中文 · EN

《宋徽宗道德真经解义(章安)》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 4 volumes 94,956 characters

About this page. The original text of 《宋徽宗道德真经解义(章安)》 (Taixuan 太玄部, 4 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 53 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

Contents (4 volumes)

Vol. 1

宋徽宗道德真经解义(章安) > 经名:宋徽宗道德真经解义(章安),收录于《中华道藏》道德真经。 经名:宋徽宗道德真经解义。宋代章安对宋徽宗狮注的解义,十卷。底本出处:《正统道藏》洞神部玉诀类。 宋徽宗道德真经解义序 臣闻道非言无以致显,言非经无以载道,道之不行也,以经之不传,经之不通也,以旨之不明。周季道降德衰,诸子嗣兴,私其异端,自名一家,其巧辞渺论,漫不足以索理,迭为簧鼓,流於虚伪,浮石沈木,肆为邪说,丧其性命之真,而陷溺桔亡,不能求复。老氏着嗣兴,私其异端,自名一家,其巧辞渺论,漫不足以索理,迭为簧鼓,流於虚伪,浮石沈木,肆为邪说,丧其性命之真,而陷溺桔亡,不能求复。老氏着言五千,明道德之常,将以绝学返朴,复乎无为,而镇以清净,此载道之经也。然辞简旨奥,穷之益远,测之益深,非夫神解,盖不得以议其略,此经之所以难传也。
Interpretation

I have heard that principle cannot be made clear without words, and words cannot carry principle unless they are set down in a classic. The Great Dao cannot spread because the classic has not been circulated; the classic cannot be understood because its central meaning has not been clarified.

In the final years of the Zhou dynasty, the Great Dao declined, and De (Virtue/Power) grew correspondingly thin. The various masters arose in succession, each clinging to a different doctrine and founding a school of their own. Their words were clever and their arguments abstruse, yet they often fell short of probing the truth of things. They praised one another, gradually drifting into falsehood. Some claimed that floating stones sink while wooden logs do not, recklessly promoting heterodox teachings. They caused people to lose their innate nature and life, leaving them immersed in confusion and unable to recover.

Laozi set down five thousand words to illuminate the constant Dao and De. His aim was to lead people to abandon ornate learning, return to simplicity, restore Wuwei (non-action), and maintain stillness and purity. This is the classic that carries the Great Dao. Yet the words of the Daodejing are concise and its meaning profound: the more one investigates it, the more far-reaching it seems; the more one tries to fathom it, the more unfathomable it becomes. Without an understanding that penetrates the mysteries, it may be difficult to explain its essential meaning. For this reason, the classic is difficult to make clear.

主上生知之学,天纵神圣,微言奥义,非苟知之,实允蹈之,发於宸藻,着为成书,虽相去老氏於千载寥寥之后,言若符契,真常妙本,坦然明白,此经之所以传,旨之所以明,道之所以行也。臣实非常之遇,谨斋心涤虑,凝神致一,恭读圣制,精思索至。臣之蔽蒙,豁尔抉发,恍若有得,辄不自已,妄意管见,仰稽睿训,演为《义解》,离为十卷。井蛙甚下,识固不,凝神致一,恭读圣制,精思索至。臣之蔽蒙,豁尔抉发,恍若有得,辄不自已,妄意管见,仰稽睿训,演为《义解》,离为十卷。井蛙甚下,识固不达於云天,莹爝至微,明实难增於日月。然道化广被,虽一介之微,得以形容天地造物之妙,亦足以彰圣治元功道被极致也。万有一遇,采择之幸,抑亦使天下万世,知太平盛际,不以人微废言,见经之所以传,道之所以行,岂不韪欤。 臣章安谨序。 2-宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之一 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之一 登仕郎臣章安撰义 道经
Interpretation

The emperor was born with exceptional wisdom and received from Heaven a sacred endowment. He did not stop at understanding profound and subtle teachings and principles, but truly put them into practice. He set down his insights in writings composed by the emperor and compiled them into a work. Although a thousand years separated him from Laozi, the emperor’s words accorded with Laozi’s and clearly expounded the wondrous Dao, constant and true. Thus this Jing was able to be passed down, its central teaching made clear, and the Dao put into practice.

Your servant was fortunate to encounter this auspicious occasion. I reverently observed purification, cleansed my mind of distractions, and focused my spirit as I respectfully read the emperor’s writings and considered their principles in depth. I had been ignorant and unclear, but after reading them I suddenly saw the light, as though I had grasped something. Unable to restrain myself, I used my limited understanding to expound upon them in accordance with the emperor’s instruction, compiling my explanations in ten scrolls under the title Explanatory Commentary.

My understanding is as narrow and lowly as a frog’s in a well, unable to comprehend lofty realms; it is also like the faint light of a candle, quite incapable of adding to the radiance of the sun and moon. Yet the Dao’s transformative teaching spreads far and wide. Even someone as insignificant as I can thereby describe the wondrous way Heaven and Earth bring forth and transform the myriad things, illuminate the fundamental achievements of sagely governance, and reveal the vast reach of Dao’s transformative power. If even one part in ten thousand of my work should be adopted, that would be my good fortune. It would also let people in the world and generations to come know that, in an age of peace and prosperity, words are not discarded because their speaker holds a low position. They would see how the classics are transmitted and how the Dao is put into practice. Is this not a fine thing?

Your servant Zhang An respectfully writes this preface.

Explanatory Commentary on the Dao De Jing by Emperor Huizong of Song, Volume One

Explanatory commentary written by Zhang An, a Court Gentleman for Service (an official rank)

Dao Section

御注曰:道者,人之所共由。德者,心之所自得。道者,一旦万世而无弊。德者,充一性之常存。老君当周之末,道降而德衰,故着书九九篇,以明道德之常,而谓之经。其辞简,其旨无弊。德者,充一性之常存。老君当周之末,道降而德衰,故着书九九篇,以明道德之常,而谓之经。其辞简,其旨远,学者当默识而深造之。
Interpretation

The imperial commentary says: “The Dao (the Way) is the fundamental principle that all people follow in common; De (Virtue) is the quality that people naturally experience inwardly and uphold. The Dao endures through the ages without decline, while De is a virtue that fills human nature and remains constant.

Laojun (Laozi) lived at the end of the Zhou dynasty, when the influence of the Dao had waned and De was gradually fading. He therefore wrote ninety-nine chapters to explain the enduring principles of the Dao and De, and called the work a Jing (classic). Its words are concise and its meaning profound; its value does not fade as times change. Those who study it should reflect on it attentively and investigate its principles in depth.”

臣义曰:太初有无,无有无名,命之曰道。有一未形,物得以生,命之曰德。道本无名,谓之道者,即人之所共由者而为言也。德本自得,谓之德者,即有心所同得者而为言也。惟道无垠,虚湛常存,惟道无体,微元常真,绝於有无之域,泯於彼是之居,在体为体,在用为用,天地虽大,未离乎内,秋毫虽末,待之成体。万物终始出入,未始不由於此,故谓之道,即其自心同然皆得。审乎无假,而不与物化,渊乎其居,而不与物迁,未尝蔽亏,未尝乘驰,心全乎天,而无得丧之累,故谓之德。道无体也,无体则不涉於变故,亘万世而无弊。德在我也,在我则无待於外,故充一性而得丧之累,故谓之德。道无体也,无体则不涉於变故,亘万世而无弊。德在我也,在我则无待於外,故充一性而常存。周衰文弊,天下奔驰於末流,多骈於聪明,淫僻於仁义,素朴日凿,而不能朝彻见独。留连乎荣辱之境,荡摩乎好恶之场,至於以人灭天,以故灭命,何道德之云。故老君着书九九篇,绝学返朴,复乎道纪,深根固柢州冥於泰初。以道名之常,论天地万物之始母。以有无之常,观至变至精之徼妙。复命以体神,知和以守气。道常而复乎无名,德常而至乎归朴,皆所以明道德之常也。有常而不变,故谓之经。纬则错综往来,故谓之变。经有一定之体,以体神,知和以守气。道常而复乎无名,德常而至乎归朴,皆所以明道德之常也。有常而不变,故谓之经。纬则错综往来,故谓之变。经有一定之体,常而可久之义也。言意曰辞,指意曰旨,惟载道之言,故简而当。寓道之旨,故远而明。道固不可以言传也,道固不可以旨喻也,求夫言迹之间,固非所以得道。然拾夫言边,则道又不可得而形容。惟冥於道者,契会於言意之表,合乎元一,而复乎真常,故曰默识而深造之。噫,道非有心者所能远,亦非无心者所能近,默识深造,是谓玄同。
Interpretation

I, your subject, believe that at the beginning of all things there was a “Nothing” that belonged neither to what exists nor to the nameless. We can only reluctantly call it the Dao. Before the “One” had taken visible form, all things had already received life from it; this is called De. The Dao has no name of its own. It is called “Dao” only because it is the root that all people follow together. De is something attained naturally. It is called “De” because all beings endowed with awareness receive it together.

The Dao is vast and boundless, empty, still, and clear, and it exists forever. It has no fixed form, yet is subtle and real. It transcends the distinctions between existence and nonexistence and dissolves the boundaries between one thing and another. Wherever it takes form, there is its substance; wherever it acts, there is its function. Though Heaven and Earth are vast, neither lies beyond the Dao’s reach. Even a fine autumn hair depends on the Dao to take shape. The ending and beginning, arising and vanishing of all things all come from the Dao; hence it is called the Dao.

When people examine their own nature, they see that it borrows nothing from external things and is not changed by them. Deeply still and settled, it is not moved by anything outside. Their nature has never been obscured or diminished, and it does not chase after external things. When mind and nature are fully joined, untroubled by gain or loss, this is called De. The Dao has no fixed form and is therefore untouched by change; it does not decline through the ages. De abides within oneself and so depends on nothing external. It fills a person’s nature and enables it to endure.

After the Zhou dynasty declined and the excesses of ornamentation took hold, people throughout the realm pursued trivialities, flaunted their cleverness, and pushed benevolence and righteousness to extremes. Their originally simple nature was gradually carved and polished, leaving them unable to see clearly and perceive what was true on their own. They sank into honor and disgrace and wavered between likes and dislikes. They even harmed their nature with artificial judgments and damaged their life nature with man-made customs. How, then, could they speak of the Dao and De?

Thus the Old Lord, Laozi, wrote nine chapters, urging people to abandon shallow learning and return to simplicity, restore the root of the Dao, deepen their foundation, and return to the distant Great Beginning—the state from which all things first arose. He used “Dao” to explain the constant root and discuss the source of Heaven, Earth, and all things. He also examined the constant principles of “being” and “nonbeing” to observe the subtlest mysteries within change. To return to one’s life nature is to perceive the spirit; to understand how to bring things into harmony is to preserve and nourish essence and vital energy. The Dao is constant and returns to namelessness; De is constant and returns to simplicity. All this explains the constancy of the Dao and De.

What is constant and unchanging is called a “Jing” (classic); what runs across and through, moving back and forth, is called a “Wei”—the principles of change. A Jing has a settled root and carries the sense of what is constant and enduring. Words express meaning, while the central intent is conveyed through those words. This text records teachings about the Dao, so its wording is concise and precise; it conveys the intent of the Dao, so its meaning is far-reaching and clear.

The Dao cannot be transmitted through words alone, nor explained through intent alone. Those who seek it only in written characters and spoken phrases will never truly attain it. Yet if words are set aside altogether, the Dao cannot be described. Only those who deeply accord with the Dao can grasp what lies beyond words and intent, unite with the beginning, and return to what is real and constant. Thus it is said that one must understand in silence and penetrate deeply. The Dao is not something that those who seek it deliberately can distance themselves from, nor something that those without intention can draw near to. To understand in silence and penetrate deeply is to be in union with the Dao.

道可道章第一 道可道,非常道。名可名,非有心者所能远,亦非无心者所能近,默识深造,是谓玄同。 道可道章第一 道可道,非常道。名可名,非常名。 御注曰:无始曰道,不可言,言而非也。又曰道不当名。可道可名,如事物焉,如四时焉,当可而应,代废代兴,非真常也。常道常名,自本自根,未有天地,自古以固存。伏羲氏得之,以袭气母,西王母得之,坐乎少广。莫知其始,莫知其终。臣义曰:道至虚也,寓天下之群实而不见其吵畦,故无体之可言。道至静也,对天下之群动而不涉於绪使,故无方之可名。道不可言也,托於言声之间,皆道之糟粕尔。道不可名也,寓於形器之域,皆道之筌蹄尔。可道可名,属於诸有,如事物焉,废兴新故之不停,如四时焉,旋复代谢之不一。应理适变,蹄尔。可道可名,属於诸有,如事物焉,废兴新故之不停,如四时焉,旋复代谢之不一。应理适变,各可其可,岂真常耶。真常妙本,先天地而不弊,后天地而不穷,玄冥自契,岂容声哉。伏羲得之,以袭气母,可谓既知其子,复守其母,所以会道之体也。其常道欤?西王母得之,坐乎少广,可谓既得其母,以知其子,所以契道之用也。其常名欤?常道常名,自本自根,未有天地,自古以固存,又安得以新故始终议其将?故曰莫知其终也。
Interpretation

The “Dao” that can be spoken is not the eternal, unchanging Dao; the “name” that can be named is not the eternal, unchanging name.

The Imperial Commentary says: “The Dao has existed since before any beginning and cannot be explained in words. Once spoken, it is no longer the Dao itself. Nor should the Dao be named. Things that can be described and named, like the myriad things and the four seasons, change with the times: they rise and decline, and are not constant. The truly constant Dao and name are rooted in themselves. They existed before Heaven and Earth took shape and have never ceased, from ancient times to the present. Fuxi, the legendary ruler of high antiquity, attained the Dao and thereby received the source from which the myriad things come into being and change. The Queen Mother of the West, an immortal in Daoist legend, attained the Dao and sat peacefully in the land of Shaoguang. The Dao has no known beginning and no known end.”

Minister Yi’s explanation says: The Dao is utterly empty, yet contains all the real things under Heaven without revealing distinctions among them; for this reason, it cannot be described by any concrete form. The Dao is utterly still. Though all things under Heaven are in motion, it is not drawn along by their disorder; for this reason, it cannot be defined by a fixed direction or name. The Dao cannot be spoken of; what language and sound can convey is only a rough remnant of it. The Dao cannot be named; what falls within the bounds of concrete forms and objects is only a means or clue for knowing it.

Whatever can be described and named belongs to the realm of concrete existence. Like the myriad things, such things continually replace the old with the new and rise and decline without end. Like the four seasons, they cycle and change without cease. They shift with circumstances and principles, each serving its own purpose. How could any of them be truly constant?

The subtle, constant Dao does not decline before Heaven and Earth, nor is it exhausted after them. It is deep and mysterious, and can only be understood inwardly. How could it be expressed in sound? Fuxi attained the Dao and received the source from which the myriad things come into being and change. We may say that he recognized the things brought forth by the Dao while holding fast to their source; thus he grasped the Dao’s essence. This is the constant Dao. The Queen Mother of the West attained the Dao and sat peacefully in Shaoguang. We may say that she mastered the Dao’s source and understood the myriad things it manifests; thus she accorded with the Dao’s function. This is the constant name. The constant Dao and name are rooted in themselves and existed before Heaven and Earth appeared. Since this is so, how could they be measured by the old and the new, or by beginning and end? Hence it is said that no one knows when the Dao will end.

无名,天地之始。有名,万物之母。 御注曰:道常无名,天地亦待是而后生,《庄子》所谓生天生地是也。未有天地,孰得而名之?故无名为天地之。有名,万物之母。 御注曰:道常无名,天地亦待是而后生,《庄子》所谓生天生地是也。未有天地,孰得而名之?故无名为天地之始。有天地然后万物生焉, 故有名为万物之母。 臣义曰:泰初有无,无有无名,故无名者,气之始也,天地得我以生者也,故为天地之始。有一而有名,一生二,二生三,三生万物,故有名者,数之起也,万物得我以成者也,故为万物之母。以其气始谓之始,以其生生谓之母。 常无,欲以观其妙。常有,欲以观其徼。 御注曰:《庄子》曰:建之以常无有。不立一物,兹谓常无。不废一物,兹谓常有。常无在理,
Interpretation

“Nameless” describes the state in which Heaven and Earth first began to take shape; “having a name” is the source from which the myriad things grow.

The Imperial Commentary says that the Dao has never had a fixed name, and that Heaven and Earth came into being by relying on the Dao. This is what Zhuangzi means by saying, “The Dao gave birth to Heaven and gave birth to Earth.” Before Heaven and Earth appeared, who could have named them? Hence “nameless” is called the beginning of Heaven and Earth. Only after Heaven and Earth took shape could the myriad things gradually grow, so “having a name” is the mother of the myriad things.

The Minister’s Commentary explains that at the time of the Great Beginning there was “nothing”: no concrete things and no names. Thus “nameless” refers to the beginning of Qi, and because Heaven and Earth came into being by relying on the Dao, it is called their beginning. Once “One” appeared, names and categories came into being. From One came Two, from Two came Three, and from Three the myriad things were born. Thus “having a name” is the beginning of number. The myriad things took shape by relying on the Dao, so it is called their mother. In terms of Qi’s beginning, it is called “beginning”; in terms of its ceaseless generation of the myriad things, it is called “mother.”

To remain constantly in the state of “nothing” is to observe the Dao’s subtle essence; to remain constantly in the state of “being” is to observe the boundaries and signs through which things appear.

The Imperial Commentary quotes Zhuangzi’s phrase, “Take constant nothing and being as your foundation.” To establish no particular thing is called “constant nothing”; to discard no thing is called “constant being.” “Constant nothing” belongs to the realm of principle,

御注曰:《庄子》曰:建之以常无有。不立一物,兹谓常无。不废一物,兹谓常有。常无在理,其上不徼,天下之至精也,故观其妙。常有在事,其下不昧,天下之至变也,故观其徼。有无二境,徼妙寓焉。大智并观,乃无不可。恍惚之中,有象与物。小智自私,蔽於一曲,弃有着空,徇末忘本,道术於是为天下裂。臣义曰:在有而无,谓之常无,非空绝之无,见无於有尔。而物物皆空,故曰不立一物,乃真常之无也。即无而有,谓之常有,非物色之有也,见有於无尔。而物物具在,故曰不废一物,乃真常之有也。常无冥於一致之理,藏天下之至精常之无也。即无而有,谓之常有,非物色之有也,见有於无尔。而物物具在,故曰不废一物,乃真常之有也。常无冥於一致之理,藏天下之至精,贯通是非,混一今古。常无而不堕於无,故可以观妙。常有应於方来之事,对天下之至变,时物终始,形器变化,错出无穷,纷然不一。常有而不滞於有,故可以观徼。即有无之境,有 徼妙之观。然徼妙岂即夫有无所能尽观也哉?亦曰即其常无常有欲以观尔。大智达观有无本末,泯於忘言之域,是谓要妙。
Interpretation

In his imperial commentary, Emperor Huizong of the Song quotes the Zhuangzi: “Constant nonbeing” and “constant being” can serve as the basis for discussion. To establish nothing as fixed is called “constant nonbeing”; to discard nothing is called “constant being.” “Constant nonbeing” points to the principle behind things. Its depths are not constrained by outward traces; it is the most subtle essence under Heaven, and through it one can observe the mystery of the hidden and subtle. “Constant being” takes shape in particular things. Its manifestations are clear, and it is the aspect of the world that undergoes the most change; through it one can observe the traces of things. Being and nonbeing are two realms, within which both the hidden and the traces are present. A person of great wisdom can observe both sides and so nothing is beyond their understanding. Even amid the elusive and indistinct, images and things are still contained. Those of lesser wisdom are confined by personal biases: they see only one side, reject being and cling to emptiness, pursue the minutiae and forget the root. Thus the arts of the Dao split into opposing doctrines.

Zhang’an explains: to dwell in “being” while discerning “nonbeing” is called “constant nonbeing.” This does not mean extinguishing everything into emptiness; it means seeing nonbeing within being. Since nothing among the myriad things has a fixed, unchanging self-nature, this is called “establishing no thing.” This is true constant nonbeing. When being becomes manifest from nonbeing, it is called “constant being.” This does not refer to the being of concrete forms; it means seeing being within nonbeing. Since the myriad things continue to exist in their own ways, this is called “discarding no thing.” This is true constant being.

“Constant nonbeing” accords with the principle by which the myriad things are one. It contains the most subtle essence under Heaven and can bring right and wrong into accord and unite past and present. Though called nonbeing, it does not fall into emptiness, and so it can be used to observe the mystery of the hidden and subtle. “Constant being,” in turn, responds to the many things about to occur and faces the myriad changes under Heaven: things begin and end, forms and implements continually change, and their intricate variety is endless and never the same. Though called being, it does not become fixed in being, and so it can be used to observe outward traces.

Being and nonbeing are two realms; the hidden and the traces are ways of observing them. Yet the hidden and the traces cannot exhaust being and nonbeing. Here, one simply uses “constant nonbeing” and “constant being” as means of observation. Great wisdom can view being and nonbeing, root and branch, as a whole, and ultimately transcend distinctions made through words, returning to what cannot be spoken. This is the subtle essence.

“These two arise together, though their names differ; both may be called the mysterious.” Emperor Huizong’s imperial commentary says: The Dao manifests as constant nonbeing and constant being, through which people observe. Great wisdom can view being and nonbeing, root and branch, as a whole, and ultimately transcend distinctions made through words. This is the subtle essence.

此两者同出而异名,同谓之玄。 御注曰:道其常无常有欲以观尔。大智达观有无本末,泯於忘言之域,是谓要妙。 此两者同出而异名,同谓之玄。 御注曰:道本无相,孰为徼妙?物我同根,是非一气,故同谓之玄。世之惑者,舍妄求真,去真益远,殊不知有无者,特名之异尔。 臣义曰:道以常无为体,以妙有为用,宝尔无相,孰观徼妙。物我复乎造化之原,是非混於冲虚之气,离形去智,有无都泯,故同谓之玄。在无而有,在有而无,所谓两者同也。有无相生,而有无之辨着,此出而异名也。玄之为色,赤且黑,於其方曰朔日北之类,皆合两者故也。通夫有无而同於一,乃可以语道。 玄之又玄,众妙之门。 御注曰:《素问》曰:玄北之类,皆合两者故也。通夫有无而同於一,乃可以语道。 玄之又玄,众妙之门。 御注曰:《素问》曰:玄生神。《易》曰:神也者,妙万物而为言者也。妙而小之谓玄,玄者天之色。色之所色者彰矣,而色色者未尝显。玄之又玄,所谓色色者也。玄妙之理,万物具有,天之所以运,地之所以处,人之所以灵,百物之所以昌,皆妙也,而皆出於玄,故曰众妙之门。孔子作《易》,至《说卦》然后言妙,而老氏以此首篇,圣人之言,相为终始。
Interpretation

“Both of these” come from the Dao, yet have different names. They can both be called “mysterious” (xuan): profound and subtle, beyond description.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao originally has no form. How, then, can we clearly explain its manifest aspect and its hidden, subtle aspect? The myriad things and I share one source, and right and wrong alike arise through transformations of the same primordial Qi. Thus both are called “mysterious.” Those in the world who are deluded abandon what is false in pursuit of what is true, only to move ever farther from the truth. They do not know that “being” and “nonbeing” differ only in name.

The minister’s commentary says: The Dao takes “constant nonbeing” as its substance and “wondrous being” as its function. If we treasure the Dao formless and without appearance, how can we distinguish and observe its manifest and hidden aspects? The myriad things and I return to the source of creation, while right and wrong alike dissolve into the empty, subtle Qi. Once form and cleverness are forgotten, being and nonbeing both disappear; thus both are called “mysterious.” The Dao contains being within nonbeing, and in being returns to nonbeing: this is what is meant by “both come from the same source.” Being and nonbeing generate one another, and their distinctions appear in relation to each other: this is what is meant by “they come from the same source yet have different names.” The color called xuan is a mixture of red and black; in terms of direction, the north belongs to xuan. These are all ways of expressing the union of the two. Only when one understands being and nonbeing and knows that they return to unity can one speak of the Dao.

“Mysterious upon mysterious: the gateway from which the many wonders emerge.”

The Imperial Commentary says: The Suwen says, “The mysterious gives birth to spirit.” The Yijing says that “spirit” refers to the power that brings forth the wondrous transformations of all things. What is wondrous and subtle is called xuan; xuan is also the color of Heaven. The visible color has already appeared, but the source that makes color what it is has never appeared. “Mysterious upon mysterious” refers to this invisible source. The wondrous principle of the Dao exists within all things: Heaven moves in its course, Earth rests in its place, human beings possess spiritual awareness, and the myriad things flourish. All of these are wondrous functions, and all arise from the mysterious; hence it is called “the gateway of all wonders.” Confucius, in composing the Yijing, speaks of the wondrous only in the Discussion of the Trigrams. Laozi, by contrast, discusses this principle at the very beginning of the Dao De Jing. The words of these two sages echo one another and are mutually connected.

臣义曰:天肇一於北,玄之同也,地耦二於南,神之出也。神以玄生,玄以神妙,同夫有无,混然无间,所谓玄也,玄之又玄,玄亦至矣,神由是出,灵由是着,妙万物而无方,此天地所以神明,圣人所以无为而为。而人之灵,,同夫有无,混然无间,所谓玄也,玄之又玄,玄亦至矣,神由是出,灵由是着,妙万物而无方,此天地所以神明,圣人所以无为而为。而人之灵,物之昌,皆尽其妙,而妙皆出於玄,故曰众妙之门。孔子作《易》,托象数以示神,故至《说卦》然后言妙。老子同有无以示玄,故以首篇言之。神生於玄,而玄为众妙之所自出,故终始之序如此。 天下皆知章第二 天下皆知美之为美,斯恶已。皆知善之为善,斯不善已。
Interpretation

In my view, Heaven begins with “One” in the north. This expresses the unity of the Mysterious (Xuan) and the Same. Earth joins as “Two” in the south, and from this the wondrous workings of spirit become manifest. Spirit arises from the Mysterious, while the Mysterious is made wondrous through spirit. The Mysterious brings being and nonbeing together as one, without any division; this is what is meant by “the Mysterious.” When its mystery reaches its utmost, spirit emerges and its numinous subtlety shines forth. It enables each of the myriad things to reveal its own wondrous qualities, yet has no fixed form or location. This is the origin of the divine luminosity of Heaven and Earth, and the reason the sage can follow nature, seeming to act without action while still accomplishing things.

Human spiritual awareness and the flourishing of the myriad things likewise each fully reveal their wondrous qualities. Since these workings all arise from the Mysterious, it is called “the gateway to the many wonders.” Confucius composed the Changes, using hexagrams and numbers to reveal the principles of spiritual wonder; accordingly, the discussion of the wondrous appears only in the “Discussion of the Trigrams” chapter. Laozi, by contrast, reveals the Mysterious by bringing being and nonbeing together, and so speaks of it from the very beginning. Spirit arises from the Mysterious, which is also the source of the many wondrous workings; this is why the book is arranged in this order, from beginning to end.

Chapter Two: All Under Heaven Knows

When everyone under Heaven knows beauty as beauty, ugliness appears. When everyone knows goodness as goodness, what is not good appears.

御注曰:道无异相,孰为美恶?性本一致,孰为善否?有美也,恶为之对,故曰:天下皆知美之为美,斯恶已。有善也,不善为之对,故曰:皆知曰:道无异相,孰为美恶?性本一致,孰为善否?有美也,恶为之对,故曰:天下皆知美之为美,斯恶已。有善也,不善为之对,故曰:皆知善之为善,斯不善已。世之所美者为神奇,所恶者为臭腐,神奇复化为臭腐,臭腐复化为神奇,则美与恶奚辨?昔之所是,今或非之,今之所弃,后或用之,则善与不善奚择?圣人体真无而常有,即妙用而常无,美恶善否,盖将简之而弗得,尚何恶与不善之能累哉?
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong explained, “The Dao has no fixed, unchanging form. How, then, could there be absolute beauty or ugliness? Human nature is the same at its root. How, then, could there be absolute good or evil? Once we speak of ‘beauty,’ ‘ugliness’ appears as its counterpart. Thus, when people throughout the world recognize what is beautiful, its opposite—ugliness—arises as well. Once we speak of ‘goodness,’ ‘not good’ appears as its counterpart. Thus, when people throughout the world recognize what is good, what is not good is distinguished as well.

What people regard as marvelous and beautiful may later decay into something loathsome; what has decayed may, in turn, change back into something marvelous and beautiful. If so, how can beauty and ugliness be distinguished? What was once considered right may now be considered wrong; what is rejected today may later be taken up again. Since judgments change with time, how can one choose between good and what is not good?

The sage has grasped the truth of ‘Nothingness’ and ‘Being’: abiding always in emptiness, yet able to bring forth the myriad things; skillfully making use of the myriad things, yet keeping the heart-mind rooted in quiet emptiness. Faced with distinctions between beauty and ugliness, good and evil, the sage seeks a fixed standard but finds none. If so, what ugliness, evil, or lack of goodness could entangle the sage?”

臣义曰:道本无物,孰有异相?涉乎美恶,有相之异。性本玄同,孰有二致?丽乎善不,其致不一。古人复乎道初,冥於天性,适然自得,而各安其所得,莫然自为,而各宜其所为。何以知为也?纯浇朴散,离道而向於物,去性而从於心,知之以心,而取合以情,不信性命,而荡於私欲,故美恶善否,代为之对,何有已耶。物之神奇臭腐,系?纯浇朴散,离道而向於物,去性而从於心,知之以心,而取合以情,不信性命,而荡於私欲,故美恶善否,代为之对,何有已耶。物之神奇臭腐,系夫世之美恶尔。迭徙於化,适可者贵。则美恶果何辨哉?理之是非用舍,系夫世之善否尔。绿几之会,应时为当则善不善果何择哉?且情见在人其知不同,各徇其私,而相为彼我,则美之与恶,善之与不善,其环无穷矣。圣人物我玄同,有无俱泯,离对疑独,不容声矣。季咸若神,而壶子不得而相,则美恶善不善何所能累?玄珠之遗,而使知索之不得何复事知? 无之相生,难易之相成,长短之相形,高而壶子不得而相,则美恶善不善何所能累?玄珠之遗,而使知索之不得何复事知? 无之相生,难易之相成,长短之相形,高下之相倾,音声之相和,前后之相随。
Interpretation

My minister explained: The Dao (the Way) has no fixed form to begin with, so how could it have different appearances? Differences in appearance emerge only when things are divided into beautiful and ugly. Human nature is originally subtle and the same in everyone, so how could there be two different destinations? Only when people incline toward good or bad do their paths diverge.

The ancients returned to the Dao’s original state. They followed their nature and lived naturally, each content with what they had received. Without deliberately arranging their actions, they all acted as was fitting. Why was this so? Because, over time, simplicity gradually faded and original purity dispersed. People turned away from the Dao and toward external things, abandoning their nature to follow private desires. They used the mind to understand things, then relied on emotion to choose among them. They did not trust the principles of life and nature they were born with, but let private desires run unchecked. Thus beauty and ugliness, goodness and badness, took turns opposing one another. Where could such arguments ever end?

Whether the things of the world are regarded as marvelous or foul depends only on how society views beauty and ugliness. Things change and are replaced; whatever suits the needs of the time is valued. How, then, can beauty and ugliness be distinguished with certainty? Whether a principle is judged right or wrong, adopted or rejected, also depends on how society views goodness and badness. If whatever suits the time is considered appropriate, why insist on distinguishing good from bad?

People’s emotions differ, and so do their understandings. Each person looks only to their own position and draws a line between “self” and “other,” so distinctions between beauty and ugliness, goodness and badness go on without end. The sage, however, sees self and other as one undivided whole. The distinction between being and nonbeing dissolves; no longer trapped by opposites, the sage returns to the Dao’s solitary, tranquil realm, where even words are unnecessary.

Ji Xian, the shaman skilled in reading faces, seemed to possess supernatural powers, yet could not see through Huzi, the Dao cultivator in the Zhuangzi. How, then, could beauty and ugliness, good and evil, bind him? When the dark pearl of the parable was lost, sending a wise man to search for it did not help. This shows why one need not cling to cleverness.

Nonbeing and being appear through one another; difficulty and ease bring one another about; long and short take shape through comparison; high and low stand in relation to each other; tones and sounds answer one another; what comes before is followed by what comes after.

御注曰:太易未判,万象同体。两仪既生,物物为对。此六对者,群变所交,百虑所生,殊涂所起,世之人所以陷溺而不能自出者也。无动而生有,有复归无,故曰有无之相生。有涉险之难,则知行地之易,故曰难易之相成。长短之相形,若尺寸是也。高下之相倾,若山泽是也。声举而响应,故曰音声之相和。形动而影从,故曰前后之相随。阴阳之运,四时之行,万物之理,俄造而有, 倏化而无。其难也,若有为以经世。其易也,若无为而适己。性长非所断,性理,俄造而有,

No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.

倏化而无。其难也,若有为以经世。其易也,若无为而适己。性长非所断,性短非所续,天之自高,地之自下,鼓宫而宫动,鼓角而角应,春先而夏从,长先而少从,对待之境,虽皆道之所寓,而去道远矣。臣义曰:气者,道之所运。物者,气之所化。气冥於无,虚而常通,其有见也,得而像之,故谓之象。阐道乎太易,而象帝之所出,以无授万物之气,以有成万物之形,气散乎泰始,而为阴阳。形离乎泰初,而为天地。气变之极,形之所化,山岳之止,海川之流,五材之着用,群物之名言,其理其形,其声其数,行流散徙,出入生死,凡涉丽於形器之间,此六对者,更出迭入,而不能自止。世之人认而有之,与接为构,以妄为常,相刃而交相伤,相靡而交相溃更出迭入,而不能自止。世之人认而有之,与接为构,以妄为常,相刃而交相伤,相靡而交相溃,薾然疲役,而不知所归,所以陷溺於转徙之流,而不能自出也。凡天下之可名者,未尝无偶也,有无也,难易也,长短也,高下也,声音之相和也,前后之相随也,皆其理之必然也。凡天下之可名者,莫不皆尔,而未始独立也。然则由美而有恶,由善而有不善,固其理也。六对之境,虽皆道之寓,而妙用之所托宿,然役於绪使,出离乎道,可谓远矣,又安得以语道?

No English interpretation of this passage is available yet. The Chinese source text is shown above; a translation will be added later.

是以圣人处无为之事,行不言之教。 御注曰:处无为之事,《庄子》所谓无为而用天下也。行不言之教,《易》所谓以神道设教而天下服也。为则有成为之事,《庄子》所谓无为而用天下也。行不言之教,《易》所谓以神道设教而天下服也。为则有成亏,言则有当愆,曾未免乎累,岂圣人所以独立於万物之上,化万物而物之所不能累欤? 臣义曰:事之方来,我为之对,不可不为也。见於有为,则理有成亏,物之适至,我为之辨,则不可无言也。见於有言,则理有当愆,涉於有为有言之域,则孰能忘累。圣人独立万物之上,事之所处,教之所行,而天下因得以返常复朴。玄同是非,不为美恶善不善之辨,彼六对者,无自而扰,故未始有言为之累也。万物作而不辞,生而不有,为而不恃,功成不居,可谓无为而用天下者也。故日处无为之事。不尚贤,不贵难得之货,不见可欲,可谓以神道设教,而天下服也,故曰行不言之教。 万物作而不辞,生而不有,为而不恃为之事。不尚贤,不贵难得之货,不见可欲,可谓以神道设教,而天下服也,故曰行不言之教。 万物作而不辞,生而不有,为而不恃,功成不居。夫惟不居,是以不去。
Interpretation

Therefore, the sage handles affairs through Wuwei (non-action) and carries out teachings without relying on words.

The Emperor’s commentary says: “Handling affairs through non-action” is what the Zhuangzi means by “being non-active while putting the whole world to use.” “Carrying out teachings without words” is what the Yijing means by “using the way of spiritual illumination to teach, so that the world will submit.” If one acts with deliberate intent, there will be success and failure, gain and loss. If one speaks, one cannot avoid saying what is fitting or unfitting, and so becoming entangled. The sage stands above all things, teaches them, yet is not entangled by them. How could he be caught up in such entanglements as ordinary people are?

A minister’s commentary explains: When affairs come before the sage, he must respond; he cannot simply do nothing in every case. But if he clings to deliberate action, affairs will have their successes and failures. When things come before him, they also need to be examined; he cannot refrain from speaking altogether. But if he clings to speech, he cannot avoid sometimes saying what is fitting and sometimes what is not. As long as one is caught up in deliberate action and deliberate speech, who can avoid becoming entangled?

The sage stands above all things, handles affairs well, and puts teachings into practice, enabling the people of the world to return to the constant Dao and recover their unspoiled simplicity. He accords with the mysterious Dao, without clinging to distinctions between right and wrong or to judgments of beauty and ugliness, good and evil. In this way, oppositions such as success and failure, gain and loss, right and wrong, beauty and ugliness, and good and evil cannot disturb him. He is therefore not entangled by speech or action.

The sage does not obstruct the growth and transformation of the myriad things. He lets them grow without claiming them as his own; he acts without relying on his achievements; when things are accomplished, he takes no credit. This is “being non-active while putting the whole world to use.” Hence it is said, “handling affairs through non-action.”

Not honoring those deemed worthy, not valuing rare goods, and not deliberately displaying things that can stir desire: this is to teach through the way of spiritual illumination, so that the world will submit. Hence it is said, “carrying out teachings without words.”

The myriad things arise, and he does not obstruct them. He lets them grow without possessing them, acts without relying on his achievements, and takes no credit when things are accomplished. Precisely because he takes no credit, his achievements do not depart.

御注曰:万物并作,随感而应,若鉴对形,妍丑毕现。若谷应声,美恶皆赴,无所辞也。故曰:作而不辞。自形自化,自生自色,各极其高大,而遂其性,孰有之哉?故曰生而不有。整万物而不为戾,泽及万世而不为仁,覆载天地,雕刻众形,而不为巧,故曰为而不恃。四时之运,功成者去,天之道也。圣人体之,故功盖天下,而似不自己,认而有之,亦已惑矣,故曰功成不居。有居则有去,古今是也。在己无居,物莫能迁,适来时也,适去顺也,何加损焉?故曰夫惟不居,是以不去。臣义曰:圣人迫而后动,不得已而后起,故不从事於务,物来则应,应而不穷,而系累居,是以不去。臣义曰:圣人迫而后动,不得已而后起,故不从事於务,物来则应,应而不穷,而系累於当时,不留情乎既往,因时乘理,惟变所适,如天运寒暑,付之自然,而心无积怨想方。万物之并作也,作其自作,夫复何辞?随感而应,何容心哉?若镒对形,不将不迎,应而不藏。若谷应声,不扬不抑,洪纤不遗,故曰万物作而不辞。一气之所运,大巧之所范,其生出有次,其终始有序,动静语默,劳乎天机之所役,精神心卫,萌乎气机之所作。天与之形,散於万殊,其运,大巧之所范,其生出有次,其终始有序,动静语默,劳乎天机之所役,精神心卫,萌乎气机之所作。天与之形,散於万殊,其化不同,其生不一,其体之别,其色之异,各极其量,而遂其自然,且莫知其所以然也。认而有之,孰能生生,故曰生而不有。无为而为,虽为而我何恃也。功成於天,虽成而我何居也。有我则有居,在己无居,则物莫能迁,有居则转徙不常矣。故曰为而不恃,功成不居,居而有之,天下所不与也,不居而有,天下所不去也,故曰夫惟不居,是以不去。
Interpretation

All things arise together and respond in their own ways when they encounter different influences. It is like a mirror reflecting forms: the beautiful and the ugly alike appear. It is also like an empty valley echoing sounds: pleasing and unpleasant sounds alike resound. Neither the mirror nor the valley rejects anything. Thus, when all things arise, the Dao neither refuses them nor interferes.

All things reveal their forms, undergo change, receive life and color, and develop to the full extent suited to each of them, fulfilling their own nature. But who can say that they created and possess all this themselves? Thus, the Dao gives life to and nurtures all things, yet does not claim them as its own.

The Dao brings all things into their proper order without violating their nature. Its benevolence extends through all ages, yet it does not call itself benevolent. It covers and supports Heaven and Earth and shapes the forms of all things, yet does not boast of its skill. Thus, it acts, yet does not rely on its achievements.

The seasons move in turn: when one has completed its work, it gives way to the next. This is the Way of Heaven. The sage follows this example. His achievements extend throughout the world, yet seem not to come from him. To regard them as his own and claim them for himself is to be deluded. Thus, when the work is done, he does not take credit for it. If one takes credit, there will come a day when it is lost; this is a constant principle from ancient times to the present. When the heart does not cling to achievement, external things cannot unsettle it. When something arrives, he responds to the moment; when it departs, he lets it go. Why should this add or subtract anything? Thus, precisely because he does not take credit, his achievements are not lost.

The minister’s commentary says: The sage acts only after circumstances have moved him, and takes action only when there is no alternative; he does not pursue affairs of his own accord. When matters arise, he responds to them. His response does not exhaust him, nor does he become entangled in the affairs of the moment or cling to what has already passed. He follows the occasion and the order of things, adjusting as circumstances change. It is like Heaven’s passage through cold and heat: he lets things follow their natural course, storing up in his heart neither resentment nor delusion.

All things arise in their own way: they arise of themselves, so what is there to refuse? When they encounter an influence, they respond; what need is there for deliberate thought? It is like a mirror reflecting forms: it does not go out to meet them or deliberately send them away. It reflects, yet does not retain their images. It is also like an empty valley echoing sounds: it does not deliberately raise or lower them. Whether a sound is loud or faint, it can be heard. Thus, when all things arise, the Dao does not refuse them.

The movement of all things is driven by Qi (vital energy) and follows the natural Great Way of Heaven and Earth. The birth of each thing has its order, and each beginning and end has its pattern. Movement or stillness, speech or silence—all are governed by the workings of Heaven, the principles of natural operation. The spirit and the mind, too, arise from the movements of Qi. Heaven and Earth give form to all things, dividing them into myriad different shapes. Their transformations differ, their forms of life vary, and their bodies and colors are not alike. Each develops to the extent it can reach, following its natural course, yet no one knows why things are as they are. If the life of all things were claimed as one’s own achievement, who could truly create and sustain life? Thus, the Dao gives life to and nurtures all things, yet does not claim them as its own.

To act in accordance with nature: even when one acts, what is there to rely on or boast of? Achievement is brought about by the Way of Heaven; even when the work is complete, what is there to claim as one’s own? When the heart holds to an “I,” it will want to possess the achievement. If one does not cling to taking credit, external things cannot unsettle one. If one clings to achievement, one will be in constant flux. Thus, one acts without self-reliance, and when the work is done, one takes no credit. If one takes credit and claims the achievement as one’s own, the people of the world will not acknowledge it. If one takes no credit and lets the achievement belong to the world, the people of the world cannot make it disappear. Thus, precisely because one does not take credit, the achievement is not lost.

不尚贤章第三 不尚天下所不与也,不居而有,天下所不去也,故曰夫惟不居,是以不去。 不尚贤章第三 不尚贤,使民不争。不贵难得之货,使民不为盗。御注曰:尚贤则多知,至於天下大骇,儒墨毕起。贵货则多欲,至於正昼为盗,日中穴阡。不尚贤,则民各定其性命之分,而无所夸跂,故曰不争。不贵货,则民各安其性命之情,而无所觊觎,故日不为盗。《庄子》曰:削曾史之行,钳杨墨之口,而天下之德始玄同矣。《旅美》曰:不贵异物,贱用物,民乃足。臣义曰:圣人之在宥天下也,举灭其贼心,而进其独志,故性正,而天下之德始玄同矣。《旅美》曰:不贵异物,贱用物,民乃足。臣义曰:圣人之在宥天下也,举灭其贼心,而进其独志,故性正而不流,情防而不驰,安於性而将与道同,复制乎情而将与天同理,故嗥然归於自得之场,熙然乐於无事之域。三代之后,道不足以胜欲,静不足以制动,摩利害於荣辱之途,逐夸靡於形体之外,故君子泥道执有,矜揽贤行,而慕尚忘己。小人背道返驰,贾售贵货,而徇逐失身。彼以贤尚,而鄙我之不己若,我以彼胜,而忿己之不我胜,此所以起争也。彼以货贵,胜我也所无,我以彼矜,而嫉彼之所有,此所以起盗也鄙我之不己若,我以彼胜,而忿己之不我胜,此所以起争也。彼以货贵,胜我也所无,我以彼矜,而嫉彼之所有,此所以起盗也,故名者争之端,利者盗之起。向於名者,失於徇外,耽於利者,丧於逐末,故不尚贤,则民无夸跋,不贵货,则民无觊觎。夸跂之心忘,则何争之有。觊觎之望息,何盗之有。削曾史之行,钳扬墨之口,则言行不立,是非俱泯,而德性同於初,故曰不尚贤,使民不争。不贵异物,则民不失常。不贱用物,则民不背本,故民乃足。民足则不为盗,故曰不贵难得之货,使民不为盗。
Interpretation

If those whom the world calls virtuous and capable are not exalted, the people will not compete with one another. If rare and precious goods are not prized, the people will not steal. It is said that “when nothing is claimed as one’s own, the world will not abandon it.” Thus: “Precisely because one does not possess, one does not lose.”

Chapter Three: Do Not Exalt the Worthy

Not exalting the worthy can keep the people from competing for fame and profit; not valuing rare and precious goods can keep them from stealing.

The imperial commentary says: Exalting the worthy leads people to pursue reputation and sharpen their cleverness, stirring the world and giving rise to many competing schools of thought. Valuing precious goods fuels desire, until some people steal in broad daylight. If the worthy are not exalted, the people each keep to their proper place and no longer boast of themselves or compare themselves with others, so they do not fight. If precious goods are not valued, the people can be content with their own lives and will not develop unreasonable desires, so they do not steal.

The Zhuangzi says: “Remove the displays of virtue associated with Zeng Shen and Shi Qiu, and seal the mouths of disputants such as Yang Zhu and Mo Di; then the virtue of all under Heaven can return to a deep and unified state.” The Lümei says: “If unusual objects are not prized and ordinary useful things are not despised, the people will be content.”

The minister’s commentary says: When the sage governs the world, he dispels people’s intent to harm one another and nurtures each person’s inborn nature. In this way, human nature is set aright, and the virtue of all under Heaven can return to unity. The sage keeps people from straying from their nature in pursuit of external things, and from letting their desires run unchecked. When people rest in their own nature, they draw near to the Dao; when they restrain their desires, they accord with the workings of Heaven’s Dao. Thus they can be at ease and live joyfully in a state free from disturbance.

After the Three Dynasties, virtue was no longer strong enough to overcome desire, and tranquility no longer sufficient to restrain agitation. People schemed over fame and gain, and pursued extravagance in appearance and material pleasures. Gentlemen clung to names for the Dao and fixated on particular things, imagining they could seize a reputation for worthiness; they envied others and forgot themselves. Lesser people turned away from what is right, traded in precious goods, and pursued profit at the cost of losing themselves.

When someone sees another person honored, they may resent being less esteemed; when they surpass someone else, they may grow angry that the other person falls short. This is how rivalry begins. Seeing another person possess precious goods can stir envy and a desire to claim them as one’s own. This is how theft begins. Fame is therefore the beginning of rivalry, and profit the cause of theft. Those who pursue fame become wholly intent on pleasing external things; those who are absorbed in profit lose what is fundamental while chasing what is trivial.

If the worthy are not exalted, the people will not boast or compare themselves with one another. If precious goods are not valued, the people will not give rise to covetous desires. Once the impulse to compare disappears, where could rivalry arise? Once the desire to covet subsides, where could theft arise? Remove the displays of virtue associated with Zeng Shen and Shi Qiu, and quiet the disputation associated with Yang Zhu and Mo Di: then displays in word and deed will no longer stand, disputes over right and wrong will also fade away, and human virtue can return to its original state.

If unusual objects are not prized, the people will not lose the constant Dao; if ordinary useful things are not despised, they will not turn away from what is fundamental, and so they can be content. When the people are content, they will not steal. This is the meaning of “not valuing rare and precious goods can keep the people from stealing.”

不见可欲,使心不乱。 御注曰:人之有欲,次性命之情以争之,而攘夺诞谩,无所不至。伯夷见名之可欲,饿於首阳之下。盗跖见利之可欲,暴於东陵之上。其热焦火,其寒凝冰,故其心则情乱偾骄,而不可系道。至於圣人者,夷见名之可欲,饿於首阳之下。盗跖见利之可欲,暴於东陵之上。其热焦火,其寒凝冰,故其心则情乱偾骄,而不可系道。至於圣人者,不就利,不违害,不乐寿,不哀夭,不荣通,不丑穷,则孰为可欲?欲虑不萌,吾心湛然,有感斯应,止而无所碍,动而无所逐也,孰能乱之?孔子四十而不惑,孟子曰:我四十不动心。臣义曰:静而不变,返冥於一德,同乎泰初,神凝於太虚,气葆乎冲和,视物之在天下者,曾不足以摇吾之天宇,其心休休焉。彼昧者,五綦交战,而好恶之私荡其情,六凿相攘,而取拾之情流於伪。目之妄见,意之妄不足以摇吾之天宇,其心休休焉。彼昧者,五綦交战,而好恶之私荡其情,六凿相攘,而取拾之情流於伪。目之妄见,意之妄欲,日斗其心於接构之间,故心为之愦,而天理去矣。伯夷、盗跖,卒死饿暴者,见名利之可欲尔。焦火之热,凝冰之寒,蕲向得失,愦乱若此,夺於可欲尔。孔子之不惑,孟子之不动心,知其无可欲,故不惑不动,何乱之有?
Interpretation

Once people have desires, they struggle over their lives and their innate nature, resorting to plunder, deception, and every kind of wrongdoing. Bo Yi believed that fame was worth pursuing and ultimately starved to death at the foot of Mount Shouyang. Robber Zhi believed that profit was worth pursuing and ran rampant around Dongling, committing crimes. Their feelings at times burned like a fierce fire, at times froze like ice. Their emotions were disordered and arrogant, so they could not accord with the Dao.

Sages neither chase after profit nor flee from misfortune. They do not rejoice in long life or grieve over an early death; they do not regard high status as an honor or poverty as a disgrace. In that case, what could they regard as something they must obtain? When desires and calculations do not arise in the heart, the mind becomes clear and calm. It can respond to whatever occurs, remain free of obstruction in stillness, and act without being pulled along by external things. What could disturb it?

At forty, Confucius reached the state of being “free from perplexity,” and Mencius likewise said that after forty his resolve no longer wavered. Chen Yi explains: the mind is still and does not change, returning to the deep, undivided De and aligning with the Great Beginning—the primal state before Heaven and Earth had separated. The spirit settles in the Great Void, the vast and empty realm, while the breath is nurtured in balanced harmony. Looking upon all things under Heaven, nothing is enough to shake the world within; the mind remains at ease, open, and untroubled.

The ignorant, by contrast, are pulled about by the turmoil of the five senses, while personal likes and dislikes stir their emotions. The six openings of the mind—the channels through which it perceives external things—contend with one another, and thoughts of pursuit and rejection become false. The eyes look recklessly, and the mind gives rise to desires without restraint. Every day, people struggle amid their encounters and entanglements with external things. Their hearts grow confused, and the natural order recedes.

Bo Yi and Robber Zhi ended their lives in opposite ways—one starving to death, the other living violently—because each regarded fame or profit as worth pursuing. Chasing gain and fearing loss makes people burn as though scorched by fire or freeze as though trapped in ice; their spirits become confused because desire has taken control. Confucius was free from perplexity and Mencius’s heart did not waver because they understood that no external thing was worth clinging to or pursuing. So they were neither perplexed nor shaken, and nothing could disturb them.

是以圣人之治也,虚其心,实其腹,弱其志,强其骨,常使民无知无欲。 御注曰:谷以虚故应,鉴以虚故照,管钥以虚故受,耳以虚故能听,目以虚故能视,鼻以虚故能嗅。有实其中,则有碍於此。圣人不得已而临莅天下,一视而同仁,笃近而举远,因其固然,付之自尔,何容心焉?尧之举舜而用鲧,几是矣。心虚则公听并观,而无好恶之情,腹实则赡足平泰,而无贪求之志,岂贤之可尚,货之足贵哉!圣人为腹不为目,虚则公听并观,而无好恶之情,腹实则赡足平泰,而无贪求之志,岂贤之可尚,货之足贵哉!圣人为腹不为目,腹无择而容故也。志者心之所之,骨者体之所立。志强则或殉名而不意,或逐货而无厌,或伐其功,或矜其能,去道益远。骨弱则行流散徙,与物相刃相靡,胥沦溺而不反。圣人之志,每自下也,而人高之。每自后也,而人先之。知其雄,守其雌,知其荣,守其辱,是之谓弱其志。正以止之,万物莫能迁。固以执之,万变莫能倾。不坏之相,若广成子者,千二百岁而形未尝衰,是之谓强其骨。《庄子》曰:同乎无知,其德不离。同乎无欲,是谓素朴。素朴而民性得矣。圣人之治,务使民得其性而已。多知以残性命之分,多欲以汨性命之情,名曰治之,而乱孰甚矣?故常使民,务使民得其性而已。多知以残性命之分,多欲以汨性命之情,名曰治之,而乱孰甚矣?故常使民无知无欲。臣义曰:道藏於无,故虚者道之合也。物累於有,故实者物之积也。人开其天,物窦其欲。有形者,形为物役。有心者,心为形使。私欲胜於内,事物夺於外,阴阳为之并毗,天和为之交丧,所谓灵台太虚之室,盖已柴塞乎其中,则事物之来,将以通其故而应其感,岂不大谬?谷以虚,故应其声於无方。镒以虚,故照其形於无穷。管钥以虚,故能受虚之气。况心之为物,摄五官以为主,统万善以为宗,适感而应,应而不藏,要在於虚。惟虚也复乎无物,合乎无始,谓之抱朴。抱此者也,谓之守一。守此者也,颜子进於是矣。齐心以致一,致一以集虚,入游其樊,至於未始有回,则能尽其性,而爱抱此者也,谓之守一。守此者也,颜子进於是矣。齐心以致一,致一以集虚,入游其樊,至於未始有回,则能尽其性,而爱恶无留情矣。因其固然,付之自尔,心虚故也。冥是非,一好恶,尘累忘,而心虚矣。举舜用鲧,尧何容心焉,以虚应之尔,何好恶之累?腹之为物,容而无择,受而不盈,气之所往,物之所化,俱复於此,出入终始,无有纪极,未始或足也。困於不足,则不能无求。求也不已则殆,故腹要乎实。实则赡足於已,而外无所待。责求之念绝,而平泰之福至,复何利欲之念哉?好恶之累亡,岂贤之趺尚也。利欲之念灭,岂货之足贵也。心有所之谓之志,志之强也,其向无方,则劳於营为,弊精神,役思虑,徇名逐货,伐功矜能,何有已也。故志要乎弱,则离动而之静,自有而适无。守雌以复乎无为,守辱以安於至分方,则劳於营为,弊精神,役思虑,徇名逐货,伐功矜能,何有已也。故志要乎弱,则离动而之静,自有而适无。守雌以复乎无为,守辱以安於至分。自下而不为高,自后而不为先,求复於道,是谓弱志。体之所立,在乎骨。骨之弱也,失己於物,随变流徙,视彼出入为之行藏,缘彼好恶为之用拾,与物刃靡而不知其非,与物沦溺而不知其返。不能自立,一至於此,故骨要乎强,强则特立而有常,独立而有造,全天之守,而不迁於物,完天之固,而不丧於人,其动不殆,其行也健,其强不息,日进於道,是谓强骨。圣人之治心,虚而无所分,腹实而无所求,志弱而不营於外,骨强而不迁於物,此所以使民无知而不累於名,无欲而不累於利,全其逍遥游而於合得之场,所以返素朴也。有知则心为物役,故多知所以残於性命之分。有欢无知而不累於名,无欲而不累於利,全其逍遥游而於合得之场,所以返素朴也。有知则心为物役,故多知所以残於性命之分。有欢则情为物迁,故多欲所以汨性命之情。知复乎无知而无以知为,钦复乎无欲而不见可欲,要在乎有常,故曰常使民无知无欲。
Interpretation

Therefore, when the sage governs the people, he empties and stills their minds while providing for their needs. He weakens their ambitions to outdo one another and strengthens the foundations on which they sustain their lives. He continually keeps the people from being burdened by clever knowledge and excessive desires.

The Imperial Commentary says: A valley can answer an echo because it is empty; a mirror can reflect things because it is empty; a flute or key can receive breath because it is hollow; and the ears, eyes, and nose can hear, see, and smell because their interiors are empty. When they are filled, these functions are obstructed. The sage governs the world only when he has no choice. He treats people impartially, caring for those close to him and appointing those from far away. He follows the way things are and lets them develop naturally, without putting his personal likes and dislikes first. This is perhaps why Yao appointed Shun and also employed Gun.

When the mind is empty, one can listen and observe impartially, without being swayed by personal likes and dislikes. When the belly is full, one can live in sufficiency and stability, with no further craving. Why, then, revere worthy reputations or prize wealth? The sage gives priority to providing people with enough to live on, rather than indulging the eyes’ desires. The belly accepts food without choosing among it, so “working for the belly” is used as a metaphor for meeting fundamental needs.

“Ambition” is the direction toward which the mind inclines; “bones” are the foundation that allows the body to stand. When ambition becomes excessive, some people chase after fame, some pursue wealth without satisfaction, and others boast of their achievements and display their abilities. All of this takes people farther from the Dao. When the backbone is weak, people drift with the current, let external things control them, and become entangled in struggles with the myriad things, sinking into them without turning back. The sage always lowers his ambition, and others esteem him; he always takes the place behind others, and they put him first. He understands the value of strength yet holds to weakness; he knows that honor is desirable yet accepts disgrace. This is what it means to “weaken ambition.”

When one disciplines oneself by the right way, the myriad things cannot change one. When one firmly maintains one’s original nature, no amount of change can overturn one. The legendary Guangchengzi is said to have kept his body from aging and lived for twelve hundred years; this is called “strengthening the bones.”

The Zhuangzi says, “When one is like those who know nothing, one’s De does not disperse; when one is like those who desire nothing, this is called simplicity.” When the people preserve their simplicity, their inborn nature remains whole. The sage governs only to help the people preserve their nature. Too much knowledge damages the proper course of life, and too many desires disturb its inborn nature. If this is called good governance, what could be more disorderly? Therefore, the sage continually keeps the people from being burdened by knowledge and desire.

The minister Yi explains: The Dao is hidden in what has no form or substance, and so emptiness and stillness accord with the Dao. The myriad things are constrained by what exists, and attachment to what exists accumulates burdens. Once people open their minds to cleverness, external things seize the opportunity to stir up desire. Those with bodies are made to serve external things, while those with minds are in turn governed by their bodies. When private desires gain the upper hand within, external things seize the mind from without. Yin-Yang falls out of balance, and the innate harmony of Qi is lost. The mind should be like a spacious, luminous dwelling; when it is blocked by stray thoughts, it cannot respond smoothly to events.

The mind governs the five senses and is the root of every good action. It responds to external things without retaining them within; the key lies in emptiness and stillness. Through emptiness and stillness, one returns to nothingness and joins with the beginningless. This is called “embracing simplicity”; maintaining this state is called “holding to the One.” Yan Hui’s cultivation came close to this state. The Zhuangzi says to gather the spirit and return to oneness, then proceed from oneness to emptiness and stillness. Enter the realm of the mind until one no longer clings to the distinction between “I” and “Hui,” and one can fulfill one’s nature without letting likes and dislikes linger in the heart. To follow the way things are and let them develop naturally is precisely a matter of an empty and still mind. When Yao appointed Shun and employed Gun, he had no private intentions; he simply responded with an empty and still mind. What burden of personal likes and dislikes could there have been?

The belly can receive without choosing and accept without becoming full. The movement of breath and the transformation that gives rise to the myriad things are all connected with the belly. Coming and going, beginning and ending, never cease, and there is no true point of satisfaction. When people suffer from insufficiency, they cannot help seeking something; when seeking never stops, they fall into danger. Therefore, the belly must be filled. When life is sufficient, there is no need to seek outside oneself. When the impulse to seek is cut off, the blessing of peace and well-being arrives. What thoughts of profit or craving could remain? When the burdens of likes and dislikes disappear, one no longer blindly reveres worthy reputations; when thoughts of profit and desire fade, one no longer prizes wealth.

When the mind inclines toward something, this is called “ambition.” If ambition runs in every direction, people become busy pursuing their aims, exhausting their spirit and burdening their thoughts as they chase fame and profit and boast of their achievements and abilities without end. Therefore, ambition should be softened: turning from agitation toward stillness, and from attachment to form toward emptiness. Hold to weakness and return to Wuwei (non-action); accept disgrace and keep to one’s proper place. Do not put oneself above others or compete to be first. Seek to return to the Dao: this is called “weakening ambition.”

The body stands by means of its bones. When the backbone is weak, one loses oneself before external things and is carried from place to place by change. When others advance or retreat, one advances or retreats with them; when others approve or dislike something, one makes the same choice. One struggles against external things without realizing this is wrong, and sinks into them without knowing to turn back. Unable to stand on one’s own, one reaches this condition. Therefore, the bones must be strong. Strong bones make it possible to stand independently and firmly, with constancy: external things cannot change one, and other people cannot make one lose one’s nature. One acts without slackening, steps forward with strength, and continues to cultivate De and the Dao. This is called “strengthening the bones.”

The sage cultivates his own mind, making it empty and still, without clinging to distinctions. He provides sufficiency in life, leaving nothing to seek; softens ambition, so it does not compete outwardly; and strengthens the backbone, so it is not moved by external things. Thus the people are not burdened by clever knowledge or trapped by fame; they are not driven by desire or bound by profit. They preserve the freedom to wander and the state that accords with nature, returning to simplicity.

With abundant knowledge, the mind is easily made to serve external things, so excessive knowledge damages the proper course of life. With abundant desire, the emotions are easily stirred by external things, so excessive desire disturbs the inborn nature of life. Let the mind return to not-knowing, so it does not act recklessly through clever knowledge; let it return to desirelessness, so it is not lured by desirable things. The key is to maintain this state continually. This is what is meant by “continually keeping the people free of knowledge and desire.”

使夫知者不敢为也。 御注曰:辫者不敢骋其辞,勇者不敢奋其快,能者不敢矜其材,智者不敢施其察,作聪明,矜机巧,滋法令,以盖其众,圣人皆禁而止之。此所谓使夫知者不敢为也。九官咸事,俊ㄨ在服,岂以知为凿也。行君之命,致之民而已。 臣义曰:圣人之治,处无为之事,行不言之教,上以道在宥天下,下以道化成於上,民之多知,而复乎义曰:圣人之治,处无为之事,行不言之教,上以道在宥天下,下以道化成於上,民之多知,而复乎无知,民之多欲,而复乎无欲。至治之极,复乎太古,可谓至矣。虽有知者,其辞办,其勇仗,材之能,察之智,将安所施,自谓曰知,何敢为也。为之则败,抑何所容,故曰不敢为。 为无为,则无不治矣。 御注曰:圣人之治,岂弃人绝物,而想然自立于无事之地哉?为出于无为而已。万物之变在形而下,圣人体道,立乎万物之上,总其成理而治之。物有作也,顺之以观其复。物有生也,因之以致其成,岂有不治者哉?故上治则日月星辰得其序,下治则乌驮草木遂其性。
Interpretation

This makes even the wise dare not act recklessly.

The Imperial Commentary says: Those skilled in speech dare not show off their eloquence; the brave dare not flaunt their courage in a moment of impulse; the capable dare not boast of their abilities; and the clever dare not rely on their own discernment. The sages put an end to these practices: they no longer display cleverness or flaunt contrivances, nor do they add laws and regulations to suppress the people. This is what “making even the wise dare not act recklessly” means. The nine ministers, each responsible for a different area of government, perform their own duties, and the worthy and capable each occupy their proper positions. Must governance depend on cleverness and reckless action? They need only carry out the ruler’s commands and put his policies into practice among the people.

The Minister Yi says: In governing the world, the sage acts according to Wuwei (non-action) and teaches without words. Above, the sage embraces the world through the Dao; below, the sage transforms and nurtures the people through the Dao. In this way, the people turn from excessive thought and worry back to their proper place, and from abundant desires back to desirelessness. When governance reaches its utmost, society returns to the simplicity of the most ancient times. This may be called the highest state. Even if there are clever people, what use would their eloquence, courage, abilities, and discernment be? If they claim to be wise, how could they dare act recklessly? Reckless action leads to failure and leaves no firm footing. That is why it says, “They dare not act.”

When affairs are handled according to Wuwei, nothing is left poorly governed.

The Imperial Commentary says: When sages govern the world, do they abandon human affairs, cut themselves off from the outside world, and hide away where nothing needs doing? They simply act according to Wuwei. The transformations of the myriad things belong to the realm below form—that is, to concrete, visible things and phenomena. The sages comprehend the Dao and stand above the myriad things, bringing their principles together in order to govern them. When things arise, the sages respond to them and observe how they return; when things grow, the sages guide them in accordance with their circumstances so that they may come to fruition. How could anything be poorly governed? Thus, when governance above is in order, the sun, moon, and stars move in their proper courses; when governance below is in order, birds, beasts, plants, and trees follow their natures.

臣义曰:圣人游人问世,应帝王,而立乎事物之上,其化民成俗,将以复性返朴,其能想然无为也哉。其为也出於无为,非无为也。辅万物之自然,生其所自生臣义曰:圣人游人问世,应帝王,而立乎事物之上,其化民成俗,将以复性返朴,其能想然无为也哉。其为也出於无为,非无为也。辅万物之自然,生其所自生,成其所自成,曲全乎天而无夭阏,梏亡之患则无不治矣。日月星辰得其序,上治也。乌兽草木遂其性,下治也。上下之治如此,而民至於无知无欲,而知者有不敢为,治之至也如此心 道冲章第四 道冲而用之,或不盈。 御注曰:道有情有信,故有用;无为无形,故不盈。经曰:万物负阴而抱阳,冲气以为和。莴物之理,偏乎阳则强,或失之过。偏乎阴则弱,或失之不及。无过不及,是谓冲气。冲者,中也,是谓太和。高者抑之,下者举之,有余者阴则弱,或失之不及。无过不及,是谓冲气。冲者,中也,是谓太和。高者抑之,下者举之,有余者取之,不足者与之,道之用,无适而不得其中也。注焉而不满,酌焉而不竭,既以为人己愈有,既以与人己愈多,道之体,犹如太虚,包裹六极,何盈之有?
Interpretation

The commentary of Minister Yi says: When sages came into the human world to assist rulers, they stood above worldly affairs and guided the people, cultivating good customs so that people might recover their original nature and return to simplicity. Could they simply do nothing at all? The sages’ actions arose from Wuwei (non-action); they were not entirely without action. They followed the natural patterns of all things, allowing each to grow and fulfill itself, preserving its nature in every way and sparing it the calamities of premature death, obstruction, or constraints on its life. In this way, nothing was left unwell-governed.

The sun, moon, and stars each follow their proper courses: this is governance above. Birds, beasts, plants, and trees each flourish according to their nature: this is governance below. When both above and below are properly governed, the people reach a state free of knowledge and desire, and even those skilled in schemes dare not act recklessly. This is the highest form of governance.

Chapter Four: The Way Is Empty

The Dao is empty in its essence, yet in use it seems never to be exhausted.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao has inner reality and reliability, and so it can function; it is without action or form, and so it cannot be filled up. The Daode Jing says: “All things turn their backs on Yin and embrace Yang; the two vital energies mingle and bring about harmony.” The principle of all things is this: to incline toward Yang is to become excessive, while to incline toward Yin is to fall short. When there is no inclination, excess, or deficiency, this is called “blended Qi.” “Blended” means centered; it is also called Great Harmony, the state of utmost balance.

It lowers what is high and raises what is low; it takes from what is abundant and supplies what is lacking. The Dao’s function is everywhere, always bringing things back to proper balance. Pouring water into it does not make it full; drawing from it does not make it run dry. The Dao gives itself to others and thereby becomes more abundant; the more it gives, the more it gains. In essence, the Dao is like the Great Void, vast and boundless, encompassing Heaven, Earth, and all four directions. How could it ever be filled?

臣义曰:道藏於太易之先,以气则未见,以形则未判,以质则未分,孰为体哉。体且无矣,孰为用哉。道枢一运,天机已张,阴阳以气而妙於无,万物以形而显於有,其终始出入,莫不有用,而莫知其所以然而然。是道之用也,充塞无外,而其应无方,赡足万物,而不弊於有。是妙於无,万物以形而显於有,其终始出入,莫不有用,而莫知其所以然而然。是道之用也,充塞无外,而其应无方,赡足万物,而不弊於有。是道之不盈也,有情有信,未离乎心也。谓之用,盖有使之者矣。道以无心为心,即彼情信,在用为用,故曰道用,无为无形,不堕诸有也。谓之不盈,盖不丽於器矣。道以妙有为有,即彼形为。在体为体,故为不盈。气散乎泰始,而分阴分阳,故气者道之所运,物者气之所化。堕於数者,不能逃乎阴阳之机。囿於形者,不能出乎阴阳之造。故阴阳为万物之负抱,而未始或离也。毗於阳,则失於太过而为强。毗於阴,则失於不及而者,不能出乎阴阳之造。故阴阳为万物之负抱,而未始或离也。毗於阳,则失於太过而为强。毗於阴,则失於不及而为弱。强而用之,其刚必折。弱而用之,其柔必殆。冲者,道之见於气也。其气均,以和为冲,交通而成和,捆缢而为一。刚柔之用,无过不及。往来之变,无相乖谬。两者浑一,适乎太和,无所往而不适乎中。冲之用也,冲而用之,犹彼太虚,充满六极,包裹天地,运量不匮,酬醉无已,高而无上,广不可极,渊而无下,深不可测,其盈也何有。
Interpretation

The Dao (the Way) existed before “Great Change” (Taiyi), when Heaven and Earth had not yet separated and the myriad things had not yet appeared. From the perspective of Qi (vital energy), it could not yet be seen; from the perspective of form, the myriad things had not yet taken distinct shapes; from the perspective of matter, things had not yet differentiated. At that time, how could one speak of concrete entities? And without concrete entities, how could one speak of their function?

Once the pivot of the Dao began to turn, the generative workings of Heaven and Earth unfolded. Yin-Yang, through Qi, exerted its subtle influence in a realm without shape or image, while the myriad things, through their forms, appeared in the visible world. From their coming into being to their passing away, from emergence to return, all things display function, yet no one knows why they do so. This is the function of the Dao: it fills the space between Heaven and Earth without boundary. Its responses follow no fixed pattern. It nourishes the myriad things, yet is never exhausted by anything with form.

The Dao’s function does not fill to the point of becoming obstructed or one-sided. It has real qualities and reliable effects, yet does not depart from the mind. It is called “function” because some power makes it effective. The Dao takes no-mind as its mind, responding to the real qualities and effects of things. It functions through its own activity, and so is called the “function of the Dao.” It is non-action and formless, and does not fall within any particular kind of existence. It is said to be “not full” because it does not attach itself to any particular vessel. The Dao takes subtle “being” as its being: although the myriad things have form, the Dao is not confined by form. It manifests as the inherent nature of things, and so is said not to be full.

Qi spread through “Great Beginning” (Taishi), the stage when Heaven and Earth first separated and Qi began to circulate, and from this it divided into Yin and Yang. Qi is therefore the means by which the Dao turns, while the myriad things take shape through the transformations of Qi. Whatever is governed by the patterns of Yin and Yang cannot escape their changes; whatever is limited by form cannot escape their creative transformation. Thus Yin and Yang bear and sustain the myriad things, never separated from them.

To favor Yang is to go to excess and become rigid; to favor Yin is to fall short and become yielding. When excessive rigidity is put into practice, hardness must break; when excessive weakness is put into practice, softness too falls into danger. “Emptiness” (Chong) is the state in which the Dao appears through Qi: Qi is evenly harmonized, Yin and Yang meet to form harmony, and all are gathered and condensed into one. The effects of hardness and softness go neither too far nor fall short, and their movements and changes do not clash. Yin and Yang are blended into one, perfectly aligned with Great Harmony (the most peaceful and balanced state), and wherever they reach, they accord with the center and what is right.

The function of “Emptiness” is like the Great Void: it fills the four directions between Heaven and Earth and embraces Heaven and Earth; its movement never ceases, and its responses never stop. It reaches so high that there is nothing higher, extends so far that it cannot be measured, and goes so deep that there is nothing deeper; its depth cannot be fathomed. In view of this, how could it ever be said to be full?

渊兮似万物之宗。 御注曰:《庄子》曰:鱿桓之审为渊,止水之审为渊,流水之审为渊。渊虚而静,不与物杂,道之体也。惟虚也,故群实之所归。惟静也,故群动之所属。是万物之所系,一化之所待也。故曰似万物之宗。然道本无系,物自宗道,故群实之所归。惟静也,故群动之所属。是万物之所系,一化之所待也。故曰似万物之宗。然道本无系,物自宗道,故似之而已。 臣义曰:渊者,静一而流复,虚一而体深。其复也不与物杂,其深也不为物测,游於物初,同乎太虚,道之体也,万物本乎道之所生,故道为万物之本宗矣。群有之实,归乎至虚。群有之动,属乎至静。惟虚与静,所以管摄万有,而大化之所以神也。万物宗於道,未始为之宗,物自宗之尔,故曰似。 挫其锐,解其纷和其光,同其尘至静。惟虚与静,所以管摄万有,而大化之所以神也。万物宗於道,未始为之宗,物自宗之尔,故曰似。 挫其锐,解其纷和其光,同其尘。
Interpretation

Profound and still, it is like the root of all things.

The Imperial Commentary cites the Zhuangzi: deep pools, still water, and flowing water can all be called “abysses.” An abyss is empty and still, unmixed with external things; this is precisely the substance of the Dao. Because it is empty, all things turn toward it; because it is still, the activity of all things depends on it. All things are connected to it, and their transformations also arise from it. Thus it is said to be “like the root of all things.” Yet the Dao does not originally belong to any particular thing. Rather, all things naturally take the Dao as their root, which is why it is only said to be “like” their root.

The subject’s interpretation explains: An “abyss” is both still and focused, and able to flow and return; it is both empty and focused, and inwardly profound. In returning, it does not mix with external things; its profundity, too, lies beyond the measure of external things. It exists before all things and is identical with the Great Void—the vast, formless emptiness. This is the substance of the Dao. All things are born from the Dao, so the Dao is their root. All things that have substance return to ultimate emptiness, and all activity returns to ultimate stillness. Because the Dao is empty and still, it can govern all things and make the transformations between Heaven and Earth appear wondrous. All things take the Dao as their root, but the Dao never claims to be their root. Rather, all things naturally return to their source in the Dao, which is why it is said to be “like” their root.

“Blunt the sharpness and resolve the turmoil; temper the radiance and mingle with the dust of the world.” This means to soften one’s edge and calm disorder, without flaunting one’s brilliance or withdrawing from the common world.

御注曰:锐则伤,纷则杂,挫其锐则不争,解其纷则不乱。和其光,庄子所谓光矣而不耀也。同其尘,庄子所谓与物委蛇而同其波也。内诚不解,形谋成光,而舍者与之避席,岂和其光之谓欤?饰智以惊愚,修身以明污,昭昭乎若揭,曰月而行,岂同其尘之谓欤?圣人挫其锐,则处物不伤物,物莫之能伤也。解其纷,则不谋乌用智?不断乌用胶?万物无足以挠其心者,若之谓欤?圣人挫其锐,则处物不伤物,物莫之能伤也。解其纷,则不谋乌用智?不断乌用胶?万物无足以挠其心者,若是则无泰色,无骄气,和而不流,大同於物,以通天下之志,无入而不自得也。 臣义曰:锐者,物之利。纷者,事之交。其锐不挫,则其利也伤。其纷不解,则其交也杂。伤则争,杂则乱,故挫其锐,则浑然而全於天,解其纷,则凝然而观其复。形谋成光,修身明污,未能忘我也。立我为累,去道远矣。光矣而不耀,则其光也,和於物而不乖。与物委蛇,而同其波,则其尘也,同於物而不异。至於此,则情系都忘,物我玄同,彼是不立无入,而不自得也。 湛兮似或存。 御注曰:心若死灰,而身若槁木之枝,泰定之中,天光自照,愍然若亡而存,油然不形而神,此其道欤?
Interpretation

Sharpness can easily hurt others, while disorder can easily lead to confusion. Sheathe your sharp edges, and you will not struggle with others; set disorder in order, and you will not fall into confusion. “Blend with its radiance,” Zhuangzi said, means that one’s light is bright without dazzling. “Mingle with its dust,” he said, means adapting to all things and flowing along with their transformations.

If one is stubbornly attached to oneself inwardly, while deliberately making oneself shine outwardly so that others rise to move aside, can this be called “blending with its radiance”? If one uses contrived cleverness to startle the ignorant, embellishes oneself to expose the faults of others, and stands out conspicuously like the sun and moon, can this be called “mingling with its dust”?

The sage sheaths his sharp edges and dwells among all things without harming them; therefore, all things cannot harm him. The sage sets disorder in order without having to seek wisdom through schemes or force things together through decisive action. Nothing can disturb his heart—is this the state meant here? Thus the sage shows no sign of self-satisfaction and no air of arrogance. He harmonizes with all things without being swept along by the current. By joining with all things, he understands the hearts and minds of people everywhere, and wherever he may be, he is at ease.

The Explanatory Commentary by the Minister says: “Sharp” refers to the keen edge of a thing; “disorder” refers to matters that are tangled together. If the sharp edge is not sheathed, what is useful can hurt others; if disorder is not set in order, entanglement becomes confusion. Injury gives rise to struggle, and confusion leads to chaos. Therefore, sheathing one’s sharp edges allows one to remain whole and follow one’s nature; setting disorder in order allows one to observe in stillness the root to which all things return.

Deliberately planning one’s outward image and embellishing oneself to expose the faults of others shows that one has not yet forgotten the self. To establish an “I” is to become burdened, and so to distance oneself from the Dao. To be bright without dazzling is to let one’s radiance harmonize with all things without opposing them. To adapt to all things and flow along with them is to be one with them without setting oneself apart. In this state, feelings and attachments dissolve; things and self become wholly one. One no longer clings to distinctions between self and other, and so remains at ease whatever circumstances one enters.

Deep and still, it seems to exist and yet seems unseen.

The Imperial Commentary says: The mind is like dead ashes, and the body like the branches of a withered tree. In settled stillness, the light of Heaven appears of itself. It is silent, as though it were nothing, yet it truly exists; it arises naturally, yet leaves no trace, while working in a wondrous way. Is this what is meant by the Dao?

臣义曰:闷道奥而弗示,杜德机枝,泰定之中,天光自照,愍然若亡而存,油然不形而神,此其道欤? 臣义曰:闷道奥而弗示,杜德机而不发,复乎无为,游乎物初,心若死灰,身若槁木,而体同太虚,湛然凝一,窈冥恍惚,而物或有焉,此温伯雪子得於目击之间也。若亡而存,不形而神,大圣神解,不容声矣。学道学此者也,传道传此者也。 吾不知谁之子,象帝之先。 御注曰:象者,物之始见。帝者,神之应物。物生而后有象,帝出而后妙物。象帝者,群物之始,而道实先知谁之子,象帝之先。 御注曰:象者,物之始见。帝者,神之应物。物生而后有象,帝出而后妙物。象帝者,群物之始,而道实先之。《庄子》所谓神鬼神帝,生天生地是也。视之不见,听之不闻,搏之不得,有乎出而莫见其门,孰知之者?故曰吾不知谁之子,象帝之先。臣义曰:自无而适有者,皆丽乎物,故万物本乎道之所生。自有而适无者,皆复乎道,故道为万物之祖。道本乎无,何所自生,故曰不知谁之子。物属诸有,由道以生,故曰象帝之先。物见於像曰象,则象者生物之始也。神之应物曰帝,则帝者应物之始也。象与帝,群物之所始,而皆本乎道之所自出,故曰象帝之先。 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之一竟
Interpretation

I do not understand the profound depths of the Great Dao, yet I do not try to display them. I conceal the subtle workings of De, allowing them no rash movement. In stillness and quiet, the light bestowed by Heaven appears of itself. It seems to vanish, yet truly exists; it leaves no trace, yet works in wondrous ways. Perhaps this is the Dao?

I do not understand the profound depths of the Great Dao, yet I do not try to display them. I conceal the subtle workings of De and do not let them stir. Thus I return to Wuwei (non-action) and roam at the beginning, before anything in the world had come into being. My mind is like dead ashes, my body like a withered tree; body and mind merge with the Great Void, that vast and empty realm, becoming still, clear, and settled, and returning to undivided unity. In its deep, indistinct depths, all things seem to arise from it. Wen Boxuezi, a legendary person of ancient times who attained the Dao, experienced this state at the very moment he saw the Dao with his own eyes. The Dao seems to vanish, yet truly exists; it leaves no trace, yet works in wondrous ways. Sages grasp the Great Dao through spiritual insight, but it cannot be expressed in words. This is what those who study the Dao must learn, and what those who teach it pass on.

I do not know who gave birth to the Dao; it came before the sovereign of Heaven and Earth and all things.

“Image” is the form in which all things first begin to appear; “Sovereign” is the numinous power by which the spirit responds to all things. Things take on form only after they come into being, and only after the spirit manifests can things exercise their wondrous functions. “Image and Sovereign” refers to the beginning of all things, but the Dao in fact precedes them. As the Zhuangzi says, ghosts, spirits, and divine sovereigns are born from the Dao, as are Heaven and Earth.

The Dao cannot be seen, heard, or touched. It seems to exist, yet no one can see where it comes from. Who, then, can know it? Hence the saying: “I do not know who gave birth to the Dao; it came before the sovereign of Heaven and Earth and all things.”

Whatever passes from nonbeing into being depends on concrete things; therefore all things are born from the Dao. Whatever passes from being back into nonbeing returns to the Dao; therefore the Dao is the source of all things. The Dao is rooted in nonbeing—where, then, did it arise? Hence the saying, “I do not know who gave birth to it.” All things belong to the realm of being and are born from the Dao, so the Dao is said to come before “Image and Sovereign.” When things take on visible form, this is called “Image”; thus “Image” is the appearance of things as they begin to come into being. When the spirit responds to all things, this is called “Sovereign”; thus “Sovereign” is the spirit’s first response to them. Though Image and Sovereign mark the beginning of all things, their source is the Dao. That is why the Dao is said to come before “Image and Sovereign.”

3-宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之二三 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之二 登仕郎臣章安撰义 道经 天地章第五天地不仁,以万物为刍德真经解义卷之二三 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之二 登仕郎臣章安撰义 道经 天地章第五天地不仁,以万物为刍狗。 圣人不仁,以百姓为刍狗。御注曰:恩生於害,害生於恩,以仁为恩,害则随至,天地之於万物,圣人之於百姓,辅其自然,无爱利之心焉,仁无得而名之。束刍为狗,祭祀所用,适则用之,过则弃之。彼万物之自生,百姓之自治,曾何容心焉?臣义曰:大仁不仁,非不仁也,以仁为恩,仁亦浅矣,害之随至,仁可为乎?大道之世,适然皆生,同焉皆得,何以仁为?天地无爱於物,而物当其分,而同於自得。圣人无爱於百姓,而百姓自适,而相忘於无情,此天地圣人所以视万物百姓为刍狗也。天地之於物,圣人之於民,非无心也,非有心也,生其所自生,治其所自治,应时而用,其用也不藏。已事而废,其废也不留,何容心天地之於物,圣人之於民,非无心也,非有心也,生其所自生,治其所自治,应时而用,其用也不藏。已事而废,其废也不留,何容心哉?皆所以辅自然尔。 天地之间,其犹橐钥乎?
Interpretation

Heaven and Earth show no favoritism, treating the myriad things like straw dogs used in sacrifice. The sage, too, shows no favoritism, treating the people like straw dogs.

The Imperial Commentary of Huizong says: Kindness can sometimes bring harm, and harm may also arise from kindness. When benevolence is imposed as a favor, harm often follows. Heaven and Earth respond to the myriad things according to their natural qualities, and the sage responds to the people in the same way. Neither shows favoritism or seeks personal gain, so this kind of benevolence is difficult to call “benevolence.” Straw dogs are used during the sacrifice and discarded once it is over. The myriad things each grow in their own way, and the people each govern themselves. Why would Heaven and Earth or the sage deliberately arrange anything?

Zhang’an explains: Truly great benevolence does not mean a lack of care; it means not imposing care as a favor. Cling to the idea of bestowing kindness, and that kindness becomes shallow, with harm possibly following in its wake. In an age when the Great Dao prevails, the myriad things grow naturally and each finds its proper place. Why deliberately make a point of benevolence? Heaven and Earth do not favor the myriad things, yet each thing rests in its place and thrives in its own way. The sage does not favor the people, yet they live at ease and adapt to their circumstances, without binding one another through private attachments. This is what it means for Heaven and Earth and the sage to regard the myriad things and the people as straw dogs.

Heaven and Earth do not leave the myriad things entirely to themselves, nor do they arrange things out of self-interest. They let the myriad things grow according to their nature and the people live and govern themselves according to their circumstances. When a response is called for, they act in keeping with the moment; when the matter is done, they let it go, without lingering or clinging. In all this, they follow what is natural.

Isn’t the space between Heaven and Earth like a bellows?

御注曰:橐钥虚而能受,受而能应,故应而不穷。有实其中,则触处皆碍,在道为一偏,在物为一曲。臣义曰:天地之间,一气之运,阖辟变化,出入动静,不见新故,无有终始,其犹橐钥乎。橐钥之为物,以虚而受,其受也不辞。以虚而应,其应也不穷。有实其中,其用也废。天地之鼓万物,岂有心哉。万物自动於至虚,而天地听其自尔。圣人之於百姓,是以应其适然,而无系累,故比夫弃钥。 虚而不屈,动而愈出。 御注曰:虚己以游世,则泛应而曲当,故曰虚而不屈。迫而后动,则运量而不匮,故曰动而愈出。圣人出,应帝王,而无言为之累者此也。 臣义曰:气寓於橐钥,以鼓万物者,,故曰虚而不屈。迫而后动,则运量而不匮,故曰动而愈出。圣人出,应帝王,而无言为之累者此也。 臣义曰:气寓於橐钥,以鼓万物者,橐钥以虚能受能应故也。其静也虚,气复於无,而未始或屈。其动也虚,气应於有,而未始或穷。圣人虚己泛应,曲当於物,而其道不屈,动化应时,运量不匮,而其道愈出,安有言为之累。 多言数穷,不如守中。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says: The bellows is hollow, which enables it to hold things. Once it holds them, it can respond to external forces, and so its function is inexhaustible. If it were stuffed full, it would be obstructed everywhere. As a metaphor for the Dao, this is a fixation on one extreme; as a metaphor for things, it is clinging to one side.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Between Heaven and Earth, Qi moves and breathes, opening and closing, entering and leaving, stirring and stilling. No beginning or end, no old or new, can be discerned. It is like a bellows. Because the bellows is empty, it can hold what comes without refusing it; because it is empty, it can respond accordingly, and its function is inexhaustible. If it were stuffed full, its usefulness would cease. Do Heaven and Earth set all things in motion intentionally? Things move of themselves within utmost emptiness, and Heaven and Earth let them be. The sage treats the people in the same way, following the way things naturally are and remaining unencumbered. That is why the bellows serves as a metaphor.

Empty, yet never exhausted; when set in motion, its function becomes all the more apparent.

The Imperial Commentary says: By emptying oneself while engaging with the world, one can respond broadly to every circumstance and adapt appropriately. Hence the phrase “empty, yet never exhausted.” One acts only when prompted; in this way, use and expression never run short. Hence the phrase “set in motion, it gives forth more.” The sage emerges to attend to the affairs of rulers, yet is not encumbered by words or deeds. This is the meaning.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Qi resides within the bellows and drives all things in their movement. It is precisely because the bellows is empty that it can hold and respond. When still, it is empty: Qi returns to nothing, yet is never exhausted. When active, it remains empty: Qi responds to the myriad things, yet is never spent. The sage empties himself and responds broadly to worldly affairs, adapting appropriately to all things; thus his Dao is never exhausted. He acts and changes in response to the times, and his use and expression never run short; thus his Dao gives forth ever more. How, then, could he be encumbered by words?

Too many words often lead to difficulty. Better to hold fast to inner emptiness, stillness, and centeredness.

御注曰:钥虚以待气,气至则呜,不至则止。圣人之言似之。辩者之囿,言多而未免夫累,不如守中之愈也。慎汝内,闭汝外,收视反听,复以见天地之心焉,此之谓守中。 臣义曰:圣人本乎无言,迫不得已而有言,其言也绿时适可,应彼而已。内,闭汝外,收视反听,复以见天地之心焉,此之谓守中。 臣义曰:圣人本乎无言,迫不得已而有言,其言也绿时适可,应彼而已。犹钥之虚,为气所呜尔。应理而言,其言不穷。辨者之言,是非交击,言之虽多,其穷也数。惟善恶两忘,是非不立,则虚而无系。无系则不偏,不偏则得中,中而能守,旷然忘怀,而复乎天一,天地之心,於此可见。 谷神章第六 谷神不死, 御注曰:有形则有盛衰,有数则有成坏,形数具而生死分,物之理也。谷应群动而常虚,神妙万物而常寂,真常之中,与道为一,不丽於形,不堕於数,生生而不穷,如日月焉,终古不息,如维斗焉,终古不忒,故云不死。
Interpretation

The imperial commentary says: Because a key is hollow inside, it can await the flow of air. When the air arrives, the key sounds; when it does not, the key stays quiet. The words of a sage are like this. Those fond of debate are trapped in language: they speak at length, yet cannot escape being burdened by words. Better to keep the mind inwardly empty and still. Guard the inner self with care, shut out external disturbances, gather the gaze and listen with focused attention, and return to the heart. Then one can discern the original nature of Heaven and Earth. This is called “guarding the center.”

The minister’s explanation says: Sages have no need to speak; they speak only when they have no choice. Their words accord with the moment and are precisely apt, serving only to respond to the other person, like a hollow key sounding when stirred by a flow of air. When speech follows the pattern of things, it does not run out. The words of those fond of debate, however, are always taken up with arguing over right and wrong. Though they speak at length, their words must eventually come to an end. Only by forgetting distinctions between good and evil and avoiding attachment to right and wrong can the mind become empty and still, free of entanglements. Free of entanglements, one will not be biased; free of bias, one can attain the center. Guarding the Middle Way, with a spacious mind that clings to nothing, allows one to return to the original state of the Dao of Heaven and thereby discern the original nature of Heaven and Earth.

Chapter Six: The Valley Spirit

The Valley Spirit never dies.

The imperial commentary says: Things with form undergo cycles of flourishing and decline; things governed by fixed measures meet with success, failure, and destruction. Once form and fixed measures are present, life and death are distinguished in turn. This is the constant pattern of the myriad things. A mountain valley can contain the movements and stillness of all things while remaining empty; the wondrous Dao gives rise to all things while remaining still. It is constant and unchanging, united with the Dao. Unconfined by form and untouched by fixed measures, it generates life without end and is inexhaustible—like the sun and moon, which have moved without pause since ancient times, and like the Northern Dipper, whose course has never deviated since ancient times. Hence the saying: “The Valley Spirit never dies.”

臣义曰:囿於阴阳者,其盛衰有形。役於变化者,其成坏有数。涉形与数,其生也孰固。谷以常虚,而应群动之感。神以常寂,而妙万物之上。常虚则不累於形,常寂则不滞於数。,其成坏有数。涉形与数,其生也孰固。谷以常虚,而应群动之感。神以常寂,而妙万物之上。常虚则不累於形,常寂则不滞於数。谷之虚,神之妙,冥於一致,与道同体,生生不穷,其应无已,其化不测,其犹日月维斗,皆终古而未始,或息或忒,故曰不死。不死者,以其无所自生,故不死也。神亦至矣,必曰谷神者,气冥於虚,神潜於气。神之应也如响,能容能应,能虚能盈,无有终已,故以谷言。 是谓玄牝。 御注曰:万物受命於无,而成形於有,谷之用无相,神之体无方,万物所受命也。玄者天之色,牝者地之类,万物所以成形也。谷神以况至道之常,玄牝以明造物之妙。 臣义曰:谷神以无受万物之命,天地以有赋万物之形。不曰天地,而日玄牝者,以天地之色类言也。色类本乎气,故玄牝者,,玄牝以明造物之妙。 臣义曰:谷神以无受万物之命,天地以有赋万物之形。不曰天地,而日玄牝者,以天地之色类言也。色类本乎气,故玄牝者,气之所以生物也。有母养万物,生生之理,是造物之妙也。
Interpretation

Commentary by the minister: Things governed by the changes of Yin and Yang show signs of flourishing and decline; things driven by change have their measure of success and failure. Since all must undergo changes in form, flourishing and decline, success and failure, how can life endure securely for long?

The valley is often empty, yet it can respond to the impressions of all things. The wondrous nature of spirit is always still, yet it can manifest its subtle workings above all things. Being constantly empty, it is not burdened by form; being constantly still, it is not constrained by fate. The valley’s emptiness and the spirit’s wondrous workings belong to the same realm and unite with the Dao as one. Thus they bring forth life without end, respond without limit, and change beyond measure. They are like the sun, moon, and Northern Dipper, whose courses have continued without pause since ancient times: they may wax and wane, yet never cease. This is why they are called “deathless.” The deathless do not die because they were not brought forth by anything. The wondrous nature of spirit has reached its utmost, yet it is deliberately called the “Valley Spirit” because Qi joins with emptiness, and spirit lies hidden within Qi. The spirit’s responses are like echoes: it can contain and answer, remain empty and still, and yet be full, without end. That is why it is compared to a valley.

This is called the “Mysterious Female” (the subtle mother, referring to the source from which all things arise).

The Imperial Commentary says: All things receive life from “nonbeing,” then take on form in “being.” The valley’s function has no fixed shape, and the spirit’s essence has no fixed location; from them all things receive life. “Mysterious” is the color of Heaven; “female” belongs to the category of Earth. From them all things take on form. The “Valley Spirit” is a metaphor for the constant, unchanging nature of the Great Dao; the “Mysterious Female” describes its subtle power to bring all things into being.

Commentary by the minister: The Valley Spirit gives life to all things in the state of “nonbeing,” while Heaven and Earth give them form in the state of “being.” The text says “Mysterious Female” rather than “Heaven and Earth” to express this through their color and category. Color and category have their roots in Qi, so “Mysterious Female” refers to Qi’s power to bring all things into being. Like a mother nurturing all things and allowing life to continue without end, this is the subtle wonder of creation.

玄牝之门,是谓天地根。 御注曰:《庄子》曰:万物有乎生,而莫见其根,有乎出,而莫见其门,而见之者,必圣人已。故於此明言玄牝之门,是谓天地根。天地者,万物之上下也,物与天地,本无先后,明大道之序,则有天地,然后有万物。然天地之所从出者,玄牝是已。彼先天地生者,孰得而见之? 臣义曰:玄,明大道之序,则有天地,然后有万物。然天地之所从出者,玄牝是已。彼先天地生者,孰得而见之? 臣义曰:玄牝者,生物之本,体属乎阴阳,万物之母也。门有阖辟之义,根有生出之理,玄牝之气,辟而为阳,丽乎阳者之所生也,阖而为阴,丽乎阴者之所出也。天地以阴阳形之大者言之也,天地万物由此门出,莫得而见,故曰玄牝之门。 绵绵若存,用之不勤。 御注曰:自本自根,自古以固存,不知其尽也。夫是之谓绵绵若存。茫然天造,任一气之自运,倏尔地化,委众形之自殖,乾以易知,坤以简能,非力政也,何勤之有? 臣义曰:万物资气以生,资神以灵,故气为神母,神为气子。气固则神全,气汨则神乱,气丧则神去。绵绵者,引而简能,非力政也,何勤之有?
Interpretation

“The Gate of the Mysterious Female” is the source of Heaven and Earth and all things. Here, “Mysterious Female” refers to the profound power that gives birth to and nurtures all things. “Gate” suggests opening and closing, as well as birth and emergence, while “root” refers to the source of life and generation.

Emperor Huizong of the Song explained that the Zhuangzi says all things are alive, yet their source cannot be seen; all things come into being, yet where they come from cannot be seen. Only a sage can perceive these sources. The phrase “Gate of the Mysterious Female” points to the foundation of Heaven and Earth, which encompass all things above and below. In the sequence of generation by the Great Dao, Heaven and Earth come first, and all things follow. Yet Heaven and Earth themselves are born from the Mysterious Female. Who, then, could see with their own eyes the source that existed before Heaven and Earth?

A court commentator explained that the Mysterious Female is the root from which all things arise, and the mother through which Yin and Yang interact and transform to give birth to them. When the Qi of the Mysterious Female opens, it appears as Yang, and things associated with Yang come forth; when it closes, it appears as Yin, and things associated with Yin take shape. “Heaven and Earth” here represent the largest forms within Yin and Yang. Heaven and Earth and all things emerge from this Gate, yet no one can see it; hence it is called the “Gate of the Mysterious Female.”

“Continuous, as though it were present; in its use, never exhausted” means that it extends without end, seeming both present and absent. Its function unfolds without effort and is never depleted.

Emperor Huizong of the Song said that this source is its own foundation. It has remained firm since ancient times and seems to have no end; this is what “continuous, as though it were present” means. Heaven and Earth arise naturally, allowing a single Qi to move of itself. The Earth nurtures all things, letting forms grow naturally. Qian (Heaven) makes change easy to understand, while Kun (Earth) accomplishes things through simplicity. Neither acts through exertion, so how could either become weary?

A court commentator explained that all things depend on Qi for life and on Shen (spirit) for awareness. Qi is therefore the root of Shen, while Shen is the expression that arises from Qi. When Qi is stable, Shen is whole; when Qi is disturbed, Shen is unsettled; when Qi disperses, Shen departs. “Continuous” describes this function as unceasing: it unfolds and brings things to completion naturally, without being forced or controlled, and so there is no question of weariness.

臣义曰:万物资气以生,资神以灵,故气为神母,神为气子。气固则神全,气汨则神乱,气丧则神去。绵绵者,引而不绝,续而不已,先天地而有,后天地而无穷,恍惚窈冥,而或有在,故谓之若存。茫然天造,任其气之自运,而莫知其所以然。倏尔地化,委其形之自殖,而莫知其所自。以无为用,而非智力所能为也,故曰用之不勤。 天长地久章第七 天长地久,天地所以能长且久者,以其不自生,故能长生。 御注曰:天穹窿而位乎上,经为日月,纬为星辰,而万物覆,天地所以能长且久者,以其不自生,故能长生。 御注曰:天穹窿而位乎上,经为日月,纬为星辰,而万物覆焉。地磅礴 而位乎下,结为山岳,融为川泽,而、万物载焉。万物覆载於天地,天地无心於万物,故天确然而常运,地颓然而常处,所以能长且久也。天地有心於生物,则天俄而可度,其覆物也浅矣,地俄而可测,其载物也薄矣。若是则有待也,而生焉故能长生?
Interpretation

All things grow by relying on Qi (vital energy), and display their spiritual nature by relying on Shen (spirit). Thus Qi is the mother of Shen, and Shen is the child of Qi. When Qi remains steady, Shen is whole; when Qi is disturbed, Shen becomes clouded; when Qi disperses, Shen also departs.

“Continuous” means that the breath stretches on without interruption, carrying on without end. It existed before Heaven and Earth, and remains boundless after them. It is faint and profound, seeming to exist; hence it is said to be “as if present.” Heaven and Earth came into being vast and unknowing, letting Qi move of itself, yet no one knows the reason behind it. The earth suddenly brought forth life, letting forms reproduce of themselves, yet no one knows where they came from. Heaven and Earth act through Wuwei (non-action). This cannot be accomplished through human schemes or strength, which is why it is said that “its use is not strenuous.”

Chapter Seven: Heaven and Earth Endure

Heaven is long-lasting and Earth endures. The reason Heaven and Earth can last so long is that they do not live for themselves; therefore, they are able to endure.

The Imperial Commentary says: The vault of Heaven rises high above. The sun and moon travel along their courses, while the stars are arrayed across the sky, covering all things. Earth is vast and solid, lying below. It congeals into mountains and gathers into rivers, streams, and lakes, bearing all things. Though Heaven and Earth cover and support all things, they do not set out to rule them. Thus Heaven steadfastly moves without rest, while Earth quietly remains still and unmoving. This is why they can endure.

If Heaven and Earth intended to nourish all things, Heaven could soon be measured, and the expanse it covers would become narrow; Earth could soon be surveyed, and its capacity to bear all things would become limited. In that case, Heaven and Earth would depend on something else. How, then, could they endure?

臣义曰:复乎无物,孰命其形。合乎无始,孰有其生。赋生之初,同乎太虚,凝为我形,如水有冰。世之人一受成形,遂以形为我有,认其有生,遂以生为我固。是以形亏而不全,生离而不抱,忽然而逝,何异隙驹,曾不知天地之所以能长且久者,以其不自生尔。天穹隆而位乎上,未始有心於覆物也,地磅砖而位乎下,未始有心於载物也。形为天地,而不知其所以为天地。功为覆载,而不知,以其不自生尔。天穹隆而位乎上,未始有心於覆物也,地磅砖而位乎下,未始有心於载物也。形为天地,而不知其所以为天地。功为覆载,而不知其所以为覆载。其长且久,未始以生为也。无以生为,则生未尝生,虽寓於有生,而无有生之累,故能长生。 是以圣人后其身而身先,外其身而身存。
Interpretation

I understand this passage to mean: When one returns to a state without form or substance, who can prescribe its shape? When one joins with the original source that has no beginning, who can say that it was born? When all things first receive life, they are like the Great Void, empty and without form. Later, they gather into the shape of my body, just as water freezes into ice. Once people have a body, they assume that it belongs to them; once they know they are alive, they believe their life can remain theirs forever. Yet the body wastes away and loses its wholeness; life departs and cannot be held. In an instant it vanishes, like a white colt darting past an opening in a wall.

People do not understand that Heaven and Earth endure because they are not attached to their own existence. Heaven stands high above, yet has no intention of covering the myriad things; Earth lies deep below, yet has no intention of bearing them. They take shape as Heaven and Earth and perform the functions of covering and bearing, but do not know why they do so, nor give it any thought. Precisely because they do not keep their own existence in mind, Heaven and Earth can endure. Those who do not deliberately seek life are not attached to it; even while living in a world of life, they are not burdened by being alive, and so can endure.

Therefore, the sage puts himself last and comes to stand before others; he sets himself aside and is able to preserve himself.

御注曰:天运乎上,地处乎下,圣人者位乎天地之中。达而为三才者,有相通之用。辨而为三极者,有各立之体。交而为三灵者,有无不妙之神。然则天地之与圣人,咸得乎道,而圣人之所以治其身,亦天地而已。故此章先言天地之不自生,而继之以圣之神。然则天地之与圣人,咸得乎道,而圣人之所以治其身,亦天地而已。故此章先言天地之不自生,而继之以圣人不自有其身也。人皆取先,己独取后,曰受天下之垢,是谓后其身。后其身,则不与物争,而天下莫能与之争,故曰后其身而身先。在涂不争险易之利,冬夏不争阴阳之和,外死生,遗祸福,而神未尝有所困也,是谓外其身而身存。夫圣人之所以治其身者如此,况身外之事物乎?遭之而不违,过之而不守,体性抱神,以游世俗之间。形将自正,物我为一,先天地生,而不为久,长於上古,而不为老者,一此其效欤!臣义曰:立己以先物,则物为我敌,而为物之胜,而身未始或先。有我以存身,则身为物丧,而为物之!臣义曰:立己以先物,则物为我敌,而为物之胜,而身未始或先。有我以存身,则身为物丧,而为物之倾,而身未始或存,此理之固然也。圣人位乎天地之两间而成,能於天地达而为三才,辨而为三极,交而为三灵,混然无间,咸体乎道,其致不异。故此章言天地之不自生,故能长且久。继言圣人后外其身,故能先能存也。圣人无心於自先,故后其身,而天下莫如我先之至。无心於自存,故外其身,而天下莫如我存之固。我身之先,我身之存,皆超然无物我之累,未始有其身者然也。
Interpretation

Heaven moves above, and Earth rests below. The sage dwells between Heaven and Earth. Heaven, Earth, and humanity together are called the “Three Powers,” and they communicate with and serve one another. Considered separately, each occupies its own place among the “Three Extremes” of Heaven, Earth, and humanity. When they respond to one another, they become the “Three Spirits,” revealing a wondrous power that is present everywhere. Heaven, Earth, and the sage have all attained the Dao. In cultivating himself, the sage should therefore take Heaven and Earth as his model. This chapter first explains that Heaven and Earth do not act for their own sake, then that the sage does not claim himself as his own possession.

Everyone strives to be first, but the sage is willing to come last and bear the world’s filth. This is what it means to place himself behind others. Because he does not contend with anything outside himself, no one in the world can contend with him; thus, he is able to be first. In traveling, he does not compete for the advantages of easy or difficult roads. As the seasons shift between cold and heat, he does not contend for the comfort of a balance between Yin and Yang. He transcends life and death and forgets calamity and good fortune, so his spirit is never confined. He places himself outside himself, yet thereby preserves himself. If the sage cultivates himself in this way, how much more so should he treat things beyond himself? When he encounters something, he does not resist it; when it has passed, he does not cling to it. He preserves his nature and nourishes his spirit, moving freely through worldly life. His form is naturally upright, and external things and the self merge into one. He existed before Heaven and Earth, yet does not concern himself with longevity; he has endured since remote antiquity, yet does not feel old. This is perhaps the result of cultivating oneself to such a state.

Chen Yi says: If you establish yourself by striving always to be ahead of external things, they will become your adversaries and overcome you in turn; you may not truly get ahead. If you cling to the self and hope to preserve yourself through possession, external things will instead constrain and overturn you; you may not truly preserve yourself. This is inevitable.

The sage dwells between Heaven and Earth and fulfills his De. He can join Heaven and Earth to form the “Three Powers,” stand apart among the “Three Extremes,” and respond with them as the “Three Spirits.” Blended without any separation, they embody the Dao together, and there is no difference in the state they ultimately attain. Thus, the chapter first says that Heaven and Earth endure because they do not act for their own sake; it then says that the sage is willing to come last and place himself outside himself, and so can be first and preserve himself. The sage has no wish to be first, and so is willing to come last; yet no one in the world can surpass him in taking precedence. He has no wish to preserve himself, and so places himself outside himself; yet no one in the world can preserve himself more securely. His precedence and his preservation of self transcend the burdens of both self and external things, as though he had never clung to himself.

非以其无私耶,故能成其私。 御注曰:天地之大德曰生,圣人之大宝曰位,道者为之公,天地体道故无私,无私故长久。圣人体道故无私,无私故常存以其无私耶,故能成其私。 御注曰:天地之大德曰生,圣人之大宝曰位,道者为之公,天地体道故无私,无私故长久。圣人体道故无私,无私故常存。自营为私,未有能成其私者也。 臣义曰:天地圣人所以无私者,无我故也。私於有我,未有能成其私者。天地无自生之私,故能长生,圣人无有身之私,故能常存,故曰成其私。 上善若水章第八 上善若水。
Interpretation

The highest virtue is like water. Water nourishes all things without claiming credit, and always settles in places people are unwilling to occupy. For this reason, it is closest to the Dao (the Way), the fundamental principle by which all things operate. The deepest virtue between Heaven and Earth is to bring all things to life; what the sage values most is the position from which to govern the world. The Dao is rooted in impartiality. Heaven and Earth follow the Dao and so show no favoritism; for this reason, they endure. The sage follows the Dao and does not put himself first; for this reason, he can last.

Here, “self-interest” means valuing oneself too highly and acting only for one’s own sake. Deliberately pursuing private gain makes it harder to truly fulfill oneself. Heaven and Earth do not seek their own survival, and so they continue giving life without end. The sage does not put his own interests first, and so he endures. Precisely because he is selfless, he fulfills himself.

御注曰:《易》曰:一阴一阳之谓道,继之者善也。《庄子》曰:离道以善,善名既立,则道之体亏。然天一生水,离道未远,渊而虚,静而明,是谓天下之至精,故曰上善若水。臣义曰:寂然不动,复乎妙常者,道也。感物而应,继道而出者,善也。复於至道,善无所立,名为上善,道曰上善若水。臣义曰:寂然不动,复乎妙常者,道也。感物而应,继道而出者,善也。复於至道,善无所立,名为上善,道固已离,盖善名立而道体亏矣。水之为物,生乎天一,道之出也,水几於道,道未远也,出於空无,流乎实有,出乎道者然也。渊而虚,其深也可以会道,静而明,其一也可以复道,则未远乎道者然也。出乎道,而未远乎道,故曰上善若水。 水善利万物而不争,处众人之所恶,故几於道。
Interpretation

The Yi says, “The changes of Yin and Yang are the Dao; what receives and carries on the Dao is goodness.” The Zhuangzi says, “If one leaves the Dao and deliberately practices goodness, then once the name ‘goodness’ has been established, the substance of the Dao is diminished.”

Heaven One gives birth to water (the ancients took “Heaven One” as the number that generates water). Water is still close to the Dao. Deep and empty, still and clear, it may be called the most subtle thing under Heaven. Thus it is said, “The highest goodness is like water.”

The imperial commentary explains: What is still and unmoving, returning to the mysterious and constant state, is the Dao. What responds to external things and carries on from the Dao is goodness. When one returns to the ultimate Dao, goodness is no longer given a separate name; this is what is called “highest goodness.” If one clings to the name “goodness,” one has already deviated from the Dao, for once a name is established, the substance of the Dao is diminished.

Water arises from Heaven One, just as the Dao manifests. Water is very close to the Dao, scarcely distant from it: it emerges from emptiness and flows through what is substantial, just as things arise from the Dao. Water is deep and empty, and its depths can commune with the Dao; it is still and clear, and its purity can bring one back to the Dao. Thus, although water manifests from the Dao, it remains close to it. Hence it is said, “The highest goodness is like water.”

Water is good at nourishing all things, yet does not contend with them. It stays in low places that people all despise, and so is close to the Dao. The imperial commentary says: Water becomes rain and dew to nourish all things; it congeals as frost and snow to bring them to completion. Though its functions differ, it remains close to the Dao.

御注曰:融为雨露,万汇以滋。凝为霜雪,万宝未远乎道者然也。出乎道,而未远乎道,故曰上善若水。 水善利万物而不争,处众人之所恶,故几於道。 御注曰:融为雨露,万汇以滋。凝为霜雪,万宝以成。疏为江河,聚为沼沚;泉深海大,以汲以藏以裕。生殖万物,皆往资焉而不匮。以利万物,孰善於此?善利万物,万物蒙其泽,受其施,而常处於柔弱不争之地,纳污受垢,不以自好,累乎其心,故於道为近。几,近也。 臣义曰:五行之政用也大,而水为之本,万物之生殖也博,而水资其生。施及於物,而受之者不知其所施。物蒙其泽而利之也,不知其所及。处不争之地,而利殖也博,而水资其生。施及於物,而受之者不知其所施。物蒙其泽而利之也,不知其所及。处不争之地,而利及万物,不知其所以为善。众流之污,群物之垢,彼有心者之所恶,水之纳污受垢,处众人之所恶,而不知其所以为善。恶而不知其善,恶而不知其恶,故於道为近。 居善地, 御注曰:行於地中,流而不盈。臣义曰:水由地中行,性也。其流趋下而不盈,故曰善。地如水之善,地则得所居矣。 心善渊, 御注曰:测之而益深,穷之而益远。臣义曰:虚静而深不可测,晦明而远不可穷,心如水之善渊如此。 与善仁, 御注曰:兼爱无私,施而无择。臣义曰:兼爱无私,爱之广也。施而无择,施之博也。广且博,仁至矣。与如水之善仁如此。 言善信,
Interpretation

Rain and dew fall, nourishing the myriad things; when they congeal into frost and snow, they help them mature. Water spreads out to become rivers and gathers to become ponds. Springs run deep, and oceans stretch wide: water can be drawn up and stored, and it can make supplies abundant. Water enables the myriad things to grow and multiply; they all draw nourishment from it, so its source does not run dry. What could nourish the myriad things better than water? Water is skilled at nourishing them. They receive its gifts, yet water always remains in a soft and yielding, noncompetitive position. It takes in filth and bears dust without disliking itself for this or giving it thought. Thus water is close to the Dao. “Ji” means “close.”

Minister Yi explains: The functions of the Five Phases—Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, and Water—are vast, and water is their foundation. The myriad kinds of things are numerous and flourish abundantly, and their growth all depends on water. Water benefits the myriad things, yet those it nourishes do not know how it gives; they receive its gifts without knowing where those gifts extend. Water occupies a noncompetitive position, yet nourishes the myriad things far and wide, and they do not know why it does so. The grime carried by water from all places and the filth on all things are loathed by those who scheme. Water, however, takes in filth and bears dust, occupying the place everyone shuns without giving it thought. It neither knows itself to be good because it is loathed, nor knows itself to be bad because it is loathed. Thus it is close to the Dao.

Dwelling, it is skilled in choosing a fitting place.

The Imperial Commentary says: Water flows through the earth, running without swelling or flooding. Minister Yi explains: Water moves beneath the ground; this is its nature. It follows the terrain toward lower places, yet does not overflow because of this. Thus it is said that water is skilled at finding its place. If people can be skilled at finding their place as water is, they too can dwell where it is fitting.

In mind, it is skilled at remaining deep.

The Imperial Commentary says: Probe it, and it proves ever more profound; pursue it to the end, and it proves ever more remote. Minister Yi explains: The mind is empty, still, and deep, beyond measure. Its subtle shifts between obscurity and clarity are inexhaustible. A mind as deep as water is what is meant by “in mind, it is skilled at remaining deep.”

In giving, it is skilled at expressing benevolence.

The Imperial Commentary says: It cares for all without selfishness and gives without choosing. Minister Yi explains: To care for all without selfishness is to love widely; to give without choosing recipients is to bestow benefits broadly. When love is both wide and far-reaching, benevolence reaches its utmost. Water gives to others in just this way, expressing benevolence.

In speech, it is skilled at keeping faith.

御注曰:避碍而通诸海,行险而不 失其信。择,施之博也。广且博,仁至矣。与如水之善仁如此。 言善信, 御注曰:避碍而通诸海,行险而不 失其信。 臣义曰:避碍行险,旁流万折,行由地中,束归於海,言如水之善信如此。 政善治, 御注曰:污者洁之,险者夷之,顺物之理,无容心焉,故无不治。臣义曰:洁污而清,夷险而平,任理之自尔。顺物之自然,水之治也,政如水之善治如此。 事善能, 御注曰:因地而为曲直,因器而为方圆,趋变无常而常,可以为平,无能者若是乎? 臣义曰:曲直圆方,趋变不一,适可而应,常得其平,水之能也。事如水之善能如此。 动善时。 御注曰:阳释之而伴,阴凝之而冰,次诸东方则束流,次诸西方则西流,动而不括,宜其随时而已。 臣义曰:也。事如水之善能如此。 动善时。 御注曰:阳释之而伴,阴凝之而冰,次诸东方则束流,次诸西方则西流,动而不括,宜其随时而已。 臣义曰:时次则流,时塞则止,以阳释,以阴凝,随时而动,动而不括。动如水之善时如此。 夫惟不争,故无尤矣。
Interpretation

Water avoids obstacles and flows toward the sea from every direction. Even when it passes through perilous places, it never loses its course. Its giving is boundless, and its benevolence reaches the utmost degree. This is how water excels at practicing benevolence.

Excelling at Keeping Faith

The Imperial Commentary says: Water avoids obstacles and flows into the sea from every direction; even as it passes through dangerous places, it does not lose its faithfulness.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Water avoids obstacles and passes through dangerous places, winding and turning countless times along the way. It flows through low-lying terrain and eventually joins the sea. This shows that water excels at keeping faith.

Excelling at Governance

The Imperial Commentary says: Water washes away filth and smooths out steep, dangerous places. It follows the nature of all things and harbors no selfish intent; therefore, there is nothing it cannot govern well.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Water washes away filth and makes it clear; it smooths out dangerous places and makes them level. It follows the natural order and does not force things. This is how water excels at governance. Those who govern should also be skilled at governing in this way.

Excelling at Making Use of Things

The Imperial Commentary says: Water bends or runs straight according to the lay of the land, and takes a square or round shape according to its container. It adapts continually to change, yet always remains steady. Can the incapable be like water?

The Minister’s Commentary says: Water can bend or run straight, and can be round or square. It takes different forms as circumstances change, always adapting appropriately and remaining steady. This is how water excels at making use of things. In carrying out affairs, one should likewise adapt to circumstances and act appropriately.

Excelling at Seizing the Moment

The Imperial Commentary says: Yang energy melts water and sets it flowing; Yin energy freezes it into ice. When water is in the east, it flows east; when it is in the west, it flows west. It moves with the current of events and is unrestrained, so it always accords with the times.

The Minister’s Commentary says: When the moment is right, water flows; when circumstances are obstructed, it comes to a halt. When Yang energy arrives, it melts; when Yin energy arrives, it freezes. Water moves with the current of events and acts without constraint. This is how water excels at seizing the moment.

Precisely because water does not contend with the myriad things for precedence, it commits no error.

御注曰:圣人体道则治身,惟长久之存。兼善则利,物处不争之地。《庄子》曰:有而为其易耶?易之者嗥天不宜。夫无为而寡过者,易;有为而无患者,难。既利而有为,则其於无尤也难矣。上善利物,若水之性,虽利物而不择所利,不与物争,而物莫能与之争,故无尤矣。故日天下莫柔弱於水,而攻坚强者,莫之能先。 臣义曰:水兼诸善,不有其善,故不为而几於道。人有诸善,而不有其善,故不争而无尤。 持而盈之章第九 :水兼诸善,不有其善,故不为而几於道。人有诸善,而不有其善,故不争而无尤。 持而盈之章第九 持而盈之,不如其已。揣而锐之,不可长保。 御注曰:盈则溢矣,锐则到矣,万物之理,盈必有亏,不知持后以处先,执虚以御满,苟湛溺满盈之欲,是增倾覆之祸,故不如其已。物之变无穷,吾之智有尽,前识者道之华,愚之始也。揣物之情,而锐於进取,则智有时而困,可长保乎? 臣义曰:善持满者不盈,盈则有倾覆之息。善揣物者不锐,锐则有挫折之失。不能忘有,而事於矜持,虽一时之盈,未至或倾,而终有覆溢之患。不能忘情,而工於亿度,虽进锐屡中,未见或失,而终有困拙之累。持盈揣锐,立我故也。有我则物为之敌,事物之来无已,将以我胜,殆矣。
Interpretation

The imperial commentary says: The sage takes the Dao as a model in governing himself and seeks only to endure. When he extends his care to all people, he can benefit all things and rest in a position free of contention. The Zhuangzi says, “Is it easy to act? If you regard it as easy, Heaven will not approve.” It is easier to do nothing and make few mistakes; it is difficult to act without making mistakes. To benefit all things while actively doing things, yet remain entirely free of fault, is harder still.

The highest good is like water: it benefits all things. Though water nourishes all things, it does not choose whom to nourish. It does not contend with them, and nothing can contend with it, so it is without fault. Thus it is said: Nothing in the world is softer and weaker than water, yet nothing is better than water at overcoming what is hard and strong.

The minister’s commentary says: Water possesses every kind of excellence but does not claim those excellences as its own. Thus it acts without contrivance and comes close to the Dao. If people possess every kind of excellence but do not claim those excellences as their own, they will not compete and so will be without fault.

Chapter Nine: Holding and Filling

If you hold a vessel and fill it too full, it is better to stop in time. If you sharpen something too keenly, it will be hard to keep it sharp for long.

The imperial commentary says: What is full will overflow; what is sharp to the utmost will be damaged. The way of things is that whatever reaches its fullness must decline. If you do not know how to take a lower position and remain humble in the face of fullness, but lose yourself in the pursuit of perfection, you will increase the danger of a fall. So it is better to stop in time. The changes in things are limitless, while human wisdom is limited. To anticipate things too soon is merely a superficial expression of the Dao, and the beginning of folly. If you try to gauge the situation and press single-mindedly ahead, your wisdom will eventually be stymied. How could you possibly preserve yourself for long?

The minister’s commentary says: Those skilled at maintaining fullness do not let themselves become overfull, because excess brings the danger of a fall. Those skilled at gauging things do not pursue sharpness without limit, because excessive sharpness is easily blunted. If you cannot let go of your attachment to “having” and devote yourself to maintaining fullness, then even if you do not fall for a time, the danger of overflow and collapse will remain. If you cannot let go of your fixation and instead devote yourself to calculating and scheming, then even if you succeed repeatedly for a time and seem to make no mistakes, your wisdom will eventually be stymied and you will become inept. Insisting on staying full and pursuing sharpness both arise from attachment to the self. When the self occupies the heart, you treat external things as opponents. As one thing after another comes along, you always want to overcome it by your own effort, and in the end this is extremely dangerous.

金玉满堂,莫之能守。富贵而骄,故也。有我则物为之敌,事物之来无已,将以我胜,殆矣。 金玉满堂,莫之能守。富贵而骄,自遗其咎。 御注曰:金玉富贵,非性命之理也,外物之不可恃而有者也。宝金玉者,累於物。累於物者,能勿失乎?故莫之能守。富贵而骄,则害於德。害於德者,能免於患乎?故自遗其咎。圣人不拘一世之利,以为己私分,不以王天下以为己处显,夫岂金玉以为宝,富贵之足累乎?故至富国财并焉,至贵国爵并焉,其贵无敌,其富无伦,而道不渝。 臣义曰:在外之物,无非傥来,寄认而有之,同适并焉,其贵无敌,其富无伦,而道不渝。 臣义曰:在外之物,无非傥来,寄认而有之,同适於弊。金玉富贵,在彼者也,性命道德,在我者也,忘其在我,而逐夫在彼,丧其天真,流於物假,亦妄人尔。金玉,世所宝也,非我固有,恃而有之,自累於物尔。物有所累,能无失乎?富贵,人所愿也,非我固有,有而骄之,自害於德尔。德有所害,能无患乎?圣人无我累,虽王天下,而不为己处显,无物累,虽拘一世之利,而不为己私分者,体道故也,故其道不渝。 功成名遂身退,天之道。
Interpretation

No one can guard a house piled high with gold and jade forever. Pride and complacency after gaining wealth and status invite calamity. When the mind clings to “I,” it sees external things as opposed to itself. If things from the outside keep coming one after another, trying to overcome them all by one’s own strength is dangerous.

No one can guard a house piled high with gold and jade forever. Pride and complacency after gaining wealth and status bring calamity upon oneself.

The Imperial Commentary says: Gold, jade, and riches are not what human nature and life depend on; they are all external things, and cannot truly be relied upon or possessed. Cherish gold and jade, and you will be burdened by external things. How could you avoid losing them once they burden you? That is why it is said that no one can guard a house full of gold and jade. Pride and complacency after gaining wealth and status damage De. How could calamity be avoided once De is damaged? That is why it is said that calamity is brought upon oneself. The sages do not claim passing gains as their own, nor do they treat ruling the world as proof of their own eminence. How could they regard gold and jade as treasures, or be burdened by riches and status? Thus, the richest can possess the wealth of the whole state, and the most honored can hold its highest ranks. Though none can surpass them in honor or wealth, they do not thereby depart from the Dao.

The minister Zhang’an explains: External things are merely what happens to come one’s way. People claim and possess them for a time, but in the end they often perish along with them. Wealth, status, and fame belong to the external; one’s nature, life, and De belong to oneself. To forget what one has within and pursue external things is to lose one’s innate nature and fall into delusion. Such a person is simply deluded. Gold and jade are prized by the world, but they are not originally one’s own. Relying on gold and jade and imagining one can possess them only leaves one burdened by external things. How could one avoid losing them once they become a burden? Wealth and status are desired by the world, but they too are not originally one’s own. Pride and complacency after gaining wealth and status only damage De. How could calamity fail to follow once De is damaged? The sages are not burdened by “I”: though they rule the world, they do not make eminence their final destination. They are not burdened by external things: though they enjoy passing gains, they do not claim those gains as their own. This is because they understand and practice the Dao, and so their Dao does not change.

When the work is done and one’s name is established, one should withdraw and retire. This accords with the Way of Heaven.

御注曰:功成者寨,名成者亏,日中则反,月盈则蚀,物之理也。圣人睹成坏之相,因识盈虚之有数,超然自得寨,名成者亏,日中则反,月盈则蚀,物之理也。圣人睹成坏之相,因识盈虚之有数,超然自得,不累於物,无复骄盈之患,非知天者,孰能与此?故曰功成名遂身退,天之道。四时之运,功成者去,是天之道。知进而不知退,知存而不知亡,知得而不知丧,能勿悔乎?伊尹曰:臣罔以宠利居成功。 臣义曰:阴阳迭运,寒暑代推,有进则有退,有成则有亏。天道付功於物,而其用退藏,自然之道也。彼认功名为己事,进而不知退,虽得持盈之善,揣锐之工,能勿悔乎。圣人见成坏之理,识盈虚之数,知造化之密移,明吉凶之倚伏,而无功名之累,故知进退存亡,而不失其正,得天之道也。 载营魄工,能勿悔乎。圣人见成坏之理,识盈虚之数,知造化之密移,明吉凶之倚伏,而无功名之累,故知进退存亡,而不失其正,得天之道也。 载营魄章第十 载营魄,
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says: When achievements reach their height, one should stop; when fame reaches its height, it begins to suffer. The sun starts to decline once it reaches noon, and the moon wanes once it is full. This is the way things run their course. Seeing the signs of success and failure, the Sage understands that fullness and lack each have their appointed measure. Thus the Sage remains detached and at ease, unburdened by external things and free from the troubles of pride and complacency. Who could do this without understanding the Dao of Heaven? Hence the saying: “When the work is done and the name established, withdraw.” This is the Dao of Heaven. The seasons turn, and once things have fulfilled their function, they recede. This is the Dao of Heaven. If one knows only how to advance and not how to retreat, only how to preserve and not how to perish, only how to gain and not how to lose, how could one avoid regret? Yi Yin said: “I do not use a ruler’s favor and rewards to hold on to a position won through success.”

The Minister’s Commentary says: Yin and Yang alternate in their movement; cold and heat take turns. Where there is advance, there is retreat; where there is completion, there is decline. The Dao of Heaven bestows its efficacy on the myriad things, then, once they have fulfilled their purpose, causes them to withdraw and be concealed. This is the natural order. If one treats fame and achievement as one’s own concern and presses ever onward without knowing how to yield, then even if one is skilled at preserving fullness and knows how to restrain one’s brilliance, how could one avoid regret? Seeing the principles behind change in success and failure, the Sage understands the pattern of waxing and waning, knows that creation and transformation are constantly at work unseen, and sees how good and ill fortune depend on and transform into one another. Thus the Sage is not burdened by achievement and fame. The Sage understands advance and retreat, preservation and perishing, yet does not depart from the right path. This is what it means to follow the Dao of Heaven.

“Carrying the Corporeal and Ethereal Souls” Chapter, Ten

Carrying the corporeal and ethereal souls…

御注曰:魄,阴也,丽於体而有所止,故老氏於魄言营。魂,阳也,托於气而无不之,故《易》於魂言游。圣人以神御形,以魂制魄,故神常载魂而不载於魄,如车之运百物载焉,如时之行寒暑往焉。心有天游,六彻相因,外天地,遗万物,而神未尝有所困也,岂复滞於魄哉? 臣义曰:魂托於气,而神无不之者,属如车之运百物载焉,如时之行寒暑往焉。心有天游,六彻相因,外天地,遗万物,而神未尝有所困也,岂复滞於魄哉? 臣义曰:魂托於气,而神无不之者,属乎阳也。魄丽於体,而营有所止者,属乎阴也。神载魂则生神,从魄则死,圣人气完固而神全,一出入变化,而无形体之或累,以阳胜阴,以魂制魄,故神常载魂而不载於魄。至於外天地,遗万物,独往独来,应化无穷,而神未始或困者,不载於魄尔。谓之营,盖有托宿止集之意,言魄之舍也。谓之载,盖有乘载运动之意,言神之游也未始或困者,不载於魄尔。谓之营,盖有托宿止集之意,言魄之舍也。谓之载,盖有乘载运动之意,言神之游也。故於魂言载,於魄言营。 抱一,能无离乎?
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says: The Po belongs to Yin. It depends on the body and has a fixed dwelling, which is why Laozi says the Po “resides”—that is, it has somewhere to remain. The Hun belongs to Yang. It lodges in Qi and can move freely back and forth, which is why the Book of Changes says the Hun “wanders.” The sage uses Shen to govern the body and the Hun to restrain the Po. Thus Shen is always carried along with the Hun, but does not lodge in the Po. This is like a cart carrying various goods, or like the passage of the four seasons bringing changes of cold and heat. The mind’s spirit roams through the natural realm, and the senses flow into one another. With Heaven and Earth placed outside the self, and all things forgotten, the spirit is never troubled. How, then, could it remain bound to the Po?

The Minister’s Explanation says: The Hun lodges in Qi, while Shen moves freely back and forth; these belong to Yang. The Po depends on the body and has a fixed dwelling; this belongs to Yin. When Shen carries the Hun, life is vital. When one submits to the Po’s restraint, one moves toward death. The sage’s primordial Qi is abundant and secure, and the spirit is complete. The sage enters, departs, and transforms without being burdened by the body, overcoming Yin with Yang and governing the Po through the Hun. Thus Shen is always carried along with the Hun and does not lodge in the Po.

As for placing Heaven and Earth outside the self, forgetting all things, moving freely alone, and responding to endless changes while the spirit remains untroubled, this is precisely because Shen does not lodge in the Po. “Reside” means to lodge, remain, or gather; it refers to the Po’s dwelling. “Carry” means to bear along and move; it refers to Shen’s roaming. Therefore, “carry” is used for the Hun, and “reside” for the Po.

Can you hold fast to unity and keep it from departing from you?

御注曰:天一生水,於物为精。地二生火,於物为神。精神生於道,形本生於精,守而勿失,与神为一,则精与神合而不离。以精集神,以神使形,以形存神,精全而不亏,神用而不竭,形生而不敝,如日月之丽乎天,如草木之丽乎土,未尝离也。窃尝申之,人之生也,因精集神,体像斯具,四达并流,无所不极,上际於天,下蟠於地,化育万物,不可为象,其名为同帝。而世之愚者,役己於物,失性於俗,无一息之顷,内存乎神,驰无穷之欲,外丧其精,魂反从魄,形反累神,而下与万物俱化,岂不惑哉?圣人则不然,载魄以通,抱一以守,体神以静,形将自正,其神经乎太山而精,魂反从魄,形反累神,而下与万物俱化,岂不惑哉?圣人则不然,载魄以通,抱一以守,体神以静,形将自正,其神经乎太山而不变,处乎渊泉而不濡,孰知其所始,孰知其所终,故曰圣人贵精。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says: The heavenly numbers begin with one, which gives rise to water. Among the myriad things, water corresponds to Jing (essence). The earthly numbers begin with two, which gives rise to fire. Among the myriad things, fire corresponds to Shen (spirit). The human spirit is born of the Dao (the Way), while the body takes Jing as its root. Guard Jing and Shen so that they do not dissipate, and unite body and spirit as one; then Jing and Shen can join and never part.

Use Jing to gather Shen, let Shen direct the body, and in turn rely on the body to nurture the spirit. Jing and Qi (vital energy) will be abundant and undiminished, Shen will act without becoming exhausted, and the body will grow without decaying. It is like the sun and moon attached to Heaven, or plants growing in the soil: they never separate from their source.

I have explained further: A person is born when Jing gathers and gives form to the spirit, thereby bringing the body into being. The spirit’s activity extends in every direction and flows without end; there is nowhere it cannot reach. It connects with Heaven above, spreads throughout the earth below, and transforms and nourishes the myriad things, yet cannot be described in any concrete image. This state is called “being one with the Sovereign”—that is, being united with the Dao.

Yet foolish people in the world are driven by external things. They lose their original nature amid worldly habits and never let their spirit rest within, even for a moment. They indulge endless desires and dissipate the Jing and Qi within them. So the Hun (ethereal soul) is pulled along by the Po (corporeal soul), the body in turn wears down the spirit, and in the end they change and perish along with the myriad things. Is this not delusion?

The sages are different. They bring the Hun and Po into accord and nurture themselves through “Embracing the One”—maintaining a state in which spirit and Dao are united. They quiet the spirit, and the body naturally becomes upright. Their spirit passes through heights as lofty as Mount Tai without changing, and dwells in depths like an abyss without being stained. Who can know where they begin or where they end? Thus it is said: the sages treasure Jing.

臣义曰:道生一,一者,水之生数也,精之所本,故天一之水为精。一生二,二者,火之生数也,神之所出,故地二之火为神。一元之炁,混於太虚,气本无形,精因以生,精固於一,神集乃全,一精集神,而神用不竭,以神御形,而形生不敝。故精者生之本,一者精之数。精固而不摇,则复乎一,一抱而不离则精全,精全则神全集乃全,一精集神,而神用不竭,以神御形,而形生不敝。故精者生之本,一者精之数。精固而不摇,则复乎一,一抱而不离则精全,精全则神全,神全则合乎变物,而上与造化者游。其静也体道,其作也契理,孰究其终始。彼汨於多欲,与接为构,丧精失灵,神敝於形,魂载於魄,沦於幽,阴沉为下愚而天理灭矣。惟抱一不离者,虽涉万变,而神全於一。 专气致柔,能如婴儿乎?
Interpretation

I explained: “‘The Dao gives birth to the One.’ Here, ‘One’ is the generative number of Water. Jing arises from it, so the Water of Heavenly One is called Jing. ‘The One gives birth to the Two.’ Here, ‘Two’ is the generative number of Fire. Shen emerges from it, so the Fire of Earthly Two is called Shen.

Primordial Qi blends within the Great Void. Qi has no form in its original state, and Jing arises from it. When Jing holds fast to the One and Shen gathers, life can become whole. When Jing and Shen unite, the function of Shen does not run dry. When Shen governs the body, the body can grow without decline. Jing is therefore the foundation of life, and One is the number associated with Jing. When Jing is stable and unwavering, it can return to the One; when one holds to the One without straying, Jing can become abundant. When Jing is abundant, Shen is whole; when Shen is whole, it can adapt to the transformations of all things and roam with the workings of creation. In stillness, it embodies the Great Dao; in action, it accords with the principles of things. Who can fathom its beginning and end?

Those who give themselves over to excessive desires and ceaselessly engage with external things deplete their Jing-Qi and lose their clarity. Shen is burdened by the body, the hun is governed by the po, and they sink into darkness, becoming dull and confused until the principles of Heaven are extinguished within them. Only those who hold to the One without straying can remain whole in Shen and return to the One, even amid the myriad changes.

“By concentrating Qi and bringing the body and mind to softness, can you become like an infant?” “Concentrating Qi and attaining softness” means devoting oneself to nourishing Qi and making it supple. The infant is often used as a metaphor for a state of simple, gentle purity, undisturbed by desire.

御注曰:《易》曰:乾,其静也专。扬雄曰:和柔足以安物。静而不杂之谓专,和而不暴之谓柔,婴儿居不知所为,行不知所之,不藏是非美恶,故气专而致柔。孟子曰:蹶者趣者,是气也,而反动其心,心不足以专气,则气有蹶趋之不正,而心至於愤。孟子曰:蹶者趣者,是气也,而反动其心,心不足以专气,则气有蹶趋之不正,而心至於愤骄而不可系。圣人虚己以游世,心无使气之强,则其静而不杂,和而不暴,与婴儿也奚择?故曰能如婴儿乎?孟子曰:其为气也至大至刚,以直养而无害,则充塞乎天地之间。老氏之专气,则曰致柔何也?至刚以行义,致柔以复性,古之道术,无乎不在。
Interpretation

The Book of Changes says, “When the Way of Qian—the Way by which Heaven moves—is at rest, it is undivided.” Yang Xiong says, “Gentleness and compliance are enough to bring all things to rest.” Quietness without distraction is called “undivided”; gentleness without impatience is called “soft.” When infants sit quietly, they do not know what they are doing; when they move, they do not know where they are going. They do not harbor judgments of right and wrong, beauty and ugliness, so their Qi is undivided and they can attain a gentle state.

Mencius says, “Stumbling and hurrying are both movements of Qi, yet they in turn unsettle the heart.” If the heart cannot keep Qi undivided, Qi becomes unsteady, stumbling or hurried, while the heart grows resentful and arrogant, and is hard to rein in. The sage lets go of the self and moves with ease through the world, not allowing the heart to drive Qi into hardness. In this way, the sage is quiet and undivided, gentle and unhurried. How is this different from being an infant? Hence the saying: “Can you be like an infant?”

Mencius also says, “This Qi is vast and strong. If you nourish it with uprightness and do it no harm, it will fill the space between Heaven and Earth.” Laozi speaks of “concentrating Qi,” yet says one should attain gentleness. Why? Great strength is for putting the Way of right conduct into practice; reaching softness is for returning to one’s nature. The ancient art of the Dao embraced both strength and softness.

臣义曰:气者道之所运,物者气之所化,气寓乾坤以出入,而万物因气以生死,故气为万物之元,而人尤贵於善养也。《孟子》曰:蹶者趋者,是气也,而反动其心。杨雄曰:气者所适善恶之马欤。则气之所养,要乎专也。静而不变,一而不杂,则气养也。《孟子》曰:蹶者趋者,是气也,而反动其心。杨雄曰:气者所适善恶之马欤。则气之所养,要乎专也。静而不变,一而不杂,则气得其专,岂复有蹶趋动心之累,善恶失其所适也哉。气专则静一而有常,冲和而不暴,致柔以全真,而体与道俱,其与婴儿等尔。彼心火炎於中,气马蹶於外,强暴之心胜,而醇和之德消,喜怒并毗於阴阳,嗜欲接构於声色,此人所以陷於妄作之凶不自返也。 涤除玄览,能无疵乎? 御注曰:圣人以此洗心,则涤除万行而不有。以此以陷於妄作之凶不自返也。 涤除玄览,能无疵乎? 御注曰:圣人以此洗心,则涤除万行而不有。以此退藏於密,则玄览妙理而默识。若是者体纯素而不累,过而弗悔,当而不自得也,何疵之有? 臣义曰:心复於无,则情亡垢尽,心融形释,故曰涤除万物而不有。冥会於道,则遗人离物,明彻见独,故曰玄览妙理而默识。涤除玄览,则物我玄同,何复有疵? 爱民治国,能无为乎?
Interpretation

I believe that Qi (vital energy) is what the Dao (the Way) relies on as it operates, and that all things are formed through the transformation of Qi. Qi moves back and forth between Heaven and Earth, and all things grow and perish through it. Qi is therefore the root of all things, and people in particular should be skilled at nourishing it.

The Mencius says that whether a person stumbles or runs, Qi has been stirred and has in turn moved the heart. Yang Xiong says that Qi is like a horse that can carry a person toward good or evil. This shows that the key to nourishing Qi is singleness of purpose: remain calm without rash change, and keep the mind undistracted. Only then can Qi be cultivated. It will no longer agitate the heart through restless movement, and the course toward good or evil will not be lost. When Qi is concentrated, one can be still and settled, enduring, even-tempered, and free of violence. By becoming gentle and preserving one’s original nature, body and mind accord with the Dao, like those of an infant. By contrast, when desire burns fiercely within, Qi grows restless like a wild horse, and violent impulses prevail. One’s pure, even-tempered De (Virtue/Power) then fades. When joy and anger become excessive, and the senses are continually stirred by sights and sounds, a person may fall into reckless action, invite disaster, and fail to turn back.

Can one cleanse the heart and perceive what is hidden and subtle without any flaw?

The Imperial Commentary says: The sage uses this method to cleanse the heart, bringing every action to purity and freedom from attachment. The sage then withdraws into deep quiet, observes the subtle principles of the mysterious, and apprehends them in silence. Such a person is naturally simple and unburdened by external things; when they make a mistake, they do not dwell on regret, and when they act appropriately, they do not congratulate themselves. What flaw could remain?

I believe that when the heart returns to emptiness, desires recede and defilements are cleared away; when the mind opens into free communion, attachment to bodily form is released. Thus one cleanses everything without possessing anything. Once one has merged silently with the Dao, one can forget self and others, transcend external things, and clearly perceive the unique Dao. By cleansing the heart and perceiving what is hidden and subtle, one reaches a state in which self and things merge. Where, then, could any flaw remain?

Can one care for the people and govern the state through Wuwei (non-action)?

御注曰:以仁爱民,以智治国,施教化,修法则,以善一世,其於无为也难矣。圣人利泽施於万世不为爱人,功盖天下似不自己,故无为也,用天下而有余。 臣义曰:爱民以仁,而仁之施也,未离乎有心。治国人,功盖天下似不自己,故无为也,用天下而有余。 臣义曰:爱民以仁,而仁之施也,未离乎有心。治国以智,而智之用也,未离乎有知。役於心智,劳於有为者然也。不为其爱,则爱周於民,不为其治,则治全於国。 天门开闱,能为雌乎? 御注曰:知其雄,守其雌,为天下溪。圣人体天道之变化,卷舒启闭,不违乎时,柔刚微彰,惟其所用。然未尝先人而常随人,未尝胜物而常下物,故天下乐推而不厌,能为雌,於是乎在。 臣义曰:天门开阖,阳之动也。阳动自然,而常下物,故天下乐推而不厌,能为雌,於是乎在。 臣义曰:天门开阖,阳之动也。阳动自然,故以天言之。道有出入,故以门言之。圣人无心於作为,而阖辟变化,应而不玄,其为雌乎。 明白四达,能无知乎? 御注曰:聪明圣智,守之以愚,与此同义。 臣义曰:旒纩之设,收聪明也,守之以愚,无所用知。明白四达,无以知为,所以为聪明圣知。 生之畜之,生而不有,为而不恃,长而不宰,是谓玄德。
Interpretation

The imperial commentary says: To care for the people through benevolence, govern the state through wisdom, carry out instruction, and revise the laws, all in the hope of bringing order to the world through good deeds—this makes Wuwei difficult to attain. The sage bestows benefits on the world for generations, yet does not think of himself as caring for anyone. His achievements extend throughout the world, yet they seem not to have come from him. Thus he is able to practice Wuwei, and has ample capacity to govern the world.

A minister explains: To care for the people through benevolence means that once benevolence is put into practice, the mind still acts with intention. To govern the state through wisdom means that the use of wisdom still involves discrimination and deliberation. Being stirred by schemes and cleverness, and wearied by deliberate action—that is the result. When one does not deliberately set out to love, love can extend to all the people; when one does not deliberately set out to govern, the state’s order can instead be made complete.

“Can you keep to the feminine when Heaven’s Gate opens and closes?” This asks whether, amid the opening and closing transformations of Heaven and Earth, one can remain gentle and still, and take the lower position.

The imperial commentary says: The Dao De Jing states, “Know the masculine, keep to the feminine, and become the stream of the world.” The sage follows the transformations of the Dao: sometimes contracting and sometimes extending, sometimes opening and sometimes closing, without ever going against the moment. He is gentle when gentleness is called for, firm when firmness is called for, hidden when concealment is called for, and manifest when it is called for, using each quality only as needed. He never rushes ahead of others, but always follows them; he never places himself above the myriad things, but always stays beneath them. Thus the people of the world are glad to raise him up and do not reject him. This is what it means to keep to the feminine.

A minister explains: Heaven’s Gate opening and closing refers to the movement of Yang Qi. Yang Qi arises naturally, yet always remains beneath the myriad things. Thus the people of the world are glad to raise it up and do not reject it. This is what it means to keep to the feminine.

Another minister explains: It is called “Heaven’s Gate” because the Dao enters and exits through it. Heaven’s Gate opening and closing refers to the movement of Yang Qi. Yang Qi arises naturally, and the sage, too, acts without deliberate intention. He simply follows the moment and changes with it, responding to things without clinging to the mysterious. This is what it means to keep to the feminine.

“Can you understand all things clearly and remain free of cleverness?” This asks whether one can see in every direction and understand everything without taking pride in one’s cleverness.

The imperial commentary says: To be wise and discerning, yet hold fast to simplicity—this means the same thing.

A minister explains: The hanging strands on the crowns of ancient emperors and the ornaments that screened their ears were meant to restrain sight and hearing. To hold fast to simplicity is to avoid using cleverness recklessly. One who is truly clear-sighted and understanding does not rely on cleverness to act; only then can one be called wise and discerning.

To give life to and nurture the myriad things, letting them grow without claiming them as one’s own; to help them without taking pride in one’s achievements; to guide them as they develop without ruling over them—this is called Mysterious De (profound and subtle Virtue).

御注曰:圣人存神知化,与道同体,则配神明,育万物,无不可者。生之以遂其性,畜之以极其养。无爱利之心焉,故生而不有。无矜伐之行焉,故为而不恃。无刻制之巧焉,故长而不宰。若是者其德深矣远矣,与物反矣,故曰是谓玄德。天道升於北,则与物辨。而玄者天之色也,圣人之於天道,降而为德,非玄不足以名之。 臣长而不宰。若是者其德深矣远矣,与物反矣,故曰是谓玄德。天道升於北,则与物辨。而玄者天之色也,圣人之於天道,降而为德,非玄不足以名之。 臣义曰:圣人自抱一专气,至乎玄览,则在我者至矣。自无为为雌,至乎无知,则应物者至矣。在我而忘我,在物而忘物,与道同体,於是乎见生其所自生,畜其所自畜,道生万物,孰认而有为。本无为,孰矜而恃其长天下也。无刻削之巧,皆付之自然尔。故曰不宰,夫如是,故百姓不知。万物不谢,是谓玄德。 三十辐章第十一 三十辐共一毂,当其无,有车之用。埏埴以为器,当其无,有器之用。凿户牖以为室,当其无,有室之用。 御注曰:有无一致,利用出入,是谓至神。有无异相,在有为体,在无为用,阴阳之运,万物之理也用。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong’s commentary says: The sage nurtures the spirit and understands transformation, becoming one with the Dao. Thus the sage can accord with the divine and nourish all things, with nothing beyond reach. The sage allows all things to grow and fully express their nature, then cares for them so they receive ample nourishment. With no preference or expectation of reward, the sage gives life to all things without possessing them. With no self-praise or claim to merit, the sage acts without relying on achievement. Without contrived skill to control or shape things, the sage lets all things grow without ruling them. Such a person’s De is deep and far-reaching, contrary to the common way of seeing things; this is called “Mysterious De,” profound and subtle virtue. When the Way of Heaven moves to the north, it reveals a character distinct from that of the myriad things. “Mysterious” is the color of Heaven. The sage receives the Way of Heaven and puts it into practice as De; only the word “mysterious” can describe it.

A subordinate does not rule over the myriad things as they grow. Such a person’s De is deep and far-reaching, contrary to the common way of seeing things; this is called “Mysterious De.” When the Way of Heaven moves to the north, it reveals a character distinct from that of the myriad things. “Mysterious” is the color of Heaven. The sage receives the Way of Heaven and puts it into practice as De; only the word “mysterious” can describe it.

A subordinate’s explanation says: The sage holds fast to the One, the root of the Dao, and gathers Jing and Qi with undivided focus, reaching a state of subtle insight; in this way, self-cultivation reaches its utmost. From taking the lower position through Wuwei and responding to things with gentleness, to not forcing all things through discriminating knowledge, the capacity to respond to external things also reaches its utmost. The sage does not cling to the self, nor cling to things when facing the myriad things, and so becomes one with the Dao. From this we can understand that each thing grows from its own nature, and each is nourished according to its own natural conditions. The Dao gives life to and nourishes all things, but who would claim them as their own or deliberately act upon them? If one acts through Wuwei from the start, why praise oneself, rely on one’s achievements, or claim to rule the world? Without contrived cleverness to shape or control the myriad things, one leaves them to nature. Hence the words, “does not rule.” In this way, the people do not feel that anyone governs them, and the myriad things do not lose sight of their own nature. This is called “Mysterious De.”

Chapter Thirty-One: Thirty Spokes

Thirty spokes converge at the hub of a wheel. Because the hub’s center is empty, the wheel can turn. Clay is kneaded to make a vessel. Because the vessel’s center is empty, it can hold things. Doors and windows are cut to make a house. Because the inside of the house is empty, it can be lived in.

Emperor Huizong’s commentary says: Being and nonbeing are connected from the outset; their practical function appears through their interaction. This is the wondrous function at its highest. Being and nonbeing seem different in form: being is the shape of things, while nonbeing is the condition that allows things to function. This is the function at work in the movement of Yin-Yang and in the formation of the myriad things.

御注曰:有无一致,利用出入,是谓至神。有无异相,在有为体,在无为用,阴阳之运,万物之理也。车之用在运,器之用在盛,室之用在虚,妙用出於至无,变化藏於不累,如鉴无象,因物显照,至人用心,每解乎此。臣义曰:有之与无,冥於一致,道之全体,神之至也。自无适有,因有见无,则有无异相。无即有而为体,有即无而为用,物理皆然也。车之运转,器之成贮,室之居处,皆以无为之用。车也、器也、室也,皆以有为之体。堕於形体,认为已有,归於俱敝,蔽蒙之人也。知无有为用,则明变化之机。达妙用之功也、器也、室也,皆以有为之体。堕於形体,认为已有,归於俱敝,蔽蒙之人也。知无有为用,则明变化之机。达妙用之功,应於无穷,得於神解。 故有之以为利,无之以为用。 御注曰:有则实,无则虚,实故具貌像声色而有质,虚故能运量酬醉而不穷。天地之间,道以器显,故无不废有,器以道妙,故有必归无。木挠而水润,火熯而金坚,土均而布,稼穑出焉,此有也,而人赖以为利。天之所以运,地之所以处,四时之所以行,百物之所以昌,孰尸之者?此无也。世莫睹其进,故其用不匮。有无之相生,老氏於此三者,推而明之。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of the Song dynasty comments: Being and nonbeing are originally one. Being gives things form; nonbeing enables them to function. This is the most subtle principle. Being and nonbeing appear distinct: being is the form of things, while nonbeing is their function. The movement of Yin-Yang and the patterns of the myriad things work in the same way. A cart is useful because it can move; a vessel because it can hold things; a house because of its empty space. Subtle function arises from “nonbeing,” and change is hidden where nothing is constrained. A mirror, for example, contains no images of its own, yet reflects whatever appears before it. Those who attain a high level of cultivation are often able to grasp this principle.

A minister’s commentary says: In their depths, being and nonbeing return to unity. This is the complete substance of the Dao (the Way), and the culmination of its mystery. From nonbeing comes being; through being, one comes to understand nonbeing. Thus being and nonbeing appear to be distinct. Nonbeing depends on being to take the form of things, while being depends on nonbeing to function. This is the principle of all things. A cart can move, a vessel can hold things, and a house can provide shelter because of the emptiness within them; the cart, vessel, and house themselves are forms of being. Those who cling to outward forms and take what is before their eyes to be everything will ultimately decay along with those forms. This is the view of the unenlightened. To understand that nonbeing can function is to grasp the pivot of change, comprehend subtle functions, respond to transformations without end, and apprehend them through spiritual insight.

Thus it is said: being brings practical benefit, while nonbeing makes function possible.

Emperor Huizong of the Song dynasty comments: Being is substantial; nonbeing is empty. Substantial things have shape, image, sound, color, and texture. Emptiness enables things to operate, contain, and respond, so their functions are inexhaustible. Between Heaven and Earth, the Dao manifests through concrete things, so being cannot be set aside. Yet things reveal their subtlety through the Dao, and being ultimately returns to nonbeing. Wood can bend and remain supple; water can moisten; fire can dry things; metal is hard; and level ground can be sown so that crops grow. These are all instances of being, through which people obtain practical benefit. But what enables Heaven to move, Earth to remain stable, the seasons to turn, and the myriad things to flourish? And what governs them? This is nonbeing. People cannot see how it functions, and so its function is inexhaustible. Here Laozi uses these three examples to explain the principle that being and nonbeing give rise to each other.

臣义曰:形而为有,物之为利,虚而为无,物之为用,有无相资而成功。如后车也、器也、室也,皆物之易见者也,故即此三者,以明有无之利用。 五色章第十二 五色令人目盲,五音令人耳聋。 御注曰:目围二焉,其见者性即此三者,以明有无之利用。 五色章第十二 五色令人目盲,五音令人耳聋。 御注曰:目围二焉,其见者性也,彻而为明则作哲,足以断天下之疑。耳藏一焉,其闻者性也,彻而为聪则 作谋,足以通天下之志。睹道之人,无形之上,独以神视,无声之表,独以气听,而视听有不待耳目之用者,曾何声色之足蔽哉?世之人役耳目於外物之累,故目淫於五色,耳淫於五音,而聪明为之衰,其於聋盲也何辩?臣义曰:见晓於无形者,得之神视。闻和於无声者,得之气听。视不以目,故彻而为明。聪不以耳,故彻而为聪。聪明足以作谋作哲,而耳目彻乎无闻无见,岂有声色之累乎,性迁於情,已失於物。弊精神於声色,役耳目於视听,是以神宇耗而聪明衰,故曰目盲耳聋。 五味令人口爽,驰骋田猎,令人心发狂。
Interpretation

My minister explains: Physical form manifests as “being,” and vessels are useful to people. Emptiness manifests as “nonbeing,” and from it the function of vessels also arises. “Being” and “nonbeing” depend on one another; only together can they enable vessels to serve their purpose. The wheel, the vessel, and the house are familiar examples, so Laozi uses them to explain the distinct functions of “being” and “nonbeing.”

Chapter Twelve: The Five Colors

The five colors dazzle the eyes; the five tones dull the hearing.

The Imperial Commentary says: Each of a person’s two eyes has its own nature. When the eyes can discern things clearly and fully, this is called “vision.” By discerning how things stand, one can judge the world’s difficulties. The ears, too, have their own nature. When they can hear and distinguish sounds clearly and fully, this is called “hearing.” By understanding how things stand, one can grasp the thoughts of people throughout the world. One who has realized the Dao can perceive the formless through Shen, and hear the soundless through Qi. Such a person senses without relying on ears and eyes—how, then, could sounds and colors obscure perception? People in the world are burdened by external things and become absorbed in the five colors and five tones. Their discernment consequently declines; how is this any different from being blind and deaf?

My minister explains: To perceive things clearly in the formless is to see through Shen; to hear harmony in the soundless is to listen through Qi. Seeing does not depend on the eyes, so it can discern with complete clarity. Hearing does not depend on the ears, so it can perceive with complete acuity. Discernment of this degree is sufficient for planning and judgment. When the ears and eyes can go beyond ordinary experience, how could they be burdened by sounds and colors? When desires alter a person’s nature, external things come to govern them. Becoming absorbed in sounds and colors and tiring the ears and eyes with constant seeing and hearing depletes the spirit and diminishes discernment. Thus it is said: “The five colors dazzle the eyes; the five tones dull the hearing.”

The five flavors spoil the palate; racing horses and hunting in the fields unsettle the mind.

The Imperial Commentary says: The flavor in which the Dao manifests is bland and without taste. Becoming absorbed in sounds and colors and tiring the ears and eyes with constant seeing and hearing depletes the spirit and diminishes discernment. Thus it is said: “The five colors dazzle the eyes; the five tones dull the hearing.” The five flavors spoil the palate; racing horses and hunting in the fields unsettle the mind.

御注曰:道之出口,淡於物。弊精神於声色,役耳目於视听,是以神宇耗而聪明衰,故曰目盲耳聋。 五味令人口爽,驰骋田猎,令人心发狂。 御注曰:道之出口,淡乎其无味。五味,人之所同嗜也,而厚味实腊毒,故令人口爽。人之生也,形不满仞,而心侔造化。圣人之心,动而纬万方,静而鉴天地。世之人从事於田猎,而因以丧其良心,不足以自胜,可不为大哀也耶? 臣义曰:大羹玄酒,复乎无味,所以体道也。道之出口,淡乎无味,所以语道也。葆乎冲和,全其天真,至味存焉。逐世好之嗜,而厚於五味,则失味之真,故曰口爽。心游於物初,而侔乎造化,其动而出也,足以纬万方,其静而入也,足以鉴天地,心复乎无心而然也。从事於田猎,则精神驰骋於外,而不和返,气血作劳,而心发狂,失性如此,大可哀也。 难得之货,令人行妨。足以鉴天地,心复乎无心而然也。从事於田猎,则精神驰骋於外,而不和返,气血作劳,而心发狂,失性如此,大可哀也。 难得之货,令人行妨。 御注曰:利以养人,而货以化之,故交利而俱赡。圣人不贵难得之货,不贵异物,贱用物,欲人之安其分而无所夺也。贵难得之货,则至於决性命之情,而饕贵富,何行之能守?故令人行妨。仲虺之称汤曰:不殖货利,孔子之谓子贡曰:赐不受命而货殖焉。货之妨行如此。
Interpretation

When spoken aloud, the Dao (the Way), the fundamental principle of all things in the universe, sounds plain and tasteless. Everyone enjoys the five flavors—sour, sweet, bitter, pungent, and salty. But flavors that are too strong can damage the sense of taste; in this way, they throw the palate out of balance.

The human body is only a little over ten feet tall, yet the heart can connect with the transformations of Heaven and Earth. When active, the heart of a sage can plan and govern all affairs under Heaven; when still, it can see through Heaven and Earth. People in the world are engrossed in hunting, their spirits chasing after external things, and so they lose the goodness already within them. Unable even to restrain themselves, are they not in a state of great sorrow?

The great broth, made without seasoning, and the dark wine, which in ancient ritual stood for pure water, both return to tastelessness; this is how the Dao is embodied. The Dao, when spoken, is plain and tasteless; this is how it is described. Hold fast to emptiness, stillness, and balance, and preserve your unspoiled nature: the true flavor lies within. Chase worldly pleasures and crave the five strong flavors, and you lose your original sense of taste. This is why it is said that they “make the mouth lose its proper taste.”

The spirit of the heart can roam in the realm before all things began and connect with the transformations of Heaven and Earth. When the heart stirs into action, it can plan all affairs; when it grows still, it can see through Heaven and Earth. This is possible because the heart returns to a state of no-mind, free of attachment. But if one becomes absorbed in hunting, the spirit races outward, unable to settle and gather itself. Qi and blood are depleted by exertion, and the spirit grows frantic. To lose one’s nature in this way is truly tragic.

Hard-to-obtain goods hinder people’s conduct.

Goods can be used to sustain people, but people are also affected by goods. Thus, people exchange benefits and provide for one another. The sage does not prize rare goods or unusual objects, and makes little of unnecessary implements, hoping that people will keep to their proper place and not compete with one another. If rare things are treated as precious, people will violate their nature in pursuit of wealth and status. How could they then remain on the right path? This is why it is said that such goods hinder people’s conduct.

Zhong Hui, an aide to King Tang of Shang, praised Tang, saying, “He did not amass goods for profit.” Confucius, speaking of Zigong, said, “Ci (Zigong) did not accept the Mandate of Heaven, but traded in goods and amassed wealth.” This is precisely how goods hinder people’s conduct.

臣义曰:知义命之所在者,明富贵之有分。知分而安之,岂复有攘夺健羡之患。货之难得,世之所贵,非适於用,而妄以为美者,难得故也。贵其难得,至於决性命之情,而期於必得,则行之毁也。孰顾,故曰行妨。 是以圣人为腹不为目,故去彼取此。 御注曰:八卦坤为腹,以厚载而也。孰顾,故曰行妨。 是以圣人为腹不为目,故去彼取此。 御注曰:八卦坤为腹,以厚载而容也。离为目,以外视而明也。厚载而容,则无所不受。外视而明,则有所不及。圣人以天下为度,故取此能容之腹,非事事而治之,物物而察之也。故去彼外视之目。《庄子》曰:贼莫大乎德,有心而心有眼,故圣人去之。 臣义曰:无所择而无不容者,腹也。有所视而有所别者,目也。故坤以厚载,有容为腹,离以外视,而明为目。容则无所不受,契道之体,明则见有所不及,立我为用,故圣人去彼取此。声音、嗜好、利欲,均失性也。感移於物,情累之役人也。目为多,故先言乎目。目不盲,耳不聋,口不爽,心不狂,行不妨,则情忘气完而腹实矣,故终之以为腹不为目。
Interpretation

A commentator says: When people understand the proper place of status and destiny, they know that wealth and honor each have their allotted share. If they know their limits and accept them peacefully, what cause remains for the distress of competing, demanding more, or envying others? People prize goods that are hard to obtain. Such goods may have no real use, yet their rarity leads people to value them recklessly. When they prize rare things, even going against their nature and harming their lives in a single-minded effort to acquire them, their conduct is damaged. That is why Laozi says, “conduct is obstructed”: this kind of behavior harms the person who engages in it.

Therefore, the sage seeks only to enrich the inner self and does not chase outward desires for sights and sounds. The sage thus sets aside one course and chooses the other.

The imperial commentary says: In the Eight Trigrams (Bagua), Kun symbolizes the belly because it is substantial and bearing, able to contain all things. Li symbolizes the eyes because they look outward and can distinguish things. The substantial, capacious belly has nothing it cannot contain; the eyes, though bright in their outward gaze, have things they cannot see or see in their entirety. The sage takes all under Heaven as the measure, and so chooses to be like the belly, containing all things, rather than governing everything and inspecting every detail. The sage therefore sets aside the outward scrutiny represented by the eyes. The Zhuangzi says, “Nothing is worse than damaging one’s De: when the mind clings to something, it is as though eyes have grown upon it.” The sage therefore seeks to remove this kind of attachment.

The commentator adds: Taking things without selection and containing them all are qualities of the belly; looking at things and thereby making distinctions are qualities of the eyes. Thus Kun symbolizes the belly through its substantial bearing and capacity to contain, while Li symbolizes the eyes through their outward gaze and discernment. To contain is to receive everything, in keeping with the very nature of the Dao; to scrutinize clearly is always to leave something unseen and to bring one’s own will into one’s actions. The sage therefore sets aside outward scrutiny and distinction, and chooses inward receptivity.

Sounds, appetites, and desires for gain can all lead people away from their nature. When they are moved and changed by external things, they become burdened and governed by emotions. The eyes readily give rise to excessive desire, which is why the scripture speaks of them first. When the eyes are not blind, the ears not deaf, the mouth remains true to its nature, the mind is not disordered, and conduct is not obstructed, one can forget desires, preserve Jing (essence), and enrich the inner self. Hence the passage concludes: “Attend to the belly, not the eyes.”

宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之二竟宋徽宗道德真不爽,心不狂,行不妨,则情忘气完而腹实矣,故终之以为腹不为目。 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之二竟宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之三 登仕郎臣章安撰义 道经 宠辱章第十三 宠辱若惊,贵大患若身。 御注曰:宠者在下,贵者在上,居宠以为荣,则辱矣。处贵而以为利,则患莫大焉。以富为是者,不能辞禄。以显为是者,不能辞名。亲权者,不能与人柄,操之则栗,拾之则悲,兹宠辱所以若惊欤?惨怛之疾,恬愉之安,时集於体,怵迫之恐,欣惧之喜,交溺於心,兹大患所以若身欤?臣义曰:见宠於人,而心为之荣,辱孰甚焉。处贵於时,而己为之利,患莫大焉。宠辱本乎得失,得失之来,心之惊也。惊於得失,而为荣辱,故曰若惊。以彼之贵,为我之利,固而居之,反累其心,同乎有为之患,而不能自脱。 何谓宠辱?宠为下。 。以彼之贵,为我之利,固而居之,反累其心,同乎有为之患,而不能自脱。 何谓宠辱?宠为下。 御注曰:龙之为物,变化自如,不可制畜,可豢养焉,则志於豢养,有辱之道。古之善为士者,三旌之位,不足易其介,万钟之禄,不足迁其守。居宠而思危,在福而若冲,则何辱之有?责天位也,慕天禄也,知进而不知退,知得而不知丧,则人贱之矣。故受宠於人,则为下之道。
Interpretation

The end of Volume Two of Emperor Huizong of Song’s Explanation of the Meaning of the True Scripture of the Dao De Jing; Volume Three begins.

An explanation of the text written by the court official Zhang An, Gentleman of Service.

Dao Jing: “Favor and Disgrace,” Chapter Thirteen

Being favored or disgraced is like being startled. To regard honor as precious is to regard a great calamity as precious as one’s own life.

The imperial commentary says: The favored person occupies a low position, while the honored person stands above. If one takes favor as a source of glory, it will bring disgrace; if one takes high rank as an advantage, it will bring still greater calamity. Those who think wealth is good cannot bear to give up their stipends. Those who think distinction is good cannot bear to relinquish their reputations. Those attached to power will not hand their authority to anyone else. While clutching power, they are anxious and uneasy; when they lose it, they grieve bitterly. This is why favor and disgrace cause alarm. Painful illness and feelings of comfort arise in the body from time to time; urgent fear and joy, worry and dread, take turns disturbing the heart. This is why one regards a great calamity as one’s own self.

Your servant Zhang An explains: When others favor you, your heart takes it as an honor. What could be more humiliating than that? When you hold an honored position, you take it as an advantage. What could be a greater calamity? Favor and disgrace both arise from gain and loss; when gain or loss comes, the heart is disturbed. Thus the scripture says that favor and disgrace are like being startled. If you take another person’s honor as your own advantage and cling to it, you burden your heart and fall into the calamities brought on by striving, with no way to escape.

What does “favor and disgrace” mean? To be favored is, by its very nature, to occupy a low position.

The imperial commentary says: A dragon can transform freely and cannot be controlled or tamed by people. If it can be kept in an enclosure, it can only be raised as a creature in captivity; this is what it means to be disgraced. Those of old who were skilled in cultivating the Dao would not alter their principles even when they held the rank of the Three Dukes, nor change their convictions even when they received generous stipends. If, when favored, they remain mindful of danger, and, amid good fortune, maintain humility and restraint, they will suffer no disgrace. But if they crave the high rank bestowed by Heaven and envy the stipends granted by Heaven, knowing only how to advance and not how to withdraw, and only how to gain and not how to lose, people will look down on them. Thus, accepting another’s favor places one in a subordinate position.

臣义曰:以彼之宠为荣,则受宠者所为辱,此为下之道也。况知进不知退,知得不知丧,此所。故受宠於人,则为下之道。 臣义曰:以彼之宠为荣,则受宠者所为辱,此为下之道也。况知进不知退,知得不知丧,此所以履忧患而贻身灾,人得而贱之,岂不为下。 得之若惊,失之若惊,是谓宠辱若惊。 御注曰:轩冕在身,非性命之理也。物之傥来,寄也,寄之来不可拒,故至人不以得为悦。其去不可圉,故至人不以失为忧。今寄去则不乐,受则喜之,是得失累乎心,能勿惊乎?柳下惠为士师,三黜而不去,正考父三命,循墙而走,则异於是。 臣义曰:宠辱生於得失,得失至而心为之累,神为之惊,是惊於得为士师,三黜而不去,正考父三命,循墙而走,则异於是。 臣义曰:宠辱生於得失,得失至而心为之累,神为之惊,是惊於得失而为宠辱也。无得则无失,无宠则无辱,忘怀於得失,则何所惊也。不惊,则乌有所谓宠辱。 何谓贵大患若身?御注曰:据利势,擅赏罚,作福威,
Interpretation

The “Minister Yi” interpretation says: If you regard the favor bestowed by others as an honor, then being favored will bring humiliation in its wake. This is the conduct of someone in a subordinate position. What is more, if you know only how to advance and not how to withdraw, only how to gain and not how to lose, you will meet with troubles, invite disaster, and earn people’s contempt. How could this not be a subordinate position?

The Dao De Jing says: “When favored, be as though startled; when disfavored, be as though startled.” This is called “favor and disgrace both bring alarm.”

The Imperial Commentary says: High office and generous emoluments worn upon one’s person are not part of the innate principle of life. External things happen to come one’s way; they are only temporary guests. When they arrive, there is no way to refuse them, so the perfected person does not rejoice at gaining them. When they depart, there is no way to stop them, so the perfected person does not grieve at losing them. If one is unhappy when external things leave and delighted when they arrive, one has allowed gain and loss to entangle the heart. How could one not be alarmed? When Liu Xiahui served as a judge, he remained in office even after being dismissed three times. Zheng Kaofu, a senior official of the state of Song during the Spring and Autumn period, bowed his head and hurried along the foot of the wall each time he was appointed to a higher post, even after his third promotion. Their attitudes were different from this.

The “Minister Yi” interpretation says: Favor and disgrace arise from gain and loss. When gain and loss arrive, the heart becomes entangled and the spirit is stirred; this is how favor and disgrace arise from gain and loss. If nothing is gained, there is nothing to lose; if one does not take favor to heart, there is no humiliation. Once gain and loss are forgotten, what is there in the heart to cause alarm? Without alarm, there can be neither favor nor disgrace.

The Dao De Jing also asks: “What does it mean to regard great trouble as seriously as one regards oneself?” The Imperial Commentary says: Relying on benefits and power, one monopolizes rewards and punishments, dispensing favors and wielding authority…

天下畏之如神明,尊之如上帝,可谓贵矣。圣人则不以贵自累,故能长富贵而无患。譬如人身堕肢体,黜聪明,离形去智,同於大通,则无入而不自得也。世之人以物易性,故累物而不能忘势,以形累心,故丧心而不能忘形,其患大矣。 臣得也。世之人以物易性,故累物而不能忘势,以形累心,故丧心而不能忘形,其患大矣。 臣义曰:以贵自累者,忘其自贵,而有彼之贵,孰免於患,惟圣人无我,故履至贵而未始以贵自累,此所以长守贵,而无人道之患。涉於有我,则有身之患,心向於贵,而心为之役,身荣於贵,而身为之累,患之大也。 吾所以有大患者,为吾有身。及吾无身,吾有何患? 御注曰:人之生也,百骸九窍,五藏六府,赅而存焉,吾谁与为亲,认而
Interpretation

People throughout the realm hold him in awe as they do the spirits, and honor him as they do God. This may be called the highest honor. Yet the sage does not let honor become a burden, and so can enjoy wealth and distinction for a long time without disaster.

It is like being able to set aside the sensations of the limbs, discard distinctions of hearing and sight, and forget the body and cleverness, returning to a state of communion with the Great Dao. Then, wherever one may be, one can remain at ease and content. People of the world let external things alter their nature, and so are entangled by material desires and cannot forget power and status. They also let the body burden the mind, causing them to lose their original nature; yet they still cannot let go of the body. Their troubles run deep.

The Minister says: “To ‘obtain’ means to acquire. People of the world let external things alter their nature, and so are entangled by material desires and cannot let go of power and status. They also let the body burden the mind, causing them to lose their original nature; yet they still cannot let go of the body. Their troubles are indeed great.”

Minister Yi explains: Those who make honor a burden to themselves have forgotten the dignity they inherently possess and become attached instead to honor bestowed from outside. How could they escape disaster? Only the sage has no attachment to self. Though occupying the highest position, he is never burdened by honor; thus he can preserve his distinction for a long time without suffering the calamities of the human world. Once one becomes attached to oneself, one worries over oneself. When the mind pursues honor, it is ruled by it. When the body is glorified by honor, it is also bound by it. This is a great calamity.

The reason I have great troubles is that I have this body. Once I no longer cling to the body, what troubles could I have?

The Imperial Commentary says: The human body is made up of the hundred bones, nine openings, and five organs and six bowels; only when these are joined together does a person come into being. Which part of them, then, should I cherish? To regard the body as…

有之,皆惑也。体道者解乎此,故孔子曰:朝闻道,夕死可矣。孟子曰:夭寿不贰,颜子曰:回坐忘矣。夫死生亦大矣,而无变于己,况得丧祸福之所介乎?此古之至人所以不以利累形,不以形累心,视万物与我,将择焉而不可得,则吾身非吾有于己,况得丧祸福之所介乎?此古之至人所以不以利累形,不以形累心,视万物与我,将择焉而不可得,则吾身非吾有也。上与造物者游,下与外死生齐终始者为友,吾有何患?且宠者世所荣也,而以为辱,贵者人所乐也,而以为患,盖外物之不可恃也,理固然矣。诚能有之以无有,则虽宠而不辱,虽贵而无患。伊尹之不以宠利居成功,尧之不以位为乐,几是已o 臣义曰:有吾故有身,有身故有患,无身则吾固无矣,吾且不有,复有何息?形不累於物,而至於形复乎无形,心不累於形,而至於心复乎无心,是以上与造物者游而吾且无身矣。下与外生死齐终始者为友,而有何息。视宠为辱,履贵知患,则宠贵在彼,夫复何恃。 故贵游而吾且无身矣。下与外生死齐终始者为友,而有何息。视宠为辱,履贵知患,则宠贵在彼,夫复何恃。 故贵以身为天下,若可寄天下。爱以身为天下,若可托天下。
Interpretation

Every idea that clings to “being” is delusion. Those who truly realize the Great Dao can release these attachments. As Confucius said, “If I hear the Dao in the morning, it is worth dying that evening.” Mencius said, “Whether life is long or short, the will remains unchanged.” Yan Hui said, “I have attained the state of sitting in forgetfulness.” Sitting in forgetfulness means forgetting the distinction between body and mind, and no longer being burdened by external things.

Death and life are great matters in human existence, yet those who embody the Dao can keep their hearts unchanged in the face of them. How much more so with external circumstances such as gain and loss, fortune and misfortune? The perfected people of antiquity did not let profit burden the body, nor let the body burden the mind. Seeing all things and themselves as one, they no longer chose between them. If they did not even regard their own bodies as their possession, why would they care about gain and loss, fortune and misfortune? Above, they roamed with the Creator—the natural force that brings all things into being. Below, they befriended those who transcended life and death and saw beginnings and endings as one. What troubles could they have?

Being favored is something ordinary people take pride in, but those who embody the Dao see it as something that may bring humiliation. Holding high office is something people are eager to pursue, yet they know it can also harbor trouble. This is because external things cannot be relied upon; such is the nature of things. If one can possess everything without treating it as one’s own, then favor brings no humiliation, and prominence brings no anxiety. Yi Yin did not claim credit for being favored or rewarded, and Yao did not take pleasure in holding the throne. They were close to this state.

A commentator explains: Because there is an “I,” there is a body; once there is a body, there is trouble. Without a body, there is no “I” to speak of. And if one does not even possess an “I,” what troubles could there be? When the body is not burdened by external things, it ultimately returns to formlessness. When the mind is not burdened by the body, it ultimately returns to mindlessness. Thus, when one roams above with the Creator, one is no longer attached to the body; when one befriends below those who transcend life and death and see beginnings and endings as one, what troubles could there be? To regard favor as humiliation and to recognize the troubles hidden in high office is to see that affection and honor are external things. What, then, is there to rely on?

Only those who value the world more than their own bodies can be entrusted with the world. Only those who care for the world more than themselves can have the world placed in their care.

御注曰:天下,大器也,非道莫运;天下,神器也,非道莫守。圣人体道,故在宥天下,天下乐推而不厌。其次则知贵其身,而不自贱以役於物者,若可寄而已。知爱其身而不自贱以困於物者,若可托而已。故曰道之真以治身,绪余以为国家,土直以治天下。世俗之君子,乃危身弃生以殉物,岂不悲夫? 臣义曰:圣人体道,在天下,其静也以道为之守,其动也以道为之运,岂复以身任天下之事为,而反以为累乎。天下乐推而不厌,复有何患?苟未及乎此,知以道贵其身,而不失己於苟贱之地,则知自贵矣,故可以受天下之寄。知以道爱其身,而不徇物於自弃之域则知自爱矣,故
Interpretation

The emperor’s commentary says: The world is a great vessel. Without the Dao, it cannot be set in motion; the world is also a sacred vessel, and without the Dao, it cannot be protected. The sage follows the Great Dao in governing the world, and so enables it to endure in peace. The people of the world are glad to choose him and do not grow weary of him. Those of the next rank understand how to honor themselves through the Dao. They do not demean themselves by submitting to the service of external things, and so may perhaps be entrusted with great responsibilities. They understand how to cherish themselves and do not demean themselves by becoming trapped by external things, and so may perhaps be entrusted with affairs. Thus, the root of the Dao is used to cultivate oneself; its remaining portion can be used to govern the state; and only its lesser function is used to govern the world. Yet those whom the world calls gentlemen do not hesitate to harm their bodies and abandon their lives in pursuit of external things. Is this not lamentable?

The minister’s explanation says: The sage follows the Great Dao in governing the world. In stillness, he uses the Dao to protect the world; in action, he uses the Dao to set the world in motion. Why, then, would he need to take the affairs of the world upon himself and treat them as a burden? The people of the world are glad to choose him and do not grow weary of him. What, then, has he to worry about? If someone has not yet reached the sage’s level, but understands how to honor himself through the Dao and does not lose himself through servile humiliation, then he understands how to value himself; he can therefore be entrusted with the great responsibilities of the world. If he understands how to cherish himself through the Dao and does not abandon himself for the sake of external things, then he understands how to love himself; he can therefore…

可以

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback