《老子翼》Vol. 6
About this page. The original text of 《老子翼》 Vol. 6 (Xu Daozang 續道藏, 6 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 21 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English
Reading modes explained
- Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
- Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
- Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
- Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.
Source textInterpretation
This passage examines how different dynasties in Chinese history applied Laozi's philosophy, highlighting both successes and failures in grasping the core principles of the Daodejing (Classic of the Way and Virtue).
When scholar Cheng Dachang advised Emperor Guangzong of the Song dynasty, he emphasized that Laozi's true value lay in mastering the essential art of governance—using the Dao (the Way) to harmonize all things. The Han Emperor Wen, Cheng noted, exemplified genuine understanding of Laozi's thought. By governing through clarity of mind, simplicity, and profound steadiness—not through inaction but by embodying wuwei (non-action) in its authentic sense—Emperor Wen achieved remarkable political stability. In contrast, the Western Jin dynasty misunderstood wuwei as mere laissez-faire governance and abandonment of laws, which led to societal chaos. As the Sui thinker Wang Tong rightly observed: the Western Jin's collapse wasn't Laozi's fault, but rather their failure to grasp his philosophy's essence.
Cheng advised the emperor to emulate the Western Han's approach while learning from the Western Jin's mistakes. He employed a vivid fire metaphor to explain the relationship between "Dao" (the Way) and "qi" (concrete implements): just as firewood (the implement) generates flame (the Dao), studying concrete matters (xiaxue, lower learning) leads to comprehending universal principles (shangda, higher realization). Confucian classics like the Six Classics, Analects, and Mengzi predominantly discuss tangible matters (the firewood), while Daoist texts like Laozi and Zhuangzi focus on abstract principles (the flame). Though Confucianism presents a complete system in itself, Lao-Zhuang thought offers particularly profound insights into the mysteries of the Dao.
The passage introduces key conceptual pairs: "Dao-qi" (the Way and its manifestations), where "Dao" represents fundamental laws and "qi" denotes concrete phenomena; and "xiaxue-shangda" (lower learning leading to higher realization), describing how practical study elevates to universal understanding. The firewood-flame analogy vividly illustrates their interdependence.
This passage examines the proper understanding of Laozi's philosophy and the deviations that emerged in later Daoist traditions.
It first notes how Jin Dynasty scholars engaged in empty metaphysical discussions, believing that simply abandoning rituals, music, laws, and governance would lead to spontaneous social order—an absurd notion akin to trying to start a fire without fuel. The author criticizes Daoist practitioners of that era for straying from Laozi's original teachings: instead of focusing on the fundamental Dao, they became obsessed with techniques like alchemical formulas, blessings, and exorcisms. Particular praise is given to the Tang poet Bai Juyi, whose verse points out that the Daodejing's five thousand characters never mention elixirs (dan), immortals (xian), or ascension to heaven—honoring Laozi as the "Primal Emperor" (Yuan Yuan Huangdi). The text's eighty-one chapters exclusively advocate purity, stillness, and desirelessness, devoid of such delusions.
The discussion then turns to Zheng Boxiong (courtesy name Jingwang), who observed that the Han-era official Gai Gong successfully governed Qi state using Huang-Lao methods, though Confucians often disparaged this approach. Through personal practice, Zheng discovered that seated meditation (jingzuo) and restraining desires indeed brought physical-mental harmony and freedom from illness. He argued these principles could extend to statecraft—why were they effective only in Qi? In truth, Confucian and Huang-Lao teachings share the same essence.
Finally, the passage cites Xue Hui's (courtesy name Juncai) Collected Explanations of Laozi, prefaced by Gao Shusi. The preface notes that Laozi (born in Bozhou) originally expounded the profound Dao of heaven, but post-Han interpretations became fragmented, breeding misconceptions. Only through Xue Hui's deep scholarship was Laozi's true doctrine clarified anew. The work was completed in 1530 (Jiajing era, gengyin year).
This passage explores the fundamental connections between the thought of Laozi and Confucius, critiquing the later scholarly tendency to oppose these two sages. It argues that the Great Dao (the ultimate principle of the universe) is ultimately unified, though sages expressed it through different approaches. Just as Confucius, when interpreting the Qian hexagram in the Book of Changes, emphasized the heavenly virtue (De) manifested in "using the nines" (the wisdom of yang lines transforming into yin) — being strong yet capable of gentleness — this aligns essentially with Laozi's way of yielding flexibility. This is why Confucius praised Laozi as "like a dragon."
True scholars most fear failing to comprehend the unity of heavenly principle (Tian Dao) and human affairs (Ren Dao). Since ancient times, none has surpassed Laozi in discussing benevolence, righteousness, rites, and music, yet this doesn't mean he didn't understand heavenly principle. None has surpassed Confucius in discussing yin-yang and strength-flexibility, yet this doesn't mean he didn't understand human affairs. Sages simply adapted their teachings to different audiences, yet people persistently regard what wasn't explicitly stated as grounds for suspicion. This has led those studying Laozi to reject Confucianism and Confucian scholars to reject Laozi. Understanding human affairs without heavenly principle approaches foolishness; understanding heavenly principle without human affairs approaches delusion. Evaluating sages through such partial perspectives is fundamentally mistaken.
Some claim Laozi's work merely discusses health cultivation, but the way of sages integrates inner and outer cultivation: internal self-cultivation brings health and longevity, while external application brings smooth governance and peace. The sage-kings' statecraft and self-cultivation share the same essence — how could there be any separation? Sadly, such profound understanding faded with the passing of ancient sages, and few today can truly grasp it.
The passage concludes by mentioning Master Xue Hui (style name Kaogong), who retreated to Bozhou for twelve years devoted to scholarship. In the Gengyin year, he completed his two-volume Collected Explanations of Laozi. The author first wrote a preface for its publication, after which Master Xue continuously revised it until reaching final form in the Dingyou year. This commentary, with its subtle philosophical insights, harmonizes various schools through the doctrine of the Mean (Zhongyong), standing as the most comprehensive study of Laozi since the Han dynasty. Yet the author laments: in today's world where even genuine understanding of Laozi is rare, who can truly appreciate Master Xue's scholarly contribution?
In my youth when reading the Laozi, I perceived it as containing the principles by which ancient rulers governed the world—simple and unadorned, yet difficult for later monarchs to apply. However, with sincere study, it could indeed help reduce selfish desires and achieve orderly governance. As my experience grew, I realized its philosophy didn’t conflict with the Way of the sages and could be applied in practice, though its language was often exaggerated and obscure, making it hard for ordinary people to grasp. Some, in their eagerness to convince others, even embellished it with supernatural claims, only to be dismissed by Confucian scholars as mere texts on self-cultivation.
The teachings of the ancient sages were originally all about cultivating oneself and governing the world, differing only in depth of understanding and purity of insight. Sadly, later generations avoided discussing Laozi’s doctrines, nearly causing this wisdom to vanish. I once sought the true distinction between Confucius and Laozi from two scholars: Master Wang Chunfu of Wucheng believed that Laozi (Dan) and Confucius (Nifu) shared the same fundamental ideas but expressed them differently. Laozi lived in the collapsing Zhou dynasty, yearning for a return to simplicity, hence his vehement language. Just as Confucius said, "Without humaneness, what use are rites?" Laozi declared, "Rites are the remnants of fading loyalty and trust, the beginning of disorder"—clearly more extreme.
Later, Master Cao Defang enlightened me with a brilliant analogy: when sages discuss the Dao (the Way), it’s like naming the sky—the Central Plains call it tian, the Xiongnu call it chengli, but the essence is the same. The Dao of Heaven does not proclaim itself; it is people who insist on debating names. True seekers of the Dao should transcend verbal disputes. Both men deeply understood Laozi’s true meaning, and now, comparing them with the annotations of the Examination Official, I am even more convinced. The Book of Changes states, "All paths under Heaven lead to the same destination, though by different routes." Scholars often fixate on surface differences and attack each other, failing to see the underlying unity.
This passage discusses Li Zhi (style name Hongfu)'s colophon written when he published Su Zhe's (style name Ziyou) commentary on the Laozi in Jinling. He uses the analogy of food to illustrate the relationship between Confucian and Daoist thought.
Li Zhi observes that southerners prefer rice while northerners favor millet, each considering their own staple the most delicious. If they were to exchange foods, they might initially find it unfamiliar but wouldn't completely reject it. The teachings of Confucius and Laozi (Kong-Lao) are like these regional staples—each possesses its own excellence. Just as truly hungry people aren't picky about food, those who genuinely comprehend the Dao won't stubbornly cling to any single school of thought.
He recounts a personal experience: during his studies in the north, he was caught in heavy snow and went without food for seven days. When his host served millet, the famished Li Zhi thought it the most exquisite delicacy under heaven, only realizing afterward it was ordinary millet. His host remarked: "The food hasn't changed—it's your extreme hunger that made it taste exceptional." From this, Li Zhi realized seeking the Dao is like eating when starving—why must one distinguish between Confucian or Daoist teachings?
Thereafter, he devoted himself passionately to Daoist studies day and night. When he read Jiao Hong's (style name Ruohou) edition of Su Zhe's Laozi commentary, he considered it the finest among all interpretations. Su Zhe ingeniously used the Doctrine of the Mean's concept—"When joy, anger, sorrow, and pleasure have not yet arisen, this is called the Mean (Zhong)"—to explain Laozi's "profound mystery of all things." This unique insight excavated subtle essences from surviving texts, illuminating the five-thousand-character Daodejing as clearly as daylight. Li Zhi deemed such commentary indispensable for Dao practitioners.
Li Zhi (style name Hongfu) composed this colophon in the winter of the second year of the Wanli era. With deep emotion, he remarked: Over five hundred years had passed since Su Zhe (style name Zizhan) annotated the Laozi, yet never had he expected to encounter such an exquisite interpretation—this could only be grasped by those truly thirsting for the great Dao.
Having previously published Su Zhe's Commentary on Laozi, Li Zhi penned his own two-volume Explication of Laozi the following year. In the preface, he reflected: "Whenever I read Han Feizi's Explication of Laozi, I cannot help but lament for this Legalist representative—with Han Fei's remarkable talent, he ultimately met his end at the hands of Qin. How could this be considered true understanding of Laozi's thought?" Han Fei interpreted wuwei (non-action) as political stratagem, completely deviating from Laozi's original intent. Just as weakness and strength, courage and non-contention represent diametrically opposed realms, how could Legalists like Shen Buhai and Han Fei possibly have inherited the true essence of Laozi's Dao and De (Virtue)?
Su Shi (style name Zizhan), after fruitlessly seeking Laozi's true meaning, reluctantly concluded: "Laozi's teachings emphasize wuwei while neglecting governance." Li Zhi countered: "If this were truly the case, wouldn't Laozi's philosophy become the root cause of Han Fei's cruelty and harshness?" In reality, Laozi wasn't incapable of governance—he achieved it precisely through "not governing deliberately." Just as those who truly cherish their bodies don't overexert them, those who genuinely care for the world don't forcibly interfere with it. The ancient sage-kings' promotion of benevolence, righteousness, rituals, and music were, in Laozi's view, not fundamental to governance—let alone severe laws and punishments.
Thus the entire Laozi discusses only Dao and De, never mentioning benevolence or righteousness—for while "benevolence" may appear wuwei, it still involves deliberate effort, whereas "righteousness" is entirely artificial. Laozi's way of governing takes emptiness as its constant principle and following nature as its guiding tenet: like all rivers flowing seaward, it willingly occupies the low position; it opposes warfare and slaughter, using arms only as last resort; it considers victory disgraceful, retreat as advancement, failure as success; it recognizes the mutual transformation of fortune and misfortune, gain and loss; it takes non-knowing as true knowledge, non-desire as true desire, and namelessness as true name—who dares say wuwei cannot govern? People simply fail to comprehend the subtle function of wuwei.
As for why Han Fei revered Laozi? Li Zhi reveals the truth: Because following nature spontaneously represents the highest art of imperial statecraft.
This passage examines the core principles of Huang-Lao thought (the governing and self-cultivation doctrines attributed to the Yellow Emperor and Laozi) and subsequent misinterpretations by later generations.
The essence of Huang-Lao philosophy lies in its paradoxical wisdom: what appears contrary to common sense actually embodies restraint. When rulers govern with "a heart that cannot bear to see suffering" (compassion for their people's hardships), their benevolent policies may yield slow results but ultimately achieve universal harmony. Conversely, forcibly suppressing desires through harsh measures may seem effective initially, but inevitably breeds greater calamities.
The author criticizes those seeking quick results for distorting Laozi's teachings—misinterpreting Wuwei (non-action) as laissez-faire permissiveness while turning restraint into cruel oppression. Just as Legalist thinkers like Shen Buhai and Han Feizi warped Daoist philosophy to justify tyranny, and Confucian emphasis on benevolence inadvertently led to regicide and usurpation, all schools of thought inevitably deviate from their original meanings during transmission.
Though admitting his own fiery temperament and fondness for Han Feizi's writings, the author ultimately reveres Laozi's wisdom. He compiled the "Textual Analysis of Laozi" after discovering how the Daode Jing had been arbitrarily altered during transmission—such as deleting particles to meet the arbitrary 5,000-character count—with even the Tang Dynasty's official Kaiyuan era commentaries acknowledging revisions. He argues that Sima Qian's assertion that "Laozi wrote a text of five thousand characters" ironically prompted later tampering with this classic.
This passage records the textual variants of the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue) compiled by Ming dynasty scholar Jiao Hong (style name Ruohou) in his work Laozi Yi. He placed the version he considered correct in the main text while listing variant readings in an appendix titled "Textual Variants" for scholars interested in ancient texts.
Chapter 2 contains these notable differences:
- "斯恶已" appears as "斯恶矣" in some editions
- "皆知善之为善" has an additional "天下" before "皆" in certain versions
- "有无相生" appears without the introductory "故" in some texts, while others insert "之" before "相"
- "万物作焉而不辞" is written as "作而不为始" elsewhere
- "功成而不居" varies as "功成不处"
- "夫唯不居" appears as "不处" in alternative editions
Chapter 3 variants include:
- "使心不乱" written as "使民心"
- "圣人之治" with an added "也" after "治"
- "使天知者不敢为也" missing either "敢" or "也"
- "则无不治" appearing as "无不为矣"
Chapter 4 shows these divergences:
- "冲" written as "盅"
- "或不盈" as "不满"
- "渊兮" with "兮" replaced by "乎"
- "湛兮似或存" lacking the "兮" particle
- "吾不知其谁之子" omitting the "之" character
Chapters 5 through 8 document similar textual variations:
- "不屈" appearing as "不诎"
- "多言" as "多闻"
- "天地根" expanded to "天地之根"
- "天长地久" written as "天也长久"
- "非以其无私耶" with "非" replaced by "不"
These collation notes demonstrate the natural textual evolution that occurred during the Daode Jing's transmission, reflecting the organic changes inherent in handwritten classical texts over centuries of copying and circulation.
This passage elucidates key concepts from several chapters of the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue), noting minor textual variations between editions. Chapter Nine teaches that maintaining humility and non-contention, willingly occupying positions others avoid, brings one closer to the Dao (the fundamental principle of the universe). Like water that flows downward yet nourishes all things, truly wise individuals refrain from flaunting their brilliance and know when to withdraw after achieving success.
Chapter Ten describes how practitioners of the Dao should emulate the purity and naturalness of an infant, preserving their innate authenticity. Chapter Eleven employs the metaphor of pottery-making ("kneading clay") to illustrate the dialectical relationship between "non-being" (emptiness) and "being" (form).
Chapter Thirteen focuses on the principle that "favor and disgrace equally disturb the mind." Both receiving praise and suffering humiliation unsettle the spirit because they stem from excessive concern for personal gain. Those who transcend such attachments regard the world as more significant than themselves—only such individuals are fit to govern. While different editions vary in phrasing (using either "entrusting the world" or "committing the world"), the core message remains consistent.
Chapter Fourteen portrays the mysterious nature of the Dao: invisible, inaudible, and intangible, yet undeniably real. These three attributes are ultimately unified in what is called "indistinct and vague" (a state of primal chaos). By grasping this ancient and enduring Dao, one gains mastery over present phenomena.
Chapter 15
Those who have attained the Dao act with utmost caution, as if crossing a winter river. They treat others with reverence, as though receiving honored guests. Their minds remain pure like uncarved wood (the "pu" or primal simplicity), their hearts expansive as open valleys, their thoughts profound like turbid waters (symbolizing all-encompassing acceptance). Just as muddy water gradually clears when left undisturbed, tranquility brings enduring stability. By maintaining this original state, they achieve lasting renewal ("bi bu xin cheng" means not pursuing superficial novelty).
Chapter 16
Observing the cyclical patterns of all things, one returns to the source of life ("fu ming" signifies returning to natural essence) through stillness. Though the myriad things flourish in complexity, all ultimately return to their roots. Understanding this principle leads to impartiality; impartiality aligns with the heavenly Dao ("wang nai tian" means conforming to natural law), ensuring lifelong freedom from peril.
Chapter 17
The most accomplished rulers (those embodying the Dao) govern so subtly that people barely notice their presence. Those of lesser attainment earn their people's affection and praise. Inferior rulers inspire fear, while the worst meet with contempt. When sincerity is lacking, people naturally distrust. The truly wise ("you xi" describes prudence) seldom issue commands, yet affairs resolve naturally, and the people believe these outcomes arose spontaneously.
Chapter 18
Only when the great Dao declines do benevolence and righteousness appear. Family discord gives rise to emphasis on filial piety. National turmoil brings loyal ministers to prominence (showing how these virtues emerge as remedies for the Dao's absence).
Chapter 19
Relying solely on these three methods—cleverness, benevolence-righteousness, and cunning artifice (referring to the governing approaches mentioned above)—proves utterly inadequate for proper statecraft.
Chapter 20
How vastly different are those who follow the Dao from ordinary people! The multitudes bustle about as if attending a grand feast ("ru xiang" depicts lively scenes), while Dao cultivators maintain serene detachment, their purity resembling that of newborn infants.
This passage describes the state and realm of Daoist practitioners, as well as the relationship between the Dao and all things.
When cultivators reach profound spiritual attainment, their awareness becomes as clear and expansive as viewing distant landscapes during springtime ascents, while maintaining inner caution and humility. This state appears indistinct and muddled (闷闷), like drifting on boundless dim seas without discernible shores. What distinguishes Daoist practitioners from ordinary people lies in their emphasis on nurturing the fundamental root (食母, meaning returning to the origin of the Dao).
Chapter 21 explains that within the trance-like state of reverie (芒芴), one can nevertheless perceive the Dao's authentic presence. The subtle Qi (气) contained within is of utmost purity and genuineness.
Chapter 22 emphasizes that cultivation requires uprightness without pretense—this isn't empty rhetoric.
Chapter 23 employs natural phenomena as metaphors: fierce winds don't last all morning—if Heaven and Earth can't sustain such intensity, how much less can human affairs? Those who follow Dao and De (德) become unified with them, while those who deviate become unified with deviation. The Dao gladly receives those in harmony with it. Where sincerity is deficient (信不足焉), this accord will be lost.
Chapter 24 observes that standing tiptoed (跂) appears unnatural from the Dao's perspective—even the myriad things detest such posture, so those possessing Dao refrain from it.
Chapter 25 portrays the Dao's boundlessness (寥兮/寞兮), reluctantly calling it "Great." Within the cosmos exist Four Greats: the Dao, Heaven, Earth, and the Sovereign (or "Humanity"), with the ruler (or humanity) being one among them.
Chapter 26 (incompletely presented) presumably continues elaborating the Dao's characteristics. These passages reveal practitioners' pursuit of unity with the Dao and the Dao's nature of nurturing all existence.
The Laozi Yi documents textual variants across different versions of the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue), focusing on discrepancies in Chapters 27 to 31. This passage highlights how key terms appear differently in ancient manuscripts:
For instance, in Chapter 27, the phrase "善行" (skillful action) appears as "善行者" (one who acts skillfully) in some early editions. The term "筹策" (counting rods, ancient calculating tools) is rendered "善数者无筹" (one who calculates skillfully needs no rods) in older texts. The expression "救物" (saving things) appears as "而" (yet/but) in the Ye edition, while Fu Yi's version omits it entirely—only the Heshang Gong commentary preserves the original wording.
Chapter 28's "大制不割" (the great system cannot be divided) appears as "大制无割" (the great system has no divisions) in ancient manuscripts. Chapter 29's reference to "天下神器" (the sacred vessel of the world, denoting state power) includes an additional introductory particle "夫" in early editions. The character "呴" (to exhale) appears variously as "歔," "嘘," or "噤" across different versions.
Chapter 30's discussion on military strategy contains the famous line "大军之后必有凶年" (after great armies pass, years of calamity follow), which is absent from stele inscriptions. The phrase "果而已" (stop when the aim is achieved) concludes with an additional particle "矣" in ancient texts. The expression "不道" (not in accordance with the Dao) appears as "非道" (contrary to the Dao) in both early manuscripts and stele engravings.
Chapter 31's reflections on warfare present "恬淡为上" (tranquil detachment is supreme) in more complete form in ancient editions, clarifying that only this approach preserves one's fundamental nature. To glorify killing, it warns, is to delight in slaughter—such people can never fulfill ambitions to govern the world. Stele versions replace "志" (aspiration) with "意" (intention) and omit the final particle "矣." The chapter concludes by advising rulers to observe funeral rites when handling military affairs.
These textual variations reflect the Daode Jing's complex transmission history. Scholars compare these divergent versions to reconstruct the text closest to its original form.
The selected chapters of Laozi Yi primarily discuss the intrinsic nature of the Dao (the Way) and its wisdom for navigating life. Chapter 32 states that although the Dao appears simple and subtle ("pu" refers to its unadorned essence), all things under heaven naturally return to it, just as streams inevitably flow into rivers and seas. Here, the metaphor of rivers and seas illustrates the Dao's all-encompassing nature—everything effortlessly attains balance ("zi jun") without coercion.
Chapter 33 focuses on self-cultivation: understanding others is wisdom, but knowing oneself is true clarity ("zizhi zhe ming"). Here, "ming" (clarity) surpasses "zhi" (wisdom), emphasizing the importance of inward reflection. Conquering others may demonstrate strength, but mastering oneself is true power ("zisheng zhe qiang"), and contentment brings genuine abundance.
Chapter 34 describes the Dao's characteristics: the great Dao flows everywhere yet leaves no trace ("fan" signifies pervasiveness). It nurtures all things without claiming ownership and may even be called "small" (referring to its humility), as all things return to it without its domination. The chapter concludes by highlighting the Dao's greatness precisely because it never asserts itself as great.
Chapter 35 mentions those who grasp the great symbol ("daxiang," representing the Dao). Their words may seem plain ("dan hu qi wu wei"), even flavorless, yet their meaning is profound. This "flavorlessness" describes the Dao's unadorned expression, which contains infinite depth.
Chapter 36 explores dialectical principles: contraction ("xi") prepares for expansion, and gentleness overcomes rigidity. The famous line, "To take, one must first give," reveals the law of transformation inherent in all things.
Chapter 37 returns to fundamentals: if rulers can preserve the Dao's simplicity ("zhen zhi yi wu ming zhi pu"), all things will naturally settle into harmony. When desires cease ("bu yi yi jing"), the world finds peace of its own accord.
Chapter 38 distinguishes higher De (Virtue/Power) from lower De: the highest De ("shang de") aligns with nature and avoids contrived action, while lesser De ("xia de") involves deliberate effort. This contrast reveals that true morality flows naturally from within.
This passage from Laozi Yi primarily documents textual variants found in different versions of the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue), revealing how ancient texts evolved through transcription. The highlighted chapters touch upon core Daoist principles:
Chapter 39 expounds the principle of "attaining the One." All beings rely on this fundamental "One" for existence ("All things attain the One to live"). Should rulers lose this foundation ("having nothing to uphold as their root"), their lofty positions would likely collapse ("they will surely topple"). Like a carriage without its axle ("counting chariots yet having none"), it may appear ornate but cannot move; true treasures (like jade) often seem unadorned ("standing alone like uncut jade").
Chapter 41 discusses varying levels of enlightenment. Supreme De (Virtue/Power) embodies Wuwei (non-action) yet accomplishes all ("Highest De does not act yet nothing is left undone"), while inferior De strains through effort yet achieves nothing ("Lower De acts yet has nothing to accomplish"). When hearing the Dao, the shallow-minded laugh ("On hearing the Dao, the inferior laugh heartily")—precisely revealing the Dao's profundity. Hence the ancient adage: Advancing on the Dao seems like retreating ("Progress on the Dao appears as regression"), and level paths appear rugged.
Chapter 42 mentions the "teaching father" (fundamental pedagogical principle), emphasizing mutual learning through "what others teach, I too shall teach." Chapter 43 illustrates how "the softest penetrates the hardest" ("Nothingness enters the seamless"), demonstrating supreme suppleness overcoming rigidity, like water permeating solid objects.
These textual variants show that ancient Daode Jing manuscripts differed in phrasing—such as "dwelling in thickness rather than thinness" (abiding in simplicity, not superficiality) or "dwelling in substance rather than ornament" (rooted in essence, not ostentation)—while maintaining consistent philosophical essence. Wang Bi's (the renowned Three Kingdoms-era Xuanxue scholar) commentary edition exhibits character variations like "discard" versus "still" or "praise" versus "chariot" compared to other ancient texts, reflecting subtle evolutionary changes during transmission.
These scriptural passages reveal Laozi's profound teachings on Wuwei (non-action). Through observation, I've come to understand the benefits of Wuwei (non-interference, following natural flow), though few can truly attain this state.
Laozi points out: excessive attachment inevitably leads to great depletion. Maintaining a state of empty tranquility ("chong" signifies emptiness, "qu" indicates pliability) with a serene, non-active attitude becomes the true standard for governing the world.
He warns humanity: the greatest transgression is indulging desires, the gravest calamity being insatiable greed. Thus, only those who understand contentment can achieve true fulfillment. Genuine wisdom doesn't require distant journeys - one can comprehend worldly affairs without leaving home, perceive heavenly principles without gazing out windows. The farther one travels, the more one may actually distance oneself from the Dao.
In the pursuit of learning and spiritual cultivation, we must continually reduce desires and attachments. When reaching the state of Wuwei, one paradoxically accomplishes everything. Those who wish to govern the world through forceful means will ultimately fail to achieve true governance.
Laozi further observes: authentic virtue manifests as a state of undifferentiated wholeness ("hun qi xin" describes a mind returning to primal simplicity), possessing the purity of an infant. Human life originally brims with vitality, yet excessive artificial movement leads toward death. These teachings consistently emphasize preserving natural authenticity and minimizing human interference.
This passage examines textual variants and annotations across several key chapters of the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue). Chapter 51 mentions the phrase "abundance of life" (生之厚) which in ancient versions includes an additional final particle "也", while "land without death" (无死地) similarly appears with an extra "焉" in older texts. These differences illustrate variations in the use of function words across editions.
Chapter 52 discusses how "the beginning" (有始) appears with an additional "可" in ancient manuscripts, while "knowing its mother" (得其母) appears in some versions as "knowing its oneness" (知其一). Such subtle distinctions reflect different interpretive traditions of Laozi's thought among transmitted versions.
Chapter 53 notes that "the people prefer shortcuts" (民好径) appears in certain editions as "the people greatly prefer shortcuts" (民甚好径), emphasizing degree. The term "chief of robbers" (盗竽) appears elsewhere as "boastful robber" (盗夸), both referring to behavior contrary to the Dao. These variants demonstrate textual changes during ancient copying processes.
Chapter 54 explores differences in describing "those good at building" (善建者), where "their descendants' sacrifices never cease" (子孙祭祀不辍) appears in some versions as "generations continue sacrifices without end" (世世祭祀不绝). These comparisons reveal the rich diversity in the text's transmission history.
Chapter 55 describes how those of "profound virtue" (含德之厚) remain innocent like infants, noting how "venomous creatures" (毒虫) cannot harm them. Ancient versions write the character for "choking" (嗄) as "㱊", reflecting dialectical or scribal variations. The chapter concludes by observing how violent actions contrary to the Dao inevitably meet destruction.
A true knower of the Dao does not engage in empty talk (ancient texts add the character "也" after "言"), for the Dao itself can neither be distanced nor harmed, nor can it be belittled (ancient versions prefix these phrases with "亦").
Chapter 57
Governing a state with proper administration (ancient texts use "政" for "正") prevents unnecessary complications (the Dazhen version substitutes "为" for "事"). How do I comprehend the principles governing the world? Precisely because when people excessively pursue clever techniques, all manner of strange phenomena emerge (ancient texts read: "when people become overly shrewd, wickedness arises"). If rulers maintain purity and simplicity, the people naturally return to innocence (the Heshang Gong edition adds: "When I remain dispassionate, the people naturally become clear").
Chapter 58
What appears muddled (ancient texts use "闵闵") actually contains profound sincerity (ancient texts use "偆偆"). Within misfortune lies the seed of fortune, while fortune harbors the roots of misfortune (Han Feizi and ancient versions state: "Misfortune leans on fortune; fortune harbors misfortune"). Humanity has been lost in confusion for a long time (Han Feizi reads: "Human confusion has persisted for ages"; other versions say: "The people's confusion has indeed lasted long").
Chapter 59
No method surpasses frugality ("若" sometimes appears as "如"), which we call early adherence to the Dao (Han Feizi uses "以" for "谓" and "复" for "服"). This enables continuous accumulation of De (Virtue/Power) (Han Feizi states: "This is called accumulating De in layers"), ultimately reaching unfathomable depths. Only when roots grow deep and trunks stand firm (Han Feizi writes: "deepen its roots, solidify its base" - "柢" sometimes appears as "蒂") can lasting stability be achieved.
Chapter 60
Governing a large state (Han Feizi reads: "Those who govern large states") resembles cooking small fish (the character "烹" should not include the "fire" radical). When spiritual beings cause no harm (Han Feizi adds "也"), sages likewise harm no people (Han Feizi states: "do not injure the people").
Chapter 61
All things in heaven and earth interact and merge, wherein the feminine always overcomes through stillness (alternate versions read: "the convergence of heaven and earth's feminine"). Because stillness naturally assumes the lower position (ancient texts state: "through stillness it therefore remains below"; the Sima version omits this phrase), the mightier something becomes, the more it should maintain humility.
The selected chapters of Laozi Yi primarily elucidate the profound mysteries of the Dao and its wisdom for navigating life. Chapter 62 states that the Dao is a treasure for the virtuous, capable of absolving transgressions. Here, the "Dao" refers to the fundamental principle underlying all phenomena in the cosmos. Daoist practitioners believe that aligning with the Dao can dispel calamities and resolve difficulties.
Chapter 63 discusses the method for handling complex challenges: begin with what is simple. All difficult undertakings in the world must start from their easiest aspects, and great endeavors must commence with small steps. Those who make promises lightly often struggle to fulfill them, and those who underestimate tasks ultimately encounter obstacles. Thus, the sage (one who has attained the Dao) consistently approaches every matter with earnestness, thereby avoiding genuine difficulties.
Chapter 64 emphasizes preventing problems before they arise: preparations should be made before events unfold, and order should be established before chaos emerges. A massive tree grows from a tiny sprout; a nine-tiered tower is built from accumulated earth; a thousand-mile journey begins with a single step. The sage follows the natural course (Wuwei, non-action) and thus does not fail; by not clinging to possessions, nothing is lost. People often falter when success is within reach, but if one remains cautious throughout, failure can be averted.
Chapter 65 points out: governing a state with cunning and cleverness brings misfortune, whereas refraining from such methods brings blessings. Understanding the distinction between these two approaches to governance means grasping the principle. This principle is the "profound De (Virtue/Power)," which enables people to return to their original simplicity and align with nature.
Chapter 66 employs the metaphor of rivers and seas: because they willingly occupy the lowest position, they can accommodate countless tributaries. If a sage wishes to lead the people, they must remain humble; if they wish to guide the people, they must place their own interests last. Though positioned above the people, the people will not feel burdened; though standing before them, they will not feel obstructed. Thus, the world gladly supports such a leader without weariness.
The selected chapters from Laozi Yi primarily discuss the Daoist approach to governance and military strategy, centered on the core principle of overcoming hardness with softness and achieving victory through non-contention.
Chapter 68 states that truly skilled commanders do not rely on brute force or aggression (here "士" refers to military leaders), and those adept at defeating enemies avoid direct confrontation. This represents the highest wisdom since ancient times.
Chapter 69 expounds on military strategy: Ancient military texts advise maintaining composure as if no enemy exists and handling weapons as if holding nothing. Underestimating opponents risks losing one's most precious quality (referring to the virtue of "慈" or compassion). When two armies face each other, the side embodying compassion ultimately prevails.
Chapter 70 observes that the world fails to understand this principle, hence no one can practice it. Precisely because others don't comprehend my way, my philosophy becomes valuable. Like sages wearing coarse hemp garments (褐), their outward simplicity conceals profound wisdom.
Chapter 71 explains: Sages remain flawless because they vigilantly recognize faults as faults—thus achieving faultlessness (here "病" denotes shortcomings or errors).
Chapter 72 emphasizes: When facing grave threats, rulers must avoid oppressing the people (狹 meaning coercion). Only by refraining from oppression can rulers avoid being rejected by their subjects.
Through military metaphors, these chapters articulate the Daoist core tenet that "softness overcomes hardness," advocating governance through compassion and non-contention while rejecting authoritarian force. The recurring concept of "慈" (compassion) represents a crucial Daoist virtue denoting tolerance and benevolent empathy.
Chapter 74 states: When people no longer fear death, what threat can rulers hold by brandishing executions? Forcing oneself to act as Heaven's executioner (the "Minister of Death" refers to divine beings governing life and death) is like an amateur pretending to be a carpenter wielding an axe—rarely does one avoid injuring one's own hand. This warns rulers against abusing punitive measures.
Chapter 75 analyzes the root causes of people's hardship: When the people starve, it's because taxes are too heavy; when taxes become crushing, it's because rulers pursue extravagant living. Only those who don't prioritize personal indulgence truly understand valuing life. Here "valuing life" (guisheng) refers to cultivating reverence for life's essential nature.
Chapter 76 employs natural metaphors: Tender plants survive while armies that rely on brute strength ultimately fail. What appears strong often occupies the inferior position—just as great trees snap easily while tender grass bends unbroken in the wind. This illustrates the Daoist core principle that "the soft overcomes the hard."
Chapter 77 uses archery as allegory: Drawing a bow requires perfect balance, just as the Dao of Heaven takes from excess to supplement deficiency. Only those who embody the Dao (those who comprehend natural laws) can achieve without claiming credit. The phrase "displaying worthiness" (jianxian) implies true sages never deliberately showcase their abilities.
Chapter 78 emphasizes water's nature: Nothing under heaven is softer than water, yet it penetrates the hardest stone. Though all know the principle that weakness conquers strength and gentleness overcomes hardness, few can practice it. Here "altering its nature" (yizhi) refers to water's unchanging character, demonstrating that soft power derives from steadfast authenticity.
These chapters of Laozi Yi expound profound principles for human conduct. Chapter 79 states that even when major grievances are reconciled, residual resentment may remain. Those who truly possess De (Virtue) handle affairs with the impartiality of a contract holder, showing no partiality to either side.
Chapter 80 depicts an ideal social condition: though the people possess various tools, they seldom use them; they value life and are reluctant to travel far or migrate. In the most harmonious age, people are content with their own food, satisfied with local customs, and find joy in their occupations. Though neighboring states may hear each other's roosters and dogs, the people have no desire to visit one another.
Chapter 81 reveals: Truly benevolent people don't rely on clever arguments, while those who love debate often lack true kindness. The Dao of heaven operates without deliberate accumulation—it functions spontaneously. Here the text emphasizes returning to simplicity, a teaching that appears contrary to common wisdom yet contains profound meaning.
Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5h0056); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback