中文 · EN

《庄子内篇注》Vol. 4

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書 Vol. 4 / 4 11,029 characters

About this page. The original text of 《庄子内篇注》 Vol. 4 (Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書, 4 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 24 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《庄子内篇注》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

生定)。故曰:鱼相忘乎江湖,人相忘乎道术(穿池而养鱼,尚难忘,不若放之江湖,则自然忘矣。如人能造乎大道,浩然大均,则无不忘矣)。”子贡曰:“敢问畸人(子贡意谓方外之人,乃独行之君子,故问畸人。畸,独也。谓不知独行之人,比方外何如)?”“畸人者,畸于人而侔于天。故曰:天之小人,人之君子﹔人之君子,天之小人也(孔子言彼方外者,亦畸人也。但彼畸于人,而侔合乎天。若世之独行君子,矜矜自持,不能逍遥自在者。是乃之小人也(孔子言彼方外者,亦畸人也。但彼畸于人,而侔合乎天。若世之独行君子,矜矜自持,不能逍遥自在者。是乃天之小人,则为人中之君子;人中之君子,则为天之小人,第未能与天为一耳)。” 此一节,言孔子方内之圣人,亦能引进于方外之学。意谓世之拘拘者,亦可与造乎大道。故以子贡之才智,尚去道远甚,况其它乎。 下明方外之道,方内亦有能行者,第俗人不识耳。故借颜子发明,孔子以开其迷意。若颜子之好学,诚可以深造而自得也。
Interpretation

(When the mind and spirit are settled.) Hence it is said, “Fish forget one another in rivers and lakes; people forget one another within Daoist arts.” (Even when fish are kept in a pond, it is hard for them and their keeper to forget one another. Better to return the fish to rivers and lakes, where they can live freely and naturally. When people enter the Great Dao and reach a vast, equal state, they too have nothing to cling to and no longer remain bound by thoughts of one another.)

Zigong asked, “May I ask what a ‘unique person’ is—that is, someone unconstrained by worldly conventions?” Confucius replied, “A unique person appears different in the eyes of the world, yet accords with the Way of Heaven. Hence it is said: ‘Those who are petty from the perspective of the Way of Heaven may be called exemplary people in the human world; those called exemplary people in the human world may, from the perspective of the Way of Heaven, be petty instead.’” (Confucius says that those who live beyond worldly conventions are also unique people. Though they differ from the world, they accord with the Way of Heaven. Some exemplary people who stand apart from the crowd in this world are cautious and self-restrained, but cannot roam freely. From the perspective of the Way of Heaven, they are still petty, though people regard them as exemplary. Those whom the world calls exemplary may not be one with the Way of Heaven.)

This section says that Confucius, a sage living within the secular world, could still guide people toward learning beyond worldly conventions. In other words, even those bound by worldly concerns can enter the Great Dao. A talented and intelligent person like Zigong was still far from attaining the Dao, let alone anyone else.

Next, the text will explain how the Way beyond worldly conventions can also be practiced in everyday life, though ordinary people do not understand this. The author therefore uses Yan Hui, a disciple of Confucius, to illustrate the point, with Confucius resolving the crowd’s confusion. Yan Hui was indeed eager to learn: he could deeply experience the Great Dao and gain insight into it.

颜回问仲尼曰:“孟孙才,其母死,哭泣无涕(无心于哭),中心不戚(全无哀意),居丧不哀。无是三者,以善丧盖鲁国(以善居丧之名,以盖鲁国),固有无其实而得其名者乎(名不副实)?回壹怪之(壹,谓一,常怪之)。”仲尼曰:“夫孟孙氏尽之(言能极尽丧礼也),进于知矣(言世人但知世俗之礼,而不知天壹,谓一,常怪之)。”仲尼曰:“夫孟孙氏尽之(言能极尽丧礼也),进于知矣(言世人但知世俗之礼,而不知天。今孟孙氏乃尽于知天,故人之返本,乃礼之实也),唯简之而不得,夫已有所简矣(言孟孙知其本无生死,又何假以哀为礼哉。但世人常情,必以哀为礼,故欲简之;而不得,故人哭亦哭,乃不得已而从俗之情耳。今哀而不戚,则已有所简矣)。孟孙氏不知所以生,不知所以死(言孟孙子悟不生不死之道)。不知就先,不知就后(言以了悟不生不死,故虽生而如不有生,故云不就先;虽死而知本不死,故不就后,坦然大化之不死之道)。不知就先,不知就后(言以了悟不生不死,故虽生而如不有生,故云不就先;虽死而知本不死,故不就后,坦然大化之中)。
Interpretation

Yan Hui asked Confucius, “When Mengsun Cai’s mother died, he wept but shed no tears; in his heart he felt no grief, and while observing the mourning period he showed no sorrow. Though he displayed none of these three signs, he became renowned for his skill in mourning, and his reputation even surpassed that of the state of Lu. Can someone in this world really have a great reputation without deserving it? I have always found this puzzling.”

Confucius said, “Mengsun Cai has brought the way of mourning to its utmost. His understanding has gone further than that of ordinary people. People in the world know only conventional rites, not the Way of Heaven. Mengsun Cai, by contrast, has grasped the Way of Heaven and knows that returning to one’s true nature is the essence of ritual. He wished to reduce the rites to their simplest form, but could not wholly disregard worldly customs, so he has simplified them as much as he can.”

Confucius continued, “Mengsun Cai does not know where life comes from, nor is he attached to where death leads. He does not regard life as a beginning or death as an end. He understands that life and death are not absolute opposites: while alive, he does not cling to the thought ‘I am being born’; when dying, he also understands that life itself is not confined by death. Thus he calmly follows the transformations of nature and experiences within them the principle of neither birth nor death.”

若化为物(言孟孙自视其形,在大化之中,若忽焉化为一物耳),以待其所不知之化已乎(言不知其所以生,故今虽处形骸,但待其所不知之大化,听其尽之而已,岂有情识哉)。且方将化,恶知不化哉(言方将化,恶知有不化者有焉)?方将不化,恶知已化哉(言世人但知固守其形,将谓不化。彼恶知造化密移,而念念已化哉)?吾特与汝,其梦未始觉者邪(言化而不化,乃死生一贯,唯大觉方知。且吾与汝,移,而念念已化哉)?吾特与汝,其梦未始觉者邪(言化而不化,乃死生一贯,唯大觉方知。且吾与汝,皆在梦中而未觉者也)!且彼有骇形而无损心(到此方言,孟孙之母虽死,而不死者存,但形死耳。故曰有骇形,如豚子之视死母而走也。若其天真之性,湛然不迁,所谓死而不亡,故曰无损心),有旦宅而无情死(言其生如旦,其形如宅。谓假形虽化,而真宰长存。故曰有旦宅,而无情死。情,实也)。孟孙氏特觉(死而不死之理,孟孙特悟于此),人哭亦哭,是自其所以乃(孟孙已知其母不死,但以世情不得不哭,故其所以乃如此哭而不哀切也)。
Interpretation

If people regard themselves as one thing among the myriad things undergoing change, and let themselves experience that unknowable transformation, that is enough. We do not know why we were born. Now that we have a physical form, we can only await the great change that cannot be foreseen and let it run its course. Why cling to all manner of feelings and understandings?

When a person is about to change, how can we know that something unchanging will remain afterward? And when someone seems not to have changed, how can we know that they have not already changed? People know only how to hold fast to the form before their eyes, believing that this is what it means to remain unchanged. How can they know that creation is shifting unseen, and that every moment brings change? Perhaps you and I are both still dreaming, and have not truly awakened. The transformations of life and death are joined as one; only those who have awakened fully can understand this.

Though the physical form vanishes in terror, the mind is not harmed. When Mengsun’s mother died, only her physical form passed away; her innate nature remained peacefully intact. This is what is meant by “dying without perishing.” Life is like the morning, and the body like a temporary dwelling. Though the borrowed form changes, the root that truly governs life endures. Thus the body undergoes change, but true life does not truly die.

Mengsun had simply grasped this truth in a special way. Seeing others weep, he wept along with them, following the feelings and customs of ordinary people. Yet he felt no grief or sorrow as they did. Since he understood that death does not mean life has vanished completely, he regarded his dead mother as he would have regarded her had she not died.

且也相与吾之耳矣(言既知死而不死,则视已死之孟母,即未死之孟孙。故相较之知其母不死,但以世情不得不哭,故其所以乃如此哭而不哀切也)。且也相与吾之耳矣(言既知死而不死,则视已死之孟母,即未死之孟孙。故相较之,乃吾之耳相与,谓一体而视也),庸讵知吾所谓吾之乎(言死生一条之理,若吾之之言此,岂常人所能知之乎?下以梦喻吾之之意)?且汝梦为鸟而厉乎天(厉,犹戾也),梦为鱼而没于渊(言吾之之意,女未及信。我且问女:且女梦为鸟,则飞戾于天,梦为鱼,则没于渊。然梦中之鱼鸟,即不梦之颜回。是乃吾之之意也我且问女:且女梦为鸟,则飞戾于天,梦为鱼,则没于渊。然梦中之鱼鸟,即不梦之颜回。是乃吾之之意也)。不识今之言者,其觉者乎?其梦者乎(言女方今对我言者,乃不梦之颜回耶,乃梦中之鱼鸟耶?若言是颜回,则女已化为鱼鸟矣;若言是鱼鸟,不妨现是不化之颜回。女试自看死生一条之理,固如是乎?此数语极奇,最难理会)?造适不及笑(适者,称意之极,则笑亦不及),献笑不及排(如人诙谐献笑,至发笑处,则女排不及。言死生一贯之理,必须顿悟,乃自知之,非言可则笑亦不及),献笑不及排(如人诙谐献笑,至发笑处,则女排不及。言死生一贯之理,必须顿悟,乃自知之,非言可及也),安排而化去,乃入于寥天一(寥天一,乃大道寥廓冥一之天。此由初心造道功夫,故如安排;
Interpretation

Moreover, if we understand that death does not mean truly vanishing, then we should regard Meng’s mother, who has already died, as we regard Meng Sun, who is still alive. Compared in this way, they are simply one and the same “I”—we see them as a single whole. But who could understand this “I” I speak of in the ordinary sense? Let me explain it with a dream.

You dream that you have become a bird and soar into the sky; you dream that you have become a fish and dive into the abyss. Perhaps you still do not believe what I have said. Then let me ask you: what is the relation between the bird and fish in your dream and Yan Hui when he is awake? This is what I mean by “I.”

As you speak now, are you the waking Yan Hui, or the bird and fish in a dream? If you say you are Yan Hui, then you have already transformed into a bird or fish. If you say you are the bird or fish, that does not prevent you from still being the unchanged Yan Hui at this moment. Try to apprehend for yourself whether the truth that life and death are one is just as I have described. These words are wondrous, and difficult to grasp.

When the mind’s intention first reaches its utmost fulfillment, there is not even time to laugh. By the time laughter appears, that instant of understanding has already passed. The truth that life and death run through one another must be grasped in a sudden flash; words can never catch up with it. Follow the transformations arranged by nature, and you can enter a vast, profound realm in which you become one with the Dao. The “arrangement” spoken of here refers to the perspective of a beginner working at cultivating the Dao.

及夫纯一,到大化之境,自然顿悟,不假作为,而自证入也)。” 此一节,言方外之学,方内亦有能之者,第在世俗之中,常情所不识,必有真人,乃能知之。故借重颜子与圣人开觉之。此段最是惺悟世人真切处。 上言了无生死,乃造道之极,要在顿悟。下言世人必欲学道,须将仁义、恭矜、智能、夙习之事,一切屏绝,乃可入道。
Interpretation

When one reaches a state of utter purity, free of all admixture, and enters the depths of the natural transformations of all things, sudden understanding arises of itself. Without deliberate effort, one can personally realize and enter the Great Dao.

This section discusses learning that transcends the ordinary world, though some people within it can also grasp it. Such a state is beyond the understanding of ordinary people; only a True Person can know it. The story of Yan Hui and the sage is therefore used to enlighten readers. These words strike especially close to the heart of the matter and can truly awaken people.

Earlier, the text said that fully transcending life and death is the highest state of the Great Dao, and that the key is sudden awakening. It now says that anyone in the world who wishes to learn the Dao must set aside benevolence and righteousness, reverent self-discipline, cleverness and talent, and the habits accumulated over time. Only then can one enter the Great Dao.

Yi’erzi went to see Xu You. Xu You asked, “What did Yao teach you?” Yi’erzi replied, “Anyone in the world who wishes to learn the Dao must set aside benevolence and righteousness, reverent self-discipline, cleverness and talent, and the habits accumulated over time. Only then can one enter the Great Dao.”

意而子见许由,许由曰:“尧何以资汝(何以教汝)?”意而子曰“世人必欲学道,须将仁义、恭矜、智能、夙习之事,一切屏绝,乃可入道。 意而子见许由,许由曰:“尧何以资汝(何以教汝)?”意而子曰“尧谓我:汝必躬服(行也)仁义而明言是非。”许由曰:“而奚来为轵(奚,何。轵,助语辞。言又何为来耶?意谓女已被尧教坏了也)?夫尧既黥(拔其须,则毁其面貌)汝以仁义(言以仁义伪行坏了本来面目),而劓(割其鼻也)汝以是非矣。汝将何以游夫遥荡(逍遥之境)恣睢(纵横也)转徙(变化)之涂乎(言汝已被尧以仁义是非,坏了汝本来面目,而拘于仁义是非之场;又何能(逍遥之境)恣睢(纵横也)转徙(变化)之涂乎(言汝已被尧以仁义是非,坏了汝本来面目,而拘于仁义是非之场;又何能游于逍遥大道之乡乎)?”意而子曰:“虽然,吾愿游其蕃(言虽不能入大道之奥,亦愿游其蕃篱)。”许由曰:“不然。夫盲者无以与乎眉目颜色之好,瞽者无以与乎青黄黼黻之观(言汝心既盲瞽,难以与大道也)。”意而子曰:“夫无庄(古之美貌者)之失其美,据梁(古之有力者)之失其力,黄帝之忘其知(言至人之善救,能使人人失其平昔之所自有),皆在炉锤之间耳(言上三人顿失其固忘其知(言至人之善救,能使人人失其平昔之所自有),皆在炉锤之间耳(言上三人顿失其固有,是在夫子之陶铸之中耳)。
Interpretation

Yi’erzi went to see Xuyou. Xuyou asked, “What did Yao teach you?” Yi’erzi replied, “Yao told me that I must practice benevolence and righteousness myself, and clearly distinguish right from wrong.”

Xuyou said, “What have you come here for, then? Yao has branded you with benevolence and righteousness, destroying your original nature; he has also cut your nose with his judgments of right and wrong. How can you now roam freely along the path of untrammeled transformation? Bound by benevolence and righteousness, and by right and wrong, how can you enter the Great Way of freedom?”

Yi’erzi said, “Even so, I would still like to linger at the edge of the Great Way.”

Xuyou said, “That will not do. A blind person cannot appreciate the beauty of a face and its features; someone whose eyes are sightless cannot see garments embroidered with patterns in alternating blue and yellow. Your mind has been obscured, so it will be hard for you to understand the Great Way.”

Yi’erzi said, “Wuzhuang lost his beauty, Juliang lost his strength, and the Yellow Emperor forgot his own intelligence. These things happened amid the furnace and hammer. The furnace and hammer are metaphors for the transforming power of creation. What those three originally possessed was suddenly lost through the shaping work of the Master.”

庸讵知夫造物者之不息我黥而补我劓,使我乘成以随先生耶(言我今日幸得见先生,岂非造物者补我之缺失,乘其浑全之大道,以随先生耶)?”许由曰:“噫!未可知也(言汝虽有志,未知何如也)。我为汝言其大略(不敢尽其底蕴,试为汝言其大略):吾师乎!吾师乎(吾师乃大宗师也,非尧可比)!齑万物而不为义,泽及万世而不为仁(言尧谆谆以仁义为仁义,以爱养万物以为功。吾大宗师则齑粉万乃大宗师也,非尧可比)!齑万物而不为义,泽及万世而不为仁(言尧谆谆以仁义为仁义,以爱养万物以为功。吾大宗师则齑粉万物而不以为义,纵泽及万世而不以为仁。以大仁不仁,大义不义,即老子‘生而不有、为而不恃、长而不宰’之意),长于上古而不为老(言未有天地,先有此道),覆载天地、刻雕众形而不为巧(言大道生天生地、化育万物而无心,故不有其巧)。此所游已(言整物已下,乃吾师之所游者,如此而已)!” 此一节,言欲学大道,必须屏绝有心要为仁义、恭矜、智能之事,方可超玄入妙,而逍遥乎大道之乡。盖仁义、智能,乃功名之资,世俗之所尚,实为大道之障碍故耳。
Interpretation

“How do I know the Creator will not erase the tattoo on my face and restore my severed nose, making me whole again so that I can follow you, Master?”

Xu You said, “Ah, that remains to be seen. Though you have this aspiration, no one knows what the outcome will be. I can tell you only the general principle; I cannot explain all its mysteries. My Master, oh, my Master! He is the root of all things, and even Yao cannot compare with him. He brings forth and transforms all things, yet does not regard this as practicing benevolence and righteousness. His grace extends through all ages, yet he does not claim the title of benevolent. He existed before high antiquity, yet does not seem aged for it. He covers and supports Heaven and Earth and gives form to the myriad things, yet does not boast of his skill. This is the realm in which I roam.”

The passage says that to learn the Great Dao, one must set aside the impulse to display benevolence and righteousness, deference, self-importance, and cleverness. Only then can one enter the deep and mysterious realm and roam freely within the Dao. Benevolence, righteousness, and intellectual cleverness are often used in the mundane world to gain a reputation, and may therefore become obstacles to experiencing the Dao.

颜回曰:“回益矣。”仲要为仁义、恭矜、智能之事,方可超玄入妙,而逍遥乎大道之乡。盖仁义、智能,乃功名之资,世俗之所尚,实为大道之障碍故耳。 颜回曰:“回益矣。”仲尼曰:“何谓也?”曰:“回忘仁义矣!”曰:“可矣,犹未也(言虽忘仁义,则可许有入道之分,然犹未也)。”他日复见,曰(颜回他日又见夫子):“回益矣。”曰:“何谓也?”曰:“回忘礼乐矣(言忘礼乐,则不拘拘于世俗也)。”曰:“可矣,犹未也(言虽忘人而同,未忘己)。”他日复见,曰:“回益矣!”曰:“何谓也?”曰:“回坐忘矣。”仲尼蹴然(改容也)曰:“何谓坐忘?”颜回曰:“隳(坏也)支体(言忘形也),黜聪明(日复见,曰:“回益矣!”曰:“何谓也?”曰:“回坐忘矣。”仲尼蹴然(改容也)曰:“何谓坐忘?”颜回曰:“隳(坏也)支体(言忘形也),黜聪明(泯知见也),离形去知,同于大通(言身知俱泯,物我两忘,浩然空洞,内外一如,曰大通),此谓坐忘。”仲尼曰:“同则无好也(言身世两忘,物我俱空,则取舍情尽,故无所好也),化则无常也(言物我两忘,形神俱化,化则无己,则物无非己。故不常执我为我也)。而(汝也)果(实也)其贤乎(言汝功夫到此,实过于我多无非己。故不常执我为我也)。而(汝也)果(实也)其贤乎(言汝功夫到此,实过于我多矣)!丘也请从而后也(夫子自以为不若,亦愿为此也)。”
Interpretation

Yan Hui said, “I have made further progress.” The commentary explains that people commonly take benevolence and righteousness, reverence, self-restraint, and wisdom as means of moral cultivation and achievement, and regard them as things esteemed by the world. Yet these can sometimes become obstacles on the path to the Great Dao.

Yan Hui then said, “I have made further progress.” Confucius asked, “What do you mean?” Yan Hui replied, “I have forgotten benevolence and righteousness.” Confucius said, “That is good, but it is not enough.” The commentary explains that forgetting benevolence and righteousness means one has become capable of entering the Dao.

Some days later, Yan Hui came to see Confucius again and said, “I have made further progress.” Confucius asked, “What do you mean?” Yan Hui replied, “I have forgotten ritual and music.” The commentary explains that this means no longer being bound by worldly conventions. Confucius said, “That is good, but it is not enough. Though you are no longer constrained by worldly preconceptions, you have not yet forgotten yourself.”

Some days later, Yan Hui came to see Confucius once more and said, “I have made further progress.” Confucius asked, “What do you mean?” Yan Hui replied, “I have attained sitting in forgetfulness.” Confucius asked solemnly, “What is sitting in forgetfulness?” Yan Hui said, “I forget the body’s form, cast aside the distinctions and judgments brought by the ears, eyes, and mind, leave behind physical form, relinquish perception, and become one with the Great Dao. This is called sitting in forgetfulness.” Here, “sitting in forgetfulness” refers to forgetting bodily form and one’s own views through quiet sitting and cultivation, so that inner and outer, self and things, are no longer divided.

Confucius said, “When you are one with all things, you have no preferences; when you follow the transformations of all things, you no longer cling to a fixed self. You have indeed reached a lofty state, far beyond mine. I would like to follow behind you and learn.”

此一节,言方内曲学之士,果能自损兼忘,而与道大通,虽圣智亦尝让之。意谓此等功夫,非智巧可入也。故前以子贡之不知,今以颜子乃可入也。 子舆与子桑友。而淋雨十日。子舆曰:“子桑殆病矣(知其绝食也)!”裹饭而往食之。至子桑之门,则若歌若哭(言歌之哀也),鼓琴曰:“父耶!母耶!天乎!人乎(此鼓琴之曲也)!”有不任其声(言饿而无力,故不任其声)而趋举其诗焉(趋举其诗,言气短促,举诗而气不相接也)。子舆入,曰:“子之歌诗,何故若是(言何故不成音韵也)?”曰:“吾思夫使我至此极者,而弗得也(言且歌且思,使我如此之贫至极者,不可得,故不成音韵也)?”曰:“吾思夫使我至此极者,而弗得也(言且歌且思,使我如此之贫至极者,不可得,不知其谁使也)。父母岂欲吾贫哉?天无私覆,地无私载,天地岂私贫我哉?求其为之者,而弗可得也!然而至此极者,命也夫!”
Interpretation

This section says that even people in the world who are one-sided and bound by learning, if they can truly lessen their private desires and forget their fixed ideas as well, thereby connecting with the Great Dao, will be treated with deference even by sages and wise people. The author’s point is that such cultivation cannot be achieved through cleverness and ingenuity. Earlier, Zigong was used to show that he still did not understand; now the text suggests that Yan Hui may be able to grasp it.

Ziyu and Zisang were friends. After ten days of continuous rain, Ziyu guessed that Zisang was probably ill—the commentators say this was because Zisang had run out of food. So Ziyu wrapped up some cooked rice and took it to him. At Zisang’s door, he heard what sounded at once like singing and weeping. Strumming his zither, Zisang sang, “Was it my father? Was it my mother? Was it Heaven? Was it humankind?” The commentators say these were lyrics from a zither piece. So hungry that he could barely make a sound, Zisang could only sing the lines in short, breathless bursts.

Ziyu went inside and asked, “Why are you singing the poem so haltingly, unable to keep a tune?” Zisang replied, “I’m trying to find out what has brought me into such desperate straits, but I can’t.” He continued, “Could my parents really wish me to be poor? Heaven covers all things without partiality, and Earth bears all things without partiality. Could Heaven and Earth single me out for poverty? I try to find the cause of all this, but I can’t. Yet here I am in such a state. Perhaps this is simply my fate.”

此一节,总结一篇之意。然此篇所论,乃大宗师,而结归于命者,何也?乃此老之生平心事,有难于言语形容者。意谓己乃是有大道之人,可为万世之大宗师。然生斯世也,而不见知于人,且以至贫极困以自处者,岂天有意使我至此耶?然而不见知于时者,盖命也夫。即此一语,涵滀无穷意思。然此大宗师,即逍遥游中之至人、神人、圣人,其不知为知,即齐物之因是真知,乃真宰,即养生然此大宗师,即逍遥游中之至人、神人、圣人,其不知为知,即齐物之因是真知,乃真宰,即养生之主。其篇中诸人,皆德充符者。总上诸意,而结归于于大宗师,以全内圣之学也。下应帝王,即外王之意也。 应帝王 庄子之学,以内圣外王为体用。如前逍遥游之至人、神人、圣人,即此所谓大宗师也。且云,以尘垢秕糠,犹能陶铸尧舜。故云,道之真以治身,其绪余土苴,以为天下国家。所谓治天下者,圣人之余事也。以前六篇,发挥大道之妙。而大宗师,乃得道之人。是圣人之全体,已得乎己也。有体必有用,故此应帝王,以显大道之用。若圣人时运将出,迫不得已而应命,则为圣帝明王;推其绪余,则无为而化,绝无有意而作为也。此显无为之大用,故以名篇。
Interpretation

This section summarizes the central meaning of the whole work. Since this chapter speaks of the “Great Ancestor Master,” why does it ultimately return to “fate”? It is because the concerns that filled Zhuangzi’s life are difficult to put into words. He seems to have believed that he possessed the Great Dao and could become a “Great Ancestor Master” for all generations. Yet, living in this world, he was not understood and willingly endured poverty and hardship. Was Heaven’s will responsible for placing him in such circumstances? Perhaps it was simply his fate that the people of his time did not understand him. These words carry a profound meaning that is difficult to express fully.

The “Great Ancestor Master” here is the same as the “Perfected Person, Spirit Person, and Sage” described in “Free and Easy Wandering.” They regard “not knowing” as true wisdom. The phrase “because of this, it is true knowing” in “Discussion on Making All Things Equal” also refers to true knowing—that is, the “True Ruler” who governs all things. “The Essentials for Nurturing Life” teaches the same principle. The figures presented in this chapter all embody a state of abundant Virtue and inner self-sufficiency. The author gathers the ideas expressed earlier and brings them together in the figure of the “Great Ancestor Master,” thereby fully explaining the teaching of “inner sageliness.” The next chapter, “Responding as an Emperor and King,” addresses the way of “outer kingship.”

Responding as an Emperor and King

Zhuangzi’s teaching takes “inner sageliness and outer kingship” as its substance and function: inner cultivation is the foundation, while governing the world is its function. The Perfected Person, Spirit Person, and Sage described earlier in “Free and Easy Wandering” are the “Great Ancestor Master” spoken of here. The text also says that even the dust and chaff of the Dao are enough to shape Yao and Shun. The meaning is that the essence of the Dao is used to cultivate oneself; only what remains of it is applied to governing the world and the state. Governing the world, in the end, is merely something left over for the Sage to do.

The first six chapters expound the mysteries of the Great Dao. “The Great Ancestor Master” concerns those who have attained the Dao—that is, Sages who have realized the Great Dao within themselves. Once there is a foundation, its function naturally follows. “Responding as an Emperor and King” therefore goes on to show how the Great Dao can be applied to governing the world. If circumstances require it, and a Sage has no choice but to answer Heaven’s mandate and enter public life, that Sage becomes a wise and enlightened ruler. Even when putting the Dao’s remaining traces into practice, one should follow things as they naturally are, allowing the world to be governed through Wuwei, without deliberate planning or contrivance. The chapter is titled “Responding as an Emperor and King” to make clear the broad scope of this Wuwei governance.

啮缺问于王倪,四问而四不知;推其绪余,则无为而化,绝无有意而作为也。此显无为之大用,故以名篇。 啮缺问于王倪,四问而四不知(此篇以无知二字作眼目,此无知,乃无心于世,漠然而已)。啮缺因跃而大喜,行以告蒲衣子。蒲衣子曰:“而(汝也)乃今知之乎(言汝今日乃知不知之妙乎)?有虞氏不及泰氏(向来世人只知有虞氏之为圣人,而不知不及泰氏也)。有虞氏,其犹藏(善美也)仁以要人(此言有虞之不济处。盖以仁为善,故有心以仁要结人心),亦得人矣,而未始出于非人(言有虞氏以仁要人,虽亦得人,且不能忘其功名,但是世俗之行;而未能超出人世,而悟真人之道妙,以非人(言有虞氏以仁要人,虽亦得人,且不能忘其功名,但是世俗之行;而未能超出人世,而悟真人之道妙,以造非人之境也)。泰氏,其卧徐徐(徐,纡徐,闲闲之意),其觉于于(自得之妙)。一以己为马,一以己为牛。其知情信,其德甚真,而未始入于非人(此言泰氏超越有虞,虚怀以游世,心闲而自得,且物我兼忘。人欺以为牛,则以牛应之;人呼以为马,则以马应之。未尝坚执我见,与物俱化。其知则非妄知,而悟其性真然。情信,指道体而言。前云有情有信是也,此其体也。至其德用甚真,不以人伪。即已超凡情,安于大道非人之境,而不堕于虚无。且能和光同尘,而未始拘拘自隘。此泰氏之妙也。盖已得大宗师之体,而应用世间,特推绪余以度世。故云未始人于非人)。”
Interpretation

Nie Que sought instruction from Wang Ni, asking him four questions in succession. Wang Ni answered each time that he did not know. From this, one can reason further that the traces of the Dao lie in following things as they are, allowing all beings to transform of themselves, without deliberate intention or action. This reveals the great power of Wuwei (non-action), which is why it serves as the chapter’s title.

Nie Que questioned Wang Ni four times, and each time Wang Ni said he did not know. This chapter takes “not knowing” as its key idea. Here, “not knowing” does not mean ignorance; it means having no attachment to worldly affairs and meeting them with calm detachment.

Nie Que was so delighted that he jumped up and went back to tell Puyi Zi. Puyi Zi said, “Have you only now understood the wonder of ‘not knowing’? You Shun, of the Youyu clan, was not the equal of the Taishi. You Shun, the legendary sage king of high antiquity, seems to have kept benevolence and virtue in his heart and then used them to win people’s support. This could indeed win people over, but it still did not go beyond the ordinary world. He regarded benevolence and virtue as good and deliberately put them into practice. Inevitably, he also valued his own achievements and reputation. He had not yet grasped the mysteries of the Dao of the True Person or reached a state beyond worldly distinctions.

“The Taishi, however, was different. He slept in ease and repose, and awoke at peace and contentment. If others treated him as an ox, he responded as an ox; if they treated him as a horse, he responded as a horse. His understanding was genuine and trustworthy, and his virtue was pure and natural. He did not cling to his own views but could change along with external things. His understanding was not illusory; it came from realizing the truth of his own nature. His conduct was free of human contrivance: he could rest in the Great Dao without falling into nothingness. He could live among people without being bound by self-imposed limits. This was the Taishi’s great subtlety. He had realized the Dao of the ‘Great Ancestor’—the root of the Dao—yet still responded to things and acted in the world. He simply used the traces of the Dao to help people. That is why it is said he did not shut himself away in a realm beyond the ordinary world.”

肩吾见狂接舆。狂接舆曰:同尘,而未始拘拘自隘。此泰氏之妙也。盖已得大宗师之体,而应用世间,特推绪余以度世。故云未始人于非人)。” 肩吾见狂接舆。狂接舆曰:“日中始何以语汝(日中始,乃接舆所见之人)?”肩吾曰:“告我君人者,以己出经(常法也)式(程准也)义度人(言人君治天下,当以所出之常法为程准,以义制而度人,以此乃治天下之常法也),孰敢不听而化诸(诸,犹之也。言人君以此治人,则人孰敢不听而从其化耶)!”狂接舆曰:“是欺德也(言若日中之说,乃非真实之德,盖欺德耳。谓人君恃己之能治而欺其人,将以不敢不听从也)。其于治天下也,犹涉海凿河,而使蚊负山也(言大也(言若日中之说,乃非真实之德,盖欺德耳。谓人君恃己之能治而欺其人,将以不敢不听从也)。其于治天下也,犹涉海凿河,而使蚊负山也(言大圣治天下,以不治治之。但以道在宥群生,使各安其性,各遂其生而已。若以有心强治以为功,则舍道而任伪,而犹越海之外凿河,则失其大而枉劳;且如蚊负山。必无此理也)。夫圣人之治也,治外乎(言圣人之治天下,岂治外乎)?正而后行(正,即前云正生,以正众生,谓使各正性命之意。谓圣人但自正性命,而施之百姓,使各自正之。老子云:清净为天下正),确乎能其事者而已矣(确者,真确。能事,即孟子之良能。言人各禀大道,以为性命之正,天然自足,一毫人力不能与其间。今但使人人各悟性真,则恬淡无为自化矣,又何假有心为之哉)。且鸟高飞以避矰弋之害,鼷鼠深穴乎神丘(社坛也)之则恬淡无为自化矣,又何假有心为之哉)。且鸟高飞以避矰弋之害,鼷鼠深穴乎神丘(社坛也)之下,以避熏凿之患,而曾二虫之无知(言鸟鼠二虫,天性自得,但人心以机械而欲取之,故高飞深藏而避之。而人曾谓二虫之无知乎?百姓天性,犹鸟鼠也;人君有心欲治之,能不惊而避之乎?外篇马蹄,痛发明此意)?”
Interpretation

Shoulderblade met Madman Jieyu. Madman Jieyu said, “To live among all things in the world without ever being constrained or limiting oneself: this is the mysterious realm of Tai, the sage of ancient legend. He has grasped the essence of the Great Master, the fundamental state of the Dao. When applying it in the world, he offers only a little of his remaining strength to help others. That is why he does not distinguish between ‘human’ and ‘nonhuman.’”

Shoulderblade met Madman Jieyu. Madman Jieyu asked, “What did Rizhongshi, the person I once met, tell you?” Shoulderblade replied, “He told me that a ruler should govern the people by measuring them against principles of right conduct, in accordance with the established laws and standards he has set. If the world is governed this way, who would dare refuse instruction?”

Madman Jieyu said, “That is merely a virtue that deceives people. Governing the world this way is like trying to cross the sea on foot or dig a channel through a river; it is like asking a mosquito to carry a mountain. A sage does not deliberately try to control the people. Instead, the sage puts himself in order and then puts his Dao into practice. To ‘put things in order’ here means letting all things rest in their own nature and life. The sage simply first sets himself right, then leads the people to set themselves right. Laozi said that through stillness and Wuwei (non-action), one can become the right way for all under Heaven.

“Each person already possesses a true and definite nature, as well as the ability to follow it. Everyone is born endowed with the Great Dao; their nature is complete from the start and needs no force imposed from outside. If people are allowed to understand their true nature, they will naturally become calm and free of deliberate action, and all things will transform and flourish of themselves. Why, then, govern deliberately?

“A bird flies high to escape the nets and arrows used to catch it. A shrew burrows deep beneath the sacred mound where the soil god is worshipped, to avoid the harm of smoke and digging. Can we say these two creatures lack wisdom? The bird and the shrew simply protect themselves by following their nature. If people use contrivance to govern the people deliberately, how could the people avoid being alarmed and fleeing?”

此上二节,言治天下不可以有心,恃知好为,以自居其功。若任无为,而百姓自化。老子曰“我无为而民自化”、“清净为天下正”。若设法以制其民,不但不从,而且若鸟鼠而惊且避之也。 天根游于殷阳(地名),至蓼水(水名)之上,适遭(遇也)无名人而问焉,曰:“请问为天下。”无名人曰:“去!女鄙人也,何问之不豫也(豫者,从容安详之意。而问之太仓促也)!予方将与造物者为人而问焉,曰:“请问为天下。”无名人曰:“去!女鄙人也,何问之不豫也(豫者,从容安详之意。而问之太仓促也)!予方将与造物者为人(言任造化而为人,非有心于世也),厌(厌,不欲也)则又乘夫莽眇之鸟(乃道之取譬也),以出六极之外,而游无何有之乡(大道之乡),旷垠(旷垠,谓无际也)之野。又何帠(为音)以治天下感(触也)予之心为(无名责天根,问之仓卒而无礼也。言我虽处世,但顺造化而为人,乘化而游;若厌而不欲为人,则乘大道,而游于广大逍遥无为之境。又何以天下触我之心,而若此耶)?”又复问(天根又问,必愿闻其说也),无名人曰(无名因求教之切,故告之以正):“汝游心于淡(谓恬淡寂寞之境),合气于漠(漠,冲虚也。言合气于虚),顺物自说也),无名人曰(无名因求教之切,故告之以正):“汝游心于淡(谓恬淡寂寞之境),合气于漠(漠,冲虚也。言合气于虚),顺物自然(不可有心恃知妄为)而无容私焉(会万物以为己,大公均调,而无庸私焉),而天下治矣(必如此而天下自治)。”
Interpretation

The previous two sections explain that one cannot govern the world while harboring private intentions, relying on cleverness and insisting on having one’s own way, or claiming the credit for oneself. If one follows things as they are and governs through Wuwei (non-action), the people will transform and flourish of their own accord. Laozi said, “When I practice Wuwei, the people transform themselves,” and, “Stillness and purity are the standard for the world.” If one devises all sorts of measures to control the people, they will not submit; instead, they will hide like frightened birds and rats.

Tian Gen was traveling in Yinyang. When he came to the banks of the Liao River, he happened to meet the Nameless One and asked, “May I ask how to govern the world?” The Nameless One replied, “Go away! You are so shallow—why ask in such haste? I am about to live in accord with the transformations of nature. Weary of the mundane world, I will ride the ‘bird of obscurity and subtlety,’ a symbol of the Great Dao, and fly beyond the four quarters of Heaven and Earth, wandering in the formless realm of the Dao. Why should the business of governing the world stir my heart?”

Tian Gen asked again. Seeing how earnestly he sought instruction, the Nameless One told him the proper way: “Let your heart and spirit rest in calm stillness, let your breath return to emptiness and quiet, and follow the natural transformations of the myriad things without harboring private intentions. If you can do this, the world will settle itself.”

此一节,直示无为而化、治天下之妙,欲君人者取法,返乎上古无为之化也。 阳子居见老聃,曰:“有人(假若有人)于此,向(向也)疾(捷也,谓向道敏捷也)强梁(勇为也),物彻(事物透彻也)疏明(疏通明达也),假若有人)于此,向(向也)疾(捷也,谓向道敏捷也)强梁(勇为也),物彻(事物透彻也)疏明(疏通明达也),学道不勌,如是者,可比(及也)明王乎?”老聃曰:“是于圣人也(言如此之人,比于圣人者),胥(胥靡之罪役也)易(更番也)技(工技之人)系(羁系于市肆也),劳形怵心者也(言向疾强梁之人,亦似胥役之罪夫更番不暇,工役之系肆劳苦形骸,惊惕其心者也。将此以比王,自苦不暇,安能治民乎)。且也虎豹之文,来田(言虎豹因皮有文,故招来田猎之灾);猨狙之便(捷也)、执斄(音狸)之狗(言狗能执狸),来藉(藉,以绳系之也。言猨狙因便捷,故人得);猨狙之便(捷也)、执斄(音狸)之狗(言狗能执狸),来藉(藉,以绳系之也。言猨狙因便捷,故人得而系之,以教衣冠;狗能执狸,人得而系之,以竞田猎)。如是者,可比明王乎(言若向疾之人可比明王,则猨狙与执狸之狗,亦可比明王矣)?”阳子居戚然(改容也)曰:“敢问明王之治(言如是之人不可比明王,敢问如何是明王之治)。”老聃曰:“明王之治:功盖天下而似不自已(纵有功盖天下,而不自居其功),化贷(贷者,与人之意)万物(万物皆往资焉而不匮)而民弗恃(而民不知恃赖)。有莫举名(名不可得而举称),使物自喜(但使物物自遂自喜,犹言‘帝力何有于我’)。立乎不测(不可测识),而游于无有者也(不测、无有,通指大道之名(名不可得而举称),使物自喜(但使物物自遂自喜,犹言‘帝力何有于我’)。立乎不测(不可测识),而游于无有者也(不测、无有,通指大道之乡也。此全是老子为而不长、不宰之意)。”
Interpretation

This section directly explains the art of governing through “transformation by Wuwei (non-action)”—acting without deliberate interference while allowing all things to flourish naturally—and urges rulers to follow the ancient practice of ruling without interference.

Yang Ziju paid a visit to Lao Dan and asked, “Suppose there were someone quick to respond and eager to take responsibility, keenly perceptive and clear in understanding things, who never slackened in studying the Dao. Could such a person measure up to an enlightened king?”

Lao Dan replied, “In the eyes of a sage, such a person is like a convict assigned to shifts of forced labor, or a craftsman tied up in the marketplace: he exhausts himself and lives in constant anxiety. Someone so eager to show off and assert himself in everything can barely manage his own affairs. How could he govern the people? Besides, tigers and leopards are hunted because of the beautiful patterns on their coats. Monkeys are captured and tethered for their agility, and hunting dogs for their ability to catch wildcats; people train or drive them as they please. If someone like this could measure up to an enlightened king, then monkeys and hunting dogs should count as enlightened kings too.”

Yang Ziju’s expression grew solemn. “May I ask how an enlightened king governs the world?”

Lao Dan said, “An enlightened king’s achievements extend across the world, yet he seems not to claim credit for them. His benevolence nourishes all things, and all things benefit from it, yet the people do not feel dependent on him. He leaves behind no name to be celebrated; he simply lets all things grow as they will, each content and at ease. He dwells in a realm beyond comprehension and wanders where there are no forms or traces.”

Here, “nonbeing” and “beyond comprehension” both refer to the realm of the Dao. The enlightened king follows the Dao, claims no credit, and imposes no control, allowing all things to grow naturally.

此一节,发挥明王之治,皆申明老子之意,以示所宗、立言之本。极称大宗师应世而为圣帝明王,以行无为之化也。 上言明王立乎不测,而游于无有,如此乃可应世,以治天下。但不知不测是如何境界,人亦有能可学而至者乎?故下撰出壶子,乃不测之人;所示于神巫世,以治天下。但不知不测是如何境界,人亦有能可学而至者乎?故下撰出壶子,乃不测之人;所示于神巫者,乃不测之境界。列子见之而愿学,即其人也。
Interpretation

This section develops the ideas about how an enlightened ruler governs a state. It further explains Laozi’s teachings, showing the intellectual roots and grounds for the argument that the text upholds. It strongly praises the Great Master—the highest person who has attained the Dao—who appears in the world as a sage emperor or enlightened king and governs through Wuwei (non-action).

Earlier, the text says that an enlightened ruler can respond to worldly affairs and govern all under Heaven only by dwelling in an unfathomable state and roaming in “nonbeing.” But what, exactly, is this unfathomable state? Can ordinary people learn to attain it too? The text therefore introduces Huzi, an unfathomable figure. The various states he reveals to the spirit medium—a person who can foretell good and ill fortune through divination and other means—embody this state. Liezi’s wish to study with Huzi after meeting him illustrates this point.

郑有神巫曰季咸(神巫,乃善相者,名季咸也),知人之死生存亡、祸福寿夭,期以岁月旬日(言相人最验,刻期不爽)若神。郑人见之,皆弃之而走(言畏其灵验,恐说出不好之事,故皆走,不敢近也)。列子见之而心醉(列子将以为神,故心醉服也),归以告壶子(此乃列子之师也),曰:“始吾以夫子之道为至矣,则又有至焉者矣(意谓神巫超过壶丘子远矣)。”壶子曰:“吾与汝既其文(言我之教汝者,但外面皮毛耳。既,尽也),未既其实(其道之真实处,全未示汝)。而(汝也)固(将谓也)得道欤(汝将谓已得道欤)?众雌而无雄,而又奚卵焉(言物(其道之真实处,全未示汝)。而(汝也)固(将谓也)得道欤(汝将谓已得道欤)?众雌而无雄,而又奚卵焉(言物有雌雄,乃能生卵。以比人有心对待,而相者乃见其祸福。若心能绝待,又何从而相之。如雌而无雄,又何卵焉)!而(汝也)以道与世亢(与人相比亢也),必信夫(以要人必信,故相亢以示己之长),故使人得而相汝(以不能忘己,要人知之,故人亦因得而相之也)。尝试与来,以予示之(若来以我示之,看彼能测我乎)。”明日,列子与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:“嘻(惊叹也)!子之先生死矣!弗活矣!不以。
Interpretation

In the state of Zheng, there was a spirit medium named Jixian, skilled in reading people’s faces. He could foresee a person’s life or death, good or ill fortune, and length of life, even stating precisely the year, month, and day when his predictions would come true, as though he were divine. People in Zheng avoided him, afraid he might foretell something ominous.

When Liezi met Jixian, however, he was deeply impressed. He returned and told his teacher, HuzI, “I used to think that your Dao had reached the highest state. I never imagined there could be something higher.”

HuzI said, “What I have taught you is only the outward expression of the Dao. I have not yet enabled you to grasp its true substance. And you think you have already attained the Dao? If there is only the female and no male, how could eggs be produced? This is like a person whose heart still holds distinctions and oppositions: only then can a face reader discern good or ill fortune. If one could go beyond such distinctions, what signs would there be to read? You put the Dao to the test against the world, always wanting others to believe you. That is why you give them the chance to read your condition. Bring Jixian to meet me, and let me see whether he can see through me.”

The next day, Liezi brought Jixian to meet HuzI. Afterward, Jixian said to Liezi, “Alas! Your teacher is close to death. He cannot be saved!” Here, “the female and male producing eggs” is HuzI’s metaphor for Yin-Yang depending on one another and bringing things into being together; face reading means inferring good or ill fortune from a person’s outward signs.

”明日,列子与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:“嘻(惊叹也)!子之先生死矣!弗活矣!不以旬数矣(言不十数日即死矣)!吾见怪焉(吾见怪之),见湿灰焉(言面如湿灰,绝无生机也)。”列子入,泣涕沾襟(以闻先生必死)以告壶子。壶子曰:“向吾示之以地文(此下三见,壶子示之安心不测之境。此即佛门之止观,乃安心之法也。地文,乃安心于至静之地,此止也),萌(草之未出芽,曰萌)乎不震(动也)不正(犹显示也。谓我安心于至静一念不生不动、不显之地,即心念俱及泯绝,故面如湿灰,无生机也),是殆见吾杜(止也)德机(犹生机也)也(言彼殆见我止绝生机,故将谓我必死也)。尝又与来(命明日湿灰,无生机也),是殆见吾杜(止也)德机(犹生机也)也(言彼殆见我止绝生机,故将谓我必死也)。尝又与来(命明日再来看)。”明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:“幸矣!子之先生遇我也,有瘳矣(言汝之先生幸遇我,可以不死,而疾有瘳矣)!全然有生矣!吾见其杜(绝也)权(活动也)矣(言我见其死而复活,乃有生机也)!”列子入,以告壶子。
Interpretation

The next day, Liezi took Jixian to meet with Huchu. After they left, Jixian said to Liezi, “Alas, your teacher is close to death and cannot be saved. I doubt he will live another ten days! I saw a strange sign: his face was like damp ashes, utterly devoid of life.”

Liezi went inside. Tears soaked the front of his robe as he told Huchu what Jixian had said.

Huchu said, “Just now, I showed him the ‘earth pattern,’ a state as still as the earth. I settled my mind in absolute stillness: no thoughts arose or moved, and nothing showed itself. So he saw me as though my vitality had ended and thought I was near death. Bring him again tomorrow.”

On the third day, Liezi again took Jixian to meet with Huchu. After they left, Jixian said to Liezi, “Fortunately, your teacher has encountered me. His condition has improved, and he will not die! He is now displaying vitality in full. I saw that his vitality was no longer blocked and had begun to move.”

Liezi went inside and told Huchu what Jixian had said.

壶子曰:“向吾示之以天壤(天壤,谓高明昭旷之地,此即观也),名实不入(言性地光明,一切不存也),而机发于踵(踵,最深深处也。言自从至深静之地,而发起天壤(天壤,谓高明昭旷之地,此即观也),名实不入(言性地光明,一切不存也),而机发于踵(踵,最深深处也。言自从至深静之地,而发起照用,如所云即止之观也)。是殆见吾善者机也(言彼见吾善而不死者,以我示之以天机也)。尝又与来(再命明日更来)。”明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:“子之先生不齐(言精神恍惚,颜色不一。齐,一也),吾无得而相焉。试齐,且复相之(言待精神一定,而复相之也)。”列子入,以告壶子。壶子曰:“吾向示之以太冲(至虚之地)莫胜(言动静不二也。初偏于静,次偏于动。今则安心于极虚,动静不二。犹言止观双运、不二之境也),是殆见吾衡(平也)气机也(言平等持心,动静不二,故气机亦和融二。犹言止观双运、不二之境也),是殆见吾衡(平也)气机也(言平等持心,动静不二,故气机亦和融而不测也。下壶子又讲明前所示者,乃三种观法,故彼莫测耳)。鲵(鳅鱼也)桓(盘桓,言鳅鱼盘于深泥也)之审(处也)为渊(渊,湛渊,乃止观之名。
Interpretation

The Pot Master said, “Earlier, I showed him ‘Heaven and Earth’—a lofty, open realm, the state of contemplative awareness. There, neither reputation nor reality can enter; this means that one’s original nature is luminous and all distinctions fall away. Yet the activity of contemplation arises from the deepest place. ‘Heel’ refers to the deepest place: the function of observation emerges from a state of deep stillness, like contemplation that arises from cessation. Perhaps he sensed my tendency to use mental stratagems, and so was not bewildered by the realm I showed him. Have him come again tomorrow.”

The next day, Liezi accompanied him to see the Pot Master again. After they left, he said to Liezi, “Your teacher’s spirit is unsettled, and his expression keeps changing. I cannot discern his condition. Let him settle, then bring me to see him again.”

Liezi went inside and told the Pot Master what he had said. The Pot Master replied, “Earlier, I showed him ‘Supreme Emptiness, Unconquerable’—a state of utter stillness and openness. At this point, movement and stillness are no longer opposed. At first, stillness predominated; then movement did; now he rests in utter emptiness, where movement and stillness are united. Perhaps he sensed the harmony of my Qi. ‘The loach’s coiling in the mud is examined as an abyss’—the loach coils in deep mud, and here the abyss is a metaphor for the states of cessation and contemplation…”

然鲵桓之所处于深泥,以喻至静,即初之止也),止水之审为渊(此喻观也。止水澄清,万象斯鉴。即次之天壤之观也),流水之审为渊(流水虽动,而水性湛然不动。此喻即动而静,即静而动,动静不二澄清,万象斯鉴。即次之天壤之观也),流水之审为渊(流水虽动,而水性湛然不动。此喻即动而静,即静而动,动静不二,平等安心。即末后太冲莫胜,止观不二也)。渊有九种(言定有九种),此处三焉(言我示之者,乃三种定法也)。尝又与来。”明日,又与之见壶子。立未定,自失而走。壶子曰:“追!”列子追之不及。返以报壶子曰:“已灭矣(言去之已无踪影矣),已失矣(言即寻之已不得见矣),吾弗及矣(言我追之已不及已)。”壶子曰:“已灭矣(言去之已无踪影矣),已失矣(言即寻之已不得见矣),吾弗及矣(言我追之已不及已)。”壶子曰:“向吾示之以未始出吾宗(宗者,谓虚无大道之根宗。安心于无有,了无动静之相,即佛氏之摄三观于一心也)。吾与之虚而委蛇(言我安心于至虚无有之地,但以虚体而示状貌,委蛇随顺彼耳),不知其谁何(故彼不知其谁何也),因以为弟靡(言物之类靡,难于收拾也),因以为波流(言精神浩荡,捉摸不定也),故逃也(因此难测,故逃走耳)。
Interpretation

The salamander curls up and dwells in deep mud, serving as a metaphor for the original state of stillness. The water, still and profound, serves as a metaphor for observation. Its clear surface reflects all things; this corresponds to the second stage, “observing Heaven and Earth.” Flowing water is also profound: though it moves, its nature remains still and undisturbed. This is a metaphor for maintaining stillness within movement and containing movement within stillness. Movement and stillness are not separate; the mind remains balanced and settled. This corresponds to the final state, “the Great Flux, beyond all opposition,” where stopping and observing become one. There are nine kinds of abyss; the text discusses three of them.

The Master of the Pot said, “Come again tomorrow.”

The next day, Liezi accompanied the shaman Jixian to visit the Master of the Pot again. As soon as Jixian had taken his place, he panicked and fled. The Master of the Pot said, “Go after him!” Liezi gave chase but could not catch him. When he returned, he said to the Master of the Pot, “He has vanished. I can no longer find him. I couldn’t catch up.”

The Master of the Pot said, “Just now, what I showed him was a state that had not yet departed from the root of the Great Dao. The root of the Great Dao is the source of the Dao in emptiness: abiding in nonbeing, without any sign of movement or stillness. This is like what Buddhism calls gathering three forms of contemplation into a single mind. I abide in the realm of utmost emptiness and nonbeing, revealing a form only through the substance of emptiness and stillness, and changing in accordance with the other person’s perceptions. That is why he could not tell what I was. Then I appeared like something scattered and flying about, impossible to gather in, and like waves of spirit surging and flowing, impossible to grasp. That is why he fled.”

”然后列子自以为未始学(初则列子未得壶子之真实,故以神巫为至。今见壶子所因以为波流(言精神浩荡,捉摸不定也),故逃也(因此难测,故逃走耳)。”然后列子自以为未始学(初则列子未得壶子之真实,故以神巫为至。今见壶子所以示神巫者,虽善相卒莫能测识其端倪,到此方信壶子之道大难测,而始知自己从来未有学也),而归(辞壶子而归,立志造修也)三年不出(专一做工夫),为其妻爨(言列子初恃自己有道,以骄其妻。今能忘身,而为妻爨),食豕如食人(初未入道,而有人物分别之心。今则分别情忘),于事无与亲(言无心于事也)。雕琢复朴(先以雕琢丧朴,今则还纯返朴矣),块然(不识不知之貌)独以其形立。纷而封哉(封,即齐物之有封之封。谓受形骸,是于大化之中,乃立人我,横生是非,固执而不化者,犹有封之疆界也。而今乃知此形,为纷授而封畛之也),一以是终之有封之封。谓受形骸,是于大化之中,乃立人我,横生是非,固执而不化者,犹有封之疆界也。而今乃知此形,为纷授而封畛之也),一以是终(言列子竟此学,以终其身也)。
Interpretation

Only then did Liezi feel that he had never truly learned before. At first, he did not understand the true attainment of Huzi, his teacher, and so believed the shaman’s abilities had reached their utmost limit. Now he had seen Huzi reveal states that shifted in ways impossible to fathom. Even the shaman, skilled at reading people’s features, could not discern their hidden depths. Liezi thus came to believe that Huzi’s Dao was unfathomable and understood that he himself had not yet truly entered the Way.

Liezi took leave of Huzi and returned home, resolved to devote himself to practice. For three years he did not go out. He applied himself wholeheartedly, cooked over the fire for his wife, and regarded feeding the pigs as no different from serving people. He no longer clung to any particular affairs or drew close to one thing over another. In the past, deliberate refinement had made him lose his natural simplicity; now he returned to that simplicity, at ease with himself, as though unaware and making no distinctions.

Once people take on bodily form and are born, they easily divide themselves from others amid the transformations of Heaven and Earth, give rise to judgments of right and wrong, and cling to their own views, as if separated by one boundary after another. Liezi now understood that the human body and all these distinctions were boundaries that arose amid ceaseless transformation. With this realization, he completed his practice and lived out his life.

此一节,因上言明王立乎不测,以无为而化,庄子恐世人不知不测是何等境界,为何等人物。故特撰出个壶子,乃其人也;即所示于神巫者,乃不测之境界也。如此等人,安心如此,乃可应世,可称明王,方能无为而化也,其它岂可仿佛哉。言此假学问,亦可学而至,只贵信得及做得出。若列子,即有志信道之人也。此励世之心,难以名言矣。 上言壶子,但示其不测问,亦可学而至,只贵信得及做得出。若列子,即有志信道之人也。此励世之心,难以名言矣。 上言壶子,但示其不测之境。下文重发挥应世之用。
Interpretation

This section continues the preceding idea that “the enlightened ruler stands in a realm beyond comprehension and, through Wuwei (non-action), allows the myriad things to transform naturally.” Zhuangzi worried that people might not understand what this “realm beyond comprehension” was, or what kind of person could inhabit it, so he introduced the figure of Huzi. What Huzi reveals before the spirit medium is precisely this realm beyond comprehension. Only someone inwardly settled, like Huzi, can respond to the affairs of the world and be worthy of the name “enlightened ruler”; only such a person can nurture and transform the myriad things through the Way of Wuwei. How could others imitate this so easily?

This describes a teaching that may seem obscure and mysterious, yet it can in fact be learned. What matters is whether one can truly believe in it and put it into practice. Liezi was someone resolved to follow the Great Dao. The intention to inspire people expressed here is difficult to put into words.

The preceding passage uses Huzi to make clear the realm beyond comprehension and points out that this realm can be learned, provided one believes in it and puts it into practice. Liezi was resolved to follow the Dao. The author’s intention to inspire people is beyond words.

The preceding passage discusses Huzi only to make clear the realm beyond comprehension; what follows goes on to explain how this realm works when responding to the affairs of the world.

无为名尸(尸,主也。言真人先要忘名,故戒其不可为名尸),无为谋府(智谋之所聚,曰谋府。言一任无心,不可以智谋为事也),无为事任(言不可强行任事,谓有担当,则为累为患。但顺事而应,若非己出者也),无为知主(知主,以知巧为主也。言顺物忘怀,不可主于智巧也)。体尽无穷(体,言体会于大道,应化无有穷尽也),而游无朕(朕,兆也。谓游于无物之初,安心于一念不生之地也)。尽其所受乎天,而无见得(言但自尽其所受乎天者,道,应化无有穷尽也),而游无朕(朕,兆也。谓游于无物之初,安心于一念不生之地也)。尽其所受乎天,而无见得(言但自尽其所受乎天者,全体不失,而亦未见有得之心也),亦虚而已(如此亦归于虚而已,言一毫不可有加于其间也)!至人之用心若镜,不将不迎,应而不藏,故能胜物而不伤(至人用心如明镜,当壹物来顺照,并不将心要应事之未至,亦不以心先迎。即物一至,妍丑分明,而不留藏妍丑之迹,了无是非之心。如此虚心应世,故能胜物;而物卒莫能伤之者,虚之至也)。
Interpretation

Do not make yourself the master of reputation (“corpse” means master or controller; a realized person first forgets reputation, so it cannot rule them). Do not make yourself a storehouse of schemes (“storehouse of schemes” means a gathering place for stratagems and clever ideas; let things follow their natural course, rather than putting cleverness in command). Do not force yourself to take on affairs (deliberately assuming responsibility can turn into a burden and a source of trouble; respond only as circumstances change, as though you had not initiated the matter). Do not let cleverness govern you (follow external things, release your attachments, and do not put contrivance in command).

Fully embody the Great Dao, and you can respond to things and change without end. Let your mind and spirit roam in a realm without any signs (“sign” means an indication: the time before anything has appeared and before any thought has arisen). Fulfill to the utmost what Heaven has endowed you with, without feeling that you have gained anything by doing so. In this way, you preserve what Heaven has given without losing it, yet form no thought of “having gained” something. In the end, all remains empty; you add not the slightest thing to it.

The heart of the Perfected Person is like a clear mirror: when things arrive, it reflects them as they are. It does not anticipate how to respond or go out to meet them. As each thing arrives, beauty and ugliness appear plainly, yet leave no trace and stir no attachment to judgments of right and wrong. Responding to worldly affairs with such an empty, still heart, you can meet the myriad things without being harmed by them.

已前说了真人如多情状、许多工夫,末后直结归“至人”已下二十二字乃尽。庄子之学问功夫、效验作用,尽在此而已。其余种种撰出,皆蔓衍之辞也。内篇之意,已尽此矣。学者体认,亦不必多,只在此数语下手,则应物忘怀,一生受用不尽。此所谓逍遥游也。 南海之帝为倏,北海之多,只在此数语下手,则应物忘怀,一生受用不尽。此所谓逍遥游也。 南海之帝为倏,北海之帝为忽,中央之帝为浑沌。倏与忽时相与遇于浑沌之地,浑沌待之甚善。倏与忽谋报浑沌之德,曰:“人皆有七窍以视听食息,此独无有,尝试凿之。”日凿一窍,七日而浑沌死(倏忽者,无而忽有。言人于大化最初、受形之始也。混沌,言虽俄尔有形,尚无情识,浑然沌然、无知无识之时也。及情窦日凿,知识一开,则天真尽丧,所谓日凿一窍、七日而混沌死也。副墨以倏为火,以忽为水,混沌为土,似有理,太犯穿凿。只如此解,则已)。
Interpretation

The various circumstances of the True Person and the practices of cultivation have already been discussed. The passage closes with the twenty-two characters beginning “As for the Perfect Person,” which complete the meaning. Zhuangzi’s learning, methods of cultivation, and their results are all contained here; the other elaborations are mostly extensions of what has already been said. The central ideas of the Inner Chapters are also included. Those who study them need only grasp these few sentences and begin from here. Then, when dealing with things, they can set aside their concerns and draw on this teaching throughout their lives. This is what is meant by “Free and Easy Wandering.”

The emperor of the South Sea was called Shu, the emperor of the North Sea was called Hu, and the emperor of the center was called Hundun. Shu and Hu often met in Hundun’s domain, and Hundun treated them well. Shu and Hu discussed how to repay Hundun’s kindness. “Everyone has seven orifices”—eyes, ears, nose, and mouth, for seeing, hearing, breathing, and eating—“but he alone has none. Let’s try boring seven openings for him.” Each day they bored one opening. On the seventh day, Hundun died.

The commentator explains that “Shu” and “Hu” signify the sudden emergence of something from nothing, while “Hundun” refers to the earliest stage in which the myriad things take form: though they already have physical shape, they have not yet developed awareness or distinctions and remain in a state of undifferentiated ignorance. The gradual opening of the seven orifices symbolizes the awakening of awareness and knowledge. Once the mind of distinction arises, one loses one’s original, natural character; hence the words, “On the seventh day, Hundun died.” Fumo explains Shu and Hu respectively as Fire and Water, and Hundun as Earth. The commentator considers this interpretation plausible in some respects but excessively forced; the meaning given above is sufficient.

此倏忽一章,不独结应帝王一篇,其实总结内七篇之大意。前言逍遥,则总归大宗师。前频言小知伤生、养形而忘生之主一章,不独结应帝王一篇,其实总结内七篇之大意。前言逍遥,则总归大宗师。前频言小知伤生、养形而忘生之主、以物伤生,种种不得逍遥,皆知巧之过。盖都为凿破混沌,丧失天真者。即古今宇宙两间之人,自尧舜以来,未有一人而不是凿破混沌之人也。此特寓言大地皆凡夫愚迷之人,概若此耳。以俗眼观之,似乎不经;其实所言,无一字不是救世愍迷之心也,岂可以文字视之哉!读者当见其心可也。即予此解,亦非牵强附会,盖就其所宗,以得其立言之旨。但以佛法中人天止观而参证之,所谓天乘止观,即宗镜亦云,老庄所宗,自。即予此解,亦非牵强附会,盖就其所宗,以得其立言之旨。但以佛法中人天止观而参证之,所谓天乘止观,即宗镜亦云,老庄所宗,自然清净无为之道,即初禅天通明禅也。吾徒观者,幸无以佛法妄拟为过也
Interpretation

This passage on “Whirlwind and Suddenness” does more than bring the chapter “Responding to Emperors and Kings” to a close; it also sums up the central meaning of the seven inner chapters of the Zhuangzi. The carefree wandering discussed earlier ultimately leads to the state described in “The Great Ancestral Teacher.” The text has repeatedly pointed out that cleverness can damage life; that caring only for the body while forgetting life’s root, and harming oneself through attachment to external things, all keep a person from carefree wandering. At the root of these problems is excessive artifice. In the end, they arise from deliberately carving open chaos and losing one’s natural authenticity.

From ancient times to the present, since the age of Yao and Shun, it seems that no one in the world has entirely escaped this “carving open of chaos.” This is an allegory about how most people on earth are ordinary and deluded; it is not meant to be taken literally. From a worldly point of view, these words may seem unreasonable. In fact, every word expresses a wish to save the world and compassion for those lost in delusion. They should not be read as mere words; readers should attend to the intention behind them.

My interpretation is not a forced reading. I understand Zhuangzi’s original intent in light of the purpose to which his thought belongs. Here I use the Buddhist practice of “calming and contemplation for the human and heavenly realms”—meditative cultivation directed toward the states of humans, gods, and others—as a point of comparison. As for “calming and contemplation in the heavenly vehicle,” the Zongjing also says that the natural, pure, Wuwei (non-action) Way revered by Laozi and Zhuangzi corresponds to “luminous meditation,” a form of meditative practice in the heaven of the first dhyana. Readers need not regard my comparison of Zhuangzi with Buddhist teachings as a fault.

。

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 3