中文 · EN

《道德真經集註(一)》Vol. 4

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 4 / 10 9,203 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集註(一)》 Vol. 4 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 18 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集註(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經集註卷之四     靡四    明皇河上公王弼王雱註   希言自然章第二十三 希言自然  明皇曰希言者忘言也不云忘言而云希  者明因言以詮道不可都忘悟道則言忘  故云希爾若能因言悟道不滯於言則合  自然矣○河曰希言者謂愛言也愛言者  自然之道○弼曰聽之不聞名曰希下章  言道之出言淡兮其無味也視之不足見  聽之不足聞然則無味不足聽之言乃是  自然之至言也○雱曰希與上篇聽之不  聞者同自然者不因物而然也希不與物  並而無所交感獨出於萬法之上故曰自  然 故飄風不終朝驟雨不終日  明皇曰風雨飄驟則暴卒而害物言疾執  滯則失道而生迷○河曰飄風疾風也驟  雨暴雨也言疾不能長暴不能久也○雱  曰風雨者陰陽交感所爲飄驟者交感之  過所以不能乆 孰爲此者天地  河曰孰誰也誰爲此飄風暴雨者乎天地  所爲 天地尚不能久  河曰不終於朝暮也 而况於人乎  眀皇曰天地至大欲爲暴卒則傷於物尚  不能乆以况於人執言滯教則害於道欲  求了悟其可得乎○河曰天地至神合爲  飄風暴雨尚不能使終朝至暮何况人欲  爲暴卒乎○弼曰言暴疾美興不長也 故從事於道者  明皇曰故從事於道之人當不執滯言教
Interpretation

This chapter elucidates the principle that "sparing speech accords with nature." Four commentators illuminate its profound meaning from different perspectives.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) suggests that "xiyan" (sparing speech) does not mean complete silence, but rather using words to grasp the true essence of the Dao (the Way), thereby transcending the limitations of language to achieve harmony with nature. Just as violent winds and torrential rains, though fierce, do not last an entire day—this reflects the natural order of heaven and earth. Even forces as mighty as heaven and earth cannot sustain such storms indefinitely, let alone those who rigidly cling to verbal doctrines. Therefore, true Dao cultivators should not be bound by words.

Master Heshang Gong’s commentary is more straightforward: sparing speech means valuing words wisely. Violent storms are the work of heaven and earth, yet even they cannot make such tempests persist from dawn till dusk. How much less should humans pursue extreme or excessive behaviors?

Wang Bi interprets this from the Daoist perspective of "the greatest sound is faintly heard" (dayin xisheng): the true Dao, when spoken, is plain and unadorned—unremarkable to the eye and unpleasing to the ear. Yet precisely this seemingly ordinary speech embodies the most natural and profound truth.

Wang Pang further elaborates: "xiyan" resembles the earlier notion of "listening but not hearing," representing a state beyond concrete phenomena. Wind and rain arise from the interaction of yin and yang qi (vital energy). Excessively violent storms (whirlwinds and sudden downpours) cannot endure, illustrating that any extreme action is unsustainable.

In summary, this chapter uses natural phenomena to demonstrate that Dao cultivation should emulate nature’s balance, avoiding extremes. Clinging to intense words and actions is like a violent storm—seemingly powerful but fleeting. Those who truly attain the Dao understand moderation and flow with nature’s rhythms.

 河曰從爲也人爲事當如道安靜不當如  飄風驟雨 道者同於道  明皇曰體道忘言則同於道矣○河曰道  者謂好道人也同於道者所爲與道同○  弼曰從事謂舉動從事於道者也道以無  形無爲成濟萬物故從事於道者以無爲  爲君不言爲教緜緜若存而物得其眞與  道同體故曰同於道○雱曰一本無下道  者二字 德者同於德  明皇曰德者道用之名人能體道忘功則  其所施爲同於道用矣○河曰德謂好德  人也同於德者所爲與德同也○弼曰得  少也少則德故曰得也行得則與得同體  故曰同於得也 失者同於失  明皇曰執言滯教無由了悟不悟則迷道  故自同於失矣○河曰失謂任己失人也  同於失者所謂與失同也○弼曰失累多  也累多則失故曰失也行失則失與失同  體故曰同於失也○雱曰一本德作得 同於道者道亦得之  河曰與道同者道亦樂得之也 同於德者德亦得之  河曰與德同者德亦樂得之也 同於失者失亦得之  明皇曰方諸挹水陽燧引火類族辨物斷  焉可知○河曰與失同者失亦樂失之也  弼曰言隨行其所故同而應之○雱曰凡  人之生不待物而有所謂獨化者是也不  待物而有則固希而自然矣而失性者妄  有我體而從事於道故屈己以從道然則
Interpretation

This passage discusses the relationship between spiritual cultivators and three realms: "Dao" (the Way), "De" (Virtue/Power), and "loss" (disorientation). If a cultivator seeks the realm of the Dao, their conduct should be as tranquil and natural as the Dao itself, not restless like a storm.

Those who comprehend the Dao will ultimately merge with it. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) explains that those who truly realize the Dao transcend language and concepts, attaining unity with it. The commentary by Heshang Gong states that those who love the Dao naturally align their actions with it. Wang Bi further elaborates that cultivators should emulate the formless and effortless (Wuwei) nature of the Dao, accomplishing all things through non-action, thereby becoming one with it.

Those who pursue De will unite with De. De is the concrete manifestation of the Dao. Emperor Xuanzong remarks that those who embody the Dao without claiming merit act in harmony with the function of De. Heshang Gong observes that those who cherish De naturally conform to its principles. Wang Bi offers another perspective, explaining that De implies moderation, and through moderation, one preserves it.

Those who are lost will merge with "loss." Emperor Xuanzong points out that clinging to doctrines and words prevents true awakening, leading to disorientation from the Dao. Heshang Gong interprets this as referring to those who stubbornly cling to their views and lose their innate humanity. Wang Bi explains that excessive desires and attachments result in disorientation.

The passage concludes: Those who align with the Dao will be embraced by it; those who align with De will be embraced by it; those who align with loss will find it their final state. Just as the ancient water-gathering vessel (fangzhu) draws water and the fire-mirror (yangsui) draws fire, like attracts like—this principle is evident. Wang Pang adds that human nature originally exists without reliance on external things, yet those who lose their true nature become arrogant and deliberately pursue the Dao, thereby forsaking their innate spontaneity.

 道爲之主而吾所謂其君者反臣於道矣  故從事於道者有此道德失之三等而同  歸於失此由不冥於希而立己待物離一  爲二而交感生患也 信不足  河曰君信不足於下下則應君以不足也 有不信  明皇曰執言滯教不能了悟是於信不足  也自同於失失亦樂失是有不信也○河  曰此言物類相歸同聲相應雲從龍風從  虎水流濕火就燥自然之類也○弼曰忠  信不足於下焉有不信也○雱曰降乎希  則失性命之常於信爲不足上於信不足  則下必至乎不信此又明修己治人皆嘗  用希   跂者不立章第二十四 跂者不立  河曰跂進也謂貪權慕名進取功榮也則  不可乆立身行道也○弼曰物尚進則失  安故曰企者不立 跨者不行  明皇曰跂舉踵而望也跨以跨夾物也以  喻自見求明明終不得何異夫跂求乆立  跨求行履乎○河曰自以爲貴而跨於人  衆共蔽之使不得行○雱曰不適其形之  常故失性之用 自見者不明  明皇曰靈才揚己動而見尤故不明○河  曰人自見其形容以爲好自見所行以爲  應道殊不自知其形醜操行之鄙 自是者不彰  明皇曰是己非人直爲怨府故不彰○河  曰自以爲是而非人衆共蔽之使不得彰  明 自伐者無功  明皇曰專固伐取物所不與故無功○河
Interpretation

This passage discusses several common deviations that may occur during Daoist cultivation. The core message is that when one treats the Dao as a subordinate to be commanded (i.e., attempting to dominate the natural order rather than following it), one actually becomes a servant of the Dao (controlled by desires).

Practitioners often commit three fundamental errors that ultimately lead them astray from the Great Dao. These mistakes all stem from failing to comprehend the "Xi" (the mysterious state of Dao), constantly setting oneself in opposition to external reality through dualistic distinctions between subject and object, thereby generating various problems.

The text illustrates this through several metaphors:

Those who stand on tiptoe to appear taller actually lose their balance (symbolizing how rushing for quick gains makes one lose their foundation). This resembles those who crave power and pursue empty fame—they cannot maintain De (Virtue) for long.

Those who stride aggressively to walk faster actually cannot go far (symbolizing how violating natural laws backfires). Such self-righteous individuals will face collective resistance from others.

These manifest as four specific flaws:

1. Those who self-display actually obscure their vision (like people constantly showing off their cleverness—every action invites mistakes);

2. Those who self-assert actually fail to be recognized (always insisting they're right while others are wrong, breeding resentment);

3. Those who self-boast actually achieve no merit (forcing claims to recognition that others won't acknowledge);

4. Those who self-inflate actually cannot endure (as the Heshang Gong commentary states—those who feel superior and belittle others will face united opposition).

The root of these flaws lies in violating the natural state of body and innate nature. As the Minghuang commentary explains, standing on tiptoe and overstriding are unnatural postures—hence one cannot stand long or walk far. The same applies to Dao cultivation: forcing outcomes makes one lose the natural functioning of their original nature.

 曰所爲而自伐取其功美即失有功於人  也 自矜者不長  明皇曰矜衒行能人所鄙薄故不長○河  曰好自矜大者不可以長乆 其在道也曰餘食贅行  河曰贅貪也使此自矜伐之人在治國之  道曰賦斂餘禄食爲貪行○弼曰其唯於  道而論之若郤至之行盛饌之餘也本雖  美更可穢也本雖有功而自伐之故更爲  疣贅者也○雱曰皆在分外 物或惡之  河曰此人在位動欲傷害故物無有不畏  惡也 故有道者不處也  明皇曰自見等行於道而論是曰殘餘之  食疣贅之行凡物尚或惡之故有道之人  不處斯事矣○河曰言有道之人不居其  國也    有物混成章第二十五 有物混成先天地生  明皇曰將欲明道立名之由故云有物言  有物混然而成含孕一切尋其生化乃在  天地之先生○河曰謂道無形混然而成  萬物乃在天地之前○弼曰混然不可得  而知而萬物由之以成故曰混成也不知  其誰之子故先天地生○雱曰道之中體  混然而成其視天地亦由一物耳而此特  云先天地者老氏將歛天下之散亂迷錯  而復之性本故且舉混成而已蓋由萬殊  而觀則此爲道之全而由道本以觀則雖  混成者猶散殊也目之爲物則明更有物  物之妙耳 寂兮寥兮  雱曰混成無象 獨立而不改
Interpretation

(Interpretation of Chapter 24 of the Dao De Jing)

Those who delight in self-praise are like people claiming others' merits as their own—such behavior ultimately causes them to lose genuine achievement. Those who constantly elevate themselves often struggle to maintain their standing for long. From the perspective of the Dao (the Way), such conduct resembles leftover food or unsightly tumors—utterly superfluous.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explained: Those who flaunt their talents invite public disdain, making their position untenable. Heshang Gong's commentary notes: Those fond of self-aggrandizement cannot endure. When such people govern, they become as detestable as officials who greedily collect taxes and monopolize salaries. Wang Bi further illustrates: This behavior is like delicacies at a banquet—originally delicious but rendered foul by excess; or like tumors on the body—initially natural growths that become burdens through self-promotion. Lü Huiqing concludes: These are all actions that overstep one's proper bounds.

All things despise such people. Heshang Gong observes: When these individuals wield power, they invariably seek to harm others, making them universally feared and loathed. Therefore, those who truly embody the Dao would never act this way. Emperor Xuanzong remarks: Behaviors like self-display, measured against the standard of the Dao, are nothing but cold leftovers and superfluous growths. Even ordinary things reject them—how much more would those awakened to the Dao?

(Interpretation of the Opening of Chapter 25)

There exists something perfectly whole, which predates the formation of heaven and earth. Emperor Xuanzong explains: This reveals the origin of the name "Dao." The "something" refers to a unified existence that contains and nurtures all things. Tracing its source, it emerges even before heaven and earth. Heshang Gong states: This formless Dao is perfectly self-sufficient; all things are born from it, existing prior to heaven and earth. Wang Bi argues: This indescribable presence gives form to all things, hence called "perfectly whole" (huncheng). We cannot know how it came to be, only that it precedes heaven and earth. Lü Huiqing elaborates: The substance of the Dao is completely unified—by comparison, even heaven and earth are but its manifestations. Laozi emphasizes its precedence to guide people back from confusion to their original nature, thus provisionally using "perfectly whole" to describe it. Viewed from the diversity of things, this is the Dao's totality; yet from the Dao's perspective, even this wholeness appears fragmented. Calling it "something" hints at subtler creative processes beyond.

Silent and soundless, formless and vast (ji xi liao xi). Lü Huiqing clarifies: This perfectly whole existence has no concrete form, standing alone and unchanging through eternity.

 河曰寂者無音聲寥者空無形獨立者無  匹雙不改者君子常○弼曰寂寥無形體  也無物之匹故曰獨立也返化終始不失  其常故曰不改也○雱曰混成之體常而  不易 周行而不殆  河曰道通行地無所不入在陽不燋記陰  不竊無不貫穿不危殆○雱曰混成之用  也萬物由我以生死我常制其命敦能危  之 可以爲天下母  明皇曰有物之體寂寥虚靜妙本湛然常  寂故獨立而不改應用遍於群有故周行  而不危殆而萬物資以生成彼其茂養之  德故可以爲天下母○河曰道育養萬物  精氣如母之養子○弼曰周行無所不至  而免殆能生全大形也故可以爲天地母  也 吾不知其名  弼曰名以定形混成無形不可得而定故  曰不知其名也 字之曰道  河曰我不見道之形容不知當何以名之  見萬物皆從道所生故字之曰道也○弼  曰夫名以定形字以稱可言道取於無物  而不由也是混成之中可言之稱最大也 强之名曰大  明皇曰吾見有物生成隱無名氏故以道  生表其德字之曰道以包含目其道而名  曰大○河曰不知其名强曰大者高而無  上羅而無外無不包容故曰大也○弼曰  吾所以字之曰道者取其可言之稱最大  也責其字定之所由則繫於大大有繫則  必有分有分則失其極矣故曰强爲之名
Interpretation

This scripture describes the essential characteristics of the Dao (the core concept of Daoism, referring to the origin of the cosmos and ultimate truth). It first states that the Dao is silent and soundless, empty and formless, existing independently without counterpart, eternally unchanging. It permeates the cosmos in ceaseless operation yet never exhausts itself, as Wang Bi's commentary explains: the Dao has no concrete form and matches with nothing, hence it is called "independent"; it perpetually cycles through transformations while remaining constant, thus called "unchanging."

The text then explains the Dao's operational state: it penetrates all things between heaven and earth, neither withering in Yang Qi nor perishing in Yin Qi, traversing all without suffering harm. Lü Huiqing (Pang) supplements that all things depend on the Dao for their birth and demise, while the Dao eternally governs their destinies, thus nothing can harm it. Precisely because the Dao nourishes all things like a mother feeding her children, it is called "the mother of all under heaven."

The scripture mentions the impossibility of giving the Dao a definitive name, as it has no concrete form. The designation "Dao" is used provisionally because all things are seen to originate from it. While "Dao" represents the most comprehensive designation, even calling it "great" remains inadequate, for the true Dao transcends all names and forms. Emperor Xuanzong's (Minghuang) commentary notes: the Dao generates all things without displaying its name, hence "Dao" manifests its virtue while "great" describes its all-encompassing nature. The Heshang Gong commentary adds: the Dao is supremely exalted and embraces all, therefore called "great." Wang Bi further clarifies: the designation "Dao" is used because it represents the most expansive name possible, yet any naming inevitably limits the Dao's boundlessness—thus these terms remain provisional approximations.

 曰大○雱曰道譬萬物則無乎不周可謂  大矣雖然大名既立全體已虧 大曰逝  河曰其爲大非若天常在上非若地常在  下乃復逝去無常處所也○弼曰逝行也  不守一大體而已周行無所不至故曰逝  也○雱曰大則有用逝者周行攖物功用  著矣 逝曰遠  河曰言遠者窮乎無窮布氣天地無所不  通也○雱曰道之爲用無所不極可謂遠  矣而去本亦遠矣此謂混成而已若道之  至則非遠非近也 遠曰反  明皇曰妙用無方强名不得故自大而求  之則逝而往矣自往而求之則遠不及矣  若能了悟則反在於身心而證之矣○河  曰言其遠不越絶乃復在人身也○弼曰  遠極也周無所不窮極不偏於一所故曰  遠也不隨於所適其志獨立故曰返也○  雱曰有爲有形復歸於無事無物往來不  窮終則有始也 故道大天大地大王亦大  明皇曰因其所大而明之得一者天地王  也天大能覆地大能載王大能法地則天  行道故云亦大○河曰道大者包羅諸天  地無所不容也天大者無所不蓋也地大  者無所不載也王大者無所不制也○弼  曰天地之性人爲貴而王是人之主也雖  不職大亦復爲大與三匹故曰王亦大也  雱曰天地能體道故皆大王者在帝皇之  下人道之至處凡老氏之說言道之中體
Interpretation

Here we discuss the four characteristics of the Dao (the cosmic origin and operating principle): vastness, flowing, far-reaching, and returning.

First is "vastness." The Dao is like boundless mist, encompassing all things without exception, truly deserving to be called immense. Yet the moment we use the concept of "vastness" to describe it, we've already limited its complete essence.

Next is "flowing." The Dao isn't like the sky that remains perpetually above or the earth that stays forever below—it moves and transforms without fixed form. As Heshang Gong (a Han Dynasty Daoist scholar) explained, the Dao operates without clinging to any single place, instead circulating universally throughout all existence.

Then we examine "far-reaching." The Dao's operation extends limitlessly, its energy permeating heaven and earth without obstruction. However, Wang Pang (a Song Dynasty scholar) pointed out that while the Dao's influence reaches everywhere, excessive pursuit of external "farness" may actually distance one from its source. The true Dao transcends distinctions of near and far.

Finally, there's "returning." Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explained that the Dao's mysterious function cannot be captured in words. Seeking it through "vastness" leads to dissipation, pursuing it through "flowing" leads to distance—only by turning inward can one realize it. Heshang Gong noted that what seems like a distant Dao actually resides within oneself. Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period metaphysician) added that while the Dao pervades infinitely, it never clings to any particular place, always maintaining its independent nature and ultimately returning to the source. Just as all formed things eventually return to the formless, this cycle continues without end.

Thus the Dao is great, and likewise heaven, earth, and the sovereign are great. Heaven's greatness lies in covering all things, earth's in bearing all existence, and the sovereign's in emulating the Dao of heaven and earth. Heshang Gong said the Dao contains heaven and earth, heaven covers everything, earth supports all, and the sovereign governs the people. Wang Bi particularly emphasized that although humans are small between heaven and earth, the ruler, as humanity's representative, can stand equally great with heaven and earth. Wang Pang believed heaven and earth manifest the Dao's greatness, while the sovereign occupies humanity's highest position—both representing the middle way in Laozi's teachings about the Dao.

 未盡絶際姑盡性而已王以歸往爲名能  盡人之性則人歸之矣猶百谷之宗江海  也盡性則體道故示大 域中有四大  弼曰四大道天地王也凡物有稱有名則  非其極也言道則有所由有所由然後謂  之爲道然則是道稱中之大也不若無自  之大也無稱不可得而名曰域也道天地  王皆在乎無稱之内故曰域中有四大者  也○雱曰道之中體因物而名故未離域  中 而王處一焉  明皇曰王者人靈之主萬物繫其興亡將  欲申其鑒戒故云而王居其一欲警王令  有所法謂下文也○河曰八極之内有四  大王居一也○弼曰處人主之大也○雱  曰一本云王居其一焉 人法地  河曰人當法地安靜和柔也種之得五穀  掘之得甘泉勞而不怨也有功而不置也  雱曰言王舉人之盡性者此復言人者明  王德止於人事人性自具王德也 地法天  河曰天湛泊不動施而不求報生長萬物  無所收取 天法道  河曰道清靜不言陰行精氣萬物自成也 道法自然  明皇曰人謂王也爲王者先當法地安靜  既爾又當法天運用生成既生成已又當  法道清靜無爲令物自化人君能爾者即  令道法自然之性○河曰道長生自然無  所法也○弼曰法謂法則也人不違地乃  得全安法地也地不違天乃得全載法天
Interpretation

Within the cosmos exist four supreme existences (the Four Greats): the Dao (the Way), Heaven, Earth, and the Sovereign (ruler). All things possess names and designations, yet these do not represent their ultimate essence. What we call the "Dao" is the source from which all things arise, but once it is given a specific name, it becomes a limited concept. The true Great Dao transcends names and cannot be described in words—hence it is referred to as "within the domain" (the cosmic center). The Dao, Heaven, Earth, and the Sovereign all exist within this realm beyond conceptual distinctions, which is why it is said there are Four Greats in the cosmos, and the ruler (Sovereign) is one of them.

As the leader of the people, the Sovereign's actions influence the flourishing or decline of all things. Here, particular emphasis is placed on the ruler emulating the character of Earth: Earth is tranquil and gentle, yielding grain when sown and sweet springs when dug. It silently bears all things without complaint, nourishing living beings without claiming merit. This is essentially saying that the ruler's virtue (De) should mirror Earth's selfless inclusiveness.

Earth, in turn, models itself after Heaven: Heaven moves ceaselessly yet appears serene and detached. It nurtures all things without seeking reward, allowing everything to grow naturally without coercion or exploitation. Heaven, moreover, follows the example of the Dao: The Dao is tranquil and acts through non-action (Wuwei), operating via formless vital energy (Qi) to let all things emerge and develop spontaneously.

As for the Dao itself, it follows "naturalness" (ziran)—here, "naturalness" does not refer to the physical world but to the state of "being as it inherently is, self-so and unforced." For the ruler, the first lesson is to learn Earth's stability and generosity; next, to emulate Heaven's transformative nourishment; and ultimately, to attain the Dao's serene non-action, allowing the people to be naturally guided. When a ruler achieves this, they are embodying the Dao's innate nature. What is meant by "emulation" is adhering to its principles: humans must not violate Earth's laws if they are to dwell securely, and Earth must not defy Heaven's rhythms if it is to sustain all things.

 也天不違道乃能全覆法道也道不違自  然方乃得其性法自然者在方而法方在  圓而法圓於自然無所違也自然者無稱  之言窮極之辭也用智不及無知而形魄  不及精象精象不及無形有儀不如無儀  故道相法也道法自然天故資焉天法於  道地故則焉地法於天人故象焉所以爲  主其一者主也○雱曰自然在此道之先  而猶非道之極致假物而言則此四者如  以次相法而至論則四者各不知其所始  非有先後莊子曰季眞之莫爲接子之或  使在物一曲佛氏曰非因非縁亦非自然  自然者在有物之上而出非物之下此說  在莊佛之下而老氏不爲未聖者教適其  時而言不悖理故也使學者止於自然以  爲定論則失理遠矣不可不察也    重爲輕根章第二十六 重烏輕根  明皇曰重者制輕故重爲根○河曰人君  不重則不尊治身不重則失神草木之華  輕故零落根重故長存也 靜爲躁君  明皇曰靜者制動故靜爲君○河曰人君  不靜則失神治身不靜則身危龍靜故能  變化虎躁故夭虧也○弼曰凡物輕不能  載重小不能鎮大不行者使行不動者制  動是以重必爲輕根靜必爲躁君也 是以君子終曰行不離輜重  明皇曰輜車也重者所載之物也輕躁者  貴重靜亦由行者之守輜重故失輜重則
Interpretation

The operations of Heaven and Earth never deviate from the principles of the Dao, thus they completely encompass all things. The Dao itself never contradicts the nature of spontaneity (ziran) - it always follows natural laws. Square things follow square principles, round things follow round principles, never violating what is natural. What we call "spontaneity" is the ultimate state beyond verbal description.

Using cleverness cannot compare to maintaining a state of unknowing; physical form cannot compare to subtle Qi manifestations, and subtle Qi cannot compare to formless essence. That which has form is inferior to the formless, therefore the Dao models itself on spontaneity. Heaven models itself on the Dao, Earth models itself on Heaven, and humans model themselves on Earth - all take "the One" (the origin of Dao) as their master.

Wang Pang (Northern Song scholar) believed spontaneity existed prior to the Dao, but this still doesn't represent the highest realm of Dao. If we use concrete things to explain, the Dao, Heaven, Earth and humans follow this sequence of emulation; but fundamentally, these four have no sequence of precedence. Zhuangzi mentions Ji Zhen advocating "non-action" (wuwei) and Jiezi advocating "action" - both are partial understandings. Buddhism speaks of "neither cause nor condition, nor spontaneity." True spontaneity transcends concrete things. While Laozi's teachings may not be as profound as Zhuangzi's or Buddhism, they were perfectly suited for enlightening people of his time. If scholars regard "spontaneity" as ultimate truth, they will deviate from the true principle.

Chapter 26 discusses "the heavy as root of the light":

Heaviness is the root of lightness. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang comments: The heavy can control the light, therefore it is the root. Heshang Gong explains: A ruler without gravity lacks authority; self-cultivation without gravity loses spirit. Just as the light flowers of plants easily wither while their heavy roots endure.

Stillness is master of restlessness. Emperor Xuanzong comments: Stillness can control restlessness. Heshang Gong explains: A ruler without stillness loses spirit; self-cultivation without stillness endangers life. The dragon transforms through stillness, while the tiger perishes early through restlessness. Wang Bi comments: What is light cannot bear heavy burdens; what is small cannot restrain what is large. The unmoving must govern the moving - thus heaviness must be the root of lightness, stillness must be master of restlessness.

Therefore the noble person travels all day without leaving their heavy-laden carriage. Emperor Xuanzong comments: The supply wagon carries essential provisions. Just as those prone to restlessness need stillness, travelers must guard their provisions carefully - losing them brings peril.

 遭凍餒好輕躁則生禍亂○河曰輜靜也  聖人終日行道不離其靜與重也○弼曰  以重爲本不離○雱曰行以輕爲速而必  籍輜重以自給遠而違之則必因於中道  矣 雖有榮觀燕處超然  明皇曰人君者守重靜故雖有榮觀當須  燕爾安處超然不顧○河曰榮觀謂宫闕  燕處后妃所居也超然遠避而不處也○  弼曰不以經心之也○雱曰雖有榮觀在  前必得燕處之處乃能安身此明躁靜之  義 如何萬乘之主  河曰如何者疾時主傷痛之辭萬乘之主  謂王者 而以身輕天下  眀皇曰如何者傷嘆之辭也天下者大寳  之位也言人君如何以身從欲輕用其身  令亡其位乎○河曰王者至尊而以其身  行輕躁乎疾時王奢恣輕淫也○雱曰人  主以天下爲根不可以一身故輕之 輕則失臣  河曰王者輕淫則失其臣治身而淫則失  其精 躁則失君  明皇曰君輕易則人離散故失臣臣躁求  則主不齒故失君○河曰王者行躁疾則  失其君位治身躁疾則失其精神也○弼  曰輕不眞重也失本爲喪身也失君謂失  君位也○雱曰臣一作本    善行章第二十七 善行無轍迹  明皇曰於諸法中失了眞性行無行相故  云善行如此則心與道冥故無轍迹可尋  求也○河曰善行道者求之於身不下堂
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principle that governing a state and cultivating one's character require steadiness and tranquility.

Ancient rulers who indulged in pleasures and acted rashly would inevitably invite disaster. Heshang Gong (the commentator) explains that true sages practice the Great Dao (Daodejing) throughout the day, maintaining constant inner peace and stability. Wang Bi (another commentator) adds that one must take steadfastness as the foundation, never deviating from this principle. Lü Huiqing uses a military analogy: though traveling light allows faster movement, an army must rely on supply troops for logistical support—if they stray too far from their provisions, they risk becoming stranded midway.

The scripture mentions "though there be splendid views, dwell in them with transcendent detachment," meaning even when surrounded by magnificent palaces ("splendid views" refers to royal residences), one should remain as composed as swallows nesting, transcending material desires. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains that rulers must maintain dignified serenity, facing luxurious pleasures with equanimity. Heshang Gong interprets this as referring to imperial consorts' quarters, suggesting rulers should distance themselves from such indulgences. Wang Bi advises not to fixate on these things, while Lü Huiqing emphasizes the necessity of finding one's spiritual anchor, revealing the profound truth behind restlessness and stillness.

The text then employs the rhetorical question of the "ruler of ten thousand chariots" (symbolizing supreme authority): how could the sovereign of all under heaven act recklessly for personal desires? Emperor Xuanzong laments that the throne is a position of utmost sacredness—if a ruler indulges cravings and behaves rashly, they will lose it. Heshang Gong criticizes contemporary rulers for extravagance and dissipation, while Lü Huiqing asserts that emperors must treat the realm as their foundation, never neglecting it for private reasons.

Finally, it warns of rashness's consequences: a flighty ruler loses ministers (Heshang Gong adds that self-indulgence depletes vital essence [Jing] and energy [Qi]), while impetuousness costs the throne (Emperor Xuanzong clarifies that a hasty sovereign drives ministers away, and restless ministers alienate their lord). Wang Bi states that frivolity lacks solidity; losing one's foundation means losing oneself, and losing sovereignty. Lü Huiqing notes some versions replace "ministers" with "foundation."

The subsequent section introduces the "Chapter on True Goodness," stating that genuine virtuous actions leave no traces (Emperor Xuanzong explains this signifies complete alignment between mind and Dao, thus leaving no marks). Heshang Gong says those skilled in walking the Dao turn inward—they realize the Way without even stepping outdoors.

 不出門故無轍迹○弼曰順自然而行不  造不始故物得至而無轍迹也○雱曰體  神則周行而無迹且聖人不得已而有行  則常不使迹著於世恐民之遷其德耳莊  子所謂行而無迹者是 善言無瑕謫  明皇曰能了言教不爲滯執遣象求意理  證言忘故於言教中無瑕疵謫過○河曰  善言謂擇言而出則無瑕疵非過於天下  弼曰順物之性不别不折故無取謫可得  其門也○雱曰巵言日出出不以心故言  滿天下而實未嘗言何瑕謫之有 善計不用籌算  明皇曰能了諸法本無二門一以貫之不  生他見故無勞用文自非天下計無計相  非善而何○河曰善以道計專者則守一  不移所計不多則不用善策而可知也   弼曰因是乎數不假形也○雱曰一生二  二生三自此以往巧曆不能計唯冥於一  相不墮諸數則身外無物物來即了何假  籌算乎一本作善計無籌策 善閉無關揵而不可開  明皇曰兼忘言行不入異門心無逐乎境  無起心之累雖無關揵其可開乎○雱曰  藏於不得遯而閉之以無外則閉外無物  敦能開之易所謂退藏於密者類此夫如  是則神不能窺其迹况得其門而入哉 善結無繩約而不可解  明皇曰體了眞性本以虚忘若能虚忘則  心與道合雖無繩索約束其可解而散乎
Interpretation

The one who truly understands the Dao (the Way) can know all under heaven without stepping out the door, thus leaving no wheel ruts behind. Wang Bi explains that by acting in accordance with natural principles without deliberate initiation, all things achieve their purpose without leaving traces. Lü Huiqing (Pang) further elaborates that those who embody the great Dao move with divine fluidity, fundamentally leaving no tracks. Even when sages must act out of necessity, they deliberately conceal their traces from the world to prevent people from blindly imitating them and losing their authentic nature. This is like Zhuangzi's saying, "walking without leaving footprints."

The highest form of speech has no flaws to criticize. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) believed that those who truly grasp the essence of teachings do not cling to surface-level words but penetrate through appearances to grasp the true meaning, ultimately forgetting language itself—thus their words are flawless. Heshanggong points out that skilled speakers weigh each word carefully, naturally avoiding mistakes. Wang Bi states that by following the inherent nature of things without forcing distinctions, others naturally find no grounds for criticism. Lü Huiqing uses the metaphor of "spontaneous speech" (zhiyan)—words flowing from a mind free of intention—which, even if spoken throughout the world, remain as though never uttered. How could there be any error?

The most profound calculations require no counting rods. Emperor Xuanzong explains that those who understand the principle of "all phenomena returning to the One" do not cling to biased views and thus have no need for tedious calculations. Heshanggong holds that those who plan with the Dao focus on maintaining unity (pure oneness), contemplating few things yet comprehending without complex strategies. Wang Bi says this is about aligning with the inherent order of things, requiring no physical tools. Lü Huiqing elaborates further: from the Dao giving birth to the One, the One to the Two, and the Two to the Three, even the most precise calculations cannot measure it. Only by merging with the Dao and transcending numerical concepts can one instantly grasp all things—what need is there for counting rods?

The most secure door needs no latch yet cannot be opened. Emperor Xuanzong states that when one completely forgets verbal distinctions and the mind no longer chases external objects, even without a physical latch, who could open such a state? Lü Huiqing quotes the Yi Jing (Book of Changes): "withdrawing and storing in secrecy," suggesting that when the mind is gathered to its utmost, external things cannot intrude—not even spirits can find a trace, let alone enter.

The firmest binding uses no ropes yet cannot be undone. Emperor Xuanzong observes that those who truly realize the emptiness and stillness of their innate nature unite their minds with the Dao. Even without physical ropes, this union can never be dissolved.

 河曰善以道結事者乃可結其心不如繩  索可得解也○弼曰因物自然不設不施  故不用關揵繩約而不可開解也此五者  皆言不造不施因物之性不以形制物也  雱曰以己信結天下之信孰能解之 是以聖人常善救人  河曰聖人所以常教人忠孝者欲以救人  性命 故無棄人  河曰使貴賤各得其所也○弼曰聖人不  立形名以檢於物不造進向以殊棄不肖  輔萬物之自然而不爲始故曰無棄人也  不尚賢能則民不爭不貴難得之貨則民  不爲盜不見可欲則民心不亂常使民心  無欲無惑則無棄人心 常善救物  河曰聖人所以教民順四時以救萬物之  殘傷 故無棄物  明皇曰是以聖人常用此五善之教以教  之故無棄者○河曰聖人不賤石而貴玉  視之如一○雱曰聖人體盡無窮以神爲  用故能有此五善然後能贍足一切使小  以成小大以成大各遂其宜也夫五善存  乎其身而因餘以爲人而其效至於人物  無棄可謂至德也已蓋聖人所爲救人亦  不使遷其性而已故雖有言行而泯然無  迹且常定于一不以計數亂其心以至於  閉之結之莫非在宥其唯則聖人所以救  人之道簡矣蓋持之在身而實所以救人  也一本無常善救物已下八字 是謂襲明  明皇曰密用曰襲五善之行在於忘遣忘
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how sages govern and educate the people through the Dao. Heshanggong (a Han Dynasty Daoist thinker) explains that those skilled in handling affairs through the Dao can genuinely move people's hearts—more effectively than binding them with ropes. Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period Xuanxue philosopher) adds that by following the natural tendencies of things without forceful intervention, one achieves results that cannot be undone.

Sages are always adept at helping others, preserving people's lives by teaching the Dao of loyalty and filial piety, enabling individuals of all social strata to find their proper place. Wang Bi points out that sages do not establish rigid rules to constrain people, nor do they deliberately distinguish between the wise and foolish. Instead, they assist all things in developing naturally. If exceptional ability is not excessively praised, the people will not contend; if rare objects are not overly valued, there will be no theft; if temptations are not displayed, the people's minds will not become disordered.

Heshanggong states that sages teach the people to follow the changes of the four seasons to protect all things from harm, treating ordinary stones and precious jade equally. Wang Pang (a Song Dynasty scholar) believes that sages inherently possess the five virtues (referring to the five governance methods mentioned earlier) and can fulfill all needs, allowing everything to find its rightful place. The sage's way of helping lies in not altering people's inherent nature—acting without leaving traces, always remaining focused on the root of the Dao.

Finally, the text mentions "xi ming" (applying wisdom subtly). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains this as the five virtues naturally manifesting in a state free from artificial effort. The entire passage emphasizes that the key to sage governance lies in following nature and avoiding forceful intervention, enabling both people and things to develop according to their inherent nature.

 遣則無迹故云密用密用則悟了故謂之  明○河曰聖人善救人物謂襲明大道也  雱曰襲如楊襲之襲聖人之在天下不敢  自見其明明見則事物畢彰民必離本非  善救之道矣如上五事皆襲明也 故善人不善人之師  河曰人之行善者聖人即以爲人師○弼  曰舉善以師不善故謂之師矣 不善人善人之資  明皇曰師法也資取也善人可師法不善  人可取以役使也○河曰資用也人行不  善聖人猶教導使爲善得以給用也○弼  曰資取也善人以善齊不善以善棄不善  也故不善人善人之所取也○雱曰善人  有不善人然後善救之功著故曰資 不貴其師  河曰獨無輔也 不愛其資  明皇曰此章深旨教以兼忘若存師資未  爲極致今明所以貴師爲存學相學相既  空自無所貴所以愛資爲存教相於教忘  教故不愛資貴愛兩忘而道自化○河曰  無所使也○雱曰聖人吉凶與民同患故  强立師資之名假爲善救之德要而極之  則道通爲一孰爲師資然則非但我不愛  資而已又能使天下忘我也所以能至於  天下忘我者亦以五善而已 雖智大迷  河曰雖自以爲智言此人乃大迷惑○弼  曰雖有其智自任其智不因物於其道必  失故曰雖智大迷○雱曰智者有知有知  則能見有物之理而不知無物之妙故道
Interpretation

This passage elucidates how sages wisely educate humanity. When delivering all beings, sages follow the path of "subtle illumination" (ximing - applying wisdom discreetly), much like the concealed Yangxi garments of antiquity that leave no trace. In governing the world, sages never deliberately display their wisdom, for excessive revelation would cause people to lose their innate nature - this cannot be considered true salvation.

Regarding the relationship between virtuous and non-virtuous people: the virtuous may serve as teachers for the non-virtuous, while the non-virtuous may become resources for the virtuous to reflect upon. However, in their teachings, sages advocate the state of "simultaneous forgetting" (jianwang - transcending dualities) - neither clinging to the identity of teacher nor fixating on the student's capacity. For the true Dao transcends such binary oppositions.

Those who consider themselves clever actually fall into greater delusion. They only perceive superficial principles of things, failing to comprehend the "marvel of non-being" (the profound essence of Dao). Genuine wisdom lies in following the natural Dao rather than relying solely on individual intellect.

 妙至此智者大迷 是謂要妙  明皇曰師資兩忘是謂玄德凡俗不悟以  爲大迷故聖人云雖知凡俗以爲大迷以  道觀之是謂要妙○河曰能通此意是謂  知微妙要道    知其雄章第二十八 知其雄守其雌  雱曰雄動雌靜靜則不離於眞但靜而已  則非道之全故至人以雌爲常而常知雄  也 爲天下谿  河曰雄以喻尊雌以喻卑人雖自知尊顯  當復守之以卑微去雄之强梁就雌之柔  和如是則天下歸之如水流入深谿也○  雱曰谿以下而資納流通守雌則能以虚  靜受一切法而不滯於物故曰爲天下谿  此盡性者 爲天下谿常德不離  河曰人能謙下如深谿則德常在不復離  於己○雱曰常德分定而不遷道之在我  者也不離者一於性分内而不外 復歸於嬰兒  明皇曰雄者忠於用牡故知其雄則當守  其雌謙德物歸是爲天下谿谷則眞常之  德不離其身抱道含和復歸於嬰兒之行  矣○河曰復當歸志於嬰兒惷然而無所  知也○弼曰雄先之屬雌後之屬也知爲  天下之先者必後也是以聖人後其身而  身先也谿不求物而物自歸之嬰兒不用  智而合自然之智○雱曰嬰兒含和守一  欲慮不萌性之本眞渾而未散德厚之至  乃同於初若然者可名於大矣孟子曰大  人不失其赤子之心 知其白守其黑
Interpretation

This passage expounds the profound Daoist principle of "knowing the masculine but guarding the feminine." The most exquisite wisdom often appears as great foolishness to ordinary people, yet this very paradox lies at the heart of Daoist cultivation.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Emperor Ming) explained that true practice transcends attachment to distinctions between master and disciple, reaching the realm of "mysterious virtue" (Xuande). Ordinary people fail to understand this principle, considering it nonsensical, but from the Dao's perspective, this represents the most subtle wisdom.

The commentary by Heshanggong notes that comprehending this principle means grasping the essential subtlety of the Dao. Chapter 28 discusses the wisdom of "knowing the masculine but guarding the feminine" — understanding the power of strength while maintaining a posture of gentle receptivity. Wang Pang explained that the masculine represents movement while the feminine represents stillness. Merely pursuing stillness isn't complete Daoism; realized practitioners take gentleness and stillness as their normal state while always maintaining awareness of the principle of strength.

Heshanggong further elaborates: the masculine symbolizes nobility while the feminine represents humility. Even when occupying honorable positions, one should maintain humble attitudes, relinquishing forcefulness to preserve softness. Then all under heaven will return to you like streams flowing into deep valleys. Wang Pang adds that valleys, by occupying low positions, can receive all rivers. Those who guard the feminine can embrace all things with empty stillness without becoming entangled.

Heshanggong states that when humans can be as humble as deep valleys, their virtue (De) will remain constantly present. Wang Pang explains that "constant virtue" refers to one's innate nature, and maintaining this nature without external pursuit constitutes "not departing from it."

Emperor Xuanzong remarks that knowing strength yet preserving gentleness and maintaining humble virtue allows one to become as pure as an infant. Heshanggong says this means returning to the natural state of an infant's innocent unknowing. Wang Bi points out that the masculine represents striving to lead while the feminine symbolizes holding back. Sages understand the paradox that yielding can actually lead to advancement. Valleys don't actively seek, yet all things naturally return to them; infants employ no cleverness, yet their actions accord with natural wisdom. Wang Pang concludes that infants maintain undivided original nature, free from desires and distracting thoughts. Their virtue remains as pure as returning to the source—this is what Mencius meant by "the great person never loses the heart of a newborn child."

Regarding "knowing the white yet guarding the black," the same principle applies: though understanding the bright path of righteousness, one willingly remains in obscure positions.

 雱曰黑者北方之色靜不足以言之聖人  建一切法非守黑則無以爲本相彼春夏  發於玄冬此其驗也 爲天下式  河曰白以喻昭昭黑以喻默默人雖自知  昭昭明白當復守之以默默如闇昩無所  見如是則可爲天下法式則德常在○弼  曰式模則也 烏天下式  雱曰至人以聖爲天下法聖者體之中故  也 常德不忒  河曰人能爲天下法則德常在於己不復  差忒○弼曰忒差也○雱曰經於事業者  遠大則疑於有忒而適時應物如天運寒  暑時之自然而心無積怒故不差忒也 復歸於無極  明皇曰能守雌靜常德不離德雖明白當  如暗昩如此則爲天下法式常德應用曾  不差違德用不窮故復歸於無極忒差也  河曰德不差忒則長生乆壽歸身於無窮  極也○弼曰不可窮也○雱曰大而化之  之謂聖化則日襌而無窮故無窮者聖之  體也從體起用還歸其本 知其榮守其辱  雱曰聖人至此等切相去未歸本德之  至極未如是所以體神也古之道術有殘  形壞衣自處污下以高教者義同於此 爲天下谷  河曰榮以喻尊貴辱以喻污濁如己之有  榮貴當守之以污濁如是則天下歸之如  水流入深谷也○雱曰谷一虚一盈而能  應一切故象神神者充塞無外有之不得  用之不窮者是蓋守辱精也精故能神唯
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Daoist cultivation wisdom of "knowing whiteness yet guarding blackness." Black symbolizes the north (representing Water and stillness in the Five Phases). When sages establish various principles, if they fail to guard this silent origin—just as the vitality of spring and summer stems from winter's hidden storage—they lose their fundamental root.

"Being the model for the world" means sages take "guarding blackness" as the universal standard. Heshang Gong (Han dynasty commentator) explains: whiteness represents outward display, while blackness signifies quietude. Even when inwardly enlightened, one should maintain an outwardly simple appearance, as if seeing nothing in the darkness—only then can one become a paradigm for the world. Wang Pang (Song dynasty scholar) adds that sages take "guarding the center" (maintaining the Middle Way) as their fundamental principle.

"Constant De (Virtue) without error" refers to maintaining enduring virtue flawlessly. Heshang Gong asserts that by following this principle, virtue can be preserved perpetually; Wang Pang compares it to the natural progression of seasons—when the heart harbors no resentment, no errors arise. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang emphasizes: guarding the De of softness and stillness may appear foolish yet contains illumination. Thus applied, virtue never exhausts itself and ultimately returns to "Wuji" (the infinite realm of Dao).

"Knowing glory yet guarding disgrace" reveals the sage's worldly wisdom. Wang Pang notes ancient Daoist cultivators often intentionally wore ragged clothes and occupied humble positions to teach others. Heshang Gong illustrates with metaphor: knowing glory yet dwelling in humility resembles deep valleys containing rivers—seemingly empty yet capable of responding to all transformations. When this "guarding disgrace" practice reaches subtle refinement, one becomes attuned to Shen (the Dao's marvelous function), filling heaven and earth yet remaining intangible, inexhaustible in application.

The core teaching demonstrates how sages, through cultivating "guarding blackness" and "guarding disgrace," attain unity with Dao. Various commentaries illuminate from different perspectives: appearing foolish while containing inner radiance, dwelling humbly yet embracing all things—these seemingly paradoxical practices precisely constitute the path of returning to Dao's essence.

 精可以入神 烏天下谷常德乃足  河曰足止也人能爲天下谷德乃止於己  雱曰降神一等則於性爲不足故道至體  神乃眞盡性 復歸於樸  明皇曰德雖尊榮常守卑辱物感斯應如  谷報聲虚受不窮常德圓足則復歸於道  矣樸道也○河曰復當歸身於質樸不復  爲文飾○弼曰此三者言常反終後乃德  全其所處也下章反者道之動也功不可  取常處其母也○雱曰樸以喻性之質性  能成萬法而不主一器故曰樸去神至矣  而未嘗離樸也蓋至人從性起用大於守  氣聖於制法神於體神要其極也復歸乎  性而已 樸散則爲器  河曰萬物之樸散則爲器用也若道散則  爲神明流爲日月分爲五行也○雱曰既  歸於樸樸復爲器終則有始道之常也 聖人用之則烏官長  明皇曰含德内融則復於樸常德應用則  散而爲器既涉形器必有精麤故聖人用  之則爲群材之官長矣○河曰聖人升用  則爲百官之元長也○弼曰樸眞也眞散  則百行出殊類生若器也聖人因其分散  故爲之立官長以善爲師不善爲資移風  易俗復歸於一也○雱曰帝王體樸以治  散而知政則但爲官長而已 故大制不割  明皇曰聖人用道大制群生暄然似春蒙  澤不謝動植咸遂曾不割傷○河曰聖人  用之則以大道制御天下無所傷割治身
Interpretation

This passage discusses how Daoist practitioners achieve unity with the Dao through returning to original simplicity. "Essence (Jing) can enter spirit (Shen)" means that when vital energy is refined to its utmost, it naturally merges with the divine, just as rivers flow effortlessly into the sea.

One who becomes "the valley of the world" (meaning embracing emptiness like a mountain valley) attains complete Virtue (De). Master Heshang Gong explains that when a person embodies this valley-like emptiness, Virtue permanently resides within them. Wang Pang further notes that lowering one's spiritual state damages inherent nature, hence cultivation requires returning to the source.

"Returning to the uncarved block" (the primal state) shows that although Virtue is noble, one must maintain constant humility. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang comments that when Virtue becomes complete, it resonates like echoes in an empty valley—only through embracing emptiness can one receive endlessly, ultimately returning to the Dao. The "uncarved block" represents the essential state of the Dao. Heshang Gong states this means returning to simple, unadorned nature without pursuing superficial refinement.

"The uncarved block divides to become vessels" describes how the primordial Dao differentiates to manifest all things. Heshang Gong explains this resembles how the Dao disperses into deities, sun and moon, and the Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, Water). Wang Pang views this as the Dao's cyclical pattern—from unity to multiplicity and back again.

Sages apply this principle in governing. Emperor Xuanzong observes that internally preserving Virtue enables return to original nature, while externally applying Virtue allows ordering all phenomena. Heshang Gong analogizes sages to leaders among officials. Wang Bi points out that after the primal Dao divides into myriad things, sages establish guidance through governance, restoring social harmony.

Finally, "the great system does not cut apart" describes how sages govern through the Great Dao as naturally as spring breezes and rain, never harming creation. Heshang Gong clarifies that just as master craftsmen leave no tool marks, sage rulers govern so seamlessly their methods seem invisible. This entire passage expounds the art of governance through non-action (Wuwei) and accordance with nature.

 則以大道制情欲不害精神也○弼曰大  制者以天下之心爲心故無割也○雱曰  以道爲制者因道之勢而適其自然故雖  制而無宰割之迹此篇白黑榮辱之句義  甚奥遠言不勝盡讀者其致意焉    將欲章第二十九 將欲取天下  河曰欲爲天下主也 而烏之者  河曰欲以有爲治民○弼曰爲造爲也 吾見其不得已  明皇曰天下者大寳之位也有之者必待  曆數在躬若暴亂之人將欲以力取而爲  之主者老君戒云吾見其不得已○河曰  我見其不得天道人心已明矣天道惡煩  濁人心惡多欲○雱曰至人體神合變與  物爲一雖兼制天下而未常有有故能從  容無爲而業無不濟糠粃土苴將陶鑄帝  王若夫塊然有己以己遇物則雖六尺之  身運轉妨滯若將不容而乃况天下之大  歟取者取物是其有我爲者造作是其有  爲有己有爲之人方且存乎憂患之間而  何暇治人乎 天下神器  弼曰神無形無方也器合成也無形以合  故謂之神器也○雱曰唯體盡無窮其應  無方者能用之以無爲 不可爲也  河曰器物也人乃天下之神物也神物好  安靜不可以有爲治○雱曰有意於爲則  有己有物矣 爲者敗之  明皇曰大寳之位是天地神明之器謂爲  神器故不可以力爲也故曰爲者敗之此
Interpretation

This passage expounds the principles of governing the world, with its core philosophy advocating alignment with the natural Dao rather than forceful intervention.

Laozi asserts that those who seek to govern the world ("将欲取天下") will inevitably fail ("吾见其不得已") if they rely on coercive measures or artificial interference ("有为治民"). The world is a sacred vessel ("神器"), akin to formless divine spirits, and cannot be controlled through brute force. Those who impose their will ("有为之人") only bring ruin upon themselves, becoming incapable of even managing their own affairs, let alone governing the world.

Commentators elaborate further:

  • Wang Bi explains that true governance should take the hearts of the people as its own, avoiding forceful division ("无割").
  • Lü Huiqing (Pang) suggests that those who follow the Dao act naturally in accordance with its flow—though they appear to govern, they leave no trace of compulsion.
  • Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) observes that imperial authority is divinely ordained ("历数在躬"), and tyrants who attempt to seize power through violence are doomed to fail.

The text also notes that the perfected person (至人), having attained the Dao, becomes one with all things. Though seemingly practicing Wuwei (non-action), they accomplish everything. In contrast, those stubbornly clinging to their own views ("块然有己") cannot even harmonize their own bodies, much less govern the world.

Ultimately, it emphasizes that the world, as a "sacred vessel," favors stillness and cannot be forcibly manipulated ("不可为也"). Deliberate intervention inevitably leads to failure ("为者败之"), embodying the Daoist political ideal of "governing through Wuwei (non-action)."

 戒姦亂之臣○河曰以有爲治之則取其  質性 執者失之  明皇曰曆數在躬已得君位而欲執有斯  位陵虚神主天道禍淫亦當令失之此戒  帝王也○河曰强執教之人則失其情實  生於詐僞也○弼曰萬物以自然爲性故  可因而不可爲也可通而不可執也物有  常性而造爲之故必敗也物有往來而執  之故必失矣 凡物或行或隨  河曰上所行下必隨之也 或歔或吹  河曰歔温也吹寒也有所温必有所寒也 或强或羸  河曰有所强大必有所羸弱也 或載或隳  明皇曰欲明爲則敗執則失故物或行之  於前或隨之於後或呴之使暖或吹之使  寒扶之則强折之則弱有道則載事無德  則隳廢○河曰載安也隳危也有所安必  有所危明人君不可以有爲治國與治身  也○雱曰聖人心超有無不物於物故陰  陽交代而我法不遷茍爲有有則物與爲  敵萬變糾錯不可勝圖矣故獨行於前而  不知隨者在後如形影之不舍歔之欲温  而不知吹者之已至如寒暑之相生知强  而已則羸者有時而來知載而已則隳者  應手而至此皆造化之大情朝暮之常態  而有有者不知由己不了故有此患而更  與爲競夫如是則雖介然一物之微而憂  患之大已充塞天壤安能操神器而不累  乎 是以聖人去甚去奢去泰
Interpretation

This passage elucidates principles of governing a state and cultivating the self. When rulers attempt to forcibly administer through artificial means (youwei), they inevitably lose touch with the fundamental. Just as all things follow their natural patterns of operation—which can be harmonized with but never forcibly controlled—any attempt to act contrary to these natural laws is doomed to fail. The harder one clings, the more one loses.

All phenomena in the world exist in relationships of complementary opposition: where there is advancement, there is following; where warmth arises, cold emerges; strength coexists with weakness, and stability with danger. For example, when someone walks ahead, others naturally follow; the same breath that brings warmth also carries chill; support strengthens while oppression weakens; aligning with the Dao brings stability, while losing De (Virtue) leads to collapse.

The sages (those who have realized the Dao) understand these principles and thus refrain from clinging to any extreme. They transcend dualities of existence and non-existence, remaining unbound by external things. Forcing any particular state inevitably summons its opposite: in pursuing warmth, cold quietly approaches; at the height of perceived strength, weakness appears; while enjoying stability, crisis silently brews. These are the natural rhythms of heaven and earth, as ordinary as the alternation of day and night.

Therefore, truly wise individuals avoid extremes, extravagance, and excess. They understand that overreaching invites misfortune, like one who cradles precious vessels (sacred objects) only to be burdened by anxiety. The optimal approach is to accord with nature, relinquishing excessive desires and actions to maintain balanced harmony. This principle applies equally to governing a state and cultivating one's being.

 明皇曰聖人睹或物之行隨知執者之必  失故去其過分爾○河曰甚謂貪淫聲色  奢謂服飾飲食泰謂宫室臺榭去此三者  處中和行無爲則天下自化○弼曰凡此  諸或言物事逆順反覆不施爲執割也聖  人達自然之至暢萬物之情故因而不爲  順而不施除其所以迷去其所以惑故心  不亂而物性自得之也○雱曰聖人心合  於無以酬萬變方其爲也不以經懷如鏡  應形適可而止分外之事理所不爲彼有  有者妄見諸相矜己樂能爲之不已故事  輒過分此由不知行隨歔吹强羸載隳之  
Interpretation

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (also known as Emperor Ming of Tang) explains: The sage observes the patterns of all things in motion and understands that those who cling forcefully are bound to lose. Therefore, one should relinquish excessive behaviors. Master Heshanggong (a Daoist scholar of the Han dynasty) annotates: "Extreme" refers to indulgence in sensual pleasures, "extravagance" denotes obsession with lavish clothing and food, while "excess" signifies the pursuit of opulent palaces and towers. By distancing oneself from these three forms of excess and maintaining a state of harmony, acting in accordance with spontaneity (Wuwei), the world will naturally flourish.

Wang Bi (a Neo-Daoist philosopher of the Wei-Jin period) adds: All these phenomena follow the natural rhythm of alternating progression and regression—there is no need for forced intervention. The sage comprehends the laws of nature and understands the inherent nature of all things, thus following principles without arbitrary action and adapting to circumstances without imposition. By eliminating factors that delude the mind and removing disturbances that disrupt one’s true nature, the inner self remains unperturbed, and all things can naturally manifest their essence.

Lü Huiqing (a Northern Song scholar, styled Pang) further elaborates: The sage’s mind merges with the Dao of emptiness, enabling them to respond to endless transformations. Even when they act, they do not fixate on these actions, just as a mirror reflects objects effortlessly. They cease when things reach their proper measure and never overstep their bounds. Those who cling to "having" (you) remain ensnared by appearances, presumptuously acting without restraint, often leading to excess. This is because they fail to grasp the cyclical patterns of nature, such as the ebb and flow of breath or the shifting balance of weight and lightness.

反復故爾 道徳眞經集註卷之四

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0093); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 3 Vol. 5 →