中文 · EN

《老子翼》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Xu Daozang 續道藏 Vol. 2 / 6 19,878 characters

About this page. The original text of 《老子翼》 Vol. 2 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 6 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 39 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《老子翼》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

老子翼卷之二轂二   下篇 上德不德是以有德下德不失德是以無德 上德無爲而無以爲下德爲之而有以爲上 仁爲之而無以爲上義爲之而有以爲上禮 爲之而莫之應則攘臂而仍之故失道而後 德失德而後仁失仁而後義失義而後禮夫 禮者忠信之薄而亂之首也前識者道之華 而愚之始也是以大丈夫處其厚不處其薄 居其實不居其華故去彼取此 蘇註  聖人從心所欲不踰矩非有意于德而德  自足其下知德之貴勉强以求不失蓋僅  自完耳而何德之有無爲而有以爲之則  猶有爲也唯無爲而無以爲者可謂無爲  矣其下非爲不成然猶有以爲之非徒作  而無術者也仁義皆不免于爲之矣其所  以異者仁以無以爲爲勝義以有以爲爲  功耳德有上下而仁義有上無下何也下  德在仁義之間而仁義之下者不足復言  故也自德以降而至于禮聖人之所以齊  民者極矣故爲之而不應則至于攘臂而  强之强之而又不應于是刑罰興而兵甲  起則徒作而無術矣忠信而無禮則忠信  不見禮立而忠信之美發越于外君臣父  子之間夫婦朋友之際其外燦然而中無  餘矣故順之則治違之則亂治亂之相去  其間不能以髮故曰亂之首也聖人玄覽  萬物是非得失畢陳于前如鑑之照形無
Interpretation

This passage elucidates Laozi's hierarchical distinction of De (Virtue/Power) and its evolutionary process, along with the resulting transformations in social norms.

The truly noble De (superior De) manifests spontaneously without deliberate display - this constitutes genuine De. Conversely, those who consciously maintain virtuous conduct (inferior De) actually lose the essence of true De. The highest form of De follows nature's course through wuwei (non-action), while lesser forms involve intentional effort.

Benevolence arises from active yet innate intention, while righteousness involves purposeful action with specific aims. When reaching the level of ritual propriety, enforcement becomes necessary when people fail to respond. This reveals the degeneration process: first the loss of Dao, then De, followed by benevolence, then righteousness, until only ritual remains. Ritual propriety emerges precisely when loyalty and trust have weakened, ironically becoming the seed of disorder. Those who consider themselves prescient merely grasp superficial aspects of Dao - the very beginning of folly.

Therefore, noble individuals should choose substantial simplicity over shallow ornamentation. Sages (those who have attained Dao) follow their heart's desire without transgressing natural principles. They don't strive for De consciously, yet De naturally abounds within them. Ordinary people straining after De can only manage not to be deficient. Both benevolence and righteousness inevitably involve deliberate action, differing only in that benevolence arises unconsciously while righteousness stems from conscious intent.

From De to benevolence, righteousness, and ritual propriety - these represent the sages' progressive methods for guiding common people. When ritual fails to function, coercive force is employed, marking complete loss of proper order. Loyalty and trust struggle to manifest without ritual framework, yet excessive emphasis on ritual makes people focus solely on superficial forms. Like a mirror reflecting objects, sages perceive the essential nature of all things, discerning right and wrong with perfect clarity.

 所不見而孰爲前後世人視止于目聽止  于耳思止于心冥行于萬物之間役智以  求識而偶有見焉雖自以爲明而不知至  愚之自始也世之鄙夫樂其有得于下而  忘其上故喜薄而遺厚采華而弃實非大  丈夫孰能去彼取此 筆乘  首亂始愚極言禮智流弊所至耳莊子舉  老子此言而論之曰今己爲物也欲復歸  根不亦難乎其易也其惟大人乎雖然既  歸其根孰爲物孰爲非物故又曰匿而不  可不爲者事也遠而不可不居者義也親  而不可不廣者仁也節而不可不積者禮  也中而不可不高者德也一而不可不易  者道也此數者雖有上下先後之異而以  聖人用之皆道也蓋聖人百慮同歸二際  俱泯豈復有彼此去取邪 㫺之得一者天得一以清地得一以寧神得 一以靈谷得一以盈萬物得一以生侯王得 一以爲天下貞其致之一也天無以清將恐 裂地無以寧將恐發神無以靈將恐歇谷無 以盈將恐竭萬物無以生將恐滅侯王無以 貞而貴高將恐蹷故貴以賤爲本高以下爲 基是以侯王自謂孤寡不穀此其以賤爲本 邪非乎故致數輿無輿不欲碌碌如玉落落 如石  裂破毁也發發泄也歇消滅也竭枯竭也  蹷音厥顛仆也數上聲 蘇註  一道也物之所以得爲物者皆道也天下  之人見物而忘道天知其清而已地知其
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses how people are often constrained by sensory perceptions and superficial understanding, while emphasizing the fundamental role of the Dao (the cosmic principle) in all existence.

Ordinary people typically rely solely on what they see with their eyes, hear with their ears, and comprehend with their limited intellect in their pursuit of knowledge. When they occasionally gain some insight, they consider themselves wise—yet this very attitude marks the beginning of ignorance. Worldly individuals become content with superficial attainments while forgetting the root, preferring ornate appearances over substantial essence. Only the truly noble person can relinquish empty embellishments and grasp the fundamental truth.

Zhuangzi quotes Laozi's teaching: once people become entangled in material pursuits, returning to the source becomes exceedingly difficult. However, sages transcend such dualities, harmonizing seemingly contradictory concepts (such as benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and virtue) within the unity of the Dao. The wisdom of sages dissolves all distinctions and oppositions.

The scripture then elaborates on the importance of "the One" (the Dao): when heaven attains the Dao, it becomes clear and luminous; when earth attains the Dao, it finds peace and stability; when spirits attain the Dao, they manifest efficacy; when valleys attain the Dao, they brim with abundance; when all things attain the Dao, they flourish; when rulers attain the Dao, the world achieves harmony. Without this foundation, heaven would crack, earth would quake, spirits would vanish, valleys would dry up, all beings would perish, and rulers would fall. Thus, nobility must take humility as its root, and elevation must be founded upon what is low—just as rulers refer to themselves as "the solitary one," "the unworthy one," or "the undeserving" (self-deprecating titles). Seeking excessive praise leads to losing one's foundation; it is better to maintain one's original simplicity.

Annotations explain: "crack" means to split apart, "quake" means to tremble, "vanish" means to disappear, "dry up" means to become exhausted, and "fall" means to collapse.

Su Shi's commentary observes: the reason all things can exist as they do originates from the Dao. Yet people only see concrete phenomena while forgetting the fundamental Dao—heaven merely knows its own clarity, earth merely knows its own stability.

 寧而已神知其靈而已谷知其盈而已萬  物知其生而已侯王知其爲天下貞而已  不知其所以得此者皆道存焉耳致之言  極也天不得一未遽裂也地不得一未遽  發也神不得一未遽歇也萬物不得一未  遽滅也侯王不得一未遽蹷也然其極必  至此耳天地之大侯王之貴皆一之致夫  一果何物也視之不見執之不得則亦天  地之至微也此所謂賤且下也本也昔之  稱孤寡不穀者亦舉其本而遺其末耳輪  輻蓋軫衡軛轂轊會而爲車物物可數而  車不可數然後知無有之爲車所謂無之  以爲用者也然則天地將以大爲天地邪  侯王將以貴爲侯王邪大與貴之中有一  存焉此其所以爲天地侯王者而人莫或  知之耳故一處貴而非貴處賤而非賤非  若玉之碌碌貴而不能賤石之落落賤而  不能貴也 反者道之動弱者道之用天下之物生於有 有生于無  反復也湏溪云反者動之極則必歸也是  其反也正以其動也非動無反 蘇註  復性則靜矣然其寂然不動感而遂通天  下之故則動之所自起也道無形無聲天  下之弱者莫如道然而天下之至强莫加  焉此其所以能用萬物也世不知靜之爲  動弱之爲强故告之以物之所自生者蓋  天下之物聞有母制子未聞有以子制母  者也 筆乘
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the primordial nature and fundamental function of the Dao. It reveals that tranquility manifests the divine (Shen), emptiness contains fullness, all things grow naturally, and rulers become models for the world—all because of the Dao's presence.

Though invisible and intangible, the "One" (representing Dao's essence) sustains heaven, earth, and the myriad beings. Without it, heaven wouldn't collapse immediately, earth wouldn't quake at once, spirits (Shen) wouldn't cease functioning, creatures wouldn't perish instantly, nor would rulers lose power abruptly—yet all would inevitably decline. The vastness of heaven and earth, the nobility of rulers, all stem from the "One's" operation.

The "One" is the subtlest existence between heaven and earth—appearing humble yet constituting the root of all things. Ancient kings called themselves "solitary," "desolate," and "unworthy," precisely because they grasped the root while discarding superficialities. Like wheels, spokes, and canopy combining to form a carriage—though each component is countable, the concept of "carriage" transcends enumeration—this demonstrates the wondrous function of "non-being" (Wu).

Heaven and earth aren't vast because of their expanse, nor are rulers noble due to status—they embody the fundamental "One." Thus the "One" remains noble without claiming nobility, humble without considering baseness—unlike jade that must be precious or stone that must be lowly.

The latter section explains: cyclical return constitutes the Dao's movement, while softness embodies its application. All beings emerge from "being" (you), which itself originates from "non-being" (Wu). This cyclical motion manifests the Dao—returning to one's original nature is stillness (Jing), yet ultimate stillness resonates with all creation, initiating movement.

Though formless and soundless, seemingly soft and weak, the Dao is the mightiest force governing existence. Most people fail to understand how stillness generates motion or weakness overcomes strength. Just as all things have their origin (mother), no child can rule its mother—this illustrates the Dao's fundamental and sovereign nature.

 天下之物生于有所謂有名萬物之母是  已有生于無所謂無名天地之始是已無  必生有是故貴其反反者反於無也有生  於無是故貴其弱弱者無之似也 上士聞道勤而行之中士聞道若存若亡下 士聞道大笑之不笑不足以爲道故建言有 之明道若昧進道若退夷道若類上德若谷 大白若辱廣德若不足建德若偷質眞若渝 大方無隅大器晩成大音希聲大象無形道 隱無名夫唯道善貸且成  建立也偷苟且也渝羊朱反變改也傅奕  音義云古本作輸廣雅曰輸愚也或作揄  董遇作摇今從王弼傅奕作渝應人之乏  而終以見還曰貸趙志堅云貸者暫借非  長與也且者權成非久固也欲使蒙貸者  不長徃得成者非久住感貸荷成速歸於  道 蘇註  道非形不可見非聲不可聞不先知萬物  之妄廓然無蔽卓然有見未免于不信也  故下士聞道以爲荒唐謬悠而笑之中士  聞道與之存亡出没而疑之惟了然見之  者然後勤行服膺而不怠孔子曰語之而  不惰者其回也與斯所謂上士也哉建立  也古之立言者有是說而老子取之下之  所陳者是也無所不照而非察也若止不  行而天下之速者莫之或先也或夷或類  所至則平而未嘗削也上德不德如谷之  虛也大白若辱者使白而不受汚此則不
Interpretation

All things under heaven arise from "being" (concrete existence), which we call the mother of all things. Yet "being" itself originates from "non-being" (formless source), which we call the beginning of heaven and earth. "Non-being" necessarily gives birth to "being," thus practitioners emphasize returning to the source—this "return" means reverting to the state of "non-being." Since "being" emerges from "non-being," we must value the state of softness and weakness, for it most closely resembles the essence of "non-being."

When people of different capacities hear the Dao, their responses vary greatly: those of superior capacity hear the Dao and diligently practice it; those of average capacity hear it with half-belief and half-doubt; those of inferior capacity hear it and burst into laughter—yet if the foolish do not laugh at it, the teaching cannot be considered profound. Thus the ancients said: Those who truly understand the Dao appear dull-witted; those who make progress in cultivation seem to regress; the smooth path of the Dao appears rugged. The highest virtue resembles a valley in its emptiness; the purest white seems stained; abundant virtue always appears insufficient; robust virtue seems indolent; the most genuine essence appears changeable.

The greatest square has no corners; the most precious vessel takes the longest to complete; the loudest sound is nearly inaudible; the grandest form has no shape. The Dao always conceals itself and reveals no name. Only the Dao excels in giving to all things and aiding their fulfillment ("lending" refers to temporary provision rather than permanent bestowal, and "provisional fulfillment" indicates temporary achievement rather than eternal fixation, with the purpose being the eventual return of all things to the Dao).

Su Zhe's commentary explains: The Dao has no form and thus cannot be seen, produces no sound and thus cannot be heard. Unless one first sees through the illusory nature of all phenomena, completely dispels delusions, and attains true knowledge, doubt is inevitable. Therefore, those of inferior capacity hear the Dao and mock its apparent absurdity; those of average capacity waver between belief and skepticism; only those who truly understand practice diligently, keeping it in their hearts without slackening. Confucius said, "Was it not Hui who could hear the teaching and practice it unremittingly?"—this describes those of superior capacity. The subsequent paradoxical descriptions (such as "the bright Dao seems dark") are all sayings of ancient sages, which Laozi quotes to illustrate how the Dao transcends ordinary understanding.

 屑不潔之士而非聖人也廣德若不足者  廣大而不可復加則止于此而已非廣也  建德若偷因物之自然而無立者外若偷  惰而實建也質眞若渝體聖抱神隨物變  化而不失其貞者外若渝也大方無隅全  其大方不小立圭角也大器晩成器大不  可近用也大音希聲非耳之所得聞也大  象無形非目之所得見也道之所寓無所  不見凡此十二者皆道之見于事者也而  道之大全則隱于無名惟其所寓惟其有  餘以貸不足物之賴之以成者如此 筆乘  上士者恬淡寂寞虛無無爲者也勤於此  則勤行之至而實無所勤行也斯所謂天  然懸解矣而下士惡足以知之君平曰中  士所聞非至美也下士所見非至善也中  士所眩下士所笑乃美善之美善者也 道生一一生二二生三三生萬物萬物負隂 而抱陽沖氣以爲和人之所惡惟孤寡不穀 而王公以爲稱故物或損之而益或益之而 損人之所教我亦教之强梁者不得其死吾 將以爲教父  凡動物背止於後隂靜也耳目口鼻居前  陽動也故曰負隂抱陽植物則背寒向暖  而沖氣運乎其間木絶水曰梁木負棟亦  曰梁取其力之强也故曰强梁金人銘曰  强梁者不得其死好勝者必遇其敵蓋古  人嘗以此爲教而我亦教之但老子獨尊  之曰教父如言萬物之母之謂母主養父
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the manifestation of Dao (the Way) and its wisdom for navigating life in Daoist thought.

The person of superior virtue (shangshi) may appear imperfect, yet this is precisely because their De (Virtue/Power) has reached its utmost refinement. Those who have truly achieved merit (jiande) may seem idle, but in reality, they are aligning with the natural flow. Those of pure essence may appear to drift with the current, yet inwardly they remain steadfast in the true path. The most square object has no sharp corners; the most precious vessel takes the longest to complete; the loudest sound cannot be heard; the grandest form cannot be seen. These twelve phenomena all reflect the operating principles of Dao, yet Dao itself remains formless and nameless.

Those who cultivate the Dao (shangshi) pursue stillness and Wuwei (non-action). Though they may seem diligent in practice, they are actually following the natural course. Ordinary people (zhongshi, xiashi) cannot comprehend this state and often mock the truly profound teachings. Just as rulers refer to themselves with seemingly self-deprecating titles like "the solitary one" or "the bereft," these very terms highlight their noble status.

All things embrace both Yin and Yang (负阴抱阳), and the harmonious blending of these two Qi (vital energies) creates balance. The ancients taught: "The violent and domineering do not meet a natural end" (强梁者不得其死). Laozi particularly valued this principle, calling it the "father of teachings" (教父)—a fundamental instruction akin to the mother of all things. Just as the main beam (强梁) of a house may be sturdy, excessive rigidity makes it prone to breakage.

 主教故言生則曰母言教則曰父 蘇註  夫道非一非二及其與物爲偶道一而物  不一故以一名道然而道則非一也一與  一爲二二與一爲三自是以徃而萬物生  物雖有萬不同而莫不負隂抱陽沖氣以  爲和者蓋物生于三而三生于一理之自  然也世之人不知萬物之所自生莫不賤  寡小而貴重大然王公之尊而自稱孤寡  不穀古之達者蓋已知之矣 天下之至柔馳騁天下之至堅無有入於無 間吾是以知無爲之有益不言之教無爲之 益天下希及之  馳騁役使也堅猶剛强不曰剛强而曰堅  變文叶韻也無間無内也至剛者天下莫  能勝而至柔能役之無内者天下莫能破  而無有能入之二語皆設喻以明無爲之  有益也 蘇註  以堅御堅不折則碎以柔御堅柔亦不靡  堅亦不病求之於物則水是也以有入有  捍不相受以無入有無未嘗勞有未嘗覺  求之于物則鬼神是也是以聖人唯能無  爲故能役使衆强出入群有 名與身孰親身與貨孰多得與亡孰病是故 甚愛必大費多藏必厚亡知足不辱知止不 殆可以長久  多猶重也薛云知足者樂今有之已多無  求者也無求奚辱知止者懼後進之有損  知幾者也知幾奚殆 大成若缺其用不敝大盈若沖其用不窮大 直若屈大巧若拙大辯若訥躁勝寒靜勝熱
Interpretation

This passage from Laozi Yi elucidates several core Daoist perspectives on the nature of the Dao and worldly wisdom:

On the generative principle of the Dao: The Dao itself is neither singular nor dualistic. When relating to the myriad things, we call it "the One." Yet this "One" undergoes differentiation—one plus one becomes two, two plus one becomes three, thus generating all phenomena. Though the ten thousand things differ, each contains the two Qi (阴 Yin representing receptivity and softness, 阳 Yang representing activity and strength), achieving harmony through harmonizing Qi. All things originate from "three," and "three" derives from "One"—this is the natural order.

On the principle of softness overcoming hardness: The softest things in the world (like water) can master the hardest substances; formless forces (like air) can penetrate seamless objects. This demonstrates how the benefits of 无为 Wuwei (non-interference) and "wordless teaching" are unparalleled. Just as water wears through stone and spirits influence human affairs unseen, the sage understands Wuwei and thereby wields great power.

On the wisdom of knowing contentment and limits: Which is more precious—fame or life? Which more vital—possessions or vitality? Which more harmful—gain or loss? Excessive pursuit inevitably leads to great depletion; excessive accumulation ultimately brings severe loss. Knowing contentment prevents disgrace; understanding moderation avoids danger—thus one endures.

On the paradox of supreme wisdom appearing foolish: The most perfect thing (大成 great perfection) seems flawed yet functions inexhaustibly; the most full (大盈 great fullness) appears empty yet serves boundlessly. True straightness seems crooked; true skill seems clumsy; true eloquence seems inarticulate. Movement overcomes cold; stillness overcomes heat. All this illustrates how things often manifest through complementary opposites.

清靜爲天下正 蘇註  天下以不缺爲成故成必有敝以不虛爲  盈故盈必有窮聖人要于大成而不卹其  缺期于大盈而不惡其沖是以成而不敝  盈而不窮也直而不屈其直必折循理而  行雖曲而直巧而不拙其巧必勞付物自  然雖拙而巧辯而不訥其辯必窮因理而  言雖訥而辯成而不缺盈而不沖直而不  屈巧而不拙辯而不訥譬如躁之不能靜  靜之不能躁耳夫躁能勝寒而不能勝熱  靜能勝熱而不能勝寒皆滯于一偏而非  其正也唯泊然清淨不染于一非成非缺  非盈非沖非直非屈非巧非拙非辯非訥  而後無所不勝可以爲天下正矣 天下有道却走馬以糞天下無道戎馬生于 郊罪莫大于可欲禍莫大于不知足咎莫大 于欲得故知足之足常足矣  却屏去也糞糞田也吴幼清本糞下有車  字以張衡東京賦却走馬以糞車爲證戎  馬戰馬也郊交也二國相交之境也戎馬  生于郊言兵久不還也一性之内無欠無  餘人能安之無徃不足故曰知足之足常  足 蘇註  天下各安其分則不爭而自治故却是馬  而糞田以其可欲者示人固有罪矣而不  足其足者其禍又甚所欲必得者其咎最  大匹夫有一于身患必及之侯王而爲是  則戎馬之所自起也唯知足者所寓而足  故無不足
Interpretation

This passage elucidates two core principles: serenity through non-action (Wuwei) and contentment as constant joy.

The first part explains the meaning of "serenity makes right the world." When worldly affairs pursue perfection (nothing lacking), they instead hasten decline; when they chase fullness, they instead approach exhaustion. The truly wise seek great accomplishment without obsessing over flaws, yearn for completion while embracing emptiness. Like how straight objects snap easily, following nature's course may appear circuitous yet embodies true integrity; forced cleverness brings exhaustion while natural compliance seems clumsy yet contains profound skill; relentless argument leads to verbal depletion while speaking according to principle seems inarticulate yet proves most eloquent. Restlessness wards off cold but cannot dispel heat, while serenity dispels heat but cannot ward off cold—both represent partial extremes. Only by maintaining detached serenity, free from attachment to any extreme—neither forcing achievement nor flaw, fullness nor emptiness, straightness nor curvature, cleverness nor clumsiness, eloquence nor reticence—can one become invincible and embody the world's true path.

The second part discusses contentment as constant joy. In peaceful times, warhorses plow fields; in chaotic times, even broodmares foal on battlefields. The greatest crime is indulging desire, the greatest calamity is insatiability, the gravest fault is unbridled greed. Human nature is originally complete—abiding in one's innate fulfillment brings contentment everywhere. When rulers flaunt luxuries before the people, they already commit crime; if still unsatisfied, the disaster grows greater; if forcibly seizing possessions, it becomes the gravest fault. Ordinary people inviting misfortune through such errors is bad enough—how much worse when rulers do so? Such greed causes warfare. Only the contented find fulfillment in any circumstance.

Note: "Broodmares foaling on battlefields" signifies prolonged war forcing birth amidst conflict; "retiring warhorses to manure fields" denotes peacetime repurposing of military steeds for farming. These metaphors illustrate the vital importance of serene non-action and knowing contentment within one's bounds.

不出户知天下不窺牖見天道其出彌遠其 知彌少是以聖人不行而知不見而名不爲 而成 蘇註  性之爲體充遍字宙無遠近古今之異古  之聖人其所以不出户牖而無所不知者  特其性全故耳世之人爲物所蔽性分于  耳目内爲身心之所紛亂外爲山河之所  障塞見不出視聞不出聽户牖之微能蔽  而絶之不知聖人復性而足乃欲出而求  之是以彌遠而彌少也性之所及非特能  知能名而已蓋可以因物之自然不勞而  成之矣 爲學日益爲道日損損之又損之以至于無 爲無爲而無不爲矣故取天下常以無事及 其有事不足以取天下  取開元䟽云猶攝化也無事即無爲也無  爲自化清靜自正故曰取天下常以無事  爲者敗之執者失之故曰有事不足以取  天 蘇註  不知道而務學聞見日多而無以一之未  免爲累也孔子曰多聞擇其善者而從之  多見而識之知之次也苟一日知道顧視  萬物無一非妄去妄以求復性是謂之損  孔子謂子貢曰女以予爲多學而識之者  與曰然非與曰非也予一以貫之去妄以  求復性可謂損矣而去妄之心猶存及其  兼忘此心純性而無餘然後無所不爲而  不失于無爲矣人皆有欲取天下之心故  造事而求之心見于外而物惡之故終不  可得聖人無爲故無事其心見于外而物
Interpretation

This passage conveys two main layers of meaning:

The first layer discusses the importance of "inner realization." Those who truly comprehend the Dao (the Way) need not travel far—they can perceive celestial principles right by their window. The farther one journeys outwardly, the less one actually knows. The sages attain understanding without direct experience, perceive essence without visual confirmation, and accomplish without deliberate action.

Su Zhe explains that human nature is intrinsically connected to the cosmos, transcending time and space. Ancient sages could know all without leaving their homes precisely because they preserved their innate nature in its wholeness. Ordinary people, obscured by external objects, with minds disturbed by distractions and vision blocked by mountains and rivers, confine their understanding to narrow confines. Unaware that sages attain fulfillment simply by restoring their original nature, they seek outwardly instead—thus the farther they go, the less they truly comprehend. Where innate nature reaches, one not only perceives and names, but also aligns with the natural patterns of all things, accomplishing effortlessly.

The second layer distinguishes between "pursuing learning" and "pursuing the Dao." The pursuit of learning means daily accumulation of knowledge, while pursuing the Dao means daily reduction of attachments. Through continuous reduction, one ultimately attains the state of wuwei (non-action). Only through wuwei can the world be properly governed—forced action leads instead to failure.

Su Zhe clarifies that those who misunderstand the Dao while obsessively pursuing learning find their growing knowledge increasingly fragmented, becoming a burden instead. Confucius' saying "learn widely and select the excellent to follow" represents only secondary understanding. Once the Dao is realized, all phenomena are seen as illusory. Eliminating illusions to return to one's original nature constitutes the practice of "reduction." Yet even the notion of "eliminating illusions" must eventually be released, completely restoring pure innate nature to achieve the state where wuwei accomplishes all. Ordinary people constantly seek to control the world through forceful action, which breeds resistance; sages practice wuwei, thus avoiding artificial interference while all things naturally align.

(Note: The phrase "governing the world" here refers not to seizing political power, but to transforming and harmonizing the world through virtuous influence.)

 安之雖不取天下而天下歸之矣 聖人無常心以百姓心爲心善者吾善之不 善者吾亦善之德善矣信者吾信之不信者 吾亦信之德信矣聖人在天下惵惵爲天下 渾其心百姓皆注其耳目聖人皆孩之  無常心心無所主也惵圖恊反爲去聲渾  胡本反 蘇註  虛空無形因萬物之形以爲形在方爲方  在圓爲圓如使空自有形則何以形萬物  哉是以聖人無心因百姓之心以爲心無  善不善皆善之無信不信皆信之善不善  在彼吾之所以善之者未嘗渝也可謂德  善矣信不信在彼而吾之所以信者未嘗  變也可謂德信矣不然善善而棄不善信  信而棄不信豈所謂常善救人故無棄人  哉天下善惡信僞方各自是以相非相賊  不知所定聖人憂之故惵惵爲天下渾其  心無善惡無信僞皆以一待之彼方注其  耳目以觀聖人之予奪而吾一以嬰兒遇  之于善無所喜于惡無所嫉夫是以善者  不矜惡者不愠釋然皆化而天下始定矣 出生入死生之徒十有三死之徒十有三人 之生動之死地者亦十有三夫何故以其生 生之厚蓋聞善攝生者陸行不遇兕虎入軍 不避甲兵兕無所投其角虎無所措其爪兵 無所容其刃夫何故以其無死地  出謂自無而見于有入謂自有而歸于無  莊子萬物皆出于機入于機又曰其出不
Interpretation

This scripture primarily expounds on the way of the sage in dealing with worldly affairs and their attitude toward the common people.

The sage maintains no fixed subjective prejudices, instead taking the people's hearts as their own. Toward the virtuous, the sage acts virtuously; toward the non-virtuous, the sage equally extends virtue—this constitutes "De Shan" (true virtuous goodness). Toward the trustworthy, the sage shows trust; toward the untrustworthy, the sage equally extends trust—this constitutes "De Xin" (true trustworthy virtue). The sage moves cautiously through the world, returning all hearts to simplicity. While the people attentively observe the sage's every action, the sage cherishes them all as one would infants.

Here, "having no constant heart" (wuchangxin) means maintaining a mind free from stubborn opinions. "Cautious and careful" (diedie) describes a state of prudent vigilance, while "returning hearts to simplicity" (hunqixin) signifies guiding people back to their original, unadorned nature.

Su Zhe's commentary further explains: The sage resembles emptiness, having no fixed form yet adapting to all forms. Without personal bias, the sage completely identifies with the people's hearts. Whether facing virtue or vice, trustworthiness or deceit, the sage treats all equally. The key lies in the sage's unchanging attitude—never altering their virtuous intention or trust based on others' goodness or wickedness. If one only treated the virtuous well while abandoning the non-virtuous, or only trusted the trustworthy while rejecting the untrustworthy, this would violate the principle that "constant virtue saves people, therefore none are abandoned."

People often quarrel and fight due to differing standards of virtue/vice and truth/falsehood. Troubled by this, the sage cautiously returns all hearts to purity, treating everyone equally regardless of these distinctions. While the people watch the sage's words and deeds closely, the sage treats all as infants—neither specially delighting in good deeds nor specially despising evil ones. Thus, the virtuous grow no arrogance, the wicked harbor no resentment, and all may ultimately be transformed, bringing peace to the world.

The latter section discusses the principle of life and death: From birth to death, roughly three-tenths belong to long life, three-tenths to short life, and another three-tenths comprise those who could have lived long but died prematurely through excessive pursuit of longevity. The truly skilled in nourishing life encounter no rhinoceros or tiger when traveling on land, nor suffer weapon wounds on the battlefield. The rhinoceros finds no place to use its horn, the tiger no place to extend its claws, weapons no place to deploy their blades. Why is this? Because such a person never enters death's domain.

Here, "emergence" (chu) signifies moving from formlessness to form, while "return" (ru) means moving from form back to formlessness. Quoting Zhuangzi: All things emerge from the mechanism of creation and return to it.

 忻其入不詎又曰有乎出有乎入皆以出  爲生入爲死夫音符攝生如攝政攝官之  攝不認生爲己有如暫焉管攝之也不期  而會曰遇兕音似山海經兕出湘水之南  蒼黑色爾雅云形如野牛一角重千斤 蘇註  性無生死出則爲生入則爲死用物取精  以自滋養者生之徒也聲色臭味以自戕  賊者死之徒也二者既分生死之道矣吾  又知作而不知休知言而不知默知思而  不知忘以趣于盡則所謂動而之死地者  也生死之道以十言之三者各居其三矣  豈非生死之道九而不生不死之道一而  已矣不生不死則易所謂寂然不動者也  老子言其九不言其一使人自得之以寄  無思無爲之妙也有生則有死故生之徒  即死之徒也人之所頼于生者厚則死之  道常十九聖人常在不生不死中生地且  無焉有死地哉 筆乘  生之徒十有三此練形住世者也死之徒  十有三此殉欲忘生者也人之生動之死  地十有三此斷滅種性者也凡此十分之  中率居其九皆生生之厚者也夫有生必  有死是生固死之地矣兕虎甲兵將安避  之善攝生則無生矣故兕之角無所投虎  之爪無所措兵之刃無所容何者彼無地  以受之也厚生者九無生者一老子于十  者之中闕一自擬其㫖微矣然聖人無生  非故薄之也本無生也昔人云愛生者可
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the Dao of life and death, with its core insight being that excessive attachment to life paradoxically hastens death—those who truly understand life cultivation do not claim life as their personal possession.

The text mentions three types of people: "followers of life" (those pursuing longevity), "followers of death" (those indulging desires), and "those moving toward death's domain" (those deliberately extinguishing their innate nature). Each group constitutes three-tenths of humanity, collectively making nine-tenths. All three types overemphasize life, thereby becoming trapped in the cycle of birth and death. Those who have attained the Dao understand that life is fundamentally a state beyond both birth and death—akin to the "tranquil and unmoving" realm described in the Yijing.

Laozi employs the metaphor of the si (a rhinoceros-like mythical beast): those skilled in life cultivation are like the si whose horns find nothing to gore, the tiger whose claws find nothing to tear, or weapons that find no place to pierce—because they have transcended the duality of life and death. The sage neither deliberately pursues longevity nor intentionally disregards life, but rather comprehends life's inherent illusoriness.

The text further criticizes three erroneous attitudes: knowing only labor without rest, knowing only speech without silence, and knowing only thought without forgetting. These all represent manifestations of "moving toward death's domain." True great wisdom lies in maintaining a state of thoughtless non-action (wuwei), neither coveting life nor fearing death—only thus can one transcend life and death.

 殺也愛潔者可污也愛榮者可辱也愛完  者可破也本無生孰殺之本無潔孰污之  本無榮孰辱之本無完孰破之知此者可  以出入造化遊戲死生 道生之德畜之物形之勢成之是以萬物莫 不尊道而貴德道之尊德之貴夫莫之爵而 常自然故道生之畜之長之育之亭之毒之 養之覆之生而不有爲而不恃長而不宰是 謂玄德  畜許六反夫音符長上聲下同 蘇註  道者萬物之母故生萬物者道也及其運  而爲德牧養羣衆而不辭故畜萬物者德  也然而道德則不能自形因物而後形見  物則不能自成遠近相取剛柔相交積而  爲勢而後興亡治亂之變成矣形雖由物  成雖由勢而非道不生非德不畜是以尊  道而貴德尊如父兄貴如侯王道無位而  德有名故也恃爵而後尊貴者非實尊貴  也 天下有始以爲天下母既得其母以知其子 既知其子復守其母殁身不殆塞其兊閉其 門終身不勤開其兊濟其事終身不救見小 曰明守柔曰强用其光復歸其明無遺身殃 是謂襲常  兊口也人之有口家之有門皆喻物所從  出者塞而閉之藏有於無守母者也參同  契云耳目己之寳閉固勿發揚兊口勿以  談希之順以洪即此義不可目窺曰小不  可力得曰柔遺唯季反襲常猶前言襲明  宻而不露也記曰揜而充裘曰襲 蘇註
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core Daoist concepts of "Dao" (the Way) and "De" (Virtue/Power), and how understanding these principles enables transcendence beyond worldly attachments.

The text begins by illustrating how excessive attachments lead to suffering: those obsessed with cleanliness become vulnerable to defilement, those craving prestige become susceptible to humiliation, perfectionists invite destruction. Yet these fixations are fundamentally illusory—without the concept of "birth," how could "death" exist? Without standards of "purity," what meaning would "defilement" hold? Those who grasp this truth transcend life and death, wandering freely with the transformations of nature.

The relationship between Dao and De is then explained: Dao serves as the generative source of all things (Dao gives them birth), while De represents the nurturing force (De rears them). All beings naturally honor Dao and cherish De—this nobility isn't conferred by external titles. Dao produces yet claims no possession, accomplishes yet takes no credit—this profound virtue is called "Mysterious De" (Xuande).

Su Zhe's commentary further clarifies: Dao acts as mother to all things, De as their shepherd. Though Dao and De have no concrete form, they manifest through the operations of existence. Like revered fathers and elder brothers, or treasured kings and lords, this honor springs from inner worth rather than external status.

The concluding section presents cultivation methods: one must locate the source of all things (the mother), understand phenomena through their origin (the children), then return to safeguard the source. Practical techniques include closing sensory gates (blocking the openings, shutting the doors), maintaining inner clarity (seeing the subtle is called illumination), and overcoming hardness through softness (guarding tenderness is called strength). By employing inner wisdom (using its light) and returning to original clarity (reverting to its brightness), one avoids self-inflicted calamity. This is termed "inheriting the constant"—following the eternal Dao while preserving inner mysteries unmanifested.

 無名天地之始有名萬物之母道方無名  則物之所資始也及其有名則物之所資  生也故謂之始又謂之母其子則萬物也  聖人體道以周物譬如以母知其子了然  無不察也雖其智能周之然而未嘗以物  忘道故終守其母也天下皆具此道然常  患忘道而狥物目悅于色耳悅于聲開其  悅之之心而以其事濟之是以終身而陷  溺不能救夫聖人之所以終身不勤者唯  塞而閉之未嘗出而狥之也悅之爲害始  小而浸大知小之將大而閉之可謂明矣  趨其所悅而不顧自以爲强而非强也唯  見悅而知畏之者可謂强矣世人開其所  悅以身狥物徃而不反聖人塞而閉之非  絶物也以神應物用其光而已身不與也  夫耳之能聽目之能見鼻之能臭口之能  嘗身之能觸心之能思皆所謂光也蓋光  與物接物有去而明無損是以應萬變而  不窮殃不及于其身故其常性湛然相襲  而不絶矣 使我介然有知行于大道惟施是畏大道甚 夷而民好徑朝甚除田甚蕪倉甚虛服文采 帶利劒厭飲食資貨有餘是謂盜竽非道哉  介然有知猶言微有知也夸張曰施嗇之  反也夷平也路狹而捷爲徑除治也傳曰  糞除先人之敝廬是也青赤爲文色絲爲  采傅奕云采是古文繡字資貨一作財貨  盜竽誤作盜夸今從韓非本 蘇註
Interpretation

In the primordial beginning of heaven and earth, the Dao (the Way) was nameless. When the myriad things came into being, the Dao became known as the mother of all. In its nameless state, the Dao is the source from which all things arise; once named, it becomes the nurturing mother of creation. All beings are children of the Dao.

The sage (one who has realized the Dao) comprehends the myriad things through embodying the Dao, just as a mother knows her children with perfect clarity. Though the sage's wisdom penetrates all phenomena, they never become entangled in external things and forget the Dao, thus always preserving their original root. All things under heaven contain the Dao, yet people often make the mistake of abandoning the Dao to chase after externals: eyes coveting beautiful forms, ears indulging in music, giving free rein to desires and acting to satisfy them, until they become hopelessly mired in these pursuits for life.

What allows sages to remain untroubled throughout their lives is their practice of closing the gates of desire and not chasing outward. The harm of desire begins small but gradually expands. Those who can foresee how small desires lead to great calamities and stop them in time are truly wise. People who pursue desires recklessly may appear strong but are not; only those who recognize temptation and remain vigilant are truly powerful.

Ordinary people indulge their desires, using their bodies to chase external things, never to return. When sages close the gates of desire, they don't completely cut off engagement with the world—they meet phenomena with spirit (Shen), employing sensory functions without letting the body become addicted. Ears that hear, eyes that see, a nose that smells, a mouth that tastes, a body that feels, and a mind that thinks—these are all aspects of "light" (sensory functions). When this "light" interacts with phenomena, things may come and go without damaging the inherent radiance of one's nature. Thus one can respond to endless changes without exhaustion, and misfortune cannot touch them. Therefore, the sage's nature remains eternally clear and luminous, transmitted through generations without interruption.

"Having slight awareness" (介然有知) means possessing a modicum of wisdom. "Extravagance" (施) is the opposite of "restraint" (啬), referring to indulgence. "Level" (夷) describes what is even and broad, while "bypath" (径) denotes a narrow shortcut. "To put in order" (除) means to repair, like cleaning an ancestral home. Interwoven blue and red threads are called "patterns" (文), while colored silk threads are called "embroidery" (采) (Fu Yi notes that 采 is the ancient character for 绣). Some versions write "resources" (资货) as "wealth" (财货). "Chief of robbers" (盗竽) was mistakenly written as "robber's boast" (盗夸) but has been corrected following Han Fei's version.

(Su Zhe comments:) The great Dao is fundamentally level and broad, yet people prefer narrow bypaths. While the court is well maintained, the fields lie neglected and granaries stand empty. People dress in ornate robes, gird themselves with sharp swords, glut themselves with food and drink, and possess surplus wealth—this is truly the behavior of robber chiefs (盗竽). How could it accord with the Dao?

 體道者無知無行無所施設而物自化今  介然有知而行于大道則有施設建立非  其自然有足畏者矣大道夷易無有險阻  世之不知者以爲迂遠而好徑以求捷故  凡舍其自然而有所施設者皆欲速者也  俗人昭昭我獨若昏俗人察察我獨悶悶  豈復飾末廢本以施設爲事夸以誨盜哉 善建者不拔善抱者不脫子孫祭祀不輟修 之于身其德乃眞修之于家其德乃餘修之 于鄉其德乃長修之于邦其德乃豐修之于 天下其德乃普故以身觀身以家觀家以鄉 觀鄉以邦觀邦以天下觀天下吾何以知天 下之然哉以此  邦一作國漢人避高帝諱改之於韻不叶  今從韓非本 蘇註  世豈有建而不拔抱而不脫者乎唯聖人  知性之真審物之妄捐物而修身其德充  積實無所立而其建有不可拔者實無所  執而其抱有不可脫者故至其子孫猶以  祭祀不輟也身既修推其餘以及外雖至  于治天下可也天地外者世俗所不見矣  然其理可推而知也修身之至以身觀身  以家觀家以鄉觀鄉以國觀國皆吾之所  及知也然安知聖人以天下觀天下亦若  吾之以身觀身乎豈身可以身觀而天下  獨不可以天下觀乎故曰吾何以知天下  之然哉以此言亦以身知之耳 含德之厚比于赤子毒蟲不螫猛獸不據攫
Interpretation

Those who truly comprehend the Dao (the Way) do not deliberately pursue knowledge or action, nor do they impose artificial interventions—the myriad things naturally flourish of their own accord. If one stubbornly believes they have mastered knowledge and deliberately strives to act upon the Dao, such artificial effort violates the natural order and instead becomes cause for vigilance. The Dao is inherently smooth and simple, without obstacles or hindrances, yet worldly people fail to understand this principle. They always perceive the Dao as distant and circuitous, preferring shortcuts for quick results. Those who abandon their natural disposition in favor of deliberate action are invariably driven by haste and self-interest.

Worldly people always appear sharp and calculating, while I seem muddled and indistinct. The masses haggle over every detail, while I remain blissfully unaware. Why would I embellish trivialities, discard the fundamental Dao, treat artificial striving as important, and even boast of such things to teach others wrongdoing?

Those who are truly skilled at establishing cannot be uprooted; those skilled at embracing cannot have their hold broken. Such virtue (De) ensures that descendants will offer sacrifices without end. Cultivating the Dao in oneself makes virtue genuine; cultivating it in the family makes virtue abundant; cultivating it in the community makes virtue enduring; cultivating it in the nation makes virtue flourishing; cultivating it in the world makes virtue universal. Therefore, observe oneself through oneself, the family through the family, the community through the community, the nation through the nation, and the world through the world. How do I know the world is like this? Precisely through this method.

(Note: The original text used the character "邦" (state) to avoid the taboo of Emperor Gaozu of Han's personal name "邦," but this disrupted the rhyme. Following Han Feizi's version, it has been restored to "国" (nation).)

Is there anything in the world that, once established, cannot be overturned, or once embraced, cannot slip away? Only the sage understands the truth of innate nature, sees through the illusion of external things, and discards externals to cultivate the self. When virtue is fully accumulated, it appears as though nothing has been established—yet this establishment cannot be shaken. It seems as though nothing is being held—yet this embrace cannot be broken. Thus, even descendants for generations continue sacrifices without cease. Once the self is cultivated, the surplus virtue extends outward, even to governing the world. What lies beyond heaven and earth remains unseen by worldly people, yet its principles can be inferred. At the pinnacle of cultivation, one observes oneself through oneself, the family through the family, the community through the community, and the nation through the nation—these are all within our grasp of understanding. But how do we know the sage observes the world through the world, just as we observe ourselves through ourselves? Can the self observe itself, yet the world not observe itself through itself? Hence the saying, "How do I know the world is like this? Precisely through this method"—meaning this too is known through the self.

Those whose virtue is profound are like newborn infants—venomous insects do not sting them, and fierce beasts do not seize them.

鳥不搏骨弱筋柔而握固未知牝牡之合而 䘒作精之至也終日號而不嗄和之至也知 和曰常知常曰眀益生曰祥心使氣曰强物 壯則老謂之不道不道早已  毒蟲蜂蠆之類以尾端肆毒曰螫猛獸虎  豹之類以爪按拏曰據攫鳥鵰鶚之類以  羽距擊觸曰搏趙志堅曰以四指握拇指  爲握固䘒子垂反說文云赤子隂也號乎  聲嗄所嫁反聲嘶也又啼極無聲曰嗄一  作嗌不嗄黄茂材云古本無嗌字嗌不嗄  莊子之文後人增入之祥吉㐫之候也 蘇註  老子之言道德每以嬰兒况之者皆言其  體而已未及其用也夫嬰兒泊然無欲其  體則至矣然而物來而不知應故未可以  言用也道無形體物莫得而見也况可得  而傷之乎人之所以至于有形者由其有  心也故有心而後有形有形而後有敵敵  立而傷之者至矣無心之人物無與敵者  而曷由傷之夫赤子所以至此者唯無心  也無執而自握無欲而自作是以知其精  有餘而非心也心動則氣傷氣傷則號而  啞終日號而不啞是以知其心不動而氣  和也和者不以外傷内也復命曰常遇物  而知反其本者也知和曰常得本以應萬  物者也其實一道也故皆謂之常生不可  益而欲益之則非其正矣氣惡妄作而又  以心使之則强梁甚矣益生使氣不能聽
Interpretation

Laozi uses the state of an infant to symbolize the essence of the Dao. Though an infant's muscles and bones are soft, its grip is surprisingly firm; though unaware of sexual matters, it exhibits natural physiological reactions—this stems from the absolute plenitude of its vital essence (Jing). Its cries last all day without becoming hoarse, demonstrating perfect harmony of internal Qi (vital energy). Understanding this harmonious state is called comprehending the "Constant" (eternal principle), and recognizing this principle constitutes true wisdom. Artificially prolonging life invites misfortune, while forcibly manipulating Qi amounts to brute force. When things reach their zenith, they begin to decline—this contradicts the Dao's nature, and whatever contradicts the Dao meets premature demise.

(Note: "Firm grip" refers to a Daoist meditation hand gesture where four fingers clasp the thumb; the infant's physiological reaction symbolizes natural vitality; "hoarseness" indicates energy depletion)

Laozi's infant metaphor reveals the Dao's pristine ontological state. Desireless yet physically complete, infants represent pure potential—they cannot manifest the Dao's functional aspects precisely because they haven't engaged with external phenomena. The formless Dao remains invisible to all creatures, making it invulnerable to harm. Human form emerges from consciousness; having form creates opposition, and opposition invites injury. An infant's immunity to harm stems precisely from its absence of conscious attachments.

An infant's spontaneous grip and natural reactions demonstrate abundant Jing-Qi rather than deliberate intention. Conscious activity damages Qi, and damaged Qi manifests as hoarse crying. An infant's enduring cries prove its mind remains undisturbed while Qi maintains harmony. True harmony means external phenomena cannot injure internal essence. Returning to the origin constitutes the "Constant"; facing situations while abiding in the root. Understanding harmony means grasping the "Constant"—responding to all things from this fundamental stance. These are ultimately one Dao, hence all termed "Constant."

Life cannot be artificially enhanced—forced enhancement deviates from the true path. Qi most abhors forced manipulation; imposing conscious control constitutes extreme violence. Both deliberate life-extension and Qi manipulation violate natural spontaneity.

(This passage elucidates the Dao's principle of Wuwei (non-action) through the infant metaphor, demonstrating that true harmony lies in returning to primordial simplicity while rejecting artificial manipulation. The "firm grip" represents a key Daoist cultivation technique, while the "Constant" denotes the eternal, unchanging pattern of Dao's essence.)

 其自然日入于剛强而老從之則失其赤  子之性矣 知者不言言者不知塞其兊閉其門挫其銳 解其紛和其光同其塵是謂玄同不可得而 親不可得而䟽不可得而利不可得而害不 可得而貴不可得而賤故爲天下貴 蘇註  道非言說亦不離言說然能知者未必言  能言者未必知唯塞兊閉門以杜其外挫  銳解紛和光同塵以治其内者默然不同  而與道同也可得而親則亦可得而踈可  得而利則亦可得而害可得而貴則亦可  得而賤體道者均覆萬物而孰爲親踈等  觀逆順而孰爲利害不知榮辱而孰爲貴  賤情計之所不及此所以爲天下貴也 以正治國以竒用兵以無事取天下吾何以 知天下之然哉天下多忌諱而民彌貧民多 利器國家滋昏人多技巧竒物滋起法令滋 章盜賊多有故聖人云我無爲而民自化我 好靜而民自正我無事而民自富我無欲而 民自樸 蘇註  古之聖人柔遠能邇無意于用兵唯不得  已然後有征伐之事故以治國爲正以用  兵爲竒雖然此亦未足以取天下天下神  器不可爲也爲者敗之執者失之唯體道  者廓然無事雖不取天下而天下歸之矣  人主多忌諱下情不上達則民貧而無告  利器權謀也明君在上常使民無知無欲  形而精存乎其中矣物至于成形則真僞
Interpretation

The Wings of Laozi presents two main layers of meaning:

The first layer explains that true wisdom does not indulge in empty rhetoric, while those fond of lecturing often lack genuine understanding. Authentic Dao cultivators close the gates of sensory desire ("block the passages, shut the doors"), temper their sharp edges ("blunt the sharp"), resolve conflicts ("untangle the knots"), and neither flaunt nor conceal their light ("harmonize the light, merge with the dust"). This leads to the state of "mysterious unity" (xuantong) with the Dao. Transcending worldly distinctions of kinship, profit-loss, and nobility-baseness, this becomes the most precious attainment under heaven.

Su Zhe's commentary notes that the Dao itself cannot be fully expressed through language. Those who truly embody it regard all things equally, rising above conventional notions of honor and disgrace—a realm incomprehensible to ordinary people.

The second layer addresses governance. While orthodox methods (zheng) should rule the state and unorthodox strategies (qi) guide warfare, truly winning the world requires Wuwei (non-action). Su Zhe explains that ancient sages only resorted to military action when absolutely necessary. Governing cannot be forced—excessive intervention leads to failure. A ruler who embodies the great Dao appears to do nothing, yet the world naturally submits.

When rulers establish too many prohibitions (taboos), the people grow impoverished; when weapons proliferate among the populace, the nation descends into chaos; when people pursue clever contrivances (extraordinary crafts), strange phenomena multiply; when laws become overly intricate, banditry increases. Thus the sage declares: "Through my Wuwei, the people transform themselves; through my tranquility, they correct themselves; through my non-interference, they prosper naturally; through my desirelessness, they return to simplicity."

Su Zhe adds that enlightened rulers preserve the people's innate simplicity, allowing their Jing (essence) and Shen (spirit) to remain naturally intact. Yet once things develop complex forms, distinguishing truth from falsehood and good from evil becomes difficult.

 雜矣方其有精不容僞也眞僞既雜自一  而爲二自二而爲三紛然錯出不可復信  矣方其有精不吾欺也古今雖異而道則  不去故以不去名之唯未嘗去故能以閱  衆有之變矣甫美也雖萬物之美不免于  變也聖人所以知萬物之所以然者以能  體道而不去故耳 筆乘  道無形容不可形容即屬之德然知德容  則道亦可從而識如所謂恍惚窈冥是也  人之學道喜于有作至恍惚窈冥類若其  芒蕩難於凑泊矣不知惚恍無象即象也  恍惚無物即物也窈冥無精即精也如釋  典云若見諸相非相即見如來也暫爲假  常爲眞恍惚窈冥則不以有而存不以無  而亡夫孰眞且信于此故曰自古及今其  名不去也昧者乃謂恍惚窈冥之中真有  一物者夫怳惚窈冥則無中邊之謂也而  物奚麗乎況有居必有去又何以亘古今  而常存乎然則曷謂閱衆甫也甫始也人  執衆有爲有而不能玄會于徼妙之間者  未嘗閱其始耳閱衆有之始則知未始有  始則衆有皆衆妙而其爲恍惚窈冥也一  矣是所以知衆有即真空者以能閱而知  之故也釋氏多以觀門示人悟入老子之  言豈復異此故閱衆始則前際空觀其徼  則後際空萬物並作觀其復則當處空一  念歸根上際永斷而要以能觀得之學者  誠有意乎知常也則必自此始矣
Interpretation

This passage explores the essence of the Dao (the Way) and methods for its realization. The core idea conveys that while the Dao itself has no concrete form (Dao wu xingrong), it can be comprehended through De (Virtue/Power). Just as we cannot see wind but know its presence through swaying leaves, the Dao manifests through its operations in the world.

When beginners first study the Dao, they often seek tangible graspable things, yet the true Dao exists in a state of hazy indeterminacy (huanghu yaoming) - seemingly present yet absent, elusive yet pervasive. This paradoxical state, far from being a shortcoming, reveals the Dao's fundamental nature: not a concrete entity yet present within all things. Like the Buddhist sutra's insight that "forms are not forms," those who truly perceive the Dao do not cling to specific appearances.

The text mentions "observing the origins of all things" (yue zhong fu), suggesting that when tracing existence to its primordial state, we discover all concrete phenomena (zhong you) ultimately arise from the same mysterious source (zhong miao). This approach resonates with Buddhism's "contemplation of emptiness" - observing the arising and ceasing of phenomena to realize their essential void-nature.

For Daoist practitioners, the crucial task lies in cultivating this observational capacity. By examining how things emerge (emptiness of origin), transform (emptiness of duration), and return to source (emptiness of location), one gradually relinquishes attachments to ultimately realize the eternal Dao (zhi chang). This practice doesn't seek specific attainments, but rather develops a contemplative wisdom that transcends all particular forms.

曲則全枉則直窪則盈敝則新少則得多則 惑是以聖人抱一爲天下式不自見故明不 自見故彰不自伐故有功不自矜故長夫唯 不爭故天下莫能與之爭古之所謂曲則全 者豈虛言哉誠全而歸之  窪烏瓜反夫音符 蘇註  聖人動必循理理之所在或直或曲要於  通而已通故與物不迕不迕故全也直而  非理則非直也循理雖枉天下之至直也  衆之所歸者下也雖欲不盈不可得矣昭  昭察察非道也悶悶若將敝矣而日新之  所自出也道一而已得一則無所不得多  學而無以一之則惑矣抱一者復性者也  蓋曲則全枉則直窪則盈敝則新少則得  皆抱一之餘也故以抱一終之目不自見  故能見物鏡不自照故能照物如使自見  自照則自爲之不暇而何暇及物哉不自  見不自是不自伐不自矜皆不爭之餘也  故以不爭終之世以直爲是以曲爲非將  循理而行于世則有不免于曲者矣故終  篇復言之曰此豈虛言哉誠全而歸之夫  所謂全者非獨全身也内以全身外以全  物物我兼全而復于性則其爲直也大矣 筆乘  曲則全枉則直窪則盈敝則新凡以明少  則得也一少之極也抱一而天下式則其  得多矣故一國三公不知誰適十羊九牧  詎可得芻喪生者繇其多方亡羊者苦于  岐路
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist wisdom of "overcoming hardness with softness." What bends is preserved, what yields becomes straight, low-lying areas naturally accumulate water, the worn-out becomes renewed, taking less leads to gaining more, while greed causes confusion. Therefore, the sage holds fast to the fundamental principle of the Dao as the standard for all under heaven.

Not displaying oneself makes one shine forth; not asserting oneself makes one distinguished; not boasting brings achievement; not exalting oneself ensures endurance. Precisely because they contend with none, none under heaven can contend with them. Were the ancient saying "Bending leads to preservation" mere empty words? This is absolute truth that all things ultimately return to.

Su Zhe's commentary explains: Sages invariably follow heavenly principle (天理). Where heavenly principle resides, sometimes directness is required, sometimes circuitousness—the key lies in penetrating understanding. Such understanding brings harmony with all things, and harmony ensures preservation. Surface-level straightforwardness that violates heavenly principle isn't genuine uprightness. Following heavenly principle, even when appearing curved, constitutes the truest straightness in the world.

All people return to those who humble themselves—such individuals cannot help but become full. Excessive cleverness isn't the Great Dao; what seems muddled generates daily renewal. The Great Dao has but one root—grasping this root enables gaining everything. Studying much without unifying it to the root brings confusion. "Embracing the One" means returning to original nature. All phenomena like "bending leads to preservation" manifest this embrace.

Just as eyes see external things by not staring at themselves, and mirrors reflect others by not reflecting themselves, these principles of not displaying, asserting, boasting or exalting oneself all exemplify "non-contention." Ordinary people consider directness correct and indirectness wrong, yet following heavenly principle sometimes requires indirectness. Thus the text re-emphasizes: Are these empty words? Truly this is the truth that preserves all and returns to original nature. "Preservation" means not just preserving oneself but all things, achieving complete preservation of both self and world while returning to original nature—this constitutes supreme uprightness.

The Bi Cheng supplement adds: All phenomena like "bending leads to preservation" illustrate how "taking less leads to gaining more." "One" represents the ultimate in "less"—holding this root enables gaining much. Like a state with three rulers leaves subjects confused, or ten sheep with nine shepherds cannot be herded. Life is lost through too many methods; the way is missed through too many paths.

希言自然飄風不終朝驟雨不終日孰爲此 者天地天地尚不能乆而況于人乎故從事 於道者道者同于道德者同于德失者同于 失同于道者道亦樂得之同于德者德亦樂 得之同于失者失亦樂得之信不足有不信  飄風疾風也驟雨暴雨也自旦及晡爲終  朝自早及莫爲終日風雨震蕩飄忽必不  能乆岐伯所謂亢則害承乃制也樂入聲 蘇註  言出于自然則簡而中非其自然而强言  之則煩而難信矣故曰道之出口淡乎其  無味視之不足見聽之不足聞用之不可  既此所謂希言矣隂陽不爭風雨時至不  疾不徐盡其勢之所至而後止若夫陽亢  于上隂伏於下否而不得洩于是爲飄風  暴雨若將不勝然其勢不能以終日古之  聖人言出于希行出于夷皆因其自然故  乆而不窮世或厭之以爲不若詭辯之悅  耳怪行之驚世不知其不能久也孔子曰  苟志于仁也無惡也故曰仁者之過易辭  志于仁猶若此而况志于道者乎夫苟從  事于道矣則其所爲合于道者得道合于  德者得德不幸而失雖失于所爲然必有  得於道德矣不知道者信道不篤因其失  而疑之于是益以不信夫唯知道然後不  以得失疑道也 筆乘  道以自然爲至而世希言之者喜于作也  有作必有輟惡能乆乎即飄風驟雨之不
Interpretation

This passage from Laozi Yi elucidates the principle of "sparse words follow nature." Laozi employs natural phenomena as metaphors: fierce winds never last a whole morning, nor torrential rains persist all day—these are but manifestations of heaven and earth's cyclical movements. If even the cosmos cannot sustain extreme states indefinitely, how much less can human artifice endure?

Practitioners of the Dao traverse three realms: those in harmony with the Dao (Dao) find the Dao joyfully embraces them; those aligned with Virtue (De) find Virtue readily accepts them; while those deviating from Dao and Virtue find their aberrations becoming their enduring condition. Here, "Dao" refers to the fundamental patterns of the cosmos, and "Virtue" (De) constitutes its tangible expression. When human faith in the Dao wavers, doubt inevitably arises.

Su Zhe's commentary (Su Zhu) explains that speech conforming to natural principles remains concise and potent, whereas forced, unnatural expressions grow convoluted and unconvincing. Just as balanced yin-yang yields temperate wind and rain, their imbalance creates storms—yet such extremes inevitably subside. Ancient sages' words and deeds followed nature's rhythms, hence their enduring legacy. Some dismiss this natural Way (Dao) as less dazzling than sophistry or less startling than eccentric deeds, unaware that deliberate affectations cannot perdure.

Bi Cheng further observes that nature itself embodies the Dao's highest realization. People seldom discuss the natural Way precisely because they crave artificial contrivances. Yet all forced human actions inevitably cease—how could they persist? Like morning gales and daytime downpours that cannot rage unceasingly. True knowers of the Dao never doubt its essence due to transient gains or losses. Even when Dao cultivators occasionally stumble, so long as their hearts incline toward Dao and Virtue, they remain fundamentally aligned with their pursuit.

 能久焉亦可見也從事于道者不然從事  于道則自然矣自然則本無所得亦復何  失無得無失而隨世之得失故爲德爲失  皆信其所至而無容心焉無不同矣無不  同亦無不樂乃其理也夫無不同則求其  信且不可得況不信乎苟離道而爲德不  能同于失矣離德而爲失不能同于德矣  不能同于德同于失而欲其同于道者未  之有也所謂信不足焉有不信也皆飄風  驟雨之類也或曰首楞嚴言非因縁非自  然而老氏以自然爲宗有以異乎余曰無  以異也夫所惡夫自然者有所自而自有  所然而然也有所自而自有所然而然則  是自然也在有物之上出非物之下是釋  氏之所訶也老聃明自然矣獨不曰無名  天地之始乎知無名則其自也無自其自  也無自則其然也無然其自無自其然無  然而因若縁曷能囿之故曰精覺妙明非  因非縁非自然非不自然離一切相即一  切法蓋所謂不可道之常道如此 跂者不立跨者不行自見者不明自是者不 彰自伐者無功自矜者不長其在道曰餘食 贅行物或惡之故有道者不處  跂與企同薛云舉踵曰跂張足曰跨立欲  增高則反害其立行欲增闊則反害其行  贅疣贅也行當作形古字通也食餘人必  惡之形贅人必醜之左氏人將不食吾餘  莊子附疣縣贅出乎形而侈乎性是也惡
Interpretation

This passage discusses how practitioners should follow the natural essence of the Dao, avoiding forced pursuit of gain or loss. True Dao cultivators don't cling to attainment or loss because the Dao itself follows spontaneity. Forced grasping leads to loss; deliberate avoidance of loss prevents attainment. Like standing on tiptoe to appear taller only makes one unsteady, or taking oversized strides to move faster actually slows progress.

The text introduces the concept of "naturalness" (自然 ziran) - the original state of things free from artificiality. Laozi's (Lao Dan) "naturalness" shares the same essence as the Buddhist Śūraṅgama Sūtra's "neither causation nor spontaneity," both pointing to the primordial reality beyond human contrivance. True naturalness transcends even the notion of "self," as suggested by "the nameless is the beginning of heaven and earth" - when there's no "self," how can there be "naturalness"?

Several metaphors illustrate the harm of forced striving: tiptoeing makes standing unstable (跂者不立), overstriding hinders progress (跨者不行), self-display clouds perception (自见者不明), self-righteousness obscures clarity (自是者不彰), self-promotion nullifies merit (自伐者无功), and arrogance prevents endurance (自矜者不長). Such behaviors resemble leftover food (余食) or bodily tumors (赘行) that provoke disgust. Thus, genuine Dao knowers avoid these tendencies.

Quoting Zhuangzi and Zuo Zhuan, the text explains how superfluous growths like skin tags (附疣县赘) become repulsive, just as no one desires spoiled food. These all represent deviations from naturalness. Practitioners should maintain original authenticity, abstaining from such unnecessary actions.

 去聲處上聲 有物混成先天地生寂兮寥兮獨立而不改 周行而不殆可以爲天下母吾不知其名字 之曰道强爲之名曰大大曰逝逝曰遠遠曰 反故道大天大地大王亦大域中有四大而 王居其一焉人法地地法天天法道道法自 然  混渾通先悉薦  寥遠也羅什曰妙理常存故曰有物萬道  不能分故曰混成鍾會曰廓然無偶曰獨  立古今常一曰不改無所不在曰周行所  在皆通曰不殆 蘇註  夫道非清非濁非高非下非去非來非善  非惡混然而成體其于人爲性故曰有物  混成此未有知其生者蓋湛然常存而天  地生于其中耳寂兮無聲寥兮無形獨立  無匹而未常變行于群有而未嘗殆俯以  化育萬物則皆其母矣道本無名聖人見  萬物之無不由也故字之曰道見萬物之  莫能加也故强爲之名曰大然其實則無  得而稱之也自大而求之則逝而徃矣自  徃而求之則遠不及矣雖逝雖遠然反而  求之一心足矣由道言之則雖天地與王  皆未足大也然世之人習知三者之大而  不信道之大也故以實告之人不若地地  不若天天不若道道不若自然然使人一  日復性則此三者人皆足以盡之矣 重爲輕根靜爲躁君是以聖人終日行不離 輜重雖有榮觀燕處超然奈何萬乘之主而 以身輕天下輕則失根躁則失君
Interpretation

Before heaven and earth took form, there existed an undifferentiated wholeness (referring to the Dao). Silent and soundless, formless and empty, it stands alone without changing, cycles endlessly without exhausting itself—it may be regarded as the mother of all things. We do not know its name, so we reluctantly call it "Dao," and further reluctantly describe it as "great." This "greatness" implies ceaseless movement ("passing away"), and ceaseless movement means boundlessness ("far-reaching"), yet ultimately it returns to its origin ("returning").

Thus it is said: The Dao is great, heaven is great, earth is great, and the king is also great. In the cosmos there are these four greats, and the king occupies one among them. Humans model themselves on earth, earth models itself on heaven, heaven models itself on the Dao, and the Dao models itself on what is so of itself (ziran, the natural state of spontaneity).

Su Zhe's commentary explains: The Dao is neither clear nor turbid, neither high nor low, neither coming nor going, neither good nor evil—it is an undifferentiated wholeness that constitutes its essence. For humans, this is our original nature. The phrase "there was something undifferentiated and complete" means no one knows how it came to be; it has always existed eternally, while heaven, earth, and the myriad things are all born from it. Silent and soundless, formless and empty, it is unique yet unchanging, pervading all yet never exhausted. Bending down to nurture the myriad things, it becomes their mother.

The Dao originally has no name. When sages observed that all things follow it to exist, they called it "Dao"; when they saw that nothing can surpass it, they reluctantly called it "great." Yet in truth, no designation can truly describe it. If we pursue it from the perspective of "greatness," it slips away into the distance; if we pursue it from the perspective of "far-reaching," it remains beyond reach. Though it seems to vanish into the distance, by turning inward to contemplation, one can fully comprehend it. From the Dao's perspective, even heaven, earth, and kings are not truly great. But since people only recognize the greatness of these three and not the Dao's greatness, they must be told plainly: humans are inferior to earth, earth is inferior to heaven, heaven is inferior to the Dao, and the Dao is inferior to what is so of itself (ziran). Yet if humans can recover their original nature, then the mysteries of these three (heaven, earth, and kings) can all be fully understood.

The steady is the root of the frivolous; the tranquil is the master of the agitated. Thus the sage conducts affairs all day without leaving the root ("heavy baggage," referring to military provisions—a metaphor for the fundamental). Even amidst splendid sights, he remains detached. Alas that the lords of ten thousand chariots should treat All-under-Heaven so lightly! Frivolity loses the root; agitation loses mastery.

 根本也躁者動之甚而煩擾也君主也韓  非云制在己曰重不離位曰靜重則能使  抱樸則少𥝠寡欲而天下無事矣素未受  采樸未斷器此所謂性之初也寳也夫遊  于性之初故雖有身而寳無身其有𥝠馬  者少矣雖有心而寳無心其有欲馬者寡  矣然則見素抱相乃聖智仁義之精也馬  用文之蓋老子絶之于彼正欲其屬之于  此學者不察其意而但知其絶而棄之猥  云老子之論蕩而不法也斯所謂不得於  言者乎 絶學無憂唯之與阿相去幾何善之與惡相 去何若人之所畏不可不畏荒兮其未央哉 衆人熙熙如享太牢如春登臺我獨怕兮其 未兆如嬰兒之未孩乘乘兮若無所歸衆人 皆有餘而我獨若遺我愚人之心也哉沌沌 兮俗人昭昭我獨若昏俗人察察我獨悶悶 忽兮若晦寂兮無似所止衆人皆有以我獨 頑似鄙我獨異於人而貴食母  唯上聲阿烏何反皆應聲唯恭而阿慢也  荒廣遠也怕古泊字靜也兆如龜兆之坼  動之微也孩小兒笑也笑則情動而識生  矣有歸必稅駕而不乘乘乘兮無所歸無  住著也馬巨濟曰性無餘欠有餘皆分外  也享太牢登春臺則所得皆分外故曰衆  人皆有餘遺失也沌如渾沌之沌無知也  一作純小明爲昭察苛細也悶莫奔反頑  不知痛痒也古謂都爲美郊爲鄙食音嗣
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the concepts of returning to simplicity and embracing quietude through Wuwei (non-action) as presented in the Daode Jing. It begins by explaining that "restlessness" refers to excessive activity that brings disturbance, much like how a ruler (metaphor for the mind-spirit/Shen) should maintain composure. Han Feizi remarked: "The ability to exercise self-control is called 'gravity' (steadiness), and not departing from one's fundamental nature is called 'tranquility.'" Maintaining this steadiness allows people to return to their authentic state.

"Embracing simplicity" (Baopu) means reducing selfishness and desires, through which peace naturally prevails in the world. "Unadorned silk" (Su) symbolizes purity before dyeing, while "uncarved wood" (Pu) represents the original, unprocessed state—both metaphors for humanity's innate, untainted nature, which is most precious. Those who can return to this primordial condition, though possessing a body, seem as if they have none (unbound by physical desires), and thus selfishness naturally diminishes. Though they have a mind, it is as if they have none (untroubled by distracting thoughts), and desires naturally fade. Hence, "seeing purity and embracing simplicity" (Jiansu Baopu) encapsulates the essence of sage wisdom.

Laozi opposed superficial ritual norms precisely to guide people back to authenticity. Some scholars fail to grasp this deeper meaning, seeing only Laozi's critique of ritual and hastily dismissing his teachings as lawless indulgence. This reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of Laozi's implicit message.

Later, Daode Jing Chapter 20 describes the contrast between those who embody the Dao and ordinary people: The latter bustle about as if attending a feast or climbing heights in spring, while the former remain serene like an infant who has yet to smile, content wherever they are, free from attachment. Ordinary people always feel they possess much, while Dao-embodiers seem lacking; the former are sharp and alert, the latter appear muddled; the former discriminate meticulously, the latter seem oblivious. This is because Dao-embodiers are unlike others—they cherish the nourishing root of all things, the fundamental Dao ("feeding from the mother" refers to the Dao's life-sustaining nature). The text questions the distinctions between "deference" and "neglect" (in social responses), "good" and "evil," suggesting these differences are ultimately trivial. It emphasizes transcending such superficial dualities to return to the primordial state of undifferentiated unity.

 食母乳母也見禮記内則篇 蘇註  爲學日益爲道日損不知性命之正而以  學求益增所未聞積之不已而無以一之  則以圜害方以直害曲其中紛然不勝其  憂矣患夫學者之至此故曰絶學無憂若  夫聖人未嘗不學而以道爲主不學而不  少多學而不亂廓然無憂而安用絶學邪  學者溺于所聞而無以一之則唯之爲恭  阿之爲慢不可同日言矣而況夫善惡之  相反乎夫唯聖人知萬物同出于性而皆  成于妄如畫馬牛如刻虎彘皆非其實湣  焉無是非同異之辨孰知其相去幾何哉  苟知此矣則萬物並育而不相害道並行  而不相悖無足怪矣聖人均彼我一同異  其心無所復留然豈以是忽遺世犯分亂  理而不顧哉人之所畏吾亦畏之人之所  爲吾亦爲之雖列于君臣父子之間行于  禮樂刑政之域而天下不知其異也其所  以不嬰于物者惟心而已人皆狥其所知  故介然不出畦畛聖人兼涉有無無入而  不可則荒兮其未可央也人各溺于所好  其美如享太牢其樂如春登臺囂然從之  而不知其非唯聖人深究其妄遇之泊然  不動如嬰兒之未能孩也乘萬物之理而  不自私故若無所歸衆人守其所知各自  以爲有餘聖人包舉萬物而不主于一超  然其若遺也沌沌若愚而非愚也世俗以  分别爲知聖人知群妄之不足辨也故其
Interpretation

The Book of Rites·Neize chapter mentions that an infant nursing at its mother's breast is a natural expression of innate nature.

When annotating this passage, Su Zhe pointed out: Those who pursue scholarship accumulate knowledge daily, while those who cultivate the Dao diminish distracting thoughts each day. Without understanding the essence of life, blindly chasing intellectual growth—hoarding information yet failing to synthesize it—is like using a compass to destroy squares or a straightedge to distort curves. The mind becomes chaotic and burdened with anxiety. Precisely because of this concern for scholars falling into such predicaments, the Laozi states, "Abandon learning, and there will be no sorrow." Yet the sage is not opposed to learning; rather, they take the Dao as their foundation. Whether they learn or not, nothing is lacking; whether they learn much or little, there is no confusion. Their mind is expansive and free from worry—why would they need to deliberately "abandon learning"?

If scholars become mired in partial views without seeing the whole, they may mistake sycophancy for reverence or flattery for pride—let alone distinguishing between entirely opposing concepts like good and evil. Only the sage understands that all things originate from the same nature and are illusory manifestations, like painted horses and oxen or carved tigers and pigs—none of which are real animals. Seeing through this, one can dissolve the discriminating mind that clings to dualities and realize that all things are fundamentally without distinction. Understanding this principle, one comprehends that all beings grow together without obstructing one another, and different truths coexist without contradiction—this is nothing strange.

The sage eliminates distinctions between self and other, equalizing differences without retaining attachments. Yet this does not mean they disdain worldly norms or violate ethical principles. What people fear, they also fear; what people ought to do, they also do. Though they abide in relationships of ruler and subject, parent and child, and conform to the frameworks of ritual, music, punishment, and governance, the world cannot perceive their uniqueness. Their freedom from external entanglements stems solely from their transcendent state of mind. Ordinary people cling stubbornly to their own perceptions, confined like crops within field boundaries, afraid to cross the lines. The sage, however, transcends the boundaries of both "having" and "nothingness," roaming freely without limits, vast and boundless.

People indulge in their preferences, finding them as delightful as a grand feast or as joyful as ascending a tower in spring—clamoring in pursuit, unaware of their illusory nature. Only the sage sees through these illusions, remaining unmoved and serene when encountering them, pure as an infant who has yet to smile. They follow the patterns of all things without selfish intent, thus appearing to have no fixed abode. The multitude cling to limited knowledge, believing themselves fulfilled, while the sage embraces all things without partiality, standing aloof as if forgetting everything. Seemingly muddled like a fool, they embody great wisdom disguised as simplicity. The world considers discrimination and analysis as wisdom, but the sage knows that such illusions are not worth distinguishing.

 外若昏其中若悶忽焉若海不見其津涯  漂然無定不見其宿止也人各有能故世  皆得而用之聖人才全德備若無所施故  疑于頑鄙道者萬物之母衆人狥物忘道  而聖人脫遺萬物以道爲宗譬如嬰兒無  所雜食食于母而已 筆乘  人之爲學憂不得善也吾能絶學則奚憂  之有然非强絶也知性本無善也彼爲學  者雖異于惡而離性則一其少異者如唯  與阿之間耳夫以善惡之同而聖人亦不  廢善者蓋人之所畏不得不畏所謂吉凶  與民同患也至其心游于性初方且荒兮  未央而豈若善之有涯涘可限量哉故人  之樂善如享太牢春登臺而我獨泊兮如  嬰兒之未孩無朕兆也乘乘者無所歸無  棲泊也人之得善皆有所止而我獨若遺  若愚人之沌沌無知識也人皆昭昭察察  皆若有所以而我獨昏也悶悶也忽兮若  海漂兮無所止也此豈聖人眞頑且鄙哉  以衆皆逐其子我獨貴其母不能不與衆  異耳蓋性無善惡而善惡萬法皆從此而  生故謂之食母 孔德之容唯道是從道之爲物惟恍惟惚惚 兮恍兮其中有象恍兮惚兮其中有物窈兮 冥兮其中有精其精甚眞其中有信自古及 今其名不去以閱衆甫吾何以知衆甫之然 哉以此  孔大也窈烏了反恍惚窈冥皆不可見之  意鄧錡云恍惚便是物非恍惚之中更别
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist understanding of the Dao (the Way) and the distinction between sages and ordinary people. Outwardly appearing dull and unremarkable, the sage's inner depth is boundless like the ocean—elusive and impossible to anchor. While ordinary people each possess their particular abilities that the world exploits, the sage, though endowed with both De (Virtue/Power) and talent, appears to practice Wuwei (non-action), often mistaken for foolishness.

The Dao is the origin (mother) of all things. Ordinary people chase external phenomena while forgetting the Great Dao, whereas sages transcend all phenomena to take the Dao as their foundation. Like an infant who consumes nothing but mother's milk, the sage remains pure and undivided. People in their pursuit of learning constantly worry about failing to attain goodness, yet if they realized their original nature is beyond distinctions of good and evil, such concerns would vanish. Those who chase knowledge, though different from evildoers, similarly deviate from their original nature. The sage does not abandon goodness only to accommodate the worldly fear of moral distinctions, sharing the people's anxieties.

When the sage's mind returns to the primordial state of original nature, it resembles wandering in an infinite wilderness—how could goodness, with its measurable boundaries, compare? The world delights in performing good deeds as if feasting at a banquet or ascending a spring terrace, while I (the sage) remain indifferent like an infant who has not yet learned to smile, showing no outward signs. People act virtuously with purpose, while I seem to have forgotten everything, appearing foolish and chaotic. The world appears sharp-eyed and discerning, as if possessing clear standards, while I remain muddled and obscure. Does this mean the sage is truly foolish? It is simply because everyone chases after the "offspring" (superficial phenomena) while I cherish the "mother" (original source), making me naturally different.

Original nature is inherently beyond good and evil, yet all phenomena including moral distinctions arise from it—hence the metaphor of "sucking at the mother's breast" (taking the Dao as fundamental nourishment). The highest manifestation of De (the Sublime Virtue) follows the Dao completely. This Dao appears indistinct and elusive, yet within its haziness there is form; profoundly dark and mysterious, yet containing the most genuine essence. From ancient times to the present, the Dao's name never perishes, through which we may observe the beginnings of all things. How do I know the origins of all phenomena? Precisely through this Dao.

(Note: "Haziness" and "profound darkness" describe the Dao's elusive nature; "sucking at the mother's breast" metaphorically represents taking the Dao as fundamental nourishment; "Sublime Virtue" refers to the highest form of ethical conduct)

 有物經云無狀之狀無物之象是謂怳惚  是也窈冥便是精非窈冥之中更别有精  張平叔云窈冥莫測是眞精是也王輔嗣  曰信驗也閱自門出者一一而數之言道  如門萬物皆自此徃也漢書此如傳舍所  閱多矣陸機賦川閱水而成川世閱人而  爲世其用字之義並同一訓經歷亦同此  義甫美也又始也 蘇註  道無形也及其運而爲德則有容矣故德  者道之見也自是推之則衆有之容皆道  之見于物者也道非有無故以恍惚言之  然及其運而成象著而成物未有不出于  恍惚者也方有無之未定恍惚而不可見  及夫有無之交則見其窈冥深眇雖未成  形而精存乎其中矣物至于成形則眞僞  雜矣方其有精不容僞也真僞既雜自一  而爲二自二而爲三紛然錯出不可復信  矣方其有精不吾欺也古今雖異而道則  不去故以不去名之唯未嘗去故能以閱  衆有之變矣甫美也雖萬物之美不免于  變也聖人所以知萬物之所以然者以能  體道而不去故耳 筆乘  道無形容不可形容即屬之德然知德容  則道亦可從而識如所謂恍惚窈冥是也  人之學道喜于有作至恍惚窈冥類若其  芒蕩難於凑泊矣不知惚恍無象即象也  恍惚無物即物也窈冥無精即精也如釋  典云若見諸相非相即見如來也暫爲假
Interpretation

This passage explores the essence of the Dao (the Way) and its manifestations. The Dao itself has no fixed form (formless form) and cannot be described by concrete objects (imageless image), a state termed "huanghu"—a nebulous condition between existence and non-existence. Both Zhang Pingshu (a Song Dynasty Daoist) and Wang Fusi (a Wei-Jin metaphysical philosopher) maintained that within this profound and unfathomable "yaoming" state lies the purest subtle energy (zhenjing, true essence).

The text employs the metaphor of a "gate" for the Dao: just as all things pass through gates, so does everything originate from the Dao. Another analogy uses a relay station (chuanshe): like ceaseless flowing water forming rivers and successive generations constituting history, the Dao remains constant amidst the transformations of all things. Here, the character "yue" (to observe) implies both experience and examination.

Su Shi's commentary notes: while the Dao itself is formless, it manifests through De (Virtue/Power). The appearances of all things are expressions of the Dao in different forms. The Dao transcends the dichotomy of "being" and "non-being," hence described as "huanghu." When things hover at the threshold between existence and non-existence (the intersection of you and wu), though not yet formed, they already contain pure essence (jing). Once formed, truth and falsehood become intermixed.

The Bijcheng section emphasizes: though the Dao cannot be directly described, we may indirectly comprehend it by observing the manifestations of De. Practitioners often cling to concrete cultivation methods (youzuo, deliberate action), yet struggle to grasp the abstract realm of "huanghu yaoming." In truth, this seemingly void state is the genuine embodiment of the Dao—as Buddhist scriptures state, "all phenomena are illusory," while the true noumenon (Tathagata) lies concealed behind appearances. All specific phenomena are but temporary illusions (zan wei jia), while only the Dao remains the eternal truth.

 常爲眞恍惚窈冥則不以有而存不以無  而亡夫孰眞且信于此故曰自古及今其  名不去也昧者乃謂恍惚窈冥之中眞有  一物者夫恍惚窈冥則無中邊之謂也而  物奚麗乎況有居必有去又何以亘古今  而常存乎然則曷謂閱衆甫也甫始也人  執衆有爲有而不能玄會于徼妙之間者  未嘗閱其始耳閱衆有之始則知未始有  始則衆有皆衆妙而其爲恍惚窈冥也一  矣是所以知衆有即眞空者以能閱而知  之故也釋氏多以觀門示人悟入老子之  言豈復異此故閱衆始則前際空觀其徼  則後際空萬物並作觀其復則當處空一  念歸根上際永斷而要以能觀得之學者  誠有意乎知常也則必自此始矣 曲則全枉則直窪則盈敝則新少則得多則 惑是以聖人抱一爲天下式不自見故明不 自見故彰不自伐故有功不自矜故長夫唯 不爭故天下莫能與之爭古之所謂曲則全 者豈虛言哉誠全而歸之  窪烏瓜反夫音符 蘇註  聖人動必循理理之所在或直或曲要於  通而已通故與物不迕不迕故全也直而  非理則非直也循理雖枉天下之至直也  衆之所歸者下也雖欲不盈不可得矣昭  昭察察非道也悶悶若將敝矣而日新之  所自出也道一而已得一則無所不得多  學而無以一之則惑矣抱一者復性者也
Interpretation

This passage elucidates profound Daoist insights into the nature of the Dao and essential cultivation principles.

"The indistinct and mysterious" describes the state of Dao—neither absolute being nor non-being. Transcending such dualities, it exists eternally. Some mistakenly believe this state contains concrete existence, yet in reality it is without center or boundary—how could it adhere to any particular form?

Understanding the origin of all things (observing the beginnings) is crucial. "Beginnings" here signifies the primal source. People cling to concrete phenomena because they fail to comprehend subtle mysteries, having not perceived existence's origin. Recognizing how all things emerge reveals their fundamentally wondrous nature, united with the indistinct Dao. Buddhist contemplation methods share this approach—through observing the arising and ceasing of phenomena, one realizes the emptiness of present moments and returns to the root, transcending temporal limitations.

The text then presents wisdom for worldly conduct: bending leads to preservation, yielding brings straightening, hollows become filled, the worn renews itself, less gain brings more abundance, while greed breeds confusion. Thus the sage holds to the "One" (Dao's foundation) as life's guiding principle. Not self-displaying yet becoming evident, not self-asserting yet shining forth, not boasting yet achieving merit, not self-aggrandizing yet enduring—precisely through non-contention, none under heaven can contend with them. When ancients spoke of "bending leads to wholeness," was this empty words? Truly it preserves and returns one to Dao.

Su Zhe's commentary adds: The sage's actions all follow Dao's principles. Where principle resides—whether in straightness or curvature—the key lies in thorough penetration. Penetration enables harmony with all things. Surface rectitude without principle isn't true straightness; following principle even through apparent bends constitutes the straightest path under heaven. People naturally follow the humble—how could they remain unsatisfied? Excessive cleverness isn't Dao; what seems muddled contains the wellspring of daily renewal. Dao is the "One"—grasping it, nothing remains unattained. Learning much without returning to the "One" brings confusion. "Embracing the One" means returning to original nature.

(Note: The character "洼" is annotated with ancient pronunciation "wū guā fǎn," equivalent to modern "wā"; "夫" here functions as a modal particle, pronounced "fú")

 蓋曲則全枉則直窪則盈敝則新少則得  皆抱一之餘也故以抱一終之目不自見  故能見物鏡不自照故能照物如使自見  自照則自爲之不暇而何暇及物哉不自  見不自是不自伐不自矜皆不爭之餘也  故以不爭終之世以直爲是以曲爲非將  循理而行于世則有不免于曲者矣故終  篇復言之曰此豈虛言哉誠全而歸之夫  所謂全者非獨全身也内以全身外以全  物物我兼全而復于性則其爲直也大矣 筆乘  曲則全枉則直窪則盈敝則新凡以明少  則得也一少之極也抱一而天下式則其  得多矣故一國三公不知誰適十羊九牧  詎可得芻喪生者繇其多方亡羊者苦于  岐路 希言自然飄風不終朝驟雨不終日孰爲此 者天地天地尚不能乆而況于人乎故從事 於道者道者同于道德者同于德失者同于 失同于道者道亦樂得之同于德者德亦樂 得之同于失者失亦樂得之信不足有不信  飄風疾風也驟雨暴雨也自旦及晡爲終  朝自早及莫爲終日風雨震蕩飄忽必不  能乆岐伯所謂亢則害承乃制也樂入聲 蘇註  言出于自然則簡而中非其自然而强言  之則煩而難信矣故曰道之出口淡乎其  無味視之不足見聽之不足聞用之不可  既此所謂希言矣隂陽不爭風雨時至不  疾不徐盡其勢之所至而後止若夫陽亢
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist wisdom that "the soft and weak overcome the hard and strong." What is bent may be preserved, what is crooked may become straight, what is hollow may be filled, what is worn may be renewed, and taking less may result in gaining more—all because these follow the principle of "embracing the One" (holding fast to the fundamental Dao).

The eyes do not look at themselves, thus they can see external things; a mirror does not reflect itself, thus it can reflect other objects. If one constantly seeks self-display, self-praise, and self-aggrandizement, one will have no energy left to care for others. Not showing off, not being opinionated, not boasting, and not being arrogant—these are all manifestations of "non-contention." Ordinary people always assume that being straightforward is right and being curved is wrong, but acting entirely according to conventional logic can sometimes lead to loss. This is why Laozi repeatedly emphasizes these principles—they are not empty talk.

True "wholeness" is not just about self-preservation but involves balancing internal and external aspects. When both people and things are preserved and return to their original nature, this kind of "straightness" is the greatest straightness. Just as when a country has multiple rulers, the people do not know whom to follow; when ten sheep have nine shepherds, the flock will scatter. Such chaos arises from too many directions and too many diverging paths.

A fierce wind does not last all morning, a downpour does not last all day. These natural phenomena are the work of Heaven and Earth—even Heaven and Earth cannot sustain extreme states for long, let alone humans. Those who follow the Dao become one with the Dao, those who follow De (Virtue) become one with De, and those who are lost become one with loss. What you believe in is what you will attain; if sincerity is lacking, trust will naturally be absent.

The Huangdi Neijing states, "Exuberance brings harm, while harmony restrains," just as excessively loud sounds become harsh to the ear. Words that flow naturally are concise and to the point, while forced preaching becomes tedious and unconvincing. Thus, the true "Dao," when spoken, seems bland and flavorless; it cannot be fully seen, fully heard, or fully exhausted in use. When Yin and Yang are in harmony, wind and rain come in perfect measure—neither too sudden nor too slow—moving in accordance with nature's rhythm. When Yang Qi becomes excessive...

 于上隂伏於下否而不得洩于是爲飄風  暴雨若將不勝然其勢不能以終日古之  聖人言出于希行出于夷皆因其自然故  久而不窮世或厭之以爲不若詭辯之悅  耳怪行之驚世不知其不能久也孔子曰  苟志于仁也無惡也故曰仁者之過易辭  志于仁猶若此而况志于道者乎夫苟從  事于道矣則其所爲合于道者得道合于  德者得德不幸而失雖失于所爲然必有  得於道德矣不知道者信道不篤因其失  而疑之于是益以不信夫唯知道然後不  以得失疑道也 筆乘  道以自然爲至而世希言之者喜于作也  有作必有輟惡能乆乎即飄風驟雨之不  能乆焉亦可見也從事于道者不然從事  于道則自然矣自然則本無所得亦復何  失無得無失而隨世之得失故爲德爲失  皆信其所至而無容心焉無不同矣無不  同亦無不樂乃其理也夫無不同則求其  信且不可得況不信乎苟離道而爲德不  能同于失矣離德而爲失不能同于德矣  不能同于德同于失而欲其同于道者未  之有也所謂信不足焉有不信也皆飄風  驟雨之類也或曰首楞嚴言非因縁非自  然而老氏以自然爲宗有以異乎余曰無  以異也夫所惡夫自然者有所自而自有  所然而然也有所自而自有所然而然則  是自然也在有物之上出非物之下是釋
Interpretation

This passage expounds the core Daoist concept of "the Dao follows what is natural" (Dao fa ziran). When yin energy accumulates above and yang energy stagnates below, violent storms arise—fierce in appearance but short-lived. Ancient sages spoke sparingly and acted with simplicity, aligning with the natural way of the Dao, thus achieving enduring constancy. Ordinary people, however, find such naturalness too plain, preferring clever rhetoric and eccentric behavior, unaware these cannot last.

Confucius said: "Those devoted to benevolence rarely do wrong." Even when benevolent people err, their mistakes are easily corrected—how much more so for those pursuing the Great Dao! By concentrating on Dao cultivation, one who acts in accordance with the Dao attains the Dao; one who aligns with De (Virtue) attains De. Even occasional missteps will yield moral progress. Those ignorant of the Dao lack firm conviction—at the first setback they doubt the Way, growing increasingly skeptical. Only true Dao-comprehenders remain unshaken by gain or loss.

The Dao takes naturalness as its highest state, yet people seldom discuss ziran (naturalness), preferring artificial effort. Where there is artificiality, there must be cessation—how can this endure? Like transient storms, it cannot last. Dao cultivators differ—they follow nature, fundamentally beyond gain or loss. Being unattached to either, they harmonize with worldly fluctuations, accepting both Virtue and error with equanimity. Thus they commune with all things in unimpeded joy.

Those who seek De (Virtue) by abandoning the Great Dao cannot embrace imperfection; those who err by forsaking De cannot maintain integrity. Unable to accommodate either Virtue or fault, how could they unite with the Dao? This illustrates how "insufficient sincerity breeds distrust"—like storms, such states are fleeting.

Someone asked: "The Śūraṅgama Sūtra states 'neither causation nor naturalness,' while Laozi takes ziran as essential—are these contradictory?" The answer: No contradiction exists. The naturalness we speak of isn't deliberate naturalness nor causally-produced naturalness. True ziran transcends particular phenomena—precisely the profound meaning behind the Buddhist teaching of "neither causation nor naturalness."

 氏之所訶也老聃明自然矣獨不曰無名  天地之始乎知無名則其自也無自其自  也無自則其然也無然其自無自其然無  然而因若縁曷能囿之故曰精覺妙明非  因非縁非自然非不自然離一切相即一  切法蓋所謂不可道之常道如此 跂者不立跨者不行自見者不明自是者不 彰自伐者無功自矜者不長其在道曰餘食 贅行物或惡之故有道者不處  跂與企同薛云舉踵曰跂張足曰跨立欲  增高則反害其立行欲增闊則反害其行  贅疣贅也行當作形古字通也食餘人必  惡之形贅人必醜之左氏人將不食吾餘  莊子附疣縣贅出乎形而侈乎性是也惡  去聲處上聲 有物混成先天地生寂兮寥兮獨立而不改 周行而不殆可以爲天下母吾不知其名字 之曰道强爲之名曰大大曰逝逝曰遠遠曰 反故道大天大地大王亦大域中有四大而 王居其一焉人法地地法天天法道道法自 然  混渾通先悉薦  寥遠也羅什曰妙理常存故曰有物萬道  不能分故曰混成鍾會曰廓然無偶曰獨  立古今常一曰不改無所不在曰周行所  在皆通曰不殆 蘇註  夫道非清非濁非高非下非去非來非善  非惡混然而成體其于人爲性故曰有物  混成此未有知其生者蓋湛然常存而天  地生于其中耳寂兮無聲寥兮無形獨立
Interpretation

Laozi (also known as Lao Dan), while emphasizing the natural Dao, did not neglect discussing the concept of "namelessness." This "namelessness" is precisely the origin of all things in heaven and earth. Understanding the true meaning of "namelessness" allows one to realize that things inherently lack fixed, unchanging essences. Since there is no fixed self, there can be no fixed state of being. This realm transcends both self and state, unbound by any causal constraints.

Thus, true awakened wisdom (jingjue miaoming) neither arises from causes and conditions nor exists as pure natural being; it is neither natural nor unnatural. It surpasses all appearances while encompassing all principles. This is the eternal Dao (changdao) that cannot be described in words.

Those who stand on tiptoe to appear taller cannot remain steady; those who take giant strides to move faster cannot go far. Those who display themselves fail to shine; those who assert their righteousness fail to illuminate; those who boast accomplish nothing; those who are prideful cannot endure. To the Dao, such behaviors are like leftover food or bodily tumors—even spirits detest them. Thus, those who embody the Dao do not act this way.

(Note: The character 跂 (qi) here means "standing on tiptoe"; 跨 (kua) refers to taking oversized steps. 赘行 (zhuixing) means superfluous growths—all such behaviors represent unnatural, forced actions.)

There exists a perfectly integrated being that predates heaven and earth. Silent and formless, it stands alone unchanging, cycles endlessly without exhaustion—it may be called the source of all things. I know not its name, but reluctantly call it "Dao," and further reluctantly describe it as "great." In its greatness it moves; moving, it travels far; traveling far, it returns. Thus the Dao is great, heaven is great, earth is great, and the king is great. The cosmos contains these four greatnesses, and the king is one among them. Humans follow earth, earth follows heaven, heaven follows the Dao, and the Dao follows ziran (self-so-ness).

(Note: 混成 (huncheng) describes the Dao's undivided wholeness; 寂寥 (jiliao) depicts its soundless, formless nature; 独立不改 (duli bugai) denotes its eternal constancy; 周行不殆 (zhouxing budai) refers to its universal operation. The four greatnesses are Dao, heaven, earth, and king. The final "Dao follows ziran" does not mean the Dao obeys some higher "Nature," but that the Dao's essence is spontaneous self-nature.)

 無匹而未常變行于群有而未嘗殆俯以  化育萬物則皆其母矣道本無名聖人見  萬物之無不由也故字之曰道見萬物之  莫能加也故强爲之名曰大然其實則無  得而稱之也自大而求之則逝而徃矣自  徃而求之則遠不及矣雖逝雖遠然反而  求之一心足矣由道言之則雖天地與王  皆未足大也然世之人習知三者之大而  不信道之大也故以實告之人不若地地  不若天天不若道道不若自然然使人一  日復性則此三者人皆足以盡之矣 重爲輕根靜爲躁君是以聖人終日行不離 輜重雖有榮觀燕處超然奈何萬乘之主而 以身輕天下輕則失根躁則失君  根本也躁者動之甚而煩擾也君主也韓  非云制在己曰重不離位曰靜重則能使  輕靜則能使躁故曰重爲輕根靜爲躁君  管子曰動則失位靜則自得離去聲輜莊  持反古者凡吉行乘乘車師行乘兵車皆  有輜車在後輜車衣車前後有蔽所以載  行者之衣食器械以其累重故稱輜重榮  觀紛華之觀也公羊傳曰常事曰視非常  曰觀處上聲燕處猶燕居超然高出而無  繫著也奈如也乘去聲失根一作失本一  作失臣非今從王輔嗣本 蘇註  凡物輕不能載重小不能鎮大不行者使  行不動者制動故輕以重爲根躁以靜爲  君行欲輕而不離輜重榮觀雖樂而必有
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the fundamental nature and function of the Dao, while emphasizing the importance of "weightiness" (zhong) and "stillness" (jing).

First, it clarifies that the Dao is formless and nameless, nurturing all things without manifesting itself. The sages observed that all beings follow this principle, hence naming it "Dao"; recognizing nothing transcends it, they provisionally termed it "Great." Yet in truth, the Dao cannot be fully captured in words. Viewed cosmically, it operates ceaselessly; examined operationally, it extends beyond comprehension. However, by returning to one's original mind, the true essence of the Dao can be realized. Compared to heaven-earth or sovereigns—things commonly deemed great—the Dao is vaster still, though ordinary people often fail to perceive this. Those who return to their innate nature may comprehend how all three are encompassed within the Dao.

Next, it stresses that "weightiness" serves as the root of "lightness," and "stillness" governs "agitation." The sage maintains steadfastness in all actions, remaining detached even amidst dazzling spectacles. The text employs the metaphor of ancient military supply wagons (zizhongche) to illustrate the importance of grounded action. It critiques rulers of great states who act rashly, warning that frivolity forfeits one's foundation while restlessness surrenders mastery.

Finally, Su Zhe's commentary is cited to further clarify: light things require weighty foundations, just as small things need larger stabilizers. As stillness naturally restrains motion, lightness must be rooted in weightiness, and agitation governed by stillness. Though action requires flexibility, it must never abandon its foundation; though one may enjoy worldly splendor, transcendent detachment remains essential.

 燕處重靜之不可失如此人主以身任天  下而輕其身則不足以任天下矣輕與躁  無施而可然君輕則臣知其不足賴臣躁  則君知其志于利故曰輕則失臣躁則失  君 善行無轍迹善言無瑕謫善計不用籌策善 閉無關楗而不可開善結無繩約而不可解 是以聖人常善救人故無棄人常善救物故 無棄物是謂襲明故善人不善人之師不善 人善人之資不貴其師不愛其資雖知大迷 是爲要妙  瑕玉玷也謫直革反責也籌策計數者所  用之筭以竹爲之楗其偃反拒門木也横  曰關堅曰楗結繫也繩索也約束也襲相  傳襲也一作掩襲之襲言宻用也傅奕云  是以聖人常善救人二十字獨見河上本  古本無之 蘇註  乘理而行故無迹時然後言故言滿天下  無口過萬物之數畢陳于前不計而知安  用籌筭全德之人其于萬物如母之于子  雖縱之而不去故無關而能閉無繩而能  約彼方挾策以計設關以閉持繩以結其  力之所及者少矣聖人之于人非特容之  又善救之我不棄人而人安得不歸我乎  夫救人于危難之中非救之大者也方其  流轉生死爲物所蔽而推吾至明以與之  使暗者皆明如燈相傳相襲而不絶則謂  善救人矣聖人無心于教故不愛其資天  下無心于學故不貴其師聖人非獨吾忘
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the dual principles of self-cultivation for governance and the sage's way of being in the world. The first half reveals the essential method for rulers governing the empire: if a ruler behaves with frivolous impatience, they will lose the trust of their ministers. Just as swallows must maintain quiet stability when building nests, a ruler cannot govern the empire recklessly. When a ruler neglects self-cultivation, ministers recognize their unreliability; when ministers act with impulsive aggression, the ruler understands they prioritize private gain. Thus, recklessness loses ministers, while impatience loses rulers.

The latter half employs five instances of "shan" (skill/mastery) to depict the sage's realm: The truly wise leave no traces in action, speak without flaws, calculate without tallies, shut gates without bolts yet none can open them, and bind without ropes yet none can loosen. Sages always excel at rescuing people, thus leaving none useless; they master utilizing all things, thus leaving nothing wasted. This is called "inherited illumination" (carrying forward luminous wisdom). The virtuous serve as teachers for the unvirtuous, while the unvirtuous become mirrors for the virtuous. But without honoring teachers or cherishing mirrors, even intelligence leads to profound delusion. Herein lies the most subtle truth.

Su Zhe's commentary adds: Sages follow heavenly principles in action, thus leaving no traces; they speak at proper moments, thus committing no faults. Confronting complex affairs, they comprehend without calculation—like mothers with children, granting freedom yet never losing them. Ordinary people use tallies for counting, bolts for gates, and ropes for binding, but their control remains limited. Sages don't merely tolerate people—they skillfully rescue them: "If I don't abandon others, how could they not return?" Saving people from peril isn't the highest rescue; when beings are blinded by material desires in the cycle of life and death, illuminating them with wisdom's light so successive lives emerge from darkness—this constitutes true salvation. Sages don't deliberately teach, thus needing no students; the world doesn't deliberately study, thus esteeming no teachers. The sage's state of mutual forgetting with all things embodies the deepest wisdom.

 天下亦能使天下忘我故也聖人之妙雖  智者有所不喻故曰要妙 知其雄守其雌爲天下谿爲天下谿常德不 離復歸于嬰兒知其白守其黑爲天下式爲 天下式常德不忒復歸于無極知其榮守其 辱爲天下谷爲天下谷常德乃足復歸于樸 樸散則爲器聖人用之則爲官長故大制不 割  守保守也復并扶又反谿谷衆水所注天  下極言之也式法也忒爽也足全也長上  聲制裁斷也割分裂也 吕註  雄動而雌靜雄剛而雌柔雄倡而雌和知  其雄守其雌則篤靜致柔和而不倡者也  故爲天下谿谿之爲物受于谷而輸于江  海受而不拒輸而不積物之能通而無迕  者也能通則常德不離矣人之生也常德  内全與物無迕反爲物之所遷則日益以  離唯能篤靜致柔和而不倡則常德不離  而復歸于嬰兒矣白于色爲受采于物爲  明于行爲金于數爲四黑于色爲不受染  于物爲晦于行爲水于數爲一知其白守  其黑不受萬物之染若晦若水終之于抱  一抱一則能曲能枉能窪能蔽故可以爲  天下式爲天下式無徃而非一則常德不  忒矣不離者不離其故處而已而未必能  不忒也不忒則不差矣嬰兒之爲物專氣  致柔不失其一體之和而已復歸于無極  則嬰兒不足以言之也草木之蕃也爲榮  其謝也辱人之所以爲榮辱亦若是而已
Interpretation

This passage from Laozi Yi elucidates the wisdom of sages (those who have attained the Dao) in navigating worldly affairs and self-cultivation. At its core lies the dialectical principle of "knowing the masculine but guarding the feminine," illustrated through three contrasting pairs that reveal the path of returning to primordial simplicity.

The first pair addresses "masculine and feminine": understanding the principles of strength yet abiding in soft tranquility, like a mountain stream (xi). Flowing from valleys to rivers and seas, it receives all things without hoarding. Thus, one preserves the innate Virtue (Chang De) from dissipation, returning to the purity of an infant's state.

The second pair discusses "white and black": recognizing the qualities of brightness yet willingly dwelling in obscurity, embodying water's nature. Water yields yet persists, hollows out yet conceals, thereby becoming the pattern (shi) for all under heaven. Maintaining this state ensures the innate Virtue remains unperturbed, ultimately returning to the boundless realm of Wuji (the Ultimate Non-Polarity).

The third pair explores "glory and disgrace": appreciating honor's worth yet resting content in humility, like an empty valley. Only thus can innate Virtue be fulfilled, returning to the original unhewn simplicity (pu). This primordial simplicity, when differentiated, gives rise to the myriad things. Sages who employ it become true administrators, so perfected systems never forcibly sever natural harmony.

Annotator Lüzu (Lü Dongbin) adds: The masculine represents movement, strength, and initiation; the feminine signifies stillness, gentleness, and receptivity. Like the stream that receives without accumulation, one preserves intrinsic nature. The infant state maintains innate harmony, while the Wuji realm reaches even deeper. Just as plants flourish (glory) and wither (disgrace), human experiences of honor and dishonor should be similarly embraced.

Using natural metaphors—streams, valleys—the passage teaches Dao practitioners to comprehend the unity of opposites. By guarding softness, obscurity, and humility, one safeguards intrinsic nature, ultimately returning to the most authentic state of being.

 知其榮守其辱去華歸根雖被以天下之  所甚惡而不能累焉故爲天下谷谷之爲  物虛而能盈應而不藏而江海之源所自  出者也能爲天下谷則反乎其源矣故常  德乃足則又非特不忒而已復歸其樸樸  者眞之全而物之混成者也唯其混成而  未爲器故能大能小能曲能直能短能長  能圜能方無施而不可則無極不足以言  之也然則守其雌守其黑守其辱足矣安  用知其雄與白與榮哉蓋守之以爲母知  之以爲子守之以爲經知之以爲變也樸  散則爲器器之爲物能大而不能小能曲  而不能直能短而不能長能圜而不能方  故聖人用之爲官長而已非容乃公公乃  王之道也若夫抱樸以制天下其視天下  之理猶庖丁之視牛未嘗見全牛也行之  于所無事而已恢恢乎其于游刃有餘地  矣何事于割哉故曰大制不割 將欲取天下而爲之吾見其不得已天下神 器不可爲也爲者敗之執者失之故物或行 或隨或呴或吹或强或羸或載或隳是以聖 人去甚去奢去泰  取如左氏取我田疇而伍之史記取高帝  約束紛更之之取爲治之也司馬温公曰  爲之則傷自然執之則乖通變呴音許一  音虛羸力爲反載始也又任載也隳許規  反去上聲陸農師云去甚慈也去奢儉也  去泰不敢爲天下先也三者聖人所以取  天下也 蘇註
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist wisdom of "maintaining softness and dwelling below." Knowing what is glorious yet content with humility; abandoning superficiality to return to original simplicity. Even when subjected to what the world most despises, one remains unburdened, like the valleys of the world. The valley's nature is emptiness that can contain all, responding to all things yet retaining nothing—even the sources of rivers and seas originate here. To emulate the valley is to return to the origin.

When eternal De (virtue/power, the manifestation of Dao) is abundant, not only does one avoid mistakes, but one also returns to the state of pristine simplicity. This simplicity is the complete and authentic state—the primordial condition where all things are undifferentiated. Precisely because it remains uncarved, it can be great or small, bent or straight, short or long, round or square, adapting to all circumstances—even "wuji" (the limitless) cannot fully describe it. Therefore, maintaining softness, obscurity, and humility is sufficient—why pursue strength, brightness, or glory? Maintaining these is like the mother; knowing these is like the child. Maintenance is the root; knowledge is the transformation.

Once pristine simplicity disperses, it becomes specific objects. Objects can only have fixed forms and cannot change freely. Thus, sages use them only to manage affairs, not to encompass everything. True encompassing belongs to the way of kings. Those who govern the world by preserving original simplicity perceive the principles of the world like a butcher carving an ox—seeing not the whole ox but following its natural patterns, moving with effortless skill, never needing deliberate division. Thus, the highest governance does not divide.

Those who seek to forcefully govern the world—I observe they cannot achieve their aim. The world is a sacred vessel that cannot be forcibly altered. Those who force will fail; those who cling will lose. Among all things, some lead while others follow; some are warm while others cold; some strong while others weak; some sustain while others destroy. Therefore, the sage eliminates extremes, extravagance, and excess.

Here, "qu" (to take) carries the meaning seen in the Zuozhuan's "taking my fields to govern them" or the Shiji's "altering Gaozu's regulations"—it signifies governance. Sima Wengong remarked: Forced action harms nature; stubbornness violates adaptability. "Xu" can be read as xu or xu; "lei" means weakness; "zai" means beginning or sustaining; "hui" means destruction. Eliminating extremes is benevolence; eliminating extravagance is frugality; eliminating excess is daring not to be ahead of the world. These three are the sage's methods for governing the world.

 聖人之有天下非取之也萬物歸之不得  已而受之其治天下非爲之也因萬物之  自然而除其害耳若欲取而爲之則不可  得矣凡物皆不可爲也雖有百人之聚不  循其自然而妄爲之必有齟齬不服者而  況天下乎雖然小物寡衆猶有可以力取  而智奪者至于天下之大有神主之不待  其自歸則叛不聽其自治則亂矣隂陽相  盪高下相傾大小相使或行于前或隨于  後或呴而暖之或吹而寒之或益而强之  或損而羸之或載而成之或隳而毁之皆  物之自然而勢之不免者也世之愚人私  己而務得乃欲拒而違之其禍不覆則折  唯聖人則知其不可逆順以待之去其甚  去其奢去其泰使不至于過而傷物而天  下無患矣此不爲之至也堯湯之于水旱  雖不能免而終不至于敗者由此故也易  之泰曰後以財成天地之道輔相天地之  宜以左右民三陽在内三隂外物在泰極  矣聖人懼其過而害生故財成而輔相之  使不至于過此所謂去甚去奢去泰也矣 以道佐人主者不以兵强天下其專好還師 之所處荆棘生焉大兵之後必有凶年善者 果而已不敢以取强果而勿矜果而勿伐果 而勿驕果而不得已果而勿强物壯則老是 謂不道不得早已  好去聲還旋通易曰師衆也處上聲善即  有道者也不得已爲之難也莊子曰不得
Interpretation

The sage (one who has attained the Dao) possesses the world not through deliberate seizure, but because all things naturally submit and he cannot but accept. They govern the world not through forceful action, but by following the natural patterns of all things, merely removing what is harmful. If one deliberately seizes or forcefully interferes, they will ultimately fail.

All things cannot be forcibly altered. Even among a small group of a hundred people, if one disregards natural principles and arbitrarily interferes, conflicts will inevitably arise—how much more so in governing the world? While in minor matters or with a few individuals, one might temporarily seize by force or impose through cunning, for the vast world, there are spiritual forces (Shen) presiding over it. If things are not allowed to submit naturally, they will rebel; if not governed according to their nature, chaos will ensue.

Yin and Yang interact and stir each other; high and low depend on one another; great and small restrain each other. Some lead from the front, while others follow behind; some exhale warmth, while others breathe cold; some strengthen to make things flourish, while others weaken to reduce excess; some support to bring success, while others destroy to cause failure. These are the natural patterns of how things develop—inevitable tendencies of existence.

Foolish people in the world, selfish and greedy, always seek to resist and defy these principles, only to meet with ruin or setback. Only the sage understands that these patterns cannot be violated, so he follows them accordingly, removing what is excessive, extravagant, or extreme, ensuring things do not go too far and harm all beings. Thus, the world remains free from calamity. This is the highest realization of Wuwei (non-action). When Yao and Tang faced floods and droughts, though they could not entirely avoid them, they ultimately did not meet with collapse—precisely because of this principle.

The Tai hexagram in the Yi Jing states: "The ruler should establish policies in accordance with the patterns of heaven and earth, assisting their natural operations to govern the people." When the three yang lines are within and the three yin lines without, things reach their zenith. The sage, fearing that such flourishing may bring harm, adjusts and assists, preventing excess. This is what is meant by "removing what is excessive, extravagant, or extreme."

Those who use the Dao to assist rulers do not rely on military force to dominate the world. For warfare brings retribution: where armies camp, thorns grow; after great battles, years of famine follow. Those skilled in warfare seek only to achieve their aim, not to flaunt strength. When the aim is achieved, they do not grow arrogant, boast, or assert dominance, recognizing it as a last resort. When things reach their peak, they begin to decline—this is called "not conforming to the Dao." What does not conform to the Dao perishes prematurely.

 已而後動又一宅而寓于不得已又託不  得已以養中皆與老子語合果而勿矜以  下五而字當讀如於字人方果於彼我獨  果于此也矜自恃也伐夸大也驕恣肆也  已止也早已言不乆也 蘇註  聖人用兵皆出于不得已非不得已而欲  以强勝天下雖或能勝其禍必還報之楚  靈齊湣秦始皇漢孝武或以殺其身或以  禍其子孫人之所毒鬼之所疾未有得免  者也兵之所在民事廢故田不修用兵之  後殺氣勝故年穀傷凡兵皆然而况以兵  强天下者邪果決也德所不能綏政所不  能服不得已而後以兵决之耳勿矜勿伐  勿驕不得已四者所以爲勿强也壯之必  老物無不然者惟有道者成而若缺盈而  若沖未嘗壯故未嘗老未嘗死以兵强天  下壯亦甚矣能無老乎無死乎 夫佳兵者不祥之器物或惡之故有道者不 處君子居則貴左用兵則貴右兵者不祥之 器非君子之器不得已而用之恬澹爲上勝 而不美而美之者是樂殺人夫樂殺人者不 可得志于天下矣吉事尚左凶事尚右偏將 軍處左上將軍處右言居上勢則以喪禮處 之殺人衆多以悲哀泣之戰勝以喪禮處之  佳謂佳之也温公曰兵愈佳則害人愈多  惡去聲處上聲下並同左爲陽爲生右爲  隂爲死恬澹安靜也美即佳也樂去聲純  甫云此章自兵者不祥之器以下似古之
Interpretation

The sage (one who has attained the Dao) resorts to arms only when absolutely compelled. Those who attempt to conquer the world through military force without true necessity—even if temporarily victorious—will inevitably face retribution. Historical figures like King Ling of Chu, King Min of Qi, Qin Shi Huang, and Emperor Wu of Han either met untimely deaths or brought calamities upon their descendants. Such actions, detested by both humanity and spirits, never escape karmic consequences.

Where armies march, people's livelihoods are ruined and fields lie fallow. After battles, the lingering aura of violence makes harvests scarce. This holds true for all warfare, let alone attempts to dominate the world through force. The term "resolute action" (果) implies using arms only as a last resort—when virtue (De) fails to transform and governance cannot pacify. The four admonitions—"no boasting" (勿矜), "no glorification" (勿伐), "no arrogance" (勿骄), and "acting only when compelled" (不得已)—all warn against forceful domination. Things at their zenith inevitably decline—this is the Dao's natural principle. Only Dao-attained sages achieve fullness while appearing deficient, possess abundance while seeming empty—for they never pursue extremes, thus avoiding decline. Military domination represents excessive "strength"—how could it avoid collapse?

Fine weapons are inauspicious objects, detested even by other tools—thus Dao-holders never wield them lightly. Gentlemen normally honor the left (symbolizing Yang and life), but in warfare honor the right (symbolizing Yin and death). Weapons, being inauspicious, aren't proper for gentlemen's use. When absolutely compelled, they maintain detachment. Victories deserve no praise—to glorify them is to delight in killing. Those who delight in killing can never fulfill the aspiration to govern the world. Auspicious events honor the left; inauspicious ones honor the right—hence lieutenant generals stand left while supreme generals stand right, indicating military authority should be treated as mourning rites. Mass killings require grief; victories demand funeral observances.

(Note: "Fine weapons" (佳兵) refers to superior arms; "detachment" (恬澹) implies serene indifference. Sima Guang remarked that finer weapons kill more people. Ancient tradition associates left with Yang/life and right with Yin/death. The latter portion may incorporate ancient commentary merged into the main text.)

 義䟽渾入于經者詳其文義可見 蘇註  以之濟難而不以爲常是謂不處 道常無名樸雖小天下不敢臣侯王若能守 萬物將自賔天地相合以降甘露人莫之令 而自均始制有名名亦既有夫亦將知止知 止所以不殆譬道之在天下猶川谷之於江 海 蘇註  樸性也道常無名則性亦不可名焉故其  爲物舒之無所不在而歛之不盈毫末此  所以雖小而不可臣也故匹夫之賤守之  則塵垢粃糠足以陶鑄堯舜而侯王之尊  不能守則萬物不賔矣沖氣升降而合爲  一而降甘露脗然被于萬物無不均遍聖  人體至道以應諸有亦露之無不及者此  所以能賔萬物也聖人散樸爲器因器制  名豈其狥名而忘樸逐末而喪本哉蓋亦  知復于性是以乘萬變而不殆也江海水  之鍾也川谷水之分也道萬物之宗也萬  物道之末也皆水也故川谷歸其所鍾皆  道也故萬物賔其所宗 筆乘  道常首章所謂常道也無名首章所謂無  名也以其未彫未琢故謂之樸以其曰希  曰微故謂之小然能見小而守之者鮮矣  侯王若能守是見小曰明者也知子守母  者也如此則靜爲動君而動爲之臣一爲  萬主而萬爲之賔又孰有臣樸者哉始即  無名天地之始制者裁其樸而分之也始  本無名制之則有名矣苟其逐于名而莫
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the essential nature and function of the Dao as presented in the Daode Jing, drawing upon commentaries by scholars Su Zhe (Su's Commentary) and Jiao Hong (Notes from the Brush).

The essence of the Dao (道) is eternally nameless and embodies pristine simplicity ("The Dao is eternally nameless and uncarved"). Though seemingly subtle, nothing in the world dares disregard it. Should rulers (侯王) uphold this great Dao, all things would naturally return to it. The harmonious interplay of heaven and earth's yin-yang qi (阴阳气) brings forth sweet dew to nourish all beings, achieving perfect equilibrium without artificial intervention.

Su Zhe explains that this unadorned nature (朴性) manifests the Dao—ubiquitous yet imperceptibly subtle. Ordinary people maintaining this Dao can achieve sagehood even in humble circumstances, while rulers losing it forfeit the allegiance of all things. When the harmonizing qi (冲气) of yin and yang interacts, it forms sweet dew. Sages emulate the Dao's way of responding to all existence, just as dew nourishes universally without omission.

Jiao Hong further observes that although sages materialize the uncarved Dao into various vessels (散朴为器) and establish names accordingly (因器制名), they never become obsessed with nomenclature at the expense of fundamentals. Like rivers returning to the sea, all things ultimately revert to the Dao's origin. Only by knowing when to stop (知止) can one maintain stability amidst transformations.

The concept of "chong qi" (冲气) mentioned here is crucial in Daoism, denoting the primordial state where yin and yang energies intermingle; "sweet dew" symbolizes the Dao's nourishing function; while "pu" (朴) metaphorically represents the Dao's undifferentiated authenticity. Both scholars emphasize grasping the Dao's root rather than being misled by appearances, thereby attaining universal harmony and enduring peace.

 止則一生二二生三將巧歷不能筭而種  種名相皆以爲實與接爲構窮萬世而不  悟隂陽之慘殆孰甚焉所謂不知常妄作  凶也誠知無可以適有則有亦可以之無  是故貴其止止者鎮以無名之樸也知止  則不隨物遷淡然自足殆無從生矣此非  强之也物生于道生物滅以道滅萬物皆  作于道萬物皆歸于道我之性宅我自復  之夫何難之有故江海水之宗也川谷水  之派也異派必會于宗殊名必統于道 知人者智自知者明勝人者有力自勝者强 知足者富强行者有志不失其所者久死而 不亡者壽  不失其所即易之止其所也羅什曰在生  而不生曰久在死而不死曰壽 蘇註  分别爲智蔽盡爲明分别之心未除故止  于知人而不能自知蔽盡則無復分别故  能自知而又可以及人也力能及人而不  能及我能克己復性則非力之所及故可  謂之强也知足者所遇而足則未嘗不富  矣雖有天下而常挾不足之心以處之是  終身不能富也不與物爭而自强不息物  莫能奪其志也物變無窮而心未嘗失則  乆矣死生之變大亦大矣而其性湛然不  亡此古之至人能不生不死者也 大道汎兮其可左右萬物恃之以生而不辭 功成不名有愛養萬物而不爲主常無欲 可名於小萬物歸焉而不知主可名於大是以
Interpretation

This passage integrates the original text of the Laozi with later commentaries, primarily expounding the Daoist profound understanding of cosmic principles and life wisdom.

All things in the universe originate from the division of "One" (the Dao), progressing from One to Two and then to Three—a transformation so subtle that even the most precise calculations cannot exhaust its mystery. People often mistake names and concepts for true existence, clinging to superficial appearances, and through myriad generations fail to comprehend the peril inherent in the transformations of Yin-Yang. This is what the Laozi refers to as "not knowing the constant leads to reckless actions with disastrous consequences"—disregarding fundamental laws invites calamity.

Those who truly understand how "non-being" (wu) transforms into "being" (you) also realize that "being" ultimately returns to "non-being." The key lies in "stopping"—abiding in the "nameless simplicity" (the authentic state of the Dao). Those who know when to stop remain unshaken by external things, their hearts serene and content, thus naturally avoiding misfortune. All things arise and perish through the Dao, eventually returning to it, just as rivers flow into the sea—countless tributaries ultimately merge into the ocean.

Regarding life wisdom: understanding others is intelligence, but knowing oneself is true wisdom; conquering others demonstrates strength, but mastering oneself is genuine power. Contentment is true wealth, and persistent action reflects true ambition. Only by not losing one's root can one endure; physical death with an undying spirit (shen) constitutes true longevity.

Su Zhe's commentary adds: fixating on distinctions between right and wrong is mere cleverness, while dissolving all obscurations is real wisdom. The contented feel abundant in any circumstance; even possessing the world, the insatiable remain forever poor. Not contending with external things yet ceaselessly strengthening oneself, preserving the unchanging heart-mind ensures eternity. Though life and death are immense transformations, the nature of those who attain the Dao remains eternally clear and indestructible—this is how the ancient Perfected Ones (zhenren) achieved the state of neither birth nor death.

Finally, the characteristics of the Great Dao (cosmic origin) are described: it is omnipresent, nourishing all things without claiming merit; accomplishing everything without possessing; nurturing all beings without dominating. Because it is desireless and unassuming, it may be called "small"; yet because all things return to it, it may also be called "great." This reveals the core Daoist principle of "the Dao follows what is natural" (dao fa ziran).

聖人終不爲大故能成其大  汎無繫著也 蘇註  汎兮無可無不可故左右上下周旋無  不至也世有物而不辭者必將名之以爲  己有世有避物而不有者必將辭物而不  生生而不辭成而不有者唯道而已大而  有爲大之心則小矣 筆乘  可名于小爾言不可名小可名于大爾言  不可名大既云可左可右所以非小非大  非小非大所以成其大 執大象天下徃徃而不害安平泰樂與餌過 客止道之出口淡乎其無味視之不足見聽 之不足聞用之不可既  林希逸云大象者無象之象也天下徃者  執此而徃行之天下也既盡也 蘇註  道非有無故謂之大象苟其昭然有形則  有同有異同者好之異者惡之好則來之  惡則去之不足以使天下皆徃矣有好有  惡則有所利有所害好惡既盡則其千萬  物皆無害矣故至者無不安無不平無不  泰作樂設餌以待來者豈不足以止過客  哉然而樂關餌盡彼將捨之而去若夫執  大象以待天下天下不知好之又况得而  惡之乎雖無臭味形色聲音以悅人  而其用不可盡矣 將欲歙之必固張之將欲弱之必固强之將 欲廢之必固興之將欲奪之必固與之是謂 微明柔勝剛弱勝强魚不可脫於深淵邦之 利器不可以示人  歙音吸也聚也張開大也深淵原作淵邦  原作國今從韓非本
Interpretation

The sage (one who has attained the Dao) never considers themselves great, and thus achieves true greatness. This state resembles water flowing freely without constraints.

Su Zhe's commentary explains: The sage is like water that can adapt to all situations, moving left or right as needed. Ordinary people often fall into two extremes: some greedily claim all things as their own, while others flee from all things in avoidance. Only the Dao can create all things without possessing them, accomplish all without claiming credit. The moment one thinks "I want to be great," they actually become small.

The Bi Cheng further elaborates: The Dao cannot be simply called small nor defined as large. Precisely because it can move left or right and transform endlessly, it transcends distinctions of size. This transcendence constitutes its true greatness.

Those who grasp the "Great Image" (the formless Dao) can traverse the world without harm, maintaining peace and tranquility. Music and fine food may temporarily attract passersby, but ultimately fade away. The Dao seems bland when spoken, invisible when looked at, and inaudible when listened to, yet its application is inexhaustible. Lin Xiyi explains: The "Great Image" refers to the formless manifestation of the Dao. By holding to this principle, one can journey unimpeded through the world.

Su Zhe adds: The Dao transcends distinctions between existence and non-existence, hence called the "Great Image." If it had concrete form, it would provoke preferences—people would approach what they like and avoid what they dislike, preventing universal harmony. Eliminating such distinctions allows peaceful coexistence with all things. Though music and food may temporarily detain travelers, they eventually cause weariness. Those who uphold the great Dao neither deliberately please nor provoke dislike—seemingly plain yet infinitely useful.

To contract something, one must first expand it; to weaken something, one must first strengthen it; to abolish something, one must first make it flourish; to take something, one must first give it. This is subtle and profound wisdom. The soft overcomes the hard; the weak overcomes the strong. Just as fish cannot leave deep waters, vital methods of governance should not be lightly revealed. (Note: "Xi" means to contract, while "Zhang" means to expand. Following Han Feizi's version, "state" is rendered as "domain" here.)

蘇註  未嘗與之而遽奪則勢有所不極理有所  不足勢不極則取之難理不足則物不服  然此幾于用智也與管仲孫武無異聖人  與世俗其迹固有相似者也聖人乘理而  世俗用智乘理如醫樂巧於應病用智如  商賈巧于射利聖人知剛强之不足恃故  以柔弱自處天下之剛强方相傾相軋而  吾以不校坐待其斃此所謂勝也雖然聖  人豈有意爲此以勝物哉知勢之自然而  居其自然耳魚之爲物非有爪牙之利足  以勝物也然方託於深淵雖强有力者莫  能執之及其脫淵而陸則蠢然一物耳何  能爲哉聖人居于柔弱而剛强者莫能傷  非徒莫能傷也又將以全制其後此不亦  天下之利器也哉魚惟脫于淵然後人得  制之聖人唯處于柔弱而不厭故終能服  天下此豈與衆人共之者哉 道常無爲而無不爲侯王若能守萬物將自 化化而欲作吾將鎮之以無名之樸無名之 樸亦將不欲不欲以靜天下將自正  道常言道之大常也介甫云言道之主故  曰萬物將自賔言道之變故曰萬物將自  化作動也鎮者壓定之使不動也羅什曰  心得一空資用不失萬神從化伏邪歸正 蘇註  道常者無所不爲而無爲之之意耳聖人  以無爲化物萬物化之始于無爲而漸至  于作譬如嬰兒之長人僞日起故三代之
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the essence of the Daoist concept of "governing through non-action (Wuwei)." Su Zhe (in his commentary) reveals the profound philosophy that "the soft overcomes the hard" by contrasting the ways of the sage with those of ordinary people.

Though the sage and worldly people may appear similar in outward behavior, their fundamental approaches differ completely. The sage follows natural principles (acting according to reason), like a skilled physician prescribing the right remedy, while worldly people rely on cunning intelligence (using cleverness), akin to merchants seeking opportunistic gains. Understanding that strength proves unreliable, the sage maintains a posture of softness. When the strong of the world contend with each other, the sage refrains from struggle yet ultimately prevails. This isn't achieved through forced effort but through alignment with natural tendencies.

The author employs the metaphor of fish: when swimming in deep waters, even the strongest person cannot catch them; once removed from water, they become utterly defenseless. By perpetually maintaining this soft state, the sage not only remains unharmed by forceful approaches but ultimately overcomes strength itself—this represents the sharpest weapon under heaven.

The second part explains the principle that "the Dao (Way) eternally does nothing yet leaves nothing undone": The great Dao always abides in non-action yet accomplishes all things. If rulers can uphold this principle of non-action, the myriad things will transform naturally. When desires begin to stir, they should be subdued with the "nameless simplicity" (referring to the authentic state of Dao). Maintaining this desireless tranquility allows the world to naturally return to proper order.

Su Zhe further elaborates: The constant state of Dao appears as non-doing yet achieves all-doing. The sage uses non-action to transform all beings. Initially, things respond to non-action and transform spontaneously, but gradually human artifice emerges—just as an infant's innate nature becomes tainted by worldly influences as it grows, and as evidenced by the historical evolution of the Xia, Shang, and Zhou dynasties.

 衰人情之變日以滋甚方其欲作而上之  人與天下皆靡故其變至有不可勝言者  苟其方作而不爲之動終以無名之樸鎮  之庶幾可得而止也聖人中無抱樸之念  外無抱樸之迹故樸全而用大苟欲樸之  心尚存于胷中則失之遠矣
Interpretation

As human desires and emotional fluctuations grow increasingly complex and intense, the Daoist approach suggests restraining them at their first emergence. Yet both individuals and society as a whole have become deeply immersed in these disturbances, allowing such transformations to develop beyond description. If one could remain unmoved when desires initially arise, consistently using the most authentic "nameless simplicity" (referring to the Dao's primordial pure state) to stabilize them, perhaps this endless transformation could be halted.

The true sage (one who has attained the Dao) maintains no conscious thought of preserving simplicity within, nor displays any outward affectation of simplicity. Thus they completely preserve the integral nature of simplicity and allow it to function at its fullest capacity. If one still harbors the thought "I must maintain simplicity" in their mind, they have already strayed far from genuine simplicity.

(Note: This passage expounds the Daoist concept of "Wuwei" or non-action, advocating naturalness without deliberate pursuit or artificiality. True simplicity emerges spontaneously. Conscious striving for simplicity paradoxically leads to losing one's authentic nature. The "nameless simplicity" is Laozi's description of the Dao, representing the original state prior to human artifice.)

老子翼卷之二

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0056); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →