵國  互分彼此叅於物而有功父子本出因心  切於情而難遏漢祖狃於謀臣之見莫能  迯其範圖 明宗得乎天性之仁故能察夫幾諌千古之  下斯可以觀 乞一郡自效而上惟恐其去弗許也仁宗嘗 對左右曰儒者皆用矣惟虞伯生未顯擢爾 英宗即位拜住爲相乃言於上遣使求之集 以憂還中丞趙世安乘間爲請曰伯生久居 京師甚貧又病目幸假外任以便醫帝怒曰 一虞伯生汝輩不容耶帝方嚮用文學集弘
Interpretation

I think the Marquis of Xiping (Mu Ying of the Ming dynasty) was much like Liu Fei and others of the Han dynasty. Liu Fei died young, while the Mu family has survived to this day. Why? Without examining the history of the state of Qi, we cannot understand the flaws in Han institutions; and without looking at the circumstances of the imperial clan, how could we recognize what Ming Taizu did well?

At first, Ming Taizu promoted and raised Mu Ying as if he were his own heir. Later, guided by impartial principles, he never forgot their former bond. He even allowed the Mu family to restore their original surname and make offerings to their own ancestors. This was far better than claiming titles such as king or lord beyond one’s station, and it clearly embodied the principle that those who render outstanding service should receive an appropriate official rank. This was truly the great wisdom of an emperor and the impartiality embodied in the Way of Heaven. Such a policy could be passed down for generations without harmful consequences. How could it fail to endure as long as Heaven and bring peace to the state? In that case, even the most resourceful ministers and eloquent advisers would have nothing more to add. The emperor’s edict, therefore, must be recorded.

Chen Yi’s Records of Cultivating Virtue states: “The learned scholar Xie” (the Ming dynasty writer Xie Jin) was ordered to inscribe the painting The Tiger Looking Back at Its Cubs. His poem reads: “The tiger is lord of the beasts; who would dare provoke its fury? Only between father and son does one take a few steps, then turn to look back.”

Emperor Wen (the Yongle Emperor) had never liked this poem, but Emperor Renzong was deeply moved by it and often reflected on its meaning. When Renzong was left in charge of Nanjing, he was greatly troubled. He therefore ordered his trusted aide Xia Yuanji to set out that very day to meet him.

I think this poem looks further ahead than Zhang Liang’s strategy. The bond between father and son is a natural affection, unlike the calculations of ministers in rival states. Rival states stand apart, and their ministers can often accomplish much by weighing gains and losses. But father and son are bound by an inward kinship: their feelings run deep and cannot easily be restrained. Emperor Gaozu of Han was caught up in the ministers’ calculations and could not escape their limits. Emperor Ming (the original text says “Emperor Ming”) was able to follow the benevolence inherent in human nature, and so he could perceive a subtle warning. People a thousand years later can see this too.

Yu Ji (courtesy name Boshen) once asked to serve as an official in a commandery, so that he could repay the court. The emperor, however, feared his departure and refused. Renzong once told those around him, “The Confucian scholars have all been appointed to office, yet Yu Boshen alone has not received a notable promotion.” After Yingzong took the throne, he appointed Baiju as chancellor. Baiju then advised the emperor to send an envoy to summon Yu Ji. When Yu Ji fell ill from worry, Censor-in-Chief Zhao Shi’an took the opportunity to petition on his behalf, saying, “Boshen has lived in the capital for a long time. His family is very poor, and he also suffers from an eye disease. I hope you will let him serve for a time as a local official so he can receive treatment.” The emperor grew angry and said, “Can none of you tolerate one Yu Boshen?” At the time, the emperor was planning to make extensive use of literati…

才愽識無施不宜故重聼其去有如此  録曰愚觀女士讀書通大義則有之矣至  左傳歐蘇文今向學之徒尚猶難之矧女  子乎史傳文仲守衡汲夫婦從以未有子  爲禱於南嶽故集生而文仲異之嗚呼生  子者本其氣也以汲之知人素本儒流而  楊之睿德無忝士行有匹配之賢而後有  嗣續之賢不待智者可以占知其成就矣  又奚待夢卜之或然歟 御製文集西平侯沐英誥曰功懋懋官帝王 之定制思親戀舊人事之常情曩者朕於擾 攘之時年已二十有五尚未生兒女爾沐英 因兵受厄八歳逢難罔知存活朕憐其孤幼 撫育如兒夜卧同相數番鼾睡於朕懷後因 有子爾亦長成以人情天理度之不晦爾名 使從爾姓祀爾祖宗今也不忘爾孩童之狀 以吾無異於爾父特封爲西平侯爾當思幸 逢之初會休忘釋難之洪恩知報不窮究心 利濟永爲多福吉哉  録曰愚觀西平侯與漢之劉肥等耳肥不  旋踵而亡沐至今猶存何也盖不鑒於齊  無以知漢法之弊不觀於宗又何以見 明祖之善哉始焉提携撫育無以異於繼體  之愛終焉大公至正卒不隱其疇昔之情  且使得以自復其姓自禰其祖不惟逺於  稱王稱伯之僣而曉然功懋懋官之典眞  帝王之大智天理之大公存之萬世而無  弊又安得下與天同其久與國同其休哉
Interpretation

He was broadly talented and far-sighted, and whatever he undertook, he handled well. That is why his coming and going were regarded as especially important. That is how matters stood.

The Record says: “In my view, there are indeed women who study and come to understand the great principles. But even people studying today often find the Zuo Tradition and the writings of Ouyang Xiu and Su Shi difficult to understand—how much more so women?”

The histories say that Wen Zhong was cautious and steady. He and his wife, the Ji family, had no children, so they went to Mount Heng in the south to pray. Later they had a son, Jisheng, whom Wen Zhong considered exceptional. Alas, whether children are born depends fundamentally on a person’s original Qi. The Ji family understood people and principles, and came from a Confucian background; the Yang family was virtuous and intelligent, meeting the standards expected of a scholar. When a worthy husband and wife are well matched, it is clear that virtuous descendants will carry on the family line. No divination by a wise person is needed to foresee this. Why wait for a dream omen or an oracle to decide whether the prayer has been answered?

In the Collected Writings of the Imperial Compositions, the emperor’s edict to Mu Ying, Marquis of Xiping, reads:

“Those who have rendered outstanding service should be granted the rank and title they deserve; this is the institution established by emperors. To remember one’s family and cherish old bonds, however, is a natural human feeling. When the realm was in turmoil, I was already twenty-five and had no children. You, Mu Ying, had been struck by misfortune in wartime. At the age of eight, you encountered disaster, and it was uncertain whether you would survive. Taking pity on your loneliness and young age, I raised you as though you were my own child. We slept together at night, and several times you snored in my arms. Later I had a son, and you grew to adulthood. Weighing the matter according to human feeling and natural principle, I did not conceal your origins from you. I restored your Mu surname and let you offer sacrifices to your ancestors. Even now, I remember what you were like as a child, and feel that we are as father and son. So I have enfeoffed you as Marquis of Xiping. You must remember the good fortune of our first meeting and never forget the great kindness by which I rescued you from hardship. Understand how to repay that kindness, and devote yourself to helping the people; only then will your blessings endure. May good fortune be with you.”

The Record says: “In my view, Mu Ying, Marquis of Xiping, resembles Liu Fei of the Han dynasty and others. Liu Fei died quite young, while Mu Ying is still remembered to this day. Why? Unless we compare this with the old affairs of Qi, we cannot see the flaws in the Han dynasty’s institutions. And how could we recognize what Ming Taizu did well without examining the stories of the imperial clan?”

At first, Ming Taizu took Mu Ying in and raised him as though he were his own heir. Later, he acted with complete impartiality: he never concealed Mu Ying’s origins, but restored his family name and allowed him to honor his own ancestors. This was far better than usurping the proper order by taking royal titles such as king or lord. It also clearly embodied the principle that great service should be rewarded with appropriate rank and title. This truly reflects an emperor’s wisdom and the fairness of natural principle. It can be passed down for generations without giving rise to abuses. How could such a person fail to endure like Heaven and share the flourishing fortune of the state?

 則雖有謀臣辯士無須措一詞而 天章綸渙不可以不録也 陳沂畜德録解學士縉應制題虎顧衆彪圖 曰虎爲百獸尊誰敢觸其怒惟有父子情一 步一回顧 文皇素不喜 仁宗感此詩甚思時 仁宗留守南京頗懷憂虞因命所親夏原吉 即日往迎之  録曰愚觀此詩賢於張良之計逺矣夫父  子天性之親與敵國謀臣之見不同敵國  互分彼此叅於物而有功父子本出因心  切於情而難遏漢祖狃於謀臣之見莫能  逃其範圖 明宗得乎天性之仁故能察夫幾諌千古之  下斯可以觀 自賦兵得自募凡百悉聼所爲有功亦不遽 徙就秩增異如此則有材者爭自奮勵緩急 得其死力時朝議出師汝談反覆言不可輕 動既而三京收復金兵新破三閫增秩又蹙 額言邊面無可倚仗乞超越拘攣簡㧞俊傑 如吴用周瑜魯肅晋任祖逖陶侃故事使之 各分方面連城數十推轂授權盡𡚖賜履巴 蜀一人荆襄一人兩淮各一人一切便宜行 事庶幾伸縮由己機出於心朝廷不能用後 二十年河南果爲金守沿邉諸郡權勢大削 兵事無肯任責者未幾洛師亦敗朝論始服 其先見云  録曰愚觀二人當光寧危險之朝韓史用  事之日更歷黨禍閉門著述自少至老未  嘗去書嘗論韓非李斯皆有荀卿之才以
Interpretation

Even when there are counselors and skilled debaters, there is no need to trouble oneself by offering advice; but imperial edicts and proclamations issued by the Son of Heaven must still be recorded.

The Record of Chen Yi’s Cultivation of De recounts that Xie Jin, a Ming dynasty official and writer, was ordered to compose The Tiger Looking Back at the Young Leopards. His poem reads: “The tiger is the sovereign of all beasts; who would dare offend its majesty? Only the bond of affection between father and son makes it take a step, then turn back to look again.”

The Yongle Emperor of the Ming, referred to in the original as “Emperor Wen,” had never liked this poem. But after reading it, the Hongxi Emperor was deeply moved and gave much thought to the circumstances of the time. He was then keeping watch in Nanjing and was troubled, so he ordered his trusted aide Xia Yuanji to go at once and meet him.

The Record of the Explication of the Dao says: “In my view, the insight in this poem far surpasses Zhang Liang’s stratagems. The natural affection between father and son is unlike the schemes devised by counselors of enemy states. Enemy states divide themselves into opposing sides, weigh advantages and harms, and strive to win merit. The bond between father and son, by contrast, springs from the heart; its feeling runs deep and cannot be restrained. The Han founder, Gaozu, was hemmed in by his counselors’ calculations and could never escape their limits. The Ming emperor—here referring to the Hongxi Emperor—recognized the subtle remonstrance because of the innate benevolence in his nature. Later readers, too, may take a lesson from this.”

Someone proposed that generals should recruit their own troops and be left to handle all other affairs as they saw fit. Those who distinguished themselves should not be transferred immediately, but should instead be promoted and given special rewards. In this way, talented people would vie to exert themselves, and in an emergency the court could count on their wholehearted service.

When the court was discussing a military campaign, Ru Tan repeatedly urged it not to act rashly. Later, after the Three Capitals had been recovered and the Jin forces had just suffered a defeat, he frowned and pointed out that the frontier had no dependable support. He asked the court to set aside established practice and select outstanding men. Citing the precedents of Wu Yong, Zhou Yu, and Lu Su, as well as the Jin dynasty’s appointment of Zu Ti and Tao Kan as generals, he proposed assigning each man to a region, placing dozens of cities under his command, and granting him enough authority to make decisions independently: one commander for Ba and Shu, one for Jing and Xiang, and one for each of the two Huai regions. Then the generals themselves could decide whether to advance or withdraw, and respond flexibly to military developments.

The court did not accept the proposal. Twenty years later, the Jin forces did indeed occupy Henan, and the frontier commanderies had been greatly weakened. When war broke out, no one was willing to take responsibility. Soon afterward, the army at Luoyang was also defeated, and only then did the court officials acknowledge that Ru Tan had foreseen what was coming.

The Record of the Explication of the Dao adds: “In my view, these two men lived through the perils of the Guangzong and Ningzong reigns, when Han Tuozhou and Shi Miyuan held power and factional strife brought disaster. They shut themselves away to write books and never turned from their reading, from youth to old age. They once remarked that Han Fei and Li Si both possessed Xunzi’s talents…”

 其富貴利惠之心重故世得而賤之惟卿  獨守其身不苟希合士可不自重哉又曰  外之得以窒吾聼雜吾目擾吾天君者以  未得貞一而靜之理也苟得之導以聲色  而不能入投以寳貨而不能中扇以功名  而不能動凝然湛然孰得而干之哉由是  觀之豈不爲一代明哲之士惜乎無及于  用也録之 遼史義宗倍阿保機長子幼𦖟敏好學外寛 内摯神册元年立爲太子及太祖崩倍知皇 太后欲安德光與羣臣請於太后而讓位焉 曰大元帥功德高大中外攸屬宜主社稷於 是大元帥即皇帝位是爲太宗太宗既立以 東平爲南京徙倍居之命王繼逺選建南京 碑倍復起書樓於西宫作樂田園詩唐明宗 聞之遣人跨海持書密召倍倍乃自忖曰我 以天下讓主上今反見疑不如適他國以成 吴大伯之名載書浮海而去唐以天子儀衛 迎倍坐船殿衆官陪列上壽至汴明宗賜姓 東丹名曰慕華改瑞州爲懷化軍拜節度使 端愼等州觀察使移鎭滑州倍雖在異國常 思其親陶安之使不絶  録曰遼太子倍可謂能知自好矣惜乎慕  泰伯之名而不求其志竊季子之跡而不  得其意小山之詩幾於怨懟領鎭之意切  於近名東丹之姓忽於忘本被明宗者父  叛子逆安在其慕華而懷化乎亦不過行
Interpretation

Because his desire for wealth, profit, and advantage was so strong, the people of the world looked down on him. You alone kept to your integrity and refused to accommodate others casually. How could a man of letters fail to value his own character?

It is also said: Outside things can block my hearing, unsettle my sight, and stir my mind because I have not yet grasped the way of holding fast to purity and singleness of purpose, and keeping the heart-mind still. Once this is truly understood, even enticements of sound and sight cannot intrude; treasures and possessions cannot sway me; and fame and office cannot set me wavering. When the spirit is settled and clear, who could disturb me? In light of this, it is a pity that such a worthy man of his age never had the chance to put his abilities to use. Let this be recorded.

The History of the Liao records that Yelü Bei, posthumously known as Liao Yizong and the eldest son of Liao Taizu Abaoji, was intelligent and fond of learning from a young age. He appeared generous and was resolute within. In the first year of the Shence era (916), he was made crown prince. After Taizu’s death, Yelü Bei knew that the empress dowager wished to install Deguang. He therefore joined the ministers in asking her to pass over him. He said, “The Grand Marshal has rendered outstanding service and earned great merit; those within and beyond the court are devoted to him. He should be entrusted with governing the state.” The Grand Marshal then took the throne. He was Liao Taizong.

After Taizong’s accession, he designated Dongping as the Southern Capital and ordered Yelü Bei to move there. Wang Jiyuan was instructed to choose a site and build the capital. Yelü Bei also built a library in the Western Palace and composed “Poem on the Joys of the Fields and Garden.” When Mingzong of Later Tang heard of this, he sent a messenger across the sea with a letter, secretly inviting Yelü Bei to come. Yelü Bei thought, “I yielded the realm to my sovereign, yet now I am suspected. I would do better to go to another state and earn a name like Wu Taibo’s.” He wrote a farewell message, boarded a ship, and crossed the sea.

Later Tang welcomed Yelü Bei with the imperial procession, seated him in the hall, and had the assembled officials congratulate him. When he reached Bianzhou, Mingzong bestowed on him the royal surname Dongdan and the personal name Muhua. He also renamed Ruizhou the Huaihua Army and appointed him military governor and regional inspector of Duanshen and other prefectures. Later, he was transferred to garrison Huazhou. Though living in a foreign land, Yelü Bei often longed for his family, and Tao Anzhi’s missions to and from Liao continued without interruption.

The Hongdao lu comments: Crown Prince Yelü Bei of Liao may be said to have understood how to cherish himself. It is a pity that, though he admired Wu Taibo’s reputation, he did not truly pursue Wu Taibo’s resolve to yield the state; he followed in Jizha’s footsteps without grasping their meaning. His poem “Small Hill” almost betrays a sense of grievance, while his willingness to accept a military governorship placed too much weight on winning a reputation in his own time. In adopting the surname Dongdan, he seemed to forget his roots; and Mingzong of Later Tang, by accepting him, seemed like a father who betrayed his son and a son who defied his father. Where, then, were the ideals expressed by “Muhua” and “Huaihua”? He was merely lodging in the land of the barbarians.

Hongdao lu, juan 42.

 乎夷狄而已 弘道録卷之四十二

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0033); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 34 Vol. 36 →