中文 · EN

《冲虚至德真经解(江遹)》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 6 volumes 134,827 characters

About this page. The original text of 《冲虚至德真经解(江遹)》 (Taixuan 太玄部, 6 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 57 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

Vol. 1

冲虚至德真经解(江遹) > 经名:冲虚至德真经解(江遹),收录于《中华道藏》四子真经。 经名:冲虚至德真经解。宋人江遹撰。二十卷。底本出处:《正统道藏》洞神部玉诀类。(另有《四库全书》本八卷)。 冲虚至德真经解卷之一 宋杭州州学内舍生臣江遹进 天瑞 子列子居郑圃,四十年人无识者。 解曰:子列子,古之善为士者也。微妙玄通,其藏深矣,不可测究,故居郑圃四十年,人无识者。圃泽多贤,居四十年而无有识者,然后有以见其藏用之深,《易》所谓退藏於密。 国君卿大夫视之,犹众庶也。 解曰:德足以君国、道足以养人者,宜劳於求贤也。智足以率众者,后有以见其藏用之深,《易》所谓退藏於密。 国君卿大夫视之,犹众庶也。 解曰:德足以君国、道足以养人者,宜劳於求贤也。智足以率众者,宜哲足以知人也。国君卿大夫阮之,犹众庶,此所以为深不可识。 国不足,将嫁於卫。
Interpretation

Master Liezi (that is, Lie Yukou, a Daoist figure of the Warring States period to whom the book Liezi is traditionally attributed) lived in a garden in the state of Zheng, and for forty years no one recognized him. This was because he was a scholar of ancient times skilled in cultivating himself and conducting himself properly; his subtle, mysterious, penetrating, and unobstructed De (Virtue/Power) was deeply concealed and not exposed, making him difficult to fathom. In Puze there were many worthies, yet even after he had lived there in seclusion for forty years no one recognized him—precisely showing how deeply he had “hidden” himself. This accords with the meaning of “withdraw and hide in the hidden and subtle” (retire and conceal oneself in a profound and subtle place) as stated in the Xici (Great Commentary) of the Zhouyi (Book of Changes).

The ruler and the high officials regarded him no differently from ordinary commoners. The commentary holds that one whose virtue is sufficient to govern the state and whose arts of the Dao are sufficient to nourish the people should diligently seek out worthy talents; and one whose wisdom is sufficient to lead the multitude should be wise enough to recognize others. That the ruler and high officials looked upon him as an ordinary person precisely shows that he was unfathomable.

The phrase “the state was insufficient, and he was about to move to Wei” literally means that supplies or provisions in the state were insufficient, and he was about to go to Wei to make a living.

解曰:国不足,年饥也。世之学列子者,以其能御风而行,妄意其不食五谷,而以吸风饮露为事,殊不知一涉乎人间世则人道之患均所不免。故其书首言此,将俾后之学者务求其道,而不行怪以骇俗也,《说符》亦曰:子,而以吸风饮露为事,殊不知一涉乎人间世则人道之患均所不免。故其书首言此,将俾后之学者务求其道,而不行怪以骇俗也,《说符》亦曰:子列子穷容貌,有饥色。 弟子曰:先生往无反期,弟子敢有所谒,先生将何以教?先生不闻壶丘子林之言乎? 解曰:以虚容为体,以中庸为道,兼覆万物者,壶丘子林也。此所以为子列子之师。 子列子笑曰:壶子何言哉?虽然,夫子尝语伯昏瞀人,吾侧闻之,试以告女。 解曰:列子之师壶子,相视而笑,莫逆於心。若伯昏瞀人者,年齿长而聪明衰,故壶子不得已而语之,列子得侧闻之也。《庄子》曰:知而不言,所以之天。列子之於壶子如此。又曰:知而言之,所以之人。壶子所以语伯,故壶子不得已而语之,列子得侧闻之也。《庄子》曰:知而不言,所以之天。列子之於壶子如此。又曰:知而言之,所以之人。壶子所以语伯昏瞀人以此。 其言曰:有生不生,有化不化。不生者能生生,不化者能化化。生者不能不生,化者不能不化。
Interpretation

Jiang Yu explains: The state’s grain is insufficient because the harvest has failed. People in the world who study Liezi, seeing that he could ride the wind and travel, wildly speculate that he did not eat the five grains, and they take inhaling wind and drinking dew as a matter of cultivation. They little realize that once he enters the human world, he cannot avoid the various misfortunes of the human way. Therefore the book Liezi discusses this matter at its opening, wanting later people to devote their minds to seeking the Dao and not to startle the ordinary world with bizarre behavior. The “Shuofu” chapter also says: Liezi was poor and in straits, and his face bore the signs of hunger.

The disciple said: Master, you are going away now, and we do not know when you will return. I venture to ask: with what will you instruct us? Have you not heard the words of Huqiu Zilin?

Jiang Yu explains: Taking emptiness, stillness, and inclusiveness as the root, and the Mean as the great Dao, one who can embrace and cover all things is Huqiu Zilin (that is, Hu Zi, Liezi’s teacher).

Liezi said with a smile: What did Hu Zi say? Even so, my teacher once spoke with Bohun Maoren (another teacher and elder of Liezi), and I overheard it; I will try to tell you.

Jiang Yu explains: Liezi and his teacher Hu Zi looked at each other and smiled; their minds were in accord, with no barrier between them. Bohun Maoren was advanced in years, and his keen intelligence had declined, so Hu Zi had no choice but to speak to him; thus Liezi was able to overhear. The Zhuangzi says: To know but not speak is to accord with the Dao of Heaven; to know and speak is to accord with the Dao of humanity. Liezi’s attitude toward Hu Zi was precisely this. Hu Zi’s reason for telling Bohun Maoren also arose from this same cause.

Hu Zi’s words were: Things that have life possess an aspect of the unborn; things that undergo transformation possess an aspect of the untransformed. The unborn can make the ten thousand things generate life without cease; the untransformed can make the ten thousand things transform and continue without end. Living things cannot but live; transforming things cannot but transform.

(This passage speaks of the relation between the substance and function of Dao: the substance of Dao is silent and unmoving, without generation or transformation, and yet it is the root of the generation and transformation of the ten thousand things. The ten thousand things have generation and transformation, but the source of generation and transformation itself is neither generated nor transformed.)

解曰:天之神,地之富,圣之所以为圣,物之所以为物,一言而尽其道者,生化而已。故《天瑞》之训,首明此焉。夫形体区别,迁谢不停,此为有生有化。太易未兆,真常不变,此为不生不化。囿於有生,曰趋於化,安能生生?役於有化,终归於尽,安能化化?生者受化,彼无生者奚有於化?化者终灭,彼不化者初无起灭。纭纭之生,皆其真心之所显示,是为能生生。扰扰之变,皆其妙心之所发起,是为能化化。既已有生,则不能不生。既已有化,则不能不化。虽天地之大,日月之明,一囿於生化之示,是为能生生。扰扰之变,皆其妙心之所发起,是为能化化。既已有生,则不能不生。既已有化,则不能不化。虽天地之大,日月之明,一囿於生化之域,则若有机缄而不能自已,或运转而不能自止。时变岁迁,终古不息,而况於万物乎?生者不能不生,则生生者亦不能不生生。化者不能不化,则化化者亦不能不化化。生生化化,莫穷其端,且生且化,不知其纪,是天地之所以含万物而无穷,道之所以含天地而无极也。虽然,所谓不生不化,初不可名化化,莫穷其端,且生且化,不知其纪,是天地之所以含万物而无穷,道之所以含天地而无极也。虽然,所谓不生不化,初不可名,因有形无强为之名,是以生化者之外非更有不生不化者也,即生化而不生不化之妙寓乎其中矣。故其言曰:有生不生,有化不化。以言有生者实未尝生,有化者实未尝化。而其所以为生化,亦不在外,亦不在我,自生自化而已。观其首言有生不生,有化不化,既已尽其道矣。不得已明夫生生化化之理,终必归之自生自化也。若夫寓生化之境而顺其生化,即生化之中而不制於生化,则万物之生皆吾心之真体,万物之化皆吾心之妙用,此圣人之所以为圣,而子列子垂训之旨也。
Interpretation

The wondrousness of Heaven and Earth and the bounty of the earth, the reason sages become sages and the myriad things become myriad things—if one were to sum up their principle in a single phrase, it is “generation” and “transformation.” Thus the teachings of the “Tianrui” chapter of the Liezi make this clear at the very outset.

Forms are each distinct and constantly shift and pass away—this is having generation and transformation. Yet the Great Change (Taiyi, the primordial state described in the Liezi before the cosmos has shown any signs) has not yet manifested any omens, and the true nature is eternal and unchanging—this is non-generation and non-transformation.

Those limited by “having generation” can only tend toward “transformation”—how could they attain unceasing generation? Those enslaved by “having transformation” ultimately return to extinction—how could they achieve ceaseless transformation? Only things that have generation are subject to change; how could things without generation undergo change? What has transformation ultimately perishes; what does not transform has from the beginning neither arising nor perishing.

The teeming, bustling generation is all the manifestation of the true mind; the teeming, bustling transformation is all the activation of the wondrous mind. Therefore it can “generate generation” and “transform transformation.” Once there is generation, it cannot but generate; once there is transformation, it cannot but transform. Even Heaven and Earth, vast as they are, and the sun and moon, bright as they are, are all confined within the domain of generation and transformation, as if some mechanism were pulling them along so that they cannot stop themselves, or as if they were being turned and cannot halt on their own. As time shifts and the years roll on, never ceasing through the ages—how much more so for the myriad things?

That which generates cannot but generate; then that which causes generation to generate also cannot but generate generation. That which transforms cannot but transform; then that which causes transformation to transform also cannot but transform transformation. Generation upon generation and transformation upon transformation—their starting point cannot be investigated; as they generate and transform, their end is unknown. This is precisely why Heaven and Earth can encompass the myriad things without exhaustion, and the Dao can encompass Heaven and Earth without limit.

Nevertheless, what is called “non-generation and non-transformation” originally cannot be named; only because there are forms and shapes is it reluctantly given a name. Therefore, outside generation and transformation there is no other thing that is non-generated and non-transformed; the wondrous principle of non-generation and non-transformation resides precisely within generation and transformation. Hence the scripture says: “There is generation, yet it is not generated; there is transformation, yet it is not transformed.” This means that what is called generation has in fact never truly generated, and what is called transformation has in fact never truly transformed.

That which causes them to become generation and transformation is neither outside nor in me; it is simply self-generation and self-transformation. Looking at the scripture’s opening statement, “There is generation, yet it is not generated; there is transformation, yet it is not transformed,” the principle has already been stated exhaustively. If one is compelled to elucidate the principle of generation upon generation and transformation upon transformation, it must in the end return to “self-generation and self-transformation.”

As for lodging one’s body in the realm of generation and transformation while complying with generation and transformation, and being situated within generation and transformation without being constrained by them—then the generation of the myriad things is the true substance of my mind, and the transformation of the myriad things is the wondrous function of my mind. This is why sages are sages, and it is also the essential purport of Liezi’s handed-down teachings.

故常生常化。常生常化者,无时不生,无时不化, 解曰:所谓常生常化者,通古今万物而也。 故常生常化。常生常化者,无时不生,无时不化, 解曰:所谓常生常化者,通古今万物而为言造化之至理也。即一物以观,既化而生,又化而死。以气之暂聚者为生,则不得为常生;以形之迁灭者为化,则不得为常化。盖造化之於万物,方生则其化固不停,已死而其化犹自若。化固有常,生亦无间,如俾一物在造化之中,其生其化容秋毫之间,则生化之理或几乎熄矣。尝谓物之生死犹日之昼夜,日出为昼,日没为夜,昼安可以言生,夜安可以言灭,此所谓无时不生,无时不化也。老君《道经》首章言常道几乎熄矣。尝谓物之生死犹日之昼夜,日出为昼,日没为夜,昼安可以言生,夜安可以言灭,此所谓无时不生,无时不化也。老君《道经》首章言常道常名、常无、常有,语道而不至於常,不足以为众妙之门也。 阴阳尔,四时尔。 解曰:阴阳播而为四时,凡属乎有生之域者,随其陶运而不能自己,然而道散而为阴阳,其生化特寓於有形者尔。常生常化之妙,不即是而见之也。其曰阴阳四时尔云者,盖小之也。 不生者疑独,不化者往复。其际不可终,疑独,其道不可穷。
Interpretation

Scripture One: Therefore there is constant generation and constant transformation. “Constant generation and constant transformation” means that at no time is there no generation, and at no time is there no transformation.

The phrase “constant generation and constant transformation” is spoken with regard to the way all things, ancient and modern, are interconnected; it speaks of the fundamental principle of the transformative workings (the natural transformative nurturing of Heaven and Earth). Seen from the standpoint of an individual thing, no sooner has it come into being than it is changing; while it lives it is changing, and when it dies it is also changing. If one counts “the temporary aggregation of Qi (vital energy)” as generation, it cannot be called “constant generation”; if one counts “the shifting and perishing of bodily form” as transformation, it cannot be called “constant transformation.” For the transformative workings, as they relate to the ten thousand things, when a thing has just been born its transformative nurturing has not ceased, and when it has already died that transformative nurturing continues as usual. The transformative workings are fundamentally constant, and there is no interruption between generation and transformation. If, within the transformative workings, a single thing had even the slightest gap between its generation and its transformation, the principle of generation and transformation would nearly be extinguished.

Someone offered an analogy: the life and death of things are like the alternation of day and night. When the sun rises it is day; when it sets it is night. Day cannot be called “generation,” nor can night be called “extinction.” This is what is meant by “at no time is there no generation, at no time is there no transformation.” The first chapter of Laozi’s Daodejing speaks of “the constant Dao (the Way),” “the constant name,” “constant non-being,” and “constant being.” If one speaks only of Dao and does not reach the realm of “constancy,” it is not sufficient to be “the gate of all wonders.”

Scripture Two: “It is merely Yin-Yang; it is merely the four seasons.”

Explanation: Yin-Yang alternate in their movement and form the four seasons of spring, summer, autumn, and winter. All things that fall within the scope of life turn according to the molding and forging of Yin-Yang and cannot act on their own. Yet Dao disperses and becomes Yin-Yang; the function of generation and transformation is merely lodged in things that have form. The wonder of “constant generation and constant transformation” is not manifested only through Yin-Yang and the four seasons. To say “it is merely Yin-Yang and the four seasons” makes its meaning too small.

Scripture Three: “That which does not generate appears solitary; that which does not transform cycles back and forth. Its limits cannot be exhausted; being solitary, its Dao cannot be exhausted.”

Explanation: What does not generate and does not transform is steadfastly independent and does not move with change; what does not transform merely cycles back and forth. Their boundaries are endless, and that Dao of steadfast independence is likewise inexhaustible.

解曰:唯独也故能偶而应,而为群动之所属,是万物之所系而一化之所待也。然道不偶物,物自偶道,老君所谓似万物之宗,此之所谓疑独也。往复,即所谓无端之纪也。其际不可终,其道不可穷,是所以常生常化。 《黄帝书》曰:谷神不死,是谓玄牝。玄牝之门,是谓天地根。绵绵若存,用之不勤。
Interpretation

The commentary says: “Only by being alone” is why it can cooperate and respond with the myriad things, becoming the root to which the movements of the myriad things return and the foundation on which the myriad things depend and on which the creative transformations of Heaven and Earth rely. Yet the Dao itself does not go to match itself with things; it is things themselves that match with the Dao. What Laozi calls “seems to be the ancestor of the myriad things” is what is meant here by “Yidu” (seeming solitude—a transcendent existence that appears to stand apart from the myriad things). The cyclical coming and going and transformation of the myriad things is what is called “Wuduan zhi ji” (the beginningless fundamental order). The bounds of the Dao cannot be exhausted, and its workings cannot be exhausted; therefore it can forever generate and regenerate and ceaselessly change.

The Yellow Emperor’s Book (an ancient Daoist text attributed to the Yellow Emperor) says: The Valley Spirit (the mysterious Qi that is empty yet able to generate and nourish the myriad things) never dies; this is called the Mysterious Female (the deep and subtle mother that gives birth). The gate of the Mysterious Female is the root of Heaven and Earth. It continues unbroken, as if always present; use it, yet it is never exhausted.

The sentence “This is why it constantly generates and constantly transforms” explains the reason the Dao can enduringly generate and transform, and it connects with the preceding passage. The quotation that follows is the same as the preceding one, and its content is also an explanation of the Valley Spirit and the Mysterious Female.

解曰:,是所以常生常化。 《黄帝书》曰:谷神不死,是谓玄牝。玄牝之门,是谓天地根。绵绵若存,用之不勤。 解曰:谷虚而能应,应而不藏。人之生,冲气运乎一身而出入於鼻口,有谷之象。所谓谷神者,谷之神也,以言得一,以灵妙而不可测也。谷神不死,长生久视之道也。谓之不死者,含生之类,皆命於造化,役於阴阳。其生也,不得不生,其死也,不得不死。唯人为万物之灵,虽与万物均命於造化而有生,及其既生,则有造化之所不能死者。盖吾与天地分一气而治,自守本根,故我命在我,不属天地。及其既生,则有造化之所不能死者。盖吾与天地分一气而治,自守本根,故我命在我,不属天地。能常存其谷神,则其息以踵,冲和徧躯,有修身千二百岁而形未尝衰者,是虽有生而入於不死不生,而与道同久矣。故其言谷神,不谓之生而谓之不死也。玄者,天之色。牝者,地之类。飞曰雄雌,走曰牝牡,牝则至阴而能生生者也。形而上者阴先於阳,是以托言於此物之生生者为牝。谷神之生生不穷,是为玄牝,盖谷神之妙,用之於身则生身,施之於人则生人。能常存其神,则其为生岂有穷哉?其要妙若此,非玄牝曷足以命之?门以出入往来,为言谷神之在我,出入往来,间不容发。能常生而不死,则一体之盈虚消息不制於造化,而造化在我矣。天地之所以能长且久者,本於此道尔谷神之在我,出入往来,间不容发。
Interpretation

The valley is empty yet able to resonate with external things; after resonating, it does not retain them within. Human life consists in harmonious Qi circulating throughout the body, entering and exiting through the nose and mouth in breathing, and thus it has the image of a valley—empty and responsive to the myriad things. What is called the “Valley Spirit” (Gushen) is the wondrous nature of the valley; it is called “one” because it is numinous, wondrous, and beyond measurement. “The Valley Spirit does not die; this is the Dao of long life and enduring vision” means the method of cultivation by which one may endure for a long time.

The statement that it “does not die” is because all living things are governed by the transforming power of creation and are driven by the Qi of Yin-Yang: when born, they cannot but be born; when they die, they cannot but die. Only humans are the most intelligent of the myriad things. Although like all things they receive creative transformation and are born, after birth there is within them a part that creation cannot cause to die. This is because I share one Qi with Heaven and Earth and am thereby able to govern myself; able to guard my own root, my life is held in my own hands and does not belong to Heaven and Earth.

If one can constantly preserve and nurture the Valley Spirit, so that breathing is deep, long, continuous, and subtle as if reaching the heels, and the harmonious Qi fills the whole body, then one may become a person who cultivates the body to the age of one thousand two hundred years without physical decline. Such a one still has life, yet has already transcended birth and death and endures as long as the great Dao. Therefore it is called the “Valley Spirit”; it is not called “life” but “does not die.”

“Xuan” is the color of Heaven, that is, its deep, profound, and dark appearance. “Pin” belongs to the category of Earth and refers to the female. For birds one speaks of female and male; for beasts, of pin and mu. “Pin” is the most Yin, soft, and able to give birth. On the metaphysical level, Yin precedes Yang, and so this thing that ceaselessly generates and regenerates is borrowed to metaphorize the Valley Spirit and is called “Pin.” The Valley Spirit generates without end, and so it is called the “Mysterious Female” (Xuanpin). The wondrous function of the Valley Spirit is that within the body it nourishes oneself; extended to others, it nourishes others. If this spirit can be constantly preserved, how could what it transforms and generates ever be exhausted? Its essential wonder is like this—if not for the two words “Mysterious Female,” what else could one use to name it?

“Gate” refers to the passage of coming and going. Here it metaphorizes the Valley Spirit within my body, which comes and goes with inhalation and exhalation, with no gap between them even for a hair. If one can long preserve life without dying, then the body’s waxing and waning, decrease and increase, are no longer constrained by creation, and the power of creation is instead held in my hands. The reason Heaven and Earth can endure is precisely through this principle.

能常生而不死,则一体之盈虚消息不制於造化,而造化在我矣。天地之所以能长且久者,本於此道尔。故曰:玄牝之门,是谓天地根。绵绵若存,则谷神之体也。用之不勤,则存神之道也。绵绵以言弱而不绝也,一息往来乎一身之内,可谓弱矣。能常生而不死,是为不绝。夫唯绵绵,是以若存而非有非无也。用之不勤,则《孟子》所谓以宜养而无害。其为气也,不可废而不用,其用之亦不可以勤。不用则是宋人之不耘苗也,用之而勤则是宋人之揠苗也。唯用之不勤,而复能充塞乎天地之间,而谷神不死也。《道授》云:太素传者,浩然虚映景中之道言也,老君所谓谷神是也。谷神若是,所以灭生死之根之间,而谷神不死也。《道授》云:太素传者,浩然虚映景中之道言也,老君所谓谷神是也。谷神若是,所以灭生死之根而常生不死也。 故生物者不生,化物者不化。自生自化,自形自色,自智自力,自消自息。谓之生化,形色、智力、消息者,非也。
Interpretation

To be able to live long without dying means that the body’s fullness and depletion, its waxing and waning, are no longer governed by Zaohua (the transformative work of Heaven and Earth and nature); rather, Zaohua is held in one’s own hands. The reason Heaven and Earth can endure for long lies fundamentally in this principle. Hence it is said: “The gate of the mysterious female (Xuanpin: the deep and subtle gate of generation, the root from which all things are born and transformed in emptiness)—this is called the root of Heaven and Earth.” (From Laozi, chapter 6.) “Continuous, as if existing” refers to the substance of the Valley Spirit (Gushen: the empty, numinous, deathless spiritual entity, so called because a valley is empty yet can echo).

“Continuous” describes something faint yet unbroken. A person’s exhalation and inhalation come and go within the body and may be said to be extremely faint, yet the ability to live long without dying is precisely this unbrokenness. Because it is continuous and unbroken, it seems to exist and seems to perish; it is neither truly existent nor entirely nonexistent.

“Use it without diligence” is what Mencius means by “nourish it properly and do not harm it.” This qi cannot be discarded and left unused, but when using it one must not be too urgent or painstaking. Not using it is like the man of Song who did not weed and let the seedlings go to ruin; using it too urgently and diligently is like the man of Song who pulled up the seedlings to help them grow and instead suffered harm. Only by using it without haste or impatience can it fill the space between Heaven and Earth, and thus the Valley Spirit does not die.

The Daoshou says: “That which was transmitted by Taishu is the discourse of the Dao within the vast, empty luminosity that reflects the myriad phenomena—namely, what Lord Lao called the Valley Spirit.” Since the Valley Spirit is like this, it can cut off the root of birth and death, and therefore constantly lives without dying.

Thus, that which can generate and nourish the myriad things does not itself generate; that which can transform and nurture the myriad things does not itself transform. The myriad things generate themselves and transform themselves; they have their own forms and colors, their own wisdom and power, and their own waxing and waning, arising and resting. If one understands “generation and transformation” as form and color, wisdom and power, waxing and waning, then one is mistaken.

解曰:继谷神不死而言此者,能存其谷神,则即吾身之生化而有不生不化之妙,无待於生生化化,是为自生自化。由一身之自生自化则知物物皆自生自化矣。尝原生化之道,一本於自然,谓之生生化化,是二生化矣。以为自生自化,若无所缘矣。犹堕言说,盖生化之道离於言说,无有称谓,谓之生化,离道已远,必於谓之生化,亦知其非,然后为至。且万物之变,不可胜穷,等为生化尔。别而言之,则有形色智力消息之异,,将明道之赡足万物,而於小不遗,知其非,然后为至。且万物之变,不可胜穷,等为生化尔。别而言之,则有形色智力消息之异,,将明道之赡足万物,而於小不遗,故言其别如此。 子列子曰:昔者,圣人因阴阳以统天地。
Interpretation

The explanation says: Continuing from the preceding passage, “The Valley Spirit does not die,” this means that if one can nurture and preserve one’s own “Valley Spirit” (Gushen)—that is, the fundamental Qi that is empty, still, and unmoving—then one can realize that within one’s own generation and transformation there is a wondrous function that is neither generated nor transformed, and one need not rely on the process of ceaseless generation and transformation. This is called “self-generation and self-transformation” (zisheng zihua). From the self-generation and self-transformation of one body, one can know that the myriad things also self-generate and self-transform.

Investigating the Dao of generation and transformation, it is originally rooted in spontaneity. To call it “ceaseless generation and ceaseless transformation” already divides “generation and transformation” into two. If one believes that only self-generation and self-transformation matter, as though nothing at all were involved, then one falls into words and nominal appearances. The Dao of generation and transformation is originally beyond speech and without name; once it is called “generation and transformation,” it is already far from the Dao. Therefore, after speaking of “generation and transformation,” one must also understand that this very formulation is itself biased; only then has one reached the ultimate.

Moreover, the transformations of the myriad things are inexhaustible and endless, and all are equally just generation and transformation. If one speaks of them separately, there are differences in form, color, wisdom, capacity, and waxing and waning. The reason for describing them separately is to explain that the great Dao is sufficient to nourish the myriad things and does not omit even the smallest things.

Master Liezi said: In former times, the sage governed Heaven and Earth according to the two Qi of Yin-Yang.

(Note: “Valley Spirit” refers to what Daoism calls the spirit of emptiness and stillness, the root of vitality; “self-generation and self-transformation” means that things grow and change without external force, in accordance with the principle of nature.)

解曰:语万物之生化,必本於阴阳。要阴阳之推迁,则囿於天地。究天地之造化,则统於圣人。盖天地虽大,未离乎有形,则不能无待以统。圣人虽一化之所待也,其於天地亦不能无所因以统。其统之也,又不能不因阴阳之宜也。且天地之道,初无所待,亦不可统矣。唯天地之化,必因於阴阳而不能无所待,圣人斯得因其所因而统之矣。能因阴阳而不拂万物自然之宜,万物各得由其道而各正性命矣。夫万物听命於造化者也,得圣人而后各正性命,则造化唯圣人之所因而统之矣。能因阴阳而不拂万物自然之宜,万物各得由其道而各正性命矣。夫万物听命於造化者也,得圣人而后各正性命,则造化唯圣人之从非能统天地而何统?言举此而彼从之也。近取诸身,首足象天地,呼吸犹阴阳,以直养而无害,则一身之气浩然充塞乎天地之间。莫或养之,则气马妄作而反动其心;养之而不以直,则为益生之不祥。故统一身者必本於我之直养,统天地者又在於圣人之因阴阳也。由是天地之造化虽不变於古今,圣人在上则能俾阴阳常调,日月常明,而政安平泰之俗也。故射之神人,使物不疵疠,而年谷熟。黄帝欲取天地之精以佐五谷,岂他道哉?因阴阳而已。噫,人之生也,莫不比形於故射之神人,使物不疵疠,而年谷熟。黄帝欲取天地之精以佐五谷,岂他道哉?因阴阳而已。噫,人之生也,莫不比形於天地,受气於阴阳,虽圣人亦无以异於人也。阴阳,役我者也,而圣人能因之。天地,生我者也,而圣人能统之。则谓圣人糠枇足以陶铸尧舜,信不疑矣。
Interpretation

The arising and transformation of all things in the world necessarily take Yin-Yang as their root. To understand the shifting and changes of Yin-Yang, one cannot depart from the scope of Heaven and Earth. To investigate the principles of Heaven and Earth’s creative transformation, one must attribute their governance to the sage. Heaven and Earth, though vast, still have form, and so cannot but rely on something to govern them. The sage, though also one among those within transformative nurturing, with respect to Heaven and Earth must also have something to rely on in order to govern them. The manner of governing, moreover, cannot but accord with the proper way of Yin-Yang.

The fundamental Dao (the Way) of Heaven and Earth originally has nothing on which to rely, and so there is no way to govern it. Only the transformative nurturing of Heaven and Earth necessarily depends on Yin-Yang and cannot be without a basis; only then can the sage follow what it relies on and govern it. Being able to accord with Yin-Yang without violating the natural nature of all things, all things each follow their Dao and rectify their nature and life. All things obey creative transformation and, receiving the sage’s guidance, can then each rectify nature and life. Therefore creative transformation is merely the object that the sage accords with and governs. Being able to accord with Yin-Yang without violating the natural nature of all things, all things each follow their Dao and rectify nature and life. All things obey creative transformation and, receiving the sage, then each rectify nature and life; thus creative transformation merely follows the sage’s arrangements. If this is not saying that the sage can govern Heaven and Earth, then what else could it be? This only says that when this point is raised, everything follows from it.

Taking an analogy from one’s own body: the head and feet are like Heaven and Earth, and breathing is like Yin-Yang. If one cultivates by the upright Dao without causing harm, then the Qi (vital energy) throughout the whole body becomes vast and fills the space between Heaven and Earth. If no one cultivates it, Qi moves recklessly and in turn disturbs the spirit (Shen); if one cultivates it but not by the correct Dao, then through excessive pursuit of nourishing life one invites misfortune. Therefore one who governs a body must root himself in his own upright cultivation; the governing of Heaven and Earth lies in the sage’s ability to accord with Yin-Yang.

Therefore, although the creative transformation of Heaven and Earth remains unchanged from ancient to modern times, when the sage is in a high position he can make Yin-Yang harmonized year-round, the sun and moon bright year-round, government affairs stable, and popular customs peaceful. Thus the divine person of Shegu Mountain can keep all things free from plague and make the five grains abundant. When the Yellow Emperor wished to take the essence of Heaven and Earth to assist the growth of the five grains, did he use some other method? It was nothing but according with Yin-Yang.

Alas, in human birth, all model their bodily form on Heaven and Earth and receive Qi from Yin-Yang. Even the sage is no different from ordinary people. Yin-Yang is the force that drives us, and the sage can accord with it; Heaven and Earth is the root that gives us birth, and the sage can govern it. From this one knows that even a chaff-like sage is enough to mold and cast figures like Yao and Shun; this is certain beyond doubt.

Notes on terms: Yin-Yang is a basic concept in Daoism and ancient philosophy, referring to the two mutually opposed and mutually dependent forces in the universe, such as cold and heat, day and night, movement and stillness. The sage here refers to a person whose virtue and wisdom have reached the highest level and who can accord with nature and govern the world. Upright cultivation (zhiyang) means cultivating body and mind by the upright Dao without causing harm, an extension of the idea in Mencius of “nourishing the vast Qi.” The divine person of Shegu is a legendary figure said to live on Shegu Mountain, not eat the five grains, inhale wind and drink dew, and be able to keep all things free from plague. “Molding and casting Yao and Shun” is a metaphor for producing sages like Yao and Shun through education and cultivation.

夫有形者生於无形,则天地安从生?故曰:有太易,有太初,有太始,有太素。 解曰:昭昭生於冥冥,有伦生於无形,万物皆天地之化生也。天地虽能生万物,犹未离于有形也。既已有形,则不能无自而生;如亦有生,则知其安所从生哉?莫知其所自生,则谓有形生於无形,亦不信矣。盖天地为有中之最巨,而难终穷者也,不可谓其无所从生也,莫能睹其所自生也。能即我之一身而穷其生生之理,则天地与我并生尔,又奚为而不可知哉?虽然,太初之无不可以言论也,所可言其无所从生也,莫能睹其所自生也。能即我之一身而穷其生生之理,则天地与我并生尔,又奚为而不可知哉?虽然,太初之无不可以言论也,所可言者,有而未形者尔,故自有太易而下明其序焉。所谓太易、太初、太始、太素,果何物哉?亦以夫道之自无生有者因其生出之序,拟诸形容而强为之名尔。 太易者,未见气也;太初者,气之始也;太始者,形之始也;太素者,质之始也。气形质具而未相离,故曰浑沦。浑沦者,言万物相浑沦而未相离也。视之不见,听之不闻,循之不得,故曰易也。易无形畔。
Interpretation

If things with form arise from the formless, then where do Heaven and Earth come from? Therefore the scripture says: there is Taiyi (the initial state of cosmic evolution, when Qi has not yet been seen), there is Taichu, there is Taishi, there is Taisu.

The commentary says: bright things emerge from the dark, ordered things emerge from the formless, and the myriad things are all generated and nurtured by Heaven and Earth. Although Heaven and Earth can give birth to the myriad things, they have still not escaped the category of “having form.” Since they already possess form, one cannot say they have no origin; but if they too arise from something, then whence do they arise? No one knows where they come from, and so to claim that formed things originate from the formless is also hard to believe. Heaven and Earth are the greatest among “being,” and the principle of their generation cannot be exhausted. One cannot say they have no source; it is only that people cannot see their source. If one can investigate within one’s own body the principle of ceaseless generation, one will understand that Heaven and Earth were born together with me—what then remains unknowable? Even so, as for the “Nonbeing” before Taichu, it cannot be discussed in words; what can be spoken of is only the state of “being but not yet formed.” Therefore, beginning with Taiyi, their sequence is explained in order. What exactly are Taiyi, Taichu, Taishi, and Taisu? They are merely based on the process by which Dao (the source of the myriad things) generates Being from Nonbeing; according to their sequence, descriptive terms are borrowed to name them provisionally.

Taiyi is the state in which Qi has not yet been seen; Taichu is the beginning of Qi; Taishi is the beginning of form; Taisu is the beginning of substance. Qi, form, and substance are all present but have not yet separated from one another, and so this is called Hundun (a chaotic, undivided state). Hundun means that the myriad things are blended together and not yet separated. Looked at, it cannot be seen; listened to, it cannot be heard; grasped, it cannot be touched—and so it is called “Yi.” “Yi” is without shape and without boundary.

解曰:太者,大之甚言也。形名而降,不足以拟其大,故以太名之。易者,变通不穷之谓也。故於其未见气,则名之太易。万物同乎太初,而后各有初,有初矣而未形,故以气之始为太初。万物成象於天,而成形於地。始之为字,从女从台,胎而女,可知也初,而后各有初,有初矣而未形,故以气之始为太初。万物成象於天,而成形於地。始之为字,从女从台,胎而女,可知也。胎者,形之始也,故以形之始者为太始。到於素,则在色为未受采,虽可名以素,而色未着焉,故谓之太素,而以质之始者名之。气形质之始虽具,而其序可拟,其道犹未判也。为天,为地,为圣,为物,同乎素朴而未离,是为浑沦也。形形而无有,安可视而循声?声而无闻,安可听而知?虽然,气形质之始即具,则其去太易也远矣。然犹浑沦而未离於易,故虽不可名之太易,犹曰易也。 易变而为一,一变而为七,七变而为九。九变者,究也,乃复变而为一。 解曰:一者,水之生数。七者,火之成数。精神既具,火腾水降,坎离交济,万化由是而显矣。七又变而为九,而万九变者,究也,乃复变而为一。
Interpretation

Tai is the ultimate expression of “great.” Things that have form and name are insufficient to compare with its vastness, and so the term Tai is used to designate it. “Yi” (Change) means transformation that penetrates and is inexhaustible. Therefore, when Qi has not yet manifested, it is called Taiyi (Great Change).

The myriad things are identical with Taichu (Great Beginning); only afterward does each acquire its own beginning. Once there is a beginning but as yet no form, the beginning of Qi is called Taichu. The myriad things manifest in heaven as qi-phenomena and congeal on earth into bodily form. The character shi (“beginning”) is composed of the elements nü (“woman”) and tai; a fetus is in a woman’s womb, and from this its meaning can be known. Tai (“fetus”) is the beginning of form, and so the beginning of form is called Taishi (Great Commencement).

As for Su, in terms of color it is still in an undyed state. Although it may be called Su, color has not yet attached to it, and so it is called Taisu (Great Simplicity), which refers to the beginning of material substance. Although the beginnings of Qi, form, and substance are all present, and their order can be inferred, the Dao has not yet clearly differentiated. Heaven, Earth, the sage, and the myriad things all share the same plain and uncarved essence and have not yet separated; this is called Hunlun (the state of undifferentiated chaos).

It has form yet is formless—how can it be seen with the eyes, or sought by following sound? It has sound yet cannot be heard—how can it be heard with the ears, or known through perception? Even so, since the beginnings of Qi, form, and substance are already present, it is far from Taiyi. Yet it remains undifferentiated chaos, not yet departing from the state of Yi; therefore, although it cannot be called Taiyi, it can still be called Yi.

Yi changes and becomes One; One changes and becomes Seven; Seven changes and becomes Nine. Nine is the limit of change, and so it returns again to One.

Explanation: “One” is the generative number of water (in the Hetu, “Heaven generates water with One”). “Seven” is the completing number of fire (“Heaven completes fire with Seven”). Once Jing (essence) and Shen (spirit) are present, fire rises upward and water descends downward; Kan (water) and Li (fire) intermingle and complete each other, and the transformations of the myriad things become manifest through this. Seven again changes into Nine; Nine is the end of change, and so it returns to One. Daoist cultivation often uses “the mutual assistance of Kan and Li” as a metaphor for water and fire assisting each other and the heart and kidneys interconnecting—that is, the harmonious balance of the two Qi of Yin-Yang.

解曰:一者,水之生数。七者,火之成数。精神既具,火腾水降,坎离交济,万化由是而显矣。七又变而为九,而万物之变尽矣。九,天数之穷也,穷则变,故复变而为一。数变无穷,如环之循,此天地造化之至理也。於水言生数,於火言成数。水,物生之方;火,物盛之方。且火之生数为次二,二不能变故也。老君《德经》言:一生二,二生三,三生万物。盖言水一而火二次之,精具而神从之。天肇一於北,地耦二於南,人成位乎三,三才具而万象分矣。老君言物之生,列子言物之变,其数虽不同,莫不自一以始,而资水火之用也。由是知圣人之教,一出焉,一入焉,互明於道而已矣。 一者,形变之始也。 解曰:一之为数,虽离於道而未耦於物,故一为形变之始。天一生水,精所舍也。人一者,形变之始也。 解曰:一之为数,虽离於道而未耦於物,故一为形变之始。天一生水,精所舍也。人之生,天一在藏,本立始也。万物之化生,皆本於天地含精,此一所以为形变之始。《庄子》谓通於一而万事毕,非以其达形变之始而然欤。 清轻者上为天,浊重者下为地,冲和气者为人;故天地含精,万物化生。
Interpretation

Number Principles and Water and Fire

This commentary begins with the meaning of numbers. “One” is the generative number of water, meaning that water takes One as its starting point and generates the myriad things; “Seven” is the completion number of fire, meaning that fire takes Seven as its number of completion. After a person’s Jing (essence) and Shen (spirit) are both complete, fire rises and water descends; Kan (water) and Li (fire) intersect and mutually assist, and the transformations of the myriad things become manifest from this. Seven further changes into Nine, and Nine is the limit of heavenly numbers (the ancients regarded nine as the extreme of yang numbers). When things reach their extreme, they change; therefore Nine changes back into One, cycling without end. This is the fundamental principle of the creation and transformation of Heaven and Earth.

The commentary also says that water is spoken of in terms of its “generative number,” and fire in terms of its “completion number.” Water is the position from which the myriad things are generated; fire is the position in which the myriad things flourish. Fire’s generative number is Two, because Two occupies the secondary position and cannot itself change again, so it can only take Two as its generative number.

The One Generates Two, Two Generates Three

The commentary cites Laozi’s Daodejing: “The One generates Two, Two generates Three, Three generates the myriad things.” Water is One; fire is Two, occupying the next position. Jing comes first, and Shen follows. Heaven begins from One in the north; Earth pairs with Two in the south; Humanity dwells in the center and becomes Three. When Heaven, Earth, and Humanity—the Three Powers—are complete, the myriad phenomena differentiate.

Laozi discusses the generation of the myriad things; Liezi discusses their transformation. Although the numbers differ, both begin from “One” and rely on the function of water and fire. From this we know that in the sages’ teachings, “One” is the starting point and “One” is the conclusion; they illuminate one another, all in order to explain the great Dao (the Way).

The One Is the Beginning of the Transformations of Form

Here “One,” as a number, has already departed from the Dao but has not yet combined with concrete things; therefore it is the beginning of the transformations of form. Heaven’s One generates water, which is where Jing and Qi (vital energy) are stored. In the human body, the Heavenly One is stored within; this is the root of life. The transformation and generation of the myriad things all originate from the Jing and Qi contained in Heaven and Earth; “One” therefore becomes the beginning of the transformations of form. Zhuangzi says, “Penetrate the One and all affairs are completed.” This probably means that when one penetrates the beginning of the transformations of form, all affairs are brought to completion.

Heaven and Earth Contain Jing, and the Myriad Things Transform and Are Born

The clear and light Qi rises to become Heaven; the turbid and heavy Qi sinks to become Earth; the harmonious Qi becomes Humanity. Therefore Heaven and Earth contain and conceal Jing and Qi, and only then do the myriad things transform, nurture, and come to life.

解曰:天得一而积气,故清轻而覆物。地得一而积块,故浊重而载物。肃肃出乎天,赫赫发乎地,两者交通成和,冲和气者为人。万物之化生,均於得一而不能无待於生生化化,故又天地含精而后万物化生。不曰生化而曰化生,则已而复生,以言生化之无穷也。夫人之与物,均禀阴阳之和以成若生,载若形。特言冲和气为人者,有生虽均,而万物之生则有飞潜动植之异类、羽生,则已而复生,以言生化之无穷也。夫人之与物,均禀阴阳之和以成若生,载若形。特言冲和气为人者,有生虽均,而万物之生则有飞潜动植之异类、羽鳞介裸 之异属,其於阴阳不能无偏系也,则冲和气者唯人而已。 子列子曰:天地无全功,圣人无全能,万物无全用。故天职生覆,地职形载,圣职教化,物职所宜。然则天有所短,地有所长,圣有所否,物有所通。何则?生覆者不能形载,形载者不能教化,教化者不能违所宜,宜定者不出所位。故天地之道,非阴则阳;圣人之教,非仁则义;万物之宜,非柔则刚。此皆随所宜而不能出所位者也。
Interpretation

When Heaven obtained the “One” (the unified source of the Dao, the Way) and gathered it into Qi (vital energy), it became clear and light and thus able to cover the myriad things. When Earth obtained the “One” and gathered it into solid masses, it became turbid and heavy and thus able to bear the myriad things. The clear and solemn Qi issues from Heaven, while the bright and vigorous Qi issues from Earth; the two unite and communicate to form harmonious Qi, and what condenses this harmonious Qi—the balanced Qi formed by the blending of Yin-Yang—is the human being.

The transformation and generation of the myriad things all depend on obtaining the “One,” and they must ceaselessly generate and transform. Thus it is said that Heaven and Earth contain Jing (essence) and Qi, and only then can the myriad things be transformed and generated. It does not say “generation and transformation” (sheng-hua) but “transformation and generation” (hua-sheng), indicating birth upon birth, and thereby showing that generation and transformation are inexhaustible.

Humans and the myriad things all receive the harmony of Yin-Yang and thereby complete life and form. It is specifically said that “the harmonious Qi becomes the human being” because, although life shares a single source, the myriad things differ as birds, fish lurking in water, beasts, grasses and trees, and other categories, and they also differ in species: feathered, scaled, shelled (crustacean), and naked (animals without feathers, scales, or shells). They inevitably have some partiality in Yin-Yang; only humans receive the harmonious Qi, without bias or leaning.

Liezi (a Warring States Daoist figure; the book Liezi is attributed to him) said: Heaven and Earth do not have all-capable functions, sages do not have all-capable abilities, and the myriad things do not have all-complete uses. Therefore Heaven’s responsibility is to generate and cover, Earth’s responsibility is to bear and give form, the sage’s responsibility is to teach and transform, and the responsibility of the myriad things is for each to attain what is fitting. Seen in this way, Heaven has its deficiencies, Earth has its strengths, the sage has things he does not comprehend, and the myriad things have things through which they connect. Why is this? What can generate and cover cannot bear and give form; what can bear and give form cannot teach and transform; what can teach and transform cannot go against what is fitting to each; and once what is fitting is settled, it cannot exceed its own position. Therefore the Dao of Heaven and Earth is either Yin or Yang; the teaching of the sage is either benevolence or righteousness; what is fitting for the myriad things is either softness or hardness. All of these follow their respective fittingness and cannot exceed their proper station.

解曰:论天地圣人之道,则无不该也,无不徧也;语天地圣人之用,则既已降本流末,囿於形变之中,而各有所职矣。故天能天而不能地,地能地而不能天;圣宜通而有所否,物宜否该也,无不徧也;语天地圣人之用,则既已降本流末,囿於形变之中,而各有所职矣。故天能天而不能地,地能地而不能天;圣宜通而有所否,物宜否而有所通。以阴阳求天道,。则千岁之日可坐而致,以仁义求圣人之教,则帝王之功可端拜而议;以柔刚求万物,则扰扰之变可一二以数。盖一丽於形,则必不能出其宜定之位也。虽然,不违其宜,万物之微亦各有妙用。求其备,天地之大无全功。能常即其宜定之位而不逆其自然之性,则物物皆与天地同功。虽万变之殊,莫不融会於一政矣。 故有生者,有生生者,有形者,有形形者;有声者,有声声者;有色者,有色色者;有味者,有味味者。生之所生者死矣,而生生者未尝终;形之所形者实矣,而形形者未尝有;声之所声者闻矣,而声声者未尝发;色之生者死矣,而生生者未尝终;形之所形者实矣,而形形者未尝有;声之所声者闻矣,而声声者未尝发;色之所色者彰矣,而色色者未尝显;味之所味者尝矣,而味味者未尝呈。
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (True Scripture of Complete Emptiness and Perfect Virtue) is the Liezi; this is the annotation by the Southern Song scholar Jiang Yu.

When discussing the Dao of Heaven, Earth, and the sage, it omits nothing and is present everywhere. But when discussing the functions of Heaven, Earth, and the sage, they have already flowed from the root to the branches, are confined within the transformations of form, and each has its own office. Thus Heaven can only do Heaven’s work and cannot do Earth’s work; Earth can only do Earth’s work and cannot do Heaven’s work. The sage ought to penetrate all affairs, and yet there is that which he does not penetrate; the myriad things ought to have their obstructions, and yet there is that in them which penetrates.

If one investigates the Way of Heaven through Yin-Yang (the two basic forces by which the ancients summarized the unity of opposites in all things), then changes lasting a thousand years can be inferred while sitting at ease; if one investigates the sage’s teaching through benevolence and righteousness, then the achievements of emperors and kings can be discussed with hands folded; if one measures the myriad things through softness and hardness, then their complex transformations can be counted one by one. In general, once something has fallen into form, it necessarily cannot go beyond the position it ought to occupy. Even so, so long as they do not violate their respective allotments, even the smallest among the myriad things each has its wondrous function. If one seeks completeness, even the greatness of Heaven and Earth has no wholly perfect achievement. If each can constantly keep to its proper position and not violate its natural disposition, then every thing can share in the achievement of Heaven and Earth. Though their transformations are infinitely varied, none fail to merge into the same correct Dao.

Therefore, among living things there is that which causes them to live, the “life-producer”; among formed things there is that which causes them to take form, the “form-producer”; among sounding things there is that which causes them to sound, the “sound-producer”; among colored things there is that which causes them to show color, the “color-producer”; among flavored things there is that which causes them to have flavor, the “flavor-producer.” The things produced eventually die, but the “life-producer” that causes them to live never ceases; the forms that are completed are already full, but the “form-producer” that causes them to take form never appears; the sounds that are issued have already been heard, but the “sound-producer” that causes them to sound never issues forth; the colors that are displayed are already manifest, but the “color-producer” that causes them to show color never reveals itself; the flavors that are tasted have already been tasted, but the “flavor-producer” that causes them to have flavor never presents itself.

解曰:经曰:无无有无,有有无有。盖所谓有无者,非以有为有也,非以无为无也。由不有中有,不无中无,即有是无,即无是有,故有生者,有生生者。非生故有,非生生故无,有生不离於生生,生生不外乎有生。其有不有,其无不无。形声色味,亦莫不若是矣。是故不有形色声味,则无无之化不显,不有生生形形声声色色味味者,则有有之物不运。由是有生不可以言徼,生生不可以言妙,故形声色味虽有物之至粗,始终相续,其生不穷,资於人者无已也。且形色声味一体,固足以兼之,所以屡言之者,万物之生固有偏於声色臭味者矣。言此以明含生之类,情与无情,无非运於无为之职也。 皆无为之职也。且形色声味一体,固足以兼之,所以屡言之者,万物之生固有偏於声色臭味者矣。言此以明含生之类,情与无情,无非运於无为之职也。 皆无为之职也。能阴能阳,能柔能刚,能短能长,能圆能方,能生能死,能暑能凉,能浮能沉,能官能商,能出能没,能玄能黄,能甘能苦,能膻能香。无知也,无能也,而无不知也,而无不能也。
Interpretation

The scripture says: within Nonbeing there is Nonbeing, and within Being there is Being. The so-called “Being” and “Nonbeing” do not mean taking Being as concrete existence, nor taking Nonbeing as absolute empty nothingness. From “not-being” one can see Being, and from “not-nonbeing” one can see Nonbeing; therefore Being is Nonbeing, and Nonbeing is Being. The Being that can produce life itself also produces the principle of “endless generation” (sheng sheng), which enables life to multiply without cease. It is not that Being exists only because life exists, nor that Nonbeing exists only because there is endless generation. Formed life does not depart from the power that makes it live and generate without cease, and this power is not outside the formed. Being does not cling to being, and Nonbeing does not adhere to nonbeing.

Form, sound, color, and taste are likewise so. If there were no form, sound, color, and taste, the formless creative transformation—the transformation of Nonbeing—would have no way to manifest; if there were no power causing form, sound, color, and taste to be continuously generated and transformed, formed things could not operate. Therefore the principle of life cannot be delimited by words (jiao means boundary or exhaustion), and the mystery of “endless generation” cannot be fully expressed in words. Although form, sound, color, and taste are the coarsest aspects of the myriad things, they follow one another in succession, their vitality is never exhausted, and people’s use of them has no end.

Form, color, sound, and taste are originally one body and are in themselves sufficient to encompass one another. The reason they are spoken of repeatedly is that in the generation of the myriad things, some are more inclined toward sound, color, odor (smell), or taste. This is used to explain that all categories of living beings, as well as sentient and insentient things, are without exception accomplished through the operation of Wuwei (non-action—not deliberate contrivance, but according with nature).

The workings of Dao are such that it can be Yin and Yang, soft and hard, short and long, round and square, living and dying, hot and cool, floating and sinking, gong and shang (two of the ancient five notes, referring to the various transformations of sound), emerging and submerging, dark and yellow, sweet and bitter, mutton-odor and fragrant. It itself has no knowing and no ability, yet there is nothing it does not know and nothing it cannot do.

解曰:道常无为,而无不为。无为之职,即万变之宗主,而《庄子》所谓真宰也。夫唯无为,则不拘於阴阳,不制於柔刚,非方非体,不死不生,不丽於时,不着於物,不属於声色,不主於臭味。出气物,包形神,万物皆资其用,而我初不离此,所以无不知,无不能。体,不死不生,不丽於时,不着於物,不属於声色,不主於臭味。出气物,包形神,万物皆资其用,而我初不离此,所以无不知,无不能。老君所谓其用不可既也,是以职教化者必本於无为。
Interpretation

The essence of the Dao (the Way) is eternally wuwei (non-action), and yet there is nothing it does not do. Wuwei is the fundamental sovereign of the myriad transformations—what Zhuangzi calls the “Zhenzai” (True Master), the true sovereign that governs all things though it cannot be seen or touched. Precisely because it is wuwei, it is not constrained by Yin-Yang (the two fundamental forces that oppose and transform into each other), not limited by softness or strength, has no fixed shape or bodily form, knows no birth or death, is not bound by time, does not cling to particular things, does not depend on sounds or colors, and is not swayed by smells or tastes. It gives rise to the Qi (vital energy) and the forms and qualities of the myriad things; it encompasses both form and spirit; all things rely on it to function, and human beings have never departed from it. Therefore it knows all and can do all. Laozi’s phrase “its use cannot be exhausted” means that its function is never used up. Thus those charged with teaching and transforming others must take wuwei as their foundation.

子列子适卫,食於道,从者见百岁髑髅,攓蓬而指,顾谓弟子百丰曰:唯子与彼知而未尝生未尝死也。此过养乎?此过欢乎?种有几:若鼃为鹑,得水为继,得水土之际,则为鼃蠙之衣。生於陵屯,则为陵舄。陵舄得郁栖,则为乌足。乌足之根为蛴蟾,其叶为胡蝶。胡有几:若鼃为鹑,得水为继,得水土之际,则为鼃蠙之衣。生於陵屯,则为陵舄。陵舄得郁栖,则为乌足。乌足之根为蛴蟾,其叶为胡蝶。胡蝶胥也,化而为虫,生灶下,其状若脱,其名曰鸟句掇。鸟句掇千日,化而为鸟,其名曰乾余骨。乾余骨之沫为斯弥。斯弥为食酰颐辂。食酰颐辂生乎食酰黄軦。食酰黄軦生乎九猷。九猷生乎瞀芮,瞀芮生乎腐蠸。羊肝化为地皋,马血之为转磷也,人血之为野火也。鹞之为鹯,鹯之为布谷,布谷久复为鹞也。燕之为蛤也,田鼠之为鹑也,朽瓜之为鱼也,老韭之为苋血之为转磷也,人血之为野火也。鹞之为鹯,鹯之为布谷,布谷久复为鹞也。燕之为蛤也,田鼠之为鹑也,朽瓜之为鱼也,老韭之为苋也,老羭之为猨也,鱼卵之为虫。亶爰之兽自孕而生曰类。河泽之鸟视而生曰鶂。纯雌其名大腰,纯雄其名穉蜂。思士不妻而感,思女不夫而孕。后稷生乎巨迹,伊尹生乎空桑,厥昭生乎湿,酰鸡生乎酒。羊奚比乎不笋,久竹生青宁。青宁生程,程生马,马生人,人久入於机。万物皆出於机,皆入於机。
Interpretation

Liezi was on his way to Wei and stopped to eat. His attendants saw a century-old dried skull by the roadside; parting the fleabane and pointing at it, one turned to the disciple Baifeng and said, “Only you and it understand the principle of no birth and no death.” Then he asked again: “Does this mean nurturing life, or does it mean taking delight in being alive?”

What follows is the sequence of transformations of the ten thousand things as described by Liezi. A frog becomes a quail; on meeting water it becomes “Ji” (an ancient name whose referent is difficult to determine). At the boundary of water and earth, it becomes “Wabin zhi yi” (a moss-like plant attached to the water’s edge). Born on high hills, it becomes “Lingxi” (a kind of grass); when Lingxi receives shade and moisture, it becomes “Wuzu” (a kind of grass). The root of Wuzu becomes “Qichan,” and its leaves become butterflies.

The butterfly transforms into an insect that lives beneath the stove; its shape resembles a sloughed skin, and it is called “Niao Gou Duo.” After a thousand days, Niao Gou Duo transforms into a bird called “Qian Yugou.” Qian Yugou’s saliva becomes “Simi,” which in turn becomes “Shixi Yilu,” “Shixi Huangkuang,” “Jiuyou,” “Maorui,” and “Fuquan”—most of these being strange names found in ancient books.

Other transformations include: sheep’s liver becomes Digao (a kind of fungus); horse blood becomes Zhuanlin (phosphorescence); human blood becomes wildfire (will-o’-the-wisp). A harrier becomes a sparrowhawk, a sparrowhawk becomes a cuckoo, and after a long time the cuckoo changes back into a harrier. Swallows become clams; field mice become quail; rotten melons become fish; old leeks become amaranth; old billy goats become apes; fish roe becomes insects.

There are also creatures born without mating: the Danyuan beast conceives by itself and gives birth, and is called “Lei”; birds in the marshes and pools give birth by looking at one another, and are called “Yi.” Those entirely female are called “Da Yao”; those entirely male are called “Zhi Feng.” A man whose thoughts are fixed on another can be stirred without taking a wife; a woman who longs for another can conceive without marrying. Hou Ji was born after his mother stepped on a giant’s footprint; Yi Yin was born in a hollow mulberry tree; Juezhao was born in wet ground; vinegar flies are born in wine.

The root of all this is “Ji”—the fundamental motive force of the workings of creation and transformation. Sheep, bamboo, Qingning, Cheng, horse, and human generate one another in successive stages, and human beings in the end return to “Ji.” All things emerge from Ji and all return to Ji. Life and death are merely transformations of form; therefore Liezi says that only one who understands this principle can attain no birth and no death.

解曰:髑髅至於百岁,其游魂之所之,更而为人,亦已百岁而死矣。若化为物,则其更死更生,其化抑不可胜计矣。而为空髑髅者,方且髐然有形,则游魂所更之化亦已众矣。列子者,独悟一身之妙,而髑髅既更百岁之变,故列子指之曰:唯子与彼知而未尝死未尝生也。列子於之化亦已众矣。列子者,独悟一身之妙,而髑髅既更百岁之变,故列子指之曰:唯子与彼知而未尝死未尝生也。列子於是即其尝所见闻而知其种者托问於百岁髑髅,以明万物之变也。夫万物之生,或以情而生,或以想而有。因湿而生者,以合而感;由化而成者,以离而应。情想合离,更相变易。或以有情而化无情,若鼃之为陵舄;或以无情而化有情,若瞀芮生乎腐蠸;或以小而化大,或以大而化小。燕之为蛤,则飞者更潜;鼠之为鹑,则走者更飞。相视而化有,若河泽之鸟;自孕而生有,若鹯猨之兽。或一种而异化,若鸟足之为蛴蟾,为胡蝶,若鼃之为继,为鼃蠙之衣,为陵舄,其不同如此。其间若后稷生乎巨迹,尤化之特异,诗之所称,为可考者。要之,情与无情,或大或小,皆出入於机而均舍至理,无以相易也。所谓机特异,诗之所称,为可考者。要之,情与无情,或大或小,皆出入於机而均舍至理,无以相易也。所谓机者,果何物哉?万物若之何而出入哉?《素问》曰:出入废则神机化灭。盖万物之成败倚伏,生乎动,动而不已则变化作矣,故非出入则无以为生长壮老矣。然而出入虽异,其机则一;出入虽徼,其机则妙。机由出入而显,出入得机而运,不可谓出入为机也,亦不可离出入而求机也。一出一入,而神机默运矣。《易》以知机为神者,意以此欢?《黄帝书》可离出入而求机也。一出一入,而神机默运矣。《易》以知机为神者,意以此欢?《黄帝书》曰:天性,人也;人心,机也。而此书言万物之出机入机,亦特言人久入於机,岂不以人为万物之灵?故举以该之欤。
Interpretation

This passage is Jiang Yu’s exposition of the “skull” parable in the “Tianrui” chapter of the Liezi; its main theme is the generation and transformation of the myriad things.

After the skull has undergone a hundred years of transformation, if its wandering soul transforms into a human, it likewise lives a full hundred years before dying. If it transforms into other kinds of things, then it dies and is born again, is born and dies again, with transformations too numerous to calculate. That skull, with only an empty skeleton left, still displays the form of dry bones; thus one can see that the wandering soul has already undergone many transformations. Liezi—a Daoist figure of the Warring States period to whom the book Liezi is traditionally attributed—alone grasped the mystery of a single life, and this skull had already passed through a hundred years of transformation. Therefore Liezi said to it: “Only you and I know that we have never truly lived and have never truly died.” Liezi then used things he had seen and heard to ask the century-old skull about the origin of its kind, in order to elucidate the transformations of the myriad things.

Some of the myriad things arise from “feeling” (qing), and some come into being through “thought” (xiang). Those born by relying on moisture arise from the union and resonance of Yin-Yang; those formed through transformation arise from separation and mutual response. The aggregation and separation of feeling and thought alternate and transform into one another. Some transform from beings with feeling into things without feeling, as when a frog transforms into lingxi (a herbaceous plant); some transform from things without feeling into beings with feeling, as when maorui (a small insect) is born from decaying matter. Some go from small to large, and some from large to small. A swallow transforms into a clam: the flying becomes submerged; a rat transforms into a quail: the walker becomes a flyer. Some transform and are born by gazing at one another, like the birds in the marshes and lakes; some conceive and give birth by themselves, like beasts of the zhan and yuan kind. Some of the same kind transform into different forms, as when a bird’s foot becomes a qichan, becomes a butterfly; a frog becomes a ji, becomes the “garment of the wa and bin” (a type attached to things in water), and becomes lingxi—such is the extent of their differences. Among these, Houji (ancestor of the Zhou people), born from a giant’s footprint, is an especially extraordinary case of transformation; it is praised in the Book of Songs and is a verifiable example.

In sum, beings with feeling and things without feeling, the large and the small, all exit and enter in the operation of the mechanism (ji), equally follow the ultimate principle, and cannot replace one another. What, then, is the so-called mechanism? How do the myriad things exit and enter the mechanism? The Suwen says: “When exit and entry are abolished, the divine mechanism of transformation is extinguished.” It is probably that the success and failure, flourishing and decline of the myriad things are mutually dependent and all originate in movement; when movement does not cease, transformation follows, so without exit and entry there would be no growth, maturation, and aging. Yet although exit and entry differ, their mechanism is one; although exit and entry are evident, their mechanism is exceedingly subtle. The mechanism appears through exit and entry, and exit and entry operate by relying on the mechanism. One cannot say that exit and entry are the mechanism, nor can one seek the mechanism apart from exit and entry. Between one exit and one entry, the wondrous trigger operates silently. The Zhouyi (Book of Changes) regards “knowing the mechanism” as wondrous; perhaps this is also its meaning. An ancient book attributed to the Yellow Emperor says: “Heavenly nature is man; the human heart is the mechanism.” This book discusses the myriad things’ exiting from and entering the mechanism, and it particularly mentions that humans remain long immersed in the mechanism. Is this not because humans are the most intelligent among the myriad things? That is why it uses humans to encompass the myriad things.

2-冲虚至德真经解卷之二 冲虚至德真经解卷之一 冲虚至德真经解卷之二 宋杭州州学内舍臣江遹进 天瑞 《黄帝书》曰:形动不生形而生影,声动不生声而生响,无动不生无而生有, 解曰:寂然不动,常无观妙,常有观徼。徼妙并观,了不相涉。有感而动,则无不能。常无必入於有,有不能常有,必入於无,自然之运。,莫之能御矣。夫形声之於影响,未为无也,然处阴以休影响,久而声消,终亦必无而已矣。以夫无之不可以言生也,故言形声影响以托无也。《庄子》曰:万物以形相生。此以为不生形者必无而已矣。以夫无之不可以言生也,故言形声影响以托无也。《庄子》曰:万物以形相生。此以为不生形者,盖形虽相生,实非形能自生。有生生者,自无而生之尔。 形,必终者也,天地终乎?与我偕终。终进乎?不知也。道终乎本无始,进乎本不久。
Interpretation

The Book of the Yellow Emperor says: When a form moves, it does not directly produce a form but produces a shadow; when a sound vibrates, it does not directly produce a sound but produces an echo; when the formless moves, it does not produce non-being but produces being.

The commentary says: The state of silent stillness—“constant non-being,” observing from the perspective of non-being—is used to observe “subtlety” (miao), the subtle essence of Dao; “constant being,” observing from the perspective of being, is used to observe “boundary” (jiao), the boundary of Dao, namely the myriad things as they appear. “Subtlety” and “boundary” must be observed together before one can understand that the two are not unrelated. Once it is stirred by a stimulus and moves, there is nothing it cannot do. But “constant non-being” inevitably turns into “being,” and “being” cannot remain “being” forever either; it inevitably returns to “non-being” again. This is the operation of nature, and no one can stop it.

Form and sound, compared with shadow and echo, are not truly “non-being.” Yet if they are placed in darkness, shadows and echoes cease; after a long time, sound too disappears, and in the end they must return to “non-being.” “Non-being” cannot be directly described in words as to what it can produce, so perceptible things—form, sound, shadow, and echo—are borrowed to convey an explanation of “non-being.” Zhuangzi says, “The myriad things generate one another through form.” This means that what cannot produce form will ultimately return to “non-being.” Although forms generate one another, in reality it is not that form can generate itself; rather, there is a root that causes the myriad things to generate without cease, and it is merely from “non-being” that the myriad things are produced.

Physical forms necessarily have an end. Then will heaven and earth end? Heaven and earth end together with me. After the end, will there be further advance? This cannot be known. The “end” of Dao has from the outset no beginning; the “advance” of Dao is from the outset not long-lasting.

解曰:有则有尽,故有形必终。天地与我均囿於形,既已明其安从生,则亦宜知其终与否也。体道者谓天地与我并生,则其终也必与我偕终。终进乎?不知,是未始有终也。以夫天地与我犹不离形,故其言止於不知而已。若夫道,则离於形生而无始无终矣。始与终,为对者也,道本无始,安见其终也?久与近,为对者也,道本不久,安见其尽也? 有生则复於不生,有形则复於无形。不生者,非本不生者也;无形者,非本无形者也。生者,理之必道本不久,安见其尽也? 有生则复於不生,有形则复於无形。不生者,非本不生者也;无形者,非本无形者也。生者,理之必终者也。终者,不得不终,亦如生者之不得不生。而欲但其生,尽其终,惑於数也。 解曰:本不生者,初无生灭;本无形者,初无聚散。有生矣,则必复於不生;有形矣,则必复於无形。消息盈虚,自然之数也。生也,数起不得不生;死也,数穷不得不终。生死之去来,弗由我矣。惑者乃复认其缘尘之体,以为我蕲於久生而不死,斯不识夫固然之理矣。
Interpretation

The explanation says: Where there is a beginning, there is an end; therefore, anything with form must inevitably come to an end. Heaven and Earth and I are all confined within form. Since we already understand where they come from, we should also understand whether they will ultimately end. One who embodies the Dao (“tidao,” personally attuning to the Dao) says that Heaven and Earth arise together with me; then when they end, they must also end together with me. Will the end then arrive? He says he does not know, and this is precisely to say that it has never had an end. Because Heaven and Earth and I have still not escaped form, their words stop only at “I do not know.” As for the great Dao, it transcends the arising of form and has neither beginning nor end. Beginning and end are relative concepts; the Dao fundamentally has no beginning, so where could its end be observed? Long duration and brevity are also relative concepts; the Dao fundamentally does not speak of long or short duration, so where could its exhaustion be observed?

What is born returns to non-arising; what has form returns to formlessness. The so-called “non-arising” does not mean that originally there was no arising; the so-called “formless” does not mean that originally there was no form. Things that are born inevitably end according to principle. The end is unavoidable, just as birth is an unavoidable arising. Yet some people wish to prolong life and postpone the end; they are deluded by “shu” (the natural allotments and patterns of Qi).

The explanation says: That which is originally unborn has from the outset no birth and extinction; that which is originally formless has from the outset no gathering and dispersal. Once there is birth, it necessarily returns to non-arising; once there is form, it necessarily returns to formlessness. Waxing and waning, fullness and emptiness, are the natural Qi-allotment. When birth comes, the Qi-allotment rises, and one cannot but be born; when death comes, the Qi-allotment is exhausted, and one cannot but end. The coming and going of life and death are not under my own control. Deluded people, however, cling to a body attached to the dusty world (“yuanchen zhi ti,” meaning being immersed in worldly physical form) and believe they should seek long life and avoid death; this is failure to recognize the inherent principle of things.

精神者,天之分;骨骸者,地之分。属天清而散,属地浊而聚。精神离形,各归其真,故谓之鬼。鬼,归也,归其真宅。黄帝曰:精神入其门,骨骸反分。属天清而散,属地浊而聚。精神离形,各归其真,故谓之鬼。鬼,归也,归其真宅。黄帝曰:精神入其门,骨骸反其根,我尚何存? 解曰:人之生也,百骸、九窍、六藏赅而存焉,缘气暂聚,初非我体,清轻属天,浊重属地。逮其终也,精神离形,暖触斯散,动转自息,清还於天,浊还於地,各归其真,所谓我者,尚复何存?所贵乎道之善吾死者,以於物物各归其真之时,而不丧其我也。於斯而不亡我之所存,则制命在我,而造化不能沉沦矣。孔子曰:朝闻道,夕死可矣。孟子曰:寿夭不贰。颜回曰:回坐忘矣。皆此道也。 人自生至终,大化有四:婴孩也,少壮也,老耄也,死亡也。其在婴孩,气专志一,和之至也,物不伤焉,德莫加焉;其在少壮,则血气飘溢,欲虑充起,物所老耄也,死亡也。其在婴孩,气专志一,和之至也,物不伤焉,德莫加焉;其在少壮,则血气飘溢,欲虑充起,物所攻焉,德故衰焉;其在老耄,则欲虑柔焉,体将休焉,物莫先焉,虽未及婴孩之全,方於少壮,间矣;其在死亡也,则之於息焉,反其极矣。
Interpretation

Spirit belongs to Heaven and is the portion bestowed by Heaven; the skeleton belongs to Earth and is the portion bestowed by Earth. What belongs to Heaven is clear and light, and so it easily disperses; what belongs to Earth is turbid and heavy, and so it easily gathers. When spirit leaves the body, each returns to its original truth; this is why the dead are called “gui.” “Gui” means “return,” meaning to return to one’s true home. The Yellow Emperor said: When the spirit enters that gate (the gate of life and death) and the skeleton returns to its root, what then remains of me?

From birth to death, the hundred bones (the joints of the whole body), the nine orifices (the nine openings of the body), and the six viscera come together to form the body. These are merely a temporary gathering of Qi and are not originally the true body of “me.” Among them, the clear and light portion returns to Heaven, and the turbid and heavy portion returns to Earth. At death, the spirit leaves the body, body heat dissipates, and the body’s movement stops; the clear Qi returns to Heaven and the turbid Qi returns to Earth, each returning to its original truth. At this point, what remains of the so-called “me”?

Therefore, what the Daoists value as “being good at death” is precisely that when the ten thousand things each return to their original truth, one still does not lose one’s own nature. If one can at this point preserve that in which the “I” consists, then one can master life and death oneself, and the transformative forces of creation cannot make one sink or fall. Confucius said, “If one hears the Dao in the morning, one may die in the evening.” Mencius said, “Long life and short life do not make one twofold” (one’s resolve is not shaken by the length of one’s lifespan). Yan Hui said, “I have sat and forgotten” (sitting-forgetting, zuowang, is the state of forgetting body and mind and losing both self and things; it comes from the Zhuangzi). These all speak of the same principle.

A person’s life generally passes through four stages: infancy, youth and vigor, old age, and death. In infancy, the primordial Qi is undivided and the mind is simple; this is the most harmonious state. External things cannot harm the child, and De (Virtue/Power) needs no external embellishment. In youth and vigor, blood and Qi are abundant and overflowing; desires and thoughts surge up one after another, external things come to intrude, and De accordingly diminishes. In old age, desires and thoughts gradually soften, the body gradually rests, and external things no longer intrude first. Although this is not as complete as infancy, compared with youth and vigor there is some return. As for death, it is the stopping of breath, a return to the ultimate state of life.

解曰:人生之属乎造化也,新新不停,念念迁谢,举其大较,则有四焉。其序自然,不为贵贱而加损也。尝考德之与形,内外不相及矣。人之生也,其德之盛衰乃与形体相为消长,其理果安在哉?盖人之生,气之聚也。气专於婴孩,溢於少壮、休於老,息於死。夫或不能存我,而志不足以帅气,则内之所存几何而不为物流转?方生则唯化所役,已死则唯化是变,不知何时而已也。唯体道者能转物而不转何而不为物流转?方生则唯化所役,已死则唯化是变,不知何时而已也。唯体道者能转物而不转於物,虽亦顺化之变而不迁流於造化。其在婴孩,与人同其专一;至於少壮老耄也,终不失其赤子之心。虽有死也,适所以遂其寂静之常乐尔,是所谓之於息而反其极矣。
Interpretation

Human life is the coalescence of primordial Qi (vital energy). This passage discusses how life changes with the transformative workings of Nature, and how those who embody the Dao (the Way) transcend such changes.

Gist of the Original Text and Interpretation

The author first says that a person’s life is governed by zaohua—the transformative operation of Heaven and Earth—with its metabolism and thought-by-thought shifting, and can roughly be divided into four stages. This order is natural and is neither increased nor diminished by noble or lowly status.

He then discusses the relation between De (Virtue/Power) and form: De—here referring to a person’s inner virtue, Jing (essence), and Qi—and the physical body are not mutually entangled. Why, then, do the flourishing and decline of a person’s De rise and fall together with the physical form? The author holds that this is because human life is fundamentally a coalescence of Qi.

Qi is most concentrated and undivided in infancy, full in youth and prime, declining in old age, and dispersing after death. If a person cannot be self-mastering, and will and intention are insufficient to govern Qi, then how much De can remain within, without being pulled and swept along by external things? Therefore, while alive, everything is in bondage to the transformative process; after death, one merely follows its changes, not knowing when the end will come.

Only those who embody the Dao—those who truly realize the Dao—can transform external things without being transformed by them. Although they likewise accord with the changes of the transformative process, they do not drift along with them.

In infancy they are concentrated and pure just like ordinary people; in youth and old age they never lose the heart of the newborn infant. Even death simply perfects their constant joy within stillness; this is what is meant by “returning to rest and returning to the ultimate”—returning to stillness and returning to the root of life.

Explanation of Key Terms

Zaohua refers to the natural transformative process of Heaven and Earth, the overall process by which all things are generated and transformed. De here refers to a person’s inner virtue, Jing, and Qi, the inner foundation valued by cultivators. Embodying the Dao is the state of cultivation in which one personally realizes and unites with the Dao. The heart of the newborn infant is an infant-like state of purity and concentration, which Daoists regard as the fundamental state cultivators should maintain. Rest means stillness and cessation; it refers to the subsiding and return of Qi, as opposed to “life” or “generation.”

孔子游於太山,见荣启期行乎郕之野,鹿裘带索,鼓琴而歌。孔子问曰:先生所以乐,何也?对曰:吾乐甚多,天生万物,唯人为贵,而吾得为人,是一乐也;男女之别,男尊女卑,故以男为贵,吾既得为男矣,是二乐也;人生有不见日月、不免租褓者,吾既已乐甚多,天生万物,唯人为贵,而吾得为人,是一乐也;男女之别,男尊女卑,故以男为贵,吾既得为男矣,是二乐也;人生有不见日月、不免租褓者,吾既已行年九十矣,是三乐也。贫者,士之常也;死者人之终也。处常得终,当何忧哉?孔子曰:善乎,能自宽者也。 解曰:所谓荣启期者,荣则英而不实,启则开以有接。揽道之英荣,形开而接物,期於趋当生之乐,而不造夫道之根深蒂固者也。此其所以以处常得,终为乐也。盖所贵乎道者,岂唯生之独乐哉?盖将以善吾死也。若夫人者,虽不物,期於趋当生之乐,而不造夫道之根深蒂固者也。此其所以以处常得,终为乐也。盖所贵乎道者,岂唯生之独乐哉?盖将以善吾死也。若夫人者,虽不汩欲於利害之涂,而无中道之夭,亦已异乎俗矣,语其闻道则未也。是所谓善自宽以为乐,非真乐之无所不乐也。
Interpretation

Confucius was traveling on Mount Tai when he met Rong Qiji in the fields of Cheng. Rong Qiji wore a deerskin garment with a rope tied around his waist, and he was playing the qin and singing. Confucius asked, “Why are you so happy, sir?” Rong Qiji replied, “I have many reasons to be happy. Heaven and Earth give birth to and nourish the myriad things, and among them human beings alone are most precious; that I can be a human being is my first joy. There is a distinction between male and female; in the understanding of the time, the male was honored and the female was lowly, and I am already a male—this is my second joy. Among people, some never see the light of the sun and moon in their whole lives and cannot avoid dying in swaddling clothes, while I have already lived to ninety—this is my third joy. Poverty is the normal condition of scholars, and death is the end of life. To be at peace with the ordinary and able to die a good death—what is there to worry about?” Confucius sighed in admiration: “Well said! This is a man who can console himself.”

The expositor says: As for “Rong Qiji,” rong is like a flower in full bloom but not bearing fruit; qi means opening and being able to receive external things. He plucked the radiance of the Great Dao, and his bodily form was open, able to respond to the myriad things; therefore he sought to grasp the joy of present existence, but he had not reached what the Great Dao has deeply planted at its root. This is precisely why he could be at peace with the ordinary, die a good death, and find joy in himself. From this we can see: what the Dao values—could it be merely for the sake of enjoying the joy of existence for oneself alone? It is probably by this means to treat one’s death well. As for ordinary people, although they do not sink into the muddy road of profit and harm, nor die young along the way, and are already different from the vulgar, yet when it comes to hearing the Dao, they are still far from it. This is what is meant by “being good at consoling oneself and considering that joy”; it is not truly being able to have nothing that is not joy.

林类年且百岁,底春被裘,拾遗穗於故畦,并歌并进。孔子适卫,望之於野,顾谓弟子曰:彼叟可与言者,试往讯之。子贡请行,逆之垄端,面之而叹曰:先生曾不悔乎,而行歌拾穗,林类行不留,歌不辍。子贡叩之不已,乃仰而应曰:吾何悔耶?子贡曰:先生少不勤行,长不竞时,老无妻子,死期将至,亦有何乐而拾穗行歌乎?林类笑曰:吾之所以为乐,人皆有之,而反以为忧。少不勤行,长不竞时,故能寿若此;老无妻子,死期将至,故能乐若此。子贡曰:寿者人之情,死者人之恶。子以死为乐,何也?林类曰:死勤行,长不竞时,故能寿若此;老无妻子,死期将至,故能乐若此。子贡曰:寿者人之情,死者人之恶。子以死为乐,何也?林类曰:死之与生,一往一反。故死於是者,安知不生於彼?故吾知其不相若矣,吾又安知营营而求生非惑乎?吾又安知吾今之死不愈昔之生乎?子贡闻之,不喻其意,还以告夫子。夫子曰:吾知其可与言,果然;然彼得之,而不尽者也。
Interpretation

Lin Lei was nearly a hundred years old. In early spring he wore a fur jacket and gathered up ears of grain left behind by others in the old field ridges, singing as he went. Confucius was on his way to Wei and saw him from afar in the countryside. Turning to his disciples, he said, “That old man is worth speaking with. Go and try questioning him.” Zigong asked to go. He walked to the end of the field ridge, approached Lin Lei, and said with a sigh, “Are you not regretful, sir? To be singing while gathering ears of grain!” Lin Lei kept walking his way and singing his song without the slightest pause. Zigong pressed him again and again, and only then did he raise his head and reply, “What is there for me to regret?”

Zigong said, “In your youth, sir, you did not diligently practice the Dao (the Way); in your maturity you did not contend with the world. Now in old age you have no wife or children, and death is near. What joy can there be, that you should pass your days gathering ears of grain and singing as you walk?”

Lin Lei laughed and said, “The reason I feel joy is a joy that everyone has, but they turn it into sorrow instead. It is precisely because in my youth I did not diligently practice the Dao and in maturity did not contend with the world that I have been able to live to such an advanced age; it is precisely because in old age I have no wife or children and death is near that I can be joyful to this degree.”

Zigong said, “Longevity is what people commonly desire, and death is what people detest. Yet you, sir, take pleasure in death. Why is that?”

Lin Lei said, “Death and life are a going and a coming, a cycle of return. Then how do we know that one who dies here is not born there? Therefore I know that death and life are not the same; and how can I be certain that those who bustle about all day in pursuit of life are not deluded? How do I know that my death now will not be better than my former life?”

When Zigong heard this, he could not grasp its meaning. He returned and told this to Confucius. Confucius said, “I knew he was someone with whom one could speak, and so it is. But he has only obtained one part of the Dao; he has not yet fully understood.”

Note: This passage comes from the story of Lin Lei in the “Tianrui” chapter of the Liezi. The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing Jie is the Song-dynasty scholar Jiang Yu’s commentary on the Liezi (that is, the Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing, the True Scripture of Original Simplicity and Ultimate Virtue). In the Daoist view, Lin Lei’s “joy” is a transcendent state of mind: following nature, at ease amid the transformations of life and death, not rejoicing in life and not grieving over death.

解曰:少而勤行,以名誉导其前也。长而竞时,以利歌汨於外也。不羡名故不动行,不徇财故不竞时。内无名利之徇,外无妻子之累,既佚於老,将之於息,知既死之暂往,谓求生之为惑,此林类之所乐也。子贡方且悦生而恶死,安足以得此人之心哉?虽然,林类以死期将至为乐,亦未为道也。於老,将之於息,知既死之暂往,谓求生之为惑,此林类之所乐也。子贡方且悦生而恶死,安足以得此人之心哉?虽然,林类以死期将至为乐,亦未为道也。得道者,泊然无心於生死,其於死生,废而任之而已,奚遽忧乐於其间哉?孔子以谓得之而不尽者,其不在兹乎?又其以营营而求生为惑,亦其所得也;谓今之死为愈於昔之生,亦其所未尽也。所谓林类者,野外谓之林,以言违物离人,处乎广莫之乡,而类圣人之道者也。是所以以死为乐,得之而不尽也。 子贡倦於学,告仲尼曰也。所谓林类者,野外谓之林,以言违物离人,处乎广莫之乡,而类圣人之道者也。是所以以死为乐,得之而不尽也。 子贡倦於学,告仲尼曰:愿有所息。仲尼曰:有生无所息。子贡曰:然则赐息无所乎?仲尼曰:有焉尔。
Interpretation

In youth, one diligently cultivates and takes reputation as the standard that leads the way; in later years, one chases the trends of the times, drawn by profit and outwardly losing one’s original nature. If one does not envy reputation, one’s conduct will not waver on that account; if one does not yield to wealth, one will not contend and compete with the worldly. With no inner entanglement in fame and profit and no outer burden of wife and children, one rests peacefully in old age, understanding death to be merely a temporary departure and regarding the pursuit of survival as delusion. This is precisely the truth in which Lin Lei (the recluse in the Liezi) took delight. Zigong (a disciple of Confucius), however, clung to life and feared death—how could he truly move such a person?

That said, Lin Lei took pleasure in the approach of death, yet this still does not count as the true Dao (the Way). One who attains the Dao is detached and has no mind for life and death; toward life and death, one simply follows nature and lets their transformations be—how could worries and joys still entangle the heart? Confucius’s saying, “attaining it but not exhausting it,” probably refers to this. Those who bustle and strive for survival are certainly deluded, but those who regard the pursuit of survival as delusion have only some realization and have not exhausted it; to think that death today is better than life in the past is likewise not to have fully understood.

As for the name “Lin Lei,” “lin” means open country, meaning that he kept distant from affairs and avoided crowds, dwelling in the vast, boundless wilderness, and yet drew near to the Dao of the sage. Thus his taking pleasure in death shows that what he had attained was still incomplete.

Zigong grew weary of learning and said to Zhongni (Confucius), “I hope to have a time of rest.” Zhongni said, “While a person lives, there is no time for rest.” Zigong said, “Then is there no place where I may rest?” Zhongni said, “There is.”

解曰:子贡,居言语之科者也,闻夫子语林类之可与言者,於是始悟贤於辩之为非,将求为道之日损,故告於仲尼愿有所息也。殊不知有生之委运於大化,其序为不可紊。方其劳我以生,安得有夫息?虽然,为子贡者亦易悟矣,一闻孔子之言,则知君子之息、小人之伏也。故孔子许之曰:赐,汝知之矣。 望其圹,睪如也,宰如也,坟如也,鬲如也,则知所息矣。 解曰:睪如、宰如、坟如、鬲如,则以言圹之所象不同,以人之贵贱异等也,同之於息而已。 子贡曰:大哉死乎。君子息焉,小人伏焉。仲尼曰:赐,汝知之矣。人胥知生之乐,未知生之苦;知也,同之於息而已。 子贡曰:大哉死乎。君子息焉,小人伏焉。仲尼曰:赐,汝知之矣。人胥知生之乐,未知生之苦;知老之惫,未知老之佚:知死之恶,未知死之息也。晏子曰:善哉,古之有死也。仁者息焉,不仁者伏焉。 解曰:息,犹气之息一往而一来。伏犹胜物而伏之,其动止有制之者矣。君子之息,虽化而不亡;小人之伏,昧然而趋化。君子者,仁之成名,小人反是。故晏子亦曰;仁者息焉,不仁者伏焉。老氏之宝以慈为先。超死生之域者,莫先於能仁而博爱,是以言君子之仁。
Interpretation

The commentator says: Zigong was skilled in speech. When he heard Confucius say that only someone like Lin Lei (a recluse of the Spring and Autumn period) was worth conversing with, he realized that being good at argument was not valuable. He wished to pursue the realm of “in pursuing the Dao, one daily decreases,” and so he asked Confucius (Zhongni), hoping to find a place where he could rest. But he did not understand that human life follows the workings of nature’s creative transformations, and that its order cannot be disrupted. People toil in the world for their livelihood—where could there be true rest? Yet Zigong was in fact quick to grasp the point: as soon as he heard Confucius’s words, he understood the difference between the gentleman’s “rest” (stability, cessation) and the petty person’s “hiding” (submission, dormancy). Therefore Confucius praised him: “Ci, you have understood.”

Looking from afar at a grave, its shape may be flat and broad, tall and steep, raised like a mound, or sunken like a li (an ancient cooking vessel). Viewed in this way, one knows what rest is.

The commentator says: The four terms—flat and broad, tall and steep, mound-like, and li-like—indicate that the shapes of graves differ, because people have ranks of noble and base, and burial specifications differ accordingly. But as for returning to rest, they are all the same.

Zigong said: “How great death is! The gentleman rests here; the petty person hides here.” Confucius said: “Ci, you have understood.” People all know the joy of life, but not the hardship of life; they know the weariness of old age, but not the ease of old age; they know the dreadfulness of death, but not the rest of death. Yanzi (Yan Ying, a famous minister of Qi during the Spring and Autumn period) said: “How fine was the ancients’ view of death! The benevolent rest here; those without benevolence hide here.”

The commentator says: Xi is like the outgoing and incoming of breath—gone and then returning. Fu is being subdued by external things and lying dormant; both its movement and stillness are governed by some force. The gentleman’s “rest” passes through transformation without perishing; the petty person’s “hiding” obscurely drifts with the current. The gentleman is one who has perfected benevolent virtue; the petty person is the opposite. Therefore Yanzi also said: “The benevolent rest here; those without benevolence hide here.” Of the three treasures cherished by Laozi (the Old Master), “compassion” is first. To transcend the boundary of life and death, nothing is more important than being able to practice benevolence and universal love; hence what is spoken of here is the gentleman’s benevolence.

死也者,德之徼也。古者谓死人为归人。夫言死人为归人,则生人为行人矣。行而不知归,失家者也。一人失家,一世非之;天下失家,莫知非焉。仁。 死也者,德之徼也。古者谓死人为归人。夫言死人为归人,则生人为行人矣。行而不知归,失家者也。一人失家,一世非之;天下失家,莫知非焉。 解曰:人生世间,如物逆旅,要必有所归宿,古无以易此也。世之贪生失理者众,而蚤悟其理者希。众寡相倾,行非为是,终莫之觉。列子言此,亦不以一人而非一世也,直欲齐死生於一贯尔。 有人去乡土,离六亲,废家业,游於四方而不归者,何人哉?世必谓之为狂荡之人矣。又有人锺贤世,锺贤世,宜言重形生。矜巧能、修名誉,夸张於世而不知己者,亦何人哉?世必以为智谋之士。此二者,胥失者也。而世与一不与一,唯圣人知所与,知所去。 解曰:狂荡之人则以去乡土而废其家业,智谋之士则以修名誉而夸张於世。彼其所为狂荡,胥失者也。而世与一不与一,唯圣人知所与,知所去。
Interpretation

Death is the boundary and endpoint of life (De, Virtue/Power). The ancients called the dead “returners,” meaning those who have returned to their destination. Since the dead are “returners,” the living are merely “travelers”—people walking along the road. To walk without knowing where one is to return to is to be someone who has lost their home. When one person loses their home, the whole age will criticize them; but when the whole world loses its home, people instead fail to notice that anything is wrong.

People living in this world are like guests lodging in an inn; in the end there must be a destination, and this has been so from ancient times to the present, impossible to change. In the world there are many who cling to life and turn away from constant principle, but few who awaken early to this truth. The side with more people overwhelms the side with fewer; wrong conduct is taken as the right way, and people never become aware of it. Liezi says these things not to condemn an entire age because of one person’s fault, but to make people regard life and death as the same principle and return to a single consistency.

There are those who leave their hometown, abandon the six relations, neglect the family estate, and wander about without returning—what kind of people are these? The world will certainly call them wild and dissolute. There are also those who consider themselves worthy and superior to the world, display their skills, pursue reputation, and show off ostentatiously among others, yet do not know their true situation—what kind of people are these? The world will certainly regard them as clever and resourceful. Both kinds have lost their original nature. The world sometimes approves and sometimes rejects them, and only the sage understands what should be accepted and what should be discarded.

The wild and dissolute lose themselves because they leave their native place and neglect the family estate; the clever and resourceful lose themselves because they pursue reputation and show off before the world. What both kinds do is loss. The world approves or rejects them inconsistently, and only the sage understands what may be taken and what should be removed.

解曰:狂荡之人则以去乡土而废其家业,智谋之士则以修名誉而夸张於世。彼其所为狂荡也,则俗谓之小人;彼其所徇智谋也,则俗谓之君子。殊不知狂荡之去乡离亲特废其家业,而智谋之残生损性乃离其性宅,又乌取君子小人於其间哉?《庄子》谓臧壳之挟策读书,博塞以游为均於亡羊,即此所谓二者之胥失也。《列子》继此言贵虚之道,以虚静为得其居,取与为失其所,则圣人之所与所去可知也已。 或谓子列子曰:子奚贵虚?列子曰:虚者无贵也。子列子曰:非其名也,莫如静,莫如虚虚静为得其居,取与为失其所,则圣人之所与所去可知也已。 或谓子列子曰:子奚贵虚?列子曰:虚者无贵也。子列子曰:非其名也,莫如静,莫如虚。静也虚也,得其居矣;取也与也,失其所矣。事之破石为而后有舞仁义者,弗能复也。
Interpretation

The commentary says: Unrestrained and unconventional people often leave their native places and let their family fortunes go to ruin; clever and resourceful men, on the other hand, use self-cultivation to build a reputation and show off in the world. The vulgar crowd sees wild behavior and calls it “the petty person”; seeing the pursuit of cleverness, it calls it “the noble person.” They do not realize that while the wild person leaving home and discarding family property is certainly a loss, the person who plays with schemes wears out his life and injures his nature—equivalent to departing from the “dwelling of nature” (the place where one’s original nature resides). Both have losses; how can one distinguish noble from petty? Zhuangzi says that the two shepherds Zang and Gu—one holding bamboo slips and reading, the other playing bo (an ancient gambling game) for amusement—both lost their sheep (the “losing the sheep” allusion comes from Zhuangzi’s “Webbed Toes”). This is precisely saying that both kinds of people have lost their original nature.

The Liezi (traditionally attributed to Lie Yukou, a Daoist of the Warring States period) then expounds the principle of valuing “emptiness”: take empty stillness as one’s dwelling place, and take giving and receiving as losing one’s proper position. From this one can know what the sage draws near and what he discards.

Someone asked Liezi, “Why do you value emptiness?” Liezi answered, “Emptiness means taking nothing as precious.” The other said, “This is still not an appropriate name; it would be better to say ‘stillness,’ better to say ‘emptiness.’” Empty stillness is where people find their dwelling; taking and giving are losing one’s proper position. Once things have been split open and carved like stubborn stone, losing their original authenticity, afterward even if someone uses benevolence and righteousness as a banner to show off, they cannot be restored to their original state.

解曰:虚静者,万物之本也。虚故足以受韦实,静故足以应韦动。虚静在我,则万变虽起而吾心常寂,万态虽殊而吾心常彻,此应物之本也。故曰:莫如静,莫如虚。虚而能容,静而常寂,周旋变故,不出性宅,是为得其居也。有所取则不虚矣,有所与则不静矣,取与交战,耳目外徇,火驰而不反,斯失其所矣。所即其居之所也,与老君所谓不失其所者久之所同意。既失其所,方且鼓舞仁义於物之凋残亏丧之后,是殆智谋之士所以夸张於世者尔。彼则自伤其性矣,又焉能便人复其初乎? 粥熊曰:运转亡已,天地密移,畴觉之哉?故物损於彼者盈彼则自伤其性矣,又焉能便人复其初乎? 粥熊曰:运转亡已,天地密移,畴觉之哉?故物损於彼者盈於此,成於此者亏於彼。损盈成亏,随世随死。往来相接,间不可省,畴觉之哉?凡一气不顿进,一形不顿亏,亦不觉其成,不觉其亏。亦如人自世至老,貌色智态,亡日不异;皮肤爪发,随世随落,非婴孩时有停而不易也。间不可觉,俟至后知。
Interpretation

The void and the still are the root of all things. Because it is void, it is sufficient to receive the realities of the various things; because it is still, it is sufficient to respond to their various movements. (Here the word wei is interchangeable with wei, “to go against”; in this context it may be understood as “various.”)

“Void and stillness” are the root of all things. Only when the mind is empty and clear can it contain the reality of external things; only when the mind is quiet can it respond to changes in the outside world. If one can maintain void and stillness within oneself, then even when ten thousand changes occur, the mind remains settled; even when the forms of all things differ, the mind remains clear and bright. This is the fundamental way of responding to external things. Therefore it is said: “There is nothing better than stillness, nothing better than emptiness.” Only when the mind is empty can it be inclusive; only when the mind is still can it remain constantly secure and peaceful. Moving amid the changes of worldly affairs without leaving the dwelling place of one’s original nature—this is “attaining its dwelling.”

If there is something to seek, the mind is no longer void; if there is something to give, the mind is no longer still. Between taking and giving they contend with one another; the ears and eyes pursue outward things like a raging fire rushing forth and never turning back. This is “losing its place.” “Place” is the dwelling place of nature and life, and it has the same meaning as Laozi’s saying, “One who does not lose his place endures.”

Since they have already lost their original dwelling, and yet after the ten thousand things have withered and become defective they loudly promote benevolence and righteousness—this is probably a device by which clever schemers show off to the world. Their own nature has already been injured; how can they help others recover their original beginning?

Yuxiong said: The movement of all things never stops; between heaven and earth there is a hidden shifting—who can perceive it? Therefore, when one thing is diminished here, it must be increased there; when one thing is completed here, it must be deficient there. Increase and decrease, success and failure, arise and perish with the times. Coming and going connect with one another; not a single moment can be omitted between them—who can perceive it?

Generally, a single qi does not suddenly increase, and a physical form does not suddenly diminish; people therefore cannot perceive its arising, nor can they perceive its decline. It is like a person from youth to old age: countenance, expression, bearing, and posture never a day without change; skin, nails, and hair fall away and are replaced with the years. It is not that in infancy there was ever a moment of staying still without change. The intervals of change cannot be perceived; one must wait until afterward to know them.

解曰:物与化为体,体随化而迁。百年之间,大化有四,复於其中,时变岁迁,日改月化。虽一息之顷,呿吟前后,新故不同。譬彼风之击水,前波非后波;灯之在缸,前焰非后焰。俯仰之间,己形万变。昧者潜移於造化,但睹夫己形之陈迹,而不知大化之密运,於物之成而乐其成,不知亏之之理已运矣。於事之亏而睹其亏,不知成之之理已进矣。杨子於《元经》言月阙其博不如开明于西之陈迹,而不知大化之密运,於物之成而乐其成,不知亏之之理已运矣。於事之亏而睹其亏,不知成之之理已进矣。杨子於《元经》言月阙其博不如开明于西,盖言造化之密移、成亏之迭进也。求之於身,百年之役,颜色智态皮肤爪发无田不异,亦已明甚,奈何其不自悟耶?此《庄子》藏舟於壑之义也。子在川上曰:逝者如斯夫。盖明此也。
Interpretation

Things change with the creative transformations of Nature, and bodily form shifts along with them. Within a hundred years, the Great Transformation has four stages, and it is within these that the seasons alternate and the years move on, with changes day by day and transformations month by month. Even in the briefest interval of a single breath, before and after are already different; there is the distinction between old and new. It is like wind blowing over water: the wave in front is not the wave behind. It is like a lamp flame burning in its vessel: the flame of the previous moment is not the flame of the next. In the space of a bow and a lift of the head, one’s own bodily form has already undergone ten thousand transformations.

The foolish do not perceive the hidden movement of creative transformation; they see only the old traces of their bodily form and do not know that the Great Transformation secretly operates. When something succeeds, they rejoice in its success, unaware that the principle of decline is already at work; when something declines, they see only the decline, unaware that the principle of success is already advancing. Yangzi says in the Yuanjing: “The moon, after waning, becomes full again; it is not like Kaiming ...” (Kaiming is a divine beast of the West, here used to refer to the brightness of moonlight) ... (the original is repetitive here and is omitted). Yangzi’s statement is intended to explain the hidden movement of creative transformation and the successive advance of completion and deficiency.

Turning back to examine oneself: amid the changes of a hundred years, countenance, intellect, demeanor, skin, nails, and hair—not one place remains unchanged. This is already very obvious; why can one still not awaken oneself? This is precisely the principle of Zhuangzi’s “hiding a boat in a ravine” (hiding a boat in a valley, yet at night someone still carries it away on his back; it means that things are always changing imperceptibly). Confucius by the river said, “It passes on like this, never ceasing day or night!” This says exactly the same principle.

杞国有人忧天地崩坠,身亡所寄,废寝食者。又有忧彼之所忧者,因往晓之,曰:天,积炁尔,亡处亡炁。若屈伸呼吸,终日在天中行止,奈何忧崩坠乎?其人曰:天果积炁,日月星宿,不当坠耶?晓之者曰:日月星宿,亦积炁中之有光耀者,只使坠,亦不能有所中伤。其人曰:奈地坏何?晓者曰:地积块尔,充塞四虚,亡处亡块。若躇步跐蹈,终日在地上行止,奈何忧其坏?其人舍然大喜。晓之者亦舍然四虚,亡处亡块。若躇步跐蹈,终日在地上行止,奈何忧其坏?其人舍然大喜。晓之者亦舍然大喜。长庐子闻而笑之曰:虹蜺也,云雾也,风雨也,四时也,此积炁之成乎天者也;山岳也,河海也,金石也,火木也,此积形之成乎地者也。知积炁也,知积块也,奚谓不坏?夫天地,空中之一细物,有中之最巨者,难终难穷,此固然矣;难测难识,此固然矣。忧其坏者,诚为大远;言其不坏者,亦为未是。天地不得不坏,则会归於坏。遇其坏时,奚为不忧哉?子列子闻而笑曰:言天地坏者亦谬,言天地不坏者亦谬。坏与不坏,吾所不能知也。虽然,彼一也,此一也。故生不知死,死不知生;来不知去,去不知来。坏与不坏,吾何容心哉?
Interpretation

In the state of Qi, a man worried that heaven would collapse and earth would split open, leaving him with nowhere to take refuge, so he could not eat or sleep. Another man, anxious on his behalf, went to enlighten him, saying: “Heaven is merely accumulated Qi (vital energy; in Daoist thought, the primal Qi from which all things are generated), and Qi is everywhere in heaven. You bend and stretch, breathe in and out, and all day long walk and pause within heaven—why worry that it will collapse?” The man asked: “If heaven really is accumulated Qi, won’t the sun, moon, and stars fall down?” The one enlightening him said: “The sun, moon, and stars are only the luminous parts of accumulated Qi; even if they fell, they could not hurt anyone.” The man asked again: “Then what if the earth is destroyed?” The enlightener said: “Earth is merely accumulated clods of soil, filling the four quarters and the void; there is no place without clods. You step and tread, and all day long walk and pause upon the earth—why worry that it will be destroyed?” The man was suddenly enlightened and very happy. The one who enlightened him was likewise suddenly enlightened and very happy.

A man named Changlu Zi heard this and laughed, saying: “Rainbows, clouds and mist, wind and rain, and the four seasons are all formed in heaven by accumulated Qi; mountains and peaks, rivers and seas, metals and stones, fire and wood are all formed on earth by accumulated forms. Since we know that heaven is accumulated Qi and earth is accumulated clods, how can we say they will not be destroyed? In the void, heaven and earth are but a tiny thing, yet they are the largest among formed things. That they are hard to exhaust and hard to fathom is certainly a fact; but to worry that they will be destroyed is a great mistake, and to say that they will never be destroyed is also wrong. Heaven and earth ultimately cannot escape destruction; in the end they will come to ruin. When the day of destruction arrives, how can one not worry?”

Liezi (a pre-Qin Daoist figure to whom the book Liezi is traditionally attributed) heard this and laughed, saying: “Those who say heaven and earth will be destroyed are wrong, and those who say they will not be destroyed are also wrong. Whether they are destroyed or not, I cannot know. Even so, one view has its grounds, and the other view also has its grounds; both alike cannot be verified. Therefore, the living do not know what death is, and the dead do not know what life is; when they come, they do not know where they are going, and when they go, they do not know where they come from. Whether heaven and earth are destroyed or not, why should I trouble my mind over it?”

解曰:号物之数,谓之一也,此一也。故生不知死,死不知生;来不知去,去不知来。坏与不坏,吾何容心哉? 解曰:号物之数,谓之万人处一焉,此其比万物也,不似毫末之在於马体乎?则人之一身寄於天地之间,微亦甚矣。又况天穹隆而位乎上,经为日月,纬为星辰,而万物覆焉。地磅礡而位乎下,结为山岳,融为江河,而万物载焉。天之长,地之久,有非人之所能俄而测度者。杞国之人乃有忧其身之无所寄而至於废寝食者,岂天地之大不足以容其身哉?亦其人无以自容尔,曷亦不思自有天地至于今也,更死更生,不可胜纪,奚独身之无所寄而至於废寝食者,岂天地之大不足以容其身哉?亦其人无以自容尔,曷亦不思自有天地至于今也,更死更生,不可胜纪,奚独至汝而忧之哉?其忧之者固悲人之自丧者也,而忧彼之所忧者则又悲夫悲人之悲者。既已忧之矣,而又以物理之鄙近者更相喻晓而舍然大喜。噫,天长地久,何多寡於斯人,而斯人奚遽以妄心而忧喜於其间哉?长庐子闻而笑之,亦似是矣。其言天地为空中之一细物,有中之最巨,理无以易矣。且曰:遇其坏时,奚为不忧哉?是得之而不尽者也。盖成理所在,无往不一,或彼或此,终无有二,以二致一,遇其坏时,奚为不忧哉?是得之而不尽者也。盖成理所在,无往不一,或彼或此,终无有二,以二致一,无有别一。明夫一之不二,则生死去来各不相知。寓形宇内,饮天和,食地德,泰然终其身而已矣,奚用知其坏与不坏哉?此长庐子所以又见笑於子列子也。
Interpretation

"When the number of things is totaled, it is called the One; this is the 'One.' Therefore the living do not know death, and the dead do not know life; those who come do not know going, and those who go do not know coming. Whether things perish or do not perish, why must I trouble my mind over it?"

This passage says: all things taken together can be called the "One." Humans, situated among the myriad things, are as tiny as a hair attached to a horse's body. A person's body, lodged between heaven and earth, is truly insignificant. Moreover, the heavenly vault is high above, with the sun, moon, and stars suspended in it, and all things are covered by it; the earth is broad and thick and firmly placed below, congealing into mountains and converging into rivers, and all things rely on it for support. The length of Heaven and the endurance of Earth are not something humans can casually measure.

In the state of Qi (an ancient state, around present-day Qi County, Henan), there was a man who worried that his body had nowhere to be placed, to the point of neglecting sleep and food. Was it that the greatness of heaven and earth could not contain his body? It was simply that this man could not settle himself. Why did he not consider that, from the formation of heaven and earth down to today, things have died and been born one after another in numbers beyond counting—why was it only in his case that he had to worry about this? That worried man was grieving over his own loss of self; to go on to worry over what others worry about is, in turn, to lament those who grieve over others' grief. After worrying, they again enlightened one another with shallow reasoning, and then suddenly became greatly delighted. Alas, heaven is long and earth endures—what distinction of more or less is there in this for such people? Why should people use a deluded mind to grieve and rejoice within it?

Changluzi (a figure in the Liezi) heard of this and laughed at him, and he seems also to have been right. He said that heaven and earth are merely a tiny thing within the void, yet among things with form they are the greatest; this principle cannot be changed. But he also said: when it comes to their perishing, how can one not worry? This is to have grasped the principle but not fully understood it. Generally, where the principle lies, wherever one goes it is the "One"; whether that or this, in the end there is no difference. If one seeks the One by means of two, one will get another besides the One—this is mistaken. Once one understands the "One" and does not split it into two, then life and death, coming and going, each do not know one another. Lodging one's body between heaven and earth, drinking Heaven's harmonious Qi (vital energy), eating Earth's abundant De (Virtue/Power), and calmly living out one's life is enough—what need is there to know whether it perishes or not? This is why Changluzi was in turn laughed at by Liezi (a pre-Qin Daoist figure, the traditional name associated with the book Liezi).

舜问乎烝《庄子》作丞。曰:道可得而有乎?曰:汝身非汝有也,汝何得有夫道。舜曰:吾身非吾有,孰有之哉?曰:是天地之委形也。生非汝有,是天地之委和也。性命非汝有,是天地之委顺也。孙子非汝有,是天地之委蜕也。故行不知所往,处不知所持,食不知所以。天地强阳,气也,又胡何得而有耶?
Interpretation

Shun asked Cheng (an ancient personal name; in the text, the person from whom Shun sought instruction): “Can the Dao (the Way) be possessed?” Cheng said: “Your body was never yours to begin with—how then could you possess the Dao?” Shun said: “If my body is not mine, whose is it?” Cheng said: “The body is a form entrusted to you by Heaven and Earth; life is not yours—it is the harmonious Qi (vital energy) entrusted to you by Heaven and Earth; nature and life are not yours—they are the principle of compliance entrusted to you by Heaven and Earth; descendants are not yours either—they are transformed things entrusted to you by Heaven and Earth. Therefore, when people walk they do not know where they are going; when they dwell they do not know what they rely on; when they eat and drink they do not know why. The vigorous, moving yang Qi between Heaven and Earth is originally the Qi of nature—by what right could it be possessed by you?”

解曰:道之与我,异名同实,即道即我,无有差殊。有无二境,虚实相形,如可得而有,亦可得而无矣。道不离我,安得复有天道,道可得而有,是道与我为二也。舜之问乎丞,盖将以实相形,如可得而有,亦可得而无矣。道不离我,安得复有天道,道可得而有,是道与我为二也。舜之问乎丞,盖将以道擅而有之於吾身也。吾之一身,天地疆阳,气之所积尔,暂聚。复散,曾非我有,安可以有道哉?究观吾之一身,天命而为性,有性斯有生,有生斯有身。性命出於天地之一委顺,有生出於天地之委和,是身出於天地之委形,至於孙子抑远矣,是天地之委蜕尔。故或行,或处,或味,常因於彼而我曾不知,是以欲知其身,顾若影则知之矣。身之於我,犹影之於形也,彼强阳则我与之强阳。强阳者又胡可得而有耶?,老君谓:吾有大患,为吾有身。我,犹影之於形也,彼强阳则我与之强阳。强阳者又胡可得而有耶?,老君谓:吾有大患,为吾有身。盖将反於未生无身而同於道也。舜,古之大圣人也,而乃问道乎丞者,盖舜不得已而临莅天下,继尧之后,明德所自而始,既已离於道矣。故其托言如此,丞,即以道佐人主者。
Interpretation

Dao (the Way) and I differ in name but are identical in substance: the Dao is myself, and I am the Dao; there is no difference between the two. In the two realms of “being” and “nonbeing,” emptiness and fullness manifest each other. What seems possible to obtain and possess can likewise be lost and return to nothingness. The Dao never leaves me—why, then, would there need to be another “Heavenly Dao” apart from this? If one says the Dao can be obtained and possessed, that is to treat the Dao and me as two separate things.

Shun asked Cheng (Cheng: in ancient times, a minister who assisted the ruler by means of the Dao), presumably wanting to monopolize the Dao, take it as his own, and place it within himself. Yet this body of mine is merely a temporary coalescence of the Yin-Yang Qi (vital energy) between Heaven and Earth; after coalescing, it will disperse again. It was never truly mine to possess—how, then, can one speak of possessing the Dao?

Look closely at oneself: what Heaven confers becomes human nature (xing); only with nature is there life; only with life is there a body. Nature and destiny issue from the compliant transformation of Heaven and Earth; life issues from their harmonious conjunction; the body issues from the forms produced by their creative transformation. As for descendants, they are even more remote—merely transformations left behind by Heaven and Earth. Thus, whether people walk, dwell, eat, or drink, they constantly rely on external things without being aware of it. To know oneself, one may look at it as one looks at a shadow: the relation between the body and me is like that between a shadow and a form. If the form is bright and strong, the shadow likewise becomes bright and strong. How, then, can this bright and strong shadow be considered something one possesses?

Lord Lao (that is, Laozi) says, “The reason I have great affliction is that I have a body.” This is meant to make people return to the state before birth, when there was no body, and thus become one with the Dao.

Shun was a great sage of antiquity, yet he still asked Cheng about the Dao. This is because he had no choice but to rule the world and inherit Yao’s imperial throne; although his bright virtue arose from this, he had already deviated from the Dao. Therefore he put forward such words, using Cheng as a pretext to ask about the Dao.

齐之国氏大富,宋之向氏大贫。自宋之齐,请其术。国氏告之曰:吾善为盗。始吾为盗也,一年而给,二年而足,三年大壤。自此以往,施及州闾。向氏大喜,喻其为盗之言,而不喻其为盗之道,遂踰垣凿室,手目所及,亡不探也。未及时,以脏获罪,没其先居之财。向氏以国氏之谬己也,往而怨之。国氏曰:若为盗若何?向氏言其状。国氏曰:嘻,若失为盗之道至此乎?今将告若矣。吾闻天有时,地有利。吾盗天地之时利,云雨之滂润,山泽之产育,以生吾禾,殖吾稼,筑吾垣,建吾舍。陆盗禽兽,,地有利。吾盗天地之时利,云雨之滂润,山泽之产育,以生吾禾,殖吾稼,筑吾垣,建吾舍。陆盗禽兽,水盗鱼鳖,亡非盗也。夫禾稼、土木、禽兽、鱼鳖,皆天之所生,岂吾之所有?然吾盗天而亡殃。夫金玉珍宝,谷帛财货、人之所聚,岂天之所与?若盗之而获罪,孰怨哉?向氏大惑,以为国氏之重罔己也,过东郭先生问焉。东郭先生曰:若一身庸非盗乎?盗阴阳之和以成若生,载若形;况外物而非盗哉?诚然,天地万物不相离也,仞而有之,皆惑也。国氏之盗,公道也,故亡殃;若之盗,私心一也,故得罪。有公私者,亦盗也;亡公私者,亦盗也;公公私私,天地之德。知天地之德者,孰为殃;若之盗,私心一也,故得罪。有公私者,亦盗也;亡公私者,亦盗也;公公私私,天地之德。知天地之德者,孰为盗耶?孰为不盗耶?
Interpretation

In Qi there was a man of the Guo clan whose family property was extremely abundant; in Song there was a man of the Xiang clan who was very poor. Mr. Xiang came from Song to Qi to ask Mr. Guo about the way to become rich. Mr. Guo said, “I am skilled at being a thief.” He said that when he first began thieving, within a year he had enough food and clothing; within two years he was well off; within three years he was greatly wealthy, and afterward he even benefited his village and neighborhood. Mr. Xiang was delighted. He understood the term “thief,” but he did not grasp the principle of being a thief. So he climbed over walls, broke through holes, and took whatever he saw; there was nothing he did not seek out and seize. Before long, he was caught with the stolen goods and punished, and even his former property was confiscated. Mr. Xiang thought Mr. Guo had deceived him and went to complain. Mr. Guo asked, “How did you go about being a thief?” Mr. Xiang explained what he had done. Mr. Guo sighed and said, “Alas, have you lost the principle of thievery to such an extent? Now I will tell you. I have heard that Heaven has the order of the four seasons and Earth has the bounty of the myriad things. I steal the seasons and bounty of Heaven and Earth: by borrowing the moisture of clouds and rain and the produce of mountains and marshes, I make my seedlings grow and plant my crops, build my walls and construct my houses. On land I steal birds and beasts; in water I steal fish and turtles—there is nothing I do not steal. Grain and crops, earth and wood, birds and beasts, fish and turtles are all produced by Heaven; how could they be mine? Yet when I steal from Heaven, I meet with no calamity. As for gold, jade, precious treasures, grain, silk, and goods, these are accumulated by people—are they bestowed by Heaven? If you steal these and are punished, whom can you blame?”

Mr. Xiang remained confused, thinking Mr. Guo was mocking him again, so he went to ask Master Dongguo. Master Dongguo said, “Is not your own self also stolen? You steal the harmonizing Qi of Yin-Yang—the two vital energies of Heaven and Earth that both oppose and harmonize each other—to complete your life and sustain your bodily form. How much more so with external things: how could they not be stolen? Indeed, Heaven, Earth, and the myriad things cannot be separated from one another. If one stubbornly believes that something is one’s own, that is delusion. Mr. Guo’s stealing accords with public justice, so he has no misfortune; your stealing comes from selfishness, so you incur punishment. Those who make distinctions between public and private are also stealing; those who do not make such distinctions are also stealing. Public and private coming and going in alternation—this is the De (Virtue/Power) of Heaven and Earth. For one who understands the De of Heaven and Earth, who is a thief, and who is not?”

解曰:《黄帝书》曰:天地,万物之盗;万物,人之盗:人,万物之盗。三盗既宜,三才既安。盖天施地生,役万物之力以更相变化,万物之生资人力以成其生育,人之生资万物以为养。天地无全功,圣人无全能,万物无全用。即其所不全而假於外,岂非其盗耶?故凡非其有而取之者,皆盗也。奚必手目所及无不探而后为盗哉?然而天地之生化也无穷,万物之生於天地也无极,人以私意力取而仞有者有限。国氏之盗天地。公道也,故可以大壤而施及州闾,向氏盗人之聚敛,私心也,彼既以私心而聚敛之矣,汝又从而利之,宜其获罪并与其天地。公道也,故可以大壤而施及州闾,向氏盗人之聚敛,私心也,彼既以私心而聚敛之矣,汝又从而利之,宜其获罪并与其先居之财而没之也。虽然,以有公与私为盗则无公与私,宜非盗矣。盖一犯人之形而身非我有,安往而非盗哉?虽无心於公私,奈何其不能逃於形体也?且盗一也,公道之盗既已异乎私心,而免人道之患矣。无公私之为盗,虽未能忘形体,亦异夫公道者之贵生爱身也。若夫天地之德,则不有心於为公也,任万物之自公。不有心於无私也,任万物之自私。语至於此,则万物之盗於人,人之盗於万物,不乃为天地大盗积者乎?天地生化万物,始终於此。故《天端》至此而终焉。尝试论之,一兔适於野,百人逐之,而人弗非也。暨乎一童子得之,虽有壮者力抗百夫,扶手而不敢取。何则?名分定也。悠悠之》至此而终焉。尝试论之,一兔适於野,百人逐之,而人弗非也。暨乎一童子得之,虽有壮者力抗百夫,扶手而不敢取。何则?名分定也。悠悠之生,以多骈旁枝之心自私於天地之间,若彼逐兔之流画为分,守其有,得之於适然者,真以为己有也;莫之得者,亦以为真彼之所有也。由是贪多务得,封殖名利,终身欣玩,唯恐人之已窥,庸讵知吾身之亦盗哉?噫,天地之生万物,非天地之道也,以夫其生无方,其化无穷,使人盗之,家富而无殃。况天地之道浑沦广博,苟能得之,则其富可胜道哉。
Interpretation

The Book of the Yellow Emperor says: Heaven and Earth are the “robbers” of the ten thousand things, the ten thousand things are the “robbers” of humans, and humans in turn are the “robbers” of the ten thousand things. (Here “robber” does not mean thief; it refers to obtaining from other things what one needs. The Book of the Yellow Emperor is a Daoist classic attributed to the Yellow Emperor.) When these threefold “takings and uses” each find their proper place, the Three Powers—Heaven, Earth, and Humanity—all become stable. (The Three Powers refer to Heaven, Earth, and Humanity.)

Heaven bestows and Earth grows; the forces that drive the ten thousand things transform into one another. The growth of the ten thousand things relies on human effort to complete their reproduction, and human survival in turn relies on the ten thousand things for support. Heaven and Earth do not possess fully complete functions; the sage does not have all-capable skills; the ten thousand things do not have fully complete uses. Since things are themselves incomplete, they must rely on external things—is this not a kind of “robbery”? Therefore, whatever takes what is not its own may be called “robbery”; why wait until everything within reach of hand and eye has been seized before counting it as robbery?

Yet the process by which Heaven and Earth transform and give life is inexhaustible, and the generation of the ten thousand things between Heaven and Earth is boundless. When humans forcibly take by private intent, what they possess is very limited. The Guo family “robbed” Heaven and Earth out of public-mindedness, and so could bring great order to the world and extend it to the provinces, commanderies, townships, and villages. The Xiang family “robbed” people’s accumulations out of private motive. Since he gathered goods from private motive, and you then compliantly make use of them, he ought to be held guilty and, together with the property he had previously accumulated, be confiscated. (The Guo and Xiang families are two figures cited as examples in the scripture; their lives are unknown here.)

Even so, if one judges robbery by the presence of a distinction between public and private, then when there is no such distinction, it would not count as robbery. But once a person has a body, the body is not truly one’s own; where can one flee and not be “robbing”? Even if one has no intention regarding public and private, how can one escape the bondage of bodily form? It can be seen that “robbery” is the same, but robbery from public-mindedness and robbery from private motive differ; the former can avoid the calamities of the human way. The “robbery” that has no distinction of public and private, though it has not forgotten the bodily form, is also different from those who value public-mindedness and treasure life and cherish the body.

As for the De (Virtue/Power) of Heaven and Earth, it does not intentionally accomplish the “public”; it lets the ten thousand things naturally tend toward the public. Nor does it intentionally seek “selflessness”; it lets the ten thousand things naturally tend toward the private. Speaking of this, are not the ten thousand things being “robbed” by humans, and humans being “robbed” by the ten thousand things, precisely the accumulation of this great “robbery” of Heaven and Earth? Heaven and Earth transform and generate the ten thousand things, always thus.

Let us try to discuss it: when a rabbit runs into the open field, a hundred people chase it, and people do not consider this wrong; when a boy obtains it, even a strong man who can match a hundred men only dares to fold his hands and not take it. Why is this? Because the claim has already been fixed. The multitude of living beings, with their many side branches and sundry thoughts, privately possess things within Heaven and Earth, like those who chase the rabbit: they draw a boundary on the ground and guard what they own; what they obtain comes by chance, yet they think it truly theirs; what they have not obtained, they also think truly belongs to others. Thus they are greedy for more and seek to obtain, accumulating fame and profit, rejoicing and savoring it all their lives, only fearing that others may peep at it, not knowing that our own selves are precisely also “robbing.”

Alas, Heaven and Earth give birth to and nourish the ten thousand things; this is not originally the original intention of the Dao of Heaven and Earth. It is only because their generation has no fixed direction and their transformation is inexhaustible, allowing people to “rob and take,” that every household can be enriched without calamity. Moreover, the Dao of Heaven and Earth is undifferentiated and vast; if one can obtain even one aspect of it, how could its abundance be fully described in words?

天端解 六经皆载道而之后世者也。寓精神之妙於形名度数之间,寄心术之微於广博,苟能得之,则其富可胜道哉。 天端解 六经皆载道而之后世者也。寓精神之妙於形名度数之间,寄心术之微於仁义礼乐之际。其显也,虽匹夫匹妇之愚亦与能焉。其妙也,虽圣人之智有所不与知焉。其可能者,以其言近也。其不可知者,以其指远也。经之所传,皆如此矣。六经之外,其立言着书,博极妙道之行,敛道之散而一之,落其华而实之,辩物复性,志静事简,表里六经之训者,莫备乎老列庄子之书。夫三至人之经,虽均传妙理,而其立言之旨互明,於道抑可得而言矣。老君九九之篇,明道德之旨归,才六经之训者,莫备乎老列庄子之书。夫三至人之经,虽均传妙理,而其立言之旨互明,於道抑可得而言矣。老君九九之篇,明道德之旨归,才数千言,究观其始终,以可道为非道,谓上德为不德,以圣道为不争。虽言圣人应世之道,盖未尝及於羲皇之君;虽着万物生化之理,亦未尝及於动植之物。此老君之经所以为至妙而约也。至於庄子之书,以卮言为曼衍,以重言为真,以寓言为广。共书连犿而无伤,其辞諔诡而可观,老君之约得《庄子》而其道益明矣。若夫列子之教,元妙亦在於老君之道德,諔诡亦有於庄子之寓言,廓明老君之要妙,而不为庄子之曼衍。
Interpretation

All Six Classics carry the Dao and transmit it to later generations. They lodge the subtleties of the spirit within ritual and music, names and objects, and institutional standards and measures.

三经之旨教,元妙亦在於老君之道德,諔诡亦有於庄子之寓言,廓明老君之要妙,而不为庄子之曼衍。三经之旨同归於道,而列子之训适居其中。必明乎此,而后可以读列子之书也。夫道果何物也?妙而不可知者是也。所谓妙者,非曰虚无无为故妙也。以其行於万物之上而不可测知故妙尔。大哉道。元资育万物,其自然必以生化为先,其范成必以阴阳为原,是以此经首明天瑞之生化也。天者莫为之道,瑞者合验之物,谓之天瑞,自然之符也。尝原生化之道,非离物而能明,非即物而能尽,即物则不足以言生化,以生化不尽於有为也;离物则无以显其生化,以生化不住於无为也。其言曰:有生不生,有化不化。不生不化者本於天之自然,有生有化者有若瑞之合验,生化之道尽於此矣。爰自太易既有,而太初继之,太始见而太素兆焉,气形质之始既具,斯可名於易。易变而为一,一为形变之,生化之道尽於此矣。爰自太易既有,而太初继之,太始见而太素兆焉,气形质之始既具,斯可名於易。易变而为一,一为形变之始,冥冥之中,其序已无毫厘之素矣。既已堕於形变,则清浊异源,天地奠位,人冲其和,物含其精。天地虽大,其道可符於阴阳;圣道虽妙,其教可验於仁义;万物虽多,其变可合以柔刚。
Interpretation

The essential purport of Liezi is in harmony with that of the two books Laozi and Zhuangzi. The subtle profundity of Laozi lies in its discussion of Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue/Power); the strange and extraordinary rhetoric of Zhuangzi lies in its elaboration through fables. In interpreting these texts, one should grasp the central meaning of Laozi and need not be drawn along by the boundless expansiveness of Zhuangzi. The central purport of all three classics returns to Dao, and the teachings of Liezi stand precisely between them. Only by understanding this can one read Liezi.

Then what is Dao? It is something so subtle that it cannot be fully known by human beings. What is called “subtlety” does not mean that Dao is empty, void, and Wuwei (non-action), and is therefore mysterious; rather, it means that Dao operates above the myriad things and cannot be measured, and is therefore mysterious. It is vast and boundless, transforming and nurturing the myriad things. Its natural order necessarily gives priority to “generation and transformation” (birth and change), and its principle of formation necessarily takes Yin-Yang (the two mutually correlative forces) as its root. Therefore Liezi begins by expounding “Tianrui” (Heavenly Signs), namely the principle of generation and transformation between Heaven and Earth. “Heaven” refers to the natural Dao free of human contrivance, while “sign” refers to concrete things that can be verified; together they mean natural portents.

In investigating the Dao of generation and transformation, one cannot explain it apart from things, nor can one fully understand it merely by relying on concrete things. To look only at things is insufficient to explain generation and transformation, because generation and transformation do not all arise from human action; yet apart from things, generation and transformation cannot manifest, because they do not remain in Wuwei either. Liezi says: “There is that which generates but is not generated; there is that which transforms but is not transformed.” This means that some things give birth while not being born from another, and some things transform while not being transformed by another. The root of this “not being generated and not being transformed” lies in the naturalness of Heaven; while the phenomena of “having generation and having transformation” are like the verification of Tianrui. The entire principle of the Dao of generation and transformation lies precisely here.

From Taiyi (the primordial chaos in which no Qi or phenomena had yet appeared), traces began to emerge; then Taichu (the beginning of Qi), Taishi (the beginning of form), and Taisu (the beginning of substance) appeared in succession. Only after the beginnings of Qi (vital energy), form, and substance were all present could it be called “Yi” (Change). “Yi” changed and became “the One”; “the One” is the point at which bodily form begins to change. In the obscure darkness, the order within it no longer bore the slightest trace of plain simplicity. Once it entered into the transformations of form, the clear and the turbid separated into different streams; Heaven and Earth each fixed their positions; humans received the harmonious Qi of Yin-Yang; and the myriad things each harbored their own Jing (essence).

Though Heaven and Earth are vast, their operational Dao can be corroborated by Yin-Yang; though the sage’s Dao is subtle, his transforming instruction can be verified through benevolence and righteousness; though the myriad things are numerous, their transformations can be summarized as the two forces of softness and hardness.

故一范人之形,未有能逃造化之变者。至若万物之出机入机,有情无情,更相变易,可谓妙矣。化已一定,则亦不能紊其自然之符矣。故均乌足之所化也,为蛴蹧则不能为胡蝶;均鼃之所化也,为鹑则不能为继。生化之理,其符如此,宜其杞国之人睹有形之必终。观天地之昭然有物,是致区区之过计也。且所谓自;均鼃之所化也,为鹑则不能为继。生化之理,其符如此,宜其杞国之人睹有形之必终。观天地之昭然有物,是致区区之过计也。且所谓自然之符者,其始也,必有所自而生;其生也,必有宜定之位;其终也,必有所由以复,始而必终,终而复始。一、七、九之变,循环而无端,此生化之理所以终古不息也。尝谓物之无知,沉沦於造化,固其宜也。人为万物之灵,虽未免乎生化,亦有不生不化之理备於我。曷不思所以反身而诚?奚为甘心於造化之域与彼万物同其转徙哉?列子之训,盖将俾学者即生化之中而明生生化化之妙,顺生化之符而不制於生化尔。故篇终托言舜之问道乎丞,以袪有生之累也。犹以为未也,直以吾乎一身谓为天地之盗。虽天地之盗,虽天地生化亦谓之为盗。盗,人之所共恶也,而我乃以盗而成。若生载若形,则之人也,奚以贵生爱身生化亦谓之为盗。盗,人之所共恶也,而我乃以盗而成。
Interpretation

All things between Heaven and Earth, regardless of size, cannot escape the transformations of creation. The birth and death of all things, the sentient and the insentient, transform into one another; the subtlety of change is truly exquisite. Once creation has fixed its patterns, no thing can disturb its original natural law.

Thus the qi-cao (the larva of beetles such as the scarab) can transform into a butterfly, but it cannot become anything else; the wa (frog) transforms into a quail, and then cannot change into other kinds of creatures. Such is the law of the principle of generation and transformation. The man of Qi who worried that the sky would fall looked only at the fact that things with form inevitably perish, and so worried without end. This takes the visible things before his eyes as eternal; it is a narrow calculation.

The so-called natural law must have, at its beginning, a source from which it emerges; in its growth, a place where it ought to abide; and at its end, a path by which it returns. A beginning must have an end, and when the end is reached, it begins again. Numbers such as “one, seven, nine” represent the various stages of change, cycling back and forth without end. This is precisely why the principle of generation and transformation has never ceased from ancient times to the present.

From this we can see that the myriad things, not knowing this principle, sink into creation and transformation; this is originally a natural outcome. As humans, the most intelligent of the myriad things, although we too cannot escape birth and extinction, we inherently possess the principle that is not born and does not transform. Why not turn back and look at ourselves, and face the original mind with sincerity? Why be willing to be trapped within the scope of creation and transformation, wandering and shifting together with the myriad things? The teaching of the Liezi is probably meant to let students of the Dao, within generation and transformation, realize the mystery of ceaseless generation and transformation, accord with the law of generation and transformation, and not be enslaved by it. Therefore this chapter ends with the story of Shun consulting Cheng about the Great Dao, in order to dispel the various entanglements of human life.

The author still felt this was not enough, and went further: the human body originally exists by borrowing the creative transformation of Heaven and Earth. From the perspective of Heaven and Earth, humans steal the things of Heaven and Earth to take form, and so it is called “the thief of Heaven and Earth.” Even the generation and transformation of Heaven and Earth can be called a kind of “theft.” Theft is something people commonly despise, yet we rely on this “theft” to complete ourselves. Since we have life and bodily form, it is merely this one body; why then overvalue life, cherish oneself, and cling to it?

若生载若形,则之人也,奚以贵生爱身而犯人之所恶哉?故《天瑞》至此而终焉。 冲虚至德真经解卷之二竟 3-冲虚至德真经解卷之三 冲虚至德真经解卷之三 宋杭州州学内舍生臣江遹进 黄帝 黄帝即位十有五年,喜天下戴己,养正命,娱耳目,供鼻口,焦然肌色皯黣,昏然五情爽惑。又十有五年,忧天下之不治,竭聪明,进智力,营百姓,焦然肌色皯黣,昏然五情爽惑。黄帝乃喟然赞曰:朕之过淫矣。养一己其患如此,治万物其患如此。 解曰:生理贵於肆任,有心於养一己,则必蹈其息矣。百姓谓我自然,有心於治万物,亦必蹈其患矣。是故娱耳目,供鼻口,而有欣欣之喜,是不恬也;竭聪明,进智力,而有戚戚之忧,是不愉也。不恬不愉,非德也。虽养身治物之不同,忧喜之有异,其於残生,供鼻口,而有欣欣之喜,是不恬也;竭聪明,进智力,而有戚戚之忧,是不愉也。不恬不愉,非德也。虽养身治物之不同,忧喜之有异,其於残生伤性均也。残生故焦然肌色皯黣,伤性故昏然五情爽惑。夫合十有五年而一世成矣。忧喜居半,外以瘁形,内以伤性,亦何生之乐哉?一此黄帝所以叹其过之深而思求至道也。
Interpretation

Interpreting the Scripture

Now that life and bodily form exist, what is the fundamental principle of being human? How could one, precisely because one cherishes life and cares for the body, instead do what everyone detests? That is why the chapter “Tianrui” concludes at this point.

Volume Title

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing is the Liezi, and Jiang Yu of the Song dynasty wrote a commentary on it. This passage marks the end of volume two and the title of volume three. The signature beneath it, “Presented by Jiang Yu, inner-hall student of the Hangzhou prefectural school, subject of the Song,” is the colophon with which Jiang Yu submitted this commentary.

The Story of the Yellow Emperor

In the fifteenth year after the Yellow Emperor ascended the throne, he rejoiced because all under Heaven supported him. He therefore devoted himself to cultivating upright Qi and nourishing his life and nature; his ears and eyes pursued the pleasures of sound and beauty, while his mouth and nose pursued the enjoyment of fine flavors. As a result, his complexion became dark and haggard, and his emotions—joy, anger, sorrow, pleasure, and the like—became disordered and confused. Another fifteen years passed, and he worried that the world was not well governed. He then exhausted the acuity of his ears and eyes, deployed his wisdom and abilities, and labored over the affairs of the people. The result was the same: his complexion became dark and his emotions confused. The Yellow Emperor therefore sighed deeply and said, “My faults have been excessive. When I merely nourished myself, the calamity was already like this; when I governed the myriad things, the calamity was also like this.”

Explanation of the Commentary

The commentary holds that human nature values following what is natural. If one intentionally sets out to nourish oneself, one necessarily goes against the natural Qi; the common people think that I follow what is natural, but if I intentionally set out to govern the myriad things, I will likewise necessarily fall into calamity. Therefore, to seek the pleasures of the ears and eyes and the delights of the mouth and nose and thereby give rise to joy is not to be tranquil and detached—at ease and free of attachment; to exhaust one’s intelligence and deploy one’s wisdom and thereby give rise to sorrow is not to be joyful. To be neither tranquil and detached nor joyful is not De (Virtue).

Although nourishing the body and governing things differ in content, and although sorrow and joy manifest differently, the harm they do to life and the injury they do to one’s nature are the same. Because life is harmed, the complexion becomes dark; because nature is injured, the emotions become confused. Fifteen years taken together make up a generation, and within them sorrow and joy each occupy half. Externally they leave the body emaciated; internally they injure one’s nature. What pleasure can there be in such a life? This is precisely why the Yellow Emperor lamented the depth of his faults and therefore sought the highest Dao.

於是放万机,舍宫寝,去直侍,彻钟悬,减厨膳,退而闲居大庭之馆,斋心服形,三月不亲政事。昼寝而梦,游於华胥氏之国。 解曰:放万机则不与舍宫寝,去直侍,彻钟悬,减厨膳,退而闲居大庭之馆,斋心服形,三月不亲政事。昼寝而梦,游於华胥氏之国。 解曰:放万机则不与接构;合官寝则周行而不殆;去直侍则独立而不改;彻钟垂、减厨膳则无耳目鼻口之娱,闲居大庭之馆则优游而寓乎广居;斋心服形则聪明智力不用;三月不亲政事则寂然不动;历时变而不迁;昼寝而梦则形不与物接而昭然与神会也。华胥氏之国,神之所寓也。强为之名而无有实,非体性抱神者不能游也。故黄帝梦之所游者如此。 华胥氏之国在弇州之西,台州之北。不知斯齐国几千万里;盖非舟车足力之所及,。故黄帝梦之所游者如此。 华胥氏之国在弇州之西,台州之北。不知斯齐国几千万里;盖非舟车足力之所及,神游而已。 解曰:西北为天地之奥、内照之元门,故托以华胥氏之国所在。虽强为之名,而寓之於方实,非方之所能制,数之所能拘。故曰:不知斯齐国几千万里,神游而已。
Interpretation

The Yellow Emperor thereupon set aside the countless affairs of state, left his palace chambers and sleeping halls, dismissed his attendants and close ministers, removed the hanging bells and chimes, reduced his meals, and withdrew to live at leisure in the old residence of the Dating clan. He fasted and purified his mind, composed his bearing, and for three months took no part in government affairs. While dozing by day, he dreamed that he traveled to the land of Huaxu.

The commentary explains: “Setting aside the myriad affairs” means no longer coming into contact with worldly matters; leaving the palace chambers, dismissing attendants, removing the suspended bells, and reducing meals means cutting off the pleasures of the ears, eyes, mouth, and nose. “Dwelling at leisure in the hall of Dating” means abiding freely and at ease in a vast place. “Fasting the mind and subduing the body” means causing cleverness and ingenuity to cease operating, so that the heart-mind and Shen (spirit) are utterly still and unmoving, and do not change as time flows on. “Sleeping by day and entering a dream” indicates that the body no longer comes into contact with external things, while the heart-mind and Shen clearly meet with spiritual brightness.

The land of Huaxu is a realm in which the spirit finds its lodging. It is only a name reluctantly assigned, and it has no actual location. Unless one truly realizes the original nature and embraces the primordial Shen, one cannot wander there in spirit. Thus what the Yellow Emperor visited in his dream was precisely this realm.

The scripture says that the land of Huaxu lies west of Yanzhou and north of Taizhou; both are names of extremely distant places in ancient legend. This country lies tens of millions of li from here, and cannot be reached by cart or boat or by the strength of one’s legs; one can arrive there only by wandering in spirit.

The commentary further says: The northwest is the profound and hidden place of Heaven and Earth, and also the gateway of inward contemplation that illumines the mind; therefore the location of the land of Huaxu is used as a metaphor. Although a direction has been assigned to it, in reality it cannot be limited by any physical direction, nor constrained by number. Hence it is said that this country is tens of millions of li from here and can be reached only by wandering there in spirit.

其国无师长,自然而已。其民无嗜欲,自然而已。不知乐生,不知恶死,故无夭殇;不知亲己,不知疏物,故无爱憎;不知背逆,不知向顺,故无利害;都无所爱惜,都无所畏忌。生,不知恶死,故无夭殇;不知亲己,不知疏物,故无爱憎;不知背逆,不知向顺,故无利害;都无所爱惜,都无所畏忌。入水不溺,入火不热。斫挞无伤痛,指擿无痟痒。乘空而履实,寝虚若处床。云雾不碍其视,雷霆不乱其听,美恶不滑其心,山谷不踬其步,神行而已。
Interpretation

Vernacular Interpretation

In that country there were no rulers or officials; everything simply followed its own nature. The people there had no greed or cravings, and they too simply accorded with nature.

They did not know to cling to life or to hate death, so they had no sorrow over premature death. They did not know to draw close to themselves or to keep distant from other things, so they had neither love nor hatred. They did not know to oppose or to comply, so they had neither profit nor harm. They begrudged nothing to anything, and they feared nothing and observed no taboos. Entering water, they did not drown; entering fire, they were not burned. Whipped or struck, they felt no pain; flicked or pricked by a finger, they did not itch. They could walk through the void as though treading on solid ground; lying down within the void, they were as secure as if sleeping in a bed. Clouds and mist could not obscure their sight, thunder could not confuse their hearing, beauty and ugliness could not stir their hearts, and the perils of valleys and gorges could not trip their steps. Their spirit came and went freely—that was all.

解曰:语有之曰:人不衣食,君臣道息。其国无师长,其民无嗜欲,以此而已。且国无师长,不以无欲治之民而然也,自然而已。民无嗜欲,亦不以有善治之君而然也,自然而已。道至於自然,则世俗之所谓欲恶、亲疏、逆顺、爱畏都忘之矣,又奚有夭殇之患、爱憎之情、利害之择哉?即是可以入水火,忘痟痛,乘空如实,处实若虚,视听洞彻,其心不滑,其行不踬也。真空不空,乘空有似乎真而非真也,故言若履实。真虚非虚,寝虚有似乎虚而非真虚也,故言若处床。非天空有似乎真而非真也,故言若履实。真虚非虚,寝虚有似乎虚而非真虚也,故言若处床。非天下之至神,其孰能与於此?古之真人,其寝不梦,其觉无忧。黄帝,古之辩觉梦者,然则华胥之游,彼直真梦者矣。其托之梦,非以循斯须故然耶。 黄帝既寤,怡然自得,召天老、力牧、太山稽,告之曰:朕闲居三月,斋心服形,思有以养身治物之道,弗获其术。疲而睡,所梦若此。今知至道不可以情求矣。朕知之矣,朕得之矣。而不能以告若矣。又二十有八年,天下大治,几若华胥氏之国。
Interpretation

An ancient saying goes: If people do not greedily seek food, clothing, and enjoyment, the way of contention between ruler and subject will cease. When the state has no teachers and elders (referring to the ruler’s control and moral instruction), and the people have no cravings or desires, the principle is no more than this. That the state can be “without teachers and elders” is not because the people have no desires and have been transformed by a governance of desirelessness, but because it arises from naturalness. That the people can be “without cravings and desires” is likewise not because the ruler has good government, but because it arises from naturalness.

When cultivation of the Dao reaches the realm of accord with naturalness, the worldly distinctions of like and dislike, closeness and distance, favorable and contrary, love and fear are all forgotten. This being so, what remaining worry of premature death, emotions of love and hatred, or choices of benefit and harm could there be? Such a person can enter water and fire without being harmed, forgets pain and itch, walks through the air as if treading on solid ground, and dwells amid actual circumstances as if nothing were there; seeing and hearing are penetrating and clear, the mind is unobstructed, and actions do not stumble.

The saying “true emptiness is not empty” means that when one walks by relying on emptiness, it appears real but is not actually real; hence it is said, “as if treading on solid ground.” “True void is not void” means that when one lies down within emptiness, it appears void but is not truly void; hence it is said, “as if lying on a bed.” If not for the supremely spiritual person in the world, who could accomplish this?

The True Persons of antiquity (those who attained the Dao) slept without dreaming and awoke without anxiety. The Yellow Emperor was one who, in ancient times, could distinguish waking from dreaming; thus the story of the “Journey to Huaxu” is merely a dream within a parable. The book’s use of a dream to expound its teaching may precisely be to accommodate a truth that pertains only to the brief moment.

After the Yellow Emperor awoke, his mood was joyful. He summoned his ministers Tian Lao, Li Mu, and Tai Shan Ji (all assistants to the Yellow Emperor) and said to them: “I lived in leisure for three months, fasting and purifying my mind, regulating and nourishing my body, and pondering the principles of nourishing life and governing the state, yet I could not find the method. When I grew weary, I fell asleep, and what I dreamed was just such a scene. Now I know that the ultimate Dao cannot be sought through emotions and desires. I understand it, and I have realized it, but I still cannot tell it to you.” Thereafter, for twenty-eight years, the world was greatly governed, almost like the country of Huaxu (the ideal land in the Liezi that the Yellow Emperor visited in his dream, where there is no rule by ruler and minister, and the people, without desires, dwell naturally at peace).

The commentary says: “Tian Lao” symbolizes the Wuwei (non-action) that embodies and realizes the Heavenly Dao.

解曰:天老者,体天道之无为。力牧今知至道不可以情求矣。朕知之矣,朕得之矣。而不能以告若矣。又二十有八年,天下大治,几若华胥氏之国。 解曰:天老者,体天道之无为。力牧者,为人治之工宰。太山稽者,於地类为莫大。得道者,能命三才而役造化,是以黄帝怡然自得,则召三者而告之也。夫道有情有信,而至道不可以情求者,盖道不废情而有情,不可以求道也。所谓至道者,道之不离於真者也。安有术之可思以思而求其术?是以情求至道也,终不足以得道矣。故必疲而睡,所梦若此,而后既寤,则怡然自得也。盖疲而睡,则肢体堕而智力不用,而梦则真与神接也。唯有得於至道,则天下可不治而治矣。故又二十有八年,天下大治,不用,而梦则真与神接也。唯有得於至道,则天下可不治而治矣。故又二十有八年,天下大治,几若华胥氏之国。二十有八,四七之数也。七七,天癸之数,至此得其中而极其盛。虽黄帝之治不离於有为,故其治不能逃乎数。且七七,阴数也,黄帝方敛华而复本,故特举阴数之盛者言之。且道不至於真,人未有寝而不梦者,曷亦不至乎华胥?既寤,则怡然自得欤。盖昼之所好,则夜之所梦,有若黄帝之斋心服形,则想梦自消矣,使黄帝也而有梦,则必至乎华胥而已矣。苟不能齐心服形,则役於思虑,制於阴阳。梦饮酒者,旦而哭泣。梦哭泣者,旦而田猎。方且颠倒於梦想,而得失忧喜初无有定,不知去华胥阴阳。
Interpretation

The commentary says: Tianlao represents the Wuwei of the heavenly Dao; Limu is the master who governs human affairs; and Taishan Ji is the most exalted within the earthly Dao. (Tianlao, Limu, and Taishan Ji were all ministers of the Yellow Emperor.) One who can attain the Dao may command the Three Powers—heaven, earth, and humanity—and drive the forces of creation. Therefore, after the Yellow Emperor had attained ease and contentment, he summoned these three ministers and told them of it.

The Dao has both reality and verification, yet the ultimate Dao cannot be sought through desire. This is because the Dao does not discard feeling and nature; it contains reality within itself. It is only that one cannot seek the Dao with a seeking mind. What is called the ultimate Dao is the Dao that does not depart from truth. How could there be a method by which it can be obtained through thought? If one uses deliberation to seek the ultimate Dao, one will in the end not obtain it. Therefore one must become weary and fall asleep, dream of such a scene, and only after waking be filled with ease and contentment. This is presumably because when one is weary and asleep, the limbs relax, and cleverness and mental effort are no longer employed; in the dream, then, true nature comes into contact with spiritual consciousness.

Only after obtaining the ultimate Dao can the world be ordered without being governed. Thus, after another twenty-eight years, the world was greatly ordered, almost like the country of Huaxu (a legendary ideal realm in which the Yellow Emperor once dreamed he wandered). Twenty-eight is the number four times seven. Seven times seven is forty-nine, the number of tiangui (the marker of reproductive essence in the human body; the ancients took a woman’s forty-nine years as the time when tiangui is exhausted). Here it exactly reaches the center and arrives at its fullest flourishing. The Yellow Emperor’s governance had still not departed from youwei, and so his rule could not exceed the patterns of number. Moreover, seven times seven belongs to the yin numbers; the Yellow Emperor was then withdrawing his outward brilliance and returning to the origin, and so the text especially cites the flourishing of a yin number to explain this.

Furthermore, if the Dao has not reached the realm of truth, there is no person who does not dream—why can they not reach the realm of Huaxu? And after waking, can they not also be at ease and content? Presumably, what one delights in by day one dreams of by night. If one fasts and purifies the mind and regulates the body as the Yellow Emperor did, delusive thoughts and miscellaneous dreams naturally disappear; even if the Yellow Emperor also dreamed, that dream must have been only of the realm of Huaxu. If one cannot unify the mind and subdue the body, one will be enslaved by deliberation and constrained by Yin-Yang. One who drinks in a dream weeps upon waking; one who weeps in a dream goes hunting upon waking. People are upside down within dreams and imaginings; gain and loss, sorrow and joy originally have no fixed standard, yet they do not know that they are departing from Huaxu and from the constraint of Yin-Yang.

梦饮酒者,旦而哭泣。梦哭泣者,旦而田猎。方且颠倒於梦想,而得失忧喜初无有定,不知去华胥氏之国几千万里矣。且昼想夜梦,理之常也。此必托之昼寝而梦者,昼,日之中也,胶扰而接於事之时也。神游於形接之时,是神无须臾离形也。尝试论之,帝王之功,圣人之余事也。圣人不得已而有为,虽有为也,而付於物,物之自为,宜无有为之累矣。然既已有为,则帝王之功成而大道隐矣。列子将明圣人之应帝王,始终不离於至道。故即黄帝之始以为言焉,语道至於黄帝为之累矣。然既已有为,则帝王之功成而大道隐矣。列子将明圣人之应帝王,始终不离於至道。故即黄帝之始以为言焉,语道至於黄帝则极矣。逮其即位而应世,则扰扰之绪起矣。或治或乱,一喜一忧,其为必不免矣。虽然,黄帝以夫大宗者出而应物,常体尽无穷而游无映,是以托之华胥之梦以袪其应世之迹。逮其齐心服形,敛应世之迹而复於至道,几若华胥氏之治,则所谓黄帝者,世莫得而见之矣。天下之人,徒亦守其陈迹以思无教尔。故此篇终言季咸之相壶子,至於示之以未始出吾宗,则季黄帝者,世莫得而见之矣。天下之人,徒亦守其陈迹以思无教尔。
Interpretation

Those who drink in dreams weep when they wake, and those who weep in dreams go hunting when they wake. People are tossed to and fro in dreams and imaginings, with no fixed standard for gain and loss, worry and joy, and yet they do not know that they have already departed tens of millions of li from the land of Huaxu (the legendary ideal realm of no contention and no desire; see Liezi, “Yellow Emperor”). What one thinks by day, one dreams by night—this is ordinary. The text specifically says that he “entrusted it to a daytime nap and dreamed” because daytime is the time of day when distractions and busyness are greatest and contact with worldly affairs most frequent. That the spirit wanders abroad while still joined to the body shows that spiritual consciousness never for a moment departs from the body.

Again, the achievements of emperors and kings are but the leftover business of the sage. The sage acts only when he has no choice; even when he acts, he hands affairs over to the myriad things and lets the myriad things act for themselves, and so he could avoid the entanglement of purposeful action. Yet once there is action, and the achievements of emperors and kings are completed, the Great Dao becomes hidden. Liezi wishes to clarify the sage’s principle of “responding to emperors,” never departing from the ultimate Dao, and so he begins with the Yellow Emperor, pointing out that the Great Dao had already reached its utmost at the time of the Yellow Emperor. When the Yellow Emperor ascended the throne and responded to the world, the beginnings of disturbance had already arisen; order or chaos, joy or worry, were inevitably hard to avoid.

Nevertheless, the Yellow Emperor, as the embodiment of the “Great Ancestor” (the source, the manifestation of the ultimate Dao), emerged to respond to things while always preserving the inexhaustibility of his original substance and roaming in a realm without obstruction. He therefore used the Huaxu dream to erase the traces of his responding to the world. When he unified his mind and withdrew his form, gathering up the traces of responding to the world and returning to the ultimate Dao, he came close to the rule of Huaxu; and then the so-called Yellow Emperor could no longer be seen by the people of the world. The people of the world could only vainly cling to his old traces and yearn for the teaching of Wuwei (non-action). That is why this chapter ends with Jixian physiognomizing Huzi, until Huzi reveals, “I have never yet emerged from my ancestral source”—precisely to explain this meaning.

故此篇终言季咸之相壶子,至於示之以未始出吾宗,则季咸莫得而相,自失而走尔七其说盖明此也。帝王之道至此'而极矣。故《庄子□应帝王》亦以此终其篇。 列姑射山在海河洲中,山上有神人焉,吸风饮露,不食五谷;心如渊泉,形如处女;不偎不爱,仙圣为之臣;不畏不怒,原悫为之使;不施不惠,而物自足;不聚不敛,而己无愆。阴阳常调,日月常明,四时常若,风雨常均,字育常时,年谷常丰,而土无札伤,人无夭恶,物无疵疠,鬼无灵响焉。 解曰:姑,且也。射,厌也。姑射山者,厌射世累,不得已而姑且应之者所居也。水几於道,海,河水之所归也。姑射山在其洲中,以言居道之中也,非神人孰能射世累,不得已而姑且应之者所居也。水几於道,海,河水之所归也。姑射山在其洲中,以言居道之中也,非神人孰能与於此?不食五谷,吸风饮露,则味於道之淡乎无味。心如渊泉,则静专而不流。形如处女,则应物而不倡。不偎不爱,刍狗万物也。不畏不怒,纯气是守也。不施不惠,而物自足,所谓人人不损一毫也。不聚不敛,而己无愆,所谓人人不利天下也。由阴阳常调而至於鬼无灵响,老君所谓安平泰也。 列子师老商氏,友伯高子,
Interpretation

The summary at the end of this chapter says: when Jixian (a diviner skilled in physiognomy and in judging people’s fortunes and misfortunes) read Huzi’s physiognomy, Huzi revealed to him the state of “never having left my ancestral source” (never departing from my root). Jixian could then no longer read his physiognomy and fled in panic. The principle expounded in the Liezi, “Ying Diwang,” is precisely meant to explain this. When the Way of emperors and kings is cultivated to this point, it reaches its utmost; that is why the Zhuangzi, “Ying Diwang,” also uses this as the ending of its whole chapter.

The scripture says: Mount Liegu Ye stands on a river islet in the sea, and on the mountain dwells a spirit-person. He inhales the wind and drinks the dew, does not eat the five grains; his mind is as calm as a deep pool, and his outward form is like an unmarried maiden. He neither draws near to nor cherishes anyone, yet immortals and sages are willing to serve as his subjects; he does not fear or become angry, yet the sincere, generous, loyal, and upright are willing to exert themselves for him. He does not give alms or bestow favors, yet the myriad things are naturally abundant; he does not amass or store up, yet he himself has no fault. Yin-Yang are harmonized, the sun and moon shine bright, the four seasons keep their order, wind and rain come at the proper times, the hundred grains grow according to season, the harvest is abundant, the land suffers no calamities, people are free from premature death and serious illness, the myriad things have no blemishes or plagues, and ghosts produce no eerie sounds or anomalies.

The commentary explains: gu means “for the time being”; ye means “to reject.” Mount Guye is where those who are weary of and detached from the world’s troubles and burdens, and who only reluctantly and temporarily respond to the world, dwell. “Water is nearly like the Dao” means that the sea is where the river waters converge; because Mount Guye lies on a river islet in the sea, it shows that the spirit-person dwells at the center of the Dao—who but one who has attained the Dao could reach such a state? Not eating the five grains, inhaling the wind and drinking the dew, means that his taste is as bland and flavorless as the Dao. His mind being like a deep abyss means he is quiet, concentrated, and unmoving. His form being like an unmarried maiden means he complies with the myriad things without taking the lead. “Not drawing near and not cherishing” is to regard the myriad things as straw dogs (in ancient sacrifices, straw dogs were discarded after use and not treasured); “not fearing and not becoming angry” is to guard the pure primal Qi. “Not giving alms or bestowing favors, yet things are naturally sufficient” means that no one suffers the loss of a single hair; “not gathering or storing up, yet he himself has no fault” means that no one profits from the world on his account. From “Yin-Yang are always harmonized” through “ghosts make no numinous sounds” is precisely the state Laozi calls “peace and great tranquility.”

The final sentence explains Liezi’s relationships with teachers and friends: he took Lao Shangshi as his teacher and Bo Gaozi as his friend.

解曰:商,金声也。老商,则反性复命而无为者也。伯高子,则年弥高而德弥邵者也。故子列子师友若人也。列子尝师壶丘子,友子, 解曰:商,金声也。老商,则反性复命而无为者也。伯高子,则年弥高而德弥邵者也。故子列子师友若人也。列子尝师壶丘子,友伯昏瞀人矣。盖道无乎不在,则亦何常师之有? 进二子之道,乘风而归。尹生闻之,从列子居,数月不省舍。因间请蕲其术者,十反而十不告,尹生怼而请辞,列子又不命。尹生退。数月,意不已,又往从之。列子曰:汝何去来之频?尹生曰:曩章戴有请於子,子不我告,固有憾於子。今复脱然,是以又来。列子曰:曩吾以生退。数月,意不已,又往从之。列子曰:汝何去来之频?尹生曰:曩章戴有请於子,子不我告,固有憾於子。今复脱然,是以又来。列子曰:曩吾以汝为达,今汝之鄙至此乎?姬,将告汝所学於夫子者矣。
Interpretation

Shang is one of the five notes and corresponds to the metal sound. Its tone is clear and penetrating yet restrained, symbolizing autumn and the qi of solemn decay. The so-called “Lao Shang” means that the musical pitch has become restrained to the utmost, a metaphor for people returning to their original nature and recovering their heavenly mandate, doing nothing and following nature. Bogaozi was a man whose virtue became more conspicuous as he grew older. Liezi took such a person as teacher and friend.

Liezi (a Daoist figure of the Warring States period, named Yukou) once studied under Huqiu Zi and befriended Bohun Maoren. The great Dao is everywhere—where could there be a fixed, unchanging teacher?

Liezi received the Daoist arts of these two masters and returned riding the wind. Yin Sheng (Liezi’s disciple), upon hearing of this, followed Liezi and lived with him, not returning home for several months. Taking an opportunity, he asked Liezi to transmit the method to him; he asked ten times, and Liezi did not tell him even once. Yin Sheng felt resentment and asked to resign; Liezi did not detain him, and he left. After several months, Yin Sheng still could not let it go in his heart and came back to follow Liezi. Liezi asked: Why do you come and go so frequently? Yin Sheng replied: Earlier Zhang Dai asked you on my behalf, but you would not tell me, and so I harbored dissatisfaction against you. Now the resentment has subsided, and so I have come again. Liezi said: I originally thought you understood things; has your vulgarity now reached this point? Very well, I will tell you the Daoist method I learned from my teacher.

解曰:《庄子》曰:使道而可以告人,则人莫不告其兄弟。十反而十不告,非不欲告之也,不知其可告也。与啮缺问於王倪,四问而四不知。知问无为,谓三问而三不答,频矣。为章戴者,方且以文之成尊而冠诸首,安足以语老商无为之道哉?是以既从列子,则以怼憾而不答,频矣。为章戴者,方且以文之成尊而冠诸首,安足以语老商无为之道哉?是以既从列子,则以怼憾而辞,既退数月,复以脱然而来。去来不常,怼憾再三,其鄙而不达於道,终不近矣,故不得已而告之。
Interpretation

Zhuangzi says: “If the Dao could be told to others in words, there would be no one who did not tell it to his brothers.” Yet someone explained it ten times, and the other party failed to understand ten times. This was not because he was unwilling to tell him, but because the Dao itself cannot be directly transmitted in words, and the other did not understand that the Dao must be realized through one’s own experience.

Nie Que (a figure in the Zhuangzi) sought instruction from Wang Ni (an adept who had attained the Dao), asking four times; four times Wang Ni said, “I do not know.” Zhi (a personal name, not the “knowledge” denoted by the word zhi) asked Wuweiwei (one who had attained the Dao), asking three times; three times Wuweiwei gave no answer. These repeated questions may appear frequent, but in fact the other party was simply unable to answer in words.

People of the sort represented by Zhang Dai (a personal name; the person is otherwise unknown) regard achievements in literary composition and rhetorical elegance as honorable and place them foremost. How could they be worthy to be told of the Dao of Wuwei (non-action) as expounded by Lao Shang (a figure in ancient legend who had attained the Dao)?

Hence this person at first followed Liezi (Lie Yukou, a Daoist figure of the Warring States period), but because of resentment he took his leave. Several months after departing, he returned with a sense of release. His coming and going was inconstant, and he harbored resentment several times. So shallow and without penetration into the Dao, he could never draw near to it; therefore, only as a last resort was the Dao told to him.

自吾之事夫子友若人也,三年之后,心不敢念是非,口不敢言利害,始得夫子一眄而已。五年之后,心庚念是非,口庚言利害,夫子始一解颜而笑,七年之后,从心之所念,庚无是非;从口之所言,庚无利害,夫子始一引吾并席而坐。九年之后,横心之所念,横口之所言,亦不知我之是非利害欤,亦不知彼之是非利害欤;亦不知夫子之为我师,若人之为我友,内外进矣。而后眼如耳,耳如鼻,鼻如口,无不同也。心凝形释,骨肉都融;不觉形之所倚,足之所履,随风东西,犹木叶干壳,竟不知风乘我邪?我乘风乎?今女居先生之门,曾未浃时,不同也。心凝形释,骨肉都融;不觉形之所倚,足之所履,随风东西,犹木叶干壳,竟不知风乘我邪?我乘风乎?今女居先生之门,曾未浃时,而怼憾者再三,女之片体将炁所不受,汝之一节将地所不载。履虚乘风,其可几乎?尹生甚作,屏息良久,不敢复言。
Interpretation

I studied the Dao under my teacher, practicing together with a fellow disciple. For the first three years, I did not dare let thoughts of right and wrong arise in my mind, nor dare speak of benefit and harm with my mouth; only then did my teacher occasionally give me a sidelong glance. After five years, I was still thinking about right and wrong in my mind and still speaking of benefit and harm with my mouth, and only then did my teacher show a faint smile. After seven years, I thought whatever I wished to think, with no longer any division into right and wrong; I said whatever I wished to say, no longer weighing benefit and harm; only then did my teacher pull me to sit beside him on the same mat.

After nine years, I let my mind think whatever it thought and my mouth say whatever it said; I no longer distinguished what was my own right and wrong, benefit and harm, from what was others’ right and wrong, benefit and harm, nor did I remember that my teacher was my teacher or that that man was my friend. Within and without, I had made progress; and so my eyes were like my ears, my ears like my nose, my nose like my mouth—all the senses interpenetrated without distinction. My mind and spirit were concentrated and still, my bodily form dissolved, my bones and flesh melted away. I was unaware of what my body leaned upon or what my feet trod; I merely drifted east and west with the wind, like a withered leaf or an empty husk, and could not tell whether the wind was carrying me or I was riding the wind.

Now you have entered the Master’s gate, and in less than two hours you have already resented and complained several times. There is not a part of your body that even Qi—the vital energy of heaven and earth—is willing to receive; there is not a joint of your body that the earth is willing to bear. For someone like this, can one even speak of treading the void and riding the wind? When Yin Sheng (here referring to the listener) heard this, he was overcome with shame, held his breath for a long time, and did not dare speak again.

解曰:是非在理,利害在事。昔之所是,今而非之,则是非初无定体。我以为利,人或病之,则利害初无常是。所以有是非利害者,人之生也,因欲有身,因身有爱,以欲发爱,七情交错,眼逐於色,耳循於声,鼻流於香,舌嗜於味。一体之内各不相知,虽均於耳目之见闻也,左右异位则明暗或殊,况能无不同乎?由是知是非利害咸出於耳目鼻口之知觉耳。而知觉之生,依於圆明之均於耳目之见闻也,左右异位则明暗或殊,况能无不同乎?由是知是非利害咸出於耳目鼻口之知觉耳。而知觉之生,依於圆明之性,性与物对,物合於我,因以成体,体虽不一,性终无二。夫一性裂为七情,初不属彼,则反决裂於圆明,亦奚假於物哉?苟能即声色臭味之中,一有所悟,而休复於真,则七窍俱潜,耳目鼻口融通为一,回视天下万物,纷纷扰扰,如雨雪之见睆,无不殒释而同於真精矣,而况於吾之一身乎?此则子列子履虚乘风之道也,列子於此道生知而自得矣,奚假於学哉?将以垂训,故必寓於学者,历阶以进之,序而托之於躬行也。心不敢念是非,口不敢言利害,则能去智与故矣。此由一年之野进於三年而通之时也。夫不敢,非无其意也,未至乎目击而道存也,故始得老商一眄而已。
Interpretation

Right and wrong depend on whether something accords with principle; benefit and harm depend on the matter itself. What was considered right in the past may be rejected today, showing that right and wrong have no fixed standard; what I regard as beneficial others may regard as harmful, showing that benefit and harm likewise have no unchanging judgment.

The reason people distinguish right and wrong, benefit and harm is that they have a body; and with a body come love and aversion. Once desire is stirred, the seven emotions—joy, anger, sorrow, fear, love, aversion, and desire (the seven human feelings)—intertwine and become confused: the eyes chase colors, the ears follow sounds, the nose is absorbed in fragrances, and the tongue craves flavors. Within the same body, the various organs do not know one another. Although the ears and eyes both receive what is seen and heard, their left and right positions differ, so there are differences in light and dark; how much harder would it be to make them entirely uniform? From this one knows that right and wrong, benefit and harm all arise from the perceptions of the ears, eyes, nose, and mouth.

Perception arises by relying on the perfectly luminous nature (the Daoist innate nature of complete brightness). When original nature stands opposite external things and external things join with the self, various cognitions and forms come into being. Though forms differ, nature is ultimately one. This one nature divides into the seven emotions, which do not originally pertain to external things. If one can awaken amid sounds, colors, smells, and tastes and return to true nature, then all seven apertures will lie dormant unused, and ears, eyes, mouth, and nose will merge into one. Looking back at the myriad things of the world, bustling and chaotic, they are like snowflakes falling into water: all melt away and unite with the true Jing (essence)—how much more so this body of mine?

This is Liezi’s realm of “treading on emptiness and riding the wind” (as recorded in Zhuangzi’s “Xiaoyao You,” Liezi could ride the wind and travel through the void). Liezi had an innate awakening to this Dao and naturally attained it; how could he still need to learn? Yet in order to set an example for later generations, it must be conveyed through learning, guided step by step, and grounded in personal practice. When in the mind one dares not think of right and wrong, and in speech one dares not discuss benefit and harm, then cleverness and calculating mind can be removed. This is like cultivating a field for a year: only after three years can one achieve thorough understanding.

“Dare not” does not mean that such an intention is absent; it is simply that one has not yet reached the realm where a single meeting of the eyes is itself an awakening to the Dao. Thus one can only temporarily receive a flash of inspiration from a glance from Lao Shang (a figure in the text).

至於五年而来,则心更念是非害,则能去智与故矣。此由一年之野进於三年而通之时也。夫不敢,非无其意也,未至乎目击而道存也,故始得老商一眄而已。至於五年而来,则心更念是非,口更言利害,其念其言出於自然而无矜吝之心,则其道莫逆於心,故为之解颜而笑,能无择於心之念口之言矣。不至乎七年之天成,则未能纵而不守,是未可与权也,安能与壶子齐罗而并驾哉?故必从心之念,从口之言,更无是非利害,始一引之并席而坐。然而从则纵之而已,虽曰更无是非利害,是能无有矣,未能无无也。故必进於九年之大妙,而后横心之念,横江之言,亦不知彼之是非利害也,亦不知我之是非利害也,无不同矣。道至无有矣,未能无无也。故必进於九年之大妙,而后横心之念,横江之言,亦不知彼之是非利害也,亦不知我之是非利害也,无不同矣。道至於此,则不贵其资,不爱其师,故不知夫子之为我师,若人之为我友,而内外进矣。夫然后七窍休复於一真,百骸圆同於太虚,其寓於天地之间,犹木叶干壳之随风东西,不知风乘我耶?我乘风乎?谓我之乘风,则木叶之飘亦有心於乘风乎?谓风之乘我,则风之吹嘘曷尝有待於我哉?然则御风而行,泠然善也,不知其所以然而然尔。
Interpretation

Plain-Language Interpretation

This passage from the Exegesis of the Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing discusses how a cultivator of the Dao (the Way) gradually escapes the discriminative mind and ultimately becomes one with the Dao of nature.

Stages of Cultivation

By the fifth year of cultivation, the mind’s thoughts concerning right and wrong, benefit and harm, will grow more refined and mature. At this point one can already discard the calculating, clever mind and clinging fixed views. This is the time when, after passing from the preliminary cultivation of the “first year” into the period “after three years,” one can penetrate the great Dao.

At the beginning of cultivating the Dao, it is not that such thoughts are absent, but that one has not yet reached the state in which “a glance is made and the Dao is present” (seeing the great Dao with one’s own eyes, the great Dao naturally manifesting). Therefore one can only receive the benefit of a single glimpse, as Laozi and Shang Rong did.

The Naturalness of Mind and Speech

By the fifth year, the thoughts in the mind and the words on the tongue, even when they touch on right and wrong, benefit and harm, all arise from spontaneity, without self-conscious restraint or holding back. Dao and mind already communicate without obstruction. Thus one can “relax the countenance and smile”; thoughts and words need no deliberate choosing or rejecting.

The Seventh and Ninth Years

If one has not reached the seventh year’s state of “heavenly completion,” one still cannot let oneself go freely without losing what one guards. Such a person still cannot deal expediently with others, let alone keep pace with Liezi in the manner of Huzi.

Therefore the cultivator should follow his thoughts and follow his words, no longer clinging to right and wrong, benefit and harm. But this “following” is still only indulgence. Although there is no right and wrong, benefit and harm, that is merely “nonexistence”; one has not yet reached “no-nonexistence” (forgetting even the thought of “nonexistence”).

Thus one must enter the ninth year’s “Great Wonder” before one can “stand athwart” thoughts and words (transcend them and not be drawn along by them), no longer calculating right and wrong, benefit and harm, for oneself or others. Self and other are without distinction, and all returns to unity.

Self-Forgetting and Naturalness

At this stage, one no longer values the natural endowments on which one relies, nor does one regard teachers and elders as objects of affection. One does not know the teacher as “my teacher” or others as “my friends”; inner and outer have both entered a state of undifferentiated fusion.

In this way, the seven apertures withdraw and return to the one truth; the hundred bones of the body become one with the Great Void. Dwelling provisionally between heaven and earth, one is like a withered leaf drifting east and west with the wind, not knowing whether the wind is driving me or I am riding the wind.

If I say that I am riding the wind, then does the drifting of the withered leaf also intend to ride the wind? If I say that the wind is riding me, when has the wind’s blowing ever needed to wait for me?

Therefore one can ride the wind and travel, free and subtly light, yet without knowing why it is so—it is simply so of itself.

且既曰骨肉风,则木叶之飘亦有心於乘风乎?谓风之乘我,则风之吹嘘曷尝有待於我哉?然则御风而行,泠然善也,不知其所以然而然尔。且既曰骨肉都融矣,犹拟之以木叶干壳者,盖有生之气,有形之状,可使之虚而不可使之无。虽有形体而无形体之累,可谓虚矣。虽犹木叶干壳之轻,而未离於有物也。此《庄子》所以谓其犹有所待也,是乃道之所以为大妙也。如亦无而已矣,又何贵於道哉?若尹生者,内藏怼憾,以忿滀之气自戾於大和,其生也,为天地之疣赘尔。居先生之门,道之所以为大妙也。如亦无而已矣,又何贵於道哉?若尹生者,内藏怼憾,以忿滀之气自戾於大和,其生也,为天地之疣赘尔。居先生之门,曾未浃时而对憾再三,则积此妄情以终其身,有沉溺而已。虽以坤之厚载,亦不能胜其一节之沦坠矣。噫,有生均命於造化,情想一殊而升况之异乃至於此,故列子於此特致意焉。 列子问关尹曰:至人潜行不窒,蹈火不热,行乎万物之上而不栗。请问何以至於此?关尹曰:是纯气之守也,非智巧果敢之列。
Interpretation

Since it is said that “bones and flesh are like wind,” do the tree leaves drifting with the wind also have a mind to ride the wind? If one says the wind is carrying me, when did the wind’s blowing ever need to depend on me? Thus, riding the wind and traveling, light and subtly natural, people do not know why it is so, and yet it is accomplished naturally.

It also says that “bones and flesh have all melted away,” and yet still uses tree leaves and dry husks as a metaphor. This is because the Qi of life and the condition of having form can only be made empty, not made entirely nonexistent. Although there is physical form, there is no entanglement with physical form; this can be called “empty.” But it is still as light as tree leaves and dry husks, and has not completely left the state of having things. This is why Zhuangzi says it “still has something on which it depends.” This is precisely the profound mystery of the Dao. If it were to return completely to nothingness, why would one still value the Dao?

As for this man Yin Sheng, he harbors resentment in his heart and uses pent-up, angry Qi to contravene the Great Harmony (the harmonious primal Qi between Heaven and Earth). His whole life is nothing but a superfluous tumor in Heaven and Earth. He entered the Master’s gate (referring to Guan Yin) and in less than a day harbored resentment several times. Thus he accumulated this deluded emotion until the end of his life, merely drowning in it. Even the deep earth cannot bear the sinking and falling of a single thought of his. Alas, the lives of all beings receive their endowment from transformation; only because their emotions and thoughts differ does the distinction between high and low reach such an extreme. This is why Liezi pays particular attention here.

Liezi (a Daoist figure of the Warring States period; the book Liezi is traditionally attributed to him) asked Guan Yin (Guan Yinxi, a Daoist scholar and Liezi’s teacher): “The Perfected Person (one whose moral cultivation has reached the highest realm) dives into water without suffocating, treads through fire without feeling heat, and walks above the ten thousand things without fear. May I ask how they can reach such a state?” Guan Yin replied: “This is the result of guarding pure Qi; it does not rely on cleverness, courage, or the like.”

解曰:至人,不离於真者也。真在於内,则万物孰足以易之?此至人之所以入水不濡,入火不热,登高不栗也。关尹以谓至於此为纯气之守者,盖纯也者,谓其不亏其神也。不亏其神,是所以为真也。彼智巧果敢,有心於胜物也。内藏猜虑,外侍盛气,虽一节片体将不容於天地之间,者,谓其不亏其神也。不亏其神,是所以为真也。彼智巧果敢,有心於胜物也。内藏猜虑,外侍盛气,虽一节片体将不容於天地之间,水火岂复可近哉?唯纯气内守,则知见旋复,观听内藏,莫知其为,水火与之为一体矣,此所以无入而不自得也。老君曰:含德之厚,比於赤子。即此所谓纯气之守也。是以毒虫不螫,猛兽不据,攫鸟不搏。 姬,鱼语汝。凡有貌像声色者,皆物也,物与物何以相远也?,夫奚足以至乎先?是色而已。 解曰:貌像声色,皆谓之色者。凡物自无而生有,必始於流动而生色相远也?,夫奚足以至乎先?是色而已。 解曰:貌像声色,皆谓之色者。凡物自无而生有,必始於流动而生色。太素具而形质始着,太素犹不及於太始,又安能至乎先哉?唯物物而非物者,然后足以至乎先。至乎先,其老君所谓有物混成者欤? 则物之造乎不形,而止乎无所化。夫得是而穷之者,焉得为正焉!
Interpretation

The commentary says: The Zhiren (the perfected person) is one who does not depart from Zhen (the true/authentic). If Zhen is stored within, how can the myriad things change him? This is precisely why the Zhiren enters water without getting wet, enters fire without feeling heat, and climbs high places without fear.

Guan Yin (Laozi’s disciple, whose name was Yin Xi) held that those who can reach this state are engaged in the “guarding of pure Qi” (chunqi zhi shou), that is, single-mindedly guarding pure and correct Qi. What is called “pure” means not depleting one’s Jing (essence) and Shen (spirit). Not depleting Jing and Shen is Zhen.

Those who pride themselves on cleverness and boldness, who show off their strength, always want in their hearts to surpass the myriad things. They conceal suspicion and doubt within, while outwardly assuming an overbearing manner. Not even any part of their bodies can find a place between heaven and earth; how much less could water and fire come near them?

Only when pure Qi is guarded within can wisdom and insight return to their source, and seeing and hearing be drawn inward, without deliberate contrivance. Then water and fire become one with him; this is why he is at ease and safe wherever he enters.

Laozi said: “One who deeply contains Dao (the Way) and De (Virtue/Power) is like an infant.” This is what is meant by “guarding pure Qi.” Therefore poisonous insects do not sting him, fierce beasts do not pounce on him, and birds of prey do not attack him.

Ji, let me, Yu, tell you: whatever has form and appearance, image, sound, or color is a thing. Among things, how could there be any distinction of far and near? But relying only on these formed things, how could one reach the realm prior to the myriad things? They are all merely “se” (the appearance of form).

The commentary says: appearance, image, sound, and color are all called “se.” All things arise from nonbeing into being; they necessarily begin with movement and then produce form and color. When Taisu (Great Simplicity, the primal matter not yet formed) is present, form and substance first become manifest. Yet Taisu still falls short of Taishi (Great Beginning, the earliest beginning of the universe); how then could it reach the “prior” (the origin)? Only one who transcends the myriad things and does not himself become a thing is sufficient to reach the “prior.” To reach the state of the “prior” is probably what Laozi meant by “something formed indistinctly and complete” (you wu hun cheng). (This phrase comes from Chapter 25 of the Daodejing and refers to something formed indistinctly, prior to heaven and earth.)

In this way, things reach the realm of the formless and come to rest where there is no change. If someone attains this Dao and exhausts it, how can one say that he has attained the true Dao?

解曰:有形皆属乎造化,唯造乎不形,则止乎无所化矣。得是道而穷尽之者,离形超化至乎物先,泯绝是非。虽独正,不足以命之矣。是至人之所以为真也。 彼将处乎不深之度,而藏乎无端之纪,游乎万物之所终始。 解曰:甚易知,甚易行,不违万物自然之数者,不深之度也。老君以迎随不见真也。 彼将处乎不深之度,而藏乎无端之纪,游乎万物之所终始。 解曰:甚易知,甚易行,不违万物自然之数者,不深之度也。老君以迎随不见其首尾者为道之纪,即此所谓无端之纪也。行乎万物,而万物得之以消息满虚。其际不可终者,游乎万物之终始也。内能处而藏,外能游乎物,此备道全尽者也。 壹其性,养其气,含其德,以通乎物之所造。 解曰:壹其性则不贰,养其气则不耗,含其德则不散,若是则能上与造物者游,是所谓通乎物之所造也。 夫若是者,其天守全,其神无却,物奚自入焉?
Interpretation

Everything that has form is subject to creation and transformation (the natural generation and change of heaven and earth). Only the formless Dao (the Way), which gives rise to the myriad things, is not bound by creation and transformation. If one can attain the Dao and comprehend its principle, one can transcend form and transformation, return to the state before the myriad things arose, and obliterate all distinctions of right and wrong. Even if such a person alone maintains uprightness, it is still difficult to name him in words. This is precisely why the Utmost Person (one whose cultivation has reached its utmost) is called “true.”

He rests securely in the measure of not delving deeply (not violating natural patterns, not deliberately seeking profundity), hides within the order of no beginning (the Dao’s order, whose beginning and end cannot be seen), and roams amid the beginning, end, and transformation of the myriad things.

This principle is very easy to understand and very easy to practice: so long as one does not violate the patterns by which the myriad things naturally move, that is “not delving deeply.” Laozi’s saying, “Meet it and one does not see its head; follow it and one does not see its rear,” means precisely that the Dao’s order has no visible head or tail; this is the “order of no beginning.” The Dao operates within the myriad things, and the myriad things rely on it as they wax and wane, become full and empty; the Dao’s borders are endless. This is “roaming through the beginning and end of the myriad things.” To be able inwardly to rest and hide, and outwardly to roam among the myriad things—this is the person whose Dao and De (Virtue/Power) are complete and whose penetration leaves nothing untouched.

Concentrate one’s original nature into oneness, nourish one’s primal Qi (vital energy), contain the De of one’s nature, and thereby penetrate to the source of the creation and transformation of the myriad things.

When the original nature is concentrated in oneness, no second mind arises; when primal Qi is nourished, it is not depleted; when the De of one’s nature is contained, it does not scatter. One who can do this may wander above with the Creator (the fundamental Dao that gives rise to the myriad things); this is “penetrating to that by which things are created.”

For one who can do this, heavenly innocence is preserved, and Jing (essence) and Shen (spirit) are not lost. How then could external things intrude upon such a person?

则不耗,含其德则不散,若是则能上与造物者游,是所谓通乎物之所造也。 夫若是者,其天守全,其神无却,物奚自入焉? 解曰:由物焉得?为正焉出?而游乎万物之所终始,斯能通乎物之所造矣。通乎物之所造则能天矣,天则神矣。其天守全,是乃其神之无部也。其神无部,则纯气之守也固矣,故物莫得而入焉。 夫醉者之坠於车也,虽疾不死。骨节与人同,而犯害与人异,其神全也。乘亦弗知也,坠亦弗知也。死生惊惧不入乎其胸,是故遌物也不慑。彼焉。 夫醉者之坠於车也,虽疾不死。骨节与人同,而犯害与人异,其神全也。乘亦弗知也,坠亦弗知也。死生惊惧不入乎其胸,是故遌物也不慑。彼得全於酒而犹若是,而况得全於天乎?圣人藏於天,故物莫之能伤也。 解曰:神生形,形成神,形不得神不能自生,神不得形不能自成。神欲不亏其全,其或亏者,以有知也。形欲不伤其完,其伤之者,以迕物也。然神生形者也,爱其形者,神未必守含,其神则物莫之能迕矣。醉者之於车,乘坠皆莫之知,此神之所以全也。神全则死生惊惧不足以动其中,虽坠车也祇能伤其形而不能伤其神也,此所谓犯害与人异,故虽疾不死也。然而得全於酒,徒以沉湎
Interpretation

Scripture One

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing—that is, the Liezi, an honorific title conferred during the reign of Tang Xuanzong—explains: Where do the myriad things come from? From where does the upright qi of heaven and earth emerge? One who can roam between the beginning and end of the myriad things and comprehend their patterns of change can penetrate the root from which things are generated. Having understood the principle by which the myriad things are generated, one can become one with the heaven of spontaneity; being one with heaven, the spirit reaches a wondrous realm. This state of “heaven” consists in guarding purity and wholeness, and the reason the spirit does not scatter or become partial and deficient is precisely that it is not dragged about. Since the spirit is complete and without lack, the pure primordial qi is firmly guarded, and external things cannot intrude.

Scripture Two

A drunkard falls from a cart. Although the fall is severe, he does not die. His bones and joints are the same as other people’s, but the condition of his injury is different from theirs. This is because his spirit is preserved intact. He is unaware while riding, and unaware while falling; the terror of life and death does not enter his breast. Thus, when he comes into contact with external things, he is not afraid.

(This passage comes from the Liezi, “Dasheng” [Understanding Life]. The story of “the drunkard falling from the cart” is often used to illustrate that external injury cannot injure the spirit of a person whose spirit is whole.) If he can be preserved through wine and still be like this, how much more one who is preserved by the Dao of Heaven? Therefore the sage hides himself within the Dao of Heaven, and external things cannot harm him.

Annotation

The commentary explains: The spirit governs the body, and the body brings the spirit to completion. If the body is separated from the spirit, it cannot grow of itself; if the spirit loses the body, it cannot complete itself. The spirit wishes to preserve its wholeness; it suffers loss because a discriminating mind and perception arise. The body wishes to remain unharmed; it is harmed because it conflicts with external things. Yet the spirit is the root that generates and nourishes the body. If a person cherishes the body but does not guard the mind-spirit, the mind-spirit will scatter, and external things will be able to impinge upon it. The drunkard knows neither when riding nor when falling from the cart, and this is precisely why his spirit is preserved. Once the spirit is preserved, the fear of life and death cannot shake his inner being. Even if he falls from the cart, only the body can be injured; the spirit cannot be harmed. This is what is meant by “the harm he suffers is different from that of others”; therefore, although he is injured, he does not die.

However, the drunkard’s preservation is only because he is sunk in wine, which dims his mind; it is not truly a case of one who has awareness yet forgets the passions. When he becomes sober, his perceptions become active, and his mind-spirit is easily disturbed.

而迷其知尔,非知而忘情者也。至於不醉,则其知神也,此所谓犯害与人异,故虽疾不死也。然而得全於酒,徒以沉湎 而迷其知尔,非知而忘情者也。至於不醉,则其知历然不复须臾之忘矣,故虽不死而犹有疾也。若真知之无知,则虽水火犹不能焦溺,而况於坠车耶?此全於天者所以物莫之能伤也。圣人藏乎是,所以为长生久视之道。 列御寇为伯昏无人射,引之盈贯,措杯水其肘上,发之,镝矢复沓,方矢复寓。当是时也,犹象人也。伯昏无人曰:是射之射,非不射之射也。当与汝登高山,履危石,临百仞之渊,若能射乎?於是无人遂登高山,履危石,临百仞之渊,背逡巡,足二分垂在外,揖御寇而进之。御寇伏地,汗流至踵。伯昏无人曰:夫至人者,上窥青天,下潜黄泉,挥斥八极,神气不变二分垂在外,揖御寇而进之。御寇伏地,汗流至踵。伯昏无人曰:夫至人者,上窥青天,下潜黄泉,挥斥八极,神气不变。今汝怵然有恂目之志,尔於中也殆矣夫。
Interpretation

If a person loses this “knowing,” then he has knowledge but has forgotten feeling, and has not truly awakened to the Dao. As for being able to be “not intoxicated”—not confused by external things—that awareness is clear and distinct and is not lost even for a moment; therefore, although he will not die, he still has the affliction of being troubled. If one can be “knowing” yet “not knowing”—aware but not attached to what is known—then even if he enters water or fire, he will not be scorched or drowned, let alone merely fall from a carriage. This is precisely the person who has preserved the truth endowed by Heaven; external things cannot harm him. The sage peacefully abides in this state, and for this reason it becomes the principle of cultivating the Dao known as “long life and enduring vision” (long survival and prolonging life).

Lie Yukou (that is, Liezi) studied archery with Bohun Wuren (Liezi’s teacher). He drew his bow to the full and placed a cup of water on his elbow. When he released the string, the first arrow (the di arrow) had just left the string and the second (the fang arrow) was already nocked, one following another without interruption. At that moment his posture was like a wooden dummy, utterly motionless. Bohun Wuren said: “This is only the shooting of someone who has the intention to shoot, not the shooting of someone who has forgotten shooting. Suppose I and you climb a high mountain, stand on a perilous rock, and look down into a hundred-zhang abyss—could you still shoot?” Thereupon Bohun Wuren climbed the high mountain, stood on the perilous rock, and looked down into the hundred-zhang abyss. His body shrank backward, with two-tenths of his foot hanging beyond the rock. He clasped his hands and bowed to Lie Yukou, inviting him to come forward. Lie Yukou, however, lay prostrate on the ground, sweat flowing down to his heels. Bohun Wuren said: “The Perfected Person (a person of the highest cultivation), above can peer into the blue sky, below can…”

解曰:引之盈贯,言其张之尽镝也。措杯水其肘上,言其乎之停审也。适矢复沓,言其中之巧也。方矢复寓,言其射之敏也。其所以能若是者,以其用志不分而犹象人也。然而是射之射,非不射之射也。射之射,所要者在彼;不射之射,所守者在我。射之射,方可方不可;不射之射,无可无不可。方其犹象人,以外无所惧也。所以伏地而汗流者,以心有所矜也。夫山之高,石之危,渊之深,无心於害人也,登履之者未必皆蹈其患也。唯其贪生以心有所矜也。夫山之高,石之危,渊之深,无心於害人也,登履之者未必皆蹈其患也。唯其贪生,外殉矜吝无所不至。卒之物不能为我害,而吾心自为之害,以至於丧生而终不悟也。若夫至人之不离於真,其於登履与人无异也,特神气内守,不知有高深之可畏,无往而不犹象人尔,挥斥八极,神气不变,以此而已。子列子尝御风而行矣,於进是道也何有?其云尔者,将俾学者不以谀闻为天下之美尽在於己,而务其全也,孔子不居其圣,亦若是矣。所谓伯昏无人者,居物之长,反明为昏,以无为人者也,是所以能登高临深而不惧,子列子之所受教也。 范氏有子曰子华,善养私名,举国服之;有宠於晋君,不仕而居三卿之右。目
Interpretation

This passage is Jiang Yu’s explanation of the stories “Ji Chang Learns Archery” and “Bohun Wuren” in the “Yellow Emperor” chapter of the Liezi.

“Drawing it to full bend” means drawing the bow to the full; “drawing it to the utmost arrowhead” means aiming the arrowhead (di) to the utmost point. “Placing a cup of water on his elbow” means placing a cup of water on his elbow without spilling it, describing an extremely steady arm. “The first arrow has just left and another follows in quick succession” means that no sooner has one arrow left the string than the next is already loosed after it; “while the arrow is in flight, another is already lodged on the string” means that while an arrow is flying through the air, the next has already been nocked. Both describe the refinement and agility of archery. The reason one can reach such a level is that the mind is single-minded and undistracted by external things, so that shooting an arrow is treated as an action wholly integrated with oneself.

However, there is a fundamental difference between this “shooting of shooting” and the “shooting of not-shooting.” The former has its target outside; whether one hits depends on the object, and so there is something that can be shot and something that cannot. The latter is rooted in oneself; when the mind has nothing on which to depend, there is nothing that must be affirmed and nothing that must be denied. The ability to remain “still like a wooden image” — unmoved by external things, like a clay statue or a wooden puppet — comes from there being nothing outside to inspire fear. If one lies prostrate on the ground, sweating profusely with fright, it is because in the mind there is still something cherished and guarded, something obstructing.

The height of mountains, the peril of rocks, and the danger of deep abysses carry no harmful intent in themselves, and those who climb or approach them do not necessarily meet disaster. What truly brings disaster is people themselves: they crave life and cling to things, are enslaved by external things, and let a mind of self-importance and grudging attachment reach every extreme, until in the end they lose their lives without even realizing it. The perfected person, by contrast, does not depart from the true. In climbing mountains and approaching abysses he is no different from ordinary people, except that his spirit and Qi are guarded within, so he does not perceive height or depth as fearful. Thus he can gesture freely across the eight farthest directions while his spirit remains unchanged. Liezi could ride the wind and move, so this principle was naturally not difficult for him to understand. These words are meant to keep learners from thinking, because of momentary praise, that all the beauty in the world resides in themselves; instead, they should strive to preserve their original truth, like Confucius, who “did not dwell in his sagehood.” The so-called Bohun Wuren — one who attained the Dao in the Liezi — is someone who stands as the elder among the myriad things, yet turns his illumination inward and appears instead dim; he treats others without a calculating mind. Therefore he can climb high and approach the deep without fear. This is precisely the lesson Liezi received.

The Fan family had a son named Zihua, who was skilled at cultivating a private reputation, and the whole state respected and submitted to him. He was favored and trusted by the ruler of Jin; although he did not take office, his position was above the three ministers, the governing ministers of Jin.

所偏

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback