中文 · EN

《道德真經集義(一)》Vol. 10

Start reading →Report an error / feedback

Dongshen 洞神部 Vol. 10 / 10 8,971 characters

About this page. The original text of 《道德真經集義(一)》 Vol. 10 (Dongshen 洞神部, 10 volumes) is shown in Classical Chinese as transmitted in the Kanripo (Kyoto University) edition. An English interpretation of the 18 passages on this page accompanies it: select a passage or press “Interpretation” to show it. All texts in English

Back to 《道德真經集義(一)》
Reading modes explained
  • Horizontal: ordinary left-to-right reading; the interpretation can be shown.
  • Scroll: vertical text running right to left; the wheel scrolls sideways (no interpretation in this mode).
  • Wheel: columns of vertical text turn around a drum; use the wheel, drag or arrow keys, or auto-play.
  • Pages: about 200 characters per page; use the buttons, swipe or arrow keys.

Source textInterpretation

道德眞經集義卷之十噐四     盱江危大有集    第七十三章 勇於敢則殺勇於不敢則活此兩者或利或 害天之所惡孰知其故是以聖人猶難之  林氏曰勇於敢爲者必至於自戕其身臨  事而懼是勇於不敢也活者可以自全也  敢者之害不敢者之利二者甚曉然天道  惡盈而好謙則勇於敢者非特人惡之天  亦惡之也而世人未有知其然者故曰敦  知其故聖人猶難之者言聖人於此道爲  難能也○何氏曰强梁者不得其死好勝  者必遇其敵此勇於敢則殺之戒也臨事  而懼好謀而成此勇於不敢則活之道也  爲此說者言君子則吉小人則凶也然此  二者或利或害爲善得吉故多其幸而罹  於凶者有矣爲惡未始不及於凶其幸免  者亦時有焉由前之說吉凶之於善惡猶  影響也由後之說禍福之來似不在我常  人之慮遂以天道好惡有不可知其故有  不可知其事有不可信者聖人畏天命修  身以俟曾不敢以常人之見而輕用其心  也惟知天之不假易而其難其慎又豈無  其故哉○李氏曰接上章民不畏威言世  人不畏公法敢以好勇殺身之本也勇於  不敢終身無害勇於敢血氣之勇也勇於  不敢者義理之勇也天之所惡造化不容  也孰知其故知則不敢是以聖人猶難知  者不敢輕示也
Interpretation

This passage examines the dialectical relationship between "courage" and "caution" in Chapter 73 of the Daodejing, synthesizing interpretations from multiple scholars:

Lin's commentary suggests that reckless individuals often bring harm upon themselves (self-destruction), while true bravery lies in approaching situations with prudent caution (apprehensiveness when facing matters), which ensures self-preservation. The Dao of heaven despises arrogance and favors humility—thus the reckless incur not only human disdain but celestial disapproval. Yet few understand this principle, hence the scripture's rhetorical question "Who knows its reason?" Even for sages, attaining this state proves exceptionally difficult.

He's analysis elaborates: Domineering individuals meet untimely ends (the violent die unnatural deaths), and those who constantly compete inevitably encounter worthy opponents—this is the warning behind "daring to be bold leads to execution." Success comes through cautious deliberation and strategic planning (achieving through careful planning)—the principle behind "daring to be cautious preserves life." This demonstrates how noble persons attract fortune while petty ones court disaster. Yet reality shows imperfect correspondence between virtue and reward—good people sometimes suffer misfortune while the wicked occasionally escape consequences. This makes ordinary people perceive heaven's preferences as inscrutable. But sages, reverently awaiting destiny while cultivating themselves (self-cultivation in readiness), never presume to judge through mundane perspectives.

Li connects this to the preceding chapter's "when people fear no authority," noting how disregard for legal sanctions leads the bold and combative to fatal outcomes. True courage manifests in two forms: brute impulsiveness (recklessness) versus principled restraint (caution). What heaven despises are actions violating natural law (cosmic order rejects them). Sages understand this profoundly, hence their extraordinary prudence in avoiding unnecessary displays of capability.

Through these layered interpretations, the text elucidates the Daoist wisdom of "the soft overcoming the hard" in worldly conduct, emphasizing the importance of cautious action and alignment with natural principles.

天之道不爭而善勝不言而善應不召而自 來觶然而善謀天網恢恢疏而不失  林氏曰聖人之於道雖以無爲不爭而是  非善否一毫不可亂此數句又以天喻道  也○何氏曰天雖剛德猶不于時此不爭  也而人衆勝天天定勝人乃勝之善者天  不言以行與事示之而感必有應應復爲  感乃應者不召而自來如日月寒暑之往  來天高日鑒於陟降誰其召之繟然而善  謀古韵繟緩也寬也於義爲長如作默然  則與不言之意重如作坦然則與不爭之  意復天道雖似悠緩而其巧於報應尤甚  於人之機謀則似有神其筭者繟然寬緩  如書云須暇之意故天網恢恢乎有容雖  不密亦不漏也○河上公曰繟寛也天之  網羅恢恢甚大雖曰踈遠而察人之善惡  無有所失○董氏曰此章告人當勇於道  不當勇於力繼明天道之自然而末又戒  之天網之不漏使人信之無疑也    第七十四章 民不畏死奈何以死懼之若使民常畏死而 爲奇者吾得執而殺之孰敢  林氏曰此章言人之分别善惡自爲好惡  至於泰甚者皆非知道也故以世之用刑  者喻之言用刑者不過以死懼其民而民  何常畏死使民果有畏死之心則爲奇邪  者吾執而刑之則自此人皆不敢爲矣故  曰吾得執而殺之敦敢今奇邪者未嘗不  殺而民犯者日衆則民何嘗畏死哉○吴
Interpretation

These two chapters of the Dao De Jing expound profound truths about the natural Dao of Heaven and the art of governance.

Regarding the Dao of Heaven: The natural order achieves victory without contention, responds without words, and arrives without summons. Though appearing unhurried, Heaven's way excels in planning—like an immense net that seems loosely woven yet leaves nothing uncaught. Lin Xiyi explains that sages emulate this Heavenly Dao; though appearing to practice non-action (Wuwei) and non-contention, their discernment of right and wrong remains impeccable. These passages use Heaven's way to illustrate the operation of the supreme Dao.

He Yan further elaborates: Though Heaven embodies strength, it never violates seasonal rhythms—this manifests its "non-contention." While human efforts may temporarily surpass Heaven's will, ultimately the Dao prevails over human force. Heaven speaks not through words but through natural phenomena; when people perceive these patterns, responses arise spontaneously. Like the sun and moon's courses or the alternation of seasons, these cycles require no summons yet come and go naturally. Though Heaven's way appears gradual and tolerant, its karmic retribution operates with precision surpassing human schemes, as if calculated by unseen spirits. Thus Heaven's net, while vast and inclusive, leaves nothing unaccounted for despite its apparent looseness.

Heshang Gong annotates: Heaven's net is supremely expansive—though seemingly distant, it clearly observes human good and evil without omission. Dong Sijing explains this chapter teaches people to devote themselves to cultivating the Dao rather than contending through force, concluding with the warning that none escape Heaven's net, inspiring deep conviction.

Chapter 74 discusses governance: When people no longer fear death, what use are death threats? If people truly feared death, wouldn't executing wrongdoers deter all crime?

Lin Xiyi interprets: This chapter shows how excessive distinctions between good/evil and attachments to preferences reflect ignorance of the great Dao. Using legalists as metaphor: punishments employ death to terrify people, but do people truly fear death? If they did, executing criminals would surely stop crime. Yet despite executions, lawbreakers multiply—proving people don't actually fear death.

Wu Cheng adds: This chapter criticizes rulers of his era for ineffective harsh punishments. Laozi observes that when governance makes life worse than death, capital punishment loses its deterrent power. True statecraft lies in ensuring people's prosperous livelihood—then they won't lightly transgress.

 氏曰奇不正也使民常有畏死之心而奇  邪爲惡之人吾得以執而殺之則人人知  畏孰敢爲惡然雖殺惡人而人之敢爲惡  者不止則是民愚不知畏死雖爲惡者必  遭刑殺彼亦無所惧上之人奈何欲以死  懼之而輕易殺人乎○河上公曰老子傷  畤王不先道德化民而先刑罰 常有司殺者夫代司殺者殺是謂代大匠斲 希有不傷其手矣  林氏曰殺者造物也天地之間爲善爲惡  常有造物者司生殺之權其可殺者造物  自殺之故曰常有司殺者爲國而切切於  用刑是代造物者司殺也以我之拙工而  代大匠斲削則鮮有不傷其手者此借喻  之中又借喻也此章亦因當時嗜殺故有  此言其意亦豈盡廢刑哉天討有罪只容  無心可也○吴氏曰不以殺人懼其民則  爲惡之人可不殺乎曰有司殺者在司殺  者天也惟天能殺人惟大匠能斲木人而  欲代天殺人猶非匠而欲代匠斲木也代  匠者其手必多有傷以譬代殺者其身必  有害也蓋不有人禍必有天刑○何氏曰  夫刑威雖一人之權而非一己之所得私  常有司其刑殺者人主政不欲以己代之  孰爲司殺之司上有司於冥冥之中者天  討有罪五刑五用是也下有司於昭昭之  中者書曰士制百姓于刑之中是也人主  中持其柄折民惟刑有不得已者則奉天
Interpretation

This passage explains the Daoist perspective on rulers employing punishments. Laozi (the founder of Daoism) criticized the rulers of his time for neglecting to first educate the people through virtue (De) and the Dao, instead immediately resorting to harsh laws and severe penalties.

In the natural order of heaven and earth, there already exists a cosmic mechanism governing life and death—the "sovereign executioner" of creation. Those deserving punishment will naturally face the judgment of the Dao's principles. This is called "there is always a proper executioner." When rulers hastily impose punishments themselves, it resembles an unskilled carpenter presuming to take the master craftsman’s place in chopping wood—rarely does such a person avoid injuring their own hand. This metaphor illustrates how rulers overstep their authority by usurping heaven’s role in administering justice, often bringing harm upon themselves in the process.

Wu’s commentary elaborates: The true "executioner" is the Dao of heaven, just as only a master carpenter can properly cut wood. For ordinary people to presume to carry out heaven’s punishments would be like a layperson trying to replace the carpenter—not only failing in the task but likely harming themselves. Those who force such actions will inevitably face either human retribution or celestial condemnation.

He’s supplementary explanation adds: While the authority of punishment resides with the ruler, it is not for private use. Hidden within the workings of the cosmos, the Dao upholds justice (the "five punishments for five applications"), while in the visible world, judicial officers administer laws according to proper standards (as the Book of Documents states: "officials regulate the people through balanced punishments"). The ruler merely holds the scales of justice, acting as heaven’s representative only when absolutely necessary.

The core message opposes rulers using capital punishment to terrorize the populace. Laozi argues that when people cease to fear death, punishments lose their deterrent effect. Rather than creating fear through executions, it is better to cultivate goodness through moral education and virtuous example.

 憲付有司以示平民之治曰百姓自有罪  爾自有罪子一人何心焉殺人者天也士  也非我也人誰得而怨其上者此而不行  乃拂天之理倚官之刑認作威爲己事是  猶大匠宜斲彼袖手旁觀而吾血指汗顔  以代之豈不傷哉人主以天人之心爲心  欲善而民善矣焉用殺有君如此則天下  遷善遠罪皆樂其生而重其死導迎和氣 之大者此聖人言外之意也    第七十五章 民之饑以其上食稅之多是以饑民之難治 以其上之有爲是以難治  林氏曰食稅之多言取於民者太過也上  之有爲言爲治者過用智術也上貪利則  民愈饑上好智則民愈難治○吴氏曰食  謂君所食於民者稅則民之所出以供上  之食者也上多取於民則民貧而饑矣上  有爲而以智術御其下則下以奸詐欺其  上而難治也○吕氏曰民者國之本也八  政以食爲先食之爲論以鄙而司農以爲  大計其如此用在於民稍失其宜爲害亦  大聖人授之田勸督百官使不違其時征  輸有制使不傷其力疏爲九一之法定爲  什一之賦務從其輕耳倘或違民之時奪  民之力以非常之求供無厭之欲民困其  稅斂之重爾爾疲瘵民有饑色野有餓□  盜賊貧窮變詐百出奸生於國人莫之知  矣身以氣爲民氣足則神全今言其饑是  氣之不滿也是其不能忘言塞慾故曰民
Interpretation

This passage primarily discusses the relationship between rulers and the common people, with its core message being that the hardships of the populace often stem from the improper conduct of those in power.

The text first observes that people go hungry because the upper classes impose excessive taxes. The difficulty in governing arises when rulers rely too heavily on manipulative tactics. As explained by commentator Lin: heavy taxation means extracting too much from the people; excessive governing refers to overusing political stratagems. The more the upper class covets profits, the hungrier the people become; the more rulers play political games, the harder they are to govern.

Commentator Wu further elaborates: when rulers take too much grain and taxes from the people, poverty and hunger inevitably follow. When superiors employ political scheming to control subordinates, those subordinates will respond with deceitful methods to deceive their superiors, resulting in ungovernable chaos.

Commentator Lü approaches the matter fundamentally, viewing the people as the foundation of the state. Grain policies are of utmost importance, and officials overseeing agriculture bear tremendous responsibility. The sage ruler (the ideal leader) should equitably distribute land, ensure officials don't disrupt farming seasons, and establish reasonable tax systems (such as the traditional one-tenth levy), striving to minimize the people's burdens. Violating agricultural cycles, exhausting the people's strength, and satisfying endless personal desires will lead to oppressive taxation, resulting in famine, banditry, and various social problems.

The passage concludes with a bodily metaphor: just as human life depends on breath, the people are the "Qi" (vital energy) of the nation. Abundant Qi brings vitality; starving people indicate "insufficient Qi." When rulers cannot restrain their desires, the people cannot live and work in peace. Through multiple perspectives, this text emphasizes governance principles of light taxation and allowing the people to recuperate.

 之饑以其上食稅之多是以饑古之民安  居樂俗耕而足食織而足衣孰云難治乎  若上以有爲有欲有事網密令苛政煩信  弛故擾其民而民不勝其擾故難治也譬  之己也氣之難清而易濁息之易粗而難  柔况有爲而擾之乎 民之輕死以其求生之厚是以輕死夫惟無 以生爲者是賢於貴生  林氏曰凡人過於自愛反以喪其身飲食  太多亦能生病此其一也過於自愛自養  欲其謀生故曰求生之厚輕用其身以自  取死故曰輕死忘其身而後身存故曰無  以生爲者賢於貴生貴生猶前章曰益生  求生之厚者也貴猶勝也○吴氏曰輕易  也生生之厚謂求生之心太重也賢猶勝  也貴生謂重其生即生生之厚者也求生  之心重而保養太過將欲不死而適以易  死至人非不愛生順其自然無所容心若  無以生爲者然外其身而身存賢重於其  心以貴生而反易死者也○何氏曰夫無  以生爲者是賢於貴生所謂與造物者爲  人而遊乎天地之一氣忘其肝膽遺其耳  目反覆始終不知端倪茫然彷徨乎塵垢  之外逍遥乎無爲之業則不以物傷生此  乃過於賢厚其生天下亦賴以全其生豈  不美哉    第七十六章 民之生也柔弱其死也堅强萬物草木之生 也柔脆其死也枯槁  吕氏曰夫道者神之主神者氣之主氣者
Interpretation

The people starve because their rulers impose excessive taxes. In ancient times, when people lived in peace and contentment—men tilling the fields and women weaving—they enjoyed ample food and clothing. How could such a society be difficult to govern? If rulers are insatiably greedy, with laws as dense as nets and harsh, convoluted decrees, they lose the people's trust. By disturbing the people without restraint, making their lives unbearable, governance naturally becomes difficult. Just as human breath struggles to remain pure and easily turns turbid, or becomes rough and hard to soften, how much more so when further disrupted by excessive governmental interference?

The very reason people trivialize life lies in their excessive pursuit of longevity. Those who do not deliberately seek eternal life are wiser than those who obsess over preserving it. Lin Xiyi explains: Ordinary people harm themselves by loving themselves too much, just as overeating leads to illness. Excessive pursuit of life's pleasures, through over-nurturing, can ironically hasten death. Only those who forget their physical existence can truly preserve life—this is the principle that "those who do not strive for life surpass those who prize it." Wu Cheng further clarifies: So-called "prizing life" means overvaluing it; excessive care can lead to premature death. Those who attain the Dao (the Way) do not neglect life but follow nature without forced attachment, thus preserving it effortlessly.

He Xinshan adds: Those who do not deliberately pursue longevity roam with the Creator, merge with the primordial Qi (vital energy) of heaven and earth, transcend bodily senses, and rise above the cycle of life and death, wandering freely in the realm of Wuwei (non-action). By remaining unharmed by external things, they embody true wisdom. If all under heaven could live so naturally, would it not be the most sublime state?

Chapter 76 employs natural imagery: The living body is soft, while the dead stiffens; plants are tender when growing but brittle when withered. Lü Huiqing observes: The great Dao governs the spirit (Shen), and the spirit governs Qi. This chapter contrasts life and death to illustrate that softness embodies vitality, while rigidity signals demise—implicitly urging rulers to emulate nature's way of gentle yielding.

 身之主道存則神存神存則氣存故人之  生也含元和之氣抱眞一之精形全神旺  萬炁朝元流通不息故其柔弱可知也及  其死也元和之氣散眞一之精竭形虧神  逝百體堅强矣故曰人之生也柔弱其死  也堅强嘗試論之萬物草木之生也天地  之炁流行乎其内陰陽之炁潤澤乎其外  春氣一動膏雨遍沾芽蘖敷榮鮮妍秀發  風霜纔扇殺氣相仍枯槁變更柯條凋謝  有識者以道存亡爲生死無識者以氣聚  散爲枯榮故曰萬物草木之生也柔脆其  死也枯槁○吴氏曰人生則肌膚柔軟而  活動可以屈伸死則肌膚冷硬而强直而  不能屈伸也草木生則枝莖軟脆死則枝  莖枯槁堅硬也○林氏曰柔弱堅强皆借  喻也老子之學主於尚柔故以人與艸木  之生死爲喻 故堅强者死之徒柔弱者生之徒  吕氏曰陽氣之所居木可卷而草可結也  陽炁之所去水可凝而冰可析也故神明  陽炁生之根也柔弱滋潤物之芽也欲剛  者必以柔守之欲强者必以弱保之今夫  堅强不能養和也與物爲敵豈免傷乎柔  弱者不失中也與物同波故能全其生也  ○何氏曰天下之柔弱者道也氣也所以  能貫天地而包萬物故人物與生爲徒者  必其道與氣存焉與死爲徒者必其道與  氣去之○林氏曰徒類也○吴氏曰上文
Interpretation

Human life is governed by the Dao (the fundamental principle of the cosmos). When the Dao resides within the body, the Shen (spirit) exists; where the Shen exists, primordial Qi is preserved. Thus living beings contain harmonious Qi within, embracing pure Jing (essence), with complete physical form and vibrant spirit. Their bodily energies continuously circulate and return to their source (yuan), manifesting the characteristic of pliancy.

At death, the harmonious Qi disperses, the pure Jing exhausts, the physical form decays and the spirit fades - whereupon the body becomes rigid. Just as all living plants remain supple while alive but become dry and brittle after death. When spring's Yang energy stirs, nourishing rain causes vegetation to sprout; but when autumn frost arrives with its killing energy, leaves wither and branches become barren.

Sentient beings define life and death by the presence or absence of the Dao, while insentient plants manifest vitality or decay through the gathering and scattering of Qi. Wu Cheng explains: Living human flesh remains soft and flexible, while corpses turn stiff; growing plants have tender branches that become brittle when withered. Lin Xiyi observes these metaphors all illustrate Laozi's core teaching that values "softness" - rigidity belongs to the state of death, while pliancy characterizes life.

Lü Huiqing elaborates: Where Yang energy exists, trees can bend and grass may knot; when Yang dissipates, water freezes and ice shatters. The root of spiritual vitality (Shenming) lies in Yang energy, with gentle moisture being the sprout of all growth. Those desiring strength must base it on flexibility; those seeking power must ground it in yielding. Entities insisting solely on rigidity cannot maintain harmony, and opposing all things inevitably brings damage. But the pliant maintain equilibrium, coexisting harmoniously with all beings, thus preserving life.

He Daoquan emphasizes: The Dao and Qi - though the softest things under heaven - penetrate heaven and earth while embracing all creation. Whatever belongs to the category of life necessarily maintains the Dao and Qi; whatever tends toward death must have lost their nourishment. Lin Xiyi clarifies that "category" (tu) indicates classification, while Wu Cheng connects this to the dialectical relationship between rigidity and pliancy discussed earlier.

 言人與草木之形體生則柔死則堅推此  物理則知人之德行凡堅强者不得其死  是死之徒也柔弱者善保其生是生之徒  也 是以兵强則不勝木强則共强大處下柔弱 處上  吕氏曰兵凶險之器鬭爭之具也所觸之  境與敵對者也恃其强而輕其敵非義也  不義而輕於用事豈勝乎故曰兵强則不  勝木之小也柔且弱及其强則合拱矣木  猶如此况於人乎况於國乎故曰木强則  拱强大者勇敢之士柔弱者君子之道推  以力者强大爲勝推以德者柔弱爲勝故  天下有常勝之道曰柔有常敗之道曰剛  蓋世之人任力不任德忘本而逐末達者  以道觀之則柔弱勝剛强此理之必然者  也○何氏曰齒剛則折舌柔而存理也共  如木墓拱之拱物壯則老是謂不道也兵  强則反不勝何也以其恃國家之大矜人  民之衆欲見威於敵國者故曰驕兵兵驕  者滅也强大處下柔弱處上非但以木爲  喻而以柔道理天下乃君上之道如妄自  尊大不過井蛙之見耳爲人上者可不鑒  哉非但道家以卑弱自持也○林氏曰兵  之恃强者必不勝木之初生者皆柔乆則  堅强至於拱把則將枯矣故知道者以柔  弱爲上堅强爲下○吴氏曰共兩手所圍  也○董氏曰此章言柔弱可以保沖和之  氣    第七十七章
Interpretation

The forms of humans and plants are soft when alive but become rigid after death. From this natural phenomenon we can deduce: those who are rigid and stubborn often meet untimely ends, belonging to the category of death; while those who are gentle and humble excel at preserving life, belonging to the category of survival.

Thus armies that rely on brute strength ultimately fail to conquer, just as trees that grow too thick become felled (the character "共" here means trees growing thick enough to require both arms to encircle). Strong things often occupy lower positions, while soft things surprisingly rise above.

Lü Shi (Lü Huiqing) explains: Weapons are instruments of violence, used for conflict and opposition. To underestimate enemies while boasting military strength is unrighteous conduct. How can an unrighteous army achieve victory through reckless warfare? Hence the saying "a strong army does not conquer." When trees are young they're supple and delicate, but when grown thick they're felled. If this is true for trees, how much more for humans? For nations? Therefore "when trees grow strong they're cut down."

Those who worship military might consider strength as victory, while those who revere virtue consider gentleness as triumph. The eternal principle of the universe is softness, while the inevitable path to defeat is rigidity. Ordinary people often trust in power while neglecting virtue, abandoning fundamentals for trivialities. Those who comprehend the Dao understand that softness overcoming hardness is an inevitable law of nature.

He Shi (He Xinshan) adds: Hard teeth break easily while soft tongues endure—this is nature's principle. "共" describes trees growing thick enough to require embracing with both arms. When things reach their peak they begin to decline—this represents deviation from the Dao. Strong armies fail to conquer because they rely on national might and population size to bully other nations—this is the so-called "arrogant army." Arrogant forces inevitably perish. "The strong belong below, the soft rise above" isn't merely about trees—it teaches that governing the world with gentle principles constitutes true rulership. Those who boastfully exaggerate their importance merely display the limited vision of frogs at the bottom of wells.

Lin Shi (Lin Xiyi) observes: Armies depending on strength inevitably fail. All trees begin soft when sprouting, gradually hardening with age, until they wither when reaching arm-span thickness. Therefore those who understand the Dao value softness above all, considering hardness inferior.

Wu Shi (Wu Cheng) explains: "共" refers to the thickness requiring both arms to encircle. Dong Shi (Dong Sijing) concludes: This chapter teaches how maintaining softness preserves the harmonious Qi (referring to the balanced vital energy of Yin and Yang).

天之道其猶張弓乎高者抑之下者舉之有 餘者損之不足者補之  吕氏曰天法于道與道同功無爲而成不  言而化四時資之以行百物待之以生未  嘗差忒而不失公平正直之理故曰天之  道其猶張弓乎夫工人之爲弓也無殺無  生無噏無張制以規矩督以準繩弦高急  者寬而緩之弦弛下者攝而上之其有餘  者削而損之其不足者補而益之故弓可  抨而矢可行也人君道當法天道抑强扶  弱損有利無弛之張之調之練之百發百  中以準的爲道虧盈益謙稱物平施相爲  表裏與夫天道均其用也得之於心應之  於手故曰高者抑之下者舉之有餘者損  之不足者補之○李氏曰接上章强弱之  義損有益無天道也强大者必受損柔弱  者必受益○董氏曰天道無私皆當適中 天之道損有餘而補不足人之道則不然損 不足以奉有餘  吕氏曰無爲而尊者天道也有爲而卑者  人道也主道化者天道宰禮法者人道蓋  天地有餘則損不足則與非有心者所能  得遠非無心者所能得近感而遂通默而  行之者也人則不然性失中而情不一好  高惡下奉有棄無不能同天道損益去道  遠矣○林氏曰天之於物每每然也而人  之爲道何爲而不然乃欲損人而益己欲  以天下之不足而爲一己之有餘失天意  矣
Interpretation

The Dao of Heaven is like drawing a bow: when the string is too high, lower it; when too low, raise it. When the force is excessive, reduce it; when insufficient, strengthen it.

Lü Huiqing (Daoist scholar of the Northern Song dynasty) explains: Heaven's Dao emulates the supreme Dao (Dao), sharing its efficacy. Though seemingly wuwei (non-action), it accomplishes all things; though silent, it transforms all beings spontaneously. The four seasons revolve by its power, and the myriad things grow by its virtue, never erring in maintaining perfect fairness and rectitude. Like a craftsman fashioning a bow—neither over-tightening nor leaving the string slack—it adjusts precisely to the standard. If the string is too taut, loosen it; if too slack, tighten it; remove what is excessive, supplement what is lacking—only then can the bow function properly. Similarly, rulers governing states should emulate Heaven's Dao: restraining the strong while supporting the weak, reducing surplus to compensate deficiency. Through such balancing, one achieves the accuracy of an archer hitting every target. Heaven's Dao maintains equilibrium through natural adjustments, mirroring and complementing the human way.

Li Yue (Tang dynasty scholar), continuing the previous chapter's discourse on the Dao of strength and weakness, states: What is strong must inevitably decline; what is weak must inevitably benefit—this is the law of Heaven's Dao.

Dong Sixing (Southern Song Daoist priest) observes: Heaven's Dao is impartial and selfless, always seeking the golden mean. It reduces excess to supplement deficiency, whereas the human way does the opposite—often depriving the insufficient to serve those who already have abundance.

Lü Huiqing further elaborates: What is noble acts through wuwei—this is Heaven's Dao; what is base acts through deliberate effort—this is the human way. What governs natural transformations is Heaven's Dao; what administers ritual laws is the human way. Heaven and Earth naturally adjust through decrease and increase—not by conscious intention but through silent resonance and spontaneous operation. Yet humans, having lost their innate balance, become emotionally biased, favoring elevation over humility, serving the abundant while neglecting the needy. Failing to maintain equilibrium like Heaven's Dao, they stray far from the great Dao.

Lin Xiyi (Song dynasty scholar) concludes: Heaven's Dao treats all things equally—why can't the human way do the same? Some always seek to benefit themselves at others' expense, attempting to satisfy their own excess by taking from the world's insufficiency. This completely violates the will of Heaven.

孰能以有餘奉天下惟有道者  吕氏曰且夫有其餘者不可不損其不足  者不可不補也故有道者不獨親其親不  獨子其子以天下之子而爲子其待人也  如此之重其待己也不輕矣非聖賢之心  其孰能爲是也故曰孰能以有餘奉天下  惟有道者○林氏曰惟有道之人乃能損  我之有餘以奉天下○李氏曰惟有道者  則天而行損情益性損多益寡損己益人  損有餘補不足損之又損以至於無爲 是以聖人爲而不恃功成不處其不欲見賢  吕氏曰聖人圓通爲智因物爲心𩐎萬物  而不爲義澤及萬世而不爲仁無自伐之  心施爲而不矜恃其美無自滿之志功成  事遂而不居其不欲人知其賢德也若昭  昭于世則是自賢豈有道之士乎○林氏  曰聖人雖有爲於天下而不以自恃雖功  成而不居其功雖有至賢之行而不欲以  此自見此爲道曰損必至損之而又損也  ○吴氏曰聖人之功能蓋天下此其有餘  者也不自恃其所爲之能而若無能不自  居其所成之功而若無功不欲顯示其功  能之賢於人皆損己之有餘也    第七十八章 天下柔弱莫過於水而攻堅强者莫之能勝 其無以易之也  吕氏曰天下之物不同而柔弱之極者莫  過乎水而已平山澤穿金石通滯礙攻堅  强善利萬物善入萬物任人壅决隨器方
Interpretation

This scripture conveys two main teachings: first, how those who possess the Dao (the Way) handle wealth and virtue (De), and second, how the nature of water illustrates the principle that gentleness overcomes hardness.

First, it explains the conduct of those who embody the Dao: Truly enlightened individuals never hoard their surplus but share it to benefit those in need. As Lü Dongbin (Master Lü) states, those with abundance should reduce their excess, while those in want should receive supplementation. Those who attain the Dao not only care for their own kin but regard all people's children as their own. They are generous toward others yet strict with themselves—a state attainable only by sages.

Lin Ziqi (Master Lin) adds that only those who embody the Dao can diminish their surplus to nourish the world. Li Daochun (Master Li) further explains that such individuals align with heavenly principles, restrain selfish desires, enhance their innate nature, and use their excess to compensate for others' lack, continuously reducing personal cravings until achieving wuwei (non-action). Thus, sages perform good deeds without claiming merit and accomplish great deeds without pride, never seeking to flaunt their virtue.

Lü Dongbin observes that sages possess consummate wisdom, accommodating all things without self-importance, benefiting generations without claiming benevolence. They lack boastful hearts, performing good without arrogance; they harbor no conceit, achieving merit without claiming credit. Lin Ziqi notes that though sages govern the world, they never presume superiority; though accomplished, they never dwell on achievements; though possessing supreme virtue, they never display it. Wu Cheng (Master Wu) explains that while sages' deeds encompass the world—their "surplus"—they neither flaunt talent nor claim credit, always minimizing their excess.

Chapter 78 uses water's nature to demonstrate gentleness overcoming hardness: Nothing in the world is softer than water, yet it conquers the hardest substances, and nothing can replace it. Lü Dongbin clarifies that while all things differ, water's gentleness is unparalleled. It fills valleys, penetrates metal and stone, clears blockages, overcomes hardness, benefits all beings, and permeates everything. Adapting to any container, yielding to obstruction or channeling, it eternally retains its gentle essence. This reveals how apparent weakness often harbors supreme strength.

 圓化而爲氣爲雲雨爲霜雪故天一生水  源泉混混浩浩蕩蕩雖千曲萬折未始失  其爲水者是得夫沖一之妙者然施之於  物能强能弱能剛能柔故能勝物幾於道  不可以易一身柔弱莫過於華池靈液至  人斡旋運轉無乎不至或漱咽以溉五臟  或搬運而達三關至於透尾閭過夾脊泝  流直上而補於腦非神水其可以易哉○  何氏曰東西可决而流天下至柔弱者莫  如水而穿太山之石决千金之堤攻堅强  者亦莫如水此古今不易之論也○林氏  曰水之至弱而能攻堅强世未有能勝之  者千金之堤敗於蟻穴之漏是弱之勝强  者無以易於水也 弱之勝强柔之勝剛天下莫不知莫能行  吕氏曰水之滅火陰之制陽舌柔齒剛舌  存齒亡天下莫不知而世俗之所共聞也  天之道不與物爭故勝物世之人常欲勝  物故鮮有勝者蓋知而莫能行之者不可  得志於天下有知而能行之者决能得志  於天下也○何氏曰列子天下有常勝之  道有常不勝之道常勝之道曰柔常不勝  之道曰强二者易知而人未之知黄石公  授子房亦惟柔勝剛弱勝强兩言耳此易  知而未知且雖有知者而莫能行惟聖人  能知能行耳○林氏曰弱勝强柔勝剛如  水之易見人莫不知之而至道在於能柔  能弱者莫之能行也○李氏曰柔勝剛弱
Interpretation

The transformations of water are profoundly mysterious—it can become vapor, clouds, rain, frost, or snow. Thus, the ancients said, "Heaven first generated water" (the primordial substance of the cosmos). Surging endlessly, vast and mighty, water maintains its essential nature even after countless twists and turns, embodying the profound mystery of "Chongyi" (the fundamental characteristic of the Dao). In its interaction with all things, water can be strong or weak, firm or yielding, nearly attaining the realm of the Dao itself.

Among the softest things, none surpasses the saliva in the mouth (known as the "Nectar of the Hua Pool"). Those who attain the Dao circulate their inner Qi (vital energy), allowing this fluid to nourish the five viscera or guiding it through the Three Passes (key points in cultivation: the coccyx, the spine's central pass, and the Jade Pillow at the base of the skull), ascending from the tailbone through the spine to ultimately benefit the brain. This wondrous transformation of fluid exemplifies water's marvelous utility.

Master He remarked: Though seemingly weak, water can pierce mountains and shatter stone, toppling mighty dams. This truth has been acknowledged since ancient times. Master Lin added: Water conquers the hardest things through its supreme softness—nothing in the world surpasses it. Just as a thousand-pound dike collapses from the seepage of an ant's nest, this is clear proof of the soft overcoming the hard.

All under heaven know the principle that the soft overcomes the hard, yet few can embody it. Master Lü illustrated: Water extinguishes fire; Yin (the passive force) restrains Yang (the active force). A tender tongue outlasts hard teeth—these phenomena are widely recognized, yet rarely practiced. The Dao of Heaven does not contend with the myriad things, yet governs them all. People constantly strive to overpower external things, yet often fail. Only those who truly understand and practice the way of softness can achieve great deeds.

Master He cited the Liezi: "In the world, there is a constant way to victory and a constant way to defeat. The constant way to victory is softness; the constant way to defeat is strength." This principle seems simple, yet even the teachings Huang Shigong imparted to Zhang Liang amounted to just six words: "Softness overcomes hardness; weakness overcomes strength." Though some may grasp this truth, only sages can truly embody it. Master Lin lamented: Examples like water—where softness visibly triumphs over hardness—are plain for all to see, yet few cultivate themselves to be as yielding as water. Master Li concluded: The soft overcoming the hard—this seemingly simple truth contains the deepest wisdom.

 勝强天下人皆知而莫能行何哉不肯卑  下故也 是以聖人云受國之垢是謂社稷主受國之 不祥是謂天下王正言若反  吕氏曰聖人之德同於天地天地至大洪  纎巨細好惡皆在其中聖人至尊賢愚貴  賤皆往資之又能忍垢藏蓄奈辱包荒以  輔仁義柔弱善勝之道則民仰其德而不  離散可以常奉社稷而爲主矣聖人謙讓  柔順法天之行兵戈水火疾厄旱蝗皆劫  運之所至是天之或有警策于人也惟其  不移罪於人而移罪於己則四海歸仁六  合宅心亦可爲天下之王矣故曰受國不  祥是謂天下王世俗以受垢受不祥爲可  惡聖君以受垢受不祥爲可樂樂其樂也  未必不爲福惡其惡也未必不爲禍正言  若與俗相反蓋世俗掩己之惡揚人之惡  聖人認己之惡而掩人之惡所以背馳非  至正者故曰正言若反○何氏曰孤寡不  穀王公所稱是皆柔勝剛之意此天下之  正理而世人不知不行聞聖人有柔勝剛  之言似乎相反而實正論也○董氏曰此  章言柔弱能容則爲物所歸也    第七十九章 和大怨必有餘怨安可以爲善  林氏曰恩怨兩忘方知至道人有大怨於  我而必欲與和雖無執怨之心猶知怨之  爲怨則此心亦未化矣雖曰能與之和此  心未化則餘怨尚在安得謂之善道此誠  到理之言亦借喻也○吕氏怨讟已深仇
Interpretation

All under heaven know that overcoming the strong is desirable, yet few can truly accomplish it. Why? Because people are unwilling to lower themselves and dwell in humility.

Thus the sages say: Only those who can bear a nation's humiliation are worthy to be its rulers; only those who endure a country's misfortunes can truly be kings of the world. These seemingly paradoxical statements contain profound truth.

Master Lü (Lü Huiqing) explains: The virtue (De) of sages is as vast as heaven and earth. Just as heaven and earth embrace all things regardless of size or beauty, so sages in their supreme position attract all people, wise or foolish, noble or humble. The sage can endure disgrace, tolerate humiliation, and maintain magnanimity, thereby assisting the way of benevolence and righteousness. This principle of the soft overcoming the hard ensures the people admire their virtue (De) without dispersing, naturally enabling them to protect the nation long-term as rulers.

The sage's humility and pliancy emulate the movement of the Dao. Wars, disasters, plagues, and locust plagues are all heaven's warnings to humanity. Sages don't shift blame but willingly shoulder responsibility, causing all lands to submit to their benevolence and the world's hearts to find peace, naturally becoming sovereign lords. Hence the saying "he who bears the nation's misfortunes is the true king." Ordinary people consider bearing humiliation hateful, while enlightened rulers delight in it—for delight brings blessings while resentment invites misfortune. These truths seem contrary to worldly views because while ordinary people conceal their faults and expose others', sages acknowledge their shortcomings while embracing others' flaws—moving in opposite directions. Thus "right words seem paradoxical."

Master He (He Yan) adds: When rulers call themselves "solitary," "desolate," or "unworthy," they're applying the principle of the soft overcoming the hard. This is the ultimate truth of the world, yet people neither understand nor practice it. Hearing sages say the soft overcomes the hard, it sounds like contradiction, yet it's supreme wisdom.

Master Dong (Dong Sijing) concludes: This chapter teaches how embracing softness and tolerance attracts all things.

Chapter Seventy-Nine mentions: Forced reconciliation of deep enmity inevitably leaves residual hatred—how can this be called good?

Master Lin (Lin Xiyi) explains: Only complete forgetting of grievances constitutes realization of the supreme Dao (Dao). When others bear me deep hatred, if I deliberately reconcile, though surface enmity disappears, the mind still remembers "this was hatred," showing the heart hasn't transcended. Superficial peace with lingering resentment—how can this be ultimate goodness? This is a profound metaphor.

Master Lü continues: When accumulated hatred runs too deep, even surface reconciliation...

 隙已甚卒未易以口舌和也縱然非其所  是而是其所非報之以德直之以義豈能  終無憾乎不若兩忘其和而化之以道則  怨者不待和而和矣碧虚子言知有怨而  和之不若無怨而不和若以刑政和報怨  惡安可以爲善乎○李氏曰接上章剛柔  之義以恩和怨怨雖解而心尚存安可爲  善不如責己恩怨兩忘恩怨兩忘則民自  然而感德契之 是以聖人執左契而不責於人  林氏曰左契如今人合同文字也一人得  左一人得右故曰左契此契在我則其物  必可索聖人雖執此契而不以索於人忘  而化之也○吕氏曰古者結繩爲約而民  不欺破木爲契而民不違是以聖人以人  道而合天道以人心而合天心故執之千  左爲契合之于右爲信不責於人亦應于  天在此無斁在彼無惡上下相親無責於  怨故曰執左契而不責於人○吴氏曰執  左契而不責於人謂無心待物也契者刻  木爲券中分之各執其一而合之以表信  取財物於人曰責契有左右左契在主財  物之所右契以付來取財物之人臨川王  氏曰史記云操左契以責事禮記云獻田  宅者操左契是知左爲受責之所執 故有德司契無德司徹天道無親常與善人  林氏曰有德者司主此契而無求索之心  無德者則以明白爲主徹明也猶今人言
Interpretation

This scripture primarily discusses how to handle resentment in interpersonal relationships. Several Daoist scholars interpret the concept of "holding the left tally without demanding from others" from the Daode Jing from different perspectives.

First, it points out that when conflicts have already deepened, mere verbal mediation is unlikely to truly resolve them. Even if one repays resentment with virtue (De) or treats others with righteousness, lingering grudges may remain in the heart. The best approach is for both parties to let go of grievances and dissolve them through the wisdom of the Dao (the Way), allowing resentment to naturally dissipate. Master Bixu (a Song Dynasty Daoist) remarked that rather than attempting to reconcile after resentment has formed, it is better to avoid creating resentment in the first place. If one relies on laws and punishments to mediate resentment, how can this be considered true goodness?

Li (likely referring to Li Daochun) further explains that using kindness to reconcile resentment may appear to resolve the issue on the surface, but hidden resentment may still remain. It is better to reflect on oneself and forget both gratitude and grudges. When rulers can forget grievances, the people will naturally be moved by their virtue.

Regarding the metaphor of "holding the left tally without demanding from others": In ancient times, contracts (similar to modern agreements) were made of split bamboo or wood, divided into left and right halves. The creditor held the left tally, while the debtor held the right. Though the sage possesses the creditor’s claim (the left tally), they do not pursue repayment. Lin explains that this is like holding a legal document today—the sage keeps the proof of debt but does not demand payment, embodying the state of "forgetting and dissolving" (a Daoist ideal).

Lü (possibly referring to Lü Dongbin) adds that in ancient times, people kept records with knotted ropes and still honored their word; later, wooden tallies were used, and agreements were still upheld. The sage aligns human principles with the Dao of Heaven and harmonizes the human heart with the heart of Heaven. Thus, holding the left tally represents alignment, while holding the right tally represents trustworthiness. By not harshly demanding from others, harmony naturally arises between superiors and subordinates.

Wu and Wang further clarify that the left tally is held by the owner of goods as proof, while the right tally is given to the recipient. "Holding the left tally without demanding from others" means possessing a claim but not enforcing it, embodying a mindset free from attachment and demands.

In conclusion: A virtuous person (one with De) holds the contract but does not demand repayment, while a person lacking virtue nitpicks and insists on their due. The Dao of Heaven shows no favoritism, yet it always favors the good. This is like the modern saying, "Be magnanimous even when in the right"—holding an advantage yet treating others with generosity is the true mark of virtue (De).

 必與之討分曉也有德司契者善人也天  道無親而此等之人天必祐之故曰常與  善人○何氏曰契爲要約也書契合同之  類有德則得道多助如契在我不求而自  合無德則失道寡助雖强求通徹於人人  誰應之莊子好通物者非聖人此也夫苟  有道德豈惟人與之而天固與之皇天無  親惟德是輔故曰行善者我不知行惡者  我不知積善善氣至積惡惡氣至積善神  明輔成天道猶祐於善人此也○李氏曰  契者信約也徹通也有德之人執其信約  無德之人司其明徹只知通爲明斷殊不  知盡法無民矣安可爲善司契者存誠信  與民心契也○吕氏曰書曰皇天無私惟  德是輔易曰自天祐之吉無不利蓋天之  道未嘗分别取與爲善則善氣生爲惡則  惡氣生自然相應也若乃上善之人自然  符會惟善是與何用司契而責於人哉此  太古之風也    第八十章 小國寡民使有什伯之器而不用使民重死 而不遠徙  林氏曰小國寡民猶孟子言得百里之地  皆可以朝諸侯一天下之意老子蓋曰有  道之人若得至小之國不多之民井而居  之使有什伯如今之保伍也人人皆有可  用之器而不求自用是人皆有士君子之  行而安於自退重死而不遠徙小人皆畏  不爲惡而各安其居也○何氏曰小國寡
Interpretation

This passage discusses two core concepts: the Dao's (the Way) protection of virtuous individuals, and the ideal of a small, self-sufficient society.

Regarding the principle that virtue brings blessings: While the Dao (natural law) shows no partiality, it invariably shelters those with De (Virtue/Power). It operates like an unspoken covenant—those with virtue naturally receive assistance without demanding it, while the unvirtuous gain no response even through coercion. Zhuangzi's notion of "comprehending all things" does not refer to sages alone; truly virtuous individuals not only receive human aid but also celestial favor. Heaven holds no bias yet supports only the virtuous. Good deeds accumulate benevolent Qi (vital energy), while wickedness gathers malign Qi—this is the principle of natural resonance. The highest form of virtue aligns seamlessly with the Dao, eliminating the need for external constraints like covenants, embodying the pristine ethos of antiquity.

Concerning the ideal society: Laozi envisioned a small, harmonious state with a modest population. In such a society, even if advanced tools ("various implements") exist, they are seldom used. The people value life and avoid distant migration. As Mencius noted, peace under heaven could be achieved even within a tiny territory. When governed by a ruler embodying the Dao, citizens dwell contentedly like the ancient well-field system—each possessing what they need without contention, all embodying noble humility. Ordinary folk, deterred by penalties, refrain from wrongdoing and remain dutiful. This social model emphasizes simplicity, self-sufficiency, and rooted contentment, rejecting excessive exploitation and far-flung journeys.

 民非不可於廣土衆民也以道用國即小  以明大耳什伯人之器按西漢詔天下吏  舍無得置什器儲偫顔師古注五人爲伍  十人爲什則共器物故通謂之什伍之具  爲什物猶今從軍作役者十人爲伙共蓄  調度也十人爲什伯人爲伯可以數計使  民有什伯之器而不用無往來免儲偫省  徭役事無事之意國於天地無小無大無  爲則治有爲則難民卒流亡始輕其生今  既樂生則無復轉道塗者孰使之與○吴  氏曰十人爲什伯人爲伯什伯之器謂重  大之器衆人所共者也不用者不營爲不  貪求則重大之器無所用也重死者視死  爲重事而愛養其生也不遠徙者生於此  則死於此而不他適也老子欲挽衰周復  還太古以國大民衆而難治故謙退而言  若得小國寡民而治之則當使民無慕於  外自足於内如此也 雖有舟車無所乘之雖有甲兵無所陳之使 民復結繩而用之甘其食美其服安其居樂 其俗鄰國相望鷄犬之聲相聞民至老死不 相往來  林氏曰雖有舟車無所乘之不致遠以求  利也雖有甲兵而不陳列不恃力以求勝  也舍書契而用結繩復歸於素樸也甘食  美衣安居樂俗鄰國相近鷄犬之聲雖相  聞而老死不相往來各自足而不求也○  何氏曰舟車以通其欲今民少欲又何所  乘甲兵以用於爭今民無爭又何所陳結
Interpretation

This passage expounds Laozi's ideal approach to governance. The core message conveys that governing a state doesn't depend on territorial size or population numbers, but rather on adhering to the principles of the Dao (the Way). When a country is ruled according to the Dao, even small states can achieve great significance.

In ancient military organization, five soldiers formed a "Wu" unit, ten made a "Shi", and a hundred constituted a "Bo". The "Shi-Bo implements" refer to large tools requiring collective use. Laozi advocated that people should possess such tools but refrain from using them—signifying reduced labor burdens, avoidance of material hoarding, and enabling people to live peacefully. Whether large or small, states maintaining harmony with nature through Wuwei (non-action) governance would prosper, whereas forceful interference would only cause displacement.

The Wu commentary explains: When people cease coveting external possessions or obsessing over livelihoods, these large implements naturally fall into disuse. Those who value life regard death seriously, thus avoiding unnecessary migration. Laozi sought to remedy the Zhou dynasty's decline by returning to simple living, believing small states with sparse populations were easier to govern—allowing people contentment through self-sufficiency.

The described utopia continues: Though boats and carriages exist, none travel afar; though weapons and armor are kept, none are displayed in use; people revert to knotting ropes for record-keeping. Citizens find their food sweet, their clothes beautiful, their dwellings comfortable, and their customs joyful. Neighboring states remain within sight and earshot (exchanging cockcrows and dog barks), yet people never visit each other throughout their lives.

The Lin commentary adds: Avoiding boats and carriages means not pursuing distant profits; storing weapons undisplayed indicates victory without force; replacing writing with knotted ropes signifies returning to simplicity. The He commentary observes: Boats and carriages serve desires that vanish when cravings diminish; weapons exist for conflicts that disappear when contention ceases.

 繩未有書契以前事自今復用反古之淳  又敦使之與甘食美服耕而食織而衣不  饑不寒也安居樂俗其卧徐徐其覺于于  自得自適也鄰國相望鷄鳴犬吠相聞而  莫往莫來無求於世以老以死以淳風之  盛皆由上古之人有道以使然爾○吴氏  曰此言有什伯之器而不用也舟車甲兵  皆非一人所可獨用也所謂什伯之器也  無所乘之無所陳之謂不用也無所行往  則無用乎舟車無所爭競則無用乎甲兵  民淳事簡則雖上古結繩之治可復雖有  書契以代結繩而亦不可用不但不用什  伯之器而已以所食之食爲甘以所服之  服爲美充然自足以愛養其生所謂重死  也以此身之居爲安而安之以此地之俗  爲樂而樂之謂不遠徙也重其死者惟老  死於所生之處孰肯輕易遠徙哉民皆懷  土則雖有相鄰之國目可以相望其鷄犬  之聲耳可以相聞雖如此至近而亦不相  從至不但不徙於遠而已    第八十一章 信言不美美言不信善者不辯辯者不善知 者不博博者不知  吕氏曰信實之言淡乎無味其猶水也水  淡而能乆不美者以其質而苦也美好之  言甘而滋益能悦於人其猶醴也醴甘則  易絶不信者以華爲虚也故曰信言不美  美言不信善於心者貴乎能行而不求辯  守素樸也辯於口者貴其能說滯於是非
Interpretation

In the ancient times before written records, people lived with simple and natural purity. If we could return to this unadorned way of life today, people would find contentment in their own happiness: coarse tea and plain rice would taste sweet, simple clothing would feel comfortable, farming would provide self-sufficiency, and weaving would meet their needs—free from hunger and cold.

People would dwell in peace and prosperity, living with leisurely ease. They would sleep soundly and wake unhurried. Neighboring states might be close enough to see each other, with the sounds of crowing roosters and barking dogs reaching across, yet they would not interact or seek anything from the world. People would live out their years in contentment, enjoying the pure and simple customs. This idyllic vision arises because the ancients followed the great Dao (the Way).

Wu’s commentary explains that this passage speaks of possessing fine tools but not using them. Boats, carts, and weapons are not objects that individuals can employ alone—they are "tools of the multitudes." If there is no need to travel, boats and carts serve no purpose; without conflict, weapons have no use. When customs are pure and affairs simple, even reverting to the ancient practice of knotting ropes to keep records would suffice. Though writing later replaced knotted cords, there would still be no need for such complex implements.

People would be satisfied with their food and clothing, content with their lot, and cherish their lives. Those who value life would rather live out their days where they were born than migrate lightly. The people would all cling to their homeland; even if neighboring states were within sight and the sounds of chickens and dogs carried between them, they would not interact.

Chapter 81 states: "True words are not ornate; ornate words are not true. The good do not argue; those who argue are not good. The truly wise do not boast of their knowledge; those who boast of their knowledge are not truly wise."

Lü’s commentary explains: True words are like clear water—plain and flavorless, yet enduring. Sweet words are like sweet wine—pleasant to the taste, but quick to spoil. Those with good hearts focus on action rather than debate, preserving their simple nature. Those skilled in argument indulge in verbal contention, clinging to disputes of right and wrong.

 未必能知也故曰善者不辯辯者不善知  其道者明於理而達其根本得其要而已  矣所謂通於一萬事畢也何必博乎博者  通於物務於事文滅質博溺心求彼是而  已矣不知所謂多則惑也故曰知者不博  博者不知○林氏曰眞實之言則無華采  有華采者非眞實之言也莊子言隱於榮  華以博物爲能以博物爲誇非知道者○  李氏曰信言不美忠言逆耳也美言不信  巧言令色也眞實之言淡泊虚妄之言華  飾善爲道者無分别故不辯善辯者致爭  之由也故不善眞知者光而不耀故不博  廣博者明見於外故不知 聖人不積既以爲人己愈有既以與人己愈 多  吕氏曰莊子天道運而無所積故海内服  聖人之所謂不積者演道德以爲人人受  其益而聖德愈彰如鑑之明未嘗少瘀分  浮財以與貧貧受其賜而浮財愈有若井  之泉清徹不竭萬物皆往資焉而不匱子  列子以財惠人謂之賢人以德分人謂之  聖人皆無積之謂也有積也故不足無藏  也故有餘故曰聖人不積既以爲人己愈  有既以與人己愈多○何氏曰聖人不積  何也莊子天道運而無所積故萬物生聖  人運而無所積故海内服故曰以有積也  故不足無藏也故有餘聖人所以既以爲  人己愈有與人己愈多或分人以德或分  人以財示人以信與人爲善積而能散博
Interpretation

Those who truly understand the Dao do not engage in debate, while those fond of debate do not genuinely comprehend it. Those who grasp the Dao apprehend its fundamental principles—seizing its core essence is sufficient. This is what is meant by "understanding the root allows resolution of all matters"—why chase after extensive knowledge? Those pursuing breadth often become mired in particulars, losing the essence amidst complexity, as extensive knowledge can disturb the mind. They merely chase distinctions of right and wrong, unaware that excessive knowledge breeds confusion. Thus, the truly wise do not seek breadth, while those who pursue breadth fail to grasp the truth.

Lin Xiyi (Master Lin) explains: Genuine speech requires no embellishment—flowery words often conceal falsehood. The Zhuangzi states that truth is frequently obscured by ornate language; those who boast of erudition do not truly understand the Dao. Li Xizhai (Master Li) remarks: Trustworthy words lack beauty, just as honest advice grates the ear; beautiful words cannot be trusted, like sweet but empty flattery. True speech is plain and unadorned, while false words are deliberately crafted. Those who genuinely cultivate the Dao do not cling to distinctions of right and wrong, hence they do not debate; skilled debaters easily provoke contention, making them undesirable. The truly enlightened shine inwardly without display, so they do not seek breadth; those pursuing breadth focus only on outward show, missing the essence.

The sage does not hoard wealth—the more they assist others, the richer they become; the more they give, the more they receive.

Lü Huiqing (Master Lü) explains: The Zhuangzi states that the Dao's operation never hoards, thus all under heaven submit. The sage's "non-hoarding" refers to spreading virtue and teaching others—as people benefit, the sage's virtue grows more radiant, like a mirror undiminished by reflecting objects. Distributing surplus wealth to the poor enriches both recipient and giver, just as a clear well never exhausts though all draw from it. The Liezi says assisting others with wealth makes one worthy, while teaching virtue makes one sagely—both exemplify non-hoarding. To hoard creates lack; to hold nothing back brings abundance. Thus, the sage does not hoard—the more they assist, the richer they become; the more they give, the more they receive.

He Xinshan (Master He) explains: Why does the sage not hoard? Because the Zhuangzi states the Dao operates without hoarding, thus generating all things—the sage emulates this, so all submit. Thus, hoarding creates lack, while non-attachment brings surplus. The sage's ability to enrich themselves by assisting others and receive more by giving—whether through virtue or material aid—stems from demonstrating sincerity, fostering goodwill, and widely dispersing what they accumulate.

 而能化莫非天下爲公之意○林氏曰聖  人之道虚一而已何所積乎未嘗不爲人  也而在己者愈有未嘗不與人也而在己  者愈多其猶天道然虚而不屈動而愈出  爲人與人言以道化物也 天之道利而不害聖人之道爲而不爭  吕氏曰天道陽也故好生而惡殺謂之有  利而無害春夏故生之育之秋冬故成之  熟之以其至公無私每成人之善而不成  人之惡與人之利而不與人害故曰天之  道利而不害天不言而善應常應之以實  而不以文聖人體之以爲和法之以爲用  施而爲之明於天通於聖所謂六通四闢  爲萬物之宗而不爭也○何氏曰善利萬  物而不害者天之道善爲萬事而不爭者  聖人之道易曰乾始能以美利利天下不  言所利大矣哉大哉乾元剛健中正純粹  精也雲行雨施天下平也體乾聖人備道  全美博施濟衆大有爲而靡有爭一乾元  之妙用也老子末章先去言中及人後同  天聖人功用至此豈不大備哉知易則知  老○林氏曰天之道雖有美利而不言所  利則但見有利而無害纔有利之之名則  害亦見矣聖人之道無爲而無不爲而未  嘗自恃其有故不與物爭而天下莫能與  之爭一書之意大抵以不爭爲主故亦以  此語結○李氏曰天地大德曰生故曰利  而不害聖人守位曰仁故曰爲而不爭只
Interpretation

This passage explores the correspondence between the Dao of Heaven (natural laws) and the Way of the Sage. Though the Dao of Heaven appears empty, it never exhausts itself—the more it operates, the more it generates all things. The sage (one who has attained the Dao) emulates this principle: the more they give to others, the more abundant they themselves become.

The defining characteristic of the Dao of Heaven is nourishing all beings without causing harm. Consider the movement of the four seasons: spring and summer foster growth, while autumn and winter bring maturity—all with perfect impartiality. The sage who comprehends this truth acts in harmony with nature, assisting others without contention. As described in the Yijing (Book of Changes), the "Creative Origin" (Qian Yuan, the primordial energy that generates all things) moistens the world through clouds and rain yet never claims merit.

Commentators further explain: though the Dao of Heaven benefits all things, it never flaunts its actions. The moment it acquires a reputation for "bestowing benefits," harm inevitably arises. The sage's actions may appear as Wuwei (non-action), yet in reality they accomplish everything. Precisely because they claim no credit, no one in the world can contend with them. The core teaching of the entire Daode Jing is non-contention, which is why it concludes with this very statement.

The greatest virtue of Heaven and Earth lies in generating all things—hence "benefiting without harming." The sage maintains their position through De (virtue/power)—hence "acting without contending." This embodies the Daoist wisdom of "governing through non-action": by refraining from deliberate struggle, one accomplishes all.

 這不爭二字爲日用乆乆純熟則自然造  混元之境眞常之道至是盡矣象帝之先  明妙之本得矣 道德眞經
Interpretation

Always keep these two words—"non-contention"—in mind, practicing them in daily life until they become completely natural. In this way, one spontaneously attains the state of Primordial Chaos (referring to the undifferentiated unity before Heaven and Earth separated). The true and eternal Dao becomes fully manifest at this stage. Even before the appearance of the "Lord of Forms" (referring to the Creator or supreme deity), that luminous and subtle essence already existed.

This is precisely the teaching expounded in the tenth volume of Collected Commentaries on the Perfect Scripture of Dao and Virtue.

集義卷之十

Source text: Kanripo 漢籍リポジトリ(KR5c0100); Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 · Report an error / feedback

← Vol. 9