中文 · EN

《道德真經集註(一)》Vol. 3

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 3 / 10 11,202 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集註(一)》 Vol. 3 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 22 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集註(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經集註卷之三      靡三     明皇河上公王弼王雱註    古之善爲士章第十五 古之善爲士者  河曰謂得道之君也 微妙玄通  河曰玄天也言其志節玄妙精與天通也 深不可識  明皇曰士事也言古之善以道爲事者於  彼微言妙道無不玄鑒通照而德容深邃  不可識知○河曰道德深遠不可識知内  視若盲反聽若聾莫知所長○雱曰士者  事道之名微而妙玄而通有此道而退藏  於密密者性本之内故無迹可見當時爲  士者異於此矣故稱古之善爲士者 夫唯不可識故强烏之容  明皇曰夫唯德量難識故强爲容狀以明  之謂下文也○河曰謂下句也 豫兮若冬涉川  明皇曰豫閑豫也善士於代閑豫如涉冬  川衆人貪著故畏懼今我不染故閑豫也  河曰舉事輒加重慎與與兮若冬涉川心  難之也○弼曰冬之涉川豫然若欲度若  不欲度其情不可得見之貌○雱曰豫者  先事而戒之謂至人無心於物迫而後動  冬涉者臨事逡巡若不得已也莊子曰不  從事於務 猶兮若畏四鄰  明皇曰猶豫疑難也上言善士不染故閑  豫及觀行事甚疑難如今代人懼鄰戒   河曰其進退猶猶如拘制若人犯法畏四  鄰知之也○弼曰四鄰合攻中央之主猶  然不知所趣向也上德之人其端兆不可
Interpretation

The ancient practitioners who truly understood the Dao (the Way) attained a state of profound subtlety and mystical communion with celestial principles. This profound realm was utterly beyond ordinary comprehension.

Precisely because it defies description, we can only approximate their state through metaphorical language:

They moved with such caution that it resembled crossing a river on thin winter ice ("Yu xi ruo dong she chuan")—simultaneously careful and composed. Master Heshang Gong (the Sage of the Riverbank) explained this as handling affairs with exceptional prudence. Wang Bi further noted this state resembled hesitating at a riverbank, making one's true intentions inscrutable.

They maintained vigilance as if wary of surrounding neighbors ("You xi ruo wei si lin"). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (the Illustrious Emperor) interpreted this as depicting cultivators who appeared leisurely yet acted with utmost circumspection. Heshang Gong likened it to someone fearing discovery by neighbors after wrongdoing, while Wang Bi explained it as being perpetually alert like one besieged from all directions.

(Note: "Heshang" refers to Heshang Gong, the renowned Han dynasty Daoist scholar; "Minghuang" denotes Emperor Xuanzong of Tang; "Bi" indicates Wang Bi, the Three Kingdoms-period metaphysician; "Fang" refers to Wang Fang, the Song dynasty scholar. All were celebrated commentators on the Daode Jing.)

 睹德趣不可見亦猶此也○雱曰可以無  戒而猶戒曰猶至人靜密幽深不出性宅  故常如畏鄰斂行而不縱也 儼若客  河曰如容由至人儼然無所造作也○雱  曰不以事爲己任故其容寂 涣若冰將釋  明皇曰雖則儼然若容無所造爲而不凝  滯於物涣然若春冰之釋散也○河曰敦  者解散釋者消亡除情去欲日以空虚○  雱曰人生之始同於大空凝爲我體如水  有冰故爲道有冰解凍釋者事至於此其  容已不滯於一體涣然將釋矣切嘗原之  人性如水爲造化所凝故結而不通彼釋  者反本而已矣 敦兮其若樸  明皇曰雖涣然冰釋曾不自矜而能敦厚  若質樸而無所分别○河曰敦者質厚樸  者形未分内守精神外無文采也○雱曰  材未爲器謂之樸喻性之全體由冰釋之  後乃能存天性之全而不雕於人僞故若  樸也 曠兮其若谷  明皇曰其德量曠然寬廣無不含容若彼  容谷○河曰曠者寬大谷者空虚不有德  功名無所不包也○雱曰性全不虧而不  自有其全故曠然空虚如谷之受且應也 渾兮其若濁  明皇曰和光渾迹若濁而清○河曰渾者  守本眞濁者不照然也與衆合同不自尊  弼曰凡此諸若皆言其容象不可得而形  名也○雱曰水性本清而濁者混於物空  人不自潔於物故渾然若濁者也
Interpretation

This passage describes the spiritual state and outward manifestation of those who have attained the Dao. The realized person dwells in profound stillness within, as if residing in a secluded courtyard without venturing out, maintaining constant vigilance and restraint—their conduct disciplined as though wary of disturbing their neighbors.

Their dignified bearing resembles that of a guest ("solemn as a guest"), not from affectation but because they remain unburdened by worldly affairs, hence their serene countenance. This state is like springtime melting ice ("melting as ice about to thaw")—outwardly composed yet not rigid, with a mind as clear and unobstructed as dissolving ice. Human nature is originally empty as the void, only congealed by the acquired sense of "self"; cultivating the Dao means returning to this original state.

Though their attainment is profound, they retain simplicity ("solid as uncarved wood"). This signifies guarding the spiritual essence within while revealing no sharp edges outwardly. Just as melting ice returns to water's fundamental nature, Dao cultivators preserve their heavenly endowment without contamination by artificial constructs.

Their mind resembles a vast valley ("open as a valley"), expansive and all-embracing. Because their original nature remains complete yet never self-satisfied, they maintain the valley's receptivity, embracing all things.

Finally, their merging with the mundane world ("merged as muddy water") appears turbid yet is fundamentally pure. Water's nature is clarity that appears murky when mixed; realized individuals make no show of purity, thus blending naturally with the dust of the world. All these metaphors illustrate how the state of Dao attainment cannot be concretely described—only suggested through such imagery.

孰能濁以靜之徐清  明皇曰孰誰也誰能於彼澤濁以靜澄止  之令徐自清乎○河曰孰誰也誰能如水  之濁以而靜之徐徐自清也○雱曰澄性  者與澄水同加工則動而彌濁唯靜以俟  之則徐自清矣有道之士所以物莫能濁  者以其靜之徐清 孰能安以動之徐生  明皇曰誰能安靜於此清以乆更求勝法  運動修行令清靜之性不滯於法而徐動  出也生猶動出○河曰誰能安靜以乆徐  徐以長生也○弼曰夫晦以理物則得明  濁以靜物則得清安以動物則得生此自  然之道也孰能者言其難也徐者詳慎也  雱曰歸於寂定感而遂通故徐徐以生終  則有始也動之徐生則變動不居非物能  止夫誰能安之爲此者信陰陽之理乘自  然之運而無心其間故皆曰徐言濁則知  安之清言安則知動之濁與上篇徼妙之  文同 保此道者不欲盈  明皇曰欲保此徐清徐生之道當須無所  執滯若執清求生是謂盈滿將失此道故  云不欲盈 河曰保此徐生之道不欲奢  泰盈溢 雱曰不盈之盈乃大盈也如見  道之後盈而有之則是自有此道違道遠  矣 夫惟不盈是以能敝不新成  明皇曰夫唯不盈滿之人故能以新證之  行爲敝薄不以其新成而滯著也 河曰  夫唯不盈滿之人能守敝不爲新成敝者
Interpretation

This passage explores the dialectical relationship between stillness (静) and movement (动) in Daoist cultivation. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains: Who can become clear like turbid water that gradually settles through stillness? This mirrors how practitioners achieve mental clarity through meditative stillness, allowing distracting thoughts to naturally subside. Master Heshang Gong adds: Just as muddy water clarifies through stillness, cultivators who maintain tranquility can gradually attain longevity.

Wang Bi observes: Obscurity brings understanding, turbidity clears through stillness, and stability gives rise to vital activity—this is the natural order. The character "徐" (gradual) emphasizes cautious progression. Wang Anshi (Pang) suggests: Only by returning to profound stillness can one resonate with all phenomena; the slow unfolding of transformation ensures continuous movement without stagnation. Those who achieve this do so by aligning with the natural rhythms of Yin-Yang transformation.

The key to maintaining this cultivation path lies in avoiding the pursuit of perfection. Emperor Xuanzong notes: To preserve this Dao of gradual purification and organic vitality, one must refrain from attachment. Forcing stillness or artificially generating vitality constitutes excessive striving that deviates from the true path. Heshang Gong clarifies: Maintaining this gradual process requires avoiding extravagance or extreme pursuits. Wang Anshi reflects: What appears incomplete is truly whole—those who believe they've fully attained the Dao after glimpsing it will inevitably distance themselves from genuine realization.

Precisely because it doesn't seek perfection, this practice preserves primordial simplicity without striving for new attainments. Emperor Xuanzong states: Only those who don't chase perfection can regard cultivation achievements with detachment, never stagnating due to new realizations. Heshang Gong explains: Non-seeking practitioners abide in simplicity without contriving fresh accomplishments—the term "敝" (worn) signifies maintaining original authenticity.

 匿光榮也新成者貴功名 雱曰道本無  體非器所盛用則有餘求之不得故有道  者未嘗盈而其用不窮也得道者未嘗盈  則成道者未嘗新也道之爲用通萬物而  不敝以其無敝無新不成不敗故也敝生  於新敗生於成士雖成道而常若敝敗矣  苟得道之初矜其新成則與道異意非大  成也經曰大成若缺其用不敝此篇句句  有序以至於成成而若敝則盡之矣    致虚極章第十六 致虚極  河曰得道之人損情去欲五内清靜至於  虚極 守靜篤  明皇曰虚極者妙本也言人受生皆禀虚  極妙本及形有受納則妙本離散今欲令  虚極妙本必致於身當須絶棄塵境染滯  守此雌靜篤厚則虚極之道自致於身矣  河曰守清靜行篤厚○弼曰言致虚物之  極篤守靜物之眞正也○雱曰致虚欲極  守靜欲篤欲觀物理者必先致一也學者  之事實則妨道動則達性故爾 萬物並作  河曰作生也萬物並生也○弼曰動作生  長○雱曰萬物由虚靜岀生還歸於虚靜  春生秋死之變可見矣 吾以觀其復  明皇曰老君云何以知守雌靜則能致虚  極乎但觀萬物動作云爲及其歸復常在  於靜故知爾○河曰言吾以觀見萬物無  不皆歸其本也人當念重本也○弼曰以  虚靜觀其反復凡有起於虚動起於靜故
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the nature of the Dao (the Way) and methods for cultivating it.

Regarding the essence of Dao, the text clarifies that Dao has no fixed form and cannot be contained by any physical vessel. When applied, its resources are inexhaustible, yet deliberate pursuit yields nothing. Those who truly attain Dao never become complacent, hence its efficacy never diminishes. Dao's function permeates all things without decline, being neither old nor new, neither succeeding nor failing. If practitioners become arrogant upon initial achievement, they deviate from Dao's fundamental meaning.

The text cites the Daode Jing's teaching that "great perfection seems defective," illustrating how true completeness appears imperfect, thereby maintaining its continuous function. The path of cultivation progresses gradually, ultimately reaching a state of perfection that paradoxically appears incomplete.

In the section corresponding to Chapter 16 on "Attaining Ultimate Emptiness," it describes cultivation methods:

Achieve a state of extreme emptiness (referring to eliminating all distracting thoughts and desires, attaining complete mental purity). The commentary by Heshang Gong explains that those who attain Dao purify their internal organs to the utmost by eliminating emotional desires.

Maintain profound stillness. Emperor Xuanzong's commentary suggests that ultimate emptiness constitutes Dao's origin. All humans receive this origin at birth, but gradually lose it through worldly engagement. To reclaim it, one must completely abandon worldly distractions and steadfastly preserve this tranquil, substantial state.

Observe the growth and transformation of all things. All beings emerge from emptiness and stillness, eventually returning to it, following nature's cycle like spring growth and autumn decay. Laozi states that by observing the activity of all things and their eventual return to stillness, one comprehends the importance of preserving tranquility.

Both Heshang Gong and Wang Bi emphasize observing the cyclical patterns of existence with an empty, still mind. Since all activity originates from emptiness and all movement begins from stillness, practitioners should prioritize this fundamental principle.

 萬物雖並動作卒復歸於虚靜是物之極  篤也○雱曰虚靜則明明則見理見理非  以有爲將觀復性之情也 夫物芸芸  河曰芸芸者華葉盛 各復歸其根  明皇曰又云所以萬物歸復常在於靜者  爲華葉芸芸生性皆歸復其根故本有作  芸芸者芸芸動作也言夫物芸芸動作者  及其歸復皆在根本爾○河曰言萬物無  不枯落各復反其根而更生也○弼曰各  反其所始也○雱曰復復性起用復還性  根動植雖殊理歸一致 歸根曰靜  河曰浮謂根也根安靜柔弱謙卑處下故  不復死也 靜曰復命  明皇曰華葉芸芸者生性歸根則靜止矣  人能歸根至靜可謂復所禀之性命○河  曰言安靜者是爲復還性命使不死也○  雱曰有生曰性性禀於命命者在生之先  道之全體也易曰窮理盡性以至於命觀  復窮理也歸根盡性也復命至於命也至  於命極矣而不離於性也 復命曰常  河曰復命使不死乃道之所常行也○弼  曰歸根則靜故曰靜靜則復命故曰復命  也復命則得性命之常故曰常也○雱曰  出生則入有入有則系數然則密移之變  頃刻不停唯復命則湛然常寂物莫能遷  矣 知常曰明  明皇曰守靜復命可謂有常知守常者更  益明了○河曰能知道之所常極則爲明
Interpretation

All things in the world, though constantly moving and changing, ultimately return to a state of emptiness and stillness—this is the fundamental law of existence. Just as a tree's flourishing branches and leaves (芸芸 denoting lush abundance) eventually shed and return to their roots, everything finds its way back to the origin.

Laozi uses the metaphor of "returning to the roots" to illustrate that coming back to the source is the state of "stillness." Heshanggong explains: the roots of a tree are quiet, soft, and humble, dwelling below—thus they attain eternal life. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) elaborates further: when the splendor fades and returns to the root, all movement ceases. If a person can return to this root and reach perfect stillness, they restore their innate true nature (性命 referring to one's original, inborn essence).

Wang Anshi (Pang) interprets this through the lens of nature and life (性命学说): the activity of life is called "nature" (性), which originates from the more fundamental "life" (命, the primordial essence bestowed by the Dao). As the Yijing states: "Exhausting principle to fulfill nature leads to life"—observing the patterns of all things is exhausting principle, returning to the origin is fulfilling nature, and restoring life means reuniting with the source of the Dao. Attaining the state of "life" is the highest level, yet it never departs from one's inherent nature.

This law of returning to the origin is eternal (常). Heshanggong states that preserving life from death is the Dao's eternal principle. Wang Bi notes: returning to the roots brings stillness, stillness restores one's nature, and restoring nature means grasping the eternal law of life. Wang Anshi expresses this more philosophically: though all things are in constant flux, only by returning to the source can one reach the eternal stillness, undisturbed by external influences.

Understanding this eternal law is called "illumination" (明). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang says that maintaining stillness and returning to one's nature means comprehending the eternal, and those who uphold this law grow wiser. Heshanggong concludes: recognizing the Dao's eternal principle is true wisdom.

 雱曰所知非常則非眞知也聖人所貴夫  明者自見而已 不知常妄作凶  明皇曰不恒其德或承祭之羞失常妄作  窮凶必矣○河曰不知道之所常行妄作  巧詐則失神明故凶也○弼曰常之爲物  不偏不彰無皦昩之狀温凉之象故曰知  常曰明也唯此復乃能包通萬物無所不  容失此以往則邪入乎分則物離分故曰  不知常則妄作凶也○雱曰不會於性命  之極則種種色相皆以爲實因生妄情與  接爲摇窮萬世而不悟陰陽之禍慘孰甚  焉 知常容  明皇曰知守眞常則心境虚靜如彼空谷  無不含容○河曰能知道之所常行則去  情忘欲無所不包容也○弼曰無所不包  通也○雱曰知常則達乎無疵何所不容 容乃公  明皇曰含容應物無心既無私邪故爲公  正○河曰無所不包容則公政無私○弼  曰無所不包通則乃至于蕩然公平也○  雱曰無物我之殊何私之有 公乃王  明皇曰能公正無私者則爲物所歸往   河曰公政無私則可以爲天下王○弼曰  蕩然公平則乃至于無所不周普也○雱  曰内公則外王 王乃天  明皇曰萬物樂推如天之覆則與天合德  河曰能王德合神明乃與天通○弼曰無  所不周普則乃至于同乎天也○雱曰王  者人道之至極極人之道乃通於天 天乃道
Interpretation

This passage discusses the relationship between "true wisdom" and the "constant Dao (the Way)." Genuine knowledge is not ordinary cognition, but rather an understanding of eternal and unchanging principles. Those who fail to comprehend this constant Dao will act recklessly and invite misfortune. Various commentaries note that reckless actions and cunning schemes lead to the loss of divine protection (Shen), while deviation from the right path results in peril.

Those who understand the constant Dao possess expansive minds capable of embracing all things. Like an empty valley that echoes all sounds, a tranquil and open heart can receive everything. Such inclusiveness is not forced but arises naturally. Attaining this state eliminates selfish thoughts and allows one to act with impartiality and selflessness.

The impartial and selfless naturally become the gathering point for others, just as rivers flow into the sea. Such leaders align with heavenly virtue (De), their moral power as vast as the sky that shelters all things. When human virtue reaches its pinnacle, it merges with the heavenly Dao. The term "king" here does not refer to political power or status but to the perfected state of a sage-king.

The commentaries mention the "ultimate essence of life" (xingming zhi ji) as the fundamental nature of human existence, while the "calamities of Yin-Yang" refer to the disasters that arise from violating natural laws. All schools emphasize returning to one's original nature and aligning with the natural Dao to avoid the dangers brought about by reckless actions.

 明皇曰王德如天乃能行道○河曰德與  天通則與道合同也○弼曰與天合德體  道大通則乃至于極虚無也○雱曰因有  道乃與天侔侔天乃所以盡道道則莫知  其天乎人乎 道乃乆  明皇曰道行天下乃可以乆享福祚矣   河曰與道合同乃能長乆○弼曰窮極虚  無得物之常則乃至于窮極也○雱曰所  謂常也 殁身不殆  明皇曰同天行道則終没其身長無危殆  之事矣○河曰能公能王通天合道四者  統備道德弘遠無殃無咎乃與天地俱没  不危殆也○弼曰無之爲物水火不能害  金石不能殘用之於心則兕虎無所投其  爪角兵戈無所容其鋒刃何危殆之有乎  雱曰天地並生萬物爲一孰能危之    太上章第十七 太上下知有之  明皇曰大上者淳古之君也下知者臣下  知上有君尊之如天而無施教有爲之迹  故人無德而稱焉○河曰太上謂大君無  名之君也下知有之者下知上有君而不  臣事質樸也○弼曰太上謂大人也大人  在上故曰太上大人在上居無爲之事行  不言之教萬物作焉而不爲始故下知有  之而已○雱曰因三皇之出無爲而治使  民各遂而不知其然豈得而親譽之乎 其次親而譽之  明皇曰逮德下衰君行善教仁見故親之  功高故譽之○河曰其德可見恩惠可稱
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the relationship between De (Virtue/Power) and the Dao (the Way), as well as different levels of governance.

First, it explains the relationship between De and Dao: Only when a ruler's virtue becomes as vast as heaven can they truly practice the Great Dao. When virtue communicates with heaven, it becomes united with the Dao. Achieving this state of heavenly virtue allows one to comprehend the Dao and enter the ultimate state of emptiness and nothingness. Because one possesses the Great Dao, they can equal heaven, and only by reaching this state of heavenly equality can one fully embody the Dao. At this stage, the distinction between heavenly Dao and human Dao disappears.

Next, it explains how practicing the Dao leads to longevity: Only when the Great Dao prevails under heaven can blessings be enjoyed eternally. Union with the Dao brings everlasting endurance. Reaching the ultimate state of emptiness and grasping the constant patterns of all things leads to perfection. This is what's called the "Constant Dao."

Attaining this state ensures lifelong safety: Walking the same path as heaven means no danger throughout one's life. By achieving these four qualities—impartiality, kingship, heavenly connection, and Dao union—one's virtue becomes vast and profound, free from calamity, coexisting with heaven and earth without peril. The Dao of emptiness is such that water and fire cannot harm it, metal and stone cannot destroy it. Applied to inner cultivation, rhinos and tigers find no place for their claws, weapons find no place for their edges—where could danger arise? Being born with heaven and earth, united with all things—who could cause harm?

Chapter Seventeen, "The Supreme Chapter," discusses different levels of governance:

The highest governance (Taishang) is when the people merely know the ruler exists. This refers to the ancient era of simple, virtuous rulers when subjects knew their sovereign existed, revering him like heaven, yet the ruler didn't deliberately teach or act, so the people couldn't praise him with virtue. These were great rulers who didn't display titles or fame—the people simply knew of their existence without conscious submission. "Taishang" refers to rulers of supreme virtue who practice Wuwei (non-action) and wordless teaching, letting all things operate naturally without interference, so the people merely know of their existence. Like the era of the Three Sovereigns who governed through non-action, letting people develop naturally without awareness—how could the people consciously draw close to praise them?

The next level of governance is when the people feel close to and praise their ruler. This marks the beginning of virtue's decline—when rulers practice benevolent governance, the people draw near because they feel their kindness and praise them for their remarkable achievements.

 故親愛而譽之○弼曰不能以無爲居事  不言爲教立善施化使下得親而譽之也  雱曰政有明效則百姓戴恩懷德毁譽之  名彰雖足以爲治一時而上己離道德之  全下己失性命之正亂自此始矣此仁義  之治 其次畏之  河曰設刑法以治之○弼曰不能復以恩  仁令物而賴威權也○雱曰此法制之治 其次侮之  明皇曰德又下衰君多弊政則驅以刑罰  故畏之懷情相欺明不能察故侮之○河  曰禁多令煩不可歸誠故欺侮之○弼曰  不能法以正齊民而以智治國下知避之  其令不從故曰侮之也○雱曰失德無政  則民侮之一本作畏之侮之無其次二字 信不足焉  河曰君信不足於下下則有巧詐民 有不信焉  明皇曰畏之侮之者皆由君信不足故令  下有不信之人○河曰君信不足於下下  則應之以不信而欺其君也○弼曰言從  上也夫御體失性則疾病生輔物失眞則  疵釁作信不足焉則有不信此自然之道  也己處不足非智之所濟也○雱曰孟子  曰有諸己之謂信經曰其中有信人盡其  性則不失天命之常故曰信也上離道而  治則非性之質而失其常矣故於信爲不  足上於信不足則下必至於偷薄詐僞故  曰有不信也下有不信亂之大者 猶兮其貴言  明皇曰親之譽之者由君有德教之言故
Interpretation

This passage discusses different levels of governance and their effects. The highest realm is governing through "Wuwei" (non-action), where no deliberate efforts are made, no words are used to teach, and no virtuous deeds are flaunted—yet the people naturally feel closeness and affection. However, commentator Wang Bi notes that if one cannot truly achieve governance through non-action but instead deliberately sets up virtuous models to educate the people, though it may earn their praise and admiration, this already deviates from the wholeness of the "Dao."

The next level relies on the deterrence of laws and punishments. Heshang Gong explains this as establishing penal codes to manage society, while Wang Bi adds that at this stage, governance can no longer rely on benevolence to inspire but must depend on authority. Wang Pang calls this "rule by law," acknowledging its effectiveness but noting that the people obey out of fear rather than genuine devotion.

A worse form of governance leads to the people's contempt. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) comments that when a ruler's virtue declines and governance becomes chaotic, relying solely on punishments to compel the people results in superficial fear while deception festers beneath. Heshang Gong further points out that excessive and burdensome prohibitions prevent sincere allegiance, leading to deceit and disrespect. Wang Bi sees this as governing through cunning rather than the true Dao, teaching the people evasion and rendering decrees ineffective.

Finally, the passage addresses the issue of "insufficient trust." Heshang Gong states that when rulers lack sincerity toward the people, the people respond with deception. Wang Bi uses a bodily metaphor: just as losing one's nature leads to illness, losing sincerity in governance invites disorder. Wang Pang quotes Mencius—"What is within oneself is called trust"—arguing that rulers who stray from the Dao in governance lose their true nature, resulting in a lack of trust. This inevitably breeds cunning and hypocrisy among the people, becoming the root of great chaos.

Emperor Xuanzong concludes that the people's attitude toward their ruler—whether closeness and praise, fear, or contempt—depends entirely on whether the ruler embodies genuine virtuous governance. Just as precious things are not casually displayed, the true Dao does not rely on many words but on inner sincerity that naturally inspires transformation.

 貴其言而親譽之○河曰說太上之君舉  事猶貴聖於言恐離道失自然○雱曰猶  豫之猶猶者不决貴者不輕也莊子曰言  者風波也聖人出言常若有所疑不敢輕  發言且不敢輕而况於爲乎民之難治以  其上之有爲也是以聖人猶難之一本無  兮字非 功成事遂  河曰謂天下太平也 百姓皆謂我自然  明皇曰功成而不執事遂而無爲百姓日  用而不知謂我自然而成遂則太上下知  也○河曰百姓不知君上之德淳厚反以  爲已自當然也○弼曰自然其端兆不可  得而見也其意趣不可得而睹也無物可  以易其言言必有應故曰猶兮其貴言也  居無爲之事行不言之教不以形立物故  功成事遂而百姓不知其所以然也○雱  曰遷善遠罪而莫知爲之者是也    大道廢章第十八 大道廢有仁義  明皇曰澆淳散樸大道不行曰仁與義小  成遂作濡沬生於不足周弊超於有爲然  則聖人救世之心未嘗異而夷險之迹不  得一爾○河曰大道之時家有孝子户有  忠信仁義不見也大道廢不用惡逆生乃  有仁義可傳道○弼曰失無爲之事更以  施慧立善道進物也 智惠出有大僞  明皇曰用智惠者將立法也法出而姦生  則有大僞矣○河曰智惠之君賤德而貴  言賤質而費文下則應之以爲大偽姦詐
Interpretation

This scripture primarily expounds on how the "Supreme Sovereign" (the highest ruler) should govern the world. A ruler must be cautious in speech, for words are like wind and waves that easily stir chaos. When sages speak, they always appear hesitant, neither daring to speak lightly nor act rashly. The reason people become difficult to govern is precisely because rulers are too interventionist. Thus, when sages govern the world, they exercise extraordinary prudence.

When the world is at peace and achievements are accomplished, the people will feel these things occurred naturally, completely unaware of the ruler's actions. This illustrates that the highest form of governance allows people to live in peace and prosperity without realizing it, believing instead that they achieved it themselves.

The text then discusses how when "the Great Dao is abandoned," artificial benevolence and righteousness emerge. When society's simple and honest customs fade, and people begin deliberately promoting benevolence and righteousness, this signals societal problems. True benevolence and righteousness should flow naturally, requiring no forced advocacy. When people start valuing clever strategies and schemes, hypocrisy and deceit inevitably follow. For when governing through cunning intellect, numerous laws are created—and the more laws there are, the more crafty individuals will exploit loopholes.

Heshang Gong (a renowned Daoist scholar of the Han dynasty) explains that in eras when the Great Dao flourished, every household naturally produced filial children and trustworthy individuals—there was no need to specially promote benevolence and righteousness. Only when the Dao is abandoned and wickedness arises must benevolence and righteousness be emphasized to salvage the world. Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period metaphysician) adds that when rulers abandon Wuwei (non-action) governance and begin ruling through intellectual means, hypocrisy inevitably proliferates.

This passage reveals the Daoist political philosophy of "governing through non-action," maintaining that the highest form of rule makes the people unaware of the ruler's presence, with everything following its natural course. Deliberately promoting benevolence and righteousness or employing intellectual cunning ultimately disrupts society's natural harmony.

 弼曰行術用明以察姦偽趣睹形見物知  避之故智惠出則大僞生也 六親不和有孝慈  明皇曰父子夫婦兄弟六親也疏戚無倫  不和也乆親各子有孝慈也皆由失道故  有偏名○河曰六親絶親戚不和乃有孝  慈相收養也○雱曰至德之世民盡其性  六親非不孝慈而孝慈以爲常故無孝慈  之名今尚孝慈之行而尊之者更由六親  有不和故也 國家昏亂有忠臣  明皇曰大平之時上下交足何異名乎昏  亂之日見危致命有忠臣矣○河曰政令  不行上下相怨耶俑爭權乃有忠臣匡救  其君也○弼曰甚美之名生於大惡所謂  美惡内門六親父子兄弟夫婦也若六親  自和國家自治則孝慈忠臣不知其所在  矣魚忘於江湖之道則相濡之德生也   雱曰明治則人無不忠敦爲忠臣    絶聖棄智章第十九 絶聖  河曰絶聖制作反初守元五帝盡象倉頡  作書不如三皇結繩無文 棄智  河曰棄智惠反無爲 民利百倍  明皇曰絶聖人言教之迹則化無爲棄凡  夫智詐之用則人淳樸淳樸則巧僞不作  無爲則矜徇不行人挹天和物無天性是  有百倍之利○河曰農事無私○雱曰民  之性質純粹無疵以其失眞沉僞故强立  聖智以爲君師而民因聖智之迹更逐而  不反離本愈遠矣故有一時之小補而終
Interpretation

Wang Bi (a Three Kingdoms period philosopher) explains: When rulers employ political tactics and keen observation to detect deception, people will deliberately craft appearances to avoid punishment. Thus when society esteems wisdom and strategy, it paradoxically breeds greater hypocrisy.

Regarding the phrase "When the six relationships are discordant, filial piety and parental affection arise":

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang comments: When the six familial bonds—father and son, husband and wife, elder and younger brothers—lose their natural harmony, discord emerges. The appearance of filial sons and kind fathers actually signifies the degeneration of the Dao (the Way), becoming mere superficial reputations. Heshang Gong (Han dynasty commentator) observes: Only when kinship ties are broken do people conspicuously champion virtues like filial devotion. Wang Pang (Song dynasty scholar) adds: In the golden age of perfect virtue, people's innate purity made filial affection naturally abundant among relatives—no conscious promotion was needed. Today's veneration of filial piety precisely indicates ruptured family relations.

On "When the state is in chaos, loyal ministers appear":

Emperor Xuanzong notes: In times of peace, rulers and ministers fulfill their roles effortlessly—no one praises loyalty. Only during national turmoil do ministers earn renown for dying in service. Heshang Gong states: When governance fails, when resentment festers between rulers and subjects, when treacherous ministers seize power—then loyal ministers emerge to rectify the throne. Wang Bi offers an analogy: Just as fish in rivers needn't moisten each other with saliva, such desperate kindness only appears when the waters run dry.

The meaning of Chapter 19's "Abolish sageliness, discard wisdom":

Heshang Gong interprets: Reject the ritual systems created by sages and return to primordial simplicity. Civilizational inventions like Cangjie's writing system prove inferior to the primal knot-records of antiquity. Abandon cunning stratagems to resume natural wuwei (non-action), and the people will gain hundredfold benefits.

Emperor Xuanzong elaborates: Eliminate the formal trappings of sagehood's teachings, and people transform spontaneously; discard worldly cleverness and deceit, and human hearts regain innocence. Wang Pang argues: Human nature was originally pristine—only after losing this authenticity did people require sages to establish norms. But chasing these superficial forms distances us further from the root. Though sagely wisdom may bring temporary improvement, it ultimately creates greater harm.

 使民喪其不貲之樸絶而棄之則民復於  無事其利可勝計哉 絶仁棄義  河曰絶仁之見恩惠棄義之尚筆信 民復孝慈  明皇曰絶兼愛之仁棄裁制之義則人復  於大孝慈矣○河曰德化淳也○雱曰至  德之世父子相親而足今更生仁義則名  實交糾得失紛然民性亂矣蓋盛於末者  本必衰天之道也孝慈仁義之本也或曰  孔孟明堯舜之道專以仁義而子以老氏  爲正何如曰夏以出生爲功而秋以收斂  爲德一則使之榮華而去本一則使之彫  悴而反根道歲也聖人時也明乎道則孔  老相爲終始矣 絶巧棄利  河曰絶巧者詐僞亂眞也棄利者塞貪路  閉權門也 盜賊無有  眀皇曰人矜偏能之巧必有爭利之心故  絶巧則人不爭棄和則人自足足則不爲  盜賊矣○雱曰巧利勝則民欲侈而本業  衰必至於爲盜上三事皆以末傷本者 此三者  河曰謂上三事所棄絶也 以烏文不足  河曰以爲文不足者文不足以教民○雱  曰文於質爲末末勝則不足民所以失性  一本云文而未足非 故令有所屬  明皇曰此三者俱令絶棄未示修行故以  爲此文不足至教更令有所著謂下文也  河曰當如下句○雱曰令屬其性於下四  事 見素抱樸  河曰見素者當抱素守眞不尚文飾也抱
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how to govern society by abandoning certain artificial norms and returning to natural simplicity.

Laozi believed that if people lose their original, unspoiled nature, society will descend into chaos. Conversely, by "rejecting benevolence" (ren, or forced acts of kindness) and "discarding righteousness" (yi, or rigid moral codes), people can restore genuine filial piety and compassion. Excessive emphasis on benevolence and righteousness disrupts human nature, just as a tree that overextends its branches risks harming its roots.

Regarding "rejecting cleverness and abandoning profit," this means eliminating opportunistic behavior and relinquishing the pursuit of personal gain. Heshang Gong explains that cunning deception obscures truth and falsehood, while greed opens the door to power struggles. If these are eliminated, there will be no thieves. When people no longer compete in skill, they will not fight over benefits; when they abandon greed, they will naturally be content and thus have no reason to steal.

These three principles—rejecting benevolence and righteousness, and forsaking cleverness and profit—must be abandoned because superficial embellishments and norms are insufficient to truly educate the people. Just as excessive ornamentation diminishes substance, so too must people return to more fundamental forms of cultivation.

Finally, the text proposes the solution of "embracing simplicity and holding to plainness" (jian su bao pu), meaning to maintain a state of unadorned authenticity. Heshang Gong explains that one should preserve innate purity without seeking flashy appearances. This is akin to a tree preserving its roots rather than chasing luxuriant foliage. It represents Laozi’s advocated path of governance—returning to the natural simplicity of human nature.

 樸者當見其質樸以示故可法則○雱曰  不見物而見自性也素者性之質人生而  靜不染諸物故無文而素蓋秋之時萬物  復靜其色爲白天理固然樸者性之全以  樸爲本以器爲末 少私寡欲  明皇曰見眞素抱淳樸少私邪寡貪欲○  河曰少私者正無私也寡欲者當知足也  弼曰聖智才之善也仁義人之善也巧利  用之善也而直云云絶文甚不足不令有  所屬無以見其指故曰此三者以爲文而  未足故令人有所屬屬之於素樸寡欲○  雱曰私欲皆有己之所爲有己則有物有  則外重外重則失本矣    絶學無憂章第二十 絶學  河曰絶學不眞不合道文 無憂  明皇曰絶仁爲俗學則淳樸不散少私寡  欲故無憂也○河曰除浮華則無憂患也  雱曰學所以求復命見至於命則不見有  物無所用學矣爲道至此則避絶吉凶敦  能憂之孔子曰樂天知命憂之大者有知  有樂則非體道也 唯之與阿相去幾何  河曰同爲應對而相去幾何疾時賤質而  貴文 善之與惡相去何若  明皇曰唯則恭應阿則慢應同出於口故  云相去幾何而恭應則善慢應則惡以喻  俗學絶之則無憂不絶則生患只在心識  迴照豈復相去遠哉○河曰善者稱譽惡  者諫爭能相去何如疾時惡忠直用邪佞  也○雱曰道體本一已降於全復分陰陽
Interpretation

This passage discusses the core Daoist concept of returning to original simplicity. "Pu" (the Uncarved Block) refers to the most primal and pure essential state of things, akin to the plain white hue revealed when all things return to stillness in autumn. Humans should emulate this natural state, maintaining inner purity uncontaminated by external influences.

Regarding "reducing selfishness and desires," various commentators offer interpretations: Emperor Xuanzong of Tang suggests revealing one's authentic nature and embracing simplicity; the Heshang Gong commentary explains that "reducing selfishness" means being impartial and selfless, while "diminishing desires" means understanding contentment. Wang Bi (Bi) adds that although a sage's wisdom, compassion, and skill are all virtuous, excessive attachment to these superficial practices may cause one to lose the fundamental essence. Wang Pang (Pang) further points out that selfish desires all stem from ego-attachment—once the concept of "self" arises, one becomes preoccupied with external things and loses one's original nature.

The section on "abandoning learning to be free from worries" discusses relinquishing worldly knowledge: Heshang Gong considers false learning incompatible with the Dao (the Way); Emperor Xuanzong states that only by discarding artificial studies of humaneness and righteousness can one preserve one's simple nature. Wang Pang explains that true learning aims to return to the source of life—once this state is attained, deliberate study becomes unnecessary, and even distinctions between fortune and misfortune cease to matter. Confucius's saying "rejoicing in Heaven and knowing destiny," if pursued with deliberate intent, still falls short of comprehending the Dao.

Finally, concerning the distinction between "wei" (a respectful response) and "e" (a dismissive response): Heshang Gong observes that while both are forms of reply, their essence differs greatly, criticizing contemporary society for prioritizing superficial form over substance; Emperor Xuanzong considers respectful responses good and dismissive ones evil, emphasizing the transformation of mental attitudes. Wang Pang, from the philosophical height of the Dao's fundamental unity, explains that such distinctions are phenomena emerging after the differentiation of yin-yang.

 擾擾起矣種種分别皆屬妄心照以道眞  理同夢幻且唯之與阿同出於口元無異  狀而世之人以唯爲恭以阿爲慢是非喜  怒因此生情反求唯阿所以異者竟何謂  也善惡之殊亦若此矣 人之所畏不可不畏  明皇曰凡人所畏者慢與惡也善士所畏  者俗學與有爲也皆當絶之故不可不畏  河曰人爲道人也人所畏者畏不絶學之  君也不可不畏近令色殺仁賢○弼曰下  篇云爲學者日益爲道者日損然則學者  求益所能而進其智者也若將無欲而足  何求於益不知而中何求於進夫燕雀有  匹鳩鴿有仇寒鄉之民必知旃裘自然已  足益之則憂故續鳧之足何異截鶴之脛  畏譽而進何異異刑唯阿美惡相去何若  故人之所畏吾亦畏焉未敢恃之以爲用  也○雱曰至人不見一物善惡無所分而  不廢世人善惡諸法但於其中灑然不累  耳自相去何若已上所以明心之無累而  無累者本不自異於世故種種分别與民  同之所謂吉凶與民同患也聖人絶累忘  形亦可患乎而易有吉凶之象者因民情  而已莊子曰不忽於人道既兼忘宜若忽  人事而實無忽也 荒兮其未央哉  明皇曰若不畏絶俗學則衆生正性荒廢  其未有央止之時○河曰或言世俗人荒  亂欲進學爲文未央止也○弼曰嘆與俗
Interpretation

The myriad distracting thoughts and discriminations in the world all stem from the deluded mind. When viewed through the lens of Dao's ultimate truth, these attachments appear as illusory as dreams. Both the respectful "wei" (affirmative response) and the dismissive "a" (negative response) originate from the same mouth—there's no essential difference between them. Yet worldly people consider "wei" as respectful and "a" as arrogant, thus generating emotions of right/wrong and joy/anger. If one inquires what fundamental distinction truly exists between "wei" and "a," the same applies to the illusory division between good and evil.

Laozi said: "What people fear, I cannot but fear." Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) comments: Ordinary people fear arrogance and wicked deeds, while Dao cultivators fear worldly learning and forced action—all these should be severed, hence one must remain vigilant. Heshang Gong explains: Even Dao practitioners must fear what worldly people fear, especially rulers who refuse to abandon conventional knowledge. Wang Bi states: The second part of the Daode Jing mentions "Those who study gain daily, those who practice Dao lose daily"—pursuing learning aims to increase knowledge, but if one achieves desireless contentment, why seek augmentation? Those who force progress without understanding this principle are like sparrows having their own mates, doves their own partners, or northerners naturally wearing fur coats—all being inherently complete. Forced seeking brings only sorrow. What difference exists between lengthening a duck's legs and shortening a crane's shanks? How dissimilar is striving from fear of praise compared to suffering punishment? Ultimately, how great is the gap between "wei" and "a," or beauty and ugliness? Therefore, what the world fears, I too must fear, not daring to consider myself uniquely correct.

Wang Pang (son of Wang Anshi) observes: Those who attain Dao perceive no distinctions among things, yet don't negate the world's standards of good/evil—they simply transcend unaffected. The passage from "how much difference exists" upward describes the mind's liberation from constraints. This transcendence isn't isolation from the world, hence differentiated views remain identical to ordinary people's—this is what the Yijing means by "sharing the people's joys and sorrows regarding fortune/misfortune." Could sages who transcend physical form possibly have such concerns? The Yijing presents omens of fortune/misfortune merely to accord with popular sentiment. Zhuangzi says: Never neglecting human affairs—having forgotten both self and objects, they seem indifferent yet never disregard worldly matters.

Laozi laments: "Desolate! As if without end!" Emperor Xuanzong interprets: Without vigilance in severing worldly learning, sentient beings' original nature becomes endlessly barren. Heshang Gong says: This describes worldly people's chaotic confusion—seeking knowledge yet finding no direction. Wang Bi suggests: It sighs at the vast difference between Dao and worldly ways.

 相返之遠也○雱曰萬化相推終則有始  生生無盡豈有央乎而世人欲物物爲之  美惡不亦惑乎唯聖人能知萬古一時而  無得失於其間也 衆人熙熙  河曰熙熙淫放多情欲也 如享太牢  河曰如飢思大牢之具意無足時也 如春登臺  明皇曰衆人俗學有爲熙熙逐境如臨享  太牢春臺登望動生貪欲○河曰春陰陽  交通萬物感動登臺觀之意志淫淫然   弼曰衆人迷於美進惑於榮利欲進心競  故熙熙若享太牢如春登臺也○雱曰造  化無極事物日生唯聖人能一古今而無  變衆人則隨化而遷一見美惡樂得其生  自以爲美春者萬物奮張離靜而動去本  逐末之時臺者可以遠覽諸境之地物不  明乎至理者皆逐物生情其狀如此 我獨怕兮其未兆  河曰我獨怕然安靜未有情欲之形兆也 如嬰兒之未孩  明皇曰我獨怕然安靜於其情欲略無形  兆如彼嬰兒未能孩孺也○河曰如小兒  未能答偶人時也○弼曰言我廓然無形  之可名無兆之可舉如嬰兒未能孩也○  雱曰性體怕然不萌智慮含和守一同於  嬰兒古本作廓兮非也怕與泊同怕者不  流之義廓者虚大之名文義考之理當從  怕 乘乘兮若無所歸  明皇曰至人無心運動隨物無所取與若  行者之無所歸乘乘運動貌○河曰我乘
Interpretation

All things in the world undergo mutual transformation in an endless cycle of perpetual recurrence. Yet ordinary people insist on imposing rigid standards of beauty and ugliness, good and bad upon everything—is this not profoundly confused? Only the sage understands that the vast river of eternity is but a fleeting moment, where notions of gain and loss ultimately hold no meaning.

Common people chase after desires with feverish excitement, like starving men at a lavish banquet who can never be satiated, or like those ascending high towers in springtime who greedily try to take in all the scenery. Blinded by fame and profit, they rush headlong after external things with the same exhilaration as attending grand feasts or viewing spring landscapes from lofty pavilions. In truth, the transformations of Heaven and Earth are boundless—all things change daily, yet only sages can transcend time to preserve their original mind, while ordinary people lose themselves chasing shifting externals. Spring is inherently the season of all things sprouting, and high towers naturally offer broad vistas, but those who don't comprehend the Dao (the Way) inevitably generate endless desires when encountering these things.

Only I maintain a state of serene detachment, as innocent and natural as an infant who has not yet learned to laugh playfully. My fundamental nature remains peaceful and stable, free from calculating thoughts, preserving the natural harmony of my original state. I move in accordance with circumstances, flowing forward like water without deliberately pursuing any particular destination. This condition resembles riding in a carriage without fixed direction—what appears to be aimless wandering is in truth complete alignment with the authentic state of nature.

(Note: "Grand Sacrifice" [太牢] refers to the ancient ritual offerings of ox, sheep and pig, here metaphorically representing sumptuous delicacies; "serene" [怕] is interchangeable with "detached" [泊], indicating a state of tranquil indifference; "riding along" [乘乘] describes movement in harmonious accordance with nature's flow.)

 乘如窮鄙無所歸就○弼曰若無所宅○  雱曰乘乘者乘萬物之變而不自私故若  無所歸蓋唯變所適無所嚮著故也一本  作儡儡兮無所歸非也 衆人皆有餘  明皇曰耽嗜塵務矜誇巧智自爲有餘以  示光大○河曰衆人餘財以爲奢餘智以  爲詐○雱曰矜覽庶物故常有餘 而我獨若遺  明皇曰常若不足有所遺忘○河曰我獨  如遺棄似不足也○弼曰衆人無不有懷  有志盈溢胸心故曰皆有餘也我獨廓然  無爲無欲若遺失之也○雱曰超然自喪  不有其有 我愚人之心也哉  河曰不與俗人相隨守一不移如愚人之  心也○弼曰絶愚人之心無所别析意無  所好欲猶然其情不可睹我頽然若此也 純純兮  明皇曰我豈愚人之心遺忘若此哉但我  心純純故若遺爾○河曰無所分别○弼  曰無所别析不可爲名○雱曰純純兮似  愚而眞智之極一本純純作沌沌 俗人昭昭  明皇曰矜巧智也○河曰明且達也○弼  曰耀其光也 我獨若昏  明皇曰自韜晦也○河曰如闇昩也○雱  曰物我兼忘不主分别故若昏 俗人察察  明皇曰立法制也○河曰察察急且疾也  弼曰分别别析也○雱曰推昭昭之意加  之政則察察矣 我獨悶悶  明皇曰唯寬大也○河曰悶悶無所割截
Interpretation

This passage vividly contrasts realized adepts with ordinary people. The Dao-realized person (one who has attained high spiritual cultivation) appears like a homeless wanderer, for he flows with the transformations of all things without attachment, thus seeming to have no fixed abode. Like water that takes the shape of any container, he has no rigid form.

Worldly people all consider themselves abundantly satisfied, indulging in material pleasures, flaunting cleverness, and constantly striving to appear superior to others. Yet the Dao cultivator always feels a sense of deficiency within - his mind is empty and luminous, free from desire, as if having forgotten all worldly pursuits.

The cultivator may appear foolish, but this is actually a manifestation of returning to original simplicity. His consciousness remains pure and unadulterated, like uncarved jade in its natural state. Ordinary people display sharp intellect outwardly, distinguishing everything clearly, while the cultivator seems muddle-headed and indifferent to worldly affairs.

Worldly people nitpick over trivialities, establishing countless rules to constrain others. The cultivator, however, maintains a state of benign confusion, treating all with magnanimity. This seemingly muddled condition actually represents a higher wisdom that transcends dualistic judgments of right and wrong. Just as turbid water naturally clarifies when left undisturbed, the cultivator preserves this inner state of primordial chaos to ultimately achieve true clarity.

 雱曰推若昏之意加之政則寬大悶悶然  矣悶悶謂不取日前小快 澹兮其若海  河曰我獨忽忽如江海之流莫知其所窮  極也○弼曰情不可睹○雱曰自怕兮未  兆而下有諸事物及此又歸於性本湛然  深廣如海之積水水性全矣一本作忽若  晦非是 飂兮似無所止  明皇曰容貌忽然若昏晦而心寂兮絶於  俗學似無所止著○河曰我獨漂漂若飛  若揚無所止也志意在神域也○弼曰無  所繫繫○雱曰澹兮若海以言性體此則  言其用飂然無所不通而無所繫著非用  而何一本作寂非 衆人皆有以  明皇曰衆人於代間皆有所以逐境俗學  之意○河曰以有爲也○弼曰以用也皆  欲有所施用也○雱曰物於物則爲物用  物物而不物於物則用物而物莫能用 而我獨頑  河曰我獨無爲 似鄙  明皇曰頑者無分别鄙者陋不足而心實  了悟外若不足故云似爾○河曰鄙似若  不逮也○弼曰無所欲爲悶悶昏昏若無  所識故曰頑且鄙也○雱曰物莫能入可  謂頑矣見若不睹可謂鄙矣一本且作似  亦通 我獨異於人  明皇曰人有情欲我無愛染人與道反我  與道同○河曰我獨與人異也 而貴求食於母  明皇曰求食於母者貴如嬰兒無營谷爾  故上文云如嬰兒之未孩下經云含德之
Interpretation

This passage presents a collection of commentaries by various Daoist scholars on a particular chapter of the Daode Jing, showcasing their interpretations of concepts like "muddled" and "simple and dull."

Wang Pang comments: When applying a state of dim-witted non-intentionality to governance, it manifests as magnanimous and inclusive policies. "Muddled" refers to not pursuing immediate gratification of superficial benefits. Like the vast ocean's profound depth, water's nature fully reveals its authentic state (mentioning that another version's reading as "suddenly like dusk" is inaccurate).

Heshang Gong notes: Those who attain the Dao move alone in a trance-like state like rushing rivers and seas, with none knowing their ultimate destination. Wang Bi adds: This realm transcends the superficial appearances of worldly emotions. Wang Pang further explains: This seemingly muddled state actually returns to the original clarity and profundity of one's nature, akin to the accumulated waters of the ocean.

Regarding the description "blowing as if without cease": Emperor Xuanzong of Tang interprets this as appearing outwardly dim and unclear, while inwardly transcending the constraints of worldly knowledge. Heshang Gong describes it as drifting without fixed direction, yet with spiritual awareness already entering sacred domains. Wang Pang identifies this as describing the function of Dao attainers—like wind reaching everywhere yet bound by nothing.

When all others pursue external things (all have their purposes): Emperor Xuanzong says ordinary people are obsessed with worldly knowledge; Heshang Gong believes they cling to "deliberate action"; Wang Bi explains it as everyone wanting to accomplish something; while Wang Pang distinguishes: being controlled by external things makes one their slave, whereas controlling things without being controlled by them constitutes true utilization.

On "I alone am simple and dull": Heshang Gong says this refers to the wuwei (non-action) state of Dao attainers. Emperor Xuanzong interprets "simple" as non-discriminatory judgment and "dull" as outwardly clumsy yet inwardly penetrating. Wang Bi considers it a desireless, chaotic state. Wang Pang understands it as: external things cannot penetrate hence "simple," appearing sightless hence "dull."

Finally regarding "value feeding from the mother": Emperor Xuanzong explains this means being purely desireless like an infant (echoing earlier references to "like a baby that cannot yet smile" and later passages on "containing abundant De"). Heshang Gong emphasizes how Dao attainers differ from ordinary people by valuing nourishment from the fundamental source (mother).

 厚比於赤子如此所以獨異於人也先無  求於兩字今所加也且聖人說經本無避  諱今代爲教則有嫌疑暢理故義不可移  臨文則句須穩便便今存古是所庶幾又  司馬遷云老子說五千餘言則明理諸而  息言不必以五千爲定格○弼曰食母生  之本也人者皆棄生民之本貴未飾之華  故曰我獨欲異於人○雱曰不外逐物而  取養於道道者萬物之母也一本無求於  兩宇亦通   孔德之容章第二十一 孔德之容  河曰孔大也有大德之人無所不容能受  垢濁處謙卑也 唯道是從  明皇曰孔甚也從順也設問甚有德之人  容狀若何言此有德人所行唯虚極之道  是順○河曰唯獨也大德之人不隨世俗  所行獨從於道也○弼曰孔空也唯以空  爲德然後乃能動作從道○雱曰道之在  我之謂德德至則與道爲一道不可容因  德而顯德者無我從道而已 道之爲物唯恍唯惚  明皇曰此眀孔德所從之道不有不無沖  用難名故云恍惚○河曰道之於萬物獨  恍惚往來於其無所定也○雱曰道兼陰  陽陰陽之微若無若有謂之恍惚 忽兮恍其中有像  河曰道唯恍惚無形之中獨爲萬物法像  雱曰一陰一陽乃成象一本作忽兮恍兮 恍兮忽其中有物  明皇曰物者即上道之爲物也自有而歸
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the meaning of the chapter "The Appearance of Great Virtue" (孔德之容) in the Daodejing. Laozi uses the metaphor of an "infant" (赤子) to depict the pristine state of one who has attained the Dao—a state distinct from ordinary people, as Dao-realized individuals do not pursue external adornments but return to the fundamental source of life. "Nourishing from the Mother" (食母) refers to sustaining life's root essence, which ordinary people often abandon in pursuit of superficial glamour.

Regarding "the appearance of great virtue," various commentaries explain that those possessing great De (德) embrace all things, endure impurity while maintaining humility. They do not conform to worldly customs but follow only the patterns of the Dao. The Dao itself is elusive and unfathomable—both existent and non-existent, hovering between presence and absence. Yet within this ambiguous state lies the essence of all things and their inherent order.

Heshang Gong's commentary emphasizes that although the Dao is formless and imageless, it establishes the laws for all beings. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's annotation points out that the Dao is neither wholly existent nor wholly non-existent, defying precise verbal description. Wang Pang (son of Wang Anshi) interprets the Dao as encompassing both Yin and Yang aspects, asserting that its existential state manifests precisely at the subtle intersection of these two forces.

The text also notes that one need not rigidly adhere to the conventional notion of the Daodejing as a fixed text of five thousand characters; what matters is comprehending its true meaning. Though differing in expression, all commentaries agree that those with great De should maintain boundless openness, harmonize with the natural Dao, and avoid attachment to external phenomena.

 無還復至道故云其中有物也○河曰道  唯恍忽其中有一經營造化因氣立質○  弼曰以無形始物不繫成物萬物以始以  成而不知其所以然故曰恍兮惚兮惚兮  恍兮其中有象也○雱曰一陽一陰乃成  物恍惚者陰陽之妙故能變化以成象物  一本作恍兮忽兮 窈兮冥兮其中有精  明皇曰惚恍有無窈冥不測生成之用精  妙甚存○河曰道唯窈冥無形其中有精  實神明相薄陰陽交會也○弼曰窈冥深  遠之欺深遠不可得而見然而萬物由之  其可得見以定其眞故曰窈兮冥兮其中  有精也○雱曰精者物生之始前稱象物  道之具體道體既具乃生萬類萬類之所  出在深妙不測之際故云窈兮冥兮 其精甚眞  河曰言道精氣神妙甚眞也非有飾也   雱曰精者形生之始精無不眞而更云甚  眞者由物有失理喪精沉於人偽故也 其中有信  明皇曰窈冥之情本無假雜物感必應應  用不差故云有信○河曰道匿功藏名其  信在中也○弼曰信信驗也物反窈冥則  眞精之極得萬物之性定故曰其精甚眞  其中有信也○雱曰窈冥之精萬物作類  而物之生者各正性命度數法象一有儀  則可以前知無或差舛此之謂信莊子曰  未形者有分 自古及今其名不去  明皇曰言道自古及今生成萬物物得道
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the profound mysteries of Dao (the Way) as described in the Daode Jing. Various commentators have interpreted the intangible yet fundamentally real nature of Dao from different perspectives.

Heshang Gong (a Han dynasty commentator) suggests that although Dao is unfathomably deep and obscure (yaoming), it contains genuine Jing (essence), Qi (vital energy), and Shen (spirit). This subtle energy is not illusory ornamentation but the fundamental force behind the generation of all things. While Dao conceals its achievements and forms, its inherent principles remain reliable (xin zai zhong, "trust lies within").

Wang Bi (a Three Kingdoms period metaphysician) emphasizes that Dao creates all things in a formless state (yi wuxing shi wu). All things exist and take shape because of Dao, yet they do not comprehend how this occurs. Within this seemingly indistinct and elusive condition (huang xi hu xi) lies the pattern (xiang) that gives rise to all things. In the deep and invisible realm of obscurity (yaoming), there exists the subtle energy (jing) that determines the nature of all things. This energy is absolutely real (shen zhen) and can be verified through the transformations of all things (xin).

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Tang Minghuang) notes in his commentary that Dao contains the wondrous function of generation within its indistinct state, while the realm of yaoming holds the subtle creative power. This refined energy responds accurately to the needs of all things (wu gan bi ying) and operates without error (ying yong bu cha), hence it is deemed trustworthy (you xin).

Wang Pang (a Song dynasty scholar) further explains: the exquisite interaction of Yin and Yang (yi yin yi yang) gives form to all things, and this indistinct state precisely embodies the mystery of their transformation. Jing is the primordial energy from which all things arise; when Dao takes concrete form, it manifests as various phenomena. All things originate from the unfathomable Dao (yaoming), within which the subtle energy is absolutely real (shen zhen). The emphasis on "shen zhen" arises because people often lose awareness of this subtle energy by violating natural principles. When things come into being, they follow precise laws (du shu fa xiang), and this predictable regularity is what constitutes "xin" (trust).

In summary, this passage reveals the following characteristics of Dao: seemingly indistinct yet containing order, seemingly obscure yet holding subtlety, seemingly formless yet verifiable. From ancient times to the present, this generative nature of Dao has never changed (qi ming bu qu, "its name does not fade"). Collectively, these commentaries demonstrate that although Dao transcends sensory perception, its real existence and dependable operation can be confirmed through the orderly generation and transformative patterns of all things.

 用因用立名生成之用既今古是同應用  之名故古今不去○河曰自從也從古至  今道常在不去○弼曰至眞之極不可得  名無名則是其名也自古及今無不由此  而成故曰自今及古其名不去也○雱曰  常道常名未常變易 以閲衆甫  明皇曰閲度閲也甫本始也言至道應用  度閲衆物本始各遂生成之用也○河曰  閲禀也甫始也言道禀與萬物始生從道  受氣○弼曰衆甫物之始也以無名說萬  物始也○雱曰甫美也莊子曰神奇復爲  臭腐臭腐復爲神奇夫萬物之美遷易不  常唯道常住故能遍閲之閲如閲人多矣  之閲 吾何以知衆甫之然哉  河曰我何以知從道受氣 以此  眀皇曰以此今萬物皆禀道妙用生成故  爾 河曰此今也以今萬物皆得道精氣  而生動作起居非道不然○弼曰此上之  所云也言吾何以知萬物之始皆始於無  哉以此知之也○雱曰道常住而衆美不  常故能閲其萬變聖人所以能知衆美之  不常者亦以體道之常住故也    曲則全章第二十二 曲則全  明皇曰曲己以應務則全○河曰曲己從  衆不自專則全也○弼曰不自見其明則  全也○雱曰至人沖虚其行如水無心於  物而順物之變不與物迕孰能傷之故常  全也此篇大㫖與莊子養生生相類 枉則直
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the eternal and universal nature of the Dao. Though the Dao cannot be defined by specific names, it has functioned since ancient times as the generative source of all things. Classical commentators like Heshang Gong (a Han dynasty Daoist scholar) and Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period metaphysician) both maintained that all beings receive their vital breath (Qi) from the Dao and operate according to its principles.

The scripture mentions "observing the origins of all things" (以阅众甫), indicating the Dao's capacity to perceive the fundamental source and transformations of existence. The character "fu" (甫) carries three layered meanings here: first as primordial origin, second as the receiving of Dao's Qi, and third as the wondrous state of all things' evolution. As the Zhuangzi states, the mystical and the mundane mutually transform, and only the unchanging Dao can fully witness these transformations.

The author rhetorically asks how one comprehends the patterns of universal change, answering "through this" - by realizing the Dao's eternity to understand worldly impermanence. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (in his commentary) notes that since all things are born through the Dao's subtle workings, true knowledge arises from this recognition.

Chapter 22's "Yield to become whole" (曲则全) expounds wisdom for navigating life: that yielding may lead to preservation. Various interpreters explain this differently: Emperor Xuanzong suggests adapting oneself to circumstances ensures preservation; Heshang Gong states that avoiding self-assertion and following the collective leads to wholeness; Wang Bi maintains true preservation comes from not flaunting one's cleverness; while Wang Pang (a Song dynasty scholar) employs Zhuangzi's philosophy, describing the perfected person as water-like in pliancy - without competitive mind yet able to adapt harmlessly to all transformations. This resonates deeply with the Zhuangzi's philosophy of nurturing life.

 明皇曰枉己以申人則直○河曰枉屈己  而申人久久自得直也○弼曰不自是則  其是彰也○雱曰於形枉者於理爲直有  我者執我之直以遇物而不知物變之無  窮其直乃枉也唯順物之枉而不自有其  直則理直於中矣一本直作正 窪則盈  明皇曰執謙德則常盈○河曰地窪下水  流之人謙下德歸之也○弼曰不自伐則  其功有也○雱曰澤以窪下故衆水鍾焉 弊則新  眀皇曰守弊薄則曰新○河曰自受弊薄  後己先人天下敬之久久自新也○弼曰  不自矜則其德長也○雱曰非秋冬之雕  敝則無春夏之榮華 少則得  明皇曰抱一不離則無失○河曰自受取  少則得多也天道祐謙神明託虚○雱曰  道在乎微性存乎樸得者得其本故不多  也欲體上四事唯得一者能之 多則惑  明皇曰有多爲則惑亂○河曰財多者惑  於所守學多者惑於所聞○弼曰自然之  道亦猶樹也轉多轉遠其根轉少轉得其  本多則遠其眞故曰惑也少則得其本故  曰得也○雱曰棄本逐末妄見多岐 是以聖人抱一烏天下式  明皇曰聖人抱守淳一故可爲天下法式  河曰抱守法式也聖人守一乃知萬事故  能爲天下法式也○弼曰一少之極也式  猶則之也○雱曰抱一者不離於精夫唯  抱一不二乃體道盡性物我玄同故能應
Interpretation

This scripture expounds the Daoist wisdom of self-cultivation and worldly conduct through several contrasting principles that highlight the importance of "guarding the One" (守一).

Regarding "bending oneself to accommodate others" (枉己申人), Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains that temporary self-abasement to fulfill others ultimately leads to true integrity. Wang Pang further elucidates that stubbornly imposing one's own standards of righteousness upon all things actually deviates from the Dao. Only by flowing with the transformations of all beings without fixed preconceptions can one truly apprehend the truth.

The principle "depressions become filled" (洼则盈) illustrates the virtue of humility: just as low-lying terrain naturally gathers water, maintaining humble virtue allows one to receive abundance. As Wang Bi comments, not boasting of oneself leads to genuine accomplishment.

"Worn-out things renew" (弊则新) demonstrates the cyclical law of renewal: the withering of autumn and winter makes possible the flourishing of spring and summer. Heshang Gong's commentary notes that those willingly occupying humble positions ultimately gain universal respect.

The contrast between "less brings attainment, more creates confusion" (少则得,多则惑) is striking. Wang Bi uses the metaphor of trees - the more branches proliferate, the further they stray from the root, while simplicity brings one closer to the essence. Wang Pang observes that excessive pursuits cause one to lose fundamental orientation.

The conclusion "the sage embraces the One" (圣人抱一) reveals that sages maintain unwavering connection to the fundamental Dao (where "One" signifies the root of the Way), thus becoming models for all under heaven. Heshang Gong interprets this as mastering the fundamental principle to comprehend all phenomena. Wang Bi states the "One" represents the ultimate in simplicity, while Wang Pang emphasizes that only through undivided focus can one fully realize the Great Dao, achieving the state of unity between self and all things.

These commentaries collectively illuminate core Daoist principles - guarding the One, maintaining humility, and flowing with natural processes - demonstrating that an attitude of simplicity, single-minded focus, non-contention and non-attachment constitutes the path in harmony with the Dao.

 而不窮也此句上文言道之理聖人抱一  乃能見此理故行如下文云 不自見故明  明皇曰人能不自見其德常曲己以應務  則其德全自明○河曰聖人不以其視千  里之外也乃因天下之目以視故能明達  也○雱曰自見則有己有己則敝於己故  不能曲以應變 不自是故彰  明皇曰人能不自以爲是而枉己以申人  則其是直自彰矣○河曰聖人不自以爲  是而非人故能彰顯於世○雱曰無己是  則能枉以應理不期彰而自彰矣 不自伐故有功  明皇曰人能不自伐取則其功歸己矣   河曰伐取也聖人德化流行不自取其美  故有功於天下也○雱曰伐功生乎滿假  知窪之爲盈則豈有滿假之累 不自矜故長  明皇曰人能長守弊薄不自矜衒則人推  其長○河曰矜大也聖人不自貴大故能  乆不危○雱曰矜者耀其榮之謂耀其榮  則弊矣唯能居弊乃所以新 夫唯不爭故天下莫能與之爭  明皇曰不與物爭誰與爭者○河曰此言  天下賢與不肖無能與不爭者爭也○雱  曰唯沖虚不實無心於物物欲有之而不  得而况能與之爭乎此篇之義要在忘我  故結之以不爭而終始以曲則全也 古之所謂曲則全者豈虛言哉   河曰傳古言曲從則全身正言非虚妄也 誠全而歸之  眀皇曰古有曲全之言豈虚妄哉實能曲
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the operational principles of the Dao (the Way) and the worldly wisdom of sages (those who have attained the Dao). Several ancient commentators—Emperor Xuanzong (Minghuang), Heshang Gong, and Wang Pang—offer interpretations from different perspectives.

Regarding "not self-displaying thus becoming enlightened": Truly wise individuals refrain from deliberately showcasing themselves, instead aligning with the inherent principles of things. Emperor Xuanzong remarks that those who avoid self-promotion preserve their De (Virtue/Power); Heshang Gong notes that sages perceive the world through the eyes of the multitude, thus gaining deeper insight; Wang Pang adds that fixation on self-display constrains one's adaptability to change.

Concerning "not self-asserting thus becoming distinguished": Relinquishing stubborn opinions paradoxically illuminates truth. Emperor Xuanzong holds that humility naturally reveals the right path; Heshang Gong states that sages, free from self-righteousness, earn universal recognition; Wang Pang explains that letting go of the ego allows alignment with heavenly principles—true distinction emerges without pursuit.

On "not self-praising thus achieving merit": True accomplishment arises from abstaining from boastfulness. Emperor Xuanzong observes that those who claim no credit ultimately receive it; Heshang Gong points out that sages let merits circulate naturally without monopolizing them; Wang Pang employs the metaphor of a vessel—only by maintaining emptiness can one remain perpetually replenished.

Regarding "not self-exalting thus enduring": Lasting greatness stems from eschewing arrogance. Emperor Xuanzong asserts that humility invites reverence; Heshang Gong suggests sages, by not esteeming themselves highly, attain lasting stability; Wang Pang warns that flaunting glory invites decline, while abiding humbly ensures renewal.

The passage culminates in the wisdom of "non-contention": Precisely because they contend with nothing under heaven, none can contend with them. Emperor Xuanzong notes that avoiding strife leaves no opponents; Heshang Gong clarifies that neither the wise nor foolish can rival those who embody non-contention; Wang Pang emphasizes the essence of "self-forgetting"—maintaining emptiness like water renders one invulnerable to contention. The ancient adage "to bend is to become whole" (qu ze quan) is cited to demonstrate this principle's veracity: its genuine practice leads to perfect fulfillment.

 者則必全理而歸之○河曰誠實也能行  曲從者實其肌體歸之於父母無有傷害  也○雱曰曲者虚己而應理縁物爲變而  不與物迕凡上諸說要在於是全而歸之  者庖丁善刀而藏之之意竊原此篇養生  之旨也聖人之於生不期自養而養生者  莫善焉所謂不自見不自是不自伐不自  矜者非克己以期全也不知其然而自然  耳若睹夫曲枉窪弊之利而爲之則賢人  之事學者之德於道爲未盡
Interpretation

This commentary explains the principle in the Daodejing about how "bending leads to wholeness" (曲则全). Heshang Gong (a renowned Han dynasty commentator) states that truly sincere individuals can achieve preservation through yielding, much like protecting one’s body from harm, ultimately returning to the source of life.

Wang Pang (a Song dynasty scholar) elaborates further: "Bending" (曲) means letting go of the self, aligning with the natural order of things, adjusting to external changes, and avoiding conflict with the world. All these interpretations converge on a central idea—complete harmony with nature is the key to self-preservation, just as the butcher stores his knife carefully after carving an ox. This passage ultimately explores the fundamental principles of nurturing life.

The sage’s approach to life is unique: they do not deliberately pursue longevity, yet they preserve life most effectively. Those who do not flaunt themselves, assert their own views, boast, or grow arrogant are not forcibly restraining themselves to achieve wholeness—they embody it naturally. If one only bends, yields, or embraces humility and simplicity for the sake of perceived benefits, this remains the realm of the virtuous and the learned, indicating an incomplete understanding of the Dao.

矣 道徳眞經集註卷之三

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0093); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 2 Vol. 4 →