中文 · EN

《冲虚至德真经解(江遹)》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 2 / 6 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《冲虚至德真经解(江遹)》 Vol. 2 (Taixuan 太玄部, 6 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 59 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《冲虚至德真经解(江遹)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

视,晋国爵之;有子曰子华,善养私名,举国服之;有宠於晋君,不仕而居三卿之右。目所偏视,晋国爵之;口所偏肥,晋国黜之。游其庭者伴於朝。子华使其侠客以智鄙相攻,强弱相凌。虽伤破於前,不用介意。终日夜以此为戏乐,国殆成俗。禾生,子伯,范氏之上客,出行,经垧外,宿於田更商丘开之舍。中夜,禾生、子伯二入相与言子华之名势,能使存者亡,亡者存;富者贫,贫者富。商丘开先窘於饥寒,潜於牖北听之。因假粮荷畚之子华之门。 解曰:禾生、子伯皆范氏之上客,则其知范氏之名势也审矣。相与言子华之名势於中夜,则非有夸诞於人也。商丘开潜於牖比听之,则知其言之无心而不妄矣。故以其党之言皆实,唯恐诚之之不至,行之之不及也。 子华之门徒皆世听之,则知其言之无心而不妄矣。故以其党之言皆实,唯恐诚之之不至,行之之不及也。 子华之门徒皆世族也,缟衣乘轩,缓步阔视。顾见商丘开年老力弱,面目黎黑,衣冠不检,莫不眲之。既而狎侮欺诒,挡扌必挨抌,亡所不为。商丘开常无愠容,而诸客之技单,惫於戏笑。
Interpretation

Interpretation of the Text

Whomever the powerful man of Jin favored, Jin granted a rank; whomever he disliked, Jin removed from office. He had a son named Zihua (the son of a Jin powerful man), who excelled at gathering retainers and cultivating reputation, and the whole state respected and deferred to him. He was deeply favored and trusted by the ruler of Jin; although he held no official post, his position was above the three chief ministers (the highest-ranking ministers of Jin). His retainers often received protection at court.

Zihua had the knightly retainers under his household compete in cleverness and strength, bullying one another for amusement. If someone was injured or defeated, no one took it to heart. Day and night they made this a game, and it nearly became a custom in the state.

There were two retainers named Hesheng and Zibo, both honored retainers of the Fan clan (a great clan of Jin and Zihua’s faction). Once, when the two left the city and passed through the outskirts, they spent the night at a farmhouse where an old man named Shangqiu Kai lived. At midnight, Hesheng and Zibo discussed Zihua’s power, saying that he could make the living die and the dead live, make the rich poor and the poor rich. Shangqiu Kai, suffering from hunger and cold, hid north of the window and eavesdropped. So he borrowed some grain, carried a basket (a straw basket for carrying earth) on his back, and went to join Zihua’s household.

Interpretation of the Commentary

Hesheng and Zibo were both honored retainers of the Fan clan, so their understanding of the Fan clan’s power was necessarily very accurate. Their midnight discussion of Zihua’s power was not meant to exaggerate before others. Shangqiu Kai’s eavesdropping shows that their words came from sincerity and were not false. Therefore words among fellow partisans were all taken as true, and they only feared that their belief in Zihua was not deep enough and their obedience not quick enough.

Zihua’s retainers were all sons of established families, dressed in white, riding ornate carriages, walking slowly with measured steps, and gazing arrogantly. When they saw Shangqiu Kai—old and weak, dark-complexioned, with disheveled clothes and cap—none failed to slight him. Then they teased and deceived him, pushed and shoved him, and beat him, stopping at nothing. Shangqiu Kai never showed anger. When the retainers had exhausted their tricks and grown tired of the sport, they stopped.

解曰:子华之门徒以狎侮其诒众技为戏笑者,求己胜而人辱也。为商丘开者亦以为诞辱而怼憾之,则子华之志骋而商丘开诚可辱矣。今也一遇之以诚而常无愠容,技虽众,俄而单矣,戏笑虽乐,俄而惫矣,终不足以为商丘开之辱矣。回视昔之狎伤戏笑,不亦徒劳而自辱乎? 遂与商丘开俱乘高台,於众中漫言曰:有能自投下者赏百金。众皆竞应。商丘开以为信然,遂先投下回视昔之狎伤戏笑,不亦徒劳而自辱乎? 遂与商丘开俱乘高台,於众中漫言曰:有能自投下者赏百金。众皆竞应。商丘开以为信然,遂先投下,形若飞鸟,扬於地,骨几骨无石为。 解曰:猜虑不存,诚信内守,则其体虚矣。故其轻扬拟於飞鸟投於高台而骨几骨无石为,亦犹醉者之坠车,其犯害与人异矣。 范氏之党以为偶然,未讵怪也。因复指河曲之淫隅曰:彼中有宝珠,泳可得也。商丘开复从而泳之。既出,果得珠焉。众昉同疑。子华昉令豫肉食衣帛之次。
Interpretation

Zihua’s followers took pleasure in mocking and teasing Shangqiu Kai, hoping thereby to outdo and humiliate him. Shangqiu Kai also regarded this as absurd insult and resented it in his heart. Yet Zihua’s mind was calm and unobstructed, and Shangqiu Kai met him with sincerity, never once showing a look of anger. Although the followers had many tricks, they soon exhausted them; though their jesting was lively, it soon grew weary. In the end they could not make Shangqiu Kai feel humiliated. Looking back at those earlier mockeries and jokes, was it not wasted effort that only brought humiliation upon themselves?

Thereupon Zihua and Shangqiu Kai ascended a high terrace together, and among the crowd Zihua said casually, “Whoever jumps down by himself, I will reward with a hundred jin of gold.” (A hundred jin of gold refers to a hundred jin of gold, emphasizing an extremely generous reward.) The crowd vied to respond. Shangqiu Kai believed it to be true and jumped down first. His body was light, and he landed like a flying bird, and was not hurt at all. (The original text is unclear here; this is understood from the context.)

Explanation: When the heart holds no suspicion or worry, and sincerity is kept within, body and mind become empty, still, and unobstructed. Thus his body was light and buoyant, and he fell from the high terrace like a flying bird without being injured—just as a drunken person falls from a carriage and, because body and mind are relaxed, is harmed differently from ordinary people.

The partisans of the Fan clan (the faction that joined Zihua in mocking Shangqiu Kai) thought this was merely accidental and did not find it strange. Then Zihua again pointed to a deep pool at a bend in the river and said, “There are precious pearls inside; dive and you can get them.” Shangqiu Kai again followed and dove into the water, and when he came out he had indeed obtained the pearls. Just as everyone was feeling doubtful, Zihua ordered meat and silk garments to be prepared in advance as rewards.

Explanation: If one harbors doubt and does not believe his words, then diving into the water will not obtain the pearls. Because Shangqiu Kai trusted Zihua and had no suspicion, he was able to obtain them.

解曰:信其言而泳水不能得也。商丘开复从而泳之。既出,果得珠焉。众昉同疑。子华昉令豫肉食衣帛之次。 解曰:信其言而泳水不能溺,此忠信错其躯於波流尔。诒以为彼中有宝珠,泳而出,果得珠焉。此何理哉?诚信能感物之证也。且宝珠之为物,体元用妙,每下愈况,无乎不在,求以明智,索以吃诟,其失愈远。唯商丘开之诚同於象罔,则其得之亦何异哉?
Interpretation

This passage is a commentary that uses a story to illustrate how sincerity can resonate with all things. Someone readily believed another person’s claim that “there is a precious pearl in the water,” dove into the deep water, and actually obtained the pearl—and was not drowned. The commentator therefore holds that a belief of utmost sincerity can indeed resonate with external things. The precious pearl (a metaphor for the Great Dao, the Way) has a subtle essence and a wondrous function; the deeper one probes, the more it manifests, and it is everywhere present. If one seeks it with clever intelligence (“Mingzhi”), or demands it through verbal disputation (“Chigou,” referring to the eloquent disputer whom the Yellow Emperor sent to find the pearl in the Zhuangzi), one instead grows farther and farther from it. Only by being as sincere and undivided as “Xiangwang” (the person without mind or form, wholly in Wuwei, non-action) can one obtain the precious pearl. Shangqiu Kai’s sincerity is the same as Xiangwang’s; then what difference is there between his obtaining the pearl and Xiangwang’s obtaining it?

俄而范氏之藏大火。子华曰:若能入火取锦者,从所得多少赏若。商丘开往无难色,入火往还,埃不漫,身不焦,范氏之党以为有道,乃共谢之曰:火取锦者,从所得多少赏若。商丘开往无难色,入火往还,埃不漫,身不焦,范氏之党以为有道,乃共谢之曰:吾不知子之有道而诞子,吾不知子之神人而辱子。子其愚我也,子其聋我也,子其盲我也。敢问其道。商丘开曰:吾亡道。虽吾之心,亦不知所以。虽然,有一於此,试与子言之。曩子二客之宿吾舍也,闻誉范氏之势,能使存者亡,亡者存,富者贫,贫者富。吾诚之无二心,故不远而来。及来,以子党之言皆实也,唯恐诚之之不至,行之之不及,不知形体之所措,利害之所存也,心一而已。物亡迕者,如斯而已。今昉知子党之诞我,我内藏猜虑,外矜观听,追不知形体之所措,利害之所存也,心一而已。物亡迕者,如斯而已。今昉知子党之诞我,我内藏猜虑,外矜观听,追幸昔日之不焦溺也,怛然内热,惕然震悸矣。水火岂复可近哉?
Interpretation

Before long, a great fire broke out in the Fan family’s storehouses. Zihua (that is, Zihuazi, a Daoist figure of the Warring States period) said, “Whoever can rush into the fire and bring out the brocade will be rewarded according to how much he brings out.” Shangqiu Kai (a personal name) showed no sign of difficulty; he went in and out through the fire, yet not a speck of dust clung to him, nor was his body scorched. The associates of the Fan clan (a great clan of the Jin state in the Spring and Autumn period, here used generically for wealthy and powerful households) thought he possessed Daoist arts, and together apologized to him, saying, “We did not know that you, sir, possessed Daoist arts, and so we deceived you; we did not know that you were a divine man, and so we treated you rudely. Are you making fools of us, blinding us, and playing with us? May we ask what your Dao is?”

Shangqiu Kai said, “I have no Dao; even my own mind does not know why. Still, there is a principle here, and I will try to explain it to you. In the past, when you two guests were staying at my house, I heard of the power and influence of the Fan clan: it could make the living die and the dead live, the rich poor and the poor rich. I sincerely believed this, and so I came from a thousand li away. After I arrived, I felt that everything you associates said was true. I only feared that my sincerity was insufficient and my action not up to it; I paid no attention at all to where my body should be placed, nor did I consider gain and loss, harm and benefit. In my mind there was only one thing. Things did not obstruct me—that is probably how it was. Only now do I understand that you associates were deceiving me. I harbor doubts and misgivings within, while outwardly boasting of my own experience. Looking back, I count myself fortunate that earlier I was not scorched or drowned; right now my heart is hot and agitated, and I am so frightened that my heart pounds without stop. How would I dare to go near water and fire again?”

解曰:泳而得宝珠,亦已异矣,范氏之党防同疑之。至於入火往还,而埃不漫,身不焦,而后以其为有道,而谓之为神人,盖投於高而无石为,或能因其势而偶然。泳而出,学泅者能之,若火之烈烈,则物无美恶柔刚,一投於烟焰皆煨烬矣。自非体合於神而同於无,则块然之形薪火奚可近哉?商丘开以谓吾无道,虽吾之心,亦不知所以。唯其忘情而无知,则心一而不二,是所以为道而物莫之能迕也。若夫藏猜虑,矜观听,则吾无道,虽吾之心,亦不知所以。唯其忘情而无知,则心一而不二,是所以为道而物莫之能迕也。若夫藏猜虑,矜观听,则怛然内热,已焚其和於中,又焉能入火不热哉?惕然震悸,已溺其性於内,又焉能入水不濡哉? 自此之后,范氏门徒路遇乞儿马医,弗敢辱也,必下车而揖之。 解曰:以子华之名势而弗轻於乞儿马医者,盖审夫名势之非道,以君子之盛德,其容貌若愚,故能忘其势,虽贱弗敢辱也,是亦至信之所感化也。尝谓商丘开方其诚物而无二心,虽至人纯气之守,无以复加矣。至於藏猜虑,矜观听,则犹为蔽蒙之民。由是知至道所在不俟他求,其於有得亦无渐次。狂圣相去特在克念,罔念一息之间尔,可不慎哉?
Interpretation

First Passage

This passage is the commentator’s explanation of the preceding story. The Fan clan’s partisans had seen with their own eyes Shangqiu Kai dive into the water and obtain the precious pearl, and already found it strange; they still suspected he had extraordinary powers. Only when they saw him enter and leave fire, with smoke and dust not touching his body and his body not scorched, did they conclude that he was a person who possessed the Dao (the Way), and regard him as a divine man. This was probably because he jumped into the water from a high place, with no rock to rely on, or succeeded by chance by following the water’s flow. To be able to swim out of the water is something that people who learn swimming can also do. But flames are fierce: no matter whether things are beautiful or ugly, soft or hard, once cast into smoke and flame they all turn to ashes. If his body and mind had not been united with Shen (spirit) and numinous clarity and become one with vacuity and nothingness, so that his physical form was like withered wood or stubborn stone, how could he approach the flames?

Shangqiu Kai said: “I have no Daoist arts at all; even I do not know why I am able to be like this. It is only because I forgot private feelings and had no discriminating mind, with my mind focused singly and without duality, so that external things could not harm me. If one harbors suspicion in the heart and delights in showing off what one has seen and heard, then one is inwardly agitated and has already burned up the harmonious Qi (vital energy) within the body; how then could one enter fire without feeling heat? If the heart is frightened and trembling, one has already drowned one’s original nature within; how then could one enter water without getting wet?”

Second Passage

After this, when the disciples of the Fan clan met beggars and horse doctors on the road, they did not dare insult them, and would invariably get down from their carriages and bow to them.

Commentary

The commentator says: Zihua (a man of reputation and power among the Fan clan’s followers) did not treat beggars and horse doctors with contempt because he understood that fame, position, and power are not the true Dao. The noble person cultivates himself with great De (Virtue/Power), and his outward appearance seems simple and foolish; therefore he can forget power, and even when the other person is lowly, he dares not insult him. This too is the result of being transformed by a heart of utmost sincerity.

The commentator also says that Shangqiu Kai treated things with sincerity and without duplicity; even a Perfected person (zhiren), a person of the highest moral cultivation, who guards himself with pure Qi, could not surpass him. As for those who harbor suspicion and show off what they have seen and heard, they remain deluded ordinary people. From this one knows that the ultimate Dao lies within oneself and need not be sought outside; when there is realization, there are also no gradual stages. The difference between a sage and a madman lies only in whether one can restrain one’s thoughts, and the interruption or continuation of a thought is but a matter of an instant. How can one not be cautious?

宰我闻之,以告仲尼。仲尼曰:汝弗知乎?夫至信之人,可以感物也,动天地,感鬼神,横六合,而无逆者,岂但履危险、入水火而已哉? 解曰:当之,以告仲尼。仲尼曰:汝弗知乎?夫至信之人,可以感物也,动天地,感鬼神,横六合,而无逆者,岂但履危险、入水火而已哉? 解曰:当而以为信,未孚之小信尔。信矣而不期,辟金之至信也。至信之人,内不疑於已,外不疑於物,至虚而无所於忤,至粹而无所於杂,故能参天地之广大,赞天地之化育。蛮貊之邦可行,豚鱼之微可及,此所谓动天地,感鬼神,横六合,而无逆也。若夫尾生之溺,饱焦之燔,岂信之罪也哉?是塞以为有信,非至信尔。 商丘开信伪物犹不逆,况彼我皆诚尾生之溺,饱焦之燔,岂信之罪也哉?是塞以为有信,非至信尔。 商丘开信伪物犹不逆,况彼我皆诚哉?小子识之。
Interpretation

Zai Wo heard about this matter and told Confucius. Confucius said: “Do you not know? A person of true sincerity can move all things, shake Heaven and Earth, communicate with ghosts and spirits, and range through the four quarters with no one opposing him. How could this be merely a matter of braving danger and treading through fire?”

This passage explains: if one merely takes what is right as a matter of keeping faith, that is only a small faithfulness that has not yet reached true sincerity. Perfect trust is trusting without deliberately seeking, like “pijin” (the original uses this to illustrate the perfect trust that “trusts without expectation”). A person of perfect trust does not doubt himself within, and the outside world does not doubt him either; his state of mind is utterly empty, he is not at odds with things, and he is utterly pure and free of distracting thoughts. Therefore he can participate in the vastness of Heaven and Earth and assist in their transforming and nurturing work. He can go even to the lands of the Man and Mo (ancient designations for peoples of remote regions), and he can affect even pigs and fish (tiny creatures; the Zhongfu hexagram of the Zhouyi contains the phrase “pigs and fish: auspicious”). This is what is meant by “moving Heaven and Earth, affecting ghosts and spirits, and extending across the six directions without opposition.”

As for Weisheng, who clung to a pillar and drowned, and Bao Jiao (an ancient recluse who held to his own intent until death), who embraced a tree and was burned—these are not faults of sincerity. This is stubbornly mistaking rigidity for sincerity; it is not perfect trust.

Shangqiu Kai (a personal name; the original uses him as an example), even though what he trusted was false, still was not opposed by external things—how much less so when both sides are sincere? My young disciples, remember this.

解曰:诚在於我,则物虽伪而皆真;惑存於内,则境虽顺而犹逆。处己者唯务於自诚,而圣人之善救必期於彼我皆诚而后已。若《汤问》所谓仙圣之种一日一夕飞相往来於五山之间者,其彼我皆诚者欤。谓小子识之,则道之在人,无间於少壮,小子之所宜勉也,奚俟而晚闻大道哉?所谓子华者,以荣而不实为名,固宜以名势骄人也。商则声之揫敛,丘则地之中高,开则物之启出,谓之商丘开,是以始则能入水火,终则以谓水火岂复可近也。
Interpretation

The explanation states: sincerity lies within oneself; even if external things are false, they become real through it. Delusion resides in the mind; even when circumstances are favorable, one still feels them to be adverse. One who cultivates himself should only devote himself to his own sincerity, while the sage’s benevolent relief must wait until both parties are sincere before it ceases. As the “Tangwen” chapter of the Liezi says of “the seeds of immortals and sages” (in legend, the seeds of immortals and sages, able to travel among the immortal mountains), they go back and forth among the five immortal mountains (the five immortal mountains said in legend to lie in the sea) in a single day and night—this is probably the condition of mutual sincerity.

Tell young people to remember this: the Great Dao exists in people and does not differ according to youth or age. This is precisely where you should strive; why wait until old age to hear the Dao?

As for the so-called Zihua (a Daoist figure of the Warring States period, whose book is the Zihua Zi), he took empty honor and lack of real accomplishment as his reputation, and was inherently one to rely on fame and power to show off before others.

“Shang” is the gathering-in of sound, “qiu” is ground rising in the middle, and “kai” is the opening and arising of the myriad things; together they form “Shangqiu Kai.” Therefore, at first he could enter water and fire without being harmed, but in the end he believed that water and fire could no longer come near him.

周宣王之牧正有役人梁鸯者,能养野禽兽,委食於园庭之内,虽虎狼雕鹗之类,无不柔驯者。雄雌在前,孳尾成群,异类杂居,不相搏噬也。王虑其术终於其身,令毛丘园传之。梁鸯曰:鸯,贱役也,何术以告尔?,异类杂居,不相搏噬也。王虑其术终於其身,令毛丘园传之。梁鸯曰:鸯,贱役也,何术以告尔?惧王之谓隐於尔也,且一言我养虎之法。凡顺之则喜,逆之则怒,此有血气者之性也。然喜怒岂妄发哉?皆逆之所犯也。夫食虎者,不敢以生物与之,为其杀之之怒,也不敢以全物与之,为其碎之之怒也。时其饥饱,达其怒心,虎之与人异类,而媚养己者,顺也,故其杀之,逆也。然则吾岂敢逆之使怒哉?亦不顺之使喜也。夫喜之复也必怒,怒之复也常喜,皆不中也。今吾心无逆顺者也,则鸟兽之视吾,犹其侪也。故游吾围者,不思高林旷泽,寝吾庭者,不愿深山幽谷,理使然也。 解曰:含生之类皆有血气之性。自人以观,血者心之所藏,气者肺之所府,气运而血如之。一昼一夜,凡万有三深山幽谷,理使然也。
Interpretation

Interpretation of the Scripture

Among the subordinates of King Xuan of Zhou’s pasture supervisor—the official in charge of livestock—was a laborer named Liang Yang, who was skilled at taming wild birds and beasts. He kept them in a park, and even fierce birds and beasts such as tigers, wolves, eagles, and ospreys became gentle. Males and females paired, bred, and formed flocks; animals of different species lived together without fighting or biting one another. King Xuan of Zhou worried that this skill would be lost when Liang Yang died, so he ordered Mao Qiuyuan to study it with him.

Liang Yang declined, saying: “I am only a lowly laborer; what skill do I have that I could tell you? I fear only that the king may think I am hiding something, so I will briefly speak of my method for raising tigers.”

He continued: In general, when one follows an animal’s intentions, it is pleased; when one opposes them, it becomes angry. This is the innate nature of every creature with blood and Qi (vital energy). Yet joy and anger do not arise without cause; they are all provoked by human opposition. Therefore those who raise tigers dare not feed them living creatures, for fear that the act of seizing and killing will stir their anger; nor do they dare feed them whole dead creatures, for fear that tearing them apart will stir their anger. One must grasp the timing of their hunger and fullness and understand their shifts of mood. A tiger is not of the same kind as man, yet it draws close to the one who rears it because he follows it; and it injures people because they oppose it. That being so, how would I dare deliberately provoke its anger? Nor do I deliberately curry favor with it. For after joy there is often a turn to anger, and after anger there is often a turn back to joy; both depart from centeredness and harmony. Now in my mind there is no longer any distinction between opposition and compliance, and the birds and beasts regard me as they regard their own kind. Thus the birds and beasts that come into my park no longer long for the high forests and broad wilds; those that nest in my courtyard do not wish to return to the deep mountains and secluded valleys. This is simply how things are.

Interpretation of the Commentary

The commentary explains “the nature of blood and Qi” from the perspective of human physiology: in the human body, blood is what the heart stores, and Qi is what the lungs govern; when Qi moves, blood flows along with it. This uses the principle of the movement of blood and Qi in the human body as an analogy for the principle that all things possess blood and Qi and all possess an innate nature.

解曰:含生之类皆有血气之性。自人以观,血者心之所藏,气者肺之所府,气运而血如之。一昼一夜,凡万有三千五百息,血气周流,寤行於身,寐行於藏,间不容发,或过或不及,微则疾而甚则死矣。血气之可顺而不可逆如此。由有血气之性,斯有逆顺之境,而起喜怒之情,怨恩生杀,无所不至矣。然而人之为人,虽不能逆其气,而能帅其气;虽不能违其性,而能节其性,此人之所以为有道。虽有喜怒之情,其发也,罔或不中节矣。至於飞潜之伦,附翼戴角,分牙布爪,仰飞伏走,知有生之是利,唯血气之是使,是以鸟穷则攫,兽穷则搏,欲其柔驯於人杂居而不相搏噬,不亦难乎?然而唯血气之是使,是以鸟穷则攫,兽穷则搏,欲其柔驯於人杂居而不相搏噬,不亦难乎?然而虎狼雕鹗,禽兽之至强者也,既己与人均其血气,则其心智与人不殊远也。苟能达其情欲,时其饥饱,媚其顺而无犯其所逆,未有不可以柔驯者。且达其喜怒而媚之,是养之之术尔。要其所以能使雄雌在前,孳尾成群,异类杂居而不相搏噬者,则本於其心无逆顺尔。何则?达其喜怒,未能使之忘喜怒也。喜怒之复,犹阴阳之往来,逆而犯之,固所不可顺而喜之,亦非其中。虽暂能顺之而喜,喜怒也。
Interpretation

Humans, like all things, possess a nature of blood and Qi. In the human body, blood is stored by the heart and Qi is governed by the lungs; when Qi moves, blood follows. Over a day and a night, a person breathes approximately 13,500 times (one exhalation and one inhalation make one breath). Blood and Qi circulate throughout the body: when awake they move over the body’s surface and through the four limbs; when asleep they move through the internal organs, never pausing for a moment. The circulation of blood and Qi has its proper measure; if it is too fast or too slow, illness results—in mild cases sickness, in severe cases death. From this it is clear that blood and Qi can only be followed, not opposed.

Once there is the nature of blood and Qi, there are circumstances of the favorable and the adverse; hence the emotions of joy and anger arise, and resentment and gratitude, the giving and taking of life, reach every extreme. Yet what makes a human human is that, although one cannot oppose one’s own Qi, one can command it; although one cannot depart from one’s own nature, one can regulate it. This is precisely why humans are said to possess the Dao. Although humans have feelings of joy and anger, when they arise they can be exactly appropriate and accord with due measure.

As for flying birds and submerged scaly creatures, those with feathers on their bodies, horns on their heads, sharp teeth in their mouths, and sharp claws—whether they fly aloft or crawl along the ground—they know the benefits of survival and only obey the promptings of blood and Qi. Thus when a bird is driven to extremity it strikes, and when a beast is driven to extremity it fights. If one wished to make them docile and let them live mixed with humans without fighting and biting one another, would that not be very difficult?

Yet tigers, wolves, eagles, and ospreys are the fiercest among birds and beasts. They share with humans the same blood and Qi, and their minds and intelligence do not differ far from those of humans. If only one can satisfy their desires, feed them on schedule and let them eat their fill, accommodate what they are compliant toward, and avoid what they resist, there are none that cannot be tamed. To satisfy and accommodate their joy and anger, however, is merely the method of rearing them. The reason they can pair as male and female, mate and reproduce, gather in flocks and live together, and mix with other species without fighting or devouring one another lies chiefly in the human mind making no distinction between the compliant and the resistant. How can this be known? Satisfying their joy and anger does not make them forget joy and anger. The alternation of joy and anger is like the coming and going of Yin-Yang: to oppose their nature and forcefully offend them is, to be sure, impermissible; but to follow them blindly and delight them is likewise not the middle way. Even if for a time one can comply with them and make them joyful, that joy and anger still remain.

喜怒之复,犹阴阳之往来,逆而犯之,固所不可顺而喜之,亦非其中。虽暂能顺之而喜,终必或犯而激其怒也。唯喜怒不形而於物无逆顺,则物亦无逆顺於我矣。故鸟兽之视吾,犹其侪也。夫鸟兽之所以惊骇散乱,逃窜隐伏,唯高林广泽、深山幽谷之是趋者,以避患害而从其类也。今而视吾犹其侪,则其游吾之园,寝吾之庭,与人同处,与人并行,亦已乐矣,又何暇趋山林之幽深、慕川谷之险阻耶?意无逆顺在我,其不言不为之妙乃默得於禽兽之强食。靡角者化而柔驯,可谓妙矣。周之宣王知惜梁鸯之术而传之,至於为治则方且料民,而不知用其术焉,弗思甚矣。如亦以斯道而牧斯民,其於在宥天下而致恬愉之俗,亦易易矣,所谓梁乔者,鸯,匹鸟,其性驯耦,梁鸯则进而在梁得其所者。所谓毛丘园者,丘园,盖而牧斯民,其於在宥天下而致恬愉之俗,亦易易矣,所谓梁乔者,鸯,匹鸟,其性驯耦,梁鸯则进而在梁得其所者。所谓毛丘园者,丘园,盖羽毛之族,利养之地而所乐居也。此梁鸯所以能养野禽兽,宣王所以令毛丘园传其术也。
Interpretation

The alternation of joy and anger is like the coming and going of Yin-Yang; it is originally a principle of nature. If one intentionally goes against it or offends it, then of course one cannot have things go as one wishes and rejoice; even if one occasionally follows it and feels glad, there will eventually be times when it is offended and anger is stirred, so this is not the proper middle way. Only when neither joy nor anger is displayed outwardly, and one neither courts nor resists external things, will external things no longer be divided, in relation to me, into the adverse and the favorable.

For this reason birds and beasts look upon me as one of their own kind. The reason birds and beasts startle and scatter, flee and hide, and run only to high forests and great marshes, deep mountains and secluded valleys, is to avoid harm and stay with their own kind. Now that they regard me as their own kind, they sport in my garden and roost in my courtyard; dwelling together with people and walking alongside them, they are already quite happy—how would they have leisure to rush off to deep mountains and secluded forests, or envy the steep streams and valleys? To have no thought of adverse or favorable in the mind—this is the subtle wonder of wordless Wuwei (non-action); it secretly accords with the nature of birds and beasts and makes even beasts that are originally strong and combative become gentle and tame. One may call it exceedingly subtle.

King Xuan of Zhou knew how to cherish this method of Liang Yang (traditionally a man skilled at taming wild birds and beasts) and handed it down, but when it came to governing the state, he merely concerned himself with counting the population (liaomin, taking a census) and did not understand how to apply this method—he was truly poor at reflection. If he could use this principle to govern the people, causing everyone under Heaven to dwell in Zaiyou (letting things follow their nature without disturbance) and bringing about settled and joyful customs, it would have been easy.

In the text, the name “Liang Yang” is explained in the commentary as follows: yang is a kind of water bird that goes in pairs, gentle in disposition and matching one another; “Liang Yang” refers to the manner in which they come to rest in places such as roof beams, each finding its proper place. “Mao Qiuyuan” refers to a hill-garden where feathered birds gather, have abundant food and drink, and are glad to roost. This is precisely why Liang Yang was able to tame wild birds and beasts, and also why King Xuan of Zhou had Mao Qiuyuan (here either a personal name or a person who took this as his sobriquet) transmit and practice this method.

颜渊问乎仲尼曰:吾尝济乎觞探之渊矣,津人操舟若神。吾问焉,曰:操舟可学邪?曰:可,能游者可教也,善游者数能,若乃夫没人,则未尝见舟而谡操之者也。吾问焉,而不告。敢问何谓也?仲尼曰:言医,吾与若玩其文也久矣,而未达其实,而固且道欤?能游者可教也,轻水也;善游者之数能也,忘水也。若乃夫没人之未尝见舟也而谡操之也,彼视渊若陵,视舟之覆其车却也。覆却万方陈乎前而不得入其舍,恶往而不暇?
Interpretation

Yan Yuan asked Confucius, “I once crossed the Shangtan Deep—a dangerous, deep stretch of water—and the ferryman there handled the boat with truly marvelous skill. I asked him, ‘Can this skill of piloting a boat be learned?’ He said, ‘Yes. One who can swim can be taught; one who is good at swimming masters it quickly. As for those naturally skilled at diving (the “submerged ones”), they have never seen a boat and yet can handle one.’ I asked him again, but he would not tell me. May I ask what this means?”

Confucius said, “You and I have studied these words for a long time, and yet you have not penetrated their substance—do you really think you can simply put it into words? When it is said that ‘one who can swim can be taught,’ it means that such a person can make light of water and does not regard it as dangerous. When it is said that ‘one who is good at swimming masters it quickly,’ it means that he has already forgotten the water. As for those naturally skilled at diving, who have never seen a boat yet can handle one, it is because they look upon the deep abyss as level ground and regard a capsizing boat as no more than a cart backing up. Even if every kind of overturning and capsizing were laid out before them, it could not enter their minds; wherever they go, they are calm and at ease.”

Explanation: Water is what bears up the boat; one who learns to pilot a boat should first understand this fundamental point.

解曰:水,负舟者也,学操舟者宜知所本矣。学津人之操舟而之也,彼视渊若陵,视舟之覆其车却也。覆却万方陈乎前而不得入其舍,恶往而不暇? 解曰:水,负舟者也,学操舟者宜知所本矣。学津人之操舟而不能学其为津人,虽津人之妙止能传其术而不能使之尽其巧也。有习於水勇於泅者,虽不学操舟而津人之妙可侔矣。盖不习於水则顾视水之津涯,方且惕然震悸,惟沈溺之是虞,尚何舟之能操耶?是以轻水者可教,忘水者数能。若夫没人,则未尝见舟而便操之也。未尝见舟,则非特忘水,虽舟亦忘之矣,是以无往而不暇也。涉水犹涉难也,御世者犹操舟以济斯民於无难之地也。唯有道者斯能轻忘世故,出没於万变之中而未尝有所困,则其於济世也有暇矣。颜子用舍行藏同於圣人,故孔子与之玩其文而道其实。 以瓦抠世故,出没於万变之中而未尝有所困,则其於济世也有暇矣。颜子用舍行藏同於圣人,故孔子与之玩其文而道其实。 以瓦抠者巧,以钩抠者惮,以黄金抠者惛。巧一也,而有所矜,则重外也。凡重外者拱内。
Interpretation

First Paragraph

Water is what bears boats, and those learning to steer boats should understand this fundamental principle. If one learns only the ferryman’s technique of rowing but not his cultivation as a ferryman, then even if one learns his superior points, one can transmit only his technique and cannot fully bring his skill into play. (Jinren: a ferryman at a ford.)

Some people are familiar with the nature of water and skilled at swimming; even without having learned to steer a boat, they can reach the ferryman’s high level. The reason is this: those unfamiliar with water, when they see a ford by the water, are frightened and trembling, worrying only about drowning—how could they even speak of steering a boat? Therefore, those who do not make water a matter of concern can be taught; those who forget water often achieve success. As for those skilled at diving (meiren), they have never seen a boat, so they need not rely on a boat to swim; they even forget the boat, and thus wherever they go they are calm and free.

Crossing water is like crossing danger and hardship; those who govern worldly affairs are like one steering a boat to rescue the people from a place of danger. Only one who has attained the Dao (the Way) can easily forget worldly disturbances, enter and exit amid countless transformations without being troubled, and therefore always have ease and abundance when saving the world. Yan Hui’s advancing and retreating, taking and relinquishing, were the same as the sage’s; therefore Confucius appreciated both his outward brilliance and his actual cultivation. (Yongshe Xingcang: from the Analects, “When employed, act; when set aside, hide,” referring to entering office and withdrawing, advancing and retreating, taking and relinquishing.)

Second Paragraph

This paragraph repeats the first and has the same meaning: those who dwell in the world enter and exit amid myriad changes without being troubled; therefore, when saving the world, they have ease and abundance. Yan Hui’s advancing and retreating, taking and relinquishing, accord with the sage; for this reason Confucius both appreciated his refinement and recognized his substance.

Third Paragraph

Those who use tiles as stakes have the highest skill; those who use belt hooks as stakes become apprehensive; those who use gold as stakes become confused in mind. (Kou is interchangeable with zhu, meaning to place a bet or stake. This passage comes from Zhuangzi, “Dasheng”: “Those who stake tiles are skillful; those who stake hooks are apprehensive; those who stake gold are confused.”)

The skill itself is the same; only because one is restrained and values winning or losing—that is, values external things—does it become otherwise. Whoever values external things will inevitably have the inner mind constrained and find it difficult to bring his skill into play.

解曰:所要愈重,则其心愈矜,心矜则智惛而巧丧矣。夫巧在我,物在外,既已巧矣,以有所矜而拙尔,曷亦定其内外之分?等黄金为瓦甓,则无往而不巧,所要者亦不能舍我矣。然此终不可以强而为之也,唯有道者其为出於自然尔。且其始也巧,其终也拙,是以巧而拙。如俾其智巧不存,则莫不可以强而为之也,唯有道者其为出於自然尔。且其始也巧,其终也拙,是以巧而拙。如俾其智巧不存,则莫见其所要之轻重,而遇事未必不巧也。则世俗之所谓巧者,不乃为大拙者乎?故大巧若拙。 冲虚至德真经解卷之三竟 4-冲虚至德真经解卷之四 冲虚至德真经解卷之四 宋杭州州学内舍生臣江遹进 黄帝
Interpretation

The more highly people value what they pursue, the more attached their minds become; once the mind is attached, wisdom grows dim and clever thought is lost along with it. Skill lies within oneself, while things lie outside. One may already be skilled, yet because of attachment one becomes clumsy. Why not first draw the boundary between inner and outer? If one looks upon gold as roof tiles, one will be at ease everywhere and skillful in all that one does, and what one pursues will no longer be able to bind one. Yet this ultimately cannot be forced; only one who has attained the Dao can do it naturally. Moreover, to begin with skill and end in clumsiness—this is “becoming clumsy through skill.” If cleverness is no longer allowed to remain, one will not weigh the relative importance of what one pursues, and when encountering affairs one may in fact not be unskillful. Then is what the world regards as “skill” not precisely the greatest clumsiness? That is why Laozi says, “Great skill appears clumsy.”

The heading at the beginning of the fascicle states that this fascicle is the fourth fascicle of the Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing Jie (Explanation of the True Scripture of the Vast Void and Ultimate Virtue), composed by Jiang Yu of the Song dynasty—a work that annotates the Liezi—and that Jiang Yu was at the time an inner-hall student at the Hangzhou prefectural school. The two characters “Huangdi” are the title of the next chapter, namely the opening “Yellow Emperor” chapter of the Liezi.

孔子观於吕梁,悬水三十仞,流沫三十里鼋鼉鱼鳖之所不能游也,见一丈夫游之。以为有苦而欲死者也,使弟子并流而承之。数百步而出,被发行歌,而游於棠行。棠行当作塘下。孔子从而问之曰:吕梁悬水三十仞,流沬三十里,鼋鼉鱼鳖所不能游,向吾见子道之,以为有苦而欲死者,使弟子并流将承子。子出而被发行歌,吾以子为鬼也,察子,则人也。请问蹈水有道乎?曰:亡,吾无道。吾始乎故,长乎性,成乎命被发行歌,吾以子为鬼也,察子,则人也。请问蹈水有道乎?曰:亡,吾无道。吾始乎故,长乎性,成乎命,与赍俱入,与汩偕出。从水之道而不为私焉,此吾所以道之也。孔子曰:何谓始乎故,长乎性,成乎命也?曰:吾生於陵而安於陵,故也;长於水而安於水,性也;不知吾所以然而然,命也。 解曰:水生之虫不疾易水性也,若人则生於陵而安於陵尔。吕粱之丈人乃能游於鼋鼉鱼鳖之所不能游,盖其性之所偏能也。唯有其性,故能长於水而安於水。虽安於水矣,不至於不知吾所队然而然,是未能从水之道而不为私也,则亦不若是之妙矣,故其言终至於命。若夫人者,犹庄子所谓得之以游大川者也。
Interpretation

Confucius was viewing the water at Lüliang. There the waterfall was thirty ren high, and the foam it churned up stretched for thirty li; even soft-shell turtles, alligators, fish, and terrapins could not swim in it. Confucius saw a man swimming in the water and, thinking he was in difficulty and meant to kill himself, had his disciples run along the current, ready to rescue him. After swimming several hundred paces, the man came ashore, his hair unbound, singing as he walked, until he reached Tanghang (which should be “Tangxia,” the low ground beneath the embankment).

Confucius caught up with him and asked: “The waterfall at Lüliang is thirty ren high, its foam stretches thirty li, and soft-shell turtles, alligators, fish, and terrapins cannot swim in it. Just now I saw you in the water and thought you were suffering and wanted to die, so I sent my disciples along the bank to meet and assist you. But when you came out with your hair unbound, singing as you walked, I thought you were a ghost; only after looking closely did I realize you were a person. May I ask whether you have some knack for moving in the water?”

The man said: “I have no knack. I begin with the nature I was born with, follow that nature as I grow, and reach completion through Heaven’s mandate. I enter the water together with the whirlpools and come up together with the surging current. Following the principle of the water without mixing in private intention—this is why I can be like this.”

Confucius asked again: “What do you mean by ‘beginning in gu, growing in xing, and completing in ming’?”

The man answered: “I was born among hills and uplands and am at peace among hills and uplands—this is gu (habit, the old environment). I grew up in the water and am at peace in the water—this is xing (the natural expression of one’s nature). As for why I am like this and can be so, I cannot say the reason—this is ming (the Heaven-determined principle that is so without one’s knowing why).”

Interpretation:

The commentator says: creatures that grow in water do not change their watery nature just because the water changes; human beings, by contrast, are born on land and simply find peace on land. The old man of Lüliang can swim in torrents where even soft-shell turtles, alligators, fish, and terrapins cannot swim because his nature contains a particular endowment for this. It is precisely because he has such a nature that he could grow up in water and be at peace in it. Although he can already be at peace in water, he has not yet reached the state of “being so without knowing why it is so.” This shows that he has not yet succeeded in following the principle of the water without mixing in private intention. Thus, although his skill is exquisite, it is not yet sublime, and so his words must ultimately come down to ming. As for ordinary people, they are like those Zhuangzi calls “those who obtain it and thereby swim the great river”: they refer to people who can cross a great river by relying on some external support or skill.

仲尼适楚,出於林中,见痀瘘者承蜩亦不若是之妙矣,故其言终至於命。若夫人者,犹庄子所谓得之以游大川者也。 仲尼适楚,出於林中,见痀瘘者承蜩犹掇之也。仲尼曰:子巧乎。有道耶?曰:我有道也。五六月,累丸二而不坠,则失者锱铢;累三而不堕,则失者十一;累五而不坠,犹攘之也。吾处也,若橛株驹;吾执臂若槁木之枝。天地之大,万物之多,而唯蜩翼之知。吾不反不侧,不以万物易蜩之翼,何为而不得?孔子顾谓弟子曰:用志不分,乃凝於神。其痀瘘丈人之谓乎?丈人曰:汝逢衣徒也,亦何知问是乎?修汝所以,而后载言其上。 解曰:学承蜩於累丸者,丸之为物,可转而反,莫适为仄,能累之而不坠,则其处身之定、执臂之审、用志之不分可知矣。而后载言其上。
Interpretation

Zhuangzi Fable: The Hunchbacked Old Man Catches Cicadas

Confucius was on his way to Chu. Passing through a grove, he saw a hunchbacked old man catching cicadas with a pole. His movements were as effortless as reaching out to pick something up. Confucius asked him, “You are truly skillful—do you have some knack?” The old man replied, “I have a Dao.” He said: “During the fifth and sixth months…”

解曰:学承蜩於累丸者,丸之为物,可转而反,莫适为仄,能累之而不坠,则其处身之定、执臂之审、用志之不分可知矣。以是而承蜩,此所以犹掇之也。夫以蜩翼轻迅,而取之犹掇,则进乎道矣,岂智巧之列?故曰:我有道也。盖方其处身,若橛株驹,执臂若槁木之枝,则内能忘我矣。不以万物易蜩之翼,则外能忘物矣。物我两忘,奚止可甩以承蜩?故孔子谓其用志不分,乃凝於神也。志分则神耗,志一则神凝,所谓纯气之守,如是而已。痀偻丈人则支离其形而无修於外者也,孔子方且衣逢腋之衣而饰儒行於鲁,是以丈人者俾孔子修其所用於世者而去之,而后载斯言於其上也。蜩之为物,舍毕秽,趣高洁,其鸣以时,不食而无求。得形禅之道者,是所以而后载斯言於其上也。蜩之为物,舍毕秽,趣高洁,其鸣以时,不食而无求。得形禅之道者,是所以托之承蜩也。 海上之人有好沤鸟者,每旦之海上,从沤鸟游,沤鸟之至者百住而不止。其父曰:吾闻沤鸟皆从汝游,汝取来,吾玩之。明日之海上,沤鸟舞而不下也。故曰,至言去言,至为无为。齐智之所知,则浅矣。
Interpretation

This passage first tells the story of “cheng tiao” (catching cicadas with a pole). In Zhuangzi’s “The Full Understanding of Life” (Dasheng), a hunchbacked old man catches cicadas with a pole, his movements as effortless as picking something up from the ground. He says that being able to stack several pellets on the tip of the pole without their falling shows that body and mind are settled, the arm is steady, and the will is focused. With such skill applied to catching cicadas, it is like picking them up at will. The cicada’s wings are light and swift, yet he can still obtain them in this way, showing that he has entered the realm of the Dao (the Way)—not through cunning or clever calculation—and so he says, “I have the Dao.”

When he stands, his body is motionless like a wooden post, and his arm is still like a withered branch; inwardly he can forget the self. He does not let the myriad things alter his concentration on the cicada’s wings, and external things therefore cannot disturb him—this is forgetting external things. When both things and self are forgotten, how could this be useful only for catching cicadas? Thus Confucius praised him for “not dividing his will,” that is, focusing the mind and will and concentrating it in the spirit. When the will is divided, the spirit is depleted; when the will is focused, the spirit is concentrated. This is what is called “guarding pure Qi (vital energy)”—the cultivation of maintaining the purity and oneness of Jing (essence) and Qi—and the principle is simply this.

That hunchbacked old man (Goulou Zhangren) only let his bodily form be broken and incomplete, and did not exert effort in external affairs. Confucius at that time, by contrast, wore broad-sleeved Confucian robes and promoted Confucian virtue in the state of Lu. The old man therefore had Confucius remove those adornments used for worldly purposes, and only then add this teaching on top of it.

The cicada, as a creature, abandons what is foul and tends toward what is pure and lofty; it cries out according to the season, eats nothing, and seeks nothing. One who can understand the way of the cicada’s molting and escaping the bonds of bodily form—this is why “catching cicadas” is used to convey this principle.

The next story tells of a man by the sea who loved seagulls (ou birds). Every morning he went to the seashore to play with the seagulls, and as many as a hundred or more gathered. His father said, “I hear the seagulls all play with you. Catch a few and bring them back, so I can play with them too.” The next day when he went to the sea, the seagulls only circled in the air and would not come down. Therefore it is said: the highest speech is not speaking, and the highest action is Wuwei (non-action). If one seeks to understand it through worldly cleverness, what one gains will be shallow.

解曰:经曰:既有妄心,即惊其神。心之与神,表里之符也。我惊其神,则物亦惊我矣。海上之人从沤鸟游,以其心无逆顺也。既怀取之之心,则惊其神矣,此沤鸟所以舞而不下也。且於物无迕,则物物皆然矣,奚止沤我矣。海上之人从沤鸟游,以其心无逆顺也。既怀取之之心,则惊其神矣,此沤鸟所以舞而不下也。且於物无迕,则物物皆然矣,奚止沤鸟而已?唯其好在於沤鸟,故沤鸟从之尔。夫涯之於人为异类也,而人心之不言不为者乃为其所密察,则吾之修身治物亦何假於言而后信,为而后知哉?齐智之所知,诚浅矣。列子於五浆先馈,所以惊也。 赵襄子率徒十万狩於中山,藉仍燔林,扇赫百里。有一人从石壁中出,随烟烬上下。众谓鬼物。火过,徐行而出,若无所经涉者。襄子怪而留之,徐而察之,形色七窍,人也;气息音声,人也。问奚道一人从石壁中出,随烟烬上下。众谓鬼物。火过,徐行而出,若无所经涉者。襄子怪而留之,徐而察之,形色七窍,人也;气息音声,人也。问奚道而处石?奚道而入火?其人曰:奚物而谓石?奚物而谓火?襄子曰:而向之所出者,石也;而向之所涉者,火也。其人曰:不知也。
Interpretation

Commentary: The scripture says: Once deluded thoughts are present in the mind, the spirit is disturbed. Mind and spirit correspond to one another as outer and inner. If I disturb the spirit, external things will disturb me as well.

People by the sea played together with seagulls because in their minds there was no thought of opposing or welcoming. As soon as the thought of catching the seagulls arose in the mind, the spirit was disturbed, and so the seagulls only wheeled in the air and would not alight. Moreover, if one meets external things without resistance, all things will be so—why only seagulls? It was merely because that man’s fondness was entirely fixed on the seagulls that the seagulls drew near him.

To humans, seagulls are originally of a different kind, yet the unspoken and unmoving thoughts in a person’s mind were subtly detected by them. From this we may know that in cultivating myself and governing things, why should I need to rely on words to win trust or on actions to make myself known? What ordinary people can know through cleverness is truly shallow. In the Liezi, that the seagulls flew over first was precisely because that man’s mind had already alarmed them.

(Note: The “five beverages” are the five drinks mentioned in the Liezi; “first offered” means to present food first. Here the sentence “Liezi was first offered among the five beverages” is rather abbreviated in the original; its general meaning is that Liezi used this to explain that mental intentions are perceived before actions.)

Zhao Xiangzi led a hundred thousand men hunting in Zhongshan, burning the fields to drive out the game. The fire spread for a hundred li, with raging flames. Suddenly a man walked out from within a stone wall, drifting up and down amid the smoke, dust, and fire. Everyone thought he was a ghost or spirit. After the great fire had passed, this man slowly walked out, as if he had experienced nothing. Zhao Xiangzi found it strange and kept him there, observing him carefully: his form, complexion, and seven apertures were all those of a human; his breathing and voice were also human. He then asked him: How is it that you dwell in stone? And how did you enter the fire? The man said: What is called stone? What is called fire? Zhao Xiangzi said: The place you just came out from is a stone wall; the place you just passed through is fire. The man said: I do not know.

解曰:我之所以为物累,物之所以能为我累者,以形隔而不能大同也。物之与我非本不同,其不同者生於知见。故知其为石则其坚不可入矣,知其为火则其烈不可近矣。虽然,火之燔也,石之坚也,亦非泊然无知者所能亡也。唯其知以无知,湛然不留秋毫於胸中,则骨肉都融,合乎大同。大同而无己,故物莫之能碍尔。今则人从石壁中出,随烟烬上下,至於问无知,湛然不留秋毫於胸中,则骨肉都融,合乎大同。大同而无己,故物莫之能碍尔。今则人从石壁中出,随烟烬上下,至於问其处石入火之道,则不知也。非特不知其道也,虽石火亦亡之,是真不知者矣。则石也,火也,孰得而碍之? 魏文侯闻之,问子夏曰:彼何人哉?子夏曰:以商所闻夫子之言,和者大同於物,物无得伤闻者,游金石,蹈水火,皆可也。文侯曰:吾子奚不为之?子夏曰:刳心去智,商未之能。虽然,试语之有暇矣。文侯曰:夫子奚不为之?子夏曰:夫子能之,而能不为者也。文侯大说。 解曰:可否相济谓之和,滞於有不可以为和,匿於无亦不可谓之和,盖无则无为而非理,有则有碍而非道,。文侯大说。
Interpretation

People are burdened by external things, and external things can hinder them, because physical form creates separation, making it impossible to merge with the myriad things as one. In reality, things and the self are originally no different; the distinction arises only because cognitions and discriminating minds (views and perceptions) come into being. Knowing that stone is hard, its hardness prevents one from penetrating it; knowing that fire is fierce, its blazing heat keeps one from approaching. Yet the burning of fire and the hardness of stone are not something the utterly unknowing person can eliminate. Only by using a mind free of knowing to realize that realm beyond knowing, making the mind clear and pure, leaving not a trace of attachment in the chest—then even bone and flesh can merge with the myriad things, joining in the Great Sameness (the state of undifferentiated unity with all things). Attaining the Great Sameness, one forgets the self, and so external things can no longer obstruct such a person. People today pass in and out through stone walls, drift up and down with smoke, flame, and ashes, yet when asked the way to pass through stone and enter fire, they say they do not know. Not only do they not know the principle behind it—they have forgotten stone and fire themselves as well. This is true not-knowing. That being so, how could stone and fire obstruct them?

Marquis Wen of Wei (ruler of the state of Wei during the Warring States period) heard of this and asked Zixia (a disciple of Confucius): What kind of person is that? Zixia said: I have heard the Master (Confucius) say that one whose heart is harmonious and attuned, communicating with the myriad things, cannot be harmed by external things—such a person can roam among metal and stone, walk through water and fire, all without difficulty. Marquis Wen asked: Why do you not do so yourself? Zixia said: To cast off the calculating mind and remove cleverness—this I am not yet able to do. However, I can try to explain the principle to you. Marquis Wen asked: Then why does the Master not do so? Zixia said: The Master is one who is capable of it but does not do it. Marquis Wen was greatly pleased.

The commentary says: When can and cannot complete each other, this is called "harmony." To cling rigidly to "being" means one cannot achieve harmony; to hide away in "non-being" also cannot be called harmony. Roughly speaking, "non-being" means doing nothing yet failing to accord with principle; "being" means having entanglements and failing to accord with the Dao.

解曰:可否相济谓之和,滞於有不可以为和,匿於无亦不可谓之和,盖无则无为而非理,有则有碍而非道,唯不废有无之用而有无俱遣,然后能大同於物。所谓大同者,以不同同之也。同以不同则不毁,石之坚不废火之烈而不能伤阂於我矣。是道也,子夏闻之於夫子者,虽子夏之未能刳心去智,亦有暇於语此矣,而况於夫子乎?夫子之不为此者,非不能也,不为尔。夫不能者,固不为矣,能而不能不为,是为能之所使,必不能为此矣。唯能之而能不为,或为之而莫知其所以为,斯无不能为矣。窃尝论之,赵人之处石入火,以其不知也。然则草木之无知也,曷亦不能不焦溺於水火,不窒阂於金石也,盖丽於五行者,木桡,水弱,金坚,火熯,土均,而布相生、相成、相克、相制,乌能逃其化?人为万物之灵,冲和之气所锺也,能天能地,能,土均,而布相生、相成、相克、相制,乌能逃其化?人为万物之灵,冲和之气所锺也,能天能地,能阴能阳。其所谓不知者,非若物之无知也。含和守气,融会万物,不觉其有异尔。则其游金石,蹈水火,乌乎往而不可哉?求之於物,固有云飞之翰,潜渊之鳞,虫藏於木,鼠游於火,皆阴阳之所为也。彼其得阴阳之一偏者犹若是,则圣人大同於阴阳,造化在我,其无入而不自得,又奚待为之而后信哉?
Interpretation

Only when things can complete one another is it called “harmony.” If one clings obstinately to “Being,” it cannot be called harmony; if one hides away in “Non-being,” it likewise cannot be called harmony. To cling to “Non-being” is to become inactive and turn away from the nature of things; to cling to “Being” is to be obstructed by things and deviate from the Great Dao (the Way). Only by neither discarding the respective functions of “Being” and “Non-being” and by dispelling attachment to both at once can one attain Great Harmony with all things. What is called “Great Harmony” is to bring differences into accord through difference itself. When what is different is thus brought into accord, things do not injure one another: stone does not reject the fierceness of fire on account of its hardness, and therefore fire cannot harm it; nor will I be obstructed.

Zixia heard this principle from Confucius. Although Zixia had not yet been able to cleanse his cunning mind and remove cleverness, he still had leisure to discuss this Dao—how much more so Confucius! Confucius did not do this, not because he was unable to do it, but because he did not wish to. Those who are unable to do it simply do not do it; those who are able to do it but cannot keep from doing it are driven by their own capacity and inevitably cannot do this. Only one who can do it yet does not do it, or who does it without knowing why he does so, is truly omnipotent.

I once conjectured that the legendary man of Zhao could enter stone and fire without being injured because he did not know danger. Yet plants and trees are also without knowledge—why can they not escape being burned or drowned by water and fire, or blocked by metal and stone? It is because they are attached within the Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, Water): wood is soft and bends, water is weak, metal is hard, fire is fierce, earth is level. Among the Five Phases there is mutual generation, mutual completion, mutual overcoming, and mutual control—how could plants and trees escape such transformations? Humans are the most intelligent of the myriad creatures, formed by the coalescence of the harmonious Qi between Heaven and Earth; they can communicate above with Heaven and accord below with Earth, and can belong to Yin as well as to Yang. The “not knowing” spoken of is not the dull ignorance of plants and trees; it is to contain and nurture harmonious Qi, guard primal Qi, and fuse completely with all things, without feeling that one differs from others. Such a person may move among metal and stone and tread upon water and fire—where could he not go?

Viewed among other creatures, there are birds that fly in the sky, fish that dive in the depths, insects that hide in wood, and rats that move through fire—all these are brought about by the transformations of Yin-Yang. Having received only one side of Yin-Yang, they can still do such things; how much more so the sage, who is in Great Harmony with Yin-Yang and in whom the power of creation resides personally? Wherever he enters, he finds joy in himself—why must he wait until he has personally tried it before believing?

有神巫自齐来处於郑,命曰季咸,知人死生、存亡、祸福、寿夭,期以岁、月、旬、日,如神,郑人见之,皆避而走。列子见之而心醉,而而后信哉? 有神巫自齐来处於郑,命曰季咸,知人死生、存亡、祸福、寿夭,期以岁、月、旬、日,如神,郑人见之,皆避而走。列子见之而心醉,而归以告壶丘子,曰:始吾以夫子之道为至矣,则又有至焉者矣。 解曰:古者民之精爽不贰,而神降之者,在男日巫,谓之神巫,则妙於其道矣。命曰季咸,则少而有感者也。妙於其道则我之於人也能洞鉴,少而有感则人之於我也无匿情。凡域於形体者,莫不惑於死生存亡祸福寿夭之数,而季咸能先事以期之,是乃昧者之所谓至至者也。 壶子曰:吾与汝既其文,未既其实,而固得道欤?众雌而无雄,而又奚卵焉?而以道与世抗,必信矣。夫故使人得而相汝。 解曰:文者事之彰,实者道之真,有文而无实,犹有雌而无雄也,安能居物之先而化育万物哉?列子以道与世抗,故其为可必而其信而相汝。 解曰:文者事之彰,实者道之真,有文而无实,犹有雌而无雄也,安能居物之先而化育万物哉?列子以道与世抗,故其为可必而其信可期,是尽壶子之文而未尽其实者,则於何逃形哉?
Interpretation

Summary of the Original Text

A spirit shaman came from Qi to Zheng, named Jixian. He could determine a person’s life and death, survival and ruin, misfortune and fortune, and length of lifespan, down to the year, month, ten-day period, and day, like a god. When the people of Zheng saw him, they all fled in fright. After Liezi saw Jixian, his mind was overwhelmed; returning, he told his teacher Huqiu Zi (Huzi): “I had thought the Master’s Dao was supreme; now it seems there is something higher.”

Annotation One: On the Spirit Shaman and Jixian

In ancient times, when people’s spirit was single-minded and pure, the divine could descend upon them. Men who practiced this kind of communication with spirits and divination were called “wu” (shamans); Jixian is called a “spirit shaman,” indicating his great refinement in this art. The name “Jixian” means that even in youth he had a strong capacity to sense things. He could see through others because he discerned their hearts; he could foreknow their fortune and misfortune because their circumstances could not be hidden from him. All who are bound by bodily form are deluded by fate—life and death, survival and ruin, misfortune and fortune, longevity and early death—and Jixian could know the outcome in advance. This is precisely what the ignorant call “the ultimate.”

Huzi’s Response

Huzi said: “I have only shown you the outer pattern (wen), not yet revealed the inner substance (shi). How could you conclude that I have attained the Dao? With only the female and no male, how could eggs be hatched? You use the Dao to contend with the world, so you are bound to be seen through; that is why Jixian can read your physiognomy.”

Annotation Two: On “Wen” and “Shi”

“Wen” is the outward manifestation of things; “shi” is the true core of the Dao. To have only outward manifestation and no inner substance is like having only the female and no male: how could one stand before the ten thousand things and transform and nourish them? Liezi contended with the world by means of the Dao, and so Jixian could judge his fortune and misfortune and see through his destiny. This shows that Liezi had learned only Huzi’s outer “wen” and had not obtained his inner “shi.” From what, then, could he escape the bonds of bodily form?

尝试与来,以予示之。明日,列子与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:嘻,子之先生死矣,弗活矣,不可以旬数矣。吾见怪焉,见湿灰焉。列子入,涕泣沾衾,以告壶子,子曰:向吾示之以地文,罪庄子作萌乎不震不止,是殆见吾杜德几也。尝又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:幸矣,子之先生遇我也,有瘳矣。灰然有生矣,吾见杜权矣。列子入告壶子。壶子曰:向吾示之以天壤,名实不入,而几发於踵,此为杜权。是殆见吾善者几也。尝又与来。明杜权矣。列子入告壶子。壶子曰:向吾示之以天壤,名实不入,而几发於踵,此为杜权。是殆见吾善者几也。尝又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:子之先生坐不斋,吾无得而相焉。试斋,将旦复相之。列子入告壶子,壶子曰:向吾示之以太冲莫朕,是殆见吾衡气几也。鲵旋之潘为渊,止水之潘为渊,流水之潘为渊,滥水之潘为渊,沃水之潘为渊,汍水之潘为渊,雍水之潘为渊,沃水之潘为渊,氿水之潘为渊,是为九渊焉。尝又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。立未定,自失而走。壶子曰沃水之潘为渊,氿水之潘为渊,是为九渊焉。尝又与来。明日,又与之见壶子。立未定,自失而走。壶子曰:追之。列子追之而不及,反以报壶子,曰:已灭矣,已失矣,吾不及也。壶子曰:向吾示之以未始出吾宗。吾与之虚而琦移,不知其谁何,因以为茅靡,因以为波流,故逃也。
Interpretation

One day, Liezi again brought that spirit-medium (Jixian) to visit Huzi. After the medium came out, he said to Liezi: “Alas, your master is about to die; he cannot live; within ten days he will be gone. I saw an uncanny portent, like sodden dead ashes.” Liezi went in, wept until his tears soaked the quilt, and told Huzi. Huzi said: “Just now what I showed him was ‘Earthly Patterns’ (Diwen)—the state in which the earth is still and the myriad things do not move, meaning the mind is utterly quiet like dead ashes. What he saw was my appearance of ‘sprouting, yet neither shaken nor still.’ This is probably his seeing my ‘Du De Ji’—the blocking of the De (Virtue/Power) mechanism; the state in which vitality is closed and stored, not exposed.”

After some days, Liezi brought the spirit-medium again. The medium came out and said: “Fortunately your master met me; he is saved! Dead ashes have reignited; vitality has appeared; I saw the stirring of life.” Liezi went in and told Huzi. Huzi said: “Just now what I showed him was ‘Heavenly Terrain’ (Tianrang)—the realm between heaven and earth that is empty and penetrating, not constrained by names and forms. Neither names nor realities entered my mind, and vitality sprouted from my heels. This is called ‘Du Quan’—a slight disclosure within the closed store of vitality. This is probably his seeing my good vitality.”

After several more days, the spirit-medium came again. After he came out, he said: “Your master’s mind is not still; I cannot read his physiognomy. Wait until he has fasted and purified body and mind, and I will come again tomorrow morning to examine him.” Liezi went in and told Huzi. Huzi said: “Just now what I showed him was ‘the Great Vastness without trace’ (Taichong Mo Zhen)—the Great Void, harmonious and balanced, with no trace to be found. This is probably his seeing my ‘balanced Qi’ (vital energy)—the Qi of Yin-Yang that is peaceful and harmonious, centered and unbiased.”

The “Nine Abysses” (Jiuyuan) that the spirit-medium saw refer to the places where various water currents swirl and gather: the spot where the salamander-fish coils, still water, flowing water, overflowing water, Wo water, Wan water, blocked water, Gui water, and so on. Each gathering of a current can form a deep pool; hence they are called the “Nine Abysses.”

After another day, the spirit-medium came again. Before he had steadied himself, he fled in panic. Huzi said: “Go quickly and chase him!” Liezi could not catch up, returned, and reported: “He has already vanished, already disappeared; I cannot catch him.” Huzi said: “Just now what I showed him was ‘not yet emerging from my ancestral source’ (Wei Shi Chu Wu Zong)—never departing from the fundamental source, that is, returning to the origin and making no distinction between self and other. I was empty, still, and traceless with him, following along and yielding (weiyi)—bending and stretching with things, without attachment. He had no way to fathom who I really was; to him I seemed to bend with the grasses and trees and drift with the waves—and so he fled.”

解曰:示之者在我,见之者在彼,有所示则必有所见矣。示以地文,偏於阴也,不震以动,不止而寂,则见其德几杜而不发,故以为弗活。示以天壤,多於阳也,名实虽不入,而犹有我,气几虽外发,而其息则深,则见其德出而为善,故以为有生。所谓杜权者,始见其地文,莫知其为杜德几也,及见其天壤,然后以其杜德几为权,时之宜尔。至於示之以太冲莫眹,则至和发越,莫测其涯,气几常均,充塞天地,外应万变,而终不能挠。其渊静之居,,然后以其杜德几为权,时之宜尔。至於示之以太冲莫眹,则至和发越,莫测其涯,气几常均,充塞天地,外应万变,而终不能挠。其渊静之居,水之九渊类是矣,故季咸於此莫得而见焉。所谓九渊者,水性无人。虽曰因地而为曲直,因器而为方圆,或旋或止,或流或滥,或下溜而为汏,或旁出而为氿,或雍而复入,或汧而流行,或出同而归异,虽波流九变,常渊然自若。道至於此,则入於不死不生矣。季咸所知者,有生之后尔,尚安得而相之哉?然而太冲莫眹犹寓於气而示以几也,至於示之以未始出吾宗,则虽人而能天,虽泛应万物而常深根宁极,此季咸之所以自失而走,列子追之弗及也。夫伪之於真,犹雨雪之见晛而消应万物而常深根宁极,此季咸之所以自失而走,列子追之弗及也。夫伪之於真,犹雨雪之见晛而消也,故曰已灭矣,已失矣。且未始出吾宗,则不离於宗而犹有所示者,盖至道虽妙,未始不示,譬如日光无所不照,盲者不见,咎岂在日?所谓壶丘子者,以空虚为体而居於中高之地,居於中高则疑若可接矣,以虚为体则未尝与世抗,此其所以莫得而相。
Interpretation

This passage discusses the story of Ji Xian (a spirit medium from the state of Zheng who could read a person’s physiognomy and determine life, death, misfortune, and fortune) and Huqiu Zi (Liezi’s teacher) in the “Huangdi” chapter of the Liezi. Jiang Yu uses it to explain the principle of “showing” and “seeing”: the act of showing lies with the one who shows, while whether it can be seen lies with the other. When the display reveals something, the observer can see something.

Huqiu Zi first showed “Earthly Pattern” (diwen; the state of the earth at rest), which inclines toward Yin and softness. It does not shake, does not flow, and is utterly still, so Ji Xian saw only that vital life was closed and stored, and judged that this person “was about to die and was not alive.” Then he showed “Heaven and Earth” (tianrang; the state in which vital life issues outward between heaven and earth), which inclines toward Yang and hardness. Names and actualities were both dissolved, yet there was still a mark of self; although the Qi-mechanism radiated outward, the breathing was deep, so Ji Xian saw vitality surging forth and judged that this person “had life.” The so-called “Duquan” (blocking the expedient) means that at first, when he saw the Earthly Pattern, he did not know that it was closed and stored vitality; only when he saw Heaven and Earth did he understand that the mechanism of closure and storage was merely a temporary expedient, changing with circumstances.

When it came to “the Great Thoroughfare Without Sign” (Taichong Mozhen; the state of utmost emptiness in which no trace can be seen), it was entirely different. Within it the Qi of ultimate harmony dispersed in all directions, unfathomable; vitality was balanced and filled heaven and earth; while externally responding to the myriad transformations, it remained throughout undisturbed. This deep and still state was like the nine abysses within water. Therefore Ji Xian had no way to see it in this realm.

The nine abysses refer to the depths of water. Water by nature has no fixed form: it bends according to the lay of the land, becomes square or round according to the vessel; it may swirl, stop, rush, or overflow; it may gather from below or branch off from the side; it may wind back and re-enter, or surge forward; it may proceed from the same to the different; though it undergoes nine transformations, it remains deep and self-possessed. When the Dao reaches this state, it transcends life and death. What Ji Xian could know was only matters after birth—how could he read people’s destinies?

Yet “the Great Thoroughfare Without Sign” still rested on Qi, so it was still necessary to reveal it through subtle, incipient workings. When it reached the state of “not yet emerging from my ancestral source” (weishi chu wuzong), although the person was still human, he was already united with Heaven. Although he responded to all things, he could always plant his root deeply and rest securely in the ultimate. Ji Xian therefore panicked and lost his composure, fled, and Liezi chased him but could not catch up.

The relation between the false and the true is like rain and snow melting upon meeting sunlight. Hence it says, “It is already extinguished, already lost.” As for the fact that “not yet emerging from my ancestral source” still had something shown, this is because the ultimate Dao, though profound and mysterious, is not without manifestation. For example, sunlight shines on all things, but a blind person cannot see it—is the fault then with the sun?

Huqiu Zi took emptiness as his substance and dwelt in a central and high place. Dwelling in the central and high, he seemed approachable; but taking emptiness as his substance, he never contended with the world. This is precisely why Ji Xian could not see through him.

然后列子自以为未始学而归,三年不出,为其妻爨,食稀如食人,於事无亲,雕琢复朴,块然独以其形,立忄分然而封戒,戎宜作哉。壹以是终。 解曰:三年不出绝物也为其妻爨食稀如食人,忘我也。於事无亲,则去智与故也。雕琢复朴,块然独以其形立,则复命反常而一真独露也。忄分然而封哉,则万变杂然而其却常涂也。一以是终如食人,忘我也。於事无亲,则去智与故也。雕琢复朴,块然独以其形立,则复命反常而一真独露也。忄分然而封哉,则万变杂然而其却常涂也。一以是终,则亘万世而不易也。列子进此道矣,将示人以复本,故云尔也。 子列子之齐,中道而反,遇伯昏瞀人。伯昏瞀人曰:奚方而反?曰:吾惊焉。恶乎惊?吾食於十浆,而五浆先馈。伯昏瞀人曰:若是,则汝何为惊已?曰:夫内诚不解,形谍成光,以外镇人心,使人轻乎贵老,而整其所患。夫浆人特为食羹之货,何为惊已?曰:夫内诚不解,形谍成光,以外镇人心,使人轻乎贵老,而整其所患。夫浆人特为食羹之货,无多余之赢;其为利也薄,其为权也轻,而犹若是,而况万乘之主,身劳於国,而智尽於事,彼将任我以事,而效我以功,吾是以惊。
Interpretation

Part One: Liezi Shuts His Door and Cultivates Himself

Liezi felt that he had not yet mastered the teaching, so he returned home and did not go out for three years. He tended the fire and cooked for his wife; when he ate, he simply ate, like any ordinary person who eats, without giving rise to discriminating thoughts. He no longer drew close to worldly affairs. He stripped away ornamentation and returned to plainness, whole and independent, existing only as his own bodily form. The profusion of external things and transformations all gathered back with it and no longer stirred him. In the end, he passed his whole life in this state.

The commentary means: “Not going out for three years” is being cut off from external things. “Cooking for his wife yet eating like an ordinary person” is forgetting the self. “Having no closeness to worldly affairs” is removing cunning and preconceptions. “Stripping away ornamentation, returning to plainness, whole and independent” is returning to the original state of life and causing the single true nature to reveal itself. The myriad transformations, vast and complex, ultimately all return to the constant Dao. “Using this one to the end” means penetrating ten thousand generations without change. When Liezi’s cultivation of the Dao reached this stage, he wished thereby to show the world the path back to original nature; hence he spoke as he did.

Part Two: Liezi Returns Because of “Fright”

Liezi set out for Qi. Halfway there, he turned back and met his teacher Bohun Wuren (Liezi’s master). Bohun Wuren asked: “Why have you returned midway?” Liezi said: “I was frightened.” Bohun Wuren asked: “What frightened you?” Liezi said: “On the road I went to ten shops that sold drinks, and five of them rushed to bring drinks and offer them to me.”

Bohun Wuren said: “If that is so, why should you be frightened?” Liezi said: “If the inner mind cannot preserve undivided sincerity and reverence, then outward traces will display a brilliant light, with which one overawes others, making people slight the noble and the elderly and instead occupy themselves only with responding to what worries them. Those drink-sellers merely make their living by selling food and drink, with little surplus and meager profit, and their station is low—yet even they are like this. How much more so a ruler with ten thousand chariots of war! Their bodies are worn out by affairs of state, and their intellects are exhausted by government. They will entrust affairs to me and demand that I establish achievements. This is why I am frightened.”

解曰:人之性犹水也,凝之而为冰,释之而为水。凝则其体不易,释则其用不穷。至人之心,泱若冰将释而复归其明,曾何光耀之外镇哉?若夫内矜实智,不能自解物有,结之便辟成光,人皆得以密察之,有若浆人之权轻利薄者,亦轻乎贵老而敕其所患矣。敕,乱也,谓所患众至也。齐,中央之国,任事效功之所在也。故子列子之齐,中道惊五浆之馈而反也。虽然,惊於此者,与所谓宠辱若惊者异矣。 伯昏瞀人曰:善哉观乎。汝处己,人将保汝矣。无几何而往,则户外之屦满矣。 解曰:以五浆先馈为惊,是善於内观者此者,与所谓宠辱若惊者异矣。 伯昏瞀人曰:善哉观乎。汝处己,人将保汝矣。无几何而往,则户外之屦满矣。 解曰:以五浆先馈为惊,是善於内观者也。处己,谓不遗形也,此户外之屦所以满也。 伯昏瞀人北面而立,敦杖蹙之乎颐,立有间,不言而出。宾者以告列子。列子提屦徒跣而走,暨乎门,问曰:先生既来,曾不废药乎?
Interpretation

Human nature is like water: it congeals into ice, and when it melts it is water again. When congealed, its form is stable; when melted, its function is inexhaustible. The mind of the Perfected Person is like ice about to melt and return to a clear, limpid state; its original brightness naturally appears. How could it still need to flaunt its brilliance outward and be constrained by external things?

If a person inwardly boasts of intelligence and cleverness and cannot dissolve his attachment to external things, then once that attachment congeals, he will deliberately put his skills on display and let his sharp edges show, and everyone will be able to see through to his true measure. This is like those petty drink-sellers, whose power is slight and whose profit is meager. They made light of the principle of “honoring Laozi” (Guilao: taking stillness and non-contention as precious), and so invited the very troubles they feared. The commentary says that chi means disorder, referring to the troubles he worries about arriving one after another. Qi was a great state in the Central Plains, a place for establishing achievements and serving in office. Therefore, when Liezi went to Qi, midway he was alarmed by gifts from five drink-sellers and turned back. However, being alarmed by this matter is not the same as what Laozi calls “favor and disgrace are both like alarm” (remaining alert whether favored or disgraced, and not treating them as gain or loss).

Bohun Maoren (Liezi’s teacher) said: “Excellent, your observation! If you settle yourself, others will come to protect you.” Before long, Liezi went again, and shoes were already piled up outside the door.

The commentary says: Being alarmed because he had first received gifts from five drink-sellers was a sign of skill in inward examination. “Settling oneself” means not losing one’s own form and spirit and preserving one’s original authenticity; this is precisely why the shoes outside the door were piled full.

Bohun Maoren stood facing north (the ritual in ancient times for a minister or disciple visiting a teacher), propped his chin on his staff, stood for a while, said not a word, and left. The guests told Liezi about this. Liezi, carrying his shoes, ran out barefoot, caught up with him at the gate, and asked: “Since you, Master, have come, would you refuse to leave me your instruction?”

解曰:北面而立,辩於物也。敦杖蹙之乎颐,忘我也。不言而出,忘言辩也。列子提履徒跣而走,则未能默悟不言之教,敏於求道而忘其足也。且徒跣而走,也。不言而出,忘言辩也。列子提履徒跣而走,则未能默悟不言之教,敏於求道而忘其足也。且徒跣而走,则既已异于处己矣。《庄子□德充符》数称无趾兀者,意几是欤。 曰:已矣。吾固告汝曰:人将保汝,果保汝矣。非汝能使人保汝,而汝不能使人无汝保也,而焉用之感也?感豫出异。且必有感也,摇而本身,又无谓也。与汝游者,莫汝告也;被所小言,尽人毒也。莫觉莫悟,何相孰也。
Interpretation

Standing facing north was to distinguish the boundaries between things. Tapping his chin with his staff, he forgot himself. Leaving without speaking is the state of forgetting words, and it is also a kind of discrimination. Liezi picked up his shoes and ran barefoot, which shows that he still could not silently grasp the teaching of “not speaking”; he was so eager to seek the Dao that he forgot his own feet. Moreover, running barefoot is already different from dwelling at ease. Zhuangzi’s “The Sign of Virtue Complete” mentions people crippled by the loss of their toes several times; this is probably what it means.

The Master said: “I told you long ago that others would protect you, and now indeed someone has protected you. It is not that you can make others protect you; it is that you cannot make others refrain from protecting you. Why use such a moving manner? Once the mind is stirred, one reveals an appearance different from ordinary people. Moreover, since there is something that stirs you, shaking your body is meaningless. Those who associate with you will not speak the truth to you; and when petty people discuss you, you will be wounded by their poisonous words. No one perceives it, no one awakens—so why compare yourselves with one another?”

解曰:能不失其德而未至乎上德之不德,知可道之有迹而未造乎常道之无心,斯不能使人无汝保也,且以不能使人之无保为患者与夫使人保汝者有间矣。感豫者常道之无心,斯不能使人无汝保也,且以不能使人之无保为患者与夫使人保汝者有间矣。感豫者,先施之谓也。列子固未尝出异以感物也,其所以人得而保之者,是必有以感之而不自知也。既已感物也,劳汝神,摇汝精,日与户外之屦者相与辩,其果有谓乎?故曰:摇而本身,又无谓也。与汝游者,俱沦於人道之息,故莫知所告。其小言之詹詹,安能为至言之发药哉?若是者,同之乎迷涂,物与我无成也。故曰:莫觉莫悟,何相孰也。 杨朱南之沛,老聃西游於秦,邀於郊。至梁而遇老君。老君中道仰天而叹曰:始以汝为可教,今不可教也。杨子不答。至舍,进涫漱巾栉,脱履户外,膝行而前,曰:向者夫子仰天而叹曰:始以汝为可教,今不可教,弟子欲请夫子辞,行不闲,是以不敢前,曰:向者夫子仰天而叹曰:始以汝为可教,今不可教,弟子欲请夫子辞,行不闲,是以不敢。今夫子闲矣,请问其过。 解曰:孔子曰:彼非至人,不能下人;下人不精,不得其真。进涫漱巾栉,脱履膝行,凡以欲得其真而已。 老君曰:而睢睢而盱盱,而谁与居?
Interpretation

Such a person can keep from losing De (Virtue/Power), but has not yet attained the state of “the highest De does not [deliberately] appear as De” (the highest virtue does not intentionally manifest as virtue); such a person knows that the Dao (the Way) can be spoken of and has traces to follow, but has not yet reached the point of the “constant Dao” (the eternal Dao), where there is no-mind and Wuwei (non-action). Such a person cannot make others entirely free of guardedness toward them. To worry over “being unable to make others wholly unguarded” is fundamentally different from “letting others naturally trust and rely on one.”

The so-called ganyu means actively giving and being the first to move others. Liezi never deliberately sought to be novel or unconventional in order to move external things; the reason people drew close to and trusted him was that he had already transformed them without self-conscious intent. But once one intentionally sets about transforming others, one consumes Shen (spirit) and unsettles Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy). What benefit is there in arguing all day with people who come to the gate, shoes in hand, to seek instruction? Hence it is said: “To shake the root of body and mind is utterly meaningless.” Those who associate with you are all sunk in the gaspings of the worldly human path, so no one knows how to guide them. How can those trivial words become the good medicine of the supreme true teaching? Such people are like those walking together on a lost road; neither external things nor the self comes to fulfillment. Hence it is said: “No one perceives, no one awakens—how can one tell who is who?”

Yang Zhu (a Daoist figure of the Warring States period) went south to Pei; Lao Dan traveled west to Qin; they met in the outskirts and then went on to Liang.

解曰:存乎人者莫良於眸子,眸子不能掩其恶,盖离为目而围二,神之所托也。得道者之相遇,目击而其意已传,知人者每得於眉睫之间,故杨朱之睢睢盱盱,其视不正,则老君以为不可教也。故《黄托也。得道者之相遇,目击而其意已传,知人者每得於眉睫之间,故杨朱之睢睢盱盱,其视不正,则老君以为不可教也。故《黄帝书》曰:机在目。 大白若辱,盛德若不足。 解曰:明白四达,是谓大白。每下愈况,是谓若辱。冲而不盈,故盛德若不足。若此者,其视颠颠,与人相遇,目若不相见者,奚有於睢盱哉? 杨朱蹴然变容曰:敬闻命矣。其往也,舍者迎将家,公执席,妻执巾栉,舍者避席,炀者避灶。其反也,舍者与之争席矣。 解曰:避席,非止於不争而已。争席,非止於不避而已,闻命而反,则昔之避者更且争。夫秦梁之地不远也,今之舍者犹昔之舍者也,亦非有二杨朱也。其相遇遽若是之异者,乃知至道密庸,变形易虑,人常由之,而莫之知也。盖南之沛,则趋於物梁之地不远也,今之舍者犹昔之舍者也,亦非有二杨朱也。其相遇遽若是之异者,乃知至道密庸,变形易虑,人常由之,而莫之知也。盖南之沛,则趋於物之所会;其反也,则复於命之所本。或避或争,在於往反之间尔。
Interpretation

Nothing on the human body reveals one’s nature more than the eyes. The eyes cannot conceal evil thoughts in the heart. In the Zhouyi (Book of Changes), the Li hexagram symbolizes the eyes; its middle yin line is like the pupil, the place where Shen (spirit) is lodged. When those who have attained the Dao (the Way) meet, as soon as their eyes touch, their minds are already in communication. Those skilled at judging people often discern the signs from the eyebrows and eyes. Thus when Yang Zhu (a Warring States thinker who advocated “for oneself”) glanced sidelong with an improper gaze, Laozi (Lord Lao) judged him incorrigible. The ancient Huang-Lao text The Book of the Yellow Emperor says, “The mechanism lies in the eyes”—both the workings of the mind and the crux are in the eyes.

“Great whiteness seems disgraced” means that when clarity and penetration reach their utmost, they instead appear to have suffered disgrace, just as “the lower one goes, the more it becomes evident” (Zhuangzi’s words: the further downward one goes, the clearer the Dao appears). “Abundant De (Virtue/Power) seems insufficient” means that a person of great De is humble and empty, never self-satisfied. Such a person’s gaze is calm; meeting others, he seems as if not seeing them—how could he still have the fault of sidelong peeping?

Yang Zhu’s expression changed solemnly, and he said, “I respectfully receive the teaching.” When he went to Pei, the innkeeper came forward and brought out a mat from the house; the host’s wife offered a towel and comb; the people in the inn yielded their seats; and the fire-tender yielded his place by the stove. When he returned, the same inn people contended with him for seats.

This shows that yielding a seat is more than merely not contending, and contending for a seat is more than merely not yielding. After hearing the teaching and returning, those who had previously yielded of their own accord now contended. The two places were not far apart; the innkeeper was still the same innkeeper, and it was not that there was another Yang Zhu. Yet the treatment he met with was so different. Thus the ultimate Dao is hidden and subtle yet ordinary; people use it daily without knowing it. Broadly speaking, going south to Pei was to move toward a place where external things gather; returning was to come back to the root of life. Whether yielding or contending lay merely in the coming and going.

杨朱过宋,东之於逆旅。逆旅人有妾二人,其一人美,其一人恶-,恶者贵而美者贱。杨子问其故。逆旅小子对曰:其美者自美,吾不知其美也;其恶者自恶,吾不知其恶也。杨子曰:弟子记之,行贤而去自贤之行,安往而不爱哉? 解曰:贵其美而贱其恶者,情之私;恶者贵,而美者贱,道之公。或美或恶,生於妄见;贵之贱之,亦非真理。所恶於逆旅之妾者,非谓其美也,以恃其美故贱之,所贵於逆旅之人者,不以能贱其美也,以不知其美故取之。如俾逆旅之妾亦不恃其美而无自贤之行,则无往而不爱矣。於逆旅之人者,不以能贱其美也,以不知其美故取之。如俾逆旅之妾亦不恃其美而无自贤之行,则无往而不爱矣。老君曰:天下皆知美之为美,斯恶矣。非恶美也,恶知其美尔。
Interpretation

Yang Zhu was passing through the state of Song and lodged at an inn. The innkeeper had two concubines, one beautiful and one ugly, yet the innkeeper valued the ugly one and slighted the beautiful one. Yang Zhu asked the reason. A young servant at the inn replied, “The beautiful one considers herself beautiful, but I do not find her beautiful; the ugly one considers herself ugly, but I do not find her ugly.” Yang Zhu said, “Disciples, remember this: one whose conduct is worthy and good but who does not regard himself as worthy and good—where would he not be loved?”

Interpretation: To value the beautiful and slight the ugly comes from personal likes and dislikes; that the ugly is valued and the beautiful slighted instead accords with the impartiality of the great Dao. Beauty and ugliness alike arise from deluded views, and valuing or slighting are likewise not the truth. The innkeeper’s concubine was disliked not because she was beautiful, but because she relied on her beauty to slight others; the innkeeper valued her not because he could be indifferent to beauty, but because he did not know she was beautiful, and so accepted her. If this concubine too did not rely on her beauty and did not do things while considering herself worthy and good, then wherever she went she would be loved. Lord Lao (that is, Laozi, the founding ancestor revered in Daoism) said, “When all under heaven know beauty as beauty, ugliness arises.” This is not a dislike of beauty, but a dislike of the fixation of “knowing oneself as beautiful.”

天下有常胜之道,有不常胜之道。常胜之道曰柔,常不胜之道曰强。二者亦知,而人未之知。故上古之言:强,先不己若者;柔,先出於己者,先不已若者,至於若己,则殆矣。先出於己者,亡所殆矣,以此胜一身若徒,以此任天下若徒,谓不胜而自胜,不任而自任也。粥子曰:欲刚,必以柔守之;欲强,必以弱保之。积於柔必刚,积於弱必强。观其所积,以知祸福之乡。强胜不若己,至於若己者刚;柔胜出於己者,其力不可量。老聃曰:兵强则灭,木强则折。柔弱者生之徒,坚强者死之徒。 解曰:柔弱者道之本。守道之本,自胜而已强则灭,木强则折。柔弱者生之徒,坚强者死之徒。 解曰:柔弱者道之本。守道之本,自胜而已,故无一不胜。以此胜一身,以此任天下,有安而无危,有福而无祸。虽未尝先人而人莫之能先,是乃善摄生者与天地同久之道也。《易》曰:巽以行权。《庄子》曰:於鱼得计。义协於此。故老君、粥子其书每政意焉,其称上古之言则以此道自古以固存也。
Interpretation

In the world there is a principle that can always prevail, and a principle that cannot always prevail. What can always prevail is softness and yieldingness; what cannot always prevail is hardness and strength. People in fact all know these two principles, but few truly understand their deeper meaning.

Thus the ancients said: The hard and strong first overpower those who are inferior to themselves; the soft and yielding willingly place themselves behind others and let others stand above them. If they meet an opponent equal to themselves, the hard and strong are in danger. One who puts himself behind others is without danger. To use this method to overcome one’s own private desires and to use it to undertake the affairs of the world seems easy. This means that by not contending for victory, one naturally wins; by not contending to take on responsibility, one is naturally able to bear it.

Yuzi said: If one wishes to be hard and strong, one must guard it with softness and compliance; if one wishes to be great and powerful, one must preserve it with weakness and smallness. Accumulating softness and compliance necessarily leads to hardness and strength; accumulating weakness and smallness necessarily leads to greatness and power. By observing what a person accumulates, one can know where fortune and misfortune will tend. Hardness and strength can only overcome those inferior to oneself, and when they meet an equal they are thwarted; softness and yieldingness can overcome those above oneself, and their power cannot be measured.

Laozi said: Weapons that are too hard are destroyed; trees that are too hard are broken. Softness and yieldingness belong to the category of life; hardness and strength belong to the category of death.

The commentary says: Softness and yieldingness are the root of Dao (the fundamental law of the universe). Guarding the root of Dao is conquering oneself. One who can conquer himself will be invincible wherever he goes. Using it to restrain oneself and using it to bear the affairs of the world, one can be secure without danger, blessed without disaster. Although he never takes precedence over others, no one can surpass him. This is precisely the way by which one skilled in nurturing life can endure as long as Heaven and Earth.

The Yijing says, “Xun (xùn, compliance) is used to act with expediency,” that is, to respond flexibly through soft compliance. The fishing metaphor in Zhuangzi also accords with this meaning. Therefore this thought is reflected everywhere in the books of Laozi and Yuzi. Their quotations of ancient sayings precisely show that this principle has existed since ancient times and endures forever.

状不必童而智童,智不必童而状童。圣人取童智而遗童状,众人近童状而疏童智。状与我童者,近而爱之;状与我异者,疏而畏之。有七尺之骸,手足之异,戴发含齿,倚而趋者,谓之人;而人未必无兽心。虽有兽心,以状而见亲矣。傅翼戴角之异,戴发含齿,倚而趋者,谓之人;而人未必无兽心。虽有兽心,以状而见亲矣。傅翼戴角,分牙布爪,仰飞伏走,谓之禽兽;而禽兽未必无人心,虽有人心,以状而见疏矣。庖牺氏,女蜗氏,神农氏,夏后氏,蛇身人面,牛首虎鼻,此有非人之状,而有大圣之德。夏桀、殷纣,鲁桓,楚穆,状貌七窍,皆同於人,而有禽兽之心。而众人守一状以求至智,未可几也。 解曰:所谓有非人之状者,其形貌之近似,若蜂诿目豺声、虎头燕颔,载之近史,为可考者。斯言吻合乎造化之妙人之状者,其形貌之近似,若蜂诿目豺声、虎头燕颔,载之近史,为可考者。斯言吻合乎造化之妙,特人惑於浅智,不悟童智之奥尔。列子务明至道,故横口而言,唯诚理之是取,而不顾众意之所惊也。
Interpretation

Things are not necessarily alike in outward appearance, yet they may be alike in wisdom; they are not necessarily alike in wisdom, yet they may be alike in outward appearance. What the sage values is sameness in wisdom; he does not care whether outward appearance is the same. Ordinary people, however, like to draw close to those whose appearance is the same and to keep at a distance those whose wisdom is the same. Those whose appearance resembles their own, they approach and love; those whose appearance differs from their own, they distance themselves from and fear.

A creature seven chi tall, with four limbs like a human’s, long hair on its head, teeth in its mouth, and walking on two feet is called a “human.” But a human is not necessarily without the heart of a beast. Even if it has a beast’s heart, because its outward form is the same, it is still approached. One with wings, horns on its head, sharp claws and fangs, that flies upward with head raised or runs crouching on the ground is called a “bird or beast.” But a bird or beast is not necessarily without a human’s mind. Even if it has a human mind, because its outward form is different, it is still kept at a distance.

Fuxi, Nüwa, Shennong, and the Xia Hou clan (that is, Yu the Great) all had snake bodies and human faces, ox heads and tiger noses; their forms did not resemble ordinary people, yet they possessed the virtue of great sages. Jie of Xia, Zhou of Yin, Duke Huan of Lu, and King Mu of Chu had outward appearances and seven apertures like those of ordinary people, yet they had the hearts of birds and beasts. And if ordinary people merely cling to outward form in seeking wisdom, it is impossible for them to attain it.

Commentary: Those said to have “non-human forms” had physical appearances close to those of ordinary people, as in descriptions recorded in historical works such as “bee eyes and a jackal’s voice” or “tiger head and swallow’s jaw,” which can be verified. These words accord with the mysteries of creation and transformation; it is only that the people of the world are deluded by shallow understanding and cannot grasp the profundity of “the sameness of wisdom.” Liezi (author of the Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing and a pre-Qin Daoist figure) devoted himself to elucidating the highest principle; therefore he spoke directly and without concealment, taking only the truth and paying no heed to whether the multitude would be astonished.

黄帝与炎帝战於阪泉之野,帅熊、罴、狼、豹、貙、虎为前驱,雕、鹖、鹰、鸢、为旗帜,此以力使禽兽者也。尧使夔典乐,击石拊石,百兽率舞;箫韶九成,凤凰来仪,此以声致禽兽者也。然则禽兽之心,奚为异人?形音与人异,而不知接之之道焉。圣人无所不知,无所不通,故得引而使之焉。 解曰:观箫韶九成,凤凰来仪,则以力使禽兽,不诬之理也。 禽兽之智有自然与人童者,其齐欲摄生,亦不假智於人也:牝牡相偶,母子相亲;避平依险,,则以力使禽兽,不诬之理也。 禽兽之智有自然与人童者,其齐欲摄生,亦不假智於人也:牝牡相偶,母子相亲;避平依险,违寒就温;居则有群,行则有列;小者居内,壮者居外;饮则相携,食则鸣群。太古之时,则与人同处,与人并行。帝王之时,始惊骇散乱矣。逮於末世,隐伏逃窜,以避患害。今东方介氏之国,其国人数数解六畜之语者,盖偏智之所得。太古神圣之人,备知万物情态,悉解异类音声。会而聚之,训而受之,同於人民。故先会鬼神魑魅,次达八方人民,末聚禽兽虫蛾。言血气之类心智不殊远也。神圣知其如此,故其所教训者无所遗逸焉。
Interpretation

The Yellow Emperor and the Yan Emperor fought at Banquan. The Yellow Emperor used bears, brown bears, wolves, leopards, chū, and tigers as his vanguard, and eagles, hawks, falcons, and kites as his banners: this was driving birds and beasts by military force. Yao commanded the music official Kui to strike the stone chimes, and all the beasts danced to the music; when the nine sections of Shun’s Xiaoshao were performed, phoenixes too flew in response to the sound: this was summoning birds and beasts by sound and music. That being so, why should the minds of birds and beasts differ from those of humans? It is only that their bodies and voices differ from those of humans, and people do not know the way to get along with them. The sage knows all and penetrates all; therefore he can guide and employ them.

A commentator says: When one sees that the Xiaoshao was performed to completion and the phoenix came in attendance, one knows that the business of driving birds and beasts by force was not fabricated.

In some respects the intelligence of birds and beasts resembles the innocent simplicity of humans. To sustain their lives, they need not rely on human intelligence: males and females pair, mothers and young are attached; they avoid level ground and rely on dangerous terrain; they shun cold and seek warmth; they dwell in flocks and travel in ranks; the young stay within and the strong remain without; when drinking they assist one another, and when foraging they call and answer one another. In remote antiquity they lived together with humans and walked alongside them; only in the age of emperors and kings did they begin to be startled and scatter; in later ages they hid and fled to escape harm. Today the people of the land of the Jieshi clan in the east can often understand the language of the six domestic animals; this is presumably within reach of a wisdom confined to one corner. The holy sages of highest antiquity understood the dispositions of all things and fully comprehended the voices of other species. They gathered them together, instructed them, and made them like ordinary people. Thus they first assembled ghosts, spirits, and chimei; next they established communication with the peoples of the four quarters; and finally they gathered birds, beasts, insects, and moths. This shows that among beings with blood and Qi, their minds are not far apart. The holy sages understood this truth, and therefore the edification they carried out omitted no kind.

解曰:皇步帝骤,有虞氏之官,汤武之室,以言世每降而道每隘也。在太古之时,则禽兽与人同处,与人并行而不疑。世降而每隘,乃始惊骇散乱,逃窜隐伏矣。夫异类而与人同处并行,虽曰太每隘也。在太古之时,则禽兽与人同处,与人并行而不疑。世降而每隘,乃始惊骇散乱,逃窜隐伏矣。夫异类而与人同处并行,虽曰太古之时则然,亦太古神圣之人有以会聚而训受之也。且古今之时则异矣,而神圣何殊於古今?后之神圣之人亦有矣,不闻聚禽兽虫蛾而训受之者,何哉?盖世已降矣,异类既已惊骇散乱隐伏而不可复聚矣。虽有神圣之君,亦能使鸟兽鱼鳖咸若而已。故必达乎圣人之时,而后可以语圣人之道。 宋有狙公者,爱狙,养之成群,能解狙之意,狙亦得公之意。损其家口,充狙之欲。俄而匮焉,将限其食。恐众狙之不驯於己也,先诳之曰:与若芋,朝三而暮四,足乎?众狙皆起而怒。俄而曰:与若芋,朝四而暮三,足乎?先诳之曰:与若芋,朝三而暮四,足乎?众狙皆起而怒。俄而曰:与若芋,朝四而暮三,足乎?众狙皆伏而喜。物之以能鄙相笼,皆犹此也。圣人以智笼群愚,亦犹狙公之以智笼众狙也。名实不亏,使其喜怒哉。
Interpretation

This passage says that as the world declines generation after generation, the great Dao becomes ever narrower. From the August Ones and the Emperors down to the Youyu clan (Shun), Shang Tang, and King Wu of Zhou, the later the age, the worse the way of governance. In remote antiquity, birds and beasts lived alongside people and walked together with them without mutual suspicion. Only after the world declined and the great Dao became narrow did birds and beasts begin to take fright, scatter, flee, and hide. That creatures of different kinds could live and walk together with humans—even if this was so only in the most ancient times—was because the sages of highest antiquity could gather them and educate and tame them. Ancient and modern circumstances differ, but the essential nature of the sage is no different. Later ages also had sages, yet we never hear of their being able to gather birds, beasts, insects, and moths and train them. Why is this? Probably because the world had already declined, and creatures of different kinds had long since been frightened into scattering and hiding, so they could no longer be gathered. Even if there were a sage ruler, he could only let flying birds, running beasts, fish, and turtles each find its place and remain at peace with one another. Therefore one must understand the circumstances in which the sages lived before one can discuss the Dao of the sage.

In the state of Song there was a monkey keeper named Monkey Keeper Gong. He loved monkeys very much and raised a large troop of them. He could understand the monkeys’ minds, and the monkeys could also grasp his intentions. To satisfy the monkeys’ desires, he took the grain from his household stores and fed it to them. Later, when food grew scarce, he planned to restrict the monkeys’ rations. Fearing that the troop would no longer obey him, he first deceived them, saying: “I will give you taro—three in the morning and four in the evening. Is that enough?” The whole troop rose up in anger. After a moment, he said: “I will give you taro—four in the morning and three in the evening. Is that enough?” The whole troop lay down and rejoiced.

In all things, cleverness and crudeness check and constrain one another, and all cases are like this. The sage uses cleverness to draw in and control the ignorant multitude, just as Monkey Keeper Gong used cleverness to draw in and control the troop of monkeys. In name and in reality nothing was reduced, yet he made them feel anger and joy on that account—this is precisely the principle.

解曰:喜怒之用皆不中也,喜之复也必怒,怒之复也常喜。狙公赋芋,名实不亏,将欲限其食,使之伏而喜,必且诳之而使之起而怒,故终得其喜也。如亦遽而与之以朝四而暮三,非特不得其喜,必亦起而怒矣。且众狙之喜怒非有伪也,三四之数无增损於七也,计众狙之心,宁饮於朝而馁於暮也,则朝暮之多寡,喜怒安得不为用哉?尝谓自太易既判,一变而为七,天三地四之数,一奇增损於七也,计众狙之心,宁饮於朝而馁於暮也,则朝暮之多寡,喜怒安得不为用哉?尝谓自太易既判,一变而为七,天三地四之数,一奇一耦,方生方成,万物不能逃其数也。不明其数则役於数,不惑於数则能用其数。非唯众狙之喜怒为然也,霸者欢娱之治所以羞称於圣人之门者,为其以能鄙相笼也。非唯霸者之治为然也,虽圣人之应帝王,未免於以天下为笼也,特其用数有徼妙,故其治效有浅深尔。推而极之,虽天地之造化,一昼一夜,一觉一梦,一寒一暑,一死一生,亦无以易大衍七七虚一之数矣。故谓众狙地之造化,一昼一夜,一觉一梦,一寒一暑,一死一生,亦无以易大衍七七虚一之数矣。故谓众狙之喜怒为惑,则物物皆惑也;谓人之喜怒为是,则众狙之喜怒安得独为非乎?人见众狙之笼於狙公则笑之,至於已尝处於笼而不知笑,是亦惑矣。故以人而笑众狙,亦犹《孟子》所谓以五十步笑百步也。且狙之为物,善伐其巧,恃其便,其心难於调御者也,乃惑於三四反覆之数而不悟,而况於余物乎?是或列子特取狙公赋芋之意也。虽然,狙公以损其家之口而至於匮,故不得已而限狙之食尔。由是知圣人以智笼群愚,亦以世降而不足於道,故不得已欤。
Interpretation

The deployment of joy and anger is in neither case in accord with the Middle Way. After joy there is inevitably a turn to anger, and after anger there often returns joy. The monkey keeper who raised monkeys distributed acorns to them and restricted their food. First he made the monkeys bow down and be pleased; then he deliberately tricked them into rising up and becoming angry; in the end he still won the monkeys’ joy. If he had said directly at the outset, “Three in the morning and four in the evening,” the monkeys would not only have failed to be pleased but would immediately have become angry.

The monkeys’ joy and anger were not false, and the total of “three” and “four” neither increased nor decreased; but what the monkeys calculated in their minds was whether it was better to eat more in the morning and less in the evening, or less in the morning and more in the evening. How could their joy and anger fail to be governed by the greater or lesser quantity between morning and evening?

According to the Liezi, the time when the cosmos had not yet any qi or phenomena is called Taiyi (the Great Change, the initial state before primordial qi had differentiated, as stated in the Liezi, “Tianrui”). Thereafter one divided into seven. Heaven is three and Earth is four; one odd and one even, they generate and complete each other, and the ten thousand things cannot escape the patterns of these numbers. One who does not understand these numbers will be enslaved by them; one who is not deluded by them can use them.

This was not only so with the monkeys’ joy and anger. The hegemons’ pleasing, gratification-style governance was regarded as shameful before the gate of the sages because they used their abilities to oppress and to win over others. Even the sage’s governance of “Responding to Emperors and Kings” did not avoid treating all under Heaven as something within a cage; only the degree of subtlety in their use of numbers differed, and so the results of governance differed in depth.

Extending this further, even the transformations of Heaven and Earth—one day and one night, one waking and one dream, one cold and one heat, one death and one life—cannot go beyond the rule of “seven times seven with one left empty” in the Dayan numbers of the Zhouyi (the base numbers used for divination). Therefore, if one says the monkeys’ joy and anger are delusion, then all things are delusion; if one says human joy and anger are correct, how could the monkeys’ joy and anger alone be wrong?

People laugh at the monkeys when they see them shut in cages by the monkey keeper, yet they do not know that they themselves are in a cage without realizing it—this is the same delusion. For humans to laugh at monkeys is exactly what Mencius called “laughing at a hundred paces because one has retreated fifty.”

Moreover, monkeys as creatures like to display their cleverness and rely on their own agility; their minds are difficult to tame and control, and yet they are still deluded by the alternating numbers “three” and “four” without awakening—how much more so other creatures? This may be precisely why Liezi deliberately took up the story of the monkey keeper distributing chestnuts.

That said, the monkey keeper, because he had distributed too much food and reduced his household to want, had no choice but to restrict the monkeys’ rations. From this one can know that the sage’s use of wisdom to bind the ignorant multitude was also because the way of the world had declined and there was not enough capacity to practice the great Dao, and so he did it only as a last resort.

纪渻子为周宣王养斗鸡。十日而问,鸡可斗已乎?曰:未也,方虚骄而恃气。十日,故不得已欤。 纪渻子为周宣王养斗鸡。十日而问,鸡可斗已乎?曰:未也,方虚骄而恃气。十日又问。曰:未也,犹应影向。十日又问。曰:未也,犹疾视而盛气。十日又问。日:几矣。鸡虽有鸣者,已无变矣。望之似木鸡矣,其德全矣。异鸡无敢应者,反走尔。
Interpretation

Ji Shengzi was an expert chicken raiser and trainer in the time of King Xuan of Zhou, and he once raised fighting cocks for the king. After ten days, King Xuan asked: “Can the chicken be taken to fight now?” Ji Shengzi said: “Not yet. It still bluffs and puts on an empty show of strength, relying on a burst of blood and Qi to assert itself.”

Another ten days passed, and King Xuan asked again. Ji Shengzi said: “Not yet. As soon as it hears a sound or sees a shadow, it still reacts.”

Another ten days passed, and King Xuan asked again. Ji Shengzi said: “Not yet. Its gaze is fierce, and its aura is very aggressive.”

Another ten days passed, and King Xuan asked again. Ji Shengzi said: “It is almost ready. Although other chickens crow, it no longer reacts. Seen from a distance, it looks like a chicken carved from wood, and its De (Virtue/Power) is complete. When other chickens see it, they do not dare to challenge it and turn and flee.”

Note: The quality of a fighting cock lies not in outward ferocity but in inner steadiness. Daoists often use the “wooden chicken” as a metaphor for a state undisturbed by external things and complete in inner virtue.

解曰:鸡,木畜也。木与木相摩则然,故鸡为善斗之畜。虚骄则有傲物之态,恃气则有凌物之志,虽未尝见鸡而求敌无所不至,若是则能无惧而已矣,岂能必胜哉?故问其可斗,则曰:未也,犹应影向,则能不恃其气,顾影之所向则应之尔。犹疾视而盛气。则弗逐於影之妄,见向而无惧而已矣,岂能必胜哉?故问其可斗,则曰:未也,犹应影向,则能不恃其气,顾影之所向则应之尔。犹疾视而盛气。则弗逐於影之妄,见向而应之也。有敌之者至,则致其雄毅以待之而已。然而疾视则其神不宁,盛气则其心不平,虽弗与之斗,而心动於内,神沮於外,但忍而不发尔。故曰:未也,及其几矣。之后鸡虽鸣而无变,望之似木鹞,其德全矣。盖内忘其气,外忘其形,他鸡虽竦立而鸣,而我不闻其声矣,与槁木何以异哉?则不争之德莫盛於此,故曰全也,天下之皆鸡莫之能敌,但反走而悦服矣。若太上之降胡俗,孔子之服门人也。心为绛官,於禽为朱雀,圣人善养於内,使之足而不贪,饱而不争,故天下莫能与之争。众人但养於外,使朱雀常饥,翱翔八表,惟利是求,不贪则不足以满其怀,不争则不足以充其欲,至於死而足而不贪,饱而不争,故天下莫能与之争。众人但养於外,使朱雀常饥,翱翔八表,惟利是求,不贪则不足以满其怀,不争则不足以充其欲,至於死而后止。悲夫。
Interpretation

In the “Da Sheng” chapter of Zhuangzi, the story of Ji Shengzi raising a fighting cock for the king provides the background for this scriptural passage. Among the Five Phases, chickens belong to Wood; when Wood rubs against Wood, Fire is generated, and so chickens are naturally pugnacious by nature.

If there is pride in the heart, the exterior reveals a demeanor that looks down on all things; if one relies on blood and Qi, thoughts of bullying others arise. Such a cock, even before meeting an opponent, will seek provocation everywhere and reach everywhere. It is merely fearless—how can that guarantee certain victory? So when someone asks whether it can fight, it says, “Not yet.” This is because it still responds like a shadow following form, merely reacting in the direction of the shadow, and has not truly escaped the pull of external things. If its gaze is fierce and its momentum abundant, it will be swayed by the illusion of the shadow; seeing the other move, it immediately responds.

When a true opponent arrives, it need only gather its brave and resolute Qi and quietly wait. Yet if its gaze is fierce, its spirit is not at peace; if its momentum is abundant, its heart is not harmonious. Although it has not yet fought the other, inwardly it is already agitated, and its spirit has already been thwarted externally; it is merely forcing itself to hold back and not erupt. Therefore it says, “Not yet”; one must wait until its condition approaches maturity.

When its cultivation is complete, even if other chickens crow, it has no reaction at all, and at a glance it looks like a chicken carved of wood. Its De is then complete. This is because inwardly it has forgotten blood and Qi, and outwardly it has forgotten form and appearance. Though other chickens ruffle their feathers and crow loudly, it seems not to hear them—what difference is there between it and withered wood? The De of non-contention has no greater expression than this, and so it is called “complete.” No chicken under heaven can match it; they can only turn and retreat, convinced in heart and submissive.

This is like Taishang Laojun (Lord Lao, the Daoist honorific for Laozi) descending into the world to transform the customs of the Hu lands, and also like Confucius causing his disciples to submit in their hearts. Daoists regard the chamber of the human heart within the body as the Crimson Palace (the place where the heart resides); among birds it corresponds to the Vermilion Bird (the spirit bird of the south and Fire; the heart belongs to Fire). The sage is good at nourishing the inner, making the heart content without greed and full without contention, and so no one under heaven can contend with him.

Ordinary people only care for nurturing the external, causing the Vermilion Bird often to go hungry and soar to the farthest reaches of the eight directions, seeking only profit. Without greed, there is not enough to fill the heart; without contention, there is not enough to satisfy desire. Only at death do they stop. How lamentable!

惠盎见宋康王。康王蹀足謦欬,疾言曰:寡人之所说者,勇有力也,不悦为仁义者也。客将何以教寡人?惠盎对曰:臣有道於此,使人虽有勇,刺之不入,虽有力,击之弗中。大王独无意耶?宋王曰:善,此寡人之所欲闻也。惠盎曰:夫刺之不入,击之不中,此犹辱也。臣有道於此,使人虽有勇,弗敢刺;虽有力,弗敢击。夫弗敢,非无其志也。臣有道於此,使人本无其志也。夫无其志也,未有爱利之心者。臣有道於此,使天下丈夫女子莫不欢然志也。臣有道於此,使人本无其志也。夫无其志也,未有爱利之心者。臣有道於此,使天下丈夫女子莫不欢然皆欲爱利之。此其贤於勇有力也,四累之上也。大王独无意邪?宋王曰:此寡人之所欲得也。惠盎对曰:孔墨是以。孔丘,墨翟无地而为君,无官而为长;天下丈夫女子莫不延颈举踵而愿安利之。今大王万乘之主也,诚有其志,则四境之内皆得其利矣,其贤於孔墨也远矣。宋王无以应,惠盎趋而出。宋王谓左右曰:辩矣,客之以说服寡人也。
Interpretation

Hui Ang went to visit King Kang of Song. The king stamped his feet, coughed, and said impatiently: “What I like are men of bravery and strength; I have no interest in those who talk of benevolence and righteousness. What do you, sir, intend to teach me?” Hui Ang replied: “I have a method by which, even if a man is brave, he cannot pierce the other with a thrust; even if a man is strong, he cannot strike the other. Would Your Majesty not want this?” The King of Song said: “Good—this is exactly what I want to hear.”

Hui Ang continued: “To be unable to pierce and unable to strike is still a lower method. I have another method by which, even if a man is brave, he does not dare to stab; even if he is strong, he does not dare to attack. Their not daring is not because they lack the thought, but because they simply have no such thought at all. If a person has no such thought, then no intention to harm others will arise in his heart. I have yet another method by which all men and women, old and young, throughout the world may be joyful, all willing to love others and seek benefit for others. This is several levels higher than bravery and strength. Would Your Majesty not want it?”

The King of Song said: “This is exactly what I wish to obtain.” Hui Ang said: “This is precisely what Confucius and Mozi achieved. Though Confucius and Mozi had no land and did not become rulers, and held no office and did not become leaders, throughout the world there was no man or woman, old or young, who did not stretch out their necks and stand on tiptoe, hoping that they might bring stability and benefit. Now Your Majesty is the ruler of a great state with ten thousand chariots. If you truly had this aspiration, then all within the four borders could receive benefit, and such virtue would far surpass that of Confucius and Mozi.” The King of Song had no reply, and Hui Ang quickly withdrew. The King of Song said to those around him: “This guest’s argument is truly exquisite; he has persuaded me with words alone.”

Commentary: This passage is the annotator’s comment. King Kang of Song admired bravery and strength; Hui Ang did not contend with him over strength or fierceness, but began from “making people have no mind for strife” and advised him with the principle of loving and benefiting the world. The annotator holds that this transformation through virtue surpasses bravery and strength, and also surpasses the benevolent and righteous teachings of Confucius and Mozi.

解曰:宋康王说於勇力,方,则四境之内皆得其利矣,其贤於孔墨也远矣。宋王无以应,惠盎趋而出。宋王谓左右曰:辩矣,客之以说服寡人也。 解曰:宋康王说於勇力,方惠盎之见也,康王蝶足謦欬,疾言恶其以仁义之说投於我也,其意疑若不可迕矣。而惠盎因以勇力投其好,屡进其说而终归於孔墨。宋王将以其言为然,则既拂其所好矣;将以其言为不然,则未见其背於理也。是以惠盎既出,则谓左右言其辩尔。尝试论之,在可言之域,初无定是非也。成者为首,不成者为尾尔。有若仪秦习纵横之言而游於战国,俾六国之君皆知其言之域,初无定是非也。成者为首,不成者为尾尔。有若仪秦习纵横之言而游於战国,俾六国之君皆知其为辩,终不能屈其说,信其官而用之,安中国者各十余年,则辩者之是非果如何耶?虽列子之书亦未免於辩也,其言此者亦遣其着书,陈言之一端尔。 黄帝解
Interpretation

King Kang of Song delighted in feats of bravery and strength. When Hui Ang came to have an audience with him, the king was arrogant: his legs kicked about restlessly, he coughed without pause, and his speech was rapid and rude. He disliked Hui Ang’s attempt to move him with the doctrine of benevolence and righteousness, and he looked as though there was no way to argue with him. So Hui Ang followed the king’s inclinations, beginning with feats of bravery and strength and advancing his advice step by step, until at last he steered the conversation to the teachings of Confucius (Kong Qiu) and Mozi (Mo Di). If the king of Song considered his words reasonable, that would run counter to his own tastes; if he considered them unreasonable, he could not see where they departed from reason. Thus, after Hui Ang withdrew, those in attendance merely said that he was skilled in argument.

Let us try to assess this: within the sphere of what can be debated, there is no absolute right and wrong to begin with. What can be accepted and put into practice is upheld as a doctrine; what is not accepted can only be relegated to the last place. For example, Zhang Yi and Su Qin (famous strategists of the Vertical and Horizontal alliances in the Warring States period) studied the persuasive rhetoric of vertical and horizontal alliances and traveled among the states of the Warring States, leading the rulers of the six states all to regard them as eloquent, yet in the end they could never make those rulers submit to their doctrines. Nevertheless, the rulers of the six states still granted them offices and employed them, keeping the Central Plains (here meaning the Central Plains states) stable for more than ten years. How, then, should the right and wrong of debaters be judged? Even the book of Liezi (Lie Yukou, a Daoist figure) is not free of a disputatious coloring. Those who expound this principle merely each write books and set forth one side of it.

庄子以帝王之功为圣人之余事,谓之为余事者,不曰帝王之功,为不足为也。亦云圣人之道博大宏深,帝王之功皆其糠枇土苴之所为尔。盖圣人之所以为圣人者,以其有帝王之功也。天下之所以仰望於圣人者,以其有帝王之治也。故庄子亦曰:莫神於天,莫富於地,莫大於帝王。夫天之神,地之富,必形於天瑞之生化,则圣人之寂然不动,感而遂通天下之故,以应帝王者,安可以已哉?此《黄帝》之篇所由而作也。昔者神农氏没,黄帝尧舜氏作,道出而为德矣,皇降而为帝矣。而黄已哉?此《黄帝》之篇所由而作也。昔者神农氏没,黄帝尧舜氏作,道出而为德矣,皇降而为帝矣。而黄帝,为帝之始,虽有应世之务,未至乎尧之放勋也;虽有济世之德,未至乎舜之明德也。然而既已通天下之故,则思为之端起而吉凶之变生矣。故其始也,喜天下之戴己,继乃忧天下之不治。五情惑於内,肌色瘁於外,自非斋戒以神明其德,安能当天下之至变,为天下之至难而不蹈於凶咎悔吝之域哉?唯黄帝能斋心服形,而不离於至道,是以虽游於荣辱利害之涂而辱与害之所不能及,天下之治,几若华胥氏之国也。有若姑射神人之所为,即黄帝之治效也;有若列子之御风而行,即黄帝之至道也。至人之守纯气,圣人之藏於天。商丘开之与物无迕,梁鸯之心无逆顺,凡皆其鼓舞万物之所本也。津人之操舟,吕梁之蹈水,痀瘘之承蜩,赵人之处石入火,凡皆其感通天下之功之藏於天。商丘开之与物无迕,梁鸯之心无逆顺,凡皆其鼓舞万物之所本也。津人之操舟,吕梁之蹈水,痀瘘之承蜩,赵人之处石入火,凡皆其感通天下之功也。以此感通天下,则天下孰足以累之?以此鼓舞万物,则万物孰足以挠之?黄帝之所以为帝,其道如此。故列子之论道,数称《黄帝书》以为宗原缺。
Interpretation

Zhuangzi regarded the achievements of emperors and kings as the “leftover business” of the sage. This is not to say that imperial achievements are unworthy of pursuit, but that the sage’s Dao is broad and profound, and imperial achievements are merely its dregs and remnants. The reason the sage is a sage lies precisely in his having imperial achievements; the reason the people under Heaven revere the sage lies precisely in his having imperial governance. Therefore Zhuangzi said: there is nothing more numinous than Heaven, more fertile than Earth, or greater than emperors and kings. Heaven’s numinosity and Earth’s fertility must manifest in the generation and transformation of Heaven and Earth. The sage is utterly still and unmoved, yet can resonate with all things under Heaven; how, then, could he cease to accord with the imperial position in this way? This is the reason the “Huangdi” chapter came into being.

In former times, after Shennong passed away, Huangdi, Yao, and Shun arose in succession. The Dao manifested as De, and the Three Sovereigns gave way to the Five Emperors. As the beginning of emperors, Huangdi already had actions for responding to worldly affairs, but he had not yet reached Yao’s “Fangxun”; though he had the De of saving the world, he had not yet reached Shun’s “Mingde.” However, once he understood the causes of all under Heaven, thoughts and intentions to deliberate and act arose, and the changes of good and ill fortune followed. Thus at first he delighted in the people under Heaven supporting him, and afterward he worried that all under Heaven might not be well governed. The five emotions deluded him within, and his countenance grew haggard without. Had he not, through fasting and purification, made his spirit and De clear, how could he have responded to the greatest upheavals under Heaven and undertaken its most difficult affairs without falling into misfortune, blame, regret, and disgrace?

Only Huangdi could fast his heart and discipline his body, never departing from the Ultimate Dao; therefore, although he stood amid honor and disgrace, benefit and harm, honor and disgrace, benefit and harm could not injure him. All under Heaven was greatly governed, almost like the land of Huaxu (Huaxu is the ideal state of Wuwei depicted in the Liezi). What the divine man of Mount Guye did was precisely the proof of Huangdi’s governance; Liezi riding the wind embodied the Ultimate Dao that Huangdi had attained.

The Perfected Person holds fast to pure Qi, and the sage hides himself in the Heavenly Dao. Shangqiu Kai had no conflict with the myriad things, and Liang Yang’s mind made no distinction between adverse and favorable; these are the foundation for inspiring all things. The ferryman handling a boat, the man of Lüliang treading the water, the hunchbacked old man catching cicadas, and the man of Zhao dwelling in stone and entering fire—all are manifestations of the achievement of resonating with all under Heaven and becoming one with Heaven.

By this he resonated with all under Heaven—what could burden him? By this he inspired all things—what could disturb him? The Dao by which Huangdi could become emperor was exactly this. Therefore, when Liezi discoursed on the Dao, he repeatedly cited the Huangdi Shu as his fundamental tenet.

终於应帝王者,亦此意也。且列子既着《黄帝》之篇,至於称阳朱之言,则以谓五帝之事,若觉若梦,浑贤愚而归於消灭。其言尧舜,亦谓其与桀跖同腐。盖自道观之,则黄帝之治初不离道;由帝王之功以观,则大道之体已隐矣。其功名之迹几何?而不与时俱运,而同归於尽耶?其称杨朱之言,岂非去黄帝之功名而存其大道其功名之迹几何?而不与时俱运,而同归於尽耶?其称杨朱之言,岂非去黄帝之功名而存其大道欤? 冲虚至德真经解卷之四竟 5-冲虚至德真经解卷之五 冲虚至德真经解卷之五 宋杭州州学内舍生臣江遹进 穆王上
Interpretation

This passage is the concluding remarks of Volume Four, pointing out that the main purport of the “Ying Diwang” chapter of the Liezi also lies here. Although Liezi wrote the “Huangdi” chapter, later in the text he quotes Yang Zhu—the Warring States thinker who advocated “for oneself”—arguing that the deeds of the Five Emperors are like a dream: whether wise or foolish, all ultimately come to extinction. He even says that Yao and Shun, like Xia Jie and Dao Zhi, will all decay. The author holds that, from the perspective of Dao, Huangdi’s governance originally did not depart from the Great Dao; but from the perspective of imperial achievements, the substance of the Great Dao instead became concealed. How long can those traces of fame and achievement be preserved? In the end they cannot endure the changes of the times and will likewise come to complete extinction. Is Liezi’s quotation of Yang Zhu’s words not a way of discarding Huangdi’s achievements and reputation while preserving the Great Dao within them?

The title of Volume Five is “Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing Jie” (an explication of the Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing, the Daoist honorific title of the Liezi), Volume Five, presented by Jiang Yu, an inner-house student of the Hangzhou prefectural school in the Song dynasty. This volume is divided into upper and lower sections; the present passage is “King Mu, Part One.”

周穆王时,西极之国有化人来,入水火,贯金石;反山川,移城邑;乘虚不坠,触实不碍;千变万化,不可穷极;既已变物之形,又且易人之虑。穆王敬之若神,事已若君,堆露寝以居之,引三牲以进之,选女乐以娱之,化人以为王之宫室卑陋而不可处,王之厨馔腥蝼而不可飨,王之嫔御膻恶而不可亲。穆王乃为之改筑,土木之功,赭垩之色,无遗巧焉。五府为虚,王之厨馔腥蝼而不可飨,王之嫔御膻恶而不可亲。穆王乃为之改筑,土木之功,赭垩之色,无遗巧焉。五府为虚,而台始成。其高千仞,临终南之上,号曰中天之台。简郑卫之处子娥赤衣者,施芳泽,正娥眉,设笄珥,衣阿锡,曳齐纨,粉白黛黑,佩玉环。杂芷若,以满之,奏《烝云》《六莹》《九韶》《晨露》以乐之。月月献玉衣,旦旦荐玉食。化人犹不舍然,不得已而临之。居亡几何,谒王同游,王执化人之袪,腾而上一者,中天乃止,暨及化人之宫。化人之宫构以金银,络以珠玉;出云雨之上,而不知下之所据,望之若云屯焉。耳目所观听,鼻口所纳尝,皆非人间之有,王实以为清都紫微,钓天,广乐,帝之所居。王俯而视之,其宫榭若累块积苏焉。王自以居数十年不思其国也。
Interpretation

During the reign of King Mu of Zhou, a wondrous man capable of transformations (huaren) came from a country extremely far to the west. He did not get wet when he entered water, was not scorched when he entered fire, could pass through metal and stone, and could make mountains and rivers turn about and cities shift their places. He rode through the air without falling and touched objects without obstruction; his transformations were endless, for he could both alter the forms of things and change people’s thoughts. King Mu revered him as a god and treated him as a lord and father. He built a Dew Terrace for him to live on, offered him the three sacrificial animals—ox, sheep, and pig—and selected beautiful women to sing and dance for his amusement. But the Huaren said: “The king’s palace chambers are crude and unfit for dwelling; the food is rank and foul and hard to swallow; the concubines have a rank odor about them and are not fit to approach.” King Mu therefore ordered reconstruction; the construction work and the ochre, white, red, and blue-green pigments were all executed with the utmost ingenuity. The five state treasuries (wufu) were drained, and only then was the Central Heaven Terrace completed. The terrace was a thousand ren high (an ancient unit of length, about eight chi) and overlooked the Zhongnan Mountains (in present-day Shaanxi); it was called the “Central Heaven Terrace.”

King Mu then selected young women from Zheng and Wei, dressed them in red, anointed them with fragrant oils, adorned their eyebrows and eyes, had them wear hairpins and earrings, draped them in A-xi and Qi-wan (fine silks), powdered their faces and blackened their eyebrows, hung jade rings on them, and filled the terrace with them and with fragrant herbs such as angelica and ruo. He also had ancient music such as “Zhengyun,” “Liuying,” “Jiushao,” and “Chenlu” performed to entertain him. Each month jade garments were offered to him, and each day fine food was presented. The Huaren was still not satisfied, and King Mu had no choice but to go in person to the Central Heaven Terrace. Before long, the Huaren invited King Mu to journey with him; King Mu grasped the Huaren’s sleeve, and the two rose into the air, not stopping until they reached the Central Heaven Terrace, and then arrived at the Huaren’s palace.

The Huaren’s palace was built of gold and silver, adorned with pearls and jade, and rose above the clouds and rain; one could not tell what supported it below, and from afar it looked like gathered clouds. What his eyes and ears saw and heard, what his mouth and nose tasted and smelled, were all unlike anything in the human world. King Mu thought this must be Qingdu, Ziwei, and Juntian (legendary dwellings of the Heavenly Emperor) and Guangyue (heavenly music). Looking down, he saw the palaces, pavilions, and towers below as so many piles of clods and crumbs of pastry. King Mu lived there for several decades and, unexpectedly, no longer longed for his own country.

解曰:方外之与方内,其不相实以为清都紫微,钓天,广乐,帝之所居。王俯而视之,其宫榭若累块积苏焉。王自以居数十年不思其国也。 解曰:方外之与方内,其不相及亦远矣。穆王,方之内者也;化人,方之外者也。西方主金,金为从革,故化人之来必自西极也。物本非有身,原太虚化人造物之主也,六合所不能拘,五行所不能役,故可以撮乾坤于黍米之中,促劫运于须臾之内,绰绰然犹有余地,至于入水火,贯金石,反山川,移城邑,变物之形,易人之虑,皆平常闲事尔。穆王在耄荒之中,见物皆有知,身不虚故惊天骇地,而敬之若神,事之若君,惟露寝,引三牲,选女乐,庶几其欢心焉,而不知化人之所乐者真乐无乐尔,反以为卑陋腥擅,困澲蓄嫸不肯一顾焉。王又改筑中天之台於终南之上,其高千仞,选郑卫之处子以满之,奏《烝云擅,困澲蓄嫸不肯一顾焉。王又改筑中天之台於终南之上,其高千仞,选郑卫之处子以满之,奏《烝云》、《六莹》、《九韶》、《晨露》以乐之,献玉衣,进玉食,而不知化人者居无居,味无味,色无色,声无声,又岂悦夫人间之所悦者乎?化人见王有殷懃恭敬之心,似可教者,然未可顿超最上乘道,试渐引之入於下乘之道,使揽其袪而同游,上中天之半,及化人之宫,构以金银,络以珠玉,出云霄之外,上无所攀,下无所据,若云屯于碧霄而不坠焉。耳目之所观听,鼻口之所纳尝,皆非世间之所有。自以为清都紫微,钧天广乐,上帝之宫阙,乃复从上俯而视之,却见人间,若云屯于碧霄而不坠焉。耳目之所观听,鼻口之所纳尝,皆非世间之所有。自以为清都紫微,钧天广乐,上帝之宫阙,乃复从上俯而视之,却见人间昔日旧宫但累土积薪尔,与蜂房蚁穴何以异哉?乃舍卑秽,趋高洁,不愿复还於故都,仿髴数十年矣。呜呼,穆王亦丹台之旧侣也,谪降人间,尘俗之气尚未深染,故能安栖圣境。此虽下乘之所居,岂胎生肉人所能到哉?纵使能到,亦魂警魄丧而必求反归也。
Interpretation

The realm beyond the square (fangwai, the transcendent realm beyond the mundane world) and the realm within the square (fangnei, the mundane world) do not communicate with each other. Qingdu, Ziwei, Juntian, and Guangle are the places where the Heavenly Emperor dwells. When King Mu of Zhou looked down at the human world, he saw his own palaces and towers as nothing but piles of clods and stacks of dry straw. He stayed there for several decades and did not think of his own state again.

The realm beyond the square and the realm within the square are separated by an immense distance. King Mu belonged to those within the square, while the transformed man (huaren)—a divine being who has attained the Dao and can transform all things—belonged to those beyond the square. The west corresponds to Metal; since the nature of Metal is to transform in accordance with circumstances, the transformed man must have come from a place far away in the west. All things originally have no substantial form; the transformed man originates from the Great Void (Taixu) and is the master who creates and transforms all things. The six directions cannot confine him, nor can the Five Phases (wuxing) command him. Thus he can gather heaven and earth into a single grain of millet and compress a long kalpa into a single instant, and still have room to spare. As for entering fire and water, penetrating metal and stone, reversing mountains and rivers, moving cities, altering the forms of all things, and changing people’s thoughts—to him these are ordinary trifles.

King Mu, in his old age and benightedness, saw all things as if endowed with consciousness, yet his own body and mind could not become empty; therefore he marveled without end, revered the transformed man as a god, and served him as a ruler. He only wished to please the transformed man with the Luqin Palace, the three sacrificial animals (ox, sheep, and pig), and female musicians, but he did not understand that what the transformed man enjoyed was true joy—the joy of no joy. The transformed man, however, found his offerings crude and rank and would not give them another glance. King Mu then rebuilt the Terrace of Mid-Heaven on Mount Zhongnan, a thousand ren high, filled it with beautiful women chosen from Zheng and Wei, had them perform pieces such as Zhengyun, Liuying, Jiushao, and Chenlu, presented robes of jade, and offered fine foods. Yet he did not know that the transformed man dwells in the dwelling of no dwelling, tastes the flavor of no flavor, sees the color of no color, and hears the sound of no sound—how could he delight in what the human world delights in?

The transformed man saw that King Mu was earnest and reverent and seemed capable of being taught, but since he could not transmit the highest Dao all at once, he proceeded gradually and led him into the lower path. The transformed man took King Mu by the sleeve and journeyed with him, rising into the midst of the heavens until they reached the transformed man’s palace. This palace was built of gold and silver and adorned with pearls and jade, rising beyond the clouds, with nothing above to climb and nothing below to stand on, like a cloud suspended in the blue sky without falling. What their ears and eyes saw and heard, what their mouths and noses tasted and smelled, were all things not found in the human world. King Mu thought he had arrived at Qingdu and Ziwei, at Juntian and Guangle, at the palace of the Supreme God. Only when he turned his head and looked down from that height did he see that his former palace in the human world was merely piled earth and stacked firewood—what difference was there between it and a beehive or an anthill? Thereupon he abandoned the base and defiled and turned toward the high and pure, unwilling to return to his old capital; and so several decades passed.

Alas, King Mu was also an old companion of the Dantai (the immortal realm), banished to the mortal world; the dust and vulgarity of the world had not yet deeply stained him, and so he could dwell securely in the sacred realm. Although this is a state that can be reached by the lower path, how could it be reached by ordinary humans born of womb and flesh? Even if they could reach it, their souls would be startled and their spirits scattered, and they would certainly seek some way to return.

化人复谒王同游,所及之处,仰不见日月,俯不见河海。光影所照,王目眩不能得视;音响所来,王耳乱不能得听。百骸六脏,悸而不凝,意迷精丧,请化人求还。化人移之,王若陨虚焉。既寤,所坐犹向者之处,侍御犹向者之人。视其前迷精丧,请化人求还。化人移之,王若陨虚焉。既寤,所坐犹向者之处,侍御犹向者之人。视其前,则酒未清,肴未昲。王问所从来,左右曰:王默存耳。由此穆王自失者三月而复。更问化人,化人曰:吾与王神游也,形奚动哉?且曩之所居,奚王之宫?曩之所游,奚异王之圃?王闲常,疑暂亡。变化之极,徐疾之间,可尽模哉?王大悦。不恤国事,不乐臣妾,肆意远游。命驾八骏之乘,右服湥骝而左绿耳,右骖赤骥而左白涘主车则造父为御,歼橛遥淮诬囍乘,右服渠黄而左踰轮,左骖盗骊而右山子,柏夭主车,参百为御,奔戎为右。驰驱千里,至于巨搜氏之国。巨搜氏乃献白鹄之血以饮王,具牛马之湩以洗王之足,及二乘之人。已饮而行,遂宿于昆仑之阿,赤水之阳。别日升于昆仑之丘,以观黄帝之宫,而封之以诒后世。遂宾于西王母,觞于瑶池之上。西王母为王谣,王和之别日升于昆仑之丘,以观黄帝之宫,而封之以诒后世。遂宾于西王母,觞于瑶池之上。西王母为王谣,王和之,其辞哀焉。乃观日之所入,一日行万里,王乃叹曰:於乎,予一人不盈于德而谐於乐,后世其追数吾过乎。穆王几神人哉。能穷当身之乐,犹百年乃祖世以为登假焉。
Interpretation

King Mu of Zhou paid another visit to the Huaren and asked him to travel with him. Wherever the Huaren (a spirit-man capable of transformations and illusions) went, when one looked up one could not see the sun or moon; when one looked down one could not see rivers or seas. When light and shadow shone forth, King Mu was dazzled and could not see clearly; when sounds came, his ears were filled with clamor and he could not distinguish them. His whole skeleton and five viscera trembled and could not settle; his heart-spirit became confused, and his Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy) scattered. He therefore asked the Huaren to send him back. The Huaren gave a wave of his hand, and King Mu felt as though he had fallen into empty space. When he awoke, the place where he sat was just as before, and the attendants were still the same people. He looked before him: the wine was not yet cold, and the dishes were still hot. King Mu asked where he had just been, and the attendants on either side said, “The king was merely sitting silently.” King Mu was thus dazed and absent-minded for three months before he recovered.

King Mu asked the Huaren again, and the Huaren said, “The king and I traveled in spirit; when did the body ever move? Moreover, the place where we just stayed—how could it be the king’s palace? The place where we just roamed—how could it compare with the king’s parks and gardens? The king’s heart-spirit was calm as usual; you merely lost awareness temporarily in your confusion. As for the utmost of transformation, between its swiftness and slowness, how could it be fully described?” King Mu was delighted to hear this. From then on he ignored state affairs, no longer took pleasure in his attendants and concubines, and gave himself over to distant travels.

King Mu ordered the eight fine horses to be harnessed—the famous eight steeds of King Mu of Zhou: on the right he harnessed Hualiu, on the left Lü’er; the right side horse was Chiji, the left Baiyi; Zaofu drove, and Benrong guarded. In the other chariot, on the right he harnessed Qihuang, on the left Yulun; the left side horse was Daoli, the right Shanzi; Bo Yao drove, and Can Bai was the charioteer. They galloped a thousand li and arrived at the Jusou clan. The Jusou offered the blood of a white swan for King Mu to drink, washed his feet with the milk of cows and horses, and entertained those who accompanied him. After drinking, they continued on, and that night they stayed at the foot of Mount Kunlun, on the north bank of the Red Water.

The next day, King Mu climbed a hill of Kunlun, visited the palace of the Yellow Emperor, and set up a marker there to be handed down to later generations. Afterward, at Kunlun, King Mu visited Xi Wangmu (the Queen Mother of the West, the goddess who dwells on Kunlun in myth) and drank beside the Yaochi (Jade Pool, the immortal pool on Kunlun). Xi Wangmu sang for King Mu, and King Mu sang in reply; the words were deeply mournful. King Mu also gazed at the place where the sun sets and sighed that in a single day he could travel ten thousand li. Then he sighed, “Alas! I alone lack De (Virtue/Power), yet I indulge in pleasure; later generations will likely hold me to account for my faults.” King Mu might almost be counted a divine man! He was able to enjoy a lifetime’s happiness to the full, and yet later generations had to wait a hundred years before exalting him as one who had ascended to immortality and departed.

解曰:化人之道,千变万化,不出於一。唯其至一,是以真能证其道者,一超而入无有,渐次以夫学者,其才未可告以圣人之至道也。故假示中天之化,使之睹人间之无有,审世累之可厌,而不思其国矣,乃始示以至道之真境也。仰不见日月,则高不足以拟之;俯不见河海,则深不足以命之。光影所照,目乱而不能得视,则天光内发,可视以神而不可视以目,音响所来,耳乱而不能得听,则天籁自鸣,可听以气而不可听以耳。由此而视化人之宫,内发,可视以神而不可视以目,音响所来,耳乱而不能得听,则天籁自鸣,可听以气而不可听以耳。由此而视化人之宫,亦犹中天之视其国矣。穆王不足以进此,故解心释神,意迷精丧,请化人求还也。夫化人复谒王同游,所及之处则初不离於中天,而见闻之异乃至此者,盖妙道所在,不离当处,顿超群有,非特不异於化人之宫尔,其所居,其所游,初不异於王之宫、王之圃也。由是知狂圣之所以异域者,名转而实不转,人迷而道不迷,亦若神游而形不动也。尝谓化人之来於西极也,岂从显奇出异,务骇於俗哉?盖将俾斯民同之乎妙道而后已。如穆王能先觉其道,则黄帝华胥之治可几矣,奚止一身之娱哉?
Interpretation

The way of the Transformed Man is infinitely varied, yet in the final analysis it never departs from the “One.” Only one who has truly reached the realm of Supreme Oneness can in a single leap transcend things with form and enter the realm of Nonbeing. Those who are still learning step by step have shallow foundations and cannot be told the sage’s Supreme Dao directly. Therefore, he first uses the transformations of Mid-Heaven (referring to the immortal realm beyond the human world) as a demonstration, letting them see that all things in the human world return to “Nonbeing,” and experience how worldly entanglements are tiresome, so that they no longer cling to their own land; only then does he reveal to them the true realm of the Supreme Dao.

Looking up, one cannot see the sun or moon, and so knows that heights are insufficient to compare with it; looking down, one cannot see rivers or seas, and so knows that depths are insufficient to measure it. When light and shadow shine forth, the eyes are dazzled and cannot see clearly; at this moment heavenly light issues from within, and one can perceive it only with Shen (spirit), not with the eyes. When sounds come, the ears are confused and cannot hear clearly; at this moment the music of heaven sounds of itself, and one can hear it only with Qi (vital energy), not with the ears. To observe the palace of the Transformed Man in this way is like looking down from Mid-Heaven upon his own land.

King Mu of Zhou (ruler of the Zhou dynasty) could not attain this realm, and so his mind became scattered and his spirit bewildered; he asked the Transformed Man to send him back. Later the Transformed Man came again to visit King Mu and toured with him; wherever they went, they never left Mid-Heaven, and the marvels they saw and heard reached such a degree. This is because the wondrous Dao is right where one is, never apart from what lies before the eyes, and can instantly transcend the ten thousand things. The palace of the Transformed Man is no different from Mid-Heaven; the places where he dwells and roams are originally no different from King Mu’s palaces and gardens. From this one knows that the difference between the so-called madman and the sage in the world is only that the name changes while the substance remains unchanged; people are deluded, but the Dao is not lost—just as when Shen wanders while the body remains still.

Someone once said that the Transformed Man came from a place extremely far in the west—was it to show off marvels, set up something novel, and astonish the worldly? Probably he would not rest until all the common people could understand this wondrous Dao. If King Mu could have awakened to this Dao first, then a peaceful governance like that of the Yellow Emperor and Huaxu could have been attained—how much more than merely seeking pleasure for oneself!

方穆王虚五府以为化人之奉,化人犹不舍然,化人岂真有心於声之治可几矣,奚止一身之娱哉?方穆王虚五府以为化人之奉,化人犹不舍然,化人岂真有心於声色臭味之乐哉?盖欲其即此而悟世味之无乐也。此而不悟,於是化人与之为神游,显示幻化,欲其睹化工之随起随灭而悟神理之自然也。彼方假示变化,穆王乃实以为清都紫微,钧天广乐而乐之,抑又非矣。至於化人复谒王同游,则示以道之真境也,穆王至此非特不能进,请於化人而求还矣,何则?妙道之行,超於形体,岂未得於道,未证其理者所能居其域哉?化人知其终不悟矣,故於其求还也亦不制止之焉。虽然,化人移之,王若陨虚,是亦所以觉之也,而穆王终以不悟。故及其既寤,则自失者三月也。然而由此而复,更问化人,化人语以神游之理,乃始悟变化之理而大悦也。於是不恤国事而遗物,不乐臣妾而离人,肆意而不守其心,远游而不局人,化人语以神游之理,乃始悟变化之理而大悦也。於是不恤国事而遗物,不乐臣妾而离人,肆意而不守其心,远游而不局於近。命驾八骏之乘,驰驱无所不至矣。夫造父三百之伦不世出,八骏之乘非常有,一日而行万里,则其超虚送日之步风云不足以拟其駃矣。
Interpretation

King Mu of Zhou once brought out the treasures of the five palace storehouses to make offerings to the Transformist (huaren), an immortal who could perform illusions and transformations of ten thousand kinds. The Transformist, however, was unmoved. Did he truly value pleasures such as music and beautiful sights? In truth, he wanted King Mu to understand that the flavors of the world contain no true joy. When King Mu still did not awaken, the Transformist took him along on a “spirit journey” (in which the spirit leaves the body and roams freely), displayed various illusory scenes, and let him see that the things of creation arise and perish moment by moment, so that he might realize the spontaneous way of spirit and heavenly principle. The Transformist was only using transformations as a demonstration, but King Mu truly believed he had arrived at Qingdu and Ziwei (the realm where the Heavenly Thearch dwells) and heard the Grand Music of Jun Heaven (heavenly immortal music); he became intoxicated by it, and this was another mistake.

When the Transformist later invited King Mu to journey with him again, he caused him to see the true realm of the Great Dao. At this point King Mu not only could not advance further but instead begged to return. Why? The operation of the wondrous Dao transcends bodily form; how could one who has not attained the Dao or realized its principle dwell in such a realm? The Transformist knew that King Mu ultimately could not comprehend, and so did not stop him when he asked to go back. Even so, when the Transformist sent him back, King Mu was still in a daze, as if falling into emptiness. This too was the Transformist’s attempt to awaken him, but in the end he still did not wake. Thus when he came to, he had already been lost in a trance for three months.

Yet after this experience, King Mu turned his mind around and went again to consult the Transformist. The Transformist explained to him the principle of the spirit journey, and only then did King Mu comprehend the principle of transformation and rejoice greatly. Thereafter he no longer concerned himself with affairs of state, held treasures lightly, and ceased to indulge in concubines and attendants. He acted according to his own nature, did not cling fixedly to his own mind, traveled far in all directions, and was no longer confined to nearby places. He ordered the chariot of the Eight Steeds to be harnessed and galloped wherever he wished, reaching everywhere. A fine charioteer like Zaofu (a skilled driver of the Zhou dynasty) is rarely seen in the world, and fine horses like the Eight Steeds are also extremely rare; yet King Mu could travel ten thousand li in a single day. That pace, which transcended the void and chased the sun, could not be matched even by wind and clouds.

驰驱千里,至于臣搜氏之国者,搜,择也,方且驰驱而择所徂向也。白鹄,洁白高飞之物。牛马,任重致远之畜。献白鹄之血以饮王,将易其虑而使之趋高也。具牛马之湩以洗王之足,则涤其形而使之致远也。昆仑,西极之山也,谓之昆仑,则拟夫道之高明浑沦也。赤水之阳,水之北也。虑而使之趋高也。具牛马之湩以洗王之足,则涤其形而使之致远也。昆仑,西极之山也,谓之昆仑,则拟夫道之高明浑沦也。赤水之阳,水之北也。阴而含阳,元妙之象也。其始也,至于巨搜氏之国,则过之而不守。宿于昆仑之阿、赤水之阳,则犹托宿而不久处也。别日升于昆之丘,则进於道矣。《庄子》以支离叔观於冥伯之丘,昆仑之墟为黄帝之所休,谓黄帝由昆仑之丘南望,还归而遗其玄珠,则昆仑之象道可知矣。夫穆王能升于昆仑之丘,则其肆意所游亦远矣。然其行不能无假於舆马,非若化人之神游也。故虽一日行万里,犹可期以数。虽入於西极,终亦不过乎昆仑。不游乎太虚,而不能至化人所从来之国也。黄帝,至圣之人也,虽封于其宫而不见其人。西王母,仙圣之种也,虽不容於不主而宾之。
Interpretation

After galloping a thousand li, he arrived in the territory of the Chensou clan. “Sou” means “to choose,” indicating that King Mu, while speeding along, was selecting the direction in which to go. The white swan—a pure white bird skilled at high flight—is a symbol of lofty purity; oxen and horses are beasts able to bear heavy loads and carry one far. Having King Mu drink the blood of the white swan was meant to alter his thoughts and make his aspirations high and far-reaching; washing his feet in the milk of oxen and horses was meant to cleanse his body so that he could travel far. Kunlun is the farthest mountain of the West; the name “Kunlun” is used to compare with the Dao’s loftiness, brilliance, and undifferentiated wholeness. North of the Red Water is called yang. Yang contained within yin is a symbol of the mysterious and wondrous Dao.

King Mu at first passed through the state of the Jusou clan, merely passing by without stopping; lodging at night at the foot of Mount Kunlun and on the north bank of the Red Water was likewise only temporary sojourning, not long residence. Later he ascended the mound of Kunlun, which was a further step along the Dao. Zhuangzi says that Shuli Shu wandered in contemplation on the mound of Mingbo, and also that the region of Kunlun was where the Yellow Emperor rested; the Yellow Emperor, looking south from the mound of Kunlun, lost the Mysterious Pearl (the pearl symbolizing the Dao) on his return. From this it can be seen that Kunlun symbolizes the Dao, and this is understandable.

King Mu was able to ascend the mound of Kunlun, and the range of his wandering at will was thus quite far. Yet his journey could not leave carriages and horses behind; he was not free and unobstructed like the transformed man (one who can travel in spirit). Therefore, even if he could travel ten thousand li in a day, it could still be counted in days. Although he entered the farthest reaches of the West, in the end he got no farther than Kunlun. If one cannot roam in the Taixu (the vast, boundless void), one cannot reach the country from which the transformed man came.

The Yellow Emperor was a supremely sage person; although he dwelt in his palace, he was not seen. The Queen Mother of the West was a figure of the immortal sages; although he was not accommodated in the place of No-Master, she still received him with the courtesy due a guest. Thereupon she and he raised their cups and drank together above the Yaochi (Jade Pool), and they merely answered one another in song.

抑与之觞于瑶池之上,而徒歌以倡之,圣之人也,虽封于其宫而不见其人。西王母,仙圣之种也,虽不容於不主而宾之。抑与之觞于瑶池之上,而徒歌以倡之,宜能心醉其道而得其乐矣。而穆王之和,其辞哀焉,是止能穷当身之人乐,而不得夫天乐者也。乃观日之所入者,日,道喻也,庄子以十日并出万物皆照为德之盛,则日之入於西极,其圣人敛道而归於大本大宗之象欤?观日之所入,则观之而已,不能造其道也,故终则叹其不盈于德而谐于乐也。《周书》称其百年耄荒,是所谓后世追数其过也。然而能穷当身之乐造其道也,故终则叹其不盈于德而谐于乐也。《周书》称其百年耄荒,是所谓后世追数其过也。然而能穷当身之乐而得寿之大斋,是乃世俗之所谓登假於道者。故考以竹书蠹简,求诸石室,不绝《金绳》《山经》《尔雅》及乎《大传》,咸纪其说焉。尝谓黄帝之梦神行也,穆王之化亦神游也,梦化均矣。而异其治效者,黄帝之梦本於斋心服形,穆王之化殆变易於化人尔。又黄帝之寤得之自然,穆王乃不得已谓於化人而求还尔。此黄帝所以既寤则怡然自得而致华胥之治,而穆王既寤则自失者三月止於穷当身之乐而已。 老成子学幻於尹文先生,三年不告。老成子请其过而求退,尹文先生揖而进之於室,屏左右而与之言 解曰:欲学幻者,是欲以幻还学於幻也。三年之久,请其过而求退,尹文先生揖而进之於室,屏左右而与之言
Interpretation

King Mu of Zhou once feasted with the Queen Mother of the West beside the Jade Pool, but it was only a vain exchange of songs. Properly speaking, he should have been able to let his mind and spirit become steeped in the Great Dao and thereby obtain true joy. Yet the lyrics he made were full of sorrow, showing that he could enjoy only the pleasures of a human lifetime and could not attain the heavenly joy brought by the natural Great Dao.

Then look at the place where the sun sets. Here “sun” is a metaphor for “Dao.” Zhuangzi once used “ten suns rise together and all things are illumined” to metaphorize the greatness of De (Virtue/Power); thus the sun setting in the western extremity may symbolize the sage withdrawing his Dao and returning to the Great Root and Great Source. Watching the sunset is only looking on from the side; one cannot personally arrive at that Great Dao, so King Mu in the end could only sigh that his De was not full enough and could not harmonize with heavenly joy. The Yizhou Shu records that in his later years he was muddled and dissolute, and this is precisely the basis on which later generations investigated his faults. Nevertheless, he could exhaust the pleasures of his age and also enjoy a long life; this is what the worldly call “ascending to the Dao” (rising into the Great Dao and communicating with the Dao).

Therefore, the author searched bamboo-slip ancient texts and sought out books stored in stone chambers; the Jin Sheng, Shan Jing, Erya, and Da Zhuan all record these accounts.

The author holds that the Yellow Emperor’s spirit journey in a dream and King Mu’s journey with the Huanren (illusionist) were both spirit journeys; in respect of “dream” and “transformation” their nature is the same, but the effects of their governance were utterly different. The Yellow Emperor’s dream arose from fasting, purifying the heart, and rectifying the body; King Mu’s travels were more like being transformed by a Huanren (a person skilled in illusions). Moreover, when the Yellow Emperor awoke, he had naturally gained insight, so after waking he was joyful and at ease, and the world was therefore greatly governed like the kingdom of Huaxu. King Mu, by contrast, was compelled to beg the Huanren to send him back. Thus after waking he was dazed and lost, and for three months could not recover his senses; all he could obtain was merely to exhaust the pleasures of the age.

Laochengzi studied illusion with Master Yinwen for three years and never spoke of what he had attained. Laochengzi then asked the master to point out his fault and requested to leave. Master Yinwen bowed with hands clasped, invited him into the inner chamber, dismissed the attendants, and spoke with him alone.

Annotation (Jiang Yu): One who wishes to learn illusion actually wishes to use illusion to return to the study of illusion—that is, to be mired in illusion while seeking illusion. Therefore Laochengzi, after three years still having gained nothing, asked to leave.

解曰:欲学幻者,是欲以幻还学於幻也。三年之久,其幻化之极可尽模哉。三年不告其术,是以不告告之也。老成子莫能洞视不说之理,方且请过而求退,故尹文先生不得已而与之言,揖而进之於室。其道奥也,屏左右而与之言,则众不见独,非所与知也。所谓老成子,则晚闻大道而能有成者也,故其学幻於尹文先生,则始也请其过而求退,终能传其术也。所谓尹文先生,则内得於道,示斯文以尹众者也,故老成子学其术焉。 曰:昔老聃之徂西也,顾而告予曰:有生之气,有形之状,尽幻也。造化之所始,阴阳之所变者,谓之生,谓之死。穷数达变,因形移者,谓之:有生之气,有形之状,尽幻也。造化之所始,阴阳之所变者,谓之生,谓之死。穷数达变,因形移者,谓之化,谓之幻。造物者其巧妙,其功深,固难穷难终。因形者其巧显,其功浅,故随起随灭。知幻化之不异生死也,始可与学幻矣。吾与汝亦幻也,奚须学哉?
Interpretation

Someone who wants to learn the art of illusion is, in effect, wanting to use illusion to learn illusion. After three years of practice, his art of transformation had reached its utmost, and he could nearly exhaust every kind of change. Master Yinwen did not transmit its secrets for three years; this was precisely his way of telling him through “not telling.” Lao Chengzi—one who heard the Great Dao only in his later years yet was ultimately able to accomplish something—at first could not fathom this “principle of not speaking,” so he asked the master to point out his fault and said that he wished to withdraw. Master Yinwen had no choice but to speak with him; with hands clasped in respect, he invited him into the inner chamber. The Great Dao is profound, and so he dismissed those around him and spoke with him alone. Others could neither see nor hear, for this was not knowledge in which the crowd could share.

The so-called Master Yinwen refers to one who had already attained the Dao inwardly and used the art of illusion to display the principle to others. Lao Chengzi therefore learned the art of illusion from him.

Master Yinwen further said: In former times, when Lao Dan traveled west and went through the pass, he turned back and said to me: All Qi that possesses life and all appearances that possess bodily form are illusions. What is begun by creation and formed by the changes of Yin-Yang is called “life” and is also called “death.” That which can exhaust the measure of Qi, penetrate transformation, and shift in accord with bodily form is called “transformation” and is also called “illusion.” The Shen (spirit) of creation and transformation is subtle and profound in its ingenuity, and is inherently difficult to exhaust and difficult to bring to an end; the illusory transformation that arises in accord with bodily form has its cleverness exposed and its skill shallow, and so it perishes as soon as it arises. Only one who understands that illusion and birth-and-death are no different can study the art of illusion together with him. I and you are also illusion—why bother to learn it?

解曰:生死幻化,槩而论之,如形之影,如水之沤,如薤之露,如电之光,皆幻而已。即其巧妙功深而难穷难终者,谓之生死。即其巧显功浅而随起随灭者,谓之幻化。谓之者,因其用而强名之也。故徼妙虽殊,妙功深而难穷难终者,谓之生死。即其巧显功浅而随起随灭者,谓之幻化。谓之者,因其用而强名之也。故徼妙虽殊,其巧均也;浅深虽异,其功等也。则幻化奚异於生死哉?唯知幻化之不异生死,则死生不足以为大。幻化不可以言浅,死生不能变幻,化自我出矣,故学幻者必本於知幻也。虽然,知不离觉,说有觉者不离幻境,就无觉者亦不离幻,是故由知学幻以幻幻,物虽能幻,物我犹在幻,既有学幻之知,斯堕为幻之境矣。唯真能以性觉者,诸幻尽灭。初无有心,奚须学哉?然则尹文先生之不告老成子,是真能幻者矣。 老成子归,用尹文先生之言,深思三月,遂能存亡自在,幡校四时;冬起雷,夏造冰;飞者走,走者飞。终身不着其术,固世莫传焉。
Interpretation

Life and death, illusion and transformation—summarized, they are all like a shadow following its form, bubbles floating on water, dew on a scallion leaf, the flash of lightning; in essence they are all illusory. What is called “life and death” refers to change whose operation is subtle and profound, inexhaustible and difficult to bring to an end; what is called “illusion and transformation” refers to change whose operation is manifest and shallow, arising and perishing as it arises. The reason for giving them names is simply to label them provisionally according to their operations.

Although the subtle and the manifest differ, their wondrous essence is the same; although there are differences of depth, their efficacy is identical. Then what difference is there between illusion-transformation and life-death? Only when one understands that illusion-transformation and life-death are not two does one feel that life and death are not worth taking to heart. Illusion-transformation itself cannot be called shallow, and life and death cannot truly master a person; all transformations issue from oneself. Therefore one who studies illusion arts must take understanding “illusion” as the foundation.

That said, “knowledge” cannot be separated from “awakening.” If one speaks of a person who has awakening, that person has still not escaped the realm of illusion; one who lacks awakening has likewise not escaped illusion. Therefore, if one relies on knowledge to study illusion arts and uses illusion to perform illusion arts, then although things may transform, people and things remain within illusion. Once one has the knowledge of learning illusion, one has fallen into the realm of illusion. Only one who can truly awaken through original nature will have all illusory appearances entirely extinguished. Since originally there is no mind directed toward this, why bother to learn it? From this we can see that Master Yin Wen’s not telling Lao Chengzi about the illusion arts precisely shows that he was the one who truly understood illusion arts.

Among things that depend on form, there is no movement that is not illusion. Although the creative transformation of heaven and earth is wondrous, it too does not depart from illusion. The myriad things produced by creation often come into play through people.

After Lao Chengzi returned, he pondered Master Yin Wen’s words deeply for three months, and then he could control life and death, existence and nonexistence at will, and arbitrarily reverse the order of the four seasons: in winter he could make thunder, in summer he could make ice; flying birds could walk, and walking beasts could fly. But he never revealed this art throughout his life, so it has never been transmitted in the world.

解曰:丽於形体,无动非幻。造化虽妙,亦不离幻。造化幻物,常因人为。人四时;冬起雷,夏造冰;飞者走,走者飞。终身不着其术,固世莫传焉。 解曰:丽於形体,无动非幻。造化虽妙,亦不离幻。造化幻物,常因人为。人为之幻,亦依天理。造化之幻,不离阴阳。人之幻化,不离数变。制於阴阳则虽真亦幻,穷其数变则即幻而觉。觉在於我,幻岂属彼?苟得此道矣,不特能幻物,而不幻於物尔,遂能幡校四时,更造雷冰,变易飞走,夺造化之幻矣。且所谓幻者,果何自而然哉?要其所本,依於妙心,是生其体,犹如空华从空而有。幻体虽显,幻理则妙。显斯有幻,妙故能幻。唯显故可得而言,唯妙故必深思三月而后得其道尔。且古之学幻者,非曰幻可以骇俗也,故学之盖将即幻而觉其道尔。故语其能幻,则飞走可易,雷冰可造。及既得其道,则终身不着其术,固世莫传焉。噫,幻化之妙若此,故尹幻可以骇俗也,故学之盖将即幻而觉其道尔。故语其能幻,则飞走可易,雷冰可造。及既得其道,则终身不着其术,固世莫传焉。噫,幻化之妙若此,故尹文先生亦不自任其道,姑道老君徂西而告之之言尔。 子列子曰:善为化者,其道密庸,其功同人。五帝之德,三王之功,未必尽智勇之力,或由化而成,孰测之哉?
Interpretation

Explanation: All things that adhere to form are without exception illusory and subject to transformation. Although the creative workings of Heaven and Earth are exquisitely subtle, they too cannot depart from “illusion.” The illusory transformations of the natural world often arise through human action; human-made illusions must likewise accord with heavenly principle. Natural illusion does not depart from the turning of Yin-Yang (the two forces of growth and decline between Heaven and Earth), while human illusion does not depart from the changes of Qi and destiny. If one is constrained by Yin-Yang, even real things will appear illusory; if one can exhaustively investigate the patterns of Qi and destiny’s changes, one can awaken within illusion. Awakening lies with oneself—how could illusion belong to anyone else?

If one grasps this principle, not only can one master the transformations of the ten thousand things, but one can also avoid being deluded by external things. Thereupon one can interchange the four seasons, produce thunder and ice, alter the forms of birds and beasts, and seize the illusory arts of creation. Then where, after all, does what is called “illusion” come from? Tracing it to its root, it relies on the mysterious original mind, like a flower in the sky (konghua, the phantom image seen when the eyes are tired) arising from empty space. Although the illusory form appears, the principle of illusion is extremely subtle. Precisely because it appears, there is illusion; precisely because it is subtle, it can produce illusion. Only because it appears can it be spoken of; only because it is subtle does it require months of deep thought to comprehend its way.

Those in ancient times who learned the arts of illusion did not do so to shock the world and startle the vulgar, but to use illusion as a means to awaken to the great Dao. Therefore, when speaking of their abilities, they could alter birds and beasts and produce thunder and ice; yet once they had attained the principle within, they never again displayed their arts for a lifetime, and so the world had no way to know of them. Alas, the subtlety of illusion reaches such a point! This is why Master Yinwen did not advertise his own Way, but merely provided commentary on these words left by Laozi when he traveled west.

Master Liezi said: Those skilled in carrying out transformations have a principle that is subtle yet ordinary, and their effects are the same as those of ordinary people. The virtue of the Five Emperors and the achievements of the Three Kings were not necessarily accomplished entirely through wisdom and courage; some were also brought to completion through “transformation.” Who can truly fathom it?

解曰:天地之所以为天地者,幻化万物也。圣人之所以为圣人者,觉幻化之道也。天地之幻物,阴阳迭运,寒暑审度,使万物莫不由其道而得其宜,不以幡校四时为功也。如天地亦以冬起雷,夏造冰为幻,则物无遗类矣。则善为化幻物,阴阳迭运,寒暑审度,使万物莫不由其道而得其宜,不以幡校四时为功也。如天地亦以冬起雷,夏造冰为幻,则物无遗类矣。则善为化者,亦奚以显奇出异,务骇人之观听为哉?是以圣人之化,虽曰密庸,不可俄而测其功,则亦同於人而已。此老成子之能幻,所以终身不着也。孔子能之而不为,亦此道也。五帝三王,皆古圣人也,或逊或争,因时适变,虽示智勇之功,而默运不言之妙,人能睹其功而莫测其化之之由,未足以语帝王之治也。 觉有八征,梦有六候。奚谓八征?一曰故,二曰为,三曰得,四曰丧,五曰哀,六曰乐,七曰生,八曰死。此者八征,形所接也。奚谓六候?一曰正梦,二曰蘁梦,三曰思梦,四曰寤曰故,二曰为,三曰得,四曰丧,五曰哀,六曰乐,七曰生,八曰死。此者八征,形所接也。奚谓六候?一曰正梦,二曰蘁梦,三曰思梦,四曰寤梦,五曰喜梦,六曰惧梦。此六者,神所交也。
Interpretation

Note: In the original text, after “If summer made ice as an illusion, then no kind of thing would survive intact,” there is a long block of repeated text; there is also textual corruption at “wu yue gu” (“e-meng” should be a misprint for “wumeng,” and “wu yue gu” is an erroneous linking to the Eight Signs). The following interpretation follows the commonly accepted meaning, and the repeated portion is interpreted only once.

Vernacular Explanation:

The reason Heaven and Earth are Heaven and Earth lies in their ability to transform and generate the myriad things. The reason sages are sages lies in their ability to awaken to this principle of transforming the myriad things.

Heaven and Earth transform the myriad things by means of Yin-Yang alternating in operation and cold and heat succeeding one another in order, so that all things can accord with their Dao and each attain its proper place; they do not seek results by defying the four seasons or reversing normal principles. If Heaven and Earth likewise made winter thunder and summer ice to produce illusions, then the myriad things would not be able to preserve each its own kind. Therefore, for one who is good at transformation and good at creation, why must he deliberately reveal the strange, establish novelty, and astonish the eyes and ears of the world?

Thus the sage’s teaching appears ordinary and subtle; people cannot suddenly fathom its effects, and so it is no different from that of ordinary people. That Lao Chengzi could perform illusionary arts yet never revealed them throughout his life is precisely this principle. Confucius also possessed this capacity but did not exercise it; this likewise is the same Dao. The Five Emperors and Three Kings were all sages of antiquity: some governed the world through humility and yielding, others established their undertakings through military campaigns—all adapted in response to the times. Although they displayed achievements of wisdom and martial valor, their true marvel lay in operating secretly and without speech. People see only their accomplishments but cannot fathom the causes of their teaching; this is still not enough to discuss the true meaning of the rule of emperors and kings.


Regarding the passage “In waking there are eight signs; in dreams there are six conditions”:

When awake there are eight signs, and in dreams there are six conditions. The so-called “eight signs” are: first, gu (old matters, past events); second, wei (taking action); third, de (obtaining); fourth, sang (losing); fifth, ai (sorrow); sixth, le (joy); seventh, sheng (life); and eighth, si (death). These eight signs are all that the physical form contacts and experiences.

The so-called “six conditions” are: first, zhengmeng (dreams when the mind is calm and balanced); second, wumeng (what one thinks while awake reappearing in a dream); third, ximeng (dreams born of joy); and fourth, jumeng (dreams born of fear). In addition, the “simeng” and “wumeng” listed here in the original correspond respectively to mental thoughts and waking experience, together forming part of the six conditions. These six dream states are all presentations of the spirit as it interacts.

解曰:觉之证,梦之候,虽神形所遇,不一其理。要其所本,唯其心之自造尔。 不识感变之所起者,事至则惑其所由然;识感变之所起者,事至则知其所由然。知其所由然,则无所怛。 解曰:感变之所起,不出於觉之证,梦之候,理之常尔。识其所由然,且能无所怛,而况於知道乎?知道者,虽死生曾无变乎己,其视梦觉亦末矣。 一体之盈虚消息,皆通於天地,应於物类。故阴气壮,则梦涉大水而恐惧;阳气壮,则梦涉大火而燔櫍阴阳俱壮,则梦生杀。甚饱则梦与,甚饥则梦取。是以以浮虚为疾者,则梦则梦涉大火而燔櫍阴阳俱壮,则梦生杀。甚饱则梦与,甚饥则梦取。是以以浮虚为疾者,则梦扬;以沉实为疾者,则梦溺。藉带而寝,则梦蛇,飞鸟御发,则梦飞。将阴梦火,将疾梦食。饮酒者忧,歌舞者哭。
Interpretation

Explanation: The signs of waking consciousness and the symptoms in dreams, though they are situations encountered by Shen (spirit) and form respectively, have different principles. Ultimately, their roots all lie in the mind's own fabrications.

Those who do not understand where the responses and changes of external things come from are perplexed by their causes when events arise; those who understand where responses and changes originate know their causes as soon as events arise. Knowing the cause, the mind will be free from fear and worry.

Explanation: The arising of responses and changes does not exceed the signs of waking and dreaming; this is the normal state of things. If one understands their causes, one can still be free from fear in the mind—how much more so for one who understands the great Dao? One who understands the Dao, even when experiencing life and death, will not allow oneself to be altered; viewing dream and waking is like viewing the peripheral details.

The fullness and emptiness, waxing and waning of the body are all connected with heaven and earth and correspond to the myriad things. Therefore, when yin qi is abundant, one dreams of wading through great water and being afraid; when yang qi is abundant, one dreams of wading through great fire and being burned; when yin and yang qi are both abundant, one dreams of killing or being killed. When one has eaten too much, one dreams of giving to others; when one is extremely hungry, one dreams of asking for things. Thus, those whose illness is of the floating-emptiness type (qi deficiency causing floating and scattering) dream of flying; those whose illness is of the sunken-fullness type (internal stagnation and heaviness) dream of drowning. Sleeping with a belt on, one dreams of snakes; a bird alighting on the hair, one dreams of flying. When yin qi is about to become abundant, one dreams of fire; when illness is about to break out, one dreams of food and drink. Those who drink wine have much sorrow; those who sing and dance have much weeping.

解曰:梦者,神之所遇也。至神之道,阴阳莫测,莫之能测,则莫之能制矣。人之为神,因精而集,寓於形体,因於阴阳,因於彼则必役於彼矣。此一体之盈虚消息,神遇为梦,所以通於天地,应於物类,无所逃也。故梦涉大水,梦涉大火,气实制之也。饱而梦与,饥而梦取,欲则使之也。或梦扬,或梦溺,则疾疠物类,无所逃也。故梦涉大水,梦涉大火,气实制之也。饱而梦与,饥而梦取,欲则使之也。或梦扬,或梦溺,则疾疠得以蠹吾之神也。或梦蛇,或梦飞,则物类得以感吾之神也。将阴梦火,将疾梦食,则梦想之颠倒有如此者。饮酒者忧,歌舞者哭,则忧喜之更生有如此者。夫以一身之微,百年之生,昼夜居半,一不能守其纯气,则与时盈虚,阴阳万物昼夜为吾之寇,形劳而不休,神耗而不已,终身役役,与物俱化矣,可不悟哉?尝究梦觉之理,夜旦之常尔。梦之所见,虽曰神遇,实为形役。形之役我,非形能役,我则自役。由我役形,形反究梦觉之理,夜旦之常尔。梦之所见,虽曰神遇,实为形役。形之役我,非形能役,我则自役。由我役形,形反役我,我受其役,反不能制。方其为梦,不知是梦,因觉知梦,俄而复梦,犹以为觉。夜旦迁流而不停,终身觉梦而不悟,虽水火取与等相,初无有实,而忧惧喜乐之态真有於心。然而觉能知梦,梦不知觉,则觉固真於梦。觉之所为,止存於思虑之中;梦之先知,乃见於思虑之外,则梦实灵於觉。旦旦之觉,其云为常有伦;昔昔之梦,其闻见常不续。梦觉须臾之说尔,其差殊之变乃至於此,又况生死为去来之大变,苟非其人,欲无轮溺於造化,得乎哉?虽然,苟能早悟於梦觉,则死生之去来亦不足道矣。
Interpretation

Dreams are the manifestation of Shen (spirit) meeting the external world.

The transformations of Shen are profoundly subtle and mysterious; Yin-Yang is difficult to fathom, and no one can fully penetrate them, so there is no way to master them. Yet the Shen within the human body relies on Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy) to gather and resides within the physical form. Moved by Yin-Yang, once it is constrained by external things, it is inevitably enslaved by them. The body’s fullness and emptiness, waxing and waning, cause Shen to meet the external world and become dreams; thus dreams can communicate with Heaven and Earth and resonate with the myriad things, leaving nowhere to escape. Therefore, dreaming of wading across a great river or of being amid a great fire is governed by the abundance or decline of Qi; dreaming of giving when one is full and of taking when one is hungry is driven by desire; dreaming of flying upward or of sinking and drowning is illness and pathogenic Qi disturbing Shen. Dreaming of snakes or of flying is external things stirring Shen. When Yin Qi is abundant, one dreams of fire; when illness is about to arise, one dreams of food and drink—such is the inversion and confusion of dreams and imaginings. Those who drink wine easily become sorrowful, while those who sing and dance may weep; the same is true of such mutual transformation of sorrow and joy.

This human body is tiny, and its lifespan is no more than a hundred years; within day and night, sleep at night takes up half. Once one cannot guard the pure primordial Qi, one will wax and wane with time, and together with Yin-Yang and the myriad things, day and night invade oneself, becoming “my bandit.” The body toils without rest, and the spirit is depleted without cease. To rush about and labor all one’s life, changing together with external things—should one not awaken?

Let us examine the principle of dream and waking: it is merely the ordinary pattern of day and night. What is seen in dreams, though said to be Shen meeting the external world, is in fact the physical form enslaving Shen. On the surface it seems the form enslaves me, but in reality it is not that the form can enslave me; rather, I enslave myself. Because I enslave the form, the form in turn enslaves me; and when I am enslaved by it, I cannot control myself. While in a dream, one does not know one is dreaming; only after waking does one know it was a dream, and soon one enters dreaming again, still taking the dream as the real scene of waking. Day and night turn without pause, and all one’s life one is confused between dream and waking without awakening. Although scenes such as water and fire, taking and giving, have no substance, the states of anxiety and fear, joy and pleasure truly exist in the mind.

Yet when awake one can know dreams, while in dreams one does not know waking; thus waking is indeed more real than dreaming. What one does while awake exists only within thought, whereas matters foreknown in dreams appear beyond thought; thus dreams are instead more spiritually perceptive than waking. In daytime waking, speech and conduct are generally orderly; night after night in dreams, what is seen and heard is often disconnected. Dream and waking differ only by a moment, yet their differences and transformations reach this extent. Moreover, birth and death are the greatest change in coming and going. If one is not a person of cultivation, how could one possibly avoid drowning in transformation? Even so, if one can awaken early to the principle of dream and waking, then the coming and going of life and death will no longer be worth worrying about.

冲虚至德真经解卷之五竟 6-冲虚至德真经解卷之六 冲虚至德真经解卷之六 宋杭州州学内舍生臣江遹进 穆王下 子列子曰:神遇为梦,真经解卷之五竟 6-冲虚至德真经解卷之六 冲虚至德真经解卷之六 宋杭州州学内舍生臣江遹进 穆王下 子列子曰:神遇为梦,形接为事。故昼想夜梦,神形所遇。故神凝者,想梦自消。信觉不语,信梦不达,物化之往来者也。古之真人,其觉自忘,其寝不梦,几虚语哉? 解曰:昼之想,夜之梦。梦也魂交,觉也形开。昼夜迭运,物化往来,犹如空华,随起随灭。故信觉者不可以语道,信梦者不可以为达。虽然,神形所遇,虽合於物,究其所生,咸其自造。故夫想梦之颠倒与夫想梦之自为,非有佗也,亦在天神之凝不凝而已。所谓其所生,咸其自造。故夫想梦之颠倒与夫想梦之自为,非有佗也,亦在天神之凝不凝而已。所谓真人者,不离於精,而其神凝者也,不知悦生,不知恶死,其出不欣,其入不拒,不以心捐道,不以人助天,翛然而往,翛然而来,不逐於物化之往来,而於梦觉都无所信者也。故能其觉自忘,而其寝不梦也。
Interpretation

Liezi says: When the spirit encounters things, it becomes a dream; when the body comes into contact with things, it becomes a matter. Therefore, what one thinks by day and dreams by night are all things encountered by the spirit and the body. For one whose spirit is settled, thoughts and dreams naturally dissolve. Not speaking while awake of what one believes, and being unable to comprehend in dreams—these are manifestations of “thing-transformation” (wuhua: the myriad things changing with time, coming and going, arising and perishing). The True Persons of antiquity forgot everything when awake and did not dream when asleep. Could this be empty talk?

Jiang Yu explains: When there is thought by day, there is dreaming by night. Dreaming is the intersection of the hun and po souls; waking is the opening of the body. Day and night alternate and revolve; the myriad things transform and pass back and forth, like illusory flowers in the air, arising and perishing as they occur. Therefore, one who clings to waking cannot be spoken to about the Dao, and one who clings to dreaming cannot be brought to understanding. Although spirit, body, and external things coalesce, if one traces them to their root, the inversion of thoughts and dreams and their spontaneous arising are all self-created; they are not due to external causes. It depends only on whether the “Heavenly Spirit” (tianshen, referring to the spirit) is settled. The so-called True Persons do not depart from Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy), and their spirit is settled. They do not delight in life or loathe death; they are not elated at birth, nor do they resist when entering death. They do not harm the Dao with the mind, nor force the Heavenly Dao with human effort. They come at ease and go at ease, not drifting along with the transformations and comings and goings of the myriad things, and they have no particular attachment to dream or waking. Thus when awake they can forget everything, and when asleep they do not dream.

西极之南隅有国焉,不知境界之所接,名古莽之国。阴阳之气所不交,故寒暑亡辩;日月之光所不照,故昼夜亡辩。其民不食不衣而多眠,五旬一觉,以莽之国。阴阳之气所不交,故寒暑亡辩;日月之光所不照,故昼夜亡辩。其民不食不衣而多眠,五旬一觉,以梦中所为者实,觉之所见者妄。四海之齐,谓中央之国,跨河南北,越岱东西,万有余里。其阴阳之审度,故一寒一暑;昏明之分察,故一昼一夜。其民有智有愚,万物滋殖,才艺多方,有君臣相临,礼法相持。其所云为,不可称计。一觉一寐,以为觉之所为者实,梦之所见者妄。东极之北隅,有国曰阜落之国。其土气常燠,日月余光之照,其土不生嘉苗。其民食草根木实,不知火食,性刚悍,强弱相藉,贵胜而不尚义;多驰步,少休息,常觉而不眠。 解曰:西极之南隅,坤兑之方也,万物由坤之致役而趋悦息之兑,故其国以梦之所为者为实。谓息,常觉而不眠。
Interpretation

At the southern corner of the western extremity there is a country whose borders no one knows where they connect; it is called the country of Gumang. Here the Qi of Yin-Yang does not intermingle, so there is no distinction between cold and heat; the light of the sun and moon does not reach it, so there is no distinction between day and night. The people neither eat nor wear clothes, yet they greatly love sleep and awaken only once every fifty days. They regard what they do in dreams as real and what they see when awake as illusory.

The land of Qi within the Four Seas, the so-called country of the Central Plains, stretches north and south of the Yellow River and east and west beyond Mount Tai, over ten thousand li in circumference. Here the movement of Yin-Yang has its regular measure, so there is cold and heat; the alternation of light and darkness has its order, so there is day and night. Among the people some are clever and some are dull; the myriad things multiply and grow, and the crafts are many and varied; there are rulers and ministers, superiors and inferiors, who govern one another, and ritual and law sustain one another. What they do is countless. In their waking and sleeping, they regard what they do while awake as real and what they see in dreams as illusory.

At the northern corner of the eastern extremity there is a country called Fuluo. The earth Qi here is warm throughout the year; the lingering radiance of the sun and moon shines here, yet the land does not grow fine crops. The people eat grass roots and tree fruits and do not know how to cook food with fire. Their nature is fierce and bold; the strong bully the weak; they esteem victory and do not value righteousness; they are constantly running about without cease, seldom resting, and always awake without sleeping.

Explanation: The southern corner of the western extremity is the position of Kun and Dui (Kun occupies the southwest, Dui due west; together they are called the west). The myriad things, after Kun’s toil and service, tend toward Dui’s joy and repose, and so this country takes what is done in dreams as real. “Xi” means rest or cessation; the country of Fuluo is always awake and does not sleep, forming an exact contrast with the western extremity country that takes dreams as real.

解曰:西极之南隅,坤兑之方也,万物由坤之致役而趋悦息之兑,故其国以梦之所为者为实。谓之古莽之国,则其道广莫,自古以固存也,是亦西南之类也。东极之北隅,艮震之方也,万物由艮之径路而达乎震之大涂,方将趋於相见之离,故俗常觉而不眠。谓之阜落之国,则以物生阜而为聚落也,是亦东北之类也。中央之国,阴阳审度,故一昼一夜,一寒一暑,以觉为实,以梦为妄,凡皆不能逃阴阳之变尔。
Interpretation

In the far west, at its southern corner—the region of Kun and Dui (two of the Bagua, the Eight Trigrams; Kun occupies the southwest, Dui the west)—all things receive their service at Kun and then proceed toward the joy and rest symbolized by Dui. Thus the people there take what they see in dreams as real. This country is called the Country of Gumang (meaning vast and remote). Its customs are boundless and have persisted unchanged since ancient times; it too belongs to the southwest category.

In the far east, at its northern corner—the region of Gen and Zhen (Gen occupies the northeast, Zhen the east)—all things travel by the path of Gen to the great road of Zhen and are about to move toward Li, the position of meeting (Li occupies the south). Thus the people there are often awake and do not sleep. This country is called the Country of Fuluo, because people gather on earthen mounds to form villages; it too belongs to the northeast category.

The central country has Yin-Yang harmonized and properly regulated, so a single day has day and night, and a single year has cold and heat. People take waking as real and dreams as illusory. Yet none of this escapes the transformations of Yin-Yang.

周之尹氏大治产,其下趣役者,侵晨昏而弗息。有老役夫,筋力竭矣,而使之弥勤。昼则呻呼而即事,夜则昏惫而熟寐。精神荒散,昔昔梦为国君。居人民之上,总一国之事;游燕宫观,恣意所欲,其乐无比,觉则复役。人有慰喻其懃者,役夫曰:人生百年,昼夜各分。吾昼为仆虏,苦则苦矣;夜为人君,其乐无比。何所怨哉?尹氏心营世觉则复役。人有慰喻其懃者,役夫曰:人生百年,昼夜各分。吾昼为仆虏,苦则苦矣;夜为人君,其乐无比。何所怨哉?尹氏心营世事,虑锺家业,心形俱疲,夜亦昏惫而寐。背昔梦为人仆,趋走作役,无不为也;数骂杖挞,无不至也,眠中啽呓呻呼,彻旦息焉。尹氏病之,以访其友。友曰:若位足荣身,资财有余,胜人远矣;夜梦为仆,苦逸之复,数之常也。若欲觉梦兼之,岂可得耶!尹氏闻其友言,宽其役夫之程,减己思虑之事,疾并少间。 解曰:昼夜各分,形神迭用。昼劳於神者其形则佚,故夜则神佚而形劳;昼劳其形者其神则佚,故夜则神己思虑之事,疾并少间。
Interpretation

In the Zhou dynasty there was a wealthy household named Yin that managed its estate vigorously. The people under it worked from morning to night without rest. Among them was an old laborer (a servant who did hard labor), whose strength was already exhausted, yet his master made him work even harder. By day he groaned and sighed as he worked; at night he was so tired and muddled that he fell asleep as soon as he lay down. His spirit was dazed and scattered, and every night he dreamed that he became a ruler: placed high above the people, directing the affairs of a whole state, feasting and amusing himself among palaces and pavilions, following his desires and immeasurably happy. When he woke, he had to go back to work. Someone comforted and encouraged him, and the laborer said: “A human life lasts a hundred years, and day and night each take half. By day I am a servant—hard work it certainly is; by night I am a ruler—immeasurably happy. What is there to resent?”

Yin’s mind was wholly set on managing the family estate. Toiling and calculating, he was exhausted in body and mind, and at night he too fell into a heavy sleep. Instead, he dreamed that he was a servant for others, running about at hard labor, having to do every kind of work, repeatedly insulted and whipped, groaning and crying out in his sleep until dawn. Troubled by this, Yin went to consult a friend. The friend said: “Your position is enough to bring honor to yourself, and your wealth is ample; you already far surpass others. Dreaming at night that you are a servant—after hardship comes ease, and after ease comes hardship; this is simply the natural order. If you want the benefits of both waking and dreaming to belong to you, how could that be possible?” Hearing his friend’s words, Yin relaxed the labor quota for the servant and reduced his own worrying, and his illness gradually improved.

Commentary: This passage uses day and night as a metaphor to explain that form and spirit take turns being active. Those who labor with the spirit by day allow the body to rest, and so at night the spirit is at ease while the body is tired; those who labor with the body by day allow the spirit to rest, and so at night the spirit then needs to… The gist is that by day body and mind each have their own use, while at night the reverse occurs; only when form and spirit alternate in rest and regulate each other can balance be maintained.

解曰:昼夜各分,形神迭用。昼劳於神者其形则佚,故夜则神佚而形劳;昼劳其形者其神则佚,故夜则神劳而形佚。此阴阳消长、物极则反之道也。尹氏与其仆所以有苦佚之复而不得兼於觉梦也。昧者不察夫盈虚之理,信觉为实,以梦为妄,知趋於昼之利害,而不暇知梦之苦佚,殊不悟使梦而无知则可矣,梦而有知则哀乐欲恶不殊於觉,又安可以为妄哉?尹氏知以是为疾而访其友,是或神者先受之也。至於能宽其役夫之程,减己思虑之事,疾并少间,则其理诚可信矣。如俾其诚之不已於己,思虑损之又损,则至神可凝,想梦自消,奚止其疾少间而已哉?
Interpretation

Day and night each have their division of labor; body and spirit take turns at work. If during the day the spirit is tired, the body can rest, and so at night the spirit rests while the body labors; if during the day the body is tired, the spirit can rest, and so at night the spirit labors while the body rests. This is the principle of the waxing and waning of Yin and Yang, and of things turning to their opposites when they reach an extreme. Master Yin and his servant—one suffering under toil, the other enjoying happiness in dreams—are precisely a case of waking and dreaming not being obtainable at the same time.

The ignorant do not understand the principle of fullness and emptiness. They take waking as real and dreams as illusory, pursue only the advantages and harms of daytime, and have no leisure to experience the suffering and joy within dreams. They do not consider that if there were no awareness at all in dreams, that would be one thing; but since there is awareness in dreams, the sorrow, joy, likes, and dislikes in dreams are no different from those when awake—how then can dreams be called illusory?

Master Yin regarded this dream-state as an illness and went to visit a friend; this was probably because his spirit had first been affected. If he could relax the servant’s labor and reduce his own thoughts, the symptoms would lessen somewhat, and then this principle would indeed hold true. If he could make his intentions sincere and constantly reflect inward, reducing his thoughts again and again, his spirit would become concentrated, and delusive thoughts and dreams would naturally disperse. That would be more than just a slight alleviation of his illness.

郑人有薪事,疾并少间,则其理诚可信矣。如俾其诚之不已於己,思虑损之又损,则至神可凝,想梦自消,奚止其疾少间而已哉? 郑人有薪於野者,遇骇鹿,御而击之,毙之。恐人见之也,遽而藏诸隍中,覆之以蕉,不胜其喜。俄而遗其所藏之处,遂以为梦焉,顺涂而咏其事。傍人有闻者,用其言而取之。既归,告其室人曰:向薪者梦得鹿而不知其处,吾今得之,彼直真梦者矣。室人曰:若将是梦见薪者之得鹿耶?讵有薪者耶?今真得鹿,是若之梦真耶?夫曰:吾据得鹿,何用得鹿而不知其处,吾今得之,彼直真梦者矣。室人曰:若将是梦见薪者之得鹿耶?讵有薪者耶?今真得鹿,是若之梦真耶?夫曰:吾据得鹿,何用知彼梦我梦耶?薪者之归,不厌失鹿。其夜真梦藏之之处,又梦得之之主。爽旦,按所梦而寻,得之。遂讼而争之,归之士师。士师曰:若初真得鹿,妄谓之梦;真梦得鹿,妄谓之实。彼真取若鹿,而与若争鹿。室人又谓梦仞人鹿,无人得鹿。今据有此鹿,请二分之。以闻郑君。郑君曰:嘻士师将复梦分人鹿乎?访之国相。国相曰:梦与不梦,臣所不能辩也。欲辩觉梦,唯黄帝、孔丘。今亡黄帝、孔丘,孰辩之哉?且恂士师之言可也。 解曰:人之常情,信觉为实,以其形之所接也。谓梦为妄,以其魂之所交也。今焉言可也。
Interpretation

A man of Zheng was gathering firewood in the countryside when he came upon a startled deer; he went up and killed it. Fearing that someone would see him, he hastily hid the deer in a ditch by the road (huang), covered it with plantain leaves, and was overjoyed. Before long he forgot where he had hidden the deer and took it to have been a dream, muttering about the matter all along as he walked. Someone nearby heard him, went to look according to what he had said, and carried the deer away.

The man who had taken the deer went home and said to his wife, “Just now that woodcutter dreamed he had gotten a deer but did not know where he had hidden it; now I have really gotten the deer, so it must be he who was dreaming.” His wife said, “You dreamed that a woodcutter got a deer, didn’t you? Where was there really any woodcutter? Now the deer is indeed here—this is probably your dream coming true.” The husband said, “I got the deer in solid fact; how could it be a dream?”

When the woodcutter came back, he was vexed at having lost the deer. That night he truly dreamed of the place where the deer had been hidden, and he also dreamed of the man who had taken it. At daybreak he went to search according to what he had seen in the dream, and sure enough he found the deer. He then brought the other man to the authorities; the two sides argued and would not give way, and the case was handed to the Shishi, the official in charge of criminal justice.

The Shishi ruled: “You originally did truly get the deer, but you called it a dream; you dreamed of getting a deer, but you insist it was a real event. That man did indeed take your deer, and only then came to dispute with you. Your wife said that someone in a dream got a deer, and that no other person got a deer; now the deer is here, so let it be divided in two.”

The verdict was reported to the ruler of Zheng. The ruler said, “Alas! Must even the Shishi divide another man’s deer in a dream?” He then asked the chancellor (xiangguo, the highest official assisting the ruler). The chancellor replied, “Dream and waking—I cannot distinguish between them. To distinguish waking from dreaming, only the Yellow Emperor and Kong Qiu (that is, Confucius) could do it. Now that the Yellow Emperor and Kong Qiu are both gone, who else can distinguish them? Still, it is acceptable to act according to the Shishi’s words.”

This explanation means: It is the common way of people to believe that what is seen while awake is real, because it is what the physical body has personally come into contact with; and to treat dreams as empty and false, because in dreams the hun-soul and Shen (spirit) are interacting with external things. The judgment as it stands is thus acceptable.

解曰:人之常情,信觉为实,以其形之所接也。谓梦为妄,以其魂之所交也。今焉觉之所为而忘之,不几於梦乎?梦之所遇而有实,不几於觉乎?盖觉之所为,每出於有心,故易以忘神之所遇;或出於无心,故梦则灵。要其梦觉,初无二致,冥之则俱真,辩之则俱妄。如仞梦为实,方其梦时,奚不知其为梦?以觉为实,则既已觉矣,奚为复有夫梦?斯人之生,适居中央之国,故其於梦觉,别之如此。如以梦觉之理语诸古莽阜落之民,则其是非特未可定也。郑之薪者,其初以实为梦,终则以梦为实;取鹿者用其言而以为梦,取其鹿而争其鹿。梦觉杂揉,真伪交驰,是非相齑,此所以必有讼也。士师,听其讼而折之者也,将以取鹿者为是,则鹿本薪者之有;谓薪者为是,则寻而得之。盖出於梦,是
Interpretation

The Chongxu Zhide Zhenjing (True Scripture of Ultimate De and Supreme Emptiness) is the Zhuangzi, a Daoist honorific title used from the Tang dynasty onward; Jiang Yu is the annotator of this passage.

People generally regard what is seen while awake as real and what is seen in dreams as false, because when awake the body comes into contact with external things, whereas in dreams it is the hun-soul and Shen that interact. Yet what one does while awake is often forgotten after waking—how is this different from a dream? Events encountered in dreams sometimes also have a basis in reality—how is this different from waking?

Actions while awake mostly arise from intentionality, and so are easily forgotten by Shen-consciousness; dreams mostly arise from no-mind, and so are instead efficacious. Dream and waking are essentially no different: if one realizes them with the mind, both are real; if one discriminates between them, both are illusory. If one clings to dreams as real, how, while in a dream, could one know that one is dreaming? If one clings to waking as real, then after waking one would no longer dream.

The author says that people are born in the Central State, and only for this reason do they distinguish dream from waking. If one explained the principle of dream and waking to people of remote tribes, their judgments of right and wrong would not necessarily reach a settled conclusion.

He then cites the parable from the Liezi: a woodcutter of Zheng at first took a real event as a dream, and in the end took a dream as a real event. Another man, hearing the woodcutter’s words, thought it was a dream, went and took that deer, and then contended with the woodcutter over the deer. Dream and waking mix with each other, true and false gallop across one another, and right and wrong clash with one another; thus litigation inevitably arises.

When the Shishi (ancient judge) heard this case, he had to adjudicate it. If he judged the deer-picker to be in the right, then the deer originally belonged to the woodcutter; if he judged the woodcutter to be in the right, then the woodcutter had only obtained the deer after searching for it. All this is because dream and waking are confused, so that right and wrong become entangled and cannot be clarified.

非樊

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →