中文 · EN

《老子翼》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Xu Daozang 續道藏 Vol. 3 / 6 9,036 characters

About this page. The original text of 《老子翼》 Vol. 3 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 6 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 18 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《老子翼》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

老子翼卷之三      轂三   下篇 上德不德是以有德下德不失德是以無德 上德無爲而無以爲下德爲之而有以爲上 仁爲之而無以爲上義爲之而有以爲上禮 爲之而莫之應則攘臂而仍之故失道而後 德失德而後仁失仁而後義失義而後禮夫 禮者忠信之薄而亂之首也前識者道之華 而愚之始也是以大丈夫處其厚不處其薄 居其實不居其華故去彼取此 蘇註  聖人從心所欲不踰矩非有意于德而德  自足其下知德之貴勉强以求不失蓋僅  自完耳而何德之有無爲而有以爲之則  猶有爲也唯無爲而無以爲者可謂無爲  矣其下非爲不成然猶有以爲之非徒作  而無術者也仁義皆不免于爲之矣其所  以異者仁以無以爲爲勝義以有以爲爲  功耳德有上下而仁義有上無下何也下  德在仁義之間而仁義之下者不足復言  故也自德以降而至于禮聖人之所以齊  民者極矣故爲之而不應則至于攘臂而  强之强之而又不應于是刑罰興而兵甲  起則徒作而無術矣忠信而無禮則忠信  不見禮立而忠信之美發越于外君臣父  子之間夫婦朋友之際其外燦然而中無  餘矣故順之則治違之則亂治亂之相去  其間不能以髮故曰亂之首也聖人玄覽  萬物是非得失畢陳于前如鑑之照形無
Interpretation

The Laozi Yi here discusses the hierarchical differences in moral cultivation. The truly noble virtue (Shang De, Superior Virtue) does not consciously flaunt its virtuousness—this is authentic virtue. Conversely, those who deliberately maintain virtue (Xia De, Inferior Virtue) lose the essence of De (Virtue/Power). The highest level of virtue is natural Wuwei (non-action), requiring no deliberate effort; the next level still demands conscious exertion.

The text then examines the hierarchy of benevolence, righteousness, and ritual: Benevolence arises spontaneously from the heart without expectation of return; righteousness involves deliberate action seeking results; while ritual represents the most superficial norms. When society loses the Dao (the Way), virtue must be emphasized; when virtue is lost, benevolence is stressed; when benevolence fades, righteousness is promoted; and when righteousness declines, ritual becomes the focus. Ritual is actually the product of waning loyalty and sincerity—the very beginning of chaos. Those who pride themselves on foresight merely grasp the surface of the Dao, embodying instead the dawn of ignorance.

Thus, the truly great person stands firm in substantial simplicity rather than pursuing shallow superficiality. The sage (one who has attained the Dao) follows their heart's desire without transgressing boundaries, not by deliberately pursuing virtue, yet their virtue remains naturally abundant. Those who recognize virtue's value and strive to maintain it can only barely preserve it through effort.

From virtue to ritual—these are the sage's last resorts for governing the people. When even ritual fails to elicit response, one can only roll up their sleeves and enforce it; when enforcement proves ineffective, punishments and military force are employed, marking a complete loss of order. Loyalty and trust without ritual norms struggle to manifest, yet excessive emphasis on ritual transforms the beauty of loyalty and trust into mere formality. Relationships between ruler and subject, parent and child, husband and wife, or friends may appear polished on the surface but remain hollow within. Following this principle brings peace to the world; violating it leads to chaos. The difference between order and disorder is as fine as a hair—thus ritual is said to be the origin of chaos.

The sage perceives all things clearly—right and wrong, gain and loss are laid bare before them as distinctly as objects reflected in a mirror.

 所不見而孰爲前後世人視止于目聽止  于耳思止于心冥行于萬物之間役智以  求識而偶有見焉雖自以爲明而不知至  愚之自始也世之鄙夫樂其有得于下而  忘其上故喜薄而遺厚采華而弃實非大  丈夫孰能去彼取此 筆乘  首亂始愚極言禮智流弊所至耳莊子舉  老子此言而論之曰今己爲物也欲復歸  根不亦難乎其易也其惟大人乎雖然既  歸其根孰爲物孰爲非物故又曰匿而不  可不爲者事也遠而不可不居者義也親  而不可不廣者仁也節而不可不積者禮  也中而不可不高者德也一而不可不易  者道也此數者雖有上下先後之異而以  聖人用之皆道也蓋聖人百慮同歸二際  俱泯豈復有彼此去取邪 㫺之得一者天得一以清地得一以寧神得 一以靈谷得一以盈萬物得一以生侯王得 一以爲天下貞其致之一也天無以清將恐 裂地無以寧將恐發神無以靈將恐歇谷無 以盈將恐竭萬物無以生將恐滅侯王無以 貞而貴高將恐蹶故貴以賤爲本高以下爲 基是以侯王自謂孤寡不穀此其以賤爲本 邪非乎故致數輿無輿不欲碌碌如玉落落 如石  裂破毁也發發泄也歇消滅也竭枯竭也  蹶音厥顛仆也數上聲 蘇註  一道也物之所以得爲物者皆道也天下  之人見物而忘道天知其清而已地知其
Interpretation

People can only see what is before their eyes, yet fail to discern cause and effect. Ordinary understanding is confined to what the eyes perceive, what the ears hear, and what the mind conceives - blindly moving among the myriad things, using cleverness to pursue knowledge. When they occasionally make some discovery, they consider themselves wise, unaware this marks the beginning of foolishness. Worldly people become content with minor gains while forgetting more fundamental truths, thus favoring the superficial while neglecting the profound, chasing ornamentation while abandoning substance. If not a true person of great virtue, who could relinquish appearances to grasp the essence?

(Supplementary Commentary) This passage profoundly reveals the pitfalls of excessive pursuit of ritual propriety and intellectual cleverness. When Zhuangzi quoted this passage from Laozi, he commented: Once entangled in material desires, returning to the fundamental root becomes extremely difficult - only the "great person" who has awakened to the Dao can accomplish this effortlessly. Yet even when returning to the root, how can we strictly distinguish what is "thing" from "non-thing"? Therefore it is also said: What seems avoidable yet must be done are worldly affairs; what seems distanceable yet must be upheld is moral principle; what seems reducible yet must be expanded is humaneness; what seems simplifiable yet must be accumulated is ritual propriety; what seems ordinary yet must be revered is virtue (De); what seems singular yet must adapt is the great Dao. Though these aspects have relative priorities, the sage applies them all in accordance with the Dao. Because sages achieve thorough comprehension and dissolve dualities, why would they need deliberate acceptance or rejection?

(On "The Ancient Attainment of the One") In ancient times when things attained the Dao (the "One" refers to the Dao): Heaven attained it and became clear, Earth attained it and became tranquil, spirits attained it and became numinous, valleys attained it and became full, the myriad things attained it and flourished, lords and kings attained it and the world became properly ordered. Tracing to their roots: If Heaven lost its clarity it might rupture; if Earth lost its tranquility it might quake; if spirits lost their numinosity they might vanish; if valleys lost their fullness they might dry up; if the myriad things lost their vitality they might perish; if lords and kings lost their proper way while pursuing noble status they might topple. Therefore nobility takes humility as its root; the exalted takes the lowly as its foundation. Hence lords and kings call themselves "solitary," "desolate," and "unworthy" - is this not taking humility as fundamental? Thus seeking excessive honor brings no honor. They would not be polished jade, but prefer to remain unhewn stone.

(Annotations: "Rupture" means breakage and destruction; "quake" means shaking and release; "vanish" means dissipation and extinction; "dry up" means exhaustion and desiccation; "topple" [pronounced "jué"] means stumbling and overturning; numerical characters should be read with rising tone.)

(Su Shi's Commentary) The Dao is unified. The reason the myriad things can become the myriad things is all due to the Dao. People only see concrete things yet forget the Dao: Heaven merely knows to maintain clarity, Earth merely knows to maintain tranquility...

 寧而已神知其靈而已谷知其盈而已萬  物知其生而已侯王知其爲天下貞而已  不知其所以得此者皆道存焉耳致之言  極也天不得一未遽裂也地不得一未遽  發也神不得一未遽歇也萬物不得一未  遽滅也侯王不得一未遽蹷也然其極必  至此耳天地之大侯王之貴皆一之致夫  一果何物也視之不見執之不得則亦天  地之至微也此所謂賤且下也本也昔之  稱孤寡不穀者亦舉其本而遺其末耳輪  輻蓋軫衡軛轂轊會而爲車物物可數而  車不可數然後知無有之爲車所謂無之  以爲用者也然則天地將以大爲天地邪  侯王將以貴爲侯王邪大與貴之中有一  存焉此其所以爲天地侯王者而人莫或  知之耳故一處貴而非貴處賤而非賤非  若玉之碌碌貴而不能賤石之落落賤而  不能貴也 反者道之動弱者道之用天下之物生於有 有生于無  反復也湏溪云反者動之極則必歸也是  其反也正以其動也非動無反 蘇註  復性則靜矣然其寂然不動感而遂通天  下之故則動之所自起也道無形無聲天  下之弱者莫如道然而天下之至强莫加  焉此其所以能用萬物也世不知靜之爲  動弱之爲强故告之以物之所自生者蓋  天下之物聞有母制子未聞有以子制母  者也 筆乘
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the fundamental characteristics of the Dao (the cosmic source principle). All things manifest their divine mystery when maintaining tranquility; valleys remain full by staying empty; all beings grow by preserving their vitality; and rulers who comprehend this principle become models for the world. Their ability to attain such states stems entirely from following the Dao.

Though invisible and intangible, the Dao is the essential thread sustaining all existence: Heaven would not immediately collapse without it, Earth would not instantly quake, spirits (Shen) would not abruptly vanish, all creatures would not perish at once, nor would rulers immediately fall from power. Yet complete deviation from the Dao inevitably leads to destruction. The grandeur of Heaven and Earth, the nobility of rulers—all derive from adhering to the "One" (another name for the Dao).

The Dao represents the most refined existence, appearing humble and lowly yet constituting the fundamental root. Like ancient kings referring to themselves as "the solitary one," "the unworthy," or "the inept" (self-deprecating terms), they grasped the essence while relinquishing superficialities. Just as individual components assemble to form a wheeled carriage, the carriage itself transcends the sum of its parts—this exemplifies the practical function of "non-being" (the formless Dao).

Heaven and Earth become what they are not through sheer magnitude, nor rulers through mere nobility—the key lies in their embodiment of the Dao. The true Dao transcends distinctions of value, unlike jade that signifies nobility or common stones that suggest baseness.

"Returning" (cyclical reversal) constitutes the Dao's mode of movement, while "softness" (pliancy) characterizes its operational quality. All things emerge from "being," yet "being" itself originates from "non-being" (the Dao's state of emptiness). This cyclical movement manifests the Dao's nature—what appears as a return to origin actually represents the ultimate expression of dynamic activity.

The commentary by Su Zhe adds: Returning to one's original nature leads to stillness, yet this stillness is not lifeless inertia but the root capable of sensing all transformations. The Dao appears supremely gentle yet contains incomparable strength. People often fail to recognize that stillness harbors kinetic potential and softness conceals tremendous power. Like the relationship between mother and child, influence always flows from mother to offspring, never the reverse.

 天下之物生于有所謂有名萬物之母是  已有生于無所謂無名天地之始是已無  必生有是故貴其反反者反於無也有生  於無是故貴其弱弱者無之似也 上士聞道勤而行之中士聞道若存若亡下 士聞道大笑之不笑不足以爲道故建言有 之明道若昧進道若退夷道若類上德若谷 大白若辱廣德若不足建德若偷質眞若渝 大方無隅大器晩成大音希聲大象無形道 隱無名夫唯道善貸且成  建立也偷苟且也渝羊朱反變改也傅奕  音義云古本作輸廣雅曰輸愚也或作揄  董遇作摇今從王弼傅奕作渝應人之乏  而終以見還曰貸趙志堅云貸者暫借非  長與也且者權成非久固也欲使蒙貸者  不長徃得成者非久住感貸荷成速歸於  道 蘇註  道非形不可見非聲不可聞不先知萬物  之妄廓然無蔽卓然有見未免于不信也  故下士聞道以爲荒唐謬悠而笑之中士  聞道與之存亡出没而疑之惟了然見之  者然後勤行服膺而不怠孔子曰語之而  不惰者其回也與斯所謂上士也哉建立  也古之立言者有是說而老子取之下之  所陳者是也無所不照而非察也若止不  行而天下之速者莫之或先也或夷或類  所至則平而未嘗削也上德不德如谷之  虛也大白若辱者使白而不受汚此則不
Interpretation

All things in the world originate from "being" (concrete existence), which is called "the mother of all things." Yet this "being" itself arises from "non-being" (formless origin), which is called "the beginning of heaven and earth." Since "non-being" necessarily gives birth to "being," Dao cultivators emphasize returning to the source—this "return" means reverting to the state of "non-being." Because "being" is born from "non-being," Dao practitioners value softness and pliancy, as these qualities most closely resemble the nature of "non-being."

People of different capacities respond differently upon hearing the Dao: Those of superior disposition diligently practice it upon hearing; those of average disposition listen with hesitant belief; while those of inferior disposition laugh heartily at it—yet if the Dao weren't laughed at, it wouldn't be the true Dao. The ancient sages declared: The brightest Dao appears dim; the advancing Dao seems to retreat; the smoothest Dao feels rugged. Supreme De (Virtue) resembles a valley in its emptiness, the purest white appears sullied, abundant De always seems insufficient, vigorous De appears indolent, and unadorned genuineness seems changeable. The most square lacks sharp corners, the most precious vessel is completed last, the loudest sound is inaudible, and the greatest form is shapeless. The Dao always remains subtle and nameless, yet it alone excels in giving to all things and helping them achieve completion.

(Note: The term "lend" in Daoism refers to temporary provision rather than permanent bestowal, and "temporary completion" indicates provisional achievement rather than fixed permanence—this reminds recipients to swiftly return to the Dao.)

Su Zhe's commentary adds: The Dao has no form and thus cannot be seen, no sound and thus cannot be heard. Unless one first sees through the illusory nature of all things, even profound clarity and exceptional insight will still harbor doubts. Therefore, those of inferior disposition laugh scornfully at the Dao as absurd; those of average disposition waver between belief and skepticism; only those who truly awaken practice it diligently and retain it in their hearts without slackening. Confucius said, "Was it not Yan Hui who never slackened upon hearing the Dao?"—this describes those of superior disposition. The ancient saying "The bright Dao appears dim" and similar expressions were quoted by Laozi. True wisdom illuminates all without deliberate observation, seems to halt yet arrives before any swift movement, appears rugged yet maintains perfect balance. Supreme De doesn't flaunt its virtue, remaining empty as a valley. "The purest white appears sullied" means true purity can embrace defilement without being tainted.

 屑不潔之士而非聖人也廣德若不足者  廣大而不可復加則止于此而已非廣也  建德若偷因物之自然而無立者外若偷  惰而實建也質眞若渝體聖抱神隨物變  化而不失其貞者外若渝也大方無隅全  其大方不小立圭角也大器晩成器大不  可近用也大音希聲非耳之所得聞也大  象無形非目之所得見也道之所寓無所  不見凡此十二者皆道之見于事者也而  道之大全則隱于無名惟其所寓惟其有  餘以貸不足物之賴之以成者如此 筆乘  上士者恬淡寂寞虛無無爲者也勤於此  則勤行之至而實無所勤行也斯所謂天  然懸解矣而下士惡足以知之君平曰中  士所聞非至美也下士所見非至善也中  士所眩下士所笑乃美善之美善者也 道生一一生二二生三三生萬物萬物負隂 而抱陽沖氣以爲和人之所惡惟孤寡不穀 而王公以爲稱故物或損之而益或益之而 損人之所教我亦教之强梁者不得其死吾 將以爲教父  凡動物背止於後隂靜也耳目口鼻居前  陽動也故曰負隂抱陽植物則背寒向暖  而沖氣運乎其間木絶水曰梁木負棟亦  曰梁取其力之强也故曰强梁金人銘曰  强梁者不得其死好勝者必遇其敵蓋古  人嘗以此爲教而我亦教之但老子獨尊  之曰教父如言萬物之母之謂母主養父
Interpretation

This passage elucidates several key Daoist concepts from the Daode Jing:

The truly virtuous person appears imperfect ("广德若不足" - abundant De seems deficient), for supreme virtue manifests as ordinary. Cultivating virtue requires alignment with nature ("建德若偷" - establishing De appears as laziness), where outward nonchalance conceals inner steadfastness. Those preserving their authentic nature ("质真若渝" - genuine substance seems flawed) adapt to external changes without losing their essence.

The Dao manifests through these characteristics: The most square lacks corners ("大方无隅"), the most precious vessel takes longest to complete ("大器晚成"), the loudest sound transcends hearing ("大音希声"), and the grandest form transcends visibility ("大象无形"). These twelve attributes represent the Dao's phenomenal expressions, though the Dao itself transcends all forms and names.

Superior practitioners (上士) pursue the realm of clarity and Wuwei (non-action). Intermediate practitioners (中士) possess incomplete understanding, while inferior practitioners (下士) often mock true wisdom.

All phenomena emerge from the Dao's unfolding ("道生一,一生二,二生三,三生万物" - the Dao begets the One, the One begets Yin-Yang, which begets the Three, which begets the myriad things), each containing complementary Yin-Yang aspects balanced through Qi harmonization. When ancient rulers called themselves "孤寡不谷" (solitary, bereft, unworthy), this illustrates how apparent loss may bring gain, and apparent gain may bring loss.

"强梁" originally meant roof beams supporting structures, metaphorically representing domineering personalities. Ancient wisdom warns that "the violent die unnatural deaths," a teaching Laozi particularly emphasizes as the "教父" (teaching father - where 'mother' represents nurturing, 'father' represents instruction). All creatures manifest Yin-Yang qualities: animals' static backs belong to Yin while active fronts belong to Yang; plants grow toward warmth while roots anchor in cold, with Qi circulating through their stems.

 主教故言生則曰母言教則曰父 蘇註  夫道非一非二及其與物爲偶道一而物  不一故以一名道然而道則非一也一與  一爲二二與一爲三自是以徃而萬物生  物雖有萬不同而莫不負隂抱陽沖氣以  爲和者蓋物生于三而三生于一理之自  然也世之人不知萬物之所自生莫不賤  寡小而貴重大然王公之尊而自稱孤寡  不穀古之達者蓋已知之矣 天下之至柔馳騁天下之至堅無有入於無 間吾是以知無爲之有益不言之教無爲之 益天下希及之  馳騁役使也堅猶剛强不曰剛强而曰堅  變文叶韻也無間無内也至剛者天下莫  能勝而至柔能役之無内者天下莫能破  而無有能入之二語皆設喻以明無爲之  有益也 蘇註  以堅御堅不折則碎以柔御堅柔亦不靡  堅亦不病求之於物則水是也以有入有  捍不相受以無入有無未嘗勞有未嘗覺  求之于物則鬼神是也是以聖人唯能無  爲故能役使衆强出入群有 名與身孰親身與貨孰多得與亡孰病是故 甚愛必大費多藏必厚亡知足不辱知止不 殆可以長久  多猶重也薛云知足者樂今有之已多無  求者也無求奚辱知止者懼後進之有損  知幾者也知幾奚殆 大成若缺其用不敝大盈若沖其用不窮大 直若屈大巧若拙大辯若訥躁勝寒靜勝熱
Interpretation

This passage from Laozi Yi explores the essence of the Dao and wisdom for navigating life, with key insights that can be understood as follows:

The Dao is neither singular nor dualistic. When the Dao corresponds to concrete things, we call it "One," yet the Dao itself transcends this concept. Like numbers, it begins as One; One added to One becomes Two, and Two added to One becomes Three—from which the myriad things arise. Though all things differ, each contains the two Qi (vital energies) of Yin (passive, yielding) and Yang (active, firm), achieving harmony through their intermingling. While things appear to emerge from Three, they originate from One—this is nature's principle.

Ordinary people often belittle the small and revere the grand, but those truly attuned to the Dao understand the opposite wisdom. Just as kings and nobles refer to themselves as "the solitary one" or "the unworthy" (humble titles like "gu," "gua," and "bugu"), they embody this insight. The softest things in the world can master the hardest; formless forces penetrate even seamless objects. This demonstrates the benefit of Wuwei (non-action, or acting in accordance with nature) and the profundity of wordless teaching.

When hardness confronts hardness, one side breaks or shatters; when softness meets hardness, neither is harmed—like water wearing away stone without injuring itself. Solid forms entering solid forms encounter obstruction, yet formless forces (such as Shen/spirit) pass through freely. Thus, the sage understands Wuwei and thereby masters all formidable powers.

Which is more precious: reputation or life? Which matters more: life or wealth? Which brings greater pain: gain or loss? Excessive desire inevitably leads to great loss; hoarding too much invites ruin. Those who know contentment avoid self-inflicted disgrace; those who understand moderation avert danger—this is how one endures.

The greatest perfection seems flawed yet never decays; the fullest abundance appears empty yet is inexhaustible. The straightest seems bent, the most skillful seems clumsy, the most eloquent seems inarticulate. Movement dispels cold; stillness overcomes heat. These seemingly contradictory phenomena reveal the dialectical nature of reality.

清靜爲天下正 蘇註  天下以不缺爲成故成必有敝以不虛爲  盈故盈必有窮聖人要于大成而不卹其  缺期于大盈而不惡其沖是以成而不敝  盈而不窮也直而不屈其直必折循理而  行雖曲而直巧而不拙其巧必勞付物自  然雖拙而巧辯而不訥其辯必窮因理而  言雖訥而辯成而不缺盈而不沖直而不  屈巧而不拙辯而不訥譬如躁之不能靜  靜之不能躁耳夫躁能勝寒而不能勝熱  靜能勝熱而不能勝寒皆滯于一偏而非  其正也唯泊然清淨不染于一非成非缺  非盈非沖非直非屈非巧非拙非辯非訥  而後無所不勝可以爲天下正矣 天下有道却走馬以糞天下無道戎馬生于 郊罪莫大于可欲禍莫大于不知足咎莫大 于欲得故知足之足常足矣  却屏去也糞糞田也吴幼清本糞下有車  字以張衡東京賦却走馬以糞車爲證戎  馬戰馬也郊交也二國相交之境也戎馬  生于郊言兵乆不還也一性之内無欠無  餘人能安之無徃不足故曰知足之足常  足 蘇註  天下各安其分則不爭而自治故却是馬  而糞田以其可欲者示人固有罪矣而不  足其足者其禍又甚所欲必得者其咎最  大匹夫有一于身患必及之侯王而爲是  則戎馬之所自起也唯知足者所寓而足  故無不足
Interpretation

Laozi here expounds the core concept of "tranquility and wuwei (non-action)." He observes that when all things under heaven strive for perfection (nothing lacking), they inevitably decline; when they pursue fullness, they become exhausted. The truly wise sage seeks great accomplishment without obsessing over flaws, pursues wholeness without rejecting emptiness. Only thus can lasting preservation be achieved.

Excessive rigidity leads to breaking—by following natural patterns, what appears circuitous actually moves directly; excessive cleverness creates useless toil—by conforming to things' inherent nature, what seems clumsy proves most skillful; excessive eloquence results in speechlessness—by speaking according to principle, what appears inarticulate becomes most persuasive. Just as agitation can ward off cold but cannot dispel heat, while stillness can dispel heat but cannot ward off cold—both represent one-sided extremes. Only by maintaining serene detachment, free from attachment to any extreme—not deliberately pursuing accomplishment or flaw, fullness or emptiness, straightness or curvature, cleverness or clumsiness, eloquence or reticence—can one become unimpeded and embody the world's true Dao.

The second section discusses governance. In times of peace, warhorses retire to plow fields; in chaotic times, even broodmares give birth on battlefields. The greatest crime is indulging desires, the greatest calamity is insatiability, the gravest fault is unbridled acquisitiveness. Only those who understand contentment attain true fulfillment.

Su Zhe's commentary adds: When all people abide by their proper roles, natural harmony prevails. If rulers display luxurious indulgences (objects of desire) to the populace, this itself constitutes wrongdoing; if people consequently develop dissatisfaction, the disaster grows graver; if one insists on obtaining the unobtainable, it becomes the ultimate fault. Ordinary people inviting misfortune need commit only one such error, but rulers committing these faults provoke warfare. Only the contented person finds fulfillment in any circumstance.

(Note: "retiring warhorses to manure fields" refers to peacetime demobilization; "broodmares birthing in borderlands" illustrates prolonged warfare; "the contentment of knowing sufficiency" emphasizes the importance of inner fulfillment.)

不出户知天下不窺牖見天道其出彌遠其 知彌少是以聖人不行而知不見而名不爲 而成 蘇註  性之爲體充遍字宙無遠近古今之異古  之聖人其所以不出户牖而無所不知者  特其性全故耳世之人爲物所蔽性分于  耳目内爲身心之所紛亂外爲山河之所  障塞見不出視聞不出聽户牖之微能蔽  而絶之不知聖人復性而足乃欲出而求  之是以彌遠而彌少也性之所及非特能  知能名而已蓋可以因物之自然不勞而  成之矣 爲學日益爲道日損損之又損之以至于無 爲無爲而無不爲矣故取天下常以無事及 其有事不足以取天下  取開元䟽云猶攝化也無事即無爲也無  爲自化清靜自正故曰取天下常以無事  爲者敗之執者失之故曰有事不足以取  天 蘇註  不知道而務學聞見日多而無以一之未  免爲累也孔子曰多聞擇其善者而從之  多見而識之知之次也苟一日知道顧視  萬物無一非妄去妄以求復性是謂之損  孔子謂子貢曰女以予爲多學而識之者  與曰然非與曰非也予一以貫之去妄以  求復性可謂損矣而去妄之心猶存及其  兼忘此心純性而無餘然後無所不爲而  不失于無爲矣人皆有欲取天下之心故  造事而求之心見于外而物惡之故終不  可得聖人無爲故無事其心見于外而物
Interpretation

The Wings of Laozi passage discusses the cognitive approach and worldly wisdom of Daoist practitioners.

The first part explains that true wisdom does not require traveling afar to understand the world, nor peering through windows to comprehend the Dao (the Way). Those who chase after distant knowledge often grasp less. Thus, sages attain understanding without direct experience, perceive truth without visual confirmation, and accomplish great things without deliberate action (Wuwei). Su Zhe comments that human nature inherently connects with the cosmos, transcending time and space. Ancient sages knew all without leaving their homes because they preserved their innate wholeness. Ordinary people, however, become obscured by external distractions—their nature fragmented by sensory attachments, their minds disturbed by scattered thoughts, their perception blocked by worldly barriers. Limited to narrow sensory experience, they fail to realize that sages need only restore their original nature. Seeking outwardly, they understand less the farther they go. A nature in harmony not only perceives and names things but also aligns with the natural order, achieving effortlessly.

The second part distinguishes between conventional learning and Daoist cultivation: the pursuit of knowledge leads to accumulation, while practicing the Dao requires continual reduction. Reduce until nothing remains, reaching the state of Wuwei (non-action). In this state, all things are accomplished. Governing the world also demands Wuwei—forced interference only invites failure. Su Zhe elaborates: those ignorant of the great Dao drown in learning, their fragmented knowledge becoming a burden. Confucius once said, "Hear much and select the good to follow," yet this remains secondary wisdom. Upon realizing the Dao, one sees all phenomena as illusory; discarding delusions to return to one’s nature is "reduction." When Confucius told Zigong, "My Way is bound together by one thread," he pointed to this shedding of falsehoods. Even the intention to "discard delusions" must eventually be forgotten, fully restoring pure innate nature to attain Wuwei’s boundless efficacy. Ordinary rulers try to control the world through force, breeding resistance; sages, by contrast, act without acting, and all things align spontaneously.

 安之雖不取天下而天下歸之矣 聖人無常心以百姓心爲心善者吾善之不 善者吾亦善之德善矣信者吾信之不信者 吾亦信之德信矣聖人在天下惵惵爲天下 渾其心百姓皆注其耳目聖人皆孩之  無常心心無所主也惵圖恊反爲去聲渾  胡本反 蘇註  虛空無形因萬物之形以爲形在方爲方  在圓爲圓如使空自有形則何以形萬物  哉是以聖人無心因百姓之心以爲心無  善不善皆善之無信不信皆信之善不善  在彼吾之所以善之者未嘗渝也可謂德  善矣信不信在彼而吾之所以信者未嘗  變也可謂德信矣不然善善而棄不善信  信而棄不信豈所謂常善救人故無棄人  哉天下善惡信僞方各自是以相非相賊  不知所定聖人憂之故惵惵爲天下渾其  心無善惡無信僞皆以一待之彼方注其  耳目以觀聖人之予奪而吾一以嬰兒遇  之于善無所喜于惡無所嫉夫是以善者  不矜惡者不愠釋然皆化而天下始定矣 出生入死生之徒十有三死之徒十有三人 之生動之死地者亦十有三夫何故以其生 生之厚蓋聞善攝生者陸行不遇兕虎入軍 不避甲兵兕無所投其角虎無所措其爪兵 無所容其刃夫何故以其無死地  出謂自無而見于有入謂自有而歸于無  莊子萬物皆出于機入于機又曰其出不
Interpretation

This passage expounds on the Daoist sage's way of interacting with the world and perspective on life and death. The sage doesn't cling to fixed opinions but instead adopts the people's thoughts as their own. They treat both kind and unkind people with kindness—this constitutes true De (Virtue) of goodness. They trust both trustworthy and untrustworthy individuals—this represents genuine De of trustworthiness.

Moving cautiously through the world, the sage perceives all people's minds as an undivided whole. While the populace watches the sage's every move attentively, the sage treats everyone with childlike impartiality. Here, "having no constant mind" means maintaining mental flexibility, while "blending all minds together" refers to embracing diverse thoughts as one unified whole.

Su Zhe's commentary further clarifies: Just as emptiness has no fixed form but adapts to all shapes, the sage holds no rigid ideas but follows the people's thinking. Treating both good and bad, trustworthy and untrustworthy equally—this alone constitutes true De of goodness and trustworthiness. Selective kindness shown only to the virtuous or trust extended solely to the honest would fail to embody true inclusiveness.

People often quarrel and fight due to differing standards of good/evil and true/false. Troubled by this, the sage dissolves such discriminations and treats all equally. While the people anxiously await the sage's judgments, the sage treats them like infants—neither overjoyed by goodness nor repelled by wickedness. Only through this equanimity can both sides coexist peacefully and the world find stability.

Regarding life and death: From birth to death, three in ten people live naturally, three in ten die naturally, while another three in ten who might have lived instead rush toward death. Why? Because they excessively pursue life-preservation. Those truly skilled at nurturing life encounter no rhinoceroses or tigers when walking, nor suffer weapon wounds in battle. Rhinos find no place to gore, tigers no place to claw, weapons no place to strike. Why? Because such practitioners maintain no vulnerable spots. "Emerging into life and entering death" describes birth as movement from non-being to being, and death as return from being to non-being—like Zhuangzi's teaching that all things emerge from nature's workings and return to nature's mechanisms.

 忻其入不詎又曰有乎出有乎入皆以出  爲生入爲死夫音符攝生如攝政攝官之  攝不認生爲己有如暫焉管攝之也不期  而會曰遇兕音似山海經兕出湘水之南  蒼黑色爾雅云形如野牛一角重千斤 蘇註  性無生死出則爲生入則爲死用物取精  以自滋養者生之徒也聲色臭味以自戕  賊者死之徒也二者既分生死之道矣吾  又知作而不知休知言而不知默知思而  不知忘以趣于盡則所謂動而之死地者  也生死之道以十言之三者各居其三矣  豈非生死之道九而不生不死之道一而  已矣不生不死則易所謂寂然不動者也  老子言其九不言其一使人自得之以寄  無思無爲之妙也有生則有死故生之徒  即死之徒也人之所頼于生者厚則死之  道常十九聖人常在不生不死中生地且  無焉有死地哉 筆乘  生之徒十有三此練形住世者也死之徒  十有三此殉欲忘生者也人之生動之死  地十有三此斷滅種性者也凡此十分之  中率居其九皆生生之厚者也夫有生必  有死是生固死之地矣兕虎甲兵將安避  之善攝生則無生矣故兕之角無所投虎  之爪無所措兵之刃無所容何者彼無地  以受之也厚生者九無生者一老子于十  者之中闕一自擬其㫖微矣然聖人無生  非故薄之也本無生也昔人云愛生者可
Interpretation

This passage explores the Dao of life and death, with its core insight being that excessive attachment to life paradoxically hastens death. It mentions that "followers of life" (those pursuing longevity) and "followers of death" (those indulging in desires) each constitute three-tenths of people, while another three-tenths are "those who move toward death" (deliberately cutting off life). These nine types all overvalue life in some way. Only one-tenth truly understand life's essence—they neither deliberately pursue life nor fear death.

The text employs the metaphors of the si (a rhinoceros-like mythical beast) and tigers: those skilled in nurturing life are like a si with no place to thrust its horn or a tiger with no place to sink its claws, because there fundamentally exists no "life" that can be harmed. Sages dwell in a state of "neither born nor dead"—not deliberately despising life, but realizing its inherent emptiness.

Drawing from Laozi's philosophy, the author notes that excessive craving for life (whether through sensory pleasures or forced longevity practices) ironically invites death. True wisdom transcends the concepts of life and death to reach the realm of "serene stillness." Laozi intentionally leaves the mystery of that final tenth unexplained, hoping readers will personally realize the marvel of thoughtless non-action (wuwei).

 殺也愛潔者可污也愛榮者可辱也愛完  者可破也本無生孰殺之本無潔孰污之  本無榮孰辱之本無完孰破之知此者可  以出入造化遊戲死生 道生之德畜之物形之勢成之是以萬物莫 不尊道而貴德道之尊德之貴夫莫之爵而 常自然故道生之畜之長之育之亭之毒之 養之覆之生而不有爲而不恃長而不宰是 謂玄德  畜許六反夫音符長上聲下同 蘇註  道者萬物之母故生萬物者道也及其運  而爲德牧養羣衆而不辭故畜萬物者德  也然而道德則不能自形因物而後形見  物則不能自成遠近相取剛柔相交積而  爲勢而後興亡治亂之變成矣形雖由物  成雖由勢而非道不生非德不畜是以尊  道而貴德尊如父兄貴如侯王道無位而  德有名故也恃爵而後尊貴者非實尊貴  也 天下有始以爲天下母既得其母以知其子 既知其子復守其母殁身不殆塞其兊閉其 門終身不勤開其兊濟其事終身不救見小 曰明守柔曰强用其光復歸其明無遺身殃 是謂襲常  兊口也人之有口家之有門皆喻物所從  出者塞而閉之藏有於無守母者也參同  契云耳目己之寳閉固勿發揚兊口勿以  談希之順以洪即此義不可目窺曰小不  可力得曰柔遺唯季反襲常猶前言襲明  宻而不露也記曰揜而充裘曰襲 蘇註
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist understanding of "Dao" (the Way) and "De" (Virtue/Power), and how comprehending these principles enables transcendence beyond worldly constraints.

It begins by observing that those obsessed with purity are easily sullied, those chasing glory readily humiliated, and perfection-seekers ultimately meet destruction. Fundamentally, life knows no birth or death, purity no defilement, glory no disgrace, nor perfection any flaw. Those who truly grasp this truth transcend life and death, wandering freely in harmony with creation.

The Dao generates all things, while De nourishes them. Things take form through Dao and achieve completion through circumstance. Thus all beings revere Dao and value De. This reverence isn't conferred by titles but arises naturally. Dao begets, nourishes, matures, cultivates, perfects, protects, and embraces all things. It creates without possessing, acts without claiming, guides without controlling—this constitutes the most profound De.

Su Zhe's commentary explains: Dao as mother generates all things, while De represents the nurturing force. Yet Dao and De themselves have no form—they manifest only through phenomena. All things require interacting conditions to form patterns of rise and decline. Though phenomena emerge from specific conditions, without Dao's generative power and De's nourishment, nothing could exist. Thus people honor Dao as they would fathers and elder brothers, valuing De as they would kings and lords. True nobility isn't granted by titles.

The text continues: All things under heaven have their origin (mother). Knowing this origin enables understanding of phenomena (offspring), and understanding phenomena leads back to the origin—thus one remains free from peril throughout life. Blocking sensory outlets (ears, mouth) and closing desire's gates brings lifelong freedom from toil. Conversely, indulging senses in worldly pursuits makes one incurably lost. Perceiving subtlety is true wisdom; maintaining softness constitutes strength. Using wisdom's light to return to inner clarity while avoiding self-inflicted harm—this constitutes following the constant Dao.

Here "mouth" and "gates" metaphorically represent phenomena's exits. Blocking them means storing "being" within "non-being" to preserve the origin. The Can Tong Qi states ears and eyes are personal treasures to be sealed and guarded—this conveys the same meaning. Not peering with eyes is called "smallness"; not forcing with strength is called "softness." Following the constant Dao means maintaining hiddenness without display.

 無名天地之始有名萬物之母道方無名  則物之所資始也及其有名則物之所資  生也故謂之始又謂之母其子則萬物也  聖人體道以周物譬如以母知其子了然  無不察也雖其智能周之然而未嘗以物  忘道故終守其母也天下皆具此道然常  患忘道而狥物目悅于色耳悅于聲開其  悅之之心而以其事濟之是以終身而陷  溺不能救夫聖人之所以終身不勤者唯  塞而閉之未嘗出而狥之也悅之爲害始  小而浸大知小之將大而閉之可謂明矣  趨其所悅而不顧自以爲强而非强也唯  見悅而知畏之者可謂强矣世人開其所  悅以身狥物徃而不反聖人塞而閉之非  絶物也以神應物用其光而已身不與也  夫耳之能聽目之能見鼻之能臭口之能  嘗身之能觸心之能思皆所謂光也蓋光  與物接物有去而明無損是以應萬變而  不窮殃不及于其身故其常性湛然相襲  而不絶矣 使我介然有知行于大道惟施是畏大道甚 夷而民好徑朝甚除田甚蕪倉甚虛服文采 帶利劒厭飲食資貨有餘是謂盜竽非道哉  介然有知猶言微有知也夸張曰施嗇之  反也夷平也路狹而捷爲徑除治也傳曰  糞除先人之敝廬是也青赤爲文色絲爲  采傅奕云采是古文繡字資貨一作財貨  盜竽誤作盜夸今從韓非本 蘇註
Interpretation

At the beginning of heaven and earth, the Dao was nameless—it was the origin of all things. When the Dao acquired a name, it became the mother that nurtures all existence. In its nameless state, the Dao is the root from which all beings arise; with a name, it becomes the support for their growth. Thus we call it both the "beginning" and the "mother," while all things are its children.

The sage (one who has realized the Dao) comprehends all things through embodying the great Dao, just as a mother understands her children with perfect clarity. Though the sage's wisdom penetrates all phenomena, they never forget the Dao in pursuit of external objects, thus eternally preserving the root. All things under heaven contain this Dao, yet people often abandon it to chase after externals—eyes coveting beautiful forms, ears indulging in music, desires running wild and endlessly gratified, until they become hopelessly entangled.

The reason sages remain unburdened by worldly things throughout their lives is that they close the gates of desire, never indulging in reckless pursuit. The harm of desire begins small but grows steadily. Those who foresee how minor cravings lead to great calamities and restrain them accordingly possess true wisdom. People who chase desires without regard for consequences may appear strong but are not; only those who remain vigilant when facing temptation demonstrate real strength. Ordinary people indulge their desires, chasing externals with their physical forms until there's no return; sages shut desire's gates not to isolate themselves completely, but to perceive all things with spirit, employing only their inner light of awareness without physical involvement.

The ears' capacity to hear, eyes to see, nose to smell, mouth to taste, body to touch, and mind to think—these all constitute the inner light of awareness. When this luminous awareness interacts with phenomena, external things come and go while the awareness itself remains undiminished. Thus it responds to infinite changes without exhaustion, and calamities cannot touch it. Therefore, the sage's essential nature remains eternally clear and bright, transmitted without interruption through the ages.

If I have even slight understanding of this principle while walking the great Dao, my greatest fear is indulging desire. The Dao's path is inherently level, yet people always prefer narrow shortcuts. While court halls gleam with ornamentation, fields lie fallow and granaries stand empty. People dress in embroidered silks, gird themselves with sharp swords, feast extravagantly, and hoard more wealth than they could ever use—this is what's called being a "chief of robbers" (referring to behavior that violates the Dao). How could this be the right path?

"Jieran you zhi" means having just a sliver of wisdom. "Shi" is the opposite of "se" (restraint), indicating indulgence. "Yi" denotes levelness. "Jing" refers to cramped shortcuts. "Chu" means to put in order, like the ancient saying "sweeping clean our ancestors' humble dwelling." "Wencai" indicates blue-red patterns and colored silks (Fu Yi notes that "cai" is the ancient character for "embroidery"). Some versions write "zihuo" as "caihuo" (material goods). "Daoyu" appears erroneously in some editions as "daokua"; here we follow Han Feizi's version.

Su Zhe (in his commentary) explains: People always abandon the Dao's broad highway for dangerous bypaths, as if refusing the main road to scale mountains and ridges. Sages understand how desires grow from small to great, hence they close desire's gates at the outset. Yet closing doesn't mean complete isolation—it's like using a mirror: the mirror reflects objects without retaining their traces. This is the wisdom of "using its light."

 體道者無知無行無所施設而物自化今  介然有知而行于大道則有施設建立非  其自然有足畏者矣大道夷易無有險阻  世之不知者以爲迂遠而好徑以求捷故  凡舍其自然而有所施設者皆欲速者也  俗人昭昭我獨若昏俗人察察我獨悶悶  豈復飾末廢本以施設爲事夸以誨盜哉 善建者不拔善抱者不脫子孫祭祀不輟修 之于身其德乃眞修之于家其德乃餘修之 于鄉其德乃長修之于邦其德乃豐修之于 天下其德乃普故以身觀身以家觀家以鄉 觀鄉以邦觀邦以天下觀天下吾何以知天 下之然哉以此  邦一作國漢人避高帝諱改之於韻不叶  今從韓非本 蘇註  世豈有建而不拔抱而不脫者乎唯聖人  知性之眞審物之妄捐物而修身其德充  積實無所立而其建有不可拔者實無所  執而其抱有不可脫者故至其子孫猶以  祭祀不輟也身既修推其餘以及外雖至  于治天下可也天地外者世俗所不見矣  然其理可推而知也修身之至以身觀身  以家觀家以鄉觀鄉以國觀國皆吾之所  及知也然安知聖人以天下觀天下亦若  吾之以身觀身乎豈身可以身觀而天下  獨不可以天下觀乎故曰吾何以知天下  之然哉以此言亦以身知之耳 含德之厚比于赤子毒蟲不螫猛獸不據攫
Interpretation

The true knower of Dao does not deliberately pursue knowledge, action, or artificial striving—the ten thousand things transform and nurture themselves naturally. Those who stubbornly cling to their own understanding and forcibly intervene in the Dao's workings engage in artificial effort that violates the natural way—this is truly something to beware. The Great Dao is originally level and simple, without obstacles, yet worldly people fail to comprehend this principle. They always consider the Dao circuitous and distant, forever seeking shortcuts. Therefore, those who abandon their natural disposition for deliberate action are all people chasing quick gains and instant benefits.

Worldly people all appear clever and discerning—only I seem muddled and confused. The masses are calculating and meticulous—only I appear dull and simple. How could I possibly embellish trivial details while abandoning the fundamental Dao, treating artificial striving as proper business, or using ostentation to attract thieves?

What is truly well-established cannot be uprooted; what is truly well-embraced cannot slip away—such virtue enables descendants to maintain ancestral sacrifices without end. Cultivating oneself with Dao makes virtue authentic; cultivating a household makes virtue abundant; cultivating a village makes virtue enduring; cultivating a state makes virtue flourishing; cultivating the world makes virtue universal. Therefore, observe others through oneself, observe other households through one's own, observe other villages through one's own, observe other states through one's own. How do I know the condition of the world? Precisely through this method.

(Note: The original text used "state" [邦] where later editions substituted "country" [国] to avoid naming taboo for Emperor Gaozu of Han, but this disrupted the rhyme. Following Han Feizi's version, we restore the original.)

Su Zhe's Commentary:

In this world, what is ever established without falling, or embraced without slipping away? Only the sage understands the authenticity of innate nature and sees through the illusory nature of external things, abandoning externals to cultivate the self. His virtue accumulates in fullness—seemingly establishing nothing, yet this establishment cannot be shaken; seemingly grasping nothing, yet this embrace cannot be lost. Thus even descendants maintain unbroken ancestral sacrifices. Having perfected self-cultivation, he extends surplus virtue outward—even governing the world becomes possible. What lies beyond heaven and earth remains unseen by worldly people, yet its principle can be inferred and known.

The highest cultivator observes others through oneself, households through one's own, villages through one's own, states through one's own—all this we can comprehend. But how do we know the sage observes the world through the world, just as we observe others through ourselves? If the self can be observed this way, why not the world? Therefore it is said: How do I know the world's condition? Precisely through this method—by inferring from oneself.

One whose Dao and virtue are profoundly cultivated resembles a newborn infant: poisonous insects don't sting him, fierce beasts don't pounce upon him.

鳥不搏骨弱筋柔而握固未知牝牡之合而 䘒作精之至也終日號而不嗄和之至也知 和曰常知常曰眀益生曰祥心使氣曰强物 壯則老謂之不道不道早已  毒蟲蜂蠆之類以尾端肆毒曰螫猛獸虎  豹之類以爪按拏曰據攫鳥鵰鶚之類以  羽距擊觸曰搏趙志堅曰以四指握拇指  爲握固䘒子垂反說文云赤子隂也號平  聲嗄所嫁反聲嘶也又啼極無聲曰嗄一  作嗌不嗄黄茂材云古本無嗌字嗌不嗄  莊子之文後人增入之祥吉凶之候也 蘇註  老子之言道德每以嬰兒况之者皆言其  體而已未及其用也夫嬰兒泊然無欲其  體則至矣然而物來而不知應故未可以  言用也道無形體物莫得而見也况可得  而傷之乎人之所以至于有形者由其有  心也故有心而後有形有形而後有敵敵  立而傷之者至矣無心之人物無與敵者  而曷由傷之夫赤子所以至此者唯無心  也無執而自握無欲而自作是以知其精  有餘而非心也心動則氣傷氣傷則號而  啞終日號而不啞是以知其心不動而氣  和也和者不以外傷内也復命曰常遇物  而知反其本者也知和曰常得本以應萬  物者也其實一道也故皆謂之常生不可  益而欲益之則非其正矣氣惡妄作而又  以心使之則强梁甚矣益生使氣不能聽
Interpretation

Laozi uses the state of an infant to symbolize the essence of the Dao. Though an infant's tendons and bones are soft, it can clench its fists tightly; though unaware of sexual matters, its genitalia naturally become erect—both signs of abundant Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy). It can cry all day without becoming hoarse, demonstrating the harmony of its primordial Qi. To understand this harmony is to grasp the eternal principle (常, chang), and to comprehend this principle is true wisdom. Forcing longevity through deliberate effort invites misfortune, while coercively controlling Qi with willpower constitutes brute force. When things reach their zenith, they begin to decline, for this violates the Dao—and to violate the Dao leads to premature demise.

(Note: The term "䘒" refers to male infant genitalia; "握固" (wò gù) is a hand gesture used in Daoist cultivation; "祥" here denotes omens of fortune or misfortune.)

When Laozi discusses Dao and De (Virtue/Power), he often employs the infant as a metaphor—not to illustrate function but to reveal the Dao's fundamental nature. Infants embody serenity and desirelessness; their primal state is perfection itself. Yet they lack the capacity to engage with external things, so functional application cannot yet be discussed. The Dao has no form; all things cannot perceive it, much less harm it. Human physical forms arise from consciousness (心, xin). With consciousness comes form; with form comes opposition; and with opposition comes harm. What enemy would a thing without consciousness have? How could it suffer harm?

An infant achieves this state precisely through wuxin (no-mind). Without intention, it naturally clenches its fists; without desire, its body spontaneously responds. This reveals the abundance of its Jing and Qi, not the workings of deliberate effort. Conscious activity injures primordial Qi, and when Qi is injured, crying leads to hoarseness. An infant cries ceaselessly yet remains unharmed—proof that its consciousness remains undisturbed and its Qi harmonized. This harmony means not allowing external things to damage inner nature. Returning to the origin is called "chang"—meeting phenomena yet always reverting to the root. Understanding harmony is also "chang"—grasping the root to respond to the myriad things. Both are manifestations of the same Dao, hence both are termed "chang."

Life cannot be artificially enhanced; forced enhancement violates its natural course. Primordial Qi abhors reckless agitation, let alone being driven by conscious will—this represents extreme arrogance. Deliberate life-nurturing and forced Qi circulation both defy natural spontaneity.

 其自然日入于剛强而老從之則失其赤  子之性矣 知者不言言者不知塞其兊閉其門挫其銳 解其紛和其光同其塵是謂玄同不可得而 親不可得而踈不可得而利不可得而害不 可得而貴不可得而賤故爲天下貴 蘇註  道非言說亦不離言說然能知者未必言  能言者未必知唯塞兊閉門以杜其外挫  銳解紛和光同塵以治其内者默然不同  而與道同也可得而親則亦可得而䟽可  得而利則亦可得而害可得而貴則亦可  得而賤體道者均覆萬物而孰爲親䟽等  觀逆順而孰爲利害不知榮辱而孰爲貴  賤情計之所不及此所以爲天下貴也 以正治國以竒用兵以無事取天下吾何以 知天下之然哉天下多忌諱而民彌貧民多 利器國家滋昏人多技巧竒物滋起法令滋 章盜賊多有故聖人云我無爲而民自化我 好靜而民自正我無事而民自富我無欲而 民自樸 蘇註  古之聖人柔遠能邇無意于用兵唯不得  已然後有征伐之事故以治國爲正以用  兵爲竒雖然此亦未足以取天下天下神  器不可爲也爲者敗之執者失之唯體道  者廓然無事雖不取天下而天下歸之矣  人主多忌諱下情不上達則民貧而無告  利器權謀也明君在上常使民無知無欲  民多權謀則其上眩而昏矣人不務本業
Interpretation

When a person gradually becomes rigid and stubborn by following their natural tendencies, they lose the innocent nature of an infant. Those who truly understand the Dao (the Way) do not indulge in empty talk, while those who love to lecture often lack genuine comprehension. One must block the openings of desire (referring to sensory cravings), close the gates of temptation, smooth out sharp edges, resolve conflicts, temper brilliance, and blend with the mundane world—this is the attainment of "profound unity" (the highest state of oneness with the Dao). Upon reaching this state, one will neither be deliberately embraced nor alienated by others, unaffected by the lure of profit or the sting of harm, unswayed by praise or blame, and thus becomes the most revered existence in the world.

Su Zhe's commentary: The great Dao cannot be fully expressed in words, yet it is not entirely divorced from them. Those who grasp the Dao may not be eloquent, and those who are articulate may not truly understand it. Only those who block the openings of desire and close the gates of temptation to shut out external disturbances, while internally cultivating their nature, resolving conflicts, tempering their brilliance, and blending with the mundane, can achieve unity with the Dao in silence. If one can be embraced, they can equally be alienated; if they can gain profit, they can also suffer loss; if they can be exalted, they can be demeaned. Those who truly embody the Dao treat all things equally, without distinction between closeness and distance; they remain indifferent to fortune and misfortune, unconcerned with gain or loss; they transcend notions of honor and disgrace, unbothered by status. This state surpasses worldly calculations, making them the most revered existence in the world.

Govern the state with upright principles, command battles with ingenious strategies, and win the world through Wuwei (non-action, letting things take their natural course). How do I know this is the way? Because: the more prohibitions there are, the poorer the people become; the more weapons among the populace, the greater the chaos in the state; the more cleverness people possess, the more bizarre occurrences arise; the more intricate the laws, the more thieves and bandits proliferate. Thus, the sage says: "Through my non-action, the people transform themselves; through my love of stillness, they become upright; through my avoidance of meddling, they prosper naturally; through my lack of desire, they return to simplicity."

Su Zhe's commentary: The ancient sages employed a policy of gentle persuasion for both near and far, resorting to arms only when absolutely necessary. Hence, governing the state requires upright principles, while warfare demands ingenious strategies. Yet even this is insufficient to win the world, for the world is a sacred entity—it cannot be seized by force, as forceful attempts lead to failure, and grasping leads to loss. Only those who embody the Dao with an expansive mind, though they do not strive for it, will find the world naturally drawn to them. When rulers impose excessive prohibitions, the grievances of the people cannot reach the top, leaving them impoverished and helpless. "Sharp tools" refer to cunning tactics. When a wise ruler is in power, they keep the people simple and honest; if the people become obsessed with scheming, the ruler grows confused and unseeing. When people neglect their fundamental duties of farming and sericulture, social upheaval ensues.

 而趨末技則非常無益之物作矣患人之  詐僞而多爲法令以勝之民無所措手足  則日入于盜賊矣 其政悶悶其民淳淳其政察察其民缺缺禍 兮福所倚福兮禍所伏孰知其極其無正邪 正復爲竒善復爲祅人之迷也其日固久矣 是以聖人方而不割廉而不劌直而不肆光 而不耀  悶音門缺殘缺也一作𡙇𡙇失望貌以其  察察宜無不及故人望之而卒失望也極  終也竒衰也廉稜也劌居衛反割也皆謂  芒利傷物也 蘇註  天地之大世俗之見有所眩而不知也蓋  福倚于禍禍伏于福譬如老稚生死之相  繼未始有止而迷者不知也夫惟聖人出  于萬物之表而攬其終始得其大全而遺  其小察視之悶悶若無所明而其民醇醇  各全其性矣若夫世人不知道之全體以  耳目之所知爲至彼方且自以爲福而不  知禍之伏于後方且自以爲善而不知禍  之起于中區區以察爲明至于察甚傷物  而不悟其非也可不哀哉知小察之不能  盡物是以雖能方能廉能直能光而不用  其能恐其陷于一偏而不反也此則世俗  所謂悶悶也 治人事天莫若嗇夫惟嗇是謂早服早服謂 之重積德重積德則無不克無不克則莫知 其極莫知其極可以有國有國之母可以長 乆是謂深根固柢長生乆視之道  服一作復柢一作蒂花趺也 蘇註
Interpretation

This scripture expounds principles of governance and self-cultivation. When rulers excessively pursue detailed laws and regulations, they ironically create more problems. Overly harsh decrees leave the common people disoriented, ultimately leading to social disorder.

Laozi reveals the interdependence of fortune and misfortune: what appears as blessing may conceal calamity, while apparent disaster might bring unexpected grace. This transformation follows no fixed pattern, often eluding ordinary comprehension. Just as kindness may turn to wickedness and integrity to strangeness, humanity's confusion about such matters has persisted since ancient times.

True sages (those who have attained the Dao) conduct themselves with square-cornered integrity that doesn't wound others, with purity that isn't harsh, with straightforwardness that never oversteps, and with radiance that doesn't dazzle. They transcend appearances to grasp the holistic patterns of existence—appearing muddled yet profoundly perceptive, preserving the people's innate simplicity. Ordinary folk, by contrast, fixate on immediate gains; when they presume to have secured blessings, misfortune may already be taking root unseen.

In both statecraft and spiritual cultivation, the supreme principle is "restraint" (frugality and reverence). Practicing this means following the Dao early and accumulating De (Virtue/Power) continuously. Thus one becomes invincible, reaching unfathomable depths to master governance's essence and achieve enduring stability. This constitutes the deeply rooted, long-lasting Way of perpetual vision.

Su Zhe's commentary particularly emphasizes how celestial patterns often transcend worldly understanding. Sages rise above particulars to apprehend wholeness, while ordinary people clinging to fragmented observation unknowingly damage reality's fabric. True wisdom lies in possessing capability without abuse, avoiding rigid fixation. This seemingly muddled state paradoxically represents governance's highest art.

 凡物方則割廉則劌直則肆光則耀唯聖  人方而不割廉而不劌直而不肆光而不  耀此所謂嗇也夫嗇者有而不用者也世  患無以服人苟誠有而能嗇雖未嘗與物  較而物知其非不能也則其服之早矣物  既已服歛藏其用至于殁身而終不試則  德重積矣德積既厚雖天下之剛强無不  能克則物莫測其量矣如此而後可以有  國彼世之小人有尺寸之柄而輕用之一  試不服天下測知其深淺而爭犯之雖欲  保其國家不可得也吾是以知嗇之可以  有國可以有國則有國之母也孟子曰存  其心養其性所以事天也以嗇治人則可  以有國者是也以嗇事天則深根固蒂者  是也古之聖人保其性命之常不以外耗  内則根深而不可拔蒂固而不可脫雖以  長生久視可也蓋治人事天雖有内外之  異而莫若嗇則一也 治大國若烹小鮮以道蒞天下其鬼不神非 其鬼不神其神不傷人非其神不傷人聖人 亦不傷之夫兩不相傷故德交歸焉  蒞力至反聖人亦不傷之一作傷人以下  德交歸焉觀之作之爲是之指神而言也 蘇註  烹小鮮者不可撓治大國者不可煩煩則  人勞撓則魚爛聖人無爲使人各安其自  然外無所煩内無所畏則物莫能侵雖鬼  無所用其神矣非其鬼之不神亦有神而  不傷人耳非神之不傷人聖人未嘗傷人
Interpretation

All things in the world that have sharp edges tend to harm others, pointed objects easily cut hands, straightforwardness can become presumptuous, and dazzling brilliance often stings the eyes. Only the sage can be square without wounding, sharp without cutting, direct without overstepping, and luminous without blinding. This is what we call the Dao of "restraint" (frugality and inward cultivation). Those who understand restraint possess capability yet refrain from casual use.

People often struggle with gaining others' trust. If one truly possesses genuine talent while maintaining humility, even without competing for superiority, others will recognize one's competence and naturally come to respect them early on. When public trust is already established, yet one continues to restrain their abilities—never flaunting them throughout life—virtue (De) accumulates continuously. When virtue becomes profoundly deep, even the most unyielding things in the world can be transformed, making one's depths utterly unfathomable to others. Only upon reaching this state is one fit to govern a nation.

Petty individuals in the world wield whatever minor power they obtain recklessly. When their attempts to command respect fail, the world sees through their limitations and challenges them accordingly. Such people can never preserve a state. Thus I understand that the Dao of restraint can govern a country—mastering this means grasping the root of statecraft. Mencius said, "Preserve the heart and nurture nature to serve Heaven." Governing people through restraint is statecraft; serving Heaven through restraint creates "deep roots and firm foundations." Ancient sages preserved life's essence, preventing external things from depleting internal vitality (Jing-Qi), thus making their roots unshakable and foundations unbreakable—thereby achieving longevity. Though governing people and serving Heaven differ as internal and external practices, their supreme method is identical: restraint.

Governing a great state is like cooking small fish (don't stir excessively). When the Dao governs the world, even spirits lose their efficacy—not that spirits cease functioning, but their functioning no longer harms; not only do spirits not harm, the sage also refrains from harming. When neither harms the other, their virtues merge and interpenetrate.

Su Zhe's commentary: Small fish disintegrate with excessive stirring; great states suffer from excessive governance. More governance wearies the people, more stirring ruins the fish. The sage governs through non-action (Wuwei), letting people settle naturally. With no external disturbances and no internal fears, nothing can violate them. At this point, even spirits cannot exercise their powers. It's not that spirits lose efficacy, but their efficacy ceases to harm; not only do spirits not harm—the sage fundamentally refrains from harming.

 故其鬼無能爲耳人鬼所以不相傷者由  上有聖人也故德交歸之 大國者下流天下之交天下之牝牝常以靜 勝牡以靜爲下故大國以下小國則取小國 小國而下大國則取大國故或下以取或下 而取大國不過欲兼畜人小國不過欲入事 人夫兩者各得其所欲故大者宜爲下 蘇註  天下之歸大國猶衆水之趨下流也衆動  之赴靜猶衆高之赴下也大國能下則小  國附之小國能下則大國納之大國下以  取
Interpretation

(Herein lies the wisdom of interaction between great and small nations) The reason malevolent spirits cannot wreak havoc is because sagely rulers govern the human realm, their De (Virtue) harmonizing Yin-Yang forces. A great nation should position itself like the lower reaches of a river—humbly receptive, becoming the convergence point of all under heaven. Just as the female (the receptive principle) often overcomes the male (the active principle) through stillness, quiet humility constitutes the fundamental approach.

If a great nation treats smaller states with modesty, it will naturally attract their allegiance. Conversely, if a small state serves a greater power with humility, it will be embraced by the larger entity. Thus, sometimes taking the initiative in humility builds trust, while at other times, humility secures protection. The great nation seeks only to nurture and encompass the smaller, while the small state desires merely to serve and rely upon the greater. Both parties find their proper place—though the greater power bears greater responsibility to demonstrate humility first.

(Su Zhe's commentary adds:) The allegiance of all under heaven to a great nation resembles how all rivers flow toward low ground. All beings gravitate toward stillness, just as water inevitably moves from high to low. When a great nation humbles itself, smaller states naturally submit; when a small state demonstrates humility, the greater power naturally accepts it. The great nation gains hearts through humility, while the small state gains protection through deference.

人小國下而取于人

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0056); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →