中文 · EN

《庄子注》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書 Vol. 3 / 5 25,000 characters

About this page. The original text of 《庄子注》 Vol. 3 (Zangwai Daoshu 藏外道書, 5 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Godners/DaoZang edition. An English interpretation of the 1 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《庄子注》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

游外以经内,守母以存子,称情而直往也。若乃矜乎名声,牵乎形制,则孝不任诚,慈不任实,父子兄弟,怀情相欺,岂礼之大意哉! 子贡反,以告孔子曰:「彼何人者邪?修行无有,而外其形骸,临尸而歌,颜色不变,无以命之。彼何人者邪?」孔子曰:「彼游方之外者也,而丘,游骸,临尸而歌,颜色不变,无以命之。彼何人者邪?」孔子曰:「彼游方之外者也,而丘,游方之内者也。外内不相及,而丘使女往吊之,丘则陋矣!彼方且与造物者为人,而游乎天地之一气。彼以生为附赘县疣,以死为决病溃痈。夫若然者,又恶知死生先后之所在!假于异物,托于同体﹔忘其肝胆,遗其耳目﹔反复终始,不知端倪﹔芒然仿徨乎尘垢之外,逍遥乎无为之业。彼又恶能愤愤然为世俗之礼,以观众人之耳目哉!」子贡曰:「然则夫子何方之依?」 夫理有至极,外内相冥,未有极游外之致而不冥于内者也,未有能冥于内而不游于外者也。故圣人常游外以(宏)〔冥〕(二:「然则夫子何方之依?」 夫理有至极,外内相冥,未有极游外之致而不冥于内者也,未有能冥于内而不游于外者也。故圣人常游外以(宏)〔冥〕(二)内,无心以顺有,故虽终日(挥)〔见〕(三)形而神气无变,俯仰万机而淡然自若。夫见形而不及神者,天下之常累也。是故睹其与群物并行,则莫能谓之遗物而离人矣;睹其体化而应务,则莫能谓之坐忘而自得矣。岂直谓圣人不然哉?乃必谓至理之无此。是故庄子将明流统之所宗以释天下之可悟,若直就称仲尼之如此,或者将据所见以排之,故超圣人之内迹谓至理之无此。是故庄子将明流统之所宗以释天下之可悟,若直就称仲尼之如此,或者将据所见以排之,故超圣人之内迹,而寄方外于数子。宜忘其所寄以寻述作之大意,则夫游外(宏)〔冥〕内之道坦然自明,而庄子之书,故是涉俗盖世之谈矣。 夫吊者,方内之近事也,施之于方外则陋矣。 皆冥之,故无二也。 若疣之自县,赘之自附,此气之时聚,非所乐也。 若肒之自决,廱之自溃,此气之自散,非所惜也。 死生代谢,未始有极,与之俱往,则无往不可,故不知胜负之所在也。 假,因也。今死生聚散,变化无方,皆异物也。无异而不假,故所假虽异而共成一体也。 任之于五藏犹忘,何物足识哉!未始有识,故能放任于变化之涂,玄同于反复之波,而不知终始之所极(五)也。 理而冥往也。 所谓无为之业,非拱默而已;所谓尘垢之外,非伏于山林也。 其所反复之波,而不知终始之所极(五)也。 理而冥往也。 所谓无为之业,非拱默而已;所谓尘垢之外,非伏于山林也。 其所以观示于众人者,皆其尘垢耳,非方外之冥物也。 子贡不闻性与天道,故见其所依而不见其所以依也。夫所以依者,不依也,世岂觉之哉! 孔子曰:「丘,天之戮民也。虽然,吾与汝共之。」 以方内为桎梏,明所贵在方外也。夫游外者依内,离人者合俗,故有天下者无以天下为也。是以遗物而后能入群,坐忘而后能应务,愈遗之,愈得之。苟居斯极,则虽欲释之而理固自来,斯乃天人之所不赦者也。 子贡曰:「敢问其方?」 虽为是以遗物而后能入群,坐忘而后能应务,愈遗之,愈得之。苟居斯极,则虽欲释之而理固自来,斯乃天人之所不赦者也。 子贡曰:「敢问其方?」 虽为世所桎梏,但为与汝共之耳。明己恒自在外也。 孔子曰:「鱼相造乎水,人相造乎道。相造乎水者,穿池而养给﹔相造乎道者,无事而生定。故曰:鱼相忘乎江湖,人相忘乎道术。」 问所以游外而共内之意。 孔子曰:「鱼相造乎水,人相造乎道【一】。相造乎水者,穿池而养给;相造乎道者,无事而生定【二】。故曰,鱼相忘乎江湖,人相忘乎道术【三】。」 子贡曰:「敢问畸人?」 所造虽异,其于由无事以得事,自方外以共内,然后养给而生定,则莫不皆然也。俱不自知耳,故」 所造虽异,其于由无事以得事,自方外以共内,然后养给而生定,则莫不皆然也。俱不自知耳,故成无为也。 曰:「畸人者,畸于人而侔于天。故曰:天之小人,人之君子﹔人之君子,天之小人也。」 各自足而相忘者,天下莫不然也。至人常足,故常忘也。 问向之所谓方外而不耦于俗者,又安在也。 夫与内冥者,游于外也。独能游外以冥内,任万物之自然,使天性各足而帝王道成,斯乃畸于人而侔于天也。 以自然言之,则人无小大(一);以人理言之,则侔于天者可谓君子矣。 颜回问仲尼曰:「孟孙才,其母死,哭泣无涕,中心不戚,居丧不之,则人无小大(一);以人理言之,则侔于天者可谓君子矣。 颜回问仲尼曰:「孟孙才,其母死,哭泣无涕,中心不戚,居丧不哀。无是三者,以善处丧盖鲁国,固有无其实而得其名者乎?回壹怪之。」 鲁国观其礼,而颜回察其心。 仲尼曰:「夫孟孙氏尽之矣,进于知矣,唯简之而不得,夫已有所简矣。孟孙氏不知所以生,不知所以死。不知就先,不知就后。若化为物,以待其所不知之化已乎。且方将化,恶知不化哉?方将不化,恶知已化哉?吾特与汝,其梦未始觉者邪!且彼有骇形而无损心,有旦宅而无耗精。孟孙氏特觉,人哭亦哭,是自其所以乃。且也相与吾之耳矣,庸讵知吾所谓吾之非吾乎?且汝梦为鸟而厉乎天,梦为鱼而没于渊。不识今之乃。且也相与吾之耳矣,庸讵知吾所谓吾之非吾乎?且汝梦为鸟而厉乎天,梦为鱼而没于渊。不识今之言者,其觉者乎?其梦者乎?造适不及笑,献笑不及排,安排而去化,乃入于寥天一。」 尽死生之理,应内外之宜者,动而以天行,非知之匹也。 简择死生而不得其异,若春秋冬夏四时行耳。 已简而不得,故无不安,无不安,故不以生死概意而付之自化也。 所遇而安。 不违化也。 死生宛转,与化为一,犹乃忘其所知于当今,岂待所未知而豫忧者哉! 已化而生,焉知未生之时哉!未化而死,焉知已死之后哉!故无所避就,而与化俱往知而豫忧者哉! 已化而生,焉知未生之时哉!未化而死,焉知已死之后哉!故无所避就,而与化俱往(二)也。 夫死生犹觉梦耳,今梦自以为觉,则无以明觉之非梦也;苟无以明觉之非梦,则亦无以明生之非死矣。死生觉梦,未知所在,当其所遇,无不自得,何为在此而忧彼哉! 变化为形之骇动耳,故不以死生损累其心。 以形骸之变为旦宅之日新耳,其情不以为死。 夫常觉者,无往而有逆也,故人哭亦哭,正自是其所宜也(四)。 夫死生变化,吾皆吾之。既皆是吾,吾何失哉!未始失吾,吾何忧哉(五)!无逆,故人哭亦哭;无忧,故哭而不哀。 靡所不吾也,故玄同外内,弥贯古今,与化日新失吾,吾何忧哉(五)!无逆,故人哭亦哭;无忧,故哭而不哀。 靡所不吾也,故玄同外内,弥贯古今,与化日新,岂知吾之所在也! 言无往而不自得也。 梦之时自以为觉,则焉知今者之非梦耶,亦焉知其非觉耶?觉梦之化,无往而不可,则死生之变,无时而足惜也。 所造皆适,则忘适矣,故不及笑也。排者,推移之谓也。夫礼哭必哀,献笑必乐,哀乐存怀,则不能与适推移矣。今孟孙常适,故哭而不哀,与化俱往也。 安于推移而与化俱去,故乃入于寂寥而与天为一也。自此以上,至于子祀,其致一也。所执之丧异,故歌哭不同。 意而子见许由,许由曰:「尧何以资汝?」 资者,给济之谓也。 意而子曰「尧谓我:汝必躬服仁义而同。 意而子见许由,许由曰:「尧何以资汝?」 资者,给济之谓也。 意而子曰「尧谓我:汝必躬服仁义而明言是非。」许由曰:「而奚来为轵?夫尧既已黥汝以仁义,而劓汝以是非矣。汝将何以游夫遥荡恣睢转徙之涂乎?」 言其将以刑教自亏残,而不能复游夫自得之场,无系之涂也。 意而子曰:「虽然,吾愿游于其藩。」 不敢复求涉中道也,且愿游其藩傍而已。 许由曰:「不然。夫盲者无以与乎眉目颜色之好,瞽者无以与乎青黄黼黻之观。」意而子曰:「夫无庄之失其美,据梁之失其力,黄帝之亡其知,皆在炉捶之间耳。庸讵知夫造物者之不息我黥而补我劓,使我乘成以随先生邪?」 观。」意而子曰:「夫无庄之失其美,据梁之失其力,黄帝之亡其知,皆在炉捶之间耳。庸讵知夫造物者之不息我黥而补我劓,使我乘成以随先生邪?」 言天下之物,未必皆自成也,自然之理,亦有须冶锻而为器者耳。故此之三人,亦皆闻道而后忘其所务也。此皆寄言,以遣云为之累耳。 夫率性(二)直往者,自然也;往而伤性,性伤而能改者,亦自然也。庸讵知我(三)之自然当不息黥补劓,而乘可成之道以随夫子耶?而欲弃而勿告,恐非造物之至也(四)。 许由曰:「噫!未可知也。我为汝言其大略:吾师乎!吾师乎齑万物而不为义,泽及万世而不为仁告,恐非造物之至也(四)。 许由曰:「噫!未可知也。我为汝言其大略:吾师乎!吾师乎齑万物而不为义,泽及万世而不为仁,长于上古而不为老,覆载天地刻雕众形而不为巧。此所游已!」 皆自尔耳,亦无爱为于其间也,安所寄其仁义! 日新也。 自然,故非巧也。 游于不为而师于无师也。 颜回曰:「回益矣。」 以损之为益也。 仲尼曰:「何谓也?」曰:「回忘礼乐矣!」曰:「可矣,犹未也。」 仁者,兼爱之迹;义者,成物之功。爱之非仁,仁迹行焉;成之非义,义功见焉。存夫仁义,不足以知爱利之由无心,故忘之可也。但忘功迹,故犹未玄达也。 他日复见,曰:「回益矣。」曰:「何谓也由无心,故忘之可也。但忘功迹,故犹未玄达也。 他日复见,曰:「回益矣。」曰:「何谓也?」曰:「回忘仁义矣。曰:「可矣,犹未也。」 礼者,形体之用,乐者,乐生之具。忘其具,未若忘其所以具也。 他日复见,曰:「回益矣!」曰:「何谓也?」曰:「回坐忘矣。」仲尼蹴然曰:「何谓坐忘?」颜回曰:「堕肢体,黜聪明,离形去知,同于大通,此谓坐忘。」 无物不同,则未尝不适,未尝不适,何好何恶哉! 仲尼曰:「同则无好也,化则无常也。而果其贤乎!丘也请从而同于大通,此谓坐忘。」 无物不同,则未尝不适,未尝不适,何好何恶哉! 仲尼曰:「同则无好也,化则无常也。而果其贤乎!丘也请从而后也。」 同于化者,唯化所适,故无常也。 子舆与子桑友。而霖雨十日,子舆曰:「子桑殆病矣!」裹饭而往食之。至子桑之门,则若歌若哭,鼓琴曰:「父邪!母邪!天乎!人乎!」有不任其声而趋举其诗焉。子舆入,曰:「子之歌诗,何故若是?」 此二人相为于无相为者也。今裹饭而相食者,乃任之天理而自尔耳,非相为而后往者也。 嫌其有情,焉。子舆入,曰:「子之歌诗,何故若是?」 此二人相为于无相为者也。今裹饭而相食者,乃任之天理而自尔耳,非相为而后往者也。 嫌其有情,所以趋出远理也。 曰:「吾思夫使我至此极者而弗得也。父母岂欲吾贫哉?天无私覆,地无私载,天地岂私贫我哉?求其为之者而不得也!然而至此极者,命也夫!」 言物皆自然,无为之者也。 《庄子.内篇.应帝王第七》 啮缺问于王倪,四问而四不知。啮缺因跃而大喜,行以告蒲衣子。蒲衣子曰:「而乃今知之乎?有虞氏不及泰氏。有虞氏,其犹藏仁以要人,亦得人矣,而未始出于非人啮缺因跃而大喜,行以告蒲衣子。蒲衣子曰:「而乃今知之乎?有虞氏不及泰氏。有虞氏,其犹藏仁以要人,亦得人矣,而未始出于非人。泰氏,其卧徐徐,其觉于于。一以己为马,一以己为牛。其知情信,其德甚真,而未始入于非人。」 夫无心而任乎自化者,应为帝王也。 夫有虞氏之与泰氏,皆世事之迹耳,非所以迹者也。所以迹者,无迹也,世孰名之哉!未之尝名,何胜负之有耶!然无迹者,乘群变,履万世,世有夷险,故迹有不及也。 夫以所好为是人,所恶为非人者,唯以是非为域者也。夫能出于非人之域者,世有夷险,故迹有不及也。 夫以所好为是人,所恶为非人者,唯以是非为域者也。夫能出于非人之域者,必入于无非人之境矣,故无得无失,无可无不可,岂直藏仁而要人也! 夫如是,又奚是人非人之有哉!斯可谓出于非人之域。 任其自知,故情信。 任其自得,故无伪。 不入乎是非之域,所以绝于有虞之世。 肩吾见狂接舆。狂接舆曰:「日中始何以语女?」肩吾曰:「告我君人者以己出经式义度,人孰敢不听而化诸!」狂接舆曰:「是欺德也。其于治天下也,犹涉海凿河「告我君人者以己出经式义度,人孰敢不听而化诸!」狂接舆曰:「是欺德也。其于治天下也,犹涉海凿河,而使蚊负山也。夫圣人之治也,治外夫?正而后行,确乎能其事者而已矣。且鸟高飞以避矰弋之害,鼷鼠深穴乎神丘之下,以避熏凿之患,而曾二虫之无知?」 以己制物,则物失其真。 夫寄当于万物,则无事而自成;以一身制天下,则功莫就而任不胜也。 全其性分之内而已。 各正性命之分也。 不为其所不能。 禽兽犹各有以自存,故帝王任之而不为,则自成也。 言汝曾不知(三)此二虫之各存而不待教乎! 天根游于殷阳,至蓼水之上,适遭无名人而问焉,曰:「请问为天下。」无名人曰:「去!汝鄙人也,何问之不豫也!予方将与造遭无名人而问焉,曰:「请问为天下。」无名人曰:「去!汝鄙人也,何问之不豫也!予方将与造物者为人,厌,则又乘夫莽眇之鸟,以出六极之外,而游无何有之乡,以处圹垠之野。汝又何帠以治天下感予之心为?」 问为天下,则非起于大初,止于玄冥也。 任人之自为。 莽眇,群碎之谓耳。乘群碎,驰万物,故能出处常通,而无狭滞之地。 言皆放之自得之场,则不治而自治也。 又复问无名人曰:「汝游心于淡,合气于漠,顺物自然而无容私焉,而天下治矣。」 其任性而无所饰焉则淡矣。 漠然静于性而止。 任性自生,公也;心欲益之,私也;容私果不足以生生,而顺公乃全也。 阳子居见老聃,曰:「有人于此,向疾强梁,物彻疏明,学道不卷,如是者,可比明王乎?」老聃曰:「是于圣人也,胥易也。 阳子居见老聃,曰:「有人于此,向疾强梁,物彻疏明,学道不卷,如是者,可比明王乎?」老聃曰:「是于圣人也,胥易技系,劳形怵心者也。且也虎豹之文来田,猿狙之便来藉。如是者,可比明王乎?」阳子居蹴然曰:「敢问明王之治。」 言此功夫,容身不得,不足以比圣王。 此皆以其文章技能系累其身,非涉虚以御乎无方也。 老聃曰:「明王之治:功盖天下而似不自己,化贷万物而民弗恃。有莫举名,使物自喜。立乎不测,而游于无有者也。」 天下若无明王,则莫能自得。令(一)之自得,实明王之功也。然功在无为而还任天下。天下皆得自任,故似非明王之功。 夫明王皆就足物性,故人人皆云我实明王之功也。然功在无为而还任天下。天下皆得自任,故似非明王之功。 夫明王皆就足物性,故人人皆云我自尔,而莫知恃赖于明王。 虽有盖天下之功,而不举以为己名,故物皆自以为得而喜。 居变化之涂,日新而无方者也。 与万物为体,则所游者虚也。不能冥物,则迕物不暇,何暇游虚哉! 郑有神巫曰季咸,知人之死生存亡、祸福寿夭,期以岁月旬日若神。郑人见之,皆弃而走。列子见之而心醉,归,以告壶子,曰:「始吾以夫子之道为至矣,则又有至焉者矣。」 不憙自闻死日也。 谓季咸之至又过于夫子。 壶子曰:「吾与汝既其文,未既其实。而固得道与?众雌而无雄,而又奚卵焉!而以道与世亢,必信,夫故使人得而相汝。尝试与来,以予示之。」 言列子之未怀道也。 未怀道则有心必信,夫故使人得而相汝。尝试与来,以予示之。」 言列子之未怀道也。 未怀道则有心,有心而亢其一方,以必信于世,故可得而相之。 明日,列子与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:「嘻!子之先生死矣!弗活矣!不以旬数矣!吾见怪焉,见湿灰焉。」列子入,泣涕沾襟以告壶子。壶子曰:「乡吾示之以地文,萌乎不震不止,是殆见吾杜德机也。尝又与来。」 萌然不动,亦不自正,与枯木同其不华,湿灰均于寂魄,此乃至人无感之时也。夫至人,其动也天,其静也地,其行也水流,其止也渊默。渊默之与水流,天行之与地止,其于不为而自尔,一也。今季咸见其尸居而坐忘,即谓之将死;睹其神动而天随,也渊默。渊默之与水流,天行之与地止,其于不为而自尔,一也。今季咸见其尸居而坐忘,即谓之将死;睹其神动而天随,因谓之有生。诚〔能〕(三)应不以心而理自玄符,与变化升降而以世为量,然后足为物主而顺时无极,故非相者所测耳。此应帝王之大意也。 德机不发曰杜。 明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:「幸矣!子之先生遇我也,有瘳矣!全然有生矣!吾见其杜权矣!」列子入,以告壶子。壶子曰:「乡吾示之以天壤,名实不入,而机发于踵。是殆见吾善者机也。尝又与来。」 权,机也。今乃自觉昨日之所见,见其杜权,故谓之将死也。 天壤之中,覆载之功见矣。比之地文,不犹(来。」 权,机也。今乃自觉昨日之所见,见其杜权,故谓之将死也。 天壤之中,覆载之功见矣。比之地文,不犹(卵)〔外〕(一)乎!此应感之容也。 任自然而覆载,则天机玄应,而名利之饰皆为弃物也。 常在极上起。 机发而善于彼,彼乃见之。 明日,又与之见壶子。出而谓列子曰:「子之先生不齐,吾无得而相焉。试齐,且复相之。」列子入,以告壶子。壶子曰:「吾乡示之以太冲莫胜,是殆见吾衡气机也。鲵桓之审为渊,止水之审为渊,流水之审为渊。渊有九名,此处三焉。尝又与来。」 居太冲之极,浩然泊心而玄同万方,故胜负莫得厝(一)其间也。 无往不平,混然一之。以管窥天者,莫见其涯,故似不齐。 渊者,静默之谓耳。夫水常无心,委顺外物,故虽流之与止,鲵桓之与龙跃无往不平,混然一之。以管窥天者,莫见其涯,故似不齐。 渊者,静默之谓耳。夫水常无心,委顺外物,故虽流之与止,鲵桓之与龙跃,常渊然自若,未始失其静默也。夫至人用之则行,舍之则止,行止虽异而玄默一焉,故略举三异以明之。虽波流九变,治乱纷如,居其极者,常淡然自得,泊乎忘为也。 明日,又与之见壶子。立未定,自失而走。壶子曰:「追之!」列子追之不及。反,以报壶子曰:「已灭矣,已失矣,吾弗及已。」壶子曰:「乡吾示之以未始出吾宗。吾与之虚而委蛇,不知其谁何,因以为弟靡,因以为波流,故逃也。」 虽变化无常,而常深根冥极也。 无心而随物化。 (汛)〔泛〕然无所系也。 变化之虚而委蛇,不知其谁何,因以为弟靡,因以为波流,故逃也。」 虽变化无常,而常深根冥极也。 无心而随物化。 (汛)〔泛〕然无所系也。 变化颓靡,世事波流,无往而不因也。夫至人一耳,然应世变而时动,故相者无所措其目,自失而走。此明应帝王者无方也。 然后列子自以为未始学而归。三年不出,为其妻爨,食豕如食人,于事无与亲。雕琢复朴,块然独以其形立。纷而封哉,一以是终。 忘贵贱也。 唯所遇耳。 去华取实。 外饰去也。 虽动而真不散也。 使物各自终。 无为名尸,无为谋府,无为事任,无为知主。体尽无穷,而游无朕。尽其所受乎天,而无见得,亦虚而已!至人之用心自终。 无为名尸,无为谋府,无为事任,无为知主。体尽无穷,而游无朕。尽其所受乎天,而无见得,亦虚而已!至人之用心若镜,不将不迎,应而不藏,故能胜物而不伤。 因物则物各自当其名也。 使物各自谋也。 付物使各自任。 无心则物各自主其知也。 因天下之自为,故驰万物而无穷也。 任物,故无迹。 足则止也。 见得则不知止。 不虚则不能任群实。 鉴物而无情。 来即应,去即止。 物来乃(三)鉴,鉴不以心,故虽天下之广(四),而无劳神之累。无情。 来即应,去即止。 物来乃(三)鉴,鉴不以心,故虽天下之广(四),而无劳神之累。 南海之帝为倏,北海之帝为忽,中央之帝为浑沌。倏与忽时相下遇于浑沌之地,浑沌待之甚善。倏与忽谋报浑沌之德,曰:「人皆有七窍以视听食息此独无有,尝试凿之。」日凿一窍,七日而浑沌死。 为者败之。 向秀、郭象着《庄子注》 《庄子.内篇.逍遥游第一》 夫小大虽殊,而放于自得之场,则物任其性,事称其能,各当其分,逍遥一也,岂容胜负于其间哉! 北冥有鱼,其名为鲲。鲲之大,不知其几千里也。化而其分,逍遥一也,岂容胜负于其间哉! 北冥有鱼,其名为鲲。鲲之大,不知其几千里也。化而为鸟,其名为鹏。 鹏鲲之实,吾所未详也。夫庄子之大意,在乎逍遥游放,无为而自得,故极小大之致,以明性分之适。达观之士,宜要其会归而遗其所寄,不足事事曲与生说。自不害其弘旨,皆可略知耳。 鹏之背,不知其几千里也;怒而飞,其翼若垂天之云。是鸟也,海运则将徙于南冥。南冥者,天池也。 非冥海不足以运其身,非九万里不足以负其翼。此岂好奇哉?直以大物必自生于大处,大处亦必自生此大物,理固自然,不患其失,又何处心于其间哉。 齐谐者,志怪者也。谐之言曰:「鹏之徙于南冥也,水击三千里,抟扶摇而上者九万里, 夫翼必自生此大物,理固自然,不患其失,又何处心于其间哉。 齐谐者,志怪者也。谐之言曰:「鹏之徙于南冥也,水击三千里,抟扶摇而上者九万里, 夫翼大则难举,故搏扶摇而后能上,九万里乃足自胜耳。既有斯翼,岂得决然而起,数仞而下哉!此皆不得不然,非乐然也。 去以六月息者也。」 夫大鸟一去半岁,至天池而息;小鸟一飞半朝,抢榆枋而止。此比所能则有闲矣,其于适性一也。 野马也,尘埃也,生物之以息相吹也。 此皆鹏之所凭以飞者耳。野马者,游气也。 天之苍苍,其正色邪?其远而无所至极邪?其视下也,亦若是则已矣。 今观天之苍苍,竟未皆鹏之所凭以飞者耳。野马者,游气也。 天之苍苍,其正色邪?其远而无所至极邪?其视下也,亦若是则已矣。 今观天之苍苍,竟未知便是天之正色邪,天知为远而无极邪。鹏之自上以视地,亦若人之自是天。则止而图南矣,言鹏不知道里之远近,趣足以自胜而逝。 且夫水之积也不厚,则负大舟也无力。覆杯水于坳堂之上,则芥为之舟;置杯焉则胶,水浅而舟大也。 此皆明鹏之所以高飞者,翼大故耳。夫质小者所资不待大,则质大者所用不得小矣。覆杯水于坳堂之上,则芥为之舟;置杯焉则胶,水浅而舟大也。 此皆明鹏之所以高飞者,翼大故耳。夫质小者所资不待大,则质大者所用不得小矣。故理有至分,物有定极,各足称事,其济一也。若乃失乎忘生之(主)【生】而营生于至当之外,事不任力,动不称情,则虽垂天之翼不能无穷,决起之飞不能无困矣。 风之积也不厚,则其负大翼也无力。故九万里,则风斯在下矣,而后乃今掊风;背负责天而草之夭阏者,而后乃今将图南。 夫所以乃今将图南者,非其好高而慕远也,,而后乃今掊风;背负责天而草之夭阏者,而后乃今将图南。 夫所以乃今将图南者,非其好高而慕远也,风不积则夭阏不通故耳。此大鹏之逍遥也。 蜩与学鸠笑之曰:『我决起而飞,枪榆枋而止,时则不至而控于地而已矣,溪以之九万里而南为?』 苟足于其性,则虽大鹏无以自贵于小鸟,小鸟无羡于天池,而荣愿有余矣。故小大虽殊,逍遥一也。 适莽苍者,三凔而反,腹犹果然;适百里者,宿舂粮;适千里者,三月聚粮。 所适弥远,则聚粮弥多,故其翼弥大,则积气弥厚也。 之二虫又何知! 二虫,谓鹏虾也。对大于小,所以均异趣也。夫趣之所以异,岂知异而异哉?皆不知所以然而自然耳。自然耳,不为也。此逍遥之也。 之二虫又何知! 二虫,谓鹏虾也。对大于小,所以均异趣也。夫趣之所以异,岂知异而异哉?皆不知所以然而自然耳。自然耳,不为也。此逍遥之大意。 小知不及大知,小年不及大年。 物各有性,性各有极,皆如年知,岂跂尚之所及哉!自此已下至于列子,历举年知之大小,各信其方,未有足以相倾者也。然后统以无待之人,遗彼忘我,冥此群异,异方同得而我无功名,是故统小大者,无小无大者也;苟有乎大小,则虽有大鹏之与斥鴳,宰官之与御风,同为累物耳。其死生者,无死无生者也;苟有乎死生,则虽大椿之与蟪蛄,彭祖之与朝无大者也;苟有乎大小,则虽有大鹏之与斥鴳,宰官之与御风,同为累物耳。其死生者,无死无生者也;苟有乎死生,则虽大椿之与蟪蛄,彭祖之与朝菌,均于短折耳。故游于无小无大者,无穷者也;冥乎不死不生者,无极者也。若夫逍遥而系于有方,则虽放之使游而有所穷矣,未能无待也。 溪以知其然也?朝菌不知晦朔,蛇蛄不知春秋,此小年也。楚之南有冥灵者,以五百岁为春,五百岁为秋;上古有大桩者,以八千岁为春,八千岁为秋。此大年也。而彭祖乃今以久特闻,众人匹之,不亦悲乎! 夫年知不相及若此之悬也,比于众人之所悲,亦可悲矣。而众人未尝悲此者,以其性各有极也年也。而彭祖乃今以久特闻,众人匹之,不亦悲乎! 夫年知不相及若此之悬也,比于众人之所悲,亦可悲矣。而众人未尝悲此者,以其性各有极也。苟知其极,则毫分不可相跂,天下又何所悲乎哉!夫物未尝以大欲小,而必以小羡大,故举小大之殊各有定分,非羡欲所及,则羡欲之累可以绝矣。夫悲生于累,累绝于悲去,悲去而性命不安者,未之有也。 汤之问棘也是已。 汤之问棘,亦云物各有极,任之则条畅,故庄子以所问为是也。 穷发之北有冥海者,天池也。有鱼焉,其广数千里,未之有也。 汤之问棘也是已。 汤之问棘,亦云物各有极,任之则条畅,故庄子以所问为是也。 穷发之北有冥海者,天池也。有鱼焉,其广数千里,未有知其修者,其名为鲲。有鸟焉,其名为鹏,背若泰山,翼若垂天之云,抟扶摇羊角而上者九万里,绝云气,负青天,然后图南,且适南冥也。斥鴳笑之曰:『彼且溪适也?我腾跃而上,不过数仞而下,翱翔蓬蒿之闲,此亦飞之至也。而彼且溪适也?』此小大之辩也。 各以得性为至,自尽为极也。向言二虫殊异,故所至不同,或翱翔天池,或毕至榆枋,则各称体而足,不知所以然也。今言小大之辩,各有自然之素,记非跂慕之所及,亦各安其天性,不悲所以异,故再出之。 故夫知效一官,行比一乡,德合一君,而征一国者,其自视也亦若此矣。 亦犹鸟之自得于一方也。 而宋荣子犹然笑之。 未,行比一乡,德合一君,而征一国者,其自视也亦若此矣。 亦犹鸟之自得于一方也。 而宋荣子犹然笑之。 未能齐,故有笑。 且举世而誉之而不加劝,举世而非之而不加沮, 审自得也。 定乎内外之分, 内我而外物。 辩乎荣辱之竟, 荣己而辱人。 斯已矣。 亦不能复过此。 彼其于世未数数然也。 足于身。故闲于世也。 虽然,犹有未树也。 为能自是耳,未能无所不可也。 夫列子御风而行,泠然善也。 泠然,轻妙之貌。 旬有五日而后反。 苟有待焉,则虽御风而行耳,不能以一时而周也。 彼于致福者,未数数然也。 自然御风行耳,非数数然求知也。 此虽免乎行,犹有所待者也。 非风则不得行,斯必有待也。唯无所不成者无待耳数数然求知也。 此虽免乎行,犹有所待者也。 非风则不得行,斯必有待也。唯无所不成者无待耳。 若夫乘天地之正,而御六气之辩,以游无穷者,彼且恶乎待哉! 天地者,万物之总名也。天地以万物为体,而万物必以自然为正。自然者,不为而自然者也。故大鹏之能高,斥鴳之能下,桩木之能长,朝菌之能短,凡此皆自然之所能,非为之所能也。不为而自能,所以为正也。故乘天地之正者,即是顺万物之性也;御六气之辩者,即是游变化之途也;如斯以往,则何往之有穷哉!所御斯乘,又将恶乎待哉!此乃至德之人玄同彼我者之逍遥也。苟之性也;御六气之辩者,即是游变化之途也;如斯以往,则何往之有穷哉!所御斯乘,又将恶乎待哉!此乃至德之人玄同彼我者之逍遥也。苟有待焉,则虽列子之轻妙,犹不能以无风而行,故必得其所待,然后逍遥耳,而况大鹏乎!夫唯与物冥而循大变者,为能无待而常通,岂【独】自通而已哉!又顺有待者,使不失其所待,所待不失,则同于大通矣。故有待无待,无所不能齐也;至于各安其性,天机自张,受而不知,则无所不能殊也。夫无待犹不足以顺有待者,使不失其所待,所待不失,则同于大通矣。故有待无待,无所不能齐也;至于各安其性,天机自张,受而不知,则无所不能殊也。夫无待犹不足以殊有待,况有待者之巨细乎! 故曰,至人无己, 无己,故顺物,顺物而至矣。 神人无功, 夫物未尝有谢生于自然者,而必欣赖于针石,故理至则迹灭矣。今顺而不助,与至理为一,故无功 圣人无名。 圣人者,物得性之名耳,为足以名其所以得也。 尧让天下于许由曰:「日月出矣而爝火不息,其于光也,不亦难乎!时雨降矣而犹浸灌,其于泽也,不亦劳乎!夫子立而天下治。 尧让天下于许由曰:「日月出矣而爝火不息,其于光也,不亦难乎!时雨降矣而犹浸灌,其于泽也,不亦劳乎!夫子立而天下治,而我犹尸之,吾自视缺然,请致天下。」许由曰:「子治天下,天下既已治也。 夫能令天下治,不治天下者也。故尧以不治治之,非治之而治者也。今许由方明既治则无所待之,而治实由尧,故有「子治」之言,宜忘言以寻其所况。而或者遂云治之而治者尧也,不治而尧得以治者许由也,斯失之远矣。夫治之由乎不治,为之出乎无为也,取于尧而足,岂借之许由哉!若谓拱默乎山林之中,,斯失之远矣。夫治之由乎不治,为之出乎无为也,取于尧而足,岂借之许由哉!若谓拱默乎山林之中,而后得称无为者,此庄老之谈所以见弃于当涂,【当涂】者自必于有为之域而不反者,斯之由也。 而我犹代子,吾将为名乎?名者实之宾也。吾将为宾乎? 夫自任者对物,而顺物者与物无对,故尧无对于天下,而许由与稷契为匹矣。何以言其然邪?夫与物冥者,故群物之所不能离也。是以无心玄应唯感之从,泛乎若不系之舟,东西之非己也,故无行而不与百姓共者,亦无往不为天下之君矣。以此为君,若天下自高,实君之德也。若独亢然立乎高山之顶,非夫人之有情于自守,守一加之偏尚,何得专此!此故俗中之一物,而为尧之外臣耳。若以外臣代乎内主,斯有为君之名而无任君之实也。 鹪立乎高山之顶,非夫人之有情于自守,守一加之偏尚,何得专此!此故俗中之一物,而为尧之外臣耳。若以外臣代乎内主,斯有为君之名而无任君之实也。 鹪鹩巢于深林,不过一枝;偃鼠饮河,不过满腹。 性各有极,苟足其极,则余天下之财也。 归休乎君,予无所用天下为! 君之无用,而尧独有之。明夫怀豁者无方,故天下乐推而不厌。 庖人虽不治庖,尸祝不越樽俎而代之矣。」 庖人尸祝,各安其所司;鸟兽万物,各足于所受;帝尧许由,各静其所遇;此乃天下之至实也。各得其实,又何所为乎哉?自得而已矣。故尧许之行虽异,其于逍遥一也。 肩吾问于连叔曰:『吾闻言于接舆,大而无当,往而不反。吾惊怖其言,各得其实,又何所为乎哉?自得而已矣。故尧许之行虽异,其于逍遥一也。 肩吾问于连叔曰:『吾闻言于接舆,大而无当,往而不反。吾惊怖其言,犹河汉而无极也;大有径庭,不近人情焉。』连叔曰:『其言谓何哉?』曰:『藐姑射之山,有神人居焉,冗肤若冰雪,淖约若处子。 此皆寄言耳。夫神人即今所谓圣人也。夫圣人虽在庙堂之上,然其心无异于山林之中,世岂识之哉!徒见其戴黄屋,佩玉玺,便谓足以缨绂其心矣﹔见其历山川,同民事,便谓足以憔悴其神矣。岂知至至者之不亏哉!今言王德之人,而寄之此山,将明世所无由识,故乃托之于绝垠之外,而推至者之不亏哉!今言王德之人,而寄之此山,将明世所无由识,故乃托之于绝垠之外,而推之于视听之表耳。处子者,不以外伤内。 不食五谷,吸风饮露。 俱食五谷而独为神人,明神人者非五谷所为,而特禀自然之妙气。 乘云气,御飞龙,而游乎四海之外。其神凝,使物不疵疠而年谷熟。吾以是狂而不信也。』 夫体神居灵而穷理极妙者,虽静默闲堂之里,而玄同四海之表,故乘两仪而御六弃,同人群而驱万物。苟无物而不顺,则浮云斯乘矣﹔无形而不载,则飞龙斯御矣。遗身而自得,虽淡然而不待,坐忘行忘,忘而为之,故行若曳枯木,止若聚死灰,事以云其神凝也。其神凝,则不凝者自得矣。世皆齐其所见而断之,岂忘而为之,故行若曳枯木,止若聚死灰,事以云其神凝也。其神凝,则不凝者自得矣。世皆齐其所见而断之,岂尝信此哉! 连叔曰:『然。瞽者无以与乎文章之观,聋者无以与乎钟鼓之声。岂唯形骸有聋盲哉?夫知亦有之。 不之至言之极妙,而以为狂而不信,此知之聋盲也。 是其言也,犹时女也。 谓此接舆之所言者,自然为物所求,办知之聋盲者为无此理。 之人也,之德也,将旁礡万物以为一世蕲乎乱,孰弊弊焉以天下为事! 夫圣人之心,极两仪之至会,穷万物之妙数。故能体化合变。无往不可,磅礡万物,无物不然。世以乱故求我,我无心也。我苟无心,亦何为不应世哉!然体玄而极妙者,其所以会通万物之性,而陶铸天下之化,我,我无心也。我苟无心,亦何为不应世哉!然体玄而极妙者,其所以会通万物之性,而陶铸天下之化,以成尧舜之名者,常以不为为之耳。孰弊弊焉劳神苦思,以事为事,然后能乎! 之人也,物莫之伤, 夫安于所伤,则伤不能伤;伤不能伤,而物亦不伤之也。 大浸稽天而不溺,大旱金石流土山焦而不热。 无往而不安,则所在皆适,死生无变于己,况溺热之间哉!故至人之不婴乎祸难,非避之也,推理直前而自然与吉会。 是其尘垢秕糠,将犹陶铸尧舜者也,孰肯以物为事! 尧舜者,世事之名耳;为名者,非名也。故夫尧舜者,岂直尧舜而已哉?必有神人之实焉。今所称尧舜者,徒名其尘垢秕糠耳。 宋人资章甫而适诸越,越人断发文身,无所用之。尧治天下之民,平海内之政,往见四子藐姑射之人之实焉。今所称尧舜者,徒名其尘垢秕糠耳。 宋人资章甫而适诸越,越人断发文身,无所用之。尧治天下之民,平海内之政,往见四子藐姑射之山,汾水之阳,窅然丧其天下焉。』 夫尧之无用天下为,亦犹越人之无所用章甫耳。然遗天下者,固天下之所宗。天下虽宗尧,而尧未尝有天下也,故窅然丧之,而尝游心于绝冥之境,虽寄坐万物之上,而未始不逍遥也。四子者,盖寄言以明尧之不一于尧耳。夫尧实冥矣,其迹则尧也。自迹观冥,内外异域,未足怪也。世徒见尧之为尧,岂识其冥哉! 惠子谓庄子曰:『魏王贻我大瓠之种,我树之成而实五石,以盛水浆,其坚不能自举也。剖之以为瓢,则瓠落无所容。非不呺然大也,吾为其无用而掊之。』庄子曰:『夫子固自举也。剖之以为瓢,则瓠落无所容。非不呺然大也,吾为其无用而掊之。』庄子曰:『夫子固拙于用大矣。宋人有善为不龟手之药者,世世以洴澼絖为事。 其药能令手不拘坼,故常漂絮于水中也。 客闻之,请买其方百金。聚族而谋曰:『我世世为洴澼絖,不过数金;今一朝而鬻技百金,请与之。』客得之以说吴王。越有难,吴王使之将,冬与越人水战,大败越人,裂地而封之。能不龟手,一也;或以封,或不免于洴澼絖,则所用之异也。今子有五石之瓠,何不虑以为大樽而浮乎江湖,而忧其人,裂地而封之。能不龟手,一也;或以封,或不免于洴澼絖,则所用之异也。今子有五石之瓠,何不虑以为大樽而浮乎江湖,而忧其瓠落无所容?则夫子犹有蓬之心也夫!』 蓬,非直达者也。此章言物各有宜,苟得其宜,安往而不逍遥也。 惠子谓庄子曰:『吾有大树,人谓之樗。其大本拥肿而不中绳墨,其小枝卷曲而不中规矩,立之涂,匠者不顾。今子之言,大而无用,众所同去也。』庄子曰:『子独不见狸狌乎?卑身而伏,以候敖者;东西跳梁,不辟高下;中于机辟死于罔罟。今夫□牛,其大若垂天之云。此能为大矣,而不能执鼠。今子有大树,患其无用,何不树之于无何有之乡,广莫之野,彷徨乎无为其侧,逍遥乎寝卧其下。不夭斤斧,物无害者,无所可用,安所困若哉!』 夫大小之物,苟失其极,则利害之理均;用得其所,则物皆逍遥也。 《庄子用,安所困若哉!』 夫大小之物,苟失其极,则利害之理均;用得其所,则物皆逍遥也。 《庄子.内篇.齐物论第二》 南郭子綦隐机而坐,仰天而嘘,答焉似丧其耦。颜成子游立侍乎前,曰:「何居乎?形固可使如槁木,而心固可使如死灰乎?今之隐机者,非昔之隐机者也?」 夫自是而非彼,美己而恶人,物莫不皆然。然,故是非虽异而彼我均也。 同天人,均彼我,故外无与为欢,而答焉解(一)体,若失其配匹。 死灰槁木,取其寂莫(三)无情耳。夫任自然而忘是非者,其体中独任天真而已,又何所有哉!故止若立枯木,动若运槁枝,坐若死灰,行若游尘。动止之容,吾所不能一也;其于无心而自得(四),吾所不能二也(任天真而已,又何所有哉!故止若立枯木,动若运槁枝,坐若死灰,行若游尘。动止之容,吾所不能一也;其于无心而自得(四),吾所不能二也(五)。 子游尝见隐机者,而未有(六)若子綦也。 吾丧我,我自忘矣;我自忘矣,天下有何物足识哉!故都忘外内,然后超然俱得。 子綦曰:「偃,不亦善乎而问之也!今者吾丧我,汝知之乎?汝闻人籁而未闻地籁,汝闻地籁而不闻天籁夫!」 籁,箫也。夫箫管参差,宫商异律,故有短长高下万殊之声。声虽万殊,而所禀之度一也,然则优劣无所错其闲矣。况之风物,异音同是,而咸自取焉,则天地之籁见矣。 子游曰:「敢问其方。」子綦曰:「夫大块噫气,其名为风。是唯无作,作则万窍怒呺。而独不闻异音同是,而咸自取焉,则天地之籁见矣。 子游曰:「敢问其方。」子綦曰:「夫大块噫气,其名为风。是唯无作,作则万窍怒呺。而独不闻之翏翏乎? 大块者,无物也。夫噫气者,岂有物哉?气块然而自噫耳。物之生也,莫不块然而自生,则块然之体大矣,故遂以大块为名。 山林之畏佳,大木而围之窍穴,似鼻,似口,似耳,似笄,似圈,似臼,似洼者,似污者。激者、謞者、叱者、吸者、叫者、号者、宎者,咬者,前者唱于而随者唱喁,泠风则小和,飘风则大和,厉风济则众窍为虚。而独不见之调调,之刁刁乎?」 言风唯无作,作则万窍皆怒动而为声也。 长风之声。 大风之所扇动也。 此略举众窍之所似。 此略举(异)〔众〕(八)窍之声殊。 夫声之宫商虽千变万化,唱和大小,莫不称其所受而各当其分。 济,止也。烈风作之声殊。 夫声之宫商虽千变万化,唱和大小,莫不称其所受而各当其分。 济,止也。烈风作则众窍实,及其止则众窍虚。虚实虽异,其于各得则同。 调调(刁刁)〔刀刀〕,动摇貌也。言物声既异,而形之动摇亦又不同也。动虽不同,其得齐一耳,岂调调独是而(刁刁)〔刀刀〕独非乎! 子游曰:「地籁则众窍是已,人籁遇比竹是已,敢问天籁。」子綦曰:「夫天籁者,吹万不同,而使其自己也。咸其自取,怒者其谁邪?」 此天籁也。夫天籁者,岂复别有一物哉?即众窍已,敢问天籁。」子綦曰:「夫天籁者,吹万不同,而使其自己也。咸其自取,怒者其谁邪?」 此天籁也。夫天籁者,岂复别有一物哉?即众窍比竹之属,接乎有生之类,会而共成一天耳。无既无矣,则不能生有;有之未生,又不能为生。然则生生者谁哉?块然而自生耳。自生耳,非我生也。我既不能生物,物亦不能生我,则我自然矣。自己而然,则谓之天然。天然耳,非为也,故以天言之。〔以天言之〕(一)所以明其自然也,岂苍苍之谓哉!而或者谓天籁役物使从己也。夫天且不能自有,况能有物哉!故天者,万物之总名也,莫适为天,谁主役物乎?故物各自生而无所出焉,此天道也。 物皆自得之耳,谁主怒之使然哉!此重明天籁也。 大知闲闲,小知闲闲。也,莫适为天,谁主役物乎?故物各自生而无所出焉,此天道也。 物皆自得之耳,谁主怒之使然哉!此重明天籁也。 大知闲闲,小知闲闲。大言炎炎,小言詹詹。其寐也魂交,其觉也形开。与接为构,日以心斗。缦者、窖者、密者。小恐惴惴,大恐缦缦。其发若机栝,其司是非之谓也﹔其留如诅盟,其守胜之谓也﹔其杀若秋冬,以言其日消也﹔其溺之所为之,不可使复之也﹔其厌也如缄,以言其老洫也﹔近死之心,莫使复阳也。喜怒哀乐,虑叹变慹,姚佚启态,乐出虚,蒸成菌。日夜相代乎前,而莫知其所萌。已乎,已乎!旦暮得此,其所由以生乎! 此盖知之不同。 此盖言语之异。 此盖寤寐之异。 此盖交接之异。 此盖恐悸之异。 此盖动止之异。 其衰杀日消有如此者! 此盖知之不同。 此盖言语之异。 此盖寤寐之异。 此盖交接之异。 此盖恐悸之异。 此盖动止之异。 其衰杀日消有如此者。 其溺而遂往有如此者。 其厌没于欲,老而愈洫,有如此者。 其利患轻祸,阴结遂志,有如此者。 此盖性情之异者。 此盖事变之异也。自此以上,略举天籁之无方;自此以下,明无方之自然也。物各自然,不知所以然而然,则形虽弥异,其(五)然弥同也。 日夜相代,代故以新也。夫天地万物,变化日新,与时俱往,何物萌之哉?自然而然耳。 言其自生。 非彼无我,非我无所取。是亦近矣,而不知所为使。若有真宰,而特不得其眹。可行己信,而不见其形,有情而无形。 彼,自然也。自然生我,我自然生。故自然者,即我之自然,岂远之哉! 凡物云云,皆自尔耳,非相为使也,故任之而而无形。 彼,自然也。自然生我,我自然生。故自然者,即我之自然,岂远之哉! 凡物云云,皆自尔耳,非相为使也,故任之而理自至矣。 万物万情,趣舍不同,若有(一)真宰使之然也。起索真宰之眹迹,而亦终不得,则明物皆自然,无使物然也。 今夫行者,信己可得行也。 不见所以得行之形。 情当其物,故形不别见也。 面骸、九窍、六藏、赅而存焉,吾谁与为亲?汝皆说之乎?其有私焉?如是皆有为臣妾乎?其臣妾不足以相治乎?其递相为君臣乎,其有真君存焉!如求得其情与不得说之乎?其有私焉?如是皆有为臣妾乎?其臣妾不足以相治乎?其递相为君臣乎,其有真君存焉!如求得其情与不得,无益损乎其真。 付之自然,而莫不皆存也。 直自(二)存耳。 皆说之,则是有所私也。有私则不能赅而存矣,故不说而自存,不为而自生也。 若皆私之,则志过其分,上下相冒,而莫为臣妾矣。臣妾之才,而不安臣妾之任,则失矣。故知君臣上下,手足外内,乃天理自然,岂真人之所为哉! 夫臣妾但各当其分耳,未为不足以相治也。相治者,若手足耳目,四肢百体,各有所司而更相御用也。 夫时之所贤内,乃天理自然,岂真人之所为哉! 夫臣妾但各当其分耳,未为不足以相治也。相治者,若手足耳目,四肢百体,各有所司而更相御用也。 夫时之所贤者为君,才不应世者为臣。若天之自高,地之自卑,首自在上,足自居下,岂有递哉!虽无错于当而必自当也。 任之而自尔,则非伪也。 凡得真性,用其自为者,虽复皂隶,犹不顾毁誉而自安其业。故知与不知,皆自若也。若乃开希幸之路,以下冒上,物丧其真,人忘其本,则毁誉之间,俯仰失错也。 一受其成形,不亡以待尽。与物相刃相靡,其行进如驰,而莫之能止,不亦悲乎!终身役役而不见其成功,苶然疲役而不知其所归,可不哀邪其成形,不亡以待尽。与物相刃相靡,其行进如驰,而莫之能止,不亦悲乎!终身役役而不见其成功,苶然疲役而不知其所归,可不哀邪!人谓之不死,奚益!其形化,其心与之然,可不谓大哀乎?人之生也,固若是芒乎?其我独芒,而人亦有不芒者乎? 言性各有分,故知者守知以待终,而愚者抱愚以至死,岂有能中易其性者也! 群品云云,逆顺相交,各信其偏见而恣其所行,莫能自反。此(皆)〔比〕(三)众人之所悲者,亦可悲矣。而众人未尝以此为悲者,性然故也。物各性然,又何物足悲哉! 夫物情无极,知足者鲜(三)众人之所悲者,亦可悲矣。而众人未尝以此为悲者,性然故也。物各性然,又何物足悲哉! 夫物情无极,知足者鲜。故得(止)〔此〕(四)不止,复逐于彼。皆疲役终身,未厌其志,死而后已。故其成功者无时可见也。 凡物各以所好役其形骸,至于疲困苶然。不知所以好此之归趣云何也! 言其实与死同。 言其心形并驰,困而不反,比于凡人所哀,则此真哀之大也。然凡人未尝以此为哀,则凡所哀者,不足哀也。 凡此上事,皆不知其所以然形并驰,困而不反,比于凡人所哀,则此真哀之大也。然凡人未尝以此为哀,则凡所哀者,不足哀也。 凡此上事,皆不知其所以然而然,故曰芒也。今未知者皆不知所以知而自知矣,生者〔皆〕(六)不知所以生而自生矣。万物虽异,至于生不由知,则未有不同者也,故天下莫不芒也。 夫随其成心而师之,谁独且无师乎?奚必知代而自取者有之?愚者与有焉!未成乎心而有是非,是今日适越而昔至也。是以无有为有。无有为有,虽有神禹且不能知,吾独且奈何哉! 夫心之足以制一身之用者,谓之成心。人自师其成心,则人各自有师矣。人各自有师,故付之而自当。 夫以成代不成,非知也,心自得耳。故愚者亦师其成心,未肯用其所谓短而舍其所师其成心,则人各自有师矣。人各自有师,故付之而自当。 夫以成代不成,非知也,心自得耳。故愚者亦师其成心,未肯用其所谓短而舍其所谓长者也。 今日适越,昨日何由至哉?未成乎心,是非何由生哉?明夫是非者,群品之所不能无,故至人两顺之。 理无是非,而惑者以为有,此以无有为有也。惑心已成,虽圣人不能解,故付之自若而不强知也。 夫言非吹也,言者有言。其所言者特未定也。果有言邪?其未尝有言邪?其以为异于鷇音,亦有辩乎?其无辩乎? 各有所说,故异于吹。 我以为是而彼以为非,彼之所是,我又非之,故未定也。未定也者,由彼我之情偏。 以为有言邪?辩乎? 各有所说,故异于吹。 我以为是而彼以为非,彼之所是,我又非之,故未定也。未定也者,由彼我之情偏。 以为有言邪?然未足以有所定。 以为无言邪?则据己已有言。 夫言与鷇音,其致一也,有辩无辩,诚未可定也。天下之情不必同而所言不能异,故是非纷纭,莫知所定。 道恶乎隐而有真伪?言恶乎隐而有是非?道恶乎往而不存?言恶乎存而不可?道隐于小成,言隐于荣华。故有儒墨之是非,以是其所非而非其所是。欲是其所非而非其所是,则莫若以明。 道焉不在!言何隐蔽而有真伪,是非之名纷然而起? 皆存。 皆其所是。欲是其所非而非其所是,则莫若以明。 道焉不在!言何隐蔽而有真伪,是非之名纷然而起? 皆存。 皆可。 夫小成荣华,自隐于道,而道不可隐。则真伪是非者,行于荣华而止于实当,见于小成而灭于大全也。 儒墨更相是非,而天下皆儒墨也。故百家并起,各私所见,而未始出其方也。 夫有是有非者,儒墨之所是也;无是无非者,儒墨之所非也。今欲是儒墨之所非而非儒墨之所是者,乃欲明无是无非也。欲明无是无非,则莫若还以儒墨反复相明。反复相明,则所是者非是而所非者非非矣。非非则无非,非是则无是。 物无非彼,物无非是。自彼则不见,自知则知之。故曰:彼出于是,是亦因彼。彼是方生之说也。虽然,方生方死,方死方生﹔方可方不可,方不可方可﹔因是因非,因非因是。是知则知之。故曰:彼出于是,是亦因彼。彼是方生之说也。虽然,方生方死,方死方生﹔方可方不可,方不可方可﹔因是因非,因非因是。是以圣人不由,而照之于天,亦因是也。 物皆自是,故无非是;物皆相彼,故无非彼。无非彼,则天下无是矣;无非是,则天下无彼矣。无彼无是,所以玄同也。 夫物之偏也,皆不见彼之所见,而独自知其所知。自知其所知,则自以为是。自以为是,则以彼为非矣。故曰彼出于是,是亦因彼,彼是相因而生者也。 夫死生之变,犹春秋冬夏四时行耳。故死生之状虽异,其于各安所遇,一也。今生者方自谓生为生,而死者方自谓生为死,则无生矣。生者方自谓死为死,而死者方自谓死为生,则无死矣。无生无死,无可无不可,故儒墨之辨,而死者方自谓生为死,则无生矣。生者方自谓死为死,而死者方自谓死为生,则无死矣。无生无死,无可无不可,故儒墨之辨,吾所不能同也;至于各冥其分,吾所不能异也。 夫怀豁者,因天下之是非而自无是非也。故不由是非之涂而是非无患不当者,直明其天然而无所夺故也。 是亦彼也,彼亦是也。彼亦一是非,此亦一是非,果且有彼是乎哉?果且无彼是乎哉?彼是莫得其偶,谓之道枢。枢始得其环中,以应无穷。是亦一无穷,非亦一无穷也。故曰莫若以明。 我亦为彼所彼。 彼亦自以为是。 此亦自是而非彼,彼亦自是而非此,此与彼各有一是一非于体中也。 今欲谓彼为彼,而彼复自是;欲谓是为是,而是复为彼所彼;故彼是有无,未果定也。 偶,对也。彼是相对,而圣人两顺之。故无心者与物冥,而未尝有对于天下也。〔枢,要也〕(一)。彼是有无,未果定也。 偶,对也。彼是相对,而圣人两顺之。故无心者与物冥,而未尝有对于天下也。〔枢,要也〕(一)。此居其枢要而会其玄极,以应夫无方也。 夫是非反复,相寻无穷,故谓之环。环中,空矣;今以是非为环而得其中者,无是无非也。无是无非,故能应夫是非。是非无穷,故应亦无穷。 天下莫不自是而莫不相非,故一是一非,两行无穷。唯涉空得中者,旷然无怀,乘之以游也。 以指喻指之非指,不若以非指喻指之非指也﹔以马喻马之非马,不若以非马喻马之非马也。天地一指也,万物一马也。 夫自是而非彼,彼我之常情也。故以我指喻彼指,则彼指于我指独为非指矣。此以指喻指之非指也。若复以彼指还喻我指,则我指于彼指复为非指矣。此(亦)〔以〕(二)非指喻指之非指也。将明无是无非,莫若反复相喻指喻指之非指也。若复以彼指还喻我指,则我指于彼指复为非指矣。此(亦)〔以〕(二)非指喻指之非指也。将明无是无非,莫若反复相喻。反复相喻,则彼之与我,既同于自是,又均于相非。均于相非,则天下无是;同于自是,则天下无非。何以明其然邪?是若果是,则天下不得(彼)〔复〕(三)有非之者也。非若果非,〔则天下〕(四)亦不得复有是之者也。今是非无主,纷然淆乱,明此区区者各信其偏见而同于一致耳。仰观俯察,莫不皆然。是以至人知天地一指〕(四)亦不得复有是之者也。今是非无主,纷然淆乱,明此区区者各信其偏见而同于一致耳。仰观俯察,莫不皆然。是以至人知天地一指也,万物一马也,故浩然大宁,而天地万物各当其分,同于自得,而无是无非也。 可可乎,不可乎不可。 可于己者,即谓之可。 不可于己者,即谓之不可。 道行之而成,物谓之而然。有自也而可,有自也而不可,有自也而然,有自也而不然。恶乎然?然于然。恶乎不然?不然于不然。恶乎可,可于可,恶乎不可,不可乎不可。物固有所然,物固有所可。无物不然,无物不可。故为是举莛与楹,厉与西施,恢诡谲怪,复通为一。其分也,成也﹔其成也,毁也。凡物无成与毁,复通为一。 然,物固有所可。无物不然,无物不可。故为是举莛与楹,厉与西施,恢诡谲怪,复通为一。其分也,成也﹔其成也,毁也。凡物无成与毁,复通为一。 无不成也。 无不然也。 各然其所然,各可其所可。 夫莛横而楹纵,厉丑而西施好。所谓齐者,岂必齐形状,同规矩哉!故举纵横好丑,恢谲怪,各然其所然,各(一)可其所可,则理虽万殊而性同得,故曰道通为一也。 夫物或此以为散而彼以为成。 我之所谓成而彼或谓之毁。 夫成毁者,生于自见而不见彼也。故无成与毁,犹无是与非也。 唯达道通为一也。 夫物或此以为散而彼以为成。 我之所谓成而彼或谓之毁。 夫成毁者,生于自见而不见彼也。故无成与毁,犹无是与非也。 唯达者知通为一,为是不用而寓诸庸。因是已,已而不知其然谓之道。 夫达者无滞于一方,故忽然自忘,而寄当于自用。自用者,莫不条畅而自得也。 几,尽也。至理尽于自得也。 达者因而不作。 夫达者之因是,岂知因为善而因之哉?不知所以因而自因耳,故谓之道也。 劳神明为一,而不知其同也,谓之「朝三」。何谓「朝三」?狙公赋芧,曰:「朝三而暮四。」众狙皆怒。曰:「然则朝四而暮三。」众狙皆悦。名实未亏而喜怒为用,亦因是也。是以圣人和之以是非而休乎天钧,是之谓两行。 夫达者之于一,岂劳狙皆怒。曰:「然则朝四而暮三。」众狙皆悦。名实未亏而喜怒为用,亦因是也。是以圣人和之以是非而休乎天钧,是之谓两行。 夫达者之于一,岂劳神哉?若劳神明于为一,不足赖也,与彼不一者无以异矣。亦同众狙之惑,因所好而自是也。 莫之偏任,故付之自均而止也。 任天下之是非。 古之人,其知有所至矣。恶乎至?有以为未始有物者,至矣,尽矣,不可以加矣!其次,以为有物矣,而未始有封也。其次,以为有封焉,而未始有是非也。是非之彰也,道之所以亏也,道之所以亏,爱之所以成。果且有成与亏乎哉?果且无成与亏乎哉?有成与亏,故昭氏之鼓琴也﹔无成与亏,故昭氏之不鼓琴也。昭文之鼓琴也,师之所以成。果且有成与亏乎哉?果且无成与亏乎哉?有成与亏,故昭氏之鼓琴也﹔无成与亏,故昭氏之不鼓琴也。昭文之鼓琴也,师旷之枝策也,惠子之据梧也,三子之知,几乎皆其盛者也,故载之末年。唯其好之也,以异于彼,其好之也,欲以明之。彼非所明而明之,故以坚白之昧终。而其子又以文之纶终,终身无成。若是而可谓成乎,虽我无成,亦可谓成矣。若是而不可谓成乎,物与我无成也。是故滑疑之耀,圣人之所图也。为是不用而寓诸庸,此之谓「以明」。 此忘天地,遗万物,外不察乎宇宙,内不觉其一身,故能旷然无累,与物俱往,而无所不应也。 虽未都忘,犹能忘其彼此。 虽未能忘彼此明」。 此忘天地,遗万物,外不察乎宇宙,内不觉其一身,故能旷然无累,与物俱往,而无所不应也。 虽未都忘,犹能忘其彼此。 虽未能忘彼此,犹能忘彼此之是非也。 无是道亏则情有所偏而爱有所成,未能忘爱释私,玄同彼我(二)也。 非乃全也。 有之与无,斯不能知,乃至。 夫声不可胜举也。故吹管操弦,虽有繁手,遗声多矣。而执钥鸣弦者,欲以彰声也,彰声而声遗,不彰声而声全。故欲成而亏之者,昭文之鼓琴也;不成而无亏者,昭文之不鼓琴也。 几,尽也。夫三子者,皆欲辩非己所明以明之,故知尽虑穷,形劳神倦,或枝策假寐,或据梧而瞑。 赖其盛,故能久,不尔早困也。 言此三子,唯独好其所明,自以殊于众人。 明示众人,欲使同乎我之所好。 是犹对牛鼓簧耳。瞑。 赖其盛,故能久,不尔早困也。 言此三子,唯独好其所明,自以殊于众人。 明示众人,欲使同乎我之所好。 是犹对牛鼓簧耳。彼竟不明,故己之道术终于昧然也。 昭文之子又乃终文之绪,亦卒不成。 此三子虽求明于彼,彼竟不明,所以终身无成。若三子而可谓成,则虽我之不成亦可谓成也。 物皆自明而不明彼,若彼不明,即谓不成,则万物皆相与无成矣。故圣人不显此以耀彼,不舍己而逐物,从而任之,各(宜)〔冥〕(四)其所能,故曲成而不遗也。今三子欲以己之所好明示于彼,不亦妄乎! 夫圣人无我者也。故滑疑之耀,则图而域之;恢谲怪,则通而一之;使群异各安其所安,众人不失其所是,则己不用于物,而万物之用用矣。物皆自用,则孰是孰非哉!故虽放荡之变,屈奇之异,曲而从之,寄之自用,则用异各安其所安,众人不失其所是,则己不用于物,而万物之用用矣。物皆自用,则孰是孰非哉!故虽放荡之变,屈奇之异,曲而从之,寄之自用,则用虽万殊,历然自明。 今且有言于此,不知其与是类乎?其与是不类乎?类与不类,相与为类,则与彼无以异矣。虽然,请尝言之:有始也者,有未始有始也者,有未始有夫未始有始也者﹔有有也者,有无也者,有未始有无也者,有未始有夫未始有无也者。俄而有无矣,而未知有无之果孰有孰无也。今我则已有谓矣,而未知吾所谓之其果有谓乎?其果无谓乎? 今以言无是非,则不知其与言有者类乎不类乎?欲谓之类,则我以无为是,而彼以无为非,斯不类矣。然此虽是非不同,亦固未免于有是非也,则与彼类矣。故曰类与不类又相与为类,则与彼无以异也。然则将大不类,莫我以无为是,而彼以无为非,斯不类矣。然此虽是非不同,亦固未免于有是非也,则与彼类矣。故曰类与不类又相与为类,则与彼无以异也。然则将大不类,莫若无心,既遣(一)是非,又遣其遣。遣之又遣之以至于无遣,然后无遣无不遣而是非自去矣。 至理无言,言则与类,故试寄(二)言之。 有始则有终。 谓无终始而一死生。 夫一之者,未若不一而自齐,斯又忘其一也。 有有则美恶是非具也。 有无而未知无无也,则是非好恶犹未离怀。 知无无矣,而犹未能无知。 此都忘其知也,尔乃俄然始了无耳。了无,则天地万物,彼我是非,豁然确斯也。 谓无是非,即复有谓。 又不知谓之有无,尔乃荡然无纤芥于胸中也。 天下莫大于秋豪之末,而大山为小﹔莫寿于殇子,而彭祖为夭。天地与我并生,而万谓无是非,即复有谓。 又不知谓之有无,尔乃荡然无纤芥于胸中也。 天下莫大于秋豪之末,而大山为小﹔莫寿于殇子,而彭祖为夭。天地与我并生,而万物与我为一。既已为一矣,且得有言乎?既已谓之一矣,且得无言乎?一与言为二,二与一为三。自此以往,巧历不能得,而况其凡乎!故自无适有,以至于三,而况自有适有乎!无适焉,因是已! 夫以形相对,则大山大于秋豪也。若各据其性分,物冥其极,则形大未为有余,形小不为不足。〔苟各足〕(三)于其性,则秋豪不独小其小而大山不极,则形大未为有余,形小不为不足。〔苟各足〕(三)于其性,则秋豪不独小其小而大山不独大其大矣。若以性足为大,则天下之足未有过于秋豪也;(其)〔若〕性足者(为)〔非〕(四)大,则虽大山亦可称小矣。故曰天下莫大于秋豪之末而大山为小。大山为小,则天下无大矣;秋豪为大,则天下无小也。无小无大,无寿无夭,是以蟪蛄不羡大椿而欣然自得,斥鴳不贵天池而荣愿以足。苟足于天然而安其性命(五),故虽天地未足为寿而与我并生,万物未足为异而与我同得。则天地之生又何不并,万物之得又何不一哉! 万物万天地未足为寿而与我并生,万物未足为异而与我同得。则天地之生又何不并,万物之得又何不一哉! 万物万形,同于自得,其得一也。已自一矣,理无所言。 夫名谓生于不明者也。物或不能自明其一而以此逐彼,故谓一以正之。既谓之一,即是有言矣。 夫以言言一,而一非言也,则一〔与〕(六)言为二矣。一既一矣,言又二之;有一有二,得不谓之三乎!夫以一言言一,犹乃成三,况寻其支流,凡物殊称,虽有善数,莫之能纪也。故一之者与彼未殊,而忘(七)一者无言而自一。 各止于其所能,乃最是也。 夫道未始有封,言未始有常,为是而有畛也。请言其畛:有左,有右,有伦,有义,有分,有辩,有竞,有争,此之谓八德。六合之外,圣人存而不论﹔六合之内,圣人论而不议﹔春秋经世先王之志,圣人议而不辩。故分也者,谓八德。六合之外,圣人存而不论﹔六合之内,圣人论而不议﹔春秋经世先王之志,圣人议而不辩。故分也者,有不分也﹔辩也者,有不辩也。曰:「何也?」「圣人怀之,众人辩之以相示也。故曰:辩也者,有不见也。」 冥然无不在也。 彼此言之,故是非无定。 道无封,故万物得恣其分域。 各异便也。 物物有理,事事有宜。 群分而类别也。 并逐曰竞,对辩曰争。 略而判之,有此八德。 夫六合之外,谓万物性分之表耳。夫物之性表,虽有理存焉,而非性分之内,则未尝以感圣人也,故圣人未尝论之。〔若论之〕(二),则是引万物使学其所不能也。故不论其外,而八畛同于自得也。 陈其性而安之。 顺其成迹而凝乎至当之极,不执其所是以非众人也。 夫物物自分,事事自别。而欲由己以分别之者,不见彼之自别也。 以不极,不执其所是以非众人也。 夫物物自分,事事自别。而欲由己以分别之者,不见彼之自别也。 以不辩为怀耳,圣人无怀。 不见彼之自辩,故辩己所知以示之。 夫大道不称,大辩不言,大仁不仁,大廉不嗛,大勇不忮。道昭而不道,言辩而不及,仁常而不周,廉清而不信,勇忮而不成。五者无成而几向方矣! 付之自称,无所称谓。 已自别也。 无爱而自存也。 夫至足者,物之去来非我也,故无所容其嗛盈。 无往而不顺,故能无险而不往 无爱而自存也。 夫至足者,物之去来非我也,故无所容其嗛盈。 无往而不顺,故能无险而不往。 以此明彼,彼此俱失矣。 不能及其自分。 物无常爱,而常爱必不周。 皦然廉清,贪名者耳,非真廉也。 忮逆之勇,天下共疾之,无敢举足之地也。 此五者,皆以有为伤当者也,不能止乎本性,而求外无已。夫外不可求而求之,譬犹以圆学方,以鱼慕鸟耳。虽希翼鸾凤,拟规日月,此愈近彼,愈远实,学弥得而性弥失。故齐物而偏尚之累去矣。 故知止其所不知,至矣。孰知不言之辩,不道之道?若有能知,此之谓天府。注焉而不满,酌焉而不竭,而不知其所由来,此之谓葆光。 所不知者,皆性分之外也。故止于所知之内而至也。 浩然都任之也。 至人之心若镜,应而不藏,故,此之谓葆光。 所不知者,皆性分之外也。故止于所知之内而至也。 浩然都任之也。 至人之心若镜,应而不藏,故旷然无盈虚之变也。 至理之来,自然无迹。 任其自明,故其光不弊也。 故昔者尧问于舜曰:「我欲伐宗、脍、胥敖,南面而不释然。其故何也?」舜曰:「夫三子者,犹存乎蓬艾之间。若不释然,何哉!昔者十日并出,万物皆照,而况德之进乎日者乎!」 于安任之道未弘,故听朝而不怡也。将寄明齐一之理于大圣,故发自怪之问以起对也。 夫物之所安无陋也,则蓬艾未弘,故听朝而不怡也。将寄明齐一之理于大圣,故发自怪之问以起对也。 夫物之所安无陋也,则蓬艾乃三子之妙处也。 夫重明登天,六合俱照,无有蓬艾而不光被也。 夫日月虽无私于照,犹有所不及,德则无不得也。而今欲夺蓬艾之愿而伐使从己,于至道岂弘哉!故不释然神解耳。若乃物畅其性,各安其所安,无远迩幽深,付之自若,皆得其极,则彼无不当而我无不怡也。 啮缺问乎王倪曰:「子知物之所同是乎?」曰:「吾恶乎知之!」 所同未必是,所异不独非,故彼我莫能相正,故无所用其知。 「子知子之所不知
Interpretation

If one does not cling to outward reputation and the forms of ritual, one can discern what is true within. Hold fast to the root, and the branches and leaves will grow naturally. Simply act in keeping with genuine feeling. If one prizes reputation above all and is constrained by ritual rules, filial devotion and parental care can no longer come from the heart; father, son, brothers, and younger brothers will deceive one another with false affection. Can that be what ritual is meant for?

When Zigong returned, he told Confucius, “Who was that man? He pays no heed to the rules of self-cultivation or to his appearance. He sang in the presence of a corpse without the slightest change of expression. I don’t know what to call him. Who is he?”

Confucius said, “He wanders beyond worldly conventions, while I remain within their bounds. The inner and outer do not originally communicate, yet I sent you to offer him condolences. That was narrow-minded of me. He keeps company with the Creator—the natural power that brings all things into being and transforms them—and wanders in the primal Qi shared by Heaven and Earth. To him, life is like an extra lump of flesh on the body, and death like a boil bursting. Since that is so, why would he care which comes first, life or death? He relies on a body formed through transformation and entrusts himself to the nature shared by all things. He forgets his liver and gallbladder and does not cling to his ears and eyes. Transformation comes and goes without any fixed beginning or end. He wanders at ease beyond the dusty world and rests in the Way of Wuwei (non-action). Why would he be bound by worldly rites, deliberately putting on a show for others?”

Zigong asked, “Then what do you follow, Master?”

Confucius said, “The Way has an ultimate point at which the worldly inner and outer can finally communicate. One who truly transcends worldly conventions can accord with the inner Way; one who truly accords with the inner Way can also live freely in the world. Thus the sage often stands beyond worldly opinions while remaining in communication with what is true within. He holds no fixed views and responds to all things. So even when he appears in the world all day long, his spirit does not change; even while handling all kinds of affairs, he remains calm and untroubled.

“To see only outward form and not the spirit within is a common limitation among people. When you see him moving alongside all things, you cannot say that he has abandoned worldly affairs and withdrawn from human society. When you see him responding to change and handling affairs, you cannot say that he merely sits in stillness, forgets himself, and finds contentment alone. Zhuangzi makes this point through Confucius: the sage can live in the world without being bound by its conventions, and can transcend the world without being cut off from other people. Do not cling to the characters’ outward identities in the story; grasp its central idea, ‘to stand beyond the outer world while remaining in accord with what is true within.’”

Offering condolences is a rite of worldly society. To impose this rite on someone who transcends worldly conventions is narrow-minded.

Because inner and outer communicate, they are not two realms divided from one another.

A skin growth is like something hanging from one’s body. It is formed temporarily when primal Qi gathers, and is not worth longing to keep.

When a boil bursts, primal Qi disperses of its own accord; there is no need to grieve.

Life and death alternate and transform without end. Move along with transformation, and there is nowhere one cannot face with equanimity; one can no longer tell which prevails, life or death.

“To rely on” means to follow. Life and death, gathering and dispersal, change unpredictably into different forms. Though the forms differ, they all depend on the same whole.

If one does not cling even to one’s own five organs, what is there worth remembering in particular? Only by refusing to hold fast to knowledge and judgment can one let oneself move with change, accord with the transformations that come and go among all things, and avoid clinging to any endpoint.

Follow the Way and move together with transformation.

The “work of Wuwei” does not mean doing nothing and sitting silently in stillness. Nor does being “beyond the dust” mean hiding away in the mountains. The outward actions a person shows to others are only the appearances of the world; they do not amount to the transcendent state within.

Zigong had never heard Confucius speak of human nature, life, and the Way of Heaven. He saw only what Confucius followed, not why he followed it. To truly follow is to avoid deliberately clinging to any particular way of following; people find this difficult to understand.

Confucius said, “I am merely someone punished by Heaven’s decree and confined to the world. Even so, I share this with you.”

To regard worldly life as confinement shows that one truly values the transcendent Way. Yet those who transcend the world still depend on it for their lives, and those who have let go of attachment can still take part in everyday life. Thus one who truly governs the world does not claim it as his own. Only by first letting go of attachment to external things can one enter among people; only by first forgetting the rigid self can one deal with affairs. The more one lets go, the more one can respond to all things. When one reaches this state, even if one wishes to escape worldly affairs, the principles of all things will naturally become clear. This is a state of following the Way of Heaven and remaining in accord with human affairs.

Zigong asked, “May I ask how to reach this state?”

Confucius said, “Although worldly conventions bind me, I am willing to bear them with you. This shows that my heart remains free and has not been completely trapped by the world.”

Confucius said, “Fish depend on water for life, and people depend on the Way. Fish live by depending on water, so one digs ponds and stores water to nourish them. People live by following the Way, so one does not interfere recklessly, and life settles naturally. Thus fish forget one another in rivers, lakes, and seas; people, in the Way of human life, forget deliberate striving.”

Zigong asked, “What is a ‘deviant person’—someone who does not conform to worldly norms?”

Confucius said, “A deviant person seems different from other people, yet is in accord with nature. Thus a person who accords with nature may look like a petty person to the world; a gentleman in the eyes of the world may, from nature’s perspective, have lost what is true in himself.”

Each thing being content with itself and forgetting the others is the ordinary state of all things under Heaven. The Perfected Person is always self-sufficient, and so forgets comparison and competition.

Zigong pressed him: What was the state meant by the earlier words about transcending the world and not conforming to worldly life?

To accord with what is true within is to live freely beyond the world. One who can do this while remaining in accord with what is true within lets all things develop according to their own nature and find fulfillment in their inborn qualities; the way of governing the world is then complete. This is what it means to seem at odds with worldly convention yet accord with nature.

From the perspective of nature, there is no ranking between people and other things. From the perspective of worldly ethics, one who accords with nature may be called a gentleman.

Yan Hui asked Confucius, “When Mengsun Cai’s mother died, he cried without tears and felt no sorrow within; while in mourning, he showed no grief. Though he displayed none of these three signs, he became renowned in Lu for being good at conducting funerals. Can someone lack real virtue and still gain such a reputation? I find it very strange.”

The people of Lu looked only at how he observed the funeral rites; Yan Hui paid attention to his heart.

Confucius said, “Mengsun Cai has already grasped the principle of life and death, and his insight has advanced further. He simply has not yet let go of his habit of distinguishing the rites of mourning; even so, he has already let go of something. He does not know why he was born, or what will happen after death. He does not know which state comes first and which comes later. He simply follows the transformations of life as he becomes different things, and awaits changes he cannot foresee. Since he is now in the midst of transformation, how can he know that the future will not bring more change? And if change ceases in the future, how can he know that it will then have truly ceased?

“You and I are probably still dreaming and have not yet awakened. Although Mengsun Cai’s body has undergone a change, his heart has not been harmed; life is like a dwelling that changes every day, and his spirit has not been exhausted by it. He simply goes along with what happens: when others cry, he cries too, because that is the fitting response at the time. Besides, is the ‘I’ we speak of necessarily a fixed, unchanging self? You have dreamed of becoming a bird and flying into the sky, and of becoming a fish and sinking into the depths. So is the you who speaks now awake, or still dreaming?

“Respond to the circumstances you encounter, and you will not miss the fitting response; genuine laughter is not contrived either. Entrust yourself to nature’s unfolding and move with transformation, and you can enter a vast, still realm and become one with Heaven and Earth.”

One who understands the principle of life and death and can live appropriately within and beyond the world acts in accord with nature; this is something that knowledge and distinctions alone cannot achieve.

He does not choose one state over the other, life over death, yet knows that their differences need not be clung to, just as spring, summer, autumn, and winter proceed in turn.

He cannot prefer life to death or death to life, so he accepts whatever comes with equanimity. He does not carry life and death as a burden in his heart, but lets transformation unfold naturally.

Be at peace with whatever comes.

Do not resist transformation.

Life and death alternate and transform, so he does not cling to what he knows now or worry in advance about what is unknown.

Since one is born through transformation, one cannot know what came before birth; and before one has changed through death, one cannot know what comes after it. There is therefore nothing one must flee or pursue; one need only move along with transformation.

Life and death are like waking and dreaming. In a dream, one may believe oneself awake, but that does not prove that waking life is not a dream. Since one cannot establish the boundary between waking and dreaming, one cannot determine the boundary between life and death either. Whatever circumstances one is in, be at ease with them. Why be here and worry about somewhere else?

The transformation of the body is merely a disturbance of outward form; it should not be allowed to injure the heart through life and death.

The body changes continually, like a dwelling exchanged each day; the heart does not regard this change as true death.

One who truly understands never resists nature, whatever he encounters. So when others cry, he cries with them: it is a fitting response to the moment.

The changes of life and death are changes experienced by the self. If they can all be regarded as part of the self, what has been lost? If nothing has truly been lost, what is there to grieve? He does not resist nature, so he cries when others cry; his heart is free of sorrow, so he cries without grief.

No change is entirely unrelated to him. Thus he can make inner and outer communicate, link past and present, and renew himself each day alongside all things. Why cling to the question of where the “I” truly is?

That is to say, one can find contentment in any circumstances.

If one believes oneself awake in a dream, how can one be certain that the present is not a dream? Since change between waking and dreaming is nothing to resist, neither is there anything in the transformations of life and death worth clinging to or mourning.

When one can accept whatever circumstances arise, one forgets what it is that one is accepting, and so no longer laughs. By ritual, crying should express grief and laughter should express joy. If the heart clings to sorrow or joy, it cannot move with transformation. Mengsun Cai remained at ease with whatever he encountered; he cried without grief and moved forward with change.

To be at ease with transformation and move along with it is to enter a vast, empty stillness and become one with Heaven. The people mentioned earlier all understood the same principle; they simply responded to funerals differently, so some sang while others wept.

Yizi went to see Xu You. Xu You asked, “What help did Yao give you?”

“Help” here means provision or assistance.

Yizi said, “Yao told me that I must put benevolence and righteousness into practice myself and clearly explain right and wrong.”

Xu You said, “Why have you come here? Yao has branded you with benevolence and righteousness, and cut off your nose with right and wrong. How can you still wander freely, unbound, along the Way that moves with transformation?”

This means that Yizi has been constrained by teachings about benevolence, righteousness, and right and wrong, and has already been injured by them. It will be difficult for him to enter a realm of freedom without obstruction.

Yizi said, “Even so, I hope I can wander at least along its edges.”

He no longer dared to ask to enter directly; he only hoped to travel along the outskirts.

Xu You said, “It cannot be so. A blind person cannot appreciate the beauty of eyebrows and eyes; one who has lost sight cannot see the beauty of colors and patterns.”

Yizi said, “Wuzhuang lost his beauty, Juliang lost his strength, and the Yellow Emperor lost his wisdom. These seem like changes brought about through the refining furnace. How do you know the Creator will not remove the brand on my body, restore my severed nose, and make me whole again, so that I can follow you and learn?”

This means that all things do not necessarily take their natural form at once; sometimes the principles of nature are tempered before they give rise to a new form. The stories of Wuzhuang, Juliang, and the Yellow Emperor are used to show that after hearing the Great Way, a person may forget the things to which he was once attached. These stories aim to free people from attachment to deliberate action.

To act according to one’s nature is natural; if one’s actions injure that nature, correcting them later may also be part of nature. How do I know that my natural Way will not remove this injury, repair this loss, and let me follow you along a path that can fulfill me? If you shut me out and refuse to teach me, that too may go against the Creator’s natural Way.

Xu You said, “Ah, that remains to be seen. Let me tell you the gist of it: My teacher, my teacher! He smooths out all things without claiming benevolence or righteousness. His grace reaches across all generations, yet he does not claim to be loving. He endures from time immemorial, yet does not concern himself with age. He covers and supports Heaven and Earth and shapes the forms of all things, yet does not claim skill. This is the realm in which I wander!”

All things change naturally of themselves. No one deliberately bestows grace, so there is no question of benevolence or righteousness.

They renew and transform without end.

Because all things arise naturally, they are not deliberately sculpted.

Take Wuwei as one’s teacher, and wander in a realm without fixed teachings.

Yan Hui said, “I have made progress.”

He regarded having fewer attachments as progress.

Confucius asked, “Where have you made progress?” Yan Hui said, “I have forgotten ritual and music.” Confucius said, “That is good, but not enough.”

Benevolence is the expression of broad care, and righteousness is the achievement of bringing things to completion. Simply remembering benevolence and righteousness is not enough to understand how care and achievement can arise without intention. One may forget the names of benevolence and righteousness, but merely forgetting their expressions and accomplishments does not amount to complete understanding.

Some days later, Yan Hui came to see Confucius again and said, “I have made further progress.”

Confucius asked, “Where have you made progress?” Yan Hui said, “I have forgotten benevolence and righteousness.” Confucius said, “That is good, but not enough.”

Ritual governs the body’s conduct; music helps people live together in harmony. Forgetting these means of conduct is less than forgetting the distinctions that make them necessary.

Some days later, Yan Hui said, “I have made further progress!” Confucius asked, “Where have you made progress?” Yan Hui said, “I can sit in forgetfulness.” Confucius asked solemnly, “What does it mean to sit in forgetfulness?” Yan Hui said, “I forget the distinctions of the body, set aside the acuity of ears and eyes, leave behind attachment to form, abandon clever knowledge, and unite with the Great Way that reaches through all things. This is what I mean by sitting in forgetfulness.”

When all things communicate with oneself, nothing is out of place; when one is at ease everywhere, what is there to like or dislike in particular?

Confucius said, “When you communicate with all things, you no longer favor anything; when you move with all things as they change, you no longer cling to any fixed state. You truly are a worthy person! I too would like to follow you and communicate with the Great Way.”

To become one with change is to respond only to the circumstances change brings; one therefore has no fixed form.

Ziyu and Zisang were friends. It rained for ten days straight, and Ziyu worried that Zisang might have fallen ill. He wrapped up some food and went to see him. At Zisang’s door, he heard him playing the zither and singing as though caught between song and sobbing: “Was it my father who made me this way? My mother? Heaven? Or other people?” His voice seemed unable to bear the strain, and his words sounded rushed. Ziyu went in and asked, “Why are you singing like this?”

The two men helped each other without deliberately setting out to show kindness. Ziyu brought food to his friend simply because it came naturally and was fitting; he was not trying to display his affection or righteousness.

Ziyu felt that Zisang’s song showed him being led by emotion and departing from the natural Way.

Zisang said, “I was wondering what could have brought me to this state, but I can’t find an answer. Would my parents want me to be poor? Heaven covers all things, and Earth supports them all; would Heaven and Earth single me out and make me poor? I can’t find who brought this about. But I really have ended up in this predicament. Perhaps that is simply fate!”

All things arise naturally; there is no master who deliberately arranges everything.

Zhuangzi, Inner Chapters, Chapter Seven: “Responding to Emperors and Kings”

Nie Que sought counsel from Wang Ni, asking him four times. Each time, Wang Ni said he did not know. Nie Que heard this and was delighted, jumping up to tell Puyi. Puyi said, “Do you understand only now? You Shun could not match the Supreme Ancestor, an ancient sage. You Shun kept benevolence in his heart and used it to win people’s support. Though he won their support, he did not transcend the realm of making distinctions between people. The Supreme Ancestor, by contrast, slept at ease and awoke in freedom. Sometimes he thought of himself as a horse, sometimes as an ox. His understanding was true and trustworthy, and his virtue pure; he never fell into distinctions that exclude others.”

To respond to change without intention is the proper state for an emperor or king who governs the world.

The differences between You Shun and the Supreme Ancestor are only outward forms of conduct, not what lies behind them. The root leaves no trace; how, then, can people name it? If it has never been named, how can there be rankings or winners and losers? Yet the traceless Way responds to the transformations of all things and endures through long generations. The affairs of the world meet both favorable and unfavorable conditions, so their particular expressions differ.

To call those one likes “right” and those one dislikes “wrong” is still to be constrained by distinctions between right and wrong. One who transcends such distinctions enters a realm where there is no such thing as “wrong.” He does not settle matters in terms of gain and loss or what is acceptable and unacceptable, and so does not use benevolence to win people’s support.

Once one reaches this state, what distinction remains between “right” and “wrong”? This is what it means to be free of distinctions that exclude others.

Let what one truly knows come through of its own accord; this is sincerity.

Follow one’s nature and receive what comes; this is freedom from pretense.

One who does not enter the realm of right and wrong is no longer confined by the way You Shun governed.

Shangwu met Kuang Jieyu. Kuang Jieyu asked, “What did Rizhongshi tell you?” Shangwu replied, “He told me that a ruler must personally establish laws, standards, and principles. Who would dare not submit and accept instruction?” Kuang Jieyu said, “That is using virtue to deceive people. Governing the world this way is like trying to cross the sea on foot, cutting a channel through a river, and making mosquitoes carry mountains. Does a sage govern the world by personally managing everything? It is enough for him to set himself aright and let those capable of a task do it. A bird flies high to escape an arrow; a shrew burrows deep beneath a shrine to escape smoke and digging. Are you less capable than even these two little creatures?”

Using one’s own will to control all things makes them lose their nature.

Leave things to each thing to do for itself, and they will be completed naturally, without interference. Try to direct the world by one’s own strength, and the task will be difficult to accomplish and the responsibility will exceed one’s capacity.

It is enough for each thing to preserve its inborn nature and remain within its own limits.

Let each thing attain the condition its nature and life make possible.

Do not do what lies beyond one’s ability.

Even animals have their own ways of preserving themselves. A ruler need only let them be and not obstruct them; all things will then develop naturally.

Do you really not know that even these two little creatures can live in their own way without anyone teaching them?

Tiangen was traveling in Yinyang when he reached the banks of the Liao River. By chance, he met an unnamed man and asked, “How should one govern the world?” The nameless man said, “Go away, you shallow fellow! Why ask such a tiresome question? I am about to keep company with the Creator. When I tire of that, I will ride on fine, elusive breaths, fly beyond the four quarters of Heaven and Earth, wander in the realm of nothingness, and rest in the boundless wilderness. Why disturb my heart with talk of governing the world?”

To ask how to govern the world is already to ask from a place far removed from the deep principle that returns to the origin of all things.

Let people follow their own nature and act for themselves.

“Mangmiao” refers to fine, elusive breaths. Riding the subtle changes of all things lets one move freely in and out, without being confined to any fixed place.

If all things are left to find ease in their own nature, without forceful interference, the world will settle naturally.

Tiangen again asked the nameless man, “If one can make the heart indifferent, quiet the breath, follow the natural transformations of all things without private motives, then the world can be governed.”

When one follows one’s nature without embellishment, the heart becomes indifferent.

The heart is quiet and does not seek recklessly.

To live according to one’s nature and follow what comes naturally is impartiality; trying to add interference through private motives is partiality. Self-interest cannot make life grow more fully. Following the impartial principles of nature instead allows all things to preserve themselves.

Yang Ziju visited Lao Dan and said, “There is a person who is quick and strong in action, sees into all things, has a clear mind, and never tires of learning the arts of the Way. Can such a person compare with an enlightened king?” Lao Dan said, “By the standards of a sage, he is no more than a working craftsman, bound by his skills, wearing out his body and stirring up his heart. Tigers and leopards are hunted for their beautiful skins; monkeys are captured for their agility. Can such a person compare with an enlightened king?”

These abilities leave him nowhere to rest and do not make him the equal of a sage king.

He is burdened by outward talents and skills, and cannot meet the transformations of all things with an empty, quiet heart.

Yang Ziju looked uneasy and asked, “May I ask how an enlightened king governs the world?”

Lao Dan said, “An enlightened king governs the world, and his achievements cover it, yet it seems as if he has done nothing. His grace reaches all things, yet the people do not feel dependent on him. He does not claim his achievements as his own; all things are content in themselves. He establishes himself in what cannot be fathomed and wanders in a realm free of attachment.”

Without an enlightened king’s governance, all things under Heaven would find it difficult to settle into their proper places. The enlightened king enables them to find their own ease; this is in fact his achievement. Yet he follows the Way of Wuwei and returns everything to the world, so it seems as if his achievement were not his.

The enlightened king fulfills the nature of all things. Everyone feels that things are simply as they have always been, and does not know that the king has helped them.

Though his achievements cover the world, he does not claim them as his own. All things therefore feel they have gained what they have through their own nature, and rejoice in it.

He lives amid transformation, renewing himself each day without a fixed direction.

He merges with all things, and wherever he wanders is a realm of stillness and freedom. If he cannot communicate with all things, he will already be too busy responding to external things; how could he wander in stillness?

In Zheng, there was a spirit medium named Jixian who could foretell whether people would live or die, prosper or suffer, and how long they would live. He could predict the year, month, and day with uncanny accuracy. Whenever people in Zheng saw him, they avoided him, unwilling to hear the date of their own death. Liezi, however, was deeply impressed by him. He went home and told Huzi, “I used to think your Way had reached its highest point. I never imagined there could be someone more accomplished than you.”

Liezi thought Jixian’s powers surpassed Huzi’s.

Huzi said, “I have taught you only the outward forms of the Way; I have not yet let you grasp its true substance. Have you really attained the Way? If there is only a female and no male, how could there be an egg? You take the Way and set it against the world, seeking to win people’s belief, and that is why someone can read your appearance. Bring him tomorrow and let him look at me.”

Liezi had not yet truly made the Way part of himself.

Without truly understanding the Way, one holds fixed views. Once one clings to a position and tries to make the world believe it, one leaves traces for others to observe.

The next day, Liezi brought Jixian to meet Huzi. After Jixian left, he said to Liezi, “Alas, your master is about to die. He will not live more than a few days. I saw him like wet ashes.” Liezi went inside, weeping so hard that his tears soaked his robe, and told Huzi what Jixian had said. Huzi said, “Just now I showed him the ‘patterns of Earth’: stirred, yet neither moving nor ceasing. He must have seen the state in which I conceal the mechanism of De. Bring him again.”

Huzi appeared still and unadorned, like withered wood showing no sign of life, like wet ashes in their silence. This is the state of a Perfected Person when he is not responding to external things. When in motion, the Perfected Person follows Heaven; when still, he rests like Earth. His action is like flowing water, his stillness like an abyss. These different states all arise naturally and are the same in essence. Jixian saw him still and thought he was near death; when he saw Huzi’s spirit stir and respond naturally, he thought he was full of life. If one does not respond to external things with fixed opinions but lets things accord naturally, rising and falling with transformation and taking the world’s changes as one’s measure, one can become the master of all things and respond to circumstances without end. This is the central idea of “Responding to Emperors and Kings.”

When the mechanism of De does not show itself, it is called “closure.”

The next day, Liezi brought Jixian to see Huzi again. After Jixian left, he said, “Fortunately your master met me. His illness is better now, and he is full of life. I saw that he was concealing his vitality.” Liezi went inside and told Huzi. Huzi said, “Just now I showed him ‘Heaven and Earth’: neither reputation nor reality can enter me, yet vitality rises from my heels. He must have seen the mechanism by which I respond well. Bring him again.”

“Pivot” means mechanism. Jixian thought he had seen Huzi’s vitality, and so said that he was near death.

In “Heaven and Earth,” the functions of covering and supporting all things become apparent. Compared with the patterns of Earth, this reveals more outward change. It is a state of responding to and being moved by things.

Let nature cover and support all things, and the workings of Heaven will respond of their own accord; adornments of fame and profit become unnecessary.

This vitality always arises from the deepest place.

When vitality appeared in Huzi, Jixian saw it.

On the third day, Jixian came to see Huzi again. After he left, he said, “Your master’s state is not fixed; I can’t read him. When his state has settled, I’ll come again.” Liezi went inside and told Huzi. Huzi said, “Just now I showed him ‘the supreme equilibrium, beyond all prevailing’: a realm of emptiness and harmony, with no victory or defeat. He must have seen the mechanism of my balanced breath. A whirlpool where loaches gather, a still pool, and flowing water can all be abysses. There are nine kinds of abyss; I have named only three here. Bring him again.”

In the state of supreme equilibrium, the heart is vast and calm, communicating with all things, and victory or defeat cannot take hold.

He treats everything he encounters as equal, blending it all into one. Seen with limited vision, he is like something with no discernible boundary, and so seems to be changing without any fixed state.

“Abyss” means still and deep. Water has no intention of its own and follows what surrounds it. So whether it flows or is still, whether loaches gather there or a dragon rises, it remains deep and calm. The Perfected Person is the same: he acts when action is needed and rests when it is not. Though action and rest differ, the emptiness and stillness of his heart remain the same. The story names these three differences to make this point. Even when worldly affairs change like waves, one who has reached the furthest point of the Way remains calm and content, without clinging to action.

The next day, Jixian came to see Huzi again. Before he could even steady himself, he panicked and fled. Huzi said, “Quick, go after him!” Liezi chased him but could not catch up. He returned and reported, “He has vanished without a trace. I couldn’t catch him.” Huzi said, “Just now I showed him a state that had not yet departed from the root. When I faced him, I was empty and yielding, unaware of who I was or who he was. So I was like delicate grass bending in the wind, like waves turning with the current. That is why he fled.”

Though change is unpredictable, the root remains hidden in the Way.

Respond to all things as they change, without intention.

Like something floating on the water’s surface, with no fixed attachment.

When change comes, yield softly. As worldly affairs rise and fall like waves, he responds to everything he encounters by going along with it. The Perfected Person seems to have a single nature, yet can act in response to changing affairs. Thus a fortune-teller has no way to judge him and finally flees in terror. This shows that those who respond to the affairs of emperors and kings have no fixed method.

From then on, Liezi felt that he had not truly studied the Way, so he went home and stayed there for three years. He cooked for his wife and fed pigs as if they were people. In handling affairs, he showed no preference for those near or dear. He cast off ornament and returned to simplicity, standing alone and at ease like a clod of earth. He let all things change in confusion while holding fast to their undivided unity.

Forget distinctions of status and rank.

Simply follow what one encounters.

Cast off what is ornate and take what is true.

Outward ornament disappears.

Though he acts, his true nature remains undisturbed.

Let each thing follow nature and complete its own course.

Do not become a master of reputation, a storehouse of schemes, the one responsible for every affair, or an authority on knowledge. Grasp the boundless Way and wander in a realm without traces. Bring forth all that Heaven has endowed you with, but do not show what you have gained; simply remain empty and still. The Perfected Person uses his mind like a mirror: he does not go out to meet things or hold them back; when things come, he responds, and when they leave, he leaves no trace. Thus he can respond to all things without being harmed.

Respond to things, letting each thing fulfill its own place.

Let things make their own plans.

Hand affairs over to all things, and let each bear its own responsibility.

When the mind holds no fixed intentions, all things can use their own wisdom.

Follow the spontaneous actions of all things under Heaven, and one can respond to boundless change.

Let all things develop on their own, and no human-made trace is left behind.

Know when enough is enough.

If one is always thinking of what to gain, one does not know when to stop.

Without emptiness and stillness, one cannot accommodate the many particular things.

Like a mirror, reflect external things without personal feeling.

When things come, respond; when they leave, stop responding.

Reflect external things only when they come, without judging them through fixed opinions. Thus, even when the affairs of the world are numerous, the mind is not worn out by exertion.

The ruler of the South Sea was called Shu, the ruler of the North Sea was called Hu, and the ruler of the Center was called Hundun. Shu and Hu often met in Hundun’s territory, where Hundun treated them very well. Shu and Hu discussed how to repay his kindness. They said, “People all have seven openings, which they use to see, hear, eat, and breathe. He alone has none. Let us try boring him some.” They bored one opening each day, and on the seventh day Hundun died.

Deliberate action can instead destroy the natural nature of all things.

邪?」曰:「吾恶乎知之!」 若自知其所不知,即为有知。有知则不能任群,所异不独非,故彼我莫能相正,故无所用其知。 「子知子之所不知

Source text: Godners/DaoZang; Licence: Apache-2.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →