中文 · EN

《道德真經集註(一)》Vol. 6

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 6 / 10 11,193 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集註(一)》 Vol. 6 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 22 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集註(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經集註卷之六      靡六     明皇河上公王弼王雱註  德經(雱曰德者得也物生乎道而名得於/道故謂之性得其性而不失則德之)  (全也德未嘗異道而有其德者嘗至於自/私而失道彼眞人者不然性命道德之實)  (渾乎其爲一而四者之名應世而殊號吾/莫知其異亦莫知其同也是德之玄者也)  (雖然德者得也能無失乎哉唯以無得爲/德而德乎不德則可謂至矣是體道者也)  (非有德/者也)    上德不德章第三十八 上德不德  河曰上德謂太古無名號之君德大無上  故言上德也不德者言其不以德教民因  循自然養人性命其德不見故言不德也 是以有德  河曰言其德合於天地和氣流行民得以  全也○雱曰全德之人體道盡常德外無  復餘物故無德名 下德不失德  河曰下德謂號謚之君德不及上德故言  下德也不失德者其德可見其功可稱也 是以無德  明皇曰德者道之用也莊子曰物得以生  謂之德時有淳醨故德有上下上古淳樸  德用不彰無德可稱故云不德而淳德不  散無爲化清故云是以有德逮德下衰功  用稍著心雖體道跡涉有爲執德可稱故  云不失跡涉於有此上爲麤故云是以無  德○河曰以有名號及其身○雱曰德至  則無德下德之人適今於德而已無德之
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the distinction between "superior De (Virtue/Power)" and "inferior De," as well as the true realm of virtuous attainment.

Authentic "superior De" (the highest level of Virtue/Power) does not deliberately manifest virtuous conduct. Heshanggong explains that the sage rulers of antiquity governed not through moral indoctrination but by following nature's course, nourishing the people's inherent character. Their De remained unexpressed externally, hence termed "non-virtuous." Wang Pang further clarifies that those who fully embody De have already merged with the Dao (the Way), leaving nothing beyond De itself—thus requiring no designation as virtuous. Precisely because they refrain from deliberate virtuous display, they genuinely possess De.

By contrast, "inferior De" (the secondary level of Virtue/Power) clings to maintaining virtuous appearances. Heshanggong observes that rulers of this category fall short of ancient sages—their virtuous manifestations are conspicuous, their merits praiseworthy. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) explains that De represents the concrete manifestation of Dao. As Zhuangzi states, all things exist through attaining Dao—this is De. Historical periods vary between simplicity and decadence, hence De manifests differently across eras. In antiquity's age of pristine simplicity, De's function remained hidden; later, as virtue declined, its efficacy became visible. Though such practitioners may still comprehend Dao in heart, their actions already bear traces of contrivance. By clinging to praiseworthy virtue, they ironically lose authentic De.

Wang Pang elaborates further: When De reaches its ultimate state, it requires no virtuous labels, while those fixated on virtue merely linger on De's superficial forms. True Dao-realized individuals (zhenren) integrate their innate nature and life with Dao-De. Though worldly circumstances may assign them various designations, they transcend distinctions of sameness and difference—this constitutes the profound mystery of De. Authentic De lies not in acquisition but regards "non-attainment" as virtue. The highest realm of De emerges precisely through non-attachment to virtue itself—this characterizes those who embody Dao's essence, rather than merely possessing virtuous qualities.

 德則非至人所謂德也經曰同於德者德  亦得之 上德無爲  河曰謂法道安靜無所故爲也 而無以爲  明皇曰知無爲而無爲者非至也無以無  爲而無爲者至矣故上德之無爲非徇無  爲之美但含孕淳樸適自無爲故云而無  以爲此心跡俱無爲也○河曰言無名號  雱曰上德無爲然亦無所事爲而德自足  也 下德爲之  河曰言爲教令施政事也 而有以爲  明皇曰下德爲之者謂心雖無爲以功用  彰著跡涉於有爲故云爲之言下德無爲  而有所以爲此心無爲而跡有爲也○河  曰言以爲己取名號也○雱曰下德之人  不修則不至是以既不至於無爲而又勢  當有爲也所謂上德者兼下德之事方其  有爲同於下德然未嘗離乎上德也 上仁烏之  河曰上德謂行仁之君其仁無上故言上  仁也爲之者爲仁恩 而無以爲  明皇曰仁者兼愛之名下德衰而上仁見  所以爲兼愛之仁故云爲之行仁而忘仁  亦欲求無爲故云而無以爲此則心有爲  而跡無爲也且上仁稱無爲者據跡欲無  爲而方上義爾未可以語下德之有爲也  河曰功成事立無以執爲○雱曰仁乃善  之長德之别名既别於德則是爲之也然  聖人之仁盡性而足不事於作故無以爲 上義爲之  河曰爲義以斷割也 而有以爲
Interpretation

This passage examines the graded manifestations of De (Virtue/Power) in moral cultivation. The highest level, "supreme De" (shangde), operates with complete naturalness, requiring no deliberate action. Like a river flowing effortlessly, those embodying supreme De follow the Dao's principles with inner serenity and wuwei (non-action), their external conduct free from contrived displays. This state isn't achieved by consciously pursuing wuwei's reputation, but emerges from one's innate simplicity and natural harmony with the Way.

The next level, "lower De" (xiade), involves conscious effort. While the mind may aspire to wuwei, the practical demands of teaching and governance necessitate outward engagement. Here, inner stillness coexists with active external involvement.

Further down lies "supreme benevolence" (shangren). Though benevolence expresses De, consciously practicing it already falls within the realm of "deliberate action." However, the sage's benevolence flows spontaneously from their nature, requiring no artificial construction—thus while manifesting as action, it remains a natural emanation.

Finally, "supreme righteousness" (shangyi) demands clear judgments and decisive actions, inherently involving conscious effort. At this stage, both inner intention and outward conduct require active engagement.

Through this hierarchy, the text reveals that genuine supreme De manifests through effortless alignment with the Dao—the more one strives deliberately, the further one strays from the Way. As the river commentary observes, those of supreme De emulate the Dao's quiescent nature without forced action, while lower De requires concrete expressions like governance and instruction to manifest virtue.

 明皇曰義者裁非之謂謂裁非之義故云  爲之有以裁非斷割令得其宜故云而有  以爲此則心迹俱有爲也○河曰動作以  爲己殺人以成威賊下以自奉也○雱曰  仁有不足乃經以義 上禮烏之  河曰謂上禮之君其禮無上故言上禮爲  之者言爲禮制度序威儀 而莫之應  河曰言禮華盛實衰飾偽煩多動則離道  不可應也 則攘臂而仍之  明皇曰六紀不和則爲禮以救之故云爲  之禮尚往來不來非禮行禮於彼而彼不  應則攘臂而怒以相仍引○河曰言煩多  不可應上下忿爭故攘臂相仍引○雱曰  禮所以定上下别親疏審隆殺也種種分  别得失始彰純誠已虧乃制其外外貌既  嚴責望深矣雖名止邪之具兹實爭亂之  端竊嘗原禮於物爲火於時當夏夏者萬  物去本盛末之時觀四時之有夏則禮者  聖人所不免也方期去末歸本則以禮爲  非亦所不免也聖人之教時而已矣何常  之有而歸本之言於學者爲要矣 故失道而後德  河曰言道衰而德化生也 失德而後仁  河曰言德衰而仁愛見也 失仁而後義  河曰言仁衰而分義明也 失義而後禮  明皇曰失道者失上德也上德合道故云  失道夫道德仁義者時俗夷險之名也故  道衰而德見德失而仁存仁亡而義立義
Interpretation

This passage describes the devolution from Dao (the cosmic primordial principle) to ritual propriety. When Dao (the universal law of origin) is lost, then De (virtue of natural non-action) becomes necessary; when De is lost, then humaneness (conscious benevolence) emerges; when humaneness is lost, then righteousness (standards for judging right and wrong) appears; and when righteousness is lost, then ritual (codified behavioral norms) must be established.

Regarding "righteousness": It refers to making judgments about right and wrong. When people begin consciously distinguishing right from wrong and establishing standards, it indicates they have already deviated from the state of natural Wuwei (non-action). Though such human judgments may seem reasonable, they are fundamentally artificial constructs.

Concerning "ritual": The highest form of ritual (superior ritual) involves establishing ceremonial systems and behavioral codes. But when ritual becomes overly elaborate and hypocritical, it breeds conflict instead. Like summer foliage that grows lush yet drifts from its roots, excessive emphasis on external ritual forms causes the loss of inner sincerity.

Heshang Gong (the Han dynasty commentator) observed: When society requires ritual to maintain order, it signifies the loss of genuine sincerity, causing people to accuse one another. While ritual can regulate behavior, overemphasis makes it a source of contention. Just as seasons necessarily include summer, ritual serves a purpose in certain periods—yet ultimately we must return to the fundamental.

This text reflects the Daoist devolutionary view of "Dao-De-humaneness-righteousness-ritual": The ideal state is natural harmony with the Dao, while De, humaneness, righteousness and ritual represent increasingly external constraints necessitated by humanity's moral decline.

 喪而禮救斯皆適時之用爾故論禮於淳  樸之代非狂則悖忘禮於澆醨之日非愚  則誣若能解而更張者當退禮而行義退  義而行仁退仁而行德忘德而合道人反  淳樸則上德之無爲也 夫禮者忠信之薄  河曰言禮廢本治末忠信日以衰薄 而亂之首也  明皇曰制禮者爲忠信衰薄而以禮爲救  亂之首爾用禮者在安上理人豈玉帛云  乎哉○河曰禮者賤質而貴文故正直日  以少邪亂日以生○雱曰太古之道降爲  帝德帝德又降乃有王者王者始任禮以  治自王者之後天下之俗可見矣然則亂  首之言豈其妄歟 前識者道之華  河曰不知而言知爲前識此人失道之實  得道之華 而愚之始也  明皇曰識者人性識也謂在人性識之前  而制此檢外之禮雖欲愚時實喪淳樸故  云道之華禮以救亂所貴同和而失禮意  者則將矜其玉帛者其民詭如此之人性  其愚昩之始○河曰言前識之人愚闇之  倡始○雱曰智藏於賢人之德本華乃草  木之精發見於外者也雖足以美一時之  觀而華盛則本衰矣智者亦德性之精也  固當深藏於本而乃發露乎外以爲前識  夫事有常運至則應耳而奚以豫識其兆  爲哉種種分别以示聰明世俗睹其有先  幾之明而聖人以爲眞愚者之始孔子曰  不逆詐不億不信亦惡夫爲華而已
Interpretation

In the pristine antiquity when Dao and De (Virtue) remained pure, the emphasis on ritual propriety was either arrogance or contrary to natural principles. Yet in eras of moral decline where rituals are abandoned, such neglect reflects either foolishness or self-deception. The truly wise adapt to their times: when rituals become empty formalities, they return to righteousness; when righteousness proves difficult to practice, they return to benevolence; when benevolence cannot be universally applied, they return to natural authenticity—ultimately transcending moral conventions to reunite with the primordial Dao. When humanity rediscovers this uncarved simplicity, the highest state of "supreme De's wuwei (non-action)" is attained.

Ritual propriety emerges precisely when loyalty and sincerity wane. The commentator Heshang Gong explains: when society begins emphasizing ceremonial decorum, it signals the gradual decline of inner faithfulness and trustworthiness. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang further clarifies: ritual laws were established to compensate for the loss of loyalty and trust—using etiquette to remedy disorder, though ironically these very rituals mark the beginning of chaos. True application of ritual aims to stabilize society and educate the people—how could it merely value jade and silk as ceremonial objects? Heshang Gong observes: ritual prioritizes form over substance, causing genuine integrity to diminish while corruption proliferates. The scholar Wang Pang adds: the ancient Dao first transformed into imperial virtue, then declined further until rulers employed ritual governance—since then, the degeneration of worldly customs has become evident.

Those who claim "foresight" merely grasp superficial manifestations of Dao. Heshang Gong interprets: pretending to know what one doesn't comprehend constitutes so-called "foresight"—such people lose Dao's essence while clinging to its empty trappings. Emperor Xuanzong notes: establishing external ritual constraints before natural human understanding develops may appear to correct contemporary ills, but actually destroys innate simplicity. Overemphasis on ritual—originally intended to save chaotic times—when divorced from its true purpose, leads people to flaunt ceremonial treasures like jade and silk, breeding cunning among the populace. Wang Pang illustrates with metaphor: wisdom should reside in the virtue of sages like essence stored in a plant's roots. Premature displays of "prescience" resemble excessive flowering that inevitably damages the root. Confucius' admonition—"neither suspect deceit beforehand nor presume dishonesty arbitrarily"—precisely condemns such artificial posturing.

是以大丈夫處其厚  河曰大丈夫謂得道之君也處其厚者處  身於敦樸 不處其薄  河曰不處身違道爲世煩亂也 居其實  河曰處忠信也 不居其華  明皇曰有爲者道之薄禮義者德之華故  聖人處無爲之事其厚也不處其薄矣退  禮義之行其華也自居其實矣○河曰不  尚言也 故去彼取此  明皇與河註同○河曰去彼華薄取此厚  實○弼曰德者得也常得而無喪利而無  害故以德爲名焉何以得德由乎道也何  以盡德以無爲用以無爲用則莫不載也  故物無焉則無物不經有焉則不足以免  其生是以天地雖廣以無爲心聖王雖大  以虚爲主故曰以復而視則天地之心見  至日而思之則先王之主睹也故滅其私  而無其身則四海莫不瞻遠近莫不至殊  其已而有心則一體不能自全肌骨不能  相容是以上德之人唯道是用不德其德  無執無用故能有德而無不爲不求而得  不爲而成故雖有德而無德名也下德求  而得之爲而成之則立善以治物故德名  有焉求而得之必有失焉爲而成之必有  敗焉善名生則有不善應焉故下德爲之  而有以爲也無以爲者無所偏爲也凡不  能無爲而爲之者皆下德也仁義禮節是  也將明德之上下輒舉下德以對上德至  于無以爲極下德之量上仁是也是及於
Interpretation

The truly wise ruler (the "great man" who has attained the Dao) establishes himself upon the foundation of simplicity and genuineness. They do not dwell in superficiality and ostentation, but abide in their authentic nature, without pursuing flashy external adornments.

Emperor Xuanzong's commentary explains that deliberate action represents the shallowness of the Dao, while ritual propriety constitutes the superficial ornamentation of De (Virtue/Power). Thus, the sage acts through Wuwei (non-action), which embodies true substance; only by transcending the formal trappings of ritual can one preserve inner authenticity. The Heshang Gong commentary further clarifies: this means not indulging in empty rhetoric.

Therefore, one should discard superficial glitter and choose this substantial, grounded quality. "De" means attainment - maintaining it without loss, benefiting without harm. How does one attain De? Through the Dao. How does one fully realize De? By applying it through Wuwei, thus becoming capable of bearing all things. When all things appear nonexistent, they can contain everything; when fixated on concrete forms, one actually endangers life. Thus, though heaven and earth are vast, they take Wuwei as their root; though sage-kings are great, they take emptiness as their guide.

Those possessing superior De completely follow the Dao's principles without flaunting their virtue, neither clinging nor forcing, thereby truly embodying De that accomplishes all things effortlessly. They obtain without seeking, achieve without striving, possessing De yet leaving no trace of its name. Those of inferior De attain through pursuit and accomplish through action, using good deeds to govern affairs, thus leaving behind the name of virtue. But what is pursued will inevitably be lost; what is forced will inevitably fail; where good reputation appears, its opposite follows. Therefore, inferior De represents action through deliberate doing.

The supreme state is Wuwei - action without partial striving. All who cannot reach Wuwei and must act deliberately belong to inferior De, including specific virtues like humaneness, righteousness, and ritual propriety. To illustrate the distinction between superior and inferior De, inferior De is presented here in contrast to superior De. The realm of Wuwei represents De's ultimate expression, while even supreme humaneness (the highest form of benevolence) already belongs to the category of inferior De.

 無以爲而猶爲之焉爲之而無以爲故有  爲爲之患矣本在無爲母在無名棄本捨  母而適其子功雖大焉必有不濟名雖美  焉僞亦必生不能不爲而成不興而治則  乃爲之故有弘普博施仁愛之者而愛之  無所偏私故上仁爲之而無以爲也愛不  能兼則有折抗正直而義理之者忿枉祐  直助彼功此物事而有以心爲矣故上義  爲之而有以爲也直不能售則有斿飾修  又禮敬之者尚好修敬校責往來則不對  之間忿怒生焉故上禮爲之而莫之應則  攘臂而仍之夫大之極也其唯道乎自此  已往豈足尊哉故雖德盛業大富有萬物  猶各有其德而未能自周也故天不能爲  載地不能爲覆人不能爲瞻萬物雖貴以  無爲用不能捨無以爲體也不能捨無以  爲體也失其爲大矣所謂失道而後德也  以無爲用則德其母故能己不勞焉而物  無不理下此已往則失用之母不能無爲  而貴博施不能博施而貴正直不能正直  而貴飾敬所謂失德而後仁失仁而後義  失義而後禮也夫禮也所始首於忠信不  篤通簡不暢責備於表機微爭制夫仁義  發於内爲之猶僞况務外飾而可乆乎故  失禮者忠信之薄而亂之首也前識者前  人而識也即下德之倫也竭其聰明以爲  前識役其智力以營庶事雖得其情姦巧  彌密雖豐其譽愈喪篤實勞而事昏務而
Interpretation

This passage expounds the core Daoist concept of "governing through non-action" (Wuwei). Laozi teaches that the highest form of governance resembles a mother nurturing all things—completely spontaneous and effortless. When we abandon this fundamental principle of non-action to pursue specific achievements, even the greatest accomplishments remain incomplete, and the finest reputations inevitably contain artifice.

The highest benevolence gives naturally without partiality; the next level of righteousness requires conscious efforts to uphold justice, already carrying human intention; the lowest form of ritual becomes mere superficial formality, often breeding conflict. The Dao (the cosmic source and its laws) stands supreme, while all other virtues are secondary.

The greatness of heaven, earth, and the myriad things arises precisely because they follow the natural principle of non-action. Losing this foundation leads to degeneration: from Virtue (De) to benevolence, from benevolence to righteousness, and from righteousness to ritual. The emergence of ritual norms, in fact, stems from a lack of inner sincerity, requiring external regulations. Those who pride themselves on foresight may appear wise, yet the more they scheme, the further they stray from the essence.

Laozi employs the metaphor of mother and child: non-action is the root (mother), while deliberate action is the branch (child). Excessive focus on specific deeds is like abandoning the mother to chase after the child—ultimately losing what is most precious. True wisdom lies in aligning with nature, accomplishing all without striving.

 治薉雖竭聖智而民愈害舍己任物則無  爲而泰守夫素樸則不順典制聽彼所獲  棄此所守識道之華而愚之首故苟得其  爲功之母則萬物作焉而不辭也萬事存  焉而不勞也用不以形御不以名故仁義  可顯禮敬可彰也夫載之以大道鎮之以  無名則物無所尚志無所營各任其貞事  用其誠則仁德厚焉行義正焉禮敬清焉  棄其所載舍其所生用其成形役其聰明  則仁失誠焉義其競焉禮其爭焉故仁德  之厚非用仁之所能也行義之正非用義  之所成也禮敬之清非用禮之所濟也載  之以道統之以母故顯之而無所尚彰之  而無所競用夫無名故名以篤焉用夫無  形故形以成焉守母以存其子崇本以舉  其末則形名俱有而邪不生大美配天而  華不作故母不可遠本不可失仁義母之  所生非可以爲母形器匠之所成非可以  爲匠也捨其母而用其子棄其本而適其  末名則有所分形則有所止雖極其大必  有不周雖盛其美必有患憂功在爲之豈  足處也○雱曰自拔於常流之中而思比  德於至聖非眞大丈夫孰能如此    昔之得一章第三十九 昔之得一者  明皇曰一者道之和謂沖氣也以其妙用  在物爲一故謂之一爾○河曰昔往也一  無爲道之子也○弼曰昔始也一數之始  而物之極也各是一物之生所以爲主也
Interpretation

In governing society, even when exhausting the wisdom of sages, the people often suffer more harm. By relinquishing subjective will and following the innate nature of all things, one attains the realm of wuwei (non-action) and peaceful stability. Preserving one's pure and simple nature frees one from the constraints of rigid institutions; listening to the natural state of all things allows one to abandon artificial attachments. Those who only grasp the superficial brilliance of the Dao are, in truth, at the beginning of folly.

If one can master the root (Dao) from which all things are created, then all things grow naturally without deliberate intervention, and all affairs unfold effortlessly without toil. True governance does not rely on external forms or empty reputations—only then can genuine benevolence and righteousness manifest, and reverence arise naturally. When the Great Dao carries all things and the "nameless" (the original state of Dao) stabilizes everything, then beings will not pursue empty fame, and human hearts will not scheme for selfish gain. Each preserves their innate purity, acting from sincerity—thus, virtue (De) deepens naturally, righteous conduct aligns effortlessly, and reverence remains untainted.

But if one abandons the root of the Dao and discards natural essence, focusing only on outward forms and misusing cleverness, then benevolence loses its sincerity, righteousness turns into contention, and reverence becomes hypocrisy. True virtue is profound—it cannot be achieved by deliberate pursuit of "benevolence." True righteousness is upright—it cannot be accomplished by flaunting "righteousness." True reverence is pure—it cannot be realized through forced rituals.

To govern all things with the Great Dao is to hold fast to the root (the "mother"). Thus, when manifesting, there is no need for deliberate display; when revealing, there is no cause for conflict. By abiding in the "nameless," names become truer; by adhering to the "formless," forms become more complete. Guard the root (mother) to preserve the branches (children); honor the source to perfect the details. In this way, both form and name are fulfilled, evil thoughts do not arise, great beauty matches the Heavenly Dao, and superficial ornamentation does not flourish.

The root (mother) must not be forsaken; the source must not be lost. Benevolence and righteousness emerge from the root, but they must not be mistaken for the root itself. Just as tools are crafted by artisans, they must not be confused with the artisan. To discard the root and chase the branches, to abandon the source and pursue the trivial—this fractures names and confines forms. Even if pursued to the extreme, there will inevitably be insufficiency; even if adorned with outward beauty, there will surely be hidden anxieties. How can one find true peace by striving for artificial achievements?

Wang Pang (Northern Song scholar) commented: "To transcend worldly conventions and aspire to the virtue of the highest sage—who but a true great man could achieve this?"

(Chapter 39) Since ancient times, those who attained the "One" (i.e., the Dao):

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains: "The 'One' is the harmonious state of the Dao, referring to the blended qi (vital energy) of yin-yang. Because its wondrous function in all things is undivided, it is called the 'One.'"

Heshang Gong notes: "'Of old' refers to antiquity; the 'One' is what arises from the Dao of wuwei (non-action)."

Wang Bi states: "'Of old' signifies the beginning; the 'One' is the origin of numbers and the ultimate of all things. All things arise from this 'One,' thus it is the sovereign of the myriad beings."

 物各得此一以成既成而舍一以居成居  成則失其母故皆裂發歇竭蹶也 天得一以清地得一以寧  河曰言天得一故能垂象清明地得一故  能安靜不摇動 神得一以靈  河曰言神得一故能變化無形○雱曰神  謂鬼神之神靈者神之散也 谷得一以盈  河曰言谷得一故能盈滿而不絶也○雱  曰一之爲一無乎不遍故谷虚而能應者  一存乎中也 萬物得一以生  河曰言萬物皆須道以生成也 侯王得一以爲天下貞  河曰言侯王得一故能爲天下平正 其致之一也  明皇曰物得道用因用立名道存則名立  用失則實喪矣故天清地寧神靈谷盈皆  資妙用以致之故云其致之○河曰致誡  也謂下五事也○弼曰各以其一致此清  寧靈貞盈生○雱曰一者不二在彼在此  其所謂一其體常一無有别一故惟一可  以致一不可以他致一也一之爲義天下  之至精唯精故能神神則盡之矣而神之  爲德常在一也 天無以清將恐裂  河曰言天當有陰陽施張晝夜更用不可  但欲清眀無已時將恐分裂不爲天○弼  曰用一以致清耳非用清以清也守一則  清不失用清則恐裂也故爲功之母不可  舍也是以皆無用其功恐喪其本也 地無以寧將恐發  河曰言地當有高下剛柔氣節五行不可
Interpretation

All things come into being by attaining the "One" (the essence of Dao), yet once formed, they often abandon this "One," clinging only to their manifested forms. When one clings solely to the formed, the root is lost, ultimately leading to division, collapse, exhaustion, and decay.

Heaven attains the "One" and thereby remains clear (Heshang Gong notes: Heaven attains the "One" and thus manifests its clarity; Earth attains the "One" and remains steady and unmoved). The spirits attain the "One" and thereby become efficacious (Heshang Gong notes: The spirits attain the "One" and thus transform without form. Wang Pang comments: "Spirit" refers to the numinous power of ghosts and deities, while "efficacy" is its manifestation). The valleys attain the "One" and thereby remain full (Heshang Gong notes: The valleys attain the "One" and thus stay abundant without drying up. Wang Pang adds: The "One" is omnipresent—the valleys are empty yet responsive precisely because the "One" resides within them).

All things attain the "One" and thereby grow (Heshang Gong notes: All things require Dao to come into being). The lords and kings attain the "One" and thereby become models for the world (Heshang Gong notes: The lords and kings attain the "One" and thus bring justice to the world). These are all states achieved through single-minded focus on the "One" (Emperor Xuanzong of Tang comments: Things establish their names through the function of Dao—when Dao is present, names are established; when its function is lost, substance perishes).

If Heaven could not maintain its clarity, it might shatter (Heshang Gong notes: Heaven must have the alternation of Yin and Yang, the cycle of day and night—it cannot seek only perpetual clarity, or it risks breaking apart and ceasing to be Heaven. Wang Bi remarks: One uses the "One" to attain clarity, not clarity itself to preserve clarity. Hold fast to the "One," and clarity will not be lost; if one seeks only clarity, it may lead to rupture). If Earth could not maintain its steadiness, it might collapse (Heshang Gong notes: Earth must have heights and depths, firmness and softness, the transformations of climate and the Five Phases).

 但欲安靜無已時將恐發泄不爲地 神無以靈將恐歇  河曰言神當有王相囚死休廢不可但欲  靈無已時將恐虚歇不爲神也 谷無以盈將恐竭  河曰言谷當有盈縮虚實不可但欲盈滿  無已時將恐枯竭不爲谷 萬物無以生將恐滅  河曰言萬物當隨時生死不可但欲生無  已時將恐滅亡不爲物也 侯王無以烏貞而貴高將恐蹶  明皇曰得一者不可矜其用故誡云天無  以其清而矜之將恐分裂地無以其寧而  矜之將恐發泄神矜則靈歇谷矜則盈竭  物矜則生滅侯王矜其貴則將顛蹶矣聖  教垂代本爲生靈雖遠舉天地之清寧而  會歸只在於侯王守雌用道耳故下文云  河曰言侯王當屈己以下人汲汲求賢不  可但欲貴高於人將恐顛蹶失其位也   雱曰一之爲一無乎不在欲言其理詞不  勝窮且以人形言之凡人初生精爲之本  因精集神體象斯具精之既喪形斃神離  或形其理無二也一本無爲貞而三宇 故貴以賤烏本  河曰言必欲尊貴當以薄賤爲本若禹稷  躬稼舜陶河濱周公下白屋也 高以下烏基  明皇曰侯王貴高兆民非下爲國者以人  爲本基當勞謙以聚之令樂其愷悌之化  不有離散○河曰言必欲尊貴當以下爲  本基由築墻造功因卑成高下不堅固後  必傾危○雱曰水於五行其數爲一而趨
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the profound principle of "things reversing upon reaching their extreme" through comparisons between natural phenomena and social dynamics. All things between heaven and earth must maintain dynamic equilibrium, as excessive pursuit of any singular state ultimately leads to decline.

Just as divine spirits (referring to natural laws) would exhaust their spiritual power and become ineffective if they persistently sought manifestation without rest; or as valleys would dry up if they only sought fullness without depletion; so too would all creatures face ecological extinction if they only lived without dying. The text employs the "five phases of growth and decline" (Wang-Xiang-Qiu-Si-Xiu-Fei, representing the developmental stages in ancient Five Phases theory) to illustrate how all things must complete their cyclical transformations.

For rulers (Houwang), the scripture particularly emphasizes: those who relentlessly pursue lofty status without understanding humility as their foundation are like builders constructing tall towers without proper foundations—eventually destined to collapse and lose their position. Historical sage-kings serve as examples: Yu the Great personally plowed fields, Hou Ji worked the farmlands, Shun made pottery by the riverbank, and the Duke of Zhou visited commoners' thatched cottages (baiwu denoting humble dwellings), demonstrating how true nobility must be rooted in humility.

The core teaching ultimately reveals: the fundamental essence of all things lies in the "One" (a central Daoist concept denoting cosmic origin), which itself embodies clarity and Wuwei (non-action). Like water—which occupies the lowest position in the Five Phases system—yet becomes the source of life precisely through its soft, yielding, and low-dwelling nature. Rulers should emulate water's qualities, understanding that nobility must take humility as its foundation, just as construction must begin from the ground up.

 下不爭乃陰陽之情也知此道者雖居貴  高而不忘基本故居位也安猶體神而存  精則神常存也 是以侯王自稱孤寡不轂  一本作轂○河曰孤寡喻孤獨不轂喻不  能如車轂爲衆輻所凑 此其以賤烏本邪  河曰言侯王至尊貴能以孤寡自稱此非  以賤爲本乎以曉人 非乎  明皇曰孤寡不轂則凡情所惡侯王自稱  以謙爲本非乎者明是以賤爲本爾○河  曰嗟嘆之辭○雱曰一於數至少而爲萬  物本故知本在於賤知賤乃貴也 故致數譽無譽  御本作數輿無輿弼本作數譽無譽○明  皇曰數與則無與輪轅爲與本數貴則無  貴賤下爲貴本元爲與本當存元以定與  賤爲貴本當守賤以安貴將戒侯王以賤  爲本故致此數與之談也○河曰致就也  言人就車數之爲輻爲輪爲轂爲衡爲曰  尊無有名爲車者故成爲車以喻侯王不  以尊號自名故能成其貴○雱曰知一者  以賤爲本而内韜至貴故世不得而貴亦  不得而賤苟爲己而數致稱譽豈眞譽乎  一本譽作輿非 不欲琭琭如玉落落如石  明皇曰琭琭玉貌落落石貌以賤爲大○  河曰琭琭喻少落落喻多玉少故見貴石  多故見賤言不欲如玉爲人所貴如石爲  人所賤當處其中也○弼曰清不能爲清  盈不能爲盈皆有其母以存其形故清不
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the concept in the Daode Jing that "nobility takes humility as its root." The Dao of Yin-Yang emphasizes non-contention. Those who understand this principle, even when occupying high positions, never forget their foundation, thus maintaining stability in their status. It resembles how nurturing one's spirit (Shen) allows the primordial spirit to endure eternally.

Ancient rulers referred to themselves as "solitary," "desolate," or "unworthy" (毂 originally meaning the hub of a wheel)—terms denoting lowly status. Heshang Gong (a commentator) explains: When rulers adopt these self-deprecating titles, they demonstrate taking humility as their foundation. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang notes that these were words ordinary people despised, yet rulers used them for self-reference, embodying the principle of basing themselves in modesty.

Just as in crafting a chariot, only when wheels, shafts, and axles combine do they form a complete vehicle—individually, none constitutes a chariot. Similarly, true nobility lies not in empty titles. Wang Pang (another commentator) adds that those who understand the Dao (the Way) take humility as their root while inwardly embodying the highest virtue (De), making them impervious to worldly judgments of honor or disgrace. Deliberately seeking praise cannot yield genuine honor.

The passage concludes with a jade-stone metaphor: Don't stand out like rare jade (琭琭如玉), nor be commonplace like ordinary stone (落落如石). Heshang Gong clarifies that jade's scarcity makes it precious, while stone's abundance renders it humble—the ideal state lies between. Wang Bi (a foundational commentator) further observes that purity cannot exist alone, nor can fullness endure permanently; both rely on their roots to maintain form.

 足貴盈不足多貴在其母而母無貴形貴  乃以賤爲本高乃以下爲基故致數譽乃  無譽也玉石琭琭落落體盡於形故不欲  也○雱曰玉石體堅而一定不能曲變非  所謂一也若夫萬變而常一則眞一矣故  玉琭琭貴而已矣不能賤也石落落賤而  已矣不能貴也老氏既明一義恐不悟者  執一不變堅如玉石則失一之理矣夫唯  體一者一貴一賤其德如水方圓枉直應  物無窮而不離於一故不得而貴賤以一  無貴賤故也此篇義最奥密難言今粗明  綱領而已蓋道生一一則德之全體於物  則幾於道者是也上篇序德經之大旨次  以此篇則論德之者亦猶終以小國寡民  而更有信言不美耳    反者道之動章第四十 反者道之動  明皇曰此明權也反者取其反經合義反  經合義者是聖人之行權行權者是道之  運動故云反者道之動○河曰反本也本  者道之所以動動生萬物背之則亡也○  弼曰高以下爲基貴以賤爲本有以無爲  用此其反也動皆之其所無則物通矣故  曰反者道之動也○雱曰反本則靜靜乃  能動譬如秋冬能起春夏也 弱者道之用  明皇曰此明實也弱者取其柔弱雌靜柔  弱雌靜者是聖人之處實處實者是道之  常用故云弱者道之用○河曰柔弱者道  之所常用故能長久○弼曰柔弱同通不
Interpretation

This passage elucidates two core concepts from the Daode Jing concerning "reversal" and "softness." Laozi posits that the movement of the Dao often manifests through complementary opposites.

Regarding "Reversal is the movement of the Dao":

The Dao's motion frequently appears as a return to the origin. Just as nobility finds its root in humility, height is founded upon depth, and being arises from non-being. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) explained that this seemingly paradoxical "reversal" actually embodies the sage's wisdom of adaptive change. The Heshang Gong commentary notes that returning to the root is the very impetus through which the Dao generates all things—departing from this foundation leads to dissolution. Wang Pang further illustrates this with the metaphor of autumn and winter nurturing the vitality of spring and summer: beneath apparent stillness lies dynamic potential.

Concerning "Softness is the function of the Dao":

The Dao's concrete workings often reveal themselves through gentle means. Emperor Xuanzong observed that sages maintain a state of softness and quiet receptivity in worldly affairs, which constitutes the Dao's practical application. The Heshang Gong adds that softness is the Dao's most frequent mode of operation, hence its enduring nature. Wang Bi argues that gentleness penetrates all things without obstruction.

The text employs jade as a metaphor: though hard and precious, jade's fixed nature causes it to lose the Dao's true essence. The authentic "One" (the Dao) should resemble water—adapting to all forms while preserving its fundamental nature. This paradoxical quality of maintaining constancy while remaining infinitely adaptable constitutes the Dao's profound mystery.

Finally, the passage clarifies that while the Dao generates all things (the "One"), De (Virtue) is its complete manifestation. Understanding this principle reveals the essence of the De Jing: seemingly opposite states actually complement each other, and softness proves to be the most effective way the Dao operates.

 可窮極○雱曰道之用無所不克可謂健  矣而獨揵不能自健必以弱爲之本此相  生之情故下文原其本以明之 天下之物生於有  一本作萬物○河曰萬物皆從天地生天  地有形位故言生於有也 有生於無  明皇曰夫實之於權由無之生有故行權  者貴反於實用有者必資於無然至道沖  寂離於名稱諸法性空不相因待若能兩  忘權實雙泯有無數輿無輿可謂超出矣  河曰天地神明蜎飛蠕動皆從道生道無  形故言生於無此言本勝於華弱勝於强  謙虚勝盈滿也○弼曰天下之物皆以有  爲生有之所始以無爲本將欲全有必反  於無也○雱曰無以生有有復爲無反復  相生萬物一致    上士聞道章第四十一 上士聞道勤而行之  明皇曰了悟故勤行○河曰上士聞道自  勤苦竭力而行之○弼曰有志也○雱曰  士學者也故尚志無志則終不可以語道  矣 中士聞道若存若亡  明皇曰中士可上可下故疑疑則若存若  亡○河曰中士聞道治身以長存治國以  未平欣然而存之退見財色榮譽或於情  欲而復亡之也○雱曰人聞夫子之道而  悦者是也 下士聞道大笑之  明皇曰迷而不信故笑○河曰下士貪狠  多欲見道柔弱謂之恐懼見道質樸謂之  鄙陋故大笑之○雱曰道大故似不肖淺
Interpretation

The Dao's function is all-encompassing and can be said to be supremely powerful, yet it does not manifest through force but rather takes weakness as its foundation. This principle of strength and weakness mutually generating each other will be further explained below regarding its origin.

All things under heaven arise from "being" (concrete existence). As Heshang Gong's commentary states: All things are born of heaven and earth, which themselves possess form - thus it is said "born of being." Yet "being" itself originates from "non-being" (the formless source). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains: Just as temporary adaptations must return to the root, the production of all things emerges from "non-being" giving birth to "being." Therefore, when employing "being," one must rely on the foundation of "non-being." The supreme Dao is empty and quiescent, transcending names and concepts; all phenomena are intrinsically empty and interdependent. By simultaneously transcending the duality of "expedient means" and "ultimate truth," "being" and "non-being," one attains transcendent realization. Heshang Gong notes: Celestial deities, earthly spirits, flying and crawling creatures all arise from the Dao, yet the Dao itself has no form - thus it is said "born of non-being." This illustrates how essence surpasses appearance, weakness overcomes strength, and humility exceeds complacency. Wang Bi explains: All things depend on "being" for existence, yet the source of "being" is "non-being." To preserve "being," one must return to the root of "non-being." Wang Pang elaborates: "Non-being" gives birth to "being," and "being" returns to "non-being" - this cyclical movement reveals the fundamental unity of all things.

Chapter 41 describes different attitudes toward the Dao: Those of superior capacity who hear the great Dao will diligently cultivate it. Emperor Xuanzong observes this is because they genuinely comprehend it. Heshang Gong states these advanced practitioners willingly endure hardships in practice. Wang Bi considers this a mark of resolute determination. Wang Pang explains that "scholars" (shi) are seekers who must establish their aspiration before discussing cultivation. Those of middling capacity who hear the Dao will waver in uncertainty. Emperor Xuanzong notes their ambivalence leads to doubt. Heshang Gong describes how they find the Dao reasonable for self-cultivation and governance, yet vacillate when faced with fame and profit. Wang Pang identifies this as the state Confucius described as "delighting upon hearing the Dao." Those of inferior capacity who hear the Dao will laugh at it. Emperor Xuanzong attributes this to ignorant disbelief. Heshang Gong points out such people are burdened by desires, mistaking the Dao's weakness for cowardice and its simplicity for crudeness. Wang Pang concludes that precisely because the Dao is profound, it appears incompatible with vulgar views.

 見者所不識故笑誠如下文所云豈流俗  能睹乎 不笑不足以爲道  明皇曰不爲下士所笑不足以爲玄妙至  道○河曰不爲下士所笑不足以名爲道  雱曰孑然有體以投世俗耳目者豈道也  哉 故建言有之  明皇曰建立也將欲立言明此三士於道  不同○河曰建設也設言以有道當如下  句○弼曰建由立也 明道若昧  河曰明道之人若闇昩無所見○弼曰光  而不耀○雱曰大明若晦察察於美惡而  有其明非明乎道也 夷道若纇  明皇曰上士勤行於明若昩於進若退於  夷若纇故中士疑而下士大笑之○河曰  夷平也大道之人不自别殊若多比纇也  弼曰纇㘨也大夷之道因物之性不執乎  以割物其平不見乃更反若纇㘨也○雱  曰莊子曰以不平平其平也已 進道若退  河曰進取道者若退不及○弼曰後其身  而身先外其身而身存○雱曰孟子曰其  進銳者其退速故進道當因時任理以直  養之不可躁於有成故若退也彼揠苗者  異乎此矣 上德若谷  明皇曰虚沿而容物○河曰上德之人若  深谷不恥垢濁也○弼曰不德其德無所  懷也○雱曰上德不德而其用不窮谷虚  而能應者也 大白若辱  明皇曰純潔而含垢○河曰夫潔白之人  若污辱不自彰顯○弼曰知其白守其黑
Interpretation

The common people cannot comprehend the true principles, so they mock them. As the following text states, how could these profound truths be understood by worldly people? If no one laughs at them, it would indicate these are not the true Dao.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Emperor Ming) comments: If not mocked by ordinary people, it cannot be considered the profound and sublime Dao. Master Heshang says: If not ridiculed by those of inferior capacity, it does not deserve to be called the Dao. Wang Pang remarks: Things that deliberately seek novelty or court popularity—how could they be the true Dao?

Therefore, the ancients in establishing their teachings said:

Emperor Xuanzong explains: "To establish" means to set forth doctrines explaining how superior, average, and inferior scholars differently comprehend the Dao. Master Heshang says: "To establish" means to formulate teachings that clarify what the Dao is. Wang Bi states: "To establish" simply means to set forth.

The truly illuminated Great Way appears instead dim and obscure. Master Heshang says: Those who understand the Great Way seem as if ignorant. Wang Bi comments: It has light but does not dazzle. Wang Pang observes: True illumination appears as darkness—those who excessively discriminate beauty from ugliness or good from evil may seem understanding but don't truly comprehend the Dao.

The level path seems full of hollows. Emperor Xuanzong says: Superior practitioners diligently cultivate the Dao yet appear to regress; walking the smooth path seems like encountering obstacles—thus average scholars become doubtful while inferior ones laugh aloud. Master Heshang explains: "Level" means even—those who attain the Dao don't seek novelty, appearing no different from ordinary people. Wang Bi notes: "Hollows" signify flaws—the most level Way follows all things' nature without artificial carving, making true evenness seem flawed. Wang Pang quotes Zhuangzi: Using uneven means to achieve balance—this is true evenness.

Seeking the Dao appears as regression. Master Heshang says: Dao seekers seem to move backward. Wang Bi observes: Putting oneself behind actually leads; disregarding oneself ensures preservation. Wang Pang cites Mencius: Those advancing too fiercely retreat quickly—thus cultivating the Dao requires following timing and principle without haste, appearing like regression. Like those who pull up sprouts to help them grow—they fundamentally misunderstand this principle.

The highest virtue resembles a valley. Emperor Xuanzong says: Empty as a valley, it embraces all things. Master Heshang comments: The virtuous are like deep valleys, rejecting no impurity. Wang Bi notes: Without flaunting virtue, they contain everything. Wang Pang says: The highest virtue doesn't deliberately manifest yet functions boundlessly—like empty valleys echoing all sounds.

The purest white appears stained. Emperor Xuanzong remarks: Though pure, it embraces defilement. Master Heshang says: The truly pure seem sullied yet never self-promote. Wang Bi observes: Though knowing brightness, they dwell in obscurity.

 大白然後乃得○雱曰知其白守其黑孔  子曰涅而不淄涅故似辱 廣德若不足  明皇曰大成而執謙○河曰德行廣大之  人若愚頑不足也○弼曰廣德不盈廓然  無形不可滿也○雱曰塊然有餘者豈廣  德哉 建德若偷  明皇曰立功而不衒○河曰建設道德之  人若可偷引使空虚也○弼曰偷匹也建  德者因物自然不立不施故若偷匹○雱  曰偷苟且也區區欲速務有所建豈足以  爲德唯因時任理視若偷隋者其建大莊  子曰不得已而後起 質眞若渝  明皇曰淳一而和光○河曰質樸之人若  五色有渝淺不明○弼曰質眞者不矜其  眞故渝○雱曰體性抱神以遊乎世俗之  間者萬變從俗而其眞常眞故物莫知其  眞彼漢陰丈人孑孑以眞爲己任而别乎  世俗乃子貢之徒所驚而聖人以爲假修  渾沌者豈所謂質眞乎 大方無隅  明皇曰不小立圭角○河曰大方正之人  無妄曲廉隅○弼曰方而不割故無隅也  雱曰大方道之體也若有四隅則形盡於  所見其小乆矣 大器晩成  明皇曰且無近功○河曰大器之人若九  鼎瑚璉不可卒成也○弼曰大器成天下  不持全别故必晩成也○雱曰帝王之功  不如霸者之速效 大音希聲  明皇曰不飾小說○河曰大音猶雷霆待
Interpretation

This passage describes several important realms of cultivating De (Virtue/Power) in Daoist practice:

Knowing brightness yet dwelling in obscurity is like Confucius' saying "dyed blue, one becomes blue; dyed yellow, one becomes yellow." Those with genuine De can adapt to their environment without losing their essential nature. The most expansive De appears insufficient because true perfection resembles emptiness—it can never be filled. Those who consider themselves abundant in De are still far from attaining genuine greatness.

Establishing De should be done as inconspicuously as a thief. The Ming Emperor's commentary explains that one should accomplish merits without showing off, while Wang Bi states that establishing De must follow natural principles without forced action. Wang Anshi further elaborates that those who rush for quick results cannot build great De—only those who follow circumstances and appear idle can achieve great things. Zhuangzi said true action arises only when compelled by necessity.

The genuinely simple and authentic appear to follow the crowd. The Ming Emperor notes their inner purity harmonizes with external things, while Wang Bi observes that truly simple people don't deliberately advertise their authenticity. Wang Anshi gives an example: the Hermit of Hanyin who deliberately flaunted his authenticity was considered fake by sages, while genuine Daoist adepts mingle in society without losing their true nature.

The most square appears to have no corners. The Ming Emperor says truly great vessels don't deliberately display their squareness, while Wang Bi explains that real squareness doesn't cut others. Wang Anshi argues the Dao itself is boundless—having corners would limit it.

Great vessels take time to complete. The Ming Emperor states great achievements can't be rushed, while Heshang Gong compares great vessels to the Nine Tripods and precious ritual objects that require slow forging. Wang Bi explains that a vessel capable of holding the world must be complete, hence necessarily late in formation. Wang Anshi contrasts this with the quicker results of hegemonic rule compared to imperial accomplishments.

The greatest sound is inaudible. The Ming Emperor says true principles need no ornate words, while Heshang Gong compares the greatest sound to thunder that manifests only when the time is right.

 時而動喻常愛氣希言也○弼曰聽之不  聞名曰希不可得聞之音也有聲則有分  有分則不宫而啇矣分則不能統衆故有  聲者非大音也○雱曰道盈於無外而其  體常寂諸物不能感觸其聲常聲而世莫  得聞也莊子曰無聲之中獨聞和焉希聲  之謂乎 大象無形  明皇曰故能應萬類○河曰大法象之人  質樸無形容○弼曰有形則有分有分者  不温則炎不炎則寒故象而形者非大象  雱曰能賦萬物之形而其體廓然不可得  而有此道之全體由其有物故曰大象 道隱無名  明皇曰功用不彰無名氏也○河曰道潛  隱使人無能指名也○雱曰自希聲而下  皆道之大全所由言者異故曰大音也大  象也能體大音大象以爲道則其道至矣  夫唯道之至思慮之所不及在有也爲實  在無也爲空處處皆然無乎不在故欲爲  之名而不可狀無名之中常有此物欲見  而不得故曰隱也 夫惟道善貸且成  明皇曰雖隱無名氏而實善以沖和妙用  資貸萬物且成熟之○河曰成就也言道  善禀貸人精氣且成就之也○弼曰凡此  諸善皆是道之所成也在象則爲大象而  大象無形在音則爲大音而大音希聲物  以之成而不見其形故隱而無名也貸之  非唯供其乏而已一貸之則足以永終其  德故曰善貸也成之不加機匠之裁無物
Interpretation

This scripture elucidates the profound characteristics of the Dao (the Way). It begins with the notion that "the greatest sound is inaudible" — the true Dao resembles silent music, for once specific tones emerge with distinguishable musical notes, the holistic unity is lost. This echoes Zhuangzi's teaching of "hearing harmony in silence," referring to this mystical state of perception.

Next, it discusses how "the greatest form has no shape." Though the Dao gives form to all things, its essence remains formless and imageless. Just as the true "great image" (the Dao's complete manifestation) cannot be confined to specific attributes like heat or cold, any concrete form would compromise its wholeness.

The text then explains how "the Dao conceals itself and has no name." Though omnipresent, the Dao cannot be defined by any particular designation. It manifests as substance in the realm of "being" and as emptiness in the realm of "non-being," yet words fail to capture its nature.

Finally, it states that "the Dao excels in giving and perfecting." Though hidden and nameless, the Dao nourishes all things through its mysterious workings. Unlike a craftsman who deliberately carves, it accomplishes everything spontaneously. Like a loan that not only meets temporary needs but enables lasting virtue, all beautiful things are manifestations of the Dao. Yet the Dao itself remains formless, soundless, and nameless in its essence.

 而不濟其形故曰善成○雱曰道能供萬  物之求而成就之然物之所得復歸其本  故道雖贍足萬物而吾未嘗費貸之爲言  應彼之乏而終以見還者也竊嘗論此篇  曰道不遠人而世莫能睹者不明故也故  首之以眀道大道甚夷而惟明者能由之  以進故次曰夷道也進道也進於道而復  乎性命之常則不德之德也故次之以上  德上德者自得其德而不同乎庶物者也  故不染而白以其白自異於物則安能若  谷乎故次之以若辱不辱而潔則是伯夷  之隘也則安能廣乎故若辱而後曰廣德  上德而能廣則是與人爲徒而可以爲君  師矣故曰建德若偷偷者不汲汲乎有建  者也建德則有所立而離本近偽矣故又  要在乎不易吾眞故次之以質眞其序至  此則道之在我者體既具矣故曰大方無  隅有大方以爲體則所以應無方之傳而  可以緒餘爲人矣故曰大器大器者業也  至人以其糠粃土苴爲器而器未嘗不大  也孔子以管仲爲小器則帝王之功其大  器乎道雖爲此而要其終則未嘗爲也未  嘗有也故曰大音也大象也然則既盡之  矣故能與道爲一而供萬物之求成萬物  之性也嗚呼是道也不可以識識而况於  以言言乎而余論之者亦其粗而已矣    道生一章第四十二 道生一  河曰道始所生者一 一生二
Interpretation

The Dao (referring to the cosmic origin and ultimate truth), while capable of fulfilling all beings' needs and bringing them to completion, ultimately sees all things return to their source. Thus although the Dao nourishes the myriad things, it never considers this as expenditure. This resembles lending money to others—while temporarily meeting their needs, it will eventually be returned.

I have contemplated the meaning of this chapter: The Dao is actually very close to humans, yet people cannot see it because they fail to comprehend its profundity. Therefore, one must first understand the essence of the Dao. The Great Dao is actually perfectly level—only those who understand can walk upon it, which is the meaning of the "level path" (Yi Dao). Walking this path and returning to the original state of life constitutes the highest Virtue (Shang De), which is not obtained through deliberate pursuit but attained naturally.

Those possessing Shang De maintain their own purity without conforming to worldly ways. But if one looks down upon others due to one's own purity, this becomes narrow-mindedness, like Bo Yi's excessive fastidiousness. True De should embrace all like a valley—unconcerned even when sullied—only then can it become vast. Those who can maintain both noble character and broad-mindedness may become teachers and leaders of others.

Establishing De should occur as naturally as if done in secret, without deliberate display. Forced cultivation of De instead leads one astray from authenticity toward artificiality. Most crucial is preserving one's original true state. Achieving this allows one to comprehend the complete form of the Dao—just as the most perfectly square thing paradoxically has no corners (Da Fang Wu Yu). Based on this complete form, one can adapt to all changes and accomplish great achievements (Da Qi).

Those who attain the Dao can accomplish great things even with the coarsest materials. Confucius said Guan Zhong had small capacity—then should we consider an emperor's achievements as Da Qi? Yet though the Dao accomplishes all this, it ultimately claims no merit nor possession—this is the realm where "the greatest sound is scarcely heard, the greatest form has no shape." Reaching this state allows complete unity with the Dao, fulfilling all beings' needs and perfecting their natures.

Ah, this Dao—it cannot be understood through ordinary cognition, nor adequately expressed in words. What I explain here remains but the most superficial interpretation.

Chapter 42 discusses "the Dao begets the One": The Dao first gives birth to "One" (the undifferentiated primordial state). Heshang Gong (a renowned Han dynasty Daoist scholar) comments: What the Dao first generates is precisely "One." This "One" then begets "Two" (the Yin and Yang energies).

 河曰一生陰與陽也 二生三  明皇曰一者沖氣也言道動出沖和妙氣  於生物之理未足又生陽氣陽氣不能獨  生又生陰氣積沖氣之一故云一生二積  陽氣之二故云二生三○河曰陰陽生和  清濁三氣分爲天地人也 三生萬物  明皇曰陰陽含孕沖氣調和然後萬物阜  成故云三生萬物○河曰天地共生萬物  也天施地化人長養之也○雱曰道兼陰  陽有陰有陽有陰陽之中此三物者始應  一二三之數而物之類莫不由此以出入  故其情與形至纖至悉而考其法象咸類  是矣知此者是知萬物之本也知其本則  其於末也何有至人所用居今日而知萬  世之後者或在是也 萬物負陰而抱陽  河曰萬物無不負陰而向陽回心而就日 沖氣以烏和  明皇曰萬物得陰陽沖氣生成之故故負  抱陰陽含養沖氣以爲柔和也○河曰萬  物中皆有元氣得以和柔若胸中有藏骨  中有髓草木中有空虚與氣通故得乆生  也○雱曰由之以生故無不負抱之者觀  吾之形則其法見矣陰陽適中乃和凡此  以眀物皆係陰陽之屬爲數所定當與之  消息也 人之所惡唯孤寡不穀而玉公以爲稱  明皇曰萬物皆以沖和之氣爲本而沖氣  和柔守本者當須謙卑柔弱故王公至尊  而稱孤寡不轂者以謙柔爲本故也○河
Interpretation

This passage expounds the Daoist fundamental principles of cosmic generation. "One" refers to the primordial Dao (cosmic origin), which first differentiates into the complementary opposites of Yin and Yang. The interaction of these two Qi (vital energies) produces a third harmonizing force (chonghe miaoqi, the subtle qi of harmonious blending), thus forming "Three." This "Three" represents the triad of Heaven, Earth and Humanity, as well as the three qi states of clarity, turbidity and harmony.

These three forces further interact to generate all phenomena in the world. All things contain both Yin and Yang attributes while relying on the harmonizing qi to maintain equilibrium. Just as all beings turn their backs to shade while facing the sun, they internally contain primordial qi (life energy) that sustains their gentle vitality. In the human body, this manifests as the five viscera and six bowels; in bones as marrow; in plants as hollow spaces - all embodiments of qi circulation.

Interestingly, though people generally dislike terms like "orphan," "widower," or "the unworthy" (ancient royal self-deprecations), nobles deliberately use these for self-reference. This reflects how all things take the harmonizing qi as their foundation, and maintaining humility and softness embodies the preservation of origin. Thus the higher one's status, the more one should use modest titles to remind oneself of this gentle essence.

The text reveals Daoist understanding of cosmic generation and the nature of existence: all phenomena consist of Yin-Yang and harmonizing qi, with balance among these three being the fundamental law. It simultaneously demonstrates the Daoist wisdom of valuing softness and humility in worldly conduct.

 曰孤寡不轂者不神之名而王公以爲稱  者處謙卑法虚空和柔○雱曰陰極生陽  陽極生陰陰陽之情也故高則傾窪則盈  侯王居極尊之位其勢至危故取人之所  惡自名以適陰陽之和也故下文云 故物或損之而益益之而損  明皇曰自損者人益之自益者人損之故  朝宗者善於下謙弱者生之柄孤寡之稱  不亦宜乎○河曰夫增高者崩貪富者致  患○弼曰萬物萬形其歸一也何由致一  由於無也因無乃一一可謂無已謂之一  豈得無言乎有言有一非二如何有一有  二子生乎三從無之有數盡乎斯過此以  往非道之流故萬物之生吾知其主雖有  主形沖氣一焉百姓有心異國殊風而得  一者王侯主焉以一爲主一何可令先多  愈遠損則近之損之至盡乃得其極既謂  之一猶乃至三况本不一而道可近乎損  之而益豈虚言也○雱曰澤下而肥山聳  而瘦午過必昃虧至乃盈凡類屬陰陽數  由一二者理極則反物物皆然至人以此  適盈虛之時順消息之理常以謙沖自牧  豈或强亢致菑者乎 人之所教  河曰謂衆人所以教去弱爲强去柔爲剛 亦我義教之  明皇曰老君云人君所欲立教教人者當  以吾此柔弱非虚之義以教之○河曰言  我教衆人使去强爲弱去剛爲柔○弼曰  我之非强使人從之也而用夫自然舉其
Interpretation

This passage explores the profound meaning behind the self-deprecating terms like "orphaned" and "desolate" used by rulers in Laozi's Daodejing. When nobles adopt these seemingly inauspicious titles, they are emulating the emptiness of the Dao, maintaining a humble and yielding attitude.

The law of Yin-Yang transformation dictates that when Yin reaches its extreme, it turns to Yang, and vice versa. Just as tall structures are prone to collapse, low-lying areas naturally become filled. Though rulers occupy the highest positions, this very elevation makes their situation most precarious. By deliberately using terms people normally shun, they align with the principle of Yin-Yang harmony. Hence the scripture later states: Sometimes what appears as loss may bring gain, while apparent gain may ultimately cause loss.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains: Those who humble themselves will be exalted by others, while those who exalt themselves will be humbled. Like rivers flowing to the sea because it willingly stays below, yielding softness is the key to survival—isn't using "orphaned" and "desolate" perfectly appropriate?

Heshang Gong's commentary notes: Piled too high, things will crumble; craving wealth invites disaster. Wang Bi further elaborates: Though all things differ in form, they return to "the One." This "One" is "Non-Being" (Wu), for only through "Non-Being" can all things be united. Yet calling it "One" already gives it a name, and with naming comes the distinction between "One" and "many." From "Non-Being" emerges "Being," and numbers arise—once surpassing three, we stray from the Dao's origin. Though all things have their masters, they are fundamentally unified in Qi (vital energy). People have diverse thoughts and nations varied customs, but only the ruler can unify them. The ruler takes "One" as foundation, yet this "One" cannot be forcibly grasped—the more one pursues it, the farther it recedes. Only through continuous reduction can one approach it; reducing to the utmost reaches the Dao's state.

Lü Huiqing (Pang) adds: Low-lying marshes become fertile while towering peaks grow barren; the sun declines past its zenith as the moon waxes after extreme waning. All things governed by Yin-Yang transformation—born from "One" dividing into "Two"—reverse when reaching their extremes. Those who understand the Dao follow the rhythms of rise and fall, maintaining constant humility—how could they force strength and invite calamity?

Regarding the "what people teach" passage, Heshang Gong explains: Ordinary teaching urges turning weakness to strength and softness to hardness, but Laozi's teaching reverses this. Emperor Xuanzong says: Rulers establishing teachings should use this yielding truth to guide the people. Heshang Gong continues: I (Laozi) teach people to abandon strength for weakness, discard hardness for softness. Wang Bi observes: This isn't about compelling obedience but aligning with the Dao's natural course, revealing the fundamental patterns of things.

 至理順之必吉違之必凶故人相教違之  必自取其凶也亦如我之教人勿違之也 强梁者不得其死  明皇曰强梁之人動與物亢求益而損物  或擊之故不得其死○河曰强梁者謂不  信玄妙背叛道德不從經教尚勢任力也  不得其死者爲天所絶兵刃所伐王法所  殺不得以壽命而死也 吾將以爲教父  明皇曰吾見强梁者亡柔弱者全故以此  柔弱之教爲衆教之父也○河曰父始也  老子以强梁之人爲教戒之始也○弼曰  强梁則必不得其死人相教爲强梁則必  如我之教人不當爲强梁也舉其强梁不  得其死以教即吉云順吾教之必吉也故  得其違教之徒適可以爲教父也○雱曰  識陰陽之情則物物有理皆可以師强梁  殞身物之至惡苟識理者睹之足以鑒消  息之理以爲教父不亦宜乎    天下之至柔章第四十三 天下之至柔馳騁天下之至堅  明皇曰天下之至柔者正性也若馳騁代  務染雜塵境情欲充塞則爲天下之至堅  矣○河曰至柔者水也至堅者金石也水  能貫堅入剛無所不通○弼曰氣無所不  入水無所不出○雱曰聖人所以執柔而  御群剛觀於物則水是也 無有入於無間  河曰無有謂道也道無形質故能出入無  間通神群生也○雱曰有纎物則動爲窒  閡安能入無間乎觀於境則至虚是也此
Interpretation

This scripture expounds two core principles: first, that violating natural laws inevitably invites calamity; second, the wisdom of how softness overcomes hardness.

It begins by stating that aligning with the Dao's patterns brings fortune while defiance brings ruin. Thus people warn each other not to oppose the Dao, lest they court self-destruction—just as I teach others not to transgress natural laws. Those who act tyrannically often meet untimely ends. The Tang Emperor Xuanzong's commentary explains that the aggressive constantly struggle against all things, seemingly pursuing gain but actually incurring loss, potentially provoking fatal retaliation. Master Heshang Gong further clarifies that such people disbelieve the Dao's profound mysteries, betray natural principles, and ignore classical teachings, relying solely on brute force. Ultimately, they perish by heavenly punishment, warfare, or legal execution, denied peaceful deaths.

Therefore, Laozi establishes "gentleness in worldly conduct" as fundamental teaching. Emperor Xuanzong observes that the strong perish while the soft endure, hence establishing yielding as the root of all instruction. Heshang Gong explains that "father" here means origin—Laozi uses the violent man's fate as the starting point for instruction. Wang Bi adds that citing the tragic outcomes of aggressors serves to educate; those who heed the teaching find fortune, while the disobedient become cautionary examples.

Chapter 43 illustrates softness's power through water and emptiness: "The softest things in the world (like water) penetrate the hardest." Emperor Xuanzong notes humanity's original nature is supremely gentle, but worldly desires harden it. Heshang Gong exemplifies how water wears through metal and stone, while Wang Bi compares it to Qi permeating all things. Water's nature reveals why sages conquer hardness through yielding.

"The formless (the Dao) enters where no gap exists." Heshang Gong explains the Dao, being shapeless, penetrates everything to nourish all beings. Like absolute emptiness—the slightest impurity creates obstruction. This demonstrates the formless Dao's penetrative power far surpasses physical objects.

 聖人所以體無而應群有 是以知無爲之有益  明皇曰無有者不染塵境令心中一無所  有無間者道性清靜妙體混成一無間隙  夫不爲可欲所亂令心境俱靜一無所有  則心與道合入無間矣故聖人云吾見身  心清靜則能合道是知有爲之教不如無  爲之有益耳○河曰吾見道無爲而萬物  自化成是以知無爲之有益於人也○弼  曰虚無柔弱無所不通無有不可窮至柔  不可折以此推之故知無爲之有益也 不言之教  河曰法道不言帥之以身 無爲之益  河曰法道無爲治身則有益精神治國則  有益萬民不勞煩也  天下希及之  明皇曰言天下衆教少能及之者○河曰  天下謂人主也希能及道無爲之治身治  國也○雱曰不言之教無爲之益不可以  象告不可以言傳唯體無盡道者足以知  之不亦希乎    名與身章第四十四 名與身孰親  明皇曰名者實之賔代人徇名以亡身設  問誰親欲令去功與名而全其眞○河曰  名遂則身退也○弼曰尚名好高其身必  疏 身與貨孰多  明皇曰徇名者將以求財財得而亡身設  問孰多欲令擲玉毀珠以全其和○河曰  財多則害身也○弼曰貪貨無厭其身必  少○雱曰莊子云足乎内外之分辨乎榮  辱之境余嘗有言内外兩境雖眞僞不侔
Interpretation

The reason sages are able to comprehend the void (the essence of Dao) and respond to all things lies in their understanding of the benefits of wuwei (non-action, or following nature without forcing). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains: "Having nothing" means remaining untainted by worldly desires, keeping the mind empty and luminous; "without gaps" refers to the purity of Dao's nature, where its mysterious substance forms a seamless whole. When one is undisturbed by desires and maintains purity of body and mind, one can unite with Dao and reach this gapless state. Therefore, the sages say: When my body and mind are pure, I can unite with Dao—from this we know that deliberate, forced teachings are less beneficial than natural wuwei.

Heshanggong adds: I observe that though Dao is wuwei, it naturally nurtures all things—thus I know wuwei is beneficial to humanity. Wang Bi explains from a philosophical perspective: The state of emptiness and softness penetrates everywhere, and the softest things cannot be broken—from this we deduce the benefits of wuwei.

Regarding "teaching without words," Heshanggong points out that this follows Dao's natural principle, leading by example rather than verbal instruction. The benefits of wuwei manifest in self-cultivation nourishing the spirit (shen) and governing a nation allowing people to live undisturbed. Emperor Xuanzong laments how rarely the world attains such teaching, while Heshanggong emphasizes how few rulers truly practice wuwei to cultivate themselves and govern. Wang Pang further clarifies: This wordless teaching and wuwei's benefits cannot be fully conveyed through form or language—only those who truly embody Dao can understand them, making them exceedingly rare.

In Chapter 44's "Which is dearer, fame or life?", Emperor Xuanzong observes that fame is merely an appendage to reality, yet people often lose their true selves chasing empty reputation. His rhetorical question—"Which is more precious, fame or life?"—urges letting go of glory to preserve one's genuine nature. Heshanggong states that pursuing fame ultimately leads to self-loss, while Wang Bi notes excessive fame-seeking estranges one from their essence. On "life versus wealth," Emperor Xuanzong warns that chasing riches ends in life-destroying greed; Heshanggong bluntly says excessive wealth harms its owner, and Wang Bi argues insatiable craving depletes vitality. Wang Pang cites Zhuangzi to distinguish inner cultivation from external fame and wealth, clarifying the true boundary between honor and disgrace. He acknowledges that while inner and outer realms differ in authenticity, both require discernment.

 貴賤懸絶而常更相爲輕重不可不察者  也失性之人忘其不貲之有而貪逐外物  矜攬無窮自以爲得而不知所取者塵穢  臭腐非可已畜之物而所耗失沉陷者乃  吾之所以爲我者也其爲親疏多寡之計  亦己愚甚可不哀乎蓋知無待於外而唯  内之務始可與語道故顔子之賢而孔子  之所稱乃在乎樂陋巷之簞瓢然則君子  之所養蓋可知矣今之士非乏聰明之資  而志徇其外外重而内輕察其天機已在  肝膈之上面目之間去本遠矣而猶欲語  古人之至論則亦見其勞而無功也觀老  子此言若將無謂而乃學者之至戒修身  之要務故余因廣其意而詳說之 得與亡孰病  明皇曰問得名貨與亡名貨敦者病其身  河曰好得利則病於行也○弼曰得多利  而亡其身何者爲病也○雱曰得則有有  有所不足有而疲神耗精以守之其病大  矣 是故甚愛必大費  河曰甚愛色費精神甚愛財遇禍患所愛  者少所亡者多故言大費 多藏必厚亡  明皇曰甚愛名者必勞神非大費乎多財  貨者必累身非厚亡乎○弼曰甚愛不與  物通多藏不與物散求之者多攻之者衆  爲物所病故大費厚亡也○雱曰此必至  之理而世俗之所未悟 知足不辱  河曰知足之人給利去欲不辱於身○雱  曰我貴在我何辱之有 知止不殆
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the principle that one should focus on inner cultivation rather than external pursuits. Though social status may vary greatly, it is constantly subject to transformation—a truth one must understand. Those who lose their innate nature forget their most precious essence, chasing instead after external material things with insatiable greed. They believe they have gained much, unaware that what they acquire is nothing but filth and decay, unworthy of preservation. What they truly lose is the very essence that constitutes their being. Such calculations of gain and loss, intimacy and distance, are utterly foolish—is this not lamentable?

Those who truly comprehend the Dao (the Way) know they need not rely on external things but should devote themselves to inner cultivation. Take Yan Hui (Confucius’ most virtuous disciple) as an example: though he lived in a humble alley, eating from bamboo vessels and drinking from a gourd, Confucius praised his virtue. This illustrates where the focus of a noble person’s cultivation lies. Scholars today are not lacking in intelligence, yet they constantly chase fame and fortune, valuing the external while neglecting the internal. Their innate spiritual clarity is obscured by desires, drifting further from their true nature. Yet they still attempt to discuss the profound wisdom of the ancients—this is nothing but futile effort.

Laozi’s words may appear plain, but they are in fact the most crucial precepts for scholars and the key to self-cultivation. The scripture further elaborates through a question-and-answer format:

"Which is more harmful—gain or loss?" Emperor Xuanzong of Tang comments: Which harms the body more—the pursuit of fame and fortune or their loss? Heshang Gong says: Greed for profit damages virtue (De). Wang Bi states: Gaining great profit but losing oneself—which is worse? Lü Huiqing explains: To gain is to possess, and possession leads to dissatisfaction, requiring further mental exertion to protect it—this is the true great harm.

"Excessive miserliness inevitably leads to great waste." Heshang Gong explains: Excessive attachment to beauty depletes one’s spirit (Shen), while excessive greed for wealth invites disaster. What seems like minor gain is in fact great loss.

"The more one accumulates, the heavier the loss." Emperor Xuanzong remarks: Excessive pursuit of fame inevitably exhausts the spirit—is this not great waste? Accumulating too much wealth burdens the body—is this not a grave loss? Wang Bi adds: Excessive miserliness severs connection with all things; excessive accumulation prevents sharing with all things. When many pursue, many contend, and thus one becomes trapped by external things—hence the great waste and heavy loss. Lü Huiqing observes: This is an inevitable principle, yet regrettably, worldly people fail to understand it.

"Contentment brings no disgrace." Heshang Gong says: Those who are content rid themselves of greed and thus avoid disgrace. Lü Huiqing notes: True nobility lies within oneself—how could disgrace occur?

"Knowing when to stop prevents danger." This means that only those who understand contentment and moderation can avert calamity and peril.

 河曰知可止則財利不累於身聲色不亂  於耳目則身不危殆也○雱曰無求於外  故常安也 可以長乆  明皇曰知足者不甚愛知止者不多藏既  無辱殆故可長久○河曰人能知止足則  福禄在己治身者神不勞治國者民不擾  故可長乆
Interpretation

To know when to stop means wealth and gain will not burden your body; beautiful music and dazzling colors will not disturb your ears and eyes—thus keeping one's person free from peril. Wang Pang (Northern Song scholar) adds: Only those who do not seek externally can maintain lasting peace and stability.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Li Longji, who annotated the Daode Jing) explains: Those who understand contentment will not indulge in excessive desires; those who know moderation will not hoard beyond need. Being free from disgrace and danger, they naturally attain longevity. Master Heshang Gong (Han dynasty Daoist scholar) further clarifies: When people comprehend the principles of knowing limits and being content with sufficiency, blessings and prosperity will naturally accompany them. Cultivators who refine their Shen (spirit) will not suffer exhaustion; rulers who govern properly will not oppress their people—thereby achieving enduring tranquility.

(This commentary originates from Collected Annotations on the True Scripture of Dao and De, Volume 6, compiling multiple scholars' interpretations of the "knowing when to stop" and "contentment" concepts in the Daode Jing.)

道徳眞經集註卷之六

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0093); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 5 Vol. 7 →