中文 · EN

《道德真经衍义手抄(王守正)》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Taixuan 太玄部 Vol. 2 / 5 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真经衍义手抄(王守正)》 Vol. 2 (Taixuan 太玄部, 5 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 55 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真经衍义手抄(王守正)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

大若垂天之云。此能为大矣,而不能执鼠。今子有大树,患其无用,何不树之於无何有之乡,广莫之野,彷徨乎无为其侧,逍遥乎寝卧其下。不夭斤斧,物无害者,无所可用,安所困苦哉。又引栎者,《庄子□人间世》云:匠石之齐,至乎曲辕,谓曲道也。崔云道名。见栎杜树。其大蔽牛,絜约束也。之百围,径尺谓围。其高临山,十仞七尺曰仞。而复有枝,其可以为舟者旁十数。观者如市,匠伯不顾,遂行不辍。弟子厌观之,走及匠石,曰:自吾执斧斤以随夫子,未尝见材如此其美也。先生不肯视,行不辍,何耶。曰:已矣,勿言之矣。散木也,以为舟则沉,以为棺椁则速腐,以为门户尝见材如此其美也。先生不肯视,行不辍,何耶。曰:已矣,勿言之矣。散木也,以为舟则沉,以为棺椁则速腐,以为门户则液Z,津液脂槅不受斤斧者。以为柱则蠹。是不材之木,无所可用,故能若是之寿。今取此以为说者,言师资授受之道,若遇天性能者,可教而成材器也。若无天性,虽教不成,亦如伯乐不能御驽骀为骐骥,良村不能伐樗栎为栋梁者也。 衍义云:列子师老商氏,友伯高子,而得风仙至内外进矣。
Interpretation

It was as vast as a cloud hanging at the edge of the sky. Though enormous, it could not be used to catch mice. Now you have a great tree and worry that it is useless. Why not plant it in an empty place, in a boundless wilderness? Wander at ease beside it and rest peacefully beneath its branches. No axe will fell it, and nothing will harm it. Since it has no use to offer, what trouble could it bring?

Here the story of the oak tree is cited again. The Zhuangzi, in “Among Humans,” says that the carpenter Shi was on his way to the state of Qi. When he reached a place called Quyuan, he saw an oak tree. Its shade was broad enough to shelter cattle, and its trunk measured a hundred spans around. Its top rose above the mountain, and it had many branches, more than a dozen of which could have been used to make boats. Crowds came to see the tree, as if gathered at a market, but Carpenter Shi did not even glance at it and walked straight on.

His apprentice watched it for a long time, then caught up with Carpenter Shi and asked, “Since I began working with you, carrying an axe, I have never seen such fine timber. Yet you did not even look at it and kept walking. Why?”

Carpenter Shi replied, “Enough—there’s no need to talk about it. It is useless wood, unsuitable for making things. A boat made from it would sink; a coffin and its outer case would soon rot; doors and windows would seep with sticky sap; and a pillar made from it would be eaten by insects. It is a tree of no use, and that is why it has lived so long.”

This story is used to explain the principle of teaching passed from master to disciple: when someone has the right natural aptitude, they can be taught and made into a person of use. Without such aptitude, even teaching may not bring them to fruition. Just as Bole, the skilled judge of horses, cannot turn a poor horse into a thoroughbred, a master carpenter cannot cut an unsuitable tree, such as a chinquapin oak, into timber fit for beams.

The Yanyi says: Liezi took Lao Shang as his teacher and befriended Boyaozi. Through his cultivation of the Dao, he attained the Way of the Immortals and advanced further both inwardly and outwardly.

钞《列子□黄帝篇》之文云:列子师老商氏,友伯高子,进二子之道,乘风而归。尹生闻之,从列子居,数月不省合。因间请蕲其术者,十反而十不告。尹生怼而请辞,列子又不问。尹生退子居,数月不省合。因间请蕲其术者,十反而十不告。尹生怼而请辞,列子又不问。尹生退数月,意不已,又往从之。列子曰:汝何去来之频。尹生曰:曩章戴有请於子,子不我告,固有憾於子。今复脱然,是以又来。列子曰:曩吾以子为达,今汝之鄙至此乎。姬将告汝所学於夫子者矣。自吾之事夫子友若人也,三年之后,心不敢念是非,口不敢言利害,始得夫子一盻而已。五年之后,心庚念是非,口更言利害,夫子始一解颜而笑。七年之后,从心之所念,庚无是非,从口之所言,庚无利害,夫子始一引吾并席而坐。九年之后,横心之所念,横口之所言,亦不知我之是非利害欤,亦不知彼之是非利害欤,亦不知夫子之为我师,若人之为我友,内外进矣。引吾并席而坐。九年之后,横心之所念,横口之所言,亦不知我之是非利害欤,亦不知彼之是非利害欤,亦不知夫子之为我师,若人之为我友,内外进矣。而后眼如耳,耳如鼻,鼻如口,无不同也。心凝形释,骨肉都融,不觉形之所倚,足之所履,随风东西,犹木叶干壳,竟不知风乘我耶,我乘风耶。今汝居先生之门,曾未浃时,而怼憾再三,汝之片体将气所不受,汝之一节将地所不载。履虚乘风,其可几乎。尹生甚作,屏息良久,不敢复言。若列子与老商氏,真可谓师资三,汝之片体将气所不受,汝之一节将地所不载。履虚乘风,其可几乎。尹生甚作,屏息良久,不敢复言。若列子与老商氏,真可谓师资相忘者也。今取此证解不贵其师、不爱其资之义也。
Interpretation

A passage in the Liezi: The Yellow Emperor says that Liezi took Lao Shang as his teacher and befriended Bo Gaozi. After learning the arts of the Dao from them, he rode the wind home. Yin Sheng heard of this and went to live with Liezi. For several months, Liezi did not summon him even once. Yin Sheng seized an opportunity to ask Liezi to teach him the art of riding the wind. He asked ten times in all, but Liezi never told him. Resentful, Yin Sheng announced that he was leaving, and Liezi did not try to stop him. Several months after he left, Yin Sheng still could not let go of the matter, so he returned to follow Liezi.

Liezi asked, “Why do you keep coming and going?” Yin Sheng replied, “Before, I asked you several times to teach me, but you refused, so I held on to my resentment. Now I have let it go, and that is why I have returned.”

Liezi said, “I once thought you understood how things work. Now I see how shallow your understanding is. I will tell you what I learned from my teacher.

“When I served my teacher and spent time with my friend, three years passed before I no longer dared to judge right and wrong in my thoughts or speak of gain and loss. Only then did my teacher look at me once. After five years, I began again to think about right and wrong and speak of gain and loss. Only then did my teacher smile for the first time. After seven years, I no longer distinguished right from wrong or calculated gain and loss in either thought or speech. Only then did my teacher invite me to sit beside him. After nine years, whatever I thought or said, I no longer judged myself or others in terms of right and wrong or gain and loss. I no longer clung to the idea that my teacher was my teacher or my friend was my friend. The distinction between my inner self and the things around me had dissolved.

“After that, my eyes, ears, nose, and mouth seemed to communicate with one another, with no divisions between them. My spirit settled, and my body seemed to fall apart; my bones and flesh melted away. I no longer felt what supported my body or what my feet stood upon. I drifted east and west with the wind, like a withered leaf or a husk, until I could no longer tell whether the wind was carrying me or I was riding the wind.

“You have been under your teacher’s guidance for less than a season, yet you have repeatedly resented and calculated. Part of your body seems unable to bear even the Qi; part of it seems unable to bear even the earth. How could someone like that tread on empty air and ride the wind?”

Yin Sheng was deeply ashamed. He held his breath and remained silent for a long time, not daring to speak again.

Liezi and Lao Shang can be said to have reached a state in which teacher and student forgot their roles and were separated by no barriers. This story is cited here to explain the meaning of “not esteeming one’s teacher and not cherishing one’s credentials”: one does not cling to the status of honoring a teacher or to the distinctions of rank within the teacher-student relationship.

衍义云:孔子见太公任,然后辞其交游,去其弟子。 钞《庄子□山木篇》云:孔子围於陈蔡之间,七日不火食。太公任往吊之曰:子几死乎。曰:然。子恶死乎。曰:然。任曰:子尝言不死之道。东海有鸟焉,其名曰意怠。其为鸟也,翂翂翐翐,是舒迟不能高飞之貌。而似无能,引援而飞,迫胁而栖,进不敢为前,退不任曰:子尝言不死之道。东海有鸟焉,其名曰意怠。其为鸟也,翂翂翐翐,是舒迟不能高飞之貌。而似无能,引援而飞,迫胁而栖,进不敢为前,退不敢为后,食不敢先尝,必取其绪。是故其行列不斥,与群俱也。而外人卒不得害,是以免於患。直木先伐,甘井先竭。子其意者饰知以惊愚,修身以明污,昭昭乎如揭日月而行,故不免也。昔吾闻之大成之人曰:自伐者无功,功成者隳,名成者亏。孰能去功与名而还与众人。道流而不明居,德行而不名处,纯纯常常,乃此於狂,削迹捐势,不为功名。是故无责於人,人亦无责焉。至人不闻,子何喜哉。孔子曰:善哉。辞其交游,去其弟子,逃於大泽,衣裘褐,食橡栗,入兽此於狂,削迹捐势,不为功名。是故无责於人,人亦无责焉。至人不闻,子何喜哉。孔子曰:善哉。辞其交游,去其弟子,逃於大泽,衣裘褐,食橡栗,入兽不乱群,入鸟不乱行,鸟兽不恶,而况人乎。
Interpretation

The Yanyi says: After Confucius met Taigong Ren, he took leave of his friends and left his disciples.

The Zhuangzi, in the “Mountain Tree” chapter, records that Confucius was trapped between the states of Chen and Cai and went seven days without food. Taigong Ren came to console him and asked, “Are you about to die?” Confucius replied, “Yes.” “Do you hate death?” “Yes.”

Taigong Ren said, “You once spoke of a way to avoid death. In the Eastern Sea there is a bird called Yidai. It flies slowly and seems to have little ability, yet it knows how to ride the wind and settle where the current carries it. It does not strive to be first when moving forward or lag behind when moving back. It does not rush to taste the food, taking only what remains. So it is never rejected by the flock and can always live among other birds. Those outside cannot harm it, and it can thus evade trouble.

“Straight trees are the first to be cut down; sweet wells are the first to be drained. You have probably stirred the foolish by displaying your intelligence and exposed other people’s filth by deliberately cultivating yourself. You shine so brightly, as if walking with the sun and moon in your hands, and so you cannot escape disaster.

“I once heard a deeply cultivated person say: Those who boast have no merit; after an achievement is complete, it may be ruined; great renown may bring loss. Who can set aside merit and fame and return to an ordinary life? The Dao moves through all things without displaying itself; De is embodied in action without being claimed as one’s own. Plain and unadorned, it may even look like madness. One erases one’s traces, gives up power, and does not pursue reputation. So one does not blame others, and others do not blame one. Those who have attained the highest Dao do not seek fame. Why, then, do you take pleasure in making yourself known?”

Confucius said, “Well said.” He then took leave of his friends, left his disciples, and withdrew to the vast wilderness. He wore coarse clothes and ate acorns. He entered among the beasts without disturbing their gatherings, and among the birds without disrupting their flocks. If birds and beasts did not dislike him, how much less would people?

衍义云:七圣皆迷,无所问涂。 钞《庄子□徐无鬼篇》之文。黄帝将见大隗乎具茨之山,方明为御,昌寓骖乘,张若、謵Y前马,二人先马导也。昆阍、滑骨稽后车,至于襄城之野,七圣皆迷,今汝州有襄城县,在泰隗山南,即黄帝访道之所也。自黄帝已上至于滑稽,总有七圣也。注云:圣者,名也。名生而物迷矣。虽欲之乎,大隗其可得乎。无所问涂。适遇牧马童子,问涂焉,童子得道人也。曰:若知具茨之山乎。曰:然。若知大隗之所在乎,曰:然。黄帝曰:异哉小童,非徒知具茨之山,又知大隗之所在。请问为天下茨之山乎。曰:然。若知大隗之所在乎,曰:然。黄帝曰:异哉小童,非徒知具茨之山,又知大隗之所在。请问为天下。小童曰:夫为天下者,亦若此而已矣,又奚事焉。 知其雄章第二十八 知其荣,守其辱,为天下谷。为天下谷,常德乃足,复归於朴#1。 衍义云:草木之蕃也为荣。 钞:草木蕃,《周易》坤卦文言之辞云:天地变化,草木蕃。天地闭,贤人隐。孔颖达正义云:此一节明六爻辞,天地变化谓二气交通,生养万物,故草木蕃滋。 朴散则为器,圣人用之,则为官长,故大制不割。 衍义云:子贡问夫子曰:赐也何如。子曰:女器也。
Interpretation

The Zhuangzi records that the Yellow Emperor went to Mount Juci to visit Da Kui, a legendary master who had attained the Dao. Fang Ming drove the carriage, Chang Yu rode beside him, Zhang Ruo and Xi Peng led the way, and Kun Hun and Hua Ji followed behind. When the procession reached the countryside around Xiangcheng, the seven sages lost their way and could find no one to ask for directions. According to this account, the seven were the Yellow Emperor and the six others through Hua Ji. Xiangcheng is identified with the area around present-day Ruzhou, south of Mount Taiwei, and tradition says this was where the Yellow Emperor sought the Dao.

They came upon a boy tending horses and asked whether he knew where Mount Juci and Da Kui were. The boy said that he did. The Yellow Emperor was surprised and asked how he would govern the realm. The boy replied that governing the realm was no different from tending horses—why do anything more?

Chapter Twenty-Eight: Knowing the Male

Know the prominent side, yet remain content with the humble side, and you can become the valley to which all under Heaven flows. As the valley of all under Heaven, your constant De will be abundant, and in the end you will return to uncarved simplicity.

“Flourishing” refers to plants and trees growing luxuriantly. The scripture quotes the “Commentary on the Words of the Text” for the Kun Hexagram in the Book of Changes: when Heaven and Earth move and transform, plants and trees flourish; when Heaven and Earth are blocked and no longer communicate, worthy people withdraw. Kong Yingda explains that the Qi of Heaven and Earth mingle and nourish the myriad things, causing plants and trees to flourish.

When uncarved simplicity is divided, it gives rise to all kinds of implements. When the sage makes use of these implements, the sage becomes the leader of the people. Thus, truly great governance does not cut things apart or force them into divisions.

The scripture quotes Zigong asking Confucius, “What kind of person am I?” Confucius replied, “You are an implement.”

钞《论语□公冶长第五》之文。子贡问曰:赐也何如。子曰:女器也。曰:何器也。曰:瑚琏也。器有用之成材,夏曰瑚,商曰琏,周曰簠簋,皆宗庙盛黍稷之器而饰以玉,器之贵重而华美者也。 将欲章第二十九 将成材,夏曰瑚,商曰琏,周曰簠簋,皆宗庙盛黍稷之器而饰以玉,器之贵重而华美者也。 将欲章第二十九 将欲取天下而为之,吾见其不得已。 衍义云:舜避尧之子於南河之南,天下诸侯朝觐、讼狱、讴歌者,不之尧之子而之舜,非所谓力取天下也。 钞《孟子□万章章句上》之文。舜相尧二十有八载,非人之所能为也,天也。尧崩,三年之丧毕。舜避尧之子於南河之南,天下诸侯朝觐者,不之尧之子而之舜。讼狱者,不之尧之子而之舜。讴歌者,不讴歌尧之子而之舜。故曰:天也。夫然后之中国而践天子位焉。今取此为证,子而之舜。讴歌者,不讴歌尧之子而之舜。故曰:天也。夫然后之中国而践天子位焉。今取此为证,言舜之为君,天与之,民归之,非力取而为之也。 天下神器,不可为也。为者败之,执者失之。 衍义云:神器者,大宝之位,是天地神明之器也。
Interpretation

The Analects, “Gongye Chang,” records that Zigong asked Confucius, “What sort of person am I?” Confucius replied, “You are like a vessel.” Zigong asked, “What kind of vessel?” Confucius answered, “A húlián.” The hú and lián were ritual vessels from the Xia and Shang periods; the corresponding vessels of the Zhou dynasty were called fǔ and guǐ. They were used in ancestral temples to hold grains such as millet and broomcorn millet, and were decorated with jade, making them both precious and beautiful. Here, vessels serve as a metaphor: a person of ability is useful in their own way, and each has their particular strengths.

Chapter Twenty-Nine

Whoever wants to take possession of the world and govern it according to their own will, I believe, will not succeed.

The Extended Explanation says: Shun withdrew from the son of Yao and lived south of the Southern River. When the feudal lords of the world came to pay their respects, bring legal cases, and praise virtue, they did not go to Yao’s son; they turned instead to Shun. This was not because Shun had seized the world by force.

The Mencius, “Wan Zhang I,” records that Shun assisted Yao for twenty-eight years. This was not something a person could accomplish by their own efforts; it was Heaven’s will. After Yao died and the three-year mourning period ended, Shun withdrew from Yao’s son and lived south of the Southern River. When the feudal lords of the world came to pay their respects, they went to Shun rather than Yao’s son. Those with legal cases also went to Shun, not Yao’s son. And the people praised Shun’s virtue, not Yao’s son’s. Thus, it is said that this was Heaven’s will. Only later did Shun come to the Central Plains and ascend to the position of Son of Heaven. Shun’s story is cited here to show that he became ruler because the Mandate of Heaven was bestowed upon him and the people turned to him—not because he forcibly seized power.

The world is a sacred vessel, and one must not act upon it at will. Those who force their efforts upon it will fail; those who insist on holding it will lose it.

The Extended Explanation says that “sacred vessel” refers to the supreme position of rulership over the world, a vessel entrusted by the spirits of Heaven and Earth.

钞大宝之位,《易系辞》云:天地之大德曰生。圣人之大宝曰位。何以守位,曰仁。此言天下之大,有神以主之,岂可以力而取之乎。虽得之,必失之,可不慎欤。 衍义云:《庄子》载天根游於殷汤,至蓼水之上,适遭无名人而问焉,曰:请问为天下。无名人曰:去,汝鄙人,何问之不豫也。 钞:《庄子□应帝王篇》。天根姓名也游於殷汤,至蓼水之上,适遭无名人而问焉。天根,无名,并为姓字。寓言问答也。殷汤,殷山之阳。梦水在赵国界内。天根遨游於山水之间,适遇无名人而问之,意在天下。,并为姓字。寓言问答也。殷汤,殷山之阳。梦水在赵国界内。天根遨游於山水之间,适遇无名人而问之,意在天下。无名又曰:汝游於淡,合气於漠,顺物自然而无私容,而天下治矣。 衍义云:七窍凿而混沌死。 钞《庄子□应帝王篇》之辞。载之已详,不复重录。 衍义云:鞭策威而马力竭。 钞《庄子□马蹄篇》之辞。大道废,章中已备,不复重录。 是以圣人去甚,去奢,去泰。 衍义云:故仲尼不为已甚。 钞《孟子□离娄章句下》云:孟子曰:仲尼不为已甚者。注杨氏曰:言圣人所为本分之外不加毫末,非孟子真知,孔子不能是以称之。 衍义云:礼,与其奢也,宁俭。
Interpretation

The Appended Remarks to the Classic of Changes say, “Heaven and Earth’s greatest virtue is to bring forth and transform the myriad things; a sage’s most precious possession is the ruler’s position. How can that position be kept? Through benevolence and virtue.” This means that the greatest affairs under Heaven are directed by the divine. How could the ruler’s position be seized by force? Even if it were taken, it would surely be lost. How, then, could one fail to exercise caution?

The Zhuangzi records that Root of Heaven was traveling on Mount Yin Tang. When he reached the Liao River, he happened to meet a man named Nameless and asked him how to govern the world. Nameless said, “Go away, you shallow person! Why ask such an unpleasant question?”

The commentary explains that this is a parable in the Zhuangzi, “The Great and Venerable Teacher.” Root of Heaven and Nameless are both names of characters in the parable. Yin Tang refers to the southern side of Mount Yin, and the Meng River lies within the borders of the state of Zhao. Root of Heaven was traveling among the mountains and waters when he met Nameless and asked him how to govern the world. Nameless added, “You should settle in a state of calm simplicity, bring your breath into harmony with the void, follow the natural course of the myriad things, and harbor no private intentions. Then the world will govern itself.”

The Zhuangzi, “The Great and Venerable Teacher,” also says, “They drilled seven orifices into Hundun, and Hundun died.” The commentary says this passage has already been cited earlier and will not be repeated.

“Driving horses with whips and reins exhausts their strength.” These words come from the Zhuangzi, “Horses’ Hooves.” The commentary says this has already been discussed in the chapter “When the Great Dao Is Abandoned,” so it will not be repeated.

Thus, the sage rejects excess, extravagance, and extremes.

The Mencius, “Li Lou II,” says, “Confucius did not go too far.” The commentary cites Yang’s explanation: the sage acts only within the proper bounds and does not add even a little more. This shows that Mencius understood Confucius well.

The Analects says, “In the practice of ritual, it is better to be frugal than extravagant.”

钞《论语□八佾第三》之辞。子曰:大哉问。礼,与其奢也,宁俭。丧,与其易也,宁戚。此孔子答林放鲁人之言也。 衍义云:舜受尧之天下,而不以为泰也。 钞,宁俭。丧,与其易也,宁戚。此孔子答林放鲁人之言也。 衍义云:舜受尧之天下,而不以为泰也。 钞《孟子□滕文公章句下》。彭更孟子之弟子也。问曰:后车数十乘,从者数百人,以传食於诸侯,不亦泰乎。孟子曰:非其道,则一箪食不可受於人。如其道,则舜受尧之天下,不以为泰,子以为泰乎。此言圣人於施为之中有三者之过,必为亡败之祸。故皆去之,谦抑自居,冲虚自守,则与道合。真必无过分之累矣。 道德真经衍义手妙卷之七竟 #1『知其荣』前疑缺一段文字。 6-道德真经衍义手钞卷之八 道德真经衍义手钞卷之八 五峰清安逸士王守正集 以道佐人主章第三十 以道佐人主者,不以兵强天下。其事好还。 衍义云:杀人之父者,人亦杀其父。杀人之兄者,人亦杀其兄。
Interpretation

The Analects, “Bayi,” Book 3, records Confucius as saying: “That is a very broad question. In matters of ritual, simplicity and frugality are better than lavish display; in funeral rites, heartfelt grief is better than carrying out every ceremonial detail.” Confucius said this in reply to Lin Fang, a man of Lu.

The Extended Meaning says that Shun did not consider it excessive to accept the realm ceded to him by Yao.

The Mencius, “Teng Wen Gong,” Part 2, records that Peng Geng was a disciple of Mencius. He asked Mencius: “When you travel, dozens of carts accompany you and hundreds of people follow you, and you accept lodging and meals provided by the feudal lords. Isn’t that extravagant?” Mencius replied: “If it is not in accord with the right way, then even a small basket of food must not be accepted from another. If it is in accord with the right way, then Shun did not consider it excessive to accept the realm ceded to him by Yao. Do you think that counts as extravagance?”

This passage says that when sages act, excess in certain respects can bring the danger of ruin. They should therefore rid themselves of such faults, remain humble and self-restrained, and approach the world with an open mind. In this way they can accord with the Dao and avoid being burdened by excessive desire.

This concludes Scroll Seven of the Handwritten Commentary on the Extended Meaning of the True Scripture of the Way and Its Virtue.

A passage may be missing before “knowing what is glorious.”

Handwritten Commentary on the Extended Meaning of the True Scripture of the Way and Its Virtue, Scroll Eight

Compiled by Wang Shouzheng, a reclusive scholar of Qing’an on Five Peaks.

Chapter Thirty: “Using the Dao to Assist the Ruler”

Those who use the Dao to assist a ruler do not rely on military force to dominate the world. Those who act through force often invite retaliation.

The Extended Meaning says: “If you kill another’s father, another will kill your father; if you kill another’s elder brother, another will kill your elder brother.”

以道佐人主者,不以兵强天下。其事好还。 衍义云:杀人之父者,人亦杀其父。杀人之兄者,人亦杀其兄。 钞《孟子□尽心章句下》之文。孟子曰:吾今而后知杀人亲之重也。杀人之父,人亦杀其父。杀人之兄,人亦杀其兄。然则非自杀之也,一间耳。注:一问者,我往彼来问一人耳。其实与自害其亲无异也。 衍义云:出乎尔者,反乎尔者也。 钞《孟子□梁惠王章句下》,邹与鲁哄,穆公问曰。,斗声也。孟子对曰:凶年饥岁,君之民老弱转乎沟壑,壮者散而之四方者,几千人矣。而君之仓库实,府库充,有司莫以告,是上慢而残下也。曾子曰:戒之戒之,出乎尔者,反乎尔者也。夫民今而后得反之也。君无尤焉。 衍义云:楚灵王,齐实,府库充,有司莫以告,是上慢而残下也。曾子曰:戒之戒之,出乎尔者,反乎尔者也。夫民今而后得反之也。君无尤焉。 衍义云:楚灵王,齐愍王、秦始皇、汉孝武,或以杀其身,或以祸其子孙。
Interpretation

This passage is quoted from “Jinxin, Part Two,” in the Mencius. Mencius said, “Only now do I understand how grave the consequences are when someone kills another person’s family member. If you kill someone else’s father, that person will kill your father; if you kill someone else’s elder brother, that person will kill your elder brother. You have not killed your own family member with your own hands; there is only one person between you.” The commentary explains that “one person between” means that I act first and the other person acts in return, with only one person separating us. In reality, this is no different from killing one’s own family member with one’s own hands.

The extended commentary says, “What you do to others will, in the end, return to you.”

This passage is quoted from “Liang Hui, Part Two,” in the Mencius. Zou and Lu were at war, and Duke Mu of Zou asked Mencius what he should do. “Clamor” refers to the noise of fighting. Mencius replied, “During the famine, the elderly and weak among your people were left dead in the ditches, while the young and strong left their homes and scattered across the land. There were several thousand of them. Yet your granaries were full and your storehouses well stocked, and not one official responsible for your administration reported the people’s suffering to you. Those in high positions have neglected their duties and harmed the people. Zengzi said, ‘Be on your guard, be on your guard! What you do to others will, in the end, return to you.’ Now the people have merely had the chance to repay you for how they were treated before. You need not blame them.”

The extended commentary says that King Ling of Chu, King Min of Qi, Qin Shi Huang, and Emperor Wu of Han each suffered such consequences: some lost their lives, while others brought disaster upon their descendants.

钞:楚灵王者,《春秋》昭公十三年,楚公子比、子干公子黑肱、子晢公子、弃疾蔓成然、蔡、朝吴大夫。帅陈、蔡、不羹、许、叶之师,因四族之徒四族谓薳氏、许围、蔡洧、蔓成然。以入楚。杀太子禄及公子罢敌,使观从从师于乾溪,而遂告之,告其兵使畔楚。师及訾梁而溃。王闻群公子之死也,自投于车下曰:人之爱其子也,亦如余乎。王曰:予杀人子多矣,能无及此乎。岂非天报我乎。右尹子革曰:请待于郊,以听国人。王曰:众怒不可犯也。曰:若入于大都而乞师于诸侯。王曰:皆畔矣。曰:若忘於诸侯,以听大国之图君也。王曰:大福不再,只取辱焉。听国人。王曰:众怒不可犯也。曰:若入于大都而乞师于诸侯。王曰:皆畔矣。曰:若忘於诸侯,以听大国之图君也。王曰:大福不再,只取辱焉。然丹乃归于楚。子革。王缢于芋尹申亥氏。灵王至共家而镒死,此岂非杀其身而祸及其子孙乎。《通鉴》齐愍王三十一年,燕上将军乐毅以秦、魏、韩、赵之师伐齐。毅曰:齐王伐功矜能,谋不逮下,废黜贤良,信任谄谀,政令戾虐,百姓怨怼,其民必畔,齐可图也。愍王出走莒。楚使淖齿将兵救齐。因为齐相。齿欲与燕分齐地,乃执愍王而杀之。苟子曰:国者,天下之利势也。得道以持之,则大安也,大荣也,积美之源也。不得道以持之,则大危也,大累也,有之不如无之。而杀之。苟子曰:国者,天下之利势也。得道以持之,则大安也,大荣也,积美之源也。不得道以持之,则大危也,大累也,有之不如无之。及其綦也,索为匹夫,不可得也。齐愍、宋献是也。此非无道,或以杀其身乎。秦始皇正立元年乙卯至二十六年庚辰,平诸侯,灭六国,自号始皇。三十七年秋七月,于沙丘平台崩。胡亥立,称二世。三年,丞相赵高恐诛及其身,阴令咸阳令阎乐将史卒千余人至望夷宫。阎乐前即二世,数曰:足下骄恣,诛杀无道,天下共畔足下,足下其自为计。乐麾其兵进。二世自杀。乃立子婴为秦王。高祖元年冬十月,沛公至灞上。秦王子婴素车、白马,系颈以组,封皇帝玺、符节,降轵音只《字书》云:车轮之穿为道道旁。羽引兵西屠咸阳,杀秦降王子婴,烧秦宫室。子婴立四十六日以至国亡身死,此岂非祸其子孙乎。汉武帝征和二年四月,帝如甘泉云:车轮之穿为道道旁。羽引兵西屠咸阳,杀秦降王子婴,烧秦宫室。子婴立四十六日以至国亡身死,此岂非祸其子孙乎。汉武帝征和二年四月,帝如甘泉。秋七月,皇太子据杀使者江充,白皇后发兵反。诏丞相屈牦讨之。据罢走湖,皇后卫氏及据皆自杀。胡氏曰:武帝意广欲多,穷兵黩武,大兴土木,巡游不休,民力既殚,盗贼蜂起,而后大祸及其子孙,不亦宜乎。
Interpretation

According to the copied account, in the thirteenth year of Duke Zhao of Lu, King Ling of Chu’s son, Prince Bi, Prince Zigan, Prince Heigong, Prince Zhe, as well as Qiji, Man Chengran, Cai Chao, the Wu grandee, and others led troops from Chen, Cai, Bu Geng, Xu, and Ye against Chu. They also joined forces with the followers of four clans—Wei, Xu Wei, Cai Wei, and Man Chengran. They killed Crown Prince Lu and Prince Badi, then sent Guan Cong to accompany the army to Qianxi and tell the soldiers to rise in rebellion against Chu. The army broke apart when it reached Ziliang.

When King Ling heard that several princes had been killed, he fell from his carriage and said, “Do others love their sons as much as I love mine?” He then said, “I have killed so many other men’s sons. Could disaster really not come upon me in turn? Is this not Heaven’s retribution against me?”

The Right Minister Zige urged him to go first to the outskirts and wait there to hear what the people thought. King Ling replied, “The people’s anger cannot be challenged.” Zige then urged him to go to a large city and seek help from the feudal lords. The king said, “They have all turned against me already.” Zige next advised him to take refuge for a time among the feudal lords and leave himself to the judgment of a great state. King Ling replied, “Great fortune does not come twice; I would only bring disgrace upon myself.” Randan then returned to Chu. Zige… King Ling eventually hanged himself at the home of Shen Hai, the official of Yu. After reaching the Gong family’s home, the king took his own life by hanging. Was this not bringing calamity upon himself and passing disaster on to his descendants?

The Comprehensive Mirror for Aid in Government records that in the thirty-first year of King Min of Qi, Yue Yi, the senior general of Yan, led troops from Qin, Wei, Han, and Zhao in an attack on Qi. Yue Yi believed that the king of Qi boasted of his achievements and relied on his own abilities, ignored his ministers’ advice, dismissed the worthy and trusted flatterers, and governed with cruelty. The people therefore resented him and would surely turn against Qi, making the state ripe for conquest. King Min fled to Ju. Chu sent Nao Chi with troops to aid Qi and appointed him its chancellor. Nao Chi wanted to divide Qi’s territory with Yan, so he seized King Min and killed him.

Xunzi said, “A state is the most powerful position in the world. Govern it by following the right way, and it will be secure and prominent, becoming a source from which good things accumulate. Govern it without following the right way, and it will be in extreme danger and become a heavy burden; possessing it is worse than not having it. At the limit, even if one wishes to retreat and become an ordinary person, one cannot.” King Min of Qi and Duke Xian of Song were examples of this. Were these rulers not killed because they lacked the Way?

From the first year of Zhengli, the Yimao year, through the twenty-sixth year, the Gengchen year, Qin Shi Huang subdued the feudal lords and destroyed the Six States, then proclaimed himself the First Emperor. In the autumn of the thirty-seventh year, in the seventh month, he died at the Shaqiu Terrace. Hu Hai succeeded him as Qin Er Shi, the Second Emperor of Qin. In the third year of his reign, Chancellor Zhao Gao feared that he himself would be killed. He secretly ordered Yan Le, the magistrate of Xianyang, to lead more than a thousand officials and soldiers to Wangyi Palace. Yan Le stepped forward and rebuked the Second Emperor: “You have been arrogant and unrestrained, killing people at will. Everyone in the realm has turned against you. You should consider your own course.” Yan Le signaled his soldiers to advance, and the Second Emperor took his own life. Zhao Gao then installed Ziying as king of Qin.

In the winter of the first year of Gaozu, in the tenth month, the Duke of Pei arrived at Bashang. King Ziying of Qin rode in a white carriage drawn by a white horse, with a silk cord around his neck, and surrendered with the imperial seal and tally. Xiang Yu led his troops west into Xianyang, killed the surrendered King Ziying, and burned the palaces of Qin. Ziying had been king of Qin for only forty-six days when the state fell, and he too lost his life. Was this not inviting calamity upon his descendants?

In the fourth month of the second year of the Zhenghe era under Emperor Wu of Han, the emperor went to Ganquan. In the autumn, in the seventh month, Crown Prince Liu Ju killed the envoy Jiang Chong, informed the empress, and then raised troops in resistance. The emperor ordered Chancellor Qu Mao to put down the revolt. Liu Ju was defeated and fled to Hu County; the empress, Lady Wei, and Liu Ju both took their own lives. Hu’s commentary says: Emperor Wu of Han had boundless desires and sought too much. He waged wars without restraint, undertook vast construction projects, and traveled constantly, exhausting the strength of the people. This led to bandits rising everywhere, and later great calamities fell upon his descendants. Was this not only to be expected?

师之所处,荆棘生焉。大军之后,必有凶年。 衍义云:田荒石露,荆棘生焉。 钞:田荒石露者,《庄子□渔父篇》云:官治其职,人忧其事,乃无所陵,故田荒石露,衣食不足,征赋不属,妻妾不和,长幼无序,庶人之忧也。此明大军之后,农民失业,田土荒废,荆棘乱生,必有凶年之兆也。 故善者果而已,不敢以取强。果而勿矜,果而勿伐,果而勿骄,果而不人之忧也。此明大军之后,农民失业,田土荒废,荆棘乱生,必有凶年之兆也。 故善者果而已,不敢以取强。果而勿矜,果而勿伐,果而勿骄,果而不得已,是果而勿强。 衍义云:自圣人画卦,弦木为弧,剡木为矢,弧矢之利,以威天下。 钞《周易系辞下》之文。弦木为弧,剡木为矢,弧矢之利,以威天下,盖取诸睽。睽者,乖也。物乖则争端兴,弧矢之用,所以威乖争也。此圣人不得已而用之,以示其威,初非嗜杀人者也。
Interpretation

Wherever an army has been stationed, thorns will later grow in abundance; after a great war, years of famine are sure to follow.

The Extended Meaning says: When fields lie abandoned and rocks are left bare, thorns begin to grow.

The Collected Explanations quotes the “Fisherman” chapter of the Zhuangzi: Officials each attend to the duties of their offices, and people each concern themselves with their own affairs; in this way, no one oppresses another. Thus abandoned fields and bare rocks, shortages of food and clothing, unpaid taxes, discord between husband and wife, and disorder between young and old are all sources of hardship for the people. This shows that after a great war, farmers lose their livelihoods, fields are abandoned, and thorns grow in tangled profusion, foretelling years of famine.

Therefore, one skilled in using the army does only what is necessary to achieve the goal and does not dare to flaunt force. After victory, one does not boast, show off, or grow arrogant. The army is used only when there is no other choice; so even in victory, one does not press one’s advantage.

The Extended Meaning says: Since the sages devised the Eight Trigrams, people have bent wood to make bows and sharpened wood to make arrows. The power of bow and arrow can be used to awe the world.

The Collected Explanations quotes these words from the Appended Statements, Part Two of the Classic of Changes: “They bent wood to make bows and sharpened wood to make arrows; the power of bow and arrow could be used to awe the world.” This took its model from the principle of the Hexagram Kui, “Opposition.” “Opposition” means estrangement and turning against one another. When things become estranged, conflict arises; bows and arrows are used to deter strife. The sages resorted to force only when there was no other choice, to display their might—not because they delighted in killing.

衍义云:庚桑子曰:原兵之所起与始有人俱。又曰:有此咽药而死者,欲禁天下之医,非也。至征伐不可偃於天下,言善以道佐人主者,当守雌与始有人俱。又曰:有此咽药而死者,欲禁天下之医,非也。至征伐不可偃於天下,言善以道佐人主者,当守雌静,不可以兵强天下。若为敌所侵,不得已而应之,故曰善用也。 钞此皆《亢仓子□兵道篇》之文也。今取以为证者,言兵虽不可废,亦不可恃此,戒以兵强於天下。 衍义云:《春秋》曰:杀敌为果。
Interpretation

The Yanyi quotes Gengsangzi: “If we trace the origins of war, we find that it has existed since human beings first appeared.” It also says: “If someone dies after taking medicine, it is wrong to try to ban all physicians throughout the world.” In the same way, punitive wars cannot be entirely eliminated from the world. Those skilled in assisting a ruler through the Dao should maintain an attitude of gentleness, stillness, and restraint. They must not use force to impose their will on the world. If an enemy attacks, and there is no choice but to send out troops in response, only then can one be called skilled in the use of arms.

The commentator says that these words all come from the chapter “The Way of War” in the Kangcangzi. They are cited here as supporting evidence to show that although war cannot be abolished, one must not rely on force. This is a warning against using military power to dominate the world.

The Yanyi also quotes the Spring and Autumn Annals: “Only those who kill the enemy can be called resolute.”

钞:《春秋》宣公二年春,郑公子归生受命于楚,伐宋。宋华元帅乐莒司寇御之。二月壬子,战于大棘,宋师败绩,囚华元,囚以明其生获。获乐莒,及甲车四百六十乘,俘二百五十人,馘百人。宋大夫狂。宋华元帅乐莒司寇御之。二月壬子,战于大棘,宋师败绩,囚华元,囚以明其生获。获乐莒,及甲车四百六十乘,俘二百五十人,馘百人。宋大夫狂狡辂迎也郑人,郑人入于井,狂狡,宋大夫也。倒戟而出之,获狂校。君子曰:失礼违命,宜其为擒也。戎,昭果毅以听之之谓礼。听谓常存於耳,着於心,想闻其政令。杀敌为果,致果为毅。言易之,而反之,必为戮矣。易之,戮也。将战,华元杀羊食士,其御羊斟不与。及战,曰:畴昔前日也之羊,子为政。今日之事,我为政。与之郑师,故败。君子谓:羊斟非人也。以其私憾,败国珍尽也。民,於是刑孰大焉。《诗》所谓人之无良者,《诗小雅》义,取不良之人相怨以亡也。其羊斟之谓乎。是知杀敌为果,即止敌也。事不得已而用兵,用以止敌,令不为寇,故曰不敢以取强。义,取不良之人相怨以亡也。其羊斟之谓乎。是知杀敌为果,即止敌也。事不得已而用兵,用以止敌,令不为寇,故曰不敢以取强。 衍义云:成汤胜夏而有暂德之言。
Interpretation

The Chunqiu records that in the spring of the second year of Duke Xuan of Lu, Gongsun Guisheng of Zheng attacked Song on the orders of Chu. Hua Yuan of Song led Le Ju, the minister of justice, and others in resisting him. On the day renzi in the second month, the two armies fought at Daji. The Song army suffered a crushing defeat; Hua Yuan was captured, as was Le Ju. The Zheng army also seized 460 chariots, took 250 prisoners, and cut off the left ears of 100 enemy soldiers as proof of their victory.

When the Song grandee Kuang Jiao fought the Zheng army, a Zheng soldier hid in a well. Kuang Jiao lowered his halberd and pulled the man out, only to be captured by the Zheng army in turn. A gentleman commented: “He failed to observe ritual and disobeyed military orders, so it was only right that he was captured.” On the battlefield, ritual means fighting the enemy with clear resolve and obeying military orders. To “heed orders” means to keep them constantly in mind and be ready to carry them out at any moment. Killing the enemy is called resolve; carrying it through is called steadfastness. Anyone who carelessly treats military orders as a game and then disobeys them will surely be punished.

Before the battle, Hua Yuan slaughtered sheep to reward the soldiers but gave no share to Yang Zhan, the charioteer. During the fighting, Yang Zhan said, “Yesterday, you decided how the sheep’s meat was divided. Today, I decide how the battle is fought.” He then drove his chariot toward the Zheng army, causing the Song defeat. A gentleman judged that Yang Zhan was unworthy of being called a human being: out of personal resentment, he brought great loss upon his state. What graver crime could there be against the people? The “man of bad character” mentioned in the Lesser Odes of the Book of Odes refers precisely to one who, out of resentment, brings about the ruin of his state. This was probably speaking of Yang Zhan.

From this we can understand that “killing the enemy with resolve” means stopping the enemy from continuing to make incursions. One should take up arms only when there is no other choice, and do so to end warfare, so that the enemy will no longer prey upon others. That is why it is said that one must not flaunt one’s strength through force.

The Yanyi says that after Tang of Shang defeated Jie of Xia, he spoke of “temporary De”—Virtue exercised for a time.

钞《商书□仲虺汤之左相。之诰》。成汤放桀于南巢,地名惟有惭德。曰:予恐来世以台为口实。此言汤虽顺天应人,然承尧舜禹授受之后,於心终有所不安,故愧其德之不古,若又恐天下后世藉以为口实也。 衍义云:归亳而有临渊之惧。 钞《汤语》。王归自克夏,至于亳,诞告万方。亳,汤所都,在宋州谷熟县。俾我一人辑和也宁尔邦家,兹朕未知获戾于上下,栗栗危惧,若将坠陨也于深渊。天使我辑宁尔邦家,其付予之重,恐其不足以当之,未知已得罪于天地与否,惊恐忧畏若将坠於深渊。 衍义云深渊。天使我辑宁尔邦家,其付予之重,恐其不足以当之,未知已得罪于天地与否,惊恐忧畏若将坠於深渊。 衍义云:春秋时,吴尝破越,而有轻楚之心。 钞《春秋》义中已详,不复重录。 物壮则老,是谓不道,不道早已。 衍义云:道者,长於上古而不为先。钞《庄子□太宗师篇》之文。在太极之先而不为高,六极六合之下而不为深,先天地生而不为久,长於上古而不为老,此言道无不在而所在皆无。有物混成章中载之已详。 夫佳兵章第三十一 君子居则贵左,用兵则贵右。兵者不祥之器,非君子之器,不得已而用之,恬淡为上。 衍义云:若夫蛮夷猾夏,寇贼奸宄。
Interpretation

The “Proclamation of Zhong Hui” in the “Books of Shang” section of the Book of Documents records that Cheng Tang, the founding ruler of the Shang dynasty, exiled Xia Jie to Nanchao. Tang said, “I fear that later generations will use this as an excuse.” This means that although Tang acted in accordance with Heaven’s will and the people’s wishes, he still felt uneasy when he thought of the ancient tradition in which Yao, Shun, and Yu passed the throne to one another. He felt that his virtue fell short of that of the ancients, and worried that later generations throughout the realm would use the event as grounds for criticism.

The commentary says that after Cheng Tang returned to Bo, the Shang capital, he remained as anxious as if he were standing at the edge of an abyss.

The Tang yu records that after Tang defeated the Xia and returned to Bo, he issued a proclamation to the various regions: “I hope to bring peace and harmony to your states. But I do not know whether I have offended Heaven and Earth. My heart trembles with fear, as though I were about to fall into an abyss.” Tang believed that Heaven’s mandate had charged him with bringing peace to the states, a grave responsibility. He feared he might not be capable of bearing it and worried that he might already have failed Heaven and Earth; thus, he was apprehensive and uneasy.

The commentary further says that during the Spring and Autumn period, after the state of Wu defeated Yue, it began to look down on Chu.

The relevant principles from the Spring and Autumn Annals have already been discussed in detail; they will not be copied out again here.

When things reach the height of strength and prosperity, they begin to decline. This is called being contrary to the Dao; what is contrary to the Dao soon perishes.

The commentary says that although the Dao predates high antiquity, it does not place itself first. Here it cites the “Great Ancestral Teacher” chapter of the Zhuangzi: the Dao is before the Supreme Ultimate, yet is not thereby high; it lies beneath the four quarters of Heaven and Earth, yet is not thereby deep; it was born before Heaven and Earth, yet is not thereby old; it outlasts high antiquity, yet is not thereby aged. This means that the Dao is everywhere, yet is confined to no particular place. The chapter “Something Formed in Confusion” in the Daodejing explains this in detail.

Chapter Thirty-One: On the Art of War

In ordinary life, a gentleman honors the left; in war, he honors the right. Weapons are instruments of ill omen, not tools a gentleman delights in using. He uses them only when there is no alternative, and the best approach is to regard war with calm detachment.

The commentary says: As for cases such as barbarians invading the Central States and bandits causing disorder and committing evil…

钞《舜典》之文。舜帝命皋陶曰则贵右。兵者不祥之器,非君子之器,不得已而用之,恬淡为上。 衍义云:若夫蛮夷猾夏,寇贼奸宄。 钞《舜典》之文。舜帝命皋陶曰:蛮夷猾乱也夏,寇劫人曰寇贼杀人曰贼奸在外曰奸宄在内曰宄,汝作士,理官也。五刑有服,五服三就。五流有宅,五宅三居。惟明克允。此舜命皋陶作士,蛮夷戎狄,猾乱中夏,害于良民,汝为士理治之,必当致其明察,乃能使刑当其罪而人无不信服也。五服,服其罪也。三就,孔氏以为大罪於原野,大夫於朝,士於市。五流,五等象刑之当宥者也。五宅三居者,流虽有五而宅之但为三等之居,如列爵惟五分,土惟三也。不免用兵御敌征伐而已,故曰:有道君子不得已而用之也。 衍义云但为三等之居,如列爵惟五分,土惟三也。不免用兵御敌征伐而已,故曰:有道君子不得已而用之也。 衍义云:克定祸乱,应敌为用。得隽曰克,凶暴及人曰祸,反德肆迷曰乱。
Interpretation

This passage quotes the Shundian. Emperor Shun admonished Gao Yao: “Armed force is a measure to be used only when there is no other choice. Weapons are ill-omened tools, not things a gentleman uses in ordinary circumstances. Even when they must be used, calm restraint and detachment should be the guiding principles.”

Those called “barbarians” who disrupt the Central States, and robbers who commit crimes, are distinguished as follows: people who seize property are called kou (“robbers”); those who kill are called zei (“murderers”). Evil committed outside the state is called jian (“treachery”), while evil committed within it is called gui (“subversion”). Shun appointed Gao Yao to oversee criminal justice and adjudicate cases. Each of the five punishments had its corresponding offenses and penalties, and each of the five degrees of banishment had its designated place of resettlement. Only through careful investigation could punishment be made to fit the crime and earn people’s trust.

The “five punishments” refers to penalties imposed according to the severity of an offense. According to Kong Anguo’s interpretation, the “three places of execution” (san jiu) were the countryside for major criminals, the court for high officials, and the marketplace for lower-ranking officers. The “five banishments” refers to five degrees of exile, used to deal with offenders whose crimes could be met with leniency. Although banishment had five degrees, the places of resettlement fell into three categories, just as there were five ranks of nobility but three grades of fief.

When conflict cannot be avoided, force is the only means of resisting the enemy and carrying out punitive campaigns. Thus, a Dao-aligned gentleman uses force only when there is no other choice.

“To bring disorder to an end and meet the enemy when necessary” means that troops are deployed only to quell upheaval and confront an enemy. “Conquer” means to defeat and win. “Disaster” refers to violent acts that bring harm to others; “disorder” means abandoning virtue and acting recklessly.

钞:克定祸乱,乃齐太公姜子牙钓於磻溪,剖鱼得玉璜,中有此书名曰《六韬》。一曰文韬,经邦立国不越天常。二曰武韬,克定祸乱威伏八方。三曰龙韬,燮理阴阳不逾时令。四曰虎韬,善用爪牙群凶自挫。五曰豹韬,臂时戡难智在权机。六曰犬韬,探听至微或成奇变。韬者,藏也。兵机权变不可轻以示人,故以韬藏隐晦为义。 衍义云:非贪土地利财宝也。 钞:汉宣帝时,韦贤为丞相。元康中,匈奴遣韬藏隐晦为义。 衍义云:非贪土地利财宝也。 钞:汉宣帝时,韦贤为丞相。元康中,匈奴遣兵击汉,屯田军师不能下。上与后将军赵充国等议,欲因匈奴衰弱,出兵击其右地,使不敢复扰西域。丞相上书谏曰:臣闻之救乱诛暴者,谓之义兵,兵义者王。敌加於己,不得已而起者,谓之应兵,兵应则胜。争恨小故不忍忿怒者,谓之忿兵,兵忿则败。利人土地货宝者,谓之贪兵,兵贪则破。恃国之大,矜民之众,欲见威於敌者,谓之骄兵,兵骄则灭。此五者,非但人事,是以玄同,取以为证,以证其果,而不得已,是果而勿强。上文与《文子□欲见威於敌者,谓之骄兵,兵骄则灭。此五者,非但人事,是以玄同,取以为证,以证其果,而不得已,是果而勿强。上文与《文子□兵道篇》同。
Interpretation

“Pacifying disorder” refers to the story of Jiang Ziya, the Grand Duke of Qi, fishing at Pan Creek. He split open a fish’s belly and found a jade huang pendant containing a book called the Six Secret Teachings. The book has six sections. The first, “Civil Strategy,” explains that governing a state and establishing a realm must follow the natural principles of the Dao. The second, “Military Strategy,” discusses how to pacify disorder and awe the four quarters. The third, “Dragon Strategy,” concerns harmonizing Yin-Yang and following the seasons. The fourth, “Tiger Strategy,” explains how to make good use of subordinates so that violent people bring about their own defeat. The fifth, “Leopard Strategy,” addresses how to quell crises at the opportune moment, chiefly through strategy and adaptability. The sixth, “Dog Strategy,” concerns observing subtle circumstances, which can sometimes make it possible to win by an unexpected move. “Tao” means concealment. The stratagems and adaptations of warfare should not be readily disclosed, so the word conveys the sense of keeping them hidden and obscure.

The Commentary on the Extended Meaning says: This is not done out of greed for land, profit, or treasure.

During the reign of Emperor Xuan of Han, Wei Xian served as chancellor. In the Yuankang era, the Xiongnu sent troops to attack Han, and the forces and commanders stationed on the frontier could not drive them back. Emperor Xuan consulted with Zhao Chongguo, the General of the Rear, and others. They planned to attack the Xiongnu’s western territory while the Xiongnu were weakened, so that they would no longer dare to raid the Western Regions. Chancellor Wei Xian submitted a memorial urging the emperor to reconsider: “I have heard that rescuing the realm from disorder and punishing the violent is called a righteous campaign; only when a campaign accords with righteousness can it establish royal authority. When an enemy invades and one takes up arms out of necessity, this is called a responsive campaign; fighting in response to the enemy brings victory. Fighting over a trivial matter because one cannot contain one’s anger is called a wrathful campaign; an army raised in anger will be defeated. Coveting another’s land, wealth, and treasures is called a greedy campaign; an army raised for profit will meet with destruction. Relying on the strength of the state and the size of its population to flaunt one’s might before the enemy is called an arrogant campaign; an army raised in arrogance and self-importance will ultimately perish.”

These five situations express not only principles of human affairs; they can also be understood through “mysterious sameness,” the state of accord with the Dao in which distinctions fall away. They are cited here as evidence to show how actions lead to their consequences. Even when a campaign is truly unavoidable, one should act in accordance with circumstances and not force matters through sheer strength. The passage above says the same as the “Way of Warfare” chapter of the Wenzi.

衍义云:楚白公胜作乱,差使屈,市南宜僚弄丸而两家之难解,孙叔敖甘寝秉羽而郢人投兵。 钞《庄子□徐无鬼篇》之文。义中载之已详,不复再录。今取玄同以为说者,言市南宜僚、孙叔敖皆以不道之道、不言之辩而两家之难自解,可谓不战而善胜,恬淡而为上者也。 胜而不美而美之者,是乐杀人。夫乐杀人者,不可得志於天下。 衍义云:孟子所谓今夫天下之为上者也。 胜而不美而美之者,是乐杀人。夫乐杀人者,不可得志於天下。 衍义云:孟子所谓今夫天下之人牧,未有不嗜杀人者。 钞《孟子□梁惠王章句上》。孟子见梁襄王襄王,惠王之子,名赫。出,语人曰:望之不似人君,就之而不见所畏焉。卒然问曰:天下恶乎定。对曰:定于一。孰能一之。王再问对曰:不嗜杀人者能一之。嗜,好也,甘也。今夫天下之人牧,未有不嗜杀人者也。如有不嗜杀人者,则天下之民皆引领而望之矣。诚如是也,曰:不嗜杀人者能一之。嗜,好也,甘也。今夫天下之人牧,未有不嗜杀人者也。如有不嗜杀人者,则天下之民皆引领而望之矣。诚如是也,民归之,由水之就下,沛然谁能御之。 衍义云:《列子》载赵襄子使新稚穆子攻翟,胜之。 钞《庄子□说符篇》之文。义中载之已详,不复重录。
Interpretation

Wang Shouzheng’s Yanyi says: When Bai Gong Sheng rebelled in the state of Chu, he sent someone to summon Qu Yijiu. Shinan Yiliao played with pellets between the two sides, and their troubles were thus resolved. Sun Shuao lay at ease, holding a feather fan, and the people of Ying laid down their weapons.

This passage quotes the Zhuangzi, “Xu Wugui” chapter, which has already been explained in detail above and will not be copied out again here. The idea of “mysterious sameness”—a state of concealing one’s edge and aligning with the Dao—helps explain that Shinan Yiliao and Sun Shuao resolved the troubles between the two sides by following nature rather than relying on force, and by using wisdom that did not engage in verbal dispute. They may be said to have excelled at winning without fighting, taking calmness and Wuwei (non-action) as the highest way.

Yet if, after winning, one does not regard victory as worthy of praise but instead takes pride in killing, this is to delight in killing. Those who delight in killing cannot fulfill their aims in the world.

The Yanyi says: This is precisely what Mencius meant when he said, “Among those who govern the world today…”

Yet if, after winning, one does not regard victory as worthy of praise but instead takes pride in killing, this is to delight in killing. Those who delight in killing cannot fulfill their aims in the world.

The Yanyi says: Mencius once said, “Among those who govern the world today, there is none who does not delight in killing.”

This passage quotes the Mencius, “Liang Hui Wang I.” Mencius visited King Xiang of Liang, the son of King Hui of Liang, whose personal name was He. After leaving, Mencius told someone, “From a distance, he did not look like a ruler; up close, he inspired no sense of awe.”

King Xiang of Liang suddenly asked, “How can the world be brought to order?” Mencius replied, “The world will be at peace when it is unified.” The king then asked, “Who can unify it?” Mencius replied, “Someone who does not delight in killing can unify it.”

“Delight” means to like something or willingly engage in it. Among those who govern the world today, there is none who does not delight in killing. If there were a ruler who did not delight in killing, the people of the world would all crane their necks in longing for him. If this is so, then Mencius’s words, “Someone who does not delight in killing can unify the world,” become clear: the people would rally to him like water flowing downhill, with a force no one could stop.

The Yanyi says: The Liezi records that Zhao Xiangzi sent Xinzhimuzi to attack the state of Di and win a victory.

This passage quotes the Zhuangzi, “Shuo Fu” chapter, which has already been explained in detail above and will not be copied out again here.

吉事尚左,凶事尚右,偏将军处左,上将军处右,言以丧礼处之。 钞:尚左、尚右,此《礼记□檀弓篇》之文。义中已详,不复重录。今取此以为说者,若有勇士战胜而获功,升为上将军,居右而主杀,故云战胜则以丧礼处之,不足上也。 道常无名章第三十二 道常无名。朴,虽小,天下不敢臣。侯王若能守,万物将自宾。 战胜则以丧礼处之,不足上也。 道常无名章第三十二 道常无名。朴,虽小,天下不敢臣。侯王若能守,万物将自宾。 衍义云:世之材器,有明可以役其视,有聪可以役其听,有勇可以役其力,有辩可以役其词,此诸有名皆无为之所役,惟道朴无名。
Interpretation

When an occasion is joyful, ritual gives precedence to the left; at a funeral, it gives precedence to the right. The assistant general stands on the left, while the supreme general stands on the right. This means they are arranged according to the rules of funeral rites.

The distinction between “giving precedence to the left” and “giving precedence to the right” appears in the “Tan Gong” chapter of the Book of Rites, as explained earlier; there is no need to repeat that discussion here. The saying is used here to explain that a warrior who wins in battle and earns merit is promoted to supreme general and stands on the right to oversee the killing. Thus, when the Jing says that victory in battle should be treated like a funeral, it means that victory should not be celebrated as an honor worthy of esteem.

Chapter 32: The Dao Is Ever Nameless

The Dao is ever nameless. Though the Uncarved Block—unshaped and in its natural state—is small, no one under Heaven dares treat it as a subordinate. If the lords and kings can hold fast to the Dao, the myriad things will naturally submit to them.

The Extended Meaning says: The many abilities and implements in the world each have their own names. Insight governs sight, acuity governs hearing, courage governs physical strength, and eloquence governs speech. These named and tangible abilities are all made to serve the Dao of Wuwei (non-action). Only the Dao remains simple and nameless.

钞《列子□仲尼篇》云:郑之圃泽多贤,东里多才。圃泽之役有伯丰子者,役犹弟子行过东里,遇邓析。邓析顾其徒而笑曰:为若舞舞弄彼来者为而欲欺弄於伯丰奚若。其徒曰:所愿知闻也。邓析郑之辩智之士。谓伯丰子曰:汝知养养之义乎。爱人养而其徒而笑曰:为若舞舞弄彼来者为而欲欺弄於伯丰奚若。其徒曰:所愿知闻也。邓析郑之辩智之士。谓伯丰子曰:汝知养养之义乎。爱人养而不能自养者,犬豕之类也。养物而物我用者,人之力也。使汝之徒,食而饱,衣而息,执政之功也。长幼群聚,而为牢藉庖厨之物,奚异犬豕之类乎。伯丰子不应。伯丰子之徒者越次而进曰:大夫不闻齐鲁之多机乎。有善治土木者,有善治金革者,有善治声乐者,有善治书数者,有善治军旅者,有善治宗庙者,群才备也。而无相位者,无能相使者。而位之者无知,使之者无能,而知之与能,为之使焉。执政者乃吾之所使,子奚矜焉。邓析无以应,目其徒而退。此言有知能相使者。而位之者无知,使之者无能,而知之与能,为之使焉。执政者乃吾之所使,子奚矜焉。邓析无以应,目其徒而退。此言有知有才有能为无知无才无能者所使也。何足贵哉。是故怀抱道朴之人,不彰名誉,不显才能,昏昏默默,逍遥於世,而无敢使之者。凡人见之者,不假言说,目击而道存,自然宾服而从化矣。故经云:道常无名。朴虽小,天下不敢臣。侯王若能守,万物将自宾。
Interpretation

The Zhongni chapter of the Liezi records that many worthy people lived in the Puzhe area of Zheng, and many talented people in the Dongli area as well. A man named Bofengzi lived in Puzhe. When his disciples passed through Dongli, they encountered Deng Xi. Deng Xi turned to his own disciples with a smile and said, “Let me put on a little performance for you and see whether I can make a fool of that Bofengzi. What do you think?” His disciples replied, “We would very much like to see it.”

Deng Xi was a clever and quick-witted man of Zheng, skilled in debate. He asked Bofengzi, “Do you understand how to provide for people? Someone who only accepts support from others but cannot support himself is like a dog or a pig. The true skill of a human being is to provide for all things and put them to use. The fact that your disciples have enough to eat and wear, and a place to live and rest, is the achievement of those who govern. How are you any different from livestock kept in a pen, gathered together to be slaughtered and cooked for others?”

Bofengzi did not reply. One of his disciples stepped forward out of turn and said, “My lord, have you never heard that Qi and Lu have many talented people? Some are skilled in building with earth and timber; some in smelting metal and making weapons; some in music; some in writing and calculation; and others in commanding troops or conducting ancestral temple sacrifices. All kinds of talent are represented. Yet none of these people is naturally entitled to command the others. Those in high office are not necessarily capable, and those who give orders are not necessarily competent. Those with real understanding and ability are instead made to serve them. Those who govern are merely people we put to work. What is there for you to boast about?”

Deng Xi had no answer. He glanced at his disciples and withdrew.

This story shows that people with understanding, talent, and ability may end up serving those who lack all three. What, then, is worthy of respect in such people? Those who embrace the Dao and preserve simplicity do not advertise their reputations or display their abilities. They live freely in quiet silence, beyond anyone’s power to command. When people encounter such a person, they need not hear what he says: simply seeing him lets them sense the presence of the Dao, and they naturally feel respect and are transformed by his influence.

Thus the Dao De Jing says: “The Dao is ever nameless. Though the uncarved simplicity seems small, none under Heaven dares make it a servant. If lords and kings can preserve it, all things will come of themselves as guests.” This means that the Dao is constant and nameless. The simple Dao may appear insignificant, yet all under Heaven dare not treat it as a subordinate. If lords and kings can hold fast to the Dao, all things will naturally come and submit.

衍义云:不假威武劝赏物,不知其然而自宾矣。 钞《孟子故经云:道常无名。朴虽小,天下不敢臣。侯王若能守,万物将自宾。 衍义云:不假威武劝赏物,不知其然而自宾矣。 钞《孟子□滕文公章句下》云:孟子答景春景姓春名,魏国人也。之辞。居天下之广居,立天下之正位,行天下之大道。得志,与民由之。不得志,独行其道。富贵不能淫,贫贱不能移,威武不能屈,此之谓大丈夫。此言侯王若能以道自守,万物自知宾服,何用威武哉。 衍义云:尘垢□糠足以陶铸尧舜。 钞《庄子□逍遥游篇》之文。云:大浸稽天而不溺,大旱金石流,土山焦而不热。是其尘垢□糠将犹陶铸尧舜者也,孰肯以物为事。注:尧舜者,世事之名耳。为名者非名也。故夫尧舜者,岂直尧舜而已哉。必有神人之实焉。今所称尧舜者,徒名其尘垢□糠耳。 道德真经衍义手妙卷之八竟 7-道德真经衍义手钞卷之九 道德真经衍义手钞卷之九 五峰清安逸士德真经衍义手妙卷之八竟 7-道德真经衍义手钞卷之九 道德真经衍义手钞卷之九 五峰清安逸士王守正集 知人者智章第三十三 知人者智,自知者明。 衍义云:若辩黑白。
Interpretation

The Commentary says: Without relying on military force to intimidate, or on material rewards to entice, all things under Heaven will submit of their own accord, though no one can explain why.

Mencius says: “The Dao is always nameless. Though the Uncarved Block is small, all under Heaven dare not make it their subject. If the lords and kings can hold fast to it, all things will come of their own accord as guests.” Here, “the Uncarved Block” refers to the Dao in its uncarved state. If the lords and kings can hold fast to the Great Dao, all things will naturally come and submit.

In “Teng Wengong, Part Two,” Mencius records his reply to Jing Chun: “He dwells in the broadest house under Heaven, stands in the most proper place under Heaven, and walks the brightest path under Heaven. When he achieves his purpose, he follows the right path together with the people; when he does not, he holds fast to his own Dao alone. Wealth and rank cannot confuse him, poverty and low status cannot change him, and force cannot make him bend. Such a person is called a great man.” The Commentary uses this to explain that if the lords and kings can hold fast to the Dao, all things will naturally submit. Why, then, resort to force?

The Commentary also says: Even dust, dirt, and chaff can bring forth figures like Yao and Shun. “Dust, dirt, and chaff” comes from the “Free and Easy Wandering” chapter of the Zhuangzi. The passage describes a state in which one would not be submerged even if floods covered the sky, nor feel hot even if a great drought melted metal and stone and scorched the hills. In such a state, even dust, dirt, and chaff can bring forth Yao and Shun—so who would take external things seriously?

“Yao and Shun” here are merely the worldly titles for sage kings. The “Yao and Shun” sought by those pursuing fame are only figures borrowing those names. The true Yao and Shun are not merely the historical rulers called Yao and Shun, but beings who have attained a wondrous state. The Yao and Shun of worldly understanding are simply a way of comparing that state to dust, dirt, and chaff.

Hand-copied Commentary on the Meaning of the True Scripture of the Dao and Its De, Volume Nine

Chapter Thirty-Three: “Knowing others is wisdom; knowing oneself is clarity.”

The Commentary says: This is like being able to distinguish black from white.

钞《庄子□外篇天运篇》。庄子曰:夫鹄又作鹤。不日浴而白,乌不日黔而黑。黑白之朴不足以为辩。此言黑白得之自然。不在浴而白黔而黑也。 衍义云:智者,察人之邪正。 钞《孟子》曰:存乎人者,莫良於眸子。眸子不能掩其恶。胸中正,则眸子瞭焉。胸中不正,则眸子盹焉。听其言观其眸子,人焉厦哉。人焉庾哉。庾。匿也。此言人之邪正,观其眸子即可见也。盖人与物接之时,其神在目,故胸中正,则精神而明。不正,则神散而昏。以此察之,则人之邪正善恶,不可得而匿矣。故曰:知人者智,自知者明。而明。不正,则神散而昏。以此察之,则人之邪正善恶,不可得而匿矣。故曰:知人者智,自知者明。 衍义云:如别妍丑。 钞《九幽忏》第五卷中云:报应因缘,如影逐形,譬如浄镜照人,媸妍自别。善恶之业,理亦如然。 衍义云:而不能见其睫。 钞《庄子□庚桑楚》之文。老子曰:向吾见若眉睫目毛也。之间。 衍义云:复以自知。 钞《周易系辞》云:复以自知,言既能反复求诸己,则自知得失也。 胜人者有力,自胜者强。 衍义云:常胜之道。
Interpretation

The “Tianyun” chapter of the Outer Chapters of the Zhuangzi says: “The swan does not bathe every day, yet its feathers are naturally white; the crow is not dyed every day, yet its feathers are naturally black.” Black and white are so by nature; bathing and dyeing do not bring them into being. This means that human nature, too, has its own natural expression.

An extended commentary says: “A wise person can discern whether people are upright or crooked.”

The Mencius says: “When observing a person, nothing is more reliable than looking at their eyes. The eyes cannot conceal the thoughts of an evil mind. When the heart is upright, the gaze is clear; when the heart is not upright, the gaze is dim. Listen to what they say, then look at their eyes—can they still hide themselves?” Here, “yu” means “to hide.” When people come into contact with things outside themselves, their spirit shows in their eyes. Thus, when the heart is upright, the expression is clear; when it is not, the spirit is scattered and the gaze grows dim. A person’s integrity, crookedness, goodness, or evil is therefore difficult to conceal. As the saying goes: “Knowing others is wisdom; knowing yourself is clarity.”

An extended commentary says: “This is like distinguishing beauty from ugliness.”

The fifth scroll of the Jiuyou Chan says: “Retribution and karmic conditions follow one another like a shadow following a body. They are like a clear mirror reflecting a person’s appearance, making beauty and ugliness plain of themselves. The same is true of the karma created by good and evil deeds.”

An extended commentary says: “Yet people often cannot see their own eyelashes.”

This cites a passage from the Gengsang Chu chapter of the Zhuangzi. Laozi said: “Once, I looked at you and could see even your eyebrows, eyelashes, and the hair around your eyes.” The saying uses things nearby and right before us as an analogy: people easily see others, yet find it hard to notice themselves.

An extended commentary says: “So one must also turn back and understand oneself.”

The Appended Remarks to the Zhouyi says: “Examine yourself again and again, and you will come to know yourself.” This means that by turning inward to seek the causes within oneself, one can understand one’s gains and losses.

“Overcoming others is strength; overcoming yourself is true power.”

An extended commentary says: “This is the way to prevail consistently.”

钞《列子□黄帝篇》之文。天下有常胜之道,有不常胜之道。常胜之道曰柔,不常胜之道曰强。二者亦知亦当作易。而人未之知。故上古之言:强先不己若者,柔先出於己者。先不己若者,至於若己,则殆矣。 衍义二者亦知亦当作易。而人未之知。故上古之言:强先不己若者,柔先出於己者。先不己若者,至於若己,则殆矣。 衍义云:羿善射,奡荡舟,皆以力胜人者也。 钞《论语□宪问第十四》。南宫适问於孔子曰:即南容也。羿善射,奡荡舟,俱不得其死焉。羿是有穷氏之国君也,最善於射,篡夏后太康之位而自立,其臣寒泥又杀羿而代之。《春秋传》言奡乃浇浞之子也,力能陆地行舟,后为夏后少康所杀。羿与奡,皆古之多力强暴之人,终不得其死。二人恃其有力不特不能胜人,又不能自胜,此老氏之所戒人也。 为夏后少康所杀。羿与奡,皆古之多力强暴之人,终不得其死。二人恃其有力不特不能胜人,又不能自胜,此老氏之所戒人也。 衍义云:衽金革,死而不厌,北方之强也。 钞《中庸》第十章。衽金革,死而不厌,北方之强也。衽,席也,籍也。金戈,兵之属。革,甲冑之属。北方风气刚劲,故以果敢之力胜人为强,强者之事也。 衍义云:夫子所谓和而不流,中立而不倚,强哉矫。
Interpretation

A passage from the “Yellow Emperor” chapter of the Liezi says: “There is a way that always prevails, and a way that does not always prevail. What prevails over the long term is softness; what may fail to prevail over the long term is strength. Both principles are easy to understand, yet people do not grasp them. Thus the ancients said: the strong begin by bullying those weaker than themselves, while the soft begin with themselves. Those who constantly bully the weaker are in danger as soon as they meet someone their equal.”

Yi, the legendary archer, was skilled with the bow; Ao, the legendary strongman, could push a boat across dry land. Both relied on strength to overcome others.

A passage from “Xian Wen” in the Analects says: “Nangong Shi, a disciple of Confucius also known as Nan Rong, asked Confucius: ‘Yi was skilled with the bow, and Ao could push a boat across dry land, yet neither met a good end.’ Yi was ruler of the Youqiong clan and an exceptionally skilled archer. He seized the throne of Taikang, the Xia ruler, and made himself king. Later, his minister Han Zhuo killed him and took his place. The Spring and Autumn Annals commentary says that Ao was the son of Jiao, a legendary figure, and Zhuo. He was strong enough to push a boat across dry land, but was later killed by Shaokang, the Xia ruler. Yi and Ao were both ancient men who relied on brute force and acted violently; neither met a good end. They relied on their strength but could neither overcome others nor restrain themselves. This is the principle Laozi urged people to heed.”

A passage from chapter ten of the Doctrine of the Mean says: “To use weapons and armor as a sleeping mat, and to face death without fear—that is the strength of the northerners.” Here, ren means a mat for lying on or bedding; jin refers to weapons such as spears, and ge to armor. The northern character is vigorous, so courage and strength used to prevail over others are regarded as boldness. This is the kind of strength shown by the strong.

What Confucius called strength, however, was this: “To be harmonious without drifting with the current, and to stand upright and centered without leaning to either side—this is true strength.”

钞《中庸》第十章云:君子和而不流,强哉矫。强貌《诗》曰:矫矫武夫是也。倚,偏着也。此则所谓中庸之不可能者,非有以自胜,其人欲之私,不能择而守也。君子之强孰大,於是夫子以是告子路,所以抑其血气之刚,而进之以德义之勇也。 知足者富,强行者有志。 衍义云:庄子曰:曾子居卫,缊袍无表。 钞《庄子□让王篇》之文。曾子居卫,缊袍谓麻组为絮,语云衣敝缊袍也。无表 知足者富,强行者有志。 衍义云:庄子曰:曾子居卫,缊袍无表。 钞《庄子□让王篇》之文。曾子居卫,缊袍谓麻组为絮,语云衣敝缊袍也。无表,颜色种呛种呛剥杂也。手足胼胝。以麻缊袍絮,复无表里,种呛剥杂,每自力作,故生胼胝。三日不举火,十年不制衣,正冠而缨绝,捉矜而肘见,纳履而踵决。根后决也。曳纵而歌商颂,声满天地,若出金石。天子不得臣,诸侯不得友。歌商颂响韵叶,宫商察其辞理,雅符天地声气清虚。又谐金石,风调高素,超绝人伦,故不与天子为臣,不与诸侯为友也。 衍义云:孔子谓颜回曰:回来家贫居卑,胡不仕乎。 钞《庄子□让王篇》之辞。义中已详,不复重录。 不失其所者久,死而不亡者寿。 衍义云:恒久也。象称:君子以立不易方,不失其所也。
Interpretation

Chapter Ten of the Doctrine of the Mean says, “The exemplary person is harmonious and accommodating without simply going along with the crowd. This is true strength.” Here, “strength” means upright resolve. The Book of Songs uses the phrase “sturdy and valiant warrior” in the same sense. “Leaning” means favoring one side. If one cannot restrain selfish desires, one cannot choose and hold to the central, upright Way. This is precisely what makes the Way of the Mean difficult to practice. What kind of strength is most noble? Confucius therefore advised Zilu to rein in the force of his physical vigor and instead cultivate courage grounded in Virtue and righteousness.

Those who know contentment are inwardly rich; those who strive to fulfill their aspirations are steadfast in purpose.

The Extended Exposition cites the Zhuangzi: When Zengzi lived in the state of Wei, he wore shabby, old clothes. A “wadded robe” was padded with tangled hemp fibers; “without an outer layer” means the garment had no covering and was mottled and uneven in color. Zengzi worked with his own hands until his palms and feet were thick with calluses. He went three days without cooking a meal and, for ten years, made no new clothes. When he adjusted his cap, its ties would snap; when he lifted his robe, his elbows showed; and when he put on his shoes, their heels were worn through. He dragged his shoes as he sang the “Hymn of Shang.” His voice rang through Heaven and Earth, sounding like the clear notes of metal and stone. The Son of Heaven could not treat him as a subject, and the feudal lords could not treat him as a friend. This means that his singing was pure and refined, in harmony with the breath of Heaven and Earth, and its tones rang out like metal and stone, setting him apart from others.

The Extended Exposition also cites the Zhuangzi: Confucius said to Yan Hui, “Hui, your family is poor and your status low. Why don’t you come out and take office?” The relevant meaning has already been explained above, so it will not be repeated here.

One who does not lose one’s root can endure; when the body dies but the Dao does not perish, that is called longevity.

The Extended Exposition explains that “constancy” means endurance. The Commentary on the Image says that an exemplary person should stand firm and not depart from the upright Way. This is what it means not to lose one’s root.

钞《周易怛卦众辞》众曰:恒者,久也。刚上而柔下。刚尊柔寿。 衍义云:恒久也。象称:君子以立不易方,不失其所也。 钞《周易怛卦众辞》众曰:恒者,久也。刚上而柔下。刚尊柔卑得其柔也。象曰:雷风恒,君子以立不易方。君子立身,得其恒久之道,不改易其方,方犹道也。 衍义云:列子之不化。钞《列子□天瑞篇》弟子告列子之辞。其言曰:有生不生,有化不化。不因物生,不为物化,故能生於众生,化於群化者也。不生者能生生,不化者能化化,生者不能不生,化者不能不化。 衍义云:庄子之不死。 钞:《庄子□大宗师篇》云:已外生矣,而后能朝彻。朝彻,而后能见独。见独,而后能无古今。无古今,而后能不死不生。夫能同然不崇朝而远彻,忘先后之远接,斯见独者也。 衍义云:释氏之不灭。
Interpretation

The Constant hexagram in the Classic of Changes says: “Constant” means enduring. The firm Yang occupies the upper place, while the yielding Yin occupies the lower; the firm is honored, and the yielding remains below. The hexagram’s image is thunder and wind. From this, the noble person understands that one should hold fast to the right way in how one carries oneself and acts, and not change it lightly. “Direction” means the Way. The noble person follows the enduring Way in establishing themselves, and so does not change the direction they uphold.

The Tianrui chapter of the Liezi records a disciple telling Liezi: There is an existence that is not itself brought forth by anything else and does not change as things change. Because it neither comes into being nor undergoes change, it can bring forth and transform the myriad things. It gives rise to life and drives change: what has been born cannot help but be born, and what is changing cannot help but change.

The Dazongshi chapter of the Zhuangzi says: Only after transcending life and death can one reach a state of sudden, all-encompassing insight. Only then can one see the Dao, independent of the myriad things. Only by seeing the Dao can one transcend past and present; and only by transcending past and present can one reach a state beyond birth and death. One who can unite with the Dao can, in an instant, grasp principles that extend far into the past, forgetting the boundaries of before and after, far and near. This is called “seeing the unique.”

Here, the text also draws on the Buddhist idea of “quiescent extinction,” meaning transcendence of arising and ceasing and attainment of an undying state.

钞《传灯录》。惠能大师对内侍薛简云:我今,而后能不死不生。夫能同然不崇朝而远彻,忘先后之远接,斯见独者也。 衍义云:释氏之不灭。 钞《传灯录》。惠能大师对内侍薛简云:我说不生不灭者,本自无生,今亦无灭,昭然此处契长生矣。此言人生天地间,若安其素分,委任天和,乘化而来,任化而往,是则君子察人所履之行,则知寿夭,况於修至道餐元和,而不能长生乎。 衍义云:夫身如蜩甲她蜕,寓之而已矣。 钞《庄子□齐物篇》之辞。罔两问於影。影曰:吾待蛇蚹蛇腹下龉龃不可以行者也。蜩翼耶。若待蛇蚹蜩翼,则无特操之所由,则寻责无极,卒至於无待,而不独化於玄冥矣。 大道泛兮章第三十四 大道泛兮,其可左右。 衍义云:夫道至高无上,至深无下。 钞《文子□符言篇》云:老子曰:夫道至高无上,至深无下。。 大道泛兮章第三十四 大道泛兮,其可左右。 衍义云:夫道至高无上,至深无下。 钞《文子□符言篇》云:老子曰:夫道至高无上,至深无下。上乎无上,下乎无下,能高能深,能上能下。平乎准,直乎绳,非衡而平,无所不夷,非绳而直,无处不正。圆乎规,方乎矩,非圆能圆而无圆,非方能方而无方。包裹天地而无表里,其大无外,其细无内。洞同覆盖而无所碍,大圆无涯,大通无滞。是故体道者不怒不喜,其坐无虑,寝而不梦,是故玄同。取以为证,以道大无方泛兮,其可左右也。
Interpretation

The Platform Sutra records that Master Huineng said to the palace attendant Xue Jian: “When I speak of nonarising and nonperishing, I mean that nothing originally came into being, and nothing now passes away. To understand this is to accord with the Way of long life.” This passage means that when people live between Heaven and Earth, if they are content with their proper place and follow the changes of nature, coming with change and departing with change, their conduct reveals the length of their lives. How much more, then, for those who cultivate the utmost Dao and absorb the primordial, harmonious Qi of Heaven and Earth: how could they fail to attain long life?

The commentator says: The human body is like the shell shed by a cicada, merely a form in which one lodges for a time.

Here the text quotes the “Discussion on the Equality of Things” in the Zhuangzi. The shadow’s shadow, Wangliang, asks the shadow a question. The shadow replies: “I move by relying on things such as the scales beneath a snake’s belly or a cicada’s wings. Without these things to rely on, I would have no way to act.” If one keeps asking what it relies on, the inquiry has no end. Ultimately, one should reach a state of relying on nothing, no longer governed by external things, and following alone the subtle, profound transformations.

Chapter Thirty-Four: “The Great Dao Flows Everywhere”

The Great Dao is vast and boundless, circulating without end and present everywhere. To the left or to the right, there is nowhere it cannot go.

The commentator says: The Dao is so high that nothing is higher, and so deep that nothing is deeper.

Here the text quotes the “Fuyan” chapter of the Wenzi. Laozi says: “The Dao is so high that nothing is higher, and so deep that nothing is deeper. It can rise above what has no summit and descend below what has no bottom; it can be high and deep, above and below. It is level like a measuring instrument and straight like a carpenter’s line, yet it is level everywhere without relying on a balance, and straight everywhere without relying on a line. It is round like a circle drawn with a compass, yet is not confined by roundness; it is square like a shape drawn with a carpenter’s square, yet is not confined by squareness. It contains Heaven and Earth, with no distinction between inside and outside: it is so great that it has no outside, and so small that it has no inside. It pervades and covers everything without obstruction; it is boundless and flows freely without impediment.”

Thus, those who realize the Great Dao feel neither anger nor joy. When sitting quietly, they have no worries in their hearts; when sleeping, they do not dream. This is to accord with the mysterious Dao. This serves as evidence that the Great Dao is vast and without fixed direction, circulating without constraint. Hence the saying: “The Great Dao is vast and boundless, present everywhere. To the left or to the right, there is nowhere it cannot go.”

衍义云:大道无乎不在,或左或右,皆逢其原。 钞《孟子□离娄章句下》。孟子曰:君子深造之以道,欲其自得之。自得之,则居之安。居之安,则资之深。资之深,则取之左右逢其原。故君子欲其自得之也。此体道之士,反求诸己,而自得之以道,欲其自得之。自得之,则居之安。居之安,则资之深。资之深,则取之左右逢其原。故君子欲其自得之也。此体道之士,反求诸己,而自得之也。 万物侍之以生而不辞,功成不名有。 衍义云:无母何恃。 钞《毛诗□小雅蓼莪篇》之文。无父何怙,无母何恃,出则衔恤,入则靡至。此言万物恃道以生,亦犹人之恃母而生成也。 爱养万物而不为主,常无欲,可名於小。万物归之不为主,可名於大。 衍义云:复小而辩於物。 钞《周易系辞第八物恃道以生,亦犹人之恃母而生成也。 爱养万物而不为主,常无欲,可名於小。万物归之不为主,可名於大。 衍义云:复小而辩於物。 钞《周易系辞第八》之文。云:复小而辩於物。此言复卦於初细微小之时,即能辩物之吉凶,不远速复也。 执大象章第三十五 执大象,天下往。往而不害,安平泰。 衍义云:舜有膻行,百姓悦之。三徙成都,至邓之墟,来之者十万家。
Interpretation

The Great Dao (the Way) is everywhere. Whether one seeks it on the left or on the right, one can encounter its root.

Here, the text quotes the Mencius, “Lilu II”: “The exemplary person follows the right path and studies deeply in order to understand its principles for himself and truly attain them. Once he understands them, his mind becomes settled. When his mind is settled, his accumulation grows deep. With deep accumulation, whatever aspect he draws upon, he can reach the root. Thus the exemplary person values understanding principles through personal experience.” Those who practice by realizing the Great Dao should also turn their search inward, examining themselves and coming to understand the Dao from within.

All things depend on the Dao for their life, yet the Dao does not refuse them or claim them as its own. Once all things have come to fruition, the Dao does not claim credit.

Here, the text quotes the Book of Songs, “Lesser Odes: Liao’e”: “Without a father, whom can I rely on? Without a mother, what can I depend on? I leave home with sorrow in my heart, and return with nowhere to rest.” The passage uses these lines to explain that all things depend on the Dao for their life, just as a person depends on a mother to be conceived and nurtured.

The Dao cares for and nourishes all things but does not rule over them. It is always free of desire and seeking, and so may be called small. All things turn toward it, yet it still does not rule over them; in this way, it may also be called great.

Here, the text quotes the Book of Changes, “Appended Judgments”: “The Return hexagram is small, yet it distinguishes things.” This means that even in its earliest, most subtle beginnings, the Return hexagram—one of the sixty-four hexagrams in the Book of Changes—can discern whether things are auspicious or inauspicious. When one strays from the right path, one can also return in time, before going too far.

Chapter Thirty-Five: Holding to the Great Image

When one grasps the Dao’s complete pattern, people throughout the world will come and submit to it. Once they have gathered, they will do one another no harm, and the world will be settled, peaceful, and harmonious.

Here, the text cites the story of Shun: his De (Virtue) spread widely like the scent of sacrificial meat, and the people therefore loved him. He moved from place to place, and wherever he settled, a town grew around him. By the time he reached the old ruins of Deng, a hundred thousand households had come to join him.

钞《庄子□徐无鬼篇》之文。义中已备,不复再录。 衍义云:大王居邠,狄人侵之,邑于岐山之下居焉,从之者如归市。 钞《孟子□梁惠王章句下》。滕文公问:齐人将筑薛,吾甚恐义中已备,不复再录。 衍义云:大王居邠,狄人侵之,邑于岐山之下居焉,从之者如归市。 钞《孟子□梁惠王章句下》。滕文公问:齐人将筑薛,吾甚恐,如之何则可。孟子对滕君之辞,义中已详,不复重录。 衍义云:国安民丰,欣乐太平。 钞《灵宝无量度人经》上卷之文。齐同慈爱,异骨成亲,国安民丰,欣乐太平。此言有道之君,民皆归之,而无害举,皆欣欣然,各得安平之乐也。 衍义云:平则无险陂之患。 钞《易系辞》之文。易曰之,而无害举,皆欣欣然,各得安平之乐也。 衍义云:平则无险陂之患。 钞《易系辞》之文。易曰:无平不陂,陂者倾也。 乐与饵,过客止。 衍义云:《庄子》载北门成问於黄帝曰:帝张咸池之乐於洞庭之野。
Interpretation

A passage is copied from “Xu Wugui” in the Zhuangzi. The relevant principles have already been discussed and will not be repeated here.

The extended explanation says: When the Great King lived in Bin, the Di people invaded. He moved to the foot of Mount Qi, built a settlement there, and made his home in it. Those who followed him came in such numbers that it was like a market day.

A passage is copied from “King Hui of Liang, Part Two” in the Mencius. Duke Wen of Teng asked: The people of Qi are preparing to build a wall around Xue, and I am very worried. The relevant principles have already been discussed and will not be repeated here.

The extended explanation says: When the Great King lived in Bin, the Di people invaded. He moved to the foot of Mount Qi, built a settlement there, and made his home in it. Those who followed him came in such numbers that it was like a market day.

A passage is copied from “King Hui of Liang, Part Two” in the Mencius. Duke Wen of Teng asked, “The people of Qi are preparing to build a wall around Xue, and I am very worried. What should I do?” This is Mencius’s reply to the Duke of Teng. Its principles have already been discussed in detail and will not be repeated here.

The extended explanation says: The state is secure, the people are prosperous, and everyone gladly enjoys a peaceful life.

A passage is copied from the first volume of the Lingbao Scripture of Infinite Salvation: “All join in harmony and show one another compassion; even those who were originally of different peoples can be like family. The state is secure, the people are prosperous, and they gladly enjoy a peaceful life.” This means that a ruler who follows the Dao can bring the people to his side. No one is harmed; each person lives in peace, and all enjoy a life of safety and happiness.

The extended explanation says: When all under Heaven is at peace, there are no dangers of imbalance or upheaval.

A passage is copied from the “Appended Statements” in the Book of Changes. The Book of Changes says: “Nothing remains level forever without becoming uneven; becoming uneven means collapse.”

“Music and fine food can make passing guests stop on their way.”

The extended explanation says: The Zhuangzi records that Beimen Cheng asked the Yellow Emperor, “You once played the music of ‘Xianchi’ in the wilderness of Dongting…”

钞《庄子□天运篇》之辞。姓北门,名成,黄帝臣也。欲明至乐之道,故寄此二人更相发起也。咸池,乐名。张,施也。咸是和也。洞庭之野,天地之间,非大湖之洞庭也。怠,退怠也。卒,终也。复,重也。惑,暗也。不悟至乐。初闻之时,惧然惊悚。再闻其声,稍悟音旨,故惧心退怠。最后闻之,知至乐。与二仪合德,视听不见,故心无分别,有同暗惑者也。荡荡平易而无偏,默默而无知,茫然坐忘,物我俱丧,乃不自得,坐忘之谓也。 衍义云:齐人饥,黔。荡荡平易而无偏,默默而无知,茫然坐忘,物我俱丧,乃不自得,坐忘之谓也。 衍义云:齐人饥,黔敖为食於路,以待饿者而食之。有饿者蒙袂袖也辑和也屦,贸贸交易之貌然来,黔敖左奉食右执饮曰:嗟来食,扬其眉而视之,曰:予惟不食嗟来之食,以至於斯也,终不食而死。
Interpretation

This passage paraphrases the meaning of the “Tianyun” chapter of the Zhuangzi. Beimen Cheng’s surname was Beimen and his given name was Cheng; he was a minister of the Yellow Emperor. Through a dialogue between Beimen Cheng and the Yellow Emperor, the author develops, step by step, the Way of “ultimate joy,” the highest state of happiness.

“Xianchi” is the name of a piece of music, and “zhang” means to perform or play it. “Xian” carries the sense of harmony. “The fields of Dongting” refers to the space between Heaven and Earth, not to the great lake Dongting. “Dai” means to relax or recede; “zu” means finally; “fu” means again; and “huo” means dim or unclear.

When one first hears the music, one is startled and afraid. Hearing it again, one gradually grasps its meaning, and the fear begins to recede. By the final hearing, one understands ultimate joy. Ultimate joy accords with Heaven and Earth—the “two forms,” meaning Heaven and Earth—and transcends ordinary sight and hearing. The mind therefore makes no distinctions, as though it were in a dim, unknowing state. With a level, impartial mind, still and unaware, one reaches “sitting in forgetfulness” amid this vast obscurity: forgetting oneself and external things alike, and no longer clinging to the distinction between self and other.

The Yanyi then tells the story of Qian Ao distributing food. During a famine in the state of Qi, Qian Ao prepared food by the roadside and waited for hungry people to come and eat. A starving man approached in a daze, shielding his face with his sleeve and dragging his worn-out shoes. Holding food in his left hand and a drink in his right, Qian Ao called to him, “Hey, come and eat!” The man raised his eyes to look at him and said, “It is because I refuse to eat food offered with such a contemptuous tone that I have fallen into this state.” In the end, he refused the food and starved to death.

钞《孟子□告子章句上》云:孟子曰:一箪食,一豆羹,得之则生,弗得则死,嘑尔而与之,行道之人弗受。蹴尔而与之,乞人不屑也。朱晦庵注,豆,木器也。嘑咄,啐之貌。行道之人,路中凡人也。蹴与之,行道之人弗受。蹴尔而与之,乞人不屑也。朱晦庵注,豆,木器也。嘑咄,啐之貌。行道之人,路中凡人也。蹴,践踏也。乞人,乞丐之人也。不屑,不以为洁也。言虽饥饿之急,而犹恶无礼,有宁死而不食者,是其羞恶之本心,欲恶有甚於生死者,人皆有之也。言此与不受嗟来之食,其义颇同,故引此以为证者,谓饥饿之为人害深矣,见食而不食,宁就死而不悔,是恶礼之不足而不食也,是则过客,亦有不为饵止者矣。 衍义云:庄子曰:仁义害深矣,见食而不食,宁就死而不悔,是恶礼之不足而不食也,是则过客,亦有不为饵止者矣。 衍义云:庄子曰:仁义,先王之蘧庐也,止可一宿而不可久处。 钞《庄子□天运篇》云:蘧庐,逆旅传舍也。不可久停。以仁博爱,以义裁非,何异假借涂路,寄托止宿耶。不可以久交,体道化人,人归於道,淡然长久,岂可散乎。 道之出口,淡乎其无味。视之不足见,听之不足闻,用之不可既。 衍义云:列子曰:形之所形者实矣。而形形者未常有。
Interpretation

The Mencius, in “Gaozi I,” says: A basket of rice and a bowl of soup can keep a person alive if they are eaten; without them, a person will starve to death. If someone offers food with a tone of rebuke, even an ordinary passerby will refuse it. If the food is thrown down in front of someone, even a beggar will not accept it.

Zhu Xi explained: “Dou” is a wooden vessel for holding food; “hu’er” describes calling to someone in a scolding, contemptuous manner; “a person on the road” means an ordinary passerby; “cu” means to tread on something with the foot; and “bu xie” means not considering something clean or acceptable. The point is that even when hunger threatens life, people still recoil from a discourteous handout and would rather starve than eat it. This is the inborn human sense of shame and aversion, showing that some things in the human heart matter more than life. The example here is similar in meaning to refusing a handout that carries an insult: hunger is an immense hardship, yet some people would rather die than eat food placed before them because they cannot accept the giver’s disrespectful attitude. It also shows that a passerby may not be tempted by food into stopping.

The Yanyi quotes Zhuangzi as saying that benevolence and righteousness bind people deeply. Someone may see food and refuse to eat it, choosing death without regret because they abhor a discourteous handout. This shows that a passerby, too, may resist the temptation of food and keep walking.

The Yanyi also says that, in Zhuangzi’s view, benevolence and righteousness were merely temporary lodgings borrowed by the former kings: one could stay for a night, but not remain for long.

The “Tianyun” chapter of the Zhuangzi explains: “Qu lu” means an inn or post station, a place where one cannot stay for long. To use benevolence to care for everyone and righteousness to judge right and wrong is like lodging at an inn by the roadside; in the end, one cannot remain there permanently. To live among people for the long term and guide them back toward the Great Way, one should follow the Way’s transformations, lead people back to the Way, and preserve a simplicity that is natural and enduring. How, then, could these principles be casually abandoned?

When the “Way” is spoken of, it is bland and tasteless. Look at it, and it cannot be clearly seen; listen to it, and no sound can be heard. Yet in its use, it is inexhaustible.

The Yanyi quotes the Liezi: The forms of the myriad things certainly exist, but the source that gives them form does not itself exist in any fixed form.

钞《列子□天瑞篇》之文。义中已备,不复重录。此言无为之用与道合,真岂有尽耶。 将欲歙之章第三十六 将欲歙之,必固张之。将欲弱之,必固强之。将欲废之,必固兴之。将欲夺之,必固与之。是谓微明。 衍义云:圣人之玄奥,莫妙於权实将欲弱之,必固强之。将欲废之,必固兴之。将欲夺之,必固与之。是谓微明。 衍义云:圣人之玄奥,莫妙於权实。
Interpretation

The passage copied from “The Signs of Heaven and Earth” chapter of the Liezi already contains the relevant meaning, so it will not be copied again here. It says that the workings of Wuwei (non-action) accord with the Dao (the Way). Could the Dao’s wondrous reality and function ever be exhausted?

Chapter Thirty-Six: When You Would Draw Something In

If you would draw something in, you must first let it expand. If you would weaken something, you must first let it grow strong. If you would abolish something, you must first let it arise. If you would take something, you must first give to it. This is called “subtle insight”: discernment revealed through what is minute.

The Explication of the Meaning says: The deepest wisdom of the sage lies above all in the subtle use of expedient means and the true Way. If you would weaken something, you must first let it grow strong; if you would abolish something, you must first let it arise; if you would take something, you must first give to it. This is called “subtle insight.”

The Explication of the Meaning also says: The deepest wisdom of the sage lies above all in the Way of expedient means and truth.

钞唐杜天师义曰:圣人设教,分权实二门,上士利根,了通实教。中下之士,须示权门。权门变通,其法甚广,依经所判,略具四门。第一将欲歙之,必固张之者,摄其心也。第二将欲弱之,必固强之者,摄其性也。第三将欲废之,必固兴之者,摄其欲也。第四将欲夺之,必固与之者,摄其贪也。夫心廉则道契,心侈则过生,因侈获过,自思复其廉矣。此歙敛其心之权也。性弱则德全,性强则祸起,因强起祸,自思复其弱必固与之者,摄其贪也。夫心廉则道契,心侈则过生,因侈获过,自思复其廉矣。此歙敛其心之权也。性弱则德全,性强则祸起,因强起祸,自思复其弱矣。此伏性挫强之权也。寡欲则行清,多欲则神浊,欲深浊极,自思复其清矣。此废欲清神之权也。不贪则俭约,极贪则殃身,因贪获殃,自思复其俭矣。此修俭夺贪之权也。皆先极其侈心,使自困於贪欲,然后反性修道也。乍闻者以为非无为自化之旨,然性有利钝之别,悟有渐顿之殊,顿悟者不假於从权,渐化者须资於善诱,乃有权实之别。尔权道教人合归於大义,故云贵於合义也。 小人轻弄权,道因以诈欺,故不可以轻示於非道之人耳。《论语》云:可与立,未可与权,言用权之难也。 衍义云:此圣人所以履霜,而知坚冰之至。
Interpretation

The Celestial Master Du of the Tang dynasty explained: “Sages establish teachings by two means: the expedient and the true. Those with superior capacities and keen understanding can grasp the true teaching directly. Those of middling or lesser capacities must first be guided through expedient teachings. Expedient methods are flexible and wide-ranging. According to the classics, they can be broadly divided into four kinds.

First, if you wish to draw someone in, begin by letting them expand. This is a way to bring their mind under control. Second, if you wish to make someone yielding, first let them assert their strength. This is a way to bring their temperament under control. Third, if you wish to make someone abandon desire, first let desire arise in them. This is a way to bring their cravings under control. Fourth, if you wish to take away someone’s greed, first give them what they crave.

When the mind is pure and restrained, it can accord with the Dao (the Way); when the mind is extravagant and unrestrained, faults arise. Someone who falls into trouble through extravagance will reflect and wish to regain restraint. This is the expedient method of first letting the mind run its course, then drawing it back. When one’s temperament is yielding, De (Virtue/Power) can be preserved; when it is forceful, calamity arises. Someone who brings trouble upon themselves by asserting their strength will come to wish for a return to yielding. This is the expedient method of subduing the temperament and curbing forcefulness. When desires are few, conduct is upright; when desires are many, the spirit grows clouded. When desire becomes so intense that the mind is utterly clouded, a person will reflect and wish to regain clarity. This is the expedient method of first letting desire develop, then bringing it to rest so the spirit may be clarified. When one is free of craving, one can live frugally; when craving reaches its height, it brings calamity. Someone who suffers because of their cravings will come to wish for a return to frugality. This is the expedient method of using frugality to restrain greed.

These methods first allow an extravagant mind to develop to its extreme, leaving a person trapped by craving, and then guide them back to their original nature and toward cultivating the Dao. At first hearing, some may think this runs counter to the principle of “Wuwei (non-action), through which things transform of themselves.” But people differ in their innate capacities: some are keen, others dull; some awaken suddenly, others gradually. Those who awaken suddenly need no expedient methods. Those who are gradually taught require skillful guidance. That is why there is a distinction between expedient and true teachings. The ultimate aim of the expedient path is to guide people back to the right course of the Great Dao; thus, an expedient method is valued for ultimately conforming to the right way.

If petty people handle expedient methods carelessly, they may use them to deceive others. For this reason, such methods should not be lightly imparted to those who do not understand what is right. The Analects says, “One may stand alongside someone in the world, but that does not mean one can work with them in adapting to circumstances.” This shows that putting the expedient path into practice is no easy matter.

The Yanyi says: “It is like the sage who sees frost and thereby knows that hard ice is on its way.”

钞《周易坤卦》之辞。初六:履霜,坚冰至。此言初六阴气之微,似若履霜,而知坚冰之至。 钞《周易坤卦》之辞。初六:履霜,坚冰至。此言初六阴气之微,似若初寒之始,但履践其霜微而积渐,故坚冰乃至。所谓阴道初虽柔顺,渐渐积着,乃至坚刚。 衍义云:勾践欲弊吴,而劝之伐齐。
Interpretation

Here the text quotes the line from the Book of Changes, “Kun Hexagram”: “Six at the beginning: Treading on frost, hard ice is on its way.” “Six at the beginning” refers to the lowest Yin line of the Kun Hexagram. When you first step on a thin frost beneath your feet, you can already foresee the coming of severe cold. This describes Yin energy just beginning to appear, still very faint but gradually accumulating until it becomes hard ice. A force that is soft and yielding at first can grow strong through the passage of time.

The commentary further says: King Goujian of Yue wanted to weaken the state of Wu, so he urged the king of Wu to attack the state of Qi.

钞《史记》云:孔子在卫,闻齐国田常欲为乱,告诸弟子曰:吾不忍父母之邦而受敌。今吾欲屈节於田常以救鲁,谁为使。子贡请使。夫子许之。遂如齐,说田常请缓师,吾请救於吴,今救鲁而伐齐,子因以兵迎之。田常许诺。子贡遂南说吴王名存亡鲁,实困强齐,救鲁伐齐,威加晋国,诸救鲁而伐齐,子因以兵迎之。田常许诺。子贡遂南说吴王名存亡鲁,实困强齐,救鲁伐齐,威加晋国,诸侯必相率而朝,霸业盛矣。吴王乃遣子贡之越。子贡曰:今者吴说吾王以救鲁伐齐,其志欲之而心畏越。勾践顿首曰:孤常不料力,而与吴难,受困会稽,痛於骨髓,日夜焦唇乾舌,徒欲与吴王接踵而死,孤之愿也。今大夫幸告以利害。子贡曰:吴王为人猛暴,群臣不堪,国家疲弊,此则报吴王之时也。越王勾践使大夫文种顿首言於吴王曰:越悉境内之士三千人以事吴。吴王乃受越王卒,谢留勾践,遂自发国内之兵以伐齐,败之。子贡遂北见晋君。今承其弊,吴晋遂遇於黄池。越王袭吴之国。吴王归,与越战,灭焉。孔子曰:夫其乱齐存鲁,吾之始愿,若能强晋以弊吴,使吴亡而越霸者,赐之说也。美言伤信慎言哉。
Interpretation

The Records of the Grand Historian recounts that when Confucius was in the state of Wei, he heard that Tian Chang of Qi was preparing to rebel. He said to his disciples, “I cannot bear to watch my ancestral state of Lu suffer an enemy’s attack. I now wish to humble myself for a time and visit Tian Chang, in the hope of saving Lu. Who is willing to go as an envoy?” Zigong asked to go, and Confucius agreed.

Zigong arrived in Qi and urged Tian Chang to postpone his campaign. “I am willing to seek help for you from Wu. If you rescue Lu and attack Qi, you can take the opportunity to lead your troops against them,” he said. Tian Chang agreed. Zigong then traveled south and persuaded the king of Wu that rescuing Lu and attacking Qi would in fact weaken the powerful state of Qi. By rescuing Lu and attacking Qi, Wu could also establish its prestige in the eyes of Jin. The other lords would surely come to pay court one after another, and Wu’s bid for supremacy would flourish. The king of Wu then sent Zigong to Yue.

Zigong said to King Goujian of Yue, “I have just urged the king of Wu to rescue Lu and attack Qi. He wants to send out his troops, but is afraid of Yue.” Goujian bowed until his head touched the ground and said, “In the past, I overestimated myself and went to war with Wu, only to be trapped at Kuaiji. The bitterness remains etched in my bones. Day and night I have ground my teeth, wanting only to fight the king of Wu to the death. That is my dearest wish. Now I am grateful for your guidance on the advantages and dangers.” Zigong said, “The king of Wu is fierce and violent, and his ministers can scarcely endure him. His state is exhausted as well. This is the moment to take revenge on Wu.”

King Goujian of Yue therefore sent his minister Wen Zhong to bow before the king of Wu and request, “Yue is willing to place all three thousand of its soldiers at Wu’s disposal.” The king of Wu accepted Yue’s troops and politely declined Goujian’s offer to remain in attendance. He then personally led his state’s army to attack Qi and defeated its forces.

Zigong next traveled north to visit the ruler of Jin, persuading him to act while Wu was exhausted. Wu and Jin eventually met in an alliance at Huangchi. Seizing the opportunity, the king of Yue attacked Wu. When the king of Wu returned, he fought Yue, and Wu was destroyed.

Confucius said, “Disrupting Qi and preserving Lu were my original aims. If Jin could be strengthened and Wu exhausted, and in the end Wu destroyed and Yue made hegemon, that was the result of Zigong’s persuasions. If words are made too pleasing, they can damage trust. One must speak with care.”

衍义云:齐桓公好味,而易牙烹其子而,吾之始愿,若能强晋以弊吴,使吴亡而越霸者,赐之说也。美言伤信慎言哉。 衍义云:齐桓公好味,而易牙烹其子而饵之。虞君好宝,而晋献公以璧马钓之。胡王好音,而秦穆公以女乐诱之。
Interpretation

The Yan Yi says: Duke Huan of Qi loved fine food, so Yi Ya cooked his own son and served the meat to him. The ruler of Yu treasured precious things, so Duke Xian of Jin tempted him with a jade disc and a fine horse. The king of Hu loved music, so Duke Mu of Qin lured him with singing and dancing performers.

“Pleasing words can undermine trust; take care in what you say” means that attractive words may damage honesty, so one should speak cautiously. The stories of Yi Ya cooking his son, Duke Xian presenting a fine horse and a jade disc, and Duke Mu offering female musicians all describe people being tempted through their particular desires. The disc and horse were precious jade and a fine steed; “female musicians” refers to performers who sang and danced for an audience.

钞《淮南子□主术训》之文也。《鸿烈解》曰:齐桓公好味,而易牙烹其子而饵之者。按《史记□齐世家》云:初,齐桓公之夫人三皆无子。好内,多内宠,如夫人者六人,长卫姬,生无亏。少卫姬,生惠公元。郑姬,生孝公昭。葛嬴,生昭公潘。密姬,生懿公商人。宋华子,贾逵曰:宋华氏之女,子姓。生公子雍。雍丞有宠於恭姬,《周礼》掌食之官,有内雍、外雍,此人为雍官名丞,易牙也。因宦者竖刁以厚献於桓公,亦有宠。桓公许之。之女,子姓。生公子雍。雍丞有宠於恭姬,《周礼》掌食之官,有内雍、外雍,此人为雍官名丞,易牙也。因宦者竖刁以厚献於桓公,亦有宠。桓公许之。易牙既有宠於公,为长卫姬请立无亏。管仲病,桓公问曰:群臣谁可相者。管仲曰:知臣莫如君。公曰:易牙何如。对曰:杀子以适君,非人情,不可。公曰:开方何如,对曰:倍亲以适君,非人情,难近。卫公子开方,去其千乘之太子,而臣事君也。公子竖刁何如。对曰:自宫以适君,非人情,难亲。管仲死。而情,难近。卫公子开方,去其千乘之太子,而臣事君也。公子竖刁何如。对曰:自宫以适君,非人情,难亲。管仲死。而桓公不用管仲言,卒近用三子。三子专权,此谓易牙烹其子而要桓公也。虞君好宝,而晋献公以璧马钓之者,按《春秋》僖公二年云:晋苟息请以屈产之乘与垂棘之璧,假道於虞,以伐虢。荀息,荀叔也。屈地生良
Interpretation

This passage is copied from the “Mastery of Technique” chapter of the Huainanzi. The Honglie Jie says that Duke Huan of Qi loved fine food, so Yi Ya boiled his own son and served him to the duke.

According to the “Hereditary House of Qi” in the Records of the Grand Historian, Duke Huan’s first three wives had no sons. He was fond of women and kept many favored concubines. Six held a status equivalent to that of a wife: the elder Wei consort bore Wukui; the younger Wei consort bore Yuan, later Duke Hui; Zheng consort bore Zhao, later Duke Xiao; Ge Ying bore Pan, later Duke Zhao; Mi consort bore Shangren, later Duke Yi; and Song Huazi bore Prince Yong. Jia Kui says that Song Huazi was a woman of the Hua clan of Song, with the surname Zi.

Prince Yong’s steward, Yongcheng, was favored by Consort Gong. According to the Rites of Zhou, the officials in charge of food included the Inner Yong and Outer Yong; the Yongcheng mentioned here was Yi Ya’s official post. Yi Ya made lavish offerings through the eunuch Shu Diao, and so also won Duke Huan’s favor. The duke granted his request. Once Yi Ya had gained favor, he asked the elder Wei consort to have Wukui appointed heir apparent.

When Guan Zhong was gravely ill, Duke Huan asked, “Who among my ministers could serve as chief minister?” Guan Zhong replied, “No one knows the ministers better than their ruler.” The duke asked, “What about Yi Ya?” Guan Zhong replied, “To please his ruler, he went so far as to kill his own son. This is against ordinary human feeling; he should not be entrusted with important responsibilities.”

The duke then asked, “What about Kaifang?” Guan Zhong replied, “He abandoned his family to please his ruler. This too is against ordinary human feeling, and he is difficult to trust.” Kaifang, a prince of Wei, gave up his position as heir to the ruler of a major state and came to submit himself to Duke Huan of Qi.

The duke asked again, “What about Prince Shu Diao?” Guan Zhong replied, “To please his ruler, he went so far as to castrate himself. This is against ordinary human feeling, and he is difficult to trust.” After Guan Zhong died, Duke Huan ignored his advice and ultimately drew these three men close and put them in positions of power. The three seized control, giving rise to the story of Yi Ya cooking his son to please Duke Huan of Qi.

The ruler of Yu loved precious objects, so Duke Xian of Jin lured him with jade and fine horses. According to the “Second Year of Duke Xi” in the Spring and Autumn Annals, Xun Xi of Jin asked to take fine horses from Qu and beautiful jade from Chuiji to Yu, in exchange for passage through its territory so that Jin could attack Guo. Xun Xi was also known as Xun Shu. Qu was a source of fine horses.

马,垂棘出美玉,故以为名。四马曰乘。自晋适虢,途出於虞,故假道。公曰:是吾宝也。对曰:若得道於虞,犹外府,荀叔也。屈地生良 马,垂棘出美玉,故以为名。四马曰乘。自晋适虢,途出於虞,故假道。公曰:是吾宝也。对曰:若得道於虞,犹外府长。公曰:宫之奇存焉。宫之奇,虞忠臣也。对曰,宫之奇之为人也,懦而不能强谏。且少长於君,君昵之,虽谏,将不听。乃使苟息假道於虞曰。虞君许之,且请先伐虢。喜以厚赂而欲求媚。宫之奇谏,不听。遂起军灭下阳。五年,晋侯复假道於虞以伐虢。宫之奇谏公:虞虢之表也,虢亡,虞必从之。晋不可启,寇不可玩,一之谓甚,岂可再乎。谚所谓辅车相依,唇亡齿寒者,其虞虢之谓也。虞公弗听。冬十二月丙子朔,晋灭虢,虢公丑奔京师。师还,馆于虞谓甚,岂可再乎。谚所谓辅车相依,唇亡齿寒者,其虞虢之谓也。虞公弗听。冬十二月丙子朔,晋灭虢,虢公丑奔京师。师还,馆于虞,遂袭虞,灭之。执虞公及其大夫并伯,以胜秦穆姬。秦穆公姬,献公女也。送女曰媵,以屈辱之。此谓晋献公以璧马而钓虞君也。胡王好音,而秦穆公以女乐诱之者,按《史记□秦本纪》云:秦穆公三十四年,戎王使由余於秦。由余,其先晋人也,亡入戎,能晋言。闻缪公贤,故使由余观秦。於是缪公退而问内史廖曰:弧闻邻国有圣人,敌国之忧也。今由余贤,寡人之害,将奈之何。内史廖曰:戎王处群匿,未闻中国之声,君试遗其而问内史廖曰:弧闻邻国有圣人,敌国之忧也。今由余贤,寡人之害,将奈之何。内史廖曰:戎王处群匿,未闻中国之声,君试遗其女乐,以夺其志,为由余请,以疏其间,留而莫遣,以失其期。戎王怪之,必疑由余。君臣有间,乃可虏也。且戎王好乐,必怠於政。缪公曰:善。因与由余曲席而坐,传器而食,问其地形与其兵势尽察,而后令内史廖以女乐二八遗戎王。戎王受而说之,终年不还。於是秦乃归由余。遂谏,不听。缪公又数使人间要由余,由余遂去降。秦缪公以客礼礼之,问伐戎之形。三十七年,秦用由余谋伐戎王,益国十二,开地千里,遂霸西戎。此谓秦穆公以女乐诱胡王也。故玄同引此以明歙张与夺之权也若此。
Interpretation

“Chuiji” produced fine jade, so it was named after the place. A carriage drawn by four horses was called a sheng. The state of Jin was on its way to attack Guo, and the route passed through Yu, so Jin asked Yu for permission to cross its territory. Duke Xian of Jin said, “These are my treasures.” His minister replied, “If we can borrow a route through Yu, Yu will be like an outer storehouse for you, and these horses will be as good as stored there.”

Duke Xian said, “Gong Zhiqi is still in Yu.” Gong Zhiqi was a loyal minister of Yu. The minister replied that Gong Zhiqi was timid by nature and could not speak up firmly in remonstrance. Besides, he and the ruler of Yu had grown up together, and the ruler was fond of him. Even if Gong Zhiqi did remonstrate, the ruler would not listen. Duke Xian therefore sent Xun Xi to ask Yu for a route. The ruler of Yu agreed, and even asked to attack Guo first. Jin gladly sent generous gifts to ingratiate itself with the ruler of Yu. Gong Zhiqi tried to dissuade him, but the ruler would not listen. Jin then sent its army and destroyed Xiayang in Guo.

Five years later, Duke Xian of Jin again asked Yu for a route to attack Guo. Gong Zhiqi warned the ruler of Yu: “Yu and Guo support one another like a screen and a barrier. If Guo falls, Yu will surely suffer next. Jin’s ambitions must not be encouraged, and the enemy must not be underestimated. The first time was already too much; how can you agree again? As the saying goes, the cheek depends on the jawbone, and when the lips are gone, the teeth grow cold. That is exactly the relationship between Yu and Guo.” The ruler of Yu still would not listen.

On the bingzi day of the twelfth month in winter, Jin destroyed Guo, and Duke Chou of Guo fled to the Zhou royal court. On its way back, the Jin army camped in Yu, then seized the opportunity to attack and destroy it. The army captured the ruler of Yu and the minister Jing Bo and handed them over to Qin Mugong’s wife, Mu Ji. Mu Ji was the daughter of Duke Mu of Qin and the daughter of Duke Xian of Jin. A woman sent to accompany a bride was called a ying. Here, the account says that Duke Xian of Jin used a jade disc and fine horses as bait to lure the ruler of Yu into a trap, ultimately bringing humiliation upon him.

Another example is Duke Mu of Qin’s use of female musicians to deceive the king of the Rong. The Basic Annals of Qin in the Records of the Grand Historian states that the king of the Rong sent You Yu as an envoy to Qin. You Yu’s ancestors had been people of Jin, but later fled to Rong territory; he spoke the language of Jin. Hearing that You Yu was capable, Duke Mu of Qin asked his Director of the Interior, Liao, what he should do. Liao advised sending female musicians to the king of the Rong to distract his mind, then finding a way to drive a wedge between the king and You Yu and keep You Yu in Qin so he could not return on time. If the king grew suspicious of You Yu and a rift opened between ruler and minister, Qin would have an opportunity to seize Rong territory. And if the king became absorbed in music, he would neglect affairs of state.

Duke Mu followed the advice. He first engaged You Yu in friendly conversation, asking in detail about Rong’s terrain and military strength. Then he sent Director Liao with two groups of female musicians. The king of the Rong accepted them and was delighted, keeping them there all year. Qin then allowed You Yu to return and later sent people several times to invite him secretly. In the end, You Yu left Rong and joined Qin. Duke Mu treated him as an honored guest and asked him how to attack Rong. Later, Qin followed You Yu’s strategy, attacked the king of the Rong, annexed twelve states, expanded its territory by a thousand li, and established hegemony over the western Rong.

The stories of Yu and Rong are cited here to explain the way of restraint and expansion, giving and taking, contained in the Dao De Jing’s idea of “mysterious sameness” (xuántóng): remaining hidden and aligning with the course of things. At times, giving something first or appearing weak is precisely a way to gain a greater advantage later.

衍义云:庄子称徐无鬼见魏武侯,先相狗马,然后劳君之神形,而。故玄同引此以明歙张与夺之权也若此。 衍义云:庄子称徐无鬼见魏武侯,先相狗马,然后劳君之神形,而结以政治,斯乃知者歙张之权也。 钞《庄子□徐无鬼篇》之文。云徐无鬼姓徐字无鬼,魏之隐士也。因女商见魏武侯,女商,姓女名商,魏之幸臣也。武侯。文侯之子,毕万八世孙也。武侯劳之曰:先生病矣。苦於山林之劳,故乃肯见于寡人。徐无鬼曰:我则劳於君,君有何劳於我。君将盈嗜欲,长好恶,则性命之情病焉。君将黜嗜欲,紧好恶,则耳目病矣。我则劳君,君有何劳於我。武侯超然不对。少焉,徐无鬼曰,则性命之情病焉。君将黜嗜欲,紧好恶,则耳目病矣。我则劳君,君有何劳於我。武侯超然不对。少焉,徐无鬼曰:尝语君,吾相狗也。下之质执饱而已,是狸德也。中之质若视日,上之质若亡其一。吾相狗,又不若吾相马也。吾相马,直者中绳,曲者中钩,方者中矩,圆者中规,是国马也,而未若天下马也。天下马有成材,若恤惊悚。若失,若丧其一,若是者,超轶。绝尘,不知其所。武侯大悦而笑。徐无鬼出,女商曰:先生独何以说吾君乎。五p所以说吾君者,横说之则以诗书礼乐,从说之则以金版六弢,金版六韬,《周书》篇名也。又云文武虎豹龙犬,是谓吕望六韬也。奉事而大有功者不可为数,而吾君未尝启齿。今先生何以说吾君,使吾君悦若此乎。徐无鬼曰:吾直告之吾相狗马耳。女商曰:若是乎。曰:子不闻夫越之流人乎。去国数日,见其所知而喜。去国此乎。徐无鬼曰:吾直告之吾相狗马耳。女商曰:若是乎。曰:子不闻夫越之流人乎。去国数日,见其所知而喜。去国旬月,见所尝见於国中者喜。及期年也,见似人者而喜矣。不亦去人滋久,思人之滋深乎。夫逃虚空者,藜藋柱乎XW之径,踉位其空,闻其足音跫然而喜矣,又况乎昆弟亲戚之声欬其侧者乎。久矣夫,莫以真人之言声欬吾君之侧乎。言此者以武侯素好犬马,凡欲规谏,必先投其机,然后以正理言之则必喜矣。此亦歙张与夺之权也。故玄同取以为说云。
Interpretation

The Zhuangzi, in the chapter “Xu Wugui,” tells of Xu Wugui’s visit to Marquis Wu of Wei. He first spoke about how to judge dogs and horses, then prompted the marquis to reflect on his own spirit and circumstances, and finally turned the conversation toward the art of governing. This shows how someone who knows when to advance and when to yield can use the method of “drawing in and extending outward” (contraction and expansion).

Xu Wugui’s surname was Xu, and his courtesy name was Wugui. He was a recluse from the state of Wei. He was introduced to Marquis Wu through Nü Shang, a favorite of the Wei ruler. Marquis Wu was the son of Marquis Wen of Wei. The marquis asked him, “You must be tired, sir. Life in the mountains and forests is hard, so you have agreed to come and see me.” Xu Wugui replied, “I am the one who worries for the ruler. What is there for you to worry about on my behalf? If you indulge your desires and intensify your likes and dislikes, the natural condition of your life will be harmed. If you suppress your desires and deliberately control your likes and dislikes, your eyes and ears will grow weary. I worry for you, so what is there for you to worry about on my behalf?” Marquis Wu looked troubled and did not answer.

After a while, Xu Wugui said, “I once told you that I can judge dogs. A low-grade dog cares only about getting enough to eat; that is the nature of a wildcat. A middle-grade dog has an alert gaze. A high-grade dog seems to forget even that it exists. But judging dogs is not as good as judging horses. When I judge horses, those that run straight follow the ink line, those that turn follow the curve of a hook, those that make square turns follow the carpenter’s square, and those that make circles follow the compass. These are good horses, but they are still not as good as the finest horses in the world. The finest horses are naturally endowed and perfectly formed. Their expressions sometimes seem anxious or alarmed, sometimes as if they have lost something, and sometimes as if they have forgotten themselves. When they run, they surpass the ordinary; even dust cannot catch them, and their destination is hard to discern.”

Marquis Wu was delighted to hear this. After Xu Wugui left, Nü Shang asked him, “What exactly did you say to make the ruler so happy?” Nü Shang explained that he had advised the marquis using the Odes, the Documents, the Rites, and the Music. He had also discussed military texts such as the Golden Edition and the Six Secret Teachings, and spoken of assisting the ruler and earning great merit, but he had never made the marquis so cheerful.

Xu Wugui replied, “I simply told him directly that I can judge dogs and horses.” Nü Shang did not understand. Xu Wugui then made an example of exiles from Yue: after leaving their homeland for a few days, they were glad to see someone they knew; after ten days or half a month, they were glad to see someone they had encountered back home; after a year, they were glad to see anyone with a similar appearance. The longer people were away, the deeper their longing for home became. Those who flee into empty wilderness and walk along paths overgrown with mugwort and weeds are glad even to hear their own footsteps. How much more delighted they must be to hear the voices and coughs of brothers and relatives nearby!

Xu Wugui lamented that for a long time Marquis Wu had had no “true person”—someone who understood the genuine Dao—to speak with him in words that accorded with his nature. Since the marquis usually took pleasure in dogs and horses, Xu Wugui began with a subject that interested him, then guided him toward hearing what was right. To begin with what appeals to another person and then, at the right moment, draw back and turn toward counsel is the method of “drawing in and extending outward, giving and taking.”

柔弱胜刚强,鱼不可脱於渊,国之利器,不可以示人。 衍义云:犹鱼之不可脱於渊,鱼脱於渊则获。 钞《庄子□庚桑楚篇》云:函车之兽,介而离器,不可以示人。 衍义云:犹鱼之不可脱於渊,鱼脱於渊则获。 钞《庄子□庚桑楚篇》云:函车之兽,介而离山,则不免于罔罟之患。吞舟之鱼,砀而失水,则蚁能苦之。故鸟兽不厌高,鱼鳖不厌深,其斯之谓欤。 衍义云:此之谓独化。 钞《庄子□在宥篇》云:独有之人,是之谓至贵。此言独有之人,苍生乐推,百姓荷戴,以斯为主,不谓至尊至贵也。《大宗师篇》云:朝彻而后能见独,见独而后能无古今,任造物之日新,随变化而俱往,不为物境所迁,故云独化。 衍义云:《易》曰:巽以行权。 钞《易系云:朝彻而后能见独,见独而后能无古今,任造物之日新,随变化而俱往,不为物境所迁,故云独化。 衍义云:《易》曰:巽以行权。 钞《易系辞》曰:巽以行权者,顺也。言能顺时合宜,故可以行权也。若不顺时制变,不可以行权也。 衍义云:於鱼得计。
Interpretation

Softness can overcome strength. Fish cannot leave the deep water; once they do, they are caught. The important instruments of state and the authority held by a ruler, too, must not be shown casually to others.

The Yanyi says: This is like a fish that cannot leave the deep water. Once it leaves, people will catch it.

The chapter “Gengsang Chu” in the Zhuangzi says: A great beast large enough to fill a cart should not be seen by people once it has left the forest. Away from the place where it can hide, it falls into the danger of nets and traps. A great fish that could swallow a boat, if it thrashes its way out of the water, can be made to suffer even by ants. So birds and beasts do not mind high mountains, and fish and turtles do not mind deep waters—is this not the reason?

The Yanyi says: This is called “spontaneous transformation”: all things grow and function by following the changes proper to themselves.

The chapter “Zaiyou” in the Zhuangzi says: One who stands alone and depends on nothing else can be called supremely noble. The “person who alone possesses” mentioned here means someone whom the people gladly choose and support as their leader. They make him their ruler; this does not mean that he declares himself supreme and most noble. The chapter “Dazongshi” in the Zhuangzi says: Only after reaching “Dawn Clarity,” a state of lucid awareness, can one experience “the Alone.” Having experienced “the Alone,” one can transcend the distinction between past and present. Such a person lets the transformations of nature renew themselves day by day and moves along with them, without being constrained by external things or circumstances. This is why it is called “spontaneous transformation.”

The Yanyi says: The Book of Changes says, “Through yielding, one exercises authority.”

The “Appended Statements” of the Book of Changes says: “Through yielding, one exercises authority” means to adapt to the circumstances of the time. Only by responding to the right moment and acting in accordance with reason can one deal flexibly with events. If one does not adapt to the circumstances and respond to change, one cannot exercise authority.

The Yanyi concludes: This is like a fish that knows how to preserve itself.

钞《庄子□徐无鬼篇》之文。云:是以神人恶众至,众至则不比,不比则不利也。故无所甚亲,无所甚疏,抱德炀和,以顺天下,此谓真人。於蚁弃知,於鱼得计,於羊弃意。疏:不慕羊肉之人,故蚁弃知也。不为膻行教物,故於羊弃意也。既遣仁义合乎至道,不伤濡沬相忘於江湖,故於鱼得计,此斥虞舜膻行故给斯言也。 道德真经衍义手钞卷之九竟 8-道德真经衍义手钞卷之十 道德真经衍义手钞卷之十 五峰清安逸士王守正集 道常无为章第三十七 道常无为,而无不为。 衍义 道德真经衍义手钞卷之十 五峰清安逸士王守正集 道常无为章第三十七 道常无为,而无不为。 衍义云:道以无为为常。 钞《庄子□天地篇》之辞。故曰:古之畜天下者,无欲而天下足,无为而万物化。又云:无为为之之谓天,无为言之之谓德。 衍义云:天下之善人少,而不善人多。 钞《庄子□胠箧篇》之辞。此乃盗跖答其徒之言。由是观之,善人不得圣人之道不立,跖不得圣人之道不行。天下之善人少,而不善人多,则圣人之利天下也少,而害天下也多。
Interpretation

That is why the “Xu Wugui” chapter of the Zhuangzi says: “The True Person does not want everyone to come and attach themselves to him. When too many people gather, it becomes difficult for them to be close to one another; when they are not close, things do not go smoothly. So the True Person is neither especially close to anyone nor especially distant from anyone. He holds to his De (Virtue/Power), nurtures equanimity, and responds to the world. This is what is called a True Person.”

The commentary says: The True Person is not greedy, like someone who craves mutton, and so can abandon clever schemes and calculations. He does not use rank or status to teach others, and so can abandon preconceptions and intentions. Having set aside deliberate acts of benevolence and righteousness and aligned himself with the Great Dao, he does not uphold benevolence and righteousness like Bo Yi and Shu Qi. It is like fish living freely together in rivers and lakes: they need not moisten one another with their breath to maintain their relationship. The image of fish forgetting one another in rivers and lakes is used here to criticize Emperor Shun’s practice of teaching the world through benevolence and righteousness.

Hand-copied Commentary on the Extended Meaning of the True Classic of the Way and Its Virtue, scroll nine, ends.

Hand-copied Commentary on the Extended Meaning of the True Classic of the Way and Its Virtue, scroll ten

Compiled by Wang Shouzheng, a reclusive scholar from Qing’an at Wufeng

Chapter Thirty-Seven: “The Constant Dao Acts Through Wuwei”

The Dao always proceeds in accordance with its own nature, yet there is nothing it does not bring to completion.

“The Dao takes Wuwei as its constant state” means that Wuwei is the Dao’s natural condition. Here, “Wuwei” means not forcing things through the intervention of subjective will.

The “Heaven and Earth” chapter of the Zhuangzi says: “The people of ancient times who governed the world had no greed, and the world was therefore prosperous; they did not act deliberately, and the myriad things transformed of themselves.” It also says: “Acting in accordance with nature is called Heaven; speaking in accordance with nature is called De.”

The text goes on to say that good people are few in the world, while those who are not good are many. This statement comes from the “Cutting Open Satchels” chapter of the Zhuangzi, where Robber Zhi says it in reply to his disciples. From this, we can see that good people find it difficult to establish themselves without relying on the Way of the sages; Robber Zhi, too, would find it difficult to succeed without relying on that Way. If good people are few and those who are not good are many, then the sages bring little benefit to the world and cause even greater harm.

Chapter Thirty-Eight: “One of Superior De Does Not Display De”

A person with superior De does not deliberately display De; for this reason, he truly has De.

上德不德章第三十八 上德不德,是以不得圣人之道不行。天下之善人少,而不善人多,则圣人之利天下也少,而害天下也多。 上德不德章第三十八 上德不德,是以有德。下德不失德,是以无德。 衍义云:支离所为,百姓日用而不知。 钞:支离所为者,谓其德支折离散,不彰其用,不显其名之义也。《庄子□人间世篇》云:支离疏者,颐隐於脐,肩高於项,会撮谓头发也指天,五管在上,五管,五脏也。两髀为胁。挫针治繲,缝衣洗院,足以糊口,鼓策揲蓍也。播精,足以食十人。上微武士,则支离攘臂於其间。上有大役,则支离以有常疾不受工。上与病者粟,则受三锺六石四斗曰锺。与十束薪。夫支离其形者,犹足养其身,终其天年,何况支离其德者乎。,则支离以有常疾不受工。上与病者粟,则受三锺六石四斗曰锺。与十束薪。夫支离其形者,犹足养其身,终其天年,何况支离其德者乎。若能保其常名者,如此,百姓日用而不知者。《易系辞》云:一阴一阳之谓道。继之者善也。成之者性也。仁者见之谓之仁,智者见之谓之智,百姓日用而不知,故君子之道鲜矣。此言上德不以德为德,故百姓日用而不知也。 上礼为之,而莫之应,则攘臂而仍之。 衍义云:礼者,履也,谓可履而行之也。辩上下定贵贱。 钞辩上下者,《易履卦大象》曰:上天下泽,履。君子以辩上下,定民志者是也。
Interpretation

Those of the highest De (Virtue) do not deliberately proclaim their virtue, and so truly possess it. Those of lesser De cling to the idea of not losing their virtue, and so do not truly possess it.

The Yanyi says: Some people act in ways that seem incomplete and unconventional, yet the people are affected by them every day without realizing it.

The Chao explains that “the actions of the fragmented” means that virtue remains inconspicuous, without deliberately displaying its effects or reputation. Here it refers to Zhilishu from the Zhuangzi, “In the Human World”: though his body was malformed, he made a living sewing clothes, washing garments, and telling fortunes, supporting himself and living out his full span of years. If even someone with a malformed body could support himself, how much more could someone whose virtue was not put on display? If this ordinary, inconspicuous way is maintained, the people will be influenced in their daily lives without knowing it.

The Appended Statements of the Book of Changes says: “The mutual transformation of Yin and Yang is the Dao; what carries on the Dao is goodness, and what brings the Dao to completion is nature.” The benevolent see benevolence in the Dao and call it benevolence; the wise see wisdom in it and call it wisdom. The people use the Dao every day without knowing it exists, so the way of the noble person is rarely truly understood. This passage means that those of the highest De do not treat virtue as something worth proclaiming. The people are influenced by them every day, yet remain unaware of it.

Those who practice ritual at a lower level deliberately impose it, but no one responds. They then roll up their sleeves and force people to comply.

The Yanyi says: Ritual means “to tread”—that is, a standard one can follow and put into practice. It distinguishes ranks between higher and lower and establishes an order of greater and lesser status.

The Chao explains that “distinguishing ranks between higher and lower” comes from the “Image” of the Treading hexagram in the Book of Changes: “Above is Heaven, below is the marsh: this is the image of Treading. The noble person distinguishes the ranks between higher and lower, and thereby settles the minds of the people.”

衍义云:玉帛交驰,威仪相答。 谓可履而行之也。辩上下定贵贱。 钞辩上下者,《易履卦大象》曰:上天下泽,履。君子以辩上下,定民志者是也。 衍义云:玉帛交驰,威仪相答。 钞《鲁语□阳货篇》云:孔子曰:礼云礼云,玉帛云乎哉。乐云乐云,锺鼓云乎哉。《礼记□中庸》曰:礼仪三百,威仪三千,一言以蔽之,曰毋不敬。夫礼主於敬,乐主於和,有威可畏谓之威,有仪可法谓之仪。夫玉帛者,礼之物,以表其意者也。锺鼓者,乐之器,以导其和者也。是知言敬中和者,礼乐之本也。锺鼓者,礼乐之末也。故曰:玉帛交驰,威仪相答,擎跽曲拳,进退顾揖,此礼之文也。故云:末敬中和者,礼乐之本也。锺鼓者,礼乐之末也。故曰:玉帛交驰,威仪相答,擎跽曲拳,进退顾揖,此礼之文也。故云:末焉,其或交驰相答而莫之应,则至攘臂而仍之也。 衍义云:击跽曲拳。 钞《庄子□人间世篇》之文。颜回曰:击跽曲拳者,人臣之礼也。擎,叉手也。跽,跪膝也。曲拳,折腰也。 衍义云:庄子曰:大礼与天地同节。又曰:以礼为翼者。
Interpretation

Jade and silk pass back and forth, and people respond to one another through ritual gestures. This means that ritual is a standard people can follow in practice: it distinguishes the ranks of those above and below, and brings peace to people’s minds.

The Great Image Commentary on the “Treading” hexagram in the Book of Changes says, “Heaven is above and the marsh below: this is the Treading hexagram.” From this, the exemplary person clarifies the distinctions between those above and below, bringing peace to the people’s minds.

The “Yang Huo” chapter of the Discourses of the States of Lu records Confucius as saying, “Ritual, ritual—is it only a matter of jade and silk, the objects used in ceremony? Music, music—is it only a matter of bells and drums, the instruments used in performance?” The Doctrine of the Mean in the Book of Rites says that ritual has three hundred formal provisions and three thousand specific observances, but all can be summed up in one phrase: “There is nothing that does not call for reverence.” Reverence is the foundation of ritual, and harmony is the foundation of music. A bearing that inspires awe is called “dignity”; conduct worthy of being a model is called “propriety.” Jade and silk are objects used in ritual to express its meaning; bells and drums are instruments used in music to guide harmony. Thus, reverence and harmony within are the foundations of ritual and music, while objects such as bells and drums are their outward forms. The exchange of jade and silk, the mutual response of dignified bearing, and gestures such as clasping the hands, kneeling, bowing, advancing and withdrawing, looking back, and making a respectful salute are all outward observances of ritual. If people concern themselves only with exchanging objects and responding with gestures, without anyone reciprocating, things will eventually come to blows, with people forcing one another.

The expressions “clasping the hands, kneeling, bowing,” and the like, come from the “In the Human World” chapter of the Zhuangzi. Yan Hui says that these are the proper courtesies of a minister. “Qing” means clasping the hands; “ji” means kneeling; “ququan” means bowing.

Zhuangzi says, “Great ritual accords with the rhythms of Heaven and Earth.” He also says, “Take ritual as your wings.”

钞《礼记□乐记篇》之文。云:大乐与天地同和,大礼与天地同节。和故百物不伤,节则祀天祭地。明则有礼乐,暗则有鬼神。又曰:以礼为翼者,所以行於世也者,此《庄子□大宗师篇》之文也。既云大礼与天地同节,又以此为翼而行於世,则恶有攘臂之乱哉。 衍义云:来而不往非礼也。往而不来亦非礼也。 篇》之文也。既云大礼与天地同节,又以此为翼而行於世,则恶有攘臂之乱哉。 衍义云:来而不往非礼也。往而不来亦非礼也。 钞《礼记篇》之文。此言礼以辩上下别亲疏。攘者,攘除衣袂以出臂,而相仍引,施报之礼。行於彼而彼不应,则怒而相仍引也。 衍义云:一言之不雠,一拜之不中,两国为暴骨,则攘臂而仍之。 钞《春秋》:宣公十二年,楚文公又使求成于晋,晋人许之。楚子曰:非尔所知也。武王克商,作颂曰:绥万邦屡丰年。夫武以禁暴戢兵,保大定功,安民和众,丰财者也。故使子孙无忘其章。今我使二国暴骨暴矣。今我一战而使晋楚之民暴骨于野,是不能禁暴矣。 衍义云:春秋时,楚宣王朝诸侯国暴骨暴矣。今我一战而使晋楚之民暴骨于野,是不能禁暴矣。 衍义云:春秋时,楚宣王朝诸侯,义中备载。又云:至德之世,实而不知以为忠。
Interpretation

The Book of Rites: Record of Music says, “The greatest music accords with the movements of Heaven and Earth; the greatest ritual accords with their rhythms.” When music is harmonious, the myriad things are not harmed. When ritual is measured and proper, people make offerings to Heaven and Earth. In the realm of light, ritual and music have their order; in the realm of darkness, the spirits respond.

It also says, “Only with ritual as your wings can you act in the world.” These are the words of the Zhuangzi, in the “Great and Venerable Teacher” chapter. If great ritual accords with the rhythms of Heaven and Earth, and one must act in the world through ritual, how can people still roll up their sleeves, bare their arms, and fight one another?

The Book of Rites says, “For another to come to you when you have not gone to them is contrary to ritual; for you to go to another when they have not come to you is also contrary to ritual.” This means that ritual serves to distinguish rank and status, and to mark degrees of closeness and distance. To “bare one’s arms” means to roll up one’s sleeves and expose one’s arms, then to seize and quarrel with one another. If one offers ritual first and the other does not respond, one may grow angry, and the two may come to blows.

Thus it is said, “A single unanswered word, or one bow performed in improper form, may leave the people of two states lying dead on the battlefield.” The Spring and Autumn Annals records that in the twelfth year of Duke Xuan of Lu, Chu once again sent an envoy to seek peace with Jin, and Jin agreed. But King Zhuang of Chu said, “This is beyond your understanding. After King Wu of Zhou defeated Shang, he composed a hymn saying that he would bring peace to the myriad states and secure repeated harvests. The use of force was meant to stop brutality, end warfare, consolidate the state, and secure its achievements, so that the people might live in peace, all might be in harmony, and resources might be plentiful. These principles were to be kept in mind by later generations. Now I have left the people of both states lying dead across the land. If I fight another battle and leave the people of Jin and Chu exposed in the wilderness, that will show I have failed to stop brutality.”

The Extended Meaning further says that the records give a detailed account of the Chu ruler’s meetings with the feudal lords during the Spring and Autumn period. It also says that in the age when the highest De prevailed, people were honest and sincere, yet did not know to call this quality “loyalty.”

钞《庄子□天地篇》之辞。至德之世,不尚贤,不使能。上如标枝,民如野鹿。端正而不知以为义,相爱而不知以为仁,实而不知以为忠,当而不知以为信,蠢动而相使,不以为赐。 是以大丈夫处其厚,不处其薄。居其实,不居其华。故去彼取此。 衍义云:此晋宋之士所以荡而忘及,以至国破身亡而不自知也。 钞:晋司马昭之时三年,樵郡嵇康,文辞壮丽,好言庄老,而尚奇任侠,与陈留阮籍、兄子阮咸、河内山涛、河南向秀、琅琊王戎、沛人刘伶特相友善,号竹林七贤,皆崇尚虚无,轻蔑、兄子阮咸、河内山涛、河南向秀、琅琊王戎、沛人刘伶特相友善,号竹林七贤,皆崇尚虚无,轻蔑礼法,纵酒昏酣,遗落世事。锺会方有宠於司马昭,闻嵇康名而造之。
Interpretation

The “Tian Di” chapter of the Zhuangzi says: In the age when Dao and De were most unadulterated, people did not honor the worthy or deliberately appoint the talented. The ruler stood high above, like a branch at the treetop; the people lived freely, like wild deer. People behaved properly without knowing it was righteousness; they cared for one another without knowing it was benevolence; they carried out their work fully and reliably without knowing it was loyalty; they acted appropriately without knowing it was trustworthiness. They acted naturally and cooperated with one another, without considering this the granting of favors.

Therefore, a great person should make solid substance the basis of their conduct, not superficiality; they should hold fast to what is genuine, not pursue outward display. Thus, they should set aside what is showy and choose what is solid and genuine.

The Yanyi says: During the Jin and Song dynasties, scholars gave themselves over to unruly conduct and became absorbed in talk of nothingness. They did not come to their senses even as their states fell and they themselves lost their lives.

A commentary records: When Sima Zhao held power, Ji Kang, a native of Qiao Commandery, wrote with striking force and grandeur. He enjoyed discussing the Zhuangzi and Laozi, and admired the unusual, chivalry, and righteousness. He was close to Ruan Ji of Chenliu, Ruan Ji’s nephew Ruan Xian, Shan Tao of Henei, Xiang Xiu of Henan, Wang Rong of Langya, and Liu Ling of Pei. They were known as the “Seven Sages of the Bamboo Grove.” They exalted nothingness, scorned ritual and law, drank wine to excess, and set the affairs of the world aside. At the time, Zhong Hui enjoyed the favor of Sima Zhao. Hearing of Ji Kang’s reputation, he went to visit him.

康箕踞而锻,不为之礼。会将去。嵇康曰:何所闻而来,何所见而去。锺会曰:闻所闻而来,见所见而去。遂深衔之。山涛为吏部郎,举嵇康自代。与涛书曰:自说不堪流俗而非薄汤武。司马昭闻而怒之。康与东平吕安亲善,锺会因譖安、康有盛名而言论放荡,害时乱教,宜因此除之。遂杀安及康。举此为证,正所谓荡而忘反,以至国破身亡,正谓此也。《南史□宋纪》谢灵运,陈郡阳夏人。秘书郎谢瑛之子。出为永嘉太守。郡有名山水,灵运素所爱好,出守既不得志,遂肆意游遨,偏历诸县,动踰旬朔。理人听讼,不复关怀。所至辄为诗咏,以致其意。在郡一周,称疾去职,遂移疾会稽,修营旧业出守既不得志,遂肆意游遨,偏历诸县,动踰旬朔。理人听讼,不复关怀。所至辄为诗咏,以致其意。在郡一周,称疾去职,遂移疾会稽,修营旧业,傍山带江,尽幽居之美。与隐士王弘之、扎淳之等放荡为娱,有终焉之志。自始宁南山伐木开径,至临海从者数百。临海太守王珠惊骇,谓为山贼。论曰:谢氏自晋以降,雅道相传,景恒、景仁以德素传美,景懋、景先以节美流誉。方明行已之度,玄晖藻续之奇,各擅一时,可谓德门者矣。灵运才名江左,独振而猖獗不已,自致覆亡。人各有能,兹言乃信,惜乎。
Interpretation

Ji Kang sat with his legs stretched out, hammering metal, and did not rise to salute. As Zhong Hui was about to leave, Ji Kang asked, “What did you hear that brought you here, and what did you see that makes you leave?” Zhong Hui replied, “I came because I heard what was worth hearing, and I leave because I saw what was worth seeing.” From then on, he bore a deep grudge against Ji Kang.

Later, when Shan Tao became Director of the Secretariat for Personnel, he recommended Ji Kang to take over his post. Ji Kang wrote to Shan Tao, saying that he was unsuited to the ways of the world and held in contempt the use of force by rulers such as Tang of Shang and King Wu of Zhou to overthrow their predecessors. When Sima Zhao heard of this, he flew into a rage. Ji Kang was close to Lü An, a native of Dongping. Zhong Hui then falsely accused Lü An and Ji Kang, claiming that their great reputations and unrestrained speech threatened the government and disrupted moral education, and that this was an opportunity to eliminate them. Lü An and Ji Kang were both put to death. This example is given to show what is meant by indulging oneself without knowing when to turn back: in the end, it brings down the state and costs a person their life. That is precisely what happened here.

The Book of the Southern Dynasties, in its “Chronicle of the Song,” records that Xie Lingyun was from Yangxia in Chen Commandery and was the son of Xie Ying, a Secretariat Gentleman. He was appointed from the capital to serve as Prefect of Yongjia. Yongjia Commandery had many famous mountains and rivers, places that Xie Lingyun had always loved. Unhappy in his post, he indulged his own wishes and traveled for pleasure across the counties, often staying away for ten days or half a month at a time. He no longer concerned himself with governing the people or hearing lawsuits; wherever he went, he wrote poems to express his feelings. After serving in the commandery for about a year, he resigned on grounds of illness. He then used illness as a reason to move to Kuaiji and build a residence on his old estate. Set against the mountains and overlooking the river, it offered every pleasure of secluded living. He reveled there with the recluses Wang Hongzhi and Zha Chunzhi, among others, and planned to spend the rest of his life in that place. He cut trees to open a road from the southern mountains of Shining, traveling all the way to Linhai with several hundred followers. Wang Zhu, the Prefect of Linhai, was greatly alarmed and thought they were bandits from the mountains.

The commentators say: Since the Jin dynasty, the Xie family’s refined traditions had passed from one generation to the next. Jingheng and Jingren were known for their virtue; Jingmao and Jingxian for their integrity. Fangming had a measured character, while Xuanhui excelled in writing. Each was outstanding in his own time, and together they may be called a distinguished family of virtue and renown. Xie Lingyun’s talent and fame had no equal in Jiangnan, yet he alone remained arrogantly self-indulgent, ultimately bringing about his own downfall. The saying “Each person has their own abilities” is indeed true. What a pity.

昔之得一章第三十九 昔之得一者,天得一,以清。地得一,以宁。神獗不已,自致覆亡。人各有能,兹言乃信,惜乎。 昔之得一章第三十九 昔之得一者,天得一,以清。地得一,以宁。神得一,以灵。谷得一,以盈。万物得一,以生。侯王得一,以为天下正。 衍义云:举本经云:道生一於物为精,元气也。元气为道之子。 钞:一者乃道之子,冲和之妙气也。作阴阳之本,为万物之母,古今不二,终始无穷。一之为言,其大矣哉。一者,元气也。能阴能阳,而不属於阴阳,升玉京金阙,而不为清。处瓦甓茅薜,而不为浊。乾元以之而资始,坤元以之而资生,制御有为则真宰出焉。 衍义云:谓之真君,制御形躯,谓之真宰。钞《庄子□齐物论》之文。非彼无我,非我无所取。是亦近矣,而不其所为使。若有真宰,而特不得其朕。如是皆有臣妾乎。其臣妾不足以相治乎。其递相为君臣乎所为使。若有真宰,而特不得其朕。如是皆有臣妾乎。其臣妾不足以相治乎。其递相为君臣乎。其有真君存焉。如求得其情与不得,无益损乎其真也。 衍义云:侯王五等之爵。王者万乘之君。
Interpretation

In ancient times, those who attained the “One” of the Dao found that heaven became clear, earth became peaceful, spirits became wondrous, valleys became full, and all things grew. Lords and kings thereby became the rightful rulers of the world. Each person, too, had their own capacity. These words are indeed credible—but how regrettable.

The “One” spoken of here is the essence produced by the Dao: primordial Qi, the Dao’s offspring. It is the harmonious, wondrous Qi born of the Dao, the root of Yin-Yang and the source of all things. Unchanged from ancient times to the present, it runs through everything without end. Primordial Qi can transform into Yin or into Yang, yet it belongs to neither. Even when it rises to the Jade Capital and Golden Palace—the celestial halls of Daoist belief—it does not thereby become pure; even when it dwells among brick, tile, and thatched huts, it does not thereby become turbid. The Primordial Yang of Qian uses it to bring all things into being, and the Primordial Yin of Kun uses it to nourish them. If one can govern the affairs of action, the power that rules behind all things will become apparent.

The “True Lord” is the ruler of the body, also called the “True Ruler,” the inner master. In the “Discourse on Making All Things Equal” in the Zhuangzi, it says that without external things there would be no self, and without a self there would be no way to know external things. This comes close, but it does not explain who, in the end, governs it all. It seems that a True Ruler exists, yet no trace of it can be found. Between it and its subjects, who governs whom? Or do they take turns as ruler and subordinate? Even if the True Lord truly exists, discovering its reality would neither add to nor diminish anything in itself.

“Lords” refers to the nobles of the five ranks; “king” refers to the ruler of a great state commanding ten thousand chariots.

钞:王者,四海之尊。侯者,五等之二。固设五等之爵,有公、侯、伯、子、男,以佐王者也。万乘之君,君者,王也,天子也。天子提封百万赋,六十四万井,出戎马百万匹,兵车万乘,故云万乘之主。 衍义云:故能永有天下,无思不服。钞:无思不服者,此《毛诗□大雅文王有声篇赋,六十四万井,出戎马百万匹,兵车万乘,故云万乘之主。 衍义云:故能永有天下,无思不服。钞:无思不服者,此《毛诗□大雅文王有声篇》云:镐京武王建都辟痈,行礼自西自东,自南自北,无思不服。无思不服,皇王烝哉。言武王作邑於镐京。笺云:自,由也,言武王於镐京行辟痈之礼,由四方而来观者,皆感武王之德化,中心无不归服者也。又云:皇王烝哉者,皇,大也,烝,君也,世美武王德化大而能君者也。今引此以证言万国欢心而归服者,亦由得一而正之所致也。故云侯王得一,以为天下正。 其致之,天无以清,将恐裂。地无以宁,将恐发。神无以灵,将恐歇。谷无以盈,将恐竭王得一,以为天下正。 其致之,天无以清,将恐裂。地无以宁,将恐发。神无以灵,将恐歇。谷无以盈,将恐竭。万物无以生,将恐灭。侯王无以贵高,将恐蹶。 衍义云:《列子》载杞国有人忧天地崩坠,身亡所寄。
Interpretation

In ancient times, the king was the most honored person within the Four Seas; a marquis ranked second among the five grades of nobility. The five grades—duke, marquis, earl, viscount, and baron—were established to assist the ruler. A sovereign commanding ten thousand chariots was a king, or Son of Heaven. The land under the Son of Heaven’s rule was said to contain one million taxable households and 640,000 well-field units, enough to supply one million warhorses and ten thousand chariots. For this reason, he was called “the lord of ten thousand chariots.”

The commentary explains the phrase “none fail to submit,” which appears in “Wen Wang You Sheng” in the Mao Commentary on the Book of Songs. The poem praises King Wu of Zhou for establishing his capital at Haojing and holding a ceremony at the Biyong, the ancient school and ritual site established by the Son of Heaven. People came from every direction to witness it, and all were moved by King Wu’s De; none failed inwardly to submit to him. The line “How splendid is the royal king!” praises King Wu’s abundant De, sufficient to make him worthy to rule. The poem is cited here to explain that the people of the myriad states gladly submit because the ruler has attained the One (the Dao) and uses the Dao to set the world in order. Thus it says: “When the marquis and king attain the One, they can become the standard for the world.”

The Dao’s workings are seen in this: if Heaven cannot remain clear, it may collapse; if Earth cannot remain stable, it may quake; if the spirits lose their efficacy, they may dissipate; if the valleys cannot remain full, they may dry up. If the myriad things lose their vitality, they may perish; if the marquis and king lose their honored position, they may be overthrown.

The commentary also cites a story from the Liezi: a man in the state of Qi feared that Heaven and Earth would collapse, leaving him nowhere to live.

钞《列子□天瑞篇》之文。云:杞国有人,殷汤封夏后于杞,周又封之,今在陈留雍丘县,今杞州地是也。衍义中载之已备,不复重录。 故贵以贱为本,高以下为基。是以侯王自谓孤、寡、不谷,此其以贱为本耶,非乎。 衍义云:称孤者,如《左传》:孤与二三臣,悼心失图。 钞:《春秋》昭公七年,楚子成章华之台,愿与诸侯落之。奉承以来,弗敢失陨坠也,而致诸宗桃,曰:我先君恭王,引领北望,日月以冀,传序相授,於今四王矣。谓恭、康、郏敖、灵王也,愿与诸侯落之。奉承以来,弗敢失陨坠也,而致诸宗桃,曰:我先君恭王,引领北望,日月以冀,传序相授,於今四王矣。谓恭、康、郏敖、灵王也。嘉惠未至,唯襄公之辱临我丧。孤与二三臣,悼心失图,社稷之不遑,况能怀思君德。言有康王大丧多不暇,楚灵无信所以不终也。 衍义云:称寡人者,即先君以寡人为贤之例。 钞:《春秋》隐公三年,宋宣公舍其子与夷,立其弟穆公。穆公有疾,召大司马孔父而属之,曰:先君舍与夷而立寡人,以寡人为贤,使主社稷。若弃德不让,段后,先君若问与夷,其将何辞以对。请子奉之,以主社稷。寡人虽死,亦无悔焉。 衍义云:称不谷者,若不谷恶其无成德之例是也。
Interpretation

This passage cites the “Tianrui” chapter of the Liezi. There was a man in the state of Qi. Yin Tang enfeoffed descendants of the Xia dynasty in Qi, and the Zhou dynasty continued to invest them with the title. The former territory of Qi lay in Yongqiu County of Chenliu Commandery, around what is now Qizhou. The Extended Explanation has already recorded this in detail, so it is not copied again here.

Thus, nobility takes lowliness as its root, and height takes what is low as its foundation. For this reason, rulers of the feudal states call themselves “orphan,” “widower,” and “unworthy.” Does this not mean that they take lowliness as their root? Is that not so?

The Extended Explanation says: “The title ‘orphan’ can be understood from a passage in the Zuo Commentary: ‘I and several of my ministers are anxious and at a loss.’”

A note cites the account for the seventh year of Duke Zhao in the Spring and Autumn Annals: King Ling of Chu built the Zhanghua Terrace and wanted to invite the feudal lords to attend its inauguration. King Ling said that he had inherited the work of his predecessors and dared not let it fall into ruin. He invited the lords to the ceremony and recalled that his late father, King Gong, had hoped to maintain friendly relations with them. By then, the throne had passed through four generations; the four kings were Gong, Kang, Jia’ao, and Ling. Chu had once been shown the kindness of a personal visit from Duke Xiang of Lu to offer condolences, but had received no such honor since. King Ling said, “I and several of my ministers are so anxious and confused that we cannot even attend to the affairs of state. How could we have the mind to remember the king’s kindness?” This refers to the turmoil in Chu after King Kang’s death, when the state was occupied with mourning, and to King Ling’s later breach of faith, which ultimately led to his unhappy end.

The Extended Explanation says: “The title ‘widower’ can be understood from the case of a former ruler who considered himself worthy.”

A note cites the account for the third year of Duke Yin in the Spring and Autumn Annals: Duke Xuan of Song did not appoint his own son, Yuyi, as ruler, but instead appointed his younger brother, Duke Mu. When Duke Mu fell gravely ill, he summoned Kongfu, the Grand Marshal, and entrusted the state to him, saying: “My late father did not appoint Yuyi but appointed me because he considered me worthy and entrusted me with governing the state. If I have virtue yet refuse to yield the throne, what will I say when my late father asks about Yuyi in the underworld? Please establish Yuyi as ruler and entrust the state to him. Even if I die, I will have no regrets.”

The Extended Explanation says: “The title ‘unworthy’ can be understood from sayings such as ‘I regret that I have failed to cultivate virtue.’”

钞:《春秋》成公十一年,秦晋有令狐之会。晋侯先至,秦伯不肯涉河。晋厉公、秦桓公也。秦背晋盟,晋侯使吕相绝秦。吕相诘十一年,秦晋有令狐之会。晋侯先至,秦伯不肯涉河。晋厉公、秦桓公也。秦背晋盟,晋侯使吕相绝秦。吕相诘秦伯曰:楚人恶君二三其德,亦来告我曰:秦背令狐之盟,而来求盟于我:昭告皇天上帝、秦三公,楚三王曰:余虽与晋出入,余惟利是视。不谷恶其无成德,是以宣之,以惩不一。 道德真经衍义手妙卷之十竟 9-道德真经衍义手钞卷之十一 道德真经衍义手钞卷之十一 五峰清安逸士王守正集 反者道之动章第四十 反者道之动。 衍义云:《易复卦》曰:刚反,动而以顺行。 钞《易经复卦众》曰:复,亨,刚反。动而以顺行,是以出入无疾,朋来无咎。王弼注:入则为反,出则刚长,故无疾。疾犹病也,朋:刚反,动而以顺行。 钞《易经复卦众》曰:复,亨,刚反。动而以顺行,是以出入无疾,朋来无咎。王弼注:入则为反,出则刚长,故无疾。疾犹病也,朋为阳也,故云是以出入无疾,朋来无咎也。 衍义云:寂然不动,感而遂通天下之故。
Interpretation

The Spring and Autumn Annals records that in the eleventh year of Duke Cheng (580 BCE), Qin and Jin met to form an alliance at Linghu. Duke Li of Jin arrived first at the Yellow River, but Duke Huan of Qin refused to cross the river to attend. Qin broke its alliance with Jin, so Duke Li sent Lü Xiang to sever relations with Qin.

Lü Xiang challenged Duke Huan, saying, “The people of Chu think you are fickle. They have also told us: ‘Qin broke the alliance at Linghu, then came to seek an alliance with us. Qin declared before August Heaven, the Supreme Emperor, Qin’s three former dukes, and Chu’s three former kings: “Although I have made alliances with Jin, I care only whether they are advantageous to me.”’ I despise this faithless and unpredictable conduct, so I am making these words public to reprimand those who are fickle.”

End of Handwritten Notes on the Extended Meaning of the True Scripture of the Dao and Its Virtue, Volume Ten

Handwritten Notes on the Extended Meaning of the True Scripture of the Dao and Its Virtue, Volume Eleven

Chapter Forty: “Reversal is the movement of the Dao”

“Reversal is the movement of the Dao”: returning and reverting are the way the Dao operates.

The Book of Changes, in its “Return” hexagram, says: “The firm and vigorous Qi returns; all things begin to move with it and proceed in accordance with its course.” Thus, advancing and retreating, coming and going, encounter no obstruction; when Yang Qi gathers with its own kind, no calamity follows. Wang Bi’s commentary explains that when Yang Qi enters within, it returns; as it grows outward, its firmness and vigor gradually increase, so its movement meets no obstruction. Here, “affliction” means harm or obstruction, while “companions” refers to Yang Qi.

The Book of Changes also says: “When all things are still and silent, their activity does not show itself. Once stirred by a response, they can comprehend the transformations of all things under Heaven.”

钞《周易系辞》之文。易,无思也,无为也,寂然不动,感而遂通天下之故,非天下之至诚,其孰能与於此哉。 衍义云:仰观于天,俯察乎地。 钞《易系辞》之文。注:故能弥论天地之道,仰以观於天文,俯以察於地理,是故知幽明之故。原始反终,故知死生之说。 衍义云:五行有水,反流全一,而动善时。 钞《列子□黄帝篇》之文。已全具於《道经□内道冲章第四篇》中,意故。原始反终,故知死生之说。 衍义云:五行有水,反流全一,而动善时。 钞《列子□黄帝篇》之文。已全具於《道经□内道冲章第四篇》中,意已全,今不再录大槩。反流全一者,反流则与道合,渊静则能全一。老子曰:心善渊渊虚而静,不与物杂,波流之变,虽或不同,而渊湛之性,动则时若。故云反流全一,而动善时也。 弱者道之用。 衍义云:指我亦胜我,踏我亦胜我,风之行乎,太虚可谓弱矣。
Interpretation

The Appended Statements of the Classic of Changes says: “Change—the Way of transformation—has no fixed thoughts and makes no deliberate effort. It is still and unmoving, yet through resonance it understands the causes of all things under Heaven. If not a person of utmost sincerity, who could reach such a state?”

An extended explanation says: Look up and observe the celestial patterns; look down and examine the earth.

A commentary on the Appended Statements of the Classic of Changes says: In this way, one can explain broadly the patterns by which Heaven and Earth operate, observing astronomy above and geography below, and so understand the causes of darkness and light. By tracing things back to their beginnings and examining where they ultimately arrive, one can understand the principles governing the changes of life and death.

An extended explanation says: Among the Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, and Water) is Water. Water can turn back and flow toward unity, while acting in accord with the right moment.

The passage copied here comes from the “Yellow Emperor” chapter of the Liezi. Its relevant content is already presented in full in the “Inner Dao: The Chapter on Emptiness” in the Dao Scripture, where its meaning has been fully explained. There is no need to copy out the general meaning again here. “Turning back and flowing toward unity” means that when water turns back and flows, it accords with the Dao; when it is deep, still, and clear, it can remain unified. Laozi says, “The mind is good at being like a deep pool.” This means the mind is empty and still like an abyss, unmixed with external things. Though the form of flowing water changes as its waves move, its deep, still, and clear nature does not change. It can also act in accord with the right moment. Thus it is said that water turns back and flows toward unity, and acts skillfully by seizing the moment.

Softness and weakness are the function of the Dao.

An extended explanation says: To point at me is to overcome me; to tread on me is to overcome me. Wind moving through the vast expanse of space may be called soft and weak.

钞《庄子□秋水篇》之文。她谓风曰:予动吾脊胁而行,则有似也。今子蓬蓬然起於北海,蓬蓬然入於南海,而似无有,何也。风曰:然。予蓬蓬然起於北海,蓬蓬然入於南海也。今子蓬蓬然起於北海,蓬蓬然入於南海,而似无有,何也。风曰:然。予蓬蓬然起於北海,蓬蓬然入於南海也,然而指我则胜我,o蹉我亦胜我。折大木,蜚大屋,唯我能也。自北徂南,击扬溟海。然人以指於风,风即不能折指,以脚o踏於风,风亦不能折脚,此小不胜也。 衍义云:决之东则东流,决之西则西流,则水之托於太虚,可谓弱矣。 钞《孟子□告子章句上》之文。告子曰:性犹湍水也,决诸东方则东流,决诸西方则西流,人性之无分於善不善也,犹水之无分於东西也。湍者,波流萦回之貌也。 衍义云:列子曰:有形生於无形,则天地安从生。 钞《列子□天瑞篇》之文。子列子曰:昔者圣人因阴阳以统天地,夫有形者生於无形,则天地安从生。此言天列子曰:有形生於无形,则天地安从生。
Interpretation

She asked the wind, “I twist my back and ribs to move, and that seems much like the way you move. Now you rise vigorously from the North Sea and enter the South Sea just as vigorously, appearing without form or shadow. Why is that?” The wind replied, “That is indeed so. I rise vigorously from the North Sea and enter the South Sea just as vigorously. Yet if someone points a finger at me, I am no match for it; if someone stamps a foot on me, I am no match for that either. Only I can break great trees and tear the roofs from large houses. I rush from north to south, striking and raising the sea. But if someone blocks me with a finger, I cannot break it; if someone steps on me, I cannot break their foot. This shows that even in such small matters, there are things I cannot do.”

The Expanded Explanation says: When an opening is made in the water toward the east, it flows east; when an opening is made toward the west, it flows west. From this we can see that water relies on the Great Void—the boundless expanse of space—and may be called soft and yielding.

Gaozi said, “Human nature is like a swift current. Open a channel to the east, and the water flows east; open one to the west, and it flows west. Human nature has no innate distinction between good and evil, just as a current has no fixed direction, east or west.” “Swift” describes the surging, swirling movement of water.

The Expanded Explanation says: The Liezi states that things with form arise from what has no form. From what, then, did Heaven and Earth arise?

The “Tianrui” chapter of the Liezi says, “The sages of old understood Heaven and Earth through the Yin-Yang. Things with form arise from what has no form. From what, then, did Heaven and Earth arise?”

钞《列子□天瑞篇》之文。子列子曰:昔者圣人因阴阳以统天地,夫有形者生於无形,则天地安从生。此言天地形之大者也。阴阳非神识也,有形若生於无形者,天地岂有神识心性乎。若其无者,从何而生耶。假设此问者,将明万物者有生也。 上士闻道章第四十一 上士闻道,勤而行之。中士闻道,若存若亡。下士闻道,大笑之。不笑,不足以为道。 衍义云:语之而不惰者,其回也与。 钞《论语□子罕第九》之文。子曰:语之而不惰者,其回也与。范氏注曰:颜子闻夫子之言,而心解力行,造次颠沛,未尝违之。如万物得时雨之润,发荣滋长,何有於惰,此群弟子所不及也。 衍义云:如《论语》之可以语上语下者也。 钞《论语□雍也第六》之文。子曰:中人以上,可以语上也。中人以下,惰,此群弟子所不及也。 衍义云:如《论语》之可以语上语下者也。 钞《论语□雍也第六》之文。子曰:中人以上,可以语上也。中人以下,不可以语上也。此言中人以下之质,骤而语之太高,非惟不能以入,且将妄意躐等,而有不切於身之弊,亦终於下而已矣。 衍义云:若子夏出见於纷华盛美而悦入,闻夫子之道而乐是已。
Interpretation

The “Tianrui” chapter of the Liezi says: Liezi once said that the sages of antiquity governed Heaven and Earth by following the transformations of Yin-Yang. If formed things arise from the formless, where did Heaven and Earth themselves arise from? Heaven and Earth are the greatest of formed things. Yin and Yang have no awareness of their own. If formed things can arise from the formless, then do Heaven and Earth, too, have awareness and a mind-nature? If Heaven and Earth have no awareness or mind-nature, where did they arise from? This hypothetical question is posed to explain that all things come into being through generation.

Chapter Forty-One: When the Highest Type of Person Hears the Dao

When people of the highest capacity hear the Dao, they diligently put it into practice. Those of middling capacity sometimes keep it in mind and sometimes forget it. Those of the lowest capacity burst out laughing when they hear the Dao. If they did not laugh at it, the Dao would not be worthy of the name.

The Yanyi says: “Perhaps only Yan Hui heard instruction without ever growing weary.”

The “Zihan” chapter of the Analects says: Confucius said, “Perhaps Yan Hui was the one who heard instruction without ever growing weary.” Master Fan’s commentary explains: Yan Hui understood Confucius’s words and worked hard to put them into practice. Whether in his daily life or in times of hardship and urgency, he never went against what he had learned. Like all things flourishing when nourished by timely rain, how could he grow weary? The other disciples could not match him.

The Yanyi also says: This is like the teaching in the Analects that one should explain principles at different levels of depth according to the listener’s capacity.

The “Yongye” chapter of the Analects says: Confucius believed that people whose capacity was above the middle could be taught profound principles, while those whose capacity was below the middle should not be given overly profound teachings directly. They might fail to understand, or even mistakenly think they had understood and try to advance too quickly. As a result, what they learned would have no bearing on their own situation, and they would ultimately remain at a shallow level.

The Yanyi gives another example: When Zixia went out, he felt delighted at the sight of the splendor and beauty around him. When he returned home and heard Confucius’s teachings, he felt joy once again.

钞《史记□礼书》所载子夏门人之高弟也。犹云:出见纷华盛丽而悦入,闻夫子之道而乐。二者心战未能自决,而况中人以下渐渍於失教,被服於成俗乎。 衍义云:目欲视色,耳欲听声,口欲察味,志气欲盈。 钞《庄子》盗跖与孔子所说之文。盗跖曰:今吾告子:以人之情,目欲视色,耳欲听声,口欲察味,志气欲盈。人上寿百岁,中寿八十,下寿六十,除病瘦死丧盗跖与孔子所说之文。盗跖曰:今吾告子:以人之情,目欲视色,耳欲听声,口欲察味,志气欲盈。人上寿百岁,中寿八十,下寿六十,除病瘦死丧忧患其中,开口而笑者,一月之中不过四五日而已矣。天与地无穷,八死者有时,操有时之具,而托於无穷之间,忽然无异骐骥之驰过隙也。 衍义云:亦犹章甫致贱於越人。 钞《庄子□逍遥游篇》云:宋人以章甫为货。章甫,邹鲁之冠也。越人者,百越之人也。其旧俗断发文身,不尚冠冕,则章甫非彼所好也。故云犹章甫致贱於越人。 衍义云:和璞见遗於楚国。 钞:和璞者,姓卞名和,楚国人也。居荆山之下。荆山在楚地,出於越人。 衍义云:和璞见遗於楚国。
Interpretation

The “Book of Rites” in the Records of the Grand Historian says that Zixia was one of Confucius’s disciples, outstanding in virtue. Even he could find himself in this situation: when he went out and saw scenes of splendor and beauty, he felt joy in his heart; when he returned home and heard the Master’s teachings, he felt joy again. Torn between these two thoughts, he could not decide for himself. What, then, of ordinary people—especially those of lesser ability—who are gradually affected by a lack of proper teaching and immersed in worldly customs?

The Extended Meaning says: The eyes want to see beauty, the ears want to hear pleasing sounds, the mouth wants to taste delicious food, and the mind and vital energy are always seeking satisfaction.

In “Robber Zhi” in the Zhuangzi, Robber Zhi says to Confucius: “Now I will tell you what people are naturally like. Their eyes want to see beauty, their ears want to hear sounds, their mouths want to taste flavors, and their minds and vital energy are always seeking satisfaction. A person’s lifespan may be a hundred years if long, eighty if average, or sixty if short. Once illness, weakness, death, funerals, and sorrow are taken away, there are no more than four or five days in a month when one can laugh with delight. Heaven and Earth are without end, but human life and death have their appointed limits. To entrust a finite life to the boundless expanse of Heaven and Earth is like a fine horse racing past a gap in the door: it is over in an instant.”

The Extended Meaning says: This is like sending a Zhangfu cap to Yue, where it is regarded as something of little worth.

The “Free and Easy Wandering” chapter of the Zhuangzi says: “The people of Song took Zhangfu caps—the ceremonial caps worn in the Zou and Lu regions—as merchandise.” The people of Yue refers to those of the Baiyue region. In ancient times, they had the custom of cutting their hair and tattooing their bodies, and did not value caps or ceremonial garments. A Zhangfu cap was therefore not something they prized, which is why it was said to be worth little in Yue.

The Extended Meaning says: The unworked jade of He was cast aside in Chu.

Bian He was a man of Chu who lived at the foot of Mount Jing. Mount Jing lay in Chu and produced jade.

钞:和璞者,姓卞名和,楚国人也。居荆山之下。荆山在楚地,出美玉。卞和得玉璞献於楚王。王怒,遂刖卞和左足。楚王崩,武王立。又进。武王曰:昔诳先君,又刖卞和右足。和抱玉泣於荆山。武王崩,成王立。和将玉进之。成王使人琢之,果是美玉也。玉价无估也。 衍义云:曲士不可以语於道矣。 钞《庄子》曰:曲士不可以语於道矣。此文在《秋水篇》,云:北海若曰:井蛙不可以语於海者,拘於虚也。夏虫不可以语冰者,笃於时也。曲士不可以语。此文在《秋水篇》,云:北海若曰:井蛙不可以语於海者,拘於虚也。夏虫不可以语冰者,笃於时也。曲士不可以语道者,束於教也。此言下士不识道之微妙也。而大笑之,使下士不笑不足以见真常之道也。 建言有之,明道若昧,进道若退,夷道若颣。上德若谷,大白若辱,广德若不足,建德若偷,质真若渝。 衍义云:如孔子曰:述而不作,窃比於我老彭。 钞《论语□述而第七》云:子曰:述而不作,信而好古,窃比於我老彭。注:述者传旧而已,作则创始也。故作非圣人不能,而述则贤者可及。窃比,尊之辞,我,亲之辞。老彭,商贤大夫,见《大载礼》。盖信古而传述者也。 衍义云:良贾深藏若虚,盛德容貌若愚。
Interpretation

Bian He, whose surname was Bian and given name He, was a native of the state of Chu. He lived at the foot of Mount Jing, in Chu territory, a place rich in fine jade. Bian He found an uncarved piece of jade and offered it to the king of Chu. The king thought he was deceiving him and had his left foot cut off. After that king died, King Wu took the throne, and Bian He offered the jade again. King Wu also thought he was deceiving the former king, so he had Bian He’s right foot cut off. Holding the jade, Bian He wept on Mount Jing. After King Wu died, King Cheng took the throne, and Bian He offered the jade once more. King Cheng ordered it carved, and it proved to be fine jade of immeasurable value.

The Yanyi says: “Those with narrow understanding cannot be spoken with about the Great Dao.”

In the “Autumn Floods” chapter of the Zhuangzi, Beihai Ruo, the spirit of the North Sea, says: “A frog in a well cannot be spoken with about the sea, because its world is confined by where it lives; an insect of summer cannot be spoken with about ice, because its world is confined by the season; and those with narrow understanding cannot be spoken with about the Dao, because they are bound by what they have been taught.” This means that people of shallow understanding do not grasp the subtlety of the Great Dao, and when they hear of it, they simply laugh. If shallow-minded people did not laugh, the constant and true Dao—the Dao that endures without change—could not be made apparent.

Among the teachings handed down from ancient times are these words: “Those who understand the Great Dao seem dim; those who advance along the Dao seem to retreat; the level road seems rough. Those of the highest De are humble as a valley; what is purest white seems stained; abundant De seems insufficient; firm and vigorous De seems indolent; what is simple and true seems altered.”

The Yanyi quotes Confucius as saying: “I transmit the teachings of the ancients rather than create new ones. In private, I compare myself to Lao Peng.”

The “Shu’er” chapter of the Analects records Confucius as saying: “I transmit rather than create; I trust and love the teachings of antiquity. In private, I compare myself to Lao Peng.” The commentary explains that “transmit” means to pass on old teachings, while “create” means to establish new ones. Only sages can create; worthy people, too, can transmit. “In private, I compare myself” is a modest way of expressing respect for the person one takes as a model; “myself” is an intimate form of address. Lao Peng was a worthy minister of the Shang dynasty, mentioned in the Da Dai Liji. He was probably someone who revered antiquity and passed on its teachings.

The Yanyi also says: “A good merchant hides his treasures deep, so that on the outside he seems to have nothing. A person of profound De appears outwardly dull.”

钞《史记□列传》:周幽王时,孔子适周,严事老子而问礼。老子曰:子所言者,其人与骨,皆已朽深藏若虚,盛德容貌若愚。 钞《史记□列传》:周幽王时,孔子适周,严事老子而问礼。老子曰:子所言者,其人与骨,皆已朽矣。独其言在耳。且君子得其时则驾,不得其时则蓬累而行。吾闻之良贾深藏若虚,盛德容貌若愚,去子之骄气与多欲,态色与淫志,是皆无益於子之身,吾所以告子者,若是而已矣。 衍义云:庄子曰:不得已而后起。钞《庄子□刻意篇》之文。故曰圣人之生也,天行其死也,物化静而与阴同德,动而与阳同波,不为物先,不为祸始,感而。故曰圣人之生也,天行其死也,物化静而与阴同德,动而与阳同波,不为物先,不为祸始,感而后动,不得已而后起。 衍义云:汉阴丈人孑孑然以真为己任,而别乎世俗。
Interpretation

According to the Records of the Grand Historian, during the reign of King You of Zhou, Confucius came to Zhou and respectfully asked Laozi about ritual. Laozi told him, “The people you speak of have long since had their bones buried deep in the earth; only their words remain. When a gentleman encounters the right time, he acts. When the time is not right, he goes along with circumstances, like tumbleweed swept along by the wind. I have heard that a skilled merchant hides precious goods as though he had nothing at all, and that a person of profound De (Virtue/Power) appears dull on the outside. You should rid yourself of pride and excessive desire, and restrain your affected manner and overreaching ambition. None of these will do you any good. This is all I can tell you.”

The “Ingrained Ideas” chapter of the Zhuangzi says, “The sage’s life follows the workings of nature; the sage’s death accompanies the transformations of all things. At rest, he is in harmony with Yin Qi; in action, he moves with Yang Qi. He does not get ahead of things, nor does he become the source of calamity. He acts only in response to what touches him from outside, and takes action only when circumstances leave him no choice.”

The commentary also mentions the Old Man of Hanyin, the elderly man who lived south of the Han River. He alone held fast to what was true, making the pursuit of truth his responsibility and setting himself apart from ordinary people.

钞《庄子□天地篇》之文。子贡南游於楚,反於晋,过汉阴,见一丈人方将为圃畦,五十亩曰畦。凿遂而入井,抱瓮而出灌,搰愲用力貌,然用力甚多而见功寡。子贡曰:有械於此,一日浸百畦,用力甚寡而见功多,夫子不欲乎。为圃者仰而视之曰:奈何。曰:凿木为机,后重前轻,挈水若抽,数如泆荡,其名为槔。为圃者忿然作色而笑曰:吾闻之吾师,有机械者必有机事,有机事者必有机心。机心存於胸中,若抽,数如泆荡,其名为槔。为圃者忿然作色而笑曰:吾闻之吾师,有机械者必有机事,有机事者必有机心。机心存於胸中,则纯白不备。纯白不备,则神生不定。神生不定者,道之所不载也。吾非不知,羞而不为也。子贡瞒然惭,俯而不对。 衍义云:与物同波,而和其光。 钞《庄子□庚桑楚》之文。行不知所之,居不知所为,与物委蛇斯顺之也而同其波,是卫生之经也。此言物波亦波,和光混迹,同其波流,至人无心,合於玄道也。 大方无隅,大器晚成,大音希声,大象无形。 衍义云:若九鼎瑚琏。 钞:九鼎者,大鼎也。《黄帝内传》云:黄帝探首大器晚成,大音希声,大象无形。 衍义云:若九鼎瑚琏。
Interpretation

After traveling south through the state of Chu, Zigong was returning when he passed the southern bank of the Han River. There he saw an old man tending a vegetable garden. The garden was divided into plots, fifty in all, each called a qi. The old man had dug a channel from a well and was carrying out water in a jar to irrigate the plots. It took great effort, yet achieved little.

Zigong said, “There is a device that can irrigate a hundred plots in a day with little effort and great effect. Would you not like to use it, sir?” The old man looked up and asked, “What device is that?” Zigong replied, “Make a lever from a piece of wood, with the heavier end at the back and the lighter end at the front. Then drawing water is as easy as pumping it: the water gushes out like rippling waves. This device is called a well sweep, a lever used to lift water.”

The old man’s expression changed, and he laughed. “I have heard my teacher say that using machines brings tasks suited to machines. Once those tasks arise, a calculating and contriving mind develops. When such a mind takes hold in the heart, one can no longer preserve an unalloyed nature. When one’s nature is no longer pure, the spirit becomes unsettled. When the spirit is unsettled, the Dao cannot dwell in it. It is not that I do not know of this device. I would be ashamed to use it, so I will not.” Hearing this, Zigong lowered his head in embarrassment and made no reply.

The Extended Meaning says: Follow the changes of things and move with them; harmonize with them without showing off your abilities.

An excerpt from the Zhuangzi: Gengsang Chu says: “When walking, do not know where you are going; when dwelling, do not know what you are doing. Follow the transformations of the myriad things and move with them; flow along with them. This is the secret to nourishing life.” Here, the teaching is to change with things, conceal one’s brilliance, and blend into ordinary life, flowing together with all things. The Perfected Person, one who has attained the Dao, makes no deliberate effort and can unite with the mysterious Great Dao.

“Great squareness has no corners; great vessels are completed late; great music is barely heard; great forms have no shape.” This means that what is most square shows no edges; the most important vessels are often completed only after a long time; the grandest sounds seem faint; and the greatest forms have no fixed shape.

The Extended Meaning says: It is like the Nine Tripods and the húlián, ritual vessels used in ancient sacrifices and banquets: all are precious and important objects.

An excerpted explanation says: “The Nine Tripods” are great cauldrons. The Inner Tradition of the Yellow Emperor says, “The Yellow Emperor stretched out his head…”

钞:九鼎者,大鼎也。《黄帝内传》云:黄帝探首山之铜,铸鼎於荆山,即今之湖城南,号曰荆山。瑚琏,《鲁语□公冶长篇》之文。子贡曰:赐也何如。子曰:汝器也。曰:何器也。曰:瑚琏也。记曰黍稷之器,夏曰瑚,商曰琏,周曰簠簋,皆宗庙祭祀之器,取以贵也。故曰:大器晚成。 衍义云:庄子曰:美成在久。 钞《庄子□人间世篇》之文。叶公子高将使齐,问於仲尼。仲尼告之。故法言曰:无迁令,无劝成,过度益庄子曰:美成在久。 钞《庄子
Interpretation

“Nine Tripods” refers to a large tripod. The Inner Traditions of the Yellow Emperor says that the Yellow Emperor mined copper at Mount Shou and cast a tripod at Mount Jing. Mount Jing lies south of present-day Hucheng, which is why it is called Mount Jing.

The term “Hulian” appears in the Analects, “Gongye Chang.” Zigong asked Confucius, “What kind of person am I?” Confucius replied, “You are a vessel.” Zigong asked, “What kind of vessel?” Confucius answered, “A hulian.” The Book of Rites says that hu, lian, fu, and gui were all ritual vessels for holding grains such as millet, used in ancestral temple sacrifices. In the Xia dynasty they were called “hu,” in the Shang “lian,” and in the Zhou “fu and gui.” These were all precious ritual vessels. Hence the saying: “A great vessel takes a long time to complete.”

The Extended Meaning quotes the Zhuangzi: “A fine achievement requires a long accumulation of effort.”

This line comes from “In the Human World” in the Zhuangzi. Ye Gong Ziqi was about to go on a diplomatic mission to Qi and sought Confucius’s advice, so Confucius cautioned him. The general meaning is that one should not alter the ruler’s commands at will when conveying them, nor press too hard to get things done quickly. Going beyond what is appropriate can instead bring trouble. The Zhuangzi therefore says: “A fine achievement requires a long accumulation of effort.”

□人

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →