中文 · EN

《道德真經集註(一)》Vol. 5

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 5 / 10 8,483 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集註(一)》 Vol. 5 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 17 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集註(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source text (with commentary)Interpretation

道德眞經集註卷之五靡五     明皇河上公王弼王雱註    以道佐人主章第三十 以道佐人主者  河曰謂人主能以道自輔佐也 不以兵强天下  河曰以道自佐之主不以兵革順天伍德  敵人自服○弼曰以道佐人主尚不可以  兵强於天下况人主躬於道者乎○雱曰  體道而有天下者萬物將自賔何暇言此  故但稱佐人主者聖人以德强國以兵輔  德 其事好還  明皇曰人臣能以道輔佐人主者當柔服  以德不用兵甲之威取强於天下何則兵  者凶器戰者危事抗兵加彼彼必應之其  事既好還報則勝負之數未可量也○河  曰其舉事好還自責不怨於人也○弼曰  爲治者務欲立功生事而有道者務欲還  反無爲故云其事好還也○雱曰還謂不  往而務復也與事天治人莫如嗇同意 師之所處荆棘生焉  河曰農事廢田不修 大軍之後必有凶年  明皇曰軍師所處戰則妨農農事不修故  生荆棘兵氣感害水旱繼之農廢於前災  隨其後必有凶荒之年○河曰天應之以  惡氣即害五穀五榖盡傷人也○弼曰言  師凶害之物也無有所濟心有所傷賊害  人民殘荒田畝故曰荆棘生也○雱曰殺  戮之慘傷天地之和氣 善者果而已矣  河曰善兵者當果敢而已不休 不敢以取强焉
Interpretation

This scripture passage primarily discusses how to use the Dao (the Way) to assist rulers in governing the state, emphasizing that one should not rely on military force to assert dominance. Several commentators have provided interpretations from different perspectives:

Heshang Gong (the legendary commentator) argues that rulers should employ the Dao to support their governance rather than conquering the world through military might. By aligning with the natural order of heaven, adversaries will submit of their own accord. Wang Bi supplements this view by stating that even those who assist rulers should avoid military aggression—how much more should this apply to rulers themselves? Wang Pang further observes that rulers who truly comprehend the great Dao will naturally attract all things to them, making such considerations unnecessary.

The scripture mentions that "such affairs easily rebound." Emperor Xuanzong explains this as meaning that military action invites retaliation, making outcomes unpredictable. Heshang Gong interprets it as reflecting on one's actions without blaming heaven or others. Wang Bi suggests that rulers obsessed with governance constantly seek achievements, while those who follow the Dao pursue a return to simplicity. Wang Pang explains "rebound" as focusing on restoration rather than initiating attacks, aligning with the principle that "in governing people and serving heaven, nothing surpasses frugality."

The passage then describes the dire consequences of war: lands where armies camp become desolate, and great battles inevitably lead to years of famine. Emperor Xuanzong notes that warfare disrupts agriculture, causing disasters. Heshang Gong states that war generates malignant Qi (vital energy) that harms crops. Wang Bi views armies as instruments of destruction that only harm people and ruin farmland. Wang Pang emphasizes that killing disrupts the harmonious Qi between heaven and earth.

Finally, the text states that those skilled in military affairs stop once their objective is achieved, never daring to persist in aggression. Heshang Gong explains this as acting decisively but not excessively. The entire passage warns rulers to govern through the Dao and exercise caution with military force, as warfare inevitably brings severe consequences.

 河曰不以果敢取强大之名也○弼曰果  猶濟也言善用師者趣以濟難而己矣不  以兵力取强於天下矣○雱曰果成也趣  成事而已兵猶天之霜雪凡所以成物蓋  物非威不成故天與聖人皆以威輔德也  豈敢恃衆求强以利歸己乎 果而勿矜  河曰當果敢謙卑勿自矜大也 果而勿伐  河曰當果敢推讓勿自伐取其美也 果而勿驕  明皇曰善輔相者果於止敵蓋在於安人  和衆必不敢求勝取强故雖果於止敵敵  不爲冦慎勿矜功伐取以自驕盈驕則敗  亡故爲深戒○河曰驕欺也果敢勿以驕  欺人○弼曰吾不以師道爲尚不得已而  用何矜驕之有也○雱曰此三者生於有  我而好勝唯無意於勝者爲可以用兵 果而不得己  河曰當果敢至誠不當迫不得已也 果而勿强  明皇曰前敵來侵不得休止故用兵以止  之如是則果在於應敵非果以取强也○  河曰果敢勿以爲强兵堅甲以侵陵人也  弼曰言用兵雖趣功果濟難然時故不得  已當復用者但當以除暴亂不遂用果以  爲强也○雱曰凡上四事是勿强之道 物壯則老  河曰草木壯極則枯落人壯極則衰老也  言强者不可以久○雱曰盛極則衰物理  必然古有當此禍者秦是也 是謂非道  雱曰體道者兼萬變而不居一物故無壯  老之意 非道早己
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the Dao (the Way) of military strategy and wisdom for navigating life. Commentators like Heshang Gong (Han Dynasty annotator) and Wang Bi (Wei-Jin period metaphysician) emphasize that true strength never relies on brute force to gain fame. Those skilled in military affairs only resort to arms when absolutely necessary to resolve crises, never to flaunt their power before the world.

When employing force, one must maintain humility: avoid arrogance after success (勿矜), refrain from boasting about achievements (勿伐), and shun domineering behavior (勿骄). These commentaries reveal that pride, self-aggrandizement, and competitive mentality all stem from excessive self-attachment. Those who truly understand the Dao of warfare only take up arms as a last resort.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's commentary particularly clarifies that military action should solely serve to resist invasion and preserve peace, never to demonstrate might. Like autumn frost that appears harsh yet follows natural law—all things require measured authority to fulfill their purpose. The威严 (awe-inspiring power) of celestial Dao and sages exists only to support De (Virtue/Power); how could one exploit numerical superiority for selfish gain?

The text employs the growth cycle of plants as metaphor: when things reach their zenith, they inevitably decline (物壮则老), and excessive displays of strength violate the Dao (是谓非道). Just as the Qin Dynasty collapsed prematurely through its obsessive pursuit of dominance. Those who embody the Dao embrace all transformations without fixation, thus avoiding the trap of prosperity turning to ruin.

 明皇曰物之用壯由兵之恃强物壯則衰  兵强則敗是謂不合於道當須早止不爲  雱曰壯武力暴興也喻以兵强於天下者  也飄風不終朝驟雨不終日故暴興必不  道早已也    夫佳兵章第三十一 夫佳兵者不祥之器  河曰祥善也兵者驚精神濁和氣不善人  之器也不當修飾之 物或惡之  河曰兵動則有所害故萬物無有不惡之 故有道者不處  明皇曰佳者好也兵者謀略也凡人修辭  立誠不能以道德藏器而以兵謀韜略爲  好謀略之用只在於攻取殺伐故爲不善  之器凡物尚或惡之是以有道之人不處  身於此爾○河曰有道之人不處其國○  雱曰不處者濟難而已不以爲常 是以君子居則貴左  河曰貴柔弱也 用兵則貴右  明皇曰左陽也陽和則發生故平居所貴  右陰也陰凝則肅殺故用兵所貴○河曰  貴剛强也此言兵道與君子道反所貴者  異也 兵者不祥之器  明皇曰祥善也好兵者尚殺爲不善之材  器也○河曰兵革者不善之器也 非君子之器  明皇曰君子以道德爲材器不貴兵謀○  河曰非君子所貴重器也○雱曰君國以  無爲子民以慈惠故不尚兵 不得已而用之  河曰謂遭衰逢亂禍欲加萬民乃用之以  自守 恬淡爲上  明皇曰夷狄内侵故不得已善勝不爭是
Interpretation

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (also known as Emperor Ming) explains: When things reach their peak of strength, they inevitably decline—just as an army relying solely on brute force is prone to defeat. This occurs because such actions violate the principles of the Dao (the Way), and one should cease such aggressive behavior in time.

Wang Pang (a Song Dynasty scholar) adds: Military strength often breeds tyranny, just as fierce winds do not blow all day, nor do torrential rains last through the night. Such sudden surges of power are inherently contrary to the Dao and will quickly fade away.

Chapter 31 specifically addresses the issue of military force: "Fine weapons are inauspicious objects." Heshang Gong (a Han Dynasty commentator) elaborates: Weapons disturb the human spirit (Shen) and disrupt the harmonious Qi (vital energy) of heaven and earth. They are not tools for virtuous people, nor should they be glorified. All things despise weapons because their use inevitably brings harm—thus, those who follow the Dao do not engage with them.

Emperor Xuanzong further clarifies: "Fine weapons" here refers to an obsession with strategy. Ordinary people, unable to secure their lives through moral cultivation, instead treasure military tactics as precious. Yet these strategies serve only conquest and slaughter, making them ill-omened tools. Even common objects detest them—how much more so would a person of Dao? Heshang Gong states that a Daoist ruler would never allow a state to rely on such means, while Wang Pang argues that force should only be a last resort in dire circumstances, never a routine practice.

Therefore, a noble person in daily life honors the left (symbolizing gentleness), but in warfare, honors the right (symbolizing severity). Emperor Xuanzong interprets this distinction: The left belongs to Yang, governing growth—hence its precedence in peaceful times. The right belongs to Yin, governing execution—thus its dominance in military affairs. Heshang Gong notes that this very contrast reveals how warfare opposes the way of the noble.

Weapons are indeed inauspicious. Emperor Xuanzong observes that they glorify slaughter and are not tools of virtuous craftsmanship. Heshang Gong also emphasizes that weapons should never be valued by noble-minded individuals. Wang Pang adds that governance should follow Wuwei (non-action), cherishing the people rather than glorifying force.

Only when absolutely necessary should force be employed. Heshang Gong explains that this applies to situations like defending against chaos or disasters that threaten the people. Even then, one must maintain inner detachment. Emperor Xuanzong illustrates this with the example of repelling foreign invasions: those skilled in victory do not provoke conflict.

 恬淡爲上○河曰不貪土地利人財寳 故不美也  河曰雖得勝而不以爲利美也 若美必樂之樂之者是樂殺人也  河曰是得勝者是爲喜樂殺人者○雱曰  兵器主於殺伐而過爲之飾使美而可觀  是以殺人爲美也 夫樂殺人者不可得志於天下矣  明皇曰制勝於敵必哀其人故不以爲美  也夫勝必多殺若以勝爲美者是樂多殺  人也樂多殺人人必不附欲求得志不亦  難乎○河曰爲人君而樂殺人此不可得  志於天下爲人主必專制人命妄行刑誅  雱曰孟子曰不嗜殺人者能一之 故吉事尚左  河曰左生位也 凶事尚右  河曰陰道殺也 是以偏將軍處左  河曰偏將軍卑而居陽者以其不專殺也 上將軍處右  明皇曰偏將軍卑而處左者不專殺也上  將軍尊而處右者主兵謀也○河曰上將  軍尊而居右者言其主殺也 言居上勢則以喪禮處之  明皇曰喪禮尚右今上將軍居右者是以  喪禮處置之○河曰上將軍於右喪禮尚  右死人貴陰也 殺人衆多以悲哀泣之  明皇曰以生靈之貴而交戰殺之有惻隱  之心故以悲哀傷泣之爾○河曰傷己德  薄不能以道化人而害無辜之民 戰勝以喪禮處之  明皇曰勇士雄人戰而獲勝勝則受爵居  於右位尚右非吉是以喪禮處之但以爲
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how the art of warfare should maintain an attitude of serenity and equanimity, never glorifying military force. Ancient commentators like Heshanggong and Wang Pang offer valuable insights for understanding its meaning:

First, it establishes that serenity and wuwei (non-action) are the superior approach. Heshanggong explains that true detachment means not coveting land or material possessions. Even in victory, one should not revel in triumph—to celebrate military success as a joyous occasion is equivalent to taking pleasure in killing. Wang Pang adds that weapons are inherently tools of violence; to deliberately adorn them with ornate decorations is to treat killing as something beautiful.

Next, it emphasizes that those who delight in killing can never attain true mastery under heaven. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (Minghuang) clarifies that when victorious over an enemy, one should mourn them rather than treat the victory as celebratory. Heshanggong notes that a ruler who enjoys killing will never win the hearts of the people. Wang Pang quotes Mencius: "Only those who do not relish killing can unify the world."

The text then illustrates military principles through ancient ritual protocol: auspicious events honor the left (representing yang and life), while inauspicious events honor the right (representing yin and death). Thus, the lieutenant general (偏将军) stands to the left as he does not preside over slaughter, while the commanding general (上将军) stands to the right, symbolizing his role in warfare. Both Emperor Xuanzong and Heshanggong point out that positioning the commander on the right follows funeral rites conventions.

Finally, it stresses maintaining sorrow even amid heavy casualties. Emperor Xuanzong observes that while recognizing the preciousness of life, people still kill one another—this should be met with grief. Heshanggong interprets this as self-reproach for insufficient De (Virtue), failing to transform others through Daoist principles and thus harming the innocent. Victories should be treated as funerals: though brave warriors receive honors on the right, this position is inherently inauspicious, hence the need for mourning rituals.

 不祥之器亦何必縞素爲資○河曰古者  戰勝將軍居喪主禮之位素服而哭之明  君子貴德而賤兵不得已誅不祥心不樂  之比於喪也知後世用兵不已故悲痛之  弼曰疑此非老子之作也    道常無名章第三十二 道常無名  明皇曰道以應用爲常常能應物其應非  一故於常無名○河曰道能陰能陽能弛  能張能存能亡故無常名也○雱曰道無  體焉得名 樸雖小天下莫能臣  明皇曰樸妙本也妙本精一故云小而應  用匠成則至大也故無敢以道爲臣者○  河曰道樸雖小微妙無形天下不敢有臣  使道者也○雱曰樸在人爲性於數爲一  不主一氣而能成萬象故常在事物之先  敦能臣之然取於一念而足可名爲小矣  易曰復小而辨於物 侯王若能守萬物將自賔  明皇曰侯王若能守道精一無爲而化則  萬物將自賔服矣○河曰侯王若能守道  無爲萬物將自賔服從於德也○弼曰道  無形不繫常不可名以無名爲常故曰道  常無名也樸之爲物以無爲心也亦無名  故將得道莫若守樸夫智者可以能臣也  勇者可以武君也巧者可以事役也力者  可以重任也樸之爲物憒然不偏近於無  有故曰莫能臣也抱樸無爲不以物累其  眞不以欲害其神則物自賔而道自得矣  雱曰賔者伏而歸之之謂侯王體此無名
Interpretation

Concerning weapons of war as ominous instruments, why adorn them with white mourning garments? Heshanggong (the commentator) explains: Ancient victorious generals would stand in the position of chief mourner, weeping in plain white garments, demonstrating how noble men value virtue over military force. Even when compelled to execute the inauspicious, they took no joy in it, grieving as if attending a funeral. Knowing future generations would endlessly resort to arms, they felt sorrow in advance. Wang Bi (another commentator) suspects this passage may not be original to Laozi.

Chapter 32 discusses the nature of Dao: The Dao remains eternally nameless. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang (commentator) states: Dao's constancy lies in following all things, yet its manner of accommodation varies endlessly, thus defying any fixed designation. Heshanggong adds: Dao manifests as both Yin and Yang, expands and contracts, exists and perishes, therefore it has no constant name. Wang Pang (commentator) argues: How could the formless Dao possibly possess a name?

Though this primal state (pu, the Uncarved Block) is subtle, nothing in the world dares claim mastery over it. Emperor Xuanzong explains: Pu is the root of all subtlety - minute yet responsive to all things, its application achieves greatness, thus none dare treat Dao as subordinate. Heshanggong says: Though this Dao-origin appears small and formless, none in the world presume to command it. Wang Pang elaborates: In humans it appears as innate nature, in numbers as unity; while not governing any particular Qi, it completes all phenomena, thus eternally preceding concrete things - who could dominate it? The Yijing states "Returning to the minute yet discerning all things."

Should lords and kings preserve this primal state, the myriad things will naturally submit. Emperor Xuanzong maintains: If rulers guard Dao's purity, governing through wuwei (non-action), all things spontaneously yield. Heshanggong says: When kings uphold Dao through non-action, creatures submit through De (Virtue). Wang Bi interprets: Dao leaves no traces, bound by nothing, eternally unnameable - hence "Dao remains nameless forever." This primal state takes wuwei as its heart and likewise lacks names; to attain Dao, best preserve this original condition. The wise may become capable ministers, the brave may lead armies, the skillful may handle affairs, the strong may bear heavy burdens - but this primal state remains whole and impartial, bordering on emptiness, thus none can master it. Preserving the uncarved, governing through non-action, neither burdening essence with externals nor harming spirit with desires, the myriad things submit spontaneously and Dao is naturally obtained. Wang Pang concludes: "Submission" means bowing in allegiance - should lords and kings embody this nameless realm...

 之樸以爲天下正則不假威武勸賞物不  知其然而自賔矣猶收其母則子必從也 天地相合以降甘露  河曰侯王動作能與天相應合天即下甘  露善瑞也 人莫之令而自均  明皇曰侯王若能抱守精一則地平天成  交泰致和故降灑甘露夫甘露之降簫蘭  俱澤不煩教令而自均平取譬侯王稱物  平施 河曰天降善瑞則萬物莫有教令  之者皆自均調若一也 弼曰言天地相  合則甘露不求而自降我守其眞性無爲  則民不令而自均也 雱曰守無名之樸  以爲治則陰陽之升降各由其序而和氣  應矣甘露者陰陽交和所生自然均彼無  使之者蓋道之所感無所不周故也孟子  曰上下與天地同流豈曰小補之哉此之  謂也若莊子所謂寒暑之和不成反傷人  之形者蓋失此道而已一本人作民非 始制有名  河曰始道也有名萬物也道無名能制於  有名無形能制於有形也 名亦既有  明皇曰人君以道致平始能制御有名之  物故有名之物亦盡爲侯王所有矣既盡  也河曰既盡也有名之物盡有情欲叛  道離德故身毁辱也 天亦將知止  河曰人能法道行德天亦將自知之 知止所以不殆  明皇曰若侯王能制有名之物則夫有名  之物亦將知依止於侯王知依止有道之  君所以無危殆之事○河曰天知之則神
Interpretation

This scripture passage primarily discusses how rulers (sovereigns) could achieve natural harmony by governing according to the principles of the Dao (the Way).

When a ruler maintains a state of pristine simplicity (holding fast to essential unity), it is like heaven and earth naturally cooperating to send down sweet dew—no coercive measures are needed for all things to submit of their own accord. This resembles how a child naturally follows when reunited with its mother. The sweet dew symbolizes auspicious signs produced by the harmonious blending of Yin and Yang Qi (vital energies), evenly distributed without human intervention, embodying the natural equilibrium of the Dao.

The text emphasizes that true governance does not lie in external coercion (without resorting to force or rewards) but in inner virtue (De). If the ruler can preserve the nameless simplicity (the original state of the Dao), all things will naturally fall into order, as if nourished by the sweet dew. Mencius’ statement about "flowing in unison with heaven and earth" and Zhuangzi’s critique of "disordered seasons harming people" illustrate, from both positive and negative perspectives, the importance of following the natural Dao.

The discussion on "the beginning of regulation gives rise to names" points out that the original Dao is nameless yet governs all named things (the myriad beings). When a ruler governs with the Dao, all specific phenomena (named things) find their proper place. However, becoming obsessed with named things while straying from Dao and De invites calamity. Thus, one must know when to stop (knowing limits) to avoid danger (free from peril).

Commentaries by Heshang Gong and Emperor Xuanzong of Tang both stress that if rulers uphold the fundamental Dao and De, celestial signs of auspiciousness (sweet dew) will manifest, and all things will naturally attain balance—this is the path to enduring peace and stability.

 靈祐助不復危殆○弼曰始制謂樸散始  爲官長之時也始制官長不可不立名分  以定尊卑故始制有名也過此以往將爭  錐刀之末故曰名亦既有夫亦將知止也  遂任名以號物則失治之母也故知止所  以不殆也○雱曰名迹既立則民將遂而  不返枝葉橫生源流派别而性命爛熳矣  故始制有名當即知止則終無爭奪之危  制者判樸成器之謂 譬道之在天下由川谷之於江海也  明皇曰天降甘露以瑞有道故譬有道之  君在宥天下天則應之猶如川谷與江海  通流爾○河曰譬言道之在天下與人相  應和如川谷與江海相流通也○弼曰川  谷之不求水與海非江海召之不召不求  而自歸者世行道於天下者不令而自均  不求而自得故曰猶川谷之與江海也○  雱曰江海不求水而水歸之者由鍾水之  多則性同者往矣道民之性也聖人能集  其純全則有生之類從而賔之亦性然也    知人者智章第三十三 知人者智  河曰能知人好惡是爲智○雱曰智足以  知人而昩於見己者由私己故也可名爲  智而未明也 自知者明  明皇曰智者役用以知物明者融照以鑒  微智則有所不知明則無所不照○河曰  人能自知賢不肖是爲反聽無聲内視無  形故爲明○弼曰知人者自智而已矣未
Interpretation

This passage discusses the relationship between governance and natural laws. When institutions are first established ("始制" refers to society emerging from a state of primal simplicity), official positions and titles must be created to clarify hierarchical order. However, once distinctions are made, people begin contending over trivial advantages, so one must understand where to stop. If governance relies entirely on names and titles, it loses touch with the root of order ("治之母" meaning the source of the Dao).

Just as rivers naturally flow into the sea without being summoned, a ruler who embodies the Dao governs the world without forceful commands, yet all things find their harmonious order. The reason the ocean can receive countless streams lies in its capacity to embrace; the sage attracts people because he maintains integral virtue (De).

Chapter Thirty-Three speaks of cognitive wisdom: Understanding others demonstrates intelligence, but knowing oneself constitutes true enlightenment. Comprehending others is external knowledge ("智"), while self-awareness ("明") represents inner insight. The clever employ intellect to perceive external matters; the enlightened use wisdom to contemplate their inner nature. Only those who clearly recognize their own strengths and weaknesses can achieve meditative introspection—this is genuine understanding.

 若自知者超智之上也○雱曰智者如人  識理明者如鏡鑒形鑒而無心所以能自  見 勝人者有力  河曰能勝人者不過以威力也○雱曰力  可以勝人不可以勝己 自勝者强  明皇曰能制勝人者邇可謂有力能自勝  其心使柔弱者方可全其强爾○河曰人  能自勝己情欲得天下無有能與己爭者  故爲强○弼曰勝人者有力而已矣未若  自勝者無物以損其力用其智於人未若  用其智於己也用其力於人未若用其力  於己也明用於己則物無避焉力用於己  則物無改焉○雱曰自勝者克己從道能  專氣者也孔子曰棖也欲焉得剛不能自  勝者也 知足者富  河曰人能知足之爲足則長保福禄故爲  富也○弼曰知足者自不失故富也○雱  曰性分之内萬物皆足窮居不損大行不  加而愚者或舍至貴而徇腐餘故知有萬  之富則輕天下而不顧矣此眞富也孟子  曰萬物皆備於我矣豈非富乎 强行者有志  明皇曰知止足者無貪求可謂富矣强力  行者不懈怠可謂有志節矣○河曰人能  强力行善則爲有意於道道亦有意於人  弼曰勤能行之其志必獲故曰强行者有  志矣○雱曰心營天下非眞志也唯强行  此道乃可謂志 不失其所者久  明皇曰知足强力不失其所惟則是久於
Interpretation

The one who truly knows oneself possesses wisdom surpassing mere cleverness. As Wang Pang (Song Dynasty scholar) observed: The clever resemble ordinary people, while the enlightened are like mirrors reflecting objects—the mirror simply reflects objectively without subjective bias, thus revealing one's essential nature.

To overcome others merely demonstrates force. Heshanggong (Han Dynasty commentator) noted: Dominating others through power has inherent limitations. Wang Pang added: Such strength may conquer others but cannot conquer oneself.

True strength lies in mastering oneself. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explained: Subduing others proves nothing, while taming one's inner self and transforming rigidity into gentleness constitutes real power. Heshanggong held that those who restrain selfish desires find no rival under heaven. Wang Bi (Wei-Jin philosopher) further elaborated: Overcoming others relies on brute force, but conquering oneself is superior—directing wisdom inward for self-reflection holds greater value than outward contention, and this inner strength cannot be diminished by external circumstances. Wang Pang invoked Confucius' evaluation of Shen Cheng to illustrate: Those ruled by desires can never attain true fortitude.

To know contentment is genuine wealth. Heshanggong stated: The contented preserve blessings long-lasting. Wang Bi remarked: The satisfied never experience lack. Wang Pang expounded using Mencius' teaching "All things are complete within me": Those whose nature is self-sufficient feel no deprivation even in humble circumstances, their spiritual abundance far exceeding material accumulation.

Persisting in practicing the Dao (the Way) constitutes true resolve. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang maintained: Not coveting external things signifies wealth, while unrelenting cultivation demonstrates resolve. Heshanggong said: Those steadfast in virtuous deeds resonate with heavenly principles. Wang Bi emphasized: Diligent practitioners ultimately fulfill their aspirations. Wang Pang particularly noted: Governing the world doesn't signify true resolve—only practicing the great Dao does.

Not losing one's foundation ensures endurance. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang concluded: Contentment, diligent practice, and abiding by one's essential nature—these three constitute the enduring Way.

 其道者○河曰人能自節養不失其所愛  天之精氣則可以久○弼曰以眀自察量  力而行不失其所必獲久長矣○雱曰性  不爲物誘則久矣此盡性者也 死而不亡者壽  明皇曰死者分理之終亡者天注之數壽  者一期之盡夫知人勝人必招殃咎知足  强力動得天常得天常者死而不亡是一  期之盡可謂壽矣○河曰目不妄視耳不  妄聽口不妄言則無怨惡於天下故長壽  弼曰雖死而以爲生之道不亡乃得全其  壽身没而道猶存况身存而道不存乎○  雱曰賢人死曰鬼盡其道以反眞者也聖  人死曰神未嘗死未嘗生也愚人死曰物  雖生猶死耳盡道養神之人雖形體萬變  而眞性湛然無所終極可謂壽矣此至於  命者也嘗原此篇自知而後知所貴知所  貴而後能修修者要在勝利欲之私勝其  私者要在知内外之分夫然後能强行而  進此道矣此盡性復命之序也蓋自知自  勝者始也不可以不知人不勝人也而知  人勝人者蓋將以自知自勝而己    大道汎兮章第三十四 大道汎兮  河曰言道汎汎若浮若沉若有若無視之  不見說之難殊 其可左右  明皇曰大道汎兮無繫而能應物左右無  所偏名○河曰道可左右無所不宜○弼  曰言道汎濫無所不適可左右上下周旋  而用則無所不至也○雱曰汎然不定於
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the principles of cultivating the Dao and nurturing life. He Shang Gong (a renowned Daoist scholar of the Han dynasty) stated that if one can exercise self-restraint and maintain body-mind harmony without losing what one's innate nature treasures, one can preserve the heavenly endowed Jing (essence) and Qi (vital energy) for a long time.

Wang Bi (a Neo-Daoist philosopher of the Wei-Jin period) supplemented this by saying one should use wisdom to examine oneself, act according to one's capacity, and not deviate from the fundamental Dao—only then can one attain longevity. Lü Huiqing (a Song dynasty scholar) believed that when one's nature remains unswayed by external temptations, true longevity is achieved—this represents the full realization of one's innate nature.

Regarding the interpretation of "dying but not perishing constitutes longevity": Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explained that death marks the end of life, while perishing follows natural law, and "longevity" refers to completing one's life journey. Those who understand contentment and accord with the Dao of Heaven may experience physical death, but their Shen (spirit) will not perish—this constitutes true longevity.

He Shang Gong specified concrete practices: when eyes refrain from indiscriminate seeing, ears from random listening, and mouth from reckless speech, one avoids incurring resentment and naturally attains longevity. Wang Bi further elaborated that though the physical body dies, the Dao one follows never perishes—this constitutes complete lifespan. Lü Huiqing distinguished three types of postmortem states: virtuous persons become "Gui" (returning to original truth), sages become "Shen" (transcending life and death), while fools become mere "objects" (dead while still living). Those who truly cultivate Dao and nurture Shen may experience physical transformation, but their true nature remains eternal—this represents the highest realm of longevity.

The text then outlines the sequence of Dao cultivation: First, one must know oneself and understand what is most precious; knowing what's precious enables practice; the key to practice lies in overcoming selfish desires; overcoming desires requires distinguishing internal from external. Only through persistent practice can one attain the Dao. This describes the complete process from recognizing one's nature to returning to heavenly mandate.

Chapter 34 describes the characteristics of the "Great Dao": The Great Dao flows everywhere, floating and sinking like water, seemingly existent yet non-existent—invisible to the eye and ineffable in words. It can turn left or right, appearing everywhere. Emperor Xuanzong said the Great Dao, though unconstrained, responds to all things without partiality. Both He Shang Gong and Wang Bi emphasized how the Great Dao moves freely in all directions without obstruction. Lü Huiqing viewed the Great Dao as fluid and unconfined, never fixed in any particular place.

 一物故用之無所不通 萬物恃之以生  河曰恃待也萬物皆恃道而生 而不辭  河曰道不辭謝而逆止也 功成不居  明皇曰言萬物恃賴沖用而生化而道不  辭以爲勞功用備成不名己有○河曰有  道不名其有功也 衣被萬物而不爲主  河曰道雖愛養萬物不如人主有所收取 故常無欲可名於小矣  明皇曰愛養群材而不爲主宰於物無欲  則可名於小言不可名小○弼曰萬物皆  由道而生既生而不知其所由故天下常  無欲之時萬物各得所若道無於物故名  於小矣○雱曰此所謂小乃眞大也且以  體道者譬之欲慮不萌泊然内一豈非小  乎易曰復小而辨於物一本衣彼作愛養 萬物歸焉而不知主  河曰萬物皆歸道受氣道非如人主有所  禁止也 可名於大矣  明皇曰愛養之故萬物歸之有萬物不同  而不爲主則可名爲大言不可名大非小  非大所以難名○河曰萬物橫來橫去使  各自在故不若於大也○雱曰有意於主  則反與物對唯其主萬物而未嘗有意乃  所以充塞無外而莫能離大道之爲物方  其小也未嘗不大方其大也未嘗離小但  觀者各得其迹而已要而言之非小非大  不可言傳可以意得 是以聖人能成其大也  河曰聖人法道匿德藏名不爲滿大 以其不自大故能成其大
Interpretation

The Dao (the Way), as the origin and fundamental principle of the universe, exists as a formless presence whose influence permeates all things. Every being in the world depends on the Dao for survival and growth, yet the Dao never claims credit for this nurturing role. Even after accomplishing the great work of bringing all things into being, it never boasts of its achievements.

Like a garment that gently clothes all creatures, the Dao nourishes them without imposing control like an earthly ruler. Precisely because it is eternally free from selfish desires, it may be described as "subtle" (in the sense of never asserting itself). Yet from another perspective, all things naturally return to the Dao and receive its sustenance—at this level, it may be called "vast" (encompassing all existence).

This "subtlety" is in fact true greatness. Just as those who cultivate the Dao achieve a mind purified of distractions—appearing "subtle" yet containing boundless potential—the Dao, as the source of all things, embodies vastness within its subtlety and subtlety within its vastness. This paradoxical nature defies precise verbal description and must be grasped through mindful contemplation.

Thus, the sages (those who have realized the Dao) emulate its qualities: they conceal their merits and avoid flaunting their greatness. Precisely because they do not inflate themselves, they attain genuine greatness. As the commentary by Heshang Gong explains, the Dao allows all things to come and go freely without interference. This refusal to consciously pursue "greatness" paradoxically achieves the most profound and expansive state of all.

 明皇曰是以聖人法道忘功終不自爲光  大故能成其光大之業○河曰聖人以身  帥導不言而化萬事修治故能成其大○  弼曰爲大於其細圖難於其易○雱曰自  大則有其大有其大則小矣唯其非大而  强名以大則眞大也    執大象章第三十五 執大象天下往  明皇曰大象道也帝王執持大道以理天  下則天下萬物歸往矣○河曰執守也象  道也聖人守大道則天下萬民移心歸往  之也治身則大率所明往來於己也○弼  曰大象天象之母也不寒不温不凉故能  包統萬物無所犯傷主若執之則天下往  也○雱曰帝王體道以君臨者不示人以  迹而使天下逍遥於自得之場大象者道  之完體無形之謂也能執以御世則親譽  不及往而不來夫豈慕羶呴沬之可擬哉 往而不害  雱曰聖人之治天下也雖窅然交喪無爲  於上而能使天地鬼神鳥獸草木各暢其  性而兩不相傷可謂至德矣 安平泰  明皇曰物性而不傷害則安於平泰○河  曰萬物歸往而不傷害則國安家寧而致  太平矣治身不害神明則身安而大壽也  弼曰無形無識不偏不彰故萬物得往而  不害妨也○雱曰安而後平平而後泰 樂與餌過客止  明皇曰樂音樂也餌飲食也言人家有音  樂飲食則行過之客皆爲之留止如帝王
Interpretation

Here we explore how the sages (those who have attained the Dao) emulate the Great Way in their actions. The sage follows the Dao without claiming merit, and precisely because they refrain from flaunting their brilliance, they accomplish truly great deeds. As Heshanggong (a renowned Daoist scholar of the Han dynasty) noted, the sage teaches through personal example rather than words, allowing all things to develop naturally in perfect order.

Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin period metaphysician) adds that great undertakings must begin with subtle details, and difficult problems should be approached at their easiest points. Wang Pang (a Song dynasty scholar) observes that deliberate pursuit of "greatness" often results in losing true greatness—only what is achieved effortlessly, without striving for greatness, embodies authentic magnitude.

Chapter 35 discusses "holding the Great Image" (grasping the essence of the Dao). Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains that the "Great Image" is the Dao itself—when rulers govern through it, all beings naturally submit. Heshanggong states that when sages uphold the Dao, people follow joyfully and willingly. Wang Bi interprets the "Great Image" as the origin of heaven, earth and the myriad things—impartial and all-encompassing, it nurtures without harm. Wang Pang notes that rulers who truly embody the Dao govern through non-action (Wuwei), allowing the world to harmonize spontaneously.

"Proceeding without harm" describes how sage-rulers appear to govern without doing, yet enable all beings to fulfill their nature without mutual injury, achieving the highest virtue.

"Peace and stability" emerge when nothing suffers harm. Heshanggong says this brings national tranquility and personal longevity. Wang Bi attributes this to the Dao's formless, impartial nature, while Wang Pang describes it as the natural state of equilibrium following stabilization.

The final analogy contrasts the Dao with "music and delicacies": just as wayfarers pause for pleasant distractions, the Dao's influence runs deeper. Emperor Xuanzong suggests that when rulers govern through the Dao, people gather as naturally as guests attracted by music and food. Yet Wang Bi reminds us that while the Dao's transformative power seems bland and tasteless, its effects surpass all sensory allure in depth and endurance.

 執道以故泰平亦爲萬物所歸往矣又解  云樂以聲聚餌以味聚過客少留非乆長  也是以蘧廬不可以乆處仁義覯之而多  責故人君體道清靜淡然無味始除察察  之政終化淳淳之人故下文結云用不可  既也○河曰餌美也過客一也人能樂美  於道則一留止也一者去盈而處虚忽忽  如過客○雱曰有聲有味故人悅而爲留 道之出言淡乎其無味  明皇曰人君以道德清靜爲教初出於口  淡乎其無味不如俗中言教有親譽畏侮  等也○河曰道出入於口淡淡非如五味  有酸鹹苦甘辛也 視之不足見  河曰足得也道無形非若五色有青黃赤  白黑可得而見 聽之不足聞  河曰道非若五音有宫商角徵羽可得聽  聞 用之不可既  明皇曰以道鎮靜初無言教故視之不足  見聽之不足聞而淳風大行萬物既阜歳  計有餘故用不可既既盡也○河曰用道  治國則國安民昌治身則壽命延長無有  既盡時也○弼曰言道之深大人聞道之  言乃更不如樂與餌應時感悅人心也樂  與餌能令過客止而道之出言淡然無味  視之不足見則不足以悦其目聽之不足  聞則不足以娱其耳若無所中然乃用之  不可窮極也    將欲歙之章第三十六 將欲歙之必固張之  河曰先開張之者欲極其奢淫 將欲弱之必固强之
Interpretation

This passage explains the characteristics and functions of the Dao (the Way). When governing the world with the Dao, all things naturally return to it. Just as music attracts those who love harmony and delicacies tempt the gluttonous, these are but temporary attractions—passersby linger briefly before departing. Thus temporary dwellings cannot become permanent homes, and excessive emphasis on benevolence and righteousness only invites more criticism.

The true ruler should comprehend the essence of the Dao, maintaining clarity and stillness through Wuwei (non-action), remaining as flavorless as the Dao itself. Initially avoiding overly harsh decrees, one ultimately cultivates simple and honest people. This is why "applying the Dao" is inexhaustible.

The Dao, when spoken, seems bland—unlike worldly speech that evokes intimacy, praise, fear, or contempt. Visually formless, it lacks the visibility of the Five Colors (blue, yellow, red, white, black); audibly toneless, it eludes the Five Tones (gong, shang, jue, zhi, yu) of music. Yet when used to govern, nations achieve peace and prosperity; when used for self-cultivation, lifespan extends without end.

The text further reveals the patterns of development: to contract something, one must first expand it; to weaken something, one must first strengthen it. Like allowing a person extreme extravagance and indulgence, which ultimately leads to their decline—these are all manifestations of the Dao's operating principles.

 河曰先强大之者欲使遇禍患 將欲廢之必固興之  河曰先興之者欲使其驕危也 將欲奪之必固與之  河曰先與之者欲極其貪心也○雱曰陰  陽之情周旋如轉輪反復如引鋸往窮必  反盛極必衰觀乎月滿之虧日中之昃則  萬物一致斷可知矣唯至人深達主機明  乎無眹故養生則俗於屈伸處己則適乎  消長蒞事則知成敗之策御敵則達擒縱  之權古之人所以酬酢萬變而澹然無事  者誠以此道也然則雖鬼神之幽將不能  窺而况於世俗之昏亦何以測其妙乎易  曰尺蠖之屈以求伸也龍蛇之蟄以存身  也 是謂徴明   明皇曰經云正言若反易云巽以行權權  反經而合義者也故君子行權貴於合義  小人用之則爲詐譎孔子曰可與立未可  與權信矣故老君前章示執大象斯謂之  實此章繼以歙張是謂之權欲量象空根  性故以權實覆却相明令必致於性命之  域而惑者乃云能道德之忘何其迷而不  悟哉故將欲歙斂衆生情欲則先開張極  其侈心令自因於愛欲則當歙斂矣强弱  等義略與此同此道甚微而效則明著故  云是謂微明○河曰此四事其道微其效  明也○弼曰將欲除强梁去暴亂當以此  四者因物之性令其自戮故曰微明也足  其張令之足而又求其張則象所翕也與
Interpretation

This passage elucidates the law governing the development and transformation of things: To weaken something, one must first strengthen it (as Heshanggong's commentary explains: strengthening it first allows it to encounter misfortune); to abolish something, one must first make it flourish (Heshanggong notes: flourishing it first leads to arrogance and eventual crisis); to take something away, one must first give it (Heshanggong observes: giving first causes greed to expand to its limit).

Wang Pang further explains that the principle of Yin-Yang transformation resembles a turning wheel or a saw moving back and forth—when development reaches its extreme, it reverses direction. Just as the full moon wanes and the noonday sun declines, all things follow this pattern. Only those who comprehend the Dao can deeply grasp this mystery, understanding that things have no fixed form. Thus, in nurturing life they know the way of bending and stretching; in worldly affairs they perceive the patterns of prosperity and decline; in action they foresee success and failure; in confrontation they master the measure of restraint and release. The ancients could calmly respond to all changes precisely because they understood this principle. This profundity is beyond even spirits and deities to fathom, let alone ordinary people. The Book of Changes speaks of the inchworm bending to extend itself and dragons/snakes hibernating to preserve life—this is what's called "subtle illumination" (the profound yet evident truth).

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's commentary notes that these seemingly paradoxical statements contain profound wisdom. Like the Xun hexagram in the Book of Changes discussing expediency—while expedient measures may appear contrary to normal principles, they accord with the Dao's righteousness. When noble persons employ expediency, they emphasize alignment with righteousness; when petty people use it, it becomes deception. Therefore, Laozi first discusses "holding the great image" as fundamental, then addresses opening/closing and tension/relaxation as expedient measures—only by combining both can one thoroughly comprehend the principle of life. Unfortunately, confused people claim this teaches forgetting morality—what obstinate delusion! Just as to restrain people's desires, one first indulges their greed, letting them become trapped by cravings until they naturally restrain themselves. The principle of strength-weakness transformation follows similarly. Though subtle, its effects are manifest—hence called "subtle illumination."

Heshanggong concludes that these four matters (strength/weakness, flourishing/abolishing, taking/giving, expanding/contracting) contain subtle principles with evident effects. Wang Bi adds that employing these four methods to follow things' inherent nature, allowing them to perish of themselves, constitutes the true meaning of "subtle illumination." Let things fully expand, and they will naturally turn toward contraction.

 其張之不足而改其求張者愈益而己反  危○雱曰此理至微而明惟知幾者足以  識之易曰知幾其神乎幾者動之微吉之  先見也此道之妙用聖人所以宰制役使  能與造化同功者也故以此篇結道經之  義 柔之勝剛弱之勝强  明皇曰巽順可以行權權行則能制物故  知柔弱者必勝於剛强矣○河曰柔弱者  久長剛强者必亡也○雱曰見形則知剛  强之制柔弱識理則悟柔弱之勝剛强至  人深達微明之義故謙而不亢沖而不盈  不與物爭而亦莫能與之爭也雖然此道  本之言耳若夫變化無常則一柔一剛一  弱一强孰能定之哉顧雖剛强而柔弱不  能勝者動契乎理而心不離乎柔弱也由  此觀之又知柔弱之勝剛强矣此兩者所  謂利器一本作柔弱勝剛强 魚不可脱於淵  河曰魚脱於淵爲去剛得柔不可復與也 國之利器不可以示人  明皇曰脱失也利器權道之訾權道不可  以示非其人故舉喻云魚若失泉則爲人  所得權道示非其人則當竊以爲詐譎矣  河曰利器權道也治國權者不可以示執  事之臣也不可道者不可以示非其人也  弼曰利器利國之器以唯因物之性不假  形以理物器不可睹而物各得其所則國  之利器也示人者任刑也刑以利國則失  矣魚脱於淵則必見失矣利國器而立形
Interpretation

This passage expounds the profound Daoist principle that "the soft and weak overcome the hard and strong." Using the metaphor of fish not leaving water, Laozi illustrates how rulers must understand the art of statecraft without revealing it to others.

Various commentators interpret this wisdom from different perspectives: Wang Pang (Northern Song scholar) describes this as extremely subtle knowledge comprehensible only to those who perceive things before they manifest. The Yijing states "to know the subtle is divine," referring to the ability to detect nascent signs of change. Sages master this subtle Dao to command all things, achieving harmony with creation.

Emperor Xuanzong of Tang explains: what appears yielding actually holds transformative power—mastering such adaptability controls events, proving softness ultimately prevails over hardness. Heshang Gong (Han dynasty Daoist) observes: gentleness endures while force hastens destruction. Wang Pang further clarifies: though strength seems to dominate weakness superficially, true understanding reveals softness's ultimate victory. Dao-realized individuals grasp this subtle dialectic deeply, maintaining humility without arrogance, emptiness without complacency—contesting nothing yet prevailing over all.

However, this represents only Dao's fundamental principle. In actual transformations, hardness and softness alternate without fixed patterns. The key lies in acting according to Dao while preserving inner gentleness. Thus, weakness truly overcomes strength—the "sharp tools" mentioned refer precisely to this wisdom of soft triumph.

The fish-not-leaving-deep-waters metaphor: Heshang Gong compares fish losing survival conditions when leaving water to rulers deprived of statecraft. Emperor Xuanzong interprets "sharp tools" as political strategy—just as exposed fish become prey, improperly revealed statecraft invites deception.

Heshang Gong identifies "sharp tools" with governance techniques never to be shown to ministers, much less the unworthy. Wang Bi (Wei-Jin metaphysician) considers them the Dao of ruling by aligning with all things' nature—requiring no concrete form yet ordering the state perfectly. Harsh laws resemble fish out of water; when governance becomes overtly manifest, it loses efficacy.

 以示人亦必失矣○雱曰魚巽伏柔弱而  自藏於深眇之中以活身者也聖人退處  幽密而操至權以獨運斡萬化於不測故  力旋天地而世莫睹其徤威伏海内而人  不名以哉豈暴露神靈而使衆得而議之  哉嘗竊論之聖人之所以異於人者知幾  也夫以剛强遇物則物之剛强不可勝敵  矣天下皆以剛强勝物也而吾獨寓於柔  弱不爭之地則發而用之其敦能禦之者  觀夫天道則秋冬之爲春夏亦一驗矣彼  聖人者自藏於深眇之中而託柔弱以爲  表故行萬物於術内而神莫能知其自此  所謂密用獨化者易曰嬰以行權莊子曰  於魚得計義協於此言之雖繁豈能名其  致哉唯明者以神解之以意了之斯可矣    道常無爲章第三十七 道常無烏  河曰道以物爲惡常也○弼曰順自然也  雱曰雖爲之時未嘗有爲 而無不爲  弼曰萬物無不由爲以治以成之也○雱  曰雖無爲之時未嘗不爲 侯王若能守  雱曰君人體道以治則因時乘理而無意  於爲故雖無爲而不廢天下之爲而吾實  未嘗爲也天何言哉四時行焉萬物生焉  侯王之道天其盡之矣 萬物將自化  明皇曰妙本謂靜故常無爲物將以生而  無不爲也侯王若能守道無爲則萬物自  化君之無爲而純樸矣○河曰言侯王若  能守道萬物將自化妙於已也○雱曰日
Interpretation

The fish understands how to conceal itself in deep waters, maintaining a soft and yielding posture to preserve its life. The sage (shengren) dwells in secluded and hidden places, yet holds the profoundest art of adaptability, single-handedly orchestrating the transformations of all things. They can reverse the movements of heaven and earth, yet the world cannot perceive their strength; their power shakes the four seas, yet none can discern its source—why would they reveal their divine abilities for public scrutiny?

What sets the sage apart is their understanding of subtle omens. To confront external things with rigidity inevitably invites greater opposition. While all under heaven seek to subdue the myriad things through force, the sage alone abides in the realm of softness and non-contention. Once this power is set in motion, who can withstand it? Just as the seasons cycle, autumn and winter may appear stern, yet they store the vitality for spring and summer’s renewal. The sage remains deeply concealed, outwardly displaying a yielding demeanor, yet drawing all things into their natural order—so subtly that even the spirits cannot fathom its workings. This is what the Yijing calls "the hidden art of exercising power" and what Zhuangzi describes as "the fish’s profound ease in water."

The essence of the great Dao (Dao) is natural non-action (wuwei). Heshang Gong’s commentary explains: The Dao treats all things without partiality—this is the constant principle. Wang Bi says: This is the expression of following nature. Though it appears to do nothing, there is never a moment when it is not acting; though it seems to accomplish all, it never forces anything.

If rulers (houwang) can uphold this principle of non-action in governance, they will accord with the times and follow natural patterns, appearing inactive yet never neglecting the affairs of the world. Just as heaven does not speak yet causes the seasons to revolve and all things to flourish, this is the highest ideal of rulership. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang elucidates: The root Dao is serene and non-acting, thus it can generate and transform all things. When rulers abide in the Dao through non-action, the myriad things will naturally transform, and the sovereign’s effortless governance returns all to pristine simplicity. Heshang Gong states: When rulers preserve the Dao, all things spontaneously return to it—this is the most sublime state. Wang Pang adds: Like the sun shining impartially on all things without claiming merit, true non-action allows each being to find its place without interference.

 化於道而不知 化而欲作  雱曰化而日進則如嬰兒之長必至於志  意充起天和漸衰觀夫三代中流物情彫  敝則可知也 吾將鎮以無名之樸  明皇曰言人既從君上之化已無爲清靜  而復欲動作有爲者吾將以無名之樸而  鎮靜之無名之樸道也○河曰吾身也無  名之樸道也萬物以化效於己也復欲作  巧偽者侯王當身鎮撫以道德○雱曰天  下既化於道則日進於治治極則名實俱  立民逐而不返故常抱無名之樸以鎮定  其志意使一於性本雖然救於已成則亦  晩矣故於欲作之時便當爲爾也 無名之樸  弼曰化而欲作作欲成也吾將鎮之以無  名之樸不爲主也 亦將不欲  弼曰無欲競也○雱曰聖人之抱樸無爲  乃其自然故雖應世之變糾紛於事物之  時未嘗離也豈欲警天下之亂而後爲之  哉夫欲爲而爲之則據此已有爲欲之實  豈眞無名之樸歟唯渾然常一不知其然  而自然者不期爲樸而樸常全也 不欲以靜  河曰言侯王鎮撫以道德民亦將不欲改  當以清靜導化之也 天下將自正  明皇曰言人君既以無名之樸鎮靜蒼生  不可執此無名之樸而令有迹將恐尋迹  喪本復入有爲故於此無名之樸亦將兼  忘不欲於無欲無欲亦忘泊然清靜而天  下自正矣○雱曰欲而動則離性離於性
Interpretation

This passage discusses the state of "natural non-action" (Wuwei) in the Daoist cultivation process. The highest realm is achieved when one harmonizes with the transformations of the Dao (the supreme truth of Daoism) without conscious awareness. However, when deliberate intention arises, it resembles how infants gradually lose their innate purity as they grow—a phenomenon mirrored in the increasing complexity of human nature since the Three Dynasties (Xia, Shang, Zhou).

Those who attain the Dao use its simplest, nameless essence ("the uncarved block") to settle human hearts. Emperor Xuanzong of Tang's commentary explains that when people, already aligned with nature, still harbor deliberate intentions, the pristine quality of the Dao must be employed to pacify such misguided thoughts. The "nameless simplicity" is the Dao itself. Heshang Gong (a Han Dynasty commentator) interprets this as the cultivator maintaining personal simplicity, thereby naturally influencing all things. If common people begin developing cunning or artificial desires, rulers should lead by example, using Dao and De (Virtue) to gently guide and transform them.

Wang Anshi elaborates: When society fully aligns with the Dao, it progressively refines itself, but at its peak, various labels and distinctions emerge, causing people to chase external things and lose their innate nature. Thus, one must hold fast to the nameless simplicity to settle hearts and return to original purity. However, waiting until problems arise to remedy them is too late—misguided thoughts must be checked at their inception.

Wang Bi (a Wei-Jin era Neo-Daoist philosopher) observes: When impulses for deliberate action arise amid change, those who embody the Dao do not intervene actively but instead use the Dao's simplicity to dissolve such tendencies naturally. This resolution isn't forced, just as the sage's non-action stems from innate nature—even when responding to worldly changes, they never deviate from the Dao. True non-action doesn't wait for chaos to emerge before governing, as that would already constitute deliberate effort. Only the state of seamless unity, where one acts without knowing why, represents the simplicity maintained effortlessly.

Heshang Gong adds: When rulers use Dao and De to transform the people, and the people become less selfish and desirous, they should then be guided further through the way of clarity and stillness. Emperor Xuanzong notes: After rulers stabilize the populace with nameless simplicity, they must not cling to this method either, as fixation would create new attachments, causing them to lose the root. Ultimately, even the notion of "no desire" must be forgotten to reach complete purity and naturalness—only then will the world spontaneously return to the right path. Wang Anshi concludes: Once desires arise and stir restlessness, one drifts from innate nature; the farther this deviation, the harder it becomes to return to the Dao's natural state.

 則非正也已且未正安能正天下哉故唯  不欲而靜者能正己而物正也此爲道之  效而道亦喪於此故道經終焉 道德眞經
Interpretation

The text discusses the concept of "uprightness" (zheng). It conveys that if a person cannot rectify themselves, how could they possibly rectify the world? Only those free from selfish desires, with purified hearts, can first correct themselves and then naturally guide all things back to the proper path.

The phrase "desireless and tranquil" (wuyu er jing) describes the effect of Dao cultivation, yet it simultaneously warns that excessive attachment to this state would lose the original genuineness of the Dao. Thus, the Dao Jing concludes here, implying that spiritual practice must avoid extremes.

This passage emphasizes that cultivating the Dao begins with oneself—first rectifying the self before rectifying others. However, one must also avoid becoming deliberate in pursuing "uprightness," maintaining instead a state of natural wuwei (non-action). When a person truly achieves desirelessness and inner purity, they naturally influence their surroundings to return to the proper way.

集註卷之五

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0093); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 4 Vol. 6 →