中文 · EN

《道德真經集註(一)》Vol. 8

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 8 / 10 10,351 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集註(一)》 Vol. 8 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 20 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集註(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經集註卷之八      恃一     明皇河上公王弼王雱註    使我介然章第五十三 使我介然有知行於大道  河曰介大也老子疾時王不行大道故設  此言使我介然有知於政事我則行於大  道躬無爲之化 唯施是畏  明皇曰老君言若使我耿介然矜其有知  欲行大道既與道不合故唯所施爲是皆  可畏○河曰唯獨也獨畏有所施爲失道  意欲賞善恐僞善生欲信忠恐詐忠起○  弼曰言若使我可介然有知行大道於天  下唯施爲是畏也○雱曰小有知於道而  由大道以行者已憚於施設矣况大有知  者乎何則至人之道不以末傷本者也施  爲盛於外則根本虚於内矣故終篇云 大道甚夷  河曰夷平易也 而民好徑  明皇曰大道平易是畏有知而人多故欲  心求捷如彼行人好從邪徑邪徑之弊具  如下文○河曰徑邪不平正也大道甚平  易而民好從邪徑也○弼曰言大道蕩然  正平而民猶尚舍之而不由好從邪徑況  復施爲以塞大道之中乎故曰大道甚夷  而民好徑○雱曰徑茍一時之速明迷於  大道而好施者皆由用近智而無遠圖也 朝甚除  明皇曰尚賢矜智生巧偽除理也○河曰  高臺榭宫室修○弼曰朝宫室也除潔好  也 田甚蕪  明皇曰浮食惰業廢農事○河曰農事廢  不耕治
Interpretation

This passage presents a collection of commentaries by four ancient scholars—Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Emperor Ming), Heshang Gong, Wang Bi, and Wang Pang—on Chapter 53 of the Daode Jing (Classic of the Way and Virtue). Each offers unique insights into Laozi's original text.

Laozi writes, "If I had but little knowledge to walk the great Dao (the Way)," which the commentators explain as his lament over rulers of his time failing to follow the Dao. They suggest that Laozi imagines himself, if granted even slight understanding of governance, would practice the Dao through Wuwei (non-action). Yet they all caution that even with such limited knowledge, one must remain vigilant against the dangers of artificial intervention—for enforcing rewards may breed hypocrisy, and trusting loyalty may invite deceit.

Regarding the line "The great Dao is perfectly level, yet people prefer bypaths," the annotators analyze: the Dao is inherently broad and smooth (yi meaning "even and accessible"), but people insist on taking shortcuts (jing referring to crooked side paths). Just as travelers often seek detours, this opportunistic mindset leads to fundamental disorientation. Wang Pang particularly notes that such short-sighted urgency stems from a lack of long-term vision.

The commentaries also critique contemporary social ills: courts indulging in extravagance (chu denoting overly ornate palaces) while farmlands lie fallow (wu). Emperor Xuanzong attributes this to the excessive veneration of talent and display of cleverness, while Heshang Gong bluntly blames massive construction projects at the expense of agriculture. These phenomena, they argue, all violate the Daoist principle of governing through Wuwei (non-action).

倉甚虛  明皇曰南畝不收無儲積○河曰五穀傷  害國無儲也○弼曰朝甚除則田甚蕪倉  甚虚矣設一而衆害生也○雱曰田事治  倉積實國之本也今務除其朝廷以爲一  時之榮觀而不恤根本之已竭豈持乆之  道乎明以末傷本者皆然也 服文綵  明皇曰刻雕綺綉害工利○河曰好飾偽  貴外華 帶利劍  明皇曰文德不修尚武備○河曰尚剛强  武且奢 厭飲食  明皇曰烹肥擊鮮重滋味厭飫足也 資財有餘  明皇曰聚斂積實饒珍異○河曰多嗜欲  無定時○雱曰侈費於外以取一時之適  而忘本業此明好施以傷本者一本作貨  財 是謂盜誇  河曰百姓不足而君有餘者是由劫盜以  爲服飾持行誇人不知身死家破親戚并  隨也 非道也哉  明皇曰矜其有知動以成弊行同盜竊仍  自矜誇誇盜非道適令興歎也哉哉者歎  辭也○河曰人君所行如是此非道也復  言也哉者痛傷之辭○弼曰凡物不以其  道得之則皆邪也邪則盜也誇而不以其  道得之盜誇也貴而不以其道得之竊位  也故舉非道以明非道則皆盜誇也○雱  曰盜者偷頃刻之榮誇者矜身外之飾爲  道者深根固本用之不窮豈務施以徇外  哉    善建不拔章第五十四 善建者不拔  明皇曰善能以道建國立本者不可傾拔
Interpretation

The state granaries are utterly depleted. Emperor Xuanzong (Minghuang) of Tang explains: This is due to poor harvests from the fields, leaving no stored provisions. Heshanggong's commentary notes: When the five grains suffer damage, the state loses its reserves. Wang Bi (Bi) adds: When the court excessively adorns itself, the fields lie fallow and the granaries stand empty. Focusing solely on superficial appearances breeds all manner of calamities. Lü Huiqing (Pang) observes: Properly managing farmland and filling granaries form the foundation of governance. Yet now they concentrate only on decorating court facades to gain fleeting glory, heedless of the exhaustion of their roots—can this possibly be the way to lasting peace? These are all examples of neglecting fundamentals while pursuing trivialities.

Wearing ornate robes. Minghuang remarks: Excessive embroidery and carving harm the artisans' livelihood. Heshanggong says: They delight in false adornments, chasing after outward splendor.

Carrying sharp swords. Minghuang states: They neglect civil virtue while glorifying martial prowess. Heshanggong comments: They revere brute force and indulge in extravagance.

Indulging in lavish feasts. Minghuang explains: They prepare rich, tender delicacies, pursuing heavy flavors and overeating.

Hoarding inexhaustible wealth. Minghuang says: They plunder and accumulate rare treasures. Heshanggong observes: Their desires know no bounds. Lü Huiqing notes: Squandering resources externally for momentary pleasure while forgetting fundamental duties—this is the clear harm of extravagance damaging the roots. Another version writes "goods and wealth."

This is called "robber's boasting." Heshanggong clarifies: When the people suffer poverty while the ruler wallows in riches, it resembles a thief flaunting stolen goods as fine garments, unaware this brings ruin to households and endangers relatives.

Truly contrary to the Dao! Minghuang explains: Flaunting one's wealth creates harmful practices—acting like a thief while self-aggrandizing. Such robber's boasting violates the true Way, truly lamentable. ("Zai" is an exclamation.) Heshanggong says: A ruler's conduct like this opposes the Dao—repeating "ye zai" conveys grief. Wang Bi observes: Anything obtained through improper means belongs to crooked paths—this is theft. Boasting of ill-gotten gains constitutes "robber's boasting," just as gaining high status improperly amounts to stealing office. Thus these examples illustrate behaviors contrary to the Dao—all fall under "robber's boasting." Lü Huiqing states: So-called "theft" means seizing transient glory, while "boasting" means flaunting external possessions. True cultivators of the Dao focus on strengthening roots to create inexhaustible resources—why would they chase superficial extravagance?

(Chapter 54) What is well established cannot be uprooted. Minghuang explains: Those who skillfully use the Dao to establish a nation's foundations create roots that cannot be shaken.

 也○河曰建立也善以道立身立國者不  可得引而拔也○弼曰固其根而後營其  末故不拔也○雱曰建中也 善抱者不脱  明皇曰善能以道懷抱百姓者不可脱離  河曰善以道抱精神者終不可拔引解脱  弼曰不貪於多齊其所能故不脱也○雱  曰抱一也 子孫以祭祀不輟  明皇曰言善以道德建抱之君功施於後  愛其甘棠况其子孫乎而王者祖有功宗  有德故周之興也起於后稷成於文武周  之祭也郊祀后稷宗祀文王故雖卜代三  十卜年七百而后稷文王郊宗之祀不輟  止也○河曰爲人子孫能修道如是長生  不死世世以久祭祀先祖宗廟無絶時○  弼曰子孫傳此道以祭祀則不輟也○雱  曰聖人修己治人要在乎建中抱一此萬  法之極致天地有終而不可易者也故能  貽法無窮功彼四海而天人歸德澤及苗  裔也一本無以字 修之身其德乃眞  明皇曰修道於身德乃眞純○河曰修道  於身愛氣養神益壽延年其德如是乃爲  眞人 修之家其德乃餘  明皇曰一家盡修德乃餘美○河曰修道  於家父慈子孝兄友弟順夫信妻貞其德  如是乃有餘慶及於來世子孫○弼曰以  身及人也修之身則眞修之家則有餘修  之不廢所施博大 修之鄕其德乃長  明皇曰一鄉盡修德乃長久○河曰修道
Interpretation

This scripture, through annotations by multiple Daoist scholars, elucidates the core concepts of "establishing De (Virtue/Power)" and "embracing the Dao (the Way)" from the Daode Jing.

Those who use the Dao to conduct themselves and govern the state are like deeply rooted trees that cannot be easily uprooted. Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period Neo-Daoist scholar) explains that only by securing the root can branches and leaves flourish, thus remaining unshaken. Lü Huiqing (a Song dynasty scholar) interprets this as grasping the principle of the central and upright Way.

Those skilled in holding fast to the great Dao never lose it. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang annotates that when rulers use the Dao to educate the people, the people will not turn away. Heshang Gong (a Han dynasty commentator) points out that those who use the Dao to nourish their Shen (spirit) will never lose their foundation. Wang Bi adds that by not craving excess and acting within one's capacity, one will not suffer loss. Lü Huiqing explains this as the state of maintaining pure and undivided Dao.

Such merit and virtue will benefit future generations, ensuring unbroken ancestral sacrifices. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang illustrates this with the Zhou dynasty—founded by Hou Ji, perfected by Kings Wen and Wu—whose sacrifices continued even after dynastic changes. Heshang Gong states that those who cultivate the Dao and attain longevity can perpetually honor their ancestors. Wang Bi emphasizes that when descendants inherit this Dao, the sacrifices endure. Lü Huiqing concludes that the sage's key to self-cultivation and governing the people lies in establishing centrality and upholding purity, which is the supreme principle.

The practical application unfolds in four levels: Cultivate the self, and De will become pure and genuine. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang says self-cultivation refines De, while Heshang Gong explains this as cherishing Jing (essence), nurturing Shen (spirit), prolonging life, and attaining the state of a zhenren (perfected person).

Cultivate the family, and De will overflow. Emperor Xuanzong believes family-wide virtue leaves a beautiful legacy. Heshang Gong details how paternal kindness, filial piety, fraternal harmony, and marital fidelity create blessings for descendants. Wang Bi notes this extends from self to others.

Extend it to the village, and De will endure. Both Emperor Xuanzong and Heshang Gong agree that when an entire community cultivates virtue, its influence becomes far-reaching and lasting.

 於鄉尊敬長老愛養幼少教誨愚鄙其德  如是乃無不覆及也 修之國其德乃豐  明皇曰一國盡修德乃豐盈○河曰修道  於國則君信臣忠仁義自生禮樂自興政  平無私其德如是乃爲人厚也 修之天下其德乃普  明皇曰若天下盡修其德施乃周普矣○  河曰人主修道於天下不言而化不教而  治下之應上信如影響其德如是乃爲普  博○雱曰因修身之法而推之以及其外  餘而後長長而後豐豐而後普 故以身觀身  明皇曰以修身之法觀身能清靜者眞○  河曰以修道之身觀不修道之身孰亡孰  存也 以家觀家  明皇曰以修家之法觀家能和睦者有餘  河曰以修道之家觀不修道之家也 以鄕觀鄉  明皇曰以修鄉之法觀鄉能順序者乃長  河曰以修道之鄉觀不修道之鄉也 以國觀國  明皇曰以修國之法觀國能勤儉者乃豐  河曰以修道之國觀不修道之國也○弼  曰彼皆然也 以天下觀天下  明皇曰以修天下之法觀天下能無爲者  乃普○河曰以修道之主觀不修道之主  也○弼曰以天下百姓心觀天下之道也  天下之道逆順吉凶亦皆如人之道也○  雱曰聖人之於有物也盡理之極而不容  私智故無不克也故修身則法一身之理  盡一身之理則身治矣自此以往施一家
Interpretation

In the village, one should respect elders, cherish the young, and guide the ignorant—such De (Virtue/Power) can encompass all things. When this De is practiced in governing a state, society will prosper abundantly. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) comments: When the whole nation cultivates De, the country will flourish. Heshang Gong (Han dynasty Daoist scholar) explains: When a ruler governs with Dao and De, ministers naturally become loyal, benevolence spontaneously arises, rituals and music flourish of their own accord, governance becomes clear and impartial—such De becomes profound and vast.

Extending this De to the entire world, its influence will reach across the four seas. Minghuang interprets: When all under heaven cultivate De, transformative teachings will spread universally. Heshang Gong states: A ruler who governs the world with Dao and De transforms people without words, achieves great order without deliberate instruction. The people's trust in such a ruler is like shadows following forms or echoes responding to sounds—this is the boundlessness of true De. Wang Pang (Song dynasty scholar) adds: The method progresses outward from self-cultivation—first refining oneself, then influencing one's family, extending to the village, the state, and finally permeating the whole world.

Therefore, observe others through the method of self-cultivation: Minghuang holds that by using the standard of clarity and Wuwei (non-action) to observe others, those who maintain purity are those who have attained Dao. Heshang Gong says: Comparing those who cultivate Dao with those who do not reveals the principles of survival and demise.

Observe other families through the standard of household governance: Minghuang notes that using harmony as the criterion, families maintaining harmony are those with De. Heshang Gong explains: Compare families that cultivate Dao with those that do not.

Observe other villages through the standard of village governance: Minghuang suggests using orderly harmony as the measure—only villages maintaining such order endure. Heshang Gong states: Contrast Dao-cultivating villages with non-cultivating ones.

Observe other states through the standard of state governance: Minghuang emphasizes taking diligent and frugal rulers as models—such states achieve abundance. Heshang Gong points out: Compare states that follow Dao with those that do not. Wang Bi (Three Kingdoms period metaphysician) adds: These principles are universally interconnected.

Observe the world through the standard of governing all-under-heaven: Minghuang concludes that using Wuwei as the measure, only rulers who follow nature's course can benefit all. Heshang Gong says: Contrast rulers who cultivate Dao with those who do not. Wang Bi further elucidates: One must understand the Dao of the world through the people's hearts—the patterns of heaven operate like those of personal cultivation, bringing fortune when followed and misfortune when opposed. Wang Pang finally clarifies: The sage exhausts the heavenly principles in dealing with all things without mixing in personal cleverness, thus succeeding in all endeavors. Self-cultivation means following the natural patterns of bodily operation; understanding these patterns allows one to regulate oneself, extending this principle to family, state, and ultimately the entire world.

 則一家以爲心治一鄉則一鄉以爲法夫  然故所遇彌廣而彌有餘也書曰天聰明  自我民聰明聖人天而已矣 吾何以知天下之然哉以此  明皇曰以此觀身等觀之則可以爾○河  曰老子言吾何以知天下修道者昌背道  者亡以此五事觀而知之○弼曰此上之  所云也言吾何以得知天下乎察己以知  之不求於外也所謂不出户以知天下者  也○雱曰聖人所守一道更無異說故其  所以爲所以知皆由此道也    含德之厚章第五十五 含德之厚  河曰謂含懷道德之厚者 比於赤子  明皇曰至人含懷道德之厚者其行比於  赤子○河曰神明保祐含德之乆若父母  之於赤子也○雱曰德性未嘗不厚而必  至於薄者欲慮使然也故全其天眞而不  以外耗内則淳氣中積而人道充至可名  於大矣然則足以馴虎豹服鬼神無足怪  也或曰赤子何以不能曰夫淳氣之守豈  一身之所能末世之俗雖有赤子之形而  原其失眞蓋已乆矣世何足以知此哉 毒蟲不螫  河曰蜂蠆蛇虺不螫 猛獸不據攫鳥不搏  明皇曰至人神矣物不能傷既無害物之  心故無螫摶之地此至人之含德也○河  曰赤子不害於物物亦不害之故太平之  世人無貴賤皆有仁心有刺之物還反其  本有毒之蟲不傷於人○弼曰赤子無求
Interpretation

This passage discusses the spiritual state of Daoist practitioners. Laozi uses the metaphor of an infant (chizi) to describe those with profound virtue (De), portraying them as pure and innocent like a newborn baby.

Individuals with deep moral cultivation possess hearts as guileless and natural as an infant's. Such people remain untouched by venomous creatures (wasps, scorpions, snakes), unharmed by fierce beasts, and unassailed by birds of prey. Having attained the realm of "perfected persons" (zhiren), their spiritual power (Shen) is so potent that even animals sense their benevolence and naturally refrain from harming them.

Heshanggong (an important Daoist commentator) explains that just as infants don't harm other creatures, neither do other creatures harm infants. During eras of great peace, people of all social strata embody humaneness—thorny plants return to their benign nature, and poisonous insects refrain from injuring others.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's commentary suggests these "perfected persons" have reached such mystical attainment that external phenomena cannot harm them. Since they harbor no intention to harm others, they never enter situations where venomous creatures or wild beasts would attack them.

Wang Pang (a Song Dynasty scholar) further elaborates that human virtue (De) is inherently profound, becoming shallow only through desires and overthinking. By preserving innate purity and preventing external matters from depleting internal spirit (Shen), one accumulates pure and potent Qi (vital energy), achieving fullness in the human Dao. Such individuals could tame tigers and command spirits—a capability hardly surprising for them.

When asked why ordinary infants don't exhibit these powers, the response clarifies: maintaining pristine Qi (chunqi) requires more than physical form alone. People in the Dharma-ending age may have infantile bodies but have long lost their true nature (xian tian ben xing)—a truth difficult for worldly people to comprehend.

 無欲不犯衆物故毒螫之物無犯於人也  含德之厚者不犯於物故無物以損其全  也○雱曰淳氣之守足以爲此竊嘗論之  萬物所以相傷者氣有所受也人爲萬物  貴所禀至和而或見侵於物者失其常故  也故陰陽以沖氣爲和夫唯守眞氣之沖  和則物豈能傷之哉然猶大人之德耳未  聖也 骨弱筋柔而握固  河曰赤子筋骨柔弱而持物堅固以其意  心不移也○弼曰以柔弱之故故握能堅  固 未知牝牡之合而䘒作  弼曰作長也無物以損其身故能全長也  言含德之厚者無物可以損其德渝其眞  柔弱不爭而不摧折皆若此也 精之至也  河曰赤子未知男女之合會而陰作怒者  由精氣多之所致也○雱曰非有慕好於  外而䘒作則是順其氣之自運而不以心  者也若夫目營於外而心佚於内則精喪  而死矣安能乆乎舉世之大患莫大於此  而學者之至戒也䘒一作全 終曰號而嗌不嗄  弼本嗄作噫○弼曰無爭欲之心故終日  出聲而不噫也 和之至也  明皇曰赤子骨弱筋柔而能握拳牢固未  知陰陽配合而含氣之源動作者猶精粹  之至終日啼號而聲不嘶嗄猶純和之至  此赤子之全和也○河曰赤子從朝至暮  啼號聲不變易者和氣多之所致○雱曰  孟子曰以直養而無害則塞乎天地之間
Interpretation

This passage uses the physiological characteristics of an infant as a metaphor for the pure and natural state that Daoist practitioners should maintain. It states that without covetous desires, one will not harm other living beings, and thus venomous creatures or fierce beasts will not injure such a person. Those with profound moral cultivation (De) do not contend with the myriad things, and therefore external forces cannot damage their wholeness.

Wang Pang (a Song Dynasty scholar) explains that the reason all things harm one another is due to the conflict of their Qi (vital energy). Humans, being the most noble among the myriad things, should naturally embody the most harmonious Qi. If they are harmed by external forces, it is because they have lost their original, authentic state. The two energies of Yin and Yang must be harmonized by the balanced Qi of "Chonghe" (harmonious blending). Only by preserving this state of balanced Qi can external things cause harm? However, this is still only the realm of those with high virtue and has not yet reached the level of a sage.

The text employs three infantile traits as metaphors: First, though their bones are soft, infants can clench their fists tightly—symbolizing the Daoist practitioner's quality of external softness and internal firmness. Second, infants do not understand male-female relations yet exhibit physiological responses, illustrating that when Jing (essence) and Qi are abundant, they circulate naturally, unlike adults who deplete their essence through desires. Third, though infants cry all day, their voices never grow hoarse—a manifestation of supreme harmony.

Both Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (the "Brilliant Emperor") and Heshang Gong (a Han Dynasty Daoist scholar) emphasize in their commentaries that these behaviors of infants arise from their pure Jing and Qi and their abundant harmonious energy. Wang Pang quotes Mencius to point out that by nurturing Qi in an upright manner without harming it, one can fill the space between heaven and earth. The core message of this passage is to admonish Daoist practitioners to maintain childlike innocence, not deliberately pursue external things, and allow Jing and Qi to flow naturally—only then can one attain a state of perfect harmony.

 此則和氣也在彼則稱其浩在此則稱其  和所稱則異而氣一也故心氣交使迷理  失常以至於斃者豈其禀或殊哉持之非  其道耳全德之人雖形與物接而心常泊  然故雖用氣而氣自動耳故但動而無動  之累然則其淳氣之守孰能擾之哉故雖  年躋壯老而不失其赤子之常廣成子修  身千二百歲而形不衰者如斯而己嗄之  爲言夏也夏者天和發散之時嗌之嗄者  和氣不積故也一本作噫散噫氣之噫噫  信也亦通 知和曰常  明皇曰能如嬰兒固守和柔是謂知常之  行○河曰人能知和氣之柔弱有益於人  者則爲知道之常也○弼曰物以和爲常  故知和則得常也○雱曰復命之常體神  也知和之常守氣也知守氣則可以言復  命矣未至乎復命也此兩者聖之所以聖  賢之所以賢更無它道古之學者一出乎  此大道既隱士逐末而不知本學始有外  此者矣常者性有定分能盡其性則自别  於物而物莫能遷故曰常蓋自性分之外  一皆蠱僞無有常者 知常曰明  明皇曰守和知常是曰明了○河曰人能  知道之常行則曰以明達於玄妙也○弼  曰不皦不昩不温不凉此常也無形不可  得而見曰明也○雱曰不知常之人雖有  察物之小智而闇於大本矣可謂明乎 益生曰祥  明皇曰祥者吉凶之兆言人不知守常而
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the essential cultivation principles of "harmony" (he) and "constancy" (chang). The so-called "harmony" refers to the harmonious Qi that permeates heaven and earth. This Qi remains identical everywhere, though it may be called by different names. When one's heart-mind and Qi become disordered, violating natural laws, it leads to the decline of life force. This is not due to differences in innate endowment, but rather to improper cultivation methods.

Those who have truly perfected their De (Virtue) maintain inner tranquility even while their bodies interact with the external world. When they employ primordial Qi, it flows naturally without causing disturbances. Such individuals preserve pure harmonious Qi, remaining unperturbed by external phenomena. Like the legendary immortal Guangchengzi, who maintained youthful appearance after twelve centuries of self-cultivation, they embody this principle perfectly.

"Knowing harmony is called constancy" means: comprehending the way of harmony means grasping eternal laws. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang commented that maintaining infant-like softness demonstrates understanding of the constant Way. Wang Bi's annotation explains that all things take harmony as their natural state, thus knowing harmony enables one to grasp eternity. Only by understanding how to preserve primordial Qi can one speak of returning to one's original nature. This constitutes the fundamental path by which sages become sages.

"Knowing constancy is called enlightenment" signifies: recognizing eternal truth constitutes genuine wisdom. Those who don't understand the constant Way may possess petty cleverness but lack fundamental wisdom. Emperor Xuanzong stated that maintaining harmony and knowing constancy constitute true enlightenment. Wang Bi interpreted this state as neither dazzling nor dim, neither warm nor cold—formless yet truly existent.

Finally, "excessive pursuit of life-nourishment brings calamity" points out that overzealous cultivation ironically invites misfortune. Emperor Xuanzong explained this refers to people who fail to maintain constancy while vainly seeking longevity, achieving the opposite result. True auspiciousness lies in following nature's course rather than forcibly prolonging life.

 求益生越分動之死地是曰凶祥○河曰  祥長也言益生欲自生日以長大○弼曰  生不可益益之則妖也○雱曰生理至足  無欠無餘以直養之則亦至矣從而增焉  秖以爲贅祥非常之事也 心使氣曰强  明皇曰心有是非氣無分别若役心使氣  是曰强梁之人○河曰心當專一和柔而  氣實内故形柔而反使妄有所爲和氣去  於中故形體自以剛强也○弼曰心宜無  有使氣則强○雱曰有心以使氣則氣復  使心心氣交使則天和雕喪損其眞矣人  所受者不可益損故增生損氣俱爲失理  孟子有揠苗不芸之戒而老子有益生使  氣之說凡以全其淳氣而已此强非自勝  之强强梁之强也 物壯則老  河曰萬物壯極則枯老也 是謂不道  河曰老不得道○雱曰人之有壯老者形  也若夫定分則常而不遷矣失性之人形  化而心興之變故壯則血氣充溢而老則  精神衰憊唯含德之厚者不然吾心未嘗  移則氣亦有常而不變故雖外有壯老而  心不異乎赤子之時此有道者也凡易於  歳時而隨壯老以化者物而已矣豈道也  哉 不道早已  明皇曰凡物壯極則衰老故戒云矜壯恃  强謂不合於道當須早已○河曰不得道  者早已死也○雱曰不道之人雖其少時  已失生理故曰早已    知者不言章第五十六 知者不言
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the relationship between "nourishing life" (yangsheng) and "mind-qi (vital energy)" as well as the principle that "when things reach their prime, they begin to age."

Regarding the excessive pursuit of longevity: Deliberately striving to prolong life paradoxically leads toward death, which is an ominous sign. Heshang Gong explains that life inherently follows predetermined measures, and forcibly extending it only invites calamity. Wang Pang further clarifies that the principle of life is naturally complete—artificial additions become burdens. Just as Mencius criticized "pulling up seedlings to help them grow," Laozi likewise opposed forced life-nourishment and artificial qi manipulation.

On the relationship between mind and qi: When the intellect forcibly controls qi, one becomes rigid rather than supple. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang observed that the intellect clings to distinctions of right and wrong, while qi is inherently undifferentiated—forced control makes it domineering. Heshang Gong maintains that the mind should remain unified and gentle, as forcibly directing qi disrupts its harmonious balance. Wang Pang adds that when mind and qi attempt to control each other, they lose their natural harmony and damage authentic nature.

Regarding the principle that "when things reach their prime, they begin to age": All things that reach their peak of vigor inevitably decline—this represents a departure from the Dao. Heshang Gong states that aging signifies deviation from the Way. Wang Pang explains that ordinary people age as their physical forms change, but those who attain the Dao maintain childlike purity within. Those who transform with age remain mere worldly beings, not true Dao attainers.

The conclusion emphasizes: Whatever does not accord with the Dao perishes prematurely. Emperor Xuanzong remarks that all forceful displays of strength contradict the Dao and should cease early. Heshang Gong asserts that those not aligned with the Dao die young. Wang Pang observes that such individuals lose life's principle even in their youth.

This corresponds to Chapter 56's teaching that "those who know don't speak"—true wisdom manifests without deliberate proclamation.

 河曰知者貴行不貴言也○弼曰因自然  也○雱曰理極於無言 言者不知  明皇曰知了悟也言辯說也○河曰駟不  及舌多言多患○弼曰造事端也○雱曰  惟其有言已非知理 塞其兊  明皇曰了悟者於法無愛染於言無執滯  故云塞其兊○雱曰其神無郤 閉其門  明皇曰既無愛染則嗜欲之門閉矣○河  曰塞閉之者欲絶其源 挫其銳  河曰情欲有所銳爲當念道無爲以挫止  之○弼曰含守質也 解其紛  河曰紛結恨不休當念道無爲以釋之○  弼曰除爭原也 和其光  河曰雖有獨見之明當和之使闇昩不使  曜亂○弼曰無所特顯則物物無偏爭也 同其塵  河曰不當自别殊也○弼曰無所特賤則  物物無偏耻也○雱曰眞知者其處己如  此 是謂玄同  明皇曰解貝如道沖章彼則約道此則約  人言人能體道是謂與玄同德也○河曰  玄天也人能行此上事是謂與天同道也  雱曰道至於玄而物我爲一者不立己以  敵物故物不得而有之 故不可得而親  明皇曰玄同無私故不可得而親○河曰  不以榮譽爲樂獨立爲哀 不可得而踈  明皇曰汎然和衆故不可得而踈○河曰  志靜無欲與人無怨○弼曰可得而親則  可得而踈也 不可得而利  明皇曰無欲故不可得而利○河曰身不
Interpretation

This passage expounds the core wisdom of Daoist self-cultivation:

Those who truly comprehend the Dao value practical action over empty discourse. Wang Bi (Wei-Jin period metaphysician) describes this as following natural spontaneity, while Lü Huiqing (Song dynasty scholar) maintains that ultimate truth transcends verbal expression. Those who engage in verbal disputes demonstrate their lack of genuine understanding—just as swift horses cannot catch spoken words, excessive speech invites misfortune. Wang Bi observes that language creates complications, and Lü Huiqing goes further to suggest that any verbalization already deviates from truth.

The concrete method of self-cultivation comprises six key principles:

First, "blocking the openings" (closing sensory channels to desire). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains that truly awakened individuals remain undisturbed by external phenomena and free from rigid opinions, while Lü Huiqing adds that this prevents spiritual leakage.

Second, "closing the gates" (shutting desire's portals). Emperor Xuanzong states that without covetous attachments, desire's gates naturally close, and Heshang Gong (Han dynasty commentator) clarifies this means severing at the root.

Third, "blunting the sharp edges" (tempering锋芒). Heshang Gong advises invoking the Dao's Wuwei (non-action) to pacify acute passions, while Wang Bi emphasizes preserving one's original simplicity.

Fourth, "untying the knots" (resolving conflicts). Heshang Gong recommends using the Dao's Wuwei to dissolve resentment, with Wang Bi identifying this as removing contention's source.

Fifth, "harmonizing the light" (tempering brilliance). Heshang Gong suggests concealing extraordinary insights, and Wang Bi explains that non-ostentation prevents partiality and strife.

Sixth, "mingling with the dust" (blending with worldly existence). Heshang Gong warns against affectation, Wang Bi advocates transcending distinctions of nobility and baseness, while Lü Huiqing adds that truly enlightened individuals interact with all things equally.

Attaining this state is called "mysterious unity" (profound union with the Dao). Emperor Xuanzong compares it to the empty Dao-body described in the "Dao Chong" chapter, though here approached through self-cultivation. Heshang Gong views this as communion with celestial law; Lü Huiqing describes the mystical state where self and other become indistinguishable.

This realm's hallmark is transcending partiality and self-interest: impartiality renders one immune to closeness or distance; serenity makes one impervious to profit or harm; detachment leaves one beyond valuation or disdain. Wang Bi concludes this represents the world's most precious state of being.

 欲富貴口不欲五味 不可得而害  明皇曰不爭故不可得而害○河曰不與  貪爭利不與勇爭氣○弼曰可得而利則  可得而害也 不可得而貴  明皇曰體道自然故不可得而貴○河曰  不爲亂世主不處闇君位 亦不可得而賤  明皇曰洗然無滓故不可得而賤○河曰  不以乘權故驕不以失志故屈○弼曰可  得而貴則可得而賤也 故爲天下貴  明皇曰體了無滯言忘理暢銳紛盡解光  塵亦同既難親疏不可貴賤故爲天下至  貴矣○河曰其德如此天子不得臣諸侯  不得屈與世沉浮容身避害故爲天下貴  也○弼曰無物可以加之者○雱曰不言  者非密而不言誠無所事言何則不見一  法故也不見一法故物物而不物於物况  可得而親疏貴賤者物而已矣彼物物而  不物於物故莫之爵而常貴也    以正治國章第五十七 以正治國  河曰以至也天使正身之人使至有國也  雱曰治國在乎盡道之正而已無容私智 以竒用兵  河曰奇詐也天使詐僞之人使用兵也○  雱曰兵非有道之器而聖人所不能無但  不以爲常故曰以奇用也 以無事取天下  明皇曰在宥天下貴乎無若以政教理國  奇詐用兵斯皆不合於道唯無事無爲可  以取天下此三句標也○河曰以無事無  爲之人使取天下爲之主○弼曰以道治
Interpretation

This scripture primarily expounds Daoist perspectives on personal conduct and state governance.

Regarding self-cultivation, Laozi asserts that true nobility does not lie in pursuing wealth or sensory pleasures. If one does not crave fine delicacies (the "five flavors" representing all gourmet tastes), avoids contention over profit or prestige, and maintains a natural, authentic state, external harm or belittlement cannot affect them. As Emperor Xuanzong (Minghuang) of Tang explained: because such a person does not contend, they remain unharmed; because they embody the natural Dao, they transcend praise or blame. The commentary by Heshanggong adds that such individuals neither seek kingship in chaotic times nor serve under foolish rulers. Drifting with the current yet preserving their essence, they become the most revered under heaven.

On statecraft, three key principles are proposed: First, govern the state with uprightness (zheng), entrusting administration to those of virtuous character who follow the Dao's principles, avoiding petty cleverness. Second, employ unconventional tactics (qi) in warfare—since war itself contradicts righteousness but is sometimes unavoidable, extraordinary means should be used to swiftly resolve conflicts. Third, attain the realm through Wuwei (non-action), minimizing interference so the people submit naturally. Emperor Xuanzong clarifies that governing through decrees or winning battles through deceit violates the Dao; only serene non-action can genuinely unify the land.

The core lies in the concept of Wuwei—not passivity, but aligning with natural patterns without excessive intervention. As Wang Pang noted, those who truly attain the Dao are unbound by external things, thus transcending worldly standards of nobility or baseness.

 國則國平以正治國則奇兵起也以無事  則能取天下也上章云其取天下者常以  無事及其有事不足以取天下也故以正  治國則不足以取天下而以奇用兵也夫  以道治國崇本以息末以正治國立辟以  攻末本不立而末淺民無所及故必至於  奇用兵也○雱曰以正治國則天下自服  奚以有事爲哉蓋天下神器唯無爲者能  有之故下云 吾何以知其然哉以此  明皇曰以此下知之○河曰此今也老子  言我何以知天意然哉以今日所見知之  也 夫天下多忌諱而民彌貧  明皇曰以政理國動多忌諱人失作業政  令彌貧○河曰天下謂人主也忌諱者防  禁也令煩則姦生禁多則下作相殆故貧  雱曰事爲之禁則民擾而失業故貧也此  亂之所始 民多利器國家滋昏  明皇曰利器謂權謀人主以權謀爲多不  能反實下則應之以詐譎故令國家滋益  昏亂○河曰利器者權也民多權則視者  眇於目聽者惑於耳上下不親故國家昏  亂○弼曰利器凡所以利己之器也民强  則國家弱○雱曰有利器則必有機心機  心生則下難知故國家昏也 人多伎巧奇物滋起  明皇曰人主以伎巧爲多不能見素下則  應之以奢泰故令淫奇之物滋起也○河  曰人謂人君百里諸侯也多知伎巧謂刻  畫宫觀雕琢服章奇物滋起下則化上飾
Interpretation

Laozi here discusses two distinct approaches to governing a nation and their respective consequences. Governing through conventional methods ("using orthodox administration") inevitably leads to military conflicts ("unconventional warfare arises"), while governing through wuwei (non-action) is the true way to attain the realm. As previously mentioned, rulers who successfully unified the realm often employed wuwei governance—once they adopted active interventionist policies, they ironically found it harder to maintain sovereignty.

Governing through the Dao (the Way) means honoring the root while eliminating superficial complexities, whereas conventional governance establishes laws to address surface-level issues. Without establishing the fundamental root and merely dealing with superficial symptoms, the people become disoriented, ultimately necessitating military measures. Wang Pang (a Song dynasty scholar) adds that when governing with true virtue, the realm naturally submits—why resort to active intervention? This sacred vessel of the realm can only be truly possessed by those who practice wuwei.

Laozi then explains how he knows this principle: through observing reality. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) notes in his commentary that this is Laozi's judgment based on the conditions he witnessed in his time.

Concrete manifestations include: When state prohibitions multiply, the people grow poorer. Emperor Xuanzong explains this as excessive decrees depriving people of their livelihoods. Heshang Gong (a Han dynasty commentator) attributes this to rulers establishing too many restrictions—the more prohibitions, the more people find loopholes, ultimately leading to poverty, which is the beginning of chaos.

When the populace masters too many cunning stratagems ("sharp tools"), the state descends into greater disorder. Emperor Xuanzong sees this as rulers valuing manipulation, to which the people respond with deceit. Heshang Gong interprets it as the people wielding power, causing confusion in perception and disharmony between rulers and subjects. Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period metaphysician) observes that when the people grow strong, the state weakens. Wang Pang adds that cunning schemes make minds more calculating, making it difficult for rulers to understand the people's true condition.

When rulers admire extravagant craftsmanship, excessive luxuries proliferate. Emperor Xuanzong points out that when rulers pursue technical ingenuity, the people respond with lavish trends. Heshang Gong identifies this as feudal lords indulging in constructing opulent palaces and crafting exquisite garments, leading to widespread extravagance.

 金鐵玉文綉綵色日以滋甚○弼曰民多  智慧則巧僞生巧偽生則邪事起○雱曰  古初之民器用鄙樸下逮末俗製作彌精  巧思日生風俗愈弊非常之事由此滋多  一本利作伎 法令滋彰盜賊多有  明皇王弼二本物作令○明皇曰無爲既  失法令益明竊法爲奸盡成盜賊豈非多  有乎○河曰法物好物也珍好之物滋生  彰著則農事廢飢寒並至故盜賊多有也  弼曰立正欲以息邪而奇兵用多忌諱欲  以耻貧而民彌貧利器欲以强國者也而  國愈昏多皆舍本以治末故以致此也 故聖人云  河曰謂下事也 我無烏而民自化  河曰聖人言我修道承天無所改作而民  自化成也○雱曰無爲則體常上體常則  民亦體常故自化申上文利器之義 我好靜而民自正  河曰聖人言我好靜不言不教民皆自忠  正也○雱曰好靜則復性上復性則民亦  復其性故自正申上文盜賊之義 我無事而民自富  河曰我無徭役徵召之事民安其業故皆  自富○雱曰無爲好靜故能無所事而民  遂其生夫豈多忌諱哉 我無欲而民自樸  明皇曰無爲則清靜故人自化無事則不  擾故人自富好靜則得性故人自正無欲  則全和故人自樸此無事取天下矣○河  曰我常無欲去華文微服飾民則隨我爲  質樸也○弼曰上之所欲民從之速也我
Interpretation

This scripture passage, through the annotations of several Daoist scholars, elucidates the core principles of social governance. Wang Bi points out that when people excessively pursue cleverness and artifice, hypocrisy and deceit will flourish, leading to the emergence of various deviant paths. Lü Huiqing (Pang) adds that in ancient times, people used simple tools, but as society developed, they increasingly pursued intricate craftsmanship, which instead corrupted social customs and gave rise to endless abnormal phenomena.

Regarding legal decrees, both Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) and Wang Bi argue that when rulers abandon the principle of "governing through non-action (Wuwei)," laws and regulations multiply. However, harsh decrees can be exploited by the wicked to commit evil, resulting in rampant banditry. Heshang Gong further explains that excessive pursuit of rare treasures leads to the neglect of agriculture, leaving people cold and hungry—naturally driving them to become thieves.

The commentators all cite the words of sages to illustrate the art of governance: When rulers refrain from deliberate action (Wuwei), the people will naturally become cultivated; when rulers maintain tranquility (good stillness), the people will naturally become upright; when rulers avoid disturbing the people (non-interference), the people will naturally prosper; and when rulers are free from greed (desirelessness), the people will naturally remain simple and honest. These perspectives emphasize that rulers should lead by example, influencing the people through their own serenity and non-action rather than relying on complex decrees to enforce control.

Heshang Gong particularly notes that if rulers abandon extravagant attire and embrace simplicity, the people will emulate this modest way of life. Wang Bi concludes that the preferences of those in power swiftly influence the populace, so rulers should grasp the root rather than discard it for superficial ends.

 之所欲唯無欲而民亦無欲而自樸也此  四者崇本以息末也○雱曰申上文奇物  之義竊嘗論曰聖人之治也化之以無爲  正之以好靜使各遂於富庶而要其終也  復之樸而已夫然則豈有利器奇物而假  法令以爲之制哉凡民之所以毁樸趨僞  皆在於多欲也上誠無欲則民安得欲乎  此帝皇之極致也一本自富在自正前    其政悶悶者第五十八 其政悶悶  河曰其政教寬大悶悶昩昩似若不明也 其民淳淳  明皇曰政教悶悶無爲寬大人則應之淳  淳然而質樸矣○河曰政教寬大故民淳  淳富厚相親睦也○弼曰言善治政者無  形無名無事無正可舉悶悶然卒至於大  治故曰其政悶悶也其民無所爭競寬大  淳淳故曰其民淳淳也 其政察察  河曰其政教急疾言决於口聽决於耳也  雱曰察察治已甚也 其民缺缺  明皇曰政教察察有苛急人則應之缺然  而凋弊矣○河曰政急民不聊生故缺缺  日以疏薄○弼曰立刑名明賞罰以檢姦  僞故曰察察也殊類分析民懷爭競故曰  其民缺缺○雱曰缺如器物破缺言不全  也 禍兮福之所倚  河曰倚因也夫禍因福而生人遭禍而能  悔過責己修善行道則禍去而福來 福兮禍之所伏  河曰禍伏匿於福中人得福而爲驕恣則  福去禍來也 孰知其極
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the fundamental principles of governance. When rulers achieve mental clarity and minimal desires, the people naturally return to simplicity and spontaneity. These four governing methods (referring to wuwei [non-action], tranquility, etc.) all address root causes to eliminate superficial problems.

Wang Pang (a Song Dynasty scholar) explains: The sage governs the world by transforming the people through wuwei and guiding them with serenity, enabling them to live in prosperity and contentment, ultimately returning to their innate purity. Why rely on harsh laws, punishments, or manipulative techniques to enforce control? The people lose their simplicity and become deceitful precisely because of excessive desires. If rulers truly harbor no selfish cravings, how could the people develop greed? This is the highest ideal of imperial governance.

The text then contrasts two approaches to governance and their outcomes:

If policies are relaxed and natural (闷闷), appearing unrefined, the people instead become sincere and genuine (淳淳). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang comments: When governance is lenient and wuwei, the people preserve their innate simplicity. Wang Bi notes: Those truly skilled in governance do not flaunt their methods—they may seem muddled, yet ultimately achieve great order.

Conversely, if policies are strict and meticulous (察察), scrutinizing every detail, the people become cunning and fractured (缺缺). Emperor Xuanzong observes: Excessive harshness in governance leads to the gradual decline of the people. Wang Bi explains: Establishing severe laws and explicit rewards and punishments to prevent deceit only results in the people scheming against one another. Wang Pang uses the metaphor of a broken vessel to illustrate how such a society becomes incomplete.

Finally, the text discusses the interdependence of misfortune and fortune: Misfortune may harbor fortune (祸兮福之所倚), as those who repent and turn toward goodness can transform calamity into blessing. Conversely, fortune may conceal misfortune (福兮祸之所伏), for those who grow arrogant and indulgent in prosperity will see their blessings turn to ruin. Who can fully comprehend the ultimate pattern governing these transformations?

 明皇曰倚因也伏藏也上言其政悶悶俗  則以爲無政理之體人反淳淳然而質樸  此則禍爲福之所因也其政察察而俗則  以爲有政理之術人乃缺缺然而凋弊此  福爲禍之所藏也○河曰禍福相生誰能  知其窮極時○雱曰萬物通乎一氣而一  氣之運往而復返終則有初轉徙如流無  有窮極故禍福相代如彼四時聖人唯知  其然故事貴適中不爲已甚若夫察察之  政欲崇正而禁奇止妖而興善以盡天下  之福而不知竒正相生妖善迭化志欲爲  福而不知福極爲禍故莊周寓言於才與  不才之間然則推而爲政其亦在察與不  察之間乎故曰其政悶悶蓋如上說則其  於善惡是非若有所不辨是以小智覩之  意或不快也此句與荒兮未央之語同蓋  彼齊唯阿此等禍福理皆一致 其無正邪  明皇王弼二本正下有邪字○河曰無不  也謂人君不正其身其無國也○雱曰言  誰知善治之極乎唯無正可舉無刑可名  悶悶然而天下大化是其極也○雱曰大  運不留當時者爲是欲定奇正而不知正  不可常則可謂知乎雖然以爲無正者是  以無正爲正者也邪者疑辭亦不定乎無  正也 正復爲奇  河曰奇詐也人君不正下雖正復化上爲  詐也○弼曰以正治國則便復以奇用兵  矣故正復爲奇 善復爲妖
Interpretation

This passage explores the dialectical relationship between governance and the transformation of misfortune and fortune. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Emperor Ming) notes in his commentary that governance that appears loose and unstructured (闷闷之政) actually allows the people to preserve their simple, genuine nature, and within such circumstances, misfortune contains the seeds of future fortune. Conversely, overly strict governance (察察之政), though seemingly effective, leads to the decline of social customs, and within such fortune lies the beginning of misfortune.

Heshang Gong's commentary adds that the mutual transformation of misfortune and fortune resembles the cyclical movement of Yin and Yang, a process whose patterns no one can fully grasp. Wang Pang further explains that all things operate through the movement of primordial Qi (元气), just as the four seasons cycle endlessly. The sages understood this principle, and thus governed with moderation, avoiding extremes. Those rulers who attempt to forcibly distinguish good from evil or suppress dissent through harsh measures, though intending to benefit the people, unknowingly invite disaster through their extreme methods.

Regarding the phrase "其无正邪" (whether there is no absolute right path): some versions render it as "其无正邪." Heshang Gong argues that if the ruler is not upright, the state cannot maintain the right path. Wang Pang, however, suggests that the highest form of governance reaches a state where it cannot be measured by fixed standards (无正可举)—seemingly chaotic yet capable of naturally guiding the world. True "rightness" is not fixed; what is considered right today may become wrong tomorrow (正复为奇), and what is good may transform into something strange or ominous (善复为妖). This is akin to governing with orthodox methods for too long, which may eventually necessitate the use of unorthodox strategies in military affairs.

This passage embodies the Daoist dialectical thinking of "misfortune and fortune being interdependent." It advocates for governance that maintains a natural and moderate approach, opposes rigid, black-and-white judgments, and emphasizes the principle that all things transform into their opposites.

 明皇曰禍福之極豈無正邪但衆生迷執  正者復以爲奇詐善者復以爲妖祥故禍  福倚伏若無正爾○河曰善人皆復化上  爲妖祥也○弼曰立善以和物則便復有  妖妖佞之患也 人之迷其日固久  明皇曰以正爲奇以善爲妖如此迷倒其  爲日也固以乆矣○河曰言人君迷惑失  正以來其日已固久○弼曰言人之迷惑  失道固乆矣不可便正善治以責○雱曰  民失其性而不冥夫道自有生以來蓋已  如此非一日之積矣而爲政者方乃事其  察察然而欲使天下畢協於吾一偏之正  既爲不可而又不知其所謂正者未嘗正  也聖人則不然雖方廉且直以道德之光  燭天下而體常混然不示人以迹故民得  安常復樸而風俗淳淳也豈曰小補之哉 是以聖人方而不割  河曰聖人行方正者欲以率下不以割截  人也○弼曰以方導物舍去其邪不以方  割物所謂大方無隅○雱曰大方無隅言  混然也若有割絶之迹則與物分界矣 廉而不劌  明皇王弼二本害作劌○河曰聖人廉清  欲以化民不以傷害人也今則不然正己  以害人也○弼曰廉清廉也劌傷也以清  廉清民令去其污不以清廉劌傷於物也  雱曰雖有廉隅不至於劌也一本劌作穢  非 直而不肆  河曰肆申也聖人雖直曲已從人不自申
Interpretation

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (also known as Emperor Ming) explains that in the ultimate sense of fortune and misfortune, how can there be any absolute distinction between right and wrong? It's merely that sentient beings, lost in their attachments, mistake the true Dao for strange deceptions and regard virtuous conduct as ominous signs. Thus fortune and misfortune intertwine and conceal each other, appearing to have no fixed standard. Heshang Gong (an early Daoist commentator) adds that even virtuous people may be misunderstood by the worldly as ominous. Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period metaphysician) points out that establishing virtuous conduct to harmonize all things may instead invite slander from petty men.

This cognitive confusion among people has persisted for a long time. Emperor Xuanzong states that mistaking the Dao for heresy and virtue for evil—this inverted, deluded state has indeed existed for ages. Heshang Gong observes that when rulers become confused and deviate from the Dao, this condition becomes deeply entrenched. Wang Bi supplements that people's loss of the Great Dao did not happen overnight, and we cannot simplistically judge them by superficial standards of "orthodox virtue." Wang Pang (a Song dynasty scholar) further elaborates: The people's loss of their original nature and ignorance of the Dao has existed since the birth of humanity. Yet rulers use narrow standards to scrutinize all things, vainly hoping the whole world will conform to their partial version of "orthodoxy"—this is neither feasible nor do they realize their so-called "rightness" itself is impure.

Sages are different. Though square-cornered in integrity and pure in conduct, they illuminate the world with the light of Dao and De (Virtue), while themselves remaining in a state of natural wholeness without deliberately displaying their traces. Thus the people can dwell in peace and return to simplicity, with customs naturally becoming honest and sincere—how could this be considered minor remediation? Therefore, the sage is square-cornered yet does not wound others—Heshang Gong says the sage's upright conduct serves as a model rather than harsh judgment; Wang Bi explains this means using squareness to guide all things, removing deviance without cutting external things with rigid standards, truly embodying "ultimate squareness has no corners." Wang Pang states that "great squareness has no corners" means complete integration—if there are dividing marks, it draws boundaries between things.

Pure yet not sharp—Emperor Xuanzong and Wang Bi's versions use the character "刿" (to wound). Heshang Gong says the sage's purity serves to teach the people, not harm them; Wang Bi explains purity helps people remove filth rather than wounding external things with puritanical standards; Wang Pang states that though there are edges, they do not wound (some versions use the character for "filth," but Wang Pang considers this incorrect).

Upright yet not unrestrained—Heshang Gong explains "肆" means indulgence; though the sage is upright, he can humble himself to accommodate others without self-assertion.

 之也○弼曰以直導物令去其僻而不以  直激沸於物也所謂大直若屈也○雱曰  直而肆則有其直大直於理爲直而常委  曲以從理 光而不耀  明皇曰聖人善化不割彼而爲方不劌彼  而爲廉不申彼而爲直不耀彼而爲光修  之身而天下自化矣肆申也○河曰聖人  雖有獨知之明常如暗昩不以耀亂人也  弼曰以光鑒其所以迷不以光照求其隱  匿也所謂明道若昩也此皆崇本以息末  不攻而使復之也○雱曰光以爚物謂之  耀和其光歸其明者豈耀以爚物哉    治人事天章第五十九 治人  河曰謂人君治理人民 事天  河曰事用也當用天道順四時 莫若嗇  明皇曰嗇愛也人君將欲治人事天之道  莫若愛費使倉禀實人知禮節三時不害  則天降之嘉祥人和可以理人天保可以  事天矣○河曰嗇貪也治國者當愛民財  不爲奢泰治身者當愛精氣不放逸○弼  曰莫如猶莫過也嗇農夫農人之治田務  去其殊類歸於齊一也全其自然不急其  荒病除其所以荒病上承於天命下綏百  姓莫過於此○雱曰治人在乎正己事天  在乎盡性此兩者一於嗇而已葆其精神  不以外耗内者嗇也人之本眞充塞六極  無所不徧而終至於不足者侈有爲而輕  自用故也唯嗇也故能全吾所受命於天
Interpretation

This passage presents various Daoist scholars' commentaries on Chapter 59 of the Daode Jing, primarily discussing how the principle of "restraint" (啬 sè) is central to both "governing people" (治人) and "serving Heaven" (事天).

Wang Bi (王弼) explains that one should guide all things with uprightness to eliminate partiality, yet avoid using directness to provoke things. This embodies the principle that "great straightness seems crooked" (大直若屈). True uprightness means conforming to heavenly principle while naturally yielding when necessary.

Regarding "bright but not dazzling" (光而不耀), Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (唐玄宗) comments that the sage excels at teaching without forcibly dividing things, neither deliberately displaying squareness, edges, directness, nor brilliance. By cultivating oneself, one naturally transforms the world. Heshang Gong (河上公) adds that although sages possess extraordinary wisdom, they constantly maintain humility without ostentation. Wang Bi further explains that one should use wisdom to perceive the root of confusion rather than employ glaring light to expose secrets—this is the profound meaning behind "the enlightened Dao appears obscure" (明道若昧).

In Chapter 59's discussion of "governing people and serving Heaven," Heshang Gong interprets "governing people" as the ruler's management of the populace, while "serving Heaven" means following the rhythms of the four seasons. Regarding "nothing compares to restraint" (莫若啬), Emperor Xuanzong understands this as frugality: rulers should economize to fill granaries, while the people observe rituals and laws without violating agricultural seasons, thus inviting heavenly blessings and social harmony. Heshang Gong explains "restraint" as curbing desires—governing requires cherishing the people's labor without extravagance, while self-cultivation demands preserving essence (Jing) and Qi without indulgence. Wang Bi compares "restraint" to farming: removing weeds to maintain field purity, following nature without haste, thereby fulfilling heavenly mandate while pacifying the people. Wang Pang (王雱) concludes that governing people lies in rectifying oneself, serving Heaven in fulfilling one's nature—both requiring restraint. Cherishing spirit (Shen) without external dissipation constitutes "restraint"; human authenticity fills heaven and earth, with insufficiency arising solely from extravagance and reckless action. Only through restraint can one preserve heaven-endowed life and innate nature.

 而不多費於妄作然則性其有不盡者乎  己其有不正者乎孟子曰盡其心知其性  所以事天也蓋全其初之所命則天心得  矣人則與我同其所受者也我誠全則同  者應矣其於治也何有哉 夫唯嗇是以早復  明皇曰何以聚人曰財故能儉愛則四方  之人將襁負而至早服事其君矣服事也  河曰早先也服德也夫獨愛民財愛精氣  則能先得天道也○弼曰復常也○雱曰  動極而靜則其復晩矣唯嗇者不侈於費  己其去本也未嘗遠故復靜爲早一本復  作服非 早復謂之重積德  明皇曰夫能儉嗇以是有德人歸有德早  事其君故云重積德○河曰光得大道是  謂重積德於己也○弼曰唯重積德不欲  銳速然後乃能使早復其常故曰早復謂  之重積德者也○雱曰德不外耗則積於  内矣積於内而資納無窮其爲積也積之  又積者也 重積德則無不克  明皇曰聖人積德四海歸仁則無有不能  制服者矣克能也○河曰克勝也重積德  於己則無不勝○雱曰盡性之人蓋將生  天生地宰制造化其於事物何所不能 無不克則莫知其極  明皇曰人君之德無有不能制御者則無  遠不至故四方莫知其窮極也○河曰無  不克勝則莫有知己德之窮極也○弼曰  道無窮也○雱曰盡性則大矣大而化之
Interpretation

By not excessively expending energy on reckless actions, how can one's inherent nature remain incomplete? How can one's own heart-mind fail to be upright? Mencius said, "By fully exercising one's original heart-mind, one can know one's nature"—this is the method of serving Heaven. By preserving the nature originally endowed by Heaven, one can comprehend the Heavenly mind. Since both others and myself receive the same Heavenly mandate, if I truly preserve my nature, those who share this same origin will naturally resonate with me—then what difficulty would there be in governing the world?

Understanding frugality (啬) enables early return to one's original truth. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explained: Only by using wealth can one gather the people. Thus by being frugal and cherishing resources, the people from all directions will carry their children to submit, early becoming subjects to the ruler. Here "submit" means to yield in allegiance. Heshang Gong's commentary states: "Early" refers to seizing the initiative, while "submit" means to return to virtue. Only by treasuring the people's resources and cherishing one's vital essence (Jing) can one be the first to comprehend the Dao of Heaven. Wang Bi noted: "Return" means reverting to the constant norm. Lü Huiqing further explained: If one waits until movement reaches its extreme before returning to stillness, it will be too late. Those who understand frugality do not waste or deplete, thus never straying far from the fundamental Dao—therefore they can return to stillness early. Some versions mistakenly write "服" (submit) instead of "复" (return).

Early return to original truth is called "heavy accumulation of De (Virtue/Power)." Emperor Xuanzong said: Being able to practice frugality and restraint constitutes De, and when people submit to a ruler with De, this is called heavily accumulated De. Heshang Gong explained: First attaining the Great Dao means heavily accumulating De within oneself. Wang Bi held that only by heavily accumulating De without rushing for quick results can one enable people to return early to the constant norm. Lü Huiqing said: When De is not dissipated outwardly, it accumulates inwardly, and this accumulation grows increasingly profound.

Heavy accumulation of De enables one to overcome all things. Emperor Xuanzong stated: When sages accumulate De, all under Heaven returns to benevolence—then nothing remains unconquered. Heshang Gong explained: "Overcome" means to prevail—when one heavily accumulates De within oneself, nothing can withstand it. Lü Huiqing further elaborated: Those who fully manifest their inherent nature can assist in Heaven and Earth's transformations—what could they possibly be unable to accomplish regarding the myriad things?

Being able to overcome all things makes one fathomless. Emperor Xuanzong believed: When a ruler's De can control everything without exception, one reaches boundlessness—the four directions cannot fathom its limits. Heshang Gong said: When nothing can withstand you, no one can know the boundaries of your De. Wang Bi pointed out: The Great Dao is inherently limitless. Lü Huiqing concluded: Fully manifesting one's nature enables reaching vastness, and vastness can then transform the myriad things.

 則聖矣化則無窮故莫知其極也 莫知其極可以有國  明皇曰莫知其窮極然後可以爲有國○  河曰莫知己德有極則可以有社稷爲民  致福○弼曰以有窮而莅國非能有國也  雱曰聖人糠粃土苴足以陶鑄堯舜其於  有國也何有 有國之母可以長乆  明皇曰有國而茂養百姓者則其福祚可  以長乆矣○河曰國身同也母道也人能  保身中之道使精氣不勞五神不苦則可  以長久○弼曰國之所以安謂之母重積  德是唯圖其根然後營末乃得其終也○  雱曰有國之母所以有國者也莫知其極  者是 是謂深根固柢  河曰人能以氣爲根以精爲蒂如樹根不  深則枝蒂不堅則落言當深藏其氣固守  其精使無漏泄○雱曰人以性命爲根外  乎此者枝葉也失性之人盛枝葉以傷根  根傷則精氣衰而蒂不固此所以早斃也  夫唯嗇則不以外傷其根根深則蒂固蒂  固則形連乎命而遲脱矣柢一本作蒂音  義同 長生乆視之道  明皇曰積德有國則根深而蒂固矣深固  者是長生乆視之道○河曰深根固蒂者  乃長生乆視之道○雱曰精神發見於目  故人死則目暝而無光能嗇以深根則蒂  固而根深其視久矣    治大國章第六十 治大國若烹小鮮  明皇曰烹小鮮者不可撓理大國者不可
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principles of governing a nation and cultivating one's character.

"The limit cannot be perceived" means that the virtue (De) of a sage is unfathomable and inexhaustible. Only those who attain this state can properly govern a country. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) annotated that only those with boundless virtue can truly possess a nation. Heshang Gong (a Han dynasty Daoist scholar) explained that only by not knowing the limits of one's virtue can one preserve the state and benefit the people. Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period metaphysician) added that governing with limited capability makes true possession of a nation impossible.

"The mother of possessing the state" refers to the fundamental Dao of governance. Emperor Xuanzong stated that those who govern and nurture the people will enjoy enduring blessings. Heshang Gong viewed state governance and self-cultivation as interconnected, with "mother" representing the foundational Dao. If one can preserve the vital essence (Jing) and Qi within the body without damaging the spirit (Shen) of the five organs, longevity can be achieved. Wang Bi further explained that national stability depends on accumulated virtue, just as a tree requires firm roots before flourishing branches can grow.

"Deep roots and firm foundation" serves as a metaphor. Heshang Gong said humans should take Qi as their roots and Jing as their foundation, just as deep roots allow trees to grow lush foliage. Wang Pang (a Song dynasty scholar) supplemented that human nature and life are the roots, while external matters are merely branches. Those who lose their innate nature by pursuing externals damage their roots, leading to exhaustion of Jing-Qi and shortened lifespan. Only through conservation ("restraint") can one protect the foundation - deep roots ensure endurance.

"The Dao of long life and enduring vision" refers to methods for prolonging life. Both Emperor Xuanzong and Heshang Gong agreed that accumulating virtue and strengthening one's foundation constitute the path to longevity. Wang Pang particularly noted that human spirit manifests through the eyes, which lose their radiance at death. Those who conserve Jing-Qi and stabilize their foundation can maintain enduring vitality.

Finally, regarding "governing a great state is like cooking small fish," Emperor Xuanzong explained it as avoiding excessive stirring when cooking small fish, just as governing a large nation shouldn't involve frequent disturbances to the people. This metaphor illustrates that governance should follow natural principles without excessive interference.

 煩煩則人勞撓則魚爛○河曰鮮魚烹小  魚不去腸不去鱗不敢撓恐其糜也治國  煩則下亂治身煩則精散○弼曰不擾也  躁則多害靜則全眞故其國彌大而其主  彌靜然後乃能廣感衆心矣○雱曰烹鮮  之術唯待其自熟無所施其巧攪而撓之  則潰矣治國之道亦然大國小鮮者明所  治雖大得其道則甚易爲也 以道莅天下者其鬼不神  明皇曰以道臨莅天下不求有妄之福故  鬼無以見其神明○河曰以道德居位治  天下則鬼不敢見其精神以犯人也○弼  曰治大國則若烹小鮮以道莅天下則其  鬼不神也○雱曰民不擾則得盡其性民  盡其性則天地之和應而萬物無不遂矣  故鬼亦安其處而不能爲神也人鬼殊道  而每至於相干者陰陽之氣有盩而交失  其所故萬物得乘釁矣 非其鬼不神其神不傷人  明皇曰上言其鬼不神非謂鬼歇滅而無  神但有其神而不見怪以傷人也○河曰  其鬼非無精神也邪不入正不能傷自然  之民○弼曰神不害自然也物守自然則  神無所加神無加則不知神之爲神也 非其神不傷人聖人亦不傷人  明皇曰鬼見神怪則傷人聖人有爲則傷  人今鬼所以不見神怪而傷人者蓋以聖  人無爲清靜故爾○河曰非鬼神不能傷  害人以聖人在位不傷害人故鬼不敢干
Interpretation

This passage uses the metaphor of "cooking small fish" to illustrate principles of governing a nation and cultivating one's self. When preparing fresh small fish, constant stirring will cause them to fall apart—implying that neither state governance nor personal cultivation should involve excessive interference. Governing a large country is like cooking small fish; only by following natural laws (the Dao) can wholeness be preserved.

When the Dao is used to govern the world, even ghosts and spirits do not manifest to cause disturbances. This does not mean that ghosts and spirits do not exist, but rather that by adhering to the Great Dao, Yin and Yang remain in harmony, and spirits remain in their proper places without interfering in human affairs. When the ruler (the Sage) refrains from arbitrary action and avoids disturbing the people, even ghosts and spirits do not harm them.

To elaborate: Just as constantly turning small fish while cooking makes the flesh crumble, excessive governance with complicated decrees leads to chaos among the people. Similarly, a scattered mind in self-cultivation dissipates one's Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy). Only through stillness and Wuwei (non-action) can one preserve their true nature. The larger the state, the more the ruler must embody tranquility—only then can the hearts of the people be gathered.

The reason ghosts and spirits do not manifest to cause mischief lies in this: When the people are undisturbed, they can live according to their innate nature. Heaven and Earth remain in harmony, all things grow naturally, and spirits remain content in their roles. Only when Yin and Yang fall out of balance do ghosts and spirits seize the opportunity to create disorder. It is not that spirits inherently seek to harm people, but rather that when the Sage (the ruler) remains serene and Wuwei, refraining from harming the people, even ghosts and spirits dare not intrude.

 之也○弼曰道洽則神不傷人神不傷人  則不知神之爲神道洽則聖人亦不傷人  聖人不傷人則亦不知聖人之爲聖也猶  云非獨不知神之爲神亦不知聖人之爲  聖也夫恃威網以使物者治之衰也使不  知神聖之爲神聖道之極也○雱曰唯聖  人不傷人故天地之和應而人鬼各遂兩  不相傷也 夫兩不相傷  河曰鬼與聖人俱兩不相傷也 故德交歸焉  明皇曰鬼神傷人則害國虧本聖人傷人  則匱神乏祀今兩不相傷物故德交歸焉  河曰夫兩不相傷人得治於陽鬼得治於  陰人得全其性命鬼得保其精神故德交  歸焉○弼曰神不傷人聖人亦不傷人聖  人不傷人神亦不傷人故曰兩不相傷也  神聖合道交歸之也○雱曰人歸德於鬼
Interpretation

This scripture discusses the relationship between the Dao (the fundamental cosmic principle) and both deities and sages. Wang Bi explains: When the Dao is universally practiced, divine spirits will not harm humans, and people may not even be aware of the spirits' existence. Similarly, sages (those who have attained the Dao) do not harm others, and their extraordinary nature remains unnoticed. This implies that people neither understand why deities are sacred nor why sages are enlightened.

The text points out that ruling through authoritarian means reflects political decline, whereas a state where people remain unaware of the presence of deities and sages represents the highest realization of the Dao. Lü Huiqing further elaborates: Precisely because sages do not harm others, heaven and earth resonate in harmony, and both humans and spirits fulfill their roles without conflict.

Heshang Gong comments: When neither spirits nor sages harm people, the living are governed in the yang realm while the deceased find peace in the yin realm. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang expands on this: If spirits were to harm people, it would endanger the foundation of the state; if sages harmed others, it would lead to the neglect of rituals. Only when neither causes harm can all things fulfill their nature, allowing De (moral power) to naturally circulate between the realms of yin and yang.

Wang Bi concludes that the essence of "neither harming the other" lies in both deities and sages aligning with the Dao's principles. Lü Huiqing ultimately clarifies: In this state, humans attribute virtue to the spirits, and the spirits in turn return virtue to humanity, creating a virtuous cycle.

 鬼歸德於人  道德眞經集註卷之八

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0093); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 7 Vol. 9 →