中文 · EN · JA · KO

《道德真經集註(一)》

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 10 volumes 95,888 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集註(一)》 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 15 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

Vol. 1

道德眞經集註卷之一     唐明皇河上公王弼王雱註  道經(雱曰道者萬物之所道在體爲體在/用爲用無名無迹而無乎不在者是)  (也故雖聖人之言常在其一曲雖在一曲/而異乎諸子百家者不失理而當於時而)  (已)    道可道章第一 道可道  河曰謂經術政教之道也 非常道  河曰非自然長生之道也常道以無爲養  神無事安民含光藏暉滅迹匿端不可稱  道○雱曰可道之道適時而爲時徙不留  道亦應變蓋造化密未嘗暫止昔之所是  今已非矣而曲士攬英華爲道根指蘧廬  爲聖宅老氏方將祛其弊而開以至理故  以此首篇明乎此則方今之言猶非常也 名可名  河曰謂富貴尊榮高世之名也 非常名  明皇曰道者虚極之妙用名者物得之所  稱用可於物故云可道名生於用故云可  名應用且無方則非常於一道物殊而名  異故非常於一名是則强名曰道而道常  無名也○河曰非自然常在之名也常名  當如嬰兒之未言鷄子之未分明珠在蚌  中美玉處石間内雖昭昭外如愚頑○弼  曰可道之道可名之名指事造形非其常  也其不可道不可名也○雱曰名生於實  實有形數形數既具衰壞隨之其可常乎  唯體此不常乃眞常也 無名天地之始  河曰無名者謂道道無形故不可名也始
Interpretation

This passage forms the opening section of the Collected Commentaries on the Authentic Scripture of Dao and De, synthesizing interpretations from four eminent commentators: Emperor Xuanzong of Tang, Heshang Gong, Wang Bi, and Wang Pang. It centers on the foundational concepts of "Dao" (the Way) and "name."

The Dao represents the fundamental principle governing all existence, manifesting both in the essence of things and their functions. Though nameless and formless, it permeates everywhere. Even the words of sages can only capture partial aspects of the Dao—yet unlike the doctrines of various philosophical schools, these sagely teachings align with ultimate truth while remaining timely in application.

The scripture states, "The Dao that can be spoken is not the eternal Dao." Heshang Gong clarifies that what is "speakable" here refers to human constructs like governance systems and institutional teachings, not the natural, everlasting Dao of longevity. The eternal Dao nourishes the spirit through wuwei (non-action), stabilizes people through non-interference, conceals its radiance and erases its traces—defying verbal description. Wang Pang adds that any speakable Dao merely suits particular circumstances; as time passes, what was once deemed correct may prove erroneous.

Regarding "The name that can be named is not the eternal name," Heshang Gong explains that "nameable" refers to worldly distinctions like wealth and status—none of which constitute enduring renown. Emperor Xuanzong observes that names denote characteristics of things; as phenomena change, so must their designations, leaving no immutable labels. Heshang Gong further illustrates with metaphors: eternal fame resembles an infant's pre-verbal state, or like pearls concealed within oysters and jade hidden in stone—radiant within yet outwardly unadorned.

The concluding phrase "Nameless, it is the origin of heaven and earth" reveals the Dao as the formless source of all creation. Heshang Gong notes that the Dao's lack of concrete appearance makes it unnameable. This nameless Dao existed prior to the formation of heaven and earth, constituting the primordial state of all things.

 者道本也吐氣布化出於虚無爲天地本  始也 有名萬物之母  明皇曰無名者妙本也妙本見氣權輿天  地天地資始故無名有名者應用也應用  既成茂養萬物物得其養故有名○河曰  有名謂天地天地有形位陰陽有柔剛是  其有名也萬物母者天地含氣生萬物長  大成就如母之養子○弼曰凡有皆始於  無故未形無名之時則爲萬物之始及其  有形有名之時則長之育之亭之毒之爲  其母也言道以無形無名始成萬物以始  以成而不知其所以玄之又玄也○雱曰  受命於無而成形於有故曰天地之始萬  物之母易曰有天地然後有萬物此言與  易之序同據覆載之間方生之物故以天  地爲先物與天地本無先後推而極之有  無同體始母之言亦筌蹄也且天地雖大  而受命成形未離有無而此乃獨言萬物  之母然則老氏之言姑盡性而已 常無欲以觀其妙  河曰妙要也人常能無欲則可以觀道之  要要謂一也○弼曰妙者微之極也萬物  始於微而後成始於無而後生故常無欲  空虚其懷可以觀其始物之妙 常有欲以觀其徼  明皇曰人生而靜天之性感物而動性之  欲若常守清靜解心釋神反照正性則觀  乎妙本矣若不性其情逐欲而動性失於  欲迷乎道源欲觀妙本則見邊徼矣○河
Interpretation

The Dao is the root of all things, emanating energy from emptiness to create the myriad beings, serving as the source from which heaven and earth take form. The nameless and formless state represents the primordial beginning (referring to the unmanifested state of the Dao), while when the Dao manifests as concrete forms, it becomes the mother that nurtures all existence.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) explains: The nameless state is the subtle essence of the Dao, which, through the workings of Qi (vital energy), gives rise to heaven and earth. Heaven and earth thereby receive their creative power, hence being called "nameless." When the Dao manifests its function, it is called "having a name," nourishing all things just as a mother nurtures her children. Heshang Gong (a Han dynasty Daoist scholar) adds: "Having a name" refers to the concrete forms of heaven and earth, which possess fixed shapes and positions, with Yin-Yang exhibiting attributes of firmness and softness, hence being called "having a name." The phrase "mother of all things" means that heaven and earth contain primordial Qi, enabling all beings to grow and flourish, much like a mother nourishing her offspring. Wang Bi (a Three Kingdoms period philosopher) argues: All tangible things originate from the formless. In the stage before shapes and names emerge, it is the origin of all things; once they acquire form and name, the Dao continues to nurture and cultivate them, becoming the mother of all things.

Wang Anshi (Pang) further elaborates: All things receive life from the formless and achieve existence in concrete forms, hence the saying "the beginning of heaven and earth, the mother of all things." The Book of Changes states, "Only after heaven and earth exist can all things come into being," which aligns with Laozi's view. In truth, there is no inherent sequence between all things and heaven and earth—fundamentally, being and non-being are one. The terms "beginning" and "mother" are merely metaphors. Though heaven and earth are vast, they too are generated from the formless Dao. Laozi particularly emphasizes the phrase "mother of all things" to illustrate the essential function of the Dao.

Only by maintaining a desireless and unattached state of mind can one comprehend the subtlety of the Dao (referring to its profound essence). Heshang Gong states: "Subtlety" (miao) means the essential core. If a person can remain free from desire, they may grasp the fundamental truth of the Dao. Wang Bi explains: "Subtlety" is the utmost refinement. All things grow from the minute, emerging from the formless; thus, only by emptying desires can one observe the wondrous process of creation.

When desires arise, one can only perceive the boundaries and limitations of the Dao. Emperor Xuanzong remarks: Humans are born with a tranquil nature, but desires emerge under the influence of external things. If one can preserve purity, withdraw the Shen (spirit), and return to their original nature, they may realize the source of the Dao. But if they indulge in desires and lose their true nature, they will only see the superficial manifestations of the Dao. Heshang Gong points out: Desires lead people astray from the essence of the Dao, allowing them to perceive only its finite appearances.

 曰徼歸也常有欲之人可以觀世俗之所  歸趣也○弼曰徼歸終也凡有之爲利必  以無爲用欲之所本適道而後濟故常有  欲可以觀其終物之徼也○雱曰易之陰  陽老之有無以至於佛氏之色空其實一  致說有漸次耳世之言無者舍有以求無  則是有外更有安得爲無故方其有時實  未嘗有此乃眞無也有無之體常一而有  有以觀者但見其徼欲觀其妙當知本無  而本無之無未嘗維有也既曰常無又曰  常有者以明有無之不相代無即眞有有  即實無耳言徼而知妙之爲奥言妙則知  徼之爲粗比法言之體 此兩者同出而異名  明皇曰如上兩者皆本於道故云同也動  出應用隨用立名則名異矣○河曰兩者  謂有欲無欲也同出者同出人心也而異  名者所名異也名無欲者長存名有欲者  亡身也 同謂之玄  眀皇曰出則名異同則謂玄玄深妙也○  河曰玄天也言有欲之人與無欲之人同  受氣於天○雱曰有無本一未有二名自  學者言之則有不如無之精既得其道則  兩皆至理初無彼此  玄之又玄  河曰天中復有天也禀氣有厚薄得中和  滋液則生賢聖得錯亂濁辱則生貪淫也 衆妙之門  明皇曰意因不生則同乎玄妙猶恐執玄  爲滯不至兼忘故寄又玄以遣玄示明無  欲於無欲能如此者萬法由之而了出故
Interpretation

This passage explores the dialectical relationship between "being" (you) and "non-being" (wu). The term "jiao" refers to the ultimate destination of all things. Those attached to desires can understand this principle by observing the goals of worldly pursuits. Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period Neo-Daoist philosopher) explains that all actions pursuing "being" fundamentally rely on "non-being" to function. The root of desire lies in aligning with the Dao to achieve fulfillment, thus observing desirous individuals reveals the endpoint of all phenomena.

Wang Anshi (styled Wang Pang) posits that while the Yijing discusses yin-yang, Laozi speaks of being and non-being, and Buddhism addresses form and emptiness, they ultimately convey the same truth through different expressions. Contemporary seekers of "non-being" who forcibly pursue it while rejecting "being" ironically fail to attain genuine "non-being." True "non-being" inherently contains "being"—the two are fundamentally unified. Those who perceive only surface phenomena (jiao) must comprehend the profound mystery (miao) by understanding the principle of "original non-being" (ben wu). Yet "original non-being" doesn't negate the existence of "being" entirely. "Constant non-being" (chang wu) and "constant being" (chang you) are interdependent—non-being constitutes authentic being, just as being constitutes substantial non-being.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang notes that both being and non-being originate from the Dao, differing only in name. Heshang Gong (Han dynasty commentator) observes that desires and desirelessness both stem from the human heart, but desirelessness leads to longevity while desire brings ruin. This unity is called the "profound mystery" (xuan). Wang Anshi further clarifies that being and non-being are originally one; scholars separate them merely for comprehension. Upon attaining the Dao, one realizes both are equally true.

The phrase "profound upon profound" (xuan zhi you xuan) suggests mysteries within mysteries. Heshang Gong explains that humans receive varying degrees of qi from heaven and earth—those imbued with balanced qi become sages, while turbid qi breeds greed. Emperor Xuanzong contends that only by transcending all conceptual attachments, including the notion of "desirelessness," can one reach genuine profundity. Mastering this reveals the fundamental principle governing all transformations (the gateway to myriad wonders).

 云衆妙之門○河曰能知天中復有天禀  氣有厚薄除情欲守中和是謂知道要之  門户也○弼曰兩者始與母也出者同出  於玄也異名所施不可同也在首則謂之  始在終則謂之母玄者冥也默然無有也  始母之所出也不可得而名故不可言同  名曰玄而言謂之玄者取於不可得而謂  之然也謂之然則不可以定乎一玄若定  乎一玄而已則是其名則失之遠矣故曰  玄之又玄也衆妙皆從門而出故曰衆妙  之門也○雱曰道有二物自形而下則陽  尊而陰卑自形而上則陰先而陽後故道  之至處曰妙曰玄妙德也玄色也言色則  至矣而蓋有非色所及故曰又玄萬物皆  有妙處皆出於此故曰衆妙之門    天下皆知章第二 天下皆知美之烏美  河曰自揚已美便顯彰也 斯惡已  河曰有粗玉也 皆知善之爲善  河曰有功名也 斯不善已  明皇曰美善者生於欲心心茍所欲雖惡  而美善矣故云皆知以己之所美爲美所  善爲善矣美善無主但是妄情皆由封執  無分别難易神奇臭腐以相傾奪大聖較  量深知虚妄故云惡已○河曰人所爭也  雱曰道本無物而物有妄情自相分别此  溺於轉徙之流而不能自出故耳然溺而  不出者不由厭離而由樂著所以惡夫美  善也故惡與不善美善之隨也當其美善
Interpretation

This passage primarily explains the concepts of the "Gate of All Wonders" (众妙之门) and the "interdependence of beauty and ugliness" (美恶相生) from the Dao De Jing.

Regarding the "Gate of All Wonders," the commentary by Heshanggong states: One must understand there are heavens beyond heavens, and that people's innate endowments vary in depth. Eliminating desires and maintaining a state of harmonious balance is the crucial gateway to comprehending the Dao. Wang Bi further explains: The Dao manifests through two aspects—"beginning" and "mother"—both originating from the profound "Mystery" (玄). This "Mystery" is the formless, imageless ultimate source that cannot be precisely described in words. Fixation on any single concept of the "Mystery" leads one astray from truth, hence the phrase "the mystery within mystery" (玄之又玄). All wondrous principles emerge from this gateway.

Wang Anshi (Pang) supplements this by saying: In the phenomenal world, the Dao manifests as the yang principle being honored while yin is humble, yet on the metaphysical level, yin precedes yang. The supreme state of the Dao is called "wondrous" (妙) and "mysterious" (玄)—"wondrous" referring to the Dao's virtuous qualities, and "mysterious" to its essential nature. All things contain their own wonders, all originating from this "Gate of All Wonders."

Chapter Two discusses how "beauty and ugliness give birth to each other": When all under heaven recognize beauty (Heshanggong notes: when people begin flaunting their beauty), the concept of ugliness arises; when all recognize goodness (Heshanggong: when people pursue fame and achievement), the notion of badness appears. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains: Standards of beauty and goodness stem from human desires—attachment to personal standards creates discrimination and contention. Wang Anshi observes: The Dao itself makes no distinctions; human delusions create oppositions. Obsessive pursuit of beauty and goodness paradoxically breeds aversion, demonstrating how these concepts inherently contain their opposites.

Note: The abbreviations in the text refer to historical commentators—"He" to Heshanggong, "Bi" to Wang Bi, "Pang" to Wang Anshi, and "Minghuang" to Emperor Xuanzong of Tang—all renowned interpreters of the Dao De Jing.

 之時蓋已惡且不善矣俟其隨而後悟則  亦悟之晩也雖然至人所謂美善未嘗離  乎惡與不善而惡與不善未嘗離乎美善  也天下之愚不足與此故所謂美善常惡  與不善也 故有無之相生  河曰見有而爲無也 難易之相成  河曰見難而爲易也 長短之相形  河曰見短而爲長也 高下之相傾  河曰見高而爲下也 聲音之相和  河曰上唱下必和也 前後之相隨  眀皇曰六者相違遞爲名稱亦如美惡非  自性生是由妄情有此多故○河曰上行  下必隨也○弼曰美者人心之所進樂也  惡者人心之所惡疾也美惡猶喜怒也善  不善猶是非也喜怒同根是非同門故不  可偏舉也此六者皆陳自然而不可偏舉  之明數也○雱曰離道而我我則有彼彼  我既分編類爲二矣此六對者物之所以    不齊而喜怒哀樂生死之變更出迭入而  不能自止者也凡此皆不冥夫陰陽之本  而隨其末流自生分别執一廢百以妄爲  常故耳此篇第二與莊子齊物論相似篇  篇有序可以理推 是以聖人處無爲之事  河曰以道治也○弼曰自然已足爲則敗  也 行不言之教  明皇曰無爲之事無事也寄以事名故云  處不言之教忘言也寄以教名故云行○  河曰以身帥導之也  雱曰聖人無心以百姓心爲心雖事而未
Interpretation

What the world calls "beauty" and "goodness" are often already mixed with ugliness and evil. When realization comes after events unfold, such awakening is already too late. However, those who have truly attained the Dao (zhiren, perfected beings) understand that beauty and goodness have always coexisted with ugliness and evil. The ignorant people of the world cannot comprehend this principle, so what they perceive as beauty and goodness is often accompanied by ugliness and evil.

Being (you) and non-being (wu) generate each other (Heshang Gong's commentary: only by observing "being" can one recognize the existence of "non-being"). Difficulty and ease complete each other (Heshang Gong: only by recognizing "difficulty" can one appreciate "ease"). Long and short are mutually defined through comparison (Heshang Gong: only by seeing "short" can "long" be determined). High and low contrast with each other (Heshang Gong: only by observing "high" can one understand "low"). Sounds harmonize through mutual response (Heshang Gong: when one leads in singing above, others will naturally follow below). Front and back follow one another (Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's note: these six pairs of opposites depend on each other, just like beauty and ugliness—not innate but products of the discriminating mind).

Heshang Gong further explains: those above set the example, and those below will imitate accordingly. Wang Bi clarifies: beauty is what people desire, while ugliness is what they detest. Beauty and ugliness are like joy and anger; good and evil resemble judgments of right and wrong—all originating from the same root. These six pairs of opposites exist naturally and should not be emphasized one-sidedly. Wang Pang elaborates: once separated from the Dao and attached to the self, the discriminating mind arises, splitting these six pairs of opposites and perpetuating the endless cycles of joy and anger, sorrow and happiness, life and death. All this stems from failing to recognize that yin and yang are fundamentally one, instead clinging to superficial distinctions.

Therefore, sages (those who have attained the Dao) handle affairs through wuwei (non-action) (Heshang Gong: governing with the great Dao) and implement teaching through "non-speaking" (Emperor Xuanzong of Tang: wuwei means refraining from unnecessary action; "non-speaking" means teaching without words). Heshang Gong states: sages guide the people by setting examples with their own conduct. Wang Pang explains: sages have no selfish mind—they take the people's hearts as their own. Though they engage in affairs, they always maintain the attitude of wuwei.

 嘗涉爲之之迹雖教而未嘗發言之之意  故事以之齊教以之行而吾寂然未始有  言爲之累而天下亦因得以反常復樸也  夫唯無累故雖寄形陰陽之間而造化不  能求彼六對者惡能擾之哉 萬物作而不辭  眀皇曰令萬物各自得其動作而不辭謝  於聖人○河曰各自動也不辭謝而逆止  雱曰萬物并作聖人各盡其性而無所辭  以吾心空然無所去取故也茍懐去取之  慮則物之萬態美惡多矣焉能不辭哉 生而不有  河曰元氣生萬物而不有 爲而不恃  河曰道所施爲不恃望其報也○弼曰智  慧自備爲則僞也 功成不居  明皇曰令萬物各遂其生不爲已有各得  所爲而不負恃如此則太平之功成矣猶  當日慎一日不敢寧居○河曰功成事就  退避不居其位○弼曰因物而明功自彼  成故不居也○雱曰有則居居則遷矣 夫唯不居  河曰夫唯功成不居其位 是以不去  明皇曰夫唯不敢寧居而增修其德者則  忘功而功存故不居而不去也○河曰福  德常在不去其身也上六句有高下長短  若開一源下生百端百端之變無不動亂  弼曰使功在己則功不可乆也○雱曰形  名而降莫不代謝唯道無體物莫能遷聖  人體道故充塞無外而未嘗有物應接萬  變而未嘗有心如是則豈以適然之事攬
Interpretation

This scripture expounds the principle of "governing through non-action (Wuwei)." Laozi believed that sages should rule in accordance with the natural order, avoiding forceful intervention.

Though sages establish teachings, their minds remain empty and tranquil, unattached to verbal instruction. Just as all things grow naturally, they allow people to live according to their innate nature without coercion. In this way, the world returns to its original state of simplicity and authenticity.

Three key points illustrate this: First, "all things arise, yet none are rejected" — allowing natural processes to unfold without interference. Second, "giving life without possessing," like primordial Qi (vital energy) that generates all things yet claims no ownership. Third, "acting without relying," performing deeds without seeking reward.

Precisely because they do not claim credit, their virtue (De) endures. Those who constantly attribute merit to themselves find it fleeting. Like a spring's living water: the less one tries to possess it, the more abundantly it flows.

Commentators like Heshang Gong and Wang Bi emphasize that sages emulate the Dao's nature: though accomplishing all things, they claim no achievement; appearing inactive yet accomplishing everything. This state transcends physical limitations — even amidst the transformations of Yin-Yang, they remain undisturbed by external phenomena.

 以爲功而固有之哉夫然後離六對之境  絶美惡之名越生死流處常住法也持此  心以涉世則功名雖高豈有充滿之累乎    不尚賢章第三 不尚賢  河曰賢謂世俗之賢辯口明文離道行權  去質爲文也不尚者不貴之以禄不尊之  以官 使民不爭  明皇曰尚賢則有迹徇迹則爭興使賢不  肖各當其分則不爭矣○河曰不爭功名  反自然也○雱曰賢者出衆之稱尚之則  民夸企外慕爭之端也 不貴難得之貨  河曰言人君不御好珍寳黃金棄於山珠  玉捐於淵 使民不爲盜  明皇曰難得之貨謂性分所無者求不可  得故云難得夫不安本分希效所無既失  性分寧非盜竊欲使物任其性事稱其能  則難得之貨不貴性命之情不盜矣○河  曰上化清靜下無貪人○雱曰民衣食足  而性定矣妄貴難得之貨則其求無已必  至爲盜蓋民之生皆由妄生分别此篇務  在齊物使民復性 不見可欲  河曰放鄭聲遠佞人 使心不亂  明皇曰既無尚賢之迹不求難得之貨是  無可見之欲而心不惑亂也○河曰不邪  淫○弼曰賢猶能也尚者嘉之名也貴者  隆之稱也唯能是任尚之曷爲而唯用是  施貴之曷爲尚賢顯名榮過其任下奔而  競效能相射貴貨過用貪者競趣穿窬睹  齎篋没命而盜故可欲不見則心無所亂
Interpretation

This passage explains the core concepts of Chapter 3 of the Daode Jing ("Not Exalting the Worthy"), which advocates that rulers should maintain a stance of clarity, stillness, and Wuwei (non-action).

Regarding "not exalting the worthy": Heshang Gong (a Han dynasty commentator) interprets "worthy" as referring to those skilled in rhetoric and superficial achievements who deviate from the Dao. Not elevating the worthy means not granting them high positions or lavish rewards. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang further explains that excessive admiration for the worthy stirs competition; instead, both the worthy and the unworthy should remain content in their proper places.

Concerning "preventing the people from contention": Heshang Gong believes this allows people to return to their natural state. Wang Pang (a Song dynasty scholar) notes that glorifying the worthy incites comparison and desire among the populace.

On "not valuing rare goods": Heshang Gong states that rulers should not covet treasures—they ought to cast gold into the mountains and discard pearls into the deep. Emperor Xuanzong elaborates that seeking beyond one's lot is akin to theft, and all things should abide by their inherent nature.

Regarding "preventing the people from becoming thieves": Heshang Gong explains that when those above remain pure and tranquil, those below will not harbor greed. Wang Pang argues that when people's basic needs for food and clothing are met, their nature stabilizes; but if they pursue rare goods, they may turn to thievery.

On "not displaying what is desirable": Heshang Gong advises keeping distance from temptation. Emperor Xuanzong states that neither exalting the worthy nor coveting treasures leaves nothing to stir desire. Heshang Gong also mentions eliminating depravity. Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period metaphysical philosopher) further clarifies that elevating the capable provokes rivalry, while treasuring objects invites theft—thus, by not displaying desires, the mind remains undisturbed.

In summary, this chapter advocates that rulers eliminate factors that incite desire, allowing the people to preserve their simple, natural essence.

 也○雱曰昩者妄見可欲所以心爲之隤  亂唯聖人能知諸物皆非眞實故萬態一  視而無取舍之心若然則心貧常夷物豈  能亂之是以能不尚賢不貴貨也 是以聖人之治也  河曰說聖人治國與治身同也 虚其心  明皇曰心不爲可欲所亂則虚矣○河曰  除嗜慾去亂煩○雱曰心虚則無所分別  此中不尚賢之義 實其腹  明皇曰道德内充則無矜徇亦如屬饜而  止不生貪求○河曰懷道抱一守五神也  弼曰心懷智而腹懷食虚有智而實無知  也○雱曰腹實則無所貪求此申不貴貨  之義 弱其志  明皇曰心虚則志弱○河曰知柔謙讓不  處權也○雱曰志强則夸企而勝志弱則  無營於外此又申不尚賢之義 强其骨  明皇曰腹實則骨强○河曰愛精重施髓  滿骨堅○弼曰骨無知以幹志生事以亂  雱曰骨强所以自立自立則外物不能遷  此又申不貴貨之義 常使民無知無欲  明皇曰常使人無爭尚之知無貪求之欲  也○河曰反樸守淳○弼曰守其眞也   雱曰知則妄見欲則外求二者既除性情  定矣自不尚賢而化之可使至於無知自  不貴貨而化之可使至於無欲 使夫知者不敢爲也  明皇曰清靜化人盡無知欲適有之者令  不敢爲也○河曰思慮深不輕言○弼曰
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how sages govern the state and cultivate their being. The core idea is that only by maintaining inner purity and reducing desires can one avoid being disturbed by external things.

Regarding "emptying the mind," this means clearing away distracting thoughts and desires. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains that when the mind isn't disturbed by greed, it becomes pure; Heshang Gong advises eliminating cravings and disturbances; Wang Pang further clarifies that an empty mind eliminates discrimination, which is the principle behind "not exalting the worthy."

"Filling the belly" refers to inner moral fulfillment. Emperor Xuanzong states that when virtue fills the heart, one avoids arrogance; Heshang Gong suggests maintaining the state of Dao and unity; Wang Bi remarks that while the mind may contemplate, the belly must be satisfied; Wang Pang explains that when the belly is full, one won't crave excessively—this embodies the meaning of "not valuing goods."

"Weakening the will" means reducing competitive ambition. Emperor Xuanzong observes that an empty mind leads to peaceful aspirations; Heshang Gong advocates practicing humility; Wang Pang notes that overly strong ambitions lead to rivalry, while moderate willpower prevents external influences from controlling one.

"Strengthening the bones" refers to fortifying inner power. Emperor Xuanzong says a full belly makes bones strong; Heshang Gong advises nurturing Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy); Wang Bi comments that bones support the body without causing trouble; Wang Pang explains that only with robust bones can one stand firm, unaltered by external things.

Finally, it teaches keeping the people simple, free from cunning minds and greed. Emperor Xuanzong advocates teaching people neither to contend nor covet; Heshang Gong urges returning to original purity; Wang Bi advises preserving innate nature; Wang Pang states that eliminating delusions and cravings stabilizes one's disposition. Thus, even the clever wouldn't dare act recklessly—Emperor Xuanzong says pure teachings make people cautious, while Heshang Gong recommends deep contemplation over rash action.

 知者謂知爲○雱曰智足以亂衆者禁而  止之 爲無爲  河曰不造作動因循 則無不治矣  明皇曰於爲無爲人得其性則淳化有孚  矣○河曰德化厚百姓安○雱曰爲無爲  非無爲也爲在於無爲而已期於復性故  也竊嘗論之三代之後民無不失其性者  故君子則志强而好善求賢無已小人則  骨弱而慕利逐貨不厭志强則多知骨弱  則多欲或有知或有欲雖所趨不同而其  爲徇外傷本一也惟至人不然弱其志非  所見者卑而求近以爲無所求而道自足  也强其骨非以自立而爲賢將以勝利欲  而尊德性也夫然後名不能移利不能溺  而性常定矣    道沖章第四 道沖而用之  河曰沖中也道匿名藏譽其用在中 或不盈  眀皇曰言道動出沖和之氣而用生成有  生成之功曾不盈滿云或似者於道不敢  正言 河曰或常也道常謙虚不盈滿   雱曰道充塞無外贍足萬物而未嘗有故  曰或不盈若虚若實謂之沖沖者陰陽之  中而以虚爲體者也道之用於物者中道  之應於事者虚此方言其用故曰沖 淵兮似萬物之宗  明皇曰泉深靜也道常生物而不盈滿妙  本泉兮深靜故似爲萬物宗主 河曰道  淵深不可之也似爲萬物之宗祖 雱曰  道生萬物而體未嘗離物自物之散殊而
Interpretation

This explains the principle of "governing through Wuwei (non-action)." Truly wise individuals understand how to govern the world through this approach of "non-forced action." Heshang Gong (a renowned Han dynasty commentator on Daoist texts) explains that by avoiding artificial effort and following natural tendencies, there is nothing in the world that cannot be properly governed.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang further clarifies that when rulers practice Wuwei, the people retain their simple, authentic nature, leading to natural social harmony. Heshang Gong adds that such virtuous governance enables people to live and work in peace and contentment. Wang Pang, a Song dynasty scholar, argues that Wuwei doesn't mean complete inaction, but rather achieving the restoration of original nature through non-forced action.

The discussion then turns to human nature: after the Three Dynasties (Xia, Shang, and Zhou), people lost their original nature. While noble persons pursue goodness and virtue, they become overly attached; petty persons crave profit without satisfaction. Whether pursuing knowledge or desires, both represent outward seeking that harms one's intrinsic nature. Only those who have attained the Dao maintain balance: they diminish attachments without becoming base, strengthen their bodies without chasing empty fame, thus remaining unswayed by reputation and profit while preserving their original nature.

Chapter four describes the characteristics of the Dao: though empty, its function is inexhaustible. Heshang Gong states the Dao conceals its name, functioning through the Golden Mean. Emperor Xuanzong explains that when the Dao operates, it generates harmonious Qi (vital energy), creating all things yet never becoming full. Wang Pang observes that while the Dao fills the cosmos and nourishes all beings without depletion, this state of being simultaneously empty and substantial is called "chong" (the balanced void state of Yin-Yang).

The Dao resembles an abyss—the source of all things. Emperor Xuanzong describes it as tranquil like a deep spring, nurturing all yet never self-satisfied, thus becoming the sovereign of all. Heshang Gong interprets the Dao as unfathomable, like the ancestor of all beings. Wang Pang notes that while the Dao gives birth to all things, it never separates from them; though things manifest infinite diversity, all originate from the Dao.

(Note: ○ indicates viewpoints from different commentators; "chong" is a key Daoist concept referring to the receptive void state; "Wuwei" represents the core Daoist philosophy of following natural spontaneity without forced action)

 觀之則似爲之宗耳淵者深而不測也人  本足於此道欲體之者不可它求當挫銳  解紛和光同塵則當自存矣 挫其銳  河曰銳挫也人欲銳精進取功名當挫正  之法道不自見○雱曰銳挫則渾然矣銳  尖之形是也 解其紛  明皇曰道以沖和故能抑止銛利釋散紛  擾若俗學求須則彌結矣○河曰紛結恨  也當念道無爲以解釋○雱曰不與物講  而坐觀其復則性命定而紛亂解矣 和其光  河曰言雖有獨見之明當如闇昩不當以  曜亂人也○雱曰挫銳解紛則性情定而  自然充實光輝矣既有光則要不異於物  而與之和同易曰蒙雜不著 同其塵  明皇曰道無不在所在常無在光在塵皆  與爲一一光塵爾而非光塵也○河曰當  與衆庶同垢塵不當自别殊○雱曰道乃  性之常得性之常奚足珍尚故至人有道  而不自異於塵 湛兮似或存  眀皇曰和光同塵而妙本不雜故湛兮似  有所存○河曰言當湛然安靜故能長存  而不亡○雱曰人能如上四事則道湛然  存矣存而定有之則非道也似或者不可  定有之謂 吾不知誰之子  河曰老子言我不知道所從生○雱曰即  今所稱道之中體蓋有所出矣雖有所出  而廉然無象故曰不知誰之子也 象帝之先  明皇曰吾不知道所從生明道非生法故
Interpretation

When observing the Dao (the cosmic origin), it appears as the sovereign of all things. The Dao is as unfathomable as an abyss. Humans inherently possess the capacity to realize the Dao. To truly comprehend it, one need not seek externally but should instead blunt sharp edges, untangle complications, temper brilliance, and merge with the dust of the world. Thus the Dao will naturally manifest.

"Blunting sharp edges" means: When people aggressively pursue fame and achievement, they should restrain themselves through proper principles. The Dao never flaunts itself—only by dulling one's edges can one achieve natural perfection. These "edges" resemble the sharp points of objects.

"Untangling complications" signifies: The Dao takes emptiness and tranquility as its foundation, thereby able to restrain sharpness and resolve conflicts. If one forces matters like worldly scholarship does, it only entangles more troubles. One should remember the Wuwei (non-action) nature of the Dao to dissolve complications. Without contending with all things, calmly observing their return to the source brings stability to one's nature and life while dissolving chaos.

"Tempering brilliance" suggests: Even with unique insights, one should appear simple like an ignorant person, avoiding the disturbance of others with one's radiance. After blunting edges and untangling complications, one's nature becomes stable and substantial, naturally glowing with inner light. Since there is light, it should harmonize rather than differ from all things.

"Merging with the dust" indicates: The Dao permeates everywhere, existing equally in radiance and dust, united with all things. It manifests through light and dust yet isn't confined by them. Practitioners should dwell among ordinary people without deliberately standing apart. The Dao embodies constant nature—since nature is constant, why prize it specially? Thus those who attain the Dao, though enlightened, never set themselves apart from worldly dust.

This state is profoundly still, seeming to exist yet not. Achieving these four points allows the Dao to exist profoundly. But if one stubbornly insists the Dao has concrete existence, that is no longer the true Dao. "Seeming to exist" precisely describes this indescribable mystical state.

I know not whence the Dao comes. Laozi said he didn't know the Dao's origin. What we now call the ontological "Dao" appears to have a source, yet seems formless in its vagueness—thus we know not whose offspring it is. The Dao existed before all forms, present even before heaven and earth. This proves the Dao isn't a generated principle.

 無父道者似在乎帝先爾帝者生物之主  象似也○河曰道自在天帝之前此言道  乃先天地生也○弼曰執一家之量者不  能全家執一國之量者不能成國窮力舉  重不能爲用故人雖知萬物治也治而不  以二儀之道則不能贍也地雖形魄不法  于天則不能全其寧天雖精象不能于道  則不能保其精沖而用之用乃不能窮滿  以追實實來則溢故沖而用之又復不盈  其爲無窮亦已抑矣形雖大不能累其體  事雖繁不能充其量萬物舍此而求其主  主其安在乎不亦淵兮似萬物之宗乎銳  挫而無損紛解而不勞和光而不污其體  同塵而不渝其冥其然乎似或存乎地守  其形德不能過其載天脅其象德不能過  其覆天地莫能及之不亦似帝之先乎帝  天帝也○雱曰象有形之兆帝有物之尊  爲帝王矣而道更在其先    天地不仁章第五 天地不仁  河曰天施地化不以仁恩任自然也 以萬物烏芻狗  明皇曰天地生萬物人最爲貴天地視之如  芻草狗畜不責望其報也○河曰天地任  自然無爲無造萬物自相治理故不仁也  仁者必造立無施有恩有爲造立施化則  物失其眞有恩有爲則物不具存物不具  存則不足以備哉天地不爲獸生芻而獸  食芻不爲人生狗無爲然萬物而萬物各  適其所用則莫不贍矣若慧由己猶未足
Interpretation

Here we discuss how the Dao (the fundamental origin and principle of the universe) existed even before the formation of heaven and earth. Although the Celestial Emperor (Tianshi) governs all things, the Dao appeared even earlier. As the commentary by Heshanggong states: The Dao existed prior to the Celestial Emperor, demonstrating that it precedes both heaven and earth.

Wang Bi's commentary further explains: Those who cling stubbornly to a single perspective cannot even properly manage their own households; those who consider only the interests of one state cannot effectively govern that nation. Forcing heavy objects with brute strength ultimately proves ineffective. Though people understand the need to govern all things, without applying the principles of mutual generation and restraint between Yin-Yang (the two complementary forces), comprehensive governance remains impossible. Though earth possesses form, without following heaven's patterns it cannot find peace; though heaven embodies refinement, without adhering to the Dao's laws it cannot maintain its essential nature.

The Dao appears empty yet can be infinitely applied—attempting to fill it completely only leads to overflow. Thus maintaining emptiness ensures it never runs dry. No matter how vast physical forms become, they never burden the Dao's essence; no matter how numerous affairs grow, they never exceed the Dao's capacity. If all things abandon the Dao to seek other rulers, where could they possibly turn? The Dao is profoundly unfathomable, like the root of all existence. It blunts sharp edges without being damaged, resolves conflicts without exertion, shares light without being tainted, mingles with worldly dust without altering its essence. Seeming both present and absent, it nonetheless truly exists.

Earth bears physical forms, yet its Virtue (De) cannot surpass its capacity to carry; heaven covers all things, yet its Virtue cannot exceed its power to encompass. Even heaven and earth cannot attain the Dao's realm—does this not demonstrate the Dao's precedence over the Celestial Emperor? Though the Celestial Emperor stands as sovereign of all things, the Dao existed before even this supreme ruler.

Chapter Five discusses how "heaven and earth are not benevolent," meaning they transform all things without deliberate displays of kindness, instead allowing natural development. As Heshanggong explains: Heaven and earth operate spontaneously without artificial effort—all things grow and perish naturally, thus concepts of benevolence or its absence become irrelevant. Those possessing benevolent intentions inevitably act deliberately and bestow favors, yet this causes all things to lose their authentic nature. Forced action ultimately fails to preserve creation. Heaven and earth don't specially grow grass for beasts nor raise livestock for humans, yet all things find their proper place. Relying solely on human wisdom to arrange matters conversely prevents fulfilling all needs.

 任也○雱曰芻狗祭祀所用方其用也隆  禮致敬以事之及其已事則棄而捐之等  於糞壤其隆禮致敬之時非不以至誠也  然而束芻爲狗耳實何足禮敬乎準不足  禮敬而加禮敬者又非以爲也夫萬物各  得其常生死成壞理有適然而天地獨爲  之父母故不得無愛而原天地之心亦何  係累哉故方其愛時雖以至誠而萬物自  遂實無足愛者反要其終則糞壤同歸而  已豈留情乎 聖人不仁  河曰聖人愛養萬民不以仁恩法天地行  自然○雱曰仁者人也以人道愛物謂之  仁彼人貌而天者仁何足以名之 以百姓烏芻狗  明皇曰不仁者不爲仁恩也芻狗者結芻  爲狗也大以守禦則有弊蓋之恩今芻狗  徒有狗形而無警吠之用故無情於仁愛  也言天地視人亦如人視芻狗無責望爾  嘗試論之曰夫至仁無親孰爲兼愛愛則  不至適是偏私不獨親其親則天下皆親  矣不獨子其子則天下皆子矣是則至仁  之無親乃至親豈兼愛乎○河曰聖人視  百姓如芻草狗畜不責望其禮意○弼曰  聖人與天地合其德以百姓比芻狗也○  雱曰聖人親親而仁民故獨言百姓若其  道則與天地一矣而有人之形故任各異 天地之間  河曰天地之間空虚和氣流行故萬物自  生人能除情欲節滋味清五臟則神明居  之也 其猶橐籥乎
Interpretation

This passage employs the metaphor of "straw dogs" (sacrificial offerings made of grass) to discuss the attitude of Heaven-Earth and sages toward all things. During rituals, people treat straw dogs with reverence, yet discard them casually after the ceremony—illustrating how external displays of respect are merely formalities. Heaven-Earth nurtures all beings like parents care for children, yet remains unattached to any particular thing, allowing the natural cycles of life, death, and transformation to unfold spontaneously.

The sage emulates this natural Dao of Heaven-Earth, never forcing displays of benevolence. Just as people don't develop genuine affection for straw figures, the sage regards common folk like these ritual objects—expecting nothing in return. True supreme benevolence (the highest form of compassion) isn't preferential treatment for some, but equal regard for all. Paradoxically, this approach makes everyone under heaven feel like family.

The text describes the cosmic process with the image of "Heaven-Earth as a bellows"—appearing empty yet brimming with vitality, where the movement of Qi (vital energy) gives birth to all things. Through Daoist cultivation practices—purging desires, moderating consumption, and purifying the five viscera—humans can align with this natural Dao. Though bearing human form, sages who embody this harmony with Heaven-Earth's De (Virtue/Power) attain true unity with the cosmos.

 明皇曰橐者鞴也籥者笛也橐之鼓風笛  之運吹皆以虚而無心故能動而有應則  天地之間生物無私者亦以虚而無心故  也○河曰橐籥中空虚故能有聲氣○雱  曰橐籥虚以應物物感則應應而不藏天  地之於萬物聖人之於百姓應其適然而  不係累於當時不留情於既往故比橐籥  之無窮也 虛而不屈動而愈出  明皇曰橐籥虚之而不屈撓動之而愈出  聲以况聖人心無偏愛則無屈撓之時應  用不窮可謂動而愈出也○河曰言空虚  無有用竭時動摇之益出聲氣也○弼曰  橐排橐也籥樂籥也橐籥之中空洞無情  無爲故虚而不得窮屈動而不可竭盡也  天地之中蕩然任自然故不可得而窮猶  若橐籥也○雱曰虚其體也動其用也 多言數窮  河曰多事害神多言害身口開舌舉必有  禍患○雱曰非應而言則窮矣舉言則爲  可知此聖人之事言而不爲者也 不如守中  明皇曰多言而不詶故數彼窮屈兼愛則  難遍便致怨憎故不如抱守中和自然皆  足○河曰不如守德於中育養精神愛氣  希言○弼曰愈爲之則愈失之矣物樹其  惡事錯其言不齊不言不理必窮之數也  橐籥而守數中則無窮盡棄己任物則莫  不理若橐籥有意於爲聲也則不足以供  吹者之求也○雱曰守中所以應萬變    谷神不死章第六
Interpretation

This passage uses the metaphors of the bellows (tuo) and flute (yue) to illustrate the philosophy of "emptiness" and "movement." The interior of both bellows and flute is hollow—precisely because they lack subjective will (wuxin) that they can generate wind and music. Similarly, Heaven and Earth give birth to all things, and sages govern the people by maintaining a state of empty stillness and wuwei (non-action), thereby responding naturally without exhaustion.

Various commentators offer different perspectives:

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) suggests that the sage's mind harbors no partiality, just as bellows cannot be bent—the more they are used, the more effective they become. Heshang Gong notes that empty things never exhaust themselves; the more they are moved, the more sound they produce. Wang Bi (Bi) explains that bellows and flutes, being hollow and wuwei, can be used limitlessly—just as Heaven and Earth operate. Wang Pang (Pang) emphasizes that emptiness and stillness are the essence, while movement is the function.

Regarding "many words lead to exhaustion" (duoyan shu qiong), Heshang Gong interprets it as inviting misfortune through excessive speech, while Wang Pang suggests that speaking at the wrong time leads to difficulty. The final teaching to "abide in the center" (buru shou zhong) is understood by Emperor Xuanzong as maintaining the Dao of harmony; Heshang Gong advises cultivating the inner spirit (shen); Wang Bi warns that forcing things leads to loss and advocates naturalness like the bellows; Wang Pang concludes that abiding in the center enables one to respond to all changes.

The core teaching is to emulate nature's way of empty stillness: maintaining inner clarity, acting in accordance with natural principles, speaking with restraint, and abiding in balanced harmony. Just as bellows and musical instruments function endlessly because of their inner emptiness, so too should we embody this principle.

谷神不死  明皇曰谷者虚而能應者也神者妙而不  測者也死者休息也谷之應聲莫知所以  有感則應其應如神如神之應曾不休息  欲明至道虚而生物妙用難名故舉谷神  以爲喻說○河曰谷養也人能養神則不  死也神謂五藏之神也肝藏魂肺藏魄心  藏神腎藏精脾藏志五藏盡傷則五神去  矣○雱曰谷應而不窮神化而不測萬物  受命於我而我未嘗生未嘗死者谷神也  言神則極矣而加谷者且能虚能盈而又  能容以應也以其活而不敝故但稱不死 是謂玄牝  明皇曰玄深也牝母也谷神應物沖用無  方深妙不窮能母萬物故寄谷神玄牝之  號將明大道生畜之功○河曰言不死之  道在於玄牝玄天也於人爲鼻牝地也於  人爲口天食人以五氣從鼻入藏於心五  藏清徹爲精神聰明音聲五性其鬼曰魂  魂者雄也主出入人鼻與天通故鼻爲玄  也地食人以五味從口入藏於胃五性濁  辱爲形骸骨肉血脉六情其鬼曰魄魄者  雌也主出入於口與地通故曰爲牝也   雱曰谷神受命而玄牝賦以自爲陰陽以  成天地然本一物也由其受命故曰谷神  由其賦形故曰玄牝 玄牝之門是謂天地根  明皇曰深妙虚牝能母萬物萬物由出是  謂之門天地有形故資禀爲根本矣○河  曰根元也言鼻口之門是乃通天地之元
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the profound meaning behind the line from the Daode Jing: "The valley spirit never dies; it is called the mysterious female." The "valley spirit" metaphorically represents the empty yet responsive nature of the Dao—just as a valley produces echoes, the formless Dao resonates with all things yet never perishes. The "mysterious female" refers to the Dao as a profound womb that gives birth to all things.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Emperor Ming) explains: A valley's characteristic is its emptiness that can return echoes, while the spirit's nature is its unfathomable mystery. The Dao responds to all beings like a valley echoing sounds, never ceasing its resonance. Here, the "valley spirit" symbolizes the Dao's paradoxical nature—formless yet generative.

Heshang Gong's commentary suggests: Nourishing the shen (spirit) and qi (vital energy) of the five viscera (liver, lungs, heart, kidneys, spleen) leads to longevity. Each organ houses specific spiritual aspects—hun (ethereal soul), po (corporeal soul), shen (spirit), jing (essence), and zhi (will). Damage to these organs causes these vital energies to dissipate.

Regarding "mysterious female," xuan (mysterious) denotes profundity, while pin (female) represents motherhood. The Dao resembles this deep womb that generates all existence. Heshang Gong further elaborates: The nose connects with heaven, drawing in the qi of the Five Phases; the mouth connects with earth, ingesting the five flavors (corresponding to the Five Phases). Through breath and nourishment, heaven and earth's energies form one's shen (spirit) and physical body within the human vessel.

"The gate of the mysterious female" refers to this generative womb as the root of heaven and earth. Just as all beings emerge from a mother's body, the myriad things originate from this mystical feminine portal. This gate constitutes the fundamental passage linking heaven and earth—the source from which all life derives its vitality.

 氣所從往來○雱曰玄牝體陰而一體之  中又自有陰陽稱門者異於户也萬物由  此門以出而不得見故曰玄牝之門 綿綿若存  河曰鼻口呼吸喘息當綿綿微妙若可存  復若無有○雱曰綿綿引而不絶之謂神  牝生生不盡而若有若無不可定有 用之不勤  明皇曰虚牝之用綿綿微妙應用若存其  用無心故不勤勞矣○河曰用氣當寬舒  不當急疾勤勞也○弼曰谷神谷中央無  谷也無形無影無逆無違處卑不動守靜  不衰谷以成而不見其形此至物也處卑  而不可得名故謂之天地之根綿綿若存  用之不勤門玄牝之所由也本其所由與  極同體故謂之天地之根也欲言存邪則  不見其形欲言亡邪萬物以之生故綿綿  若存也無物不成用而不勞也故曰用而  不勤也○雱曰
Interpretation

This passage explains the concept of the "Mysterious Female Gate" (玄牝之门) from the Daodejing. The Mysterious Female (referring to the generative portal of the Dao) is fundamentally yin in nature, yet contains both yin and yang aspects within itself. It is called a "gate" rather than a "door" because all things emerge from this mysterious portal, yet none can perceive its concrete form.

"Continuous, as if enduring" describes the state of breath regulation. Nasal and oral breathing should be gentle, prolonged, and so subtle as to seem both present and absent. The term "continuous" here implies an unbroken flow, much like the mysterious mother (the Dao) that ceaselessly generates life while remaining elusive—neither definitively existent nor completely nonexistent.

"Using it never wearies" explains the essential principle of employing this breath technique. The tranquil gate (the Mysterious Female) operates with such refinement that while appearing present, it functions through wuwei (non-action), thus never causing exhaustion. The application of qi should be unhurried and relaxed, never forced or abrupt. Like the numinous valley spirit that, though dwelling in emptiness without form or shadow, embraces all things without revealing itself—this represents the supreme manifestation of the Dao.

Though positioned in humility beyond verbal description, it is called the "root of heaven and earth." Claiming its existence reveals no form, yet declaring its nonexistence ignores how all things originate therefrom—hence "continuous, as if enduring." It accomplishes all without strain, therefore "using it never weares." As Wang Pang observed: The more the Dao's function stirs, the more it manifests—how could it ever grow weary?

動而愈出何勤之有 道徳眞經集註卷之一

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0093); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback