中文 · EN

《弘道錄》Vol. 40

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Xu Daozang 續道藏 Vol. 40 / 41 7,116 characters

About this page. The original text of 《弘道錄》 Vol. 40 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 41 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 15 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《弘道錄》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

弘道録卷之四十七路八  智   朋友之智 後漢書鍾皓以篤行稱與荀淑並爲士大夫 所𡚖慕李膺常嘆曰荀君清識難尚鍾君至 德可師同郡陳寔年不及皓引與爲友皓爲 郡功曹會辟司徒府臨辭太守問誰可代卿 者對曰明府必欲得人西門亭長陳寔可也 寔聞之曰鍾君似不察人不知何獨識我兄 子瑾亦好學慕古有退讓風與膺同年俱有 聲名膺祖太尉脩言瑾似我家性邦有道不 廢邦無道免於刑戮遂以膺妹妻之皓常語 瑾以昔國武子好昭人過以致怨本卒保身 全家爾道爲貴後終於家諸儒爲之頌曰林 慮懿德非禮不處悅此詩書弦琴樂古五就 州招九膺台輔逡巡王命卒歲容與  録曰愚勸膺祖之言似與膺大不相若何  也漢自中世以下閹堅擅恣故俗遂以危  身矯潔放言爲高士有不然者則芸夫牧  竪已叫呼之矣是以聖人導民理性裁抑  宕佚愼其所與節其所偏若林慮者智能  自全道無絶物凶邪不能以權奪王公不  能以貴驕眞可謂自拔於流欲者矣録之 徐穉家貧躬耕非其力不食然爲人恭儉義 讓所居服其德太守陳蕃在郡不接賓客唯 穉來特設一榻去則懸之延熹二年上書桓 帝薦穉乃以安車玄纁備禮徴之不至又常 爲太尉黄瓊所辟不就及瓊卒徒步到於江
Interpretation

The Record of Broadening the Dao (Hongdao lu), Scroll 47, Section 8, under the heading "Wisdom" (zhi), "Wisdom in Friendship."

According to the Book of the Later Han, Zhong Hao was renowned for his sincere and upright conduct, and the scholar-officials admired him alongside Xun Shu. Li Ying often sighed and said, "Master Xun's discernment is clear and penetrating, and is hard to surpass. Master Zhong's virtue (De) is the highest, and he can serve as a model for others." Chen Shi, a man from the same commandery, was younger than Zhong Hao, yet Zhong Hao made him a friend. When Zhong Hao served as Gongcao (a senior clerk to the commandery governor), he was summoned to the Office of the Minister of the Masses (Situ), one of the Three Excellencies. As he took his leave, the Grand Administrator asked whom he would recommend as his successor. Zhong Hao replied, "If the Honorable Magistrate wishes to find a worthy person, Chen Shi, the Pavilion Constable of Xīmen, would be suitable." When Chen Shi heard this, he said, "Master Zhong does not seem skilled at judging people. I cannot understand why he singles me out for appreciation."

Zhong Jin, the son of Zhong Hao's elder brother, was also devoted to learning and to the ancients. He had a humble and yielding bearing, and was of the same age as Li Ying; both enjoyed a good reputation. Li Ying's grandfather, the Grand Commandant (Taiwei), the highest military and administrative office, Li Xiu, remarked that Zhong Jin had the temperament of one of their own family. He said that Zhong Jin would not be discarded when the state was well governed and would be spared punishment when the government was dark. Therefore he gave his granddaughter, Li Ying's younger sister, in marriage to Zhong Jin. Zhong Hao often told Zhong Jin that in the past Guo Wuzi had been fond of exposing the faults of others and so drew resentment upon himself. Therefore, to preserve oneself and one's family, one should value the Dao above all. Zhong Hao died peacefully at home. The Confucian scholars composed a eulogy that said: Lulin (where Zhong Hao once served as magistrate) had fine virtue and did not do what was contrary to ritual. He loved the Odes and the Documents, and found joy in the zither and the ways of antiquity. Five times he was summoned by the provincial and commandery authorities, and nine times he was recommended as a candidate for the Three Excellencies. Yet he advanced and withdrew with composure in the face of royal command, and he ended his years in serene contentment.

The compiler comments: I find that this statement by Li Ying's grandfather differs greatly from Li Ying's own conduct. Why is this? After the middle of the Han dynasty, the eunuchs monopolized power and behaved without restraint. Worldly opinion then regarded those who would not hesitate to endanger themselves, who displayed their purity and spoke grand, extravagant words, as noble men of high purpose. Anyone who did not behave this way, even farmers and herdsmen, would come forward to shout and criticize. Therefore, the sages guided the people to follow their natural dispositions, restrained excess, chose their associations carefully, and moderated extremes. Someone like Zhong Hao had wisdom sufficient to preserve himself, yet he did not cut himself off from others. Wicked men could not use their power to seize his will, and nobles could not use wealth and rank to make him arrogant. He may truly be called a man who extricated himself from the desires of the vulgar world.

Recording the deeds of Xu Zhi: Xu Zhi came from a poor family and farmed with his own hands. He would not eat anything that he had not obtained through his own labor. He was respectful, frugal, devoted to righteousness, and humble in yielding to others, and the villagers all admired his virtue. The Grand Administrator Chen Fan did not receive guests in the commandery, but when Xu Zhi came, Chen Fan specially set out a couch for him. After Xu Zhi left, Chen Fan hung the couch up again. In the second year of the Yanxi era, Chen Fan submitted a memorial to Emperor Huan recommending Xu Zhi. The court, observing the full ceremonial forms for summoning a worthy, sent an an comfortable carriage (anche), in which one could sit at ease, together with the gifts of black and light-red silk bundles (xuanxun), to summon him. Xu Zhi did not accept the summons. Later, when Xu Zhi was summoned by the Grand Commandant Huang Qiong, he again declined to take office. When Huang Qiong died, Xu Zhi went on foot to mourn him.

夏赴之設鷄酒薄祭哭畢而去不告姓名時 會者皆四方名士郭林宗等數十人聞之疑 其穉也使茅容輕騎驕之及於塗爲設飯共 言稼穡之事臨去謂容曰爲我謝郭林宗大 樹將顚非一繩所維何爲栖栖不惶寧處乎  録曰遯之上九曰肥遯無不利釋之者云  肥者寬裕自得之意遯者唯飄然逺逝無  所係滯乃爲善也上九以剛陽居卦外下  無係應遯之逺而處之裕者也何往而不  利哉斯言爲穉設也彼諸人者旣知玩世  簡傲不就徵辟乃不能飄然逺引入山之  深入林之密自取黨禍甘心戮辱則所謂  係遯有疾厲者也曾是而得爲智乎 郭太博通墳藉善談論美音制始見河南尹 李膺大奇之與相友善於是名震京師後𡚖 郷里諸儒送至河上車數千两林宗唯與李 膺同舟而濟衆賓望之以爲神仙焉或勸之 仕對曰吾夜觀乾象晝察人事天之所廢不 可支也性明知人好奬訓士類身長八尺容 貌魁偉褒衣博帶周遊郡國嘗於陳梁間行 遇雨巾一角墊時人乃故折巾一角以爲林 宗巾其見慕如此或問汝南范滂郭林宗何 如人滂曰隱不違親眞不絶俗天子不得臣 諸侯不得友吾不知其他爲人雖善人倫而 不爲危言覈論故宦官擅政而不能傷也及 黨事起知名之士多被其害唯林宗及汝南 袁閎得免焉
Interpretation

Xia Fu went to offer his respects, bringing only a chicken and some wine as a modest gift. After weeping, he left without giving his name. Those present were famous scholars from various regions, including Guo Linzong and several dozen others. Having heard of the matter, they suspected the visitor was young and ignorant, so they sent Mao Rong on a fast horse to test him.

Mao Rong caught up with Xia Fu on the road. Xia Fu prepared a meal for him, and the two talked about farming. At parting, Xia Fu asked Mao Rong to pass a message on to Guo Linzong: "A great tree is about to fall, and no single rope can hold it up. Why hurry about in such restless fashion, rather than finding a secure place to settle?"

The Hongdao Lu comments: The top line of the hexagram Dun in the Book of Changes reads, "Fei dun, wu bu li," or "A well-fed retreat; nothing unfavorable." Commentators hold that "fei" means being generous and self-content, and "dun" means departing lightly and remaining unencumbered; only a retreat of this kind is a good one. The top line is a firm, yang line placed above the whole hexagram, with no ties or responses below it. It withdraws far and can rest securely, so there is nothing unfavorable wherever it goes. These words were spoken by Xia Fu to Guo Linzong.

Since those scholars had seen through the world and held themselves proudly apart, refusing the summons of the court, they should have withdrawn far away, retreating deep into the mountains and hiding in remote forests. Instead, they did not go far, and were drawn into the Party Prohibition disaster, willingly enduring slaughter and humiliation. This is a retreat that is entangled, and it inevitably brings sickness and danger. Can such conduct really be called wise?

Guo Tai (that is, Guo Linzong) was widely read in ancient classics, skilled in conversation, and striking in his bearing and manner. When he first met Li Ying, the Governor of Henan, Li Ying admired him greatly, and the two became friends. From then on, Guo Tai's fame shook the capital. Later, when he returned home, many Confucian scholars escorted him to the river, and the carriages that saw him off numbered in the thousands. Guo Tai crossed the river in a single boat with Li Ying alone, while the crowd of guests watched them from afar and felt as though they had glimpsed immortals.

When someone urged Guo Tai to take up office, he replied, "By night I observe the heavens, and by day I examine human affairs. I know that what Heaven is about to abandon cannot be upheld." Naturally clever, he was skilled at judging people, and he took pleasure in guiding and instructing scholars. He stood eight chi tall, with a sturdy, imposing frame, and he wore loose robes and wide sashes as he wandered among the regions.

Once, while travelling through the area of Chen and Liang, he met heavy rain, and one corner of his headscarf was soaked and drooped. People of the time deliberately folded down a corner of their own headscarves in imitation, calling it the "Linzong scarf." Such was the admiration he inspired.

Someone asked Fan Pang of Runan, "What sort of man is Guo Linzong?" Fan Pang answered, "He lives in seclusion yet does not turn away from his kin; he keeps his true nature yet does not leave the common world. The Son of Heaven could not make him a minister, and the feudal lords could not make him a friend. Beyond this, I do not know how else to appraise him."

Although Guo Linzong excelled at judging people, he never delivered harsh or extreme verdicts. For this reason, when the eunuchs held power, they did not harm him. After the Party Prohibition disaster broke out, many men of renown were persecuted, and only Guo Linzong and Yuan Hong of Runan escaped calamity.

 録曰范曄論曰莊周有言人情險於山川  以其動靜可識而沈阻難徵故親厚之性  詭於情貌則哲之鑒惟帝所難而林宗雅  俗無所失將其明性特有王乎然而遜言  危行終亨時晦恂恂善導使士慕成名雖  墨孟之徒不能絶也 孟敏客居太原荷甑墯地不顧而去林宗見 而問其意對曰甑以破矣視之何益林宗以 此異之勸令遊學十年知名  録曰愚觀孟敏蓋質美未學者也由質美  故無牽滯之悔而遇事能决由未學故有  不虞之失而意見殊分勸令就學則彬彬  矣此君子成人之美而誘掖奬勸之不可  無也 申屠蟠禀氣玄妙性敏心通喪親盡禮幾於 毁㓕至行美義人所鮮能安貧樂潜味道守 眞不爲燥濕輕重不爲窮達易節蔡邕自擬 以齒則長以德則賢後郡召爲主薄不行隱 居精學博貫五經兼明圖緯郭林宗見而奇 之先是范滂等非訐朝政自公卿以下皆折 節下之太學生爭慕其風以爲文學將興處 士復用蟠獨嘆曰昔戰國之世處士横議列 國之王至爲擁篲先驅卒有坑儒燒書之禍 今之謂矣乃絶迹梁碭之間因樹爲屋自同 庸人家貧傭爲漆工居二年果罹黨錮或死 或刑者數百人蟠確然免於疑論中平五年 與荀爽橋玄韓融陳紀等十四人共公車徴 幡獨不赴人咸勸之笑而不應居無幾爽等
Interpretation

The Hongdao Lu records that Fan Ye commented: "Zhuang Zhou once said that the human heart is more treacherous than mountains and rivers. The movements of mountains and rivers can be discerned, but their deep, hidden recesses are hard to fathom; the warmth and sincerity of human affection may also fail to match a person's outward expression. To see through the human heart is difficult even for a sovereign of keen discernment. Guo Linzong (Guo Tai, a renowned scholar of the Eastern Han) alone could distinguish the refined from the vulgar and never misjudged a person."

"Guo Linzong's insight into human nature may be especially remarkable. He was modest in speech and cautious in conduct, and in the end he prospered. Even when the times were dark, he remained gentle and sincere, and he was skilled at guiding others, so that scholars admired him and built their reputations on his example. Even Mozi and Mencius would have found it hard to surpass him."

When Meng Min was living as a sojourner in Taiyuan, the zeng (an earthenware vessel used for steaming food in ancient times) slipped from his shoulder and shattered on the ground. He did not even look at it but turned and walked away. Guo Linzong saw this and asked him why he had acted so. Meng Min replied, "The zeng is already broken. What use is it to look at it?" Guo Linzong felt that he was out of the ordinary and urged him to go abroad to study. Ten years later, Meng Min indeed became famous.

The Hongdao Lu records my view: Meng Min was probably a person of fine natural gifts who had not yet received scholarly instruction. Because his nature was excellent, he did not hesitate in his actions and could handle matters decisively. Because he had not yet been shaped by learning, he was also prone to oversights and held views that differed from those of ordinary people. Once he was urged to study, he could become a man of refinement and courtesy. This is precisely how a gentleman helps others achieve virtue. Guiding, supporting, and encouraging others is indispensable.

Shentu Pan had a profound and subtle natural endowment, and he was quick and perceptive. When his parents died, he observed the mourning rites fully, to the point of nearly destroying his body through grief. His conduct was lofty, and he valued sentiment and righteousness, qualities rarely found in the world. He was content in poverty and delighted in seclusion. He penetrated principles and held fast to his authentic nature, and he did not change himself according to adversity or fortune, high or low status, or hardship or prosperity. Cai Yong once remarked of himself that, in terms of age, Shentu Pan was his senior, and in terms of virtue, Shentu Pan was his superior.

Later, the commandery recruited him to serve as a registrar, but he did not respond to the summons. He lived in seclusion and devoted himself to careful study, mastering the Five Classics broadly and also understanding the tuwei (the teachings on celestial phenomena, auspicious omens, and prophetic apocrypha in ancient times). When Guo Linzong met him, he considered him truly outstanding.

Before this, Fan Pang and others denounced the government, and officials from the Three Ducal ranks and the Nine Ministers down all lowered their status to visit them. Students of the Imperial Academy vied to admire this trend, believing that learning and education were about to flourish and that the reclusive scholars would again be called to office. Only Shentu Pan sighed and said, "In the Warring States period, hermits debated affairs of state one after another. The rulers of the various states even personally carried brooms to clear the way before them in welcome, yet in the end this brought the calamity of burying Confucian scholars alive and burning the books. The present situation may well turn out the same way." He then cut off all traces of himself and settled in the Liang and Dang region, where he built a shelter among the trees and lived as a common commoner. His household was poor, so he took work as a lacquer worker for others.

He lived there for two years, and the Proscription of the Partisans (a campaign by the Eastern Han court against scholars accused of forming factions to criticize the government) indeed broke out. Several hundred people were either executed or subjected to punishment. Shentu Pan held firm in his position and was able to avoid entanglement and suspicion.

In the fifth year of the Zhongping era, he was summoned by the court together with Xun Shuang, Qiao Xuan, Han Rong, Chen Ji, and nine others, a total of fourteen men, who were to be brought to the capital by official carriage. Only Shentu Pan did not respond to the summons. When others urged him, he merely smiled and gave no reply. Before long, Xun Shuang and the others……

爲卓所脇及大駕西遷京師擾亂公卿多遇 兵飢室家流散唯蟠終全高志年七十四終 于家  録曰史稱申屠蟠見幾豈惟幾哉其見道  也審矣夫以非訐朝政而致公卿之折節  以污穢朝廷而成一己之高尚此何等事  哉中庸曰人皆曰予智驅而納諸罟獲陷  穽之中而莫之知正此謂也以蟠之禀氣  玄妙性敏心通故能始則確然免於疑論  繼則悠然成其逺圖正易所謂嘉遯貞吉  者也終全高志不亦宜乎 許劭少峻名節好人倫多所賞識若樊子昭 和陽士者並顯名於世故天下言㧞士者咸 稱許劭常到頴川多長者之遊唯不候陳寔 又陳蕃喪妻還葬郷人畢至而劭獨不徃或 問其故劭曰太丘道廣廣則難周仲舉性峻 峻則少通故不造也其多所裁量若此曹操 微時常卑辭厚禮求爲己目劭鄙其人而不 肯對操乃伺隙脅劭劭不得已曰君淸平之 姦賊亂世之英雄操大悅而去與從兄靖俱 有高明好共覈論郷黨人物每月輙更其品 題故汝南俗有月旦評焉  録曰愚觀許劭月旦之評與季野春秋之  鑒何其不相及哉子曰賜也賢乎哉夫我  則不暇聖人之酬世御物蓋如此彼既以  太丘爲難周仲舉爲少通裁量審矣而何  已之不暇顧也以操之狡猾多智尚未逢  時及其末也一鷄肋而不相容其能免禍  幸矣非明哲保身之道也
Interpretation

Shen Tu Pan was once coerced by Dong Zhuo. Later, when Emperor Xian of Han's carriage moved west to Chang'an, the capital fell into turmoil. Many of the high officials suffered in the upheaval, and their families were scattered. Only Shen Tu Pan kept his integrity intact throughout. He died at home at the age of seventy-four.

The Hongdao Lu remarks: The histories say that Shen Tu Pan could foresee calamity. Was he merely able to detect the first signs of the times? His understanding of the Dao (the Way) was indeed profound. He did not win the respect of the high officials by exposing the misdeeds of the court. Instead, by keeping his distance from a corrupt court, he achieved his lofty character. What a remarkable state of mind! The Doctrine of the Mean says: "People all claim to be clever, yet they are driven into nets and traps, and still do not realize they have fallen into danger." This describes exactly his situation. Shen Tu Pan was by nature mysterious, quick in talent, and far-reaching in thought. From the start, he firmly avoided circumstances that would invite criticism, and later he calmly carried out his long-term plans. This is what the Book of Changes (Yijing) means by "a fine retreat brings auspicious firmness," that is, withdrawing serenely and remaining upright brings good fortune. That he ultimately preserved his lofty integrity was surely only natural.

Xu Shao, a famous scholar of the Eastern Han, valued reputation and integrity highly from his youth. He enjoyed evaluating people and often recognized those worthy of appreciation. Fan Zishao, He Yangshi, and others became well known in the world because of him. Whenever people spoke of recommending talent, they praised Xu Shao. He often went to Yingchuan and associated with many virtuous elders there, but he alone did not visit Chen Shi (courtesy name Zhongong, known in his time as "Taiqiu"). When Chen Fan's wife died, Chen Fan escorted her coffin home for burial. The villagers all attended, but Xu Shao did not. When someone asked why, Xu Shao replied: "Taiqiu is generous by nature, and generosity makes it hard to attend to everything. Zhongju (Chen Fan's courtesy name) is severe by nature, and severity makes it hard to get along with others. That is why I did not visit." His way of judging people was generally like this.

When Cao Cao had not yet risen to prominence, he spoke humbly and gave generous gifts to ask Xu Shao to appraise him. Xu Shao despised Cao Cao's character and would not respond. Cao Cao then used coercion, and Xu Shao, having no choice, said: "You are a treacherous villain in a peaceful age, and a hero in a chaotic one." Cao Cao left, very pleased. Xu Shao and his cousin Xu Jing both had discerning judgment and liked to examine and comment together on the people of their native district, changing the subject of their appraisals each month. For this reason, in the Runan region there arose the saying "Yuedan Ping" (the monthly appraisal of people).

The Hongdao Lu remarks: Compared with the discernment of Jiye (Guo Tai, courtesy name Linzong), I find Xu Shao's "Yuedan Ping" falls far short. Confucius said: "Ci, do you think you are so capable? I have no leisure for such things." This precisely reflects the sage's attitude toward handling worldly affairs and governing all things. Since Xu Shao himself held that Taiqiu was too generous to be fully attended to and Zhongju too severe to accommodate others, and since he made such detailed judgments, why did he not admit that he too had no leisure to attend to these matters? Cao Cao was cunning and resourceful. Before he gained power, he had not yet faced real danger, but later a "small matter" was enough for him to be intolerable to others. To escape calamity at all was already a matter of luck. This cannot be regarded as a wise way of preserving oneself.

晋書皇甫謐沈靜寡慾勤力不怠愽綜典籍 百家之言以著述爲務自號玄晏先生著經 樂聖眞之論或勸以脩名廣交謐謂人非聖 人孰能兼存出處居田里之中安貧躬稼亦 可以樂堯舜之道何必崇接世利事官鞅掌 然後爲名乎作玄守論曰人之所至惜者命 也道之所必全者形也性形所不可犯疾病 也若擾全道以損性命安得去貧賤存所欲 哉夫一人死而號者以爲損也一人生而笑 者以爲益也然則號笑非益死損生也是以 至道不損至德不益何哉體足也如迴天下 之念以追損生之禍運四海之心以廣非益 之病豈道德之至乎夫惟無損則至堅矣夫 唯無益則至厚矣堅故終不損厚故終不薄 苟能體堅厚之實居不薄之眞立乎損益之 外遊乎形骸之表則我道全矣遂不仕武帝 下詔敦逼謐上疏自稱草莽臣就弟借書帝 送一車書與之  録曰哲哉玄晏子乎蓋不唯得以行乎貧  賤且能周於疢疾免於亂世其學起於清  虚志存於禮法既非流俗可方而視富貴  如浮雲亦非若人可比玄守之論逹於死  生有足觀者録之 韋忠慷慨好學閉門脩己不交當世裴顧數 言之於張華華辟之辭疾不起人問其故忠 曰吾茨簷賤士本無宦情且茂先華而不實 裴頠慾而無厭棄典禮而附賊后豈大丈夫
Interpretation

According to the Book of Jin, Huangfu Mi (a scholar of the Western Jin) was tranquil, sparing of desires, and tirelessly diligent. He read widely in the classics and the teachings of the various schools, and he aspired to write works of his own. He styled himself "Master Xuanyan" and wrote essays on the classics, music, and the Way of the sages.

Someone urged him to cultivate his reputation and make wide-ranging friendships. Huangfu Mi replied: "Unless a person is a sage, who can be both engaged in the world and withdrawn from it? To live in the countryside, content in poverty, farming with one's own hands, one can also enjoy the joy of the Way of Yao and Shun. Why must one chase worldly profit and busy oneself with office before one can be counted as famous?"

In his Xuanshou lun (Treatise on Guarding the Mystery), he wrote: "What people cherish most is life, and what the Dao (the Way) most needs preserved is the body. The thing that nature and the body can least endure is sickness. If one disturbs one's nature and harms one's life in order to preserve the Dao, how can one escape poverty and lowliness and obtain what one desires? When a person dies, people wail, thinking something has been lost; when a person is born, people rejoice, thinking something has been gained. But wailing and rejoicing do not harm the dead, nor do they benefit the living. Therefore the supreme Dao does not diminish, and the supreme De (Virtue) does not increase, why? Because they are already sufficient.

"If the thoughts of everyone under heaven are directed toward pursuing the calamities that harm life, and the minds of all within the four seas are devoted to worsening illnesses that bring no benefit, is this the highest attainment of De? Only what is not diminished can be called firm; only what does not seek increase can be called substantial. Because it is firm, it is never harmed; because it is substantial, it is never shallow. If one comprehends the solid essence of firmness and substance, dwells in the truth that is not shallow, and stands apart from loss and gain, transcending the form of the body, then my Dao is complete."

Thereafter Huangfu Mi never took office. When Emperor Wu of Jin issued edicts urging him to serve, he submitted a memorial calling himself a "grassland minister" (a subject dwelling among the common people). When he asked his younger brother to lend him books, Emperor Wu sent him a carriage full of books.

The Hongdao lu (Record of Broadening the Way) comments: "Master Xuanyan was truly wise! He not only practiced his Dao in poverty and lowliness, but also faced illness with equanimity and avoided a chaotic age. His learning took quietude and emptiness as its foundation, while his aspirations remained within ritual and law. He differed from worldly people, regarding wealth and rank as floating clouds, and he is not something ordinary people can be compared to. The Xuanshou lun thoroughly penetrates the principles of life and death and is truly worth reading, so I have recorded it here."

Wei Zhong (a figure of the Western Jin) was generous and fond of learning. He closed his door to cultivate himself and would not associate with the powerful of his day. Pei Wei repeatedly praised him to Zhang Hua, and when Zhang Hua summoned him to office, he refused to take up the post, citing illness. When someone asked him the reason, Wei Zhong said: "I am a poor scholar living in a thatched hut, and I never had any intention of serving in office. Moreover, Maoxian (Zhang Hua) is ostentatious yet lacks substance, Pei Wei is greedy without limit, and they abandoned statutes and rites to attach themselves to the disordered politics of the empress. How could they be considered great men……"

之所宜行耶裴常有心託我常恐洪濤蕩嶽 餘波見漂况可臨尾閭而闚沃焦哉 張翰有清才善屬文會稽賀循赴命入洛經 吴閶門於舡中彈琴翰初不相識就循言譚 大相欽悅且問知其入洛曰吾亦有事北京 便同載而去不告家人齊王冏辟爲東曹椽 冏時執權翰謂同郡顧榮曰天下紛紛禍難 未已夫有四海之名者求退良難吾本山林 間人無望於時子善以明防前以智慮後榮 執其手愴然曰吾亦與子採南山蕨飲三江 水耳翰因見秋風起乃思吴中菰萊蓴美鱸 魚膾曰人生貴得適志何能䩻宦數千里以 要名爵乎遂命駕而歸人謂之見幾  録曰韋子節之辭張茂先也見幾於未動  之先所謂果行育德者也是故山下之泉  出而遇險未有所之若山之未雲水之未  波不可及也張季鷹之辭顧彥先也懼禍  於既見之後所謂險德避難者也是故天  地不交小人道長君子道消若水之沉溺  火之焚灼不可緩也孟子不云或逺或近  或去或不去𡚖潔其身而已矣豈非明智  之士歟 顔含裁智爲衆所推與鄧攸深交嘗曰周伯 仁之正鄧伯道之清卞望之之節餘則吾不 知太常馮懷以王導時爲帝師名位隆重百 僚宣降禮問於含含曰王公雖重理無偏敬 降禮之言或是諸君事宜鄙人老矣不識時 務既而告人曰吾聞伐國不問仁人向馮祖
Interpretation

...Could this truly be the right course of action? Pei often entrusted his troubles to me, and I always feared that the great waves would crash against the mountains and their aftershocks would sweep a person away. Moreover, how could one approach the Weilü (the legendary place where the seawater drains away) and peer into the Wojiao (the legendary mountain that absorbs the sea)?

Zhang Han (courtesy name Jiying) was gifted with a clear, refined talent and excelled at writing. Once, He Xun of Kuaiji was ordered to travel to the capital and passed through Changmen in Wu by boat. Zhang Han was playing the qin on the water. The two had never met, but Zhang Han boarded the vessel and spoke with He Xun, and they quickly came to respect and admire one another. Zhang Han learned that He Xun was bound for the capital and said that he, too, had business there. The two therefore traveled together, and Zhang Han did not inform his family.

Sima Jiong, the Prince of Qi, summoned Zhang Han to serve as Dongcao Yuan (a subordinate official in charge of documents). At that time Sima Jiong held great power. Zhang Han said to Gu Rong, a fellow native of their commandery, "The realm is in turmoil, and the calamities have not ended. For men of reputation like us, it is difficult to withdraw and escape harm. I am a person of the mountains and forests by nature, and I have no aspirations regarding the times. You should be skilled at guarding against the dangers before you, and you should use your wisdom to consider what lies ahead." Gu Rong took Zhang Han's hand and said sorrowfully, "I too am willing to go with you to the Southern Mountain to gather bracken and drink from the Three Rivers."

Later, when the autumn wind rose, Zhang Han thought of the wild rice shoots, the water shield, and the minced perch of Wu, and sighed: "What is precious in life is contentment. How can one, for the sake of fame and office, serve thousands of li away?" He then had a carriage prepared to return home. People praised him for perceiving the signs of events and for withdrawing from danger in good time.

The Hongdao Lu comments: Wei Zijie's parting from Zhang Maoxian came before the matter had taken shape, and Wei saw the trend in advance. This is what is meant by acting decisively and cultivating virtue. Thus, a spring that has just welled up from the mountain meets obstacles, and it is not yet known where it will flow. It is like mountain clouds that have not yet risen or water that has not yet rippled: the peril has not yet appeared and is difficult to foresee.

Zhang Jiying's parting from Gu Yanxian came after the calamity had already become visible, and out of anxiety Zhang withdrew from it. This is what is meant by recognizing danger and avoiding disaster. When the qi of heaven and earth do not join in harmony, petty people gain power and gentlemen lose it. It is like falling into water or being scorched by fire: the danger is already upon one, and one cannot delay. Did not Mencius say that some depart far and some draw near, some leave and some do not, and that the key lies only in keeping one's purity intact? Is this not the practice of the wise?

Yan Han, a famous scholar of the Jin dynasty, possessed outstanding talent and was esteemed by many. He had a deep friendship with Deng You. Yan Han once said, "Zhou Boren is upright, Deng Bodao is incorruptible, and Bian Wangzhi has integrity. As for the others, I do not know them well."

When Wang Dao served as the emperor's tutor and held a position of great prominence, the Grand Minister of Ceremonies, Feng Huai, proposed that the officials should pay obeisance to Wang Dao. Feng Huai asked Yan Han for his opinion, and Yan Han replied, "Though Lord Wang is honored, by principle one should not bow to him in any special way. The saying that one should lower one's ceremony to visit him may be what you gentlemen ought to do. I am old and do not understand the demands of the times." Later, Yan Han told others, "I have heard that when attacking another state, one does not consult the benevolent..."

思問佞於我我有雅德乎其邪重行實抑絶 浮僞類如此嘗論少正卯盗跖其惡孰甚或 曰正卯雖姦不至剖人充膳盗跖爲甚含曰 爲惡彰露人思加戮隱伏之姦非聖不誅由 此言之少正爲甚衆咸服焉郭璞遇含欲爲 之筮辭白年在天位在人脩已而天不與者 命也守道而人不知者性也自有性命無勞 蓍龜桓温常求婚以其盛滿不許後年老遜 位帝美其素行就加右光禄大夫賜床帳被 褥大官致膳悉固辭一無所受  録曰愚觀世之虚望隆而實德病與夫謟  諛集而降禮尊者豈獨一馬祖思哉故如  含者勤兄於既没之餘未足爲的而議導  於方柄之日確然可凖含乎吾知免矣非  所稱豪傑乎哉 唐書婁師德嘗薦狄仁傑而仁傑不知意頗 輕師德數擠之於外天后覺之因問仁傑曰 師德知人乎對曰臣嘗同僚未聞其知人也 后曰朕之知卿乃帥德所薦亦可謂知人矣 仁傑既出嘆曰婁公盛德我爲其所包容久 矣吾不得窺其際也是時罷織紛紜師德久 爲將相獨能以功名終人以是智之  録曰仁傑能知五王而不能知一師德何  也易稱或默或語而又曰二人同心夫婁  狄乃心王室本無異也然而一則好面折  廷爭知無不言一則以哩面不拭始終自  負其語默各有異也以外之不同若相矛  盾而中之所存實同金石此仁傑之於師
Interpretation

Although Sima Han was for a time mistakenly regarded as treacherous and hypocritical, his conduct was upright, and in the end the world came to respect him. Someone once asked which was the greater evil, Shao Zhengmao or Robber Zhi. Some answered that Shao Zhengmao, though treacherous, did not kill people for food, so Robber Zhi's crimes were greater. Sima Han replied that when wrongdoing is displayed openly, people will naturally find ways to punish it, but treachery that is hidden is difficult to detect and eliminate unless one is a sage. Seen in this light, Shao Zhengmao's wrongdoing was in fact the more serious. The listeners were all convinced.

Guo Pu (a divination specialist of the Eastern Jin) once met Sima Han and wished to divine his fortune, saying: "A person's lifespan is decided by Heaven, while one's position depends on people. If you cultivate yourself but Heaven does not aid you, that is fate. If you hold fast to the right Way and others fail to understand you, that is one's nature. Since fate and nature each have their fixed measure, there is no need to trouble the milfoil stalks and tortoise shells."

Huan Wen (a powerful minister of the Eastern Jin) repeatedly sought a marriage alliance with Sima Han, but Sima Han judged Huan Wen's power to be excessive and declined. Later, when he grew old and resigned from office, the emperor praised his long-standing conduct and conferred on him the title of Grand Master of Splendid Officials of the Right (you guanglu dafu). The emperor also sent him bed curtains and bedding and ordered the palace dining office to provide him with meals. Sima Han firmly declined all of these and accepted none of them.

The Hongdao Lu (Hongdao Lu, "Record of Spreading the Dao") comments: I observe that among people in the world, some enjoy lofty reputations while their actual virtue is deficient, and others are surrounded by flatterers yet receive courtesy and esteem. Can such cases be limited to Ma Zusi alone? That Sima Han cared devotedly for his sister-in-law after his elder brother's death is not by itself sufficient to serve as a definitive basis for judging him. But that he upheld righteousness even while his power was at its height is indeed worthy of being taken as a standard. Sima Han, I know that you can be spared the criticism of the secular world. Are you not what people call a hero?

The Tang Shu (Tang Shu, "History of the Tang") records that Lou Shide (a Tang minister) recommended Di Renjie (a famous Tang statesman), but Di Renjie was unaware of this and held Lou Shide in low regard, several times having him posted to distant places. When Empress Wu Zetian noticed, she asked Di Renjie, "Does Lou Shide know how to recognize talent?" Di Renjie replied, "I once served as a colleague of his, and I have never heard that he is skilled at judging people." The empress said, "It was through Lou Shide's recommendation that I came to know you. This may itself be called his skill at recognizing talent."

After Di Renjie withdrew, he sighed, "Lou Shide's virtue is deep. He has tolerated me for so long, and yet I never saw through the breadth of his heart." At that time the affairs of the court were in turmoil, and Lou Shide served for a long time as a general and as chancellor, yet he was always able to preserve his good name through his achievements and reputation. People therefore considered him very wise.

The Hongdao Lu comments: How is it that Di Renjie could see clearly through five princes yet could not see through the one, Lou Shide? The Book of Changes (Yijing) says, "At times silent, at times speaking," and also, "Two people who share the same mind." Lou Shide and Di Renjie were both wholeheartedly loyal to the royal house, and there was originally no difference between them. However, Di Renjie liked to speak frankly to people's faces and argue vigorously at court, saying whatever he knew. Lou Shide, by contrast, was often patient and forbearing and did not readily reveal his intentions. In word and conduct they differed, and on the surface they even seemed to contradict each other, yet what each held to in his heart was as firm as metal and stone. Di Renjie's understanding of Lou Shide...

 德始雖汎而終乃服也亦何害其爲同哉 裴行儉有知人之何前進士王勮咸陽尉蘇 味道皆未知名一見謂之曰二君後當相次 掌銓衡僕有弱息願以爲托是時其弟勃與 華陰楊烱范陽盧照鄰義烏珞賓王皆以文 章有盛名李敬玄尤重之以爲必顯逹行儉 曰士之致逺當先器識而後才藝勃等雖有 文華而浮躁淺露豈饗爵禄之器楊子稍沈 靜應至令長餘得令終幸矣既而勃溺南海 照鄰赴頴水賓王反誅烱終盈川令勮味道 皆典選悉如行儉之言  録曰孔子以瑚璉許子貢若所謂噐識是  已文王以棫樸譽髦士若所謂才藝是已  然必金玉其相而後追琢其章若彼瓦缶  雖有絢然之飾豈廟堂之噐哉以賈誼之  雋類君子猶病其志大量小才有餘而識  不足况四傑乎故君子益自貴重無徒斐  然成章而已也 宋史張詠與青州傅霖少同學霖隱不仕詠 既顯求霖者三十年不可得一旦來謁閽吏 白傅霖請見詠責之曰傅先生天下士吾尚 不得爲友汝何人敢名之乎霖笑曰别子一 世尚爾耶是豈知世間有傅霖者乎詠問昔 何隱今何出曰子將去矣來報子爾詠曰亦 自知之霖曰知復何言翌日别玄後一月而 詠卒  録曰此與元伯巨卿相似乃誠之相感無  乎不至故心之相照無乎或違雖然蜀山
Interpretation

The beginnings of virtuous conduct may seem broad, yet in the end they can win people's sincere admiration. What prevents us from saying that the two are the same?

Pei Xingjian was skilled at judging people. At that time, Wang Ju, a former Presented Scholar (jinshi), and Su Weidao, the magistrate's assistant of Xianyang County, were not yet famous. After meeting them once, Pei said, "Both of you will in time take charge of the selection of officials, one after the other. I have a young daughter, and I would like to entrust her to you." Back then, Wang Bo, Yang Jiong of Huayin, Lu Zhaolin of Fanyang, and Luo Binwang of Yiwu were all renowned for their outstanding writing. Li Jingxuan held them in particularly high regard and believed they were sure to rise to prominence. Pei, however, said, "A scholar who hopes to accomplish great things should first look at his capacity and insight, and only then at his talent and skill. Wang Bo and the others, though gifted in writing, are frivolous, impatient, shallow, and ostentatious. How could they be people fit to enjoy high office and generous emoluments? Yang Jiong is somewhat steadier and should be able to rise to the rank of county magistrate or prefect. As for the rest, if they manage to die peacefully in old age, they will have been fortunate." Later, Wang Bo drowned in the South Sea, Lu Zhaolin threw himself into the Ying River, Luo Binwang was executed, and Yang Jiong finally became magistrate of Yingzhou. Wang Ju and Su Weidao both presided over the selection of officials, and everything turned out just as Pei had said.

The Hongdao Lu comments: Confucius praised Zigong as a "precious vessel used for holding millet in the ancestral temple," which refers to capacity and insight. King Wen of Zhou praised many outstanding talents, which refers to skill. Yet a person must have the inner substance of gold or jade before he is worth further refining and before he can shine. If he is merely an earthenware jar, however elaborately decorated, how could he ever become a ritual vessel in the ancestral temple? Even someone of Jia Yi's exceptional intelligence was criticized by gentlemen for having lofty ambitions but a narrow capacity: abundant talent but insufficient insight. How much more so for the "Four Talents of the Early Tang"? Therefore, a gentleman should be all the more self-respecting and should not be satisfied merely with writing fine essays through literary skill alone.

The History of the Song records that Zhang Yong, when young, studied together with Fu Lin of Qingzhou. Fu Lin lived in seclusion and never took office. After Zhang Yong became prominent, he sent people to look for Fu Lin, and they searched for thirty years without finding him. One day Fu Lin suddenly came to visit. The gatekeeper announced, "Fu Lin requests an audience with you." Zhang Yong rebuked him, saying, "Master Fu is a celebrated scholar of the realm. I do not even dare to call myself his friend. Who are you to address him by his given name?" Fu Lin smiled and said, "We have been apart for a lifetime, and you are still like this? Do you not know that there is a Fu Lin in this world?" Zhang Yong asked, "Why did you live in seclusion before, and why have you come out now?" Fu Lin replied, "You are about to leave this world, and I have come to tell you." Zhang Yong said, "I already know this myself." Fu Lin said, "Since you already know, what more is there to say?" The next day Fu Lin took his leave; one month later, Zhang Yong passed away.

The Hongdao Lu comments: This matter resembles the stories of Yuanbo and Juqing, in which sincere feeling moves the heart and no emotion fails to reach its mark. Thus when minds connect with one another, there is never a time when they fail to correspond. Even so, the mountains of Shu……

 人不起念十年便能前知矧如霖之靜處  三十年乎其不爲物誘而能脫屣富貴又  可見矣 畢仲游受知於司馬光吕公著范純仁最深 時蘇軾在館閣頗以言語文章規切時政仲 游憂其及禍貽書戒之曰孟軻不得已而後 辯孔子欲無言古人所以精謀極慮固功業 而養壽命者未嘗不出乎此君自立朝以來 禍福利害繫身者未嘗顧惜乎言語之累不 特出口者爲言其形於詩歌賛於賦頌託於 碑銘序記者皆是也今知畏於口而未畏於 文是其所是則見是者喜非其所非則蒙非 者怨喜者未能濟君之謀而怨者或已敗君 之事矣天下論君之文固所指名者矣雖無 是非之言猶有是非之疑又况其有耶官非 諫官職非御史危身觸忌以游其間殆猶轉 石而捄溺也  録曰史傳巢谷與三蘇同郷素與之遊甫  昆弟同朝顯貴未嘗一來會及相繼謫嶺  海平生親舊無相聞者谷有眉山獨步訪  兩蘇於是相驚喜曰此非今之人古之人  也愚竊謂古之人所以異於今者責善爲  重而責善之道明哲爲先苟使二公早因  仲游之言資其直諒之益未必天之涯海  之角而巢谷之名儋耳之跡不見於史册  矣不思忠告之可嘉輙誇卓行之尤異此  録舍元脩而叙公叔亦保身愼言之意也 邵伯温雍之子也雍名重一時與司馬光二
Interpretation

Ten years without a single deluded thought is enough to foresee the future, so how much more could Ruolin (Rulin) have achieved after thirty years of quiet cultivation? He was untouched by external temptations and could regard wealth and rank as easily as slipping off a pair of shoes, and this too is evident from his conduct.

Bi Zhongyou (Northern Song official) was highly valued by Sima Guang, Lü Gongzhu, and Fan Chunren. At that time Su Shi was serving in the Guange (the court institution responsible for managing documents and compiling books), and he often criticized current affairs through his speeches and writings. Worried that this would bring disaster, Bi Zhongyou wrote to admonish Su Shi:

"Mencius debated only when he had no other choice, while Confucius hoped to stop speaking altogether. The ancients deliberated carefully and planned thoroughly both to achieve merit and accomplishment and to preserve their lives. They never disregarded this principle.

"Since you entered court service, your personal safety, fortune, and misfortune have all depended on what you say, yet you seem never to have been concerned about the entanglements that your words bring. Speech is not only what is spoken aloud. What is written in poetry, expressed in rhapsodies and eulogies, and inscribed in epitaphs, prefaces, and commemorative essays also counts.

"Now you know to be cautious in spoken remarks, but you do not know to be cautious in writing. Whatever you consider right, those who agree will be pleased; whatever you consider wrong, those who are criticized will resent. Those who are pleased may not be able to help your plans, while those who resent you may already be undermining your affairs. People throughout the realm are already watching your writings and commentary. Even without explicit praise or blame, they will suspect praise or blame, and how much more so when your writings truly contain judgment? You are neither a remonstrance official nor a censor, yet you risk touching on taboos and maneuvering through political storms. This is as perilous as rolling stones in water to rescue a drowning person."

The Hongdao Lu (Record of Expanding the Way) comments: Historical records state that Chao Gu was a fellow native of Su Xun, Su Shi, and Su Zhe, and that he associated with them in ordinary times. While the Su brothers were prominent at court, Chao Gu never went to visit them. But when the two brothers were successively banished to Lingnan, and none of their former friends sent them any greeting, Chao Gu alone traveled from Meishan to visit them. The Su brothers, delighted and astonished, exclaimed, "This is not a man of the present, but a man of antiquity!"

Privately, I believe that what distinguishes the ancients from people today is that they valued encouraging one another to correct faults, and that the primary principle of such encouragement is clear understanding. Had Su Shi earlier heeded Bi Zhongyou's words and taken benefit from that honest counsel, he might not have been banished to the ends of the earth, and Chao Gu's reputation and his journey to Danxian to visit Su Shi might not have been recorded in history. To overlook the value of sincere counsel and instead praise Chao Gu's extraordinary integrity, while this account sets aside Su Shi to narrate Gong Shu, also expresses the idea of protecting oneself and being cautious in speech.

Shao Bowen was the son of Shao Yong. At that time Shao Yong enjoyed a very high reputation, and he associated with Sima Guang, Er……

程諸名公交以是入聞父教出事諸公所聞 日愽而尤孰當口之務神宗崩晢宗立蔡確 方在相位刑恕自襄州移河陽詣確謀造定 策事時光已卒子康當詣闕恕召詣河陽伯 温謂公休除喪未見君不宜枉道先見朋友 康曰已諾之伯温曰恕傾巧或以事要若從 之必爲異日之悔康竟往恕果勸作書稱確 康與恕同年又出光門下逐作書如恕言蓋 以康爲光子言確有定策功世必見信以爲 他日全身保家計既而梁燾以諫議召恕亦 要至河陽連日夜論確且以康書爲證燾不 悅會吴處厚奏確詩謗朝政燾與劉安世共 請誅確且論恕罪朝廷命康分折康始悔之 康卒子植幼宣仁后𠎓之吕太防謂康素以 伯温可托請以爲西京教授以教植伯温既 至誨曰温公之孫大諫之子賢愚在天下可 畏也植聞之力學不懈卒有立紹聖初章惇 爲相惇常事康節欲用伯温伯温不徃會法 當赴吏部銓程頤謂曰吾危子之行也伯温 曰豈不欲見先公於地下耶至則先就部擬 官而後見宰相惇遂論及康節之學曰嗟乎 吾於先生不能卒業也伯温曰先君先天之 學論天地萬物未有不盡者其信也則人之 仇怨反覆者可忘矣時惇方興黨獄故以是 動之惇悚然猶薦之於朝而伯温願補郡縣 惇不悅遂得監永興軍鑄錢監適元祜諸賢
Interpretation

Thanks to the recommendations of the various eminent officials, he was given these matters to handle and was thereby able to present himself at court. His father, for his part, instructed him to go out and serve the high officials and to listen to what they had seen and heard.

He grew ever more learned and was especially well versed in the affairs of government of the time. When Emperor Shenzong died and Emperor Zhezong ascended the throne, Cai Que was serving as chief minister. Xing Shu was transferred from Xiangzhou to Heyang and went to see Cai Que to discuss how to fabricate the matter of the "establishment of the succession" (dingce). By this time Sima Guang had already died, and his son Kang (Shao Bowen) was due to present himself at court, so Xing Shu summoned him to Heyang. Bowen's cousin Wen advised him, "You have only just removed your mourning garments and have not yet paid your respects to the new sovereign. You should not take a detour to visit a friend first." Kang replied, "I have already promised him."

Wen went on, "Xing Shu is crafty and changeable, and he may use this matter to coerce you. If you go along with what he says, you will surely regret it later." Kang went anyway. Xing Shu did indeed urge him to write a letter stating that Cai Que had merit in establishing the new emperor. Kang had been a classmate of Xing Shu's and had also come up under Sima Guang's tutelage, so he wrote the letter according to Xing Shu's words. Xing Shu likely meant to use Kang's standing as Sima Guang's son to make people believe that Cai Que had indeed earned merit in the succession, and thereby to secure his own safety and that of his family in the future.

Not long after, Liang Tao was summoned to serve as Remonstrating Counselor, and Xing Shu also invited him to Heyang, where for days and nights they discussed Cai Que's affairs and used Kang's letter as evidence. Liang Tao was greatly displeased. Just then Wu Chuhou submitted a memorial stating that Cai Que's poems satirized the government. Liang Tao and Liu Anshi jointly petitioned for Cai Que to be put to death, and they also pursued Xing Shu's offenses. The court ordered Kang to analyze the matter point by point, and only then did Kang regret what he had done.

When Kang died, his son Shao Zhi was still young, and Empress Dowager Xuanren took him in and raised him. Lü Dafang said that Kang had always believed Bowen could be entrusted with responsibilities, and so he requested that Bowen be appointed Professor at Xijing to instruct Shao Zhi. After taking up his post, Bowen admonished Shao Zhi: "You are the grandson of Sima Guang and the son of the Remonstrating Counselor. Whether you prove wise or foolish, the whole world is watching, and you ought to be mindful of this." Shao Zhi, upon hearing this, applied himself diligently without slackening, and in the end he achieved success.

In the early years of the Shaosheng era, Zhang Dun served as chief minister. He had formerly served Shao Yong (Kangjie), and he wished to employ Bowen, but Bowen would not go to him. Just then, in accordance with regulations, he was due to proceed to the Ministry of Personnel for official selection, and Cheng Yi said to him, "I fear that this journey of yours will be dangerous." Bowen replied, "Is it that I do not wish to meet my late father in the underworld?" When he arrived in the capital, he first went to the Ministry of Personnel to receive his proposed appointment, and only afterward went to pay his respects to the chief minister. When Zhang Dun spoke of Shao Yong's learning, he said, "Alas, I was not able to complete my studies under the master."

Bowen said, "My late father's learning of the Former Heaven (a doctrine centered on deducing the myriad things of heaven and earth), in discussing heaven, earth, and the myriad things, leaves nothing unaccounted for. If one believes in this, then the enmities of the human world and the capricious turns of fate can also be set aside." At that time Zhang Dun was stirring up cases of factional strife, and Bowen used these words to move him. Zhang Dun, upon hearing them, was somewhat awakened and still recommended Bowen to the court, but Bowen requested a post as a county or prefectural official instead. Zhang Dun was displeased, and so Bowen was sent to supervise the mint at the Yongxing Army. Just then, the various worthy ministers of the Yuanyou era……

方南遷士鮮訪之者伯温見范祖禹於咸平 見范純仁於頴昌或爲之恐不顧也初雍嘗 曰世將亂惟蜀安可避及宣和末伯温載家 使蜀故免於難趙鼎少從伯温游嘗表其墓 曰以學行起元祐以名節居紹聖以言廢於 崇寧世以此三語盡伯温出處云  録曰愚觀康節不但知興衰於既往實能  驗理亂於將來其子伯温不但無黍於其  父實欲兼善於其友自今觀之元祐重臣  胼首就戮全身者何人也二程高第闔門  遇害保家者何人也動而有悔而名亦隳  出而殉人而己先喪陷仇怨則人情可惜  甘淟認則物理全乖盍若奮身於治朝免  禍於亂世耶進於聖門可謂先覺是賢智  者不惑不得以氣數之學者累之也 近思録張横渠問於程明道曰定性未能不 動猶累於外物何如明道曰所謂定者動亦 定靜亦定無將迎無内外苟以外物爲外牽 己而從之是以己性爲有内外也且以性爲 隨物於外則當其在外時何者爲在内是有 意於絶外誘而不知性之無内外也既以内 外爲二本則又烏可遽語定哉夫天地之常 以其心普萬物而無心聖人之常以其情順 萬事而無情故君子之學莫若廓然而太公 物來而順應易曰貞吉悔亡憧憧徃來朋從 尔思苟規規於外誘之除將見㓕於東而生 於西非惟日之不足顧其端無窮不可得而
Interpretation

When Shao Bowen (Shao Yong's son) moved south, few people went to visit him. He had met Fan Zuyu in Xianping and Fan Chunren in Yingchang. Some may have been afraid because of this, but Bowen did not care. Shao Yong had once said, "The world is about to fall into great disorder. Only Shu is at peace, and one may go there to take refuge." At the end of the Xuanhe era, Bowen moved his whole family to Shu and so escaped the calamity.

Zhao Ding had studied with Bowen in his youth. Later, in writing Bowen's tomb inscription, he said: "Bowen established himself through learning and virtue in the Yuanyou era, preserved his integrity and reputation through the Shaosheng era, and was dismissed in the Chongning era for speaking frankly." People of the time regarded these three sentences as a summary of Bowen's advances and withdrawals, and of his conduct throughout his life.

The Hongdao Lu comments: I consider that Shao Kangjie (the sobriquet of Shao Yong) could not only see rise and fall in the past but could also infer the order and chaos of the future from the principles of things. Shao Yong's son Bowen did not fail his father, and he also wished to help his friends. Looking back now, among the senior ministers of the Yuanyou era, who were later killed together, facing death side by side? Among the eminent disciples of the Two Chengs (Cheng Hao and Cheng Yi), who later saw their entire families destroyed, and who preserved the family line? When one acts without caution, regret follows and one's reputation suffers. When one takes office and dies for others, one instead becomes the first to suffer harm. To fall into hatred is regrettable, and to willingly dwell in filth runs wholly against principle. Why not strive forward while the government is still clear, and avoid calamity before chaos arrives? Bowen studied within the gate of the sages and may be called far-sighted. He was a worthy and wise man, and he was not deluded. One should not attribute his achievements to fate simply because he studied the science of qi and fate.

The Jinsi Lu records that Zhang Zai (Hengqu) asked Cheng Hao (Mingdao): "The mind and nature are not yet settled. They are still moved by external things. What should one do?" Mingdao answered: "To be settled means to be at peace when moving and at peace when still. One does not greet things in advance, nor chase after them, and one does not divide inside from outside. If you regard external things as outside and feel they pull you, and so follow them, then you have treated your nature as divided into inner and outer. Moreover, if you think the nature flows outward with external things, then when it is outside, what would count as inside? This is deliberately cutting off the lure of external things without understanding that the nature has no inner or outer division to begin with. Once one regards inner and outer as two fundamentally different things, how can one speak of being settled at all?

"The constant way of Heaven and Earth is to embrace all things with its mind without holding private intentions. The constant Way of the sage is to respond to all affairs without clinging to feelings. The gentleman in learning should ideally keep a broad mind and a calm heart, and respond to things as principle requires when they arrive. The Book of Changes says, 'Holding to rightness brings good fortune, and regret disappears.' It also says, 'If the mind goes back and forth unsettled, friends will follow what you think.' If one anxiously busies oneself with clearing away external temptations, one will find that as soon as the east is pressed down, the west sprouts up again. Not only is there not enough time, but such threads are endless and cannot be..."

除也人之情各有所蔽故不能適道太率患 在於自私而用智自私則不能以有爲爲應 迹用智則不能以明覺爲自然今以惡外物 之心而求照無物之地是反鑑而索照也易 曰艮其背不獲其身行其庭不見其人與其 非外而是内不若内外之兩忘也兩忘則澄 然無事矣無事則定定則明明則尚何應物 之爲累哉聖人之喜以物之當喜聖人之怒 以物之當怒是聖人之喜怒不繫於心而繫 於物也是則聖人豈不應於物哉烏得以從 外者爲非而更求在内者爲是也今以自私 用智之喜怒而視聖人喜怒之正爲何如哉 夫人之情易發而難制者惟怒爲甚第能於 怒時遽忘其怒而觀理之是非亦可見外誘 之不足惡而於道亦思過半矣  録曰愚觀定性一書乃知先生深造獨得  而非諸子之所能及也夫以人之累於外  物乃不能收其放心至於定性則無將迎  無内外合動靜而如一矣其所至妙至妙  者莫如廓然而太公物來而順應反覆辯  証不越乎此然可指而易老者莫如其情  故又以喜怒言若乃直指所由進之路則  自忘怒觀理始也一篇之中大要在於明  覺自然大戒在於自私用智與顏子之明  睿所照曾子之定靜安慮子思之誠明謂  性孟子之以利爲本周子之明通公溥無  乎不盡此其所以超出千古又何待於著
Interpretation

Human emotions each carry their own obscurations, and for this reason they cannot accord with the Dao (Dào, the Way). Broadly speaking, the greatest flaws lie in self-interest and in deliberately exercising calculation. A self-interested person cannot respond to things in accordance with their nature and act appropriately, and a person who relies constantly on calculation cannot let clear awareness (míngjué) manifest naturally.

Now, if one harbors a mind that loathes external things and seeks out a state free of external things, it is like turning a mirror around and still expecting it to reflect. The Yijing (Yìjīng, Book of Changes) says: "Stopping at the back, one loses sense of one's own body; walking in the courtyard, one does not see other people." Rather than rejecting external things and insisting that the inner mind alone is correct, it is better to forget inner and outer together. When inner and outer are both forgotten, the mind becomes clear and still. With no disturbance in the heart, it can be settled, and once settled, it can be luminous. Given this, how could responding to things become a burden?

The sage's joy arises because things are truly worthy of joy, and the sage's anger arises because things truly warrant anger. The sage's joy and anger are not drawn out by private concerns but arise according to the principle of the matter itself. Is this not a response to external things? How could one say that responding to external things is wrong, and that only seeking rightness within the mind is correct? If we compare the joy and anger born of self-interest and calculation with the sage's joy and anger, which accord with right principle, how do the two compare?

Human emotions arise easily but are hard to govern, and of these, anger is the most serious. If one can, in the moment of anger, immediately set down the rage and turn instead to examine whether the matter accords with reason, one will understand that external temptations are not worth hating. With regard to the Dao, one will have already grasped the greater part.

The Hongdao Lu (Hóngdào Lù) comments: "Having read the Dingxing Shu (Dìngxìng Shū, Essay on Settling the Nature), I know that the Master's attainment is deep and his insight unique, not something ordinary scholars can reach. People are burdened by external things because they cannot gather their scattered minds. In speaking of settling the nature, one should neither deliberately welcome nor deliberately reject, should not cling to the distinction between inner and outer, and should let movement and stillness become one. The most subtle principle here is a mind open and even, responding as things arrive. The whole essay analyzes this repeatedly, and it says nothing beyond this principle."

Yet of these principles, the easiest to point out and the easiest to practice is to begin with the emotions, which is why the Master also illustrated them through joy and anger. If one wishes to point directly to the first step of cultivation, it is this: in the moment of anger, first set down the rage, then observe whether the matter accords with principle. The essential purpose of the whole text is to let clear awareness manifest naturally, and what must above all be guarded against is self-interest and deliberate calculation. The penetrating insight of Yanzi (Yánzǐ, Yan Hui), the settled tranquility and careful deliberation of Zengzi (Zēngzǐ, Zeng Shen), the sincerity and clarity spoken of by Zisi (Zǐsī), Mengzi's analysis grounded in righteousness versus profit, and the clarity, transparency, impartiality, and universality described by Master Zhou (Zhōuzǐ, Zhou Dunyi) can all be fully embodied here. This is precisely what sets it apart from earlier generations. Why should it have to wait for a deliberately composed treatise before...

 述而後爲成書也哉 陸九淵生三四歲問其父曰天地何所窮際 父笑而不答遂深思至志寢室及𦁕角與止 異凡兒見者敬之謂人曰聞人誦伊川語奚 爲與孔子孟子之言不類初讀論語即疑有 子之言他日讀書至宇宙二字觧者曰四方 上下曰宇往古來今曰宙忽大省曰宇宙内 事乃已分内事已分内事乃宇宙内事又嘗 曰東海有聖人出焉此心同也此理同也至 西海南海北海有聖人出亦莫不然千百世 之上有聖人出焉此心同也此理同也至於 千百世之下有聖人出此心此理亦無不同 也後登進士至行在士爭從之游言論感發 聞而興起者甚衆教人不用學規有小過言 中其情或至流汗有懷於中而不能自曉者 爲之條析其故悉知其心亦有相去千里聞 其大槩而得其爲人嘗曰念慮之不正者頃 刻而知之即可以正念慮之正者頃刻而失 之即爲不正謂學者曰汝耳自𦖟目自明事 父自能孝事兄自能弟本無欠闕不必他求 又曰此道與溺於利欲之人言猶易與溺於 意見之人言却難或勸其著書曰六經註我 我註六經學苟知道六經皆我註脚嘗與朱 熹會於鵝湖論辯所學多不合及熹守南康 九淵訪之熹與至白鹿洞九淵爲講君子喻 于義小人喻于利一章熹以爲切中學者隱 㣲深痼之病至聼之有泣下者
Interpretation

When Lu Jiuyuan was three or four years old, he asked his father, "Where is the boundary of heaven and earth?" His father smiled and did not answer. Lu then kept pondering the question, even while sleeping, sitting, or lying down. Unlike ordinary children, he impressed everyone who met him, and they respected him.

Someone once remarked to another, "I have heard people recite Yichuan's (Cheng Yi's) sayings. Why do they not seem to match the words of Confucius and Mencius?" When Lu first read the Analects, he already doubted the sayings of Master You (You Ruo, a disciple of Confucius). Later, while studying, he came to the word "yuzhou" (cosmos), and a commentator explained, "What lies in the four directions and above and below is called yu, and what extends from antiquity to the present is called zhou." Lu suddenly awakened and said, "The affairs within the cosmos are all my own affairs, and my own affairs are all within the cosmos."

He also said, "When a sage appears in the East across the sea, his mind is the same as ours and his principle is the same as ours. The same holds in the West, the South, and the North. When a sage appeared a thousand or a hundred years ago, his mind was the same as ours and his principle was the same. When a sage appears a thousand or a hundred years hence, his mind and principle will not differ either."

Later he passed the imperial examinations and became a jinshi. When he arrived at the zaixing (the temporary residence where the emperor stayed), scholars vied to follow him and study under him. His words moved his listeners and inspired them to strive, and many were affected in this way. He taught without fixed rules of study. When a student committed a minor fault, his remarks often hit precisely at what the student was thinking, and some students even broke into a sweat. When someone harbored a doubt they could not resolve on their own, he analyzed the reasons for it point by point, so that the person came to understand their own thoughts. Even those who lived a thousand li away and had heard only the general outline of his teaching could grasp his character.

He once said, "When a thought first turns crooked, notice it at once and you can correct it. When a thought first turns upright, if you lose that uprightness in the blink of an eye, it has become crooked." To those who came to learn, he said, "Your ears are already able to hear, and your eyes are already able to see. In serving your father, you naturally know filial piety. In treating your elder brothers, you naturally know respect and affection. A person is complete from the start and need not search outside for anything."

He further said, "It is easier to reason with people who are immersed in profit and desire than with people who are immersed in their own fixed opinions, which is in fact more difficult." When someone urged him to write books, he replied, "The Six Classics (the six Confucian canonical texts) are annotations on me, and I am an annotation on the Six Classics. If a student truly understands the Way, then the Six Classics are all footnotes that serve to clarify my principles."

He once met Zhu Xi at Goose Lake to discuss their respective doctrines, and they disagreed on many points. Later, when Zhu Xi took up a post in Nankang, Lu went to visit him. Zhu Xi accompanied him to the White Deer Grotto Academy, where Lu lectured on the passage from the Analects that reads, "The gentleman understands what is right; the petty person understands what is profitable." Zhu Xi held that this lecture struck at the deep-seated problems that had long afflicted those who study, and among the listeners, some were moved to tears.

 録曰愚觀朱陸之學所以異者良由資禀  之不同也九淵自三四歲時已窮究天地  之所際則其長也安得不主於性朱子則  銖銖而累之寸寸而積之及其至也安得  不主於學然則二夫子之所長各有所究  本不相悖不相害也譬之聖門曾子之才  魯子貢之質敏然同𡚖于一貫者有夫子  爲之㸃化也時聖人不作諸子各立門墻  而無統會依歸之所是以紛紛異同矧及  門者從而咻之不知尊德性道問學子思  傳于仲尼未嘗偏廢初不可岐而二也曷  若大道爲公智慮其不切於己也不必異  己學慮其無補於人也不必爲人使當時  莫得而議後世無得而非兹非所謂大同  者哉愚恐後之議者愈繁愈逺斯録所以  弘道故不可不著 水東曰記明吴思庵先生訥常言世俗淺學 談及後進輙曰此韻府羣玉秀才好趂航船 耳蓋言其破碎摘裂祇如往來羣坐偶語無 有一高智識關鍵也先生嘗熟世家自少警 敏絶人於書無所不讀嘗從其先君子遊宦 四方閱歷既廣退而况潜含養三四十年所 以其學博而核其氣剛而大其識卓而明所 著性理羣書補註小學集觧有功於儒先其 立論於性理之奥尤多所闡明  録曰公蓋起於薦舉不由科目而其言乃  切中當今學士大夫之病視昔張程朱陸  大不侔矣然則學者其可不猛省乎此録
Interpretation

I believe the differences between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan's teachings arose mainly from differences in their natural endowments. When Lu Jiuyuan was three or four years old, he already sought the fundamental principles of Heaven, Earth, and the myriad things, so when he grew up it was natural for him to take the mind and nature as the root of learning. Zhu Xi, by contrast, accumulated knowledge little by little, probing principles inch by inch, so that once his learning matured, he naturally placed greater weight on study and investigation. Each of the two masters had his strengths, and their directions of inquiry differed. This was originally no contradiction and did not impede one another.

This is like the disciples of Confucius. Zengzi was slow in temperament, while Zigong was quick and perceptive, yet both were able to grasp "one thread running through all" (the fundamental principle that penetrates all affairs and principles), because Confucius enlightened and guided them. After the sages no longer appeared, the various schools each set up their own gates, lacking any common unifying point of return, so that opinions multiplied and scholars disputed with one another. Later scholars, following along, added to the clamor and understood even less that "honoring the virtuous nature" (esteeming the moral nature inherent within oneself) and "inquiring and learning" (seeking to understand principles through study and questioning) must not be neglected. The Way of Confucius transmitted by Zisi never neglected either side, so the two should never have been separated in the first place.

If the Great Dao belongs to all under Heaven, then one whose talents and reflections do not fit oneself need not deliberately seek difference, and one whose learning and thought offer nothing to others need not force it upon them. In this way, no one at the time can criticize, and later generations have no ground for objection. Is this not what is called "Great Harmony" (Datong)? I fear that the more later generations debate, the further they drift from the principle. The Hongdao Lu was written precisely to clarify the Great Dao, which is why these words could not go unrecorded.

Shui Dong says: Master Wu Si'an, Wu Na of the Ming dynasty, often remarked that shallow-learned people of the world, when speaking of younger scholars, readily say, "This is nothing but a scholar of the Yunfu Qunyu type, who merely hurries his boat back and forth." This means their learning is fragmented, that they only pick up scattered materials, like idle sitting and idle talk, lacking lofty insight and the key that connects principles.

Master Wu had long been familiar with the affairs of great families. From childhood he was unusually quick and read widely, reading everything. He followed his father to posts in various places and had abundant observation and experience. Afterward he further immersed himself in cultivation for three or four decades. Therefore his learning was broad and solid, his bearing vigorous and expansive, and his insight outstanding and clear. His Xingli Qunshu Buzhu and Xiaoxue Jijie were quite helpful to the study of earlier Confucian masters, and especially where he discussed the profound points of the principles of nature, he offered much elucidation.

I believe Master Wu entered office through recommendation rather than through the civil examinations, yet his words cut precisely to the ills of the literati of his time. Compared with the teachings of Zhang Zai, Cheng Yi, Zhu Xi, Lu Jiuyuan, and others of the past, there is indeed a considerable gap. Seen in this light, should not scholars seriously reflect? This is the purpose for which the Hongdao Lu recorded these words.

 之所以終也 弘道録卷之
Interpretation

This is why it came to this ending.

Hongdao Lu, Scroll 47

四十七

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0033); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 39 Vol. 41 →