中文 · EN

《宋徽宗道德真经解义(章安)》Vol. 4

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 4 / 4 19,956 characters

About this page. The original text of 《宋徽宗道德真经解义(章安)》 Vol. 4 (Taixuan 太玄部, 4 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 43 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《宋徽宗道德真经解义(章安)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

为,下不知其帝力,闷闷如此。 其民淳淳; 御注曰:见素抱朴,少私寡欲。 臣义曰:淳淳者,浑厚自如,绝私欲,复素业也。 其政察察, 御注曰:简发而栉,数米而炊,窃窃然以苛为明,此察察之政。 臣义曰:察察着明,至纤至悉,新政之举,以苛为明也。 其民缺缺。 御:简发而栉,数米而炊,窃窃然以苛为明,此察察之政。 臣义曰:察察着明,至纤至悉,新政之举,以苛为明也。 其民缺缺。 御注曰:举贤则民相轧,任知则民相盗,故无全德。 臣义曰:上政察则民巧於为伪,伤於巧而不得其全,故无全德。 祸兮福所倚,福兮祸所伏,孰知其极? 御注曰:昭昭生於冥冥,有伦生於无形,德慧卫智,存乎疢疾,高明之家,鬼瞰其室,知时无止,知分无常,知终始之不可故,则祸福之倚伏,何常之有? 臣义曰:否泰穷通,祸福吉凶,出入终始,往返倚伏,如循环然,无有穷极,惟安於时分,故祸福之来,任其自尔,岂有常耶。 其无正邪? 御注曰:使同乎我与若者,正之。既同乎我与若矣,乌能正之?使异乎我与若者,正之。既异乎我与 其无正邪?
Interpretation

When governing through Wuwei (non-action), the people do not know how much effort their ruler has expended; they live peacefully and at ease.

The people are simple and sincere, living naturally. They have few selfish thoughts and desires, preserve their unadorned nature, and are content with the lives they already have.

But government orders become fussy and exacting, with inquiries into every matter. It is like picking through hair strand by strand, or counting grains of rice to cook a meal. This approach mistakes harshness for astuteness: it is what is called “scrutinizing governance.” The more detailed and severe the orders, the more the people will scheme and deceive. Their minds are harmed, and they find it harder to preserve their sincere and simple De.

Good fortune is hidden within misfortune, and misfortune lies in wait within good fortune. Who can know where they will ultimately lead?

What is clear emerges from darkness; tangible patterns take shape from what has no form. Intelligence and talent, too, may sometimes appear alongside illness and hardship. Even great wealth and status can bring calamity. Times never stand still, and people’s circumstances never remain constant. Since the changes that mark a thing’s beginning and end cannot be predicted, how could the fortunes and misfortunes that depend on one another follow any fixed rule?

Ease and adversity, hardship and success, good fortune and calamity alternate and recur, like a cycle without end. If one accepts the times and one’s proper place, letting fortune and misfortune unfold naturally when they arrive, then what could remain constant and unchanging?

Can there really be an absolutely unchanging “right”?

If we judge as right an opinion that agrees with yours and mine, then, since it already agrees with us, how can that serve to distinguish what is truly right? If we judge as right an opinion that differs from yours and mine, then…

御注曰:使同乎我与若者,正之。既同乎我与若矣,乌能正之?使异乎我与若者,正之。既异乎我与若矣,乌能正之?然则孰为天下之至正哉? 臣义曰:知善之为善,斯不善矣。知美之为美,斯恶矣。夫混於至道而莫知所以然,孰有所谓正也,况祸福无极,孰为之正。 正复为奇,善复为妖。民之迷也,其日固已久矣。 御注曰:通天下一气耳,今是而昨非,先迎而后合,神奇臭腐,相为终始,则奇正之相生,妖善之更化,乃一气之自尔。天下之生久矣,小惑易方,大惑易性,自私之俗,胜而不明乎?祸福之倚伏,且复察察以治化,乃一气之自尔。天下之生久矣,小惑易方,大惑易性,自私之俗,胜而不明乎?祸福之倚伏,且复察察以治之,民安得而反其真乎? 臣义曰:正奇善妖,相为是非,皆绿诸妄,实非大常。民之失性,固已日久,不能返本以契道,徒知缺缺於求福,苟政事察察,而以一偏为正,将使天下毕正於我,其可得耶。 是以圣人方而不割, 御注曰:方者介於辨物,大方无隅,止而不流,无辨物之迹。 臣义曰:方则介而有辨,方而不割,则混一体道,而不与物绝。 廉而不剧, 御注曰:康者矜於自洁,大康不赚,清而容物,无刻制之行。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says: If you demand that others be the same as you before acknowledging them as right, then once they are the same, why correct them at all? If you demand that others be different from you before acknowledging them as right, then once they are different, why correct them at all? Who, then, is truly impartial in the world?

The minister explains: Once goodness is recognized as goodness, its opposite, what is not good, becomes apparent; once beauty is recognized as beauty, ugliness becomes apparent. If one can merge completely with the highest Dao without clinging to the search for reasons, what could “rightness” mean? Moreover, fortune and misfortune shift without fixed measure. Who, then, can decide what is absolutely right?

What is right can turn into the strange, and goodness can turn into the monstrous. The people have been trapped in confusion for a long time.

The Imperial Commentary says: All things in the world originally come from a single Qi—the fundamental energy that forms all things. What is considered right today may have been considered wrong yesterday; what was once met may later come together. The miraculous and the decayed transform into one another in an endless cycle. Thus the strange and the right give rise to each other, just as goodness and the monstrous change into one another. All this is the natural movement of a single Qi. People have lived in the world for a long time. Small confusions can lead them astray, while great confusion can alter their nature. When selfish desires prevail, people can no longer see the principle clearly. Fortune and misfortune depend on and transform into each other. If we still try to govern and instruct the people through meticulous scrutiny and harsh demands, how can they return to their original nature?

The minister explains: The right and the strange, goodness and the monstrous, and the opposing judgments people make about one another all arise from illusory distinctions; they are not constant principles. The people have been separated from their original nature for a long time. Unable to return to the root and merge with the Dao, they seek blessings with urgent insistence. If governance is excessively severe and one person’s views are treated as the right way, how could the whole world be made to conform to that person’s standards?

Therefore, the Sage is square, yet harms no one.

The Imperial Commentary says: “Square” means distinguishing and discerning things. True, great squareness has no edges; it is stable and does not shift, leaving no trace of deliberate distinctions between things.

The minister explains: Being square often means making distinctions. To be square without harming others is to merge completely with the myriad things, accord with the Dao, and remain undivided from the things around oneself.

The Sage is upright, yet not harsh.

The Imperial Commentary says: “Upright” means priding oneself on being pure. True, noble uprightness does not boast of its purity. It remains clear while embracing all things, and does not impose harsh restraints on others.

臣义曰:洁然独立於万物之上,而物无不容,不见刻制也。 直而不肆,光而不耀。 御注曰:直而肆则陵物之态生,光而耀则扬行之息至,内直而外曲,用其光而复归其明,其唯圣人乎!民之迷光而不耀。 御注曰:直而肆则陵物之态生,光而耀则扬行之息至,内直而外曲,用其光而复归其明,其唯圣人乎!民之迷也,以方为是者,如子莫之执中,以康为是者,如仲子之操,知伸而不知屈,知彰而不知微,以夸末世之弊俗,而失圣人之大全,岂足以正天下?圣人所以正天下者何哉?如斯而已。 臣义曰:大直若曲,盖与物委蛇,而不失道之直。直而肆,则有其直而陵彼不直矣。和其光,归其明,而尘同於物,而未始与物异也,岂有其光以耀乎外哉。直而不肆,光而不耀,此圣人所以正天下也。 治人事天章第五十九 治人事天,莫若啬。
Interpretation

The sage is clear and still, standing apart from the myriad things, yet able to embrace them all. The sage does not deliberately restrain or oppress them.

True uprightness does not flaunt itself; true brightness does not dazzle.

The Imperial Commentary says: When uprightness flaunts itself, it breeds an air of superiority over others. When brightness dazzles, it invites the habit of self-praise. To be upright at heart while acting with humility and flexibility, to use one’s brightness while tempering its sharpness and returning to inward discernment—perhaps only the sage can do this. Ordinary people, however, are easily misled by outward splendor.

The Imperial Commentary continues: Some insist that strict correctness is the right way, like Zimo, who clung to what he called the middle way. Others insist that ease is the right way, like Zhongzi, who held fast to his own standards. They know only how to extend themselves, not how to yield; only how to display themselves, not how to remain concealed. This merely encourages the ills and customs of a decadent age, causing people to lose the sage’s fully rounded state. How could it be enough to set the world right? The sage’s way of setting the world right is no more than this.

The Minister Yi says: The greatest uprightness may appear crooked, because it accords with all things and changes along with them, yet never loses the uprightness of the Dao. When uprightness flaunts itself, it relies on its own correctness and looks down on others. The sage tempers sharpness and returns to inward discernment, blending with the dust and all things of the world while never straying from the Dao. How could the sage display this brightness outwardly? To be upright without flaunting it, and bright without dazzling: this is precisely the sage’s way of setting the world right.

Chapter 59: In governing the people and serving Heaven, nothing is better than restraint and conservation.

御注曰:聪明智识,天也。动静思虑,人也。适动静之节,省思虑之累,所以治人。不极聪明之力,不尽智识之任,所以事天,此之谓啬。天一在藏,以肾为事,立乎不贷之圃,丰智原而音出,则人事治而天理得。臣义曰虑之累,所以治人。不极聪明之力,不尽智识之任,所以事天,此之谓啬。天一在藏,以肾为事,立乎不贷之圃,丰智原而音出,则人事治而天理得。臣义曰:动静之劳形,思虑之役心,人之不自治者然也,极聪明,尽智识,天之不能事者然也。两者一於啬,则其神不费,而神全於精一。治人事天,莫要於此,故圣人不失於动静,不累於思虑,收聪明,忘智识,而与天为一,谓之啬,则其藏深矣,而不示其存,固矣而不费。 夫唯啬,是以早复。 御注曰:迷而后复,其复也晚矣,比复好先,音则不侈於性,是以早复。臣义曰:音则神存而不费,故其复早也。 早复谓之重积德。 御注曰:复德之本也,复以自知,则道之在我者,日积而弥新。 臣义曰:复以自知,德积於内,复之以早,则所得弥积。 重积德,则无不克。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong’s commentary says: Intelligence and knowledge are gifts of nature, while action, stillness, and thought belong to human activity. Only when action and stillness are measured, and thought does not wear us down, can human affairs be governed well. Do not bring intelligence to its utmost, or exhaust the use of knowledge; then you can follow the Way of Heaven. This is called “cherishing”—conserving and gathering the spirit. The primordial Qi bestowed by nature is stored within the body, with the kidneys as its seat. When a person is established upon an unassailable foundation and fills the source of wisdom, the voice emerges naturally. In this way, human affairs are governed and the principle of Heaven is fulfilled.

The minister’s explanation says: Action and stillness tire the body, while thought puts the mind and spirit to work. This shows that a person cannot cultivate himself. Using intelligence to its utmost and carrying knowledge to its limit show an inability to follow the Way of Heaven. When restraint is understood in both respects, the spirit is not depleted, and the mind and spirit can return intact to pure unity. Nothing is more important for governing human affairs and following the Way of Heaven. Thus the sage acts and rests without losing measure, thinks without being burdened, restrains intelligence, and does not cling to knowledge, becoming one with the Way of Heaven. This is called “cherishing”: the inner essence and Qi are stored deep within and kept from view; the foundation is firm and does not dissipate.

Only by knowing how to gather and restrain can one return early.

Emperor Huizong’s commentary says: To return only after losing one’s way is already too late. Rather than wait until one is lost before turning back, it is better to return early. Then the voice will not let one’s nature run unchecked, and one can return early.

The minister’s explanation says: When the voice is restrained, the spirit and Qi can be preserved without being depleted, so one returns early.

Returning early is called continually accumulating De.

Emperor Huizong’s commentary says: Returning is the root of De. By returning and coming to know oneself, what is already within oneself through the Way will accumulate day by day and grow ever more radiant.

The minister’s explanation says: By returning and coming to know oneself, De gathers within the heart. The earlier one returns, the greater the accumulation.

If De is continually accumulated, nothing cannot be overcome.

Emperor Huizong’s commentary says: What is already within oneself through the Way will accumulate day by day and grow ever more radiant.

The minister’s explanation says: By returning and coming to know oneself, De gathers within the heart. The earlier one returns, the greater the accumulation. If De is continually accumulated, nothing cannot be overcome.

御注曰:之在我者,日积而弥新。 臣义曰:复以自知,德积於内,复之以早,则所得弥积。 重积德,则无不克。 御注曰:能胜之谓克,宰制万物,役使群动,而无所不胜者,惟德而已。 臣义曰:德之重积,则德弥厚矣。德弥厚,则道足以胜己之私,而至於忘我,忘我则忘物,物我忘而无不克矣。 无不克,则莫知其极。 御注曰:德至於无所不胜,则泛应而不穷,孰知其极也? 臣义曰:德至於无所不胜者,物我忘故也。物我忘而复乎至无,曷知其极也。 莫知其极,可以有国。 御注曰:体尽无穷,则其於用天下也有余裕矣,况有国乎? 臣义曰:体道全神,然后可以有国者,治人事天,至矣尽 御注曰:体尽无穷,则其於用天下也有余裕矣,况有国乎? 臣义曰:体道全神,然后可以有国者,治人事天,至矣尽矣。 有国之母,可以长久。 御注曰:道为万物母,有道者万世无弊。 臣义曰:有国之母者,无极之道也。惟道常而不变,故长久。 是为探根固柢,长生久视之道。 御注曰:道者物之母,而物其子也,性者形之根,而形其柢也。既知其子,复守其母,没身不殆,故可以长久。根深则柢固,性复则形全,与天地为常,故能长生。与日月参光,故能久视。人与物化,而我独存,此之谓道。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says: To be able to overcome everything is called “conquering.” Nothing that rules over all things and sets every activity in motion is beyond its power to overcome. Only De can do this.

The Minister’s Commentary explains: As De accumulates without cease, it grows ever more profound. When De is profound, the Dao can overcome selfish desires and bring one to a state of selflessness. Once selfless, one no longer clings to external things. When self and things are both forgotten, nothing remains that cannot be overcome.

When nothing remains that cannot be overcome, no one can know where its limits lie.

The Imperial Commentary says: When De reaches a state in which nothing can overcome it, it can meet all affairs without ever being exhausted. Who can know its limits?

The Minister’s Commentary explains: De can overcome everything because self and things are both forgotten. When both are forgotten, one returns to “utter nothingness,” the furthest realm of emptiness. How, then, could anyone know its limits?

Not knowing its limits, one can govern a state.

The Imperial Commentary says: When one understands and exhausts the boundless Dao, one can put all the affairs of the world to use with ease. How much more so can one govern a single state?

The Minister’s Commentary explains: Only by understanding the Great Dao and preserving the spirit can one govern a state. To govern the people and follow the Way of Heaven is to reach the utmost.

The foundation that allows a state to be established and endure can bring it lasting peace and stability.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao is the source of all things. One who has the Dao does not decline, even across ten thousand generations.

The Minister’s Commentary explains: The foundation of a state’s longevity is the Dao without limit. The Dao is constant and unchanging, and so it can endure.

This is the principle of tracing things back to their source, strengthening their roots, and attaining long life and lasting vision.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao is the mother of all things, and all things are its children. Nature is the root of the body, and the body is a branch of nature. Having come to know the “children,” all things, one must also hold fast to the “mother,” their source. Then one will never fall into danger throughout life, and so can endure. When the roots are deep, the branches are firm. When nature returns to its source, the body is made whole, and one can endure as Heaven and Earth do. In this way one can attain long life; shining alongside the sun and moon, one can remain in the world for a long time. People and all things pass away with change, while I alone endure. This is the Dao.

臣义曰:性复於道,则其根深矣,形以道生,则其柢固矣。根不深则精不全,精不全则神不固,神不固则其形去,故根深柢固,所以长生久视而固存也。 治大国道生,则其柢固矣。根不深则精不全,精不全则神不固,神不固则其形去,故根深柢固,所以长生久视而固存也。 治大国章第六十 治大国,若烹小鲜。 御注曰:事大众而数摇之,则少成功。藏大器而数徙之,则多败伤。烹小鲜而数挠之,则渍。治大国而数变法,则惑。是以治道贵清净,而民自定。 臣义曰:烹鲜,任其自熟,无用智巧也。圣人为无为,付万物於自尔,故若烹鲜。 以道花天下者,其鬼不神。 御注曰:圣人者,神民万物之主也,不得已而临莅天下,莫若无为。道常无为,以莅天下,则人无不治。彼依人而行者,亦皆安定休止,莫或出而为祟,故曰其鬼不神。 臣义曰:不以道往天下,则人为私邪所胜,故阴阳谬戾,而鬼灵乘衅,得以神其妖。上往以道,则天清故曰其鬼不神。 臣义曰:不以道往天下,则人为私邪所胜,故阴阳谬戾,而鬼灵乘衅,得以神其妖。上往以道,则天清地宁,人和气和,而鬼亦宁,处以正胜也,故鬼不神。 非其鬼不神,其神不伤民。非其神不伤民,圣人亦不伤民。夫两不相伤,故德交归焉。
Interpretation

I believe that when human nature returns to the Dao, its roots grow deep. When the body is formed by the Dao, its foundation becomes firm. If the roots are not deep, Jing and Qi will be insufficient; if Jing and Qi are insufficient, the spirit will be unsettled; if the spirit is unsettled, the body will perish. Only with deep roots and a firm foundation can life endure and vitality be sustained.

Governing a great state, too, requires making its foundations firm. If the roots are not deep, Jing and Qi will be insufficient; if Jing and Qi are insufficient, the spirit will be unsettled; if the spirit is unsettled, the body will perish. Only with deep roots and a firm foundation can life endure and the state remain secure.

Chapter 60: Governing a Great State

Governing a great state is like cooking a small fish.

The Imperial Commentary says: When handling many affairs, if you keep stirring things up and repeatedly disturbing them, they are hard to bring to completion. If you treasure a great vessel but move it again and again, it is easily damaged. If you cook a small fish but keep turning it over, its flesh will break apart. If you govern a great state but frequently change its laws and decrees, the people will be confused. Thus, the way of governing prizes stillness and Wuwei (non-action); the people will then settle of their own accord.

The Minister’s Commentary says: When cooking a small fish, let it cook through naturally; there is no need for clever techniques or repeated handling. The sage governs through Wuwei, allowing all things to develop as they will. This is why governing a state is like cooking a small fish.

When the world is governed by the Dao, even ghosts and spirits cannot cause trouble.

The Imperial Commentary says: The sage is the master of the people and of all things. When there is no choice but to govern the world, the best course is to follow Wuwei. The Dao is always without action; govern the world by it, and there will be no one who cannot be at peace. The ghosts and spirits that move among human beings will also settle down and cease to cause trouble. This is why it says, “Ghosts and spirits cannot cause trouble.”

The Minister’s Commentary says: If the world is not governed by the Dao, people are easily ruled by selfish desires and false thoughts. Yin-Yang then falls out of balance, and ghosts and spirits seize the opportunity to cause trouble and display strange phenomena. When the ruler governs the world by the Dao, Heaven becomes clear; this is why it says that ghosts and spirits cannot cause trouble.

If the world is not governed by the Dao, people are easily ruled by selfish desires and false thoughts. Yin-Yang then falls out of balance, and ghosts and spirits seize the opportunity to cause trouble and display strange phenomena. When the ruler governs the world by the Dao, Heaven is clear and Earth is calm, and people live in harmony with the vital energy. Ghosts and spirits, too, find peace. The righteous Way prevails over evil forces, so ghosts and spirits cannot cause trouble.

It is not that ghosts and spirits lack supernatural powers; rather, their powers do not harm the people. Their powers do not harm the people, and the sage does not harm them either. Since neither ghosts and spirits nor the sage harm the people, their De (Virtue/Power) blends together, and in the end they return to a single source.

御注曰:以道莅天下者,莫之为而常自然,无攻战之祸,无杀戮之刑,是之谓不伤民。当是时也,神与民两不相伤,而德交归焉。神无所出其灵响也,饴尔多福而已。故曰其神不伤民,民无所施其智巧也。日用饮食而已,夫何伤之有? 臣义曰:夫有为而从事於务,天下多忌讳,至於法令滋彰,严刑重赋,轻敌抗兵,田莱荒,民弥贫,而百姓愁苦,不能保生,此由自伤其民尔。上以道往天下,而不伤民,遂万物务,天下多忌讳,至於法令滋彰,严刑重赋,轻敌抗兵,田莱荒,民弥贫,而百姓愁苦,不能保生,此由自伤其民尔。上以道往天下,而不伤民,遂万物性命之理,无或干於阴阳之和,则百嘉大顺,各得其序,而气应天地之和矣。神其有伤人者哉,饴尔多福而已。至於此则人神交相归,德而不相伤,治之至也。 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之八竟 8-宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之九 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之九 登仕郎臣章安撰义 德经 大国者下流章第六十一 大国者下流。 御注曰:人莫不有趋商之心,而趋高者常蹶。江海所以能为百谷王者,以其善下之也。 臣义曰:流德经 大国者下流章第六十一 大国者下流。
Interpretation

The imperial commentary says: Governing the world through the Dao, allowing everything to follow its own nature and refraining from acting recklessly, prevents the calamities of warfare and the punishments of killing. This is how the people are spared harm. At such a time, spirits and people alike remain unharmed, and blessings of De gather among humankind. The spirits need not display their efficacy or answer prayers; it is enough for them to bestow abundant blessings on the people. Thus, the spirits do not harm the people. Nor need the people resort to clever schemes: they need only eat their daily meals and live in peace. What harm could there be in that?

Zhang’an explains: When a ruler is constantly taking action and occupied with every kind of state affair, prohibitions and taboos multiply throughout the realm. Laws and decrees grow ever more numerous, punishments become harsh, taxes grow heavy, and the ruler rashly goes to war against enemy states. As a result, fields lie fallow, and the people become poorer and more distressed, struggling even to preserve their lives. All this comes from the ruler harming the people. If the ruler governs the world through the Dao, does not harm the people, lets the myriad things grow according to their nature, and does not disrupt the harmony of Yin-Yang, then all things will grow smoothly, each finding its proper order, and the Qi of Heaven and Earth will flow in harmony. How could the spirits harm people? They will only bestow abundant blessings on them. In this state, people and spirits live in peace with one another, and blessings of De gather on both sides without causing harm. This is the highest attainment of governance.

End of Volume Eight of Emperor Huizong’s Explanations of the Dao De Jing.

Volume Nine of Emperor Huizong’s Explanations of the Dao De Jing

The commentary was written by Zhang’an.

The De Jing

A Great State Lies Downstream, Chapter Sixty-One

A great state lies downstream.

The imperial commentary says: Everyone is drawn toward what is high, but those who seek only to rise often fall. The rivers and seas become the gathering place of all streams because they are skilled at remaining below them.

御注曰:人莫不有趋商之心,而趋高者常蹶。江海所以能为百谷王者,以其善下之也。 臣义曰:流下则众流之所归,故成其大。 天下之交,天下之牝,牝常以静胜,牡以静为下。 御注曰:天下皆以刚强敌物,而我独寓於柔静不争之地,则人孰胜之者?是乃所以交天下之道也。经曰,知其雄,守其雌,为天下溪。 臣义曰:刚强立我,则物为我敌,柔则不争,静则不倡,惟柔与静,与物无迕,所以为天下牝,所以为交天下之道也。 故大国以下小国,则取小国。小国以下大国,则取大国。故或下以取,或下而取。 御注曰:将欲歙之,必固张之,将欲取之,又固与之。 臣义曰:惟能下,故能取,不自下者,物必下之,而常为物下。 大国不下而取。 御注曰:将欲歙之,必固张之,将欲取之,又固与之。 臣义曰:惟能下,故能取,不自下者,物必下之,而常为物下。 大国不过欲兼畜人,小国不过欲入事人。两者各得其所欲,故大者宜为下。 御注曰:天道下济而光明,故无不覆。地道卑而上行,故能承天。人法地,地法天,故大者宜为下。 臣义曰:小国不下大国,则速祸。大国下小国,则小国鲜不为之下。不能为下者,常在大国,故大者宜为下。 道者万物之奥章第六十二
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of Song says in his commentary: Everyone has the desire to seek and climb higher, but those who keep striving upward often fall. The rivers and seas become places where many streams converge because they are content to remain low.

His ministers explain: Water flows to low places, so streams gather there in great numbers. That is how the rivers and seas become vast.

The place where all things under Heaven come together is like the female of the world. The female often prevails through stillness, while the male takes stillness as the lower position.

Emperor Huizong explains: Everyone under Heaven uses strength to contend with external things. I alone am at ease in a place of gentleness, stillness, and non-contention. Who, then, could surpass me? This is the way to join with the world. The Dao De Jing says, “Know the masculine, yet keep to the feminine, and you will become the world’s stream.”

His ministers explain: Establishing oneself through strength turns all external things into adversaries. Gentleness does not contend, and stillness does not rush to act. Gentle and still, one does not clash with the myriad things. Thus one can become the feminine place of the world and master the way of joining with it.

Therefore, if a great state can humble itself before a small state, it can win the small state’s trust. If a small state can humble itself before a great state, it can gain the great state’s acceptance. Thus some states win others through humility, while others are accepted by them through humility.

Emperor Huizong explains: To gather something in, one often first lets it open out; to obtain something, one often first gives to it.

His ministers explain: Only by being humble can one obtain something. Those unwilling to humble themselves will surely be pressed down by external things and will often find themselves in a passive position.

If a great state is unwilling to humble itself, yet seeks to obtain something from a small state…

Emperor Huizong again cites the principle: To gather something in, one often first lets it open out; to obtain something, one often first gives to it.

His ministers again explain: Only by being humble can one obtain something. Those unwilling to humble themselves will surely be pressed down by external things and will often find themselves in a passive position.

What a great state seeks is no more than to absorb and care for a small state; what a small state seeks is no more than to submit to and serve a great state. Since both can obtain what they want, the great state should be all the more humble.

Emperor Huizong explains: The Way of Heaven descends and thereby shines brightly, so there is nothing it cannot cover. The Way of Earth occupies a low position yet receives what is above it, and so can bear all things. Humans model themselves on Earth, and Earth models itself on Heaven; therefore, the powerful should be all the more humble.

His ministers explain: If a small state does not humble itself before a great state, disaster will soon follow. If a great state can humble itself before a small state, few small states will be unwilling to submit. The failure to be humble most often occurs on the part of great states, so they should be all the more humble.

The Chapter “The Dao is the Repository of All Things,” Chapter Sixty-Two.

道者,万物之奥也, 御注曰:天奥西北,郁化精也。地奥黄泉,隐魄荣也。人奥思虑,蕴至神也。天地与人,有所谓奥,而皆冒於道。道也者,难终难穷,。地奥黄泉,隐魄荣也。人奥思虑,蕴至神也。天地与人,有所谓奥,而皆冒於道。道也者,难终难穷,难测难识,故为万物之奥。道为万物之奥,则物者道之显欤? 臣义曰道者,万物所由出,而视之不可见也,故谓之万物之奥。物皆冒於道,道无所不庇覆,而妙用深密,此奥之义。 善人之宝, 御注曰利而行之,积善成性,而神明自得,圣心循焉。 臣义曰善人知贵爱於道,故不失己於物,而知所自贵。 不善人之所保。 御注曰反无非伤也,顺其理则全,动无非邪也,静其性则正,故可以保身。 臣义曰保如保傅之保,若保赤子之保。人虽不善,性静理顺,则得其全正,道之所保也,何弃之有。道之不弃,故谓之保。 美言可以市,尊行可以加於人。不善,何弃之有?
Interpretation

The Dao is the hidden source and mystery of all things.

Emperor Huizong of the Song dynasty comments: Heaven has a hidden depth in the northwest, where vital essence and Qi gather and give rise to life. Earth has a hidden depth beneath the Yellow Springs, where Yin souls lie concealed and grow. People, too, have a hidden depth within their thoughts, where their supremely spiritual nature is held in reserve. Heaven, earth, and people each have their own hidden depths, yet all are encompassed by the Dao. The Dao cannot be exhausted, measured, or understood, which is why it is called the mystery of all things. Since the Dao is the source of all things, are all things forms in which the Dao makes itself manifest?

The officials of Zhang’an explain: The Dao is the source from which all things arise, yet it cannot be seen, so it is called the mystery of all things. All things lie within the Dao’s embrace. The Dao is everywhere and protects everything; its subtle workings are hidden and beyond measure. This is the meaning of “hidden depth.”

Good people cherish the Dao as a treasure.

Emperor Huizong of the Song dynasty comments: Good people follow the Dao and make goodness part of their nature. In this way, they naturally gain wisdom like that of the spirits, and their hearts follow the standards of the sages.

The officials of Zhang’an explain: Good people know how to value the Dao. They therefore do not lose themselves among external things, and they understand where their true worth comes from.

Even those who are not good can receive the Dao’s protection.

Emperor Huizong of the Song dynasty comments: If one departs from the way things naturally are, one is easily harmed; only by following their proper course can one preserve oneself. When one’s actions repeatedly go astray, one should quiet one’s nature and restore it to what is right. In this way, one can preserve oneself.

The officials of Zhang’an explain: “Protect” has the same sense as in “guardian and tutor” who guide and protect a ruler, and in “nurturing an infant,” caring for one as one would a baby. Even those who are not good can preserve their integrity and uprightness if they quiet their nature and act in accordance with what is right. This is precisely the Dao’s protection. Why, then, would the Dao abandon them? The Dao abandons none of the myriad things; this is why it is said to “protect” them.

Fine words can be used to build relationships and gain advantage, and respected conduct can be used to influence others. Even those who are not good—why would the Dao abandon them?

御注曰:言,也,何弃之有。道之不弃,故谓之保。 美言可以市,尊行可以加於人。不善,何弃之有? 御注曰:言,风波也。行,实丧也。皆非道所贵。言美而可悦,行尊而可尚,犹可以市,且加於人,而人服从,况体道之奥,遍覆包含,而无所殊乎?然则人之不善者,何弃之有? 臣义曰美言尊行,去道弥远,犹可以市,苟利於人,况道之奥,覆被无间,则人虽不善,道则保之,在所不弃。 故立天子,置三公,虽有拱璧,以先驷马,不如坐进此道。 御注曰君子之守,修身而天下平,天子三公,有璧马以招贤,而不务进道以修身,则拾己而徇人,失自治之道矣。不如坐进此道者,求诸己而已。道之所在,圣人尊之,故民从之如归市。 臣义曰天子三公,以道莅天下者也。拱璧驷马,为物之贵,苟志於物,则失道徇物,而不能为治。坐,进此道,则天下化之,故民从之如归市。 臣义曰天子三公,以道莅天下者也。拱璧驷马,为物之贵,苟志於物,则失道徇物,而不能为治。坐,进此道,则天下化之,归者如市,亦求诸己而已。 古之所以贵此道者何也?不曰:求以得,有罪以免邪?故为天下贵。 御注曰求则得之,求在我者也。古之人所以求之於阴阳度数,而未得者,求在外故也。恶者迁善,愚者为哲,此有罪所以免欤?道之善救者如此,故为天下贵。传曰天下莫不贵者道也。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says: “Words change like wind and waves, while actions may cause people to lose their true nature. These are not what the Dao values. Even beautiful, pleasing words and upright, admirable conduct can be enough to win people’s trust and make them willing to follow. How much more so when one understands the mysteries of the Great Dao, which encompasses and embraces all things without distinction? If so, what reason could there be to abandon those who are not good?”

The Minister’s Commentary says: “Beautiful words and noble conduct are still far from the Great Dao, yet they can already win people’s trust. If they can bring people benefit, how much more can the profound Dao, which encompasses all things and leaves nothing out? Even when someone is not good, the Dao sustains that person and does not abandon them.”

Thus, when appointing the Son of Heaven and the Three Dukes, the high officials who assist him, even the gift of a great jade bi disk with a four-horse chariot drawn up before it is not as valuable as sitting calmly and cultivating the Dao.

The Imperial Commentary says: “The foundation a noble person upholds is to cultivate the self and bring peace to the world. Even if the Son of Heaven and the Three Dukes possess fine jade and fine horses to attract worthy people, if they do not devote themselves to cultivating the Dao and improving themselves, they are abandoning themselves to accommodate others, and losing the foundation of governing themselves. It is better to sit calmly and cultivate the Dao—that is, to seek within oneself. The sages honor the Dao, and so the people follow them, as crowds flock to a market.”

The Minister’s Commentary says: “The Son of Heaven and the Three Dukes govern the world through the Dao. A great jade bi disk and four horses are precious things. If they devote themselves to pursuing such things, they abandon the Dao and accommodate external objects, and so cannot govern the world well. If they calmly cultivate the Dao, the world will be transformed; the people will follow, gathering like a crowd at a market. This, too, is simply a matter of seeking within oneself.”

Why did people of old esteem the Dao? Was it not because whoever sought it could attain it, and even those with offenses could thereby be pardoned? This is why the Dao is honored throughout the world.

The Imperial Commentary says: “What one seeks can be attained because the source of what is sought lies within oneself. People of old sought the Dao in the changes of Yin-Yang and the principles of calendrical reckoning, yet failed to find it because they searched for it among external things. The wicked can reform and become good, and the foolish can become wise—is this not how those with offenses can be absolved? The Dao is skilled at helping people; this is why it is honored throughout the world. An ancient book says: ‘Nothing in the world is more worthy of honor than the Dao.’”

臣义曰惟道善救人,无弃人,善救物,无弃物,故求则得之,罪则免之,所以为天下贵。求其在我,故求则得之。性复其初,故罪则免之。 为无为章第六十三 为无为,事无事,味无味。 御注曰道之体无作,故无为性复其初,故罪则免之。 为无为章第六十三 为无为,事无事,味无味。 御注曰道之体无作,故无为;无相,故无事;无欲,故无味。圣人应物之有而体道之无,於斯三者,概可见矣。 臣义曰道无为也,为其所自成尔。道无事也,事其所自遂尔。无为故无作,无事故无相。无作也,无相也,则淡乎无味,何欲之有。彼从事於外,耽逐世味嗜好,以口累者,又乌知体道之要。 大小多少, 御注曰大小言形,多少言数,物量无穷,不可为倪。大而不多,小而不少,则怨恩之报孰睹其辨?圣,又乌知体道之要。 大小多少, 御注曰大小言形,多少言数,物量无穷,不可为倪。大而不多,小而不少,则怨恩之报孰睹其辨?圣人所以同万有於一无,能成其大。 臣义曰:大小多少,虽涉於形数,盖有不同,然恩怨一视,孰有间然。 报怨以德。 御注曰:爵禄不足以为劝,戮耻不足以为辱,则何怨之有?所尚者德而已。
Interpretation

I say: The Dao is skilled at rescuing people and abandons no one; it is also skilled at rescuing all things and abandons nothing. Thus, when people make a request, they can receive a response; even those who have sinned can be forgiven. For this reason, the Dao is the most precious thing under Heaven. Know that the root lies within yourself: seek within, and you can attain it. When your nature returns to its original state, your offenses are forgiven.

Chapter 63: Acting through Wuwei

Act with a Wuwei (non-action) attitude, handle affairs without causing disturbance, and experience things with a desireless mind.

The Imperial Commentary says: The substance of the Dao does not contrive, and so it can be Wuwei. The Dao has no fixed form, and so it can be free of affairs. The Dao has no desires, and so it has no flavor. The sage encounters particular things yet can experience the Dao’s emptiness; these three points make this clear.

I say: The Dao is Wuwei because it allows things to take shape according to their own nature; it is free of affairs because it allows things to develop in accordance with their circumstances. Because it is Wuwei, it does not contrive; because it is free of affairs, it does not cling to forms. Neither contriving nor clinging to forms, it is naturally plain and flavorless, without desire. How could those who busy themselves only with external affairs, lose themselves in pursuing worldly tastes and pleasures, and become burdened by their appetites, understand the essentials of embodying the Dao?

Great and Small, Many and Few

The Imperial Commentary says: “Great and small” refer to form; “many and few” refer to quantity. The forms and quantities of the myriad things are endless and cannot be bounded. The great is not necessarily many, and the small is not necessarily few. How, then, can any clear distinction be made between requiting resentment and requiting kindness? The sage sees all things as returning to the same “nothingness,” and so can bring about greatness.

I say: Great and small, many and few may concern form and quantity and differ from one another. But if kindness and resentment are treated alike, what distinction can there be?

Requite Resentment with De

The Imperial Commentary says: If rank and stipends are not enough to entice people, and punishments and humiliation are not enough to disgrace them, what resentment could there be? The only thing upheld is De (Virtue/Power).

臣义曰:涉乎有,身之息,则惊於宠辱,故有恩怨。放於自得之场,则孰有彼此,故无恩怨。所尚者德,不见可怨,故曰报怨以德。 图难於其易,为大於其细。天下有,身之息,则惊於宠辱,故有恩怨。放於自得之场,则孰有彼此,故无恩怨。所尚者德,不见可怨,故曰报怨以德。 图难於其易,为大於其细。天下之难事,必作於易。天下之大事,必作於细。 御注曰:千丈之堤,以蝼蚁之穴溃,百尺之室,以突隙之烟焚。白圭之行堤也,塞其穴,是以无水难。丈人之慎火也,涂其隙,是以无火患。天下之事,常起於甚微,而及其末,则不可胜图,故圣人早从事焉。 臣义曰:事藏於所忽,难於谋始,其易与细,知所图为,则终无失矣。事几一跌,未如之何矣。 是以圣人终不为大,故能成其大。 御注曰:为之於小,故能成其大。乱已成而后治之,不亦晚乎? 臣义曰:积小以成高大也。 夫轻诺必寡信,多易必多难。是以圣人由难之,故终无难矣。
Interpretation

The minister’s commentary says: When people become attached to external things, their minds and spirits are easily swayed by favor and disgrace, giving rise to resentment and grievance. If they can remain content and at ease, no longer distinguishing between self and other, resentment and grievance have no cause to arise. They esteem virtue and see nothing worth resenting. This is what it means to “repay grievance with virtue.”

When planning something difficult, begin where it is easy. When undertaking something great, begin where it is small. The difficult things under Heaven always begin with what is easy; the great things under Heaven always begin with what is small.

The imperial commentary says: A dike a thousand fathoms long may collapse because of an ants’ nest, and a house a hundred feet high may burn because smoke escapes through a crack in its chimney. When Bai Gui, who was skilled in flood control, inspected the dikes, he sealed the holes, and so there were no floods. When an old man took care to prevent fires, he sealed the cracks, and so there were no fires. Affairs under Heaven often begin in the tiniest details; by the time they reach their end, they are difficult to manage. Therefore, the sage deals with them early.

The minister’s commentary says: Affairs are often concealed in places people overlook, and the hardest part is planning at the outset. If one knows how to deal with them when they are easy and small, in the end nothing will go wrong. Once the first signs of a problem have begun to veer off course, it is often too late to put things right.

Therefore, the sage never undertakes what appears to be great, and so is able to accomplish what is truly great.

The imperial commentary says: By starting with what is small, one can accomplish what is great. If one waits until disorder has already taken shape before addressing it, will that not be too late?

The minister’s commentary says: By steadily accumulating small achievements, one can accomplish something great.

Those who make promises lightly often find them hard to keep. Those who regard things as too easy often encounter more difficulties. Therefore, the sage always approaches affairs as though they were difficult; in the end, nothing is difficult.

The imperial commentary says: Troubles are often hidden in the tiniest details. If one waits until they have taken shape before addressing them, will that not be too late?

The minister’s commentary says: By steadily accumulating small achievements, one can accomplish something great.

御注曰:祸固多藏於微治之,不亦晚乎? 臣义曰:积小以成高大也。 夫轻诺必寡信,多易必多难。是以圣人由难之,故终无难矣。 御注曰:祸固多藏於微而发於人之所忽,圣人之应世,常慎微而不忽,故初无轻易之行,而终绝难图之患,凡以体无故也。 臣义曰:轻诺细故也,而有失信之患。多易忽微也,而有多难之累,圣人由且难之,是以天下之事,终无难矣,惧微故也。 其安易持章第六十四 其安易持,其未兆易谋,其脆易浮,其微易散。为之於未有,治之於未乱。 御注曰:安者危之对,未兆者已形之对,脆者坚之对,微者着之对。持之四 其安易持,其未兆易谋,其脆易浮,其微易散。为之於未有,治之於未乱。 御注曰:安者危之对,未兆者已形之对,脆者坚之对,微者着之对。持之於安,则无危。谋之於未兆,则不形。圣人之知几也,脆者浮之则不至於坚冰,微者散之则不着。贤人之殆庶几也。奔垒之车,沈流之航,圣人无所用智,焉用智於未奔沈,所谓为之於未有,治之於未乱也。 臣义曰:其安其未兆,事之未形者也。其脆其微,事之甚细者也。事未形而为之,是为於未有也。事甚细而治之,是治於未乱也。 合抱之木,生於毫末。九层之台,起於累土。千里之行,始於足下。 御注曰:有形之类,大必滋於小,高必基於下,远必自於近。其作始也於未乱也。
Interpretation

Disaster often lies hidden in the slightest details and strikes only when people let down their guard. In responding to the affairs of the world, the sage is always careful about details and dares not neglect them. He therefore does not act rashly at the outset, and in the end avoids calamities that cannot be undone. This is all because he has grasped the principle of “nonbeing.”

A minister explains: Making promises too readily may seem a small matter, yet it brings the calamity of losing others’ trust. Treating things as too easy and overlooking small details can also lead to many troubles. The sage considers things difficult, and so, in the end, nothing in the world proves difficult to handle. This is because he remains wary of the smallest details.

Chapter 64: What Is at Rest Is Easy to Maintain

When things are stable, they are easy to keep that way. When a problem has shown no sign of emerging, it is easy to plan for. When something is still fragile, it is easy to resolve; when it is still slight, it is easy to disperse. Therefore, act before matters arise and bring order before the situation falls into disorder.

The Imperial Commentary says: “Stable” is the opposite of “perilous”; “without signs” contrasts with having already taken visible shape; “fragile” contrasts with “firm”; and “slight” contrasts with “conspicuous.” If things are maintained while stable, they will not fall into danger. If plans are made before signs appear, problems will not take shape. The sage can discern the first signs of things as they arise. If something fragile is resolved in time, it will not become as difficult to handle as solid ice; if something slight is dispersed in time, it will not grow conspicuous. The worthy can also approach this state. When a cart is about to break through the city walls or a boat is about to sink, the sage has no need to display his ingenuity. The time to use wisdom is before disaster occurs. This is what is meant by “act before matters arise and bring order before the situation falls into disorder.”

A minister explains: “Stable” and “without signs” describe matters that have not yet taken visible shape; “fragile” and “slight” describe matters that are still very small. Addressing something before it takes shape is acting before it arises; bringing order to something while it is still slight is putting things right before the situation falls into disorder.

A great tree that takes both arms to encircle grows from a tiny sprout; a nine-tiered tower is built from baskets of earth; a journey of a thousand li begins with the first step beneath one’s feet.

The Imperial Commentary says: All things with form grow large through gradual accumulation from the small; all things that are high are grounded in what is low; and all things far away begin nearby. Their beginnings all lie in a time before the situation falls into disorder.

合抱之木,生於毫末。九层之台,起於累土。千里之行,始於足下。 御注曰:有形之类,大必滋於小,高必基於下,远必自於近。其作始也简,其将毕也必巨。圣人见端而思末,睹指而知归,故不为福先,不为祸始,踌躇以兴事,每以成功。 臣义曰:木譬自小及大,台譬自下至高,行譬自近至远,大也高也远也,皆始於微,圣人所以兴事成功,盖本於此。 为者败之,执者失之,是以圣人无为,故无败,无执,故无失。 御注曰:圣人不从事於务,故无败。不以故自持,故无失。昧者规,盖本於此。 为者败之,执者失之,是以圣人无为,故无败,无执,故无失。 御注曰:圣人不从事於务,故无败。不以故自持,故无失。昧者规度而固守之,去道愈远,能无败失乎? 臣义曰:一为而求成,则败斯至。执召,一斗以求得,则失斯至,惟无为,故成其所自成而无败,惟无执,故得其所自得而无失。 故民之从事,常於几成而败之。 御注曰:中道而止,半途而废,始动而终怠者,凡民之情,盖莫不然。故事常几成而至於败。 臣义曰:有始有卒者,其圣人乎。凡民离道而事,事其能久乎,故未始不败。 慎终如始,则无败事矣。
Interpretation

A tree large enough for a person to embrace with both arms grows from a tiny shoot; a nine-tiered platform is built up basketful by basketful of earth; and a journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step beneath one’s feet.

The Imperial Commentary says: All things with form grow from small beginnings into great ones; what is high must be built on what is low, and what is far must begin nearby. A task is often simple at the outset, but by the time it is nearly complete, it has grown large in scale. When the sage sees the beginning of things, he considers their eventual outcome; when he sees the slightest signs, he knows where events are headed. Therefore, he does not rush to seek blessings or take the lead in setting calamity in motion. He acts with care and composure, and so is often able to bring things to completion.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Trees illustrate growth from small to great, a high platform illustrates rising from low to high, and a journey illustrates going from near to far. Greatness, height, and distance all begin in what is slight. The sage succeeds precisely because he understands this principle.

Deliberately forcing action leads to failure; stubbornly holding on leads to loss. Therefore, the sage does not act recklessly and so does not fail; he does not cling stubbornly and so suffers no loss.

The Imperial Commentary says: The sage is not led about by affairs, and so does not fail because of them. He does not control things by relying on preconceived notions, and so suffers no loss. Those who are ignorant of the Way often make rules, weigh and reweigh their options, and stubbornly cling to their decisions. In this way they grow ever more distant from the Way. How could they avoid failure and loss?

The Minister’s Commentary says: Acting recklessly and hastening to succeed brings failure in its wake; clinging to the struggle and forcing an outcome brings loss in its wake. Only by refraining from reckless action can things come to fruition according to their own patterns, without failure. Only by avoiding stubborn attachment can one receive what may rightly be received, without loss.

Therefore, when people undertake things, they often fail just as they are on the verge of success.

The Imperial Commentary says: To stop halfway, abandon the journey midway, or begin with energy and later grow slack—these are common human failings. Thus, many things that seem on the verge of success ultimately end in failure.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Perhaps only the sage can carry things through from beginning to end. Ordinary people depart from principle when they act; how can their endeavors last? That is why their undertakings so often end in failure.

If, at the very end, one remains as careful as at the beginning, one will not ruin the undertaking.

御注曰:靡不有初,鲜克有终,终始惟一,时乃日新。施之於事,何为而不成? 臣义曰:终始如一,慎之如始,则无败事矣。 御注曰:靡不有初,鲜克有终,终始惟一,时乃日新。施之於事,何为而不成? 臣义曰:终始如一,慎之至也,事固无败。是以圣人欲不欲,不贵难得之货,学不 学,以复众人之所过。 御注曰:欲利者,以物易己,务学者,以博溺心。夫岂足以造乎无为?圣人不以利累形,欲在於不欲,人我之养,毕足而止。故不贵难得之货,不以人灭天。学在於不学,缉熙於光明而已。故以复众人之所过。道之不明也。贤者过之,况众人乎?复其过而反之性,此绝学者所以无忧,而乐。 臣义曰:性分本自足,故无欲。性理本自明,故无学。惟忘其所自足,故多欲而至於失己,昧其所自明,故博学而至於溺心。圣人不以利累形,而欲在於不欲,故不贵货,不以人灭天,而学在多欲而至於失己,昧其所自明,故博学而至於溺心。圣人不以利累形,而欲在於不欲,故不贵货,不以人灭天,而学在於不学,故以复众之所过。谓之过,失中也,救其过,所以复性。 以辅万物之自然,而不敢为。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of Song commented: “There are few who fail to make a beginning, but few who can persevere to the end. If one remains consistent throughout and continually renews oneself, what could one fail to accomplish by applying this principle to one’s undertakings?”

A minister explained: “If one remains consistent from beginning to end and exercises the same care as at the outset, one will not mishandle things.”

Emperor Huizong commented further: “If one remains consistent from beginning to end and continually renews oneself, what undertaking could one fail to complete? The sage pursues what is not pursued and does not prize rare goods. Learning without clinging to the deliberate pursuit of knowledge serves to correct the errors people commonly make.”

Emperor Huizong elaborated: “Those who covet profit harm themselves for the sake of external things. Those who devote themselves single-mindedly to learning may find their minds and spirits burdened by an excess of knowledge. How could such practices bring anyone to the state of Wuwei (non-action)? The sage does not let profit entangle the body; what the sage seeks is freedom from misguided desire. The sage stops once personal needs are met. Thus, rare goods are not prized, and human-made greed does not damage one’s innate nature. The sage’s ‘learning’ consists in not clinging to the pursuit of learning, but simply allowing the light already within to shine forth continually. In this way, the sage can correct the errors of others. When the Great Dao is obscure, even the worthy may stray from it—how much more so ordinary people? Helping people correct their errors and return to their nature is precisely what makes it possible, after casting aside learning that clings to knowledge, to live freely and without worry.”

A minister explained: “Human nature is complete in itself, so there is no need for covetous seeking. The principles inherent in human nature are already clear, so there is no need to cling to the pursuit of learning. When people forget that they are complete in themselves, their desires multiply, and they may even lose themselves. When they fail to see the clarity inherent in their nature, they may become learned in many things and burden their minds and spirits. The sage does not let profit entangle the self; what the sage seeks is freedom from misguided desire, and so rare goods are not prized. The sage does not let human-made desires damage innate nature; thus, the sage’s learning consists in not clinging to the pursuit of learning, and is used to correct the errors of others. An ‘error’ is a deviation from the Middle Way; to set such deviations right is to help people return to their nature.”

The sage uses this to help the myriad things follow their own nature, and does not dare to act presumptuously.

御注曰:天高地下,万物彻殊,岂或使之,性之自然而已。辅其自然,故能成其性。为者败之,故不敢为。此圣人所以恃道化而不任智巧。 臣义曰:万物之性,各具自然,圣人无为体道,辅之而已。生者遂其生,成者遂其成,人为无与焉,为之则败,故不敢为也。 古之善为道章自然,圣人无为体道,辅之而已。生者遂其生,成者遂其成,人为无与焉,为之则败,故不敢为也。 古之善为道章第六十五 古之善为道者,非以明民,将以愚之。 御注曰:民可使由之,不可使知之,古之善为道者J使由之而已。反其常然,道可载而与之俱,无所施智巧焉,故曰愚。三代而下,释夫恬淡无为而悦,夫淳淳之意,屈折礼乐,以正天下之形,吁俞仁义以慰天下之心,将以明民,名曰治之,而乱孰甚焉? 臣义曰:三代以来,教化详明,其文益胜,而周末大弊,明民之过也。故老氏将以愚之也。使不知善之为善,美之为美,而无所跂尚,各安其性分,而不戕其天真,全於自得,而不以伪为,故可以反常复朴。 民之难治,以其智多善之为善,美之为美,而无所跂尚,各安其性分,而不戕其天真,全於自得,而不以伪为,故可以反常复朴。 民之难治,以其智多。 御注曰:天下每每大乱,罪在於好知。
Interpretation

The sky is high above, the earth deep below, and all things differ from one another. Was this deliberately arranged by someone? They have simply grown naturally, each following its own nature. Helping all things follow their natural course enables each to fulfill its own nature. Deliberate interference, by contrast, brings failure, so the sage does not dare act recklessly. This is why the sage follows the Dao’s transformation and nourishment, rather than relying on cleverness to control all things.

A subordinate explains: Each thing has its own natural nature. The sage acts through the Dao of Wuwei (non-action), merely helping things follow their nature. Let what should grow grow, and let what should come to fruition come to fruition, without allowing human interference. Such interference leads to failure, so the sage does not dare act recklessly.

Chapter 65: Those of Old Who Excelled at Practicing the Dao

The rulers of ancient times who excelled at practicing the Dao did not seek to make the people clever and cunning; they sought to keep them simple and sincere.

The Imperial Commentary says: The people may be led to act in accord with the Dao without everyone needing to understand its principles. Those who excelled at practicing the Dao in ancient times simply guided the people to follow it. They returned people to their ordinary nature, enabling them to bear and follow the Great Dao without displaying cleverness; hence they were called “simple.” After the Three Dynasties, people abandoned a calm life of Wuwei and instead prized the idea of simplicity. They also multiplied ritual and musical systems to regulate people’s conduct, and used teachings of benevolence and righteousness to pacify their hearts. They intended in this way to make the people wise, calling it the governance of the world—but what could have caused greater disorder than this?

A subordinate explains: Since the Three Dynasties, instruction has grown ever more elaborate and ritual forms increasingly elaborate. By the end of the Zhou dynasty, the resulting ills had deepened as well. This was the consequence of striving too hard to make the people wise. Thus Laozi advocated keeping the people simple. “Simple” here does not mean harming the people. It means not deliberately pursuing a reputation for goodness or virtue, and not envying or striving after fame and profit. Each person rests within their proper place, does not damage their inborn nature, and lives according to their natural condition, without pretense or artifice. In this way, people can return to their ordinary state and recover their original simplicity.

The people are difficult to govern because their minds are cunning and their calculations too many.

The Imperial Commentary says: Great disorder often arises in the world, and its root lies in people’s fondness for cleverness.

臣义曰:人以智胜,日益虚伪,岂胜治哉。 故以智治国,国之贼。 御注曰:法出而奸生,令下而诈起。 臣义曰:尚智,则人以奸伪胜而难治,故智为国之贼。 不以智治国,国之福。 御注曰:焚符破玺,而民鄙朴,掊斗折衡,而民不争。 臣义曰:不以智,至於民朴不争,为国之福,气大於是。 知此两者,亦楷式。 御注曰:知此两者,则知所掊斗折衡,而民不争。 臣义曰:不以智,至於民朴不争,为国之福,气大於是。 知此两者,亦楷式。 御注曰:知此两者,则知所以治国,知所以治国,故民则而象之,以为楷式。 臣义曰:上知以智不以智两者之为治,则民知则效而有所楷式。 常知楷式,是谓玄德。玄德深矣远矣,与物反矣。 御注曰:玄者天之色,常知楷式,而不用其智,则与天合德,深不可测,远不可穷,独立於万物之上,物无得而耦之者,故曰与物反矣。 臣义曰:知楷式而不以智,则心复乎无心,知复乎无知,是德之玄。玄德至深至远,故反乎物而冥於道。 然后乃至大顺。
Interpretation

The subject explains: If people rely entirely on cleverness to prevail, deceit will steadily increase over time. How could this bring good governance to the state?

Therefore, governing the state through cleverness brings it harm.

The Imperial Commentary says: As soon as laws are established, wrongdoing arises; as soon as orders are issued, deception follows.

The subject explains: When cleverness is prized, the people use deceit and hypocrisy to outdo one another, making the state difficult to govern. Cleverness, therefore, brings harm to the state.

Governing without relying on cleverness is what brings the state good fortune.

The Imperial Commentary says: Burn the tallies and break the seals, and the people will become simple. Tear apart the measuring vessels and snap the balance beams, and the people will stop competing and calculating.

The subject explains: Governing without relying on cleverness leaves the people simple and free of contention. This is the state’s greatest good fortune.

Understanding these two ways of governing is to grasp the guiding principle.

The Imperial Commentary says: Understand these two ways, and you will know how to tear apart the measuring vessels and snap the balance beams so that the people do not contend. Understand this, and you will know how to govern the state. The people will follow this way of acting and take it as their guiding principle.

The subject explains: When those in high positions understand the different results of governing with and without cleverness, the people will know what to follow and have a principle to guide them.

To understand and follow this principle constantly is called “Mysterious De” (profound and subtle Virtue). Mysterious De is deep and far-reaching, contrary to the ordinary ways of all things.

The Imperial Commentary says: “Mysterious” is the color of Heaven. To understand the principle constantly without applying cleverness is to accord with Heaven’s Virtue. This Virtue is unfathomably deep and inexhaustibly far-reaching; it stands apart from all things, and nothing can match it. Hence the phrase “contrary to things.”

The subject explains: To understand the principle and act without relying on cleverness is for the mind to return to a state without intent, and for knowing to return to a state unattached to knowledge. This is Mysterious De. Mysterious De is exceedingly deep and far-reaching; thus it runs counter to the ordinary ways of all things in the world and accords with the Dao.

Only then can one attain Great Accord: a state of following nature and reaching harmony.

御注曰:顺者天之理,乃至大顺者,去智与故,循天之理而已。庄子曰:与天地为合,其合缗缗,若愚若昏。是谓玄德同乎大顺,注曰:顺者天之理,乃至大顺者,去智与故,循天之理而已。庄子曰:与天地为合,其合缗缗,若愚若昏。是谓玄德同乎大顺,惟若愚若昏,所以去智。 臣义曰:玄德之世,物物各顺其自然,而不知其所以然,是谓大顺。 江海为百谷王章第六十六 江海所以能为百谷王者,以其善下之,故能为百谷王。 御注曰:兴事造业,其一上比者王也,王有归往之义,君能下下,则民归之,如水之就下。 臣义曰:江海善下,为众流所归,故大。 是以圣人欲上人,以其言下之。欲归之,如水之就下。 臣义曰:江海善下,为众流所归,故大。 是以圣人欲上人,以其言下之。欲先人,以其身后之。是以圣人处上而人不重,处前而人不害,是以天下 乐推而不厌。 御注曰:《易》於屯之初曰:以贵下贱,大得民也。得其民者,得其心也。处上而人不重,则从之也轻。 处前而人不害,则利之者众。若是者无思不服,故不厌。《易》曰:百姓与能。 臣义曰:圣人下其言,而人推上之,故处上而人不重。后其身,而人推先之,故处前而人不害。曰:百姓与能。
Interpretation

“Following” means complying with the principles of Heaven. To reach “great compliance” is to discard clever schemes and artificial contrivances, following only the principles of nature. The Zhuangzi says that when people accord with Heaven and Earth, they unite with them in a deep, undivided way, seeming almost dull and unaware. This is called “Mysterious De” (profound and natural Virtue), which accords with “great compliance.” Seeming dull and unaware is precisely the result of letting go of clever schemes.

A minister explains: In an age when Mysterious De prevails, all things each follow their own nature without knowing why. This is called “great compliance.”

Chapter 66: The Rivers and Seas as Kings of the Valleys

The rivers and seas can become the places where the many streams and rivers converge because they are adept at occupying low positions. Thus they can receive all the waters.

The imperial commentary says: In undertaking affairs and establishing achievements, the one who occupies the highest position is king. “King” carries the meaning of drawing people to oneself and having them come to one. If a ruler can humbly place himself below, the people will come to him, just as water flows toward low ground.

A minister explains: The rivers and seas willingly remain in low places, so the many waters converge there. That is why they can become the greatest among the waters.

Therefore, if a sage wishes to stand above others, he first speaks with humility; if he wishes others to come to him, he is like water flowing toward low ground. If he wishes to go ahead of others, he first places himself behind them. In this way, although the sage occupies a high position, people do not feel burdened by him; although he goes ahead of them, they do not feel obstructed. Therefore, people throughout the world gladly choose him to lead them and do not grow tired of him.

The imperial commentary says: When the Book of Changes discusses the first line of the Zhun hexagram, it says, “Though honored, he humbly places himself beneath those of lower station, and wins the people’s hearts.” To win the people is to win their hearts. When someone occupies a high position without burdening others, it is because they are willing to follow him with ease. When he goes ahead without obstructing them, it is because he benefits many people. Everything such a person thinks and does wins people’s willing assent, and so they do not grow tired of him. The Book of Changes also says, “The people approve of those who possess virtue and ability.”

A minister explains: The sage speaks humbly, and people choose him to occupy the high position; so even when he is above them, they do not feel burdened. The sage places himself behind others, and people choose him to go ahead of them; so even when he is in front, they do not feel obstructed. The Book of Changes’ saying, “The people approve of those who possess virtue and ability,” speaks precisely to this principle.

臣义曰:圣人下其言,而人推上之,故处上而人不重。后其身,而人推先之,故处前而人不害。民心乐推而归之,故不厌。 以其不争,故天下莫能与之争。 御注曰:行贤而去自贤之行,安往而不爱哉? 臣义曰:不争则无心,故天下应之以无心,何争之有。 天下皆谓章第六十七 天下皆谓我道大,似不肖。夫惟大,故似不肖。若肖久矣,其细也夫。 御注曰:肖物者小,为物所肖者大,道覆载万物者也,洋洋乎大哉,故似不肖。若肖则道外有物,岂得为大乎? 臣义曰:入於形器,则不能无肖。道外无物,何所肖哉,莫大於道,其细也夫。 我有三宝,宝而持之。 御注曰:异乎世俗之见,而守之不失者,我之所宝也。 臣义曰:可持不可失,如宝焉,非世俗之见也。 一曰慈, 御注曰世俗之见,而守之不失者,我之所宝也。 臣义曰:可持不可失,如宝焉,非世俗之见也。 一曰慈, 御注曰:慈以爱物,仁之实也。 臣义曰:慈以爱物,则不伤生,不害物,遂万物为自然。 二曰俭, 御注曰:俭以足用,礼之实也。 臣义曰:俭以足用,而不以物失性,故不伤财,不害民,而民自循於至理。 三曰不敢为天下先。 御注曰:先则求胜人,尚力而不贵德。
Interpretation

The minister explained: The sage lowers his words, and people instead hold him in high regard. Thus he occupies a high position, yet the people do not feel burdened. The sage puts himself behind others, and people instead raise him to the front. Thus he takes the lead, yet the people suffer no harm. The people gladly raise him up and turn toward him, so they never grow weary of him.

Precisely because the sage does not contend with others, no one under Heaven can contend with him.

The Imperial Commentary says: If a person has admirable conduct yet can let go of the thought that they are admirable, who would fail to cherish them wherever they went?

The minister explained: Not contending means having no desire to prevail. The people under Heaven respond to him with a spirit of non-contention too, so what is there to contend over?

All Under Heaven Say “The Dao Is Great”—Chapter 67

People under Heaven all say, “The Dao I speak of is vast,” yet it seems unlike any particular thing. It is precisely because the Dao is vast that it does not seem like any particular thing. If it resembled something, it would already have become small.

The Imperial Commentary says: Whatever resembles a particular thing is limited; what can be compared with all things is vast. The Dao covers and bears all things, extending without bounds, so it seems unlike any particular thing. If the Dao resembled something, that would mean there were other things outside the Dao. How, then, could it be called vast?

The minister explained: Once something takes on a particular form and becomes an object, it cannot help but display some shape. What could the Dao resemble, when nothing exists outside it? Nothing is vaster than the Dao. If you describe the Dao as having some particular form, it appears small.

I have three treasures. I cherish them and hold fast to them without losing them.

The Imperial Commentary says: What differs from worldly opinion, yet can be held fast and not discarded, is what I cherish.

The minister explained: These things can be held fast and must not be lost, like treasures; they are not worldly opinions.

The first is called compassion.

The Imperial Commentary says: Loving all things is the practical expression of “benevolence.”

The minister explained: Treating all things with compassion means not harming life or damaging things, allowing all things to grow naturally.

The second is called frugality.

The Imperial Commentary says: Practicing frugality so that resources remain sufficient is the practical expression of “ritual.”

The minister explained: Frugality makes what one uses sufficient and prevents one from losing one’s nature by coveting external things. In this way, one neither wastes resources nor harms the people, and the people can naturally follow what is most fitting.

The third is called not daring to lead all under Heaven.

The Imperial Commentary says: To contend for the lead is to seek superiority over others, valuing strength and disregarding De.

臣义曰:应而不倡,自后自下,以谦为贵,不求其胜,故所以成器长也。 夫慈故能勇。 御注曰:文王视民如伤,一怒而安天下之民。 臣义曰:慈故民爱之,卫其上如父求其胜,故所以成器长也。 夫慈故能勇。 御注曰:文王视民如伤,一怒而安天下之民。 臣义曰:慈故民爱之,卫其上如父兄,如手足之捍头目,天下其谁与敌。 俭故能广。 御注曰:闭藏於冬,故蕃鲜於春。天地尚不能常侈常费,而况於人乎? 臣义曰:惟俭故无侈费,自足而无所乏,不以末伤本,不以外丧内,故能广。 不敢为天下先,故能成器长。 御注曰:不争而善胜者,天之道。 道之尊,故为器之长。 臣义曰:天地人神,以谦为贵,自下不争,所以能成器长。 不敢为天下先,故能成器长。 御注曰:不争而善胜者,天之道。 道之尊,故为器之长。 臣义曰:天地人神,以谦为贵,自下不争,所以能成器长。 今舍其兹且勇,舍其俭且广,舍其后且先,死矣。 御注曰:世之人知勇之足以胜人,而不知慈乃能勇。知广之足以夸众,而不知俭乃能广。知器长之足尚,而不知自后之为要,则刚强之徒 而已,有死之道焉。 夫慈,以战则胜,以守则固。
Interpretation

I understand it this way: Respond to events without taking the initiative; be content to take the rear and occupy the lower position; value humility and seek no advantage over others. In this way, one can become the leader among the people.

Because one is compassionate, one can be courageous.

The Imperial Commentary says: King Wen of Zhou cared for the people as though their injuries were his own. When he became angry, he could bring peace to all under Heaven.

I understand it this way: When a ruler is compassionate, the people cherish him. They defend their ruler as they would a beloved father, and willingly strive for his victory. In this way, he can become the leader among the people.

Because one is compassionate, one can be courageous.

The Imperial Commentary says: King Wen of Zhou cared for the people as though their injuries were his own. When he became angry, he could bring peace to all under Heaven.

I understand it this way: The people cherish him because of his compassion. They defend their ruler as they would a father or elder brother, just as the limbs protect the head and eyes. In such circumstances, who under Heaven could oppose him?

Because one is frugal, one can be generous.

The Imperial Commentary says: In winter, the myriad things draw inward and store their strength; only then can they flourish and thrive in spring. If even Heaven and Earth cannot spend lavishly at all times, how much less can people?

I understand it this way: Only through frugality can one avoid extravagance and waste. When one is self-sufficient, one will not suffer want. By not letting the branches harm the roots, or the outer consume the inner, one can attain abundance.

Because one dares not claim first place under Heaven, one can become the leader among the people.

The Imperial Commentary says: To avoid contending with others yet excel at overcoming them—this is the Dao of Heaven.

The Dao is revered, and so can become the foremost of all things.

I understand it this way: Heaven and Earth, human society, and the spirits all prize humility. By being content with a lower position and not striving to be first, one can become the leader among the people.

Because one dares not claim first place under Heaven, one can become the leader among the people.

The Imperial Commentary says: To avoid contending with others yet excel at overcoming them—this is the Dao of Heaven.

The Dao is revered, and so can become the foremost of all things.

I understand it this way: Heaven and Earth, human society, and the spirits all prize humility. By being content with a lower position and not striving to be first, one can become the leader among the people.

Today, if one casts aside compassion and seeks only fierceness, casts aside frugality and seeks only abundance, or casts aside the rear and fights to be first, one will meet destruction.

The Imperial Commentary says: People know that fierceness can make them stronger than others, but do not know that compassion is what makes courage possible. They know that vastness can be used to impress the crowd, but do not know that frugality is what makes one abundant. They know that becoming the foremost among the people is worth pursuing, but do not know that being content to come behind others is the key. Such people are merely hard and forceful; in the end, they meet death.

One who is compassionate will prevail when taking up arms and fighting, and will be secure when defending.

御注曰:仁人无敌於天下,故以战则胜,民爱其上,若手足之捍头目,子弟之卫父兄,效死而弗去,故以守则固。 天将救之,以慈卫之。 御注曰:志於仁者,其衷为天所诱,志於不仁者,其鉴为天所夺,则天所以救固。 天将救之,以慈卫之。 御注曰:志於仁者,其衷为天所诱,志於不仁者,其鉴为天所夺,则天所以救之卫之者,以慈而已,此三宝所以慈为先。 善为士章第六十八 善为士者不武, 御注曰:武,下道也,士尚志,曰仁义而已。孔子曰:军旅之事,未之学也。 善战者不怒, 御注曰:上兵伐谋,而怒实胜思。 善胜敌者不争, 御注曰:争,逆德也。争地以战,杀人盈野,争城以战,杀人盈城,胜败特未定也。不武所以成其武,不怒所以济其怒,不争所以弥其争,三者皆出於德,故曰善。 善用人者为之下。 御注曰:智虽落天下,不自虑也,故智者为之谋。能虽穷海内,不自为也,故能者为之役。辩虽雕万物,不自说也,故辫者为之使。 臣义曰:善为之下,则人为我用,而天下助之。 是谓不争之德,
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary says: Those who are benevolent have no enemies under Heaven, and so their armies can win. The people cherish their ruler as hands and feet protect the head and eyes, and as children guard their father and elder brothers. They would rather give their lives than abandon him, so his defenses are secure.

Heaven wishes to aid someone, and so shelters that person with compassion.

The Imperial Commentary says: Those who resolve to practice benevolence receive inspiration in their hearts from Heaven. Those who resolve to act without benevolence have their ability to discern right from wrong taken away by Heaven. This is how Heaven aids and secures people.

Heaven wishes to aid someone, and so shelters that person with compassion.

The Imperial Commentary says: Those who resolve to practice benevolence receive inspiration in their hearts from Heaven. Those who resolve to act without benevolence have their ability to discern right from wrong taken away by Heaven. Heaven aids and shelters people through compassion. This also explains why compassion comes first among the “Three Treasures”—the three precious qualities spoken of by Laozi.

Chapter Sixty-Eight: Skilled in the Ways of a Warrior

One skilled in leading an army does not flaunt martial prowess.

The Imperial Commentary says: Flaunting force is a lesser way. A person of learning values aspiration and virtue, and upholds benevolence and righteousness. Confucius said, “I have not studied the conduct of warfare.”

One skilled in battle is not quick to anger.

The Imperial Commentary says: The best strategy in warfare is to frustrate the enemy’s plans; anger overwhelms thought.

One skilled at defeating an enemy does not contend with others.

The Imperial Commentary says: Contention goes against virtue. When armies fight to seize land, corpses cover the fields; when they fight to seize a city, bodies lie piled throughout its streets. Even then, victory and defeat may not be settled. By not flaunting force, one achieves true strength; by not being ruled by anger, one can respond well to anger; by not contending with others, one can dispel conflict. These three ways all arise from virtue, and so they are called “skillful.”

One skilled at employing others knows how to place himself beneath them.

The Imperial Commentary says: Even if his wisdom surpasses that of everyone under Heaven, he does not devise plans himself, but lets the wise plan on his behalf. Even if his abilities are sufficient to manage everything within the seas, he does not do everything himself, but lets the capable act on his behalf. Even if he is eloquent and can describe all things, he does not speak for himself, but lets those skilled in argument convey his words.

The Minister’s Commentary says: If one is skilled at treating others with humility, they will be willing to serve, and people throughout the world will help.

This is called the virtue of “not contending.”

The Imperial Commentary says: The capable act on his behalf; those skilled in speech and able to describe all things convey his words.

The Minister’s Commentary says: If one is skilled at treating others with humility, they will be willing to serve, and people throughout the world will help.

This is called the virtue of “not contending.”

御注,故能者为之役。辩虽雕万物,不自说也,故辫者为之使。 臣义曰:善为之下,则人为我用,而天下助之。 是谓不争之德, 御注曰:德荡乎名,知出乎争,才全而德不形者,未尝闻其倡也,常和人而已。 臣义曰不武不怒,不争为下,是德也,非事也。 是谓用人之力, 御注曰:聪明者,竭其视听;智力者,尽其谋能,而位之者无知也。 臣义曰:收聪明,忘智力,所以尽天下之聪明智力。 是谓配天古之极。 御注曰:无为为之之谓天,不争而用人,故可以配天,可以配天则至矣,不可以有加矣,故曰古之之极。 御注曰:无为为之之谓天,不争而用人,故可以配天,可以配天则至矣,不可以有加矣,故曰古之极。极,至也。木之至者,屋极是也。 臣义曰:天道抑高而举下,能、为下不争,是谓配天。配天则与天为一,道之至也,故曰古之极。故抗兵相加,则哀者胜矣。 御注曰:圣人之用兵,救民於水火之中,取其残而已。神武不杀,而以慈为宝,故七眇天下而无不怀,义眇天下而无不畏,是谓常胜。 臣义曰:战以杀伐为尚者,兵之事也。哀而救拯之者,兵之道也。哀者常胜,仁人之用兵也,故可以不战而胜。 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之九竟 9-宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之十 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之十 登仕郎臣章安撰义 德经 吾言甚易知章第七十
Interpretation

Once De (Virtue) is stirred by a desire for fame, it becomes shallow and restless. Once knowledge arises from rivalry, it turns into cunning. I have never heard of a person whose talents and wisdom are complete, yet whose De is not displayed, who then goes out of their way to boast of themselves. They simply treat others with ease and harmony.

The minister Zhang An explains: Not showing off one’s courage, not giving way to anger, not competing for strength, and willingly taking the lower position—these express De; they are not things done deliberately.

This is called being skilled at drawing on the strength of others.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: Let those who are clever fully exercise their powers of observation and discernment, and let those with plans and abilities make full use of their strengths. The person above them, however, does not display their own cleverness.

The minister Zhang An explains: By restraining one’s own cleverness and not relying on one’s own plans, one can fully bring forth the cleverness and resourcefulness of everyone under Heaven.

This is called being in accord with the Dao (the Way). It is the highest state since ancient times.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: To follow what is natural and act without contrivance is the Dao of Heaven. By not contending and being skilled at employing others, one can be in accord with the Dao of Heaven. To be in accord with the Dao of Heaven is already to have reached the highest state, beyond which there can be no further ascent. Hence it is called “the highest state since ancient times.” “Ultimate” means the utmost point; the very top of a piece of timber is called the “roof ridge.”

The minister Zhang An explains: The Dao of Heaven restrains what is high and supports what is low. To have ability yet willingly take the lower position and refrain from contention is called being in accord with the Dao of Heaven. To be in accord with the Dao of Heaven is to become one with Heaven; this is the highest state of the Dao, so it is called “the ultimate since ancient times.” Thus, when two armies face each other and wage war, the side that acts from compassion will prevail.

Emperor Huizong of Song comments: When sages take up arms, it is to rescue the people from deep distress; they merely eliminate oppressive forces. They use divine martial power to put an end to killing and cherish compassion as a treasure. Through compassion they transform the world, and no one fails to turn toward them; through justice they make themselves known to the world, and no one fails to respect them. This is called constant victory.

The minister Zhang An explains: Making killing and conquest the foremost aim is the common practice of warfare; acting from compassion to rescue the people is the moral purpose of warfare. The side that feels compassion for the people often prevails. This is how the humane wage war, and so they can achieve victory without fighting.

吾言甚易知,甚易行,天下莫能知,莫能行。 御注曰:道炳而易见也,故载之言则甚易知要撰义 德经 吾言甚易知章第七十 吾言甚易知,甚易行,天下莫能知,莫能行。 御注曰:道炳而易见也,故载之言则甚易知要而易守也,故见之事则甚易行。孟子曰,道若大路然,岂难知哉?故道无难而天下无不能,有难不能者,不知反求诸己耳。臣义曰:圣人之言,明道析理而已,故其为教,皆本乎性命之固然,而松其蔽也,反己则得之,非难知难行 也,惟拾近图远,徇末失本,求诸在外,溺於多言,汨於多事,而莫得其宗,故莫能知,莫能行。 言有宗,事有君。 御注曰:言不胜穷也,而理为之本。事不胜应也,而道为之主。顺理而索,循道而行,天下无难矣。 臣义曰:言宗於理,得理则忘言,而理为之本。事君於道,得道则无事,而事为之末。 夫惟无知,是以不吾知也。 御注曰:小夫之知,不离乎竿牍,虽曰有知而实无知也,夫。 夫惟无知,是以不吾知也。 御注曰:小夫之知,不离乎竿牍,虽曰有知而实无知也,夫岂足以知道? 臣义曰:言之宗,事之君,且不知,人岂吾知也,知吾则知道。 知我者稀,则我贵矣。
Interpretation

My words are easy to understand and easy to put into practice, yet among all the people under Heaven, no one can truly understand them or put them into practice.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Great Dao is bright and manifest, and so is easy to see. Put into words, it is therefore easy to understand. The essentials of the Great Dao are simple and easy to hold to, so they are also easy to put into practice. Mencius said, “The Dao is like a great road—is it really so hard to know?” The Dao itself is not difficult, and there is nothing under Heaven that cannot be done. What makes it seem difficult or impossible is simply not knowing to turn back and look for the cause within oneself.

The Minister’s Commentary says: The words of the sages do no more than illuminate the Great Dao and clarify the principles of things. Their teachings are grounded in what is inherent in human nature and life, and aim to dispel confusion. Turn inward and seek, and you can understand; it is neither difficult to comprehend nor hard to put into practice. But people abandon what is near for what is far, pursue details and lose sight of the root, and seek outside themselves. They become absorbed in a profusion of words and affairs, and so cannot find the root. That is why they cannot understand or put the teachings into practice.

Words have a root; action has a guiding principle.

The Imperial Commentary says: Words are endless, but their root is principle. Affairs are inexhaustible, but the Great Dao is their guiding principle. Seek by following the principles of things, and act in accordance with the Great Dao: then nothing under Heaven will be difficult.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Words take principle as their root. Truly understand the principle, and there is no need to cling to words; the principle is the root. Action takes the Great Dao as its guide. Truly realize the Great Dao, and you can reach a state of acting without delusion; particular affairs are only details.

It is precisely because people lack true understanding that they do not understand me.

The Imperial Commentary says: Those with shallow insight know nothing beyond books and written words. Though they may seem knowledgeable, they have no true understanding—how could they know the Great Dao?

The Minister’s Commentary says: People do not even understand that words take principle as their root and action takes the Dao as its guide. How, then, could they understand me? To truly understand me is to understand the Great Dao.

Those who understand me are few; that is why I am esteemed.

御注曰:有高世之行者,见非於众,有独智之虑者,见惊於民,故有以少为贵者。 臣义曰:我道大,故知者稀,知者稀,则我贵矣。贵於道,故莫之爵,而常自贵。 是以圣人被褐怀玉。 御注曰:圣人藏於天下,而不自街常。 臣义曰:有道则不矜於外,而退藏於密。 知不知章第七十一 知不知,尚矣。 御注曰:至道之精,窈窈冥冥,至道之极,昏昏默默。知之外矣,不知内矣,知之浅矣,不知深矣。知曰不知,是谓真知道之至也,故曰尚矣。臣义曰:介然有知,道之失也,复乎无知,其知尚矣。 不知知,病矣。 御注曰:不知至道之精,而知。知曰不知,是谓真知道之至也,故曰尚矣。臣义曰:介然有知,道之失也,复乎无知,其知尚矣。 不知知,病矣。 御注曰:不知至道之精,而知事物之粗,不知至道之极,而知事物之末,方且为绪使,方且为物纹,而日趋於忧患之涂,故病。 臣义曰:不知道,而自以为知,所知者事物之在外者尔。以其妄见而为真知,其病大矣。 夫唯病病,是以不病。 御注曰:知其愚者,非大愚也。知其惑者,非大惑也。大惑者,终身不解,大愚者,终身不灵。 臣义曰:病而不知其病,其病不可治,惟知其病,故不病。
Interpretation

Actions that rise above worldly convention often draw criticism from others; thoughts that are distinctive often astonish the people. For this reason, some regard what is rare and seldom seen as precious.

The minister explains: Our Dao (the Way) is vast and boundless, so very few truly understand it. Because few understand it, it appears precious. What is precious is the Dao itself; it does not depend on rank or title to make it noble. Its dignity is inherent.

Thus, the sage wears coarse cloth, yet keeps jade within. “Keeping jade within” is a metaphor for the sage’s inner Virtue (De) and wisdom.

The imperial commentary says: The sage lives quietly among the people, neither showing off nor making a display of fame.

The minister explains: A person of the Dao does not boast of outward appearances, but withdraws into a quiet and secluded place.

Chapter 71: Knowing That You Do Not Know

Knowing that there is something you do not know is wisdom.

The imperial commentary says: The subtlety of the utmost Dao lies deep in darkness, while its ultimate reaches are utterly still and unformed. Ordinary knowledge can grasp only its exterior, never penetrate its inner depths. Such understanding is shallow, while what it cannot comprehend is profound. To know that ordinary knowledge cannot fully understand the utmost Dao is to truly understand its ultimate nature; that is why this is called wisdom.

The minister explains: When the mind clings to some fixed understanding, it departs from the Dao. Only by returning to a state free of attachment to distinctions of knowledge can one be considered wise.

Not knowing that there is something you do not know, yet believing that you know, is a flaw.

The imperial commentary says: Not understanding the subtlety of the utmost Dao, yet believing that you do…

The minister explains: When the mind clings to some fixed understanding, it departs from the Dao. Only by returning to a state free of attachment to distinctions of knowledge can one be considered wise.

Not knowing that there is something you do not know, yet believing that you know, is a flaw.

The imperial commentary says: Those who do not understand the subtlety of the utmost Dao know only what is coarse and shallow; those who do not understand its ultimate reaches know only the branches and outermost details of things. Such people are led along by tangled affairs and entangled by external things, moving day by day toward a path of anxiety and trouble. That is why this is a flaw.

The minister explains: Not understanding the Dao, yet believing you understand it, means knowing only external things. To mistake false understanding for true knowledge is a serious flaw.

Only by recognizing a flaw as a flaw can one avoid being trapped by it.

The imperial commentary says: One who knows that they are ignorant is not utterly ignorant; one who knows that they are confused is not utterly confused. Those who are truly confused never awaken throughout their lives; those who are truly ignorant never gain insight.

The minister explains: If you have a flaw but do not know you have it, it is difficult to remedy. Only by recognizing your flaw can you avoid being trapped by it.

圣人之不病,以其病病,是以不病。 御注曰:圣人素逝而耻通於事,立本而知通於神,有真知也。而常若不知,是以不病。 臣可治,惟知其病,故不病。 圣人之不病,以其病病,是以不病。 御注曰:圣人素逝而耻通於事,立本而知通於神,有真知也。而常若不知,是以不病。 臣义曰:圣人之不病,真知也。以知为病,常若不知,故不病。 民不畏威章第七十二 民不畏威,则大威至矣。 御注曰:小人以小恶为无伤,而弗去也。故恶积而不可排,《易》曰荷校灭耳,凶。 臣义曰:民以不畏,故卒陷於祸患。 无狭其所居, 御注曰:居者,性之宅,人之性至大不可围,而曲故恶积而不可排,《易》曰荷校灭耳,凶。 臣义曰:民以不畏,故卒陷於祸患。 无狭其所居, 御注曰:居者,性之宅,人之性至大不可围,而曲士不可以语於道者,狭其所居故也。扩而充之,则充满天地,包裹六极,无自而不可,《孟子》曰:居天下之广居。 臣义曰:性宅为天下之广居,日与物伪接构,柴塞而敝於一曲,居之所以狭也。 无厌其所生。
Interpretation

The sage has no troubles because he regards “knowing” itself as a failing to be guarded against. He remains in a state as if he knew nothing, and so has no troubles.

The Imperial Commentary says: The sage follows nature and does not prize mastery of worldly affairs. He establishes the root and understands that principle can reach the divine; this is true wisdom. Yet in daily life he still appears not to know, and so is not troubled.

Minister Kezhi says: The sage has no troubles precisely because he possesses true wisdom. He regards the belief that one knows as a failing, and often maintains an attitude as if he knew nothing. Thus he has no troubles.

The People Do Not Fear Authority (Chapter 72)

When the people do not fear authority, severe calamity will befall them.

The Imperial Commentary says: Petty people treat small evils as insignificant and refuse to rid themselves of them. Their wrongdoing therefore accumulates until it can no longer be undone. The Book of Changes says that wearing stocks and suffering injury to the ears is an ominous sign.

Minister Yi says: Because the people fear nothing, they will ultimately fall into calamity.

Do not make the place where you dwell cramped.

The Imperial Commentary says: A dwelling is where one’s nature comes to rest. Human nature is vast and boundless and should not be constrained. Those of narrow understanding cannot speak of the Dao because they have made the dwelling of their own heart and nature cramped. If one can expand and enrich one’s nature, it can fill Heaven and Earth and encompass the Six Directions (above, below, and the four quarters); there is nowhere it cannot contain. The Mencius says, “Dwell in the broadest abode under Heaven.”

Minister Yi says: The dwelling of one’s nature is the broadest abode under Heaven. People entangle themselves day after day with external things and falsehoods, and their hearts and nature become blocked and obscured, confined to a corner. That is why their dwelling becomes cramped.

Do not despise your own life.

御注曰:生者,气之聚,人之生通乎物之所造,而厌其所生者,旦昼之所为,有梏亡之矣。桔之反复,则夜气不足以存彼,保合太和,而无中道夭者,无厌其所生故也。 臣义曰:人生於道,本实一政,不迁於物,则通物所造。性以情动,反复,则夜气不足以存彼,保合太和,而无中道夭者,无厌其所生故也。 臣义曰:人生於道,本实一政,不迁於物,则通物所造。性以情动,情随物迁,故气丧神敝,精亏形去,而生不自保,厌其所生而不知也。抱一反朴,全精体神,至於与道长久,可谓无厌其生。 夫惟不厌,是以不厌。 御注曰:祸福无不自己求之者。 臣义曰:不厌其生,故其生不厌。 是以圣人自知不自见,自爱不自贵。故去彼取此。 御注曰:圣人有自知之明,而不自见,以矜其能。有自爱之仁,而不自贵以临物。若是者,处物不伤物,物莫之能伤也。方且。 御注曰:圣人有自知之明,而不自见,以矜其能。有自爱之仁,而不自贵以临物。若是者,处物不伤物,物莫之能伤也。方且乐天而无忧,何威怒之足畏乎?圣人之所去取,抑可见矣。
Interpretation

Life is formed through the gathering of Qi (vital energy). Human life shares its origins with the birth and growth of all things. If people become weary of their own lives, what they do during the day will deplete them and bind their minds and spirits. When this happens repeatedly, the primordial Qi that nourishes life at night becomes insufficient. To preserve primordial Qi, maintain harmony between Yin and Yang, and avoid dying before one’s time is possible precisely because one does not grow weary of one’s life.

An explanation by a minister: Human life comes from the Dao (the Way), and at its root is one with it. When we are not pulled along by external things, we can share in the birth and growth of all things. Human nature is stirred by emotions, and emotions change in response to external things. As a result, primordial Qi dissipates, the spirit weakens, Jing (essence) and Qi are depleted, and the body declines. Life then becomes difficult to preserve, though people do not realize that they are growing weary of it. Only by holding fast to unity and returning to simplicity, preserving Jing and Qi and nurturing the spirit until one abides with the Dao for a long time, can one be said not to grow weary of life.

Precisely because one does not grow weary of life, life will not become wearisome.

A commentary says: Calamity and good fortune are always brought upon oneself.

An explanation by a minister: Because one does not grow weary of one’s life, life will not become wearisome.

Therefore, the Sage knows himself but does not make a show of himself; he cherishes himself but does not exalt himself. So he lets go of one side and chooses the other.

A commentary says: The Sage knows himself but does not flaunt his abilities. He cherishes himself but does not claim nobility or place himself above all things. Such a person lives among external things without harming them, and they cannot harm him. He follows nature and is content to dwell in peace, so he has no worries. What power or anger, then, is there to fear? The reason the Sage lets go of one side and chooses the other can thus be understood.

臣义曰:圣人神全於己,固自知也。不自见者,不有己以矜人。道在於我,固自爱也。不自贵者,物我且忘矣,我何贵於物哉。狭其所居,厌其所生,自见自贵,所谓彼也,反之所谓此也。 勇於敢则杀章第七十三 勇於敢则杀,勇於不敢则活。 御注曰:刚强者,死之徒。柔弱者,生之徒。勇於敢者,能勇而已。能勇而不能怯,非成材也,适足以杀其躯而已。故子路:刚强者,死之徒。柔弱者,生之徒。勇於敢者,能勇而已。能勇而不能怯,非成材也,适足以杀其躯而已。故子路好勇,孔子以谓无所取材。勇於不敢,则知所以持后。持后者处先之道也。《列子》曰,天下有常然之道,曰柔。 臣义曰:能勇者失於暴,故其性.残忍,而视人如草管,故其事还以杀。持后者不轻敌,故其性仁爱,而视民如伤,故其事还以活。 此两者,或利或害。 御注曰:有所正者,有所差。有所拂者,有所宜。 臣义曰:勇於杀,用兵之事也。勇於不敢,用兵之道也。道之与事,或利或害,概可见矣。然奇变无常,故於正而有所差,於拂而有所宜。 天之所恶,孰知其故? 御注曰:畸於人者,伴於天。人之所利,天之所恶。人孰从而知之? 臣义曰变无常,故於正而有所差,於拂而有所宜。
Interpretation

I explain: The sage’s spirit is complete within, so the sage naturally understands themself. “Does not display themself” means not relying on oneself to boast before others. The Dao is present within me, so I naturally cherish myself. “Does not regard themself as noble” means that self and things can both be forgotten: what reason would I have to think myself nobler than all things? To consider one’s dwelling narrow and reject the life one possesses is an attitude of displaying oneself and regarding oneself as noble. Its opposite is the attitude of “not displaying oneself and not esteeming oneself.”

Chapter Seventy-Three: “Daring to Act Boldly Leads to Death”

To force one’s way ahead through sheer boldness invites death. The courage to hold back and refrain from acting rashly, by contrast, can preserve life.

The Imperial Commentary says: The strong belong to the category that tends toward death; the weak belong to the category that tends toward life. Those who boldly press ahead know only how to be fierce, not when to yield. This is not true ability; it can instead bring about their own ruin. Thus Zilu, a disciple of Confucius, delighted in boasting of his courage, and Confucius said that he lacked qualities worth valuing. Those who have the courage not to act rashly understand how to put themselves last. Being able to take the rear is precisely the way to move to the fore. The Liezi says that among the constant principles of the world is softness.

I explain: To know only how to be fierce easily leads to brutality and a cruel disposition, treating others as though they were mere weeds. As a result, one’s actions often end in killing. Those who know how to take the rear do not underestimate their opponents. They are benevolent in disposition and take the people’s safety to heart, so their actions often preserve life.

Of these two ways of acting, one may be beneficial and the other harmful.

The Imperial Commentary says: To hold to something may lead to error; to go against something may, in turn, prove fitting.

I explain: Boldness that kills is a specific tactic of warfare; the courage to hold back and refrain from rash action is the principle of warfare. Their benefits and harms can be seen from this. Yet circumstances change without any fixed pattern, so a course of action that seems proper may go awry, while one that seems to go against the norm may prove fitting.

What Heaven abhors—who can know the reason for it?

The Imperial Commentary says: Those who differ from worldly convention may perhaps accord with the Dao of Heaven. What people regard as beneficial, Heaven may abhor. Who can know Heaven’s intent with certainty?

I explain: Circumstances change without any fixed pattern, so a course of action that seems proper may go awry, while one that seems to go against the norm may prove fitting.

天之所恶,孰知其故? 御注曰:畸於人者,伴於天。人之所利,天之所恶。人孰从而知之? 臣义曰:勇於敢杀,人之所利也,天之所恶者,天之德好生故也。人之所利,而不知天之所恶,故曰孰知其故。 是以圣人犹难之。 御注曰:顺天者存,逆天者亡,虽圣人不敢易也。 臣义曰:禹征三苗而听益之赞,其难如此,故圣人要乎顺天而不敢易。 天之道,不争而善胜, 御注曰:万物之出,与之出而不辞,万物之归,与之归而不逢。是谓不争。消息满虚,物之与俱,而万物之多,皆所受命,是谓不争而善胜而善胜, 御注曰:万物之出,与之出而不辞,万物之归,与之归而不逢。是谓不争。消息满虚,物之与俱,而万物之多,皆所受命,是谓不争而善胜。 臣义曰:万物之生也,任其所自生。万物之杀也,听其所自杀,无事於争也。万物冒於天之覆被而受命焉,善胜至矣。 不言而善应, 御注曰:天何言哉?变以雷风,示以福祸,无毫厘之差,有影响之应。 臣义曰:作善降祥,作不善降殃,善恶之应,无毫厘差不,善应如此。不召而自来。 御注曰:有所受命,则出命者能召之矣。万物之纷错,而天有以制其命,孰得而召之?健行不息,任一气之自运而已。
Interpretation

Who can know why Heaven loathes what it loathes?

The Imperial Commentary says: Those who seek what differs from what ordinary people desire often accord with the Dao of Heaven. What people regard as beneficial may be precisely what Heaven loathes. Who can judge Heaven’s will by following human likes and dislikes?

The Minister’s Commentary says: The use of force and killing is what people regard as beneficial. Heaven, however, loathes killing, because Heaven’s De (Virtue) cherishes the nurturing of life. People see only the benefits before them and do not know what Heaven loathes. Hence the question: “Who can know why?”

Therefore, even the sage treats Heaven’s will with care and does not dare take it lightly.

The Imperial Commentary says: Those who follow the Dao of Heaven are preserved; those who go against it move toward ruin. Even the sage dares not alter this principle.

The Minister’s Commentary says: When Yu set out against the Three Miao, he heeded Yi’s counsel and acted with such caution. This shows how difficult the matter was. Thus the sage strives to accord with the Dao of Heaven and dares not defy it on his own.

The Dao of Heaven does not contend with the myriad things, yet is skilled at bringing them into accord.

The Imperial Commentary says: When the myriad things come into being, the Dao of Heaven lets them grow without pushing them away. When they pass into extinction, it follows their transformations without obstructing them. This is called “not contending.” The myriad things wax and wane, become full and empty; the Dao of Heaven moves along with their changes. Though the myriad things are many, they all receive Heaven’s mandate. This is how, without contending, it can bring them into accord.

The Minister’s Commentary says: As the myriad things grow, they are allowed to grow naturally; as they perish, they are allowed to perish naturally. The Dao of Heaven need not contend with them. All things receive Heaven’s protection and its mandate. This is how the Dao of Heaven is skilled at bringing them into accord.

The Dao of Heaven does not speak, yet responds aptly to the myriad things.

The Imperial Commentary says: What has Heaven ever said? It reveals signs through the changing patterns of thunder and lightning, wind and rain, and makes outcomes known through good fortune and calamity. Its responses are exact, like a shadow following its form.

The Minister’s Commentary says: Good deeds bring good fortune, while evil deeds invite calamity; the consequences that correspond to good and evil are exact to the smallest measure. Such a response needs no summons; it comes of itself.

The Imperial Commentary says: Since the myriad things all receive Heaven’s mandate, does Heaven, which issues that mandate, really need anyone to summon it? The myriad things are intricately interwoven, and Heaven has its own way of arranging their destinies. Heaven moves with unceasing vigor; it simply allows a single Qi to flow naturally.

臣义曰:召而至者,臣子之义。天制万物之命,尊之至也,其孰能召?一气自运,其命,孰得而召之?健行不息,任一气之自运而已。 臣义曰:召而至者,臣子之义。天制万物之命,尊之至也,其孰能召?一气自运,固非使然。 坦然而善谋。 御注曰:德行恒易以知险。 臣义曰:恒易故坦然,知险故善谋。 天网恢恢,疏而不失。 御注曰:密而有间,人所为也,天则虽疏而无间。积善积恶,殃庆各以其类至,所以为不失。且争而后胜,言而后应者,人也。天则不争而善胜,不言而善应,召之则至。难於知天者,人也。天则不召而自来,坦然而善谋,惟圣人为能体此,故不就利,不违害,常利而无害,所以与天合德,异夫勇於敢者。 臣义曰:天之覆物,不以善恶为间,广博无际,恢恢然孰知其极也。祸福灾祥,各以类至,虽迟速特未定,然报应无有免者,故曰不失。 民常不田界章者。 臣义曰:天之覆物,不以善恶为间,广博无际,恢恢然孰知其极也。祸福灾祥,各以类至,虽迟速特未定,然报应无有免者,故曰不失。 民常不田界章第七十四 民常不畏死,奈何以死惧之?
Interpretation

A subject goes when summoned; this is a subject’s duty. Heaven governs the fate of all things and holds the highest position. Who can summon Heaven? The primordial Qi between Heaven and Earth moves of its own accord. Who could command Heaven’s destiny to change? Heaven’s movement is vigorous and never ceases; it simply lets the Qi run its natural course.

A calm and open state of mind makes one skilled at planning.

The Imperial Commentary says: By remaining in what is level and easy, one can recognize danger.

The subject’s explanation says: Keeping to what is level and easy allows one to be open and at ease; recognizing danger makes one skilled at planning.

Heaven’s net is vast and boundless. It looks loosely woven, yet nothing slips through.

The Imperial Commentary says: A net woven tightly but with gaps is a human arrangement. Heaven’s net may look wide and loose, but it has no real gaps. When good or evil deeds accumulate to a certain extent, blessings or calamities arrive according to their kind; thus Heaven’s net leaves nothing out. To win only after fighting, or to receive a response only after speaking, is the human way. Heaven does not contend, yet excels at winning; it does not speak, yet brings a response. When people summon it, it arrives. People find Heaven’s Way hard to understand, yet Heaven’s Way arrives naturally, without being summoned. To be open and at ease while also skilled at planning is a state only a sage can embody. Thus the sage neither pursues profit nor flees calamity, and remains at all times in a position of benefit without harm. In this way, the sage accords with the virtue of Heaven’s Way, unlike those who force their way forward.

The subject’s explanation says: Heaven’s Way covers all things and shows no favor to good or evil. It is vast and boundless; who can know its limits? Calamities and blessings, omens of disaster and signs of good fortune, all arrive according to their kind. Though the time of their fulfillment is uncertain, retribution ultimately leaves nothing out; hence the words “nothing slips through.”

Regarding the phrase “the people ordinarily do not fear death,” the subject’s explanation says: Heaven’s Way covers all things and shows no favor to good or evil. It is vast and boundless; who can know its limits? Calamities and blessings, omens of disaster and signs of good fortune, all arrive according to their kind. Though the time of their fulfillment is uncertain, retribution ultimately leaves nothing out; hence the words “nothing slips through.”

Chapter Seventy-Four: The people ordinarily do not fear death. How, then, can they be frightened with death?

御注曰:民有常心,其生可乐。苟无常心,何死之畏?釿锯制焉,绳墨杀焉,椎凿决焉,是谓以死惧之,民将抵冒而终不化。 臣义曰:民忘其所自爱,失其全生之理,俗雕民弊,抵法冒禁,至於六亲不得相保,困於涂炭,瘠於沟壑,虽生曾不若死之为愈其全生之理,俗雕民弊,抵法冒禁,至於六亲不得相保,困於涂炭,瘠於沟壑,虽生曾不若死之为愈,此死之不畏也。上不以道治,至於民不畏死,而犹将以死惧之,期底於治,不亦难乎。 若使民常畏死而为奇者,吾岂执而杀之,孰敢? 御注曰:天下乐其生而重犯法矣,然后奇言者有诛,异行者有禁。苟卿所谓犯治之罪,固重也。 臣义曰:民知生之可乐,则知死之可畏,畏死则重犯法。 常有司杀者杀,而代司杀者杀,是代大匠斲。 御注曰:上必无为而用天下,下必有为而为天下用,不易之道也。代司杀者杀,代大匠斲,是上与下同德,倒道而言,逢道而说,人之所治也,安能治人?文王罔攸兼於庶言 庶狱庶慎,惟有司之牧夫为是故也。
Interpretation

Emperor Huizong of the Song commented: If the people can settle into an ordinary life, they will feel that living is worth enjoying. If they lose that security, what kind of death could they still fear? Sawing people apart, executing them after marking out the line with an ink cord, or killing them with a hammer and chisel—these are all ways of using death to frighten the people. Yet the people will still risk death to break the law, and in the end, the threat will not change them.

A minister explains: The people have forgotten to cherish themselves and lost the means of preserving their lives. As social conditions worsen and the people fall into hardship, they break the law and defy prohibitions, until even family members can no longer protect one another. They live amid suffering, so emaciated that they collapse in ditches. A life like this is worse than death. That is what it means to say the people do not fear death: their lives have become so miserable. When rulers fail to act in accordance with the Dao (the Way), driving the people to the point where they do not even fear death, yet still hope to frighten them with executions and thereby bring about good governance, is that not a difficult task?

If the people always fear death, and someone nonetheless insists on doing something contrary to the norm, must I seize and kill him? Who would dare do such a thing?

Emperor Huizong of the Song commented: When the people throughout the realm take pleasure in living, they will naturally weigh the consequences of breaking the law. Only then can those who speak strange doctrines be punished and abnormal conduct prohibited. The offense of violating the law, as Xun Qing (that is, Xunzi) described it, was already a grave one.

A minister explains: When the people know that living is worth enjoying, they will know that death is frightening. Once they fear death, they will naturally weigh the consequences of breaking the law.

Ordinarily, officials specifically charged with executions carry them out. To kill someone in place of those responsible for executions is like taking an axe in place of a master carpenter and cutting wood.

Emperor Huizong of the Song commented: The ruler above should practice Wuwei (non-action), allowing people throughout the realm to fulfill their own duties. Those below, the ministers and subjects, should act and serve the realm. This principle cannot be changed. If a ruler kills in place of the officials responsible for executions, it is like taking an axe in place of a master carpenter. In doing so, he confuses the duties of those above and below and violates the constant Way. The ruler then becomes someone governed by others; how can he still govern them? The Book of Documents says that King Wen did not take all affairs of government, criminal cases, and matters requiring careful attention into his own hands, but left them to the officials and local administrators in charge. That is precisely the principle.

A minister explains: Wuwei is the ruler’s duty; active service is the minister’s duty. The ruler is honored and the minister is subordinate, and each has a distinct role. If the ruler takes over another’s responsibilities, he violates the constant Way and ends up being governed by others. How, then, can he govern them? The Book of Documents says that King Wen did not take all affairs of government, criminal cases, and matters requiring careful attention into his own hands, but left them to the officials and local administrators in charge. That is precisely the principle.

臣义曰:无为者君道,有为者臣道,君尊臣卑,逢道而说,人之所治也,安能治人?文王罔攸兼於庶言 庶狱庶慎,惟有司之牧夫为是故也。 臣义曰:无为者君道,有为者臣道,君尊臣卑,上下之分有常而不紊。君仰成於下,臣服勤以恭上,故大治也。国有常刑,司杀者杀,苟代其杀,则杀不以典,非当刑也。是代大匠斲,反所自伤尔。 夫代大匠斲,希有不伤其手矣。 御注曰:代斲且不免於伤,况代杀乎?此古之人所以贵夫无为也。无为也,则任事者责矣。 臣义曰:非其所任而任之,斯失矣。大匠以斧斤为用也,代之必伤无为也,则任事者责矣。 臣义曰:非其所任而任之,斯失矣。大匠以斧斤为用也,代之必伤其手。司杀以刑戮为事也,代之则刑斯滥矣。所以伤民也,民伤乃所自伤。 民之饥章第七十五 民之饥,以其上食税之多也,是以饥。 御注曰:赋重则田莱多荒,民不足於食。 臣义曰:五谷,民恃之以生,而赋於上也,为多,故民食不足。 民之难治,以其上之有为也,是以难治。 御注曰:政烦则奸伪滋起,民失其朴。 臣义曰:上有为益烦,则民应之益巧,所以难治。 人之轻死,以其生生之厚也,是以轻死。 御注曰:矜生大厚,则欲利甚动,放僻邪侈,无不为已。 臣义曰:矜生厚则求欲无已,伤生而不自爱也。 唯无以生为者,之厚也,是以轻死。
Interpretation

I hold that "non-action" (wuwei) is the principle the ruler should follow, while active doing (youwei) is the duty that ministers should bear. The ruler is honored and the ministers are humbled, and each has a fixed sphere of responsibility that must not be confused. The ruler relies on ministers to accomplish affairs of state, and the ministers, by devoting themselves to their work and respectfully assisting the ruler, allow the state to be well governed.

The state establishes fixed penal law, and those charged with executing capital punishment carry it out. If someone oversteps their office and takes over this killing, the taking of life falls outside the law, and those punished may not receive sentences that fit their crimes. This is like wielding the axe in place of a master carpenter, which is more likely to injure oneself.

Few who take the place of a master carpenter at cutting wood avoid injuring their own hands.

The imperial commentary says: If one who substitutes for the carpenter at cutting wood cannot avoid injury, how much more so one who oversteps his office to carry out executions? For this reason the ancients valued non-action. When the ruler practices non-action, those who handle concrete affairs can each bear their own responsibility.

I hold that to do what is not one's own duty is to neglect one's office. A carpenter works with axe and chisel, and if someone else takes over the work, the hand is likely to be hurt. Those who govern punishment are responsible for administering the penalties, and if others take their place, the penalties may be abused and the common people harmed. When the common people are harmed, in the end this harms oneself as well.

The Chapter on the Hungry People (Chapter 75)

The people go hungry because those above them take too much in taxes, so the common folk do not have enough to eat.

The imperial commentary says: When taxes are heavy, many fields are left uncultivated, and the people therefore lack grain.

I hold that the common people rely on the five grains for sustenance. When those above take too much, the people's food supply will be insufficient.

The people are hard to govern because those above them issue too many commands and interfere too much, so the popular mood becomes cunning and crafty, and governance becomes difficult.

The imperial commentary says: When affairs of state are complicated, deceitful and hypocritical conduct increases, and the people lose their simplicity.

I hold that the more those above interfere and the more numerous their commands, the more cunning the people become in responding to them, and therefore the harder they are to govern.

People take death lightly because they overvalue the enjoyment of life, and so in the end they do not cherish their lives.

The imperial commentary says: Placing too much value on enjoyment drives people to pursue profit intensely, indulge themselves, and commit depraved and extravagant acts, doing whatever they might do.

I hold that when one craves the enjoyments of life excessively, desire has no limit. Such people harm their own lives and do not cherish themselves.

Only those who do not place excessive importance on nourishing life and enjoyment, and who do not single-mindedly chase their desires, will not take life lightly.

御注曰:矜生大厚,则欲利甚动,放僻邪侈,无不为已。 臣义曰:矜生厚则求欲无已,伤生而不自爱也。 唯无以生为者,是贤於贵生也。 御注曰:《庄子》曰:达生之情者,不务生之所无以为。无以生为者,不务生之所无以为。弃事而遗生故也。弃事则形不劳,遗生则精不亏,形全精复,与天为一,所以贤於贵生。贵生则异於轻死,遗生则贤於贵生。推所以善吾生者,而施之於民,则薄税敛,简刑罚,家给人足,画衣冠,异章服,而民不犯,帝王之极功也。 臣义曰:无以生所以善吾生者,而施之於民,则薄税敛,简刑罚,家给人足,画衣冠,异章服,而民不犯,帝王之极功也。 臣义曰:无以生为者,任理之自尔。非务有为於生也,盖不有其生,则其生常全,形不劳於事,精不亏其全,故也。贵生贤於轻死尔,知生之可贵,曾不知所以全生之为本也。 人之生章第七十六 人之生也柔弱,其死也坚强。草木之生也柔脆,其死也枯槁。故坚强者死之徒,柔弱者生之徒也。 御注曰:万物负阴而抱阳,冲气以为和,阳以发生为德,阴以肃杀为事。方其肃杀,则冲和丧矣。故曰坚强者死之徒,柔弱者生之徒。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary (Yuzhu) and the subordinate's explanation (chenxia jieshuo) are rendered below as headings-free passages, with the chapter heading kept as the original's section title.

Excessive cherishing of life and an overly heavy emphasis on nourishing it lead one to pursue desires with great intensity. Conduct becomes dissolute and deviant, extravagant and unrestrained, and one will stop at nothing.

The subordinate's explanation: To value life excessively is to pursue desires without end, which harms the self, yet one fails to understand how to truly cherish oneself.

Only by not treating nourishing life (yangsheng) as a deliberate goal is one superior to those who simply cherish life above all.

The Imperial Commentary quotes the Zhuangzi: One who understands the nature of life does not pursue what is unnecessary to life. Not deliberately seeking to nourish life is because one can set aside affairs and does not treat life as an object of attachment. When affairs are set aside, the body does not grow weary; when attachment to life is forgotten, the spirit is not harmed. When the body is preserved and the spirit is restored to fullness, one can become one with the Dao (the Way) of Heaven, and therefore this is superior to simply cherishing life. Valuing life is better than despising death, but forgetting one's attachment to life is better still than valuing it. To apply this principle of preserving life to the governance of the common people is to lighten taxes and simplify punishments, so that every household has sufficient provisions and everyone has enough food and clothing. Clarifying the ranks of official caps and garments means the common people will not transgress the rites. This is the highest achievement that a sovereign's governance can reach.

The subordinate's explanation: "Not deliberately seeking to nourish life" means following the natural principle of things and not acting deliberately for the sake of life. Because one is not attached to one's own life, life is often preserved; the body is not worn down by affairs, and the spirit suffers no depletion. Therefore, understanding that life is precious is indeed superior to despising death, but if one does not know that following what is natural and preserving life is fundamental, one has not yet grasped the Way of nourishing life.

Chapter 76: On Human Life

When a person is alive, the body is soft; after death, it becomes stiff. When grass and trees are growing, they are tender; once withered, they become dry and hard. Therefore, the hard and unyielding belong to the category of death, while the soft, weak, and yielding belong to the category of life.

The Imperial Commentary says: All things carry Yin qi (vital energy of Yin) on their backs and embrace Yang qi, and when the Yin and Yang qi blend, they form harmony. The function of Yang qi is to make things grow, while the function of Yin qi is to make things wither. When Yin qi reaches its season of withering, the harmonizing qi of Yin and Yang disappears. Therefore it is said that the hard and unyielding belong to death, and the soft, weak, and yielding belong to life.

臣义曰:柔弱道之用,故为生之徒。强粱者不得其死,故为死之徒。死则冲和丧而反生理,故坚强。 是以兵强则不胜, 御注曰:抗兵相加,则哀者胜矣。 臣义曰:以强为胜,必有之徒。强粱者不得其死,故为死之徒。死则冲和丧而反生理,故坚强。 是以兵强则不胜, 御注曰:抗兵相加,则哀者胜矣。 臣义曰:以强为胜,必有胜之者矣。木强则共。 御注曰:拱把之桐梓,人皆知养之,强则伐而共之矣。 臣义曰:木强则伐。 故坚强居下,柔弱处上。 御注曰:柔之胜刚,弱之胜强,老氏之道术有在於是。《庄子》曰,以懦弱谦下为表。 臣义曰:老氏以柔弱为本,道术之妙,在是也。 天之道章第七十七 天之道,其犹张弓乎?高者抑之,下者举之,有余者损之,不足者补之。 御注曰:道无益损,物有盈虚,注焉而不满,酌焉而不竭者,圣人之所保也。降而在物,则天地盈虚,与时消息,而况於人乎?天之道以中为至,故高者抑之,不至於有余。下者举之,不至於不足盈虚,与时消息,而况於人乎?天之道以中为至,故高者抑之,不至於有余。下者举之,不至於不足。将来者进,成功者退,四时运行,各得其序。
Interpretation

Chapter 77: The Way of Heaven

Minister Yi says: Softness and weakness are the means by which the Dao (Dào) takes effect, and so they belong to the side of life. Those who are forceful and domineering often do not come to a good end, so they belong to the side of death. To move toward death is to lose the harmonious Qi (Qì) and to go against the normal course of life, until one becomes rigid and unyielding.

Therefore, one who relies on force in warfare cannot win.

The Imperial Annotation says: When two armies meet in battle, the side that is grieved in its heart is the one that is able to win.

Minister Yi says: Those who rely on force to prevail will certainly meet someone who can overcome them. Those who are forceful often do not come to a good end, so they belong to the side of death. To move toward death is to lose the harmonious Qi and to go against the normal course of life, until one becomes rigid and unyielding.

Therefore, one who relies on force in warfare cannot win.

The Imperial Annotation says: When two armies meet in battle, the side that is grieved in its heart is the one that is able to win.

Minister Yi says: Those who contend by strength will certainly be surpassed by someone. A tree that grows thick and hard will be cut down.

The Imperial Annotation says: Paulownia and catalpa trees a handful or so in girth are all valued and carefully nurtured by everyone. Yet once they grow thick and hard, they too will be felled.

Minister Yi says: A tree that is hard and strong will be cut down.

Thus, what is hard and strong dwells in a lower position, while what is soft and weak comes to occupy the higher one.

The Imperial Annotation says: Softness can overcome hardness, and weakness can overcome strength. The subtle principle of Laozi's Dao-art lies precisely here. The Zhuangzi says that gentleness, humility, and dwelling below are to be taken as the outward standard.

Minister Yi says: Laozi takes softness and weakness as the foundation, and the mystery of his Dao-art lies precisely here.

Chapter 77: The Way of Heaven

Is not the Way of Heaven like the drawing of a bow? The upper end of the string is pressed down, and the lower end is raised up. What is excess is reduced, and what is insufficient is supplemented.

The Imperial Annotation says: The Dao (Dào) itself has no increase or decrease, yet the myriad things have fullness and emptiness. Pour into it and it never overflows; draw from it and it never runs dry. This is the principle that the sage holds fast to. When the Dao is realized within the myriad things, it appears as heaven and earth having fullness and emptiness, waxing and waning with the seasons. How much more so is this true of human beings? The Way of Heaven takes the middle as its highest standard. What is high is pressed down so that it does not become excessive; what is low is raised up so that it does not become deficient. What is about to arrive is advanced, and what has already succeeded withdraws behind. The four seasons move on, each following its proper order.

臣义曰:益损盈虚,迭运迭旋,皆反於极,本乎自然也。高者有余者,皆盈益者也,故必抑必损。下者不足者,皆损虚也,故必举叉补。皆自然之理,故天之道其犹张弓,必薪乎得中而后已。 天之道,损有余补不足。 御注曰:满招损,谦得益,时乃天道。 臣义曰:恶盈也,故损有余,好谦也,故补不足。 人之道则不然,损不足以奉有余。 御注曰:人心排下而进上,虐荣独而畏高明。 臣义曰:凌其不足而损之,求为己之益,畏其有余而奉之,求为己之悦。 孰能损有余而奉不足於天下人心排下而进上,虐荣独而畏高明。 臣义曰:凌其不足而损之,求为己之益,畏其有余而奉之,求为己之悦。 孰能损有余而奉不足於天下者,其唯道乎? 御注曰:不虐荣独,而罄者与之。不畏高明,而饶者损之,非有道者不 臣义曰:罄者与之,使无不足之累。饶者损之,使无过满之灾,唯道为能 是以圣人为而不恃,功成不居,其不欲见贤耶。 御注曰:不恃其为,故无自伐之心。不居其功,故无自满之志。人皆饰智,己独若愚,人皆求胜,己独曲全,惟不欲见贤也,故常无损,得天之道。
Interpretation

Fullness and deficiency alternate and cycle, and when a thing reaches its extreme it turns into its opposite. This is simply the natural order. What rises above the norm and has surplus is excess, so it must be restrained and reduced. What is low and lacking is depleted and empty, so it must be supported and made up. This is all natural principle. Therefore the Dao of Heaven (Tiandao) is like drawing a bow: when the string rises too high it is pressed down, and when it sits too low it is raised, until balance is reached.

The Dao of Heaven reduces what is excessive and supplements what is insufficient.

The Imperial Commentary says: arrogance and self-satisfaction invite loss, while humility brings benefit. This is the Dao of Heaven.

Minister Yi's commentary says: the Dao of Heaven dislikes fullness, so it reduces the excess, and it loves humility, so it supplements the insufficient.

Human conduct, however, is not like this. People often take from those who lack and offer it to those who already have more.

The Imperial Commentary says: people's hearts tend to shun those of low standing and to exalt those of high rank. They bully those who stand alone without help, yet they fear the noble and powerful.

Minister Yi's commentary says: they oppress those who are already lacking, diminishing them further to serve their own gain. And they fear the wealthy and powerful, offering them tribute and flattery to win their favor.

Who in the world can reduce what is excessive and supplement what is insufficient? Perhaps only the Dao can do so.

The Imperial Commentary says: one does not bully those who stand alone without help but shares one's goods with them, and one does not fear the noble and powerful but cuts away the surplus of the rich. Only one who possesses the Dao can do this.

Minister Yi's commentary says: one gives things to the destitute so they no longer suffer want, and cuts away the excess of the wealthy so they are spared the disasters that fullness brings. Only the Dao can accomplish this.

Therefore, the sage acts without claiming his actions as his own, and accomplishes merit without dwelling on it. Is this because he does not wish to appear more worthy than others?

The Imperial Commentary says: by not claiming his actions as his own, he has no mind of self-display, and by not occupying merit, he has no sense of self-satisfaction. Others flaunt their cleverness while he seems dull. Others compete to prevail while he yields and accepts burdens. He does not wish to appear worthy, and so he is often spared loss and receives the benefit of the Dao.

臣义曰:圣人体道在天下,故能以故无自满之志。人皆饰智,己独若愚,人皆求胜,己独曲全,惟不欲见贤也,故常无损,得天之道。 臣义曰:圣人体道在天下,故能以有余奉天下,非以有余为恃也。为而不自恃,功成而不处者,不欲自伐自满以见其贤尔。贤以业言也,有余者,己之道,以己之先觉觉后觉,以己之先知觉后知,其下至於轻税薄赋,散利於天下,而不收於上,皆所谓以有余奉天下。唯不见贤,故下不知帝力。此圣人与天同德也,故曰得天之道。 天下柔弱章第七十八 天下莫柔弱於水,而攻坚强者,莫之能先,以其奉天下。唯不见贤,故下不知帝力。此圣人与天同德也,故曰得天之道。 天下柔弱章第七十八 天下莫柔弱於水,而攻坚强者,莫之能先,以其无以易之也。 御注曰:《易》以井喻性,言其不改。老氏谓水几于道,以其无以易之也。有以易之,则徇人而失己,乌能胜物?惟无以易之,故万变而常一,物无得而胜之者。 臣义曰:水之性,随器任形,曲直方圆,与之为变,至柔至弱,然攻彼坚强,莫之能胜者,以其性不易於变,其体常冥於一,此柔弱所以能擅其胜也。 柔之胜刚,弱之胜强,天下莫不知,而莫之能行。 御注曰:知及之,仁不能守之。
Interpretation

Minister Yi explains: the sage is able to follow the Dao (Dào, the Way) throughout the world, and so has no mind of self-satisfaction. Others deliberately display their cleverness, while he alone appears simple and unadorned. Others contend to outdo one another, while he alone accepts yielding and bending. Because he does not wish to appear wiser than others, he is often unharmed, and thereby attains a way of dealing with the world that accords with the Dao of Heaven.

Minister Yi further explains: the sage governs the world by following the Dao, and is able to use his surplus of goods and wisdom to nourish all under heaven, without regarding these as something to rely upon. When he accomplishes affairs yet does not take pride in them, and achieves merit yet does not claim it, it is because he does not wish to boast of himself or appear self-satisfied, as if to prove his own worthiness. Here, "worthiness" (xian) refers to achievement. As for "surplus" (you yu), it refers to the principles the sage has mastered: he uses what he understood first to enlighten those who come later, and uses what he knew first to teach those who follow. Going further, lightening taxes and distributing wealth to the common people, rather than gathering profit into the hands of the rulers, are likewise ways of offering one's surplus to all under heaven. Because the sage does not reveal his own virtue (De, Dé) and ability, the common people do not perceive the sovereign's merit. The sage's virtue accords with that of Heaven, and therefore it is said that he has attained the Dao of Heaven.

Chapter 78: The Soft and Weak

Nothing under heaven is softer or weaker than water, yet nothing surpasses water in overcoming what is hard and strong, because nothing can take its place.

The Imperial Annotation (yu zhu) says: The Yijing (Book of Changes) uses the well to illustrate human nature, meaning that nature does not change. Laozi says that water comes close to the Dao precisely because nothing can replace it. If the nature of water could change, it would follow others and lose itself, and how could it then surpass all things? Precisely because it does not change its nature, it keeps to its unity through all its countless transformations, and nothing can overcome it.

Minister Yi explains: the nature of water is that it takes the shape of its container. It accommodates curved, square, or round vessels, and its outward form changes accordingly. It is utterly soft and weak, yet it can wear down hard things, and nothing can defeat it. This is because its inner nature does not change with its transformations, and its inner substance always accords with the Dao. Thus softness is able to achieve victory.

That the soft overcomes the hard and the weak overcomes the strong is a principle that no one under heaven fails to know, yet no one is able to act upon it.

The Imperial Annotation says: Wisdom is sufficient for a person to understand the principle, but if benevolence and virtue are insufficient to hold on to it, one still cannot be said to have truly put it into practice.

臣义曰:观水之攻坚於变,其体常冥於一,此柔弱所以能擅其胜也。 柔之胜刚,弱之胜强,天下莫不知,而莫之能行。 御注曰:知及之,仁不能守之。 臣义曰:观水之攻坚强,则莫不知柔弱之为胜,是知之所及也。然莫之能行者,有已以好胜,而仁不能守也。 是以圣人言:受国之垢,是谓社稷主。受国之不祥,是谓天下王。 御注曰:川泽纳污,山薮藏疾,国君含垢,体道之虚,而所受弥广,则为物之归,而所制弥远。经曰:知其荣,守其辱,为天下谷。 臣义曰:水几於道,故圣人体水以为德,柔弱善下,藏垢纳污,无所不容,而无善恶、小大、洁污、远迩之间,故可以主社稷,王天下。 正言若反。 御注曰:言岂一端而已,反于物而合于道,是谓天下之至正。 臣义小大、洁污、远迩之间,故可以主社稷,王天下。 正言若反。 御注曰:言岂一端而已,反于物而合于道,是谓天下之至正。 臣义曰:言其受垢不祥,谓之社稷主、天下王,斯圣人之正言也。其言若反於俗,盖反俗所以为正也。故曰反於物而合於道,是谓天下之至正。 和大怨章第七十九 和大怨者,必有余怨。安可以为善?
Interpretation

I think that if one observes how water reshapes its circumstances and strikes against hard things, one will find that its nature is always yielding and unified. It is precisely because water is soft and weak that it comes to hold the advantage.

That the soft can overcome the hard and the weak can overcome the strong is something everyone under heaven knows, yet no one is able to act accordingly.

The Imperial Commentary (Yuzhu) says: Knowledge may have reached this understanding, but benevolent virtue (De) cannot hold on to it.

I think that when one observes that water can wear down what is hard and strong, people all know that softness and weakness can prevail. This is something knowledge can recognize. But people fail to act on it because each seeks to prevail, and they cannot use benevolent virtue to hold on to the principle of softness.

Therefore the sage said: "Whoever can bear the filth of the state is called lord of the altars of soil and grain (the ruler charged with state sacrifice and political authority). Whoever can bear the misfortunes of the state is called king of all under heaven."

The Imperial Commentary says: Rivers and marshes take in foul water, and mountain forests shelter poisonous insects and fierce beasts. If a ruler can tolerate filth and embody the empty receptivity of the Dao, he can take in many things, become the one to whom all things turn, and govern an even wider realm. The Daodejing says: "Knowing what is glorious yet keeping to disgrace, one becomes a valley for all under heaven."

I think that water is close to the Dao, so the sage takes water's virtue as his model: it is soft, humble, able to hold filth and receive all things, and makes no distinction between good and bad, large and small, clean and dirty, or near and far. For this reason the sage can preside over the altars of the state and rule all under heaven.

Words that accord with the Dao often sound like they go against common sense.

The Imperial Commentary says: Speech does not have only one mode of expression. Some words appear to contradict the ordinary run of worldly affairs, yet they accord with the Dao, and this is the most correct principle under heaven.

I think that the claim that one who can bear filth and misfortune may become lord of the altars of the state and king of all under heaven is the correct Way spoken by the sage. The statement seems opposed to worldly views, and precisely because it runs against them, the true correct Way becomes visible. Thus, though words may appear paradoxical, when they accord with the Dao, this is the supremely correct principle under heaven.

Chapter 79: Resolving Great Resentment

To reconcile deep resentment is certain to leave lingering resentment behind. How could this be considered proper?

御注曰:复伟者,不折镇干,虽有快心者,不怨飘瓦,故无余怨。爱人者,害人之本也。偃兵者,造兵之本也。安可以为善? 臣义曰:古之善治人者,使之自治,非有以治之也。民之情,荡於利欲,而淫侈争夺以自葱,求得其欲而已。上之人,设为禁令刑诛,一切治之,天下不得其欲,怨之所由生也。大怨者,民之欲亦大情,荡於利欲,而淫侈争夺以自葱,求得其欲而已。上之人,设为禁令刑诛,一切治之,天下不得其欲,怨之所由生也。大怨者,民之欲亦大矣,以不得所欲,故谓之大怨。以民之有是怨也,於是又欲调和而禁治之,礼乐教化,赏刑号令,无所不至,所以调和禁治之也。而天下益有余怨,故圣人所以执左契也。 是以圣人执左契,而不责于人。 御注曰:圣人循大变而无所湮,受而喜之,故无责于人,人亦无责焉。契有左右,以别取予,执左契者,予之而已。 臣义曰:执左契,则无为而付当於自然,不从事於物,任万物之自至,吾应其至,与之为合尔。常任天下之责,未始责於人也。 故有德司契, 於物,任万物之自至,吾应其至,与之为合尔。常任天下之责,未始责於人也。 故有德司契, 御注曰:以德分人,谓之圣。 臣义曰:不德之德,所以司契也。 无德司彻。
Interpretation

The one who can restore and complete things (fuwei, fùwěi) does not break the ridgepole that supports the house. Even when things go wrong, they do not blame the tiles the wind has blown down, so no lingering resentment remains in their heart. The way of cherishing people may be the very root of harming them, and the way of ending warfare may become the root of raising arms again. How could such a way be called good?

In antiquity, those skilled at governing the common people let the people govern themselves rather than forcing order through authority. The minds of the people are easily drawn along by profit and desire, so they indulge in extravagance and endless contention, seeking only to satisfy their own appetites. Rulers then establish prohibitions and impose punishments, regulating every matter, so that people cannot obtain what they want, and resentment arises from this. When desires are strong and unmet, the resentment runs all the deeper. Seeing the people's resentment, the rulers then try to harmonize and restrain them through ritual, music, moral instruction, rewards, punishments, and commands, yet this only causes the realm to accumulate still more resentment. Therefore the sage holds to the left tally (zuoqi, zuǒqì).

Therefore the sage holds the left tally, yet does not press others for repayment.

The sage follows the transformations of things without obstruction, accepts change, and abides in it peacefully. For this reason the sage does not blame others, and others have no grounds to blame the sage. A tally is split into left and right halves, used to distinguish what is taken from what is given. To hold the left tally means to give without demanding.

To hold the left tally is to practice wuwei (wúwéi), or non-action, letting affairs unfold according to their natural course and not deliberately driving the myriad things. One allows things to arrive of their own accord, responds to their coming, and accords with them. The sage always bears the responsibility for the realm, yet never shifts that responsibility onto others.

Therefore, one who possesses de (dé), or Virtue, keeps the tally.

Extending benefit to the multitude through de is called being a sage.

What is called "the de of no-de" (wude zhi de, wúdé zhī dé) is precisely the principle of keeping the tally.

One without de, by contrast, governs the collection of taxes.

御注曰:乐通物,非圣人也,无德者,不自得其得,而得人之得,方且物物求通而有和怨之心焉,兹,彻也,祇所以为蔽,《庄子》曰:丧己于物者,谓之蔽蒙之民。臣义曰:无得於己,求彻於物,蔽蒙甚矣。 天道无亲,常与善人。 御注曰:善则与之,何亲之有? 臣义曰:和大怨,不可以为善而有德。司契者,谓之善人,天道之所与也。 小国寡民章第八十 小国寡民。 御注曰:广土众民,则事不胜应,智不胜察,德自此衰,刑自此起,后世之乱,善人,天道之所与也。 小国寡民章第八十 小国寡民。 御注曰:广土众民,则事不胜应,智不胜察,德自此衰,刑自此起,后世之乱,自此始矣。老氏当周之末,厌周之乱,原道之意,寓之于书,方且易文胜之敝俗,而跻之淳厚之域,故以小国寡民为言,盖至德之世,自容成氏至于神农,十有二君,号称至治者,以此而已。 臣义曰:国小则其事易治,民寡则欲易足。事易治则忘衍智,欲易足则无巧伪,然后可以反朴复古也。 使民有什伯之器而不用也。 御注曰:一而不党,无众至之累。 臣义曰:人各安其分,各遂其生,无朋比2群聚之累,虽器有什伯,无所用之。 使民重死而不远徙。
Interpretation

The Imperial Commentary holds that a vast territory and a multitude of people would make governance too burdensome to manage, and that wisdom would struggle to remain thorough and discerning. Once De (Virtue) declined, punishments arose in its wake, and the disorder of later ages began from this. Laozi lived at the end of the Zhou dynasty and was weary of the chaos of his time. He entrusted his understanding of the Dao (the Way) to his book, hoping to reverse the fashion for ostentation and return people to a simple, sincere way of life. For this reason he spoke of a "small state with few people." The twelve rulers from Rongcheng Shi to Shennong Shi, who were traditionally said to have governed best, owed their achievement to this principle.

Minister Yi holds that in a small state affairs of government are easy to manage, and where the population is small, desires are easy to satisfy. When government is easy to manage, people have no occasion to misuse cleverness and strategy. When desires are easily satisfied, people have no reason to pursue cunning and deceit. Only then is it possible to return to simplicity and genuineness and to recover the unadorned customs of antiquity.

"Let the people have various implements, yet not use them." The Imperial Commentary explains that when the people are focused and settled, they do not form factions, and so they suffer none of the entanglements that come from gathering in crowds. Minister Yi explains that when people each remain content within their proper station and live their own lives well, there is no need to use the various implements, even though they possess them.

"Let the people value their lives and not migrate to distant lands."

"The Way of Heaven has no favorites, yet it always aids the good person." The Imperial Commentary says that the good person receives the support of the Way of Heaven, which bestows no private favor. Minister Yi says that resolving great resentment cannot rely merely on one's own sense of goodness and virtue. Only one who keeps faith with covenants and accords with the Dao may truly be called a good person, and only such a person is aided by the Way of Heaven.

御注曰:其生可乐,一而不党,无众至之累。 臣义曰:人各安其分,各遂其生,无朋比2群聚之累,虽器有什伯,无所用之。 使民重死而不远徙。 御注曰:其生可乐,其死可葬,故民不轻死而之四方。孔子曰:上失其道,民散久矣。远徙之谓欤? 臣义曰:知生之可乐而安其生,故重死。知业之为本,而乐其业,故不远徙。 虽有舟舆,无所乘之。虽有甲兵,无所陈之。 御注曰:山无蹊隧,泽无舟梁,同乎无知,其德不离。无绝险之迹,故虽有舟舆,无所乘之。无攻战之患,故虽有甲兵,无所陈之。 臣义曰:安其生,乐其业,无事於动也。虽舆,无所乘之。无攻战之患,故虽有甲兵,无所陈之。 臣义曰:安其生,乐其业,无事於动也。虽有舟舆,无所乘,无事於争也。虽有甲兵无所陈,足乎性分,乐於自得者然也。 使民复结绳而用之。 御注曰:纪要而已,不假书契。 臣义曰:有不信,有书契,民复古,则信於结绳。 甘其食,美其服,安其俗,乐其业。 御注曰:耕而食,织而衣,含哺而嬉,鼓腹而游,民能已此矣。止分故甘,去华故美,不扰故安,存生故乐。
Interpretation

People each keep to their own station and live their lives well, unburdened by forming factions or gathering crowds. Even though there are many kinds of implements, none of them are needed.

Let the people treasure their lives, not lightly give them up in death, and not wander far away to distant lands.

The Imperial Annotation (Yuzhu) explains: The people find joy in living and expect a proper burial after death, so they do not take their lives lightly, nor do they scatter across the land. Confucius said, "When those above have lost the proper Dao (the Way), the people have long been dispersed." Perhaps this refers to the situation of people fleeing to distant lands.

The ministers' commentary explains: The people understand that life is precious and are content with their lives, so they treasure it. They understand that their fundamental occupation is the root of their livelihood and take delight in it, so they do not go far away.

Even if there are boats and carts, there is no need to ride in them; even if there are armor and weapons, there is no need to display them.

The Imperial Annotation explains: In the mountains there are no narrow paths or tunnels, and across the marshes there are no boat-bridges. The people are simple and unworked, like raw wood, and their De (Virtue/Power) does not scatter. With no need to open up dangerous, distant roads, boats and carts go unused even when they exist; with no warfare or calamity, armor and weapons go unused even when they exist.

The ministers' commentary explains: The people are content with their lives and delight in their work, with no need to move about, so carts go unused even when they exist. With no war or calamity, armor and weapons go unused even when they exist. Those who are content with their station and satisfied with what they have do not think of contention.

Let the people return to the practice of knotting cords to keep records.

The Imperial Annotation explains: Knotted cords were used only to record important matters, so there was no need for written contracts.

The ministers' commentary explains: Written contracts become necessary only when the world lacks trust and good faith. When the people return to the simple customs of antiquity, they will keep faith with what was recorded by knotted cords.

Let the people find their food sweet and their clothing pleasing, content with their customs and delighted in their occupations.

The Imperial Annotation explains: Through farming there is food to eat, and through weaving there is clothing to wear. When the people are fed, they play and roam about with full bellies, living just as they naturally should. Keeping to their proper station, they find their food sweet; not pursuing show, they find their clothing fine; undisturbed, their lives are settled; and content with their livelihood, they take delight in their work.

臣义曰:甘其食,不待滋味而甘也,甘其分而已。美其服者,不待华绮而美也,美其衣而已。安其居,则无所往而不自安。乐其俗,则无所处而不自乐。 邻国相望,鸡犬之声相闻,使民至老死不相与往来。 御注曰:居相比也,声相闻也,而不相与往来,当是时也,无欲无求,莫之为而常自然,此之相闻,使民至老死不相与往来。 御注曰:居相比也,声相闻也,而不相与往来,当是时也,无欲无求,莫之为而常自然,此之谓至德。 臣义曰:嘘嘘为仁,孑孑为义,此民所以尚往来也。至德之世,民相忘於自得之场,无欲於己,无求於人,相望相闻之间,至老死不相往来,然则恶有傲情作伪,相为容悦之弊耶。 信言不美章第八十一 信言不美, 御注曰:道之出口,淡乎其无味,关百圣而不惭,历万世而无弊。 臣义曰:信言者,信於道,非苟人之好也,不可以投俗,此世俗所以不美也。美言不信。 御注曰:貌言华也,从事华辞,以支为旨,故不足于信。 臣义曰:美好之言,可以悦人,非信於道也,故於信为不足。 善者不辩, 御注曰:辞尚体要,言而当法。 臣义曰:善者不待辫而善自明,故其言简约而不费。 辩者不善。也,故於信为不足。 善者不辩,
Interpretation

"Food tastes sweet" does not mean that one needs an array of seasonings before food is considered good. It means being content with whatever food one has obtained. "Clothing looks beautiful" does not mean one must wear luxurious silks to feel well dressed. It means that clothing which fits one well is enough. To dwell in peace is to feel secure wherever one goes, and to delight in local customs is to find contentment wherever one is.

Neighboring states face one another so closely that the crowing of roosters and the barking of dogs can be heard across the border, yet the people never visit each other, even until they die of old age.

The Imperial Annotation says: Villages lie next to one another and their sounds carry, yet the people do not visit each other. In such an age, people have no desires and no cravings. No one arranges things deliberately, yet everything follows its natural course. To be within earshot of one another and yet never to visit until death is supreme De (the highest virtue).

The Minister's Commentary says: It is precisely because people deliberately display benevolence and cling to petty notions of righteousness that they come to prize social contact. In the age of supreme De, people live each in the contentment of their own circumstances and are bound to no one. They harbor no greed and seek nothing from others. Even when neighbors face each other and their sounds are heard, they never visit one another until death. Under such conditions, how could the faults of self-importance, affected pretense, and currying favor to please others ever arise?

Chapter Eighty-One: Trustworthy Words Are Not Beautiful

Trustworthy words are not necessarily pleasing to hear.

The Imperial Annotation says: When the Dao is spoken aloud, it seems as bland as if it had no flavor. It runs through the sages of every age without shame, and though it endures for ten thousand generations, it does not decay.

The Minister's Commentary says: Trustworthy words are words that accord with reason. They are not spoken merely to suit others' tastes, and so they are not necessarily liked by the world.

Pleasing words are not necessarily trustworthy.

The Imperial Annotation says: Ornate speech that is beautiful on the surface tends to dwell only on rhetoric and to treat branches as if they were the root. For this reason it is not sufficiently trustworthy.

The Minister's Commentary says: Words that delight the ear win people's affection, yet they may not accord with the Dao, and so they fall short in trustworthiness.

One who is truly good does not prove it through argument.

The Imperial Annotation says: In speaking, the emphasis lies on hitting the key points, and the wording accords with proper measure.

The Minister's Commentary says: One who is truly good naturally becomes evident and does not need to rely on debate. Therefore their words are concise and do not waste breath.

One who clings to argument is not necessarily good.

御注曰:辞尚体要,言而当法。 臣义曰:善者不待辫而善自明,故其言简约而不费。 辩者不善。 御注曰:多骈旁枝,而失天下之至正。 臣义曰:辩以求明,辞费寡理,故曰不善。 知者不博, 御注曰:知道之微者,反要而已。 臣义曰:道一而已,非博者所能知。反要则复乎无知,何事於博。 博者不知。 御注曰:闻见之多,不如其约也。《庄子》曰:博之不必知,辩之不必慧。 臣义曰:博有溺心之累,益博而益不知务外故也。闻见自外至,故歌其博。自知则知其性,知其性则知天矣,也。《庄子》曰:博之不必知,辩之不必慧。 臣义曰:博有溺心之累,益博而益不知务外故也。闻见自外至,故歌其博。自知则知其性,知其性则知天矣,故不如其约。 圣人无积。 御注曰:有积也,故不足。无藏也,故有余。《庄子》曰:圣道运而无所积。孔子曰:丘是以日祖。 臣义曰:圣人至虚而无物,何积之有?以至无供天下万物之求也。苟有积而散之,则积有时而尽矣,惟其无积,此圣道之所运也。 既以为人己愈有,既以与人己愈多。 御注曰:善贷且成,而未尝费我。万物皆往资焉,而不匮。
Interpretation

The commentary says that a text should attend to its genre and its key points, and that speech too must accord with proper standards.

Your minister explains: truly fine principles need no repeated argument, because they reveal themselves naturally. Therefore one who speaks with brevity and precision does not need many words.

One who is skilled at debate does not necessarily understand the principle.

The commentary says that when speech spreads into many side branches and minor details, it strays from the most proper principle under Heaven.

Your minister explains: debate exists to clarify principle, but when words are abundant and the content is hollow, it cannot be considered good.

One who truly understands the Dao does not prize broad seeing and hearing, and one who has broad seeing and hearing does not necessarily understand the Dao.

The commentary says that to grasp the subtle workings of the Dao, one need only hold fast to its essentials.

Your minister explains: the Dao is one, and it cannot be known through wide searching. To return to the essentials is to return to a state undisturbed by distracting thoughts, so why pursue broad learning?

The commentary says that even when seeing and hearing are abundant, they are no match for grasping the essentials of what is simple. The Zhuangzi says: "Broad learning is not necessarily true knowledge, and skill in debate is not necessarily true wisdom."

Your minister explains: excessively complicated knowledge burdens the mind, and the more one pursues breadth, the more one wastes one's thoughts on external things. Seeing and hearing come from outside, which is why broad learning is praised. If one knows oneself, one can know one's own nature and, through it, the Heavenly Way (Tiandao). Therefore, grasping the essentials surpasses the blind pursuit of breadth.

The sage (shengren) holds nothing back for himself and accumulates nothing.

The commentary says that when one accumulates, one feels insufficient; when one does not hoard privately, one can draw on an inexhaustible supply. The Zhuangzi says: "The Way of the sage operates without storing up." Confucius said: "It is precisely because of this that I study every day." (Here the term "ri zu" appears to be a corrupt reading in the transmitted text, and it is interpreted here according to the sense of the passage.)

Your minister explains: the sage's mind is empty and clear, and he does not treat things as his possessions, so how could he accumulate anything? Because he keeps nothing privately, he is able to meet the needs of all things under Heaven. If one stores up first and distributes afterward, the stored supply will eventually run out. Only when nothing is stored up can the sage's Way keep flowing without end.

When the sage helps others, he becomes all the more full himself; when he gives to others, he becomes all the more abundant.

The commentary says that the sage is skilled at bestowing and bringing things to completion, yet he does not diminish himself by doing so. All things receive benefit from him, and yet his provision never runs dry.

臣义曰:人所不能为,待我而后为者,谓之为。人之所亡,待我而后有者既以与人己愈多。 御注曰:善贷且成,而未尝费我。万物皆往资焉,而不匮。 臣义曰:人所不能为,待我而后为者,谓之为。人之所亡,待我而后有者,谓之与。圣人所为所与,皆本乎道,故於己无费,於己无乏。 天之道,利而不害。 御注曰:乾始能以美利天下,不言所利,而物实利之,未始有害。 臣义曰:生其所自生,成其所自成,美利万物,而不言所利,何害之有?是天之道。 圣人之道,为而不争。 御注曰:顺而不逆,其动若水,应而不藏,其静若鉴,和而不唱,其应若响,虽为也,而为出于无为。体天而已,何争之有?兹德也,而同乎道,故德经终焉。 臣义曰:圣人虚己以应世,无为而体道,付一气之自运,遂万物於自然,其动也顿,若水不逆。其静也明,若鉴不藏。物来来感应之如响,
Interpretation

I say: What others cannot accomplish, and what is completed only once I act, is called "doing" (wei). What others lack, and come to possess only when I give it to them, is called "giving" (yu). The sage's doings and gifts are all rooted in the Dao (Dào), so the sage is not depleted by them, nor left wanting.

The Imperial Commentary (Yùzhù) says: The Dao is skilled at bestowing and bringing to completion the myriad things, yet it never wears itself down in doing so. All the myriad things draw their support from the Dao, yet the Dao does not run dry as a result.

I say: The Dao of Heaven (Tiāndào) causes all things to grow and reach completion and benefits them, yet it does not claim to be conferring favors. It never harms the myriad things. This is the Dao of Heaven.

The Imperial Commentary says: The Dao of Heaven initiates and transforms the myriad things, extending its fine benefits to all under heaven. It does not proclaim any benefit it has conferred, yet the myriad things truly profit from it and never suffer harm.

I say: The way of the sage's conduct is to act without contending with others.

The Imperial Commentary says: The sage follows things and does not go against them. In action he is like water, never obstructing the myriad things; in stillness he is like a clear mirror, reflecting things without concealing them. He harmonizes with others without speaking first, and when he responds, it is as natural as an echo. Though he acts, his action springs from non-action (wúwéi), meaning he does not force interference through private intent. How could a sage who emulates the Dao have anything to contend for? This virtue accords with the Dao, and so the De Jing (Dé Jīng, Classic of Virtue) ends here.

I say: The sage sets aside the self in dealing with the affairs of the world. Through non-action, he apprehends and practices the Dao, allowing the One Qi (qì, the vital energy by which heaven, earth, and the myriad things move and transform) to turn of its own accord, so that each thing fulfills its nature and is completed. When he acts, he is swift and smooth, like water, never going against things. When he is still, he is clear as a mirror and conceals nothing. When the myriad things come before him, he responds naturally, like an echo.

其为出於无人虚己以应世,无为而体道,付一气之自运,遂万物於自然,其动也顿,若水不逆。其静也明,若鉴不藏。物来来感应之如响, 其为出於无有者也,无为则无我,无我则无物,物我且忘,何争之有。为而不争,体道故也。老氏明道德之意,其要在乎柔弱不争为本,故以圣人之道为而不争终焉。惟得道者为能与此,故於德经之终言之。 宋徽宗道德真经解义卷之十竟 1原作『惟』,据下文『故其性仁爱』句,知『惟』当作『性』。 2原作『此』,依义当作『比
Interpretation

Things come into being from Wu (non-being), the root that has no concrete form. By practicing Wuwei (non-action), one can forget the self, and having forgotten the self, one no longer clings to external things. When both self and external things are let go, what is left to contend over? To act without contending is to embody and follow the Dao (the Way).

Laozi sets out the essential aims of the Dao and De (Virtue/Power), and their key lies in taking softness, weakness, and non-contention as the foundation. For this reason he concludes with the line, "The way of the sage is to act without contending." Only one who has attained the Dao can achieve this, and so Laozi raises it at the close of the De Jing (Classic of De).

Commentary on the Daode Zhenjing by Emperor Huizong of Song, Scroll Ten, Complete.

』。

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 3