中文 · EN

《宋徽宗道德真经解义(章安)》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 3 / 4 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《宋徽宗道德真经解义(章安)》 Vol. 3 (Taixuan 太玄部, 4 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 54 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《宋徽宗道德真经解义(章安)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

达观忘形神全於一,不见终始,虽云其死,孰知其亡,故曰寿。 大道泛兮章第三十四 大道泛兮,其可左右。 御注曰:泛兮无所系輆,故动静不失,往来不穷,左之右之,而无不可。 臣义曰:道无乎不在,故泛然无所不之,左之右之,何系之有。 万物恃之以生而不辞,功成不居。 御注曰:往者资之,求者与之,万物自形自化,自智自力,而不居其功。譬彼四时,功成者 御注曰:往者资之,求者与之,万物自形自化,自智自力,而不居其功。譬彼四时,功成者去。 臣义曰:庄周曰:形非道不生,则道者万物所恃以生者也。道生万物,而未始或辞,生其所自生,成其所自成,何功之居。 衣被万物而不为主,故常无欲,可名於 小矣。万物归焉而不知主,可名於大矣。 御注曰:道复於至幽则小,而与物辨;显於至变则大,而与物交。与物辨,故常无欲,与物交,故万物归焉。覆露乎万物而不示其宰制之功,故不为主。鼓舞乎群众,而莫窥其归往之述,故不知主。夫道非小大之可名也,云可名者,道欲,与物交,故万物归焉。覆露乎万物而不示其宰制之功,故不为主。鼓舞乎群众,而莫窥其归往之述,故不知主。夫道非小大之可名也,云可名者,道之及乎物者尔。
Interpretation

One whose mind is open and free forgets the body; the spirit can then be wholly devoted to the Great Dao, and no longer sees the beginning or end of life and death. Though the body is said to die, who knows whether the Great Dao dies with it? Thus it is called longevity.

Chapter 34: The Great Dao Flows Everywhere

The Great Dao flows far and wide, present everywhere, reaching through every direction, left and right.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao depends on nothing and is obstructed by nothing. Thus, whether in motion or at rest, it never goes astray, and its coming and going have no end. There is nowhere it cannot reach, whether to the left or the right.

The Minister’s Commentary says: The Dao is everywhere, and so naturally reaches everywhere. What could limit it, to the left or to the right?

All things rely on the Great Dao to come into being, yet the Dao does not refuse them, nor does it claim their achievements as its own.

The Imperial Commentary says: Things that have passed found support in the Dao, and things that seek it receive from the Dao. All things take shape and change in their own ways, each exercising its own wisdom and strength, while the Dao claims none of their accomplishments. It is like the turning of the seasons: when a season has fulfilled its work, it naturally gives way.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Zhuang Zhou said that without the Dao, forms could not come into being. The Dao is the very root on which all things depend for life. It gives life and nourishment to all things, yet never refuses them. All things grow and come to fulfillment according to their own conditions. What merit, then, could the Dao claim for itself?

The Great Dao nourishes all things but does not rule over them. It is therefore often free of desire, and may be called small. All things return to the Dao, yet do not know that there is a ruler; it may therefore be called great.

The Imperial Commentary says: When the Dao returns to the deep and formless, it seems small, making no distinctions visible among things. When it appears in the myriad transformations, it seems great and mingles with all things. Because it distinguishes itself from things, it is often free of desire; because it mingles with them, all things return to it. The Dao covers and nourishes all things, yet does not display any merit in ruling or controlling them, and so it does not act as their master. It sets all things in motion, yet no one can see where they ultimately go; people therefore do not know that it is their ruler. The Dao cannot, in its essence, be defined as either great or small. To call it small or great here refers only to the different ways its influence appears among all things.

臣义曰:道遍覆於万物,而藏於至无,未始出而主之也,故曰不为主。常无欲,则与物辨而复於至幽,故名於小矣。万物鼓舞於道,而为之归往,未始知其所以为主也,与物交而显於至变,而物所不能知,故可名於大。不为主者,道也,不知主者,物也,物不足以知道,而所可见者,大而无方尔。 是以圣人终不为大,故能成其大。 御注曰:功盖天下而似不自己,故业大而富有,孟子曰:大而化之之谓圣。夫大而能化,则岂有为大之累,所以能成其大。 臣义曰:道以不为主,故万物归往焉而不知,故可名於大。是故圣人不自大,所以能成其则岂有为大之累,所以能成其大。 臣义曰:道以不为主,故万物归往焉而不知,故可名於大。是故圣人不自大,所以能成其大者,体道故也。 执大象章第三十五 执大象,天下往。 御注曰:象如天之垂象,无为也,运之以健,无言也,示之以文。圣人之御世,处无为之事,行不言之教,而民归之如父母,故曰执大象,天下往。 臣义曰:大则有形,象则有像,故以执言之。圣人体道无为,夫何所执。出而经世,则道之所运,文之所示,盖有象焉,执其象而不示之以迹,而天下化其道,故为天下之所归往。其象也本乎道,故谓之大。 往而不害,
Interpretation

The Dao extends everywhere and shelters all things, yet it remains hidden in a place of utmost depth, without form or trace. It has never appeared as a ruler, which is why it is said to “not rule.” The Dao is forever without desire; when it comes into contact with all things, it returns once more to obscurity. For this reason, it may be called “small.”

All things grow and change through the Dao’s activity and return to it, yet they do not know that the Dao is their ruler. The Dao engages with all things and appears amid their transformations, yet they cannot recognize it. For this reason, it may also be called “great.” The Dao does not claim to rule, though all things do not know that it is their ruler; all things are unable to recognize the Dao and can see only its boundless vastness.

Therefore, the sage never considers himself great, and thereby accomplishes greatness.

The Imperial Commentary says: His achievements cover all under Heaven, yet seem not to come from him. Thus his accomplishments are vast and all-encompassing. Mencius said, “When one is so vast as to be able to nurture and transform all things, this is called sagehood.” One who is vast enough to nurture and transform all things is not burdened by “considering oneself great,” and so can accomplish greatness.

The Minister’s Explanation says: The Dao does not claim to rule, yet all things return to it without knowing it; for this reason, the Dao may be called great. The sage, too, does not consider himself great, and so can accomplish greatness. This is because he takes the Dao as his model and embodies it.

Chapter 35: Holding Fast to the Great Image

If one holds fast to the encompassing principle of the Great Dao, all things under Heaven will return to it.

The Imperial Commentary says: “Image” is like the celestial phenomena displayed by Heaven. It is non-action, yet moves with vigorous force; it does not speak, yet its patterns become visible. When the sage governs the world, he practices Wuwei (non-action) and teaches without words, and the people return to him as they would to their parents. Hence the saying: “Hold fast to the Great Image, and all under Heaven will come.”

The Minister’s Explanation says: “Great” means vast, and “image” means form; hence the word “hold” is used here. The sage embodies the Dao and practices non-action, so there is originally nothing he needs to hold fast to. But when he comes forth to govern worldly affairs, the Dao’s movement and the manifestation of its patterns take on an image. He holds fast to this image without displaying traces of deliberate action, and all under Heaven is transformed by the Dao and so returns to him. This image ultimately originates in the Dao, which is why it is called “great.”

To return to it brings no harm,

御注曰:阴阳和静,鬼神不扰,群生不伤,万物不夭,民虽有知,无所用之,何害之有? 臣义曰:天下归往,则投迹者众。以迹治之,所以为害。圣人无为於上,而遂万物之自然,诱然皆生,而不知其所生,害之有? 臣义曰:天下归往,则投迹者众。以迹治之,所以为害。圣人无为於上,而遂万物之自然,诱然皆生,而不知其所生,同焉皆得,而不知其所得,使天地之间幽之阴阳鬼神、明之群生万民,各适其性,无所往而不利,故曰不害。 安平泰。 御注曰:安则无危亡之忧,平则无险陂之患,泰者通而治也。 臣义曰:往而不害,则无所往而不自安,安则底於平而同於道,是道之泰也,故安而后平,平而后泰。 乐与饵,过客止。 御注曰:悦声与味者,世之人累乎物而不能自解者,物有结之,故止。 臣义曰:乐以声感人,饵以味悦口,以其所美,感移於人,而心为之留,其不能自解如此。 道之出言,淡乎其无味。视之不足见,听之不足闻,用之不可既。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong explains: When Yin and Yang are harmonized and at peace, ghosts and spirits do not come to intrude; living beings are not harmed, and the myriad things do not meet an untimely end. Though the people possess knowledge, there is nothing for which they need to use it. What harm could there be in this?

The ministers explain: All under Heaven turn toward the sage, and many follow him. If he governs them by relying on the traces and conduct they have left behind, this will instead bring harm. The sage occupies the throne and practices Wuwei, allowing the myriad things to grow naturally. They grow of themselves, without knowing why they have come into being; they share in what they receive, without knowing what they have obtained. In this way, the subtle and unseen Yin and Yang and ghosts and spirits between Heaven and Earth, as well as the visible living beings and common people, can each follow their own nature. Wherever they go, nothing is out of place. Thus it is said that there is no harm.

At peace, in harmony, and unobstructed.

Emperor Huizong explains: At peace, there is no worry of danger or ruin; in harmony, there is no peril or calamity of collapse; to be open and unobstructed is to be free-flowing and secure.

The ministers explain: When people act without suffering harm, they can dwell at ease. From peace comes harmony; from harmony, one joins with the Dao. This is the Dao’s free-flowing ease. Thus one first finds peace, then harmony, and finally unobstructed ease.

Beautiful music and tasty food can make passersby stop in their tracks.

Emperor Huizong explains: To delight in sounds and flavors is a sign that people are entangled by external things and cannot free themselves. Bound by external things, they come to a standstill.

The ministers explain: Music moves people through sound, while food pleases the palate through flavor. People are moved and drawn in by what they love; their minds linger there, and they become unable to free themselves.

When spoken, the Dao is bland and without flavor. Look at it, and it cannot be seen; listen to it, and it cannot be heard; use it, and it is never exhausted.

御注曰:味之所味者尝矣,而味味者未尝呈,故淡乎其无味。色之所色者彰矣,而色色者未尝显,故视之所味者尝矣,而味味者未尝呈,故淡乎其无味。色之所色者彰矣,而色色者未尝显,故视之不足见。声之所声者闻矣,而声声者未尝发,故听之不足闻。若是者,能苦能甘,能玄能黄,能宫能商,无知也而无不知也,无能也而无不能也,故用之不可既。 臣义曰:至道无味无见无闻,而复乎至无,以无应有,从体起用,故用之不既。 将欲歙之章第三十六 将欲歙之,必固张之。将欲弱之,必固强之。将欲废之,必固兴之。将欲夺之,必固与之。 御注曰:阴阳相照不既。 将欲歙之章第三十六 将欲歙之,必固张之。将欲弱之,必固强之。将欲废之,必固兴之。将欲夺之,必固与之。 御注曰:阴阳相照,相盖相治,四时相代,相生相杀,万物之理,人伦之传,其敛散也,其盛衰也,其愤起也,其亏盈也,几常发於至微而莫睹其朕,惟研几之圣人得先见之吉,贤者殆庶几而已。阳盛於夏,而阴生於午,阴凝於冬,而阳生於子。句践欲弊吴,而劝之伐齐,智伯欲袭仇由,而遗之广车。此圣人所以履霜而知坚冰之至,消息满虚,不位乎其形,故勇者不能弱,智者不能夺。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary holds that the tastes perceived by the palate are already manifest, but the source that gives all things their tastes has never appeared. Thus, the Great Dao is bland and tasteless. Colors can be displayed, but the source that gives all things their colors does not take shape; therefore, even when we look, we cannot see it. Sounds can be heard, but the source that makes all things produce sound does not appear; therefore, even when we listen, we cannot hear it.

The Great Dao seems to know nothing, yet there is nothing it does not know; it seems incapable, yet there is nothing it cannot do. It enables things to display different qualities, such as sweet and bitter, dark and yellow, and the gong and shang musical tones. The Dao’s workings are therefore inexhaustible.

The minister Yi explains: The Ultimate Dao is without taste, form, or sound, and returns to the most fundamental emptiness. It responds to what exists through what does not exist, and from its substance gives rise to its workings; thus its workings cannot be exhausted.

“If You Would Draw It In” — Chapter Thirty-Six

If you would draw it in, you must first let it expand. If you would weaken it, you must first let it grow strong. If you would cast it down, you must first let it rise. If you would take from it, you must first give to it.

The Imperial Commentary says: Yin and Yang reflect and constrain each other in turn. The seasons follow one another, and all things likewise give rise to and destroy one another. This is the pattern of all things and a constant principle in the succession of human affairs. Contraction and expansion, flourishing and decline, rising and diminishing, fullness and want often begin in what is minute, yet few can recognize their signs. Only sages, who can probe deeply into the subtle changes of things, can foresee good and ill fortune; the worthy can only approach this ability.

In summer, Yang Qi is abundant, yet Yin Qi begins to emerge at midday; in winter, Yin Qi gathers, yet Yang Qi begins to emerge at midnight. When King Goujian of Yue wished to weaken Wu, he urged the king of Wu to send troops against Qi. When Zhi Bo wished to attack the state of Chouyou, he first presented it with a broad carriage. These examples show that when sages see frost descend, they can foresee that hard ice will soon follow. The waxing and waning, fullness and depletion of things begin before they take shape. Thus the brave may become weak, and the wise may lose what they possess.

臣义曰:阴阳之运,万物之理,其盛衰强弱,盈亏成败不位乎其形,故勇者不能弱,智者不能夺。 臣义曰:阴阳之运,万物之理,其盛衰强弱,盈亏成败,旋环无已,必有几焉,发於至微。圣人研几,得乎先见,故能微明。是以固张以歙其张,固强以弱其强。以彼兴之不义也,又固兴之,则势自废也。以彼取之不善也,又固与之,则势自夺也。然则刚强在彼,柔弱在此,而强者必折,理之自然也。圣人所以酬酢万变,成天下之务,而物莫知其所由然者,以此道也。 是谓微明。 御注曰:其未兆为微,而其理为甚着,扬雄曰:水息渊,木消枝,贤人睹而众莫知。 臣义曰:无形 御注曰:其未兆为微,而其理为甚着,扬雄曰:水息渊,木消枝,贤人睹而众莫知。 臣义曰:无形之中,独见有焉,其微如此,而万物之理,藏乎其问。研几先见,探赜得之,盖已甚明。贤人功用同乎造化,而众何以知。歙张弱强,废兴与夺,微明如此。 柔之胜刚,弱之胜强。 御注曰:积众小不胜为大胜者,惟圣人能之。经曰:天下莫柔弱於水,而攻坚强者莫之能先。《庄子》外篇论夔虱风之相怜曰:指我则胜我,犹我则胜我,而折大木,辈大屋者,惟我能也。
Interpretation

The movement of Yin-Yang reflects the patterns of all things. The changes through which things flourish or decline, grow strong or weak, gain or lose, and succeed or fail do not remain fixed in any one form. Thus, the brave cannot remain powerful forever, and the clever cannot remain forever beyond constraint.

The movement of Yin-Yang and the changes of all things—their cycles of flourishing and decline, strength and weakness, gain and loss, success and failure—continue without end. Signs of change must appear in advance, though at first they are exceedingly subtle. By carefully examining these subtle signs, sages can foresee change and discern what is hidden. So, to make a force expand, first draw it in; to make it strong, first weaken it. If someone rises through unrighteous means and is still supported, that person’s momentum will naturally decline. If someone obtains something by improper means and is given still more, that person’s strength will naturally diminish. In this way, firmness lies with the other, while softness lies with oneself; the strong will eventually be diminished. This is the natural order. Sages respond to the myriad changes and accomplish the affairs of the world, while ordinary people do not know how they do so: they are applying this principle.

This is called “subtle insight”: discerning how things work through what is subtle.

The Imperial Commentary says: Before signs become apparent, circumstances are exceedingly subtle, yet the underlying principle is already clear. Yang Xiong said, “Water comes to rest in the depths, and the leaves and branches of trees gradually wither. The wise can discern the signs in these things, but ordinary people do not know.”

Minister Yi says: To see, amid what has no form, signs that already exist—this is what is meant by the subtle and hidden. The principles of all things are concealed among these signs. Carefully examine the beginnings of change and foresee how events will unfold; seek out what is profound and hidden, and the underlying principle will become clear. When the worthy put their abilities into practice, they accord with the transformations of nature. How could ordinary people know how this comes about? First drawing in, then expanding; first weakening, then strengthening; causing things to decline or rise, to lose or gain—all these principles are subtle yet clear.

Softness can overcome hardness, and the weak can overcome the strong.

The Imperial Commentary says: Accumulating many small instances of “not prevailing” can ultimately bring a great victory; only sages can do this. The Daode Jing says, “Nothing in the world is softer and weaker than water, yet nothing surpasses it in overcoming what is hard.” An outer chapter of the Zhuangzi recounts a story in which Kui, a louse, and the wind express sympathy for one another. It says, “If you put me to work, I surpass you; if you are the same as I am, I still surpass you. Breaking great trees and lifting large houses—I alone can do these things.”

臣义曰:以刚胜刚,其刚必折,以强制强,其强交伤。柔则不争,而物莫与之争。弱则不敌,而物莫与之敌。故刚之与强,反为柔弱之所胜,理势然也。 鱼不可脱於渊,国之利器,不可以示人。 御注曰:渊者,鱼之所以敌。故刚之与强,反为柔弱之所胜,理势然也。 鱼不可脱於渊,国之利器,不可以示人。 御注曰:渊者,鱼之所以藏其身,利器者,国之所以制人。吞舟之鱼,砀而失水,则蚁能苦之,故不可脱於渊。君见赏者则人臣用其势,君见罚者则人臣乘其威,赏罚者治之具,且不可示,况治之道乎?圣人所以操利器而不示,非用其强也,盖有妙道焉。能穷海内而无智名,威服万物而无勇功,不务於胜物,而得常胜之道。阳开阴闭,变化无穷,驭群臣,运天下,而莫之测,故制人而不制於人。本在於上,要在於主,而天下治。 臣胜之道。阳开阴闭,变化无穷,驭群臣,运天下,而莫之测,故制人而不制於人。本在於上,要在於主,而天下治。 臣义曰:鱼以深渊藏其身,脱於渊则制於人,国以利器藏其用,示於人测不能制人。圣人运化机於不测,干至权以适变,宰制天下,役使群动,而神德妙道,物莫得窥其涯略,至於智名勇功,不可得而形容,则赏罚治具,孰得有倒持之患。
Interpretation

When hardness confronts hardness, the harder side will break. When force suppresses force, both sides are harmed. The gentle do not contend, so others have no way to contend with them. The weak do not compete with others, so others have no worthy opponent to overcome. Thus the strong are often overcome by the weak: this follows naturally from how things work and from the situation itself.

Fish cannot leave the depths. The important means a state uses to govern and control affairs, too, must not be shown casually.

The Imperial Commentary says: The depths are where fish hide themselves. “Sharp instruments” are the means a state uses to govern and restrain its people. When a large fish leaves the water, even ants can trap it; that is why fish cannot leave the depths. If a ruler lets his ministers see whom he rewards, they may use his authority to advance their own aims. If he lets them see whom he punishes, they may exploit his power. Since the tools of governance, such as rewards and punishments, should not be revealed casually, how much less should the fundamental Dao of governing the world be exposed?

The sage holds the authority to govern the state without revealing it. He does so not through force, but by grasping subtle principles. He brings the world to submit without earning a reputation for exceptional cleverness; he wins the reverence of all things without leaving a record of martial achievement. He does not make overcoming all things his sole aim, yet he attains the way of constant victory. He brings the Yang aspect to the fore and draws the Yin aspect inward, changing without limit. He directs his ministers and governs the world, yet remains impossible to fathom. In this way, he can control others without being controlled by them. The foundation of governance lies with the ruler, and so does its essential key; through this, the world is brought to order.

A minister’s explanation says: Fish hide themselves by relying on the depths; once they leave them, others can constrain them. A state keeps its important means hidden so they can be effective. If it reveals them, others can see through them, and it becomes difficult to control the situation. The sage draws on transformations that are impossible to measure and adapts his methods to circumstances. He governs the world and directs all things, yet no one can glimpse the full extent of his wondrous De and profound Dao. His reputation for cleverness and his achievements in martial valor, moreover, cannot be described in words. How, then, could the tools of governance, such as rewards and punishments, fall into a predicament where others turn them against him?

道常无为章第三十七 道常无为,而无不为。 御注曰:寂然不动,感而遂通天下之故。 臣义曰:道常无为者,道之体也。而无不为者,道之用也。道不为而自然付当万物,而无不为也. 侯王若能守,万物将自化。 御注曰:鉴水之与形接也,不设智故,而物之方圆曲直不能逃也。侯王守道以御世,出为无为,万物将自化。 御注曰:鉴水之与形接也,不设智故,而物之方圆曲直不能逃也。侯王守道以御世,出为无为之境,而为出於无为,化贷万物,而万物化之,若性之自为,而不知为之者,故曰自化。 臣义曰:天何言哉,四时行焉,侯王体道法天,治之以无为,而不废其所为,见其无不为,而实未尝为,因物之理,乘时之适,我何为哉,道为之守尔。我以道化万物,而万物化其道,而莫知其为之者,故曰自化。 化而欲作,吾将镇之以无名之朴。 御注曰:《孟子》曰:待文王而后兴者,凡民也。民惟上之从化,而欲作则离道以善,险德以行,将去性而从心,不足以定天下,惟道无名,朴而未散,故作者镇焉。救催者莫若忠,为是故也。 臣义曰:上以道化天下,万物化上所守之道,而不知其所,朴而未散,故作者镇焉。救催者莫若忠,为是故也。
Interpretation

The Dao always abides in Wuwei (non-action), yet nothing is left undone.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao is still and unmoving. Once it responds to what it encounters, it can understand the transformations of all things under Heaven.

The Minister’s Commentary says: The Dao’s constant Wuwei is its essence; its ability to leave nothing undone is its function. The Dao does not act by deliberate effort. It arranges the myriad things by following their natural course, and so nothing fails to be accomplished.

If rulers and lords can hold fast to the Dao, the myriad things will transform of themselves.

The Imperial Commentary says: A body of water reflects things like a mirror. It needs no clever contrivance, yet the shapes of things—square or round, curved or straight—cannot escape its reflection. When rulers and lords hold fast to the Dao in governing the realm, and follow the principle of Wuwei in their administration, the myriad things transform of themselves.

The Imperial Commentary also says: Rulers and lords hold fast to the Dao in governing the realm, bringing affairs of state into the realm of Wuwei. They govern through Wuwei and nurture the myriad things, which transform in turn. It is like the myriad things growing according to their own natures, while people do not know who caused them to grow this way. That is why this is called “self-transformation.”

The Minister’s Commentary says: What has Heaven said? The four seasons run their course. Rulers and lords should understand the Dao and take Heaven as their model, governing the realm through Wuwei without neglecting the tasks that need to be done. They may seem to do everything, yet in truth they act without deliberate effort. Following the patterns of things and moving with the right moment, what do they themselves do? They simply hold fast to the Dao. The Dao nurtures the myriad things, which in turn return to the Dao, yet no one knows that this was brought about by human action. That is why this is called “self-transformation.”

Once the myriad things have been transformed by instruction, if they again develop restless desires, I will settle them with the nameless, uncarved simplicity.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Mengzi says that those who wait for King Wen to appear before they strive toward goodness are ordinary people. The people often change in response to the instruction of those above them. If they again develop restless desires, they will leave the Dao to pursue goodness on the surface, act against their De (Virtue), abandon their original nature and follow private desires. They will then be unable to bring stability to the realm. Only the nameless, undivided and uncarved “simplicity” (the Dao’s plain, original state) can settle these restless impulses. To remedy this failing, nothing is better than faithfully holding fast to the Dao.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Those above teach the realm through the Dao, and the myriad things accordingly return to the Dao upheld by those above, though they do not know where this transformation comes from. The Dao remains simple and undivided, and can therefore settle restless impulses. To remedy this failing, nothing is better than faithfully holding fast to the Dao.

臣义曰:上以道化天下,万物化上所守之道,而不知其所以化,亦将复乎性命之常,而同然皆生於无为之域,故谓之化。作则有为也,欲作则将向乎有为,而流於伪。以无名之朴,镇定其志,泯其欲作之妄,而俱复乎天性之浑全。 无名之朴,亦将不欲。 御注曰:季真之莫为,在物一曲,古之道术,有在於是者。虽然:寡能备天地之体,故亦将不欲,此老氏所以祛其惑,解其蔽。 臣义曰:道,强名也,忘其所守之总,松其欲作之心,谓之无名之朴。无名之朴,亦将不欲,则不欲之欲,且又忘矣。忘其所忘,所以反乎无物。物我元同,何欲之有。 不欲以静,天下将自正。 御注曰:水静则。忘其所忘,所以反乎无物。物我元同,何欲之有。 不欲以静,天下将自正。 御注曰:水静则平户准,大匠取法焉。不欲以静,则不失其正,先自矣,故天下将自正。《易》曰:乾道变化,各正性命。乾道变化,则无为也,各正性命,则不欲以静,天下将自正也。以道治天下,至於各正性命,此之谓治之至。 臣义曰:不欲则心复於无,以静则虚一而正,先自正矣,故天下将自正。天下至於各正性命,道治之极致也。 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之五竟 6-宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之六
Interpretation

By “above,” I mean the ruler who occupies the highest position. When the ruler teaches and transforms all under Heaven through the Dao (the Way), the myriad things are also transformed by the Dao the ruler upholds, though they do not know how they have changed. They then return to the natural condition of their original nature and life, arising spontaneously from the state of Wuwei (non-action). This is why it is called “transformation.” To contrive anything is to act with intention; once the mind wants to contrive, it moves toward intentional action and gradually falls into falseness. The ruler should settle the mind with the “uncarved simplicity without a name”—the Dao, free of artificial distinctions and preserving simplicity—dispelling deluded thoughts and the desire to contrive, so that all things together return to their complete, undivided nature.

By preserving this nameless simplicity, one gradually comes to have no desires.

The Imperial Commentary says: Ji Zhen’s teaching of “doing nothing” addresses only one aspect of things. Such a view did exist among the ancient Daoist teachings, but it does not fully express the Dao of Heaven and Earth. People, too, should therefore lessen their desires. This is precisely the method Laozi uses to dispel confusion and lift the veil of delusion.

I say: “Dao” is merely a name adopted out of necessity. Forget what the mind clings to as its foundation and loosen the impulse to contrive: this is called the uncarved simplicity without a name. When even this simplicity has no desires, the thought “I wish to have no desires” is also forgotten. When even what has been forgotten is forgotten, one returns to the state of nonbeing. The myriad things and I share the same source from the beginning—what desire could there be?

When desires do not arise, the mind can be still. When the mind is still, all under Heaven naturally returns to the right path.

The Imperial Commentary says: When water becomes still, it is level as a measuring line, and so skilled artisans take it as their model. If one has no desires and remains still, one does not stray from the right path. When the ruler first sets himself right, all under Heaven naturally becomes right as well. The Book of Changes says: “The Way of Qian transforms and brings each thing’s nature and life into accord.” The transformation of the Way of Qian is Wuwei. Each thing setting its nature and life aright means that desires do not arise, stillness is maintained, and all under Heaven naturally returns to the right path. To govern all under Heaven through the Dao, until each thing has set its nature and life aright, is the highest achievement of governance.

I say: When there are no desires, the mind returns to emptiness. By remaining still, the mind becomes empty, quiet, focused, and aligned with the right. When the ruler first sets himself right, all under Heaven naturally becomes right as well. When all things under Heaven each set their nature and life aright, this is the highest achievement attainable through governing by the Dao.

End of Explanations of the Meaning of the Dao De Jing by Emperor Huizong of Song, juan five. Beginning of juan six.

宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之六 登仕郎下将自正。天下至於各正性命,道治之极致也。 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之五竟 6-宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之六 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之六 登仕郎臣章安撰义 德经 御注曰:道无方体,德有成亏,合於道则无德之,可名,别於德则有名之可辨,仁义礼智,随量而受,因时而施,是德而已户、体道者异乎此,故列於下经。 臣义曰:道乃强名,复於常无,故无方体。德有所得,继道之失,故有成亏。无得为德,冥於一政,则德与道浑乎无名。有得为德,至於自私,则德与道明然可辨。化者得之为仁,义者得之为义,即理为礼,即知为智,德之所受所施,其名可辨,而离远於道。惟全德者,实无所得,而未尝异道。 上德不德章第三十八 上德义,即理为礼,即知为智,德之所受所施,其名可辨,而离远於道。惟全德者,实无所得,而未尝异道。 上德不德章第三十八 上德不德,是以有德。 御注曰:物得以生谓之德,同焉皆得,默与道会,过而不悔,当而不自得也,是谓不德。孔子不居其圣,而为圣之时,乃所以有德。 臣义曰:物生乎道,而各得於道。德全於性,与道浑一,而未始或异,无得於道而道自得也,故德周万物而无累。
Interpretation

The highest form of De (Virtue) does not deliberately display itself as virtuous; for that very reason, it is truly virtuous.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: All things receive the Dao and come into being. The endowment they share silently accords with the Dao. One does not regret what has passed, nor regard oneself as having gained something by occupying the proper place. This is what “not having De” means. Confucius did not claim to be a sage, yet he could act in accordance with the Way of the sage as circumstances required. That is precisely why he had De.

Zhang’an explains: All things come into being through the Dao, and each receives its own endowment from the Dao. When De is fully present in one’s nature, it is wholly one with the Dao and has never been separate from it. One does not deliberately seek the Dao; it is naturally present. Thus, although De extends throughout all things, it is not burdened by them.

下德不失德,是以无德。 御注曰:认而有之,自私以失道,何德之有? 臣义曰:以德为得,以得为执,有之不失,离道远矣。 上德无为,而无以为。 御注曰:不思而得,不勉而中,不行而至,有之不失,离道远矣。 上德无为,而无以为。 御注曰:不思而得,不勉而中,不行而至,上德也。 臣义曰:无为则无得於道也,无得於道,则复於至无,而无以为也。 下德为之,而有以为。 御注曰:不思则不得,不勉则不中,不行则不至,下德也。德有上下,此圣贤之所以分欤?离形去智,通於大同,仁义礼智,盖将简之而弗得,故无以为。屈折礼乐,吁俞七义,以慰天下之心,得人之得,而不自得其得,故有以为。 臣义曰:有为则有得,而道也有德於道,则不能无为,而势不自已也。 上仁为之,而无以为。 御为。 臣义曰:有为则有得,而道也有德於道,则不能无为,而势不自已也。 上仁为之,而无以为。 御注曰:尧舜性之仁,覆天下而非利之也,故无以为。 臣义曰:德无不容,而仁迸行焉,无事於作,故无以为。 上义为之,而有以为。 御注曰:列敌度宜之谓义,以立我以制事,能无为乎?
Interpretation

Lower-level “De” deliberately holds fast to De and regards it as something one possesses. In doing so, it loses De; this is called “without De.”

The Imperial Commentary says: Once you claim De as your own, self-interest arises. Self-interest leads you away from the Dao—what De could you still have?

The Minister’s Commentary says: To treat De as something acquired, cling to that possession, and refuse to let it go because you think it belongs to you is to stray far from the Dao.

Higher-level “De” follows its nature and acts without deliberate intent.

The Imperial Commentary says: To understand without reflection, act appropriately without forcing it, and attain without deliberate action—this is higher De.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Through Wuwei (non-action), one does not regard oneself as having gained anything from the Dao. Since one believes one has gained nothing, one returns to a state of utter emptiness and does not act with deliberate intent.

Lower-level “De” takes action and does so with a deliberate aim.

The Imperial Commentary says: To be unable to understand without thinking, to be unable to act appropriately without exertion, and to be unable to attain without action—this is lower De. De has higher and lower forms, perhaps because sages and worthies differ in this way. If one can cast off the body and cleverness and reach the state in which all things are one, distinctions such as benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom will naturally dissolve. There is then no need to practice them deliberately or to act with deliberate intent. If one humbles oneself to promote rites, music, benevolence, and righteousness in order to soothe the hearts of people under Heaven, one is responding to worldly needs. Though others gain something, one does not cling to what one has gained; this is still “acting with a purpose.”

The Minister’s Commentary says: To act is to gain something. But once one has recognized the Great Dao and embodied its De, one cannot help but follow its nature. The momentum of events makes it so, and one cannot deliberately prevent it.

Higher-level benevolence takes action without a deliberate aim.

The Imperial Commentary says: Yao and Shun were benevolent by nature, and their kindness extended throughout the world, yet they did not seek profit from it. Thus they acted without deliberate intent.

The Minister’s Commentary says: De is broad enough to embrace all things, and benevolence is expressed naturally. It requires no special contrivance and so involves no deliberate action.

Higher-level righteousness takes action with a clear purpose.

The Imperial Commentary says: To distinguish between self and other and judge what is appropriate is called “righteousness.” It establishes one’s position and adjudicates matters, so how could it be without deliberate intent?

臣义曰:有我可立,有事可制,仁有不足,道无不理,而义功着焉为可已。 上礼为之,而莫之应,则攘臂而仍之。 御注曰:礼以交物,以示人以节文仁义,其用多矣。莫先施报而已,施之尽之应,则攘臂而仍之。 御注曰:礼以交物,以示人以节文仁义,其用多矣。莫先施报而已,施之尽而莫或报之,则忿争之心生,而乖乱之变起。春秋之时,一言之不雠,一拜之不中,两国为之暴骨,则攘臂而仍之,尚其患之小者。圣人厚於仁而薄於义,礼以履之,非所处也。故上仁则同於德,上义则有以为,上礼则有莫之应者。 臣义曰:礼曲为防事为制,节文仁义,发乎容体,虽名止邪之具,然尚往来先报施,以其繁缛,迭相责望,此实争乱之端。 故失道而后德,失德而后仁,失仁而后义,失义而后礼。夫礼者,忠信之薄,而乱之首也。
Interpretation

Zhang An says: Once the idea of “I” arises, things are set in place; once affairs arise, rules are established. Where benevolence falls short, Yi is needed to address the matter. The Dao, however, runs through everything and brings it into proper order. This is why the function of Yi becomes so prominent.

Ritual propriety emphasizes taking the initiative in giving. But if the other person does not respond, the one who offered the ritual will roll up their sleeves and force a response.

The Imperial Commentary says: Ritual serves both to engage with others and to display proper conduct, giving form to the expression of benevolence and Yi in many ways. Its most basic principle is giving and returning. When an offering of ritual receives no response, resentment and a desire to fight arise, followed by disorder and turmoil. In the Spring and Autumn period, sometimes a single unanswered remark or one breach of ritual protocol left people dead and wounded across two states. Forcing a response by rolling up one’s sleeves was already a relatively minor calamity. The sages valued benevolence and thought little of Yi; they put benevolence and Yi into practice through ritual, but this was not the way they chose. Thus, the highest benevolence accords with the Dao and De; to prize Yi is to engage in deliberate action; and to prize ritual is to risk receiving no response.

Zhang An also says: Ritual is elaborate. It guards against events, establishes rules, and gives outward form to benevolence and Yi through people’s conduct and bearing. Though it is said to be a means of restraining wrongdoing, it also emphasizes exchange: one gives first and expects something in return. When ritual becomes elaborate, people expect repayment from one another and make demands on each other. This is, in fact, the root of strife and calamity.

Therefore, only after the Dao is lost is De discussed; only after De is lost is benevolence discussed; only after benevolence is lost is Yi discussed; and only after Yi is lost is ritual discussed. Ritual signals that loyalty and trust have grown thin, and it is the beginning of all disorder.

御注曰:道不可致,故失道而后德。德不可至,故失德而后弁。仁可为也,为则近乎义,故失仁而后义。义可亏也,亏则饰以礼,故失义而后礼。至於礼则离道滋远,而所失滋众矣。凡物不并盛,阴阳是也。理相夺故失仁而后义。义可亏也,亏则饰以礼,故失义而后礼。至於礼则离道滋远,而所失滋众矣。凡物不并盛,阴阳是也。理相夺予,威德是也。实厚者貌薄,父子之礼是也。由是观之,礼繁者实必衰也,实衰则伪继之,而争乱作,故曰夫礼者忠信之薄而乱之首也。 臣义曰:有得於道,道之失也。有为於仁,德之失也。相嘘相濡,化之失也。有制有介,义之失也。文灭质,博溺心,而忠信薄矣。礼之所制者外,所事者迹,所拘者繁文,则所本者末也,此虚伪日滋,为乱之始。前识者,道之华而愚之始也。 御注曰:道降而出,出而生智,以智为凿,揣而锐之,敝精神而妄意度,兹谓前识。前识则徇末而忘本,故为道之华。心劳而智益困,故为愚之始。亿则屡中,此孔子所以恶子贡。
Interpretation

Song Huizong explained: The Great Dao cannot be attained through human effort. Only after losing the Great Dao do people speak of De. De, too, cannot be attained by pursuing it. Thus, only after losing De do people speak of benevolence. Benevolence can be practiced deliberately, but once it is practiced with intention, it easily draws near to righteousness. So only after losing benevolence do people speak of righteousness. Righteousness may fall short; when it does, ritual is used to adorn and repair it. Thus, only after losing righteousness do people speak of ritual. At the level of ritual, people have moved ever farther from the Great Dao, and lost ever more of what they once had.

Things cannot all flourish at the same time; Yin and Yang are like this. Principles contend with and replace one another: benevolence declines, and righteousness rises. When righteousness falls short, ritual is used to adorn and repair it; only after losing righteousness do people speak of ritual. At the level of ritual, people have moved ever farther from the Great Dao, and lost ever more of what they once had. Things cannot all flourish at the same time; Yin and Yang are like this. Principles contend with and yield to one another; so it is with the relationship between authority and kindness. Those whose inner life is substantial often appear plain on the outside; the rites between father and son are one example. From this we can see that the more elaborate the rites become, the more inner sincerity declines. When sincerity declines, hypocrisy follows, and conflict and disorder arise. Thus it is said: “Ritual is the sign that loyalty and trust have grown thin, and the beginning of disorder.”

Chen Yi explained: To think that one has attained the Dao is precisely to show that the Great Dao has already been lost; to practice benevolence deliberately shows that De has been lost. Breathing on one another to warm each other, or moistening one another to give aid, are practices that arose only after transformative influence was lost. Establishing rules and drawing boundaries arose only after righteousness was lost. External ornament obscures what is genuine, while broad learning constrains the mind; loyalty and trust thereby grow shallow. Ritual regulates outward conduct, prizes visible traces, and clings to elaborate ornament. In this way, the root is displaced by the peripheral details. Hypocrisy increases day by day: this is the beginning of disorder. So-called “foresight” is merely the surface radiance of the Great Dao, and the beginning of foolishness.

Song Huizong explained: Only after the Great Dao declined did deliberate action arise; and only once there was deliberate action did clever schemes and stratagems emerge. People use schemes to contrive deliberately and make their work ever more intricate; they exhaust their spirit and presume to measure and infer. This is called “foresight.” With such foresight, they pursue the branches and forget the root, so it is merely the surface radiance of the Great Dao. The spirit grows weary, and cleverness only confuses people further; this is why it is also the beginning of foolishness. To make guesses and repeatedly get them right is precisely why Confucius disliked Zigong.

Chen Yi explained: To follow the Great Dao is not to pursue knowledge or insight deliberately. The spirit grows weary, and cleverness only confuses people further; this is why it is the beginning of foolishness. To make guesses and repeatedly get them right is precisely why Confucius disliked Zigong.

臣义曰:道以不知不识道之华。心劳而智益困,故为愚之始。亿则屡中,此孔子所以恶子贡。 臣义曰:道以不知不识为本,而贵乎无以知为也,故以智巧为末。华,草木之末也,华盛则本衰矣。事於智巧,豫事而识,则去本远矣,故为道之华。以知为智,兹所以为愚之始。 是以大丈夫处其厚,不处其薄,居其实,不居其华,故去彼取此。 御注曰:在彼者,道所去,在此者,道所尚。道所尚则厚而不薄,实而无华,非夫智足以自知,返其性本而不流於事物之末习,其孰能之?《易》曰敦复无悔,中以自考也。敦者,厚之至也。人生而厚者,性也。复其性者,处其厚而已,此大丈夫所以备道而法德。 臣义曰:本乎在我者此也,道之本也。本乎在物者彼也,道之末也。本则言其厚而实,末则言其薄而华。取此所以处厚而居实,去彼所以也。本乎在物者彼也,道之末也。本则言其厚而实,末则言其薄而华。取此所以处厚而居实,去彼所以不处薄而不居其华,知所去取,是谓大丈夫。 昔之得-章第三十九 昔之得一者,天得一以清,地得一以宁,神得一以灵,谷得一以盈,万物得一以生,王侯得一以为天下正。其致之一也。
Interpretation

My interpretation is this: The Dao takes not knowing and not being clever as its foundation, and values acting without relying on ingenuity. It therefore regards ingenuity as secondary. “Flowers” are the branches, leaves, and blossoms of plants. When flowers and leaves flourish, the roots weaken. If we rely on ingenuity in everything, calculating at every turn and making plans in advance, we move farther and farther from the root. This is why such conduct is called the Dao’s superficial display. Treating knowledge as wisdom is the beginning of folly.

Therefore, the great person—the one of virtue and insight—grounds themselves in substance and does not linger in shallowness; they abide in what is genuine and do not pursue outward show. So they set aside one side and choose the other.

The Imperial Commentary says: That side is what the Dao rejects; this side is what the Dao honors. What the Dao honors is substance without shallowness, and genuineness without outward show. Unless one has the wisdom to know oneself, return to one’s nature, and avoid being led astray by habits tied to the trivial details of things, who could accomplish this? The Book of Changes says, “Returning with sincerity brings no regret.” This means that returning to the right path with a sincere and substantial heart brings no regret, because one has centered oneself through reflection. “Sincere” means substantial to the utmost degree. People are born with an inherently substantial nature; to return to that nature is to rest in substance. The great person can therefore embody the Dao and model themselves on De.

My interpretation is this: What has its root within oneself is “this side,” and it is also the root of the Dao. What has its root in external things is “that side,” and it is also the Dao’s secondary aspect. The root means substance and genuineness; the secondary aspect means shallowness and outward show. To choose this side is to rest in substance and hold fast to what is genuine. To set aside that side is to avoid falling into shallowness and pursuing outward show. Only those who understand what to set aside and what to choose can be called great persons.

Chapter 39: Of Old, Those Who Attained the One

Of old, each thing that attained the “One”—the unifying principle at the root of the Dao—fulfilled its own potential. Heaven attained the One and became clear; earth attained the One and became settled; spirits attained the One and became numinous; valleys attained the One and became full; the myriad things attained the One and were able to grow; and rulers attained the One and became the rightful authority under Heaven. All of them reached the same One.

御注曰:《庄子》曰,通於一,万事毕。政一则不二,抱一则不离,守一则不迁。能知一,则无一之不知,不能知一,则无一之能知。昔之得一者,体天下之至精,物无得而耦之者,故确然乎上者,纯粹而不杂。险然乎下者,静止则无一之能知。昔之得一者,体天下之至精,物无得而耦之者,故确然乎上者,纯粹而不杂。险然乎下者,静止而不变。至幽而无形者,神也。得一则不昧,至虚而善应者,谷也。得一则不穷,万物以精化形,故得一以生,侯王以独制众, 故得一以为天下正。自天地以至於侯王,虽上下异位,幽明散殊,而天之二所以清,地之所以宁,侯王之所以为天下正,非他求而外铄也。致之而已,故曰其致之一也。 臣义曰:昔则近古,今则向事。近古则言去道未远,天地神谷侯王皆本乎道。故致之而已,故曰其致之一也。 臣义曰:昔则近古,今则向事。近古则言去道未远,天地神谷侯王皆本乎道。故以昔言一者,道之朴也。至虚混全二至精未散,气复於元,故天得之纯粹而不杂,故其体也清。地得之静止而不变,故其体也宁。至幽之鬼神得之,则其灵不昧。至虚之空谷得之,则其盈不穷。万物得之,精全其生。侯王得之,为天下正。皆本乎道,其致一也。
Interpretation

The Zhuangzi says that when one understands the One, one can understand all things. When government orders are unified, there is no disorder; when the mind holds to the One, it does not become scattered; when one remains steadfastly devoted, one does not change. Those who understand the One can know everything; those who do not understand it cannot truly know anything.

In ancient times, those who attained the Dao and joined with the One perceived the most subtle essence of all under Heaven, which nothing could rival. Thus Heaven above is pure and unmixed, while Earth below is still and unchanging. The spirits, deep and formless, do not grow dim when they attain the Dao. The valleys, empty and able to receive and respond to the myriad things, are never exhausted when they attain the Dao. The myriad things take form through the transformation of vital essence, and so, attaining the Dao, they grow. Lords and kings govern everyone as a single body, and so, attaining the Dao, they become standards for all under Heaven.

From Heaven and Earth to lords and kings, their positions may be high or low, and their forms may be hidden or manifest. Yet Heaven’s clarity, Earth’s tranquility, and the rulers’ becoming standards for all under Heaven are neither sought nor imposed from outside. They need only return themselves to the Dao. That is why they are said, in the end, to return to the One.

The minister Zhang An explains: “‘Ancient times’ refers to the distant past, while ‘today’ refers to matters of the present. People spoke of these things in the distant past because they were still close to the Dao. Heaven and Earth, the spirits, the valleys, and the lords and kings all take the Dao as their root. Thus, the ‘One’ mentioned above is the Dao in its original simplicity. The Dao is empty, still, and whole; in its most subtle state, it has not yet dispersed, and Qi has returned to its origin.

Heaven attains the Dao and is therefore pure and unmixed, its nature clear. Earth attains the Dao and is therefore still and unchanging, its nature tranquil. When the deep and hidden spirits attain the Dao, their spiritual power does not grow dim; when the empty valleys attain the Dao, their capacity to receive the myriad things is never exhausted. When the myriad things attain the Dao, they preserve their vital essence and grow. When lords and kings attain the Dao, they become standards for all under Heaven. They all take the Dao as their root and, in the end, return to the same source.

天无以清将恐裂,地无以宁将恐发,神无以灵将恐歇,谷无以盈将恐竭,万物无以生将恐灭,,为天下正。皆本乎道,其致一也。 天无以清将恐裂,地无以宁将恐发,神无以灵将恐歇,谷无以盈将恐竭,万物无以生将恐灭,侯王无以为正而贵高将恐蹶。 御注曰:天职生覆,地职形载,裂则无以覆,发则无以载。神依人而行者也,歇则无所示。谷受而不藏者也,竭则莫之应。聚则精气为物,得一以生故也。散则游魂为变,失一以灭故也。惟正也,故能御万变而独立於万物之上,无以为正而贵高,将不足以自保,能无蹶乎? 臣义曰:天清於一,无以清则裂而不能广覆。地宁於一,无以宁则发而不能厚载。神,灵於一,无以灵则歇而无所示。谷盈於一,无以盈则竭而莫能应。万物生於一,无以生则灭。侯王正於一,无以正则蹶。故贵以贱为本,高以下为基。 御注曰:贱者,贵之所恃以为固,下者,高之所自起。世。故贵以贱为本,高以下为基。 御注曰:贱者,贵之所恃以为固,下者,高之所自起。世之人睹其末,而圣人探其本,世之人见其成,而圣人察其微,故常得一也。 臣义曰:贵而忘贱,其贵庭矣。高而忘下,其基危矣。 是以侯王自称孤寡不谷,此其以贱为本耶,非乎?
Interpretation

Heaven depends on clarity to sustain its operation. If it cannot remain clear, it may collapse. Earth depends on stillness to remain stable. If it cannot remain still, it may quake and burst apart. Spirit depends on its efficacy to manifest its function. If it cannot remain efficacious, it may cease to function. Valleys depend on an abundant flow of Qi to respond to all things. If they cannot remain full, they may dry up. All things depend on vitality to endure. Without vitality, they may perish. All of these take the Dao as their root; in the end, they rest on the same principle.

Heaven is sustained by clarity; if it loses clarity, it may collapse. Earth is sustained by stillness; if it loses stillness, it may quake and burst apart. Spirit manifests through its efficacy; if it loses efficacy, it may cease. Valleys respond to all things through their abundance; if they lose that abundance, they may dry up. All things exist through vitality; if they lose vitality, they may perish. If a ruler cannot set himself right through the Dao, but values only honor and high position, he too may be brought down.

The Imperial Commentary says: Heaven’s duty is to bring forth, nourish, and cover all things. If heaven collapses, it can no longer cover them. Earth’s duty is to form and bear all things. If earth quakes and bursts apart, it can no longer bear them. Spirit depends on people to exercise its function; if that function is lost, spirit can no longer manifest. Valleys receive all things without claiming them as their own; if they dry up, they can no longer respond to all things. When things gather, Jing and Qi coalesce into form, and they are born through gaining the Dao. When they disperse, the soul and vital energies wander away, and they change and perish through losing the Dao. Only by holding to what is right can one respond to myriad changes and remain secure among all things. If a ruler does not set himself right through the Dao, but craves only honor and high position, he will find it difficult to preserve himself. How could he avoid being brought down?

The Minister’s Commentary says: Heaven gains clarity through the Dao; when it loses clarity, it collapses and can no longer broadly cover all things. Earth gains stillness through the Dao; when it loses stillness, it bursts apart and can no longer stably bear all things. Spirit gains efficacy through the Dao; when it loses efficacy, it ceases and can no longer manifest. Valleys gain abundance through the Dao; when they lose abundance, they dry up and can no longer respond to all things. All things are born through the Dao; when they lose vitality, they perish. Rulers are set right through the Dao; when they lose their uprightness, they are brought down. Thus, honor has lowliness as its root, and high position has low ground as its foundation.

The Imperial Commentary says: Lowliness is what allows honor to stand firm; low ground is the foundation on which high position is built. Ordinary people see only the surface of things, while sages investigate their roots. Ordinary people see only what has already taken shape, while sages perceive subtle beginnings. Thus they are always able to grasp the Dao.

The Minister’s Commentary says: If the honored forget their lowliness, their honor will be shaken. If those who stand high above forget what lies below, their foundations will be in danger.

Therefore, when rulers call themselves “orphaned,” “widowed,” or “unworthy”—humble forms of self-reference meaning alone, lacking in virtue, or inept—are they not placing themselves in a low position and taking lowliness as their root? Isn’t that so?

御注曰:孤寡不谷,名之贱者也,而侯王以为称,知所本、而已。侯王所以贵高而不历,其以此乎? 臣义曰:侯王知所本在贱,故以孤寡不谷自称,而不以贵高自累,故能保其贵。 、而已。侯王所以贵高而不历,其以此乎? 臣义曰:侯王知所本在贱,故以孤寡不谷自称,而不以贵高自累,故能保其贵。 故致数誉无誉。 御注曰:自高以胜物,自贵以贱物,强而不知守以柔,白而不知守以黑,以求誉於世,而致数誉,则过情之誉暴集,无实之毁随至,所以无誉。 臣义曰:知一则知本,故能自贱自下,而韬乎至贵。苟自高自贵,数以求誉,而无实之毁,其能免乎。 不欲琭琭如玉,落落如石。 御注曰:玉贵而石贱,一定而不变,圣人乘时任物,而无所底滞,万变无常,而吾心常一,是真得一者也,故不可得而贵贱。孟子曰:所恶乎执一者,谓其执一而废百也。不欲琭琭如玉,落落如石,非知化之圣不能及此,是谓上德。 臣义曰:玉石性正一而不变者也,一而不能变是物也,非所谓得一者也。得一者,曲应万变,酬醉无穷,而无所底上德。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of the Song commented: “‘Orphan,’ ‘widowed,’ and ‘unworthy’ are all lowly forms of address. Yet lords and kings use these words of themselves. This shows that they know the root of honor lies in humility. Is this not perhaps why they can remain honored without suffering harm?”

A minister explained: “Lords and kings know that the root of honor lies in humility, so they call themselves ‘orphan,’ ‘widowed,’ and ‘unworthy.’ They do not let their honored status become a burden to them, and so they are able to preserve it.”

Emperor Huizong of the Song commented: “Those who think themselves above others will put others down; those who think themselves noble will look down on others. If they are forceful but do not know how to remain yielding, or display their brilliance without knowing how to rein in its sharpness, they may hope to win the world’s praise. But praise beyond what they deserve will often gather around them for a time, followed by groundless slander. In the end, they are left without a genuine reputation.”

A minister explained: “Those who understand the One of the Dao understand the root. They can therefore humble themselves and take the lower position, keeping the highest honor in check. If they exalt and honor themselves, constantly seeking praise, they will also invite groundless slander. How could they avoid it?”

Emperor Huizong of the Song commented: “They do not wish to seem precious like jade, nor ordinary like stone. Jade is precious and stone is base; each has a fixed nature. The sage, by contrast, responds to the times and meets all things without becoming constrained. The affairs of the world change endlessly, yet the sage’s mind remains at rest. This is what it truly means to attain the Dao. Such a person is not bound by distinctions of rank or worth. Mencius said that what he condemned as ‘holding to one’ means clinging to a single way and abandoning many others. To cling neither to being like jade nor like stone is a state attainable only by a sage who understands change. This is called ‘higher De’—the highest virtue.”

A minister explained: “Jade and stone each have a fixed nature and never change. To hold fast to a single state is still to be governed by external things; it cannot be called attaining the Dao. One who truly attains the Dao can respond flexibly to myriad changes and meet the limitless variety of things without becoming constrained. This is higher De.”

臣义曰:玉石性正一而不变者也,一而不能变是物也,非所谓得一者也。得一者,曲应万变,酬醉无穷,而无所底滞,而心未始或离於一,孰得而贵贱之也。如玉贵之也,如石贱之也,玉石不能变,贵贱盖已定,非所谓通於一者也,故曰不欲。 反者道之动章第四十 反者道之动,弱者道之用。天下之物生於有,有生於无。 御注曰:天下之理,动静相因,强弱相济,夫物芸芸,各归其根,则已往而返复乎至静,然感而遂通天下之故,则动无非我,故曰反者道之动。柔之胜刚,弱之胜强,道之妙用,实在於此。《庄子,各归其根,则已往而返复乎至静,然感而遂通天下之故,则动无非我,故曰反者道之动。柔之胜刚,弱之胜强,道之妙用,实在於此。《庄子》曰:积众小不胜为大胜者,惟圣人能之,故云弱者道之用。四时之行,敛藏於冬,而蕃鲜於春。水之性至柔也,而攻坚强者,莫之能先,其此之谓欤?然则有无之相生,若循环然,故无动而生有,有极而归无,如东西之相反,而不可以相无也。彼蔽於莫为,溺於或使,岂道也哉?
Interpretation

Your servant believes that the nature of jade and stone is fixed in each case and cannot be changed. Holding to one nature without adapting is simply the condition of a thing in itself; it is not called “attaining the One.” To “attain the One” means to respond to every kind of change and meet endless affairs without obstruction, while never inwardly departing from the One. Who, then, could judge it as noble or base? To regard jade as precious and stone as lowly is to say that, since they cannot change themselves, their worth is already fixed. This is not understanding the One. Therefore, do not cling to distinctions of worth.

“Reversal Is the Movement of the Dao,” Chapter Forty

Returning and reversing: this is how the Dao moves. Softness and weakness: this is how the Dao works. All things under Heaven arise from being, and being arises from nonbeing.

The Imperial Commentary (by Emperor Huizong of Song) says: The principles of the world are that movement and stillness depend on one another, and strength and weakness complement each other. All things flourish and grow, yet in the end return to their roots. After passing through change, they return to ultimate stillness. Yet when things are stirred into response, they can understand the principles of the world. Thus every kind of activity never departs from the Dao, which is why it is said, “Reversal is the movement of the Dao.” The soft can overcome the hard, and the weak can overcome the strong; this is the Dao’s subtle function.

The Zhuangzi says that many small instances of “not prevailing” accumulate to bring about a great victory, and only the sage can do this. Thus it is said, “Weakness is the Dao’s function.” The seasons turn: winter gathers and stores away, then spring brings flourishing life. Water is by nature supremely soft and weak, yet nothing is better than it at overcoming hard and powerful things. Is this not what the saying means?

Seen in this way, being and nonbeing generate each other in an endless cycle: being arises from nonbeing, and when being reaches its utmost, it returns to nonbeing. They are opposed like east and west, yet cannot be separated from each other. Do those who insist that all things arise entirely on their own, or believe that all things must be driven by an external force, truly understand the Dao?

臣义曰:道以虚静为正,故以动为反,动离乎静而复反乎静,归根反本也,道之动如此。道以不争为胜,故以弱为用。柔之胜刚,弱之胜强,道之妙用寓焉。反,动离乎静而复反乎静,归根反本也,道之动如此。道以不争为胜,故以弱为用。柔之胜刚,弱之胜强,道之妙用寓焉。天下之物,本乎至无,生而为有,其见於有,而复归於无,而无复生有,是有无旋环相生,而不可以相无也。 上士闻道章第四十- 上士闻道,勤而行之。 御注曰:士志於道者也,上士闻道,真积力久,至诚不息。 臣义曰:上士志道而信道笃者也,故力於行而有所至。 中士闻道,若存若亡。 御注曰:中士则有疑心焉。疑心生则用。 臣义曰:上士志道而信道笃者也,故力於行而有所至。 中士闻道,若存若亡。 御注曰:中士则有疑心焉。疑心生则用志分,其於道也,一出焉,一入焉。 臣义曰:中士见道不明,故信道不笃。 下士闻道,大笑之,不笑不足以为道。 御注曰:下士则信不足,以守智不足与明也,故笑。夫道无形色声味之可得,则其去耳目鼻口之所嗜也远矣。庄子曰大声不入於俚耳,高言不止於众人之心。
Interpretation

My understanding is this: the Dao (the Way) takes emptiness and stillness as its root, so its movement is a return. Movement departs from stillness and then comes back to it; all things return to their root and back to their source. This is how the Dao operates. The Dao prevails by not contending, so it acts through softness and weakness. The soft can overcome the hard, and the weak can overcome the strong; this is where the Dao’s subtle power lies. All things under Heaven originally emerge from emptiness: from nonbeing, being is born. Once things appear as being, they return to nonbeing, and nonbeing can in turn give rise to being. Thus being and nonbeing continually give rise to one another and cannot be separated.

The highest kind of person hears of the Dao and diligently puts it into practice

The highest kind of person—one with keen understanding and firm resolve—hears of the Dao and diligently puts it into practice.

The Imperial Commentary says: A person of resolve is one who aspires to the Dao. After hearing of the Dao, the highest kind of person accumulates understanding over time and applies sustained effort, persevering with complete sincerity.

The Minister’s Commentary says: The highest kind of person sets their heart on the Dao and has firm faith in it. They therefore strive to put it into practice and gradually make progress.

The middling kind of person hears of the Dao and seems to keep it in mind, then seems to forget it

The middling kind of person—one with moderate understanding and faith—hears of the Dao, sometimes keeping it in mind and sometimes seeming to forget it.

The Imperial Commentary says: Doubts arise in the heart of the middling kind of person. Once doubt appears, their resolve is scattered. Their attitude toward the Dao wavers: at one moment they believe, and at the next they lose confidence.

The Minister’s Commentary says: The middling kind of person does not see the Dao clearly enough, so their faith in it is not firm.

The lowest kind of person hears of the Dao and laughs aloud; if they did not laugh, it would not be worthy to be called the Dao

The lowest kind of person—one with limited understanding who finds the Dao difficult to grasp—hears of it and laughs aloud. If people like this did not laugh, it would scarcely be worthy to be called the Dao.

The Imperial Commentary says: The lowest kind of person lacks faith and the wisdom needed to understand principle, so they laugh. The Dao has no shape, color, sound, or taste by which people can grasp it directly; it lies far from what the ears, eyes, mouth, and nose find pleasing. Zhuangzi said: “A grand sound does not enter vulgar ears, and profound words are hard to keep in the minds of ordinary people.”

臣义曰:下士物於物而反乎道,认幻妄为已有,以至道为虚假,闻道之大,故笑而不信。道不为下士之笑,亦不足为道。 故建言有之,明道若昧, 御注曰:若日月之光,照临下土者,明也。丰智原而不示,袭其光而不耀,故若昧。 臣义曰:明若日月之明,昧若昧谷之昧,明而复乎无明,不明也。丰智原而不示,袭其光而不耀,故若昧。 臣义曰:明若日月之明,昧若昧谷之昧,明而复乎无明,不用明也,故若昧。 夷道若类, 御注曰:同归而殊涂,一政而百虑。 臣义曰:夷则得其平,类则结而止,道以不平为平,故若颣。 进道若退。 御注曰:颜渊以退为进,庄子以谓坐忘。 臣义曰:为道曰损,故若退。 上德若谷, 御注曰:虚而能应,应而不竭,虚而能受,受而不藏,经曰为天下谷,常德乃足。 臣义曰:虚而能容,体道者也,故曰上德。能应能受,故若谷。 大白若辱, 御注曰:涤除玄览,不睹一疵,大白也。处众人之所恶,故若辱。 臣义曰:大白不受色,洁乎至纯者也。若辱,纳污之谓也。 广德若不足, 御注曰:德无不容,而不自以为有余,故若不足。秋水时至,河伯自喜,所以见笑於大方之家。 臣义曰:德之容也,广若辱,纳污之谓也。
Interpretation

People of the lowest kind are led about by external things and thereby turn away from the Dao. They take what is illusory and unreal to be their own, and regard the highest Dao as false. When they hear of the Great Dao’s vastness and depth, they laugh and refuse to believe it. The Dao does not change because people of the lowest kind mock it. If a way were not mocked even by such people, it would not be the true Dao.

An ancient saying goes, “The bright Dao seems dim.” The Dao’s brightness is like the sun and moon shining upon the earth, yet it does not deliberately display its radiance. It holds profound wisdom within and does not flaunt its brightness, so it appears almost dim.

The court commentator explains: “Bright” here is like the light of the sun and moon; “dim” is like the darkness of the Valley of Darkness, the legendary place where the sun sets. Though bright, the Dao can return to a state in which nothing is displayed. It does not use its brightness to show itself off, and so appears almost obscure.

“The level Dao seems uneven.” The level Dao is the smooth and even Dao. Yet the Dao appears as though rough, uneven, and difficult to make out. The Imperial Commentary says that although paths differ, in the end they all converge in one place; although political affairs may seem to involve differing considerations, their underlying principles can be brought into accord. The court commentator explains that “level” means flat, while “uneven” suggests things gathering together and becoming obstructed. The Dao embodies evenness without displaying it, and so appears almost uneven.

“The advancing Dao seems to retreat.” Cultivating the Dao looks like making no progress, or even falling back. The Imperial Commentary says that Yan Yuan treated yielding as a way to advance. This is also the meaning of Zhuangzi’s “sitting in forgetfulness”—sitting quietly and forgetting the body and distinctions. The court commentator explains that cultivating the Dao calls for reduction, and so appears to move backward.

“Superior De seems like a valley.” The highest De seems empty, like a mountain valley. The Imperial Commentary says that emptiness can respond to all things without being exhausted; it can contain all things without claiming them as its own. The Dao De Jing says, “Be the valley of the world,” meaning that by becoming the world’s valley, constant De can be fulfilled. The court commentator explains that one who embodies the Dao is empty and able to contain things. Able to respond and receive, such a person is like a valley.

“The purest white seems soiled.” What is utterly pure appears to have suffered disgrace. The Imperial Commentary says that cleansing the mind’s profound vision until no flaw can be seen is what is meant by the purest white. Yet one dwells among what others despise, and so seems disgraced. The court commentator explains that the purest white is entirely free of any trace of other colors; “seems soiled” means being able to contain filth.

“Vast De seems insufficient.” De may be immense, yet seem as though it still falls short. The Imperial Commentary says that De contains everything, yet does not regard itself as having anything to spare. When the autumn waters rose on schedule, the Lord of the He River congratulated himself; for this, he was mocked by those of broad understanding. The court commentator explains that De’s capacity to contain is so vast that it appears almost disgraced, because it can contain what is filthy.

广德若不足, 御注曰:德无不容,而不自以为有余,故若不足。秋水时至,河伯自喜,所以见笑於大方之家。 臣义曰:德之容也,广不可极,可谓至矣,若不足然。此德之益广,与道无穷也。 建德若偷, 御注曰:圣人踌躇以兴事,以每成功。 臣义曰:圣人不得已而后起,其有所建也。因时任运,若偷堕然,不急急於从事,故德之所建弥大。 质真若渝。 御注曰:不曰坚乎?磨而不磷。不曰白乎?涅而不缁。 臣义曰:静一不变,朴乎其纯,精藏於一,全乎其真,任彼万变,其质常真,真之至也。至真而世莫知其为真,其藏深矣,故若渝。 大方无隅, 御注曰:大方者,无方之方也。方而不割,故无隅。 臣义曰:其方有隅,言其在器。大而无隅,道之无方。 大器晚成, 御注曰:大器者,不器之器也。不。 臣义曰:其方有隅,言其在器。大而无隅,道之无方。 大器晚成, 御注曰:大器者,不器之器也。不益生,不助长,故晚成。 臣义曰:惟大器有远虑,不速成,故不益生,不助长。急於求用,浅器之所为也。 大音希声, 御注曰:动於无方,而感之斯应,故希声。 臣义曰:大音,德之不闻,故其声也希。 大象无形。
Interpretation

Great virtue appears deficient. Virtue can encompass everything, yet does not consider itself complete, so it seems deficient. Just as the autumn rains raised the waters in season, the Earl of the River once believed that all the waters under heaven had gathered in his domain. Only when he later met someone of broad understanding was he laughed at. Virtue’s capacity is so vast that it has no bounds; one could say it has reached the utmost. Yet it continues to grow, and, like the Dao (the Way), has no end.

Establishing virtue appears to be slackness. When the sage acts, they always advance matters with care and composure, and so they often succeed. Sages rise to act only when they have no choice. They respond to the moment and let things unfold naturally, seeming almost idle and in no hurry to do anything. Thus the virtue they establish becomes all the deeper and greater.

Genuine simplicity appears to have changed its form. Is it not firm? Grinding cannot wear it thin. Is it not pure white? Dyeing cannot turn it black. It is tranquil and undivided, without changing; simple and unadulterated, it holds its vital essence within unity and preserves its wholeness and truth. Though the world around it undergoes countless changes, its nature remains true: this is truth at its utmost. Yet people may not recognize what is truly profound and genuine. Because it is hidden so deeply, it appears to have changed its form.

The greatest square has no corners. A “great square” is square without having a fixed shape. Though it is square, it does not cut or wound anything, and so has no corners. A square with corners is merely the shape of a particular object; vastness without corners is the Dao without fixed form.

The greatest vessel is often formed late. A “great vessel” is a vessel that surpasses ordinary vessels. It does not deliberately augment life or force growth to hasten, and so it is formed late. The truly great vessel takes the long view and does not seek to take shape quickly. Eagerly seeking usefulness and forcing growth are the ways of shallow vessels.

The greatest sound is heard only rarely. Its movement has no fixed direction; when things are moved, it responds naturally, and so it does not often appear as an audible sound. The “great sound” is virtue at work without being perceived by people, and so its sound seems rare.

The greatest image has no fixed form.

御注日:托於窈冥,而视之不得见, 故无形。 臣义曰:无象之象,道之全体,本於常无,何形之有。 道隐无名,夫惟道,善贷且成。 御注曰:自明道至於大象,皆道也。道之妙不可以智索,不可以形求,可谓屦矣。歌明之而不可得也,圣人得乎道,故予而不费,应且成。 御注曰:自明道至於大象,皆道也。道之妙不可以智索,不可以形求,可谓屦矣。歌明之而不可得也,圣人得乎道,故予而不费,应而不匮,曲成万物,未尝擅而有之,亦且而已。道之体,隐乎无名而用,乃善贷且成,故动而行之,则造乎不形,而止乎无所化。其余事犹足以为帝王之功,传曰:学始乎为士,终乎为圣。 臣义曰:道之体,复於至无。道之用,藏乎不测。明之者若昧,象之者无形,其隐如此。故不可以知索,不可以形求,孰得而名之。贷者应彼之乏,予而求复之谓也。道应乎无方,赡乎万物,成其所自成,无有终已。物之所得,复归其本,於此无与,於彼无费,故曰善贷且成。 道生-章第四十二 道生一, 御注曰:泰初有无无,有无名,一之所起。 臣义曰:道常无右,一之所生,气之混也。 一生二, 御注曰:天一而地二,次之水生而火次一之所起。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary: The Dao is lodged in what is deep and obscure. The eyes cannot see it, so we say that it has no form.

The Minister’s Explanation: The Dao has no fixed appearance, yet it contains the complete substance of all things. At its root it is the constant void; how could it have any concrete form?

The Dao is hidden and nameless. Only the Dao is able to provide all things with what they need and bring them to completion.

The Imperial Commentary: From “Making the Dao clear” through “The Great Image,” the subject is the Dao throughout. The Dao’s mystery cannot be investigated by intellect or sought through physical form. It may be called vast and boundless, yet even when explained, it remains beyond our grasp. The sage understands the Dao, so gives to all things without diminishing himself and responds to them in a way that brings them to completion.

The Imperial Commentary: From “Making the Dao clear” through “The Great Image,” the subject is the Dao throughout. The Dao’s mystery cannot be investigated by intellect or sought through physical form. It may be called vast and boundless, yet even when explained, it remains beyond our grasp. The sage understands the Dao, so gives to all things without diminishing himself, responds to them without becoming exhausted, and allows each to fulfill itself without ever claiming them as his own. The substance of the Dao is hidden and nameless, while its function is to give generously and bring all things to completion. Thus, acting in accordance with the Dao leads to a state without form or trace, no longer governed by the changes of external things. This alone is enough to accomplish the work of an emperor. An ancient book says: “Learning begins with becoming a scholar and ends with attaining the state of a sage.”

The Minister’s Explanation: The substance of the Dao returns to the utmost emptiness, and its function is concealed in what cannot be fathomed. Those who understand it seem dim; though one may try to portray it, it has no shape. It is so hidden that it cannot be investigated through knowledge or sought through physical form. Who, then, could give it a name? “Lend” means to respond to another’s lack, provide what is needed, and make up what is missing. The Dao responds to everything, nourishes all things, and enables them to fulfill themselves without end. What all things receive ultimately returns to its source. The Dao gives to all things without thereby diminishing itself, so we say that it is able to give generously and bring all things to completion.

The Dao gives birth to One—Chapter 42

The Dao gives birth to One.

The Imperial Commentary: At the beginning of time, Nonbeing came first. Being arose from Nonbeing; this was the beginning of “One.”

The Minister’s Explanation: The Dao constantly abides in emptiness, from which “One” emerges. “One” is the primal Qi, still undivided and chaotic.

One gives birth to Two.

The Imperial Commentary: Heaven belongs to the Yang number “One,” and Earth to the Yin number “Two.” Next, Water is born from “One,” while Fire comes after Water.

臣义曰:道常无右,一之所生,气之混也。 一生二, 御注曰:天一而地二,次之水生而火次之,精具而神从之。 臣义曰:一气分而阴阳之气辨,天地之所生。 二生三, 御注曰:一与言为二,二与一为三。 臣义曰:天地位而冲气之所生,故三才具矣。 三生万物。 御注曰:天肇一於北,地耦二於南,人成位於三,三才具而万象分矣。号物之数,谓之万,自此以往,巧历不能计。 臣义曰:有阴有阳,而冲气以为和,物得以生,号数为万,其可计耶。万物负阴而抱阳,冲气以为和。 御注曰:阴止而静,万物负焉。君子所以日入而息。阳融而亨,万物抱焉,圣人所以响明而治。必有阴阳之中,冲气是已。《庄子》曰:至阳赫赫,至阴肃肃,肃肃出乎天,赫赫发乎地,两者交通治。必有阴阳之中,冲气是已。《庄子》曰:至阳赫赫,至阴肃肃,肃肃出乎天,赫赫发乎地,两者交通成和,而物生焉。 臣义曰:万物赋形天地间,弃气於阴阳以生,故无不负抱之者。冲气之和,所以生生也。 人之所恶,唯孤寡不谷,而王公以为称。
Interpretation

I believe that the Dao (the Way) often favors neither side. All things are born from the Dao and, at the beginning, are one undifferentiated Qi (vital energy).

The One Qi divides, giving rise to the two kinds of Qi, Yin and Yang. The Imperial Commentary says: Heaven is One, Earth is Two; then Water comes into being, followed by Fire. Once Jing (essence) and Qi are complete, Shen (spirit) follows. I believe that when the One Qi divides, Yin and Yang become distinct, and all things between Heaven and Earth come into being.

One gives rise to Two, and Two gives rise to Three. The Imperial Commentary says: combine “One” and “speech” to call it “Two,” then combine “Two” and “One” to call it “Three.” I believe that Heaven and Earth each take their place, and the blending Qi born from their meeting also takes shape. Thus the Three Powers—Heaven, Earth, and humanity—are complete.

Three gives rise to the myriad things. The Imperial Commentary says: Heaven begins the “One” in the north, Earth joins it as the “Two” in the south, and humanity occupies the position of the “Three.” Once the Three Powers are complete, the myriad forms divide and appear. The number of kinds of things is collectively called “ten thousand”; from then on, even those skilled in calculation cannot count them all. I believe that all things have Yin and Yang and can grow only through the harmonizing action of the blending Qi. Their kinds are so numerous that they are called “ten thousand”—how could anyone count them all?

All things carry Yin and embrace Yang, and are born through the harmonizing action of the blending Qi. The Imperial Commentary says: Yin Qi gathers and is still; all things carry it, and so the gentleman rests after sunset. Yang Qi is harmonious and free-flowing; all things embrace it, and so the sage governs the world in accordance with the light. Between Yin and Yang there must be a harmonizing Qi: this is the blending Qi. The Zhuangzi says: “The utmost Yang is blazing and bright; the utmost Yin is solemn and cold. The solemn, cold Qi comes from Heaven, and the blazing, bright Qi comes from Earth. The two meet and harmonize, and from this all things are born.” I believe that all things take shape between Heaven and Earth and are born by receiving Yin and Yang Qi. Thus there is nothing that does not receive the influence of both Yin and Yang. The blending Qi harmonizes them, and only then can all things continue to grow.

The titles people dislike are “orphan,” “widower,” and “unworthy”—self-deprecating terms suggesting loneliness, a lack of blessing or virtue, and inadequacy. Yet lords and princes use them to refer to themselves.

御注曰:物罔隆而不杀,事靡盛而不衰,阴阳之运,事物之理也。消息盈虚,与之偕行,而不失其和,其惟圣人乎?故孤寡不谷,人之所恶,而王公以为称,已极而返,已满而损,所以居上而不危。 臣义曰:侯王位乎贵高者也,孤寡不毂,人之所恶者也。王公居尊位,而称人所恶,知满损之理,而要乎不失中故也。阴极生阳,阳极生阴,失於偏毗,要适乎阴阳之和,故明损益之理。 故物也。王公居尊位,而称人所恶,知满损之理,而要乎不失中故也。阴极生阳,阳极生阴,失於偏毗,要适乎阴阳之和,故明损益之理。 故物或损之而益,益之而损。 御注曰:木落则粪本,损之而益故也。月盈则必蚀,益之而损故也。天地盈虚,与时消息,而况於人乎?然则王公之所称,乃所以致益而处贵高之道。 臣义曰:益之则损,损之则益,天地盈虚,阴阳进退,理不外是,此王公称人所恶,得损益之道,而与时消息,所以位高贵而不蹶也。 人之所教,亦我义教之。强梁者不得其死,吾将以为教父。 御注曰:以强制弱,以刚胜柔,人之所教也。我之所教,则异乎此。强梁者有我而好争,有死之道。智者观之,因以为戒,故将以为教父。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of Song commented: Nothing flourishes without eventually declining, and nothing prospers without eventually waning. This is the pattern by which Yin-Yang operates and the myriad things change. Decline and growth, fullness and emptiness, all unfold along with change without losing harmony. Perhaps only the sage can achieve this? “Lonely,” “bereft,” and “unworthy” are titles people dislike, yet lords and princes use them for themselves. For they understand that what reaches its height will turn toward decline, and that fullness invites loss. Only by understanding this can one hold a high position without being imperiled.

The minister Zhang An explained: Lords and kings occupy places of honor and prominence, yet call themselves “lonely,” “bereft,” and “unworthy”—titles people dislike—because they understand that fullness brings loss and must hold firmly to the middle way, without leaning to either side. When Yin reaches its extreme, it gives rise to Yang; when Yang reaches its extreme, it turns into Yin. To favor one side is to lose balance. One should therefore follow the harmony of Yin-Yang and understand that loss and gain transform into one another.

Thus, sometimes a thing is diminished and thereby gains; sometimes it is increased and thereby incurs loss.

Emperor Huizong of Song commented: When trees shed their leaves, the roots are nourished in turn: diminution brings gain. Once the moon is full, it must begin to wane: increase brings diminution. The fullness and emptiness of Heaven and Earth wax and wane as the seasons pass; how much more so for human beings? Thus, when lords and princes call themselves by titles people dislike, they are following a way to gain benefit and remain secure in positions of honor.

The minister Zhang An explained: Increase brings diminution, and diminution brings gain. The fullness and emptiness of Heaven and Earth, and the advance and retreat of Yin and Yang, follow no other pattern. Lords and princes call themselves by titles people dislike because they understand how loss and gain transform and can follow the waxing and waning of the times. Thus, though they occupy high positions, they are not brought to ruin.

What people teach, I too take as a teaching and pass on: Those who are forceful and violent do not meet a good end. I take this as the foundation of my teaching.

Emperor Huizong of Song commented: Using strength to overcome weakness and hardness to prevail over softness is the teaching people ordinarily follow. What I teach is different. Those who are forceful, domineering, and fond of contention cling to the self and delight in fighting; they are bound to meet their end. The wise see this and take it as a warning. That is why these words can serve as the foundation of a teaching.

臣义曰:物或损之而,以刚胜柔,人之所教也。我之所教,则异乎此。强梁者有我而好争,有死之道。智者观之,因以为戒,故将以为教父。 臣义曰:物或损之而益,益之而损,阴阳有进则有退,有退则有进,物之变化,阴阳之盈虚,其理故然。理之所在,义教师也。强制弱,刚制柔,人之所教也。强梁者之好争,是强於有我,以彼之不我胜,任强而不自反者,故卒为强者之所胜,而不得善其死。知其说者,鉴彼消息盈虚损益之理,为教之本,有父之道。 天下之至柔章第四十三 天下之至柔,驰骋天下之至坚。 御注曰:坚则毁矣,锐则挫矣,积众小不胜为大胜者,惟圣人能之。 臣义曰:刚则不能通於物而易折,故毁於坚,到於锐。至柔则与物无迕逆,故能入物而有为,而至坚者为之用,驰骋而不知也。 无有入於无间, 御注曰:《庄子》外篇论夔蛇风目之相怜,而终之以目怜心,盖足至坚者为之用,驰骋而不知也。 无有入於无间, 御注曰:《庄子》外篇论夔蛇风目之相怜,而终之以目怜心,盖足之行,有所不至,目之视,有所不及,而惟神为无方也。内篇论养生之主,而况於庖丁之解牛。丁者火之阴而神之相也,故恢恢乎游刃有余。然则入於无间,非体尽无穷而游无朕者,其孰能之?
Interpretation

A minister explained: “Some things seem to suffer loss but in fact gain from it. Using strength to overcome weakness is the teaching commonly practiced by the world. What I teach is different. The overbearing person who flaunts his strength trusts in his own power and delights in fighting. This is a path toward death. The wise see this and take it as a warning, making it the foundation of their instruction.”

The minister explained further: “Sometimes things gain through reduction; sometimes they suffer loss through increase. Yin-Yang advances and recedes: when one recedes, the other advances. This is simply how things change and how Yin-Yang waxes and wanes. Where the principle lies is the foundation of moral instruction. Using strength to overpower weakness, and hardness to overpower softness, is the teaching usually practiced by the world. The overbearing person who loves to contend trusts in his own strength. Unwilling to let his opponent prevail, he keeps flaunting his power without reflecting. In the end, someone stronger subdues him, and he meets a bad end. Those who understand this principle learn from the changes through which things grow and decline, wax and wane, and gain and lose. They make this the foundation of instruction, thereby taking on the role of a father who guides and teaches.”

The Softest Thing in the World (Chapter 43)

The softest thing in the world can master the hardest thing in the world.

The Imperial Commentary says: “Hard things will eventually break, and sharp things will eventually snap. To gather many small forces that seem incapable of prevailing and ultimately achieve a great victory—only a sage can do this.”

A minister explains: “Hard things cannot readily adapt to the myriad things, so they break easily. Hard things are destroyed, and sharp things are blunted. The softest thing, however, does not resist the myriad things. It can therefore enter among them and act, putting even the hardest things to use. It masters them in such a way that they do not even realize it.”

What is soft and formless can enter where there is no gap.

The Imperial Commentary cites a story from the Outer Chapters of the Zhuangzi in which Kui, the snake, the wind, and the eye each envy one another, ending with the eye envying the heart. The feet can reach only so far, and the eyes can see only so much; only the workings of the spirit have no fixed boundaries. The Imperial Commentary also cites the story of Cook Ding cutting up an ox from “The Secret of Caring for Life,” an Inner Chapter of the Zhuangzi. Cook Ding guides his knife through the spaces in the ox’s body, moving it freely with ample room to spare. From this, we can see that whatever can enter a place with no gaps must be something that understands the endless changes and moves freely without form or trace.

臣义曰:无有则物我皆无有也,物我皆无有,则体神而冥於道,故妙於无方,游乎无朕。 是以知无为之有益也。 御注曰:柔之胜刚,无之摄有,道之妙用,实寓於此。弃事则形不劳,遗生则精不亏,兹所以为有益。 臣义曰:经曰:天下神器不可为也,为者败之,盖道之妙用,藏於不测,岂事於有为也。有为者,劳形以事,精亏其生,何益之有。 不言之教,无为之益,天下希及之於有为也。有为者,劳形以事,精亏其生,何益之有。 不言之教,无为之益,天下希及之矣。 御注曰:不言之教,设之以神,无为之益,不亏其真。圣人以此抱朴而天下宾,无为而万物化,故及之者希。 臣义曰:体神而其教不言,尽道而其益无为,至於天下宾,万物化,诚希及也。 名与身章第四十四 名与身孰亲?身与货孰多?
Interpretation

I take “nonbeing and having” to mean that neither things nor I cling to the notion that anything truly exists. When thoughts of both things and self are set aside, one can experience the mysterious and wondrous, accord with the Dao, and so transcend fixed places and traces, moving freely without obstruction.

Therefore, one should understand that Wuwei (non-action) is beneficial.

The Imperial Commentary says: The yielding and weak can overcome the firm and strong; “nonbeing” can encompass “having.” This is where the Dao’s wondrous function lies. Set aside troublesome affairs, and the body will not grow weary; let go of attachment to life, and Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy) will not be depleted. This is why non-action is beneficial.

I take the Dao De Jing to say: “The world is a vessel of mystery and wonder; it cannot be acted upon by force. Those who act upon it by force will ruin it.” The Dao’s wondrous function is hidden deep and cannot be fathomed. How could it be bound by deliberate action? Those who act deliberately weary their bodies and busy themselves with affairs, thereby depleting their Jing and Qi. What benefit, then, does life bring them?

To teach without relying on words, and to benefit through Wuwei: few in the world can achieve this.

The Imperial Commentary says: Teaching without words means teaching through the mysterious and wondrous; the benefit of Wuwei lies in not harming the life that is true to one’s nature. Thus the sage preserves simplicity, and the world submits. Without acting recklessly, all things transform of themselves; hence few can achieve this.

I take this to mean that when one experiences the principle of the mysterious and wondrous, teaching no longer depends on words; when one plumbs the Dao’s wondrous function, benefit comes from Wuwei. To reach the state in which the world submits and all things transform is indeed something few can achieve.

Chapter 44: Name and Person

Which is dearer, reputation or life? Which matters more, life or wealth?

御注曰:两臂重於天下,则名与身孰亲?生者岂特隋珠之重哉?则身与货孰多?至愿在我,名非所亲也。至富在我,货非所多也。惟不知亲疏多寡之辨,而残生珠之重哉?则身与货孰多?至愿在我,名非所亲也。至富在我,货非所多也。惟不知亲疏多寡之辨,而残生损性,以身为徇,若伯夷死名於首阳之下,盗跖死利於东陵之上,岂不惑哉?达生之情而不务生之所无以为,此有道者之所以异乎俗也。 臣义曰:失性命之理,累名利之域,而不知返者,不知亲疏多寡之辨尔。身在我者也,至贵至富所自足,而无待於外也。名货在彼者也,物之傥来寄尔,丧其在我,徇其在物,至於残生损性,愚亦甚矣。且身亲於名矣,身之可忘,则名其可固耶。身多於货矣,身之不有,货其可累耶。则孰亲孰多,有道者又在所不许。 得与亡孰病? 御注曰:列士徇名,贪夫徇利,其所得者,名与货。而其亡道者又在所不许。 得与亡孰病? 御注曰:列士徇名,贪夫徇利,其所得者,名与货。而其亡也,乃无名之朴,不赀之躯,病孰甚焉? 臣义曰:於物有所得则得之者在外。於我有所亡则亡之者在内。内省则外轻,而无徇逐之苦,丧失之病。贪得不已,至於精亏而不全其生,形劳而不舍其神,其病也为甚。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of Song explained: If one values all under Heaven more highly than one’s own two arms, then which is closer to oneself, reputation or life? Is the value of life merely as great as the Marquis of Sui’s pearl, a precious jewel? Compared with possessions, then, which matters more: life or wealth? What one truly desires lies within oneself, so reputation is not what is closest to oneself. True abundance, too, comes from within, so possessions are not what deserves the greatest regard. If one fails to understand what is close or distant, weighty or trivial, and harms life and damages one’s nature for the sake of fame and profit, offering oneself up in pursuit of external things, is that not foolish? Bo Yi died beneath Mount Shouyang for the sake of his reputation for integrity; Robber Zhi died atop Dongling for the sake of profit. One who understands the nature of life will not force the pursuit of things that do nothing to benefit life. This is precisely how a person who follows the Dao differs from an ordinary person.

The official Zhang An explained: Losing the proper principles of life, becoming entangled in fame and profit and failing to turn back, comes from not understanding what is close or distant, weighty or trivial. The body belongs to oneself; it is the most precious and abundant foundation, needing no support from external things. Reputation and possessions, by contrast, lie outside oneself and are merely contingent attachments that happen to come one’s way. To cast aside what belongs to oneself and chase external things until one harms life and damages one’s nature is truly foolish. The body is closer to oneself than reputation is. If one can even abandon the body, how could reputation possibly be held fast? The body matters more than possessions. If one cannot preserve oneself, how could possessions fail to become a burden? Thus the person who follows the Dao judges for themselves what is closer and what matters more.

Which is more harmful, gaining or losing?

Emperor Huizong of Song explained: The upright strive for reputation, while the greedy pursue profit. What they gain is reputation and possessions; what they lose is their nature of simplicity and Wuwei (non-action), along with the immeasurable gift of life. What loss could be more serious?

The official Zhang An explained: What one gains from external things is something outside oneself; what one loses from oneself is the inner foundation. By examining oneself inwardly, one comes to regard external things lightly, and is free from the distress of chasing them and the anxiety of losing them. Insatiable greed depletes one’s Jing and Qi, making it impossible to preserve life; overexerting the body also prevents the spirit from resting peacefully. These are the more serious harms.

是故甚爱必大费,多藏必厚亡。 御注曰:无慕於外,则音而不费。无累於物,则守.而不失。取予之相权,积散之相代,其至可必。若循环然,岂可长久? 臣义曰:取予积散,必至之理。然物有所爱,则心为之役,而神为之费。物有所藏,则神为之劳,而生不能厚。 知足不辱, 御注曰:处乎不淫之度,何辱之有? 臣义曰:足神为之劳,而生不能厚。 知足不辱, 御注曰:处乎不淫之度,何辱之有? 臣义曰:足乎所自得,知其自贵者也,何辱之有。 知止不殆, 御注曰:游乎万物之所终始,故无危殆之患。 臣义曰:知止於性分之内,而无求於外,故无世患。 可以长久。 御注曰:物有聚散,性无古今,世之人以物易性,故好名而徇利,名辱而身危,圣人尽性而足。天下至大也,而不以害其生,故可以长久,而与天地并。 臣义曰:知足则心复於虚,知止则神合於静,虚以集道,静以复道,故可以长久。 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之六竟 登仕郎臣章安撰义 德经 大成若知止则神合於静,虚以集道,静以复道,故可以长久。 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之六竟 登仕郎臣章安撰义 德经 大成若缺章第四十五 大成若缺,其用不敝。
Interpretation

Therefore, to cherish something too intensely will surely come at a great cost; to accumulate too much in storage will surely end in great loss.

The Imperial Commentary says: If you do not covet external things, your mind and spirit can remain at peace and will not be depleted by them. If you are not entangled by external things, you can preserve your original nature without losing it. Taking and giving, accumulation and dispersal constrain one another and take turns in succession. This is an inevitable tendency, like a cycle that repeats without end. How could anything remain unchanged for long?

The Minister’s Commentary says: Taking and giving, accumulation and dispersal follow an inevitable principle. But when people covet or cherish something, their minds become its servants and their spirit is thereby exhausted. If they accumulate too much, their spirit is worn down by it, and their lives can neither be fulfilled nor endure.

Contentment wards off disgrace: Knowing when you have enough means you will not suffer disgrace.

The Imperial Commentary says: If you remain within proper bounds, what disgrace could there be?

The Minister’s Commentary says: Be content with what you possess and know your own worth; then you will not suffer disgrace.

Knowing when to stop wards off danger: Knowing when enough is enough means you will not fall into danger.

The Imperial Commentary says: If you can follow the patterns by which all things change from beginning to end, you will not encounter danger.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Understand how to remain within your proper place and do not covet what lies beyond it; then you will avoid the calamities of the world.

You can endure for a long time: In this way, you can endure.

The Imperial Commentary says: All things come together and part, but human nature does not change with the passing of time. People use their nature to trade for external things, so they chase fame and submit to profit. As a result, their reputations are damaged and they put themselves in danger. The sage fully realizes his nature and rests content with what is enough. Though the world is vast, he does not let external things harm his life; thus he can endure and exist alongside Heaven and Earth.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Contentment allows the mind to return to emptiness and stillness; knowing when to stop allows the spirit to unite with tranquility. Emptiness and stillness gather the Dao, while tranquility allows one to return to the Dao. Thus one can endure.

This concludes Volume Six of Emperor Huizong of Song’s Explanation of the Meaning of the True Scripture of the Dao and Its Virtue.

The commentary was written by the court gentleman Zhang An.

The Scripture of De

Chapter Forty-Five: The Great Completion Seems Incomplete

What is most complete seems to have something missing, yet its function is never exhausted.

御注曰:域中有四大,道居一焉,体道之全,故可名於大。无成与亏,是谓大成。不有其成,故若缺。知化合变,而不以故自持,故其用不敝。此孔子所以集大成而为圣之时。 臣义曰:大成者,言乎道也。道之大成,孰得以见其全,故若缺。若缺者,不见其成之谓也。成而不见其所以为成,故其用不敝。 大盈若冲,其用不穷。 御注曰:充塞无外,赡足万有,大盈也。虚以应物,冲而用之,故施之不竭,其用不穷,良贾深,其用不穷。 御注曰:充塞无外,赡足万有,大盈也。虚以应物,冲而用之,故施之不竭,其用不穷,良贾深藏若虚容貌若愚。 臣义曰:大盈者,言其德也。德之大 盈,则其用也坎然若冲。若冲则其用不穷,盖有其德而居其盈,则穷矣。 大直若屈, 御注曰:顺物之变,而委蛇曲直,不求其肆,故若屈。 臣义曰:曲以应变,周流不居,而不与物争直,物亦莫见其直,而未始失其直。 大巧若拙, 御注曰:赋物之形,而圆方曲直不睹其妙,故若拙。 臣义曰:雕刻众形,未尝有为也。一无所为,而巧成在物,大巧也。不见其所以为,而莫睹其妙,故若拙。 大辩若讷。 御注曰:不言之辩,是谓大辩,惠施多方,其辩小矣。
Interpretation

The emperor’s commentary says: In the world there are four great things, and the Dao is one of them. Because the Dao possesses a nature that is whole and complete, it can be called “great.” It does not count achievement as achievement, nor does it suffer loss; this is called “great completion.” It does not claim its own achievements, so it appears as though something is lacking. It understands change and adapts to transformation without clinging to its former state, so its function is never exhausted. This is precisely what Confucius called “gathering into a great whole”: bringing together all strengths and attaining the virtue of a sage.

The minister’s commentary says: “Great completion” refers to the Dao. The Dao’s achievement is vast and boundless; who can see its entirety? So it appears as though something is lacking. “As though incomplete” means that its achievement cannot be seen. Though it has achieved completion, it does not reveal the reasons for that achievement, and so its function is never exhausted.

“Great fullness seems empty; its use is inexhaustible.”

The emperor’s commentary says: The Dao fills everything without limit and nourishes all things; this is “great fullness.” It responds to all things in a state of emptiness and stillness, receiving them like an open space and thereby serving them. Thus, its application never runs dry and its function has no end. This is like a skilled merchant who hides precious goods deep away, while appearing to have nothing at all; in appearance, he seems foolish.

The minister’s commentary says: “Great fullness” refers to De. De is supremely full, yet in its use it resembles an empty valley. Precisely because it appears empty, its function is inexhaustible. If one possesses De and then regards oneself as full, one instead moves toward exhaustion.

“Great straightness seems crooked.”

The emperor’s commentary says: It follows the changes of things, responding to them with flexibility and tact, without deliberately displaying its insight or sharpness; thus it appears as though crooked.

The minister’s commentary says: It bends to adapt to change, flows on without ceasing or remaining fixed in one place, and does not contend with the myriad things over which is more upright. The myriad things cannot see its straightness, yet it has never lost that straightness.

“Great skill seems clumsy.”

The emperor’s commentary says: It gives form to the myriad things, so that each has its own roundness, squareness, curves, and straightness, yet it does not reveal the subtlety involved; thus it appears clumsy.

The minister’s commentary says: It shapes all kinds of forms, yet seems to act without deliberate effort. It does not display its actions, yet its skill takes shape naturally among the myriad things: this is “great skill.” People cannot see how it does this or discern its subtlety, so it appears clumsy.

“Great eloquence seems halting.”

The emperor’s commentary says: Discernment expressed without relying on words is what is called “great eloquence.” Hui Shi, a thinker of the Warring States period renowned for his skill in argument, put forward many arguments, but his eloquence still did not amount to “great eloquence.”

臣义曰:言以明道也,未若不讷。 御注曰:不言之辩,是谓大辩,惠施多方,其辩小矣。 臣义曰:言以明道也,未若不言而道自明。 躁胜寒,静胜热。清静为天下正。 御注曰:阳动而躁,故胜寒。阴止而静,故胜热。二者毗於阴阳而不适中,方且为物汨,方且与动争,乌能正天下?惟无胜寒之躁,胜热之静,则不杂而清,抱神而静,天下将自正。 臣义曰:躁则热中,热中则虽寒可胜。静则心清,心清则虽热可胜。惟寒与热,阴阳之气也。而躁静之心胜,则寒暑为之不知,故何所正也。气复於一,故清而不杂,神抱於一清,心清则虽热可胜。惟寒与热,阴阳之气也。而躁静之心胜,则寒暑为之不知,故何所正也。气复於一,故清而不杂,神抱於一,故静而不乱。惟清与静致一者也,故为天下正。 天下有道章第四十六 天下有道,却走马以粪。 御注曰:以道治天下者,民各乐其业,而无所争,粪其田畴而已。 臣义曰:有道则无欲,无欲则无争,故却走马,民务本而乐业,故不辞贱事之作劳。 天下无道,戎马生於郊。 御注曰:强凌弱,众暴寡,虽疆界不 能正也。 臣义曰:戎马生於郊,则荒田莱而芜五谷,弱寡者凌慕於强众,故不能正疆界,则民失其所,可知矣。
Interpretation

My interpretation is this: Words can be used to explain the Dao (the Way), but it is better to speak little—or even remain silent—and let the Dao reveal itself naturally.

The Imperial Commentary says: “The finest eloquence is skill in argument without relying on words.” Although Huishi, the Warring States period debater, was skilled in arguing from many different angles, his eloquence still did not count as the finest kind.

My interpretation is this: Words can explain the Dao, but it is better to say nothing and let the Dao reveal itself naturally.

“Restlessness overcomes cold; stillness overcomes heat. Purity and stillness are the standard for all under Heaven.”

The Imperial Commentary says: Yang Qi moves and appears restless, so it can resist the cold; Yin Qi gathers and becomes still, so it can resist the heat. But each of these effects leans toward one side of Yin-Yang and lacks balance. They are easily disturbed by external things and struggle against change. How, then, could they bring all under Heaven back to the right way? Only by overcoming cold without restlessness and heat without stillness can one remain pure and free of admixture, hold fast to the spirit, and be at peace. Then all under Heaven will naturally return to the right way.

My interpretation is this: Restlessness makes the heart grow hot, so even in the cold one can resist it through this inner heat. Stillness clears the heart, so even in the heat one can resist it through a cool state of mind. Cold and heat belong to the Qi of Yin-Yang; if states of restlessness and stillness can overcome cold and heat, people are no longer constrained by them. When Qi returns to the One—the undivided source—it becomes pure and free of admixture. When the spirit remains in the One, it becomes peaceful and undisturbed. Only by becoming pure and still and returning to the One can one serve as the standard for all under Heaven.

Chapter Forty-Six: When the Way Prevails Throughout the World

“When the Way prevails throughout the world, warhorses are sent back to manure the fields.”

The Imperial Commentary says: When the world is governed by the Way, the people each settle into their own occupations and do not fight. Horses are used only to plow and fertilize the fields.

My interpretation is this: When governance follows the Way, the people have few excessive desires and do not contend with one another. Warhorses can therefore be retired. The people devote themselves to farming and settle into their own occupations, refusing none of the work, even when it is hard or lowly.

“When the Way is lost throughout the world, warhorses are bred on the outskirts.”

The Imperial Commentary says: The strong oppress the weak, and the many bully the few; even the borders cannot remain secure.

My interpretation is this: When warhorses appear on the outskirts of the city, the fields lie fallow and the grains cannot grow. The weak and few are oppressed by the strong and many. Since the borders cannot remain secure, it is easy to imagine how the people lose any place where they can live in peace.

罪莫大於可欲, 御注曰:不见可欲,使心不乱,人之有欲,至於次性命之情以争之,罪之所起也。 臣义曰:无可无欲,心之忘也。有可有欲,争之始也。欲而可之,不得其欲则争,争则乱,罪莫大也。 臣义曰:无可无欲,心之忘也。有可有欲,争之始也。欲而可之,不得其欲则争,争则乱,罪莫大也。 祸莫大於不知足, 御注曰:平为福,有余为祸,知足不辱,何祸之有? 臣义曰:不知足则其欲无穷,故祸之至也不可解。 咎莫大於欲得。 御注曰:欲而得,则人所咎也。 臣义曰:得其所欲,则人各求得而获咎於众。 故知足之足,常足矣。 御注曰:效人见可欲,则不知足,不知足则欲得,欲得则争端起而祸乱作。泰至则戎马生於郊,然则知足而各安其性命之分,无所施其智巧也。日用饮食而已,何争乱之有?臣义曰:无厌之求,天地所不能足,知足乎性分之内,则无欠余而常自足。 不出户章第四十七 不出户,知天下。不窥牖,何争乱之有?臣义曰:无厌之求,天地所不能足,知足乎性分之内,则无欠余而常自足。 不出户章第四十七 不出户,知天下。不窥牖,见天道。
Interpretation

Nothing is more blameworthy than pursuing desire.

Emperor Huizong of the Song dynasty’s imperial commentary says: If you do not look at things that stir up greed, your heart will not be disturbed. Once people have desires, they may even stake their lives to compete for what they want. This is how wrongdoing begins.

The minister’s explanation says: When the heart clings to nothing and covets nothing, one can forget selfish concerns. But once one decides that something is worth seeking and desire arises, rivalry begins. If you believe something is worth pursuing, you will fight for it when you cannot obtain it. Rivalry brings disorder, and no wrongdoing is greater than this.

Nothing brings greater misfortune than not knowing when you have enough.

The imperial commentary says: A peaceful state of mind is good fortune, while excessive greed brings misfortune. If you know contentment, you will not suffer disgrace—so what misfortune could there be?

The minister’s explanation says: When you do not know contentment, desire has no limit. Once misfortune arrives, it is therefore difficult to undo.

No failing is greater than single-mindedly seeking to get more.

The imperial commentary says: Unrelenting pursuit and the acquisition of what one seeks invite blame from others.

The minister’s explanation says: If everyone wants only to obtain what they desire, they will compete with one another and ultimately draw resentment and blame from all.

Therefore, knowing what contentment means allows you to remain content.

The imperial commentary says: If you imitate others and want to possess whatever you see that stirs desire, you will not know contentment. Without contentment, greed takes hold; greed leads to conflict and creates disorder. A state may reach the height of peace, only for the fires of war to break out suddenly, with warhorses appearing in the countryside. So when people know contentment and each keeps to their proper place, they need not use clever schemes to compete. If their daily food is enough to live on, what need is there for strife?

The minister’s explanation says: No amount of seeking can satisfy even Heaven and Earth. If you know how to be content within your proper bounds, you will feel neither that you lack something nor that you have too much, and so you can remain self-sufficient.

Chapter Forty-Seven: Without Leaving the Door

Without leaving one’s home, one can understand the world. Without peering out through the window, one can understand the Dao (the Way)—the natural order’s course. [The text then repeats the minister’s explanation from the preceding passage: No amount of seeking can satisfy even Heaven and Earth; when you know contentment within your proper bounds, your heart will always feel fulfilled.]

队御注曰:天下虽大,圣人知之以智,天道虽远,圣人见之以心,智周乎万物,无远之不察,故无待於出户。心港於神明,无幽之不烛,故无待於窥牖。庄子曰其疾俯仰之间,再抚四海之外,兹圣人所以密运而独化。 臣义曰:出户而知,知其所可知尔。窥牖而见,见其所可见尔。天下之大,天道之广,岂可以知知、以见兹圣人所以密运而独化。 臣义曰:出户而知,知其所可知尔。窥牖而见,见其所可见尔。天下之大,天道之广,岂可以知知、以见见乎。出户勋离此而有所知,其知能几也。窥牖则即彼而有所见,其见岂远也。圣人密运独化,不以知知,故无所不知。不以见见,故无所不见。天下者,物之所在使然者也。天道者,道之所在自然者也。其粗在物,其妙在道,皆不离当体,而尽夫知见,何事於出,何待於窥也。 其出弥远,其知弥少。 御注曰:复其见天地之心乎?近取诸身,万物咸备,求之於阴阳,求之於度数,而去道弥远,所知弥少矣。 臣义曰:出则离静而之动弥远,则不能求复其初,出弥远,知弥少,理在於是。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says: Although the world is vast, the sage can understand it through wisdom; although the Way of Heaven is remote and profound, the sage can perceive it through the heart. The sage’s wisdom encompasses all things, and there is nowhere so distant that it cannot be discerned; therefore, there is no need to go out through the door to seek. The sage’s heart is in communion with the spirits, and there is nowhere so deep that it cannot be illuminated; therefore, there is no need to peer outside through the window. Zhuangzi says that the sage’s movements are confined to the space between bowing and looking up, yet the sage’s heart and spirit extend beyond the Four Seas. This is the sage’s ability to transform things unseen and, alone, bring all things to life.

The Minister’s Commentary says: If you go out through the door to learn, what you learn is only what you can encounter; if you look out through the window, what you see is only what lies within your view. The world is so vast, and the Way of Heaven so profound—how could ordinary knowing and seeing suffice to understand them completely? If you leave through the door and go elsewhere in search of knowledge, how much can you gain? If you peer through the window and observe what is nearby, how far can you see? The sage transforms things unseen and, alone, brings all things to life. The sage does not seek knowledge deliberately, and so knows everything; does not observe by deliberately looking, and so sees everything. The world is the realm in which all things exist; the Way of Heaven is where the Dao moves of its own accord. Its coarse aspect appears in all things, and its subtle aspect appears in the Dao; neither lies beyond what is right before us. If knowing and perceiving can reach their utmost, why go out through the door or peer through the window?

The farther one goes outward, the less one knows.

The Imperial Commentary says: Is this not a return to the original mind, through which the life-giving workings of Heaven and Earth become manifest? Look near at hand, within yourself, and the principles of all things are already complete. If you seek only among the changes of Yin and Yang and the various measures, you will move ever farther from the Dao and know ever less.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Going outward means leaving stillness and entering movement and turmoil. The farther one goes, the harder it is to return to the beginning. That is why the farther one goes outward, the less one knows.

是以圣人不求之於阴阳,求之於度数,而去道弥远,所知弥少矣。 臣义曰:出则离静而之动弥远,则不能求复其初,出弥远,知弥少,理在於是。 是以圣人不行而知,不见而名,不为而成。 御注曰:以吾之智而知天下,是谓不行而知。以吾之心而见天道,是谓不见而右。不行而知,不见而名,夫何为哉?巍巍乎其有成功,是谓不为而成。 臣义曰:不离当体,尽夫知见,何俟出户窥牖也。出户则有行,窥牖则有见,圣人不行而本乎智,不见而本乎心,故天下之事,皆可得而知,天道之妙,皆可得而名。能知能名,故不为而为,成其所自成也。 为学曰益章第四十八 为乎智,不见而本乎心,故天下之事,皆可得而知,天道之妙,皆可得而名。能知能名,故不为而为,成其所自成也。 为学曰益章第四十八 为学日益, 御注曰:学以致其道,始乎为士,终乎为圣,人日加益而道积於厌躬,孔子谓颜渊曰,吾见其进也。 臣义曰:为学所以求多闻也,多闻所以穷理,故要乎进益。 为道日损。 御注曰:致道者,堕肢体,黜聪明,离形去智,而万事销忘,故曰日损。还伯玉所以行年六十而六十化。 臣义曰:为道所以致虚也,致虚所以尽性,故要乎日损。 损之又损,以至於无为,无为六十化。 臣义曰:为道所以致虚也,致虚所以尽性,故要乎日损。 损之又损,以至於无为,无为而无不为矣。
Interpretation

The sage understands the world without setting out, recognizes the Dao of Heaven without looking out through a window, and accomplishes things naturally without deliberate action.

The Imperial Commentary says: To understand the world through one’s own wisdom is called “knowing without going forth”; to discern the Dao of Heaven through one’s own mind is called “naming without seeing.” If one can understand without traveling and recognize without seeing with one’s own eyes, what more needs to be done? The sage’s achievements are lofty and great; this is called “accomplishing without acting.”

The Minister’s Commentary says: The sage’s knowing and seeing do not depart from the original mind within. Why would the sage need to go out and look around? Setting out means acting; peering through a window means looking. The sage does not travel, but takes wisdom as the foundation; does not see with the eyes, but takes the original mind as the foundation. Thus the affairs of the world can all be understood, and the mysteries of the Dao of Heaven can all be recognized. Once things are understood and recognized, there is no need for deliberate action: all things will come to completion naturally.

Chapter Forty-Eight: Learning Adds Each Day

Learning means increasing a little more each day.

The Imperial Commentary says: Learning is a way to become attuned to the Dao. It begins with the pursuit of knowledge and culminates in becoming a sage. As a person continually adds to their learning each day, the Dao likewise accumulates within them. Confucius once said to Yan Yuan, “I see him continually making progress.”

The Minister’s Commentary says: Learning seeks to gain more knowledge. With more knowledge, one can investigate things to their utmost; so the essential point is to keep making progress.

Cultivating the Dao means diminishing a little more each day.

The Imperial Commentary says: To become attuned to the Dao, one must forget the constraints of the body, set aside the sharpness of the ears and eyes, and cease clinging to outward forms and discriminating intellect, allowing all distracting thoughts to gradually fade away. That is why it is called “diminishing each day.” By the age of sixty, Qu Boyu, the worthy minister of the state of Wei during the Spring and Autumn period, could continually correct himself as the years changed.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Cultivating the Dao is a way to attain emptiness and stillness. Only in emptiness and stillness can one’s nature be fully revealed; so the essential point is continual reduction.

Reduce and reduce again, until reaching Wuwei (non-action). Through Wuwei, nothing is left undone.

御注曰:学以穷理而该有,道以尽性而造无,损之又损,则未始有。夫未始有无也者,无为也。寂然不动,无不为也。感而遂通天下之故,以一静则圣,以动则王。 臣义曰:尽性则极乎至虚,而物我忘矣。忘其所忘,而命复乎泰初,故无为以复道之体,无不为以尽道之用,故静则圣,动则王也。 故取天下者,常以无事。及其有事,不足以取天下。 御注曰:天下,大物也,有大物者,。不可以物物而不物,故能物物,故取天下者,常以无事。天下神器不可不足以取天下。 御注曰:天下,大物也,有大物者,。不可以物物而不物,故能物物,故取天下者,常以无事。天下神器不可为也,为者败之,执者失之,故及其有事,不足以取天下。圣人体道而以其真治身,帝之所兴,王之所起,偶而应之,天下将自宾,太王直父,所以去那而成国於岐山之下。 臣义曰:天下者,道妙之所在,神化之所为,故谓之大物,谓之神器。惟有道者天下之所归,而未尝以事为事也。无事而事,而复乎无为,故天下所以为我治。及其有事,则将以力取天下,而卒底於败。 圣人无常心章第四十九 圣人无常心,以百姓心为心。 御注曰:圣人之心,万物之照也。虚而能受,静而能应,如鉴对形,以彼妍天下,而卒底於败。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says: Through learning, one investigates the principles of things until one’s understanding encompasses the myriad beings. Through embodying the Dao (the Way), one exhausts one’s nature and reaches the realm of “nonbeing.” Continually diminishing, one diminishes to the utmost and returns to a state in which no distinctions have yet arisen. “Before there was ever being or nonbeing” refers to Wuwei (non-action). Quiet and still, without rash movement, yet nothing remains unaccomplished; when something calls forth a response, one can understand the principles of all under Heaven. To abide in stillness and accord with the Dao is to be a sage; to respond to affairs and accord with the Dao is to be a king.

The Minister’s Commentary explains: To exhaust one’s nature is to reach the utmost state of emptiness and stillness, forgetting the distinction between things and oneself. When one no longer clings even to the act of forgetting, life returns to the Great Beginning, the original state before the myriad beings were differentiated. Thus, Wuwei is a return to the Dao’s essence, while acting without limit is the expression of the Dao’s function. In stillness, one is a sage; in action, a king.

Therefore, those who govern all under Heaven consistently conduct affairs through Wuwei. If they deliberately try to manage everything, they are not fit to gain the world.

The Imperial Commentary says: All under Heaven is a vast entity. One must not treat it as something to manipulate at will, nor allow oneself to be controlled by external things. Precisely because one does not cling to controlling the myriad beings, each can find its proper place. Thus, one should make Wuwei the constant way of gaining the world. All under Heaven is a wondrous vessel; one must not act rashly toward it. Rash action brings ruin, and clinging brings loss. Therefore, those who forcefully manage everything are not fit to gain the world. The sage follows the Dao and governs himself through his original nature. The rise of emperors and kings comes only through responding to the times; all under Heaven then naturally turns toward them. The Great King, Gugong Danfu, ancestor of the Zhou people, left Bin and moved to the foot of Mount Qi, where the Zhou state was later established.

The Minister’s Commentary explains: All under Heaven is the Dao’s mysterious domain and the embodiment of its wondrous transformations; hence it is called the “great entity” and the “numinous vessel.” All under Heaven turns only toward those who possess the Dao, yet they never make deliberate management their way of governing. They respond to affairs through Wuwei and return to the Dao of Wuwei; thus all under Heaven is naturally brought to order. To forcefully manage everything is to try to seize the world through strength, and this can only end in failure.

“On the Sage’s Having No Fixed Mind,” Chapter Forty-Nine

The sage has no fixed opinions of his own; he takes the people’s minds as his own.

The Imperial Commentary says: The sage’s mind can illuminate the myriad beings. It is empty and still, yet receptive; settled, yet able to respond, like a mirror reflecting forms.

圣人无常心章第四十九 圣人无常心,以百姓心为心。 御注曰:圣人之心,万物之照也。虚而能受,静而能应,如鉴对形,以彼妍丑,如谷应声,以彼巨细,何常之有?疏观万物而知其情,因民而已。此之谓以百姓心为心。《庄子》曰:卑而不可不因者,民也。 臣义曰:圣人以无心为心,故因时适变,岂有常哉。百姓之心,随时异尚,圣人因之,因其时以为心,故如鉴对形,不将不迎,示其妍丑,如谷应声,不扬不抑,绿其细大,何以常为 善者吾善之,不善者吾亦善之,德善矣。信者吾信之不信者吾亦信之,德信矣。 御注曰:善否相非,诞信相欺,世俗之情,自为同异,岂德也哉?德善则见百行无非善者,故不善者亦善之。德信则见万情无非信者,故不信者亦信之。真伪两忘,是非一致,是谓全德之人。此舜之於象,所以诚信而喜之。
Interpretation

The sage has no fixed opinions and takes the people’s wishes as his own.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: The sage’s mind is like a mirror, reflecting all things. It is empty and clear, able to contain them; still and quiet, yet able to respond. Just as a mirror shows every kind of appearance, revealing what is beautiful and what is ugly, and just as a valley answers sounds, whether loud or soft, how could the sage’s mind be fixed and unchanging? He observes all things and understands human feelings, simply responding to the people’s circumstances. This is what it means to “take the people’s mind as his own.” The Zhuangzi says, “The people occupy a lowly position, yet one cannot help but respond to them.”

Zhang’an’s commentary says: The sage takes a mind free of preconceptions as his own, and so can adapt his responses to changing circumstances. How could his mind be fixed and unchanging? The people’s preferences change with the times; the sage follows those changes and handles matters according to the circumstances at hand. Thus, like a mirror reflecting things, he neither anticipates nor resists: whatever is beautiful or ugly, he shows as it is. Like a valley answering sounds, he neither amplifies nor diminishes them: whatever their volume, he responds accordingly. Why cling to fixed ways of doing things?

I treat the good with kindness, and I treat the unkind with kindness too; in this way, true goodness is attained. I trust those who are trustworthy, and I trust those who are untrustworthy too; in this way, true trustworthiness is attained.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: People in the world often accuse one another of good and evil, and deceive one another about what is true and false. These distinctions are merely customary conventions; they are not true De. Those who truly possess the virtue of goodness treat every kind of conduct with kindness, and so they are kind even to the unkind. Those who truly possess the virtue of trust treat every kind of human feeling with trust, and so they trust even the untrustworthy. To forget the distinction between true and false, and bring right and wrong into accord—this is to have perfected De. This is how Shun treated his younger brother Xiang, always trusting and loving him.

Zhang’an’s commentary says: The sage regards every kind of human feeling as worthy of trust, and so trusts even the untrustworthy. To forget the distinction between true and false, and bring right and wrong into accord—this is to have perfected De. This is how Shun treated his younger brother Xiang, always trusting and loving him.

臣义曰:圣人万情无非信者,故不信者亦信之。真伪两忘,是非一致,是谓全德之人。此舜之於象,所以诚信而喜之。 臣义曰:圣人之於人,无不善,无不信,故人从於善,从於信,而不敢违也。盖善恶信否皆本乎妄情妄见,私为同异尔。混一是非,则无善不善,玄同信否,则无信不信。不善者亦善之,不信者亦信之,则无弃人矣。故不善者将自善,不信者将自信故谓之德善德信。 圣人之在天下惵惵,为天下浑其心。 御注曰:方其在天下,则吉凶与民同患,虽无常心,而不可以不戒也。故所以为己,则惵惵然不自暇逸,所以为天下,则齐善否,同信诞,两忘而闭其所可以不戒也。故所以为己,则惵惵然不自暇逸,所以为天下,则齐善否,同信诞,两忘而闭其所誉,浑然而已。 臣义曰:惵惵,恐惧貌也,圣人虽无常心,而以道在天下,及其应世,未始不惵惵以为戒,盖有而为之,不敢以易,所以同民患也,所以为天下则其心浑然,将以反朴复性,同乎古始。 百姓皆注其耳目,圣人皆孩之。 御注曰:天视自我民视,天听自我民听,故圣人以百姓为心,圣人作而万物睹,故百姓皆注其耳目,百姓惟圣人之视听,则圣人者民之父母也自我民听,故圣人以百姓为心,圣人作而万物睹,故百姓皆注其耳目,百姓惟圣人之视听,则圣人者民之父母也。矜怜抚奄,若保赤子,而仁覆天下。
Interpretation

The minister explained: The sage regards everyone as naturally good and trustworthy in word and deed. People are therefore willing to act well and keep faith, and do not dare to go against this. The distinctions between good and evil, and between trustworthiness and untrustworthiness, all arise from deluded feelings and views; it is selfish intent that divides things into different categories. The sage reconciles distinctions between right and wrong, no longer clinging to goodness or its opposite. He regards trustworthiness and untrustworthiness as one, no longer clinging to either trust or distrust. He treats those who are not good as capable of goodness, and those who do not keep faith as capable of keeping faith. In this way, he abandons no one. Those who are not good will then turn toward goodness of their own accord, and those who do not keep faith will keep faith of their own accord. This is called using De (Virtue/Power) to guide people toward goodness and trustworthiness.

The sage lives among all under Heaven, always watchful and uneasy, and brings the minds of the people under Heaven back to a state of uncarved simplicity.

The Imperial Commentary says: The sage lives among all under Heaven and shares the people’s fortunes and misfortunes, good and ill. Although he holds no fixed opinions, he cannot help but remain vigilant. As an individual, he is always watchful and uneasy, never daring to take his ease. In relation to all under Heaven, he regards the good and the not good equally, and likewise accepts the trustworthy and the deluded. He forgets these distinctions and brings the mind back to uncarved simplicity.

The minister explained: “Watchful and uneasy” describes a state of fear and apprehension. Although the sage has no fixed mind, when governing all under Heaven through the Dao and responding to worldly affairs, he remains vigilant and self-disciplined. He takes action, but never dares to act carelessly; thus, he shares the people’s troubles. In governing all under Heaven, he brings the mind back to uncarved simplicity, intending to lead people back to plainness, restore their original nature, and bring them into accord with the earliest state of antiquity.

The people all turn their eyes and attention toward the sage, while the sage treats the people as he would infants.

The Imperial Commentary says: “What Heaven sees depends on what the people see; what Heaven hears depends on what the people hear.” The sage therefore makes the people’s minds his own. In the sage’s governance, all things can be seen, so the people watch him and heed his judgment. They rely on the sage’s sight and hearing to discern things. The sage is thus like a parent to the people: he cherishes, nurtures, and protects them, caring for them as he would newborn infants and extending benevolence throughout all under Heaven.

臣义曰:圣人以道浑一天下,而心无异心,故百姓之於上也,注耳目以闻见於道,而化於道。圣人孩而视之,以其心一,而无事智巧,所以返朴也。 出生入死章第五十 出生入死。 御注曰:万物皆出於机,皆入於机,天机自张,与生俱生,天机自止,与死俱死,生者造化之所始,死者阴阳之所变。 臣义曰:万物之生死,出入乎阴阳之化机,而不能自已者也,出而为阳故为生。入而为阴故为死。生於此者,死於彼,死於此者,生於彼,性无生死,而已者也,出而为阳故为生。入而为阴故为死。生於此者,死於彼,死於此者,生於彼,性无生死,而自古以固存。神之出入,而形有生死,故曰出入生死。 生之徒十有三,死之徒十有三。 御注曰:与死生为徒者,出入乎死生之机,固未免乎累。 臣义曰:出入於生死之机,而与生俱生,与死俱死,而未始相离,故谓之徒。十有三者,凿於形者有六,丽於魄者有七,出於形生,沦於幽阴,皆与之为徒。 民之生,动之死地亦十有三。 御注曰:贪生而背理,忘生而徇利,凡民之生,动之死地,则其生也与死奚择?臣义曰:有其形则有其生,有其生
Interpretation

The ministerial commentary explains: The sage uses the Dao to make all under Heaven one undivided whole. His heart is free of distinctions, so the people attend with their ears and eyes when they approach their ruler, listening for and observing the Dao, and are transformed by it. The sage regards the people as he would infants. Because his heart is pure and undivided and he does not resort to cunning or clever schemes, he can lead them back to simplicity.

Chapter Fifty: Going Forth into Life, Entering Death

Going forth into life, entering death.

The imperial commentary says: All things arise from the pivot of transformation, and all return to that pivot. When the celestial mechanism stirs, all things are born with it; when it comes to rest, all things die with it. Birth is the beginning of transformation; death is the outcome of Yin-Yang change.

The ministerial commentary explains: The birth and death of all things take place within the pivot of Yin-Yang change; they cannot decide this for themselves. What appears and becomes Yang is life; what withdraws and returns to Yin is death. What is born here will die there; what dies here will be born there. The nature of all things has neither birth nor death, but has endured from ancient times. The coming and going, the transformations of Shen, give bodies birth and death. That is why the text says, “Going forth into life, entering death.”

Those who follow life number thirteen; those who follow death also number thirteen.

The imperial commentary says: Those who follow life and death move within the pivot of their changes, yet in the end cannot escape the burden of birth and death.

The ministerial commentary explains: People pass through birth and death, living along with birth and dying along with death; these have never been separate from one another, and so they are called “followers.” “Thirteen” refers to six things constrained by the body and seven attached to the Po—the spiritual aspect associated with the body and the senses. They are born from the body and sink into the shadowed realm below; all accompany a person.

The people, in seeking to stay alive, act instead toward death; there are also thirteen such ways.

The imperial commentary says: They crave survival while going against what is constant, forgetting life as they pursue profit. If people, in seeking to stay alive, act instead toward death, then what difference is there between such living and dying?

The ministerial commentary explains: With a body comes life; with life…

则徇外而背理,至於失性,动皆之乎死地,而不能全生。亦以耳目口鼻四体,心知之欲诱之,至於死地而不自知,虽苟得其生,何异於死。 夫何故?以其生生之厚。 御注曰:生之徒悦,心知之欲诱之,至於死地而不自知,虽苟得其生,何异於死。 夫何故?以其生生之厚。 御注曰:生之徒悦生而累形,死之徒趣寂而忘身。动之死地,桁杨者相接也,形戮者相望也,是皆不知身之为大患,生之为有涯,而存生之过厚耳。古之得道者,富贵不以养伤身,贫贱不以利累形,不乐寿,不哀夭,朝彻而见独,故能无古今而入於不死不生。 臣义曰:知生之可乐,知死之可哀者,泥於有形,而以死生为累者也。知其未尝生,未尝死者,冥於一致而不以死生为累者也。惟其以死生为累,故乐生而恶死。以其乐也,故存生过厚,而反害其生,曾不知生之为有涯也。 盖闻善摄生者,陆行不遇兕虎,入军不被甲兵。兕无所投其角,虎无所措其爪,兵无所容其刃。夫何故?以其无死地。
Interpretation

Therefore, those who simply submit to external things will depart from what is right and reasonable, and in the end lose their nature. When every action leads toward a dead end, life cannot be preserved. The desires of the ears, eyes, mouth, nose, and limbs, along with the desires of the mind, lure people toward dead ends, yet they remain unaware. Even if they happen to survive, what difference is there between that and being dead?

Why is this so? Because they attach too much importance to preserving life.

The Imperial Commentary says: Those who cling to life are led by the desires of the mind and reach a dead end without realizing it. Even if they happen to survive, what difference is there between that and being dead?

Why is this so? Because they attach too much importance to preserving life.

The Imperial Commentary says: Those who cling single-mindedly to life burden their bodies through their attachment to life; those who seek only deathlike stillness move toward extinction and forget themselves. To go toward a dead end means that chains and shackles are linked together, the punished follow one another without end, and corpses lie everywhere. Such people do not understand that the body itself is the greatest source of anxiety and that life has its own limits. They care only too much about preserving life. Those of ancient times who attained the Dao did not indulge themselves and damage their bodies on account of wealth and rank, nor did they covet profit and burden body and mind on account of poverty and low status. They did not cling to longevity or grieve over an early death. Their minds were open and clear; they could see the Dao as independent of all things, and so transcended past and present, unconfined by life and death.

Minister Yi says: Those who know that life brings joy and death brings sorrow are attached to the physical body and regard life and death as burdens. Those who understand that, in their original nature, they are neither born nor dead have seen that all things return to oneness and are no longer burdened by life and death. It is precisely because they regard life and death as burdens that they cling to life and fear death. And it is precisely because they cling to life that they care too much about preserving it, thereby harming themselves without realizing that life must ultimately come to an end.

I have heard that one who is skilled at preserving life will not encounter rhinoceroses or tigers while traveling on land, and will not be harmed by weapons when entering a battlefield. The rhinoceros has no place to use its horn, the tiger no place to use its claws, and weapons no way to pierce him. Why is this so? Because he does not put himself in a place where death is certain.

The Imperial Commentary says: One who is skilled at preserving life will not encounter rhinoceroses or tigers while traveling on land, and will not be harmed by weapons when entering a battlefield. The rhinoceros has no place to use its horn, the tiger no place to use its claws, and weapons no way to pierce him. Why is this so? Because he does not put himself in a place where death is certain.

御注曰:善摄生行不遇兕虎,入军不被甲兵。兕无所投其角,虎无所措其爪,兵无所容其刃。夫何故?以其无死地。 御注曰:善摄生者,形全精复,与天为一,其天守全,其神无却,潜行不窒,蹈火不热,行乎万物之上而不栗,故迕物而不慑,物莫之能伤也。《易》曰:通乎.昼夜之道,而出入於死生之机者,物莫不然。知死生之说,而超然通乎物之所造,其惟至人乎? 臣义曰:有生则有死者,因气生精,因精生神,神存以使形,神亡则形蜕,此涉乎生死之域者然也。善摄:有生则有死者,因气生精,因精生神,神存以使形,神亡则形蜕,此涉乎生死之域者然也。善摄生者,气复於初,精全於一,神妙於无,与道同体,故其生也,天行而我未尝生。其出也不忻,其死也物化、而我未尝化。其入也不辞,上与造物者游乎一气之混全,方且以生为附赘垂疣,以死为次疣溃库,则谁薪彼为形乎,谁薪彼为生乎。惟能忘其生,故无死地。无死地,则人之所畏者,我何畏焉,物亦莫能为我之累矣,为我之伤矣。 道生之章第五十- 道生之, 御注曰:道常无为而无不为,万物职矶,皆从无为殖。 臣义曰:道复於至无,而群有待之以伤矣。 道生之章第五十- 道生之, 御注曰:道常无为而无不为,万物职矶,皆从无为殖。 臣义曰:道复於至无,而群有待之以生。 德畜之, 御注曰:物得以生谓之德。
Interpretation

Those who know how to preserve life keep their bodies whole and their spirits full, and can become one with the Way of Heaven. They keep their inborn nature unharmed, their spirit from waning, and their actions free and unhindered. Even when they tread through flames, they feel no heat; even when they walk above all things, they feel no fear. Thus, when they encounter external things, they are not disturbed, and nothing among those things can harm them. The Book of Changes says: “To understand the principles of change between day and night is to know the key to entering and leaving life and death; all things are like this.” To understand the principles of life and death and to transcendently comprehend the patterns by which all things transform and arise—perhaps only a Perfected Person, one who has reached the highest state, can do so.

The subject Yi says: Where there is life, there is death. Qi transforms into Jing, Jing transforms into Shen, and when Shen remains, it can govern the body; when Shen departs, the body changes. This is what happens to those who dwell within the realm of life and death. Those who know how to preserve life return Qi to its origin, gather and unify Jing and Qi, and let their spirit return to subtlety, becoming one with the Dao. Thus, although alive, they follow the movement of Heaven’s Way and do not cling to the idea “I have been born.” They appear in the world without rejoicing on that account. When they die, their bodies change along with all things, but they do not think that they themselves have perished. They enter into transformation without refusal, and ascend to roam with the Creator in the undifferentiated primordial Qi. In this state, they regard life as an excessive growth on the body, and death as the growth rotting away and a boil bursting. If so, who has used them as firewood to fashion their bodies and arrange their birth? Only by forgetting attachment to life can one escape the fear of death. Without that fear, what people dread no longer frightens them, and external things can neither burden nor harm them.

“Dao Gives Birth to Them,” Chapter Fifty

The Dao gives birth to them,

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao is constantly Wuwei, yet nothing is beyond its accomplishment. The myriad things each follow their own proper role, and all grow from Wuwei.

The subject Yi says: The Dao returns to ultimate emptiness, while the myriad things depend on it for their growth.

De nurtures them,

The Imperial Commentary says: When the myriad things are able to grow, this is called De—the Dao’s action of endowing them and enabling them to flourish.

臣义曰:物生於道,而各得於道,故畜於德。 物形之, 御注曰:留动而生物,物生成理谓之形。 臣义曰:万物万形,各有得焉。 势成之。 御注曰:形质既具,体势斯成,长短之相形,高下之相倾,其势然也。 臣义曰:相生相成,相形相倾,势成之也。 是以万物莫不尊道而贵德。 御注曰:万,其势然也。 臣义曰:相生相成,相形相倾,势成之也。 是以万物莫不尊道而贵德。 御注曰:万物莫不首之者,道也。成而上者,德也。尊故能胜物,而小之所贵,故物莫能贱之。孟子曰赵孟之贵,赵孟能贱之,非德故也。 臣义曰:道为天地万物之本始,故曰尊,尊则贵不足言也,故道言尊。德继道之后,而物莫能贱,故於德言贵。 道之尊,德之贵,莫之爵,而常自然。 御注曰:物有时而弊,势有时而倾,真君高世,良贵在我,不假势物,而常自若也。 臣义曰:道制万物而不制於物,故尊。德继於道而物莫能先,故贵。道不自尊也,万物之所尊。德不自贵也,万物之所贵。其尊其贵,不蕲然而常自然。 故道生之,畜之,长之,育之,成之,熟之,养之,覆之。 御注曰:别而言,则有道德势不自贵也,万物之所贵。其尊其贵,不蕲然而常自然。
Interpretation

The ministers’ commentary says: All things come forth from the Dao, and each receives its endowment from the Dao; therefore, they are nurtured by De.

“Things take shape through it” means that the Dao gives all things their forms.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao’s flow and operation bring all things into being. The patterns that appear as things come into being are called “form.”

The ministers’ commentary says: The forms of things differ, and each has what it receives.

“Circumstances bring them to completion” means that the Dao brings the circumstances of all things into being.

The Imperial Commentary says: Once form and substance are in place, posture and circumstance arise as well. Long and short reveal one another by contrast; high and low likewise take shape in relation to one another. This is simply how circumstances are.

The ministers’ commentary says: All things give rise to one another and bring one another to completion. They also reveal differences in form and establish relative heights and lows. In this way, circumstances come into being.

Therefore, there is nothing that does not revere the Dao and value De.

The Imperial Commentary says: This is so for all things; it is simply the natural result of their circumstances.

The ministers’ commentary says: All things give rise to one another and bring one another to completion. They also reveal differences in form and establish relative heights and lows. In this way, circumstances come into being.

Therefore, there is nothing that does not revere the Dao and value De.

The Imperial Commentary says: All things take the Dao as their root. De brings them to completion and sustains them. The Dao is revered, and so it stands above all things; De is valued by all things, and so nothing can make it less precious. The Mencius says that Zhao Meng’s high rank could be bestowed by Zhao Meng, just as Zhao Meng could make someone lowly. Such rank does not come from De.

The ministers’ commentary says: The Dao is the root and beginning of Heaven, Earth, and all things, and so it is called “revered.” Since it is revered, there is no need to call it “precious” as well; hence we speak of revering the Dao. De comes from the Dao, and nothing can treat it lightly; hence we speak of valuing De.

The Dao’s reverence and De’s preciousness are not conferred by anyone through the granting of rank. They have always been so, naturally and of themselves.

The Imperial Commentary says: All things may decline, and circumstances may collapse. The true noble person stands beyond worldly concerns, and true worth lies in one’s own character. Without relying on external power or possessions, such a person remains at ease throughout.

The ministers’ commentary says: The Dao governs all things but is not governed by them, and so it is revered. De comes from the Dao, and nothing can surpass it, and so it is precious. The Dao does not regard itself as revered; all things revere it. De does not regard itself as precious; all things value it. They are revered and valued without seeking this deliberately; it is simply their constant nature.

Therefore, the Dao brings all things into being and nurtures them. It causes them to grow, develop, come to completion, and mature; it also sustains and shelters them.

The Imperial Commentary says: If we distinguish their functions, the Dao and De each have their own role. The Dao does not regard itself as revered or precious; all things revere it. It is revered and valued without seeking this deliberately; it is simply so by nature.

故道生之,畜之,长之,育之,成之,熟之,养之,覆之。 御注曰:别而言,则有道德势物之异,合而言,则皆出於道。道者万物之奥也,万物化作而道与之生,万物敛藏,而道与之成。出乎震,成乎艮,养乎坤,覆乎乾,刚柔相摩,八卦相荡,若有机缄而不能自已,道实冒之。 臣义曰:夫德之畜,物之形,势之成,皆出於道。道冒万物,为万物之奥,故物之出入生成,作化覆被,孰有外乎道者。 生而不有,为而不恃,长而不宰,是谓玄德。 御注曰:生则兆於动出,为则效於变化,长则见於统壹,道之降,而在德者尔。然生而不有其功,为而不恃其能,长而不睹其刻制之巧,非德之妙而小者,孰能与此?故曰是谓玄德。 臣义曰:有所生,有所为,有所长,离其功,为而不恃其能,长而不睹其刻制之巧,非德之妙而小者,孰能与此?故曰是谓玄德。 臣义曰:有所生,有所为,有所长,离乎道而见乎德者也。惟其能生,而其功不有。能为,而其能不恃。能长,而其宰制之述无所见,故为德之玄。 天下有始章第五十二 天下有始,以为天下母。 御注曰:无名天地之始,有名万物之母,始与母皆道也。自其气之始则谓之始,自其生生则谓之母,有始则能生生矣。
Interpretation

Thus, the Dao brings the myriad things into being and nurtures them, allowing them to grow, develop, and reach maturity. It then sustains and shelters them.

Emperor Huizong of Song’s Imperial Commentary says: When considered separately, Dao, De, force, and things appear as distinct levels; taken together, they all come from the Dao. The Dao is the hidden root of the myriad things. As things change and grow, the Dao brings them into being; as they draw inward and become stored away, the Dao brings them to completion. Things emerge through the generative force symbolized by the Zhen trigram, come to rest and completion through the Gen trigram, receive nourishment from the earth symbolized by Kun, and are sheltered by the heavens symbolized by Qian. Yin and Yang, firmness and gentleness, respond to one another; the Eight Trigrams shift and transform, as though some inner pivot were setting everything in motion and making it impossible for things to stop. In truth, all things are encompassed by the Dao.

Your servant Yiyi explains: The nurturing of De, the formation of things’ physical shapes, and the fulfillment of their developing tendencies all come from the Dao. The Dao encompasses all things and is their hidden root. Therefore, nothing in the coming and going, generation, transformation, or sheltering of things lies outside the Dao.

The myriad things are born from the Dao, yet the Dao does not claim them as its own. It brings things to completion, yet does not rely on its own power. It allows things to grow, yet does not rule or control them. This is called “mysterious De”—a De that is profound and unseen.

Emperor Huizong of Song’s Imperial Commentary says: The first appearance of the myriad things results from the Dao setting life in motion; their transformations show the Dao at work; their growth and return to unity show the Dao governing all things. These are ways in which the Dao takes form as De. To nurture things without claiming credit, to move them forward without relying on power, and to let them grow without displaying any deliberate skill in controlling them—who could achieve such profound De unless their virtue had reached the highest degree? Hence it is called “mysterious De.”

Your servant Yiyi explains: Giving birth, acting, and allowing things to grow are all ways the Dao manifests as De. The Dao can nurture the myriad things without claiming credit, act without relying on its own power, and allow things to grow without leaving any trace of deliberate control or arrangement. This kind of De is therefore called “mysterious De.”

Chapter Fifty-Two: The World Has a Beginning

The world has a beginning, which may be regarded as the mother of all things in the world.

Emperor Huizong of Song’s Imperial Commentary says: “The nameless” is the beginning of Heaven and Earth; “the named” is the mother of the myriad things. Both the beginning and the mother refer to the Dao. Viewed as the primal state of Qi, it is called the “beginning”; viewed as its continual nurturing of the myriad things, it is called the “mother.” With this beginning, things can continue to come into being.

臣义曰:天下有始,道之一而已,非天地之始也,所谓有名万物之母是也。一者,有名之始,故为天下母。气之始者,一也。物之所自生,有母道焉。 既得其母,以知其子。 御注曰:道能母万物而字之,则物者其子也。通於道者兼物,物故得其母,以知其子。 臣义曰:一之所起,道之所以生物也。得其母,则知万物为之子。 既知其子,复守其母,段身不殆。 御其子也。通於道者兼物,物故得其母,以知其子。 臣义曰:一之所起,道之所以生物也。得其母,则知万物为之子。 既知其子,复守其母,段身不殆。 御注曰:多闻则守之以约,多见则守之以卓,穷物之理而不累於物,达道之缴而不失其妙,则利用出入,往来不穷,可以全生,可以尽年,而无危殆之患。 臣义曰:庄周曰:形非道不生,则万物本乎道,而一之所生也。知万物皆母於一,则一不可以不守。能守一,则身虽投而神不殆。 塞其兑,闭其门,终身不勤。
Interpretation

The Explanation by Minister Yi says: All the things in the world have their own beginnings. Here, “the One” is what the Dao generates; it does not mean the beginning of Heaven and Earth. It refers to the level of “the named,” the matrix of the myriad things. The One is the beginning of the myriad things once they have names, and so it is called the mother of all things in the world. The beginning of Qi is also the One. The myriad things are born from it, embodying the principle that the mother gives birth to all things.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao generates the myriad things and gives them their names, so the myriad things are like the Dao’s children. One who understands the Dao can also understand the myriad things. Since they are born from the Dao, knowing them allows one to trace them back to their mother.

The Explanation by Minister Yi says: The One is the starting point from which the Dao generates the myriad things. Once you know the mother of the myriad things, you know that they are all her children.

“Having come to know the children of the myriad things, return to keeping watch over their mother. Then body and mind will not fall into danger.”

The Imperial Commentary says: Hear much, and grasp it through simple principles; see much, and hold to a clear understanding free from confusion. Investigate the principles of the myriad things without being burdened by them; understand the essentials of the Dao without losing sight of its subtlety. Then you can advance and withdraw with ease, and come and go without limit. You will preserve your life, enjoy your full allotment of years, and avoid danger.

The Explanation by Minister Yi says: Zhuang Zhou says that without the Dao, the body cannot come into being. At their root, all things come from the Dao and are born from the One. Knowing that the One is the mother of the myriad things, one must keep to the One. If you can keep to the One, then even if the body is harmed, the spirit will not fall into danger.

“Block the openings of the senses and close their gates, and you will not toil throughout your life.”

Here, “opening” and “gate” refer to the senses and the ways through which we engage with external things. “Block the openings and close the gates” is a Daoist cultivation practice of gathering in the senses and reducing disturbance from external things.

御注之所生也。知万物皆母於一,则一不可以不守。能守一,则身虽投而神不殆。 塞其兑,闭其门,终身不勤。 御注曰:兑以言悦,门以言出,物诱於外,则心悦於内。耳目鼻口,神明、出焉。慎汝内,闭汝外,不以通物为乐,物无得而引之,则乐天而自得,孰弊弊然以物为事? 臣义曰:兑,悦於外,则心有所之。门开其出,则神向於动。其兑塞,心致一也。其门闭,神致静也。心一神静,此所以守其母也。守其母,则复乎道,而无所适而不自得,何勤之有。 开其兑,济其事,终身不救。 御注曰:妄见可说,与接为构,而从事於务,则与物相刃相靡,终身役役而不见其成功。 臣义曰:心悦於物 御注曰:妄见可说,与接为构,而从事於务,则与物相刃相靡,终身役役而不见其成功。 臣义曰:心悦於物,徇妄逐末,往而不返,费其神用,竭劳於事,以求其济,愚孰甚焉。以此丧精失灵,夫何以救。 见小曰明, 御注曰:小者,道之妙,见道之妙者,自知而已,故无不明。 臣义曰:小与朴虽小同,故见之曰明,自知故也。 守柔曰强。 御注曰:柔者,道之本。守道之本者,自胜而已,故无不胜。 臣义曰:知以柔为守,则知所以自胜。 用其光,复归其明。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of Song’s commentary says: “Delight” refers to words that please people, and “door” refers to an entrance that opens outward. When external things tempt people, their hearts rejoice in response. The ears, eyes, nose, and mouth are the points through which the spirits—our mental faculties of perception—enter and leave. Guard the heart carefully and restrain the senses; do not treat contact with external things as a source of pleasure. Then external things cannot tempt you. You can follow nature and find contentment within yourself. Why hurry about, taking external things as objects of pursuit?

A minister’s interpretation says: When “delight” arises from external things, the heart develops a direction of its own. Once the heart’s door is open, the spirit grows restless. Block the heart’s desire for external pleasures, and the heart becomes undivided; close the door of the heart that opens outward, and the spirit becomes calm. An undivided heart and a calm spirit are precisely what it means to hold fast to the root. Hold fast to the root, and you can return to the Dao. Wherever you are, you can find contentment within yourself. What need is there for toil?

Open the senses and stubbornly pursue accomplishments, and even a lifetime will not be enough to save you.

Emperor Huizong of Song’s commentary says: To entertain delusions about things that please you, become entangled in dealings with external things, and busy yourself constantly with tasks is to bring yourself into conflict and mutual depletion with those things. You will toil all your life without seeing success.

A minister’s interpretation says: When the heart is pleased by external things, it pursues illusions and abandons the root for what is secondary. It goes on without turning back, expends its spirit, and exhausts itself with tasks, hoping to achieve its aims through them. Nothing could be more foolish. This depletes Jing and Qi and causes one to lose spiritual clarity. How could such a person be saved?

Being able to perceive what is subtle is called clarity.

Emperor Huizong of Song’s commentary says: What is subtle is the mystery of the Dao. Perceive the mystery of the Dao, and you can know yourself; then nothing remains unclear.

A minister’s interpretation says: Both “small” and “unworked” carry meanings of simplicity and subtlety. To perceive them is called clarity, because it means being able to know yourself.

Holding fast to weakness is called strength.

Emperor Huizong of Song’s commentary says: Weakness is the root of the Dao. To hold fast to the root of the Dao is to master yourself; then there is nothing you cannot overcome.

A minister’s interpretation says: To understand how to hold fast through weakness is to understand how to master yourself.

Use the inner light, then return to the clear and luminous original heart.

御注曰:明者光之体,光者明之用,圣人之应世,从体起用,则辉散为光,摄用归体,则智彻为明,显诸化,藏诸用,光者明之用,圣人之应世,从体起用,则辉散为光,摄用归体,则智彻为明,显诸化,藏诸用,如彼日月万物,皆照而明,未尝亏,所以神明其德者是也。 臣义曰:光者,明之见於外者也。圣人显七以应世,光之用也。藏用以复道,明之复也。 无遗身殃,是谓袭常。 御注曰:物之化,无常也。惟复命者遗物离人,复归於明,而不与物俱化,故体常而无患,与形蝶成光者异矣。 臣义曰:用其光而不复,则以我为有,而对物之无穷。光用有尽,而物为身殃,是自遗其殃也。惟复归其明,而还复於朴,故体常而不与物化,是谓袭常。真常之妙,可以冥一,而不可以显取,故谓之袭。 使我介然章第五十三 使我介然有知,行於大道,唯施是畏。 御注曰:道去奢去泰,奢者淫於德,秦则侈於性,施之 使我介然章第五十三 使我介然有知,行於大道,唯施是畏。 御注曰:道去奢去泰,奢者淫於德,秦则侈於性,施之过也。介者,小而辩於物。介然辩物,而内以自知,则深根固柢,而取足於身,故唯施是畏。
Interpretation

Light is the form in which brightness appears outwardly; brightness is the source of light. When the sage responds to worldly affairs, brightness within comes into use and radiance appears. When outward activity is drawn back and returns to its inner source, wisdom becomes fully clear as brightness. The sage’s radiance appears amid the transformations of all things, yet remains deeply concealed within its activity, like the sun and moon shining on all things: ever bright, without diminishing. This is what is meant by mysteriously manifesting De.

Light is what appears outwardly. When the sage reveals himself to respond to worldly affairs, this is the function of light. When he restrains that function and returns to the Dao, brightness returns to its source.

To avoid bringing disaster upon oneself is called following the constant Dao.

The transformations of the myriad things have no unchanging state. Only those who return to their original nature and transcend external things can return to inner brightness without changing along with the myriad things. Thus they can remain constant and free from harm. This differs from the transformation of one whose form becomes a butterfly and then changes into light.

If one uses the function of light without returning to inner brightness, one becomes attached to one’s own existence and stands opposed to the endless external things. The function of light will eventually be exhausted, and external things may then become a source of harm to oneself. This is disaster brought on by one’s own actions. Only by returning to inner brightness and going back to unadorned authenticity can one remain constant, unchanged by external things. This is called following the constant Dao. The wonder of the truly constant Dao lies in becoming one with the Dao without distinctions; it cannot be gained through display or grasping. Hence it is called “following”—receiving and carrying on the Dao.

“If I Had Even the Slightest Understanding,” Chapter 53

If I had even the slightest understanding and walked along the Great Dao, what I would fear most is taking action and forcing things.

The Dao calls for the removal of extravagance and excess. Extravagance is indulgence in one’s conduct; excess is arrogance in one’s disposition. Acting too much means going beyond the proper limit. “Slightest” means being subtle yet able to distinguish things. If one examines things closely while also coming to know oneself inwardly, one can make one’s foundation firm and find fulfillment in one’s own nature. Therefore, what one must guard against most is forcing things.

臣义曰:志心者,可以得道。忘心则无畏,介然有知,行於大道,则有心於道矣。故於施为不能无畏。 大道甚夷,而民好径。 御注曰:道夷而径速,欲速以邀近功,’而去道也远矣。 臣义曰:夫道易知易行,而无难者也,若大路然,其夷甚矣,而民好径,用智巧,趋速捷,以求近功,故失道。 朝甚除,田甚芜,仓甚虚。 御注曰:尚贤难者也,若大路然,其夷甚矣,而民好径,用智巧,趋速捷,以求近功,故失道。 朝甚除,田甚芜,仓甚虚。 御注曰:尚贤使能,以致朝廷之治,而不知力穑积用,以成富庶之俗,则徇末而弃本,非可久之道。 臣义曰:朝甚除,则饰於外,田芜仓虚,则本不恤矣。饰外而弃本,非持久之道。 服文采,带利剑,厌饮食,资财有余,是谓盗夸,非道也哉! 御注曰:券内者行乎无名,券外者志乎期费。行乎无名,则惟施是畏,志乎期费,则服文采、带利剑、厌饮食、而资财有余以为荣,不足以为辱,怙侈灭义,骄淫矜内者行乎无名,券外者志乎期费。行乎无名,则惟施是畏,志乎期费,则服文采、带利剑、厌饮食、而资财有余以为荣,不足以为辱,怙侈灭义,骄淫矜夸,岂道也哉?
Interpretation

The Minister’s Commentary says: A person whose true heart is undivided can attain the Dao (the Way). When private desires and distracting thoughts are forgotten, the heart has nothing to fear. But if even a trace of personal understanding remains, then acting in accordance with the Great Dao still means pursuing the Dao with intention. Thus, in carrying out actions, one can hardly avoid having something to fear.

The Great Dao is broad and level, yet the people prefer narrow paths.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Great Dao is level, but narrow paths seem quicker to travel. People want shortcuts and quick results before them; in the end, they move even farther from the Great Dao.

The Minister’s Commentary says: The Dao is easy to understand and easy to follow; there is nothing difficult about it, just as a great road is level. Yet the people prefer narrow paths, relying on clever devices and seeking speed and convenience in pursuit of immediate results. In doing so, they lose the Dao.

The court is outwardly made splendid and orderly, while the fields lie waste and the granaries stand empty.

The Imperial Commentary says: Esteeming the worthy and appointing capable people may indeed make the court appear to govern well. But if people are not encouraged to work diligently in the fields and store up provisions, so that the people may prosper, then the branches are pursued while the root is abandoned. This is not a way that can endure.

The Minister’s Commentary says: The court’s neat and orderly appearance is merely a decoration of the surface. The fields lying waste and the granaries standing empty show that the root has not been tended. To care only for appearances and abandon the root is not a way that can endure.

Wearing fine clothes, carrying a sharp sword, eating and drinking abundantly, and having wealth to spare—this is called flaunting extravagance, and it is not in accord with the Dao.

The Imperial Commentary says: “Within the tally” means being within the bounds of accord with the Great Dao; “beyond the tally” means departing from the Great Dao, with the mind fixed on expected gains and expenditures. Those who walk the Dao of namelessness fear only that what they give may not be enough. Those whose minds are set on pursuing gain take pride in fine clothes, sharp swords, sumptuous food and drink, and surplus wealth, and feel no shame in them. They rely on extravagance and injure righteousness, indulging themselves and boasting of their own glory. How could this be in accord with the Dao?

臣义曰:弃本逐末,徇外伤内,忘其固有,而有非其所自有,忘其自贵,而夸非其所自贵,是谓盗夸。 宋徽宗这德真经解义卷之七竟 7-宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之八 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之八 登仕郎臣章安撰义 德经 善建不拔章第五十四 善建者不拔, 御注曰:建中以该上下,故不拔。臣章安撰义 德经 善建不拔章第五十四 善建者不拔, 御注曰:建中以该上下,故不拔。 臣义曰:心有系则偏倚不中,中则无偏系而善建者也,故不拔。 善抱者不脱, 御注曰:抱一以应万变,故不脱。 臣义曰:善抱者,抱一也。纯粹不杂,一而不二,故能应变於无穷,未始或脱也。 子孙以祭祀不辍。 御注曰:建中而不外乎道,抱一而不离於精,若是者,岂行一国与当年,盖将及天下与来世,其传也远矣。 臣义曰:建中抱一,其施无穷,其道冒於天下,后世使之享福不已,故子孙祭祀不辍。 修之身,其德来世,其传也远矣。 臣义曰:建中抱一,其施无穷,其道冒於天下,后世使之享福不已,故子孙祭祀不辍。 修之身,其德乃真。修之家,其德乃余。修之乡,其德乃长。修之国,其德乃丰。修之天下,其德乃普。
Interpretation

The ministerial commentary says: “Abandoning the root to chase after the branches, and constantly catering to external things, only harms one’s inner self. Forgetting what one already possesses while claiming and flaunting what was never one’s own; forgetting one’s own inherent worth while boasting of a nobility one does not truly possess—this is called ‘robbery and boasting.’”

Chapter 54: What Is Well Established Cannot Be Uprooted

What is well established has firm foundations and cannot be uprooted.

The Imperial Commentary says: “By standing upon the Way of centrality and correctness, one can govern those above and below; thus one’s foundations cannot be uprooted.”

Minister Zhang’an’s explanation says: “When the mind is biased or attached, it becomes crooked and departs from centrality and correctness. To establish foundations well is to have a mind free of bias and attachment; thus they cannot be uprooted.”

What is well held fast will not slip away.

The Imperial Commentary says: “By holding to the One—the Dao’s state of purity and unity—one can meet the myriad changes; thus it will not slip away.”

Minister Zhang’an’s explanation says: “To hold fast well is to hold to purity and unity. Only with an inner self that is pure and unmixed, focused and undivided, can one respond to change without end and never lose the Dao.”

In this way, descendants may continue their sacrifices from generation to generation.

The Imperial Commentary says: “One stands upon centrality and correctness without departing from the Dao, and holds to purity and unity without departing from its subtle Way. The influence of such a person is not limited to one state or one era; it benefits all under Heaven and generations to come, enduring for a long time.”

Minister Zhang’an’s explanation says: “Standing upon centrality and correctness, and holding to purity and unity, one’s influence is inexhaustible, and the effects of the Dao extend throughout all under Heaven. Later generations of descendants therefore receive its blessings, and the sacrifices do not cease.”

Cultivate the Dao in yourself, and your De (Virtue) will become genuine. Cultivate the Dao in your family, and your De will become abundant. Cultivate the Dao in your village, and your De will endure. Cultivate the Dao in your state, and your De will flourish. Cultivate the Dao throughout all under Heaven, and your De will extend everywhere.

御注曰:修之身,其德乃真,所谓道之真以治身也。修之家,其德乃余,修之乡,其德乃长,所谓其绪余以治人也。修之国,其德乃丰,修之天下,其德乃普,所谓其土直以治天下国家也。其修弥远,其德弥广,在我者皆其真也,在彼者特其末耳。故余而后长,丰而后普,於道为外。 臣义曰:建中则无过不及,抱一则精全不二,以此修身,德乃真也。以此修家,德乃余也。以此修国,德乃丰也。以此修天下,德乃普也。其修弥远,其德弥广,道之真在我,以此修身,德乃真也。以此修家,德乃余也。以此修国,德乃丰也。以此修天下,德乃普也。其修弥远,其德弥广,道之真在我者也,故以真修身,身修然后推其德,自家自乡至於国,至於天下,而德弥广矣。 故以身观身,以家观家,以乡观乡,以国观国,以天下观天下。 御注曰:万物皆备於我矣,反身而诚,乐莫大焉,故以身观身而身治,推此类也。天下有常然,以之观天下,而天下治矣。 臣义曰:天下之理,盖有常然,而各有极也。能尽之者,不容私智,故观身者不外乎身,观家者不外乎家。观乡观国观天下,皆若是也。异乎此,非善观者。 吾何以知天下之然哉?以此。
Interpretation

Huizong’s Imperial Commentary says: When one cultivates oneself, one’s Virtue becomes genuine. This is to govern oneself through the truth of the Dao. Use it to cultivate the family, and Virtue will be abundant; use it to govern the local community, and Virtue will endure. These are all ways of governing others with the Dao’s residual effects. Use it to govern the state, and Virtue will become full and flourishing; use it to govern the world, and Virtue will extend everywhere. This is to put the Dao’s root into practice in governing the world and the state. The farther cultivation reaches, the more widely Virtue extends. The genuine Dao lies within oneself; what is applied to others is only its branches and leaves. Thus, Virtue must first become abundant before it can be extended to the local community and made enduring; it must first become full and flourishing before it can extend everywhere. In relation to the Dao, all these are outward expressions.

The minister Zhang An explains: Establish yourself by holding to the center, and you will go neither too far nor fall short. Hold fast to the One—that is, the Daoist principle of single-mindedness and purity—and your spirit will remain whole and undistracted. Cultivate yourself in this way, and your Virtue will be genuine; use it to cultivate the family, and Virtue will be abundant; use it to govern the state, and Virtue will flourish; use it to govern the world, and Virtue will extend everywhere. The farther cultivation reaches, the more widely Virtue extends. The genuine root of the Dao lies within oneself. So first cultivate yourself through the genuine Dao, then extend your Virtue outward: from the family and local community to the state and the world. Virtue will thereby spread ever more widely.

Therefore, take yourself as the standard for observing yourself, the family as the standard for observing the family, the local community as the standard for observing the local community, the state as the standard for observing the state, and the world as the standard for observing the world.

Huizong’s Imperial Commentary says: The principles of all things are present within me. Reflect on yourself and make your heart sincere, and you will attain the greatest joy. Thus, observe yourself by the principles within yourself, and you will bring yourself into order; the same applies by extension. The world has its own enduring patterns. Observe the world by following these patterns, and you will bring it into order.

The minister Zhang An explains: The principles of the world have what endures, and each thing has its own limits. Those who can fully understand these principles do not rely on private judgment to make arbitrary assessments. Thus, in observing yourself, do not depart from yourself; in observing the family, do not depart from the family. The same applies to observing the local community, the state, and the world. To violate this is not to know how to observe well.

By what do I know the patterns of the world? By this principle.

御注曰:易简而天下之,观家者不外乎家。观乡观国观天下,皆若是也。异乎此,非善观者。 吾何以知天下之然哉?以此。 御注曰:易简而天下之理得矣。 臣义曰:所以知天下之然,而尽天下之理者,本乎中一,可谓易简,因性循理而已。 含德之厚章第五十五 含德之厚,比於赤子。 御注曰:惟民生厚,因物有迁,含德之厚,不迁於物,则气专而志一。孟子曰:大人不失其赤子之心。 臣义曰:人之德性,本自浑全,因物有迁,薄而不厚。惟物我两忘,而含德之厚有迁,含德之厚,不迁於物,则气专而志一。孟子曰:大人不失其赤子之心。 臣义曰:人之德性,本自浑全,因物有迁,薄而不厚。惟物我两忘,而含德之厚,精全不亏,神一不二,故复乎无知,而心同赤子。 毒虫不螫,猛兽不据,攫乌不搏。 御注曰:含德之厚者,忧息不能入,邪气不能农,故物莫能伤焉。庄子曰:人能虚己以游世,其孰能害下之? 臣义曰:比於赤子,则精全神固,心复乎无心,而恐惧忧息所不能入,固未始有震物心也。故物亦莫之伤。 骨弱筋柔而握固,未知牝牡之合而□作,精之至也。
Interpretation

When the mind is simple and unified, the principles of the world become clear. To examine the affairs of one family, there is no need to look beyond that family’s actual circumstances. The same applies when examining a village, a state, or the world. Observation that does not follow this principle cannot be called skillful.

How do I know what is happening in the world? By this principle.

The imperial commentary says: When one handles affairs simply and without complication, the principles of the world can be understood.

The minister’s commentary says: The key to knowing what is happening in the world and grasping its principles lies in keeping the mind centered and unified. This may be called the Way of simplicity: acting in accord with human nature and following the principles of things.

Chapter 55: The Deeply Rooted De

A person whose inner De (Virtue/Power) is deep and strong is like a newborn baby.

The imperial commentary says: People are endowed from the beginning with a pure and generous nature, but it changes as they respond to external things. A person with deep De is not changed by external things; therefore, the breath is concentrated and the will is pure. Mencius said, “A great person does not lose the pure heart of a child.”

The minister’s commentary says: Human De is originally whole and complete, but it changes through contact with external things and becomes shallow rather than deep. Only by forgetting the distinction between external things and oneself can deep De remain unchanged by them. Then the breath is concentrated and the will is pure. Mencius said, “A great person does not lose the pure heart of a child.”

Human De is originally whole and complete, but it changes through contact with external things and becomes shallow. Only by forgetting the distinction between things and oneself can deep De remain whole and unharmed, with the spirit concentrated and undivided. One then returns to a state without cunning distinctions, and the mind becomes as simple and pure as a baby’s.

Poisonous insects do not sting such a person; wild beasts do not harm them, and fierce birds do not attack them.

The imperial commentary says: In a person with deep De, worries and fears cannot enter, and harmful influences cannot disturb them. External things therefore cannot harm them. The Zhuangzi says, “If a person can move through the world with an empty, unattached mind, who can harm them?”

The minister’s commentary says: When a person is like a baby, with Jing (essence) abundant and the spirit steady, the mind returns to a state without attachment. Fear and worry cannot enter, and no thought arises of provoking or disturbing external things; so external things cannot harm them either.

The bones are weak and the sinews soft, yet the fists are tightly clenched. The person does not yet know the union of male and female, yet the genitals are erect. This is a sign that Jing and Qi (vital energy) are abundant.

御注曰:德全者形全,故骨弱筋柔而握固。形全者神全,故未知牝牡作合而□之。精之至者,可以入神,《庄子》曰:圣人贵精。 臣义曰:德全则气全,气全则神全,神全则形全,神全者形不滞於有,而气为之变化,故骨弱筋柔而精之至者,可以入神,《庄子》曰:圣人贵精。 臣义曰:德全则气全,气全则神全,神全则形全,神全者形不滞於有,而气为之变化,故骨弱筋柔而握固。气不感於动,而精全於一,故未知牝牡之合而□作。 终日号而嗑不嘎,和之至也。 御注曰:致一之谓精,精则德全而神不亏,冲气以为和,和则气全而嗌不嗄。人之生也,精受於天一而为智之源,和得於天五而为信之本,及其至也,可以入神,可以复命,而失其赤子之心渚,精摇而不守,气暴而不饨,驰其形性,潜之万物,岂不悲夫? 臣义曰:赤子形与物接,而心常静一,其声之所发,气之所动尔,非心使其气,而有动气之累,故全精之一,完气之冲,神不亏物,岂不悲夫? 臣义曰:赤子形与物接,而心常静一,其声之所发,气之所动尔,非心使其气,而有动气之累,故全精之一,完气之冲,神不亏而溢不嘎,故其妙可以入神,其常可以复命,和之至也如此。 知和曰常,
Interpretation

When Virtue is complete, the body is complete as well. An infant’s bones are weak and its sinews soft, yet it can grip things tightly. When the body is complete, the spirit is complete too. An infant does not yet know about sexual intercourse, yet its body can naturally become aroused and erect. When Jing and Qi reach their utmost, they can penetrate the mysterious and wondrous. The Zhuangzi says, “The sage esteems Jing and Qi.”

The minister explains: When Virtue is complete, Qi is abundant; when Qi is abundant, the spirit is whole; and when the spirit is whole, the body is complete. A person whose spirit is whole does not remain confined to material form, and Qi can change along with it. Thus the bones are weak and the sinews soft; when Jing and Qi reach their utmost, they can penetrate the mysterious and wondrous. The Zhuangzi says, “The sage esteems Jing and Qi.”

The minister further explains: When Virtue is complete, Qi is abundant; when Qi is abundant, the spirit is whole; and when the spirit is whole, the body is complete. A person whose spirit is whole is not constrained by material form, and Qi can change along with it. Thus the bones are weak and the sinews soft, yet the infant can grip things tightly. Qi is not stirred by external things, and Jing and Qi remain unified and whole. So even without understanding sexual intercourse, the body naturally becomes aroused.

An infant may cry all day without making its throat hoarse. This is because its harmonious Qi is abundant and has reached its utmost.

The Imperial Commentary explains: When something is unified and does not disperse, it is called “Jing.” When Jing and Qi are abundant, Virtue is complete and the spirit suffers no depletion. When the harmonious Qi of Yin and Yang gathers, Qi is abundant and the throat does not become hoarse. In human life, Jing and Qi are received from “Heaven’s One” and are the source of wisdom; harmonious Qi comes from “Heaven’s Five” and is the root of trustworthiness. When Jing and Qi, and harmonious Qi, reach their utmost, they can penetrate the mysterious and wondrous and return to their original nature. But once people lose the infant’s pure and innocent heart, Jing and Qi are stirred and can no longer be kept in place; their breathing becomes hurried and disordered, and body and nature scatter. They sink into the myriad things. Is this not lamentable?

The minister explains: Though an infant’s body comes into contact with external things, its inner heart remains quiet and unified. Its voice arises only from the natural movement of its breath; the heart does not deliberately drive the breath, nor is it burdened by the breath’s restless movement. Thus Jing and Qi remain unified and whole, and harmonious Qi is preserved. The spirit is not depleted by external things, the breath is abundant, and the throat does not become hoarse. In this way, what is subtle can penetrate the mysterious and wondrous, and the constant Dao can return to its original nature. This is what it means for harmonious Qi to reach its utmost.

Only by understanding harmonious Qi can one know what is constant.

御注曰:纯气之守,制命在内,形化而性不亡。 臣义曰:常者至真而常然,未始或变也,故形虽蜕化之不一,而性有所不立。守气之纯,保乎泰和,知其和而无所变,故曰常。 知常曰明, 御注曰:明足以见道者,知性之不亡故也。 臣义曰:知其性有常而不变,而未始或亡,见道明矣,故曰明。 益生曰祥, 御注曰:祥者,物之先见,生物之理,增之道者,知性之不亡故也。 臣义曰:知其性有常而不变,而未始或亡,见道明矣,故曰明。 益生曰祥, 御注曰:祥者,物之先见,生物之理,增之则赘,祸福特未定也。 臣义曰:生理固全,何事於益,益之为祥,祸福未定。 心使气日强。 御注曰:体合於心,心合於气,则气和而不暴,蹶者趋者,是气也,而心实使之兹强也。以与物敌,而非自胜之道。 臣义曰:心复於无,则气保於冲。心使气,则气失於暴。 物壮则老,是谓不道, 御注曰:道无古今,物有壮老,强有时而弱,盛有时而衰,役於时而制於数,岂道也哉? 臣义曰:有壮有老,随时徙化,形与之变,是物也。含德之厚,比於赤子,有常不变,役於时而制於数,岂道也哉?
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong commented: If one preserves the original Qi in its undisturbed purity, the power to govern one’s life remains within oneself. The body may change, but one’s nature does not perish.

A minister explained: “‘Constant’ refers to the most genuine and enduring nature, which has never changed. Thus, although the body continually sheds one form for another, one’s nature does not thereby disappear. Preserve the harmonious purity of Qi and maintain a state of peace; understand that this harmony does not change, and it is therefore called ‘constant.’”

To know the constant is called clarity.

Emperor Huizong commented: Wisdom is able to perceive the Dao because it understands that one’s nature does not perish.

A minister explained: To know that one’s nature is constant and unchanging, and has never disappeared, is to understand the Dao. This is therefore called “clarity.”

To increase life is called good fortune.

Emperor Huizong commented: “‘Good fortune’ refers to signs that appear before things become manifest. Life has its own natural order; to increase it relentlessly is to add what is unnecessary. Whether this will ultimately bring misfortune or good fortune is still uncertain.”

A minister explained: Life already has a complete natural order. Why increase it further? Deliberately adding to it may seem auspicious, but whether it will bring misfortune or good fortune remains unknown.

When the mind drives Qi, Qi grows stronger day by day.

Emperor Huizong commented: When the body is in accord with the mind, and the mind is in accord with Qi, Qi is calm and does not become agitated. Running, leaping, and other movements are expressions of Qi; yet these movements of Qi are in fact driven by the mind. This only makes Qi increasingly strong. It is not a way to truly overcome external things.

A minister explained: When the mind returns to emptiness and stillness, Qi can remain balanced and harmonious. If the mind is allowed to drive Qi, Qi will become agitated.

When things grow strong, they grow old. This is contrary to the Dao.

Emperor Huizong commented: The Dao is not bound by past or present, but things have their periods of flourishing and decline. Strength must eventually give way to weakness, and prosperity must turn to decline. How can what is governed by circumstances and constrained by fate be called the Dao?

A minister explained: Things have periods of strength and of old age; as time passes and changes, their forms change too. This is simply the condition of ordinary things. Those whose De is deep preserve, like infants, a pure and constant nature that is not lost amid change. If they are governed by circumstances and constrained by fate, how can they be called the Dao?

臣义曰:有壮有老,随时徙化,形与之变,是物也。含德之厚,比於赤子,有常不变,其几道乎。 不道早已。 御注曰:道未始有穷,民之迷,其日固已久矣。 臣义曰:不以道,则其生虽壮,已失生理。 知者不言章第五十六 知者不言,言者不知。 御注曰:道无问,问无应,知道者默而识之,无所事言。啮缺问於王倪,所以四问而四不知,多言数穷,离道远矣。 臣义曰:道不可言也,故道者不言而默识。可言者,道之粗也,多言则数穷,故言者不知道。 塞其兑,闭其门, 御注曰:涂部守神,退藏於密, 臣义曰:塞其兑,则心无悦於外,闭其门,则神不驰於物,所以退藏於密也。 挫其注曰:涂部守神,退藏於密, 臣义曰:塞其兑,则心无悦於外,闭其门,则神不驰於物,所以退藏於密也。 挫其锐,解其纷, 御注曰:以深为根,以约为纪。 臣义曰:挫其锐,钝而后利也。解其纷,不为物结也。根深者不见其锐,纪约者何事解纷。 和其光,同其尘, 御注曰:与物委蛇,而同其波。 臣义曰:和其光,复归其明也。同其尘,则混同於物也。复其明混於物,故能同其波。 是谓玄同。
Interpretation

People have their prime years and their old age; the body changes as time passes. This is the natural course of all things. If a person has deep De, is as simple and natural as an infant, and never loses their original nature, they may be close to the Dao.

When one does not accord with the Dao, life soon comes to an end.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao has no limit, yet the people have been lost to it for a very long time.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Without following the Dao, even someone in the prime of life has already lost life’s natural order.

Chapter Fifty-Six: “Those Who Know Do Not Speak”

Few people who truly understand the Dao speak much; those who speak much do not understand it.

The Imperial Commentary says: There is nothing about the Dao that can be questioned, and nothing that can be answered. Those who understand the Dao grasp it silently and need not say much. Nie Que sought guidance from Wang Ni, asking four questions; each time, Wang Ni said he did not know. Much talk brings people into difficulty and takes them farther from the Dao.

The Minister’s Commentary says: The Dao cannot be fully expressed in words. Those who attain the Dao therefore speak little and grasp it in silence. What can be said reveals only its more accessible aspect. If one says too much, words reach their limit; thus those who speak much do not understand the Dao.

Block the passages through which the senses reach outward things, and close the gates through which the mind and spirit rush outward.

The Imperial Commentary says: Block the senses, focus the mind, and withdraw to dwell in a hidden and quiet place.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Block the passages of the senses, and the mind will no longer covet the temptations of the outside world. Close the gates of the mind and spirit, and the spirit will no longer chase after external things. In this way, one can withdraw to a hidden and quiet place.

Blunt the sharpness and untangle the confusion.

The Imperial Commentary says: Take depth as your foundation and simplicity as your guiding principle.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Blunt the sharpness: by appearing dull, one can preserve oneself. Untangle the confusion: do not become entangled in external things. Those with deep foundations do not display their sharpness; those who hold to simplicity do not fall into disorder.

Temper your brightness and live among the common world.

The Imperial Commentary says: Follow along with the myriad things and flow with the world’s changes.

The Minister’s Commentary says: To temper your brightness is to restrain its outward display and turn the wisdom already within back inward. To become as one with the dust is to mingle with the myriad things. By preserving inner wisdom while living among all things, one can follow the changes of the world.

This is called “mysterious sameness”: subtly joining with the myriad things.

御注曰:道复乎至幽,合乎至一,至幽之谓玄,至一之谓同。玄同则万物与我,将择焉而不可得,岂窃窃然自投於亲疏利害贵贱之间为哉? 臣至幽,合乎至一,至幽之谓玄,至一之谓同。玄同则万物与我,将择焉而不可得,岂窃窃然自投於亲疏利害贵贱之间为哉? 臣义曰:至幽则尽妙,至一则不二,有无物我,玄同一致。 不可得而亲,不可得而疏,不可得而利,不可得而害,不可得而贵,不可得而贱,故为天下贵。 御注曰:世之人爱恶相攻,而有戚疏之态,情伪相感而有利害之见,用舍相权而有贵贱之分,反复更代,未始有极,奚足为天下贵?知道者忘言,忘言者泯好恶,忘情伪,离用舍而玄同於一性之内,良贵至足,天下兼亡心,故为天分,反复更代,未始有极,奚足为天下贵?知道者忘言,忘言者泯好恶,忘情伪,离用舍而玄同於一性之内,良贵至足,天下兼亡心,故为天下贵。 臣义曰:物於物者,可得而亲疏利害贵贱之也。至於物我玄同,则物物而不物於物,故莫之爵而常自然。 以正治国章第五十七 以正治国,以奇用兵,以无事取天下。 御注曰:正者道之常,奇者道之变,无事者道之真。国以正定,兵以奇胜,道之真,无容私焉。顺物自然,而天下治矣。
Interpretation

When the Dao returns to its most profound and mysterious state, it accords with the absolute oneness of the original essence. The profound is called “mystery,” and oneness is called “sameness.” Once one reaches “mysterious sameness”—harmony and unity with all things—there is no longer any distinction between oneself and the myriad things, and so there is nothing to choose between. How could one still confine oneself to distinctions such as closeness and distance, benefit and harm, honor and lowliness?

Your subject believes that reaching the utmost profundity exhausts the subtle, while reaching oneness leaves no distinctions. Being and nonbeing, the myriad things and oneself—all become one in mysterious sameness.

There is nothing especially worthy of closeness, and nothing especially worthy of distance; nothing especially deserving to be regarded as beneficial, and nothing especially deserving to be regarded as harmful; nothing worthy of honor, and nothing worthy of lowliness. Only such a person is truly honored beneath Heaven.

The Imperial Commentary says: People in the world clash through mutual love and hatred, giving rise to distinctions between closeness and distance. Sincere and false feelings interact, giving rise to judgments of benefit and harm. Taking and rejecting are weighed against each other, producing distinctions of honor and lowliness. These distinctions repeatedly shift without end. How could they qualify as what is truly honored beneath Heaven? One who understands the Dao does not cling to words. One who does not cling to words can let go of likes and dislikes, remain unmoved by sincere or false feelings, and escape the bonds of taking and rejecting, becoming one with all things in mysterious sameness through one’s nature. In this way, one attains a truly complete and precious state. If everyone beneath Heaven could live without a mind that makes distinctions, that would be their innate nature. The distinctions of honor and lowliness in the world shift repeatedly without end. How could they be called what is truly honored beneath Heaven? One who understands the Dao does not cling to words. One who does not cling to words can let go of likes and dislikes, remain unmoved by sincere or false feelings, and escape the bonds of taking and rejecting, becoming one with all things in mysterious sameness through one’s nature. This is true honor brought to completion; when people throughout the world no longer hold a mind that makes distinctions, that is true honor beneath Heaven.

Your subject believes that only those led about by external things distinguish between closeness and distance, benefit and harm, honor and lowliness. When all things and oneself have become one in mysterious sameness, one can meet the myriad things without being ruled by them. Thus, even without anyone conferring a title, one naturally remains honored.

Chapter Fifty-Seven: Governing the State with Uprightness

Govern the state by the upright way; use unconventional tactics in warfare; gain all beneath Heaven through Wuwei (non-action).

The Imperial Commentary says: “Uprightness” is the Dao’s constant and unchanging principle; “unconventionality” is the Dao’s application, changing with the times; and “doing nothing” expresses the Dao’s true nature. In governing the state, establish order through the upright way; in warfare, win through unconventional tactics. The Dao’s true nature, however, must not be mixed with private motives. When things are allowed to follow their natural course, all beneath Heaven can be governed.

臣义曰:治国以正定,道之常也。用兵以奇胜,道之变也。取天下以无事,道之真也。侯王得一为正,而物莫不正,国之治也。兵以克变为奇,而物莫能胜,兵之用也。法出而奸生,令下而诈起,故无为之君执左契,而天下应之,所谓无事以取天下也。 吾何以知其然哉?夫天下多忌讳,而民弥贫。 御注曰:民不难聚也,爱之则亲,利所谓无事以取天下也。 吾何以知其然哉?夫天下多忌讳,而民弥贫。 御注曰:民不难聚也,爱之则亲,利之则至,致其所恶则散。今也无爱利之心,而多忌讳之禁,民将散而之四方,故民弥贫。 臣义曰:多忌讳,则多事而多禁,故民扰於法,而业不得安,故民始乱而弥贫。 人多利器,国家滋昏。 御注曰:有机械者必有机事,有机事者必有机心。机心生则纯白不备,而或罔上以非其道。 臣义曰:人以机械相胜,诈伪萌生,迭为朋附罔蔽,此所以滋昏也。 人多伎巧,奇物滋起。 御注曰:侠巧胜则人趋末,而异服奇器出以乱俗。 臣义曰:尚伎巧,则风俗弊於奇异。法令滋章,盗贼多有。 御注曰:克核太至者,必有不肖之心应之。 臣义曰:国家昏於人之利器相胜,风俗弊於人之伎巧相尚,忌讳多禁,民贫失业,则治国失其正,而以有。
Interpretation

My interpretation is that governing a state depends on upright, steady methods; this is the constant principle of the Dao (the Way). Waging war depends on winning through the unexpected; this is the Dao’s capacity for change. Securing all under Heaven, meanwhile, depends on avoiding needless action and not disturbing the people; this is the Dao’s true meaning. When a lord or king attains the One—the fundamental principle in accord with the Great Dao—he can set himself straight, and all things will in turn be set right. This is the way to govern a state. In warfare, victory through change is what it means to win through the unexpected. Whenever laws are established, wrongdoing arises alongside them; whenever commands are issued, deception follows. Thus, a ruler who governs through Wuwei (non-action) is like one holding the left half of a tally—a token of proof in ancient times, when contracts were divided into two halves—and the people of the world will respond to him. This is what is meant by securing all under Heaven without needless action.

The Emperor’s commentary says: The people are not difficult to unite. If a ruler cares for them, they will draw near; if he benefits them, they will rally to him. If he makes them suffer what they despise, they will disperse. When a ruler today has neither care nor generosity toward the people, yet imposes many taboos and prohibitions, they will scatter and drift in every direction, becoming ever poorer.

My interpretation is that too many taboos bring with them numerous administrative measures and prohibitions. Harried by laws and orders, the people cannot engage in production in peace. Society then begins to fall into disorder, and the people grow ever poorer.

The more sharp tools the people possess, the more confused the state becomes.

The Emperor’s commentary says: When mechanical devices exist, tasks that depend on machinery arise. As such tasks multiply, people’s minds become calculating and clever. Once this cleverness takes root, their simple and genuine nature can no longer remain whole; some may even deceive their ruler by improper means.

My interpretation is that when people use mechanical devices to outdo one another, deception arises in turn. They also form factions and alliances, support one another, and conceal things from those above them. This is why the state grows increasingly confused.

The more the people prize skill, the more unusual things appear.

The Emperor’s commentary says: When opportunistic cleverness prevails, people chase petty gains and lesser interests. Strange clothing and objects then appear, disrupting customs.

My interpretation is that when skill is prized, customs decay as people pursue the unusual.

The more numerous and intricate the laws, the more thieves there are.

The Emperor’s commentary says: If investigation and enforcement become excessively harsh, they will inevitably provoke a response in the form of ill intent.

My interpretation is that the state becomes confused because people use sharp tools to compete; customs decay because people prize skill and compete with one another. Taboos and prohibitions also multiply, leaving the people poor and without work. In this way, governing loses its upright principle and turns instead to harsh, burdensome laws.

御注曰:克核太至者,必有不肖之心应之。 臣义曰:国家昏於人之利器相胜,风俗弊於人之伎巧相尚,忌讳多禁,民贫失业,则治国失其正,而以多事扰天下也。至於法令滋彰,防制密甚,然后民益无耻矣,民无耻,则无所不为矣,故盗贼多有。 故圣人云:我无为而民自化, 御注曰:天无为以之清,地无为以之宁,两无为相合,万物皆化,圣人天地而已,故民日迁善,而不知为之者。 臣义曰:圣人体道无为,以性复性,故民化於上,而不知其所以化也。 我好静而民自正, 御注曰:鉴水之与形接也,不设智故,而物之方圆曲直不能逃也,夫岂待钧绳规矩而后正哉? 臣义曰:静则政一,而, 御注曰:鉴水之与形接也,不设智故,而物之方圆曲直不能逃也,夫岂待钧绳规矩而后正哉? 臣义曰:静则政一,而民皆一於正。 我无事而民自富, 御注曰:天下本无事,庸人扰之耳。无以扰之,民将自富。 臣义曰:上无事,则民有余力,安生乐业而民富足。 我无欲而民自朴。 御注曰:不尚贤则民不争,不贵难得之货,则民不为盗,同乎无欲,而民性得矣。 臣义曰:无欲则无心,上无心则民得其性,自足於性分,而心复於一,全其朴矣。 其政闷闷章第五十八
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: If a ruler investigates and pursues matters harshly, the people will respond with unkind intentions.

A minister explains: The state becomes absorbed in having people compete against one another by means of every kind of sharp weapon, while customs are corrupted as people vie to prize clever techniques. There are too many taboos and prohibitions; the people are impoverished and out of work. The state loses the proper way of governing and instead disrupts the world with burdensome administration. When laws and decrees grow ever more numerous, and prevention and control become exceedingly strict, the people in turn grow even less ashamed. When people have no sense of shame, they will do anything, and so thieves grow ever more numerous.

Therefore, the sage says, “When I practice Wuwei (non-action), the people transform of themselves.”

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: Heaven does not act recklessly, and so it is clear and bright; Earth does not act recklessly, and so it is at peace. Heaven and Earth accord in their Wuwei, and all things are thereby brought to life and nurtured. The sage takes Heaven and Earth as a model, so the people grow better day by day without knowing who has brought this about.

A minister explains: The sage understands and follows the Dao, governing through Wuwei and allowing people’s nature to return to its original state. Thus the people are transformed by those above them, yet do not know how they have been transformed.

“When I cherish stillness, the people become naturally upright.”

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: When a mirror or a calm surface of water reflects an object, it needs no clever contrivance; the object’s roundness or squareness, curves or straight lines, cannot be concealed. Why would it have to wait for a carpenter’s measuring line, compass, or square to make the object true?

A minister explains: When the ruler cherishes stillness, his commands are consistent, and the people all return to the right way.

“When I do not stir up affairs, the people become naturally prosperous.”

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: The world has no need for so many affairs; it is only mediocre people who keep stirring things up. If the people are left undisturbed, they will naturally prosper.

A minister explains: When those above do not stir up affairs, the people have energy to spare. They can make a steady living and work in peace, and their lives naturally become prosperous.

“When I have no desires, the people become naturally simple and sincere.”

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: When the worthy are not exalted for their reputations, the people do not compete; when rare goods are not prized, the people do not steal. When neither those above nor the people have desires, the people’s nature can be preserved.

A minister explains: Without desire, the heart is not stirred by cravings. When those above do not act from selfish motives, the people can preserve their nature, be content with their proper place, and bring their hearts to unity; their simple and sincere nature is thereby made whole.

Chapter Fifty-Eight: When Governance Is Indulgent

其政闷闷, 御注曰:在宥天下,下知有之,而 臣义曰:无欲则无心,上无心则民得其性,自足於性分,而心复於一,全其朴矣。 其政闷闷章第五十八 其政闷闷, 御注曰:在宥天下,下知有之,而无欣欣之乐。 臣义曰:上以道在宥天下,下以道自遂其生成,上下皆正於一,而复乎道,上不见
Interpretation

“Their government is subdued and unobtrusive” means that, in governing the world, orders are broad and simple, and the people are not troubled.

The imperial commentary explains: The ruler governs the world with generosity and tolerance. The people know only that such a ruler exists, but show no signs of rejoicing or excitement.

The ministerial commentary explains: When the ruler has no private desires, he does not impose his personal will on the people. When the ruler is free of self-conscious intent, the people can preserve their inborn nature and remain content in their proper place, letting their minds return to unity and keeping their lives simple and unadorned. The ruler treats the world with the generosity of the Dao, and the people, too, follow what is right and live and grow naturally. Those above and below alike return to what is right in the Dao and recover their original nature. The ruler does not display any deliberate action, and so governance appears broad and simple.

其有

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →