中文 · EN

《庄子内篇注》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書 Vol. 3 / 4 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《庄子内篇注》 Vol. 3 (Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書, 4 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 58 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《庄子内篇注》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

亦更切矣。 孔子适楚,楚狂接舆游其门曰:“凤兮凤兮,何如德之衰也!来世不可待,往世不可追也。天下有道,圣人成焉(言天下有道,则成圣人之事业也);天下无道,圣人生焉(言天下无道,则圣人全生而已)。方今之时,仅免刑焉(言方今之时,仅能免害足矣,何敢言功)。福轻乎羽,莫之知载(言福之自取甚易,而又不肯受);祸重乎地,莫之知避(言世人之迷,冒祸以求利也)。已乎已乎(言自叹其当止也)!临人以德。殆乎殆乎(殆者,免而不安也。言方今之时,若以德临人,以才自用,其危之甚也)!画也)。已乎已乎(言自叹其当止也)!临人以德。殆乎殆乎(殆者,免而不安也。言方今之时,若以德临人,以才自用,其危之甚也)!画地而趋。迷阳迷阳,无伤吾行(言方今之人,画地而趋者,迷昧之甚也,岂能效之而行哉!行则有伤吾之固有也);吾行郄曲(言行不进貌),无伤吾足(言世道难行,若行之,适以伤吾之足耳)。山木,自寇也(山以生木,自取寇斫也)﹔膏火,自煎也(膏以明,故自煎耳)。桂可食,故伐之(桂以可食,故早伐也)﹔漆可用,故割之(漆以泽,故自取割之)。人皆知有用之用,而莫知无用之用也。”
Interpretation

And so it became ever more urgent.

When Confucius arrived in Chu, Jieyu, the mad recluse of Chu—who used the word “mad” to express his refusal to follow worldly conventions—passed by Confucius’s lodging and said, “Phoenix, Phoenix, how has your virtue declined to such a state? The ways of the future cannot be counted on, and the ways of the past cannot be restored. When the world is guided by the Dao, a sage can accomplish his work; when the world is without the Dao, a sage can only preserve himself. In this age, merely escaping punishment and disaster is enough. How could anyone still dare speak of achieving great things?

“Good fortune is light as a feather, yet people do not know how to receive it; calamity is heavy as the earth, yet people do not know how to avoid it. Enough, enough! To try to transform others through virtue is perilous. Be cautious, be cautious! Do not force your way forward by following the rules. Confusion, confusion! Do not obstruct me as I follow my own path. My path is winding and hard to travel; do not wound my feet.”

Trees on the mountain are felled because they grow into useful timber. Oil in a lamp is burned away because it gives light. The cinnamon tree is cut down because it can be eaten; the lacquer tree is wounded because it yields lacquer. Everyone knows the value of what is useful, but no one knows the value of what is useless.

此人间世立意,初则以孔子为善于涉世之圣,故托言以。人皆知有用之用,而莫知无用之用也。” 此人间世立意,初则以孔子为善于涉世之圣,故托言以发其端。意谓虽颜子之仁智,亦非用世之具,不免无事强行之过也。次则叶公,乃处世之人,亦不能自全,况其它乎。次则颜盍,乃一隐士耳,尔乃妄意干时,乃不知量之人也,故以伯玉折之。斯皆恃才之过也,故不免于害。故以栎社、山木之不材以喻之,又以支离疏晓之。是涉世之难也如此,故终篇以楚狂讥孔子,意谓虽圣而不知止,以发己意。乃此老披肝露胆、真情发现,真见处世之难如此。故超然物外,以道自全,以贫贱自处,故遁世无闷,着书以见志。此立言之本意也,故于人间世之末,以此结欤!实自叙也。 德充符 此篇立意,谓德充实于内者,必能游于形骸之外,而不寝处躯壳之间。盖以知身为大患之本,故不事于意,谓德充实于内者,必能游于形骸之外,而不寝处躯壳之间。盖以知身为大患之本,故不事于物欲,而心与天游。故见之者,自能神符心会,忘形释智,而不知其所以然也。故学道者,唯务实德充乎内,不必计其虚名见乎外,虽不求知于世,而世未有不知者也。故引数子以发之,盖释老子“处众人之所恶、故几于道”之意也。
Interpretation

The central theme of “In the Human World” is introduced at the outset by portraying Confucius as a sage skilled at dealing with worldly affairs, then using his words to lead into the chapter as a whole. The author argues that even someone like Yan Hui, endowed with benevolence and wisdom, may not be suited to take part in worldly affairs; if he forces himself to act, he may instead make needless mistakes. The story of Lord Ye then shows that someone living amid the world cannot even keep himself safe, making it all the harder for others. The chapter also tells of the recluse Yan He, who, though he had withdrawn from the world, imagined he could intervene in the affairs of the time. This was beyond his abilities, so Qu Boyu—a senior official of the state of Wei during the Spring and Autumn period, known for his insight and understanding of the world—counseled him to stop. These stories all show that acting on the strength of one’s talents can easily bring disaster.

The chapter therefore uses the stories of the oak at the village shrine—a great tree preserved because its timber was useless—the mountain trees, and Zhilishu, whose disabled body spared him from forced labor, as analogies to show how difficult it is to live in the world and deal with its affairs. At the end, the madman of Chu, Jieyu, mocks Confucius, suggesting that even a sage can fall into trouble if he does not know when to stop. Through this, the author reveals his true meaning: dealing with the world really is this difficult. He therefore chooses to stand apart from worldly affairs and preserve himself through the Dao, to be content with poverty and low status, and to live in seclusion without sorrow, expressing his aspirations through writing. This is the purpose behind the words of “In the Human World.” The chapter closes on this note, in effect revealing the author’s own resolve.

The central theme of “The Sign of Virtue Complete” is that those whose Virtue is full within can transcend the limitations of physical form and remain unconfined by the body. Knowing that the body is a source of distress, they are not ruled by external things or desires, and their minds and spirits can roam with the Way of Heaven. When people encounter such a person, they understand him intuitively and forget physical form and cleverness, though they cannot explain why.

Those who study the Dao, then, need only devote themselves to cultivating inner Virtue; they need not concern themselves with an outward reputation. Even if they do not seek to be understood by the world, people will naturally recognize them. The chapter cites stories of several figures to make this point, broadly expounding Laozi’s saying: “Dwell in the places people despise; thus one comes close to the Dao.” To be at ease in circumstances others reject is to draw near to the Dao.

鲁有兀(即介字,乃刖足之人也)者王台,从之游者,与仲尼相若。常季问于仲尼曰:“王台,兀者也,从之游者,与夫子中分鲁(言即介字,乃刖足之人也)者王台,从之游者,与仲尼相若。常季问于仲尼曰:“王台,兀者也,从之游者,与夫子中分鲁(言鲁国从王台游者,与夫子相半也)。立不教,坐不议。虚而往,实而归。固有不言之教,无形而心成者邪(谓教人不见于形容言语,而但以心相印成者耶)?是何人也?”仲尼曰:“夫子,圣人也,丘也直后而未往耳(谓直居其后,未能往向于前耳)!丘将以为师(此重言孔子未能忘形师心之意),而况不若丘者乎!奚假鲁国,丘将引天下而与从之(此形容孔子无我之意)。”常季曰:“彼兀者也而王(音旺,言胜也),先生其与庸亦远矣。若然者,其用心也独(句言不同于人也),若之何?”仲尼曰:“死生亦大矣,而不得与之变(不为死生之所迁变)﹔虽天地覆坠也),若之何?”仲尼曰:“死生亦大矣,而不得与之变(不为死生之所迁变)﹔虽天地覆坠,亦将不与之遗(言虽天地覆坠之变,亦不为之所遗累也)﹔审乎无假而不与物迁(审,处也。
Interpretation

In the state of Lu there was a man named Wang Tai who had lost one foot to amputation. About as many people studied with him and sought his company as followed Confucius.

Chang Ji asked Confucius, “Wang Tai is a man with a severed foot, yet the number of people who follow him is as great as the number who follow you, Master. He does not stand up to teach others, nor does he sit down to offer his views. People come to him with empty minds, yet leave as though fully laden. Can there really be a teaching that is conveyed without words, that does not show itself outwardly, yet enables people to understand inwardly and achieve something? What sort of person is he?”

Confucius said, “Master Wang Tai is a sage. I have always been behind him and have not yet had the chance to learn from him. I would like to take him as my teacher; how much more so should those who are less accomplished than I? Why should this be limited to the state of Lu? I would bring everyone under Heaven with me to follow him.” This is Confucius’ way of describing Wang Tai as his teacher and esteeming his level of attainment.

Chang Ji said, “He is only a man with a severed foot, yet he surpasses ordinary people. The distance between you, Master, and ordinary people is already so great. How does his mind work, to be so extraordinary?”

Confucius said, “Life and death are great matters in human existence, yet they cannot change his state of mind. Even if Heaven and Earth were overturned, he would not be caught up in it. He can see that things are not reliable foundations, and so he is not shaken by changes in the external world…”

无假,谓形骸之外、至真之道,超然出于万物之表,故不为物迁),命(犹名也)物之化而守其宗也(谓其人超然物外,不随物迁,唯任物自化,而彼但守其至道之宗也)。”常季曰:“何谓也(常季不解其不迁之说)?”仲尼曰(夫子示之以忘形守真之旨):“自其异者视之,肝胆楚越也(言不能忘形见道者,虽一身之肝胆,犹楚越之相远也)﹔自其同者视之,万物皆一也(自大道观之,万物与我皆一体也)。夫若然者,且不知耳目之所宜(形骸既忘,六根无用,故泯其见闻。故不知耳目之所宜),而游心乎德之和(谓超乎形骸之外,而游心于大化之乡、太和元气之境)。物见闻。故不知耳目之所宜),而游心乎德之和(谓超乎形骸之外,而游心于大化之乡、太和元气之境)。物视其所一而不见其所丧(物,人也。以彼处乎大化之中,故人但见其道真之所存,故不见其形之有所丧),视丧其足犹遗土也(言视丧其足,若与己无干,犹遗土也)。”常季曰:“彼为已(止也,言止于如此而已矣),以其知得其心(谓彼不过以其所知,得其自已之心耳),以其心得其常心(言即彼所得之心,亦寻常人之心耳)。物何为最之哉(言彼所得之心,亦人人皆有,又何有越过人之心哉)?
Interpretation

“Without falsity” refers to the Dao—the fundamental principle—which lies beyond physical form and is utterly real. It stands apart from all things, so it does not change as external things change. “Letting things undergo their transformations while keeping to their source” means allowing all things to change naturally while holding fast to the fundamental principle.

Chang Ji asked, “What does this mean? I don’t understand what it means not to change along with things.”

Confucius explained, “From the standpoint of difference, the liver and gallbladder are as far apart as the states of Chu and Yue. From the standpoint of sameness, all things are originally one. Someone who has reached this state no longer clings to how the ears and eyes ought to perceive. Instead, they let their mind and spirit roam at ease in a realm of harmonious De. People see only how this person is connected with all things; they do not see what the person has lost. Even if they see that the person has lost a foot, it is like seeing someone discard a clod of earth.”

Chang Ji asked again, “But this person has merely remained in such a state. Through their own understanding, they found their original mind, and through that original mind, they attained the ordinary mind. Since everyone has this mind, why do people hold this person in such high esteem?”

”仲尼曰:“人莫鉴于流水,而鉴于止水。唯止能止众止(夫子言,人人虽皆有此心,但众人之心妄动如流水,而圣人之心至静如止水。故众人之心动而不止,唯圣人能为与止之耳)。受命于地,惟松柏独也在(句)妄动如流水,而圣人之心至静如止水。故众人之心动而不止,唯圣人能为与止之耳)。受命于地,惟松柏独也在(句),冬夏青青(言独者,乃天地真一之气。虽万物之多,而此真一之气,独在松柏)﹔受命于天,惟舜独也正(句),幸能正生,以正众生(言受命于天,惟舜得天之正,乃各正性命之正。故为正人,以其自正,故能正众人之不正者)。夫保始之征,不惧之实(始者,受命之元,即所谓大道之宗也。言道之征验,惟不惧是其实效耳)。勇士一人,雄入于九军。将求名而能自要者,而犹若是(以勇士不惧,以比有道者之不惧),而况官天地(圣人为天地之宰)一人,雄入于九军。将求名而能自要者,而犹若是(以勇士不惧,以比有道者之不惧),而况官天地(圣人为天地之宰)、府万物(会万物归一己)、直寓六骸(假借六根)、象耳目(耳目如偶人,所谓如幻也)、一知之所知(知万化为一致),而心未尝死者乎(死,犹丧失也。
Interpretation

Confucius said, “People do not use flowing water as a mirror; they use still water to see themselves. Only stillness can bring the many things to rest. The thoughts of ordinary people rush about like flowing water, while the sage’s mind is tranquil as still water. That is why only the sage can quiet what is agitated.

“All things receive their endowment from the earth, yet only pines and cypresses remain green through both winter and summer. ‘Only’ means that the pure, unified vital energy between Heaven and Earth appears in the pines and cypresses alone, though all things are many. Human beings receive their endowment from Heaven, yet only Shun attained the right Way. Fortunate in setting his own life and nature straight, he was able to set others straight. Shun received the Mandate of Heaven and obtained the upright nature Heaven bestowed. He first made himself upright, and only then could he correct the deviations of others.

“The proof that one has safeguarded life’s original condition lies, in truth, in being fearless. A warrior who charges alone into the ranks of nine armies, seeking fame yet also keeping himself in check, can still manage to feel no fear. For this reason, the person who possesses the Way is also fearless. How much more so the sage, who governs Heaven and Earth, gathers all things within the heart, regards the six parts of the body—the head, trunk, and limbs—as temporary lodging, sees the ears and eyes as contingent forms, understands that the transformations of all things return to oneness, and yet never loses the original heart?”

谓众人丧失本真之心,唯圣人未丧本有,故能视万物为一己也)!彼且择日而登假(假,犹遐也。谓彼人且将择日而登遐,远升仙界,而超出尘凡也)。人则从事也(言人之相从者,盖从于形骸之外也)。彼且何肯以物为事乎!” 此篇以德充符为名,首以介者王骀发挥,只在末后数语,便是实德内充,故符于外。而人多从之,非有心要人从之也。盖忘形骸、一心知,即佛说破分别我障也。能破分别我障,则成阿罗汉果,即得神通变化。今庄子但就人中,说老子忘而人多从之,非有心要人从之也。盖忘形骸、一心知,即佛说破分别我障也。能破分别我障,则成阿罗汉果,即得神通变化。今庄子但就人中,说老子忘形释智之功夫,即能到此境界耳。即所谓至人忘己也。此寓六骸、象耳目、一知之所知,即佛说假观,乃即世间出生死之妙诀,正予所谓修离欲禅也。
Interpretation

People often lose their original true heart; only the sage does not, and so can regard all things as one undivided whole with himself. That person will choose a day to depart, ascending to a distant immortal realm and transcending the world. People follow him, yet what they actually follow lies beyond his physical form. How, then, could he regard things outside himself as what he seeks?

This chapter is titled “The Sign of Virtue Complete.” It opens by using Wang Tai, whose body is impaired, to explain its teachings. The closing lines make the point that when De (Virtue) is truly full within, it naturally becomes visible without. People follow him not because he deliberately draws them to himself. In Buddhist terms, forgetting the body and using a single mind to apprehend things means breaking free of the discriminating mind that clings to the self. Overcoming this attachment allows one to attain the fruit of arhatship—the spiritual attainment of Buddhist practice—and gain supernatural powers and transformations. Here, Zhuangzi speaks from a worldly perspective: cultivating the ability to forget the body and set aside cleverness can also bring one to a similar state. This is what is meant by “the perfected person forgets himself.”

The “six bodily parts” mentioned here—the four limbs, head, and torso—along with “the forms of the ears and eyes,” meaning the senses manifested through the body, and “what is known by unified awareness,” meaning apprehending things with a unified mind, correspond in Buddhist terms to “contemplation of the provisional”: a practice of observing that things appear to exist yet have no fixed self-nature. This method of contemplation is regarded as a way to practice in the world while transcending birth and death. It is also what the commentator calls “cultivating meditation that leaves behind desire,” or practicing meditative absorption free from desire.

申徒嘉,兀者也,而与郑子产同师于伯昏无人(此亦撰出其人名,盖从老子“众人昭昭、我独若昏”,故以昏为圣人之名)。子产谓申徒嘉曰:“我先出则子止,子先出则我止(此重言子产不能忘我,以功名自矜,故耻与介者为伍,故止其不与同出入也)。”其明日,又与合堂同席而坐(言申屠嘉自忘其介,而亦不知子产之厌己也)。子产谓申徒嘉曰:“我先出止其不与同出入也)。”其明日,又与合堂同席而坐(言申屠嘉自忘其介,而亦不知子产之厌己也)。子产谓申徒嘉曰:“我先出则子止,子先出则我止。今我将出,子可以止乎?其未耶?且子见执政而不违(回避也),子齐执政乎(子产见申屠嘉之不避己,故明言之;然以执政矜人,则形容子产之陋也)?”申徒嘉曰:“先生之门,固有执政焉如此哉(申屠嘉鄙子产之陋,乃曰先生之门,固有此不能相忘之人哉)?子而悦子之执政而后人者也(言子但知有己之执政,故以人不若己者,此陋之甚也)。闻之曰:‘鉴明则尘垢不止,止则不明也。久与贤人处则无过。’今子之所取大者,先生也,而犹出言若是,亦不不止,止则不明也。久与贤人处则无过。’今子之所取大者,先生也,而犹出言若是,亦不过乎(此讥子产之不明也。
Interpretation

Shentu Jia, a disabled man from the Warring States period who is described in the text as having had a foot amputated, and Zichan, a senior minister who governed the state of Zheng, studied together under Bohun Wuren. The commentator suggests that “Bohun Wuren” may be a fictional name invented by the author, inspired by Laozi’s line, “Everyone is bright; I alone seem dim,” with “dim” serving as a title for a sage.

Zichan said to Shentu Jia, “If I leave first, you stay; if you leave first, I’ll stay.” The commentator sees this as showing that Zichan could not let go of his status and reputation. Proud of his achievements and authority, he thought it undignified to come and go with a disabled man and wanted to avoid being seen with Shentu Jia.

The next day, Shentu Jia and Zichan were seated together in the same room again. According to the commentator, Shentu Jia had forgotten his disability and paid no attention to Zichan’s dislike of him. Zichan then said, “If I leave first, you stay; if you leave first, I’ll stay. Now I’m leaving. Will you stay, or would you rather not? When you see someone in government, you don’t step aside. Do you think you can stand as an equal with a ruler?” The commentator points out that Zichan said this because Shentu Jia had not moved aside for him. He used his official position to intimidate Shentu Jia, displaying a narrow mind.

Shentu Jia replied, “Can there really be someone like you among our teacher’s students?” He was mocking Zichan’s narrow-mindedness: “You care only about your position as a ruler and look down on those beneath you. That is truly shallow.”

Shentu Jia continued, “I’ve heard that when a mirror is bright, dust will not settle on it; once dust settles, the mirror is no longer bright. Spend a long time with a worthy person, and you will not make mistakes. Now the teacher you esteem most is our teacher, yet you still speak this way. Have you not made a mistake?” The commentator understands these words as a criticism of Zichan for failing to understand what is right.

盖闻老子“自知者明”之意,笑子产不自知也。意谓子产既遵圣人之门面,犹发言如此,足见无真学问也)!”子产曰:“子既若是矣(子产言申屠嘉之废人,而不能自反,而与人争善),犹与尧争善。计子之德,不足以自反耶(德,犹见识也。谓申屠嘉既废如此,而不自反求诸己,而犹且以圣自居,将与尧争善;我计料子之知见诚愚,而不自反也。子产毕竟露出本来面目)?”申徒嘉曰:“自状其过,以不当亡者众(状者,言自知己过之分明也。谓若人能自知己过,则人之过更有甚于我者,如此徒嘉曰:“自状其过,以不当亡者众(状者,言自知己过之分明也。谓若人能自知己过,则人之过更有甚于我者,如此见恕,则以我之足,不当忘者众矣)﹔不状其过,以不当存者寡(此句义似不顺,当去一不字。意谓若人不自状其己过,则责我太过,则以我足当者寡矣)。知不可奈何,而安之若命,惟有德者能之(若知我无可奈何,而命之使然,如此知命相忘,乃有德能之耳)。游于羿之彀中。中央者,中地也﹔然而不中者,命也(羿之善射,而人游于必中之地,不被射而死者,亦幸而免耳。以喻世人履危机,当祸而免者,亦幸耳。谓我以不幸而不免者,岂非命之有在耶)。
Interpretation

This draws on Laozi’s saying, “One who knows himself is enlightened,” to mock Zichan for failing to examine himself. The point is: “Though Zichan is a disciple of a sage, he still says things like this. Clearly, he has not truly learned.”

Zichan said, “You have already fallen into such a state, yet you still argue with Yao over who is wiser. In my view, your understanding is too limited for you to reflect on yourself.” Here, Zichan ridicules Shentu Jia for being disabled, yet failing to examine himself and still thinking himself wise and sage-like. But his words also reveal Zichan’s own true character.

Shentu Jia said, “If you can clearly see your own faults, you will find that many people in the world are more at fault than I am. So I should not be punished merely because I am missing a foot. If you cannot see your own faults and instead make much of mine, then few will think I should not be punished.” The commentator considers the meaning of these two sentences in the original somewhat awkward, and suspects that the phrase “those who think I should not be punished are few” may contain an extra “not.”

When one knows that what has happened can no longer be undone, one accepts it calmly and regards it as fate’s arrangement. Only a person of De can do this.

People are like those walking within the range of Yi, the legendary archer, standing where he could surely hit them. If they are not struck by an arrow, it is not because the place is safe, but because they have escaped by chance. People in the world who find themselves in danger, on the brink of disaster, and yet get away often do so by chance as well. I failed to escape because of misfortune. Is that not also the work of fate?

人以其全足笑吾不全足者众矣,我怫然而怒(言始也人笑我以足不全,我则怫然如怒),而适先生之所,则废然而反(言初未闻道,故未忘人我。今自入先生以其全足笑吾不全足者众矣,我怫然而怒(言始也人笑我以足不全,我则怫然如怒),而适先生之所,则废然而反(言初未闻道,故未忘人我。今自入先生之门,一闻大道,则人我之见尽废亡矣)。不知先生之洗我以善耶(言不自知其先生洗我以善也)?吾与夫子游十九年矣,而未尝知吾兀者也(我与先生游十九年,向未知我之亡足也)。今子与我游于形骸之内,而子索我于形骸之外,不亦过乎(言我与子相知以心,即当相忘以道,不当取于形骸之间。今子乃以形骸外貌索我,不亦过乎)!”子产蹴然改容更貌曰:“子无乃称(子产乎(言我与子相知以心,即当相忘以道,不当取于形骸之间。今子乃以形骸外貌索我,不亦过乎)!”子产蹴然改容更貌曰:“子无乃称(子产闻说,则中心愧服,而谢之曰子无乃称,谓再不必言也)!” 此章形容圣人忘功,故以子产发之。盖实德内充,形骸可外,而安命自得;以道相忘,则了无人我之相。此学道之成效也。
Interpretation

People often mock me for my maimed foot. At first, I would get angry, too. Later, when I came to the Master and heard of the Great Dao, the distinction I held in my heart between “you” and “me” faded away, and even my original anger completely subsided. I do not know whether the Master cleansed my heart with the goodness of the Dao. In the nineteen years I have spent with him, I have never felt that I was a man with a severed foot. Now I meet you heart to heart, yet you still judge me by my outward appearance. Isn’t that going too far?

When Zichan heard this, his expression immediately turned ashamed and respectful. Composing himself, he said, “Please say no more.”

Through Zichan’s experience, this chapter shows that a sage does not dwell on his own achievements. When inner De is full, one is no longer constrained by bodily impairment and can accept one’s fate with contentment. When people meet through the Dao, they can forget the distinction between you and me. This is the state one reaches after making progress in learning the Dao.

鲁有兀者叔山无趾,踵见仲尼。曰:“子不谨,前既犯患若是矣。虽今来,无及矣!”无趾曰:“吾惟不知务(务,谓务学道也)而轻用吾身,吾是以亡足。今吾来也,犹有尊足者存(尊足,盖指性而言也),吾是以务全之也。夫天无不覆,地无不载,吾以夫子为天地,安知夫子之犹若足。今吾来也,犹有尊足者存(尊足,盖指性而言也),吾是以务全之也。夫天无不覆,地无不载,吾以夫子为天地,安知夫子之犹若是也(无趾自以所全者性真,而夫子犹以形骸取之。初以夫子为圣人之大无不容,不知其犹若此之区区也)!”孔子曰:“丘则陋矣!夫子胡不入乎?请讲以所闻(夫子闻无趾之言,知其为有道者,故请入,愿讲其所闻)。”无趾出。孔子曰:“弟子勉之!夫无趾,兀者也,犹务学(谓务学道也)以补前行之恶,而况全德(犹全体也)之人乎!”无趾语老聃曰:“孔丘之于至人,其未耶?彼何宾以补前行之恶,而况全德(犹全体也)之人乎!”无趾语老聃曰:“孔丘之于至人,其未耶?彼何宾宾以学子为(言初以孔丘为至人,今见其未至也。如此之见,诚何以宾宾恭谨以学子为)?彼且蕲以諔诡幻怪之名闻,不知至人之以是为己桎梏耶(桎梏,乃拘手足之刑。言孔子专求务外之名闻,而不务实。彼殊不知,虚名乃諔诡幻怪之具,非本有也。如桎梏之于手足,拘之而不得自在者也)?”老聃曰:“胡不使彼以死生为一条,以可不可为一贯者,解其桎梏,其可乎(可不可,谓善恶、是非也。一条,即一贯也。老子谓无趾,何不以无死生、忘善恶之道以告之,以解其好名之桎梏乎)?”无趾曰:“天刑之,安可老子谓无趾,何不以无死生、忘善恶之道以告之,以解其好名之桎梏乎)?”无趾曰:“天刑之,安可解(刑,旧主作型,乃上模也。此讥孔子,乃天生成此等务名之人,安可解乎)!”
Interpretation

In the state of Lu, a man named Shushan Wuzhi had lost one foot as a result of punishment. Walking on his heel, he went to visit Confucius. Confucius said, “You were careless in your conduct and suffered this misfortune in the past. Now you have come, but I fear it is already too late!”

Wuzhi replied, “I lost my foot because I did not understand that I should devote my mind and strength to learning the Dao, and treated my body recklessly. I have come to see you because there is still something more precious than a foot: a person’s original nature. I want to do my best to preserve it. Heaven covers all things, and Earth bears all things. I thought you were as broad-minded as Heaven and Earth. How could I have known you would value bodily appearance so highly?”

Confucius said, “My understanding was shallow! Why don’t you come in, sir? Please let me hear what you know of the Dao.”

After Wuzhi left, Confucius said to his disciples, “You must strive to learn! Though Wuzhi has lost one foot, he still works to learn the Dao and make up for his past mistakes. How much more should those whose De is complete and whose bodies and minds are whole?”

Wuzhi said to Lao Dan, “I fear Confucius has not yet reached the state of the Perfect Person. Why, then, did he once humbly present himself as a student and seek instruction from me? He pursues a reputation for the strange and bizarre, without realizing that an empty reputation is like shackles, binding a person’s body and mind.”

Lao Dan said, “Why not tell him to regard life and death as one and the same Dao, and to see approval and disapproval, good and evil, right and wrong as joined in a single whole? Then he might be able to free himself from those shackles.”

Wuzhi replied, “This is a punishment Heaven has imposed on him. How could he be freed from it?” Here, the commentator explains “Heaven’s punishment” as an inborn disposition: Confucius seems naturally inclined to pursue fame, and is therefore difficult to change.

此章发挥圣人忘名,故以孔子为务虚名而不尚实德之人。故取人于规规是非、善恶之间,殊不知至人超乎生死之外,而视世之浮名为桎梏。盖未能忘死生、一是非,故未免落于世之常情耳。圣人则不以此为得也。 鲁哀公问于仲尼曰:“卫有恶人焉(谓丑貌之人也),曰哀骀它。丈夫与之处者,思而不能去也(言男子与之相处,则不忍舍去)﹔妇人见之,请于父母曰:‘与为人妻,宁为夫子它。丈夫与之处者,思而不能去也(言男子与之相处,则不忍舍去)﹔妇人见之,请于父母曰:‘与为人妻,宁为夫子妾’者,十数而未止也(言妇人见之,皆愿为之妾者,不止一人也)。未尝有闻其唱者也(谓未有所长而先见闻于人者也),常和而已矣(亦只见随于庸众人而已)。无君人之位以济乎人之死(言无势位以济人之死),无聚禄以望人之腹(望,犹月望之望,谓饱满也。言无位、聚禄,以周给于人,以饱人之腹),又以恶骇天下(既无利济于人,且又丑貌以骇天下之人),和而不唱(言一向随人,自无专能),知不出乎四域(言无超出世间常人之见识),且而雌雄合乎前(雌雄,犹言争胜负也。谓凡人之是非、胜负不决者,皆取决其人。言此事常合在前)。是必有异乎人者也(言貌丑而人从之者众,必有异乎人之所为者也)。
Interpretation

This commentary argues that the chapter explains how the sage is indifferent to fame. The commentator portrays Confucius as someone who pursues empty reputation but gives little weight to genuine virtue: he cares only about worldly judgments of right and wrong, good and evil, and does not know that the Perfected Person has long since transcended life and death and regards fleeting fame as a bond. If one cannot forget life and death and rise beyond judgments of right and wrong, one remains constrained by ordinary worldly feelings. The sage does not regard such a state as an attainment.

Duke Ai of Lu asked Confucius, “In the state of Wei there is a man of strikingly ugly appearance named Ai Taituo. Men who spend time with him find themselves thinking of him and cannot bear to leave. When women see him, they ask their parents, ‘I would rather be his concubine than marry anyone else.’ There are more than ten such people. He has never been known for any outstanding ability, and simply goes along with everyone else. He holds no position as a ruler and cannot save anyone’s life; nor does he have an accumulated income that could feed people. His appearance is so ugly that it could frighten the world. In his ordinary conduct he simply goes along with others and shows no exceptional talent. His understanding does not extend beyond the common range. Yet when people face disputes with one another and cannot decide who is right or who has won, they often ask him to judge. This man must have something out of the ordinary about him.”

In the commentary, “male and female” refers here to contests over who will prevail. “His understanding does not extend beyond the four domains” means that his insight does not go beyond the range of ordinary people in the world.

寡人召而观谓凡人之是非、胜负不决者,皆取决其人。言此事常合在前)。是必有异乎人者也(言貌丑而人从之者众,必有异乎人之所为者也)。寡人召而观之,果以恶骇天下(及召而观之,果然丑貌,不见其所长)。与寡人处,不至以月数,而寡人有意乎其为人也(及相处月数,则见其有可爱处,但未尽知耳)﹔不至乎期年,寡人信之(不期年,则信之深矣)。国无宰(宰,即宰相,掌一国之政事),寡人传国焉(言以国事授之也)。闷然而后应(闷然,若不悦其事也),泛而若辞(泛,谓泛然不经心而若辞也)。寡人丑乎(事),寡人传国焉(言以国事授之也)。闷然而后应(闷然,若不悦其事也),泛而若辞(泛,谓泛然不经心而若辞也)。寡人丑乎(言见彼之不在意,故自愧丑也),卒授之国。无几何,去寡人而行。寡人恤焉若有亡也(言恤其去,若己有所亡失也),若无与乐是国也(察其人之意,盖不以国为荣也)。是何人者耶(谓不知是何等之人也,使我爱之如此)?”仲尼曰:“丘也尝使于楚矣,适见[犭屯]子食于其死母者。少焉眴若(见死母之目不瞬也),皆弃之而走。不见己焉尔(谓母之目不见己也),不得类焉尔(言形僵不同前者之食于母,故皆弃之而走也)。所爱其母者,非爱其形也,爱使其形者也(形者,假物也。使其形者,真宰也。言[犭屯]之子母,乃天性之爱也。
Interpretation

The ruler said, “I summoned him to meet me, and, as expected, his ugly appearance startled me. I could see no particular merit in him. After spending several months with him, I began to think he had something to recommend him, though I still did not fully understand him. Before a year had passed, I trusted him completely. There was no chancellor in the state, so I entrusted him with the affairs of government. At first he remained silent and seemed displeased; later he appeared indifferent, as though he meant to refuse. I felt ashamed of this, but in the end I still handed the affairs of government over to him. Before long, he left me. I grieved at his departure, as though I had lost something, and felt that there was no one left who could govern and enjoy the state alongside me. What kind of person was he, to make me value him so highly?”

Confucius said, “I was once on a mission to Chu when I happened to see a group of fawns nursing beside their dying mother. After a while, they saw that their mother’s eyes no longer blinked, and they all abandoned her and ran away. That was because their mother could no longer see them or respond to them as she had when she was alive. They loved their mother not for her outward form, but for what had made that form move. The body is merely a vessel; what makes it move is the true master. The love between the fawns and their mother arose from their nature.”

往日食于母,何,非爱其形也,爱使其形者也(形者,假物也。使其形者,真宰也。言[犭屯]之子母,乃天性之爱也。往日食于母,何尝不爱。及今才死,始则就之而食;及见目之不瞬,则知精神不在,故弃之而走。是则死生不远,即弃之而走。是知所爱者,非形骸,乃爱使其形骸之真宰也。虽物之至愚,尚知爱其天真,而况于人乎)。战而死者,其人之葬也不以翣资(翣,古训纛,乃大将之旗也。战而死者,以此为送葬之仪。言已失其勇,又无其尸,似以此虚仪为翣资,则无其本矣);刖者之屦,无为爱之(言刖者无足趺,而屦亦无可用)。皆无其本也。言已失其勇,又无其尸,似以此虚仪为翣资,则无其本矣);刖者之屦,无为爱之(言刖者无足趺,而屦亦无可用)。皆无其本也(以翣资、刖屦为无本之喻,意谓真可爱者在本也)。为天子之诸御:不翦爪,不穿耳(言选天子之侍御者,不翦爪,不穿耳,不欲毁其全体,将以要宠也)﹔取妻者止于外,不得复使(言新婚之妇,必先戒不作事务,恐胼胝其手足也)。形全犹足以为尔,而况全德之人乎(言天子之御、新婚之人,不如此不足以要宠结欢。但全其形,尚如此;况全德之人乎!言鲁君之爱骀它,盖忘形,也)。
Interpretation

Long ago, while a piglet suckled, it was attached to its mother. What was it attached to? Not to her physical form, but to the life-giving reality that animated it. The body is only something borrowed for a time; what brings it to life is the true master. The piglet’s attachment to its mother arose from its nature: when it suckled, how could it not love her? Now that its mother has just died, the piglet at first still goes to suckle. But when it sees that her eyes no longer move and realizes that her spirit is gone, it leaves her and runs away. This shows that life and death are not far apart: as soon as the piglet senses that life has departed, it leaves at once. What it was attached to was not its mother’s corpse, but the reality that had made the body alive. If even so dull a creature knows to cherish its innate nature, how much more should a human being?

A fallen soldier should not be buried with a general’s banner—the funerary flag used in ancient rites—as a burial offering. Nor need a person who has lost a foot through amputation cherish shoes, since there is no longer a foot to wear them. Such things have lost their foundation. The examples of the banner and the shoes show that what truly deserves cherishing is the foundation.

When choosing concubines for the Son of Heaven, people required them not to cut their fingernails or pierce their ears, so as to avoid harming the integrity of their bodies. A man taking a wife was also to let his bride remain at home for a time after the wedding and not make her work, so that her hands and feet would not develop thick calluses. If people take such care to preserve bodily integrity in order to win affection and form bonds, then a person whose De is whole deserves even greater esteem. This passage uses the example to explain that Lord Jun of Lu cherished Tai Ta because he had forgotten her outward appearance.

形全犹足以为尔,而况全德之人乎(言天子之御、新婚之人,不如此不足以要宠结欢。但全其形,尚如此;况全德之人乎!言鲁君之爱骀它,盖忘形,爱其形之本也。有难以言语形容者,故夫子连以三事,喻其可爱之在本)!今哀骀它未言而信,无功而亲,使人授己国,惟恐其不受也(言哀骀它未与鲁君一语,而见信若此,且无功即授之以国,惟恐其不受,岂无谓哉),是必才全而德不形者也。”哀公曰:“何谓才全(言才者,谓天赋良能,即所谓性真一语,而见信若此,且无功即授之以国,惟恐其不受,岂无谓哉),是必才全而德不形者也。”哀公曰:“何谓才全(言才者,谓天赋良能,即所谓性真。庄子指为真宰是也。言才全者,谓不以外物伤戕其性,乃天性全然未坏,故曰全)?”仲尼曰:“死生存亡、穷达贫富、贤与不肖、毁誉、饥渴寒暑,是事之变、命之行也(仲尼言才全,而先言此十六事者,盖此诸事,皆戕生伤性之事变,而世人未有不被其伤损其性真者,故先言之)。日夜相代乎前(此十六事,人生于世,日夜相代于前,未尝暂免者,是皆戕生伤性之具也),而知不能规乎其始者也(言上十六事,日夜相代,而以知规规求之,不知所由来。盖达其性真,本不涉其变)。
Interpretation

Even a person whose physical form is complete can inspire affection; how much more so a person whose De (Virtue) is complete? (An emperor must know how to govern people, and newlyweds must learn how to build affection between them. Each must take on the appropriate bearing to win favor and establish a bond. Yet even mere physical completeness can have such an effect—how much more so completeness of De? Duke Lu may have cherished Ai Taituo because he forgot his appearance and loved the source from which that appearance arose. The quality that makes him lovable is hard to put into words, which is why Confucius went on to give three examples: what makes him lovable lies in his source.) Now Ai Taituo has not even spoken, yet people trust him; he has done nothing to earn merit, yet people grow close to him. They would even hand him the state, and fear only that he might refuse. This must be someone whose innate nature is complete by Heaven’s endowment, while his De remains unseen on the outside.”

Duke Ai asked, “What does ‘complete in innate capacity’ mean?” (Here, “innate capacity” refers to the natural goodness bestowed on people by Heaven—that is, their authentic nature. Zhuangzi calls it the “true ruler,” the authentic principle that governs life. To be complete in innate capacity means not allowing external things to injure one’s nature, so that it remains whole and unharmed.)

Confucius replied, “Life and death, preservation and loss, hardship and success, poverty and wealth, worthiness and unworthiness, disparagement and praise, hunger and thirst, cold and heat: these are changes in the affairs of the world and the workings of destiny. (Confucius begins with these sixteen conditions because each can damage life and injure one’s nature. People often cannot help being affected by them, and so their authentic nature is harmed.) They are like the alternation of day and night, appearing before us one after another. (Throughout life, these changes take turns appearing day and night; there is no moment when we can entirely avoid them. Each can damage life and injure one’s nature.) The human mind cannot trace them back to their beginnings.

故不足以滑和(滑,音汩,谓汩涓也。和,谓本元中和之体也。言以上诸事,虽常情之变,但了其本无,故来。盖达其性真,本不涉其变)。故不足以滑和(滑,音汩,谓汩涓也。和,谓本元中和之体也。言以上诸事,虽常情之变,但了其本无,故不足以汩和),不可入于灵府(灵府,所谓灵台。言诸变不可以摇动其性也)。使之和豫通,而不失于兑(和者,即中和之和,谓性真达于事变,浑然而不失其体也。豫者,安然自得而悦豫也。通者,谓达于事变而不滞也。兑者,即老子“玄牝之门”,谓虚通应物而无迹者也。言真人所以才全者,盖保其性真而不者,谓达于事变而不滞也。兑者,即老子“玄牝之门”,谓虚通应物而无迹者也。言真人所以才全者,盖保其性真而不失也)。使日夜无郄,而与物为春(郄,亦作隙,谓缝隙也。言真人之一性绵绵,日夜无隙,未尝间断;但于应物之际,春然和气发现,令人煦然而化也),是接而生时于心者也(时者,谓接物应机,时行时止,与物俱化,未尝逆也。若夫愚人,则与接为构矣)。是之谓才全(此言真人应物一味,性德流行,无一息之间,故谓之言全)。”“何谓德不形(此哀公问也)?”曰:“平者,水停之盛也。
Interpretation

Therefore, although these things may change ordinary people’s emotions, they are not enough to disturb the innate equilibrium within the heart. Those who understand the Way know that such changes have no fixed reality, so they do not lose their nature because of them. These changes therefore cannot enter the inner “spiritual abode” (the heart’s dwelling, a metaphor for a person’s inner life) and unsettle their true nature.

To keep the heart balanced, peaceful, and joyful, and to understand things without losing emptiness and stillness, is called “being harmonious, content, and responsive without losing openness.” Here, “openness” means a state of responding freely to things without leaving contrived traces. The True Person preserves their innate nature precisely by adapting to changes in things without losing their own nature.

The True Person’s nature flows on without interruption, day and night. When they encounter things, they are gentle as spring, bringing warmth and moving others to change. This is the heart’s natural grasp of the right moment: when it meets things, it acts when action is called for and rests when rest is called for, changing with things without resisting them. The ignorant, by contrast, become entangled in conflict with things. This state of adapting to things while always preserving one’s nature is called “wholeness of innate endowment” (the preservation of one’s inborn nature).

“What does it mean that ‘Virtue does not take outward form’?” Duke Ai asked.

Confucius replied, “Stillness is water’s fullest state when it has come to rest.”

其可以为法也,内保之而外不荡也(德者,谓性之德用也。以性德之用,难以言语形容,故以水平为喻。盖言水之平者,乃停之盛,谓湛渊澄静之至,故可以取法为准。言性体湛渊澄净,寂然不动,则虚明朗鉴。乃内保之而外境不荡,为守宗保谓湛渊澄静之至,故可以取法为准。言性体湛渊澄净,寂然不动,则虚明朗鉴。乃内保之而外境不荡,为守宗保始之喻。谓性静虚明,则可以鉴物为用也)。德之成,和之修也(言虚明朗鉴,乃德之成。盖从中和用功,修而后得者,非漫然也)。德不形者,物不能离也(不能离者,谓与物混一而不分,故人但见其物之变,而不知性之真,故其德不易形着于外。所以人但见其貌恶,而不识其才德之全耳。观孔子对哀公之言,发明中庸“和也者、天下之达道”之意,何等正大精确)。”哀公异日以告闵子曰:“始也吾以南面而君天下,执民之纪而忧其死,吾自以为至通矣(言自以为至通于道也)。今吾闻至人之言,恐吾无其实,轻用吾身而亡其国。吾与孔丘非君臣也,德友而已矣!为至通矣(言自以为至通于道也)。今吾闻至人之言,恐吾无其实,轻用吾身而亡其国。吾与孔丘非君臣也,德友而已矣!”
Interpretation

This De can serve as a standard. When the mind remains tranquil, external things cannot disturb it. The “De” spoken of here is the virtue and function inherent in one’s nature. It is difficult to describe in words, so still water is used as a comparison: when at rest, water is deep and clear, and can serve as a standard by which to measure things. Human nature is the same. Deeply still and lucid, unmoving in quietude, it allows the mind to discern things clearly. One can both preserve one’s nature and remain undisturbed by the external world. This is a metaphor for guarding the root, and it also shows that only a tranquil, empty, and clear mind-nature can illuminate the myriad things.

De is brought to completion through the cultivation of mind and nature by harmonizing them. An empty, tranquil, and lucid mind is the sign that De has been fulfilled; it is attained through harmonizing and cultivation, not formed by chance.

When De does not show itself outwardly, the myriad things do not depart from it. This means that people and things are wholly united, without separation. People therefore see only the outward changes of things, not their nature; a person’s De, too, is not easily revealed. It is like seeing only someone’s unattractive appearance without knowing that they are endowed with both talent and virtue. The author holds that Confucius’s words to Duke Ai aptly and profoundly explain the meaning of the Zhongyong: “Harmony is the common path followed throughout the world.”

Later, Duke Ai told Minzi—Min Sun, a disciple of Confucius, whose courtesy name was Ziqian: “At first, I thought that as ruler I was already deeply discerning: I governed the world, held authority over the people’s laws, and worried over their lives and deaths. Now, having heard the words of the Perfected One, I fear that I may in fact lack the corresponding De, and that by recklessly directing myself I might instead bring my state to ruin. Confucius and I are not lord and minister, but friends joined through De.”

此章形容圣人之德,必须忘形全性,体用不二,内外一如,平等湛一,方为全功。故才全德不形,为圣人之极致。盖才全,则内外不二;德不形,则物我一如。此圣人之成功,所以德充之符也。故鲁君闻之,亦能忘分,感化而友于圣人也。
Interpretation

This chapter describes the conduct of the sage. One must forget distinctions based on outward form and preserve one’s inherent nature, bringing the inner foundation and its outward expression into unity. The mind must also be free of barriers between itself and the world, attaining a state of equality, stillness, and single-mindedness. Only then is cultivation complete. The highest level of the sage’s cultivation is to possess complete inner wisdom without displaying it outwardly. When inner wisdom is complete, the inner and outer are no longer divided; when De (Virtue/Power) is not displayed, people and all things become one. This is why the sage’s cultivation comes to fruition and De becomes full and embodied. After hearing of the sage’s conduct, the ruler of Lu was also able to forget distinctions of status, be moved by the sage, and wish to become his friend.

闉跂(曲跂也)支离(形不全也)无脤(无臀也)说卫灵公,灵公说之,而视全人,其脰(颈也)肩肩(细小貌)。瓮瓮大瘿(言瘿如瓮瓮也)说齐桓公,桓脤(无臀也)说卫灵公,灵公说之,而视全人,其脰(颈也)肩肩(细小貌)。瓮瓮大瘿(言瘿如瓮瓮也)说齐桓公,桓公说之,而视全人,其脰肩肩。故德有所长,而形有所忘(言二子丑恶之状,而使二君说之,反视为全人之不如者,盖爱其德,故自忘其形也)。人不忘其所忘(所忘者,性也。言世人迷性真而爱形骸,故忘其性。今欲不忘),而忘其所不忘(所不忘者,形也。世人忘型而爱形,故今欲忘之),此谓诚忘(忘其所爱,而不忘其所不爱,此之谓诚忘)。故圣人有所游(圣人游于大道之乡,而忘其物欲),而知为孽(知者,以智巧揣摩人心,谓之知。孽,妖孽也),约为胶(以仁义结束人心,游于大道之乡,而忘其物欲),而知为孽(知者,以智巧揣摩人心,谓之知。孽,妖孽也),约为胶(以仁义结束人心,谓之约。胶,固结而不解也),德为接(以小惠要买人心,谓之德。接,应接于人也),工为商(以机关罔取人之利,谓之工;工,犹技巧也。商,行货之人也)。圣人不谋,恶用智?不斫,恶用胶?无丧,恶用德?
Interpretation

The man with the twisted, crippled body went to persuade Duke Ling of Wei, who took a great liking to him. Yet when Duke Ling saw a man with a sound body, he thought the man’s neck looked too slender. The man with a huge, jar-shaped growth on his neck went to persuade Duke Huan of Qi, who also took a great liking to him. When he looked again at people with sound bodies, their necks seemed too slender.

This shows that when a person has inner virtue in some respect, others readily forget their outward appearance. People forget the nature they ought to cherish and cling to the physical form they need not cling to. This is true forgetting.

The sage rests and wanders within the Great Dao, forgetting material desires. Clever schemes bring calamity; using benevolence and righteousness to restrain people’s hearts makes them rigid and hard to loosen. Buying people’s favor with small acts of kindness is merely a way of managing social obligations. Seeking profit through clever devices and contrivances is like a merchant chasing gain. The sage does not deliberately scheme, so what need is there for cleverness? The sage does not carve and shape people’s hearts, so why bind them with benevolence and righteousness? Nothing has been lost in the first place, so why try to make up for it by bestowing favors?

不货,恶用商(四者,皆伪以丧真淳,故圣人去之以全天德)?四者,天鬻也(谓四者淳德,乃天德也。鬻,犹售也。四德乃天售,即所谓天寿故圣人去之以全天德)?四者,天鬻也(谓四者淳德,乃天德也。鬻,犹售也。四德乃天售,即所谓天寿是也)。天鬻也者,天食也(谓天既售我以天德,则天之所以食我也,又何取于人伪哉)。既受食于天,又乌用人(言天生我性德,自有天然之受用,又何人伪求之)!有人之形,无人之情(言圣人虽居人世,其形虽似人,而绝无人情)。有人之形,故群于人(其形为人,故群于众人之之中);无人之情,故是非不得于身(以形寄人中,心超物外,不以物为事,故无人世之是非)。眇乎小哉,所以属于人也(人在太虚中,乃万物之一数耳,其最渺小者,又何足以爱之);謷乎大哉,独成其天(謷者,謷然超于物表也,言性德广大。全此天德,故由人而入于天)。 前虽以知忘形,而知尚存,未尽道妙。故此一章,以忘忘知,知忘则德自由人而入于天)。
Interpretation

Why accumulate wealth? Then why engage in buying and selling? (This passage refers to four artificial practices, all of which harm people’s original, unspoiled nature. The sage abandons them in order to preserve the De endowed by Heaven.) These four wholesome qualities are all bestowed by Heaven. “Heaven’s nourishment” means that Heaven grants people De; it may also be understood as the lifespan Heaven gives them. Since we have already received our endowment from Heaven, we are, in effect, nourished by Heaven. Why pursue things of human making? Heaven has endowed me with my nature and De, giving me all I need to follow and enjoy. Why rely on human striving?

Though the sage has a human form, he has no worldly feelings. His form is human, so he can live among other people; but without worldly attachments, the disputes and gains and losses of human life cannot disturb his heart. He lives among the crowd, yet his heart remains apart, and he does not let external things become a burden.

Human beings are only one among the myriad things within the Great Void, exceedingly small. What is there to cling to? Yet human nature is vast and transcendent. By preserving this De bestowed by Heaven, one can move from the human realm to the realm of Heaven.

The preceding passage said that one should use wisdom to forget the body. But wisdom itself still remained, and the mystery of the Dao had not yet been fully understood. This chapter therefore goes further: one must even forget the act of “forgetting wisdom.” When wisdom is no longer something to cling to, De can flow freely from the human realm into the realm of Heaven.

前虽以知忘形,而知尚存,未尽道妙。故此一章,以忘忘知,知忘则德自化,方能合乎自然,以全天德,其德乃充。故如二君之见二子,能不见其形,此所以为德之符也。圣人造道之极致,至此方为究竟耳。故以此结一篇之义。
Interpretation

Although the earlier passage spoke of relying on “knowledge” to forget the body, knowledge itself still remained, and the mystery of the Great Dao had not yet been fully experienced. This chapter therefore goes further and speaks of “forgetting one’s attachment to knowledge”: when knowledge itself is forgotten, De can transform naturally in accordance with the Dao of Nature, preserving one’s innate De and bringing it to fullness.

Thus, when the two rulers met the two accomplished men, they were able to see them without regarding them as embodied persons. This was proof of the depth of their De. The highest state attained by sages in cultivating the Dao is complete only at this point. For this reason, the chapter concludes the meaning of the work as a whole.

惠子谓庄子曰:“人故无情乎(借惠子之问以结者,因上文发挥天德之全者,乃绝情欲、去人伪,心与天游,乃能充实其天德。故恐世人将谓绝情,则非人类矣,故假惠子以发之。故,乃故有之故,谓本来无情耶)?”庄子曰:“然(庄子直然其问者,盖约人性本来离情绝欲,故直然之)。”惠子曰:“人而无情,何以谓之人(惠子意谓,世人若无其情,则非人也。此俗人之常见也)?”庄子曰:“道与之貌,天与之形,恶得不谓之人(道者,性之固有,人之所当行也。俗人之常见也)?”庄子曰:“道与之貌,天与之形,恶得不谓之人(道者,性之固有,人之所当行也。人禀此性而为人,乃道与之。貌,即天与之形也。既有此性,岂非人乎)?”惠子曰:“既谓之人,恶得无情(此惠子全不知道理,与常人所见一般,谓既是个人,岂得无情者乎)?”庄子曰:“是非吾所谓情也。吾所谓无情者,言人之不以好恶内伤其身,常因其自然而不益生也(惠子意谓必有情欲,乃可为人,故以无情不得为人为问。庄子以正义答之曰:我所谓无情者,非绝无君亲、父子、夫妇之情也。盖因世人纵情肆欲以求益生,而返伤其生,故我要绝其贪欲之情耳,非是绝无人伦也)。
Interpretation

Huizi asked Zhuangzi, “Are people born without feelings?” In other words, are people inherently free of emotional desires?

Zhuangzi replied, “Yes.” He meant that human nature is not originally constrained by emotional desires, and so he affirmed the claim directly.

Huizi asked, “If a person has no feelings, how can they still count as a person?” Huizi was voicing a common view: someone without feelings does not seem fully human.

Zhuangzi said, “The Dao gives people their form, and Heaven gives them their body. How could they not count as people?” People become human by receiving their nature from Heaven, and that nature comes from the Dao. With such a nature, they are of course human.

Huizi asked again, “If they are called people, how can they have no feelings?” He still believed that being human necessarily meant having feelings.

Zhuangzi replied, “That is not what I mean by ‘feelings.’ By ‘having no feelings,’ I mean that people do not let likes and dislikes injure them. They follow their nature and do not deliberately add to their life.” Here, “having no feelings” does not mean severing the bonds of duty between ruler and subject, parent and child, or husband and wife. It means letting go of greed and desire. People often indulge their desires and recklessly seek to gain more, thereby harming their own lives. Zhuangzi’s “having no feelings” means not being constrained by such desires.

以正义答之曰:我所谓无情者,非绝无君亲、父子、夫妇之情也。盖因世人纵情肆欲以求益生,而返伤其生,故我要绝其贪欲之情耳,非是绝无人伦也)。”惠子曰:“不益生,何以有其身(惠子又以为,人生必欲养其口体,乃可以有其身。此全是常人之识见耳)?”庄子曰:“道与之貌,天与之形,无以好恶内伤其身(庄子意谓,人既道与之貌、天与之形矣,苟无以好恶内伤其身,如此则全生养身之至道,又何庸益生为哉)。今子外乎子之神,劳乎子之精,倚树而吟,据槁梧而瞑(槁梧,琴也。乃惠子倚树据琴,而瞑以辩论也。庄子意谓惠子不能乐其天德,而返外其精神,而倚树据梧,以逞辩论是非也)。天选之形,子以坚白鸣(谓天选辩论也。庄子意谓惠子不能乐其天德,而返外其精神,而倚树据梧,以逞辩论是非也)。天选之形,子以坚白鸣(谓天选子之形,赋以全德。今乃舍之,而返恣坚白之论以自鸿,失之甚矣)。” 此篇以忘情、绝欲,以全天德,故其德乃充。前已发挥全德之妙,故结以无情非人,以尽绝情、全德之意,所以警俗励世之意深矣。 音释: [穴欤](音欤,空也)軱(攻乎切,音姑,大骨也)謋(霍虢切,音砉,謋然,速也)蜃(音肾,大蛤可为盛器)樠(释:
Interpretation

Zhuangzi explained, “By ‘having no emotions,’ I do not mean completely abandoning the bonds of affection between ruler and subject, parent and child, or husband and wife. People indulge their desires in the hope of making life better, but end up harming their lives. So what I advocate cutting off is the emotion of craving, not the bonds of human relationships.”

Huizi asked, “If you do not seek to increase life, how can you preserve your body?” Zhuangzi replied, “The Dao gives people their appearance, and Heaven gives them their form. As long as likes and dislikes do not harm the body from within, that is the fundamental way to preserve life and care for the body. Why deliberately seek to increase life?”

Zhuangzi continued, “Now you set your spirit outside yourself, exhaust your mind, and lean against a tree as you discourse, or rest against a zither—the ‘withered paulownia’—as you ponder. Heaven gave you this form, yet you display your arguments about ‘hardness and whiteness,’ debating whether hardness and whiteness can be separated. You have cast aside the De bestowed by Heaven and become absorbed in disputation. You have truly lost your original nature.”

The main theme of this passage is to forget private attachments and cut off craving in order to preserve the De bestowed by Heaven. The earlier passage has already explained the subtlety of preserving one’s nature; at the end, it clarifies that “having no emotions” does not mean disregarding human relationships. Rather, it means cutting off craving and preserving Heaven’s De, as a warning to the world.

[穴欤](音欤,空也)軱(攻乎切,音姑,大骨也)謋(霍虢切,音砉,謋然,速也)蜃(音肾,大蛤可为盛器)樠(模昆切,音门,脂出樠然也)[木且](庄力切,诈乎声,以木为阑也)诊(止忍切,音轸,占[马念]也)藾(庐盖切,音赖,荫芘也)咶(善指切,音视,与舐同)杙(夷益切,音弋,所以格兽也)[木单](旨善切,音颤,棺木之全一边者)繲(居隘切,音懈,浣衣也)翣(色甲切,音啑,棺羽饰文纛也)謷(牛刀切,音敖,大貌) 卷四 大宗师
Interpretation

“Yu” is read as “yu” and means “empty.” “Gu” is read as “gu” and refers to a large bone. “Huo” is read as “xu” and describes a sound made suddenly and swiftly. “Shen” is read as “shen” and refers to a large clam that can be made into a container. “Men” is read as “men” and describes the flow of grease or fluid. “Zha” is read as “zha” and refers to a wooden railing. “Zhen” is read as “zhen” and refers to divining about horses. “Lai” is read as “lai” and means “to provide shade.” “Shi” is read as “shi” and is synonymous with “to lick.” “Yi” is read as “yi” and refers to a wooden stake used to ward off wild animals. “Chan” is read as “chan” and refers to one side of a coffin made from a single block of wood. “Xie” is read as “xie” and means “to wash clothes.” “Sha” is read as “sha” and refers to feather ornaments or banner-like decorations on a coffin. “Ao” is read as “ao” and describes something vast.

Volume Four: “The Great Ancestral Teacher” (chapter title).

庄子着书,自谓言有宗、事有君,盖言有所主,非漫谈也。其篇分内外者,以其所学,乃内圣外王之道。谓得此大道于心,则内为圣人;迫不得已而应世,则外为帝为王。乃有体有用之学,非空言也以其所学,乃内圣外王之道。谓得此大道于心,则内为圣人;迫不得已而应世,则外为帝为王。乃有体有用之学,非空言也。且内七篇,乃相因之次第。其逍遥游,乃明全体之圣人,所谓大而化之之谓圣,乃一书之宗本,立言之主意也。次齐物论,盖言举世古今之人,未明大道之原,各以己见为是,故互相是非。首以儒墨相排,皆未悟大道,特以所师一偏之曲学,以为必是,固执而不化,皆迷其真宰,而妄执我见为是。故古今举世,未有大觉之人,卒莫能正之。此悲世之迷而不解,皆执我见之过也。次养生主,谓世人迷却真宰,妄执血肉之躯为我;人人只知为一己之谋,所求功名利禄,以养其形,戕贼其真宰而不悟。此举世古今之迷,皆不知所养,谓世人迷却真宰,妄执血肉之躯为我;人人只知为一己之谋,所求功名利禄,以养其形,戕贼其真宰而不悟。此举世古今之迷,皆不知所养耳。若能养其生之主,则超然脱其物欲之害,乃可不虚生矣。果能知养生之生,则天真可复,道体可全,此得圣人之体也。
Interpretation

Zhuangzi wrote his book with a fundamental purpose and a central idea running through it; it was not a collection of casual reflections. He divided its chapters into “Inner Chapters” and “Outer Chapters” because the subject is the Way of “inner sageliness and outer kingship.” If one apprehends the Great Dao within the heart, one becomes a sage inwardly; if circumstances make it necessary to engage with worldly affairs, one can govern the world outwardly and become a ruler. This learning concerns both ultimate reality and its practical application. It is not empty talk.

The seven Inner Chapters follow one another in sequence. “Free and Easy Wandering” sets out the sage’s complete state. The saying “When one’s greatness reaches the point of transformation, one is called a sage” means that when one’s state is so vast that it can encompass change, one may be called a sage. This chapter presents the book’s fundamental purpose and the central argument on which it rests.

Next comes “Discussion on Making All Things Equal.” It points out that, from ancient times to the present, most people have failed to understand the source of the Great Dao. Each takes their own view to be correct, and so they argue with one another over right and wrong. The opening mentions the Confucians and Mohists rejecting each other, and says that neither has yet apprehended the Great Dao. Each merely takes the narrow doctrine of the school they inherited as absolutely correct, clinging to it without change. In doing so, they lose sight of the true ruler—the inner true nature or spiritual foundation—and presume that their own view must be right. People throughout the ages have been caught in this confusion; few have truly awakened, and in the end no one is left to set them straight. This passage laments how people cling to their own opinions and are consequently left bewildered.

Next comes “Nourishing the Lord of Life.” Having lost sight of the true ruler, people instead take their flesh-and-blood bodies to be their true selves. They concern themselves only with personal gain, pursuing fame, profit, and status to preserve the body, while unknowingly harming their inner true nature. People throughout the ages have been lost in this way, with no real understanding of what they should be nourishing. If one can nourish the lord of life, one can rise above the harms of material desires and avoid wasting one’s life. Truly understanding how to nourish life allows one to recover one’s natural nature and preserve the foundation of the Great Dao. This is the basis for attaining the sage’s state.

次人间世,乃涉世之学问。谓世事不可以有心要为,不是轻易可涉;若有心要名干誉、恃才妄作,未有不伤生戕性者。若颜子、叶公,皆不安命、不自知而强行者也。必若圣人,忘己虚心以游世,迫不得已而应,乃免患耳。其涉世之难,委曲毕见。能涉世无患,乃圣人之大用也。次德充符,以明圣人忘形释智、体用两全,无心于世而与道游,乃德充之符也。其大宗师,总上六义,道全德备,浑然大化,忘己、忘功、忘名。其所以称至人、神人、圣人者,必若此,乃可为万世之所宗而师之者,故称之曰大宗师。是为全体之大圣,以称至人、神人、圣人者,必若此,乃可为万世之所宗而师之者,故称之曰大宗师。是为全体之大圣,意谓内圣之学,必至此为极,则所谓得其体也;若迫不得已而应世,则可为圣帝明王矣。故次以应帝王,以终内篇之意。至若外篇,皆蔓衍发挥内篇之意耳。
Interpretation

Next comes “The Human World,” which teaches how to conduct oneself in society. One cannot force worldly affairs to conform to fixed preconceptions; they are not easily handled. Those who single-mindedly pursue fame and praise, relying on their abilities to act as they please, inevitably damage their lives and harm their nature. Yan Hui and Lord Ye both acted under constraint because they could not accept their circumstances and did not understand themselves. Only by forgetting oneself and meeting the world with an open mind, as a sage does, and responding only when compelled, can one avoid calamity. “The Human World” fully reveals the many hardships and twists involved in dealing with society. To move through the world without suffering calamity is where the sage’s great influence is put into effect.

Next comes “The Sign of Virtue Complete,” which explains that sages forget distinctions of outward form and set aside cleverness and calculation. They embody both inner substance and outward function. Though free of worldly concerns, they walk in accord with the Dao (the Way). This is the proof that their virtue is complete.

“The Great Ancestral Teacher” draws together the main ideas of the preceding six chapters: the Dao’s substance is whole, virtue is complete, and one merges seamlessly with the great transformation, forgetting oneself, one’s achievements, and one’s reputation. Those called Perfected Persons, Spiritlike Persons, and sages must reach this state to become teachers whom all generations revere and emulate; hence the title “The Great Ancestral Teacher.” This is the great sage who has attained completeness. For the inner-sage tradition, this is the highest state: realizing the substance of the Dao. If one then responds to worldly affairs when compelled, one can become a sage emperor or enlightened king. Thus “Responding to Emperors and Kings” follows, bringing the central teachings of the inner chapters to a close. The outer chapters, meanwhile, extend and elaborate on the ideas established in the inner chapters.

知天之所为,知人之所为者,至矣(知天知人之知,乃指真知,谓妙悟也。天,乃天然大道,即万物之所宗旨。所为,谓天地万物,乃大道全体之变,故曰天之所为。盖天然无为,而曲成万物,非有心也。人之所为,谓人禀大道,乃万物之一数,特最灵者。以赋大道之全体,而为人之性,以,非有心也。人之所为,谓人禀大道,乃万物之一数,特最灵者。以赋大道之全体,而为人之性,以主其形,即所谓真宰者。故人之见闻知觉,皆真宰以主之;日用头头,无非大道之妙用,是知人即天也。苟知天人合德,乃知之至也)!知天之所为者,天而生也(知大道在人,禀而有生者也);知人之所为者,以其知之所知,以养其知之所不知,终其天年而不中道夭者,是知之盛也(所知者,在人日用见闻觉知之知也。所不知,谓妙性本有,人迷不觉,故日用而不知。由其不知,虽有,故但知贪欲以养形,而不知知者,在人日用见闻觉知之知也。所不知,谓妙性本有,人迷不觉,故日用而不知。由其不知,虽有,故但知贪欲以养形,而不知释智遗形以养性。故举世昏迷于物欲,戕生伤性,不能尽性全生,以终其天年者。苟能于日用之间,去贪离欲,即境明心,回光返照,以复其性,是以其知之所知,养其知之所不知。如此妙悟,乃知之盛也)。虽然有患,夫知有所待而后当,其所待者特未定也(虽然有患者,意谓我说以所知,养所不知,此还有病在。何也?然有患,夫知有所待而后当,其所待者特未定也(虽然有患者,意谓我说以所知,养所不知,此还有病在。何也?以世人一向妄知,皆恃其妄知,强不知以为知,未悟以为悟,妄为肆志,则返伤其性。必待真悟真知,然后为恰当。第恐所待而悟者,未必真悟,则恃为已悟,则未可定也。必若真真悟透,天人合德,本来无二,乃可为真知)。庸讵知吾所谓天之非人乎?所谓人之非天乎?且有真人而后有真知(意谓我说以人养天,不是离人日用之外别有妙道。盖天即人也,人即大也。直在悟得本来无二,原无欠缺。真知天人一体,方称为真人矣)。
Interpretation

Only someone who understands both the workings of the natural Dao and the workings of human beings can be said to have attained the highest understanding. The “knowing” spoken of here is not ordinary knowledge gained through what one sees and hears, but genuine insight. “Heaven” refers to the natural Dao, the source of all things; heaven, earth, and all things are transformations within the Dao as a whole. The Dao has no intention of its own, yet naturally brings all things into being and nurtures them. Human beings, too, are among the myriad things born of the Dao. Endowed with the Dao, they possess spiritual awareness. The Dao grants human nature, which governs the human body. Our perceptions, sensations, and everyday activities all express the Dao’s subtle workings. Truly understanding that Heaven and humanity are connected and united is therefore the highest understanding.

To understand how the Dao is expressed in the human person is to understand that we are born endowed with the Dao. To know how to use the perceptions we already have in daily life to cultivate the nature we have not yet perceived, and to live out the full span of life without dying prematurely, is to reach a mature state of understanding. In daily life, people can perceive what they see, hear, and feel, yet they often lose their way in desire. They focus only on satisfying their desires and preserving their bodies, without knowing to rid themselves of greed and attachment in order to cultivate their nature. If they can free themselves from greed in everyday life, reflect clearly when they encounter things, and recognize their nature anew, they can use the understanding they already possess to cultivate the nature they have not yet perceived. This is what it means for understanding to be mature.

Yet this way of speaking may itself be problematic. For understanding to be sound, it must have a basis, and that basis may not be reliable. People often act on mistaken understanding, claiming to know what they do not know and treating states they have not yet experienced as though they had already experienced them. They act recklessly and end up damaging their nature. Even if they wait until they have experienced something before making a judgment, they still cannot be sure that what they experienced was genuine insight. Only when they have truly and fully understood that Heaven and humanity are connected from the beginning can they be said to possess true knowledge.

How can we be certain that what I call “Heaven” is not “humanity,” or that what I call “humanity” is not “Heaven”? Only when there are people who have truly embodied the Dao can there be true understanding. To cultivate one’s nature through the routines of human life does not mean that some mysterious Dao exists apart from everyday life. Heaven is humanity, and humanity embodies the Dao. Only by realizing that Heaven and humanity have always been without distinction or deficiency does one become a perfected person—one who has truly embodied the Dao—and attain true knowledge.

此一节,乃一篇立言之主意,以一知字为眼目。古人所云:知之一字,众妙之门;知之一字,众祸之门。盖妙悟后,方是真知;有真知者,乃称真人,即可宗而师之也。然知天知人,即众妙之门也。虽然有患,即知之一字,众祸之门也。谓是真知;有真知者,乃称真人,即可宗而师之也。然知天知人,即众妙之门也。虽然有患,即知之一字,众祸之门也。谓强不知以为知,恃强知而妄作,则返以知为害矣。此举世聪明之通病也。
Interpretation

This section centers on “knowing” and sets out the main argument of the entire text. The ancients said that the character for “knowing” is both a gateway to all manner of subtle principles and a gateway through which all manner of misfortune may enter. Only understanding gained through genuine insight deserves to be called true knowledge. Only those who possess true knowledge deserve to be called genuine people, worthy of respect and emulation. Knowing Heaven and knowing humanity are pathways to subtle principles.

Yet the pursuit of knowledge carries hidden dangers: “knowing” can also become a gateway to misfortune. If people insist on presenting what they do not understand as though they did, or rely on their own supposed cleverness to act recklessly, knowledge can bring harm instead. This is a common failing among people in the world who consider themselves clever.

何谓真人(此下唤起真人,以示真人之所养者深迥,与常人不同也)?古之真人,不逆寡(寡,谓薄德无智之愚人。不逆者,不拒也),不雄成(雄,自恃也。成,谓己为全德也。不恃己德以激世也),不谟士(谟,即谋士。即事谓无心于事,虚己以游,全不以事干怀也)。若然者(真人如此处世),过而弗悔,当而不自得也。若然者,登高不栗,入水不。即事谓无心于事,虚己以游,全不以事干怀也)。若然者(真人如此处世),过而弗悔,当而不自得也。若然者,登高不栗,入水不濡,入火不热,是知能登假于道也(言真人无心以游世,此全无得失利害之心。以情不附物,故水火不能伤。此则遗物全性,是知则能登遐于道也)。若此(真人即世忘世之如此),古之真人,其寝不梦(梦发于妄想,以真人情不附物,则妄想不生,故寝无梦),其觉无忧(真人虚怀游世,了无得失之心,故觉无忧),其食不甘(以道自娱,故不甘于味),其息深深(深者,绵绵之意。息粗而浅,则心浮动。真人心泰定而不为物动,故其息深深)。真人之息以踵(此释上深深之意。踵者,脚跟也。以喻息之所自发处,而不为物动,故其息深深)。真人之息以踵(此释上深深之意。踵者,脚跟也。以喻息之所自发处,深不可测,故心定而不乱),众人之息以喉(众人之息在喉,则粗浅之至,故浮而妄动,所以日用心驰于物,而不知道)。屈服者,其嗌言若哇(心浮则言躁,言不由中,则易屈服。嗌者,咽喉也。哇,吐也。以浅粗之言,自咽而吐,无根之言也)。其耆欲深者,其天机浅(言世人粗浅如此者,乃嗜欲之深,汩昏真性,全不知有天然妙性。皆堕妄知,无真知也)。
Interpretation

What is a “True Person” (a person who has realized the Great Dao and lives in accord with nature)? The True People of antiquity did not reject those with little virtue or wisdom, nor did they pride themselves on being complete in talent and virtue. They did not make deliberate plans for everything. They simply lived with an open mind and did not let external things burden their hearts and spirits. They felt no regret when events had passed, and when things happened to go well, they did not congratulate themselves.

A True Person could climb to a high place without fear, enter water without getting wet, and walk into fire without feeling its heat. This means that a True Person has no concern for gain or loss, benefit or harm, and does not attach their feelings to external things. In this way, they can transcend the constraints of the outside world, preserve their inborn nature, and draw close to the Dao.

The True People of antiquity did not dream when they slept, had no worries when awake, and did not find food especially delicious. Their breathing was deep and long. To say that a True Person “breathes from the heels” uses the heels as a metaphor for breath so deep it is hard to measure, describing a settled heart and spirit untouched by external disturbances. By contrast, ordinary people “breathe from the throat”: their breathing is shallow and hurried, their hearts and spirits restless. In daily life they are always pulled along by external things and cannot experience the Dao.

Those with restless hearts and spirits often speak as though rushing words out of their throats. Their words are shallow, and they are easily made to yield. The deeper their desires, the shallower their inborn clarity. In other words, desire obscures a person’s nature, drawing them into acquired distinctions and delusions and depriving them of genuine realization.

此一节,言真人妙悟自性,是为真知者,故所养迥,与世不同。而以众人观之,则自别矣。前云有患,正恐未悟,而恃妄知为得者,害之甚也。故此双明之。 古之真人,不知悦生,不知恶死(前略言真人处世,忘利害。此则言,真人不但忘利害,而且此双明之。
Interpretation

This section explains that the perfected person, who has realized the Dao and transcended worldly distinctions, deeply understands their own nature and therefore possesses true understanding. The way they cultivate body and mind is entirely different from that of ordinary people, so they also appear unusual in the eyes of others.

Earlier, the text mentioned “having concerns”: the worry is that people may not have truly realized the truth, yet mistake illusory understanding for something they have attained. The harm caused by this misapprehension is considerable. Here, the point is developed further from both the positive and negative sides.

The perfected people of ancient times knew neither attachment to life nor aversion to death. The earlier passage broadly described how perfected people forgot worldly gains and losses; here, it goes further, explaining that they transcend not only gain and loss but also the distinction between life and death.

古之真人,不知悦生,不知恶死(前略言真人处世,忘利害。此则言,真人不但忘利害,而且超死生。以与大道冥一,悟其生本不生,故生而不悦;悟其死本不死,故不恶其死)。其出不欣,其入不距(出入,即生死二字,老子云“出生入死”。由不悦生,故不贪生。欣,犹贪也。不恶死,故不距。距,谓爪而不肯入也)。翛然而往,翛然而来而已矣(倏然,乃鹤冲举刷羽之声也。言真人无心游世,倏然冲举,出入死生,如游太虚,了无挂碍。故云如此而已矣)。不忘其所始,不求其所终(以悟其生本不生,故不忘其所始;以生与道游,不见有世可出,混万物为一,故不求所终)。受而喜之,忘而复之(众人以生为累,故患而不喜。真人载道而生,故受形而喜。虽处人世,心不违道,相忘于世,故念念而复)。是之谓不以心捐道,不以人为累,故患而不喜。真人载道而生,故受形而喜。虽处人世,心不违道,相忘于世,故念念而复)。是之谓不以心捐道,不以人助天,是之谓真人(心与道游,故不捐道。捐,弃也。人即是天,不假造作修为,故不以人助天。如此乃谓之真人)。 此一节,言真人游世,不但忘利害,而且忘死生。故虽身寄人间,心超物表。意非真知妙悟,未易至此,欲人知其所养也。
Interpretation

The perfected people of antiquity neither clung to life nor loathed death. The preceding passage said that, in their dealings with the world, they could forget about gain and harm. Here, it goes further: they could transcend life and death as well. Because they were one with the Dao, they understood that life’s source was not truly brought into being, so they did not cling to life while living. They also understood that death was not true disappearance, so they did not loathe it.

They felt no joy at birth and offered no resistance at death. “Coming and going” refers to life and death, as in the Laozi’s saying, “Coming forth into life, entering into death.” The perfected people neither clung to life nor resisted death. They seemed to come and go freely, without attachment.

They did not forget life’s beginning, nor did they pursue its end. Knowing that life had not truly come into being, they did not forget its beginning. They traveled with the Dao, did not imagine they had a world they must leave, and saw all things as one; therefore, they did not ask after an end.

They accepted life and embraced it gladly. Even when their minds seemed to forget the things around them, they always returned to the Dao. Ordinary people see life as a burden and so feel sorrow rather than joy. The perfected people, however, lived bearing the Dao, and could therefore rejoice in receiving a bodily form. Though they lived among other people, their hearts did not turn away from the Dao. They could forget themselves in the things of the world and merge with them, while their thoughts continually returned to the Dao. This is called not abandoning the Dao because of one’s own preconceptions, and not treating human contrivance as a burden. One who does not use human effort to interfere with nature is called a perfected person.

This section describes how the perfected people lived in the world: they forgot not only gain and harm, but also life and death. Though they dwelt among people, their hearts rose above worldly things. Without genuine understanding and realization, it is difficult to reach this state. The passage invites us to understand the state cultivated by the perfected people.

若然者,其心志,其容寂,其颡頯(若然者,言真人如此游世,其容貌与众不同。其心志,笔乘作忘,言无心于世也。其容寂,言容貌寂然,乃内湛而外定也。其颡頯,宽裕也,谓其貌广大宽容,不拘拘之状也。此老子云“孔德之容、唯道是从”也)。凄然似秋(言其面严冷,若。其颡頯,宽裕也,谓其貌广大宽容,不拘拘之状也。此老子云“孔德之容、唯道是从”也)。凄然似秋(言其面严冷,若秋气之肃也),暖然似春(言近之,则其中温然、暖然,令人可亲可爱也),喜怒通乎四时,与物有宜而莫知其极(言无心于喜怒,但随物所感,或喜或怒,了无一定于中。故曰通乎四时、与物有宜,而人不知无喜怒也。故曰莫知其极)。故圣人之用兵也,亡国而不失人心。利泽施乎万世,不为爱人(言圣人无心御世,与天施合德。假而用兵,即亡人之国,而不失人心,本无人心。利泽施乎万世,不为爱人(言圣人无心御世,与天施合德。假而用兵,即亡人之国,而不失人心,本无杀伐之心也。纵恩施万世,原非有意爱人也。所谓天生天杀之意也)。故乐通物,非圣人也(有心要通于物,非自然矣)﹔有亲,非仁也(大仁不仁。亲者,有心私爱,非大仁也。故曰贼莫大德有心)﹔天时,非贤也(揣度时势,非任命也)﹔利害不通,非君子也(明哲保身,乃称君子。不通利害,率意狂为,非君子也);行名失己,非士也(伪行虚名而无实,则非士矣);亡身不真,非役人也(亡己为人,则人皆听役;若执己殉名,则见役于物,非役人者也)。若狐不偕、务光、伯夷、叔齐、箕子、胥馀、纪他、申徒狄,是役人之役,适人之适,而不自适其适者也(此数夷、叔齐、箕子、胥馀、纪他、申徒狄,是役人之役,适人之适,而不自适其适者也(此数子者,皆知之不真,殉名丧实,去圣远矣)。
Interpretation

A realized person has no fixed intention in the heart. His expression is quiet, and his forehead seems broad and relaxed. The phrase “heart and intention” appears in another version as “forgetting,” meaning a lack of attachment to worldly affairs. “Quiet in countenance” describes a calm expression, a still inner state, and an outwardly composed manner. “Broad forehead” depicts a relaxed, open brow without any sign of constraint.

He appears grave and austere, solemn like the air of autumn. Yet when one draws near, he feels warm and approachable, like spring. His joy and anger shift with the four seasons, responding fittingly to different things, but no one can discern any fixed rule behind them. In other words, he does not deliberately cultivate joy or anger; he responds naturally to the way things affect him.

Thus, when a sage wages war, even if another state is destroyed, he does not lose the people’s support. His benevolence can reach across generations, yet it does not arise from a deliberate wish to care for any particular person. This means that the sage governs worldly affairs without selfish motives, following the Dao of Heaven. Even in war, he does not act from a desire to kill; when he benefits others, he does not do so in order to win their affection.

To deliberately seek communion with all things is not the way of a sage. To harbor partial affection is not true benevolence. To speculate about Heaven’s timing and calculate the turn of events is not the way of a worthy person who follows what is ordained. One who does not understand advantage and harm cannot be called a gentleman. One who pursues fame through words and actions at the cost of losing the true self is not a person of integrity. And one who sacrifices himself for others while failing to preserve his true nature cannot be said to command external things or to make others follow.

Hu Buxie, Wu Guang, Boyi, Shuqi, Jizi, Xuyu, Jita, and Shentu Di were all made to serve others and acted according to other people’s standards. They were not truly at ease with their own nature and choices. The commentator holds that they lacked genuine wisdom: they sacrificed what was true in themselves for the sake of fame, and so stood far from the Way of the sage.

此一节,概言所知不真,不能忘己、忘名,有心要誉,殉名丧实,皆非真知之圣也。下又言真人真知之不同。 古之真人(此下一节,明真人游世之状),其状义(无可不可)而不朋(中心和而不流),若不足(虚之至也)而不承(若一物无所受)﹔与乎(与世容与)其觚而不坚也(觚者,方也。虽介然不群,而非坚执不化者),张乎(施为也)其虚而不华也(虽见施为,而中心空空,不以华美为尚)﹔邴邴乎(邴,喜貌)其似喜乎(虽喜而无心于喜也),崔乎(言折节谦下也)其不得已乎(虽谦下以空空,不以华美为尚)﹔邴邴乎(邴,喜貌)其似喜乎(虽喜而无心于喜也),崔乎(言折节谦下也)其不得已乎(虽谦下以接人,其实以不得已而泛应也),滀乎(滀,如水之湛滀也)进我色也(谓中心湛滀,而和气日见于颜面之间),与乎(与之相处)止我德也(人与相处而不忍去),厉乎其似世乎(厉,谓严整而不可犯,亦似世之庄重也),謷乎其未可制也(謷,谓謷然礼法之外,似不可以礼法拘制也),连乎其似好闭也(连者,妆摄捡束之意,虽收摄捡束,但似好闭,其实无所闭藏也),悗乎忘其言也(悗,俯下之意,谓对人谦下,若忘其言者)。以刑为体(刑者,不留其私,谓中心一私不留,以为其体),以礼为翼(虽忘礼法,犹假礼以辅翼,可行于若忘其言者)。以刑为体(刑者,不留其私,谓中心一私不留,以为其体),以礼为翼(虽忘礼法,犹假礼以辅翼,可行于世),以知为时(真知时之可否,以行止也),以德为循(言以德但为循顺机宜也)。以刑为体者,绰乎其杀也(绰者,有余之义,谓杀尽私欲,一私不留而尤损之也)﹔以礼为翼者,所以行世也(言既游世,不可出于礼法之外也)﹔以知为时者,不得已于事也(言迫不得已而后应也)﹔以德为循者,言其与有足者至于丘也(丘,高处也。言循顺机宜,接引愚蒙,令有识者皆可上进于道。故喻如有足者,皆可引进于高处也。此四句,释上刑礼知德四句)。而人真以为勤行者也(老子云“用之不勤”,勤劳也。言真人游行于世,无心而游,虽行而不劳也)。
Interpretation

This section first summarizes the point: people whose knowledge is not genuine cannot forget themselves or their reputation. They devote themselves to seeking praise, and in the end sacrifice what is real for the sake of fame. None of them is a truly wise sage. The text then goes on to explain the True Person—a person who embodies the Dao in practice and whose spirit is pure—and genuine wisdom.

The True Persons of antiquity had no fixed views about what must or must not be done in dealing with the world. Their hearts were at peace, yet they did not simply follow the crowd. They seemed to lack something, as though they could not take anything in, because their hearts were empty and they did not claim the things of the world as their own. They lived among others while remaining upright, but were not rigid or inflexible. They acted when called for, yet their hearts remained clear and empty, without pursuing outward display.

They seemed joyful, but were not attached to joy. They could also be humble and yielding, as though circumstances required it. They treated others with humility, simply responding to the situation rather than putting on an act. Their hearts were quiet and full, and their faces naturally showed warmth and kindness; those around them were glad to stay in their company. They were composed and dignified, as if they conformed to worldly manners, yet they stood beyond the constraints of ritual and were not bound by them. They were restrained and self-possessed, seeming to prefer seclusion, but they were not deliberately hiding anything. They were modest toward others, as though they paid no mind even to their own words.

The True Person takes “punishment” as a foundation. Here, “punishment” means leaving no room for personal bias: the heart holds no private thoughts, and this becomes the basis for action. Ritual serves as an aid. Though not attached to ritual, the True Person uses it to act in the world. Wisdom helps discern the right moment, deciding when to act and when to stop. De guides the response to circumstances, so that one acts in keeping with how things actually are.

To take “punishment” as a foundation means clearing away selfish desires while leaving room to go further and diminish self-interest even more. To use ritual as an aid is to act in the world. To discern the right moment through wisdom is to respond as circumstances require. To guide the response through De is to guide people in an appropriate way, so that those capable of advancing can continue along the Dao. These four points explain, respectively, the earlier references to punishment, ritual, wisdom, and De.

People in the world think the True Person acts with strenuous effort and diligence. In fact, as the Laozi says, “use it without exertion”—“exertion” means laboring hard. As the True Person moves through the world and deals with affairs, they do not force themselves; though they act, they do not feel worn out.

此一节,形容真人虚心游世之状貌,如此之妙。言虽超世勤劳也。言真人游行于世,无心而游,虽行而不劳也)。 此一节,形容真人虚心游世之状貌,如此之妙。言虽超世,而未尝越世;虽同人,而不群于人。此真知之实也。 故其好之也一,其弗好之也一(故者,由上游世之工夫纯一,故得天人合德也。好之者,天也。弗好者,人也。今皆一矣,是谓之天人合德)。其一也一,其不一也一(其一,谓天人合一,谓天与人合一而归于道,则万物杂然而不一者,尽皆浑然会归于道也)。其一与天为徒(既人合其天,则人天一,则人可与天与人合一而归于道,则万物杂然而不一者,尽皆浑然会归于道也)。其一与天为徒(既人合其天,则人天一,则人可与天为徒也),其不一与人为徒(谓天人原本不一也,今人既合天,而未免游于人世,则以天而游,故与人为徒),天与人不相胜也,此之谓真人(若超然绝俗,则是以天胜人;若逐物亡性,则是以人胜天。今天人合德,两不相伤,故不相胜。必如此方是真人)。
Interpretation

This section describes the True Person (zhenren)—one who has realized the Great Dao and follows the natural course—as moving through the human world with an open mind. Though living amid the dust of the world, they are not entangled by worldly concerns; though among other people, they do not follow the crowd blindly. This is what “true knowledge” looks like in practice.

Thus, whether they like something or dislike it, they return to the same state of calm; whether following nature or living amid the world’s confusion, they return to the Great Dao. The “unity” spoken of here means that Heaven and humanity unite in the Dao: though the myriad things are diverse and complex, they ultimately merge wholly into the Great Dao. Such a person is in harmony with Heaven and can still live among other people.

Only when Heaven and humanity neither suppress nor harm one another can someone be called a True Person. To stand apart from the world is to let one’s heavenly nature suppress human life; to chase external things and lose one’s original nature is to let human desires suppress heavenly nature. The True Person allows heavenly nature and human life to coexist in peace, so that neither is harmed.

此一节,总结前知天、知人工夫,做到浑然一体、天人一际,然后任其天真。则在天而天,在人而人,天地同根,万物一体。故天与人两不相胜。必如此真知妙悟、浑化之极,乃任其天真。则在天而天,在人而人,天地同根,万物一体。故天与人两不相胜。必如此真知妙悟、浑化之极,乃可名为真人。此岂可强知妄见而可比拟哉!此真人真学之全功,故下章从“死生、命也”起,至藏舟章末,皆极口勉人学道,要做真实工夫。
Interpretation

This section summarizes the work of understanding the Dao of Heaven and the affairs of human life in advance: when Heaven and humanity have become wholly integrated and flow through one another, one can then follow what is natural and true. In this way, what belongs to Heaven accords with the Dao of Heaven, while what belongs to humanity follows human affairs. Heaven and Earth spring from a single source, and all things are interconnected; therefore, the Dao of Heaven and human affairs do not suppress one another.

Only through such true understanding and profound realization, allowing body and mind to merge with the transformations of all things, can one be called a “True Person”—an ideal person who accords with the Dao. This cannot be attained through forced study or baseless speculation. The passage describes the complete cultivation needed to become a True Person. Thus, from the next chapter’s opening, “Life and death are matters of fate,” through the end of the chapter on “Hiding a Boat,” the text repeatedly urges people to learn the Dao and cultivate themselves in earnest.

死生,命也(此下教人做了死生之工夫。命,谓自然而不可免者)﹔其有夜旦之常,天也(人有死生,如时之夜旦,不可免者。且阴阳有夜旦,太虚恒一而无昏晚。喻人形虽有生死,而真性常然不变,如太虚之无变,故曰天也)。人之有所不得与(去声),皆物之情也(谓真性在人,天然自具,一毫人力不能与其间。此人人同有之真体,所谓真宰、天君是也。此须养而后知)。彼特以天为父(言人人皆禀真性而有形,天然自足,故曰以天为父),而身犹爱之,而况其卓乎(言此血肉之假身,赖世之父而有生,且养身全特以天为父(言人人皆禀真性而有形,天然自足,故曰以天为父),而身犹爱之,而况其卓乎(言此血肉之假身,赖世之父而有生,且养身全孝以尊父;况天君载我之形、卓然不属形骸者,岂不知有所养而尊之乎)!人特以有君为愈乎己,而身犹死之,而况其真乎(且以世人知有君,欲尽忠者,而以身死之;况真君宰我之形,而不能忘形以事之、忠之,可谓不智之甚矣。此言激切之至,人读此而不悟非夫也)! 此言真性在我,而不属生死者,乃真常之性也。而人迷之而不悟,嗜欲伤之而不知所养,岂非至愚也哉!
Interpretation

Human life and death are both governed by destiny. The alternation of day and night follows a fixed pattern; this is simply how nature works. Human beings are born and die just as the seasons pass through day and night: neither can be avoided. Yet though day and night change, empty space itself remains constant. Though the human body is subject to life and death, its true nature remains unchanged, just as empty space is unaffected by day and night. This is what is called “Heaven.”

There are things people cannot control by their own efforts; this is simply the way things are. What is called true nature is naturally present within each person. It is not something human effort can create. Everyone possesses this original true substance, also called the “True Ruler” or “Heavenly Lord.” It must be nurtured before it can be recognized.

Everyone takes Heaven as their father, because both their true nature and their physical form are received from Heaven and are complete from the beginning. People cherish their bodies; how much more should they cherish the nature that transcends bodily form? The body is a temporary vessel of flesh and blood, born through one’s earthly father. People still nourish the body and honor their father. Then should they not even more carefully nurture and honor the nature that bears and governs the body, standing apart from it and unconstrained by it?

People regard the ruler as superior to themselves, and some are even willing to give their lives for him. How much more, then, should they forget the burdens of the body and serve with loyalty the “True Sovereign” who truly governs them? To fail to do so is the height of folly. These words are deeply earnest. Anyone who reads them and still does not awaken has failed to understand the matter.

This passage says that a person’s true nature resides within them, yet is not governed by life and death; it is the constant, unchanging nature. People lose sight of it without realizing, damage it through their desires, and fail to understand that it must be nurtured. This is utter foolishness.

泉涸,鱼相与处于陆,相煦以湿,相濡以沫,不如相忘于江湖(老子云:“失道而后德,失德而后仁,失仁而后义。”此取鱼失水,如失道德而后仁义。且以仁义相尚,正似相濡以湿沫,不若相忘于江湖。以喻必忘仁义,而可游于大道之乡也)。以仁义相尚,正似相濡以湿沫,不若相忘于江湖。以喻必忘仁义,而可游于大道之乡也)。与其誉尧而非桀也,不若两忘而化其道(无誉无非,则善恶两忘,而与道为一,乃真知之盛也)。夫大块(天地也)载我以形,劳我以生,佚我以老,息我以死。故善吾生者,乃所以善吾死也(言人生天地,劳佚死生,皆自然而不可郄者,命也。此所谓人也,苟知命之所系,即道之在。是知由人而即天也。若知天与人本无二致,则浑然合道,而不以人害天;虚心游世,以终其大苟知命之所系,即道之在。是知由人而即天也。若知天与人本无二致,则浑然合道,而不以人害天;虚心游世,以终其大年,生不忘道。故云善吾生者,乃所以善吾死。此其天人合德、死生不变、任造物之自然,此知之至也)。
Interpretation

When the spring runs dry, the fish are stranded together on land. They moisten one another with damp breath and wet one another with saliva. Rather than struggle to get by this way, it would be better for them to forget one another in the rivers and lakes, living freely.

The Laozi says, “When the Dao is lost, De appears; when De is lost, benevolence appears; when benevolence is lost, righteousness appears.” Here, the fish stranded away from water serve as a metaphor: only after people lose the Great Dao and De do they rely on benevolence and righteousness to support one another. Upholding benevolence and righteousness is like fish stranded on land, moistening one another. Better to forget these distinctions and roam freely in the realm of the Great Dao.

Rather than praise Yao and condemn Jie, it is better to forget both praise and blame and merge with the Dao. With neither praise nor reproach, one can leave behind distinctions between good and evil and become one with the Dao. This is true and profound understanding.

Heaven and Earth—here called “the Great Clod”—gave me my form, make me labor in life, grant me ease in old age, and give me rest after death. Therefore, one who knows how to treat life well also knows how to treat death well.

People live between Heaven and Earth. Toil or ease, life or death: all arise naturally and cannot be refused. This is destiny. Understand the principles that govern life, and one can grasp where the Dao resides. From there, one can comprehend the Way of Heaven. If one understands that Heaven and humanity are originally undivided, one can merge completely with the Dao, without letting human intentions harm what is natural. Living with an empty and tranquil mind, one passes through life without forgetting the Great Dao. To treat life well is also to treat death well. This expresses the highest understanding: Heaven, humanity, and the Dao are united; one faces life and death without a change of heart, following the natural transformations of creation.

此言世人不知大道,而以仁义为至,故以仁爱亲,以死事君。此虽善不善,故如泉涸,而鱼以湿沫相煦濡也。若能浑然悟其大道,则万物一体,善恶两忘,故如鱼之相忘于江湖。如此乃可谓知天、知人,天人合德,而能超乎生死之外。古在生在死,无不善之者也。
Interpretation

This passage says that people in the world do not understand the Great Dao, yet take benevolence and righteousness to be the highest standards. So they treat their families with compassion and devote their lives to serving their rulers. Though these actions come from good intentions, they have not yet reached the true state described by the Great Dao. It is like a spring drying up, leaving fish stranded on land, where they can only breathe moisture onto one another and wet each other with spittle.

If one can fully understand the Great Dao, one will see that all things are originally one and will no longer cling to distinctions between good and evil. This is like fish living freely in rivers and lakes, with no need to care for one another deliberately or depend on one another. Only upon reaching this state can one be said to know Heaven and humanity: one’s De accords with the Way of Heaven, and one transcends attachment to life and death. Whether living or dying, one remains at ease, finding nothing improper in either.

夫藏舟于壑,藏山于泽,谓之固矣!然而夜半有力者,负之而走,昧者不知也(藏天真于有形,如藏舟于壑;藏有形于天地,如藏山于泽。谓之固矣,此常人以此为定见也。然造化密移,虽天地亦为之变,而常人不觉;如有形于天地,如藏山于泽。谓之固矣,此常人以此为定见也。然造化密移,虽天地亦为之变,而常人不觉;如有力者负之而移,昧者不知也)。藏小大有宜,犹有所遁(形与天地,虽小大有宜,皆不免于变)。若夫藏天下于天下,而不得所遁,是恒物之大情也(若知此身与天地万物,皆与道为一,浑然大化而不分,是藏无形于无形。如此则无遁,则如藏天下于天下,而不得所遁矣。此天地万物之实际也,故曰恒物之大情)。特犯人之形而犹喜之。若人之形者,万化而未始有极也,其为乐可胜计耶(言大化造物,千变万化,而人特万物之一数耳。而人不知,特以得人身为喜。如此则万物皆有可喜者,其乐可胜计耶)?故,而人特万物之一数耳。而人不知,特以得人身为喜。如此则万物皆有可喜者,其乐可胜计耶)?故圣人将游于物之所不得遁而皆存。善夭善老,善始善终,人犹效之(言圣人心与道游,则超然生死,乃物所不得遁,如此则物物无非道之所在。故夭寿、始终,无所不善者,而人犹效之),又况万物之所系,而一化之所待乎(言大道之原,乃万物之根宗,故云所系。万物非此,而不能融贯而为一,故云一化之所待。此实天地万物之大宗。圣人之所宗而师之者,此也,可不悟乎)不能融贯而为一,故云一化之所待。此实天地万物之大宗。圣人之所宗而师之者,此也,可不悟乎)!
Interpretation

People think it is secure to hide a boat in a ravine and a mountain in a great lake. Yet in the middle of the night, someone strong enough might carry them away, and no one would know. Hiding the true nature of life within the body is like hiding a boat in a ravine; placing physical things within Heaven and Earth is like hiding a mountain in a great lake. People think such arrangements are firm and lasting, but the transformations of creation are constantly at work in secret. Even Heaven and Earth change along with them, though ordinary people do not notice—just as they fail to know when things have been quietly carried away.

Hiding things of different sizes in places suited to them cannot prevent change and loss. If all things under Heaven can be placed within Heaven, with nowhere to escape and no need to flee, then this is the enduring reality of all things. If we understand that we and all things under Heaven are one with the Dao, without distinction within the undivided transformation of the whole, it is like hiding what is formless within the formless: there is naturally no question of escape. This is the true condition of Heaven and Earth and all things.

When people happen to acquire human form, they are overjoyed. Yet the human form, too, changes along with all things, and change has no end. Since this is so, each thing has something in it to delight in. How could we ever count all the pleasures within them?

Thus the sage’s spirit wanders in a realm where nothing can escape and nothing fails to endure. The sage meets short life and long life, birth and death, with equanimity, and the world takes the sage as its model. How much more, then, does the Great Dao serve as the root on which all things depend and the basis through which their transformations flow together as one? The Great Dao is the foundation of Heaven, Earth, and all things, and the object the sage honors and follows.

此发明大道无形,而为天地万物之根本。人人禀此无形之大道而有生,是为真宰。若悟此大道,则看破天地万物,身心世界消融混合,而为一体。若悟彻此理,则称之曰大宗师,是所谓大而化之谓圣者也。至此则无己、无功、无名,逍遥于万物之上,超脱于生死之途。以世人概不知此大道之妙,而以小知小见之自是,不得逍遥,各执己是,互相是非,故丧其有生之主;而要求名利于世间,故德不充此大道之妙,而以小知小见之自是,不得逍遥,各执己是,互相是非,故丧其有生之主;而要求名利于世间,故德不充符。是则前五篇所发挥者,未曾说破。故此篇首乃立知天知人,有真知方为真人,直说到此,方指出一个大宗师,正是老庄立教之所宗者,如此而已。故此后重新单提起一道字来发挥,足见立言前后一贯。言虽蔓衍,而意有所宗,于此可见矣。 夫道(上文说了大宗师状貌,结了前义。言大宗师,宗,所崇者。大道,上云万物所保、一化所于此可见矣。
Interpretation

This commentary explains that the supreme “Great Dao” has no physical form, yet is the foundation of Heaven, Earth, and all things. Everyone receives life from this formless Dao, which is the true master of life. Those who comprehend the Dao see through Heaven, Earth, and all things, and become one with the world beyond them in both body and mind. A person who fully understands this principle is called a “Great Master” (one who takes the Dao as their foundation and teacher), a sage who has attained vastness and transformation.

At this level, one can forget the self, remain unattached to achievements and fame, roam freely beyond the myriad things, and transcend the constraints of life and death. Most people do not understand the mysteries of the Dao. With their narrow knowledge, they assume they are right, cling to their own views, and argue with one another. In doing so, they lose the root of life and chase worldly fame and profit, making it impossible for their De to accord with the Dao.

The commentator holds that the first five chapters offer some explanations but do not fully bring this point to light. This chapter therefore begins by discussing “knowing Heaven and knowing the human,” and says that those with genuine wisdom are true persons. It then introduces the “Great Master” to reveal the fundamental principle honored by Laozi and Zhuangzi in establishing their teachings. The chapter later turns to the word “Dao” on its own and develops it further, showing that the whole book is connected from beginning to end. Though the chapter’s language is expansive, its purpose has a clear foundation.

From the words “Now, the Dao…” onward, the commentary moves into a new discussion. The preceding passage has described the character of the Great Master; this section follows on from it and brings its meaning to a close. “Master” in “Great Master” means one who honors and takes refuge in something. The Great Dao is the foundation on which all things depend and from which their transformations arise.

夫道(上文说了大宗师状貌,结了前义。言大宗师,宗,所崇者。大道,上云万物所保、一化所待者何,乃大道也。故此下发挥大道之妙,以明万物所保、一化所待之义。立意皆从老子“天得一以清”等来),有情有信(此言大道之体用也。齐物云“可形己信”,有情无形,正指此也。此从老子“窈窈冥冥、其中有精、其精甚真、其中有信”。此言有情,谓虽虚而有实体,不失其用,曰信),无为无形(湛然常寂故无为,超乎名相故无形)﹔可传而不可受,可得而不可见(以心真、其中有信”。此言有情,谓虽虚而有实体,不失其用,曰信),无为无形(湛然常寂故无为,超乎名相故无形)﹔可传而不可受,可得而不可见(以心印心,故可传可受;妙契忘言,故无受无得)﹔自本自根(本自天然,原非假借),未有天地,自古以固存(天地以之建立,故先有固存)﹔神鬼神帝,生天生地(变化不测,为天地万物之主);在太极之先而不为高(伏羲画卦,始于太极;推之向上,更有事在。故不以为高),在六极之下而不为深(包天地,容六合,故不为深),先天地生而不为久(以固存,故不为久),长于上古而不为老(万化密移,而此道湛然,故不老)。豨韦氏(古帝王名)得之,以挈天地(参赞化育,整理世界);
Interpretation

The Dao’s essence is real in its nature and reliable in its evidence. “Having feeling” here does not mean human emotion. It means that although the Great Dao is profound, still, and empty, it is not wholly without substance: it has a true essence and function. “Having evidence” means that it is real and trustworthy. The Great Dao acts without contrivance and has no fixed form. It is silent and tranquil, beyond names and appearances.

The Great Dao can be passed on through a meeting of minds, but it cannot be handed over like a tangible object. It can be understood inwardly, but it cannot be seen with the eyes. It takes itself as its own basis and root; no other thing brought it into being. The Dao existed eternally before Heaven and Earth appeared. Spirits, ghosts, and the Heavenly Emperor reveal their wonders through it, and Heaven and Earth were transformed into being from it.

The Great Dao precedes Taiji (the Supreme Ultimate), yet is not lofty; it lies beneath the four directions of Heaven and Earth, yet is not deep. It came into being before Heaven and Earth, yet is not ancient; it existed before high antiquity, yet is not old. The Dao endures by nature and cannot be measured by time or space. After obtaining the Dao, Xīwéi Shì, an ancient ruler, could take part in the transforming and nurturing of Heaven and Earth and bring order to the realm.

伏羲(轩黄也)氏得之,以袭气母(袭,取也。气母,生物之本也。袭气母,即老子求食,以挈天地(参赞化育,整理世界);伏羲(轩黄也)氏得之,以袭气母(袭,取也。气母,生物之本也。袭气母,即老子求食于母)﹔维斗(北斗,天之枢也)得之,终古不忒(忒,差也。北斗,天枢,居所不动,故不差忒)﹔日月得之,终古不息(运行而不已,用行而不殆)﹔堪坏(昆仑之神人,而兽形)得之,以袭昆仑(此袭,犹承袭,言主持昆仑)﹔冯夷(河伯也)得之,以游大川﹔肩吾(山神也)得之,以处太山﹔黄帝(轩辕也)得之,以游云天(乘龙飞升上仙也)﹔颛顼(五帝之一)得之,以处玄宫﹔禺强(北海之神。《山海经》云“玄渚有神,人面鸟形,珥两青蛇,践两蛇,名曰禺强”)得之,立乎北极(北海之极);西王母(瑶池仙长也)得之,坐乎少广(王母所居之宫也)。莫知渚有神,人面鸟形,珥两青蛇,践两蛇,名曰禺强”)得之,立乎北极(北海之极);西王母(瑶池仙长也)得之,坐乎少广(王母所居之宫也)。莫知其始,莫知其终(此二句,总结上文。列圣神人主持天地日月星辰,皆恃大道,故莫知其始终。此直从老子“天得一以清”一章中,变化如许说话)。
Interpretation

Fuxi (a legendary ancient ruler) attained the Great Dao and thereby received the primordial Qi from which all things arise and transform. The Northern Dipper, the pivot of the celestial movements, attained the Great Dao, and so has moved without error since ancient times. The sun and moon attained the Great Dao, and so have continued on their courses without ceasing since ancient times.

Kanhuai, the spirit of the Kunlun Mountains, attained the Great Dao and thus presides over those mountains. Fengyi, the river god, attained the Great Dao and thus journeys along the great river. Jianwu, the mountain god, attained the Great Dao and thus dwells on Mount Tai. The Yellow Emperor, a legendary ruler, attained the Great Dao and thus roams the cloudy heavens. Zhuanxu, an ancient ruler, attained the Great Dao and thus dwells in the Dark Palace. Yuqiang, the god of the Northern Sea, attained the Great Dao and thus stands at the North Pole. The Queen Mother of the West, a legendary female immortal, attained the Great Dao and thus dwells in the Palace of Shaoguang.

No one knows when the Great Dao began, nor when it will end. All the gods and rulers mentioned above, as well as the sun, moon, and stars, rely on the Great Dao: each rests in its proper place and moves without ceasing. Thus no one can know the Great Dao’s beginning or end.

彭祖(姓钱,古长寿之人)得之,上及有虞,下及五伯(世传彭祖寿八百岁,故上自有虞,下及五伯)﹔傅说(商之贤相)得之,以相武丁,乘东维、骑箕尾而比于列星(傅说一星,在尾上。言其乘东维、骑箕尾之间也)。 此明大宗师者,所宗者,大道也。以大道乃天地、万物、神人之主。今人人禀此大道而有生,处此形骸之中,为生之主者,所谓天然之性。以形假而性真,故称之曰真宰。而人悟此大道大道也。以大道乃天地、万物、神人之主。今人人禀此大道而有生,处此形骸之中,为生之主者,所谓天然之性。以形假而性真,故称之曰真宰。而人悟此大道,彻见性真,则能外形骸,直于天地造化同流,混融而为一体。而为世间人物之同宗者,故曰大宗师者,此也。此大宗师,即逍遥游所称神人、圣人、至人。所言有情有信,即齐物之真宰,及养生篇生之主。若不悟此而涉人世,必有形骸之大患。颜子心斋,教其悟之之方。既悟性真,则形骸可外。故德充符前,一往皆敷演其古今迷悟之状,到此方分明说破。一路说来,方才吐露。所以云言有宗、事有君,正此意也。此上已发挥大道,明白了然,但未说进道工夫。故此下所以云言有宗、事有君,正此意也。此上已发挥大道,明白了然,但未说进道工夫。故此下乃说入道真实工夫。
Interpretation

Pengzu attained the Great Dao, and his life extended from the legendary age of Youyu to the Five Hegemons of the Spring and Autumn period. After Fu Yue attained the Great Dao, he assisted King Wuding of Shang. Later, he rode the Eastern Dipper and took his place between the stars Ji and Wei, becoming one of the stars in the heavens.

The “Great Master” refers to the fundamental Dao that people revere. The Dao is the common sovereign of Heaven and Earth, the myriad things, and spiritual beings and humans. All people receive the Dao and are born; what sustains life within the body is one’s inborn nature. The body is temporary, while nature is what is real, so it is called the “True Ruler”—the inner governor of life. When people comprehend the Dao and see their true nature clearly, they can transcend attachment to the body and become one with the transformations of Heaven and Earth. They then become the common foundation of all things in the world. This is why the Dao is called the “Great Master.”

The Great Master here is the spiritual being, sage, and perfected person described in “Free and Easy Wandering.” The phrase “has feeling and has evidence” corresponds to the “True Ruler” in “Discussion on Making All Things Equal” and the “master of life” in “The Essentials for Nurturing Life.” If people enter the world without comprehending the Dao, they cannot avoid the serious troubles that arise from having a body. Yan Hui’s “fasting of the mind” in “In the Human World” teaches people how to comprehend the Dao. Only after realizing their nature can they transcend attachment to the body.

Up to this point, the chapters preceding “The Seal of Virtue Complete” have presented various ways in which people across the ages lose or comprehend the Dao. Here, the principle is finally made explicit. The earlier statement, “Words have their source; affairs have their ruler,” means the same thing. The preceding text has already explained the Dao, but has not yet discussed how to cultivate entry into it. What follows therefore explains the genuine practice of entering the Dao.

南伯子葵问于女妫(此人名皆重言也。撰出个人来,设为问答,不必求其实也)曰:“子之年长矣,而色若孺子,何也(问其年老大而色若婴儿,借以发起必有所养,将以发启工夫也)?”曰:“吾闻道矣(此即要引人学道也)。”南伯子葵曰:“道可得学耶(此因闻说闻道,则惊诧其言,谓道岂可学之耶)?”曰:“恶!恶可(二字皆平声,惊叹之意。上恶字,叹其道难言;下恶字,叹其道不是容易可学,要是其人乃可)!子非(二字皆平声,惊叹之意。上恶字,叹其道难言;下恶字,叹其道不是容易可学,要是其人乃可)!子非其人也(言道非容易可学,况于非学道之人。何以见得)。夫卜梁倚有圣人之才(才谓天赋之根器,犹俗云天资也)而无圣人之道(言有美质而无进道志向),我有圣人之道而无圣人之才(言我有圣人之道,而无美质,故多费苦工夫)。吾欲以教之,庶几其果为圣人乎(言我欲教卜梁倚以大道,其亦可教,但无志向。论才亦庶几可成,第不知可能造就而为圣人乎)?不然,以圣人之道告圣人之才,亦易矣(言学道之人才德双美者,固是难得。有此全质,则学之亦易矣)。吾犹守而告之,三日而后能外天下(天下疏而德双美者,固是难得。有此全质,则学之亦易矣)。
Interpretation

Nanbo Zikui asked Nü Gui—both are fictional names; Zhuangzi often uses question-and-answer exchanges between characters to express his ideas, so there is no need to investigate whether they really existed: “You are already very old, yet your appearance is like that of an infant. Why?”

Nü Gui replied, “I have heard of the Dao (the fundamental principle and path of cultivation taught in Daoism).”

Nanbo Zikui asked, “Can the Dao be attained through study?”

Nü Gui said, “Alas, how could it be learned so easily? You are not suited to study the Dao. Buliang Yi had the innate capacity to become a sage, but no aspiration to seek the Dao. I possess the Way of the sage, but lack the innate capacity to become one—that is, my abilities are insufficient, so I have to work at it for a long time. I want to teach the Great Dao to Buliang Yi, in the hope that he may eventually become a sage. His abilities are probably enough to make this possible; I simply do not know whether he can truly accomplish it. If one teaches the Way of the sage to someone who has both the capacity to become a sage and the desire to seek the Dao, it is much easier. People who possess both capacity and aspiration are rare indeed. I continued to hold fast to the Dao and teach it to Buliang Yi. After three days, he was able to ‘place the world outside himself’—that is, to set worldly affairs outside his mind and no longer be burdened by them.”

吾犹守而告之,三日而后能外天下(天下疏而远,故三日而可外。此言教之一次也)﹔已外天下矣,吾又守之,七日而后能外物(物渐近于身,故七日而忘)﹔已外物矣,吾又守之,九日而后能外生(生则切于己者,故九日之功乃外)﹔已外生矣,而后能朝彻(朝,平旦也。彻,朗彻也。谓已外生,则忽然朗悟,如睡梦觉,故曰朝彻)﹔朝彻而后能见独(独,谓悟一真之性,不属形骸,故曰见独)﹔见独而后能无古今(谓悟一真之性,超乎天地,故不属古今)﹔无古今,而后能入于不死不生(谓了悟性真,超乎天地,量绝古今,则见本来不死不生)。杀生者不死(生者,有形之累也。既悟性入于不死不生(谓了悟性真,超乎天地,量绝古今,则见本来不死不生)。杀生者不死(生者,有形之累也。既悟性真,则形骸已外,物累全消,故曰杀生则一性独存,故曰不死),生生者不生(形化性全,则与道冥一,而能造化群生。而一真湛然,故曰生生者不生)。其为物也(物,指不死不生之道体也)无不将也(谓此道体千变万化,化化无穷,故无不将也。
Interpretation

I continue to hold to the Way as I teach him. After three days, he is able to set the world aside (the world is relatively distant from the self, so it can be forgotten in three days; this is the first step in his instruction). Once he can forget the world, I continue teaching him while holding to the Way. After seven days, he is able to set all things aside (all things are gradually drawing closer to the self, so it takes seven days to forget them). Once he can forget all things, I continue teaching him while holding to the Way. After nine days, he is able to set life and death aside (life is closest to the self, so it takes nine days of practice to forget it). Only after he can forget life and death does he reach “dawn clarity” (like the sky suddenly growing bright at dawn: a sudden illumination, as though waking from a dreamlike haze into full understanding).

Only after reaching “dawn clarity” can he “see the unique” (recognize the singular, true nature, which does not depend on the bodily form). Only after seeing this true nature can he transcend the distinction between past and present (because this nature transcends Heaven and Earth and is not bound by time). Only after transcending past and present can he enter the state of “neither death nor birth” (having awakened to the true nature and understood that it transcends Heaven and Earth, past and present, he recognizes that it was never subject to life and death).

What brings the forms of life to an end does not bring the true nature to an end (here, “life” means embodied existence and its constraints. Once one recognizes the true nature, the bodily form is no longer a burden, and constraints imposed by external things also fall away. Thus, when the body perishes, only the nature remains on its own; hence it is called “undying”). What enables all things to arise and flourish does not itself cause this nature to be born (when the body changes but the nature remains whole, one becomes one with the Dao and can take part in bringing all things into being. But the true nature is clear and unchanging, so the source of all things’ ceaseless arising is not the birth of the nature itself).

The Dao as the source of all things (the Dao that is “neither death nor birth”) can bring anything into being (it transforms in countless ways, nurturing without end).

将者,以也),无不迎也(在乎人者,日用头头,左右逢元,故曰无不迎也),无不毁也(谓此道体陶镕万化,挫锐解纷,故曰无不毁),无不成也(触处现成,不假安排)。其名为撄宁(撄者,尘劳杂乱困横,拂郁挠动其心,曰撄。言学道之人,全从逆顺境界中做出,只到一切境界不动其心,宁定湛然,故曰撄为撄宁(撄者,尘劳杂乱困横,拂郁挠动其心,曰撄。言学道之人,全从逆顺境界中做出,只到一切境界不动其心,宁定湛然,故曰撄宁)。撄宁也者,撄而后成者也(此释撄宁之意,谓从刻苦境界中做出,故曰撄而后成者也)。”
Interpretation

“Employ” means to make use of or rely on. There is nothing one cannot meet, because the Dao is present in the myriad things of everyday life and can be encountered everywhere. There is nothing one cannot dissolve, because the Dao can shape and transform all things, soften what is sharp, and resolve conflict. There is nothing one cannot bring to completion, because things take shape naturally wherever they are, without deliberate arrangement.

This state is called “stillness amid disturbance.” “Disturbance” refers to the turmoil, hardship, and adversity of the world, which unsettle the mind and spirit. Those who cultivate the Dao must temper themselves through favorable and adverse circumstances until no situation can shake their composure, and their minds remain clear and serene. This is what “stillness amid disturbance” means: such serenity is attained only after passing through turmoil and trial.

此前论大道,虽是可宗可师,犹漫言无要。此一节,方指出学道之方。意谓此道,虽是人人本有,既无生知之圣,必要学而后成。今要学者,须要根器全美,方堪授受。授受之际,又非草率,须要耳提面命,守而教之之方。又不可速成,须有渐次而入。故使渐渐开悟,其三日外天下,七日外物,九日外生死,而后见独、朝彻。此悟之之效也。既悟此道,则一切处,日用头头,触处现成,纵横无碍。虽在尘劳之中,其心泰定常宁,天君泰然,湛然不动。工夫到此,名曰撄宁。何谓撄宁?盖从杂乱境缘中虽在尘劳之中,其心泰定常宁,天君泰然,湛然不动。工夫到此,名曰撄宁。何谓撄宁?盖从杂乱境缘中做出,故曰撄而后成者也。观此老言虽蔓衍,其所造道工夫,皆从刻苦中做来,非苟然也。今人读其言者,岂可概以文字视之哉。 上言入道工夫,下言闻道,盖亦从文字中悟来。故以重言发之。
Interpretation

Earlier, when discussing the Great Dao, the text said that it is worthy of reverence and can serve as a model for practice, but this was still general and did not identify the essentials. This section now explains more specifically how to learn the Dao. Its point is that although everyone already possesses the Dao, no sage is born knowing it; it must still be attained through learning. Those who wish to learn must have good natural ability—the capacity to understand and practice—so they are suited to receive instruction. Teaching, too, must not be done carelessly: someone must repeatedly remind and personally guide the student, and teach methods of maintaining and practicing the Dao. Practice must not be rushed, but proceed step by step.

Thus practitioners should gradually awaken: after three days, they forget what lies beyond the self; after seven days, they forget external things; after nine days, they forget life and death. Then they reach “seeing the unique” (jian du, perceiving the Dao as singular and independent) and “dawn-clear” (chao che, a mind suddenly open and lucid). These are the effects of awakening. Once they have understood the Dao, wherever they are, they can naturally respond to everything they encounter in daily life. They move through all things without obstruction. Even amid the toil and bustle of the world, their hearts remain settled and peaceful, their spirits still and clear, unmoved by their surroundings. This level of cultivation is called “stillness amid disturbance” (ying ning). The term means that a person cultivates amid a chaotic environment and worldly affairs, passing through agitation before reaching peace; hence it is said, “disturbed, then fulfilled.”

This shows that although Zhuangzi’s words range widely and at length, the practice of the Dao he describes came from rigorous cultivation, not casual talk. How, then, can readers today treat his writings as mere literature?

The earlier passage discussed the practice of entering the Dao; the following passage discusses hearing the Dao. One can also gain insight into the Dao through written words, so here the teaching is developed through repetition.

南伯子葵曰:“子独恶乎闻之(此问闻道之原)?”曰:“闻诸副墨之子(副墨,文字也。言始从文中来),副墨之子闻诸洛诵之孙(洛诵,言包洛而诵习也。意谓诵习文字,久而自得也),洛诵之孙闻之瞻明(瞻明,言见有明处,乃因文字有悟处也),瞻明闻之聂许(聂许,谓从耳闻,声入心通,而心自许也),聂许闻之需役(需,待也。役,使也。言心虽有悟因文字有悟处也),瞻明闻之聂许(聂许,谓从耳闻,声入心通,而心自许也),聂许闻之需役(需,待也。役,使也。言心虽有悟,必待验之行事之间,一切处现前不昧,与道相应,然后造妙也),需役闻之于讴(于讴,涵泳吟咏之意),于讴闻之玄冥(由涵泳讴吟,而有冥会于心,乃造道之极也),玄冥闻之参寥(参寥者,空廓广大、虚无之境。谓道之实际也),参寥闻之疑始(言入于无始,乃归极于此学道之成也)。”
Interpretation

Nanbo Zikui asked, “Where did you hear these principles?”

The reply was: “I first encountered them in written texts. Through repeated recitation and reflection, I gradually saw the clear principles within them. Then I took what I had heard to heart and came to agree with it inwardly. Even after gaining some understanding, I still had to test it in practice, so that the principles would become clear in every situation and accord with the Dao. Only then could I advance toward their subtle depths.

“After that, I had to dwell on them and savor them again and again, letting my understanding sink in and blend within me. Then I entered a deep realm beyond words, and ultimately reached a vast, open expanse—the true abode of the Dao. There, one returns to the ‘beginning in doubt,’ tracing back to the beginning before beginnings. This is the ultimate attainment of studying the Dao.”

This passage describes a process that begins with reading and reciting texts, proceeds through understanding and practical testing, and culminates in deep reflection and entry into a far-reaching realm of stillness and emptiness.

此一节,言圣人得此大道,不无所闻。盖从文字语言中,有所发明,以至动用周旋、讴吟咳唾之间,以合于玄冥,参于寥廓,以极于无始,至不可知之地。必如此深造实证而后已,如此殆非口耳而可得也,是乃可称大宗师。前来发明大道可宗,悟此大道者可称宗师,但未见其极于无始,至不可知之地。必如此深造实证而后已,如此殆非口耳而可得也,是乃可称大宗师。前来发明大道可宗,悟此大道者可称宗师,但未见其果有其人否耶?恐世人不信,将谓虚谈。故向下撰出子祀等,乃实是得道之人,以作证据。
Interpretation

This section says that sages do not comprehend the Great Dao without any basis. They also gain insight from written words and spoken teachings. Then, in their everyday conduct and dealings with others—even while chanting, coughing, or spitting—they accord with a realm that is profound and mysterious, vast and boundless. They trace their way back to the beginning before beginnings and reach what cannot be fathomed. Only by experiencing this deeply and verifying it for themselves can they be said to have attained it. Clearly, it cannot be gained merely by listening to someone speak; that is why such a person is called a “Great Master,” one who has reached the highest realization of the Great Dao.

The preceding text explained why the Great Dao is worthy of reverence and said that those who realize it may be called masters. It did not yet establish whether anyone has truly attained the utmost. Concerned that people might not believe this and dismiss it as empty talk, the text now presents Zisi and others as examples of people who genuinely attained the Dao.

子祀、子舆、子犁、子来四人相语,曰:“孰能以无为首,以生为脊,以死为尻(尾也)﹔孰知死生存亡为一体者,吾与之友矣(意谓从无形而适有形,而人之此身,皆道之所化。故以无为首者,从无有生也;脊者,身也;尻者,尾也,谓生之终也。言谁能知此无生之生者,则可相与为友矣)!”四人相视而笑,莫逆于心,遂相与为友(言心同;脊者,身也;尻者,尾也,谓生之终也。言谁能知此无生之生者,则可相与为友矣)!”四人相视而笑,莫逆于心,遂相与为友(言心同道合,故为友也)。子舆有病,子祀往问之。曰:“伟哉,夫造物者以予为此拘拘也(此子舆自叹:造物有力,壮哉!能使我于大化之中,将以予为此拘拘之形也)。曲偻发背(此下子舆言其病状,谓形已佝偻残废,且又痈疮),上有五管(言形佝偻,则五脏之管向上也),颐隐于齐(言形曲,则两颐限隐于齐下也),肩高于顶(颐限则两肩耸高于顶),句赘指天(句赘,顶髻也。言颐隐而项缩,故髻指天也),阴阳之气有沴(沴,凌乱,言不和耸高于顶),句赘指天(句赘,顶髻也。言颐隐而项缩,故髻指天也),阴阳之气有沴(沴,凌乱,言不和也。
Interpretation

Zi Si, Zi Yu, Zi Li, and Zi Lai were talking together. “Who can take the formless as the head, life as the body, and death as the tail? Who can understand that death, life, being, and dissolution are all one from the beginning? We would like to be friends with such a person.” The four looked at one another and laughed, their thoughts in accord, and so they became friends.

Zi Yu fell ill, and Zi Si went to visit him. Zi Yu sighed, “The Creator is truly remarkable—to have turned me into this twisted shape!” He went on to describe his body after the illness: his back was bent, sores had grown on him, and his body was hunched so that the openings of his five organs all faced upward. His cheeks had sunk below his navel, his shoulders towered above his head, and his topknot pointed toward the sky. He added that the Qi of Yin and Yang had lost its harmony.

言虽从天化受形,以阴阳之气凌乱不和,故使我形骸如此之残废不堪也),其心闲而无事(言以形废,而心转无事。此足见其能以道自适,不以形为累也)。”跰跣而鉴于井(跰跣,扶曳也。谓恐自知不明,又鉴于井,则现身如影矣),曰:“嗟乎!夫造物者又将以予为此拘拘也(因鉴于井,自见其状,乃叹曰:夫造物者既拘拘为我此形矣,又复使我如此残废之恶状耶)。”子祀曰:“女恶之乎(子祀因见子舆之叹,乃问之曰:子恶此形耶)?”曰:“亡,予何恶(亡,绝也:“女恶之乎(子祀因见子舆之叹,乃问之曰:子恶此形耶)?”曰:“亡,予何恶(亡,绝也。子舆意谓,我心不但绝然无恶,而方与之俱化也)!浸假而化予之左臂以为鸡,予因以求时夜(浸假,造化也。言从无形造化之中,渐渐而适于有形,即化予之左臂以为鸡,予因之而求时夜。时夜,言鸡报晓也);浸假而化予之右臂以为弹,予因以求鸮炙(若化予之右臂为弹,予即因之而求鸮炙。言以弹击鸮,以充炙也)﹔浸假而化予之尻以为轮,以神为马,予因而乘之,岂更驾哉(此言有道之士,既视此身如痈疮,而不足观;且又视之如影,而不可执。是则不但无累,而且与之俱化。故又能借假修真,因此而求有实用。
Interpretation

Although my body was formed through the transformations of Heaven and Earth, it became so broken and misshapen because the Qi of Yin and Yang fell into disorder and failed to harmonize. Yet my mind is at ease and free, with nothing to trouble it.” This means that though his body is disabled, his mind is free of attachment. It shows that he can follow the natural course of things and find contentment in it, without treating his body as a burden.

Leaning on something as he hobbled along, Ziyu went to the well to look at his reflection and said, “Ah! The Maker has fashioned my body into this twisted shape. Will he make me even more disabled and unsightly?”

Zisi asked, “Do you hate this body?” Ziyu replied, “No. What is there for me to hate? My mind feels no aversion at all. On the contrary, it is moving along with these transformations. If the Maker gradually changes my left arm into a rooster, I’ll use it to announce the dawn. If he changes my right arm into a slingshot, I’ll use it to shoot an owl and roast it. If he changes my buttocks into wheels and my spirit into a horse, I’ll ride out on them. Why would I need another carriage?”

Here, “the Maker” means the force that brings all things into being and transforms them. “Announce the dawn” means to crow at daybreak, and “roasted owl” means an owl cooked over a fire. Ziyu believes that since the body can change along with the transformations, there is no need to cling to its original form. By following change, one can also find a use for it.

是则此身虽为异物,若果能化之,则形神俱妙。真人乘此以游人世,岂更驾哉)!且夫得者,时也﹔失者,顺也。安时而处顺,哀乐不能入也,此古之所谓县物,若果能化之,则形神俱妙。真人乘此以游人世,岂更驾哉)!且夫得者,时也﹔失者,顺也。安时而处顺,哀乐不能入也,此古之所谓县解也(言真人忘形适真,形神俱妙,不以得失干心,安时处顺,无往而不自得,故哀乐不能入。如此,是古之所谓悬解者也。言生累如倒悬,超乎死生,则倒悬解矣。故云悬解)。而不能自解者,物有以结之(人人本皆如此无累,超然悬解;而人不能解之者,乃自我以结之也)。且夫物不胜天久矣,吾又何恶焉(言人任造化而迁,故人不能胜天。既不能胜,则任之而已,又何恶焉)!”
Interpretation

So, even if the body is like an external object, as long as it truly follows change, both form and spirit can reach a subtle and wondrous state. The Perfected Person—one who has realized the Great Dao and follows nature—travels through the world by virtue of this. What need is there to ride anything else?

To gain something is due to the times; to lose it is to follow change. At ease with the course of events and in accord with change, one does not let grief or joy enter the heart. This is what the ancients called “release from suspension”—freedom from bonds like those of someone hanging upside down. Human existence is, by its nature, like being suspended upside down and made to suffer; to move beyond attachment to life and death is like being released from that torment. The Perfected Person forgets the body and follows what is true in their nature, so form and spirit are both free. They do not let gain or loss disturb the heart, and find contentment in every circumstance; thus grief and joy cannot trouble them.

People could, by nature, be free of these burdens and at ease beyond them. They cannot free themselves because external things and attachments have bound them. In any case, no thing can ultimately overcome the transformations of nature, so why resent them? We can only let the workings of creation carry us through change. Since we cannot overcome nature, we should follow it.

此一节,言真人真知,形本无形,今既适有形,则为生累。故真人视之如痈疮而不可爱,如影而不可执。如此则但任造化之所适,了无得失之心。故死生无变于己,所以安时处顺,哀乐不入。此所谓悬解者也。如此看来,人人本来天然解脱,但人自苦于形累,而安时处顺,哀乐不入。此所谓悬解者也。如此看来,人人本来天然解脱,但人自苦于形累,而卒莫能自解者,非天之过,乃人自结之耳。且夫天人之际,本来人不胜天,吾于此看破久矣;虽有此假形,吾有真用,又何恶焉。此其所以为真人,是可宗而师之者也。
Interpretation

This section describes the true understanding attained by the perfected person: the body is not something eternal or unchanging. Once it temporarily takes form, it becomes a burden on life. The perfected person therefore regards the body as if it were a boil and does not cling to it; they also regard it as if it were a shadow, impossible to grasp.

In this way, they let transformation take its course and no longer concern themselves with gain or loss. The changes of life and death cannot disturb their inner being. They can therefore follow the moment in peace, allowing neither sorrow nor joy to enter their heart. This is what is called “suspended liberation”: escaping bondage as if released from the plight of being hung upside down.

Seen this way, everyone could naturally be free; it is only because people are burdened by their own bodies that they ultimately cannot loosen their bonds. This is not Heaven’s fault: people have confined themselves. As for the relationship between Heaven and humanity, people cannot prevail over Heaven. I understood this long ago. Even though the form I possess is only temporary, I can still act through it in reality. Why, then, should I despise it? This is the state of the perfected person, worthy of reverence and emulation.

俄而子来有疾,喘喘焉死将(上言四人为友,而子舆之妙已知之矣。今又发子来二人之妙。喘,气喘急而将死也)。其妻子环而泣之。犁往而问之曰:“叱!避!无怛化(叱避,言呵斥其妻子,使避之也。怛,犹惊也。此言真人与造化游,非妇人小子所知,故叱使无惊之也)!”倚其户与之语曰:“伟哉造化!又将奚以汝为?将奚以汝适(言不知造化又将汝作何物化游,非妇人小子所知,故叱使无惊之也)!”倚其户与之语曰:“伟哉造化!又将奚以汝为?将奚以汝适(言不知造化又将汝作何物也)?以汝为鼠肝乎(鼠肝极细)?以汝为虫臂乎(虫臂不坚)?”子来曰:“父母于子,东西南北,唯命之从。阴阳于人,不翅(止也)于父母。彼近吾死而我不听,我则悍(违戾也)矣,彼(指造物)何罪焉(言造物亦非有心要死我也,故曰何罪)?夫大块(天地也)载我以形,劳我以生,佚我以老,息我以死。故善吾生者,乃所以善吾死也(言造化既全我一生,我任造化而游,是为善生。既任化而生,则不贪生,故谓善生。然死亦从化,是为善死,吾又何择焉)。夫大冶铸金,金踊跃曰:‘我且必为镆琊(神剑名)!’大冶必以为不祥之金谓善生。然死亦从化,是为善死,吾又何择焉)。夫大冶铸金,金踊跃曰:‘我且必为镆琊(神剑名)!’大冶必以为不祥之金。今一犯(偶然触之,曰一犯)人之形(言在万化之中,偶然触犯而为人之形),而曰:‘人耳人耳!’夫造物者必以为不祥之人(言万物不可胜数,而自独以人为善,是不知造化者,乃不祥之人也)。今一以天地为大炉,以造化为大冶,恶乎往而不可哉(言天地万物,俱在造化均陶之中,何物而非载道成形,何往而非道之所在,如此又何往而不可哉)!成然寐,蘧然觉(言死生梦觉,故死但如寐,生如觉,夜旦梦觉而已,又何必取舍欣厌哉)。”
Interpretation

Before long, Zilai fell ill. His breathing grew labored, and he seemed close to death. His wife and children gathered around him, weeping. Li went over and called out, “Hey, stand back! Don’t disturb his transformation!” Leaning against the doorway, Li said to Zilai, “How great is the transforming power! What will it turn you into, and where will it send you? Will it make you a rat’s liver, or an insect’s arm?”

Zilai said, “Parents raise their children, and children obey their commands, whether they are sent east or west, north or south. Yin and Yang—the forces of life and death and transformation—have a greater hold over us than our parents do. They are bringing me close to death. If I refused to obey, I would be defying them. What fault lies with the transforming power?

“The earth gave me my form, made me work through life, gave me ease in old age, and will give me rest in death. So to treat my life well is to treat my death well. When a great founder, a master metalworker, casts metal, if the metal leaps up and declares, ‘I insist on being made into Moye, the legendary sword!’ the founder would surely consider that metal ill-omened. Now, by chance, I have passed through the transformations of all things and received a human form. If I were to say, ‘I want to be human and nothing else,’ the transforming power would surely consider me ill-omened.

“Now, if Heaven and Earth are a great furnace, and the transforming power is the great founder, where could I go that would not be all right?” After speaking, he slept peacefully, then suddenly awoke. Life and death are like falling asleep and waking: simply different stages of transformation. Why, then, cling to choosing one over the other, or to liking one and disliking the other?

此一节,言真人所得,殊非妇人小子之所知,故子犁叱避,以形容其必有真知,然后为真人。必若子来之顺化而游,死生无变,无生人所得,殊非妇人小子之所知,故子犁叱避,以形容其必有真知,然后为真人。必若子来之顺化而游,死生无变,无生可恋,无死可拒。要学人必造到如此超然独得之妙,纯一无疵,方为学问能事之究竟处。是可称为大宗师矣。 上言真人能顺死生,不知从何致此?故下以子桑户三人发明,乃方外了道之人所能。此假学问,非方内曲士所知。
Interpretation

The state realized by a True Person is beyond the understanding of ordinary people. This is why Zili rebukes them and turns away: only someone who truly possesses wisdom can be called a True Person. Like Zilai, such a person follows change and moves freely, remaining unmoved by life and death: neither clinging to life nor resisting death. Those who study the Dao must reach this detached, self-reliant, and utterly unblemished state. Only then has their learning and cultivation reached its highest point, and only then can they be called a “Great Master” (a master of the Great Dao).

The passage above says that a True Person can follow the course of life and death, but does not explain how this state is reached. The story of Zisang Hu and his two companions that follows makes clear that only those who transcend worldly conventions and realize the Dao can do so. The “learning” referred to here is the study of cultivating and realizing the Dao. It is beyond the grasp of ordinary scholars bound by worldly assumptions.

子桑户、孟子反、子琴张三人相与友,曰:“孰能相与于无相与(无相与,言大道无形之乡),相为无相为(言大道寂莫,无为之境),孰能登天游雾,挠挑无极(言超然世外,游于万物之表),相忘以生(虽生而不见其有生),(言大道寂莫,无为之境),孰能登天游雾,挠挑无极(言超然世外,游于万物之表),相忘以生(虽生而不见其有生),无所终穷(言心与道游于无始无终,即此便见真人游世之若此)?”三人相视而笑,莫逆于心(言道合心同,忘形相与),遂相与友(唯真人乃知真人,故三人为友)。莫然有间(居顷之间),而子桑户死,未葬。孔子闻之,使子贡往待事焉(夫子使子贡往吊,以待葬事,将尽礼也)。或编曲,或鼓琴,相和而歌曰:“嗟来桑户乎!嗟来桑户乎!而(汝也)已反其真,而我犹为人猗(猗者,叹辞也。言汝幸已返其真,而我尚且为人,可叹也)!”子贡趋而进曰:“敢问临尸而歌,礼乎(子贡执礼,言临尸当哭,不当歌也)?”二人相视而笑曰:“是(指子贡)恶知礼意(言礼之意,重在返本。谓子贡不知此也)!”子贡反,以)?”二人相视而笑曰:“是(指子贡)恶知礼意(言礼之意,重在返本。谓子贡不知此也)!”子贡反,以告孔子曰:“彼何人者耶?
Interpretation

Zisang Hu, Meng Zifan, and Ziqin Zhang were friends. They talked together, saying, “Who can live among all things without clinging to the forms of their relationships? Who can follow the Great Dao and act without striving? Who can rise into the heavens and wander among the clouds and mists, roaming freely beyond the bounds of the infinite? Who can forget, while still alive, that they are living, and remain untouched by the limits of beginning and end?” They believed that such a person’s mind and spirit wandered with the Dao, as if there were neither beginning nor end. The three looked at one another and laughed, their thoughts in accord, and so they became friends.

Some time later, Zisang Hu died, before he had been buried. When Confucius heard of it, he sent Zigong to offer condolences and help arrange the funeral. Meng Zifan and Ziqin Zhang, however, had one compose a tune and the other play the qin. Singing in response to one another, they said, “Ah, Sang Hu! You have returned to your true nature, while we remain in the human world as ordinary people. How moving this is!”

Zigong hurried forward and asked, “Is it proper to sing beside the body?” The two looked at each other and laughed. “How could you understand the true meaning of ritual?” they said. They believed that ritual’s foundation lay in returning to one’s true nature, a depth that Zigong did not understand. When Zigong returned, he told Confucius what had happened and asked, “What sort of people are they?”

修行无有(言不捡于礼,不能饰行,故曰修行无有),而外其形骸(不以死生为事),临尸而歌,颜色不变(全无哀戚之容),无以命之(命,名也,不知唤他作何等人物)。彼何人者耶(言毕竟是何等人耶)?”孔子曰:“彼游方之外者也(言彼超脱凡情,游于世外者也),而丘,游方之内者也(言未能超脱世网,故云游方内)。外内不相及(言彼方外之人,以世俗之礼加之,则非所宜。言不当吊也),而丘使女往吊之,丘则陋矣(言我本不当使女往吊,此诚我之鄙陋见也)!彼方且与造物者为人(相者,犹助也。言造物本无形,彼以为人之形,乃助造物之生意耳),而游乎天地之一气(言彼虽处人世,其人(相者,犹助也。言造物本无形,彼以为人之形,乃助造物之生意耳),而游乎天地之一气(言彼虽处人世,其实心游乎未有天地已前,与大道混茫而为一也)。彼以生为附赘悬疣(赘疣,乃山中之人项上之瘿瘤,以喻形乃道之赘疣余物也),以死为决疣溃痈(彼视身如赘疣、为痈疽,以为生之大患。今幸而死,则如疣痈之决溃,方为大快活事,又何以死为哀耶)。夫若然者,又恶知死生先后之所在(言彼以生为大患,以脱形骸为轻举,返乎不生不死之乡,又何知有死生先后之所在耶)!
Interpretation

He cultivates himself but pays no heed to worldly rites and rules, and makes no effort to polish his words or conduct. This is called “cultivating without a fixed way.” He holds his body lightly and does not take life and death seriously. Even when facing a corpse, he sang, his expression unchanged and without the least sign of sorrow. It is hard to know what to call such a person. Who, then, is he?

Confucius said, “He is one who roams beyond worldly rites and rules, while I, Confucius, remain within them. Those within and those beyond the world cannot readily understand one another, so I should not have sent you to offer condolences according to worldly ceremony. My judgment was shallow indeed! He is living in mutual aid with the Creator, roaming amid the original Qi of Heaven and Earth. Though he lives among people, his mind seems joined to the undifferentiated Dao that existed before Heaven and Earth were born. He regards life as an extra growth on his body, and death as an abscess bursting and the growth falling away. How could someone like this care which comes first, life or death?”

假于异物(以性真而借四大以成形,如假托异物,元非己有也),托于同体(言心与道游,故云托于同体)﹔忘其肝胆借四大以成形,如假托异物,元非己有也),托于同体(言心与道游,故云托于同体)﹔忘其肝胆(言以生为寄,故不见有形骸,故曰忘其肝胆),遗其耳目(言虽游人世,如不闻见,故云遗其耳目)﹔返复终始,不知端倪(言真人游于大化之中,返复往来,无所穷极,又安知以生为始、以死为终乎)﹔芒然彷徨乎尘垢之外,逍遥乎无为之业。又乌能愦愦然为世俗之礼,以观(示也)众人之耳目哉(言真人处世如寄,以形骸为大患,故忘形释智,超然物表,遨游于尘垢之外,逍遥于无为寂寞之乡。又何能愦愦然以世俗之礼,以示众之耳目哉!借重孔子此言,乃明方内夫子,亦未尝不知有方外之学也)!” 此一节,言方外真人之学,逍遥物外,自得之妙,非世俗耳目之所之礼,以示众之耳目哉!借重孔子此言,乃明方内夫子,亦未尝不知有方外之学也)!” 此一节,言方外真人之学,逍遥物外,自得之妙,非世俗耳目之所及。故托孔子、子贡发挥,将以破迂儒执礼法之曲见,以解愦愦之执情,亦将使其自得超然之境。斯正此老着书之本意也。
Interpretation

Formed through various external things, one entrusts oneself to the whole that accords with the Dao. “Formed through external things” means that a person’s true nature takes shape with the help of the “Four Greats,” the basic substances that make up the human body, as though temporarily borrowing external things that never truly belonged to oneself. “Entrusting oneself to the same whole” means that the mind and spirit connect with the Great Dao, as if dwelling within one shared whole.

To forget the liver and gallbladder is to regard life as a temporary sojourn and thus stop clinging to the body. To forget the ears and eyes is to live in the human world without being led astray by what one hears and sees. Life and death turn and change without end. How, then, can one claim that birth is a beginning and death an ending?

The True Person—one who has realized the Dao—wanders freely beyond the dusty world, at ease in the realm of Wuwei (non-action). Why would such a person busily cling to worldly rites and display them for all to see? Here, the text draws on Confucius’s words to show that Confucius, though living amid the everyday world, was not unaware of cultivation that transcends it. The True Person regards life in the world as a temporary stay and the body as a burden. Thus they forget the body, set aside clever contrivances, rise above worldly concerns, wander beyond the common world, and rest peacefully in the still realm of Wuwei.

This section describes the learning of the True Person, who transcends worldly concerns: wandering beyond the myriad things and experiencing a state of freedom and contentment that lies beyond the understanding of ordinary people. The author develops this idea through the words of Confucius and Zigong, aiming to break down the narrow view that clings to ritual rules, loosen attachment to worldly proprieties, and guide people toward a state of transcendence and contentment. This is the very purpose of the Zhuangzi.

子贡曰:“然则夫子何方之依(子贡因闻夫子说方外真人之道如此,故问夫子自处何方之依)?”孔子曰:“丘,天之戮民也(此夫子自谦,言己未免生累。盖悬之未解,乃天之戮民。言未能忘桎梏也)。虽然,吾与女共之(夫子言,虽然我未超脱,与女均之,今且与女共游于方外)。”子贡曰:“敢问其方(问远举超脱之方)?”孔子曰:“鱼相造乎水,人相造乎道(人之以道为命,如鱼之以水为命)。相造乎水者,穿池而养给(言养鱼尚劳功用);相造乎道者,无事而生定(言人造乎道甚易,放下水者,穿池而养给(言养鱼尚劳功用);相造乎道者,无事而生定(言人造乎道甚易,放下便是。故云无事
Interpretation

Zigong asked, “Then what state of being do you rely on, Master?”

Confucius said, “I am merely one constrained by Heaven, still entangled in life and death and worldly affairs, not yet free of my bonds. Even so, I would like to join you in experiencing and wandering through a realm beyond the mundane.”

Zigong asked again, “May I ask how one reaches such a realm?”

Confucius said, “Fish take water as their home, and people take the Dao as their home. Fish live by water; people live by the Dao. To sustain fish, people must dig ponds and provide food. But when people return to the Dao, they can refrain from imposing needless action, and their hearts settle naturally.”

而

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →