中文 · EN

《道德真經集註(一)》Vol. 2

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 2 / 10 9,746 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集註(一)》 Vol. 2 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 19 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集註(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經集註卷之二     靡二    明皇河上公王弼王雱註   天長地乆章第七 天長地乆  明皇曰標天地長乆者欲明無私無心則  能長能乆結喻成義在乎聖人後身外身  無私成私爾○河曰說天地長生乆壽以  喻教人也 天地所以能長且乆者以其不自生  河曰天地所以獨長且乆者以其安靜施  不求報不如人居處汲汲求自饒之利奪  人以自與○弼曰自生則與物爭不自生  則物歸也 故能長生  明皇曰天地生物德用甚多而能長且乆  者以其資禀於道不自矜其生成之功故  爾○河曰以其不求生故能長生不終也  雱曰自生則有其生有其生則生既喪矣  唯無以生爲則生未嘗生生未嘗生則所  寓之形雖生而無生之累宜其長且乆也  天地之不自生非利乎長乆而然道固如  此而已然所謂長乆者亦瞬息之間耳唯  蓋載傾陷而未嘗壞者乃其眞也 是以聖人後其身  河曰先人而後己也 而身先  河曰天下敬之先以爲長○雱曰聖人雖  聖而形與物齊唯其體天道而不爭乃能  獨異於衆使其立己而與衆敵則匹夫匹  婦皆足以勝之  外其身  河曰薄己而厚人也 而身存  明皇曰後身則人樂推故身先外身則心  志淡泊故身存○河曰百姓愛之如父母
Interpretation

Heaven and Earth endure because they do not exist for themselves. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains that their longevity stems precisely from their selflessness and lack of desire. Master Heshang Gong (a Han dynasty Daoist scholar) adds that Heaven and Earth quietly bestow upon all creatures without seeking repayment, unlike humans who anxiously struggle for personal gain.

Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period metaphysician) observes that if Heaven and Earth existed solely for their own preservation, they would contend with all beings. Precisely because they don't exist for themselves, all things naturally return to them. Thus they achieve enduring vision and eternal life. Emperor Xuanzong further elaborates: though Heaven and Earth's virtue (De) in nurturing all things is immense, they never boast of their creative power—this is the true way of permanence. Wang Pang (a Song dynasty scholar) analyzes philosophically: clinging to self-preservation actually causes loss of life's essence. Only by transcending attachment to survival can one reach the state of living without being burdened by life itself.

Sages emulate Heaven and Earth's principle by putting others before themselves, yet ultimately find themselves elevated above the multitude. Heshang Gong explains that the sage's humility instead earns universal reverence. Wang Pang contends that though sages transcend ordinary sanctity, their outward appearance remains indistinguishable from common people—precisely because they follow the Dao's principle of non-contention (Wuwei), they become truly extraordinary. Those who deliberately seek novelty are more easily surpassed by ordinary folk.

When sages place themselves beyond concern, the people protect them as they would their own parents. Emperor Xuanzong reveals the subtle wisdom here: humility inspires willing support, while detachment preserves one's true self. Heshang Gong explains this worldly wisdom as "being stern with oneself yet generous with others," demonstrating how seemingly paradoxical phenomena actually align with the Dao's profound operational patterns.

 神明祐之若赤子故身常存○雱曰有我  而存之則物皆吾敵夫唯超然自喪不有  吾身者物莫能傾之 非以其無私邪  河曰聖人爲人所愛神明所祐非以其公  正無私所致乎 故能成其私  明皇曰天地忘生養之功是無私而能長  且乆是成其私聖人後外其身是無私而  能先能存是成其私也○河曰人以爲私  者欲以厚己也聖人無私而己自厚故能  成其私也○弼曰無私者無爲於身也身  先身存故曰能成其私也○雱曰聖人無  私未嘗有我故也使計而爲之則私敦甚  焉    上善若水章第八 上善若水  明皇曰將明至人上善之功故舉水性幾  道之喻○河曰上善之人如水之性○雱  曰水者五行之首方出空無而入實有者  也離道未遠故其性最近道蓋離道則善  名立矣上善若水物理自然 水善利萬物  河曰水在天爲霧露在地爲泉源也 而不爭處衆人所惡  河曰衆人惡卑濕垢濁水獨靜流居之也  弼曰人惡卑也○雱曰處一本作居 故幾於道矣  明皇曰幾近○河曰水性幾與道同○弼  曰道無水有故曰幾○雱曰人有心心爲  火火騰上而明故好爭唯忘心體道者能  利物而無心勝物也 居善地  明皇曰上善之人處身柔弱亦如水之居  地潤益一切地以卑用水好下流○河曰
Interpretation

The divine spirits (referring to the numinous powers between heaven and earth) protect selfless individuals as tenderly as they would guard an infant, thus granting them longevity. Wang Pang (a Song dynasty scholar) explains: If one clings to the notion of "self," all things become oppositional. Only those who transcend selfhood and relinquish attachments remain unshaken by the myriad phenomena.

Is this not precisely because of their selflessness?

Heshang Gong (Han dynasty commentator) annotates: The sage is beloved by people and protected by the spirits—is this not due to his impartial selflessness? Thus, he paradoxically achieves true self-realization.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang elaborates: Heaven and earth nurture all beings without claiming merit; appearing selfless, they thereby attain eternity. The sage places himself last, appearing selfless yet gaining reverence and preservation. Heshang Gong adds: Ordinary people understand "self-interest" as serving personal desires, whereas the sage, through selflessness, attains genuine self-fulfillment. Wang Bi (Three Kingdoms philosopher) observes: Selflessness means not deliberately pursuing personal gain, yet thereby taking precedence and preserving oneself. Wang Pang further states: The sage harbors no selfish intent and never fixates on "I." Calculative striving only leads to deeper selfishness.

Chapter Eight speaks of supreme goodness resembling water. Emperor Xuanzong explains: Here, water’s nature illustrates the highest virtue of one who embodies the Dao (the Way). Heshang Gong says: One possessing supreme goodness (De/Virtue) embodies water’s qualities. Wang Pang reflects: Water, foremost among the Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, Water), emerges from emptiness yet assumes form, closest to the Dao’s essence. Once water departs from the Dao, it manifests as "goodness"—this "supreme goodness like water" follows nature’s law.

Water nourishes all things without contention, willingly settling in places people disdain. Heshang Gong clarifies: In heaven, water becomes mist, clouds, rain, and dew; on earth, springs and streams. Wang Bi adds: People shun low-lying places. Wang Pang notes: Water’s nature nearly mirrors the Dao.

Emperor Xuanzong states that "nearly" (几) means approximation. Heshang Gong considers water’s nature closest to the Dao. Wang Bi observes: The Dao is formless while water has form—hence "nearly." Wang Pang explains: The human heart belongs to Fire, whose upward-tending nature breeds contention. Only by forgetting the self and embodying the Dao can one, like water, nurture without strife.

Regarding dwelling in goodness, Emperor Xuanzong says: One of supreme goodness, like water, abides in humble gentleness, enriching all without struggle. Heshang Gong annotates: Water always flows downward.

 水性善喜於地在草木之上即流而下有  以於地動而下人也○雱曰趣下而流 心善淵  明皇曰用心深靜亦如水之泉停矣○河  曰水深空虚淵深清明○雱曰深靜而乎  内明外晦 與善仁  明皇曰施與合乎至仁亦如水之滋潤品  物矣○河曰萬物得水以生與虚而不與  盈也 言善信  明皇曰發言信實亦如水之行險不失其  信矣○河曰水内影照形不失其情也   雱曰萬逝必東 政善治  明皇曰從政善理亦如水之洗滌羣物令  其清靜矣○河曰無有不洗清且平也○  雱曰任理而不任情積柔弱而勝重大 事善能  明皇曰於事善能因任亦如水性方圓隨  器不滯於物○河曰能方能圓曲直隨形  雱曰唯變所適故無不能也 動善時  明皇曰物感而應不失其時亦如水之春  泮冬凝矣○河曰夏散冬凝應期而動不  失天時○雱曰决之則流壅之則止不先  物動亦不失時 夫唯不爭  河曰壅之則止决之則流聽從人也 故無尤矣  明皇曰上善之人虚心順物如彼水性壅  止决流既不違迕於物故無過尤之地○  河曰水性如是故天下無有怨尤水者也  弼曰言水皆應於此道也○雱曰水體一  而物莫能易故能兼此諸善蓋有德於物  而常下物是以有德使有心於爲德則不 能成德矣故篇終又言之
Interpretation

The innate nature of water is to flow downward, always moving from high places where plants grow toward the earth. Several Daoist scholars have interpreted this phenomenon from different perspectives:

Wang Pang (Northern Song scholar) observed that water's downward movement mirrors how humans should maintain a deep and tranquil state of mind. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) commented that practitioners should cultivate inner stillness like the profound calm of a deep pool. Heshang Gong (Han dynasty commentator) added that while deep waters appear empty, they are in fact clear and luminous; Wang Pang further explained this state as embodying inner clarity with outward reserve.

Regarding water's nourishing quality, Minghuang noted that water's moistening of all things manifests the highest form of benevolence. Heshang Gong remarked that all beings depend on water for growth, yet it gives without seeking reward. On constancy, Minghuang observed that water never breaks its course even through treacherous terrain, while Heshang Gong likened this to water's faithful reflection of images, and Wang Pang emphasized its unwavering eastward flow.

In governance, Minghuang suggested rulers should cleanse society as water purifies all it touches. Heshang Gong described water's ability to cleanse while remaining undisturbed, and Wang Pang advocated following cosmic principles rather than personal bias—appearing yielding yet capable of bearing great weight. Concerning adaptability, Minghuang pointed to water's capacity to take any container's shape, Heshang Gong noted its ability to be square or round, and Wang Pang saw this flexibility as enabling limitless potential.

On timing, Minghuang observed water's seasonal rhythms—thawing in spring and freezing in winter without deviation. Heshang Gong added its summer dispersion and winter congealment, while Wang Pang highlighted its wisdom in flowing or pausing as needed. The scholars collectively concluded: precisely because water never contends with things (stopping when blocked, flowing when channeled), it remains free from resentment. Minghuang advised Dao cultivators to emulate water's humble responsiveness, Heshang Gong noted its flawless virtue, Wang Bi (Three Kingdoms scholar) recognized it as the perfect manifestation of Dao (the Way), and Wang Pang summarized that water's constant humility ultimately achieves the noblest De (Virtue/Power).

  持而盈之章第九 持而盈之不如其已  明皇曰執持盈滿使不傾失積財爲累悔  吝必生故不如其已已止也○河曰盈滿  也已止也持滿必傾不如止也○弼曰持  謂不失德也既不失其德又盈之勢必傾  危故不如其已者謂乃更不如無德無功  者也○雱曰持而盈之有意於有所以失  之唯忘有有之爲有而有之以無有則無  失無溢矣 揣而銳之不可長保  明皇曰揣度銳利進取榮名富貴必驕坐  招殃咎故不可長保○河曰揣治也先揣  之後必棄捐○弼曰既揣末令尖又銳之  令利勢必摧衂故不可長保也○雱曰揣  者巧於度情銳者利於入物且事物無盡  而吾持一身以遇其變則揣銳之工有時  困矣豈可長保乎故至人因時乘理而接  之以無我則其出無方而所應不窮也 金玉滿堂莫之能守  明皇曰此明盈難乆持也○河曰嗜欲傷  神財多累身○弼曰不若其已○雱曰實  外物而守之所守非所有也豈能乆乎 富貴而驕自遺其咎  明皇曰此明銳不可揣也驕猶心生故咎  非他與○河曰夫富當賑貧貴當憐賤而  反驕恣必彼禍患也○弼曰不可長保也  雱曰驕生於恃外恃外之人何足算乎四  者皆以己有物與爲驕者同累然自持盈  而下每失彌甚 功成名遂身退天之道  明皇曰功成名遂者當退身以辭盛亦如
Interpretation

This scripture passage expounds the principle of knowing when to stop in human conduct.

The first line states that trying to fill a vessel to overflowing is not as wise as stopping in time. As Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) explains, stubbornly maintaining a state of fullness invites overturning, and excessive accumulation of wealth becomes a burden, inevitably leading to regret. Both Heshang Gong and Wang Bi argue that rather than forcing fullness to the point of danger, it is better to stop at the right moment. Wang Pang further elaborates that deliberate pursuit of possession often leads to loss, and only by treating "having" with a mindset of "non-having" can one truly retain.

The second line explains that honing a blade too sharp makes it difficult to maintain for long. Emperor Xuanzong points out that excessive pursuit of glory and riches inevitably leads to arrogance, inviting disaster. Heshang Gong uses the metaphor of meticulously carving an object only to discard it in the end. Wang Bi compares it to a blade that is too sharp and easily broken. Wang Pang contends that relying on personal cleverness to handle the endless changes of the world will ultimately prove insufficient—thus, the sage aligns with the times and dissolves self-attachment to respond effortlessly.

The third line says that even a house filled with gold and jade cannot be kept forever. Emperor Xuanzong observes that this further illustrates how fullness is unsustainable. Heshang Gong notes that greed harms the spirit (Shen) and wealth burdens the body. Wang Pang argues that clinging to external things for security is futile, as those things were never truly one's own to begin with.

The fourth line warns that arrogance amid wealth and honor invites calamity. Emperor Xuanzong cites this as proof that "sharpness cannot be tested indefinitely." Heshang Gong emphasizes that those in prosperity should aid the needy, or else disaster will surely follow. Wang Pang notes that pride stems from dependence on external conditions—such people are not even worth engaging with.

The conclusion summarizes: When achievements are made and fame is at its peak, one must know to withdraw at the height of success, for this aligns with the Dao of Heaven. Emperor Xuanzong uses the metaphor of "stepping back from glory," much like.... Through these five real-life examples, the chapter progressively unfolds the profound truth that "things turn into their opposites when they reach extremes."

 天道盈虚有時則無憂患矣○河曰言人  所爲功成事立名迹稱遂不退身避位則  遇於害此乃天之常道也譬如日中則移  月滿則虧物盛則衰樂極則哀○弼曰四  時更運功成則移○雱曰寒暑相推物極  則返陰陽代運天道回然而世之愚者一  遭其變一犯其名則終身有之認以爲己  曾不知造化之密移吉凶之倚伏故終至  於坐蒙憂患無以自存唯至人不然藏金  玉而不寳居富貴而不榮凡物之來寄者  如陰影集身窅然不知其在彼邪在我邪  然則豈持盈以爲慎揣銳以爲工乎苟非  無我之妙其何以與於此天之道大矣而  莫尚乎是    載營魄章第十 載營魄  河曰營魄魂魄也人載魂魄之上得以生  當愛養之喜怒亡魂卒驚傷魄魂在肝魄  在肺美酒甘肴傷人肝肺故魂靜志道不  亂魄安德壽延年也○雱曰魄陰物形之  主也神之爲物廣大通達而不自了者神  常載於魄故神反拘於形體此廣者所以  狹通者所以滯也欲學此道者當先廓其  志氣勿累於形體使神常載魄而不載於  魄則可以抱一而體神矣竊嘗論曰人之  既死有升沉之異者良由滅神徇形以神  從魄故至於淪乎幽陰化爲異物也若夫  神完之人雖魄之陰滯將與神爲一而無  所不之矣聖人之死日神不從魄也其始  也亦載魄而已 抱一能無離乎
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the operational principles of the celestial Dao (Tian Dao) and the philosophy of self-cultivation.

The text first explains the patterns of celestial movement: All phenomena in nature follow cycles of flourishing and decline, just as the sun begins its descent after reaching its zenith, and the moon wanes after becoming full. When things reach their peak, they inevitably turn toward decline; when joy reaches its extreme, sorrow emerges. This constitutes the immutable law of nature. The four seasons rotate seamlessly—each completing its purpose before yielding to the next. Heat and cold alternate, as all developments reverse direction upon reaching their limits. Ordinary people, however, become attached to transient circumstances, mistaking temporary conditions for permanence, thereby sinking into endless distress. The truly wise differ—they neither overvalue gold and jade possessions nor take pride in wealth and status, regarding external things as fleeting shadows that blur the boundary between self and other. Such individuals need not deliberately maintain perfection or sharpness, having already attained the state of "no-self" (Wuwo).

The subsequent "Nurturing the Hun and Po" chapter discusses soul cultivation: The "Hun and Po" refer to the human spiritual souls (ancient belief held that the Hun governs consciousness while the Po governs the physical form). Human existence relies on these souls, hence their careful nourishment is essential. Excessive joy or anger harms the Hun, while sudden fright damages the Po. The Hun resides in the liver and the Po in the lungs—overindulgence in food and drink injures these organs. Only through maintaining the souls' tranquility can longevity be achieved. The Po, belonging to Yin, dominates the physical form; the Shen (spirit) is originally vast and free but becomes constrained by its attachment to the Po (physical body). Practitioners must first expand their consciousness beyond bodily limitations, allowing the spirit to govern the form rather than being confined by it—this achieves the state of "embracing unity" (Baoyi, maintaining mind-body harmony). The distinction between ascension and descent after death stems from whether one's spirit submits to the physical form—ordinary people sink because their spirits become enslaved to their bodies, while sages experience death as their spirits' liberation from temporary physical vessels.

 明皇曰人生始化曰魄既生魄陽曰魂魄  則陰虚魂則陽滿言人載虚魄常須營護  復陽陽氣充魄則爲魂魂能運動則生全  矣一者不雜也復陽全生不可染雜故令  抱守淳一能無離身乎○河曰言人能抱  一使不離於身則長存一者道始所生太  和之精氣也故曰一布名於天下天得一  以清地得一以寧侯王得一以爲正平入  爲心出爲行布施爲德總名爲一一之爲  言志一無二也○弼曰載猶處也營魄人  之常居處也一人之眞也言人能處常居  之宅抱一清神能常無離乎則萬物自賔  也○雱曰一者精之數不言精而言一者  守一則精不摇矣學道歸乎復性復性歸  乎體神所以不能神者由逐末忘本以物  易己故喪精失靈沉爲下愚也陰陽之靈  曰魂魄魂陽故遊遊而止我身者以魄爲  之配也魄陰故營營止也故學者必先寧  其志氣使精魄靜一魄止則魂定精一則  神全矣一生水水爲精人之初生因精集  神本自渾全而不能了者常至於離析隳  散其名曰罔兩罔者神不明兩者精不一  也莊子曰無揺汝精抱一之謂也蓋精神  水火之象火無常形因膏顯照神則廓然  無體不可致工但當存精而己如增膏而  火明培根而葉茂也魂魄精神既不虧耗  然後心强氣順不爲物使靜則體道作則  契理妙而極之則與神爲一更絶四名矣
Interpretation

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Emperor Ming) explains: The yin energy formed at birth is called "po" (corporeal soul). After po is established, yang energy forms "hun" (ethereal soul). As po belongs to yin, it requires nourishment and enrichment, while hun, being yang, must remain full and vibrant. The human body carries this delicate po which requires constant care and regulation.

When yang energy fully permeates po, it transforms into hun. When hun can circulate freely, life achieves complete preservation. "One" represents a state of pure, unadulterated unity. Restoring yang energy and preserving life both demand absolute purity—thus one must hold fast to the undivided Dao, never letting it depart from the body.

Heshang Gong's commentary states: If a person can maintain this "One" without letting it leave the body, they will attain longevity. "One" is the primordial harmonious Qi (vital energy) first produced by the Dao. Thus it is said that "One's" fame spreads throughout the world: Heaven becomes clear by attaining "One," Earth becomes tranquil by attaining "One," and rulers become just by attaining "One." Internally it manifests as intention, externally as action. When extended to others, it becomes De (Virtue). All these are collectively called "One"—meaning single-minded focus without distraction.

Wang Bi's commentary explains: "To carry" means to dwell. "Hun-po" is the abode where humans permanently reside. "One" is humanity's true nature. If people can peacefully dwell in their constant residence (the body), maintaining purity and clarifying their Shen (spirit) without letting it depart, all things will naturally return to them.

Lü Huiqing's commentary states: "One" is the fundamental state of Jing (essence). We say "One" rather than "essence" because by holding to "One," essence remains unshaken. The ultimate goal of Daoist practice is returning to one's original nature, which requires realizing the primordial Shen. The reason people cannot manifest their spiritual nature is that they chase branches while forgetting the root, allowing external things to alter themselves—thus losing essence and spiritual clarity, sinking into ignorance.

The spiritual manifestations of yin-yang are hun and po: Hun, being yang, wanders, and can remain in the body only when matched with po; Po, being yin, is stable. Therefore practitioners must first stabilize their will, making essence, Qi, hun and po tranquil and unified. When po is settled, hun becomes steady; when essence is unified, Shen becomes complete.

"One" generates water, which represents essence. At birth, people possess complete Shen through gathered essence, but later often lose this wholeness through dispersion—this condition is called "wangliang": "wang" meaning unclear Shen, "liang" meaning divided essence. As Zhuangzi said, "Do not disturb your essence"—this speaks precisely of holding fast to "One."

The relationship between Shen and essence resembles that of fire and water: Fire has no fixed form and relies on oil to shine; Shen is vast and formless, impossible to work with directly—one can only cultivate it through nurturing essence, just as adding oil brightens fire and strengthening roots enriches branches. When hun, po, Shen and essence remain undiminished, willpower strengthens, Qi flows smoothly, and one ceases to be driven by external things. In stillness, one comprehends the great Dao; in action, one aligns with heavenly principle. At the ultimate stage, one unites with primordial Shen, transcending all names and distinctions.

 此學者之至要萬世聖賢皆由此義求不  在外當由心得之 專氣致柔能如嬰兒乎  明皇曰專一沖氣使致和柔能如嬰兒無  所分别乎○河曰專守精氣使不亂則形  體能應之而柔順能如嬰兒内無思慮外  無政事則精神不去也○弼曰專任也致  極也言任自然之氣致至柔之和能若嬰  兒之無所欲乎則物全而性得矣○雱曰  人生有三曰精曰神曰氣精全則神全神  全則能帥氣矣神衰而不足以帥氣則氣  作不常使人陷於非道孟子曰志者氣之  帥也楊雄曰氣者所適善惡之馬歟帥懦  而衆悖則師必亡馬怒而御疲則車必敗  神不能專氣則喜怒哀樂唯氣所爲沈陷  越佚理固然也古之士無不曉此苟未及  此則當清心以防之孔子所謂三戒皆防  氣也門人獨顔回能專氣故曰不遷怒氣  之暴在陽而陽之發者莫暴於怒於怒可  以無遷則非專氣而何人生本具聖質氣  佚而不能專故自壯以往離道彌遠能抱  一則神全神全則氣柔氣柔則眞全所以  與嬰兒同專者有而擅其權之謂 滌除玄覽  河曰當洗其心使潔清也心居玄㝠之處  覽知萬事故謂之玄覽也 能無疵乎  明皇曰玄覽心照也疵瑕病也滌除心照  使令清靜能無疵病乎○河曰不淫邪也  弼曰玄物之極也言能滌除邪飾至於極
Interpretation

This passage explains how Daoist practitioners can attain a state of purity akin to an infant by regulating Jing (essence), Qi (vital energy), and Shen (spirit). The core principle lies in the four-character phrase "concentrating Qi to achieve softness," which means harmonizing and focusing the primordial Qi within the body to reach its most pliant state.

Commentators offer varied interpretations: Emperor Xuanzong of Tang suggests focusing on balancing the innate Qi (Chong Qi), becoming like an infant free from discriminating thoughts; Heshang Gong emphasizes preserving Jing and Qi without dispersion, allowing the body to naturally soften; Wang Bi advocates aligning with natural Qi to attain ultimate softness; while Wang Pang systematically analyzes the relationship between Jing, Qi, and Shen—preserving Jing stabilizes Shen, stabilized Shen governs Qi, otherwise emotions become dominated by Qi and blood.

Three examples illustrate this: Mencius describes willpower as the commander of Qi; Yang Xiong compares Qi to a horse capable of both good and evil deeds; Confucius particularly praises Yan Hui for controlling anger (not transferring anger)—all manifestations of "concentrating Qi." Ordinary people, as they age and their Qi scatters, drift further from the Dao. Only by holding fast to the "One" (the origin of Dao) can one maintain the innocence and wholeness of an infant.

The latter part, "cleansing the mysterious mirror," discusses methods of mental cultivation. "Mysterious mirror" refers to the mind's capacity to reflect all things—like polishing a mirror, one must clear away distracting thoughts (cleansing) to achieve flawless clarity. Heshang Gong explains this as purifying the heart and intentions; Emperor Xuanzong adds that the mind-mirror must be cleansed of all flaws; Wang Bi describes it as stripping away all false adornments to return to the fundamental essence.

In short, this passage presents two layers of practice: externally, harmonizing Qi to make it soft and yielding; internally, purifying the mind to achieve lucidity. Only through cultivating both can one return to the pristine state of an infant.

 覽能不以物介其明疵之其神乎則終與  玄同也○雱曰能專氣則性定性定則智  明智明則可以蕩滌除去而玄覽至理矣  既燭其理則世間萬態同爲至妙儻睹一  疵則非識理也 愛民治國  河曰治身者愛氣則身全治國者愛民則  國安 能無烏乎  明皇曰愛養萬人臨理國政能無爲乎當  自化矣自上營魄皆教修身身修則德全  故可爲君矣○河曰治身者呼吸精氣無  令耳聞也治國者布施惠德無令下知也  弼曰任術以求成運數以求匿者智也玄  覽無疵猶絶聖也治國無以智猶棄智也  能無以智乎則民又僻而國治也○雱曰  如上說爲己之道盡矣然則可以其餘及  人也老子之言專於復性有爲則非所以  使民安性故雖愛治而不尚有爲此道之  至也 天門開闔  河曰天門謂北極紫微宫開闔謂終始兩  際也治身天門謂鼻孔開謂喘息闔謂呼  吸也 能烏雌乎  明皇曰天門歷數所從出開闔謂理亂言  人君應期受命能守雌靜則可以永終天  禄矣又解云易曰一闔一闢謂之變言聖  人撫運應變無常不以雄成而守雌牝亦  如天門開闔虧盈而益謙也○河曰治身  當如雌牝安靜柔弱治國應變和而不唱  弼曰天門謂天下之所由從也開闔治亂  之際也或開或闔經通於天下故曰天門
Interpretation

This passage discusses the principles of self-cultivation and state governance, emphasizing the concepts of governing through non-action (Wuwei) and maintaining softness and stillness.

Regarding self-cultivation, the text states that by focusing on breath regulation (concentrating Qi), one can stabilize the mind. A stabilized mind leads to clear wisdom, which in turn eliminates distracting thoughts and allows one to perceive profound truths (mysterious insight into ultimate principles). Once these truths are understood, one can see through the essence of all things. If one still fixates on individual flaws, it indicates a lack of true comprehension of the Dao (the Way). In self-cultivation, one should maintain a natural state like breath regulation (inhaling vital essence and Qi), without excessive striving.

Concerning state governance, the passage advocates governing the people and administering the state through non-action. Rulers should emulate the soft and still qualities of the feminine (holding to the female principle), functioning naturally like the celestial movements of the North Star's Purple Palace (symbolizing the Heavenly Gate). When bestowing benefits upon the people, rulers should act spontaneously without making the populace feel manipulated (without letting subordinates perceive intention). By abandoning clever stratagems (discarding wisdom), rulers can foster simplicity among the people and bring stability to the nation.

The text cites various commentaries: Heshang Gong's notes emphasize that self-cultivation requires stillness and softness, while state governance should follow natural harmony; Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's commentary suggests that rulers who conform to heavenly mandate and maintain softness will endure; Wang Bi's interpretation indicates that governing should adapt to circumstances like the natural opening and closing of the Heavenly Gate. Collectively, these commentaries illustrate that whether in self-cultivation or state governance, one must follow the natural Dao, preserve softness and stillness, and avoid deliberate action—this represents the highest state of wisdom.

 開闔也雌應而不唱因而不爲言天門開  闔能爲雌乎則物自賔而處自安矣○雱  曰至人無心於作精神出入皆應而不唱  莊子所謂有物采之者老子於四時當秋  其德主金靜一復性者也故其尚如此至  於易則先天後天無非道者 明白四達  河曰言道明白如日月四達滿於天下八  極之外故曰視之不見聽之不聞彰布之  於十方焕焕煌煌也 能無知乎  明皇曰人君能爲雌靜則萬姓樂推其德  明白如日四照猶須忘功不宰故曰能無  知乎○河曰無有能知道滿於天下者○  弼曰言至明四達無迷無迷無惑能無以  爲乎則物化矣所謂道常無爲侯王若能  守則萬物自化○雱曰理無足知知以應  物既知至理則自當無知唯能無知故無  所不知也如昭然有知則是不知無知之  妙何足謂知也竊嘗論之聖智下愚本無  殊品因愚顯智乃有聖名聖人本心何嘗  自聖故明白四達而初無所知乃眞聖人  之知也 生之畜之  河曰道生萬物而畜養之○弼曰不塞其  原也不禁其性也○雱曰道備如上則造  化在我可以生畜萬物矣 生而不有  河曰道生萬物無所取有○雱曰道生萬  物物之與道常爲一體誰有之者 烏而不恃  河曰道所施爲不恃望其報也○雱曰不  得已而爲爲於已然之時雖有爲之之功
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the core Daoist concept of "governing through Wuwei (non-action)." The opening and closing of the Heavenly Gate (referring to the natural Dao) resembles the yielding receptivity of the feminine—responding harmoniously without active assertion, aligning with nature without forced interference. When rulers emulate this feminine tranquility and inclusiveness, all beings naturally return to them, and the world achieves stability of its own accord.

Those who attain the Dao do not act with deliberate intention; their spiritual activities align with natural rhythms without compulsion, much like Zhuangzi's description of "being gathered by things" in perfect spontaneity. Laozi considered autumn—representing the virtue of Metal among the Five Phases (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, Water)—as embodying stillness, unity, and the return to original nature. Those who truly comprehend the Great Dao remain aligned with it, whether in the primordial state before creation or the manifested world thereafter.

The radiance of the Great Dao illuminates all directions like the sun and moon shining upon the world, extending even beyond the Eight Extremities (the farthest reaches of space). Though invisible and inaudible, its brilliance manifests throughout the ten directions (the entire cosmos). True wisdom does not stem from deliberate seeking of knowledge but from maintaining a state of no-knowledge and no-desire. If rulers preserve feminine softness and clarity, the people will naturally support them; even while shining as brightly as the sun and moon, they must forget their achievements and refrain from arbitrary control.

The Dao gives birth to and nourishes all things without claiming possession, just as it neither blocks water sources nor suppresses innate nature. When one fully realizes the Great Dao, one becomes capable of generating and nurturing all beings like the Dao itself. The Dao creates without ownership because all things are fundamentally one with it. Its actions never anticipate reward; even when it appears to act, it does so only by following necessity in accordance with temporal conditions.

 而超然自喪豈復矜恃哉 長而不宰  河曰道長養萬物不宰割以爲器用○雱  曰道如上文則可長天下以無爲矣雖在  物上如標枝然豈有分割之功乎 是謂玄德  明皇曰令物各遂其生而畜養之遂生而  不以爲有修爲而不恃其功居長而不爲  主宰人若能如此者是謂深玄之德矣○  河曰言道行德玄冥不可得見欲使人如  道也○弼曰不塞其源則物自生何功之  有不禁其性則物自濟何爲之情物自長  足不吾宰成有德無主非玄如何凡言玄  德皆有德而又知其主出乎幽冥○雱曰  玄爲妙體德之至也昔舜在側微書聞玄  德蓋至德常在於無思無爲此篇之義主  於無爲故雖爲長而德猶稱玄也此篇自  爲士以至於體神入聖修身之序盡矣    三十輻章第十一 三十輻共一轂  河曰古者車三十輻法月數也共一轂者  轂中有孔故衆輻共凑之治身者當除情  去欲使五藏空虚神乃歸之也治國者寡  能總衆弱共扶强 當其無有車之用  明皇曰此明有無功用相資而立三十輻  者明造車共一轂者因言少總衆夫轅厢  之有共則成車車中空無乃可運用若無  轅厢之有亦無所用之車車中若不空無  則轅厢之有皆爲棄物矣○河曰無謂空  虚轂中空虚輪得轉行轝中空虚人得載
Interpretation

This passage expounds the supreme state of Daoist governance through "non-action" (Wuwei). Laozi employs two vivid metaphors to illustrate this principle:

First, consider the construction of a wheel: Ancient wheels had thirty spokes (symbolizing the lunar cycle) converging upon the central hub. The hub must remain hollow to allow the wheel to turn. Governing a state should mirror this axle—maintaining receptiveness like an empty vessel, enabling all forces to operate naturally. Forced control ("butchering") would only undermine effectiveness.

Then observe the profound virtue (Xuan De) of the Dao: True virtue nourishes all beings like springtime without claiming merit, just as the hub bears the entire carriage without ostentation. When sages govern the world, they should let people flourish naturally ("things grow spontaneously") without suppressing their innate nature ("not restricting their essence"). This seemingly inactive approach paradoxically achieves the highest accomplishment—"the merit of no-thought and non-action."

The text references Emperor Shun's (ancient sage-king) "profound virtue," denoting this unpretentious yet transformative power that influences all effortlessly. For Daoist practitioners cultivating body and mind, the same principle applies: maintain inner emptiness ("hollowed five viscera") like the vacant hub, allowing the spirit (Shen) to return naturally. Whether governing a state or refining oneself, the key lies in mastering the wisdom of Wuwei—appearing non-interventive yet accomplishing all.

 其上也○弼曰轂所以能統三十輻者無  也以其無能受物之故故能以實統衆也  雱曰共一本作用 埏埴以烏器  河曰埏和也埴土也和土以爲飲食之器 當其無有器之用  明皇曰埏和也埴土也陶匠和土爲瓦缶  之器○河曰器中空虚故得有所盛受 鑿户牖以爲室  河曰謂作屋室 當其無有室之用  明皇曰古者陶穴以爲室宇亦開户牖故  云鑿爾○河曰言户牖空虚人得以出入  觀視室中空虚人得以居處是其用也○  雱曰凡此三物或運轉或貯盛或居處而  皆以無有爲用 故有之以爲利  河曰利物也利於形用器中有物室中有  人恐其屋破壞腹中有神畏形之消亡也 無之以爲用  明皇曰有體利無以無爲利無體用有以  有爲用且形而上者曰道形而下者曰器  將明至道之用約形質以彰故借粗有之  用無以明妙無之利有爾○河曰言虚空  者乃可用盛受萬物故曰虚無能制有形  道者空也○弼曰木埴璧所以成三者而  皆以無爲用也言無者有之所以爲利皆  賴無以爲用也○雱曰無非有對因有有  無於無之中復有妙有不窮之用妙有之  功若夫有物之有具存形質非能應於不  窮者也故但爲利利陰屬也雖然此有無  之論耳極而言之則無不離有有亦眞無  非有非無乃眞妙有也
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the dialectical relationship between "being" (you) and "non-being" (wu) through three examples: the wheel, pottery, and a house. The hub at the center of a wheel can integrate its thirty spokes precisely because it is hollow—this state of "non-being" creates space for the axle, enabling the wheel to turn. Similarly, when a potter crafts vessels from clay, what proves truly useful isn't the clay itself but the empty space within the vessel that holds contents.

When building a house, doors and windows are carved out—what truly serves function isn't the wall material but the spatial openings allowing passage, light, and habitable interior. These three examples demonstrate that while physical forms ("being") provide foundational structure, it's the voids ("non-being") that enable practical utility.

The text further explains: concrete objects (the "below-form" realm) depend on material existence, yet the highest principle (the "above-form" realm, i.e., the Dao) manifests its function through emptiness. Just as the body requires Shen (spiritual energy) to sustain life—if one focuses solely on physical form while losing inner spirit, vitality perishes. The true profundity lies in the interdependence of "being" and "non-being"—"being" provides material basis while "non-being" realizes practical function; only their union generates infinite marvels.

Ultimately, the highest realization transcends the duality of "being" and "non-being," recognizing that "non-being" isn't absolute void but contains boundless potential, while "being" isn't merely matter but shares essence with "non-being." This state—neither exclusively being nor non-being, yet simultaneously both—constitutes genuine "mysterious existence" (xuanmiao zhi you).

   五色章第十二 五色令人目盲  河曰貪淫好色則傷精失明也 五音令人耳聾  河曰好聽五音則和氣去心不能聽無聲  之聲 五味令人口爽  明皇曰目悦青黃之觀耳耽宫徵之音口  嗛芻豢之味傷當過分則坐令形骸聾盲  河曰爽亡也人嗜五味於口則口亡言失  於道味也○雱曰人生而靜目物有遷耳  自本自希夷而聲色在前眞從妄喪口之  於味亦復如此故昩於聲聲色色味味之  妙者聲色味也 馳騁田獵令人心發狂  明皇曰馳騁代務執著有爲如彼田獵唯  求殺獲曰以心鬥逐境奔馳靜而思之是  發狂病○河曰人精神好安靜馳聘呼吸  精神散亡故發狂也○弼曰爽差失也失  口之用故謂之爽失耳目心口皆順其性  也不以順性命反以傷自然故曰盲聾爽  狂也○雱曰足於内則得逐於外則惑故  馳聘田獵血氣俱作心爲發狂明逐物失  性 難得之貨令人行妨  明皇曰性分所無求亦不得妄求難得故  令道行有所妨傷○河曰妨傷也難得之  貨謂金銀珠玉心貪意欲不知厭足則傷  身辱也○弼曰難得之貨塞人正路故令  人行妨也○雱曰難得之貨非適於養已  而愚者妄以爲美因毁行以求之唯明乎  天下之良貴與夫有萬之富則外物莫能  傷矣 是以聖人烏腹
Interpretation

This chapter explains how excessive pursuit of sensory pleasures damages one's inherent nature. When dazzled by too many colorful sights, the eyes become dimmed (Heshang Gong's commentary: obsession with beauty depletes Jing-essence and Qi-energy, leading to blindness). Constant exposure to elaborate music makes the ears lose their sensitivity (Heshang Gong notes: indulgence in music dissipates harmonious Qi, rendering one deaf to the silent music of heaven). Overindulgence in fine flavors dulls the palate (Emperor Xuanzong of Tang remarks: eyes craving vibrant colors, ears addicted to musical scales, mouths gluttonous for rich meats—such excesses inevitably harm the body).

Reckless hunting drives the Shen-spirit into frenzy (Emperor Xuanzong observes: constant chasing after external things resembles hunting's single-minded slaughter—such mentality is itself a kind of madness. Heshang Gong adds: the human spirit should remain serene and clear; excessive activity scatters and depletes it). Rare treasures distort one's conduct (Emperor Xuanzong points out: forcibly seeking what isn't rightfully yours obstructs Dao cultivation. Heshang Gong illustrates: insatiable craving for gold, jewels and treasures only invites calamity).

Therefore, the true Sage (one who has attained the Dao) seeks only basic sustenance, never chasing external indulgences. They understand that inner fulfillment is fundamental, while pursuing material things leads only to losing one's true nature. As Wang Pang remarked: those content within remain unmoved by external temptations, while those craving sensual pleasures are actually wounding their heaven-endowed original nature.

 河曰守五性去六情節志氣養神明 不爲目  河曰目不妄視妄視泄情於外 故去彼取此  明皇曰取此含受之腹去彼妄視之目   河曰去彼目之妄視取此腹之養性○弼  曰爲腹者以物養己爲目者以目役己故  聖人不爲目也○雱曰腹無所不容目觸  類分别 寵辱章第十三    寵辱若驚  明皇曰操之則慄捨之則悲未忘寵辱故  皆驚也○河曰身寵亦驚身辱亦驚○雱  曰心榮於見寵則辱孰甚焉 貴大患若身  明皇曰身爲患本故矜貴其身即如貴大  患矣此合云貴身如貴大患而乃云貴大  患如身者欲明起心貴身即是大患有貴  即身是大患故云貴大患如身若此也此  上兩句正標○河曰貴畏也若至也畏大  患至身故皆驚○雱曰有貴而累其心則  其患大矣如人有身動輒自累 何謂寵辱  河曰問何爲寵何爲辱寵者尊榮辱者耻  辱及身還自問者以曉人也○雱曰一本  此有若驚二字非也若曰寵乃世之所榮  何以爲辱乎設問以發下文 寵爲下  明皇曰前標寵辱如驚恐人不了故問何  謂寵辱夫得寵驕盈無不生禍是知寵爲  辱本故答云寵爲下○河曰辱爲下賤○  雱曰受寵於人則爲下之道趙孟能賤之  者寵於人者也凡生莫不有眞君足以高  天下莫不有眞宰足以製萬物而愚者失
Interpretation

This scripture primarily expounds the principles of self-cultivation. It begins by emphasizing the need to preserve the five inherent virtues (humaneness, righteousness, propriety, wisdom, and faithfulness) while eliminating the six emotional desires (joy, anger, sorrow, pleasure, love, and hatred). One should regulate willpower and Qi-blood circulation while nurturing the Shen (spirit). Particular attention is given to restraining visual desires, as indiscriminate gazing dissipates inner emotions. Therefore, one must abandon external distractions and focus on internal refinement.

Regarding the concept of "favor and disgrace," the scripture explains that both conditions cause agitation. The human body itself is the root of various afflictions, and excessive attachment to it only invites greater calamity. While favor may appear glorious on the surface, it actually represents a debased state because it implies subjugation to others. Truly wise individuals remain unattached to external judgments of honor or disgrace.

The text cites multiple commentators: Heshanggong (a renowned Han dynasty annotator) warns against calamities befalling the self; Emperor Xuanzong of Tang clarifies that overvaluing the physical form constitutes the fundamental calamity; Wang Pang (a Song dynasty scholar) adds that mental attachments inevitably bring misfortune, just as possessing a body naturally entails burdens. These interpretations collectively demonstrate that one should transcend external evaluations of honor and disgrace, returning instead to the cultivation of inner nature.

 其良貴逐物求榮與奪之權在人之乎而  吾之憂喜繫於得失豈不早且惑乎驚生  於有愛而畏奪故有寵之累如驚也彼三  仕三已而無喜愠之色者固驚乎謂誰受  寵而不自榮則居寵而非辱矣 得之若驚  河曰得寵榮驚者處高位如臨危也貴不  敢驕不敢奢 失之若驚  河曰失者失寵處辱也驚者恐禍重來也 是謂寵辱若驚  明皇曰寵辱循環寵爲辱本凡情惑滯雖  辱而不驚寵故聖人戒云汝之得寵當如  汝得辱而驚則汝之失寵得辱亦如吾戒  汝得寵而驚懼也故結云是謂寵辱若驚  弼曰寵必有辱榮必有患驚辱等榮患同  也爲下得寵辱榮患若驚則不足以亂天  下也○雱曰爲其得失之際有若驚之心  是以辱也 何謂貴大患若身  明皇曰恐人不曉即身是患本故問之○  河曰復還自門何故畏人若身○弼曰大  患榮寵之屬也生之厚必入死之地故謂  之大患也人迷之於榮寵返之於身故曰  大患若身也○雱曰貴者在物之上而有  國家有之而不能忘則爲患大矣譬人有  身珍而累之則寒暑疾痛萬緒皆作豈非  大患乎市南子曰堯非有人非見有於人  者也貴者有人寵者見有於人唯聖人能  免此二者 吾所以有大患者爲吾有身  明皇曰身相虚幻本無眞實爲患本者以
Interpretation

This scripture discusses the human attitude toward favor, disgrace, gain, and loss. Laozi points out that people often become anxious about external evaluations—trembling with fear when receiving favor and panicking when losing it. This is the state described as "being startled by favor and disgrace as if facing danger."

Heshanggong (a Han dynasty commentator) explains: Feeling alarmed when receiving honors is because high position feels precarious, making one dare not become arrogant or extravagant. Panicking when losing favor stems from fear that misfortune may strike again. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang further elaborates: Favor and disgrace form a cycle—today's honor may become the source of tomorrow's humiliation. Ordinary people are easily deceived by appearances, while sages warn us to regard favor with the same vigilance as disgrace.

Wang Bi (a Three Kingdoms period metaphysician) adds: Where there is favor, there must be disgrace; where there is glory, there must be anxiety, for they share the same essence. If rulers (those who govern) worry about favor and disgrace like common people, they will bring chaos to the world. Wang Anshi (Wang Pang) observes: It is precisely because people feel alarmed during gains and losses that they experience shame.

Regarding the discussion of "great calamity seems like the body": Laozi rhetorically asks why people treat favor as importantly as life itself? Heshanggong says this reflects confusion when examining oneself. Wang Bi explains: The greatest calamity is favor itself—excessive pursuit leads to peril. Wang Anshi uses a metaphor: Just as excessive attachment to one's body brings countless afflictions like seasonal illnesses.

Finally, quoting Shinanzi from Zhuangzi's Miscellaneous Chapters: Emperor Yao neither possessed others nor was possessed by others. The truly noble depend on no one, while the favored must curry favor. Only sages transcend both states. Laozi concludes: Our great suffering stems precisely from overvaluing this "self." Emperor Xuanzong clarifies: The body is fundamentally illusory—attachment to it is the root of all affliction.

 吾執有其身痛癢寒温故爲身患○河曰  吾所以有大患者爲吾有身憂其勤勞念  其飢寒觸情從欲則遇禍患也○弼曰由  有其身也 及吾無身  弼曰歸之自然也 吾有何患  明皇曰能知天地委和皆非我有離形去  智了身非身同於大通夫有何患○河曰  使吾無有身體得道自然輕舉升雲出入  無間與道通神當有何患○雱曰萬物與  我爲一則與道玄同而萬變皆忘吉凶息  矣而愚者不能自解恃形爲己故形之所  遭觸途生患老子先明寵貴之累而寵貴  之累皆縁有身而生故因譬貴之若身遂  及無身之妙莊子曰忘其所不忘而不忘  其所忘是之謂誠忘亦明此義而孔子毋  我理與是同學期於此而已然所謂無者  豈棄而去之乎但有之而未嘗有則不累  矣且崇高莫大乎富貴誠能有之以無有  則聖人所爲濟世也亦何患之有其於寵  也亦若斯而已矣 故貴以身爲天下若可寄天下  河曰言人君貴其身而賤人欲爲天下主  者則可以立不可以乆也○弼曰無物以  易其身故曰貴也此乃可以託天下也 愛以身爲天下若可託天下  明皇曰此章首標寵辱之戒後以託寄結  成者夫寵辱若驚未忘寵辱貴愛以爲未  忘貴愛故以辱校寵則辱不如寵以貴方  愛則貴不如愛驚寵辱者尚有寵辱介懷
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses the dialectical relationship between "having a body" (youshen) and "being without a body" (wushen), extending to principles of governance.

Laozi posits that human suffering fundamentally stems from excessive attachment to the physical form. Heshang Gong's commentary observes that people constantly worry about hunger, cold, and exhaustion while indulging carnal desires, thus inviting misfortune. Wang Bi states more directly: all suffering originates from possessing this body.

Attaining the state of "no-body" (wushen), as Wang Bi explains, means returning to one's natural state. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang elaborates: realizing that neither heaven, earth nor the myriad things truly belong to oneself, one transcends physical and mental limitations to unite with the Dao, thereby eliminating suffering. Heshang Gong adds that practitioners who liberate themselves from bodily constraints can merge with the Dao in perfect freedom.

Lü Huiqing's commentary delves deeper: when humans unite with all things, they harmonize with the Dao, rising above concepts of fortune and misfortune. Ordinary people create their own troubles through bodily attachment. Laozi first demonstrates how worldly honors and wealth become burdens through physical obsession, using "valuing the body" (guishen) as metaphor before revealing the wonder of "no-body." This resonates with Zhuangzi's "forgetting what should be forgotten" and Confucius' teaching of "no ego" (wuwo).

"Being without a body" doesn't mean abandoning the physical form, but maintaining it without bondage. Like sages who dwell amidst wealth yet remain transcendent, they benefit the world without personal entanglement.

The discourse concludes with governance principles: Heshang Gong warns that rulers who prioritize themselves over others may temporarily control the realm but cannot sustain it. Wang Bi asserts only those unswayed by external things deserve the empire's stewardship. Emperor Xuanzong synthesizes that this chapter begins analyzing how honor and disgrace affect people, ultimately revealing the true art of governance—only those unattached to personal glory or shame can genuinely shoulder the responsibility of ruling All-under-Heaven.

 存貴愛者未爲兼忘天下故初則使驚寵  如辱後欲令寵辱俱忘假寄託之近名辯  兼忘之極致忘寵辱則無所復驚忘身則  無爲患本忘天下則無寄託之近名○河  曰言人君能愛其身非爲己也乃欲爲萬  民之父母以此得爲天下主者乃可以託  其身於萬民之上長無咎也○弼曰無物  可以損其身故曰愛也如此乃可以寄天  下也不以寵辱榮患損易其身然後乃可  以天下傳之也○雱曰聖人無身故土苴  足以堯舜有身而爲之則累矣苟未及乎  無身則唯尊生重本不以物易己者如可  以寄託天下貴者不辱其身愛者不危其  身子州支父王子搜之徒是也若此二人  者豈榮其寵累其貴乎一本作可以託天  下矣可以寄天下矣此王弼取南華爲定  非是    視之不見章第十四 視之不見名曰夷  明皇曰此明道也夷平易也道非色故視  不可見以其於無色之中能色故詔曰夷  河曰無色曰夷言無采色不可得視而見  之○雱曰道至於萬法平等無有高下之  處非目所睹 聽之不聞名曰希  明皇曰希者聲之微也道非聲故聽之不  聞以其於無聲之中獨能和焉故好曰希  河曰無聲曰希言一無音聲不可得聽而  聞之○雱曰物相感觸乃有聲響大道不  與物鄰用心求之其去已遠故曰希則經  所謂大音也
Interpretation

This discussion explores Daoist wisdom regarding "forgetting the self" and "governing the state." When a ruler cherishes himself, it is not for personal gain but to become the parent of all people. Only those who truly understand how to cherish their original nature (Benxing) are worthy of ruling the world. Such individuals remain unshaken by favor or disgrace, gain or loss, and do not allow external things to harm their innate essence (Xing). Thus, the world can be entrusted to them with peace of mind. Like the ancient virtuous lords Zhou Zhifu and Prince Sou, they did not seek honor and status but prioritized preserving the authenticity of life (Zhenxing).

Next, we explain the mysterious characteristics of the Dao (the Way): When you look at it with your eyes, you cannot see it—this is called "Yi" (indicating the Dao's formless and imageless nature). Because the Dao is not a concrete form, it contains all forms within what appears as emptiness. When you listen for it with your ears, you cannot hear it—this is called "Xi" (indicating the Dao's soundless and silent nature). Because the Dao does not rely on specific sounds, within stillness lies the source of all sound. The true "Great Dao" does not collide with concrete things; if one deliberately seeks it through sensory perception, one strays further from it. This is the realm described in the classics as "the greatest sound is faintly heard" (Dayin Xisheng)—the grandest sound has no audible noise.

搏之不得名曰徴  明皇曰摶執持也微妙也道無形故執持  不得以其於無形之中而能物焉故詔曰  微○河曰無形曰微言一無形體不可摶  持而得之  此三者不可致詰  河曰三者謂夷希微也不可致詰者夫無  色無聲無形口不能言書不能傳當受之  靜求之以神不可詰問而得之也 故混而烏一  明皇曰三者將以詰道道非聲色形法故  詰不可得但得希夷微爾道非希夷微故  復混而爲一○河曰混合也故合於三名  之而爲一○弼曰無狀無象無聲無響故  能無所不通無所不往不得知更以我耳  目體不知爲名故不可致詰混而爲一也  雱曰三者本一體而人所以求之者或以  視或以聽或以摶故隨事强名雖然所用  求者與夫所欲求者未嘗不一也唯了吾  一則與彼一脗然爲一矣 其上不皦  河曰言一在天上不皦皦光明 其下不昧  明皇曰在上必明在下者必昩唯道於上  非上在上亦不明於下非下在下亦不昩  河曰言一在天下不昩昩有所闇冥○雱  曰凡物有質則具陰陽上皦下昩理必然  也唯道無物故混然而成此言道之定體  莊子曰失吾道者上見光而下爲土 繩繩兮不可名  河曰繩繩者動行無窮極也不可名者非  一色也不可以青黄白黑别非一聲也不  可以宫啇角徵羽聽非一形也不可以長
Interpretation

When you try to grasp it with your hands, you cannot seize it—this is what we call "subtle" (referring to the ineffable profundity of the Dao). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains that "grasping" means attempting to hold it with one's hands. The Dao is too refined and mysterious; it has no fixed form, and thus cannot be grasped. Precisely because the Dao exists without form yet gives birth to all things, we use the term "subtle" to describe it.

Heshang Gong (a Han Dynasty Daoist thinker) comments: "Having no form is called 'subtle,'" meaning the Dao lacks concrete shape and cannot be obtained through physical grasping. Here, the three descriptors—"even" (夷, flat), "rare" (希, scarce), and "subtle" (微, refined)—cannot be fully articulated in words. Because the Dao has no color, no sound, and no form, the mouth cannot speak of it clearly, nor can writing fully express it. One can only silently contemplate it with the spirit (Shen) and cannot attain it through questioning.

Thus, these three are actually fused into one. Emperor Xuanzong points out that if we use these three aspects to inquire into the nature of the Dao, we find that it is neither sound, color, nor form—no amount of questioning yields an answer. We can only perceive it as seemingly existent yet non-existent, as if there yet not there. But the Dao itself transcends even this state of "rare, even, and subtle," ultimately merging into a single unity. Heshang Gong says this is the convergence of the three descriptions into one. Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin Dynasty Neo-Daoist scholar) adds that the Dao has no shape, no image, no sound, and no echo—thus it is all-pervasive and omnipresent. We cannot comprehend it through the senses of sight and hearing, so we cannot exhaustively define its essence. Instead, we can only understand it as an undivided whole.

Lü Huiqing (a Song Dynasty scholar) argues that these three are originally one, but people, through different means of perception—such as sight, hearing, or touch—force different names upon it. In truth, the method of inquiry and the object of inquiry have always been the same. Only by understanding this "oneness" can one fully align with the Dao.

The Dao above is not dazzlingly bright (Heshang Gong comments: The Dao exists in the heavens yet does not glare); below, it is not dark (Emperor Xuanzong explains: Ordinary things are necessarily bright above and dark below, but the Dao is neither bright above nor dark below). Heshang Gong says: "The Dao exists beneath heaven yet is not dark." Lü Huiqing elaborates: Ordinary physical things all contain the duality of Yin and Yang—brightness above and darkness below is their inevitable pattern. Only the Dao, lacking material form, remains an undivided unity. Zhuangzi says: "Those who truly attain the Dao can perceive light above and transform into dust below."

The Dao stretches endlessly yet cannot be named (Heshang Gong comments: Like a rope, it is continuous, its movement and transformation without end). It cannot be named because: It is not a single color—it cannot be distinguished by blue, yellow, white, or black; it is not a single sound—it cannot be classified by the five notes of the pentatonic scale (gong, shang, jue, zhi, yu); it is not a single shape—it cannot be measured by length, shortness, largeness, or smallness.

 短大小度之也 復歸於無物  明皇曰繩繩者運動不絶之意不皦不昧  運動無窮生物之功名目不得非物能物  故常生物而未始有物妙本湛然故云復  歸於無物○河曰物質也復當歸之於無  質○雱曰道有常度其理可信故曰繩繩  雖繩而實無定體故不可名要其極也未  始有物至矣不可加矣 是謂無狀之狀  河曰言一無形狀而能爲物作形狀也   雱曰有而不可見 無物之象  河曰一無物質而爲萬物設形象也○弼  曰欲言無邪而物由以成欲言有邪而不  見其形故曰無狀之狀無物之象也○雱  曰有而不可得 是謂惚恍  明皇曰是謂無形狀之狀無物質之象不  可名有不可名無無有難名故謂之惚恍  河曰一忽忽恍恍若存若亡不可見之也  弼曰不可得而定也○雱曰忽者有之疑  於無恍者無之疑於有道之爲物非有非  無不可定名 迎之不見其首  河曰一無端末不可預待也除情去欲一  自歸之也 隨之不見其後  明皇曰無始故迎之不見其首無後故隨  之不見其後○河曰言一無影迹不可得  而著○雱曰物有定體乃分前後道既無  形敦爲首尾此言道之運用故可迎隨雖  曰迎隨而迎隨在物道未嘗異 執古之道以御今之有  明皇曰執古無爲之道以御今有爲之事
Interpretation

This scripture discusses the profound characteristics of the Dao (the Way, cosmic origin and principle). Using the metaphor of an endlessly moving rope, it illustrates how the Dao operates ceaselessly—neither dazzling nor dim, it gives birth to all things within infinite motion while remaining intangible itself. Though the Dao generates all phenomena, it preserves its fundamental nature of emptiness, ultimately returning to a state of non-being.

Commentators offer varied interpretations: Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Tang Minghuang) likens the Dao to an unbroken chain of knots; Heshang Gong (Heshang) emphasizes that while formless, the Dao bestows form upon all things; Wang Pang (Pang) observes that though the Dao follows constant laws, it has no fixed shape. This paradoxical state of seeming presence and absence is called "huhuang" (indistinct and elusive)—neither wholly nonexistent nor concretely existent.

The Dao has neither beginning nor end: looking back, one cannot perceive its origin; looking forward, one finds no terminus. Just as the ancients grasped this eternal Dao to address immediate affairs, the text demonstrates how its principles transcend temporal constraints. The term "yu" (to govern) here does not imply forceful control but rather aligning with the Dao's patterns to manage worldly matters.

Through layered negations ("neither dazzling nor dim," "form without form") and paradoxical phrasing ("present yet invisible"), the passage reveals the Dao's transcendence beyond ordinary perception, setting the stage for later discussions on applying the Great Dao to statecraft and self-cultivation.

 則還反淳樸也○河曰聖人執守古道主  一以御物知今當有一也○弼曰有有其  事○雱曰古之道謂古今常一之道唯其  古今常一故可御世故之萬變 能知古始  雱曰推而上之至於無初之初乃知物無  所從來則道之情得矣 是謂道紀  明皇曰能知古始所行是謂道化之綱紀  河曰人能知上古本始有一是謂知道綱  紀也○弼曰無形無名者萬物之宗也雖  今古不同時移俗易故莫不由乎此以成  其治者也故可執古之道以御今之有上  古雖遠其道存焉故雖在今可以知古始  也○雱曰道之紀要古今不變者是則莊  子所謂
Interpretation

This passage discusses how sages (those who have attained the Dao) uphold the eternal and unchanging fundamental Dao. Heshang Gong (commentator) explains that sages adhere to the ancient Dao transmitted from antiquity, using "the One" (referring to the origin of Dao) to govern all things, understanding that even now we should return to this "One." Wang Bi (commentator) adds that although the world contains countless concrete phenomena.

Lü Huiqing (commentator) elaborates: The so-called "ancient Dao" refers to the eternal principle that remains unchanged throughout past and present. Precisely because this principle is unchanging, it can respond to the myriad transformations of the world. Only by tracing all things back to their primordial origin—even beyond the very concept of "origin" itself—can one truly comprehend that all things fundamentally have no source. This is genuine realization of the Dao's truth.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (commentator) states: Those who can know the state of the ancient origin have grasped the guiding principle of the Dao's operation. Heshang Gong further explains: If a person understands that the ancient origin is "the One," they comprehend the essential outline of Dao. Wang Bi points out: That which is formless and nameless (referring to Dao) is the root of all things. Though eras change and customs transform, all phenomena must rely on this root to function properly. Therefore, we can grasp the unchanging Dao to respond to present circumstances. Though antiquity seems distant, Dao always exists—thus we can still perceive the ancient origin in the present moment.

Lü Huiqing concludes: The guiding principle of Dao is that eternal, unchanging law—what Zhuangzi called "the record without beginning" (the timeless principle that has no origin or endpoint).

無端之紀也 道徳眞經集註卷之二

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0093); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 1 Vol. 3 →